APPENDIX A. The following stakeholders were interviewed specifically for the Transfort Strategic Operating Plan:

Similar documents
Appendix B. Existing Transfort System Route Profiles

Interim Transit Ridership Forecast Results Technical Memorandum

Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates. Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP

US287 Asset Inventory Fort Collins. Figure 5-1 Fort Collins Bridges and Traffic Signals

Service Proposal for the City of Ashland, Oregon

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report September 2017 (Fiscal Year-end 2017)

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

F.1 ENHANCED FISCALLY CONSTRAINED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

MOTION NO. M Contract Amendment for Systems Construction Management Consultant Services

US287 Asset Inventory Loveland. Figure 6-1 Loveland Bridges and Traffic Signals

I-25 PEL: CO Springs Denver South Connection. Presentation to Castle Rock Town Council

What do your 2015 city election candidates have to say about bicycling?

Third Street Bridge & Corridor Project

Aurora Corridor to E Line

Community Transportation Plan Acknowledgements

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

Craig Rempp, Transit Superintendent Mary Karlsson, Kimley-Horn. Mankato City Council Meeting 6/25/2018

Bus Riders of Saskatoon Meeting with City of Saskatoon Utility Services Department October 23, :30pm 2:30pm th Street West, Saskatoon

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Members Present Mr. Gary Thomas, Mr. Dave Martinez, Mr. Robert Massaro, Ms. Jody Van Curen, Mr. Dan Hill and Ms. Joan Shaffer

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Welcome. Wilmington Transit Moving Forward Workshop Presentation. October 16, 2013

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

. ' motion. APPLtlDK.L - L"iLC_t1GLR 201b APPENDIX 7 TECHNICAL MEMOS

3.0 ACCESS CONTROL PLAN - HARMONY ROAD (SH68)

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

TRANSPORT CHICAGO: STRATEGIC PUBLIC TRANSIT BUS RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS

Developing Bikeways in South Denver

CARTA East Cooper Transit Service Transportation Committee Town of Mount Pleasant. February 5, 2013

Vision to Action Community Coalition February 14, 2014 Briefing

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting Steve Fittante, New Jersey Transit Corporation September 30, 2013

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. APPENDIX L - Mobilitiy Component Implementation Matrix

Where We Live and Work Today

Light Rail Proposal. June 13, 2016 Presentation for the Joint Sustainability Committee by the Central Austin Community Development Corporation

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #8 May 5, Welcome. Today s meeting will focus on: Land Use & Transportation CHARLOTTEPLANNING.

ITEM 2.3 South of Fraser Rapid Transit Surrey-Langley technology decision. That the Mayors Council on Regional Transportation receive this report.

Route Performance Report

Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) Meeting Minutes. June 27, 2016, 6:00 p.m.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

MEETING MINUTES OF BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. August 13, :00 p.m. Community Room 215 N. Mason St. Fort Collins, CO FOR REFERENCE:

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

Item No Halifax Regional Council January 16, 2018 January 30, 2018

Activism for a Healthier Community

David DiPierro, John Amberson. Steering Committee Meeting #4 Overview

Appendix. A. Transportation Snapshot Report. B. Key Choices Summary. C. Reshaping Street Visualizations. D. Link to Thomas Frey s Presentation

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Public Event 1 Community Workshops

CHAIR AND MEMBERS CIVIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING ON JANUARY 10, 2017

ABOUT THE PROJECT. DOWNTOWN WEST Transportation Planning Study. Pennsylvania Ave. NW: H Street NW: Farragut. K St. NW. North. I St.

FOR REFERENCE: Annabelle Berklund Ross Cunniff Staff Liaison: Paul Sizemore

Transit Workshop with MPO Board

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Bridge Street Corridor Study Report

CITY OF NEW ORLEANS. Department of Public Works. Baronne Street Bike Lane

Wilshire Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Project

Dutchess County Division of Mass Transit. Proposed LOOP Bus Service Changes. Public Information Meeting: January 8,

City of White Rock. Strategic Transportation Plan. May 16, 2005

Executive Summary BEYOND THE B-LINE: RAPID TRANSIT LINE PHASE II - COMMERCIAL DRIVE WEST. Final Draft December 13, Appendix B BROADWAY/LOUGHEED

Traffic Control Signals - Cosburn Avenue and Cedarvale Avenue

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

TriMet Title VI and Transit Equity Impacts Assessment Recommended Service Changes Line 47 Baseline/Evergreen and 48 Cornell

