Simons Run Corridor Study

Similar documents
Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

Highway 111 Corridor Study

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

Technical Memorandum TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. RIDLEY ROAD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, VA. Prepared for: Mr. David Williams.

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

Project Description Form 8EE

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. Forest View Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

Following are our comments and findings based on the site visit and review of the complete Traffic Impact Study:

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017

Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12)

Table of Contents FIGURES TABLES APPENDICES. Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

Walmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS...

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

BLUE SEA VILLAGE MER BLEUE 2159 MER BLEUE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for: Ontario Limited.

ARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY

INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY State Route 57 / Seville Road

STILLWATER AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY Old Town, Maine

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2

6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas

Queensgate Drive Corridor Traffic Study

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Figure 1: East West Connector Alignment Alternatives Concept Drawing

HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

Harrah s Station Square Casino

Date: September 7, Project #: Re: Spaulding Youth Center Northfield, NH Property. Traffic Impact Study

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

East 12 th Street Bikeway Feasibility Study

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Proposed Action, Purpose and Need Technical Memorandum

5.0 Roadway System Plan

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Bridge Street Corridor Study Report

Traffic Analysis and Design Report. NW Bethany Boulevard. NW Bronson Road to NW West Union Road. Washington County, Oregon

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

MEMORANDUM. Our project study area included the following locations:

TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

Route 29 Solutions Projects

Gateway Transportation Study

State Street and Pierce Park Lane Intersection Concept Report

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

4.0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS

Gene Dillon Elementary School Traffic Study Division Street Site

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Route 28 (South Orleans Road)/Route 39 (Harwich Road)/Quanset Road Intersection

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd.

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner

Abrams Associates. Transportation Impact Analysis. City of Rocklin. Prepared for: David Mohlenbrok City of Rocklin 4081 Alvis Court Rocklin, CA 95677

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

Access Management Regulations and Standards

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Implementing Complete Streets in Ottawa. Project Delivery Process and Tools Complete Streets Forum 2015 October 1, 2015

Northwest Corridor Project Interchange Modification, Interchange Justification and System Analysis Report Reassessment (Phase I)

Geometric Design Tables

Transcription:

Simons Run Corridor Study Campbell County & City of Lynchburg, Virginia Prepared on: September 30, 2014 Prepared for: Central Virginia Metropolitan Planning Organization 277 Bendix Road, Suite 500 Virginia Beach, VA 23452 757-499-4224 URSCorp.com

SIMONS RUN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL REPORT FINAL REPORT September 30, 2014 Prepared for: Central Virginia Metropolitan Planning Organization Lynchburg, Virginia Prepared by: URS CORPORATION Virginia Beach, Virginia The contents of this report reflect the view of the author(s) who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration and/or the Commonwealth of Virginia Transportation Board. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. FHWA acceptance of this report as evidence of fulfillment of the objectives of this planning study does not constitute endorsement/approval of the need for any recommended improvements nor does it constitute approval of their location and design or a commitment to fund any such improvements. Additional project level environmental studies of alternatives may be necessary.

Simons Run Corridor Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Region 2000 Local Government Council has engaged URS Corporation to conduct a corridor analysis along Simons Run in Campbell County, Virginia. The purpose of this report is to document a study of the alternatives for extending Simons Run to the west to intersect with Airport Road and to identify the appropriate pavement section for all of Simons Run, including the existing pavement section. The study will evaluate the costs, benefits, and impacts of the proposed extension Simons Run was built by a consortium of owners of land the Simons Run alignment. Simons Run is not incorporated to VDOT s roadway system. The alignment of Simons Run is within Campbell County right-of-way.future Land Use Two alternative scenarios for future development along the corridor were evaluated. Both Build Alternative scenarios propose development of eight of the vacant parcels along Simons Run. For Scenario 1, land use is a mix of residential and commercial uses, while Scenario 2 shifts exclusively towards office and medical land use. The residential land use in Scenario 1 provides for 300 apartment/condo units. Transportation Capacity Traffic from the future development along the corridor can be accommodated with either the existing configuration of Simons Run or with the proposed extension to Airport Road. With the existing configuration, improvements will be needed at the Leesville Road intersection in the event traffic signal warrants are met. If warrants are not met, services levels will be low (LOS F) for motorists attempting to exist to the south on Leesville Road during the PM peak hour. With the extension to Airport Road, service at Leesville Road will improve to LOS D during the PM peak hour. Service at the intersection of the Simons Run extension with Airport Road (Assuming a partial intersection) is forecast at D or better. Pavement Section With the added traffic from planned development, the existing pavement section on Simons Run, the existing two-lane pavement section will present issues in providing access to adjacent parcels. To address potential deficiencies, two pavement sections were evaluated: one that can be accommodated within the existing 60 foot wide right-of-way and a second that would require a 68 foot wide right-of-way. The narrower section provides wide outside lanes to accommodate bicyclists and a sidewalk; the wider section provides a separate 10 foot wide multi-purpose trail for bicyclists and pedestrian. Both sections include a two-way center left turn lane and curb and gutter drainage. Simons Run Extension The extension of Simons Run to Airport Road cannot be installed in compliance with VDOT s access management guidelines. The configuration that would most closely comply includes a Partial access intersection at Airport Road, which would provide for left turning movements into Simons Run from eastbound Airport Road but prohibit left turning movements from southbound Simons Run to eastbound Airport Road. Partial access would also allow for right-in/right-out turning movements at the intersection of Simons Run and Airport Road. Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page i

