F.1 ENHANCED FISCALLY CONSTRAINED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
|
- Agatha Polly Atkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 APPENDIX F
2 F.0 APPENDIX F F.1 ENHANCED FISCALLY CONSTRAINED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Recognizing the limitations of the fiscally constrained CIP discussed in Section 7.5, an enhanced fiscally constrained CIP was developed. The enhanced fiscally constrained CIP assumes that some form of dedicated funding would be identified for transportation in Fort Collins. It is important to note that the funding scenario used to develop the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP is one of an infinite number of scenarios that could be implemented to identify additional funding for transportation projects. The process used to develop the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP follows exactly the process that was used to develop the fiscally constrained CIP. F.1.1 Funding Scenario The funding approach assumes that the funds identified in the fiscally constrained CIP are still available and that the new funds would be additional to those previously identified. The funding scenario for the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP includes: 0.25 percent sales tax rate increase for the Pavement Management Program 0.25 percent sales tax increase for additional transportation capital projects $1,000,000 annual contribution from the General Fund starting in 2005 Increases in the Street Oversizing Fee schedule Implementing a Transportation Maintenance Fee of $0.10 per trip per month Please note that none of the strategies have been approved by voters or City Council, they are being used only as a means to evaluate the potential of identifying a dedicated funding source for transportation projects. Table F.18 identifies the additional funding that would be available for transportation capital projects. Appendix E contains more detailed information on how the revenues were developed. Table F.18 Additional Forecasted Revenues to Fund Transportation Capital s between 2004 and 2025 (2003 dollars) Revenue Source Additional Revenues (2003 dollars) 0.25 percent for transportation capital $172,850,000 General Fund Contribution $25,500,000 Street Oversizing Fee increase $31,150,000 Transportation Maintenance Fee $27,800,000 Total $257,300,000 The additional capital was distributed by mode according to the amounts and percentages shown in Table F.19. F-1
3 Table F.19 Distribution of Additional Transportation Capital by Mode (2003 dollars) Transportation Mode Capital (2003 dollars) Percentage of Total Streets $166,590,000 65% Transit $27,100,000 11% Bicycle (includes part of MTC) $10,300,000 4% Pedestrian $5,710,000 2% Rail Crossings $34,100,000 13% Parking $9,500,000 4% ATMS $4,000,000 2% Total $257,300, % The process of developing the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP began with funding projects by mode based on the distribution shown in Table F.18. This process was continued until all capital dollars were exhausted in each mode. In some cases, higher priority projects were not funded because sufficient funds were not available. Figure F.12 shows the projects in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP. It is interesting to note that as compared to the fiscally constrained CIP, there are several intersections and other facilities that could not be built internal to the City. lists for each mode are contained in the following sections. F-2
4 Figure F.12 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained s
5 F.1.2 Streets The list of street projects for the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP began with breaking out the cost of each project by who would contribute to the. s were allocated in four categories: development direct contribution, street oversizing fees, city capital, and state or Federal funds. s were then matched to available funding until the revenues were exhausted. Many of the street projects that were funded also included the accompanying pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Table F.20 shows the list of street projects in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP including the overall project rank and the projects are also shown graphically in Figure F.12. Table F.20 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained CIP s - Streets Location From To Facility Type Priority Category 1 R132 C1 Timberline Drake Prospect 4 lane arterial $11,400,000 High 1 2 R46 B Harmony Seneca College 4 lane arterial $7,500,000 High 2 Overall Ranking 3 R47 B Harmony Lemay Timberline 6 lane arterial $8,700,000 High 2 4 R117 Shields Elizabeth $4,000,000 High 2 5 R127 Taft Hill Elizabeth $4,000,000 High 2 6 R22 College Prospect $4,000,000 High 6 7 R21 College Drake $4,000,000 High 6 8 R71 Lemay Lincoln Conifer 4 lane arterial $23,000,000 High 8 9 R48 Harmony Mason $4,000,000 High 8 10 R156 Taft Hill Horsetooth $3,000,000 High R11 C College Fossil Creek Harmony 6 lane arterial $8,700,000 High R47 C Harmony Timberline Ziegler 6 lane arterial $6,675,000 High R47 D Harmony Ziegler I-25 6 lane arterial $10,680,000 High R69 Lemay Drake $4,000,000 High R104 B Prospect Summit View I-25 4 lane arterial $4,000,000 High R17 College Harmony $4,000,000 High R128 Taft Hill LaPorte $3,000,000 High R27 College Willox $3,000,000 High R12 A College Vine Conifer 4 lane arterial $8,000,000 High R47 A Harmony College Lemay 6 lane arterial $8,700,000 High R68 Lemay Horsetooth 22 R42 Elizabeth Overland Trail 23 R49 Harmony Ziegler 24 R19 College Horsetooth 25 R23 College Mulberry $3,000,000 High 15 Taft Hill 2 lane minor arterial $3,337,500 High 22 $2,000,000 High 23 $4,000,000 High 24 $4,000,000 High 24 F-4
