CHAPTER 6. Introduction. Transit Element. The Kanawha Valley Regional Transportation Authority System. Kanawha County Putnam County

Similar documents
Transportation in Washoe County. Lee Gibson, Executive Director February 15, 2011

ARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Staunton. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

Arnold Hinojosa

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Table of Contents Table of Contents... 3 Glossary... 3 Charlottesville Area Transit (CAT) Transit Route abbreviations... 3 JAUNT Commuter Route

FY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Craig Rempp, Transit Superintendent Mary Karlsson, Kimley-Horn. Mankato City Council Meeting 6/25/2018

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Route 7 Corridor Study

Attachment One. Integration of Performance Measures Into the Bryan/College Station MPO FY 2019 FY 2022 Transportation Improvement Program

Table of Contents Table of Contents... 3 Glossary... 3 Charlottesville Area Transit (CAT) Transit Route abbreviations... 3 JAUNT Commuter Route

Project Description Form 8EE

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN

SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

ARRENTON RANSPORTATION

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Aurora Corridor to E Line

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

Long-Range Financial Plan Implications of Revised Sales Tax Projections for DART

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

VIII. Project Prioritization & Implementation

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

1/30/2019 DRAFT. January 31, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

TexRail Truth. The real story of pork politics, government waste and taxpayer abuse in Tarrant County. December 10, 2014!

Vision to Action Community Coalition February 14, 2014 Briefing

Designing Streets for Transit. Presentation to NACTO Designing Cities Kevin O Malley Managing Deputy Commissioner 10/24/2014

San Francisco s Capital Plan & the Mayor s Transportation Task Force 2030: Funding the next steps for transportation

Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

Transportation Authority of Marin Renew Existing ½-cent Transportation Sales Tax

Final Study Recommendations AMES TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY. For Public Review and Comment. October Ames Transit Feasibility Study

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Where We Live and Work Today

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Broward Boulevard Gateway Implementation Project, Downtown Walkability Analysis, & Joint Development Initiative (JDI)

WHAT IFS: Over the course of

Transportation Assessment

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

APPENDIX D: Southwest Volusia Regional Transportation Study. Evaluation Criteria FINAL

Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study. Naples City Council Presentation January 2017

APPENDIX C. Systems Performance Report C-1

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report September 2017 (Fiscal Year-end 2017)

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Scheduling 101 Calculating Running Time Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Multimodal Operations Workshop Houston, TX

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

Spring Hill Corridor Study

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Virginia Street Bus RAPID Transit Extension Project. Environmental Assessment (EA) Presentation Public Hearing June 22, 2017

Rhode Island Moving Forward Long-Range Transportation Plan 2040 Municipal Roundtable Providence County

Prince George s County Council Retreat January 5, 2017

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

US 19 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safe Access to Transit Corridor Study

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Better Market Street. Engineering, Maintenance & Safety Committee (EMSC) February 28, 2018

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

Feasibility Study for Intermodal Facility in Anchorage, Alaska

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

TRANSPORTATION & ACCESS

Sarasota/Manatee MPO Project Priorities 2016 Adopted April 25, 2016

Hurricane to Zion Canyon Transit Study

Welcome. Wilmington Transit Moving Forward Workshop Presentation. October 16, 2013

Project Description Form 8AA

Transportation. Pages E-3 to E-145 PROPOSED FY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) CCCRC Presentation Thursday, June 14, 2018

Bicycle Lanes Planning, Design, Funding South Mountain Partnership Trails Workshop Roy Gothie PennDOT Statewide Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator

METRO Light Rail: Changing Transit Markets in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area

Secondary Road Program

APPENDIX D: SACRAMENTO URBAN AREA TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES

Draft. Lecompton. Table of Contents. Background

Tunnel Reconstruction South 5 th Street Association October 16, 2018

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

Portland International Airport Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (October 2003) Staff Acknowledgements

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

Roanoke Valley TRANSIT VISION PLAN

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting Steve Fittante, New Jersey Transit Corporation September 30, 2013

