Dra Design and Land Use Op ons Booklet

Similar documents
Overview Introduc on Project Process Key Issue:

Commercial-Vista Corridor Plan Project Management Team. Judith Johnduff, AICP, Associate Transportation Planner Public Works Department

City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

Intersec ons. Alignment. Chapter 3 Design Elements. Standards AASHTO & PennDOT: As close to 90 as possible, but a minimum of 60.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

Rail Sta ons. Transporta on Centers. Chapter 3 Design Elements PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Public Engagement Session

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

Bonita Beach Road Visioning Study

Shared Use Facili es. Mul -Use Trails. Chapter 3 Design Elements BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN MULTI USE TRAILS

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Pedestrian Facili es. Sidewalks. Chapter 3 Design Elements BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING June 17, Streetscape Overview Burlington Comprehensive Master Plan

Transportation Planning Division

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner

Draft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan

2014 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT

INFRASTRUCTURE & AMENITIES. Bicycle Parking. Chapter 3 Design Elements INFRASTRUCTURE & AMENITIES BICYCLE PARKING

Why invest in the 1 Street S.W. Corridor?

THE I-81 CHALLENGE THE I-81 CHALLENGE. Highlights from Technical Memo #1: Physical Conditions Analysis. Physical Conditions Analysis Highlights

Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Innovations & Applications

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

US 278 Corridor Concept Presentation. Avondale Estates Intersection Improvement/Roundabout and Road Diet Feasibility Study March 19, 2015

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

Southside Pilot Proposal

Executive Summary #GPC IV-18 Safe Routes to School Plans 2011

Multi-Modal Traffic Analysis. Parisi and Associates

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TOOLBOX

CITY OF CASSELBERRY WINTER PARK DRIVE IMPROVEMENT STUDY

2014 REPORT CARD 2014 STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN REPORT CARD

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

Bicycle Facilities Planning

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Public Works Committee Meeting Richard E. Mastrangelo Council Chamber November 20, 2017

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

SANTA CRUZ/ALAMEDA ROAD CONFIGURATIONS INTERSECTION AND STREET VIEWS

CRESTON ROAD COMPLETE AND SUSTAINABLE STREETS CORRIDOR PLAN

Bridges and Arizona Crossings

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

COMPLETE STREETS PLANNER S PORTFOLIO

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Balancing Operation & Safety for Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic

/ ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Protected Bike Lanes in San Francisco Mike Sallaberry SFMTA NACTO Workshop - Chicago IL

01. VICINITY OF GREENBRAE POC: EXISTING CONDITIONS

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Welcome to the Quebec Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

COMMUNITY MEETING AGENDA

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

MEMORANDUM. Future (2035) Study Area Traffic Operations. Future 2035 Study Intersection Operations [No Build] DATE: July 13, 2015

C C C

Designing for Pedestrian Safety in Washington, DC

MASONIC AVENUE STREET DESIGN STUDY Community Workshop 2. Masonic Ave Street Design Study Community Workshop 2 August 10, 2010

PUBLIC REALM MASTER PLAN

Roadway Design Standards

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. North Central Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

Safe Routes to School: Valverde Elementary Walk Audit Report. Image: CPLIVE, SkyscraperPage.com

Classification Criteria

Appendix B. Environmental Resource Technical Memorandum. Assessment on Travel Pattern and Access Impacts

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

FOCUS AREA 1 - Alberta Avenue Pocket Park 3 (121 Ave and 92 St)

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Toolbox (Excerpt from Figure 3.1)

TELEGRAPH AVENUE COMPLETE STREETS PLAN DRAFT FINAL PLAN

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

Washington County SW Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy. & SW Scholls Ferry Rd.

Safe Routes to School: Munroe Elementary Walk Audit Report. Image: Drexel, Barrell & Co.

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

This page intentionally left blank.

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

Memo. Introduction. Memphis STP Pedestrian Sidewalk Project

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

Southview Blvd & 3 rd Avenue Improvement Project. Public Open House December 4, to 7pm

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. WAY

What Is a Complete Street?