Cost Estimates Simons Run Corridor Analysis 1. Simons Run Extension to Airport Road a. 60 foot wide ROW Pavement Sections $2,730,000 b. 68 foot wide ROW Pavement Section $2,421,000 2. Upgrading Existing Simons Run Pavement Section a. 60 foot wide ROW Pavement Sections $6,530,000 b. 68 foot wide ROW Pavement Section $6,599,000 All costs are forecasted year 2015 dollars. Travel Time Impacts Travel time cost savings were calculated to determine the benefits to motorists from the installation of the Simons Run Extension. Two destinations were considered: the intersection of Greenview Drive/Airport Road with Leesville Road, and the US Route 460 interchange with Airport Road To calculate travel time, the number of vehicles on a given roadway segment were multiplied by the length of that segment, and then divided by the speed limit of that segment. Next, the delay encountered at any intersections between the origin and destination was added to arrive at an estimated overall travel time from origin to destination. Time savings was monetized by applying an hourly rate of $18.08 for each hour of travel time saved. Cost Benefit Analysis Comparing the annualized costs through the design year 2037 for construction of the extension of Simons Run to the monetized benefits of travel time savings through the same period, the total benefits exceeded the total costs by a factor of 1.58, or approximately $2.8 million. Recommendations 1. Extend Simons Run to a Partial Intersection with Airport Road: The benefits of time savings for motorists more than offsets construction costs. Moreover, while the assessed property values may not be increased, the likelihood of development is increased with the enhanced access to the corridor from Route 460. 2. Install the Simons Run Extension as the 60 foot wide ROW pavement section: This section will adequately accommodate limited expected number of bicyclists and pedestrians. It will also accommodate and be consistent with future upgrades to the existing pavement section. 3. Add Bus Stops: As detailed in Chapter IV, it is recommended that bus stops be added on Simons Run between Parcels 9A and 9B to serve as a central stopping point on the corridor. 4. Add directional guidance signage as shown in Figure 17 (page 28) to the northbound Simons Run approach to the intersections with Wards Ferry Road. Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS Simons Run Corridor Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... i I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS... 2 III. FORECASTS OF FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES... 10 IV. PAVEMENT SECTION EVALUATION... 22 V. COST-BENEFIT EVALUATION OF EXTENSION OF SIMONS RUN TO AIRPORT ROAD... 29 VI. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS... 38 LIST OF TABLES 1. Existing Conditions: Signalized Vehicle Delay and Service Levels... 8 2. Existing Conditions: Unsignalized Vehicle Delay and Service Levels... 9 3. Trip Generation Build Alternative Scenario 1... 10 4. Trip Generation Build Alternative Scenario 2... 13 5. Build Conditions Year 2024: Vehicle Delay and Service Levels... 21 6. Simons Run Extension Cost-Benefit Analysis... 37 7. Summary of Planning Level Cost Estimates... 38 Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Table of Contents Campbell County, Virginia Page iii

Simons Run Corridor Analysis LIST OF FIGURES 1. Simons Run Corridor Study Area... 1 2. Existing Conditions, Lane Geometry & Peak Hour Volumes... 4 3. Key Land Use Features... 5 4. Zoning Districts... 6 5. Planned Land Use... 7 6. Simons Run Build Alternative Scenario 1... 11 7. Simons Run Build Alternative Scenario 2... 12 8. Build Conditions Trip Distribution Existing Geometry... 14 9. Scenario 1 Build Conditions Existing Geometry Traffic Volumes... 15 10. Scenario 2 Build Conditions Existing Geometry Traffic Volumes... 16 11. Build Conditions Trip Distribution - Simons Run Extension... 18 12. Scenario 1 Build Conditions Modified Lane Geometry Traffic Volumes... 19 13. Scenario 2 Build Conditions Modified Lane Geometry Traffic Volumes... 20 14. Typical Sections... 23 15. Existing Geometry 60 ROW Extents... 24 16. Existing Geometry 68 ROW Extents... 27 17. Simons Run Guide Signing at Wards Ferry Road... 28 18. Proposed Intersection Spacing... 30 19. Modified Geometry 60 ROW Extents... 31 20. Modified Geometry 60 ROW Simons Run Intersections... 32 21. Modified Geometry 68 ROW Extents... 34 22. Modified Geometry 68 ROW Simons Run Intersections... 35 Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Table of Contents Campbell County, Virginia Page iv

I. INTRODUCTION Simons Run Corridor Analysis The Region 2000 Local Government Council (Region 2000) has engaged URS Corporation (URS) to conduct a corridor analysis along Simons Run in Campbell County, Virginia. The Simons Run corridor connects to Wards Ferry Road in the east and to Leesville Road in the west. It is located to the west of Richmond Highway (US Route 29/460) and north of Airport Road (Route 678) see Figure 1. The purpose of this report is to document a study of the alternatives for extending Simons Run to the west to intersect with Airport Road. Additionally, this study evaluates the ideal typical section (for all modes of transportation) for Simons Run in order to support future development. The study will evaluate the costs, benefits, and impacts of the proposed extension. In this effort, the study will detail traffic impacts of the proposed land development on the surrounding roadway network. After this introduction, traffic data collection and existing conditions will be documented. Next, forecasts of traffic from the proposed development will be developed. Then, existing pavement sections will be evaluated. Next, a cost-benefit evaluation of a possible extension of Simons Run to Airport Road will be conducted. Finally, recommended improvements to the Simons Run roadway section will be developed. Wards Ferry Road Figure 1 Simons Run Corridor Study Area Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 1

