INTRODUCTION. Specifically, the objectives are to:

Similar documents
2016 TELL THE TPO SURVEY

MTP BICYCLE ELEMENT UPDATE. November 2017

The specific activities consisted of:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN OUTREACH: INTERACTIVE MAP SUMMARY REPORT- 10/03/14

Engagement Summary: Round 1

AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey

2011 Countywide Attitudinal and Awareness Survey Results

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Online Open House Survey Report. December 2016

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Moving Ahead. (Community Engagement) Chapter Three

Mayor s Bicycle Advisory Council. Wednesday, December 13 th, 2017

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Chapter 3.6 Elementary School Z. Volusia County MPO. March Page 13.0

Citizen Advocacy. VISION ZERO IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY TODAY

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Transportation 2040 Update: Eudora Public Input As of June 1, 2017

PROJECT OVERVIEW & WORK COMPLETED

CHAPTER 3: Vision Statement and Goals

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

Cobb Community Transit

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

US 41 COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY from University Parkway to Whitfield Avenue

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

2018 Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by:

Complete Streets Workshop Follow-up. April 27, 2011 Rockledge City Hall

Better Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Complete Streets Planning Leading By Example in Southwest Florida

The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council

WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

APPENDIX A. Outreach Summary

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Transportation Issues Poll for New York City

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

City of Birmingham Draft Multi-modal Transportation Plan

Thank you for attending

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

Mayor s Pedestrian Advisory Council. Wednesday, February 15

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

Do As I Say Not As I Do: Observed Compliance vs. Stated Understanding of Pedestrian Crossing Laws in Florida

MARKET/JFK VISION ZERO PILOT PROJECT FEBRUARY 2019 EVALUATION REPORT

Providing an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete.

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

FDOT DISTRICT 5. Who We Are 5/17/2018. Regional Commuter Assistance Program 2018 Florida Commuter Choice Summit

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

UPDATES, SUCCESSES, AND WHAT S AHEAD ON THE ROAD TO ZERO

Downtown Tampa Parking User Survey

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

San Ramon Elementary School. Travel Plan

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

PROJECT BACKGROUND/DESCRIPTION

Cycling Master Plan Community Engagement Session WELCOME

Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study

Public Transportation and Bicycle & Pedestrian Stakeholder Webinar. April 11, :30 PM

Nanaimo Transportation Master Plan. Phase 1 Consultation Summary

FLETCHER AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST BEHAVIOR CHANGE FORMATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Brevard C2C/SJR2C Leadership Group 06/21/17

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

-Current Get On Board initiative: Existing LTC program to help make LTC accessible, informative, and encourage use of public transit

First and Last Mile Plan. April 2016

FLORIDA STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

Stakeholder Communication and Public Involvement Plan

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

On the Move: Transportation Plan Wood County Survey Assessment

Rider Satisfaction Survey Phoenix Riders 2004

SR/CR A1A PEDESTRIAN SAFETY & MOBILITY STUDY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Pinellas County Safety Initiatives

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...2

Marin County, CA. Key Findings The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

Hillsborough Pedestrian Safety Action Plan 2015 Update. Hillsborough MPO BPAC May 2015

STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE. October 8, 2015

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Incorporating Health in Regional Transportation Planning

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

Transcription:

INTRODUCTION The River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) conducts the Tell the TPO Transportation Trends Survey to better understand the transportation preferences and priorities for the TPO s planning area. The survey is completed every two years, and helps to provide insights to the TPO as they consider transportation policies and priorities. The initial survey was conducted in 2014, followed by one in 2016. This summary presents an overview of the results for the 2018 Survey. The Tell the TPO Survey seeks to provide a broad understanding of the public s awareness, perceptions, and priorities regarding transportation within the TPO region, and to identify trends of these results over the years. Additionally, it is intended to increase public awareness of the TPO and its transportation planning functions. Specifically, the objectives are to: Understand the transportation wants needs, problems, and preferences of residents, the business community, elected officials, visitors, and other stakeholders. Increase public awareness of the TPO s presence in the local area and expand branding of the organization. Engage interested and affected residents, businesses, and visitors in the TPO s planning activities. Foster partnerships among the TPO partner agencies and community organizations. Build the contact databases of the TPO and its partner agencies, including: FDOT s ReThink Your Commute, Votran, Flagler County Public Transportation, and SunRail. 1

