CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Similar documents
COMMUNITY MEETING AGENDA

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

WELCOME Public Information Centre

Public Information Centre

J Street and Folsom Boulevard Lane Conversion Project (T ) Before and After Traffic Evaluation

Northbound San Jose Avenue & I-280 Off-Ramp Road Diet Pilot Project

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

CITY OF OAKLAND. 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design. Final Report (v3) March 23, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Reference number /VP. Lafayette Downtown Congestion Study - Additional Traffic Analysis

Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

ITE Northeastern District Meeting

City of El Cerrito San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan. Capital Improvement Program

Edenbrook Hill Drive Traffic Calming Study

Clybourn Ave. Protected Bike Lane Study Halsted St. to Division St.

AGENDA ITEM G-2 Public Works

East 12 th Street Bikeway Feasibility Study

Military Road Safety Improvements

Dear Mr. Tweed: Sincerely, Min Zhou, P.E. Vice President

CITY OF LOMITA CITY COUNCIL REPORT

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

Road Diets FDOT Process

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Improving Cyclist Safety at the Dundas Street West and Sterling Road Intersection

Date: April 4, Project #: Re: A Street/Binford Street Traffic/Intersection Assessment

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Boston Post Road Design Feasibility Study

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

BUDGET FOR RESEDA BOULEVARD, STREET RECONSTRUCTION / VISION ZERO PROGRAM, REPORT BACK, COUNCIL FILE

San Jose Transportation Policy

Draft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan

Lincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development

Data Analysis February to March Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns.

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton

Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study. Naples City Council Presentation January 2017

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

Public Works Committee Meeting Richard E. Mastrangelo Council Chamber November 20, 2017

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard City Council Study Session Summary

CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Saskatchewan Drive Roadway Rehabilitation and Shared-Use Path Widening

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

Summary: Mercer County Princeton Avenue & Spruce Street Study January 2009

Multi-Modal Traffic Analysis. Parisi and Associates

2. KING EDWARD AVENUE AND ST. PATRICK STREET - SAFETY IMPROVEMENT

RETREAT AGENDA ITEM MIDTOWN AREA TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE

TRAFFIC STUDY. Birch Bluff Road / Pleasant Avenue 01/15/2018. City of Tonka Bay 4901 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN WSB PROJECT NO.

DRAFT. A fifth objective, other considerations, has been added to capture considerations not captured by the four primary objectives.

City of Beverly Hills North Santa Monica Blvd Reconstruction. Community Meeting Presentation September 30 and October 1, 2015

Route 28 (South Orleans Road)/Route 39 (Harwich Road)/Quanset Road Intersection

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK

University Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007

Albany Shaker Road Corridor Study Public Meeting # 2

BD RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE VISION ZERO RAMP INTERSECTION STUDY PHASE 1

3.16 TRANSPORTATION, CIRCULATION, AND PARKING Regulatory Setting Environmental Setting ROADWAY SYSTEM

Station 1: Street & Sidewalk Upgrades

WELCOME. Stakeholder Involvement Group Meeting #2 Round Lake Public Works October 24, 2018

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ON EDGEWATER BOULEVARD AT PORT ROYAL AVENUE (NORTH)

EXHIBIT R1. Neighborhood Cul-de-Sac Implementation

MEMORANDUM. To: Ben Weiss, Bicycle/Pedestrian Program Manager, City of Missoula. From: Joe Gilpin, Alta Planning + Design.

Figure 1: East West Connector Alignment Alternatives Concept Drawing

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION DESIGN

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

Project Goals and Objectives

Upper Market Street Bike Lane Project

180 Grand Avenue, Suite x117 Dowling Associates, Inc.

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

CAPITOL DRIVE & FOND DU LAC AVENUE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS. Urban Planning 772 SARAH BREGANT, RYAN PETERSON, & MATT WERDERITCH

MEMORANDUM. Layout Of Study Intersections And Traffic Control

AGENDA REPORT. Issue: Discussion of potential improvements on Barnwell Road at Niblick Drive

Chicago Safe Routes to School Safe Routes to High School (SRTS/SRTHS)

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

1. What is the Doran Street and Broadway/Brazil Grade Separation Project (Project)?

Peer Review of Highlands Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Plan

LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 516 North Tejon Street Colorado Springs, CO (719) FAX (719)

REPORT CONCURRENCE. City Manager. The General Manager concurs with the recommendation of this report.