II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Simons Run Corridor Analysis Daily directional traffic counts on Simons Run were conducted from September 13, 2013 through September 15, 2013 approximately 0.13 miles west of the A.C. Moore commercial driveway; these counts were conducted by VDOT and provided to URS by Region 2000. Peak period turning movement counts at the intersection of Wards Ferry Road with Simons Run were conducted on February 21, 2013 by Peggy Malone & Associates, Inc. as part of the Wards Ferry Road Corridor Study, dated June 2013. Lastly, peak period turning movement counts at the intersections of Greenview Drive/Airport Road (Route 678) with Leesville Road, and Simons Run with Leesville Road were conducted on August 4, 2014 and August 5, 2014 by URS. The results of the traffic counts are documented in the Technical Appendix. The Existing Conditions lane geometry and peak hour (7:00 8:00 AM and 4:30 5:30 PM) traffic volumes can be found in Figure 2. Existing land use data was compiled with the use of Campbell County and City of Lynchburg GIS resources. Figure 3 depicts land use characteristics in the study area, including roadways, land parcels, and hydrographic features, in addition to other noteworthy items. Figure 4 portrays zoning districts in both localities, and Figure 5 shows future planned land uses as recommended in the respective comprehensive plans. Simons Run was built by a consortium of land owners along the Simons Run alignment. Simons Run is not incorporated into VDOT s roadway system. The alignment of Simons Run is within Campbell County right-of-way. The pavement section along the majority of the Simons Run corridor, from immediately west of Wards Crossing West to Leesville Road, is a two-lane road with 24 feet of asphalt pavement with earthen shoulders in an open drainage system (ditches). In front of Wards Crossing West shopping center drainage is managed by curb and gutter. Nearly all of the right-of-way along the existing alignment is 60 feet in width. Simons Run is approximately 1.3 miles in length with approximately 0.90 miles having open drainage. There are presently no bicycle or pedestrian accommodations provided on Simons Run. With two stops on the corridor, Simons Run is currently serviced by Bus Route #6 of the Greater Lynchburg Transit Company. The first stop is on the eastern end of the corridor, just west of Wards Ferry Road. The second stop is on the western end of the corridor, on Leesville Road. The bus operates on an hourly schedule Monday through Friday, from 6:15 AM to 7:10 PM; it also operates on a two-hour schedule on Saturday, from 7:15 AM to 6:10 PM; it does not operate on Sunday. Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 2

Capacity Analysis Simons Run Corridor Analysis Using the peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figure 2, capacity analysis was conducted. Synchro 8 software was used for the analysis using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual procedures. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the results of the Existing Conditions capacity analysis. The signalized intersection of Greenview Drive/Airport Road with Leesville Road exhibits inadequate overall intersection service levels with level of service (LOS) D and E conditions in the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Several individual movements operate with LOS F conditions in the PM peak hour. This intersection accommodates a large traffic volume and the signal timing plan consists entirely of split phasing (each individual approach is provided a separate green phase). While appropriate for current volumes and approach patterns, split phasing produces an inefficient allocation of green time, resulting in excessive delay on all approaches. In contrast, the signalized intersection of Simons Run with Wards Ferry Road operates with good overall intersection service level conditions with LOS B conditions in both peak hours. The unsignalized intersection of Leesville Road with Simons Run operates with good service level conditions, with most movements operating at LOS A. The most noteworthy movement is the westbound left movement, which operates at LOS B and C in the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Lastly, the unsignalized intersection of the Wards Crossing West driveway with Wards Ferry Road operates with excellent service level conditions, with most movements operating at LOS A. In the PM peak hour, the side streets operate at LOS B. Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 3

NOT TO SCALE 418 14 205 7 Leesville Rd 2 20 15 133 Simons Run 331 50 314 110 43 311 65 7 120 31 Simons Run 39 10 85 21 11 0 Wards Ferry Rd 16 84 3 86 8 92 30 219 22 198 248 77 150 250 14 Wards Ferry Rd S 14 114 0 0 32 Leesville Rd Wards Crossing West 0 0 161 255 121 48 104 97 80 99 292 437 322 67 271 6 491 20 131 335 Greenview Dr Airport Rd 118 66 399 458 71 43 74 205 157 81 193 101 Simons Run Corridor Study S Existing Conditions Lane Geometry & Peak Hour Traffic Volumes LEGEND XXX XXX AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume XXX Daily Volume S FIGURE 2 Signalized Intersection Existing Lane Geometry

A B C D E F G 1 1 î î 2 2 Simons Run Corridor Study Figure 3 - Key Land Use Features Region 2000 Local Government Council Campbell County, Virginia 3 3 4 4 î î 5 5 Legend Point of Interest î House of Worship Cemetery Stream Area Floodzone Roadway Stream Centerline Lake 6 6 September 2014 7 7 A B C D E F G 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Miles ²

A B C D E F G 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 Simons Run Corridor Study Figure 4 - Zoning Districts Region 2000 Local Government Council Campbell County, Virginia Legend Lynchburg Zoning Districts Zone B1 B2 B3 B5 I2 R1 R2 R3 R4 RC Campbell County Zoning Districts Zone Agricultural Agricultural, Conditional Business - General Commercial Business - General Commercial, Conditional Business - Heavy Commercial Business - Heavy Commercial, Conditional Industrial - General Industrial - General, Conditional Industrial - Heavy N/A Residential - Multi Family Residential - Multi Family, Conditional Residential - Single Family Right-of-Way Roadway September 2014 7 7 A B C D E F G 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Miles ²

A B C D E F G 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 Simons Run Corridor Study Figure 5 - Future Planned Land Use Region 2000 Local Government Council Campbell County, Virginia Legend Lynchburg Future Land Use Land Use Community Commercial Employment 2 High Density Residential Institution Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Neighborhood Commercial Office Public Use Regional Commercial Resource Conservation Campbell County Future Land Use Land Use Medium to High Density Commercial Medium to High Density Residential Urban Development Area Commercial Urban Development Area Residential Roadway September 2014 7 7 A B C D E F G 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Miles ²