Community Meeting February 27, 2007 Dorchester Avenue Transportation & Streetscape Improvements Action Plan February 27, 2007

Transcription:

Dra Design and Land Use Op ons Booklet March, 2015

This page was inten onally le blank. 2 Commercial-Vista Corridor Plan

This booklet summarizes the street design and land use alterna ves for the Commercial Vista Corridor Plan project area that are discussed in greater detail in the Street Design and Land Use AlternaƟves Memorandum. The street design alterna ves address poten al changes to travel lanes, bicycle facili es and the sidewalk corridor. Land use alterna ves address opportuni es to modify the design character of building setback areas and to develop specific Ac vity Centers previously iden fied in the Urban Design, Streetscape and Land Use Booklet. The recommenda ons are described programma cally with illustrated design concepts to follow this spring. In addi on to streetscape and land use alterna ves and discussion, this booklet also includes a traffic analysis summary and the results from the er 1 screening process. The figure below illustrates the four corridors in the project study area in which cross sec onal alterna ves have been evaluated; Commercial Street, Liberty Road, Salem Heights Avenue, and Triangle Drive. General informa on regarding the facility and the alterna ves are given for each segment under the color coded segment heading. Poten al pedestrian crossing loca ons are highlighted in blue with details discussed further in the Traffic Analysis Summary sec on of this booklet star ng on page 9. Liberty Road S Commercial Street SE Classified as a Major Arterial Facility Classified as a Major Arterial Facility Currently a Four Lane Cross Sec on with Narrow Sidewalks and no Bicycle Facili es Currently a Five Lane Cross Sec on with Narrow Sidewalks Two Alterna ves were Analyzed for this Segment Three Alterna ves were Analyzed for this Segment Buffered Bike Lanes Mul use Pathway Enhanced Pedestrian Corridor Three Lane Salem Heights Avenue S/Ratcliff Drive Triangle Drive SE Classified as a Local Facility Classified as a Collector Facility Currently a Two Lane Cross Sec on with Significant Sidewalk Gaps Currently a Two Lane Cross Sec on with no Sidewalks Three Alterna ves were Analyzed for this Segment Two Alterna ves were Analyzed for this Segment TSP Standard Angled Parking Recommended Pedestrian Crossing Loca on (Approximate) Proposed Signalized Intersec on TSP Standard Angled Parking Parallel Parking Design and Land Use Options 3

Street Design Summary Sidewalk Corridor Design Elements Pedestrian Zone: Accommodates comfortable and unobstructed walking which is the primary func on of the sidewalk corridor. Two people should be able to walk comfortably, this requires at least five feet (which is the City of Salem s standard). Providing comfort for a third person coming from the opposite direc on to pass requires six to seven feet of pedestrian zone. Sidewalk Corridor Examples Furnishing Zone: Accommodates streetscape elements such as u lity and street light poles, planters, trees, benches, bike racks, bus shelters, and sloped driveway approaches. Pedestrian ac vi es also occur in the furnishing zone, such as transit boarding at designated stops, access to bike racks, mid block crossings, and access to on street parking. Street Ligh ng A repea ng pa ern of two types of lights is recommended: pedestrian scale ornamental ligh ng at intersec ons and a rac ve higher eleva on ligh ng at mid block loca ons. An example of pedestrian level ligh ng is shown to the le. Roadway Design Elements Travel and Turn Lanes: Where lane widths are wider, recommenda ons to reduce travel lane widths to the City s standard width of eleven feet have been included in mul ple alterna ves. No proposed reduc on is less than the minimum widths established in the Transporta on System Plan (TSP). Median: Where a striped median currently exists to accommodate le turns, the alterna ves maintain it. The recommended width may be less than the current width but s ll conforms to TSP standards. Curb Extensions: Curb extensions widen the sidewalk corridor at intersec ons or mid block crossings, increase the visibility of pedestrians, shorten the me needed to cross the street, provide addi onal furnishing zones area, and could lower motor vehicle speeds due to decreasing the turning radius at the intersec on. However, the curb extensions must be carefully designed to allow turning movements for larger vehicles. Bike Facili es: Con nuous bike facili es are recommended for the arterial streets (Commercial Street and Liberty Road). Facility types considered include standard striped bike lanes, buffered bike lanes, and shared mul use pathways. 4 Commercial-Vista Corridor Plan

Commercial Street AlternaƟves Vicinity Map Commercial Street AlternaƟves ExisƟng CondiƟons Alterna ve 1: Enhanced Bicycle Facili es Alterna ve 1 Considera ons Maintains five lane cross sec on Offers buffered bike lanes to separate bicyclists from motor vehicles The furnishing zone and buffered bike lane provide pedestrians with a buffer from moving cars There is poten al to add pedestrian crossing refuges at selected loca ons The sidewalk corridor can support an a rac ve commercial streetscape along with opportuni es for a wider range of bike parking facili es and public art Alterna ve 2: Enhanced Sidewalk Corridor Alterna ve 2 Considera ons Maintains five lane cross sec on The large sidewalk corridor provides addi onal width for the furnishing zone There is poten al to add pedestrian crossing refuges at selected loca ons The sidewalk furnishing easily supports standard transit shelters along with dedicated passenger loading/unloading areas, landscaping, and public art. The sidewalk corridor can support an a rac ve commercial streetscape along with opportuni es for a wider range of bike parking facili es and public art Design and Land Use Options 5

