EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL TREATMENTS AT SKID ACCIDENT LOCATIONS. Charles W. Payne Highway Materials Technician

Similar documents
Highway Research Analyst

2016 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates

ENGINEERING DRIVER SAFETY INTO PAVEMENT PRESERVATION

The Highway Safety Program and the Traffic Engineer

HSIS. Association of Selected Intersection Factors With Red-Light-Running Crashes. State Databases Used SUMMARY REPORT

FYG Backing for Work Zone Signs

2002 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates. Special Locality Report 209

2002 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 261

2010 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 172

SPEED PROFILES APPROACHING A TRAFFIC SIGNAL

2005 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 324

Pedestrian Accidents in Utah

1 Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Victoria, RACV, 550 Princes Highway Noble Park, Victoria, 3174.

2002 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates. Special Locality Report 146

Designing and Benchmarking Mine Roads for Safe and Efficient Haulage. Roger Thompson Alex Visser

2003 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates. Special Locality Report 198

INFLUENCE OF TRAFFIC FLOW SEPARATION DEVICES ON ROAD SAFETY IN BRAZIL S MULTILANE HIGHWAYS

Pedestrian Accidents in Kentucky

2001 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volumes Including Vehicle Classification Estimates where available. Jurisdiction Report 24

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

2017 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Traffic Accident Data Processing

2016 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates

2009 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 227

2014 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates

Use of Additional Through Lanes at Signalized Intersections

At-Grade Intersections versus Grade-Separated Interchanges (An Economic Analysis of Several Bypasses)

INFLUENCE OF PAVEMENT DISTRESS ON TRAVEL TIME

FINAL REPORT DETERMINING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PAVEMENT MARKING MATERIALS. Benjamin H. Cottrell, Jr. Senior Research Scientist

2009 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 250

2002 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates. Special Locality Report 204

2015 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates

LIVERPOOL TRANSPORTATION MODELING TECHNICAL MEMO MAY 2009

Road Condition Statistics: Notes and definitions

2015 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates

Effects of Traffic Condition (v/c) on Safety at Freeway Facility Sections

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Cycle journeys on the Anderston-Argyle Street footbridge: a descriptive analysis. Karen McPherson. Glasgow Centre for Population Health

Guidelines for Integrating Safety and Cost-Effectiveness into Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

Road Surface Characteristics and Accidents. Mike Mamlouk, Ph.D., P.E. Arizona State University

Mobility and Congestion

Colored Entrance Treatments for Rural Traffic Calming

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 613 IMPACT ATTENUATOR WORK DESCRIPTION 3

THE DEVELOPMENT OF MALAYSIAN HIGHWAY RAIL LEVEL CROSSING SAFETY SYSTEMS: A PROPOSED RESEARCH FRAMEWORK. Siti Zaharah Ishak

2014 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates

2002 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates. Special Locality Report 153

2015 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates

2010 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 331

2017 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates

Colorado Department of Transportation Crash Data Program Alisa Babler, PE

Geometric Categories as Intersection Safety Evaluation Tools

INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. The Honorable Board ofpolice Commissioners

2016 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates

Human Factors for Limited-Ability Autonomous Driving Systems

Pavement Markings (1 of 3)

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

Bhagwant N. Persaud* Richard A. Retting Craig Lyon* Anne T. McCartt. May *Consultant to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

SEVERE TRAFFIC CRASH SPEAKS: SAFETY FACTS FROM MOUNTAIN ROADS IN CHINA

IMPACT OF GEOMETRIC CONDITIONS ON WYOMING S RURAL CRASHES

Accident Relationships of Roadway Width on Low-Volume Roads

PAVEMENT FUNCTIONAL SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS

Impact of Reduced Maintenance on Road Safety

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Another View of Truck Lane Restrictions

Bicycle and Pedestrian Level of Service Evaluation

2010 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 153

91

WHITE LINES SAVE LIVES ROAD MARKINGS AND ACTIVE SAFETY

DRAFT. Memo. Range of the Alternatives Considered in the EIS

Rural Highway Overtaking Lanes

Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness to Make Intersections Safer

