Utilities Technical Report Oregon Department of Transportation. Appendix E. Figure Descriptions

Similar documents
Blair/Williamson Intersection Expressed Needs

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 405 LIMB MANAGEMENT

PORTLAND BICYCLE COUNTS 2007

Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project Community Connections Phase 2 Consultation. Appendix 3: Open House Display Boards

Driveway Design Criteria

Welcome to the Sellwood Bridge Project Open House!

TANGIBLE CAPITAL ASSET (TCA) Reporting Guidelines for Land Development Projects

PROPOSED BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITY Vicinity of Route 123/I-495 Interchange Tysons, Fairfax County, Virginia

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements

East Downtown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) No. 15 Infrastructure Assessment Study

section 4 Existing Conditions, Issues, and Options

DRAFT Sellwood Bridge Existing Roadway Deficiencies

Mid Rivers Mall Drive Multi-Use Path (Rte. N to MO 364)

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Multi-Modal Traffic Analysis. Parisi and Associates

Legislative Update Williamsburg Residency

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 306 DRAINAGE PIPE WORK DESCRIPTION 4

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

BARRIER OFFSET 0" A 6" 6" A 12" 12" A 26" A 26" 3A OR 4A L OR S * ** L OR S L OR S

MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network

Reference number /VP. Lafayette Downtown Congestion Study - Additional Traffic Analysis

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

Non-Motorized Overpass at SR 5/US1

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Appendix B Existing ADOT Data Parameters

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Traffic Signals at Bike Boulevards

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

91

Sharrows and Elephants and Bike Boxes!, s, Oh My!

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Projects

Foothill Expressway Improvements Between El Monte and San Antonio

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Flanders Crossing. Save Lives Save Money Saving Our Environment. Portland City Council April 30, 2008

Bicycle Management Products From Columbia Cascade Company

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

Poor pavement condition Substandard Intersections. / Substandard bike/pedestrian/transit accommodations. Driveway access Environmental concerns

EXHIBIT B-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Phase 1 of the Preferred Alternative

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

Road Safety Facilities Implemented in Japan

CHAPTER 8 STAKING SIGNALS AND LIGHTING FIELD GUIDE. 8.1 Staking Traffic Control Signal Systems

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Brooklyn Boulevard (County Road 152) Reconstruction Project Phase I. OPEN HOUSE June 20, 2017

Subject: Pedestrian Count Clarification for Electronic Submission of Turning Movement Counts Procedures and File Format

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

Project Description Form 8EE

NOTICE OF PREPARATION. Environmental Programs 3331 North First Street, Building B-2 San Jose, CA

Route 29 Solutions Projects

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. WAY

Advanced Construction Techniques. Concrete Pavements ACCELERATED CONSTRUCTION OF URBAN INTERSECTIONS WITH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (PCCP)

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

STAKING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEMS

American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association Letter Ballot. Draft

Military Road Safety Improvements

Atwood Avenue Fair Oaks Avenue Cottage Grove Road

Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Toolbox (Excerpt from Figure 3.1)

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Projects

Brian McHugh, Buckhead Community Improvement District. SUBJECT: Wieuca Road at Phipps Boulevard Intersection Improvements Project

Welcome to the Quebec Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Route 7 Corridor Study

Kentucky Transportation Center

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

APPENDIX L: COST ESTIMATING TOOLS

Markings Technical Committee Chapter 3H: Roundabout Markings APPROVED IN NCUTCD COUNCIL ON JANUARY 20, 2006

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. North Central Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

David DiPierro, John Amberson. Steering Committee Meeting #4 Overview

01. VICINITY OF GREENBRAE POC: EXISTING CONDITIONS

RIVERSIDE, Newton MA BH NORMANDY RIVERSIDE LLC. Riverside Station. A green, transit-oriented community