6 26 R2 Location From To Facility Type Annual Capital (bridges,, and RR upgrades) 27 R67 Lemay Harmony 28 R106 Prospect Lemay Minor street and intersection (, bridges, railroads) Priority Category Overall Ranking $13,200,000 High 26 $4,000,000 Medium 27 $4,000,000 Medium R103 Prospect College Lemay 4 lane arterial $8,000,000 Medium R80 Mountain Meldrum College 2 lane minor arterial $750,000 Medium R124B Taft Hill Harmony Horsetooth 4 lane arterial $4,000,000 Medium R114 C Shields Fossil Creek Harmony 4 lane arterial $6,500,000 Medium R59 JFK Troutman $2,000,000 Medium R119 Shields LaPorte $3,000,000 Medium R129 Taft Hill Mulberry $2,000,000 Medium R70 Lemay Riverside $2,000,000 Medium R20 College Swallow $2,000,000 Medium R89 Mulberry Summit View $3,000,000 Medium R65 Lemay Carpenter $2,000,000 Medium R52 B Horsetooth Taft Hill Shields 4 lane arterial $4,000,000 Medium R66 Lemay Trilby $3,000,000 Medium R118 Shields Mulberry $2,000,000 Medium R64 Laurel College $4,000,000 Medium R144 US 287 State Highway 1 GMA 4 lane arterial $4,000,000 Medium R102 Prospect Overland Trail Taft Hill 4 lane arterial $6,000,000 Medium R132 E1 Timberline Mulberry 4 lane arterial and Mountain intersection Vista $22,000,000 Medium R16 College Skyway $2,000,000 Medium R85 A Mulberry Riverside Timberline 6 lane arterial $16,020,000 Medium R85 B Mulberry Timberline Summit View 6 lane arterial $1,668,750 Medium D1 Timberline Prospect Mulberry 4 lane arterial $16,000,000 Medium R57 Jefferson Linden $2,000,000 Medium R10 B Carpenter Lemay Timberline 4 lane arterial $4,005,000 Medium R10 D Carpenter County Road 9 I-25 4 lane arterial $4,005,000 Medium R151 A Ziegler Rock Creek Harmony 4 lane arterial $500,000 Medium R41 Drake Timberline Rigden Pkwy 2 lane minor arterial $1,335,000 Medium R151 B Ziegler Harmony Horsetooth 4 lane arterial $1,000,000 Medium R53 Horsetooth Ziegler Strauss Cabin Rd 2 lane collector $2,670,000 Medium R82 Mountain Vista Timberline I-25 4 lane arterial $10,012,000 Medium R98 Overland Trail Drake $2,000,000 Medium 59 F-5
7 Location From To Facility Type 60 R164 Timberline Horsetooth 61 R18 College Boardwalk 62 R26 College Monroe 63 R63 LaPorte College 64 R29 Conifer Extension Priority Category Overall Ranking $2,000,000 Medium 59 $2,000,000 Medium 59 $2,000,000 Medium 59 $2,000,000 Medium 59 Lemay Timberline 2 lane minor arterial $3,200,000 Medium R146 A Vine College Lemay 4 lane arterial $8,010,000 Medium R146 B Vine Lemay Timberline 4 lane arterial $6,007,500 Medium R96 C Overland Trail Prospect Mulberry 4 lane arterial $4,005,000 Medium R11 A College Carpenter Trilby 6 lane arterial $10,680,000 Medium R10 C Carpenter Timberline County Road 9 4 lane arterial $4,005,000 Medium R11 B College Trilby Fossil Creek 6 lane arterial $10,680,000 Medium R39 Drake Overland Trail Hampshire 4 lane arterial $2,000,000 Medium R150 Ziegler Kechter Road Rock Creek 2 lane minor arterial $1,335,000 Medium R33 A County Road 52 County County Route 11 Route 9 2 lane minor arterial $2,670,000 Medium 66 Total $358,595,750 F.1.3 Transit Transit capital revenues from the Transit Services Fund are sufficient to fund through Scenario 4 of the Transfort Strategic Plan including the Mason Transportation Corridor. Table F.21 shows the list of transit projects in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP. These projects are also shown graphically in Figure F.12. Table F.21 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained CIP s Transit Transit Services/Capital Service Type/ Description Capital Strategic Plan Scenario 1 1 TC1 New/Replacement Vehicles $3,091,031 2 TC2 Shelters (Passenger Amenities) $68,750 3 TC3 Technology Improvements $424,000 4 TC4 Facilities - Maintenance/Repair $303,220 5 TC5 Planning $150,000 6 TC6 Bus Stop Access Modifications ADA Accessibility Improvements $69,480 Strategic Plan Scenario 2 7 TC7 New/Replacement Vehicles $4,613,000 8 TC7a Replacement Paratransit Buses 9 TC7b Service Vehicles/Pool Vehicles 10 TC8 Shelters (Passenger Amenities) $107, TC9 Technology Improvements $717, TC10 Facilities - Maintenance/Repair $720,477 F-6
8 Transit Services/Capital Service Type/ Description Capital 13 TC11 Bus Stop Access Modifications ADA Accessibility Improvements $69, TC12 Facilities - New Construction $24,496, Mason Transportation Corridor $65,950,000 Strategic Plan Scenario 3 16 TC14 New/Replacement Vehicles Replacement Fixed Route Buses $1,953, TC15 Bus Stop Access Modifications ADA Accessibility Improvements $69, TC16 Shelters (Passenger Amenities) Signage at Bus Stops $75, TC17 Technology Improvements $537, TC18 Facilities - Maintenance/Repair $702,321 Strategic Plan Scenario 4 21 TC19 New/Replacement Vehicles $2,151, TC20 Bus Stop Access Modifications $69, TC21 Shelters (Passenger Amenities) Signage at Bus Stops $75, TC22 Technology Improvements $193, TC23 Facilities - Maintenance/Repair $61,804 Long Range Plan 26 TC24 Replacement Buses (2015) $3,026, TC25 Replacement Buses (2018) $6,323, TC26 Replacement Buses (2022) $6,781,316 Total $106,668,347 F.1.4 Bicycle Several stand-alone bicycle projects are funded in the enhanced CIP and even more projects are funded by the corresponding street projects. There were a few projects that were not included in the initial estimate for the Mason Transportation Corridor that were funded the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP. Table F.21 shows the list of bicycle projects in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP including the overall project rank and the projects are also shown graphically in Figure F.12. Table F.21 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained CIP s Bicycle Location From To Facility Type 1 B31a Mason Fossil Creek Trail Harmony Bike trail by BCC 2 B31b Mason Harmony Horsetooth Bike trail by BCC 3 B31c Mason Horsetooth Drake Bike trail by BCC F-7