2015 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates

Safety Assessment of Installing Traffic Signals at High-Speed Expressway Intersections

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report

REPORT. Engineering and Construction Department

Super 2: Recent Research in Energy Corridors

3 ROADWAYS 3.1 CMS ROADWAY NETWORK 3.2 TRAVEL-TIME-BASED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Roadway Travel Time Measures

Safety Behavior for Cycling : Application Theory of Planned Behavior

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Recently Developed Intersection CMFs. Nancy Lefler, VHB ATSIP Traffic Records Forum, 2014

2011 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 247

Parks Highway: MP Lucus Road to Big Lake Road

2008 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 247

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

FREEWAY WORK ZONE SPEED MODEL DOCUMENTATION

PUBLISHED PROJECT REPORT PPR850. Optimisation of water flow depth for SCRIM. S Brittain, P Sanders and H Viner

Lessons Learned from the Minnesota County Road Safety Plans. Richard Storm CH2M HILL

Copy of my report. Why am I giving this talk. Overview. State highway network

LYNNWOOD ROAD ARTERIAL STUDY The effect of intersection spacing on arterial operation

2003 road trauma for. Wairoa District. Road casualties Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues WAIROA DISTRICT JULY 2004

Analyzing Traffic Engineering Problems in Small Cities D onald S. Berry

Traffic Control and Accidents at Rural High-Speed Intersections

CHAPTER 3 STUDY AREA OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW

Merging Traffic at Signalled Junctions

Traffic Parameter Methods for Surrogate Safety Comparative Study of Three Non-Intrusive Sensor Technologies

Interstate 66 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement. Cooperating and Participating Agencies Meeting March 19, 2012

Transcription:

v 1644 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL TREATMENTS AT SKID ACCIDENT LOCATIONS by Charles W. Payne Highway Materials Technician Virginia Highway Research Council (A Cooperative Organization Sponsored Jo intly by the Virginia Department of Highways and the University of Virginia) Charlottesville, Virginia March 1974 VHRC 73-R50

, 1645 SUMMARY The Virginia Department of Highways has for many years been concerned with the slipperiness of highway pavements, and has undertaken remedial action at numerous high wet accident locations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the remedial action taken at 18 locations to determine if the percentages of wet accidents were significantly reduced.. The remedial action taken has always been either resurfacing or grooving. The findirlgs of this study were that both resurfacing to increase skid resistance and grooving tended to reduce the percentage of wet pavement accidents, with resurfacing seeming to provide the greater benefit. iii

..: 1646 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL TREATMENTS AT SKID ACCIDENT LOCATIONS by Charles W.. Payne Highway Materials Technician INTRODUC TION For years, Virginia has been aware of the necessity to maintain roads with skid resistance adequate for the safety of the traveling.public. Minimum skid resistance standards have been established and the use of some polish susceptible aggregates has been proscribed on heavily traveled primary and interstate roads. Even so, some highways still become slippery and cause skidding accidents. When skidding accidents are reported, skid tests are performed at the accident locations and remedial action is taken where the average skid number is found to be less than 40 as measured by the stopping distance method or predicted by the Virginia Highway Research Council skid trailer 0 For the past four years most testing has been done with the skid trailer with skid numbers being reported as predicted stopping distance skid numbers based on the relationship between the car and trailer. The determinatio.n of the skid resistance at accident locations is done by the Research Council, with the responsibility having been assigned to the Maintenance Section since its formation in 19670 Since 1967 numerous accident locations have been tested upon request and at 30 of these sites remedial measures have been taken. Prior to 1969, pavement resurfacing was used to improve the skid resistance. Since that time either resurfacing or pavement grooving has been used. PURPOSE The general purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective measures - resurfacings and grooving - used by the Highway Department to reduce skidding accidents.. SCOPE Initially it was planned to include in the evaluation all 30 sites at which remedial action was taken.. However it was not possible to obtain either the accident or skid data required to make the desired analysis for all 30 sites so only 18 sites were included in the study.. The remaining 12 sites will be analyzed and reported on after the necessary data have been developed..