State of Nevada Department of Transportation Materials Division

Access Routes from US 101 to the Richmond San Rafael Bridge

Legislative Update. Frederick County Fall Staunton District. Interstate 81 - Exit 300 at Interstate 66 Southbound Acceleration Lane Extension

I-70 NEW STANTON INTERCHANGE

Concrete Pavements ACCELERATED CONSTRUCTION OF URBAN INTERSECTIONS WITH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (PCCP)

ADA Training Standard Plans

SR 53 Corridor Study. Final Report Presentation. Friday, October 3, :00 AM to noon

7.0 FREEWAYS CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS & DEFINITION

S.R. 3009, Section A20 South Park & Logan Road Intersection Improvement Project

Fulton Market Streetscape

Northwest Corridor Project Interchange Modification, Interchange Justification and System Analysis Report Reassessment (Phase I)

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Ottawa Beach Road Study

I-215 / NEWPORT ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT PRESS KIT

Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Charlesgate. World Series Path

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

Clinton Street Bridge over the Maumee River. ODOT Project DEF April 1, 2015 Stakeholder s Meeting

About the study. North Milwaukee Ave. Key goals of this study are to: Achieve Vision Zero* by. Harmonize the space and improve walkability

Welcome. Thank you for your interest in the Lewis & Clark Viaduct Concept Study

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

University Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Washington St. Corridor Study

Field guide for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way Edition

Approximately 360 trail users cross during a typical summer weekday and 420 cross during a typical summer

Transcription:

Appendix E. Descriptions

Appendix E. Descriptions This appendix includes written descriptions of all figures included in this Technical Report. If needed, additional figure interpretation is available from the ODOT Senior Environmental Project Manager at (503) 731-4804. Title Description 1 Project Area 1 show s the Project Area. The Project Area includes a 1.7-mile segment of Interstate 5 (I-5), beginning north of Interstate 405 (I-405) at milepost 303.2, extending south to the Burnside Bridge just south of Interstate 84 (I-84) at milepost 301.5. The Project Area also includes the interchange of I-5 and N Broadw ay and NE Weidler Street (Broadw ay/weidler interchange) and the surrounding transportation netw ork, from approximately N/NE Hancock Street to the north, N Benton Avenue to the w est, N/NE Multnomah Street to the south, and NE 2nd Avenue to the east. 1 also show s the Willamette River to the w est of the Project Area and the follow ing four bridges (from north to south): Fremont Bridge, Broadw ay Bridge, Steel Bridge, and Burnside Bridge. The Project Area includes segments of both I-5 and I-84. 2 Auxiliary Lane/ Shoulder 3 I-5 Auxiliary (Ramp-to- Ramp) Lanes Existing Conditions and Proposed 2 show s the locations of the proposed auxiliary lanes and shoulder improvements on I-5. One new northbound (NB) auxiliary lane w ould be added to connect the I-84 w estbound on-ramp to the N Greeley off-ramp. A new southbound (SB) auxiliary lane w ould extend the existing auxiliary lane that enters I-5 SB from the N Greeley on-ramp. The extent of proposed auxiliary lanes and shoulder improvements begin near w here I-5 crosses over N Russell and extends south to I- 84. 2 also show s the Project Area. 3 show s the existing and proposed auxiliary lane configurations from the N Greely on-ramp extending south to the SB Morrison Bridge off-ramp. Existing conditions are show n on the left and proposed improvements are show n on the right. Existing SB conditions include tw o SB lanes and three on-ramps (listed from north to south): N Greeley, I-405/N Fremont, and N Wheeler and three off-ramps (listed from north to south): N Broadw ay, I-84, and Morrison Bridge. There are existing auxiliary lanes betw een the N Greeley on-ramp extending to just south of the N Broadw ay off-ramp, the I-405/N Fremont on-ramp and N Broadw ay off-ramp, and N Wheeler on-ramp and I-84 off-ramp. Existing NB conditions include tw o NB lanes and tw o on-ramps (listed from south to north): I-84 and N Broadw ay and tw o off-ramps (listed from south to north): N Weidler, I-405/N Fremont, and N Greeley. There are existing auxiliary lanes betw een the I-84 on-ramp and N Weidler off-ramp and betw een the N Broadw ay on-ramp and I-405/N Fremont off-ramp. For proposed improvements, the on-ramps and off-ramps are the same as those show n for existing conditions, and all existing auxiliary lanes remain. There is one new SB proposed auxiliary lane that results in a continuous auxiliary lane from the N Greeley on-ramp extending south to the Morrison Bridge off-ramp. There is one NB proposed auxiliary lane that results in a continuous auxiliary lane from the I-84 on-ramp north to the N Greeley off-ramp. Tw o additional proposed NB auxiliary lane segments also extend the existing auxiliary lane betw een the I-84 on-ramp and N Weidler off-ramp. E-1