Simons Run Corridor Analysis Table 1 Existing Conditions Average Signalized Vehicle Delay and Service Levels HCM 2010 Methodology AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach Delay Delay LOS LOS (sec.) (sec.) Greenview Drive/Airport Road @ Leesville Road EB Left/Through 45.3 D 85.1 F EB Through/Right 38.8 D 67.3 E WB Left 25.2 C 34.1 C WB Through/Right 43.6 D 70.5 E NB Left/Through 50.0 D 74.3 E NB Through/Right 45.5 D 66.6 E SB Left/Through 50.8 D 102.1 F SB Through/Right 45.9 D 83.4 F Overall Intersection 43.6 D 72.1 E Simons Run @ Wards Ferry Road EB Left 14.5 B 18.6 B EB Through/Right 15.6 B 23.1 C WB Left 14.6 B 17.5 B WB Through/Right 15.8 B 23.3 C NB Left 8.1 A 12.6 B NB Through 11.1 B 15.4 B NB Right 9.4 A 13.5 B SB Left 8.2 A 11.8 B SB Through 10.1 B 18.7 B SB Right 9.2 A 14.7 B Overall Intersection 10.9 B 17.2 B Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 8

Simons Run Corridor Analysis Table 2 Existing Conditions Average Unsignalized Vehicle Delay and Service Levels HCM 2010 Methodology AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach Delay Delay LOS LOS (sec.) (sec.) Simons Run @ Leesville Road WB Left 12.4 B 17.7 C WB Right 9.3 A 9.4 A NB Through/Right 0.0 A 0.0 A SB Left 8.0 A 8.0 A SB Through 0.0 A 0.1 A Wards Crossing West @ Wards Ferry Road EB Right 9.2 A 13.6 B WB Left/Right 0.0 A 10.3 B NB Through/Right 0.0 A 0.0 A SB Left 0.0 A 8.6 A SB Through/Right 0.0 A 0.5 A Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 9

III. FORECASTS OF FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES Simons Run Corridor Analysis Two alternative scenarios for future development of currently undeveloped land along the corridor were provided to URS by Campbell County. Both Build Alternative scenarios propose development of eight of the vacant parcels along Simons Run. The two scenarios are shown in Figures 6 and 7. For Scenario 1, land use is a mix of residential and commercial uses, while Scenario 2 shifts exclusively towards office and medical land use. Trip Generation 9th Edition (published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers) was used to compute estimates trip volumes. Trip generation values for the two development scenarios are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Parcel Land Use Size 1 4A 4B 4C1 9A 9B 42 49B Home Improvement Superstore Shopping Center Shopping Center Shopping Center Condo/ Townhouse Hotel Quality Restaurant New Car Sales Table 3 Trip Generation Build Alternative Scenario 1 100,000 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft. 20,000 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft. 300 Dwelling Units 100 Rooms 5,000 sq. ft. 20,724 sq. ft. Daily Trips Enter AM Peak Hour Exit Pass- By Enter PM Peak Hour Exit Pass- By 3,074 80 69 72 115 118 112 427 5 4 3 18 19 13 854 11 8 7 36 38 25 427 5 4 3 18 19 13 1,743 22 110 0 105 51 0 817 31 22 0 31 29 0 450 2 2 2 22 15 16 669 30 10 0 22 33 0 Total 8,461 186 229 87 367 322 179 Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 10

Parcel Land Use Size 1 4A 4B 4C1 9A 9B 42 49B Medical- Dental Office Building Pharmacy w/ Drive-Thru Shopping Center General Office General Office Hotel Quality Restaurant New Car Sales Table 4 Trip Generation Build Alternative Scenario 2 25,000 sq. ft. 15,000 sq. ft. 20,000 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft. 100 Rooms 5,000 sq. ft. 20,724 sq. ft. Daily Trips Enter Simons Run Corridor Analysis AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 13 Exit Pass- By Enter Exit Pass- By 903 47 13 0 25 64 0 1,454 14 13 25 38 38 73 854 11 8 7 36 38 25 110 14 2 0 3 12 0 110 14 2 0 3 12 0 817 31 22 0 31 29 0 450 2 2 2 22 15 16 669 30 10 0 22 3 0 Total 5,367 163 72 34 180 211 114 Forecasted trip distribution patterns for traffic from the two Build Alternative scenarios using the existing roadway geometry (without the extension to Airport Road) are displayed in Figure 8. The trip distribution pattern has been based on the existing traffic patterns and surrounding land uses. Applying distribution patterns to forecasted volumes, Figures 9 and 10 display peak period turning movement counts for both Build Alternative scenarios using the existing roadway geometry. Background traffic volume growth on all study area roads has been accounted for by applying a 1% annual growth rate to the existing conditions volumes for a period of ten years. The 1% annual growth rate is consistent with that used and documented in the Wards Ferry Road Corridor Study, which was conducted in 2013. The design year for this project was chosen to be 2024, ten years beyond the existing conditions, in order to provide sufficient time for build-out of the proposed land uses. It should be noted that the intersection of Greenview Drive/Airport Road with Leesville Road is programmed to be improved from its current geometry to include separate left and right turn lanes on all four approaches. This improvement is scheduled separately from this project, and is to be completed by the time the development on Simons Run is fully developed.