tj 1647 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS Data for the 18 sites included in the study are shown in Tables 1 and 2, with Table 1 showing data for those sites that were resurfaced and Table 2 showing data for those sites that were grooved. In both tables the data are arranged in ascending order by,the skid number in the traffic lane before any treatment. Also shown in Tables 1 and 2 are the skid data after resurfacing or grooving, as well as the total accidents, wet pavement accidents and percentage wet pavement accidents that occurred at each site prior to and after the resurfacing or grooving. For those sites resurfaced (Table 1), the data include accidents occurring two years prior to the resurfacing and two years after the resurfacing. These data were obtained from the automated accident data files maintained by the Data Processing Division and include all lanes in both directions throughout the site since the resurfacing included all lanes. For the grooved sites, the accident data were obtained from the report entitled "An Accident Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Longitudinal Grooving on Virginia's Interstate System", by the Traffic and Safety Division of the Virginia Department of Highways. These data are for varying time periods (as indicated in Table 2) before and after grooving and include only accidents occurring on the lanes grooved. It is the percentage wet pavement accidents that is used to determine if a site has relatively more wet pavement accidents than normal. * The percentage of wet pavement accidents does not indicate a high total accident site (a rate such as accidents per 100 million vehicle miles is the measure normally used for this purpose) but indicates only those sites having a larger proportion of wet pavement accidents than normal. Results for Resurfaced Sites As can be seen in Table 1, the percentage of wet pavement accidents decreased substantially after resurfacing on nine sites, the exceptions being sites 1, 6, 12, and 13, which are discussed below. Site 1 was in a city and the traffic conditions are quite different from those of the open roadway. It is interesting to note that the total number ofaccidents dropped from 469 for two years prior to resurfacing to 259 for two years after resurfacing. Site 6 had too few accidents before and after resurfacing to permit a meaningful evaluation. Site 12 was on a two-lane secondary road segment having a poor cross section. Prior to resurfacing one lane was slippery (SN == 33) due to a flushing condition, while after resurfacing the situation was reversed; io e., the once slippery lane had a higher skid number but the other lane by then had a reduced skid number due to flushing (SN = 43). For site 13, a decrease in the percentage of wet pavement accidents was not expected since the skid nund er was high prior to resurfacing and the percentage was approximately 20%, which according to Mahone and Runkle is normal for good conditions. This section was scheduled to be resurfaced for normal maintenance purposes and was included in the study as a control section to verify the 20% wet pavement accident figure mentioned previously. * In the paper "Slipperiness of Highway Pavements - Phase I" Mahone and Runkle of the Research Council reported the normal percentage of wet pavement accidents to be about 20% - 2 -

Table 1 Skid and Accident Data for Sites Resurfaced 2 Years Before Resurfacing 2 Years After Resurfacing Average Skid Number Accidents Average Skid Number Accidents Site Traffic Lane Passing Lane Total Wet % Wet Traffic Lane Passing Lane Total Wet % Wet 1 28 399 70 18% 57 222 37 17% 2 29 7 2 29% 52 4 0 0% I I 3 33 87 25 29% 53 58 9 16% 4 34 45 44 12 27% 58 63 26 4 15% 5 36 9 4 44% 48 13 2 15% 6 37 5 1 20% 50 1 1 100% 7 38 43 75 20 27% 50 54 50 10 20% 8 39 70 22 31% 50 43 7 16% 9 40 43 19 9 47% 56 59 11 2 18% 10 40 50 44 21 48% 56 58 23 7 30% 11 42 I 43 11 26% 56 12 0 0% I 12 42 37 5 14% 48 55 15 27% 13 54 179 37 21% 58 163 33 20% TOTAL 443 132 30% 296 57 19% c - en CO

Before Table 2 Skid and Accident Data for Grooved Sites After c CJJ c:.o Average Skid Number Accidents _.- Average Skid Number Accidents Traffic Center Passing Traffic Site Total Wet Center %Wet Passing Lane Lane Lane Lane Total Wet h Lane Lane Wet i 1 (a) 26(d) 4 4 100% 58 2 1 50% 2 (b) 38 43 57 45 32 71% 44 48 58 35 14 40ljfl I I -- 3 (c) 44 48 55 22 16 73% 46 48 52 14 6 43% i(a) 46 49 57 44 23 52% 48 51 59 52 26 50% I 5 (a) 58 59 7 4 57% 56 57 4 0 0% ---_...-. TOTAL 122 79 65% 107 47 44% (a) Accident data 2 years oefore and aftar grooving ).Acciriet data 3 years before and after grooving (0) Accidentdata 6 nlonths before and after grooving (d) Validity of this lo\\' skid number is questionable.