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

Passenger Rail in Virginia

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Going Green: How California is Reviving Passenger Rail. APTA/ AASHTO AASHTO 2008 State Public Transit Partnerships. August 7, 2008

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

Bus Riders of Saskatoon Meeting with City of Saskatoon Utility Services Department October 23, :30pm 2:30pm th Street West, Saskatoon

Interim Transit Ridership Forecast Results Technical Memorandum

Chapter 4 Transportation Strategies to Support Growth

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Mobility Greater Johnson County Transportation Coalition. May 23, 2018

CITY OF HAMILTON PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Transportation Planning and Parking Division

Transcription:

CHAPTER 6 Transit Element The Kanawha Valley Regional Transportation Authority boasts multiple hybrid buses Introduction Transit provides mobility to thousands of residents who cannot, or choose not to, drive. Bus and/or rail transit also provide a regional air quality benefit by reducing the number of cars on the road, particularly during congested travel periods and on hot summer days. The region s transit services provide access to major regional employers, shopping areas, health care services, social services, and universities. Chapter 6 examines existing transit, rail, and air services as well as future initiatives, and describes the challenges facing the regional transit providers. In addition, this chapter identifies several roadway recommendations that will likely benefit the transit system. The Kanawha Valley Regional Transportation Authority System The Kanawha Valley Regional Transportation Authority (KVRTA) system serves Kanawha County and portions of Fayette and Putnam counties. The service area is approximately 913 square miles, with a population of approximately 188,332. An estimated 88% of Kanawha County s residents live within three quarters of a mile of a KVRTA route. KVRTA operates a network of 20 fixed routes oriented around the commercial center of Charleston. With the exceptions of four holidays during the year, KVRTA provides service seven days a week. The earliest routes begin at 4:20 a.m., and service continues until 12:30 a.m. the next day. Complimentary paratransit service, known as Kanawha Alternative Transit, or KAT, operates during the same days and hours. KVRTA recently changed from a zonal fare system to a flat fee system. Each ride costs a passenger $1.50, and daily passes are available for $2.50. The fares for the paratransit service are twice the rate of the fixed-route system. KVRTA offers discount passes and reduced senior fares for all routes. Kanawha County Putnam County Prepared by the Regional Intergovernmental Council Chapter 1: Transit Element 6-1

Regional Transportation Plan KVRTA operates a fleet of 55 vehicles for fixed-route service. The fleet consists of 30- and 35-foot-long transit coaches, minibuses, and five rubbertired trolleys. KVRTA also has 15 cutaway vans for the Kanawha Alternative Transit (KAT) complimentary paratransit service. KVRTA s operations, maintenance, and administrative headquarters are located on 4 th Avenue in Charleston. The Laidley Street Transit Mall, in downtown Charleston, is the hub and transfer center for all routes. The Transit Mall is a component of the multiuse, multimodal space that includes commercial and entertainment venues, hotels, and government offices. 6-2 Chapter 6: Transit