Title Description 4 I-5 Cross Section (N/NE Weidler Overcrossing) Existing Conditions and Proposed 4 show s a cross section comparison of existing and proposed conditions of I- 5 south of the N/NE Weidler overcrossing w ithin the Broadw ay/weidler interchange area. Existing conditions are show n on the top and are the same for NB and SB traffic and include an inside and outside shoulder of varying w idth and tw o 12-foot lanes. Proposed lane configuration is show n below the existing conditions and is the same for NB and SB traffic and include an inside and outside shoulder, tw o through lanes, and one auxiliary lane. All shoulders and lanes are 12 feet w ide. 5 Broadw ay/ Weidler/ Williams and Vancouver/ Hancock Highw ay Covers 5 show s a rendering of the Broadw ay/weidler/williams and Vancouver/Hancock highw ay covers. The Broadw ay/weidler/williams cover appears as a green space that spans east-w est across I-5, extending from immediately south of N/NE Weidler to immediately north of N/NE Broadw ay. The entire block betw een N/NE Weidler, NE Victoria, N/NE Broadw ay, and N Williams is all show n as a green space covering I-5. The Vancouver/Hancock cover is located farther to the north and appears as a smaller green space extending northw est and southeast from N Vancouver at its intersection w ith N/NE Hancock. Proposed bike lanes are also show n along N/NE Weidler, N Williams, N Vancouver, N/NE Broadw ay, and N/NE Hancock. 6 Broadw ay/ Weidler Interchange Area 7 Conceptual Illustration of Proposed N Williams Multi- Use Path and Revised Traffic Flow 6 show s locations of improvements to the Broadw ay/weidler interchange betw een I-5, the interchange, and the local street netw ork. are labeled w ith letters A through H. The Broadw ay/weidler/williams cover spans eastw est across I-5, extending from immediately south of N/NE Weidler to immediately north of N/NE Broadw ay. The Vancouver/Hancock cover is located farther to the north and appears as a smaller green space extending northw est and southeast from N Vancouver at its intersection w ith N/NE Hancock. Both covers are indicated by the letter A. Letter B is located near the bottom of the figure and show s how the I-5 SB on-ramp w ould be relocated by having it begin one block farther north at N/NE Weidler instead of N Ramsay Way, w here the existing ramp begins. Letter C located near the middle of the figure show s the segment of N Williams betw een N Ramsay and N Weidler that w ould be closed to private motor vehicles. Letter D located near the middle of the figure show s the location of w here traffic flow on N Williams betw een N/NE Weidler and N/NE Broadw ay w ould be converted to a reverse traffic flow tw o-way street w ith a 36-foot-w ide median. Letter E show s the location of the proposed Hancock-Dixon crossing that extends from the intersection of N Dixon and N Wheeler east to N Williams and N/NE Hancock. Letter G indicates the location w here N Flint w ould be removed beginning at N Tillamook and extending south to N Broadw ay. Letter H show s the location of the proposed Clackamas bicycle and pedestrian bridge, located south of N/NE Weidler to connect NE Clackamas w ith N Williams. The Project Area boundary and proposed auxiliary lanes and shoulders are also show n on the figure. 7 show s a rendering of the proposed N Williams multi-use path and reverse traffic flow. The foreground in the bottom half of the rendering show s the multi-use path as an extension of the sidew alk to the w est (left) of N Williams. The top half of the rendering show s tw o SB traffic lanes to the east (right) of the multi-use path/median and tw o NB traffic lanes to the w est (left) of the multi-use path/median. The Broadw ay/weidler/williams cover is show n as green space to the east (right) of N Williams SB traffic lanes. 8 Clackamas Bicycle and Pedestrian Crossing 8 show s a rendering of the Clackamas bicycle and pedestrian crossing. The crossing is show n as a curved elevated path crossing I-5, connecting NE Clackamas on the east side of I-5 to N Williams on the w est side of I-5. Green bicycle lanes are also show n on either side of N Williams, located just w est of I-5. E-2