Employment 8,881 17,975 9,094. Households 18,990 31,936 12,946

TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY Board of Directors April 12, 2017

Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study. Naples City Council Presentation January 2017

Monthly Ridership and Service Level Report March, Safety, Courtesy, Reliability, and the Environment

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

US 19 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safe Access to Transit Corridor Study

FUNDING SOURCES CHAPTER 6

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

# Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

Demand Estimation Model for Park-and-Ride Service: Fort Bend County to Central Houston

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Transportation Policy Manual

Geneva-Harney Bus Rapid Transit Feasibility Study

Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

LANE ELIMINATION PROJECTS

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

T1-A - Service Reduction (Re-sizing)

6 Screen 3 Analysis and Results

Item B1 November 19, 2009

Best Southwest Transportation Committee. North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department

CITY OF LOS ANGELES. The Honorable Members of the Arts, Entertainment, Parks and River Committee

Final Technical Report RAILYARD ALIGNMENT AND BENEFITS STUDY. Appendix F: Traffic Analysis, I 280

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (BICYCLE ADVISORY GROUP)

Fiscal Year Big Blue Bus Year End Performance Report

95 Express Annual Operations Report: Fiscal Year

BENTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE JOINT TECHNICAL AND STAKEHOLDER ADVISORY COMMITTEES MEETING #2

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK

COST ESTIMATION. Fully Allocated Causal Factor Models Temporal Variation Models Incremental Fixed Variable Cost Models

What do your 2015 city election candidates have to say about bicycling?

Transcription:

APPENDIX A The following stakeholders were interviewed specifically for the Transfort Strategic Operating Plan: 1. Will Arduino, Public Affairs Director for Hewlett Packard 2. Ann Azari, Former Mayor, City of Fort Collins 3. Bill Bertschy, Council Member, City of Fort Collins 4. Ben Brooks, Chair, Youth Advisory Board, City of Fort Collins 5. Mike Byrne, Council Member, City of Fort Collins 6. Stan Everitt, Everitt Companies 7. John Fischbach, City Manager 8. Tom Frazier, General Manager of Transfort 9. Mike Hauser, President, Chamber of Commerce 10. Gina Janette, Former City Council Member, City of Fort Collins 11. Tim Johns, Chair, Transportation Board 12. Kathryn Johnson, Member, Cross Disabilities Coalition/Commission on Disabilities 13. Kurt Kastein, Council Member, City of Fort Collins 14. Susan Kirkpatrick, Former Mayor, City of Fort Collins 15. Frank Lancaster, County Manager, Larimer County 16. Eric Levine, Chair, Air Quality Advisory Board, City of Fort Collins 17. Tom Livingston, Developer 18. Toni Lueck, Chair of the Dial-a-ride Advisory Committee, City of Fort Collins 19. David Marckres, Member, Cross Disabilities Coalition/Commission on Disabilities 20. Scott Mason, Council Member, City of Fort Collins 21. Ray Martinez, Mayor, City of Fort Collins 22. Loren Maxey, President, Maxey Companies 23. Shelley McGraw, Larimer County Office on Aging 24. Bill Neal, Wheeler Realty 25. Ron Philips, Director of Transportation Services, City of Fort Collins 26. Bridget Schmidt, Citizen Planners 27. Robert Thompson, County Department of Human Service 28. Don Unger, Superintendent of Schools, Poudre School District 29. Tom Vossberg, Planning Department, City of Fort Collins 30. Karen Weitkunat, Council Member, City of Fort Collins 31. Chuck Wanner, Council Member, City of Fort 32. Ed Zdenek, ZTI Group

APPENDIX B SUMMARY TABLES Service Hours and Vehicle Requirements for each Service Scenario Tables illustrating the existing (Baseline) service and the proposed scenarios are shown on the following pages.

