Traffic Engineering for Optimal BRT and TSP Success

Similar documents
New York s Revolutionary Transit Signal Priority Program

ITS-NY ANNUAL MEETING Bus Rapid Transit in New York City: Bus Lane Operations on One-Way Arterial Streets

Water Street Corridor Streetscape TRAFFIC STUDY

M14A/D Select Bus Service

Multimodal Approach to Planning & Implementation of Transit Signal Priority within Montgomery County Maryland

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Traffic and Transportation A. INTRODUCTION B. VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AND PARKING

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

Designing Streets for Transit. Presentation to NACTO Designing Cities Kevin O Malley Managing Deputy Commissioner 10/24/2014

Tunnel Reconstruction Brooklyn CB 1 August 14, 2018

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

Provide Employee Parking

Joseph Iacobucci. James Czarnecky, AICP

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Traffic Engineering for Transit Operations

ADVANCED TRANSIT OPERATIONS AND MODELING

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY

Canarsie Tunnel Repairs: Planning Ahead for the Crisis

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit

Bus Rapid Transit on Silicon Valley s El Camino Real: Working Together to Create a Grand Boulevard Steven Fisher

A. INTRODUCTION B. METHODOLOGY

Congestion Reducing Activities. Toby Carr GDOT Director of Planning April 10, 2014

Integrated Corridor Approach to Urban Transport. O.P. Agarwal World Bank Presentation at CODATU XV Addis Ababa, 25 th October 2012

Outreach Approach RENEW SF served as the primary liaison with the North Beach community; the Chinatown. Executive Summary

Hennepin/First Transportation Study

RapidRide Roosevelt Seat Sea t t le t le Depa De r pa t r men men t of Sept T an r sp an or sp t or a t t a ion

Transit Signal Preemption and Priority Treatments

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

Model Applications for Oakland Park Boulevard Transit Corridor Study

3 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL TIMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION

Tunnel Reconstruction South 5 th Street Association October 16, 2018

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

1. Operate along freeways, either in regular traffic lanes, in high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, or along the shoulders.

MOBILITY WORKSHOP. Joint City Council and Transportation Commission May 5, 2014

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit SFMTA Citizens Advisory Committee

Station Plan: Penn & 43rd Avenue

Richmond-Adelaide Cycle Tracks

Complete Streets in Constrained Corridors: Chicago s Central Loop BRT

From Disarray to Complete Street:

Bellevue Downtown Association Downtown Bike Series

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

13A.1 INTRODUCTION 13A-1

ABOUT MUNI FORWARD. Muni Forward is the SFMTA s initiative to make transit safer and more reliable.

State Street Transit Signal Priority Study

D New York City Transit

25th Avenue Road Diet Project A One Year Evaluation. Transportation Fund for Clean Air Project #05R07

Baseline Road Rapid Transit: Bayshore Station to Prince of Wales Drive

MEMORANDUM. TO: Transportation Planning and Programming Committee December 4, 2008 of the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization

TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Application to Miami-Dade Transit

Better Market Street. Engineering, Maintenance & Safety Committee (EMSC) February 28, 2018

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

North Vancouver Community Associations Network. November 15, pm to 9 pm

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

Northern Virginia Express Lanes Design Challenges and Solutions. IBTTA Maintenance and Roadway Operations Workshop June 25, 2018

Bus Queue Jump (Lane) Utilization: A case study in Calgary, AB Canada Muhammad Asim P.Eng, M.Sc. The City of Calgary

Community Task Force October 5, 2017

Bus Lanes and Pre-signals with Transit Signal Priority: Domains of Application

1. Provide a dedicated westbound approach bus lane at the intersection;

Queensboro Bridge Bus Priority Study: Summary of Recommendations. Presentation to Manhattan Community Board 8 May 4, 2011

North Coast Corridor:

The Vine: Mill Plain Bus Rapid Transit Project Open House Summary August 2018

University of California, Davis Transit Signal Priority Implementation Study

MASONIC AVENUE STREET DESIGN STUDY Community Workshop 2. Masonic Ave Street Design Study Community Workshop 2 August 10, 2010

Maryland State Highway Mobility Report. Morteza Tadayon

DDI s Can Move More Than Cars! 2016 Western ITE Conference Albuquerque, NM July 12, 2016 Alex Ariniello, P.E. Public Works Director, Town of Superior

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

Transit Priority Program: Putting Buses First

IMPACT OF TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY (TSP) ON BUS TRAVEL TIMES, LATE BUS RECOVERY, DELAY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS)

Aurora Corridor to E Line

Swift Bus Rapid Transit. June DeVoll, Community Transit & Tom Hingson, Everett Transit

9. TRANSIT ACCOMMODATIONS

GEARY BRT SIMULATION VISSIM Calibration and Existing Conditions Results

Strategies to keep people and goods moving in and through Seattle

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

I-25 PEL: CO Springs Denver South Connection. Presentation to Castle Rock Town Council

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Brian McHugh, Buckhead Community Improvement District. SUBJECT: Wieuca Road at Phipps Boulevard Intersection Improvements Project

Data Analysis February to March 2018 Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns. SFMTA Board of

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

McGrath Boulevard Project Development Public Meeting #2 May 28 th, 2015 East Somerville Community School

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Metro!Denver!MTD!Governance!Committee! October!23,!2013!!9:00!AM!to!10:00!AM! Denver!Regional!Council!of!Governments!