9 Location From To Facility Type 4 B31d Mason Drake Spring Creek Bike trail by BCC 5 B31e Mason Spring Creek Trail Prospect Bike trail and pass with MTC 6 B31f Mason Prospect Laurel Bike lanes/ sidewalks in MTC 7 B31g Mason Laurel Cherry Bike lanes/ sidewalks in MTC 8 B31h Mason Troutman Grade separated P62/RR16 $1,500,000 9 B31i Mason NRRC Employment/ CSU Vet Campus Grade separated $1,200, B31j Mason Harmony Grade separated $2,400, B31k Mason Horsetooth Grade separated $2,100, B31l Mason Drake Grade separated RR5 $2,100, B3 Campus West/Elizabeth Shields City Park Elizabeth and Plum 14 B10 College Vine Conifer Bike lanes R12A/R12B 15 B20 Jefferson Street P26 in 2003 Mountain College Bike lanes - $500, B57 College Carpenter Harmony Bike lanes R11A/R11B/R11C 17 B12 Elizabeth Overland Trail Taft Hill Bike lanes R42 18 B38 Mountain Meldrum Riverside Bike lanes Part in R80 $500, B64 Harmony BNSF tracks College Bike lanes R46 20 B65 Harmony Cinquefoil Lane Strauss Bike lanes R47D Cabin 21 B56 Carpenter Lemay Timberline Bike lanes R10 22 B72 Prospect Summit View I-25 Bike lanes R104A/R104B/ R104C F-8
10 Location From To Facility Type 23 B81 Vine Lemay Timberline Bike lanes R146B 24 B58 Cooper Slough Mulberry Underpass (P19) 25 B66 Horsetooth Ziegler Strauss Cabin Bike lanes R53 pedestrian Total $10,300,000 F.1.5 Pedestrian Several stand-alone pedestrian projects are funded in the enhanced CIP and even more projects are funded by the corresponding street projects. Table F.22 shows the list of pedestrian projects in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP including the overall project rank and the projects are also shown graphically in Figure F.12. Table F.22 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained CIP s - Pedestrian Location To From Facility Type 1 P26 Elizabeth City Park Shields Sidewalk (B3) in P9 College Carpenter Trilby Sidewalks R11A County 3 P10 College Trilby Fossil Creek Pkwy Sidewalks R11B County 4 P24 Drake Research Dr Electrical Substation Sidewalks in P31 Harmony JFK Boardwalk Sidewalks R47A County 6 P32 Harmony Rock Creek Condos 7 P8 College Vine Lemay Sidewalks in 2003 State Highway 1 Sidewalks R12A/R12B 8 P59 Stanford Horsetooth Monroe Sidewalks in P63 UPRR Trilby Under/overpass RR15 $1,000, P7 College Vine Woodlawn Sidewalks R12A 11 P33 Harmony Boardwalk Lemay Sidewalks R47A 12 P42 Linden Jefferson Buckingham Sidewalks R77 $200, P13 College Foothills Pkwy Monroe Sidewalks in P29 Harmony Shields Starflower Sidewalks $65, P47 MTC Various Neighborhood connections 16 P45 Mason Laurel Pedestrian 17 P4 Cherry Howes College Sidewalks $50, P34 Horsetooth Taft Hill Shields Sidewalks R52B 19 P14 College Swallow, Harvard Improvements $35,000 F-9
11 Location To From Facility Type 20 P67 Vine Linden Lemay Sidewalks $210, P39 Lemay Lincoln Vine Sidewalks R71 22 P1 Alta Vista Sidewalks $1,200, P36 LaPorte Sunset Taft Hill Sidewalks R62A $200, P41 Lincoln Riverside Lemay Sidewalks $200, P64 Vine Taft Hill Lyons Sidewalks R145B $300, P19 Cooper Slough Mulberry Underpass B58 County 27 P30 Harmony College Boardwalk Sidewalks R47A County 28 P49 Mulberry City Park Shields Sidewalks R86 29 P18 College Frontage Harvard Drake Sidewalks $50,000 Road 30 P61 Timberline Caribou Underpass $1,200, P11 College Fossil Creek Harmony Sidewalks R11C Pkwy 32 P65 Vine College Linden Sidewalks R146A 33 P35 JFK Pkwy Bockman Horsetooth Sidewalks $50, P37 Laurel Stover Endicott Sidewalks $50, P60 Taft Hill Trail access ramp $210, P38 Lemay Rule Drive Oakridge Drive Sidewalks $50, P25 Drake Brookwood RR Sidewalks $140, P3 Boardwalk Harmony Whalers Sidewalks $50, P66 Vine Lemay Timberline Shoulder R146B pavement 40 P62 Troutman BNSF rail line Bike/pedestrian RR16 pass 41 P43 Manhattan South of Horsetooth Sidewalks $100, P40 Lemay Parkwood subdivision Sidewalks $120, P57 Riverside Mulberry Mountain Sidewalks R109 $230, P51 Pedestrian Plan, ADA Ramps and Crossing Improvements 45 P46 Mason RR spur Cherry Sidewalks 46 P28 Harmony West of Regency Sidewalks R46B with Capital Total $5,710,000 F.1.6 Rail Crossings Several rail s projects are included in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP. Some of these projects are stand-alone projects and some are included as part of street projects. Table F.23 shows the list of rail projects in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP including the overall project rank and the projects are also shown graphically in Figure F.12. F-10