EXISTING SYSTEM AVERAGE DAILY RND TRIP TIME RND TRIP TIME FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. REVENUE SERV. HOURS excluding recovery including recovery REV REV REV ROUTE NAME 1999 Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS 1 College Avenue 28.32 54 54 59 59 30 30 2 2 6 7.0 26 30 30 2 2 6 7.0 26 30 30 2 2 6 7.0 26 1C College Avenue 54 54 59 59 60 1 5.0 5 60 1 5.0 5 60 1 5.0 5 2 W. Campus 12.01 25 25 28 28 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 2T W. Campus 25 28 30 1 3.0 3 3 W. Campus 11.44 25 25 25 28 28 28 30 30 60 1 1 6 6.0 6 12 4 Downtown 12.40 26 26 26 29 29 29 30 30 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 6 19 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 5 Lemay / PVH 12.90 46 46 51 51 60 60 1 1 6 7.0 13 60 60 1 1 6 7.0 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 6 STC/Dunbar 13.03 50 50 50 55 55 55 60 60 60 1 1 6 7.0 6 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 6T STC/Dunbar 25 28 60 1 0.5 1 7 STC/Drake 18.00 47 47 47 52 52 52 30 30 60 2 2 1 6 6.0 6 30 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 8 NTC/PVMHP 12.36 27 27 30 30 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 9 NTC/EPIC/Lincoln JH 12.44 54 54 59 59 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 9T NTC/Lincoln JH 27 30 60 1 0.5 1 60 1 0.5 1 60 1 0.5 1 10 FCHS/CSU 12.40 47 47 52 52 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 11 West Campus 14.55 18 18 20 20 20 20 1 1 6 6.5 13 11T West Campus 18 20 20 1 3.0 3 14 NTC/I-25 17.50 54 54 54 59 59 59 60 60 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 5 18 60 60 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 5 18 60 60 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 5 18 SSS South Side Shuttle 6.38 67 74 75 1 6 6 75 1 6 6 FT Fox Trot 12.71 48 48 53 53 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 NL* NightLITe 8.00 51 56 Revenue Hours 204 Peak Bus Requirement 16 20 Revenue Hours 223 13 Revenue Hours 168 12 Revenue Hours 162 Total Rev. Hours*, ** Total number of School Weekday Rev. Hours Total number of Non-School Weekday Rev. Hours Total number of Saturday Rev. Hours 60,872 36,349 15,960 8,075 * NightLITe revenue hours are included in the Total Revenue Hours by assuming 8 hours a night for 61 nights (based on 1999 totals), or 488 hours. ** Total revenue hours are higher than the total for 1999 because (1) Route 14 began service in 1999 and (2) trippers are included in this total. Nelson\Nygaard 2/11/02

SCENARIO 1: No Budget Growth - Minimal Redesign RND TRIP TIME RND TRIP TIME FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. excluding recovery including recovery REV REV REV LINE NAME Between And Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS 1 College Avenue NTC FRCC 73 73 80 80 20 20 4 4 6 7.0 52 20 20 4 4 6 7.0 52 20 20 4 4 6 7.0 52 2 W. Campus CTC Overland/Prospect 25 25 28 28 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 2T W. Campus CTC Overland/Prospect 25 25 28 28 30 1 3 0.0 3 3 W. Campus CTC Overland/Prospect 25 25 25 28 28 28 30 30 60 1 1 6 6.0 6 12 0.0 4 NW Campus CTC CTC 26 26 26 29 29 29 30 30 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 6 19 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 5** Lemay / PVH NTC STC 46 46 51 51 60 60 1 1 6 7.0 13 60 60 1 1 6 7.0 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 6** Dunbar/Stuart CTC STC 54 54 54 59 59 59 60 60 60 1 1 6 7.0 6 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 6T Dunbar/Stuart CTC STC 25 28 60 60 1 0.5 7 Drake/Stover CTC STC 47 47 47 52 52 52 30 30 60 2 2 1 6 6.0 6 30 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 8 N. College NTC N. College 27 27 30 30 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 9 Short*** Riverside/Prospect NTC Lake/Centre 42 42 46 46 6 6.5 0.0 0.0 9 West West Vine/LaPorte NTC Overland/Vine 25 28 4 0.0 4 0.0 0.0 9T West Vine/LaPorte NTC Overland/Vine 25 28 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 East Campus CTC Fort Collins High 54 54 54 59 59 59 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 West Campus CTC West Campus 18 18 20 20 20 20 1 1 6 6.5 13 11T West Campus CTC West Campus 18 20 20 1 3 0.0 3 SSS E Horsetooth/Harmony STC Hewlett Packard 24 26 6 0.0 30 1 6 0.0 6 0.0 14 NTC/I-25 NTC I-25 54 54 54 59 59 59 60 60 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 5 18 60 60 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 5 18 60 60 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 5 18 15 Downtown NTC CTC 18 18 20 20 20 20 1 1 6 6.5 13 20 20 1 1 6 6.5 13 20 20 1 1 6 6.5 13 FT Fox Trot STC Loveland 48 48 53 53 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 NL* NightLITe Downtown FC CTC/STC 51 56 Service Eliminated Peak Bus Requirement 19 16 3 Revenue Hours 225 14 13 1 Revenue Hours 176 13 13 1 Revenue Hours 170 2000 Annual Service Hours 59,999 % Increase in Scenario 1 Service Hours 4.6% * NightLITe revenue hours are included in the Total Revenue Hours by assuming 8 hours a night for 61 nights (based on 1999 totals), or 488 hours. ** 3/4 revenue hours are included in the Total Revenue Hours by assuming 8 hours a night for 61 nights (based on 1999 totals), or 488 hours in addition to the school weekday hours reflected for Route 4. *** Routes 5 and 6 are interlined at the STC to compensate for the longer running time on Route 6. **** Follows the same alignment as Route 2 in Scenario 2 from Lake and Center to the NTC. Total Rev. Hours* Total number of School Weekday Rev. Hours Total number of Non-School Weekday Rev. Hours Total number of Saturday Rev. Hours 62,765 36,594 16,720 8,475 Nelson\Nygaard 2/11/02