NOT TO SCALE Leesville Rd (3%) 7% 2% (4%) 57% (59%) Simons Run 78% (48%) (10%) 7% Simons Run (8%) 9% (17%) 18% Wards Ferry Rd 5% (20%) 3% (19%) Wards Ferry Rd S Leesville Rd (8%) (13%) (38%) 3% 6% 48% 38% (30%) Wards Crossing West (12%) 14% Greenview Dr (7%) 10% 30% (11%) Airport Rd Simons Run Corridor Study S LEGEND Build Conditions Trip Distribution Existing Geometry XX% (XX%) AM (PM) Entering % XX% (XX%) AM (PM) Exiting % S FIGURE 8 Signalized Intersection Existing Lane Geometry Proposed Lane

NOT TO SCALE 462 26 226 21 Leesville Rd 7 35 147 337 Simons Run 366 202 347 298 84 343 72 21 133 34 Simons Run 69 32 149 64 12 0 Wards Ferry Rd 18 93 9 165 9 102 43 242 24 198 248 77 166 276 15 Wards Ferry Rd S 15 127 0 0 35 Leesville Rd Wards Crossing West 0 0 204 324 256 60 129 217 160 219 323 483 394 106 309 7 616 22 145 370 Greenview Dr Airport Rd 156 92 441 506 78 47 82 283 173 89 254 112 Simons Run Corridor Study S Scenario 1 Build Conditions Existing Lane Geometry & Peak Hour Traffic Volumes LEGEND XXX XXX AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume XXX Daily Volume S FIGURE 9 Signalized Intersection Existing Lane Geometry Proposed Lane

NOT TO SCALE 462 23 226 20 Leesville Rd 4 34 71 325 Simons Run 366 191 347 243 73 343 72 20 132 34 Simons Run 67 20 145 40 12 0 Wards Ferry Rd 18 93 9 143 9 102 42 242 24 270 274 85 166 276 15 Wards Ferry Rd S 15 126 0 0 35 Leesville Rd Wards Crossing West 0 0 202 321 248 56 121 153 155 186 323 483 392 87 308 7 594 22 145 370 Greenview Dr Airport Rd 148 90 441 506 78 47 82 279 173 89 241 112 Simons Run Corridor Study S Scenario 2 Build Conditions Existing Lane Geometry & Peak Hour Traffic Volumes LEGEND XXX XXX AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume XXX Daily Volume S FIGURE 10 Signalized Intersection Existing Lane Geometry Proposed Lane

Simons Run Corridor Analysis This study also included an alternate scenario to provide for an extension of Simons Run to the south to create a new partial-access intersection with Airport Road. Figure 11 displays the adjusted trip distribution utilizing this new connection. Figures 12 and 13 display peak period turning movement volumes for both Build Alternative scenarios using the modified roadway geometry. Capacity Analysis Using the peak hour traffic volumes found in Figures 9, 10, 12, and 13, Build Alternative conditions capacity analysis was conducted for both land use scenarios, using both the existing geometry and the Simons Run extension modification. Synchro 8 software was used for the analysis using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual procedures. Table 5 summarizes the results of the various Build Alternative analyses. For the signalized intersections, the overall intersection delay and LOS were reported; for the unsignalized intersections, the single worst movement delay and LOS were reported. The signalized intersection of Greenview Drive/Airport Road with Leesville Road exhibits marked improvement in performance, coinciding with its scheduled reconstruction; it operates with adequate (LOS C or better) overall intersection service level conditions in all Build Alternative conditions. The signalized intersection of Simons Run with Wards Ferry Road is forecasted to operate with adequate (LOS C or better) overall intersection service levels for all Build Alternative conditions. With the existing geometry, the unsignalized intersection of Leesville Road with Simons Run is forecasted to operate with poor (LOS F) service levels. Specifically, the PM peak hour analysis results exhibit LOS F conditions. However, with the extension of Simons Run to Airport Road, the results are forecasted to improve to LOS D and C in the PM peak hour for Scenarios 1 and 2, respectively. In contrast, without the extension of Simons Run, the intersection of Leesville Road and Simons Run will likely meet warrants for a traffic signal. The unsignalized intersection of Wards Crossing West with Wards Ferry Road is forecasted to operate with adequate (LOS C or better) service levels, with LOS A and C conditions in the AM and PM peak hours, respectively, for all Build Alternative conditions. Lastly, the proposed new unsignalized intersection of Simons Run with Airport Road is forecasted to operate with adequate (LOS C or better) service levels, with LOS B and C conditions in the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 17

NOT TO SCALE Leesville Rd (3%) 7% 2% (4%) 48% (38%) Simons Run (10%) 7% Simons Run (8%) 9% (17%) 18% Wards Ferry Rd 5% (20%) 3% (19%) Wards Ferry Rd S (38%) Leesville Rd Wards Crossing West (12%) 14% 48% 3% (8%) Greenview Dr 6% (13%) Airport Rd (7%) 10% 30% (11%) Simons Run Simons Run Corridor Study (21%) 9% 38% (30%) S (18%) 40% Airport Rd Build Conditions Trip Distribution Simons Run Extension FIGURE 11 LEGEND XX% (XX%) AM (PM) Entering % XX% (XX%) AM (PM) Exiting % S Signalized Intersection Existing Lane Geometry Proposed Lane

NOT TO SCALE 462 26 226 21 Leesville Rd 7 35 121 213 Simons Run 366 21 347 47 84 343 72 21 132 34 Simons Run 69 32 149 64 12 0 Wards Ferry Rd 18 93 9 165 9 102 43 242 24 292 274 85 166 276 15 Wards Ferry Rd S 15 126 0 0 35 Leesville Rd Wards Crossing West 0 0 156 247 257 53 115 217 75 80 331 531 394 106 309 7 616 22 162 447 Greenview Dr Airport Rd 113 73 483 530 78 47 82 226 246 89 184 181 Simons Run Simons Run Corridor Study 125 19 84 139 549 933 S 112 97 809 896 Airport Rd Scenario 1 Build Conditions Modified Lane Geometry & Peak Hour Traffic Volumes FIGURE 12 LEGEND XXX XXX AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume S Signalized Intersection Existing Lane Geometry XXX Daily Volume Proposed Lane