Final Report October 2017 KVRTA System Analysis In an effort to adapt to the challenging fiscal climate, KVRTA conducted a system analysis to evaluate potential service expansion and reduction. The study included an analysis of demographics and passenger surveys, evaluated the existing route structure, forecasted future service levels, and proposed future funding strategies. This plan was a collaboration between KRT staff, the KRT board, and the Regional Intergovernmental Council. Goals included modernizing the transit system to better connect the customers with their communities and develop opportunities for increased communication and partnership. Service modifications included the removal of three routes: Woodward Drive, Montgomery/Easkdale, and Garrison Avenue/Hillsdale. Two new routes were added, South Side and the Charleston Loop, and an express route was added to the Southridge route. KRT Live is an app developed for KVRTA passengers to view fare and schedule information and locate their bus in real time. Transit Expenditures and Revenues The two primary funding sources for KVRTA s gap between costs and farebox revenue are: 1) special levy money, and 2) the Federal Transit Authority (FTA) Section 5307 Operating Assistance. The levy amount, determined by local property taxes, requires approval by Kanawha County voters every four years (60.0% approval is required). FTA apportions Section 5307 funds on a formula basis. KVRTA also uses a portion of its Section 5307 funds for capital expenses. Historically, KVRTA has also received capital assistance from the FTA section 5309 (Bus Discretionary Fund). However, as discussed below, recent legislation within MAP-21 replaced Section 5309. KVRTA receives funding through several state programs, such as the TRIP program (currently not in use), the Statehouse Shuttle, and Medicare costs. KVRTA does not directly receive operating assistance from the State. Transit Throughout the Region As previously mentioned, KVRTA routes extend into small portions of Putnam and Fayette counties. Transit throughout Putnam County has been studied in the past; the study revealed insufficient interest and funding. The IT Bus began January 5, 2009 and intended to improve commuter traffic between Charleston and Huntington, WV. Passengers could ride from Huntington to Charleston in the morning or evening for $3. The service was originally funded through federal and State grants; this funding was exhausted in 2012. The fare was increased by $1 and the operating costs were split between KVRTA, the State of WV, and TTA (Tri-State Transit Chapter 6: Transit 6-3

Regional Transportation Plan Authority in Huntington). After the fare increase and a decline in gas prices, ridership dropped from 1,500 riders a month to 500, and the service ended August 28, 2015. Recommendations Potential transit benefits were considered when prioritizing highway improvement projects and developing recommendations. A detailed route analysis was completed recently and was not studied as part of this plan. The following projects listed in Table 6-1 provide roadway improvements along current KVRTA routes. The study team anticipates that these projects will improve transit operations on routes that use these roadways. Table 6-1: Roadway Improvements Along KVRTA Routes PROJECT ID ROADWAY DESCRIPTION CL-8 Goff Mountain Road Widen from 3 to 5 lanes KC-4 US 119 (Corridor G) Add third lane to US 119 NB KC-5 US 119 (Corridor G) Add third lane in both directions; add Cantley Flyover to US 119SB KC-6 US 119 (Corridor G) Add third lane in both directions and upgrade frontage roads KC-8A Dupont Avenue (US 60) Widen to 4 lanes divided (Section A of US 60 Upgrade Study) KC-8B Dupont Avenue (US 60) Add right-turn lane and coal facility KC-8C Dupont Avenue (US 60) Add center turn lane from Sycamore Road to Britt Hollow (approximately 1.2 miles). Add right-turn lane at recycling center. The improvements will help reduce the risk of rear-end collisions while improving traffic flow. KC-8D Dupont Avenue (US 60) Add center turn lane west through London for approximately one mile, reducing the risk of rear end collisions and improving traffic flow. KC-9 Greenbrier St (WV 114) Widen to 3 lanes with a two-way left-turn lane SH-A MacCorkle Ave (US 60) Signal optimization, consistent travel lane widths, repurpose on-street parking for wider sidewalks/bike lanes, make consistent center turn lane, relocate utilities, provide ADA-compliant sidewalks SH-C Ford St, Vine St, Greenway Ave Convert North Ford, North Vine, South Vine, and South Greenway to One Way Pairs PROJECT ID ROADWAY DESCRIPTION 6-4 Chapter 6: Transit

