China from a Macroeconomist s Perspective Kim J. Ruhl NYU Stern China Initiative Research Luncheon February 22, 2011
China as number 1? Gross Domestic Product: 2010 (bil. USD, at exchange rates) 1. United States: $14,660 2. China: $ 5,878 3. Japan: $ 5,459
(Some of the) Big Questions 1. How big is China? Measurement issues 2. Why has China grown so quickly? Sources of growth since 1980 3. How has China s international trade changed? China s trade with the world 4. Why does China have large net export surpluses? Or: Why does China save so much?
How big is China? As measured at exchange rates o Useful for measuring market size o Doesn t take into account price differences across countries Developmental comparisons o Use Purchasing Power Parity GDP
PPP Adjusted GDP International Comparison Program o Prices in different countries of comparable goods o Construct GDP price indices o Deflate local currency GDP: international $ GDP o Defined relative to the United States GDP LC GDP = I $ PPP PPP reflects exchange rates and relative price differences
PPP Adjusted GDP, 2007 PPP (relative to US) FX (local cur/ USD) GDP GDP ifx, US, FX GDP GDP i, PPP US, PPP China 2.2 7.61 0.25 0.87 Japan 126.4 117.8 0.32 0.30 U.S. 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 Chinese prices are substantially lower! Many problems with PPP including: quality, rural/urban sampling, housing, government services
Big doesn t mean rich GDP per Capita, 2007 Adjusting GDP for the population GDP GDP ifx, US, FX GDP GDP i, PPP US, PPP GDP GDP ifx, US, FX GDP GDP i, PPP US, PPP Total Total Per Capita Per Capita China 0.25 0.87 0.06 0.20 Japan 0.32 0.30 0.76 0.70 India 0.08 0.34 0.02 0.09 Mexico 0.07 0.10 0.18 0.26 U.S. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Demographics China has an aging population compared to countries at its level of development
Fraction of population aged 15 64 years 75 70 Japan 65 China percent 60 55 India 50 45 Mexico 40 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Purchasing power parity GDP in Mexico and China 25,000 2005 U.S. dollars per person 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 Mexico GDP per working age person Mexico GDP per capita China GDP per working age person 0 China GDP per capita 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Why has China grown so quickly? China s growth in last 20 years is impressive
GDP per capita 350 300 China, T 0 =1995 index (100 = T 0 ) 250 200 150 Japan, T 0 =1960 Korea, T 0 =1980 100 50 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 year since T 0
Why has China grown so quickly? China s growth in last 30 years is impressive o but not unprecedented A quick tour of the macroeconomist s toolkit o Two factors of production: labor and capital o Total factor productivity, everything else A, measures includes Useful for identifying sources of growth Common specification Y 1 = AK a L -a t t t t
Neoclassical Growth Model When productivity grows at a constant rate o Output per capita grows at a constant rate o The capital output ratio is constant o The worker per capita ratio is constant Pretty simple model. How well does it work?
United States 3.00 800 index (1900 = 100) 2.00 400 1.00 200 0.00 100 2 percent growth trend real GDP -1.00 50 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Growth accounting for the United States, 1960 2000 1.0 0.8 Output per capita log (index) 0.6 0.4 0.2 Productivity Labor 0.0 Capital 0.2 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
Sources of Growth, United States Quantify the sources of growth Average annual growth rates Y/N L/N K/Y A 1960 2000 2.08 0.28 0.07 1.88
Growth accounting for China, 1980 2007 2.5 2.0 Output per capita log(index) 1.5 1.0 0.5 Productivity Labor 0.0 Capital output 0.5 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Sources of Growth, China Average annual growth rates Y/N L/N K/Y A 1980 2007 7.77 0.22 0.29 7.26 Major source of growth in China is productivity o Not uncontroversial: e.g., work by Alwyn Young What does that rule out? o Capital deepening: China is accumulating capital, but at about the same rate as output growth o Increase in workers per working age person
Sources of Productivity Growth What does that leave? A lot. Increases in quality of capital used, management, practices, etc. Capital and labor reallocated across production units o Away from less efficient plants o Towards more efficient plants o From changes in subsidies/taxation o From entry and exit of plants
Microeconomics of Productivity Reforms since 1970s decreased influence of central planning and allowed new firm entry into sectors previously reserved for SOEs. 1980 1995, number of industrial plants grows 7 fold (Brandt, Rawski, Sutton 2008) Increase in access to FDI, increase in trade access o Allows entry into sectors that serve large markets
Turnover and Aggregate Productivity Decompose aggregate productivity growth (Brandt, Van Biesbroeck, Zhang 2009) In China o 50% from continuing firms o 50% from new entrants In U.S. o 80% from continuing firms o 20% from new entrants Moving China to U.S. levels of allocation increase aggregate productivity 30 50% (Hsieh and Klenow 2009)