METHODOLOGY At the outset of the Survey development, a stakeholder group was identified to help with reviewing questions from previous efforts and recommending updates and/or new questions to be included in the 2018 Survey effort. The group included partner transportation agencies and key community stakeholders, including: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council (ECFRPC) Florida Department of Transportation District 5 FDOT ReThink Your Commute Flagler County Flagler County Public Transportation SunRail Volusia County Association for Responsible Development Volusia County Volusia County Roundtable of Elected Officials Votran Lochner was commissioned to support TPO staff on this effort. The Project Team gathered input and direction from the TPO Board and its advisory committees the Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), Citizen s Advisory Committee (CAC), Technical Coordination Committee (TCC), and Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB) prior to finalizing the Survey questions. A majority of the 2018 questions were consistent with the previous two surveys in order to observe trends from year-to-year. There were, however, several adjustments made based upon coordination with the stakeholder group and the TPO Board and advisory committees, including minor revisions to several questions, and two previous questions were replaced with new questions to cover topical transportation issues that the TPO Board identified as critical during the survey development process. The adjustments also included the addition of a question to track how many respondents had previously taken the Tell the TPO Survey. Based on the input received, the Project Team developed draft and final versions of the survey. The Survey was disseminated via a dedicated website at www.tellthetpo.com in English and Spanish; publicized through various media outlets; posted and announced through partner agencies websites, newsletters, email blasts; and promoted at community events. It was predominantly accessed via the online/web version but printed copies were also distributed in English and Spanish through a number of agencies including the Volusia and Flagler County Libraries. During the Survey, each of the board members, as well as members of the TPO s four standing committees were challenged to be ambassadors for the campaign, and to help promote it via their organizations communication channels and their personal networks. These Ambassador Challenges helped to increase awareness of the campaign throughout the process. The Tell the TPO Survey campaign formally ran from April 30, 2018 through June 30, 2018. 2

OUTREACH Survey outreach featured partnerships with cities, government agencies, businesses, and community organizations which helped to make the www.tellthetpo.com link widely available through various websites, newspaper, and media outlets. Some examples included: The TPO Board and advisory committee members served as Ambassadors to get the word out to their constituents and personal networks. Strategic in-person outreach was conducted at the following: One Voice for Volusia (Coalition Meeting event) Volusia County Farm Bureau weekly Farmer s Market City of Palm Coast Lunch & Learn Series Event Daytona Beach Juneteenth Celebration Bethune-Cookman University Equitable Development Conference Oak Hill Community Festival Volusia County League of Women Voters Judicial Forum Volusia County s Trails Day Celebration Tourism Week Breakfast Event Cities, agencies, organizations and private citizens made the www. TelltheTPO.com link widely available via the web, newsletters and e-blasts. Social media and email blasts including more than 100 unique shares on Facebook and more than 40 unique shares on Twitter. Earned media included stories in more than 10 print and TV publications ranging from an article in News Daytona Beach to a TV spot airing on News-13. The following numbers of respondents opted-in for partner agency email distribution lists: 595 464 285 204 170 RESPONSE A total of 2,176 responses were collected and summarized as part of this effort an increase of 900 responses (73%) over the 2016 survey. The results have been successful in providing an updated set of data to identify trends and patterns in public opinion on the region s transportation system. Out of the more than 2,100 respondents, over 35% provided additional answers in essay form to supplement the multiple choice questions. More than 57% of respondents were between age 41 and 65 and 21% of respondents were 65 or older. A summary of the respondent demographics are included on page 4 of this summary. Figure 1 on page 4 illustrates the geographic distribution of the survey respondents by where they live. Compared to previous survey efforts, respondents came from a wider variety of geographic areas, reporting a total of 120 unique zip codes, compared to 84 zip codes in 2016 and 75 zip codes in 2014. 3

FIGURE 1 - RESPONDENTS BY ZIP CODE DEMOGRAPHICS DEMOGRAPHICS OF 2018 RESPONDENTS AGE < 16 16 to 25 26 to 40 41 to 65 > 65 RACE 21% >1% 8% 4% 85% 18% 57% 3% 1% 5% 6% White Black Hispanic Asian Other 27% 2% WORK STATUS Employer Employee Student Retiree Other 6% 56% GENDER MALE FEMALE OTHER < 1% 35% 64% INCOME < $25,000 $25,001 to $45,000 $45,001 to $100,000 > $100,000 13% 29% 16% 42% 4

SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS The 2018 Survey included nine transportation questions relating to how respondents move around the TPO region and their preferences for additional investment. Generally, the results of the Survey were consistent with the previous surveys conducted in 2014 and 2016: Providing Multi-modal Options is a Priority As in previous years, respondents indicated that providing transportation choices is important. Similar to the prior surveys, many respondents walk or bike regularly. The percentage of respondents who use transit held steady from 2016. Uber Is Here The number of respondents who carpool and use SunRail regularly has decreased since 2016. These fluctuations may be attributable to the increased usage of alternative modes like Uber/Taxi, of which more than four (4) percent of respondents use regularly. Investing in Convenience Will Make Multimodal Options More Attractive Respondents indicated that they would bike or walk more if additional high quality bicycling and pedestrian facilities are constructed, and that they would use buses and SunRail more if those services were made more convenient by expanding service hours or coverage. Most respondents felt more should be invested in improving walking conditions and transit service; and adding bike lanes and trails were among the highest funding priorities. Improving Roadway Safety and Efficiency is Valued Generally participants were satisfied with the existing roadway system. Respondents identified use of technology to improve operating conditions, and replacing aging infrastructure as the highest funding priorities. Maintaining Good Operations along International Speedway Boulevard is a Priority This year, a new question asked respondents to indicate which of the 10 highest crash locations within the TPO planning area were of greatest concern. Three of the top four locations are in Daytona Beach along International Speedway Boulevard. A map showing how respondents feel about the remaining seven locations is included on page 11. The following pages include a summary of the findings. New and modified questions are marked as such and the results of the last survey are provided for reference. 5 92% OF RESPONDENTS TOOK THE TELL THE TPO SURVEY FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 2018.

1 WHAT FORMS OF TRANSPORTATION DO YOU USE REGULARLY (3 OR MORE TIMES PER WEEK)? *PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM 2016 SURVEY DRIVE 91% ALONE +2%* WALK 31% -19% BIKE 17% -11% BUS 5% +1% UBER/TAXI 4% NEW ANSWER CHOICE SUNRAIL 2% -1% CARPOOL 9% -2% 2 IF YOU DO NOT WALK OR BICYCLE NOW, WHAT PREVENTS YOU FROM DOING SO? *PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM 2016 SURVEY DISTANCE TOO FAR/TAKES TOO LONG TO WALK OR BICYCLE 53% +16%* SAFETY CONCERNS 52% +11% LACK OF PEDESTRIAN OR BIKE FACILITIES 34% +3% I AM NOT COMFORTABLE WITH MY BICYCLE RIDING/ WALKING ABILITY 8% NEW ANSWER CHOICE I CAN T WALK OR BICYCLE, NO MATTER HOW SIDEWALKS OR BICYCLE LANES ARE IMPROVED 5% NEW ANSWER CHOICE I WON T WALK OR RIDE A BICYCLE, EVEN IF BIKE/PED FACILITIES ARE IMPROVED 6% -1% 6

3 IF YOU DO NOT REGULARLY USE PUBLIC TRANSIT BUSES, WHAT IMPROVEMENTS MIGHT MAKE THEM A MORE ATTRACTIVE OPTION FOR YOU? *PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM 2016 SURVEY MORE CONVENIENT BUS STOPS OR ROUTES 38% -7%* FASTER OR MORE DIRECT BUS SERVICE 32% -6% I DON T KNOW ENOUGH ABOUT PUBLIC BUS SERVICE TO MAKE THAT CHOICE 31% -1% MORE FREQUENT/EXPANDED HOURS FOR BUS SERVICE 30% -7% 20% I WILL NOT RIDE THE BUS, EVEN WITH IMPROVEMENTS -12% LOWER FARES 8% +1% CLEANER BUSES 9% NO CHANGE 7

4 IF YOU DO NOT REGULARLY USE SUNRAIL, WHAT IMPROVEMENTS MIGHT MAKE IT A MORE ATTRACTIVE OPTION FOR YOU? *PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM 2016 SURVEY 55% EXPAND SUNRAIL SERVICE BEYOND DELAND STATION +5%* 43% MORE FREQUENT/EXPANDED HOURS FOR SUNRAIL SERVICE -7% EXPAND SUNRAIL SERVICE TO DELAND STATION 37% +7% MORE EFFECTIVE FEEDER BUS SERVICE 17% -6% 15% I WILL NOT RIDE SUNRAIL, EVEN WITH IMPROVEMENTS -4% MORE PARKING AT STATIONS 7% -3% LOWER FARES 11% +2% 8