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. North Central Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

THE NACTO MANUALS AND DESIGNING FOR VISION ZERO ZAKI MUSTAFA SHIRLEY ZAMORA

Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration

Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) Preliminary Responses to Madison-Miller Community List of Site-Specific Concerns

Appendix B. Environmental Resource Technical Memorandum. Assessment on Travel Pattern and Access Impacts

Chapter 3: Multi-Modal Circulation and Streetscapes

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

Traffic Signal Phasing Study Summary & Staff Recommendations

Joshua Saak, P.E., PTOE Traffic Design Engineer Ada County Highway District May 23, 2013

Transcription:

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM Date: April 1, 219 To: Honorable City Council c/o City Clerk, Room 395, City Hall Attention: Honorable Mike Bonin, Chair, Transportation Committee From: Seleta J. Reynold^^neral Manager Department of Transportation Subject: ROWENA AVENUE, WAVERLY DRIVE, ANGUS STREET - REVIEW OF POTENTIAL MITIGATIONS PRESENTED IN KIM LEY-HORN'S MAY 218 REPORT SUMMARY This report responds to Council File 11-213-S4 direction that the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) report back on the feasibility of implementing potential mitigations presented in Kimley-Horn's May 218 report, "Rowena Avenue, Waverly Drive, Angus Street Cut-Through Traffic Study," and work with the Bureau of Engineering to develop cost estimates. Per communication from for pedestrians, Council District 4, this report evaluates mitigations based on their ability to ensure cyclists, and motorists. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council: 1. SUPPORT Kimley-Horn's Option 1 in the "Rowena Avenue, Waverly Drive, Angus Street Cut-Through Traffic Study," which makes no change to roadway geometry on Rowena Avenue and recommends additional pedestrian safety measures to the corridor and surrounding area; 2. INSTRUCT LADOT to work with the City Administrative Office (CAO) to identify capital funds to implement the feasible capital improvement recommendations identified in this report; 3. INSTRUCT LADOT to assess the possibility of making additional safety and traffic circulation enhancements to the project area. BACKGROUND In 212, a driver fatally struck a woman crossing the 28 block of Rowena Avenue. Following this collision, Council District 4 directed LADOT to develop mitigation strategies to increase safety on Rowena. At the same time, the Department of Water and Power (DWP) began construction along Rowena that temporarily reduced the corridor from two through lanes in each direction to one.

The Honorable City Council 2 April 1, 219 Following community outreach and a robust analysis of conditions in the area, LADOT recommended a reconfiguration that maintained the lane reduction and added both bike facilities and a center left turn lane. After receiving community support, LADOT worked with DWP to construct the permanent safety improvements identified above. Some residents have complained that travel time has increased on Rowena, and that this increased congestion has shifted commuter traffic to smaller local streets. In response, LADOT conducted analyses at various time points to assess collisions, speeds, and bypass traffic. Results showed a reduction in collision frequency and severity, and a reduction in speed, but also an increase in bypass traffic on the adjacent local streets. In 217, Council District 4 commissioned a third-party study to analyze and examine conditions in the area. Kimley-Horn's report, entitled "Rowena Avenue, Waverly Drive, Angus Street Cut-Through Traffic presented existing traffic conditions in the project area, identified issues raised by the community, and recommended potential strategies to mitigate adverse impacts. DISCUSSION Kimley-Horn provided the following four recommendations along Rowena Avenue: Potion 1: Retain existing lane reconfiguration with additional pedestrian improvements along Rowena Option 2: Remove bike lanes in both directions to accommodate a second eastbound travel lane Potion 3: Remove parking and bike lane in the eastbound direction and replace with a lane with sharrows Potion 4: Remove bike lanes and restrict street parking during peak AM/PM commute hours. Convert parking zone to additional travel lane with sharrows in both directions during this time period Report Options along Rowena Option 1 recommends retaining the existing roadway configuration and adding additional pedestrian improvements (summarized in Attachment A). Data from the Kimley-Horn report indicate that traffic collisions along Rowena Avenue have decreased since the street reconfiguration on March 11, 213. Additional analysis from LADOT validates this trend and also finds the following: Reduced collisions: Over the five years prior to the road reconfiguration, Rowena Avenue averaged 12.4 crashes per year. In the five years following, crashes averaged 7.8 per year. Rowena experienced five crashes in 217, the lowest number on record. Attachment B illustrates these findings. Reduced speeding: Mid-day 85th percentile conditions went from two lanes in each direction at 39 mph to a single lane in each direction with 39 mph westbound and 36 mph eastbound. Consistent traffic volume: A review of average daily traffic (ADT) counts along Rowena Avenue indicates traffic volumes have remained consistent, with the corridor carrying approximately 25, ADT both before and after road reconfiguration. Attachment C provides a summary of this data.