SCENARIO 2: Minimal Redesign Plus Mason RND TRIP TIME RND TRIP TIME FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. excluding recovery including recovery REV REV REV LINE NAME Between And Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS 1A Mason Street NTC South Terminus 44 44 44 48 48 48 7 7 30 7 7 2 6 7.0 6 103 10 20 30 5 3 2 6 7.0 6 63 10 20 30 5 3 2 6 7.0 6 63 1B FRCC Shuttle STC FRCC 25 25 25 28 28 28 30 30 30 1 1 1 6 7.0 6 19 30 30 30 1 1 1 6 7.0 6 19 30 30 1 1 6 7.0 6 13 2 W. Campus CTC Overland/Prospect 25 25 28 28 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 2T W. Campus CTC Overland/Prospect 25 28 30 1 3 0.0 3 3 W. Campus CTC Overland/Prospect 25 25 25 28 28 28 30 30 60 1 1 6 6.0 6 12 4 NW Campus CTC CTC 26 26 26 29 29 29 30 30 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 6 19 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 5** Lemay / PVH NTC STC 46 46 51 51 60 60 1 1 6 7.0 13 60 60 1 1 6 7.0 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 6** Dunbar/Stuart CTC STC 54 54 54 59 59 59 60 60 60 1 1 6 7.0 6 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 6T Dunbar/Stuart CTC STC 25 28 30 1 0.5 7 Drake/Stover CTC STC 47 47 47 52 52 52 30 30 60 2 2 1 6 6.0 6 30 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 8 N. College NTC N. College 27 27 30 30 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 9 Short*** Riverside/Prospect NTC Lake/Centre 42 42 46 46 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 West West Vine/LaPorte NTC Overland/Vine 25 28 0.0 0.0 0.0 9T West Vine/LaPorte NTC Overland/Vine 25 28 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 East Campus CTC Fort Collins High 52 52 57 57 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 West Campus CTC West Campus 18 18 20 20 20 20 1 1 6 6.5 13 11T West Campus CTC West Campus 18 20 20 1 3 0.0 3 SSS E Horsetooth/Harmony STC Hewlett Packard 24 26 0.0 0.0 0.0 14 NTC/I-25 NTC I-25 54 54 54 59 59 59 60 60 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 5 18 60 60 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 5 18 60 60 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 5 18 15 Downtown NTC CTC 18 18 20 20 20 20 1 1 6 6.5 13 20 20 1 1 6 6.5 13 20 20 1 1 6 6.5 13 FT Fox Trot STC Loveland 48 48 53 53 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 NL* NightLITe Downtown FC CTC/STC 51 56 Service Eliminated Peak Bus Requirement 23 20 Revenue Hours 295 15 Revenue Hours 200 15 Revenue Hours 194 2000 Annual Service Hours 59,999 % Increase in Scenario 1 Service Hours 36.0% * NightLITe revenue hours are included in the Total Revenue Hours by assuming 8 hours a night for 61 nights (based on 1999 totals), or 488 hours. ** 3/4 revenue hours are included in the Total Revenue Hours by assuming 8 hours a night for 61 nights (based on 1999 totals), or 488 hours in addition to the school weekday hours reflected for Route 4. *** Routes 5 and 6 are interlined at the STC to compensate for the longer running time on Route 6. **** Follows the same alignment as Route 2 in Scenario 2 from Lake and Center to the NTC. Total Rev. Hours* Total number of School Weekday Rev. Hours Total number of Non-School Weekday Rev. Hours Total number of Saturday Rev. Hours 81,607 48,004 19,000 9,675