Title Description 9 Utilities Area of Potential Impact 10 Pump Station Piping, 72-Inch Horseshoe Sanitary Gravity Main (Source: Portland 1961) 11 Pump Station Piping, 68-inch by 70-inch Bypass Rectangular Pipe (Source: Portland 1993) 9 show s the Utilities Area of Potential Impact, w hich covers the same extent as the Project Area boundary show n in 1. As indicated in the 1 description, the Project Area includes a 1.7-mile segment of I-5 beginning north of I- 405 at milepost 303.2, extending south to the Burnside Bridge just south of I-84 at milepost 301.5. The Project Area also includes the interchange of I-5 and N Broadw ay and NE Weidler Street (Broadw ay/weidler interchange) and the surrounding transportation netw ork, from approximately N/NE Hancock Street to the north, N Benton Avenue to the w est, N/NE Multnomah Street to the south, and NE 2nd Avenue to the east. 1 also show s the Willamette River to the w est of the Project Area and the follow ing four bridges (from north to south): Fremont Bridge, Broadw ay Bridge, Steel Bridge, and Burnside Bridge. The Project Area includes segments of both I-5 and I-84. 10 show s a cross section of the 72-inch horseshoe sanitary gravity main inflow located south of the pump station at the I-5/I-84 interchange. The tunnel contains a pipe that is rounded on top and both sides, forming a horseshoe shape. The bottom edge of the tunnel is flattened out, connecting the tw o sides of the horseshoe. The interior space of the main is show n to be 6 feet in diameter, w hile the full diameter including the side w alls is 7 feet 10 inches at a roughly 30-degree angle from horizontal. The top side of the horseshoe is show n to be 8 inches thick, w hile the bottom edge of the horseshoe is show n to be 9 inches thick. The total height of the tunnel is 7 feet 9 inches, making the tunnel slightly w ider than it is tall. The image has tw o engineering notes. The first note indicates that steel show n in standard sections may be varied or omitted entirely by the engineer as may be determined by actual field conditions. The second note indicates that location and type of construction joints to be approved by the engineer. 11 show s a cross section of a pipe located to the w est of the pump station at the I-5/I-84 interchange. This pipe is a 68-inch by 70-inch gravity bypass rectangular pipe w ith a 62-inch by 39 1/2 inch abandoned semicircular pressure pipe directly above it. The image show s an excerpt from an engineering draw ing, w ith the title Typical Section: existing force main (over), gravity sew er by-pass (under). The cross section show s one pipe that is flat on the bottom and curved on the top, w ith a rectangular pipe cavity in the bottom of the pipe and a semi-circular pipe cavity in the top of the pipe. The bottom rectangular cavity has a label that reads existing gravity sew er by-pass to remain in service. The upper semi-circular cavity has a label that reads existing force main to be abandoned fill w ith light w eight concrete grout - see specs. 12 BES Gravity Sanitary, 38- inch by 66- inch Semi- Circular Pipe (Source: Portland 1954) 12 show s a cross section of a Portland Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) gravity sanitary main that runs from NE 1st to NE Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, w hich is a 38-inch by 66-inch semi-circular pipe. The image show s an excerpt from an engineering draw ing, w ith the title 3 foot 2 inch by 5 foot 6 inch monolithic tunnel. The image show s a semi-circular pipe cavity that is rounded on top and flat on the bottom, w ith straight side w alls that flare slightly out from being vertical. The cavity is taller than it is w ide, at 5 feet 6 inches tall and 3 feet 2 inches w ide. The bottom w all of the pipe is 6 inches thick and underlain by a 3-inch sill, w hile the top w all of the pipe is 9 inches thick and overlain by a 4-inch cap. E-3