Liberty Road Alterna ves Liberty Road Alterna ves Exis ng Condi ons Vicinity Map Alterna ve 3A: Mul use Path Alterna ve 3A Considera ons Maintains four lane cross sec on A 10 12 mul use pathway that would accommodate bicycle travel along the corridor would replace the exis ng sidewalk Sharing a pathway with cyclists also introduces complexity for pedestrians and transit riders Transit shelters and other stop ameni es are not supported in this alterna ve Without a sidewalk furnishing zone, streetscape ameni es will be limited Alterna ve 3B Considera ons Reduces the current four lane cross sec on to a three lane cross sec on north of Salem Heights Avenue Cycling would be accommodated by a 5 bike lane Would require rerou ng northbound through traffic on Liberty Road onto Salem Heights Avenue Would change the func on of Salem Heights Avenue from a collector to a major arterial between Liberty Road and Commercial Street Alterna ve 3B: Liberty Road Reroute Alterna ve 4: Major Arterial TSP Standard 6 Commercial-Vista Corridor Plan Alterna ve 4 Considera ons Increases the current four lane cross sec on to a fivelane cross sec on which would add a significant motorvehicle capacity increase The width of the sidewalk would be significantly increased Cycling would be accommodated by 6 standard bike lanes The available sidewalk corridor furnishing zone supports an a rac ve commercial streetscape as well as a wide range of opportuni es for ameni es such as bike parking facili es and public art

Salem Heights Avenue Alterna ves Salem Heights Avenue Alterna ves Exis ng Condi ons Vicinity Map Alterna ve 5: Collector C TSP Standard Alterna ve 5 Considera ons Maintains the two lane cross sec on The presence of a sidewalk corridor furnishing zone also provides pedestrians with physical separa on and a landscape buffer from moving cars Cyclists would share the roadway lanes and sharrow markings could be added to enhance the bicycle environment No transit service is currently provided for this segment Providing a furnishing zone provides opportuni es for an a rac ve neighborhood streetscape and visual public realm integra on with adjacent land uses Alterna ve 6: Angled Parking Alterna ve 6 Considera ons Maintains two lane cross sec on The sidewalk corridor width on one side provides a furnishing zone buffer from vehicles and parallel parking on the other side provides a pedestrian buffer from moving traffic Cyclists would share the roadway lanes and sharrow markings could be added to enhance the bicycle environment The sidewalk provides a furnishing zone on one side to provide an opportunity for streetscape ameni es Design and Land Use Options 7

Triangle Drive Alterna ves Triangle Drive Alterna ves Exis ng Condi ons Vicinity Map Alterna ve 7: Local TSP Standard Alterna ve 7 Considera ons Maintains the two lane cross sec on The presence of a sidewalk corridor furnishing zone also provides pedestrians with physical separa on and a landscape buffer from moving cars Cyclists would share the roadway lanes and sharrow markings could be added to enhance the bicycle environment Alterna ve 8A Considera ons Maintains the two lane cross sec on The sidewalk corridor width does not provide a furnishing zone buffer from vehicles Cyclists would share the roadway lanes and sharrow markings could be added to enhance the bicycle environment Angled parking supports the streetscape and land use rela onship by providing easier access to surrounding businesses Alterna ve 8A: Angled Parking Alterna ve 8B: Two Side Parallel Parking Alterna ve 8B Considera ons Maintains the two lane cross sec on The sidewalk corridor improved pedestrian safety and comfort Cyclists would share the roadway lanes and sharrow markings could be added to enhance the bicycle environment Parallel parking supports the streetscape and land use rela onship by providing easier access to surrounding businesses The proposed pathways do not provide a furnishing zone and will not support streetscape ameni es 8 Commercial-Vista Corridor Plan