NOT TO SCALE 462 23 226 20 Leesville Rd 4 34 57 205 Simons Run 366 21 347 47 73 343 72 20 132 34 Simons Run 67 20 145 40 12 0 Wards Ferry Rd 18 93 9 143 9 102 42 242 24 198 248 77 166 276 15 Wards Ferry Rd S 15 126 0 0 32 Leesville Rd Wards Crossing West 0 0 156 247 249 53 115 153 75 80 327 529 392 85 308 7 594 22 154 444 Greenview Dr Airport Rd 113 73 476 528 78 47 82 226 242 89 184 169 Simons Run Simons Run Corridor Study 120 13 79 105 543 933 S 92 91 802 832 Airport Rd Scenario 2 Build Conditions Modified Lane Geometry & Peak Hour Traffic Volumes FIGURE 13 LEGEND XXX XXX AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume S Signalized Intersection Existing Lane Geometry XXX Daily Volume Proposed Lane

Simons Run Corridor Analysis Table 5 Build Conditions Year 2024 Vehicle Delay and Service Levels HCM 2010 Methodology Existing Geometry Simons Run Extension Intersection Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (sec.) LOS Delay (sec.) LOS Delay (sec.) LOS Delay (sec.) LOS Delay (sec.) LOS Delay (sec.) LOS Delay (sec.) LOS Delay (sec.) LOS Greenview Drive/Airport Road @ Leesville Road 25.9 C 26.9 C 23.9 C 26.3 C 29.5 C 30.6 C 26.3 C 30.1 C Simons Run @ Wards Ferry Road 13.1 B 22.4 C 12.2 B 21.0 C 13.1 B 22.4 C 12.2 B 21.0 C Simons Run @ Leesville Road* 17.6 C 79.1 F 14.8 B 66.7 F 16.5 C 29.8 D 14.4 B 27.7 D Wards Crossing West @ Wards Ferry Road* 9.5 A 16.4 C 9.4 A 16.3 C 9.5 A 16.4 C 9.4 A 16.3 C Simons Run @ Airport Road* 10.7 B 16.2 C 10.6 B 15.6 C *Unsignalized intersection Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 21

IV. PAVEMENT SECTION EVALUATION Simons Run Corridor Analysis In the analysis of the Build Alternative Scenarios, eight currently undeveloped parcels have been assumed to be developed: one with a mix of residential and commercial uses and the other with exclusively commercial uses. With the added traffic volumes from either of these development scenarios, determining the appropriate pavement section is a key component for developing forecasts of costs estimates. The design speed for the existing Simons Run alignment is 40 MPH, and there are no major design deficiencies on the current corridor. However, added traffic volumes from future planned development will likely present challenges to maintaining an adequate pavement configuration. For example, considering that several parcels have relatively narrow frontage, it is not likely that a driveway to each parcel could be installed while at the same time complying with access management driveway spacing guidelines along the overall roadway. As a result, considering the forecasted volumes and parcel layout, the typical section should include a travel lane in each direction with a shared center left turn lane. Currently, the typical section on Simons Run is comprised of a single 12-foot travel lane in each direction, with an additional 5-foot earthen shoulder. The existing Campbell County right-of-way (ROW) width spans 60 feet. Two possible typical sections for the corridor were developed and are shown in Figure 14. Both of the typical sections were developed to meet VDOT design standards. Based on the type and amount of development being proposed the VDOT standard chosen for developing alternatives was the urban collector street with curb and gutter drainage (GS-7) with a design speed of 40 MPH. The first typical section can be installed within the available 60-foot ROW. It uses a center left turn lane, as well as two 14-foot travel lanes. The wider travel lanes (wide outside travel lanes) will adequately allow bicyclists to share the road with automobiles without separate bicycle lanes. Furthermore, this typical section includes a 5-foot wide sidewalk to accommodate pedestrian traffic. The year 2015 planning level cost estimate to install this typical section from the northern end of the corridor in front of the proposed car dealership to the 90 degree curve in the road south of the intersection with Leesville Road is $6,530,000 (a distance of 0.76 miles). This cost estimate includes extending the sidewalk through to Leesville Road. Conceptual plans for this typical section are displayed in Figure 15. Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 22

Simons Run Corridor Analysis An alternative typical section was also developed to provide separate accommodation of bicycle and pedestrian traffic. The travel lanes revert to the typical 12-foot width, and the center left turn lane expands to 14 feet. Instead of a 5-foot sidewalk, a 10-foot shared use path has been included. However, this wider shared-use path also necessitates a wider buffer between the road and the path. Consequently, the required ROW expands from 60 feet to 68 feet. The year 2015 planning level cost estimate to install this typical section from the northern end of the corridor (in front of the proposed car dealership) to the 90 degree curve in the road south of the intersection with Leesville Road (a distance of 0.76 miles) is $6,599,000. This cost estimate includes extending the shared-use path through to Leesville Road. Conceptual plans for this typical section are displayed in Figure 16. It should be noted that the planning level cost estimates do not include ROW acquisition costs, utility relocation costs, or loss of property taxes. Multi-Modal Build Alternative Scenario 1 provides for a 300-bedroom townhouse/apartment complex in addition to mixed commercial uses. It is estimated that this scenario would generate 2 bicycle trips and 5 pedestrian trips in each peak hour. In contrast, Build Alternative Scenario 2 is exclusively oriented for development of commercial uses. The result is that Scenario 2 is estimated to generate 1 bicycle trip and 2 pedestrian trips in each peak hour. Bus stops are currently located at each end of Simons Run as part of the Greater Lynchburg Transit Company s network. It is recommended that an additional bus stop be located between Parcels 9A and 9B; this location will serve as a central stop between the bus stops on either end of the corridor, and will directly serve both the residential complex on Parcel 9A in Scenario 1, and the hotel on Parcel 9B in both Scenarios. Signing The geometry of Simons Run at its eastern end near Wards Ferry Road is not intuitive as motorists travel eastbound: the roadway itself continues straight to an unsignalized directional intersection with Wards Ferry Road, whereas Simons Run officially turns left and snakes around the Wards Crossing West parking lot just before it intersects Wards Ferry Road to the north of the aforementioned unsignalized directional intersection. Unfamiliar motorists traveling eastbound on Simons Run may not know that they need Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 25