Title Description 13 BES Sanitary CSO, 72-inch Semi-Circular (Source: Portland 1911) 13 show s a cross section of a semi-circular 72-inch BES sanitary combined sew er overflow (CSO) pipe. The image is an excerpt from an engineering draw ing and is composed of tw o sketches, one on the left and one on the right. The left sketch has the title concrete tunnel section: w here called for on Plan from river to E. 15th St. The sketch show s a semi-circular pipe, rounded on top and nearly flat on the bottom, w ith concrete w alls and a single layer of stone blocks along the bottom interior edge of the pipe cavity. A layer of mortar is indicated betw een the stone blocks and the bottom pipe w all. The cavity is 6 feet w ide and 5 feet 11 inches tall. The layer of stone blocks on the bottom is 5 inches thick. The concrete pipe w all is 10 inches thick on top, 12 inches thick on each side, and 8 inches thick on the bottom side. The notes on the left sketch indicate quantities per linear foot: 0.781 cubic yards concrete, 0.694 square yards stone blocks. The right sketch has the title pile foundation and show s an outline of the tunnel cross section depicted in the left sketch on top of a horizontal w ooden platform supported by three vertical w ooden bents. The w ooden platform is 8 feet w ide along the bottom of the tunnel, and the vertical bents are spaced evenly along the bottom of the platform, w ith 3 feet betw een the left bent to the center bent and 3 feet from the center bent to the right bent. The platform is bolted to the bents, and a note indicates that the bents are positioned every 5 feet along the length of the tunnel. 14 Combined Gravity Main, 56-inch Crossing I-5 at Hancock (Source: State of Oregon Highw ay Department 1960) 14 show s a cross section of the combined gravity main, w hich is 56 inches in w idth and crosses I-5 at Hancock. The image is an excerpt from an engineering draw ing. The pipe cavity is circular w ith an interior diameter of 4 feet 8 inches. The pipe w alls are the same thickness of 8 inches on the top, left side, and right side; the side w alls straighten out as they approach the bottom of the pipe cross section, forming a rectangular support beneath the pipe. As a result, the outer surface is semi-circular in shape (rounded on the top and sides and flat on the bottom). Notes on the figure indicate the placement of bars that w ould be incorporated along the length of the pipe, lettered A, B, C, and D. An engineering note on the image indicates hook bars D & E into all manholes. Tw o notes on the bottom left and bottom right indicate construction joints, presumably attaching the low er rectangular pipe w all and support to the upper circular pipe w all. A 4-inch-w ide 20-gauge copper w ater stop is embedded along the construction joints on both sides of the pipe. 15 Combined Gravity Main, 56-inch Brick Pipe (Source: Portland 1905) 15 show s a cross section of the combined gravity main, w hich is a 56-inch brick pipe. The image is an excerpt from an engineering draw ing, show ing a circular pipe cavity w ith an interior diameter of 4 feet 8 inches. The bottom side of the pipe w all is show n as one layer, w hile the top and side w alls of the pipe are show n as tw o layers. Despite the difference in layers, the total thickness of the pipe w all is the same on all sides. The thickness of the pipe w all is not indicated on the draw ing. E-4