MTA CAPITAL PROGRAM: Tri-State Transportation Campaign

Similar documents
MTA Capital Program Amendment for Hurricane Sandy Recovery As submitted to the MTA Board December 2012

Looking Ahead and Looking Back: An Examination of NJDOT s and NJT s 2014 Capital Program

Aurora Corridor to E Line

FY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

Arnold Hinojosa

Transportation-Demand Management Community Presentation

ITS-NY ANNUAL MEETING Bus Rapid Transit in New York City: Bus Lane Operations on One-Way Arterial Streets

Transportation Day at the Capitol. Charlie Zelle Commissioner, MnDOT Feb. 16, 2017

Going Green: How California is Reviving Passenger Rail. APTA/ AASHTO AASHTO 2008 State Public Transit Partnerships. August 7, 2008

VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS

Preview. Tables in your paper Mass Transit as alternative to auto California s problems in urban transportation

MTA Surveys: Facts and Findings. NYMTC Brown Bag March 12, 2014 Julia Seltzer, MTA Planning

MTA Capital Program

Setting the Standard: An Introduction to Bicycle Accessibility to Transit Agencies

Semi-Annual DC Circulator Forum. February 25, 2014

Tri-State Transportation Campaign Straphangers Campaign

SCAG EMERGING REGIONAL ISSUES: GOMONROVIA OVERVIEW. City of Monrovia

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Traffic Congestion in Houston. Presented by Bill King

Integrating Community Development and Transportation Strategies. November 13, 2014

Preview. Second midterm Tables in your paper Mass Transit as alternative to auto California s problems in urban transportation


Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Metrolink Ridership and Revenue Quarterly Report. Staff Report

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Fordham Plaza. Conceptual Design Study

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Sound Transit Financing and 3-County Road & Transit Funding

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS of The Draft 2015 CLRP

1.221J/11.527J/ESD.201J TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS FALL 2003 FINAL EXAMINATION. 1. Open-book and open-notes, calculators are fine -- no laptops.

Report Overview Policy versus Performance: Directions for North Carolina s Largest Transit Systems

ANNUAL REPORT Portland Streetcar 2016

Public Transport Asset Management

Metropolitan Transportation Since September 11 A media source-book

WHAT IFS: Over the course of

Where We Live and Work Today

# Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan

NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING

ASIA PACIFIC RAIL 2006

Transportation and Equity: A 2017 Agenda for Candidates

Konstantin Glukhenkiy Economic Affairs Officer

Honolulu Rail Transit Brochure Source List

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

INTRODUCTION DISCUSSION


Dear City Council Members,

Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Application to Miami-Dade Transit

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

North Coast Corridor:

Final Study Recommendations AMES TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY. For Public Review and Comment. October Ames Transit Feasibility Study

Bus Riders of Saskatoon Meeting with City of Saskatoon Utility Services Department October 23, :30pm 2:30pm th Street West, Saskatoon

Multimodal Transportation Plan

TRANSPORTATION RECYCLING NEW JERSEY RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY INTO A PUBLIC RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM

Most Dangerous Roads for Walking And How States Can Make them Safer. Route 110, Long Island, New York Image by Dougtone

Understanding Rail and Bus Ridership

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

TRANSPORT CHICAGO: STRATEGIC PUBLIC TRANSIT BUS RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

METRO Now. Transit Leader. One of only four urban. gain bus ridership in Purple and Green Lines. Red Line is one

TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING PLANS - NEXT NETWORK TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

The Broadway SkyTrain Extension

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey

Transportation Issues Poll for New York City

Building a sustainable world city: the role of transport and land use in London. London s relationship with transport

ROADSOADS CONGESTION HAMPTON SYSTEMYSTEM MANAGEMENT. Part II Roadway Congestion Analysis Mitigation Strategies and Evaluation

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Transportation in Washoe County. Lee Gibson, Executive Director February 15, 2011

An Evaluation of Comprehensive Transit Improvements TriMet s Streamline Program

Private-Public Partnership. Presentation to Metropolitan Council October 2, 2017

Transportation Authority of Marin Renew Existing ½-cent Transportation Sales Tax

Addressing Bicycle Capacity Issues on Public Transportation

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

METRO. Monthly Board Report. February 2009

Climate Change Action Plan: Transportation Sector Discussion Paper: Cycling

SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

North Carolina Transportation Issues

Title VI Fare Change Equity Analysis

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Enhancing Return on Investment for MnPASS Express Lanes

Implementation Report # False Creek Bridges

POTENTIAL SANTA CLARA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION MEASURE

Canarsie Tunnel Repairs: Planning Ahead for the Crisis

Linking Land Use & Transportation in Minneapolis

Gulf Coast Passenger Rail Service Opportunities. Todd Stennis Director, Government Affairs August 16, 2012

Tunnel Reconstruction Brooklyn CB 1 August 14, 2018

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

Fitting Light Rail through Well-established Communities

Win-Win Transportation Solutions

MOVEABLE BARRIER. Congestion Management Solutions

Staff. ridership on train cars. ridership.