The Honorable City Council 3 April 1, 219 Unchanged collision patterns on side streets: Adjacent residential streets Waverly Drive and Angus Street, which is parallel to Rowena Avenue, experienced no discernible increase or decrease in collisions after implementation of the road reconfiguration. Option 2 recommends removing bike lanes in both directions to accommodate a second eastbound vehicle travel lane in order to reduce cut-through traffic on adjacent side streets. There is no indication that this option will reduce cut-through traffic or improve safety along Rowena. Instead, introducing an additional eastbound travel lane would restore the total number of vehicular lanes in one direction to pre- reconfiguration but offset the safety benefits from the current configuration. Option 3 recommends replacing the eastbound parking and bike lane with a shared travel lane marked by sharrows. This option eliminates approximately 5 parking spaces, including three loading zones, which may increase traffic on side streets as people search for available parking to patronize businesses along the corridor. Unlike peak-hour cut-through traffic, which is limited to a comparatively small window of time, reduced parking may create more persistent neighborhood intrusion throughout the day. The recommended shared travel lane may encourage lane weaving as drivers attempt to bypass bicycle users, reducing safety benefits provided by the existing bike lane. There is also no indication that this option will reduce cut-through traffic on adjacent side streets. Option 4 recommends removing bike lanes and restricting street parking during peak AM/PM commute hours to accommodate additional shared travel lanes marked by sharrows. This option would restore the total number of travel lanes along Rowena, thereby offsetting the safety benefits from the current reconfiguration and would eliminate parking on Rowena which may increase one type of neighborhood intrusion in attempts of alleviating another Additional Proposed Modifications In addition to the four options summarized above, the Kimley-Horn report makes several recommendations to mitigate neighborhood traffic and identifies capital improvements to address pedestrian safety issues. Attachment A includes a table of these improvements with an associated cost estimate and the feasibility of each. Below are the recommendations LADOT finds feasible: Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) at Rowena Avenue and Silver Lake Drive; New marked crosswalk with control at Rowena Avenue and Herkimer Street; High visibility crosswalks throughout project area; Added striping to bike lane at intersections and conflict points; Pedestrian-scaled lighting along Rowena Avenue (requires successful Prop 218 ballot); Updated curb access ramps at Griffith Park Boulevard and Hyperion Avenue; Continuous sidewalk along upper Angus Street and Waverly Drive; Bulb-outs along key intersections along Rowena Avenue. Additional Measures LADOT has identified additional measures that could further reduce conflict and improve user predictability. These include: Turn Restrictions: A large portion of cut-through traffic in the project area consists of eastbound traffic using Angus Street, a narrow residential street, instead of Rowena Avenue, a primary

The Honorable City Council 4 April 1, 219 commercial corridor. Eastbound peak-hour turn restrictions at Griffith Park Boulevard and Angus Street can keep traffic on primary corridors but would require additional outreach to the community. Enhanced Bikewav: Installation of the Rowena reconfiguration was intended to improve safety for all road users. Based on the growth in bicycle use along Rowena, upgrading the existing striped bike lane to accommodate a wider Class II buffered bike lane, or Class IV separated bikeway may provide additional safety to people bicycling. The street width can accommodate this facility without additional changes. More Pedestrian Upgrades: In addition to the pedestrian improvements recommended in the Kimley-Horn report, additional signal work, signs, and marked crosswalks can potentially improve safety. CONCLUSION Upon reviewing collision and traffic patterns in pre- and post- road reconfiguration conditions, LADOT concurs with the findings from the Kimley-Horn report, supports Option 1 to retain the existing road design, and recommends identifying funding to implement capital improvements that further the safety objectives of this project. FINANCIAL IMPACT STATEMENT Retaining the existing road configuration has no immediate fiscal impact. However, additional complementary measures such as constructing new sidewalks and curb extensions, enhancing striping, and adding turn restrictions, will have fiscal impacts ranging from approximately $1, to $2,748, (see Attachment A). Funding is not identified or readily available for all measures. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Table Assessing Kimley-Horn Report Project Area Recommendations Attachment B: Summary Collision Data for Rowena Ave, Angus St, and Waverly Dr with Key Findings Attachment C: Summary of Automated Vehicle Traffic Counts, Manual Bicycle Counts and Speed Surveys Along Rowena Corridor

Attachment A: Table Assessing Kimley-Horn Report Project Area Recommendations Location Proposed Time Frame Feasible Lead Estimated Improvement Depart Cost ment Proposed Improvements in conjunction with Option 1 along Rowena Rowena Ave between Pedestrian scaled lighting Long-range Yes5 LABSL $44, Hyperion Blvd and Glendale Blvd Bulb outs at key intersections Long-range Yes DPW $2,748, Crosswalk at Mid-range Yes LADOT $2, Rowena Ave and Herkimer St Crosswalk at N/A No LADOT N/A Rowena Ave and Avenal St Striping at Mid-Range Yes LADOT TBD intersections and conflict points Proposed Improvements in general project area Griffith Park Blvd High visibility Short-range Yes LADOT $1, and Hyperion crosswalks Ave Enhanced pedestrian Mid-range Yes BOE $8, access ramps Bulb outs N/A No N/A N/A Rowena Ave and St. George St Reconfigure intersection to add right turn only lane plus left/through for northbound, east/westbound travel Short-range Yes1 LADOT TBD Rowena Ave and W. Silver Lake Dr Signal phase improvement Mid-range Yes LADOT $1,

