CLARKSBURG PREMIUM OUTLETS AT CABIN BRANCH LOCAL AREA TRANSPORTATION REVIEW EXEMPTION STATEMENT

Similar documents
Bradford s Landing. Preliminary Plan Abandonment AB753 & AB754 MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

MEMORANDUM. Matt Folden, AICP, MNCPPC Rebecca Torma, MCDOT. Nancy Randall, AICP, PTP Barbara Mosier, P.E., PTOE Kevin Berger

Ownership Lots 17 & 18 (Part of Lot 14), Montgomery Auto Sales Park

RCCG Jesus House. Preliminary Plan # TRAFFIC STUDY. Prepared for: RCCG Jesus House Montgomery County, Maryland

Appendix B. Transportation Analysis. B.1 Summary. East Nassau Employment Center DSAP

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION

VTA Development Review Program Annual Report for 2015

Bridge Street Corridor Study Report

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

CITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION

FINAL Albertville Business Park AUAR Update Traffic Study

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. October 15, Mr. Bruce McBride Project Delivery Analysts, LLC Shawnee Street Moorpark, CA 93021

Pedestrian Activity Criteria. PSAC March 8, 2011

3.0 Future Conditions

Appendix G: Bicycle Parking Space Recommendations at Transit Stations

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

INNER LOOP EAST. AIA Rochester Annual Meeting November 13, 2013 TRANSFORMATION PROJECT. Bret Garwood, NBD Erik Frisch, DES

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

SPRINGFIELD REVITALIZATION REPORT

CHILDREN S HOSPITAL MIMP

tattersall park RBY EBSCO RETAIL PROPERTIES

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

Heartland Town Square

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Prepared For: Shieldbay Developments Inc. c/o Matson, McConnell Ltd. 2430A Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario M6S 1P9.

Appendix B - Street Sections

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

City of Ottawa s Complete Streets Approach to Transportation Projects

Feasibility Study of Pedestrian Crossings Along Route 7, East of Cascades Parkway and West of Dranesville Road. October 3, 2017

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

7 June 2018 OUR REF:

Project Description Form 8EE

Base Information. 1. Project Title Erie Parkway and WCR 7 Traffic Signal Project

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd.

Presentation Comments and Questions

Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, North Carolina

Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates. Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP

List of Exhibits...ii

International Physical Activity Prevalence Study SELF-ADMINISTERED ENVIRONMENTAL MODULE

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

ALPHARETTA, GA FOR LEASE

February 10, 2015 Project: P

7 NE 145TH STREET STATION TOD POTENTIAL

Ref. No February 19, Ms. Ashley Blissett, P. Eng., Senior Development Engineer City of Halifax PO Box 1749 HALIFAX NS B3J 3A5

Traffic Impact Statement

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Introduction

CHAPTER 3. Transportation and Circulation

San Jose Transportation Policy

SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS

Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for:

Title VI Fare Change Equity Analysis

Anniedale- Tynehead NCP Best Practices in Transportation Planning Summary

2017 Northwest Arkansas Trail Usage Monitoring Report

RIVERSIDE, Newton MA BH NORMANDY RIVERSIDE LLC. Riverside Station. A green, transit-oriented community

DOWNTOWN TUPELO MAIN STREET: ROAD DIET STUDY

Traffic Impact Memorandum. May 22, 2018

3.9 Recreational Trails and Natural Areas

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

McLEAN CITIZENS ASSOCIATION

Topics To Be Covered. Summarize Tier 2 Council Direction Discuss Mill and Ash Alternatives Next Steps

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS FOR THE VILLAGE GREEN MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT

APPENDIX L: COST ESTIMATING TOOLS

Planning Regionally With Transit

PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina

Town of Superior. Superior Trails Plan

OPEN HOUSE WELCOME Bronte Village Growth Area Review

FAIRFIELD - RYAN S CORNER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LOUDOUN COUNTY, VIRGINIA

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS

Technical Memorandum TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. RIDLEY ROAD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, VA. Prepared for: Mr. David Williams.

DeLand. DeBary. Sanford/SR 46. Lake Mary. Longwood Altamonte Springs. Maitland. Winter Park/Park Avenue

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Built Environment and Older Adults: Supporting Smooth Transitions Across the Life- Span. Dr. Lawrence Frank, Professor and Bombardier UBC

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

Contents. Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Stop Placement Guidelines

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Atlanta Braves Stadium and Mixed- Use Development

Traffic Assessment for Woodhaven Redevelopment. City of Rome Oneida County, New York. March 2, 2018

TAKOMA METRO STATION

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

Built Environment Childhood Obesity Forum September 15, 2010

APPENDIX I: ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND PROJECT CONSISTENCY STANDARDS

Transcription:

CLARKSBURG PREMIUM OUTLETS AT CABIN BRANCH LOCAL AREA TRANSPORTATION REVIEW EXEMPTION STATEMENT May 12, 2014

CLARKSBURG PREMIUM OUTLETS AT CABIN BRANCH TRANSPORTATION REVIEW EXEMPTION STATEMENT MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................... 1 Figure 1 - Site Location.................................... 2 Table 1 - Land Use Program Comparison.................... 3 Trip Generation Analysis......................................... 4 Table 2 - Trip Generation (2004 LATR)........................ 5 Table 3 - Clarksburg Premium Outlet Trip Generation Analysis and Comparison.............. 6 Conclusions.................................................... 7 Page

INTRODUCTION This document provides information that demonstrates and justifies the traffic conditions that exempts the Clarksburg Premium Outlets at Cabin Branch from preparation of a Local Area Transportation Review (LATR) and Transportation Policy Area Review (TPAR). The Clarksburg Premium Outlets are part of, and integral to, the commercial development of the approved Cabin Branch Community. Cabin Branch is a comprehensively planned, mixed-use, transit-oriented, and pedestrian-friendly community on approximately 535-acres. The community is located west of the I- 270/Maryland 121 (Clarksburg Road) interchange in the Clarksburg policy area of Montgomery County, Maryland, as shown on Figure 1. The overall project includes 1,886 households and 2,420,000 square feet of commercial space. The Premium Outlets portion of the project changed 364,000 square feet of Medical and Research & Development uses to retail. With these changes, 484,000 total square feet of retail space would be provided with 450,000 square feet allocated to the Outlet Center and the remaining 34,000 square feet, allocated to neighborhood retail space. The retail space accounts for twenty percent (20%) of the total commercial space approved with the project. Table 1 illustrates the changes noted in comparison to the Phase II LATR completed November 2004.

Table 1 Cabin Branch with Outlet (Build-out) Land Use Program Comparison Land Use Units 2004 2014 Change Residential Single Family Detached D.U. 792 938 146 Townhouses D.U. 655 581-74 Multi-Family D.U. 439 367-72 Residential Subtotal D.U. 1,886 1,886 - Service/Public Use (S/P) Elderly Housing D.U. 500 500 - Total Residential Plus Service/Public Use D.U. 2,386 2,386 - Commercial/Employment Retail S.F. 120,000 34,000-86,000 Outlet Center S.F. - 450,000 450,000 Retail Subtotal 120,000 484,000 364,000 General Office R&D Space Medical Use (Hospital) Hotel S.F. 622,000 622,000 - S.F. 1,230,500 1,226,500-4,000 S.F. 360,000 - -360,000 S.F. 87,500 87,500 - Employment (Non-Retail) Subtotal S.F. 2,300,000 1,936,000-364,000 Total Commercial/Employment Space S.F. 2,420,000 2,420,000-3

TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS The number of trips that will be generated by the approved Cabin Branch project were estimated based on standard MNCPPC and Institute of Transportation (ITE) trip generation rates. The development program included 1,886 total households, 500 elderly housing units, and 2,420,000 square feet of commercial space. The approved development program would generate approximately 3,671 total AM peak hour trips and 3,943 total PM peak hour trips, as shown on Table 2. To demonstrate that traffic conditions with the proposed Clarksburg Premium Outlets at Cabin Branch are within those trips generated previously, the proposed development program trips were estimated. The number of trips that will be generated by the proposed project were estimated using the same methodology as approved, except 364,000 square feet of commercial space (Medical and Research & Development uses) would be allocated to Outlet Center space for a total of 484,000 square feet of retail space. The Clarksburg Premium Outlets at Cabin Branch development program would generate 3,277 total AM peak hour trips and 3,465 total PM peak hour trips, as shown on Table 5. In comparison to the approved development program, the proposed development program would generate 394 fewer (-11%) AM peak hour trips and 499 fewer (-13%) PM peak hour trips as shown on the bottom of Table 3. Based on this trip generation analysis completed, the proposed project would fall within the trip allocation previously analyzed in the November 2004 LATR for Cabin Branch. This analysis confirms the Traffic Exemption requirement of less than 30 new weekday peak hour trips for LATR and less than three (3) trips for TPAR as noted in the January 2013 LATR and TPAR Guidelines. In addition, since the trip generation analysis indicates the proposed project trips are fewer than the trips used to analyze local intersections, the development program change would also not change the expected operation and improvements conditioned with the Cabin Branch approval. 4