Simons Run Corridor Analysis to turn left at the unsignalized four-way intersection in front of the small strip shopping center to the southeast in order to continue to Wards Ferry Road northbound. Traveling straight through this intersection forces motorists to make a right turn onto southbound Wards Ferry Road which then immediately intersects with Wards Road. The project management team brought up this issue and requested that additional signage be developed to help alleviate the confusion caused by the non-intuitive geometry and restricted access. URS developed proposed signing to help inform motorists which direction to take in order to reach their destination. URS followed MUTCD standards when developing the proposed signage. Figure 17 displays the recommended guide signage to assist eastbound Simons Run motorists in making destination decisions when the approach Wards Ferry Road. Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 26

Simons Run Corridor Analysis V. COST-BENEFIT EVALUATION OF EXTENSION OF SIMONS RUN TO AIRPORT ROAD The proposed extension of Simons Run south would create a new intersection with Airport Road (Route 678). The original intent of this extension was to provide a fullaccess intersection to Airport Road using the existing median crossover located approximately 95 feet west of the westbound US Route 460 off-ramp. However, according to the VDOT Road Design Manual, a full-access intersection next to an interchange requires a minimum spacing of 1,320 feet nearly the distance from the Route 460 interchange to the Leesville Road intersection. An alternative design would provide a partial-access intersection, which requires spacing of 750 feet. Partial access would provide for left turning movements into Simons Run from eastbound Airport Road but prohibit left turning movements from southbound Simons Run to eastbound Airport Road. Partial access would also allow for rightin/right-out turning movements at the intersection of Simons Run and Airport Road. Consequently, for the proposed extension of Simons Run, the design provides for a partial access intersection located farther west on Airport Road, closer to the intersection of Greenview Drive/Airport Road with Leesville Road. However, due to the intersection improvements previously discussed at that location, as well as the residential parcels located on the north side of Airport Road, separation of only 395 feet from the US Route 460 interchange was attainable. Therefore, an access management exemption will have to be requested from VDOT to allow for substandard spacing of the intersection to the interchange. Figure 18 displays the horizontal distances from the proposed intersection of the Simons Run extension with Airport Road to the US Route 460 interchange, and the intersection of Greenview Drive/Airport Road with Leesville Road, as well as the horizontal distance from the existing median break on Airport Road to the US Route 460 interchange. Both of the two typical sections previously displayed in Figure 14 were evaluated for use as the extension of Simons Run. Figure 19 displays the conceptual plans for an extended segment of Simons Run with the 60-foot ROW typical section, and Figure 20 displays both the modified internal Simons Run intersection, and the new intersection of Simons Run with Airport Road. In both layouts, the westbound US Route 460 off-ramp onto westbound Airport Road is extended as a right turn onto the intersection with the proposed Simons Run extension. Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 29

Simons Run Corridor Analysis The planning level cost estimate for the 60-foot-wide ROW extension of Simons Run is $2,730,000 in year 2015 dollars. Figure 21 displays the conceptual plans for an extended segment of Simons Run with the 68-foot ROW typical section, and Figure 22 displays both the modified internal Simons Run intersection, and the new intersection of Simons Run with Airport Road. The planning level cost estimate for the 68-foot-wide ROW extension of Simons Run is $2,721,000 in year 2015 dollars. Here also, it should be noted that these planning level cost estimates do not include ROW acquisition costs nor do they include utility relocation costs. Furthermore, costs for the proposed extension may be mitigated by installing the extension concurrent with development activity as parcels are developed. All planning level construction cost estimates may be found in the Technical Appendix. Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 33

Travel Time Impacts Simons Run Corridor Analysis Travel time cost savings were calculated to determine the benefits to motorists from the installation of the Simons Run Extension. Two destinations were considered: the intersection of Greenview Drive/Airport Road with Leesville Road, and the US Route 460 interchange with Airport Road. A centroid point was used to approximate the center of the development, based on the size and location of the various parcels to be developed. This centroid was placed on Simons Run between Parcels 9A and 9B, at a distance of 0.58 mile from the intersection of Simons Run with Leesville Road. Daily volumes were then applied from the centroid to the two aforementioned destinations, and vice versa. To estimate daily volumes, AM peak hour volumes were used. AM peak hour volumes generally comprise 7% of the total daily volumes at any given intersection; specifically, AM peak hour volumes for both the existing geometry and the Simons Run extension geometry were extrapolated to give an estimate of the daily volumes. Once daily volumes were calculated, they were applied to the roadway network given the trip distribution patterns previously shown in Figures 8 and 11. To calculate travel time, the number of vehicles on a given roadway segment were multiplied by the length of that segment, and then divided by the speed limit of that segment. Next, the delay encountered at any intersections between the origin and destination was added to arrive at an estimated overall travel time from origin to destination. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the mean hourly wage for the Lynchburg Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) is $18.08. By multiplying the overall travel time by the mean hourly wage, an estimate of daily travel cost savings was calculated. To create a more accurate picture of the full cost-benefit analysis, it was assumed that the extra cost of the Simons Run extension would be financed, rather than paid in full up front. Assuming a 22-year loan beginning payments in 2016 at a 5% annual interest rate, annual payments were calculated for both the 60-foot-wide and 68-footwide ROW options. The calculations assumed that the extension would be completed in 2017, and any travel cost benefits would gradually increase over the next several years, coming to the maximum level upon the full development of the parcels on Simons Run in 2024. Travel costs were annually increased at an inflation rate of 3% through the design year and loan payoff year of 2037. Table 6 displays a summary of the costbenefit analysis of the proposed extension of Simons Run to Airport Road. According to the Campbell County Assessor, any extension of the Simons Run corridor will not have any measurable impact on assessed property values on the undeveloped Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 36