12 Table F.23 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained CIP s Rail Crossings 1 RR1 Route/Facility From To Annual RR improvement program Service Type/ Description R2 Priority High 2 RR4 Downtown BNSF s High $900,000 3 RR5 Drake Mason RR grade separation (B35) High $10,000,000 4 RR8 Lake Mason RR High $150,000 5 RR9 Lemay Vine 6 RR13 Timberline Vine 7 RR16 Troutman Parkway RR grade separation RR grade separation Grade separation or (R71) High High $15,000,000 (B32) Medium $8,000,000 Total $34,050,000 F.1.7 Parking Phase 1 of the Downtown Strategic Plan and the Mulberry park-n-ride would be funded the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP. Four other projects would be funded as part of the MTC. These funding assumptions do not include any private participation in funding the and are thus considered conservative. Table F.24 shows the list of parking projects in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP including the overall project rank and the projects are also shown graphically in Figure F.12. F-11
13 Table F.24 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained CIP s Parking Parking Facility Name Location Service Type/ Description Overall Ranking 1 PK2a Downtown Strategic Plan Phase 1 Downtown Parking $8,500, PK4 Mulberry PNR Mulberry/I-25 New park and ride facility $1,000, PK3 South Transit Center Harmony/College New transit center 3 4 PK5 Horsetooth PNR Horsetooth/Mason New park and ride facility 5 5 PK6 Drake PNR Drake/Mason New park and ride facility 6 6 PK7 Troutman PNR Troutman/Mason New park and ride facility 11 Total $9,500,000 F.1.8 ATMS Both of the remaining ATMS projects are funded the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP. Table G.25 highlights these projects and they are also shown graphically in Figure F.12. Table F.25 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained CIP s ATMS Name/Location 1 TSM138 Streets Facility Expansion - de-icing $2,000,000 2 TSM161 Traffic Operations Management Center Expansion $2,000,000 Total $4,000,000 F-12
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Pedestrian Roadway Facilities. DOT HS , April 2003.
Appendices Appendix A References Federal Highway Administration Bicycle and Pedestrian Program: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bikeped/ The Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center (PBIC) http://www.walkinginfo.org/main
More informationUS287 Asset Inventory Fort Collins. Figure 5-1 Fort Collins Bridges and Traffic Signals
Chapter 5: City of Fort Collins US287 through Fort Collins is known as College Avenue, runs for approximately 9.25 miles, and bisects the City north to south. Within the City, US287 is a principal arterial.
More informationUS287 Asset Inventory Loveland. Figure 6-1 Loveland Bridges and Traffic Signals
Chapter 6: City of Loveland US287 extends for approximately 13.1 miles through the City of Loveland. Between the northern City boundary and 29 th Street, the road is labeled Garfield Avenue, before transitioning
More informationAppendix B. Existing Transfort System Route Profiles
Transfort Strategic Operating Plan Update Transfort Technical Report Appendix B Existing Transfort System Route Profiles August 29 Route 1 College Route 1 operates south from DTC on College to the South
More informationNon-Motorized Transportation 7-1
Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1 Transportation facilities no longer mean just accommodating a vehicle powered by a combustion engine. Pedestrian and non-motorized facilities are important modes of travel
More informationDraft MOBILITY ELEMENET. Community Meeting May 22, 2013
Draft MOBILITY ELEMENET Community Meeting May 22, 2013 Agenda Presentation Ira Brown New Mobility Paradigm Movement of People Implementation Q&A Ira Brown and Dave Roseman Small Group Discussion at Each
More informationTRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010
TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS April 6, 2010 Roles of Transportation Providers Context and Policy Makers Division of Transportation and Traffic Other City Operations Other Transportation Operators CMA
More informationFROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04
TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04 SUBJECT: FINANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC
More informationUPDATE TO THE FORT COLLINS BICYCLE PLAN & PROGRAM
UPDATE TO THE FORT COLLINS BICYCLE PLAN & PROGRAM July 12, 2007 Executive Summary Introduction In 1995, the Fort Collins Bicycle Plan and Program was developed by a group of citizens in conjunction with
More informationSTATION #3 INITIAL ALTERNATIVES
www.dot.il.gov www.eisenhowerexpressway.com STATIO #3 IHB RR Heavy Rail Transit (HRT) High capacity transit mode serving urban areas:» Steel wheeled, high performance electric powered rail vehicles» Right-of-way
More informationCorpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:
Introduction: The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) has continued the efforts started through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency
More informationT1-A - Service Reduction (Re-sizing)
Key T1-A Choice A Key T1-B Choice B Key T1-C Choice C Key T1-D Choice D Key T1-E Choice E Key T1-F Choice F Key Choice G T2 T1-A - Service Reduction (Re-sizing) Description This key choice would represent
More informationBICYCLE FACILITIES FULL BUILD PLAN
KIMBALL RD ROCKY RD CYPRESS DR CITY PARK AVE S SHIELDS ST CONSTITUTION AVE S TAFT HILL RD S OVERLAND TRL HILLCREST DR SKYLINE DR MOBY DR CRAGMORE DR CASTLEROCK DR MEADOWBROOK DR S BRYAN AVE BICYCLE FACILITIES
More informationMOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.