5 WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CURRENT TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES IN VOLUSIA/FLAGLER COUNTIES? *PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM 2016 SURVEY 52% -4%* 51% +9% 50% -3% 49% +5% INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS SIDEWALKS AND CROSSWALKS MAJOR STREETS LOCAL NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS 46% -4% 32% +1% 18% -6% 16% -2% TRAIL SYSTEM BICYCLE LANES PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE PUBLIC TRANSIT SHELTERS/BENCHES PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS THAT INDICATED SOMEWHAT SATISFIED OR COMPLETELY SATISFIED 6 AS WE PRIORITIZE SPENDING ON TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS, SHOULD WE INVEST MORE, THE SAME, OR LESS ON THE FOLLOWING? *PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM 2016 SURVEY 9 IMPLEMENTING TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF TRAFFIC OPERATIONS IMPROVING ROADWAY OPERATIONS IMPROVING WALKING CONDITIONS IMPROVING/ADDING SUNRAIL SERVICE IMPROVING BICYCLING CONDITIONS IMPROVING/ADDING BUS SERVICE 74% NEW ANSWER CHOICE 73% NEW ANSWER CHOICE 67% +5%* 65% +14% 65% +13% 53% +5% ADDING/IMPROVING MULTI-USE TRAILS ADDING LANES TO EXISTING ROADWAYS TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES BUILDING NEW ROADWAYS ENCOURAGING CARPOOLING PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS THAT INDICATED TO SPEND MORE OR MUCH MORE 52% +9% 49% -7% 42% -22% 39% +15% 37% NEW ANSWER CHOICE

7 NEW TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY IS IMPORTANT FOR WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING? *PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM 2016 SURVEY DECREASING ROADWAY CRASHES IMPROVING THE FLOW OF VEHICLE TRAFFIC PROVIDING SAFER INTERSECTIONS FOR PEDESTRIANS PROVIDING REAL-TIME INFORMATION TO DRIVERS/TRANSIT RIDERS/PEDESTRIANS HELPING TRANSIT VEHICLES ARRIVE ON TIME OR HAVE SHORTER TRAVEL TIMES REDUCING FREIGHT SHIPPING TRAVEL TIMES 65% -10%* 56% -19% 51% NEW ANSWER CHOICE 31% -22% 23% -22% 9% -17% 8NEW QUESTION TRANSPORTATION NEEDS EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF FUNDING AVAILABLE. WHICH TYPES OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS ARE YOUR HIGHEST PRIORITIES TO FUND WITH OUR LIMITED RESOURCES? 46% 37% IMPROVE ROADWAY SAFETY IMPROVE TRANSIT SERVICE 28% 28% CONSTRUCT NEW BIKE LANES AND TRAILS/GREENWAYS REPLACE/UPGRADE AGING FACILITIES CONSTRUCT NEW SIDEWALKS/IMPROVE CONNECTIVITY IMPLEMENT NEW TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGIES WIDEN EXISTING ROADWAYS 27% 26% 24% IMPROVE STREET APPEARANCE BUILD NEW STREETS AND ROADWAYS INSTALL BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED SIGNALS 19% 16% 14% 10

9 CRASH NEW QUESTION DATA SHOW THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS AS THE 10 HIGHEST CRASH LOCATIONS IN THE PLANNING AREA. WHICH OF THESE INTERSECTIONS CAUSE THE GREATEST CONCERN FOR YOU AS A DRIVER, BICYCLIST OR PEDESTRIAN? PALM COAST 95 ORMOND BEACH 1 17 40 11 DAYTONA BEACH 92 4 PORT ORANGE 44 95 17 1 4 A B C D E F G H I J International Speedway Boulevard @ Clyde Morris Boulevard Dunlawton Avenue @ South Nova Road International Speedway Boulevard @ Williamson Road International Speedway Boulevard @ Ridgewood Avenue South Clyde Morris Boulevard @ Dunlawton Avenue Granada Boulevard @ Nova Road Palm Coast Parkway @ Old Kings Road Granada Boulevard @ Williamson Boulevard Granada Boulevard @ North Yonge Street (US 1) Cypress Point Parkway @ Palm Coast Parkway/Boulder Rock Drive 40% 39% 39% 38% 24% 19% 14% 14% 13% 12% 11

12

2570 WEST INTERNATIONAL SPEEDWAY BOULEVARD, SUITE 100 DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32114-8145 PHONE: 386.226.0422 WWW.R2CTPO.ORG CREATED BY