Intermodal Connections with Light Rail in Phoenix, AZ Wulf Grote, P.E. Director, Planning & Development

Feasibility Study for Intermodal Facility in Anchorage, Alaska

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

The modes of government guidance for public bicycle operation and state-owned company operation: a case study of Hangzhou city in China

2013 Annual Passenger Counts

Transcription:

MTA CAPITAL PROGRAM: WHAT S IT IN FOR LONG ISLAND? Tri-State Transportation Campaign December 3, 2009

The Context From 2000-2008 Population growth 3.8% 25-44 years olds percentage of population dropped 13.5%

The Context LIRR serves 87.4 million passengers a year Average weekday- 302,583 passengers 594 miles of track Long Island Bus serves 34 million passengers a year Suffolk Transit ridership serves 6.4 million

The Context LIRR reverse commute skyrocketing. Up 76% between 1998 and 2007. Bus ridership has soared. Agency Suffolk Transit Long Island Bus Growth in ridership, 2000-2008 43.8% 9.2%

Overall MTA capital program Core Capital Programs (millions) New York City Transit $13,861 Long Island Rail Road $2,758 Metro-North th Railroad $1,839 MTA Bus $ 325 Core Subtotal $18,783 MTA Wide Security and Safety $650 Interagency $400 East Side Access, 2 nd Ave subway $5,739 Bid Bridges and dtunnels $2,508 Total $28,080

Replacement vs. Expansion Agency Existing system Expansion Other LIRR 56% 35% 9% Metro-North 89% 7% 4% New York 86% 13% 1% City Transit (Only counts portion of East Side Access project.)

How much do fares cover? Agency Long Island Railroad 43% Farebox operating ratio New York City Transit 51% Metro-North Railroad 54% Long Island Bus 34%

Breakout of LIRR capital program Shops and Yards 11% Power Misc 7% 6% Rolling stock 14% Stations 6% Communications and Signals 12% Line Structures 7% Track 37%

The Needs are Great Long Island Rail Road Allocation of Capital Funding (in millions) Proposed Percent of Capital Funding Needs Funded Rolling Stock 100.0 Stations 36.3 Track 94.3 Line Structures 69.1 Signals and Comm. 67.5 Power 75.1 Shops and Yards 81.0 Miscellaneous 99.4 Total $2,758 79.0 % Sources: Metropolitan Transportation Authority; OSDC analysis

LIRR capital program - trains Between 2002 and 2007, the MTAs MTA s capital program replaced 836 40-year old cars with the below cars.

LIRR capital program trains 2010-2014 2014 program brings similar improvements. 84 of 170 cars in electric fleet will be replaced with modern cars.

LIRR capital program stations Station program Massapequa and Wantagh station rehabs Mets/Willets Point Station Rockville Center elevators East Side Access, Penn Station A/C Babylon station rehab New Republic station in Suffolk County Parking upgrades location TBD Smart card

LIRR capital program - tracks Double track Farmingdale to Ronkonkoma Jamaica capacity improvements Pocket track initiatives improved service on Babylon Branch, Great Neck stations and west (including future service to Grand Central) Project components of LIRR third track- Ellison Ave Bridge replacement, Hicksville pocket track, track work in Mineola

LIRR capital program bridges and viaducts Bridges along Montauk Branch in Hampton Bays Main Line bridges in Queens Port Washington Branch bridge in Great Neck East River tunnel safety and Atlantic Ave viaduct in Brooklyn.

LIRR capital program communications and signals Fiber optics to improve communication for riders and LIRR employees. Modernize signals near Babylon Station. Positive train control, required by federal government.

LIRR capital program shops, yards, and power New rail yards absolutely necessary to improve service. Port Jefferson Branch and into Grand Central. Mid-Suffolk Yard to improve service on Ronkonkoma Line. Improvements to shops (maintenance facilities) at Hillside and Morris Park. Upgraded power substations.

The importance of LIRR third track The absence of the third track on the Main Line prevents the LIRR from offering a robust reverse commute and intra-island service which would provide regional mobility and strengthen Long Island s economic competitiveness. - MTA 2010-2014 capital program LIRR Weekday Leave Arrive Flatbush 5:51AM 7:00AM Farmingdale 7:41AM 8:35AM

East Side Access LIRR to Grand Central Will serve 160,000 rides a day Direct one seat rides to Grand Central for Port Washington and Main Line riders Reduce crowding at Penn Station Improve air quality

East Side Access $2.9 billion in capital program to finish the project. Scheduled to open in 2016.

Long Island Bus Not statutorily allowed to receive most MTArelated funds. Nassau County pays capital costs. Singled out for cuts, lacks necc. capital improvements.

Long Island Bus 34,000,000 LONG ISLAND BUS ANNUAL RIDERSHIP 33,000,000 32,000,000 31,000,000 30,000,000 29,000,000 28,000,000 27,000,000 26,000,000 25,000,000 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Annual Allo ocation $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000000 000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 YEAR LONG ISLAND BUS OPERATING SUBSIDY 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Year Nassau County New York State MTA

Transit-oriented development LIRR will support the efforts of municipalities in competitive planning grants and undertaking comprehensive station area/downtown planning and zoning studies as part of coordinating local land use with LIRR parking and intermodal investments. - 2010-2014 MTA Capital Program

Benefits of capital program Economic and job creation LIRR capital program creates 64,000 jobs. LIRR $1.5 B operating budget creates 60,000 jobs. Source: American Public Transportation Association

Benefits of program Environmental Long Island transit riders reduce carbon dioxide emissions by over one billion tons annually. Social slow brain drain, provide more transit options, serve 60,000 LI households that do NOT own cars.

Funding breakdown Source Total cost $ 28,080 Federal $ 8,400 City capital $ 500 MTA bus and city match $ 160 Bridges and Tunnels $ 2,508 MTA Bonds $ 6,000 Asset sales $ 600 Total available FUNDING GAP Proposed (millions) $ 18.1 BILLION $ 9.9 BILLION

More debt is not the answer

Potential revenue sources East River bridge tolls Variable tolls on East River crossings Other tolls Mobility fees (payroll tax, commuter tax) Increase taxes that fund MTA (portion of sales tax, real estate transfer tax, business petroleum tax, etc) Gas tax increase Others

Not investing means Fewer jobs More train and bus breakdowns More traffic congestion More brain drain Polluted environment Higher maintenance costs

Thank you Visit us on the web! Tri-State Transportation Campaign blog.tstc.org www.tstc.org