CHAPTER NINE: TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 9.1 INTRODUCTION 9.1 9.2 ASSUMPTIONS 9.1 9.3 TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 9.1 9.4 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.3 LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES Figure
More informationWelcome to the Quebec Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting
Welcome to the Public Meeting Please sign in. Public Comment Please fill out a comment card and tell us what you think. Check back or comment any time at: www.quebecalternatives.com Project Area Technical
More informationChapter 6 Transportation Plan
Chapter 6 Transportation Plan Transportation Plan Introduction Chapter 6 Transportation Plan Transportation Plan Introduction This chapter describes the components of Arvada s transportation system, comprised
More informationin the pop-up survey after drawing it. UPLOAD PHOTOS when you add a route or point or by clicking on an existing route or point.
Introduction As part of the first phase for the West Elizabeth Enhanced Travel Corridor Plan an online interactive map WikiMap was created and available for input. A link to the WikiMap was distributed
More informationSR-203 Sidewalks and Town-Wide Mobility Improvements. Town Council Presentation September 7, 2016
SR-203 Sidewalks and Town-Wide Mobility Improvements Town Council Presentation September 7, 2016 SR-203 Sidewalks and Town- Wide Mobility Improvements SR-203 Sidewalks and Appurtenances Town-Wide Mobility
More informationSection Access Control Plan - SH 14 (Mulberry Street)
US 287/SH 14 Access Management Report Section 5.0 - Access Control Plan - SH 14 (Mulberry Street) Page 92 US 287/SH 14 Access Management Report Section 5.0 - Access Control Plan - SH 14 (Mulberry Street)
More informationWalking Survey Results, 2010
Walking Survey Results, 2010 1. Where are your top three favorite places to be a pedestrian in Fort Collins? Generally where Specifically Where count Oldtown 186 Downtown 51 Mountian Avenue 6 Oak Street
More informationBus Rapid Transit Plans
Twin Cities Region Bus Rapid Transit Plans ULI Minnesota Workshop Connecting Bus Rapid Transit to the Community December 15, 2009 John Levin Director of Service Development Metro Transit Metropolitan Area
More information5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES
5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES These guidelines should be considered collectively when making runningway decisions. A runningway is the linear component of the transit system that forms the right-of-way reserved
More information3.0 ACCESS CONTROL PLAN - HARMONY ROAD (SH68)
3.0 ACCESS CONTROL PLAN - HARMONY ROAD (SH68) 3.1 Existing Conditions Roadway Physical Characteristics Typical Section The existing typical cross-section for SH68 is shown on Figure 3-1 and is comprised
More informationPrince George s County plans, policies, and projects
Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects Over 250 projects for trails, bikeways, designated bike lanes and sidewalk construction Trail projects that improve access to Metro Sidewalk and trail
More informationBluffdale/ UDOT South High-T Intersection Project Type Operations
Bluffdale/ UDOT 14600 South High-T Intersection Project Type Operations 14600 South and Redwood Road $ 600,000 $ 550,000 This project is to install a new High-T intersection at Redwood Road and 14600 South
More informationCITY OF PORTSMOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF PORTSMOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: JOHN P. BOHENKO, CITY MANAGER FROM: JULIET T.H. WALKER, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: BICYCLE / PEDESTRIAN PLAN PROGRESS UPDATE DATE: 3/13/2018 Background
More informationFY Regional Transportation Improvement Program
FY2014-2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Basic Project List (All Values in Thousands of Dollars) All costs in current dollars Project Name Key # Year Project Cost 10th Avenue Bridge, Caldwell
More informationDraft Recommended List of Potential Projects
Draft Recommended List of Potential Projects To Pursue Using the GID Fund Recommendations are based on results of public outreach, City Council discussion, and staff evaluation of all project ideas identified
More informationMEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year 2016-2017 AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION Agency Name: City of Livermore Date: 12/4/2017 Primary Point of Contact Name: Debbie
More informationChapter 5 Future Transportation
Chapter 5 Future Transportation The Future Land Use Plan identifies the desired land use designations. The land uses desired for Crozet depend, in large part, on the success of the transportation system,
More informationFINAL DRAFT ETC Master Plan. Appendix C Public Input
Appendix C Public Input Summary of Public Input 1 st Round of Public Involvement May 2012 The first public meeting was held at the Spirit of Joy Lutheran Church on Harmony on May 3 rd from 4:00 7:00 PM.
More informationARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY
ARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY DEVELOPED BY THE TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY PLANNING DIVISION OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
More informationBellevue Transportation: Challenges, Opportunities and Priorities Bellevue Downtown Association September 20, 2018
Bellevue Transportation: Challenges, Opportunities and Priorities Bellevue Downtown Association September 20, 2018 Dave Berg Transportation Director City of Bellevue Traffic, traffic and more traffic!
More informationBasalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations
Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations Introduction The Basalt Creek transportation planning effort analyzed future transportation conditions and evaluated alternative strategies for
More informationMetropolitan Council Transportation Committee
Nicollet-Central Transit Alternatives Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee August 2013 Project Purpose (approved by Policy Advisory Committee 10/25/2012) The purpose is to improve transit connectivity,
More informationEngineering - Bicycle and Pedestrian
Capital Improvement Plan Project Summary # Bikeways Program 781,000 860,000 900,000 933,000 933,000 933,000 # Cannonball Path 1,200,000-780,000 - - - # Capital City Trail - 70,000 - - 910,000 - # Goodman
More informationMCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx
MCTC 8 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV.xlsx Madera County Transportation Commission Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy Multi-Modal Project
More informationA Matter of Fairness: ROCOG s Environmental Justice Protocol. What is Mobility Limitation?
No Person Left Behind What is Mobility Limitation? What is the Access Limitation? Environmental Justice population should be provided adequate mobility & access to meet their needs; Identify acceptable
More informationSTUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE. October 8, 2015
STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE October 8, 2015 Study Purpose evaluate the long-term transportation strategies and investments needed to sustain the county s economic health and quality of life in the coming
More information3.0 Future Conditions
3.0 Future Conditions In order to be able to recommend appropriate improvements to the transportation system of the Town, it is important to first understand the nature and volume of traffic that is expected
More informationNeighborhood Walking, Biking, and Transit Tours Summary BACKGROUND
Neighborhood Walking, Biking, and Transit Tours Summary BACKGROUND Six tours were scheduled during the week of May 11, 2015. The intent of the tours was for City Staff to experience the corridor with locals
More informationState Highway 16/McDermott Road Kuna-Mora Road to Ada/Gem County Line
Background State Highway 16 is the main commuter route from Gem County to the Treasure Valley. An increase in traffic and accidents on this highway have been a concern for several years, and the Idaho
More informationState Highway 44/State Street High Capacity Corridor
Background State Highway 44/State Street runs from I-84 in Canyon County through parts of the cities of Middleton, Star, Eagle, and Garden City to downtown Boise. It is a commuter route from several communities
More informationTransportation in Washoe County. Lee Gibson, Executive Director February 15, 2011
Transportation in Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director February 15, 2011 RTC OF WASHOE COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Meet long term needs Deliver federal funding Program projects in
More information95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2
95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan Steering Committee Meeting #2 February 18, 2015 PURPOSE OF THE MEETING Update Steering Committee Present Community/Stakeholder Survey Results Present Transportation
More informationNew Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007
New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007 City Street and County Road Maintenance Program The preservation and keeping of public street and road rights-of-way
More informationSANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008
SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008 To assist VTA and Member Agencies in the planning, development and programming of bicycle improvements in Santa Clara County. Vision Statement To establish,
More informationHennepin County Transportation Department
Hennepin County Transportation Department Complete Streets Design and Implementation Prepared for the Complete Streets Task Force Craig Twinem, P.E. Design Division Manager Tom Johnson, P.E. Transportation
More informationHouma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization STP<200K Funding Application APPLICATION
APPLICATION HOUMA-THIBODAUX METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (HTMPO) FOR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP
More informationCity of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY
A1 Roadway Resurfacing $23,846,000 TYPE: Preservation of existing system Roadway resurfacing A2 Signal Replacement $6,000,000 TYPE: Preservation of existing system Replace traffic signals. B1 W 6th St
More informationACTIA Programs Annual Compliance Report Reporting Year Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Table 1: Summary of Expenditures and Accomplishments
Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Table 1: Summary of Expenditures and Accomplishments Note: Definitions for each drop down menu appear as Comments (scroll over the column title or in the Review mode, choose
More informationProposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017
WELCOME Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017 Purpose of the Open House The purpose of this Open House is to gain public input on the bicycle lanes proposed
More informationAPPENDIX D: SACRAMENTO URBAN AREA TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES
1 County County County County 2 Yolo Arterial Roadway Collector Roadway Urban Residential Street Rural Residential Roadway I-80 / U.S. 50 Bus/Carpool Lanes in both directions Richards Blvd PM Yol 80 0.237
More informationState Highway 16 Kuna-Mora Road to Ada/Gem County Line
Background State Highway 16 is the main commuter route from Gem County to the Treasure Valley. An increase in traffic and accidents on this highway have been a concern for several years, and the Idaho
More informationCHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 16.1 General... 16-1 16.1.1 AASHTO Reference... 16-1 16.1.2 ADA Requirements... 16-1 16.2 Sidewalks...