It is interesting to note that by totaling the accident data for sites 2 through 12 the percentage wet pavement accidents decreased from 30% prior to resurfacing to 19% after resurfacing. The 19%, of course, is about equal to the 20% indicated as being normal. Sites 1 and 13 were not included in the total because as stated above the percentages of wet pavement accidents on them were not normal and the large sample size for these two sites would greatly influence the resultso In order to determine the significance of decreases in the percentages of wet pavement accidents the chi-square test was usedo However, because of small sample sizes, sites for which skid numbers were about equal before and after treatment were combined prior to running the significance tests. These combined groups are shown in Table 3 along with the results of the chi-square tests. As indicated in Table 3, most of these groups showed a significant decrease in the percentage of wet pavement accidents. As mentioned previously 9 site 1 was unusual in that it was within a city and the traffic conditions are quite different from those of the open roadway 0 For this site the chi-square results indicate that there was no significant decrease in the percentage of wet pavement accidents. However, as also mentioned previously, the total number of accidents was somewhat less after resurfacing than it was before. 1650 The second group tested consisted of sites 2, 3, and 4, for which the skid numbers before being re,surfaced were in the low 30'so For this group the percentage of'wet pavement accidents decreased from 28% to 15%, which was a significant decrease at a confidence level between 90% and 95%0 Sites 5, 6, 7, and 8 make up the third group, which had skid.numbers in the high 30's before being resurfaced o The percentage of wet pavement accidents for this group decreased from 30% to 19%, which was a significant decrease at a confidence level between 75% and 90%. The fourth group consisted of sites 9, 10 9 and 11 9 which had skid numbers in the low 40's before being resurfaced. Afte,r_-resurfacing the percentage of wet pavement accidents decreased from 39% to 20%, which" was a sig.nificant decrease at a confidence level between 90% and 95%0 Site 12 was not included -in the fourth group for two reasonso As explained previously, there was an increase in the percentage of wet pavement accidents after resurfacing; and before resurfacing one lane was slippery whereas the other was. not, and after resurfacing the situation was reversedo Also, the skid number after resurfacing was somewhat lower than for the other three sites in the fourth group. No test was run on site 12 individually since the percentage of wet pavement accidents increased after resurfacing and thus, obviously, no reduction was realized. The final group is composed only of site 130 As explained above no decrease in the percentage of wet pavement accidents was expected, and as indicated in Table 3 there was only a 1%decrease in such accid,ents, which was not significant. Based on the results as discussed above and shown in Table 3 it seems quite obvious that reductions in the percentages of wet accidents did occur when the skid resistance was increased by resurfacing. Also, the percentages after the resurfacings and resulting higher skid resistance were equal to or less than the 20% figure stated earlier as being normal for good conditions 0-5 -

ercentage Table 3 Increases in Skid Numbers and Results of Chi-uare Tests for Sites that were Resurfaced OJ CJ1 Before After % Increase Chi-Equare Total Wet Total Wet In SN Significance Level Sites Accidents Accidents % Wet Accidents Accidents % Wet 1 399 70 18% 222 37 17% 104% Less than 2.5% 2,3,4 138 39 28% 88 13 15% 69% Between 90 and 95% 5,6,7,8 159 47 30% 107 20 19% 32% Between 75 and 90% 9,10,11 106 41 39% 46 9 20% 37% Between 90 and 95% 13 179 37 21% 163 33 20% 7% Less than O. 5% I