Pedestrian Crossing Treatments Wide cross sec ons along Commercial Street and long expanses between signalized intersec ons on both Commercial Street and Liberty Road creates a difficult environment for pedestrians to safely and efficiently travel to and from land uses and transit stops within the study area. Four loca ons for pedestrian crossing treatments were iden fied to help enhance pedestrian crossings and are shown in the figure on page 3. Pedestrian crossing loca ons one through three are across Commercial Street and involve a pedestrian refuge median, striped crosswalk markings, and a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) that is pedestrian ac vated and requires vehicles to yield to pedestrians when the yellow lights are flashing. The fourth crossing loca on is along Liberty Road and does not include a median due to the lack of a center le turn lane. A sketch of the third crossing loca on is provided to the right. A transit stop reloca on to a place closer to the pedestrian crossing is also recommended. More detail regarding the pedestrian crossing loca ons can be found in the dra Street Design and Land Use Alterna ves memorandum. Commercial Street SE/Ratcliff Drive SE Signalized Intersec on This unsignalized intersec on fails to meet the City of Salem s mobility standards due to the minor street stopped delay. A signal at this loca on would ensure that motor vehicles on Ratcliff Drive would have a signal phase and would also provide a signalized pedestrian crossing that would help support pedestrian safety and mobility as well as support neighborhood access on the corridor. A new signal at this loca on will have a slight impact to the PM peak hour progression of northbound traffic along Commercial Street due to the exis ng traffic signal spacing. Bicycle Accommoda ons at the Commercial Street SE Liberty Road S Split It is currently difficult for southbound bicyclists to con nue along Commercial Street due to the barrier of the Commercial Street Liberty Road Split which requires bicyclists to cross two lanes of unsignalized vehicle traffic just south of the Commercial Street/ Alice Avenue intersec on. The poten al solu ons are discussed in this booklet and illustrated to the le. Op on 1: This op on involves a bike box at the Commercial Street/Alice Avenue intersec on. When a red light for the southbound movement at the Alice Avenue intersec on is displayed, bicyclists could move into the bike box and wait in the bicycle are in front of motor vehicles. Op on 2: A bike box could also be implemented at the Vista Avenue/Liberty Road intersec on which would require southbound bicyclists to travel along Liberty Road through the Split to Vista Avenue. Op on 3: A bicycle phase a Vista Avenue requires southbound bicycles to travel along Liberty Road through the Split to Vista Avenue. Once at Vista Avenue, the bicyclists will ac vate a detector and u lize a bicycleonly phase that will allow them to travel eastbound through the intersec on onto Vista Avenue and turn right at Commercial Street to con nue southbound. Design and Land Use Options 9

Land Use Issues and Op ons In general, the City is not considering or planning to propose significant changes in land use in this area and the project team has not recommended any to date, although modest changes could be suggested or considered at a later stage if warranted. The bulk of the corridor is zoned for general or retail commercial use, with a smaller por on of the study area zoned for high density residen al use. Land use issues and op ons for addressing them included the following: Ac vity centers: Poten al ac vity centers such and plazas or courtyards could be created within the study area. Crea ng such centers would support land uses in the area by crea ng addi onal des na ons for pedestrians, crea ng unique ameni es and enhancing the appearance of the area and opportuni es for social interac on. Ac vity centers are discussed in more detail below. Building setback and front yard areas: The area between the public right of way and buildings located on private property, includes any required the setback areas adjacent to the right of way and any addi onal front yard areas that extend beyond the required setback. These areas are important for the rela onship between public and private spaces and how they interact with each other. Rela onship between street design and surrounding land uses: A number of land use strategies can help enhance the rela onship between the design of the streetscape and the businesses, residences and other land uses and ac vi es that occur adjacent to it. In addi on to how setback and front yard areas are used and the crea on of pedestrian ac vity centers, land use issues include direct connec ons between buildings and the sidewalk to allow people to walk safely and easily to businesses and other uses; loca on of vehicle parking, and land use and building design to ensure that buildings are visible and a rac ve to drivers, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Ac vity Centers Possible general loca ons for ac vity centers were iden fied in the Urban Design, Streetscape and Land Use Booklet and are illustrated to the right. Those loca ons provide various condi ons and opportuni es suitable for crea on of ac vity centers. The ac vity centers could vary significantly in size and ameni es, depending on their specific loca on, surrounding land uses, and integra on with exis ng or future new land uses, topography or other condi ons. Two types of ac vity centers have been described for this area a smaller ac vity center that might be in an area with smaller scale retail uses with more limited available space and a larger ac vity center that could be located in an area with larger surrounding uses and more available land. Below is a list of ameni es that could be located in smaller or larger centers. 10 Commercial-Vista Corridor Plan