More information5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN
5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN This chapter describes circulation and streetscape improvements proposed for the Northwest Chico Specific Plan Area. It includes detailed design specifications for existing
More informationHouma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization STP<200K Funding Application APPLICATION
APPLICATION HOUMA-THIBODAUX METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (HTMPO) FOR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP
More informationPurpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need
Chapter 2 Purpose and Need 2.1 Introduction The El Camino Real Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project (Project) would make transit and other transportation improvements along a 17.6-mile segment of the El Camino
More informationState Highway 16 Kuna-Mora Road to Ada/Gem County Line
Background Update! (February 2018): This project has been partially funded; see below. State Highway 16 is the main commuter route from Gem County to the Treasure Valley. An increase in traffic and accidents
More informationActive Transportation Access to Transit
Active Transportation Access to Transit Introduction COMO Connect customers access transit service in many ways, including walking, bicycling, riding in a car and being dropped off, and directly boarding
More information4.0 ACCESS CONTROL PLAN - SH 14 (JEFFERSON STREET/RIVERSIDE AVENUE)
4.1 Existing Conditions Roadway Physical Characteristics Typical Sections Jefferson Street 4.0 ACCESS CONTROL PLAN - SH 14 (JEFFERSON STREET/RIVERSIDE AVENUE) The existing typical cross-section for SH
More informationAttachment One. Integration of Performance Measures Into the Bryan/College Station MPO FY 2019 FY 2022 Transportation Improvement Program
Attachment One Integration of Performance Measures Into the Bryan/College Station MPO FY 2019 FY 2022 Transportation Improvement Program Introduction Begun as part of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the
More informationMulti Modal Transit Access Plan KIPDA ID # 239. Project Type: STUDY
Multi Modal Transit Access Plan KIPDA ID # 239 Project Type: STUDY Description: In conjunction with the results from Project Gobility and the Transit LOS Analysis, TARC seeks to examine the possibilities
More informationSouthwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.
Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary 2011 January 19 1 of 19 Introduction This executive summary presents the results of the Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW
More informationMobility Greater Johnson County Transportation Coalition. May 23, 2018
Mobility 2045 Greater Johnson County Transportation Coalition May 23, 2018 Agenda Regional Perspective Mobility Planning Overview Mobility 2045 Draft Recommendations Financial Planning Overview Schedule
More informationRapidRide Roosevelt Seat Sea t t le t le Depa De r pa t r men men t of Sept T an r sp an or sp t or a t t a ion
RapidRide Roosevelt Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board 1 Our mission, vision, and core values Mission: deliver a high-quality transportation system for Seattle Vision: connected people, places, and products
More informationComprehensive Collection of Stakeholder Alternatives by Mode
2011 Illinois Department of Transportation Comprehensive Collection of Stakeholder Alternatives by Mode October 2009 January 2011 www.dot.il.gov www.eisenhowerexpressway.com FILEY RD FILEY RD IHB RR 2
More informationMAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report
Page 1 MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report August 1, 2012 MAG Project #481 Page 2 Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report Introduction
More informationSUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS
Santa Cruz County 2016 Measure D: Transportation Improvement Expenditure Plan - Approved by over 2/3 of Santa Cruz County voters on November 8, 2016 - Overview Measure D, the 2016 Transportation Improvement
More information5.0 Roadway System Plan
Southwest Boise Transportation Study Page 16 5.0 Roadway System Plan The Roadway System Plan outlines roadway improvements in the Initial Study Area. It forecasts future deficiencies on the arterial system,
More informationFY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices
FY 2017-2026 Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices November 1, 2017 Forecasted Growth Arlington continues to grow with a shift towards multi-family
More informationCottonwood Heights HAWK Pedestrian Crossing on Fort Union Blvd. Project Type Capital Improvement
Cottonwood Heights HAWK Pedestrian Crossing on Fort Union Blvd. At West Side of Mountview Park Entrance (Approx. 1600 East) $ 206,800 $ 192,800 Install a HAWK Pedestrian Crossing System on Fort Union Boulevard,
More informationconnections 2040 the waco metropolitan transportation plan amendment 2
connections 2040 the waco metropolitan transportation plan amendment 2 developed by the waco metropolitan planning organization in cooperation with the following agencies: Adopted December 14, 2017 amendment
More informationSarasota/Manatee MPO Project Priorities 2016 Adopted April 25, 2016
All projects on the following priority lists should be implemented in the priority sequence listed, as consistent with the fiscal constraints identified in the MPO s adopted Long Range Transportation Plan
More informationECONOMY PEOPLE ENVIRONMENT
Report Back on Local Transit Improvements May 29, 2013 ECONOMY PEOPLE ENVIRONMENT Intro Council Requested Report Back Topics Progress on Planning for Broadway Subway False Creek Bridges Local Transit Improvements
More information2018 Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by:
Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by: Overview Methodology Systemwide results Strengths/Weaknesses by mode Importance of possible improvements Conclusions Methodology 500 Chittenden County residents
More informationFOR REFERENCE: Annabelle Berklund Ross Cunniff Staff Liaison: Paul Sizemore
August 15, 2018, 6:00 p.m. 281 North College Ave, Fort Collins, CO FOR REFERENCE: Chair: Eric Shenk Vice Chair: Council Liaison: Annabelle Berklund Ross Cunniff Staff Liaison: Paul Sizemore 970.224.6140
More informationMost Important Part of any Plan