Results for Grooved Sites j 1652 Referring again to Table 2, there seems to be a significant reduction in the percentages of wet paveme,nt accidents after grooving at all sites, with the exception of site 4. Chi-square tests were run for sites 2, 3 and 4 with the results shown in Table 4. Tests were not run on sites 1 or 5 because the sample sizes were too small for the results to be meaningfulo For site 2 the skid number was 38 prior to grooving and 44 after grooving. The percentage of wet pavement accidents decreased from 73% to 43%, which was significant at a confidence level between 50% and 75%0 Since the sample sizes were fairly small for site 3 and since the before and after grooving skid numbers were about equal, the accident data for sites 2 and 3 were combined and the chi-square test for the combined group indicated a significant reduction in the percentage of wet pavement accidents at better than a 99% confidence levelo For site 4 there was not a decrease in the percentage of wet pavement accidents after groovingo No explanation is apparent, except that the initial skid number was relatively highas compared to those at the first 3 sites. However the same is true for site 5 and the limited accident data for this site showed a decrease in the percentage of wet pavement accidents. As with resurfacing the grooving of pavements tended to decrease the percentage of wet pavement accidents with the e.xception of site 4. However, even after the reduction the percentages still average about 44%, as stated previously. Obviously, there are factors at work other than ski.d resistance such as geometric conditions and water runoff. In fact some of these additional factors have led to groovingo It is quite obvious that improvements seem to be best when the before skid number is low and is raised by the treatment. Based on the results as discussed above it was concluded that groovi.ng as resurfacing to increase skid resistance, does tend to reduce the percentage of wet pavement accidents. However, it should be noted 'as shown in Tables 2 and 4 that even after grooving the percentages of wet pa.vement accidents were high and, in total, the percentage was 44% after groovin,g as co_mpared to 19% after resurfacingo Thus, the question arises as to whether resurfacing would be of more benefit than grooving; 10 e., would the percentage of wet pa.vement accidents decrease more if the pavement was resurfaced rather than grooved? CONCLUSIONS' 1 0 In gelleral, sites which were resurfaced in order to improve skid resistance showed a significant decrease in the percentage of wet pavement accidents experiencedo In tota1 9 the percentage ofwet pavement accidents was 19% after sites were resurfaced which is the percentage expected for good skid resistance conditions as reported by Mahone and Runkleo 2 0 Sites which were grooved also showed a significant reduction in the percentage of wet pavement accidents but the percentage remained high (44%) even after groovingo - 7 -

Table 4 Percent Increase in Skid Numbers and Chi-uare Values for Sites that were Grooved c: OJ CJ1 BefJre After % Increase Chi-Square Total Wet Total Wet In SN Significance Level Sites Accidents Accidents % Wet Accidents Accidents % Wet 2 45 32 71% 35 14 40% 16% Between 90 and 95% 3 22 16 73% 14 6 43% 9% Between 50 and 75% 4 44 23 52% 52 26 50% 4% Less than. 5% 2,3 67 48 72% 49 20 41% 10% Between 99 and 99.5% I 00 I

,) 1654 RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that further study be undertaken to better determine the relative effects of reducing the percentage of wet pavement accidents through resurfacing in lieu of groovingo Possibly one of the grooved sites which showed a sig.nificant reduction i.n the percentage of wet pavement accidents (site 2 or 3) could be resurfaced with a highly skid resistant mix to determine if a further reduction could be achieved - 9 -

author acknowledges the following persons for their assistance The this on Stephen N. Runkle for his assistance in the statistical analysis and in the project: of accident data from the Data Processing Division; the Data Processing procurement personnel who furnished the before and after accident data on the sites Division 1655 A CKNOW LEDGEME NTS resurfaced; and David W. Hill for running the skid tests. -11-

Mahone, David Co, and Stephen N. Runkle, "Slipperiness of Highway Pavements lo I" Virginia Highway Research Council, Charlottesville, Virginia, VHRC 70-R47 Phase and Safety Division, Virginia Department of Highways, "An Accident Evaluation Traffic the Effectiveness of Longitudinal Grooving on Virginia's Interstate System", July 1973. of 1656 REFERENCES June 1971. 13-