Simons Run Corridor Analysis parcels along the Simons Run corridor. Consequently, no additional annual property tax revenues are anticipated to be realized by installation of the extension. Year Table 6 Simons Run Extension Cost-Benefit Analysis 60-Foot ROW 68-Foot ROW Annual Costs Annual Benefits Annual Costs Annual Benefits 2016 $220,035 $0 $219,267 $0 2017 $220,035 $38,292 $219,267 $38,292 2018 $220,035 $78,881 $219,267 $78,881 2019 $220,035 $121,871 $219,267 $121,871 2020 $220,035 $167,369 $219,267 $167,369 2021 $220,035 $215,488 $219,267 $215,488 2022 $220,035 $266,343 $219,267 $266,343 2023 $220,035 $320,055 $219,267 $320,055 2024 $220,035 $376,751 $219,267 $376,751 2025 $220,035 $388,053 $219,267 $388,053 2026 $220,035 $399,695 $219,267 $399,695 2027 $220,035 $411,686 $219,267 $411,686 2028 $220,035 $424,036 $219,267 $424,036 2029 $220,035 $436,758 $219,267 $436,758 2030 $220,035 $449,860 $219,267 $449,860 2031 $220,035 $463,356 $219,267 $463,356 2032 $220,035 $477,257 $219,267 $477,257 2033 $220,035 $491,574 $219,267 $491,574 2034 $220,035 $506,322 $219,267 $506,322 2035 $220,035 $521,511 $219,267 $521,511 2036 $220,035 $537,157 $219,267 $537,157 2037 $220,035 $553,271 $219,267 $553,271 Totals $4,840,780 $7,645,586 $4,823,869 $7,645,586 Benefit/ Cost Ratio 1.58 1.58 Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 37

Simons Run Corridor Analysis VI. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Findings & Conclusions Both alternative typical sections provide a three-lane typical section with a two-way center left turn lane, which will provide for better vehicular service to Simons Run as development along the corridor proceeds. Additionally, both alternatives provide facilities for pedestrians and bicycles as well as for vehicular transportation. The respective costs for both alternatives are nearly identical. Table 7 displays a summary of the planning level cost estimates for the two typical sections. Alternative 60-Foot ROW 68-Foot ROW Table 7 Summary of Planning Level Cost Estimates Year 2015 Dollars Description Existing Alignment Improvements Length Costs (mi.) Simons Run Extension Length Costs (mi.) 3-Lane Urban Section (41-foot 0.76 $6,266,000 0.32 $2,638,000 pavement width) 5-foot Sidewalk 0.92 $264,000 0.32 $92,000 Total 0.92 $6,530,000 0.32 $2,730,000 3-Lane Urban Section (38-foot 0.76 $5,808,000 0.32 $2,445,000 pavement width) 10-foot Shareduse Path 0.92 $791,000 0.32 $275,000 Total 0.92 $6,599,000 0.32 $2,721,000 However, the 68-foot-wide typical section would require the acquisition of land from the land owners because the existing right-of-way is only 60 feet wide. The major difference in the two typical sections is how multi-modal facilities are provided. The 60- foot-wide typical section provides wide outside lanes (14 feet wide) that provide for onroad bike accommodations, and it also provides a 5-foot sidewalk for pedestrians. The 68-foot-wide typical section provides accommodations for bikes and pedestrians in the form of a 10-foot-wide shared-use trail on one side of the road. The recommended posted speed limit on the corridor is to be 35 MPH in both alternatives. Figure 14 displays the typical section, while Figures 16, 21, and 22 displays the conceptual plans throughout the study area. Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 38

Simons Run Corridor Analysis While there is an existing break in the median on Airport Road, according to the VDOT Road Design Manual a partial-access intersection adjacent to an interchange requires a minimum of 750 feet of horizontal spacing. The existing break is only 95 feet from the interchange, and therefore installing an access driveway at the existing median crossover would not comply with the intersection spacing standards. If the alignment of the extension of Simons Run were to be moved so that the intersection with Airport Road could be located as far west as possible, a maximum horizontal separation of only 395 feet from the interchange would result still not in compliance with the 750 feet of separation provided in the VDOT guidelines. Consequently, regardless of the location of the extension intersection with Airport Road, an access management exemption will be required from VDOT as part of the access permit application process. Ultimately both typical section alternatives provide a benefit/cost ratio that exceeds one: both alternatives provide a benefit/cost ratio of 1.58 over the design life (20 years) of the road. The decision in choosing a particular typical-section is primarily differentiated by the right-of-way impacts (no right-of-way acquisition or 8 feet of right-of-way acquisition) and type of bicycle and pedestrian facilities that are desired (on road bike facilities and a sidewalk versus a shared-use path). Recommendations 1. Extend Simons Run to a Partial Intersection with Airport Road: The benefits of time savings for motorists more than offset construction costs. Moreover, while the assessed property values may not be increased, the likelihood of development is increased with the enhanced access to the corridor from Route 460. The improvements to Simons Run should be designed to meet current VDOT standards for an urban collector street standard (GS-7) with curb and gutter drainage and a 40 MPH design speed. 2. Install the Simons Run Extension as the 60-foot-wide ROW pavement section: This section will adequately accommodate limited expected number of bicyclists and pedestrians. It will also accommodate and be consistent with future upgrades to the existing pavement section. 3. Add Bus Stops: As detailed in Chapter IV, it is recommended that bus stops be added on Simons Run between Parcels 9A and 9B to serve as a central stopping point on the corridor. Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 39

Simons Run Corridor Analysis 4. Add directional guidance signage as shown in Figure 17 (page 28) to the northbound Simons Run approach to the intersections with Wards Ferry Road. Simons Run September 30, 2014 Corridor Analysis Campbell County, Virginia Page 40