Table 2 (Table 4 From Cabin Branch - Phase 2 LATR, November 2004) Cabin Branch Trip Generation Analysis Land Use Code Size Units AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Residential Single Family Detached M-NCPPC 792 D.U. 129 387 516 429 241 670 Townhouses M-NCPPC 655 D.U. 58 284 342 234 115 349 Multi-Family M-NCPPC 439 D.U. 36 143 179 137 70 207 Residential Subtotal 1,886 D.U. 223 814 1,037 800 426 1,226 Internal to Retail 15 % -21-22 -43-82 -64-146 Internal to Employment 15 % -33-122 -155-120 -68-188 New Residential Trips 169 670 839 598 294 892 Service/Public Use (S/P) Elderly Housing M-NCPPC 500 D.U. 15 25 40 32 23 55 New Residential and S/P Trips Total 2,386 D.U. 184 695 879 630 317 947 Commercial/Employment Retail M-NCPPC 120,000 S.F. 148 137 285 592 547 1,139 Internal to Residential 15 % -22-21 -43-64 -82-146 Internal to Employment 15 % -22-21 -43-89 -68-157 New Retail Trips 104 95 199 439 397 836 General Office R & D R&D/Bio-Medical Office Medical Use (Hospital) 1 Hotel 2 M-NCPPC 622,000 S.F. 913 136 1,049 156 760 916 ITE (760) 320,000 S.F. 312 64 376 53 297 350 ITE (760) 910,500 S.F. 779 160 939 126 711 837 ITE (610) 360,000 S.F. 265 98 363 84 268 352 ITE (310) 87,500 S.F. 37 27 64 34 36 70 Employment Subtotal 2,300,000 S.F. 2,306 485 2,791 453 2,072 2,525 Internal to Residential 15% -122-33 -155-68 -120-188 Internal to Retail 15% -21-22 -43-68 -89-157 New Employment Trips 2,163 430 2,593 317 1,863 2,180 New Commericial/Employment Trips 2,420,000 S.F. 2,267 525 2,792 756 2,260 3,016 Total Cabin Branch External Trips 2,451 1,220 3,671 1,386 2,577 3,963 Notes: 1. Subject to Certificate of Need. 2. Trips based on 120 Room, Limited Food Service Facility. 5

Table 3 Cabin Branch with Premium Outlet Trip Generation Analysis and Comparison Land Use Code Size Units AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Residential Single Family Detached M-NCPPC 938 D.U. 152 455 607 506 284 790 Townhouses M-NCPPC 581 D.U. 52 251 303 210 104 314 Multi-Family M-NCPPC 367 D.U. 30 120 150 114 59 173 Residential Subtotal 1,886 D.U. 234 826 1,060 830 447 1,277 Internal to Retail 15% -20-41 -61-74 -71-145 Internal to Employment 15% -35-124 -159-125 -53-177 Residential Trips 179 661 840 632 323 954 Service/Public Use (S/P) Elderly Housing M-NCPPC 500 D.U. 15 25 40 32 23 55 Residential and S/P Trips Total 2,386 194 686 880 664 346 1,009 Commercial/Employment Retail M-NCPPC 34,000 S.F. 55 50 105 218 202 420 Outlet Center 1 ITE (823) 450,000 S.F. 220 82 302 258 290 548 Retail Subtotal 484,000 275 132 407 476 492 968 Internal to Residential 15% -41-20 -61-71 -74-145 Internal to Employment 15% -41-20 -61-71 -53-124 Retail Trips 193 92 285 333 365 699 General Office R&D Space Hotel M-NCPPC 622,000 S.F. 913 136 1,049 156 760 916 ITE (760) 1,226,500 S.F. 1,012 207 1,219 161 911 1,072 ITE (310) 87,500 S.F. 37 27 64 34 36 70 Employment Subtotal 1,936,000 S.F. 1,962 370 2,332 351 1,707 2,058 Internal to Residential 15% -124-35 -159-53 -125-177 Internal to Retail 15% -20-41 -61-53 -71-124 Employment Trips 1,818 294 2,112 246 1,511 1,757 Commericial/Employment Trips 2,420,000 S.F. 2,011 386 2,397 579 1,876 2,455 Total Cabin Branch External Trips 2,205 1,072 3,277 1,242 2,222 3,465 Approved Cabin Branch Trips November 2004 (1) 2,451 1,220 3,671 1,386 2,577 3,963 Proposed vs. Approved -246-148 -394-144 -355-498 Notes: 1. Includes 13,300 SF of Resturant Use situated on two outparcel pads within the influence of the Outlet Center. 6

CONCLUSIONS The conclusions of this traffic exemption statement are as follows: 1. The overall development density of the Cabin Branch Community would remain as approved with 1,886 households and 2,420,000 square feet of commercial space. The Premium Outlets portion of the project changes 364,000 square feet of Medical and Research & Development uses to retail allowing 450,000 square feet for the Outlet Center. 2. The Clarksburg Premium Outlets at Cabin Branch is estimated to generate 3,277 total AM peak hour trips and 3,465 total PM peak hour trips at project build-out. In comparison to the approved development program, the planned development program would generate 394 fewer (-11%) AM peak hour trips and 499 fewer (-13%) PM peak hour trips. 3. The Clarksburg Premium Outlets at Cabin Branch trips would fall within the trip allocation previously analyzed and indicates the project trips will be adequately accommodated by the improvements planned with the approved project. 7