An Open Question The reforms in China have been previously undertaken in a score of countries, yet these other countries have not had the same growth experiences. Why? China and Mexico: Kehoe and Ruhl (2010)
How has trade changed? In the aggregate The composition of trade partners The composition of goods being traded
Chinese Exports 0.40 0.35 exports 0.30 share of GDP 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 imports 0.05 0.00 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Chinese Exports 0.6 0.5 share of total exports 0.4 0.3 0.2 1980 2009 0.1 0 APEC/US EU US
Chinese Imports 0.6 0.5 share of total exports 0.4 0.3 0.2 1980 2009 0.1 0 APEC/US EU US
Composition of Exports in China Based on Kehoe and Ruhl (2009) Trade grows from 2 forces o More trade in goods already traded o Trade in goods not previously traded Data: detailed trade by product data o About 800 product categories o Covers the universe of trade in goods
Newly Traded Goods 1. Rank codes from lowest value of exports to highest value of exports based on average of 1996 98. 2. Form sets of codes by cumulating exports: the first 684.2 codes make up 10 percent of exports; the next 45.1 codes make up 10 percent of exports; and so on. 3. Calculate each set s share of export value in 2004.
Composition of Exports: China to U.S. 0.25 Fraction of 2004 Export Value 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 684.2 45.1 24.6 13.5 8.3 5.8 4.0 2.1 0.8 0.7 0.00 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Cummulative Fraction of 1996 Export Value
Composition of Exports: China to U.S. 0.25 Fraction of 2004 Export Value 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 684.2 45.1 24.6 13.5 8.3 5.8 4.0 2.1 0.8 0.7 0.00 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Cummulative Fraction of 1996 Export Value
Composition of Exports: U.S. to China 0.25 3.9 Fraction of 2004 Export Value 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 620.2 63.2 35.7 22.9 15.7 13.4 8.8 3.5 1.6 0.00 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Cummulative Fraction of 1996 Export Value
Least Traded Goods: China and the U.S. 0.25 fraction of total export value 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 China exports to U.S. U.S. exports to China 0.00 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Newly Traded Goods Measurement National accounts do a poor job of accounting for newly traded goods Leads to a systematic overestimate of prices Which leads to an underestimate of real output Using a method developed by Feenstra (1994) to correct for this bias, Kehoe and Ruhl (2010) find for 1998 2008: o Chinese import prices biased downward about 5% o Welfare gain of almost 1% from new varieties
Unbalanced Trade in China China runs (relatively) large trade surpluses The U.S. runs (relatively) large trade deficits Consequence of savings demand in each country Simple accounting identity Y= C+ I+ G+ NX S= Y-C-G S= I+ NX When S> I, net exports are positive
Savings in China 0.6 0.5 Savings fraction of GDP 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Investment Net Exports 0.0 0.1 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Savings in United States 0.6 0.5 fraction of GDP 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Savings Investment 0.1 Net Exports 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Recast the question from: Unbalanced Trade to: Why does China export so much? Why does China save so much? More broadly: Why doesn t capital flow to poor countries? Economists are making progress, but still an open question.
Savings in China Demographics (again!) o Aging populations saving to fund old age o Research: responsible for 1% 2% of US deficit Firms save; low dividend payments, esp. SOEs Governments don t spend o China gov t expenditures: 14% of GDP o U.S. gov t expenditures: 20% of GDP Domestic financial system weakness o Incentive to move capital to other countries Local experts: Dave Backus, Tom Cooley
1. How big is China? (Some of the) Big Questions FX vs. PPP matters; per capita matters a lot 2. Why has China grown so quickly? Things that look like productivity have grown 3. How has China s international trade changed? Many newly traded goods; shift in exports to U.S. 4. Why does China have large net export surpluses? More savings than investment; demographics, financial system issues
Dependency Ratios in Major Countries Dependency Ratio(%) 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 United States Europe Japan China India 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 Year
Fertility Rates of Major Countries Fertility Rate 1 2 3 4 5 6 United States Europe Japan China India 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 Year
Life Expectancy in Major Countries Life Expectancy at Birth 40 50 60 70 80 90 United States Europe Japan China India 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 Year
Median Age of Major Countries Median Age 20 30 40 50 60 United States Europe Japan China India 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 Year