(Leading Pedestrian Interval) Upper Angus St Add continuous Long-range Yes DPW sidewalk $1,13, Add stripe edgeline Short-range Yes2 LADOT TBD Convert Angus St between Moreno Dr Short-range Yes3 LADOT TBD and Kenilworth Ave to one-way westbound Restrict right turn movements from Moreano Dr onto Angus St Short-range Yes3 LADOT TBD Waverly Dr Add continuous sidewalk along one Long-range Yes BOE $1,443, side of Waverly Dr Install angled parking and add sidewalk and curb N/A No LADOT NA Close northern portion of Rokeby St at the intersections with Waverly Dr and Glendale Blvd 4 Long-range LADOT TBD Yes 1. Unclear nexus to project area and goals. Would result in loss of parking and requires additional outreach. 2. Would result in loss of parking and requires additional outreach. 3. Creates circulation problem and requires additional outreach. Due to location it is also difficult to enforce. 4. May result in additional cut-through on Waverly Dr. 5. Requires Prop 218 Assessment.

Attachment B: Summary Collision Data for Rowena Ave, Angus St, and Waverly Dr with Key Findings 18 Rowena Ave total crashes over time 15 15 15 14 13 13 12 11 11 1 1 1 12 7 7 8 6 5 I 3 23 24 2: 6 2C37 28 2C9 21 211 212 213 Construction 214 215 216 217 Post road-diet Angus St total crashes over time 3 2 2 7 2 i 1 1 1 1 1 I Hill I c G 23 2CC4 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 2C17 Waverly D r total crashes over time 4 3 3 2 i i i 1 I I I I 2CC3 2CC4 2 -O 2C6 27 28 29 2C1 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 i

The methodology LADOT applied involved analyzing all crashes along the following corridors where Rowena, Angus or Waverly were the primary streets in recorded collisions: Rowena Avenue between Hyperion Avenue and Glendale Boulevard Angus Street between Griffith Park Boulevard and Silver Lake Drive Waverly Drive between Hyperion Avenue and Rokeby Street Because the road reconfiguration was implemented on March 11,213, the collision data are reported to conform to the "project year" of the reconfiguration (March 11 - March 1) rather than calendar year in order to better understand the pre- and post- condition trends. In the interest of full disclosure, the collision chart for Rowena Avenue acknowledges the road work that occurred on the street beginning part way through 21 and continued throughout most of 213. In addition to analyzing collision trends by year, LADOT found the following: Collisions caused by unsafe speeds decreased by 65.4% Rear-end collisions decreased 54.5% from 22 to 1 Sideswipe collisions decreased 5% from 14 to 7 The number of collisions involving people walking and bicycling has decreased from 9 to 6 Collisions rates at Hyperion Ave, Avenel and Auburn have gone down substantially. Collisions rates at Silver Lake Dr, Lakewood Ave and Herkimer St have gone down as well but not as drastically as Hyperion, Avenel, and Auburn.

Attachment C: Summary of Automated Vehicle Traffic Counts, Manual Bicycle Counts and Speed Surveys Along Rowena Corridor Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Intersection Date ADT Glendale Blvd 1/22/28 27,938 Rokeby St 1/27/28 24,895 Rokeby St 2/24/214 24,832 Silver Lake Dr June 26 25,112 Avenel St 12/9/22 24,731 1/14/24 25,87 2/24/214 23,335 Rowena Between Glendale Blvd and Hyperion Ave 3/16/217 25,55 Bicycle Counts* Implementing bike lanes was not a primary motivating factor for the road diet. Nonetheless, LADOT also reviewed bicycle counts along Rowena Avenue and found an increase in bicycle use during peak periods from a high of 14 to an average of 71 bike trips after the reconfiguration. Intersection Date Count Glendale Blvd 9/11/213 5 Rokeby St 9/26/218 61 Silver Lake Dr 9/25/213 9 Herkimer St 4/2/1994 14 Herkimer St 1/1/1997 Herkimer St 12/2/215 77 Avenel St 3/14/26 Avenel St 1/11/218 72

* Manual bicycle counts conducted between 7AM-1AM and 2PM-5PM. Above values combine the morning and afternoon counts. Speed Surveys Year Westbound Eastbound 22 39 mph 39 mph 215 36 mph 35 mph 218 38.5 mph 36.2 mph 85th percentile speeds ll;3am-12pm, Mondays Westbound general traffic speeds (mph) Eastbound general traffic speeds (mph) 22 215 218 Net change (22 v. 218) % change 39 36 38.5 -.5-1% 39 35 3a 2-2.8-7%