Final Report October 2017 KC-2 CL-3 & CL-7 Goff Mountain Rd/Big Tyler Road (WV 622) & Cross Lanes Dr/Washington Street W (WV 62) Intersection of WV 622 & Brick Lane Planning Process KVRTA faces the increasing challenge of needing to do more with less. Bus passenger volumes are close to all-time highs, while federal funding continues to decline. Simply put, there is insufficient funding to cover KVRTA s capital and operational costs. Under MAP-21 legislation, Section 5339 (Bus and Bus Facilities Program) replaced Section 5309 (Bus Discretionary Fund). The WV Division of Transit will administer Section 5339 and distribute funding to all small-urban areas (eight throughout the state). In addition, transit funding has changed due to shifting urbanized area boundaries. Specifically, Teays Valley is now part of the Huntington, WV urbanized area. The study team considered potential transit benefits when prioritizing highway improvement projects and developing recommendations, with the understanding that a detailed market study and system analysis was recently completed. There are several roadway projects that will impact transit routes; completion of these projects will improve the operation of KVRTA routes. Transit Asset Management Planning Optimize signal cycle length, splits, and offsets Extend turn lane lengths to 500 feet for all intersection approaches Convert northbound/southbound right-turn only lanes to shared through/right-turn lanes, and add receiving lanes on the opposite sides of the intersection to allow vehicles to merge after the intersection Construct a roundabout and a raised median to improve traffic flow and alleviate congestion SA 3rd Street in St. Albans Improvements from St. Albans 3rd Street Corridor Study CL-4 Big Tyler Road (WV 622) & Kroger Driveway Add a southbound right-turn lane at Kroger Entrance Transit Asset Management is a new requirement for all transit providers receiving federal funds due to new requirements from MAP-21 and the FAST Act. Transit Asset Management (TAM) is a business model that uses the condition of assets to guide the optimal prioritization of funding at transit properties to keep our transit networks in a State of Good Repair. The West Virginia Division of Public Transit is coordinating with the transit providers throughout West Virginia to develop a TAM Plan before the October 2018 deadline. KVRTA is coordinating with RIC to develop and annually report the following performance targets: Chapter 6: Transit 6-5

Regional Transportation Plan Percentage of non-revenue service vehicles that have met or exceeded their Useful Life Benchmark (ULB) Percentage of revenue vehicles, within a particular asset class, that have met or exceeded their ULB Percentage of facilities with a condition rating below 3.0 on the FTA Transit Economic Requirements Model scale. Passenger Rail Two long-distance Amtrak lines currently serve West Virginia. The Capitol Limited, operating between Washington, D.C. and Chicago, IL, stops in Harpers Ferry, WV and Martinsburg, WV. Meanwhile, the Cardinal route, providing service from Chicago, IL to New York, NY, stops in Charleston, Huntington, and other West Virginia communities. The Cardinal route offers three trips per week. As illustrated in Table 6-2 passenger volumes on the Cardinal increased by 7.0% from FY 2008 to FY 2012, yet decreased by 10% during the next four years. Table 6-2: Passenger Rail Ridership and Pricing Charleston, WV Amtrak Station YEAR RIDERSHIP TICKET REVENUE (in millions) FY 2008 109,195 $6.50 FY 2012 116,373 $7.50 FY 2016 104,831 $7.65 The West Virginia State Rail Plan provides a comprehensive overview of intercity passenger services throughout the state, and is required for West Virginia to be eligible for existing and prospective federal rail financial assistance. Cardinal Conference At the request of businesses and local interests on the Chicago-Indianapolis- Cincinnati-West Virginia-Washington portion of Amtrak s Cardinal route, Amtrak held an event called the Cardinal Conference on September 23, 2016 in Cincinnati. The intent of the conference was to build a coalition of communities, universities, and other public and private interests similar to grassroots coalitions like the Gulf Coast Working Group or on the Southwest Chief route. The purpose of such a coalition would be to seek 6-6 Chapter 6: Transit

Final Report October 2017 improvements for the Cardinal, namely a push for daily service on that route. According to the West Virginia State Rail Plan, the establishment of daily Cardinal service depends on ridership and revenue increases as well as improved connectivity to significant passenger generators, such as universities, hotels, and ski resorts. Daily service, if implemented, could likely contribute to a 40.0% increase in service on West Virginia s intercity network. Passenger Air Yeager Airport in Kanawha County serves five commercial airlines (American, United, Delta, Spirit, and US Airways) and provides direct flights to Houston, Chicago, Washington DC, Atlanta, Philadelphia, Fort Lauderdale, Myrtle Beach, and Charlotte. In 2015, there were 225,170 passenger boardings (enplanements) at the airport, a slight decrease from 2014. According to airport officials, the Boy Scout camp could contribute a 10.0% annual increase in enplanements. Chapter 6: Transit 6-7