Most Important Part of any Plan Objectives must be evaluated to determine if they have been achieved Achievement of Objectives: 10 of 13 Objectives Achieved 1 not achieved 2 not due yet Transportation
More informationTRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY
TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY ROADWAY SYSTEM There are approximately 40 miles of roadways in Manitou Springs. For planning purposes, roadways are typically assigned a functional classification which defines
More informationEliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %
Traffic Dashboard Priorities Survey Responses Introduction 1) Are you familiar with bus rapid transit (BRT)? a. No, BRT is new to me. 597 23.5% b. I ve heard of BRT, but I don t know much about it. 1,136
More informationAPPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016
APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016 Complete Streets Checklist MetroPlan Orlando s Complete Streets Checklist is an internal planning tool for staff to further implementation of
More informationFreeway System Considerations
Session 11 Jack Broz, PE, HR Green May 5-7, 2010 Freeway System Considerations Mainline Transit: Shoulder Operations, BRT, Stations HOV, HOT, UPA Interchanges Exit Ramps Entrance Ramps Bridges Local Crossings
More informationCITY OF ELKO BICYCLE AND PATHWAY PLAN
CITY OF ELKO BICYCLE AND PATHWAY PLAN INTRODUCTION: The City of Elko is intended to provide the basic framework for the development of a functional bicycle and pathway system for the community with connections
More informationRiNo Railroad Crossing Connectivity Analysis. Stakeholder Workshop June 29, 2017
RiNo Railroad Crossing Connectivity Analysis Stakeholder Workshop June 29, 2017 Ideas and Considerations Presented at Stakeholder Workshop Primary Focus: 38 th Street (between Walnut & Wynkoop) 1 Basic
More informationACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION Mobility 2040 Supported Goals Improve the availability of transportation options for people and goods. Support travel efficiency measures and system enhancements targeted at congestion
More informationComplete Streets Process and Case Study: Taft / McMillian Two-Way Street Conversion Cincinnati, Ohio. Traffic Engineering Workshop June 4, 2014
Complete Streets Process and Case Study: Taft / McMillian Two-Way Street Conversion Cincinnati, Ohio Traffic Engineering Workshop June 4, 2014 Complete Streets Streets that enable safe access for users
More informationCity of White Rock. Strategic Transportation Plan. May 16, 2005
City of White Rock Strategic Transportation Plan May 16, 2005 1 Outline Scope of Plan & Approach Council input and direction Key issues based on existing conditions Range of strategies to consider? Next
More informationFAYETTE COUNTY. Fayette County Active Transportation Profile REGIONAL ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
REGIONAL ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA 1 2 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION AT A GLANCE Trails + Bike Routes 4 miles 73 miles 130 miles 90 miles Parkland Parkland Trail Off Street Trail
More information2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft
2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Summary of Draft Fredericksburg Area Metropolitan Planning Organization The George Washington Region includes the City of Fredericksburg and the counties of Caroline,
More informationIn Collaboration with: City of Belton Cass County FHWA Johnson County KDOT MoDOT City of Olathe City of Overland Park
In Collaboration with: City of Belton Cass County FHWA Johnson County KDOT MoDOT City of Olathe City of Overland Park I. Background During the Johnson County Board of County Commissioner s (JCBOCC) meeting
More informationDRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN
DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN DEVELOPED BY THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DIVISION OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL
More informationWest Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road
West Dimond Blvd Jodhpur St to Sand Lake CSS Transportation Project Summary Municipality of Anchorage Project # 05 005 Project Manager: John Smith, P.E. (MOA PM&E) Project Administrator: Julie Makela,
More informationAGENDA ITEM NO. 5b HCAOG TAC meeting of May 8, 2014
Humboldt County Association of Governments Eureka, CA, 95501 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5b HCAOG TAC meeting of May 8, 2014 DATE: May 1, 2014 TO: HCAOG Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) FROM:, SUBJECT: Letters of
More informationADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX
ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX May 24, 2009 Pedestrian Demand Index for State Highway Facilities Revised: May 29, 2007 Introduction
More informationFUNDING SOURCES CHAPTER 6
CHAPTER 6 6.1 BICYCLE 6.1.1 Local 6.1.2 Regional 6.1.3 State 6.1.4 Federal 6.1.5 Public Facilities 6.1.6 Bicycle Registration and Licensing Fees 6.1.7 Summary Table 6.1 of Bicycle Funding Sources 6 2 6.2
More informationCity of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015
City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015 McPhail Transportation Planning Services Ltd. AGENDA 6:00 7:00 pm Viewing Boards / Q & A with the Team 7:00 7:50
More informationOTO BIKE/PED PLAN REPORT
OTO BIKE/PED PLAN REPORT 6/30/2012 Implementation in FY2012 This report outlines the bike/ped accomplishments related to the OTO Bike/Ped Plan. Activities occurring during the 2012 Fiscal Year, July 1,
More information% of Sales Tax (net of Admin) First Year Amount. Metro State of Good Repair 2% $ 17 $ 350 $ 910 $ 1,140 $ 2,400
Attachment A Proposed One-Half Cent Sales Tax for Transportation Outline of Expenditure Categories 40-s: Fiscal (FY ) 2018-2057, Escalated Dollars (millions) DRAFT Program % of Sales Tax (net of Admin)
More informationTRASBURG RANSPORTATION
TRASBURG RANSPORTATION LAN DEVELOPED BY THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DIVISION OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
More informationClackamas County Comprehensive Plan
ROADWAYS The County s road system permits the movement of goods and people between communities and regions, using any of a variety of modes of travel. Roads provide access to virtually all property. They
More information