Service Development 1600 Franklin Street, Oakland CA 94612

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit June 17, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 & VISSIM Traffic / TSP Evaluation Wrap-Up

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

Welcome to the Quebec Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

Transit Choices December 8, 2016

Contents. Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Stop Placement Guidelines

Seattle Transit Master Plan

Transcription:

Traffic Engineering for Optimal BRT and TSP Success October 31, 2018

Agenda Introduction Challenges Solution Process Traffic Engineering Decisions Case Study Results

About Presenter PI of 1981 FHWA research on TSP 21 TSP projects since 1997 Traffic engineering consultant for NYCDOT city-wide TSP since 2011 Mark Yedlin GPI: Full service Engineering Firm Staff of 1500 in over 40 US offices 6 offices in Pennsylvania

What is TSP? Real Time signal adjustments to expedite buses: Extend Green Early Green Advance Green (Queue jump)

Why TSP? Reduce Travel Time Reduce Variability Reduce Operating Costs Maintain Schedule Increase Ridership Reduce Congestion Improve Mobility

The devil is in the details Can you see it? Now?

We work in the realm of the devil Lots of details!! Many pitfalls Political Institutional Technical Many voices and choices Decisions influence success

Keys to Success Start small think big! Find a champion! Bring agencies together Communicate x 3 Know what s needed Understand constraints Address bottlenecks Good traffic engineering!!

Start Small Think BIG Pick pilot to succeed Opportunities for improvement Reasonable cross street volumes Keep eye on the future Anticipate full roll-out Plan system wide policies, hardware

Find a Champion! Lead process Take responsibility Shephard agencies to consensus Keep pushing!!

Bring Agencies Together Department of Transportation Transit Agency Consultants Multiple staff in each Recognize different: Priorities Agendas Responsibilities Cost/Benefit realities

Communicate, Communicate, Communicate! Throughout process Objectives Policies Design Implementation Acceptance testing Ongoing operations Even within same agency!

What are the constraints? Cross street traffic Pedestrians, seniors Capacity Coordination Bus stops Other corridor traffic

How should it work? Primary objectives? Conditional, Unconditional TSP? Coordination? Transition? Competing calls? How soon to accept next call? Door switches?

What do we have to Decide? What timings/offsets? Which intersections? What phases? How much time? When to act? Which call? Queue jumps? What are effects? Is it worth it? Simulation invaluable! Answers vary by time of day Also vary by direction

Why simulate? Resolve the decisions Determine savings for buses Determine effects on others Examine tradeoffs Optimize system Justify funding!!!

Public Transit in NYC 5.7 million subway, 2.4 million bus riders per day 5,700 buses on 2,800 miles of routes Public transit system operated by MTA NYC Transit Streets and 13,000 signalized intersections operated by NYCDOT

Problem: Bus Speeds in NYC 10 9 9.1 8.4 Source: Sources: National Transit Database 8 7.4 7 6 5 1996 2002 2014

Case Study: TSP in NYC Wall Street Financial District 2 nd highest ridership in city Intermodal route Lots of pedestrians, bicycles Unloading trucks Congested Coordination Canyon for GPS signal Success unlikely!

Comparing Bus Operations With and Without TSP Without TSP Intersections Crossed: 3025679811 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 41 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 34 33 32 31 24 Next: Allen Pike Pearl Madison State Water / / E. Henry Madison / Stanton Rivington Delancey Broome Grand Hester Canal Division Peter Wagner St. Dover Peck Beekman Fulton John Maiden Pine Wall Gouverneur Old 55 Coenties Whitehall Fletcher Broadway / St. Market Catherine Oliver James Water Slip Minuit James Slip Active TSP Intersections Crossed: 012345678910 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Next: Allen Pike Madison Pearl Water State / / E. Henry Madison / Stanton Rivington Delancey Broome Grand Hester Canal Division Peter St. Wagner Dover Peck Beekman Fulton John Fletcher Maiden Pine Wall Gouverneur Old 55 Coenties Whitehall Broadway / James Market Catherine Oliver St. Water Slip Minuit James Slip Early Extended TSP not return to green available green Time saved to last intersection: 00:00 00:20 00:23 00:35 00:36 01:02 01:13 02:01 01:56 02:02 02:53 02:49 02:50 03:53 03:26 01:57 02:05 02:59 03:01 03:02 04:04 03:23 03:14 03:17

Results: Win-Win! Period Travel Time Savings Min/Bus trip % NB SB NB SB AM Peak 3.5 2.6 18.4 13.7 Mid-day 0.7 1.7 4.4 9.1 PM Peak 3.2 2.6 16.2 14.5 M15 SBS Bus Travel Time Deviations, SB/WB Direction, AM Period Lowered Bus Travel Time Up to 18.4% Reduced Delay for Other Traffic Side streets improved too! Side street delay: 3.2 to 10.3% Peak hour delay for corridor: 12.4 to 15.1% Peak hour delay for all traffic: 8.3 to 11.9% 17 17.5 18 18.5 19 19.5 20 20.5 21 21.5 22 22.5 23 Travel Time (mins) Existing Active TSP Lowered Variability Improved reliability

840 intersections 92 miles

Keys to Success Find a champion! Bring agencies together Communicate!!! Know what s needed Understand constraints Address bottlenecks Simulation and good traffic engineering!!

Questions? Mark Yedlin Director of Simulation Modeling Services Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. (GPI) myedlin@gpinet.com Thank you!