SCENARIO 3: Transition to Grid Plus Mason RND TRIP TIME RND TRIP TIME FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. excluding recovery including recovery REV REV REV LINE NAME Between And Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS 1A Mason Street NTC South Terminus 44 44 44 48 48 48 10 10 30 5 5 2 6 7.0 6 77 10 20 30 5 3 2 6 7.0 6 63 10 20 30 5 3 2 6 7.0 6 63 1B FRCC Shuttle STC FRCC 25 25 25 28 28 28 30 30 30 1 1 1 6 7.0 6 19 30 30 30 1 1 1 6 7.0 6 19 30 30 1 1 6 7.0 6 13 2 long Prospect/Drake NTC STC 100 100 100 110 110 110 15 15 60 8 8 2 6 7.0 6 116 60 60 2 2 6 6.5 25 60 60 2 2 6 6.5 25 3 mid W Eliz/Laporte NTC Campus TC 54 54 54 59 59 59 15 15 4 4 6 7.0 52 30 30 2 2 6 6.5 25 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 3 short W Eliz/CSU W Eliz NTC 54 54 54 59 59 59 30 30 2 2 6 7.0 26 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 3 long W Eliz NTC Campus TC 70 70 70 77 77 77 60 2 6 12 60 60 2 2 6 6.5 25 5** Lemay NTC STC 38 38 42 42 60 60 1 1 6 6.0 12 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 6** Shields/Dunbar/NE STC NTC 74 74 74 81 81 81 60 60 60 1 1 2 6 6.0 6 24 8 N. College NTC N. College 27 27 30 30 30 30 1 1 6 6.0 12 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 14 NTC/I-25 NTC I-25 54 54 54 59 59 59 60 60 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 5 18 60 60 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 5 18 60 60 60 1 1 1 6 6.5 5 18 20 STC-Loveland STC Loveland 54 54 54 59 59 59 60 60 1 1 6 6.0 12 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 21 STC-HP/East Harmony STC Hewlett Packard 24 26 30 1 6 6 60 1 6 6.5 6 NL* NightLITe Downtown FC CTC/STC Peak Bus Requirement 26 25 Revenue Hours 386 16 Revenue Hours 206 15 Revenue Hours 194 Scenario 1 Service Hours 62,765 % Increase in Scenario 3 over Scenario 1 53.7% Total Rev. Hours* Total number of School Weekday Rev. Hours Total number of Non-School Weekday Rev. Hours Total number of Saturday Rev. Hours 96,474 62,837 19,523 9,675 * NightLITe revenue hours are included in the Total Revenue Hours by assuming 8 hours a night for 61 nights (based on 1999 totals), or 488 hours. 3,952 Annual Revenue Hours added for Sunday Service on Mason Street ** Routes 5 and 6 are interlined at the NTC to compensate for the longer running time on Route 6. Nelson\Nygaard 2/11/02

