STUDY LOCATION February 26, 2015

Similar documents
Proposed Action, Purpose and Need Technical Memorandum

92% COMMUTING IN THE METRO. Congested Roadways Mode Share. Roadway Congestion & Mode Share

LOOP 360 IMPROVEMENT STUDY

North Coast Corridor:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

US 69 RELIEF ROUTE STUDY

VISION Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop. February 10, 2016

OPEN HOUSE SUMMARY. Comment and Response Report For The 183 North Mobility Project Open House July 8, 2014

ALTERNATIVE A ONLY. Right Turn Only. BOTH ALTERNATIVES on southbound Mission from 23rd St to 25th St and on northbound Mission from 20th St to 23rd St

183 North Mobility Project Community Survey Report

Hennepin Avenue Reconstruction Washington Avenue to 12 th Street

Terwillegar Drive Expressway Draft Concept Plan

MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

Thank you for attending

Measuring the Distribution and Costs of Congestion. Tim Lomax Texas Transportation Institute

Wilshire Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Project

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS of The Draft 2015 CLRP

Bluffdale South (SR140) Bicycle/Shoulder Lanes Project Type Bicycle

Protected Bike Lanes in San Francisco Mike Sallaberry SFMTA NACTO Workshop - Chicago IL

BRT for Berkeley A Proposal for Consideration

2018 Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by:

11,000. P.M. Peak Hour Vehicles/Hour 10,000 9,000 8,000. Year

6/14/2013. Welcome. to the US 75 Corridor Study. Public Meeting. US 75 Corridor Study Area

Project Overview. Rolling Road Widening Fairfax County. Get Involved. Design Public Hearing. Contact Information

TAKOMA METRO STATION

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Providing an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Nixon, Green, and Dhu Varren Roads. Intersection Improvement Study

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

WELCOME. Stakeholder Involvement Group Meeting #2 Round Lake Public Works October 24, 2018

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

I-35 COMAL COUNTY OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

I-20 East Transit Initiative. Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting September 9, :00-6:00 PM

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

Project Description Form 6V

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

WELCOME. FM 2818 (Harvey Mitchell Parkway) Open House. Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2017

I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)

Understanding Rail and Bus Ridership

Transform I-66. Chief Engineer Garrett W. Moore, P.E. July 12, 2018

MULTIMODAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Tunnel Reconstruction Brooklyn CB 1 August 14, 2018

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

Giles Run Connector Road

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

Regional Alternatives Analysis. Downtown Corridor Tier 2 Evaluation

Wyldewood Estates. Pre-Application Public Engagement Summary of Issues and Responses

Memorandum. Purpose: To update the MPO CTAC on the status of the LRTP scenario evaluation process.

Bike/Multipurpose Trail Study for Glynn County, Georgia MAY 16, 2016

DULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director

APPENDIX W OFF-MODEL ADJUSTMENTS

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

Fresno Council of Governments Community Workshop. Tuesday, April 25, 2017 Hoover High School Fresno, California

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030

Performance Metrics: [Making lemonade out of federal and state Requirements]

Best Southwest Transportation Committee. North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

Richmond-Adelaide Cycle Tracks

Managed Lanes: A Popular and Effective Urban Solution. Ed Regan Presented by Susan Buse

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

Tolling Study. July 23, 2009

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY

SFMTA PROJECT TIMELINE

DRAFT. Memo. Range of the Alternatives Considered in the EIS

Board of Supervisors February 27, 2017

Vision Public Workshop: Findings

VIEW FROM ZILKER PARK TWO EXPRESS LANES IN EACH DIRECTION + A DOWNTOWN DIRECT CONNECTION

Fordham Plaza. Conceptual Design Study

Public Hearing Tarrant County. October 11 th, 2012

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY/NOTICE OF COMMENT PERIOD OF A DRAFT EIR/EIS/EIS FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND HEARINGS

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Introduction. Neighborhood Traffic Analysis. Vehicular Travel Times. Mitch Bonanno. Vornado/Charles E. Smith.

Feasibility Study for Intermodal Facility in Anchorage, Alaska

Maryland State Highway Mobility Report. Morteza Tadayon

2016 Northwest Metro Region Mobility Report. July 2018

Employment 8,881 17,975 9,094. Households 18,990 31,936 12,946

Transform 66 Project February 4, 2016 Partnering Conference Michigan Department of Transportation American Council of Engineering Companies

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

Summary of Comments Public Meeting: Marietta Street Resurfacing Project Atlanta Contemporary August 29, 2017 / 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

Rail Station Fact Sheet DFW Airport North Station* (*station under construction with anticipated start of service in late 2018)

Public Comment Meeting Geary BRT Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Report

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION

In Collaboration with: City of Belton Cass County FHWA Johnson County KDOT MoDOT City of Olathe City of Overland Park

Crystal City Potomac Yard Transitway. Enforcement Ordinance & Construction Update

Transcription:

STUDY LOCATION

ANTICIPATED TIMELINE The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 16, 2014, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT.

WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO DO? (PROJECT PURPOSE) Provide an opportunity for reliable travel times Improve operational efficiency Create a dependable and consistent route for transit Facilitate reliable emergency response 85% of respondents agree or strongly agree that the Draft Purpose and Need for this project are appropriate. Source: Community Survey, spring 2014

WHAT PROBLEMS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED? (PROJECT NEED) Current and forecasted congestion levels are creating unreliable travel times TRAVEL TIME (IN MINUTES) between Cesar Chavez and Slaughter 2013 2035 (NO BUILD) ADDITIONAL TRAVEL TIME Morning peak period northbound 15 47 +32 (7-9 a.m.) Evening peak period southbound 12 45 +33 (4-6:30 p.m.) Source: CDM-Smith 2014 using INRIX speed data, CAMPO 2035 Travel Demand Model, observed congested speeds in October 2013, and Bluetooth data Under the No Build Alternative (Do Nothing), it could take an additional ½ hour to drive between Cesar Chavez Street and Slaughter Lane in 2035 Emergency response times are impacted by traffic congestion

Employment Population WHAT PROBLEMS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED? (PROJECT NEED) Forecasted population and employment growth in Travis and Hays counties HISTORIC AND PROJECTED POPULATION 2,000,000 1,600,000 1,200,000 Historic 86% Growth Projected 61% Growth Source: U.S. Census Bureau: 1990 Census & 2008-2011 American Community Survey; CAMPO 2035 Forecast 800,000 400,000 0 1990 2012 2035 Hays County Travis County Total 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 HISTORIC AND PROJECTED EMPLOYMENT Projected 74% Growth Source: U.S. Census Bureau: 1990 Census & 2008-2011 American Community Survey; CAMPO 2035 Forecast 600,000 Historic 90% Growth 400,000 200,000 0 1990 2012 2035 Hays County Travis County Total

PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Provide consistency with local and regional plans Reduce congestion delay and provide travel time savings for all roadway users Be constructible without unnecessary impacts to the natural and human environment* Avoid and minimize impacts to water quality* Deliver relief in a timely manner* Facilitate congestion management* Increase opportunities for transit and ridesharing Increase opportunities for pedestrians and bicyclists *Major theme identified through public input provided via fall 2013 and spring 2014 Community Surveys.

CONCLUSIONS EXPRESS LANES ALTERNATIVE is recommended for the following reasons: Offers reliable travel times for single occupancy vehicles, high occupancy vehicles, vanpools, buses and emergency vehicles Provides the shortest peak period travel time for all vehicles, including those using the general purpose lanes Provides over 3 million hours of annual travel time savings for all users compared to the No Build Alternative. That s about 1.7 times more savings than HOV Lanes and 13 times more savings than Transit Only Lanes Avoids unnecessary impacts to the natural and human environment and avoids and minimizes impacts to water quality Delivers relief in a timely manner Increases opportunities for transit and ridesharing and includes new bicycle and pedestrian facilities

CONCLUSIONS HOV LANES and TRANSIT ONLY LANES are not recommended because of the following reasons: Exclude Single Occupancy Vehicle trips (over 70% of peak period commuters) from the opportunity for reliable travel times Result in longer delays for vehicles using the general purpose lanes as compared to the Express Lanes Alternative Lead to underutilized capacity, even during peak periods Cannot deliver relief in a timely manner (without major change to regional funding)

PROPOSED MOPAC EXPRESS LANES FROM ZILKER PARK DOWNTOWN ACCESS GENERAL PURPOSE & EXPRESS LANES ANN & ROY BUTLER HIKE & BIKE TRAIL (LADY BIRD LAKE TRAIL) TO DOWNTOWN The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. ac M ave s Rd. Bar ton Dr. ec rd Be op St ra tf o Sp rin gs Rd. An na nd Roy Bu tle La dy Bir r Hik d La e& ke Bik e Ce sa rc ha ve zs t. Zilker Metropolitan Park Lou Neff Rd. N

PROPOSED MOPAC EXPRESS LANES FROM ZILKER CLUBHOUSE DOWNTOWN ACCESS GENERAL PURPOSE & EXPRESS LANES The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Zilker Clubhouse ac M ave s Rd. Bar ton Dr. ec rd Be op St ra tf o Sp rin gs Rd. An na nd Roy Bu tle La dy Bir r Hik d La e& ke Bik e Ce sa rc ha ve zs t. Zilker Metropolitan Park Lou Neff Rd. N