SCENARIO 4: 2010 Restructuring RND TRIP TIME RND TRIP TIME FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. FREQUENCY VEHICLES HRS/WEEKDAY WKDAY. excluding recovery including recovery REV REV REV LINE NAME Between And Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve Peak Base Eve HRS 1A Mason St./FRCC NTC FRCC 54 54 54 59 59 59 15 15 30 4 4 2 6 7.0 6 64 15 15 30 4 4 2 6 7.0 6 64 30 30 60 2 2 1 6 7.0 6 32 1B Mason St./Loveland NTC Loveland 75 75 83 83 30 30 3 3 6 7.0 39 30 30 3 3 6 7.0 39 60 60 2 2 6 7.0 26 1C Mason St./Harmony NTC I-25 TC 75 75 83 83 30 30 3 3 6 7.0 39 30 30 3 3 6 7.0 39 2 long Prospect/Drake NTC STC 100 100 100 110 110 110 15 15 60 8 8 2 6 7.0 6 116 60 60 2 2 6 6.5 25 60 60 2 2 6 6.5 25 3 long W Eliz/Laporte NTC STC 100 100 100 110 110 110 15 15 60 8 8 2 6 7.0 6 116 60 60 2 2 6 6.5 25 60 60 2 2 6 6.5 25 3 short W Eliz Eliz/Constitution Campus TC 15 15 17 17 15 15 2 2 6 7.0 26 4 Taft Hill NTC Dunbar/Drake 38 38 38 42 42 42 30 30 2 2 6 7.0 26 30 30 2 2 6 7.0 26 30 30 2 2 6 7.0 26 5** Lemay NTC STC 38 38 42 42 30 30 2 2 6 6.0 24 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 60 60 1 1 6 6.5 13 6** Shields/Dunbar/NE STC NTC 68 68 68 75 75 75 30 30 60 3 3 2 6 6.0 6 48 60 60 2 2 6 6.5 25 60 60 2 2 6 6.5 25 8 N. College NTC N. College 27 27 30 30 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.5 13 30 30 1 1 6 6.0 12 9 East Lincoln/Timberline NTC STC 69 69 76 76 30 30 3 3 6 6.0 36 60 60 2 2 6 6.5 25 30 30 3 3 6 6.5 38 21 E Horsetooth/Harmony STC FRCC 24 26 30 1 6 6 30 1 6 6 NL* NightLITe downtown FC STC Peak Bus Requirement 40 39 Revenue Hours 553 23 Revenue Hours 299 17 Revenue Hours 221 2000 Annual Service Hours 59,999 % Increase in Scenario 3 over Scenario 2 117% * NightLITe revenue hours are included in the Total Revenue Hours by assuming 8 hours a night for 61 nights (based on 1999 totals), or 488 hours. ** Routes 5 and 6 are interlined at the NTC to compensate for the longer running time on Route 6. Total Rev. Hours* Total number of School Weekday Rev. Hours Total number of Non-School Weekday Rev. Hours Total number of Saturday Rev. Hours 130,001 90,058 28,405 11,050 Nelson\Nygaard 2/11/02

Conceptual Costing based on A No Budget Growth and Various Moderate Growth Scenarios Projected FY 2000 FY 2002 FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2010 Existing System Scenario 1 - Minimal Redesign Scenario 2 - Minimal Redesign Plus Mason Scenario 3 - Transition to Grid Plus Mason Scenario 4-2010 Restructuring Annual Vehicle Service Hours 59,999 62,764.5 81,606.5 96,474 130,000.5 Est. Annual Cost $3,867,536 $4,045,800 $5,260,355 $6,218,714 $8,379,832 Weekday Base Vehicle Requirement 16 16 25 39 Weekday Peak Vehicle Requirement 18 19 23 26 40 Assumptions made: Annual Vehicle Service Hours Est. Annual Cost Weekday Base Vehicle Requirement Weekday Peak Vehicle Requirement FY 2000 FY 2002 FY 2006 FY 2008 FY 2010 Existing System Scenario 1 - No Budget Growth Derived from the estimated service hours for Scenario 2 - Mason Corridor Derived from the estimated service hours for Scenario 3 - Transition to Grid Derived from the estimated service hours for Scenario 4-2010 Transfort Goal Derived from the estimated service hours for school school weekdays, non-school weekdays and school weekdays, non-school weekdays and school weekdays, non-school weekdays and weekdays, non-school weekdays and Saturdays. Saturdays. This number is then multiplied by the Saturdays. This number is then multiplied by the Saturdays. This number is then multiplied by This number is then multiplied by the number of number of days in each category. number of days in each category. the number of days in each category. days in each category. From Existing Cond. Report From Existing Cond. Report Calculated by dividing the actual frequency of each route by the round trip running time Calculated by dividing the actual frequency of each route by the round trip running time Calculated using the estimated Revenue Service Hours and Transfort's Variable Cost/Revenue Hour from 2002 of $64.46 Calculated using the estimated Revenue Service Hours and Transfort's Variable Cost/Revenue Hour from 2002 of $64.46 Calculated using the estimated Revenue Service Hours and Transfort's Variable Cost/Revenue Hour from 2002 of $64.46 Calculated using the estimated Revenue Service Hours and Transfort's Variable Cost/Revenue Hour from 2002 of $64.46 proposed routes by the round trip running time (including recovery) proposed routes by the round trip running time (including recovery) Estimates are in constant 2002 Dollars!