Tuesday, May 15, Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout.

Similar documents
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Continuing Review of Approved Research

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

Issue in IRB Approvals:

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program

Baptist Health Institutional Review Board. Study Closure Report (Expedited Review) IRB #: Study Title:

7.0 DEVIATION and EXCEPTION of a PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROTOCOL

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.

Yale University Institutional Review Boards

SOP #2-2 Version #1 Date First Effective: December 14, Page 1 of 6

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 02 06/30/10 08/01/07 1 OF 6

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

NONCOMPLIANCE. 1. Overview

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the continuing review procedure of approved projects for the IRB.

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Human Research Protection Program Policy

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

CONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

AMENDMENTS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESEARCH 3/01/2016

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

Wayne State University Institutional Review Board

The IRB reviews and monitors human subjects research conducted by Columbia College Chicago faculty, staff, and students.

Independent Ethics Committees

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Post-Approval Submissions

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Policy on IRB Review of Protocol Deviations and Noncompliance for Non-exempt Research

SOP 5.06 Full Committee Review: Initial IRB Review

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

HSPP Standard Operating Procedures

Lapse in IRB Approval

Supersedes Document Dated: 7/7/11. SOP: RR 401 Version No.: 07 Version Date: 9/8/15 EXPEDITED REVIEW 1. POLICY

Review of Research by the Convened IRB

CUNY HRPP Policy: Suspension or Termination of Human Subject Research

Effective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval

IRB Chair Responsibilities

Research Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Cayuse IRB Policy and Procedure Manual

IRB-REQUIRED INVESTIGATOR ACTIONS

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. IRB Review Processes

Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

Title: EXPEDITED IRB REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

EXPEDITED REVIEW. Terms used in this policy, but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Glossary.

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

2.0 Institutional Review Board

RESEARCH SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Interactions with the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Human Subjects in Research Review and Monitoring Form. Not applicable

University of Cincinnati. Radiation Safety Committee Operations Guidelines Statement of Policy (RSC Guidelines) RSC Guidelines (revision 5)

The Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. Cooperative Agreements

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: MHC_RP0107. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

Chapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities

21 CFR Part 56 - Institutional Review Boards

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Penn as Central IRB FAQ

POLICY NO EXEMPT RESEARCH... 4 POLICY NO DISCLOSURE OF RESEARCH LAB TEST RESULTS... 5

The Top 10 Human Research Protection Compliance Risks

External IRB Instructions for the Registration Pathway in OSIRIS

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN S E RVICES, 'mgr,':~~ MAY WARNING LETTE R

Minot State University Institutional Review Board ANNUAL UPDATE/REVISION/PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

Arkansas Tech University Institutional Review Board

IRB Minutes Quality Improvement Assessment

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

the HRPP Director will prepare a draft report within three (3) workdays after the IRB meeting at which the determination occurred.

Institutional Review Board Investigator Handbook

Florida State University IRB Standard Operational Procedures

Section 8. Continuing Review of Ongoing IRB-Approved Research (Revised 7/1/10)

EMERGENCY USE 03/02/2016

Procedure Department: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM Policy Number: II.B.1

University of Wisconsin Colleges Administrative Policy #56 NON-COMPLIANCE IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

COMPLIANCE MONITORING

IRB Staff Administration Guide

HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS RESEARCH NETWORK

Submitting Continuing Reviews and/or Amendments to the IRB

2 Institutional Review Board

Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Serving as a Reviewing IRB

What s New in GCP? FDA, OHRP Issue Harmonized Guidance on Transferring IRB Oversight of Clinical Studies

Institutional Review Board - Restriction s Impo sed

Collaborative Research

Version 1. Submission Guide and Policies

SOP 903: HRPP AND NON-COMPLIANCE

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR S ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES

RESEARCH PROTECTIONS OFFICE

IRB Authorization Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool

FDA > CDRH > CFR Title 21 Database Search. Registration Listing Adverse Events Advisory Committees. 21 CFR Part 56

Illinois Institute of Technology Institutional Review Board Handbook of Procedures for the Protection of Human Research Subjects

Transcription:

Tuesday, May 15, 2012 Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout. 1

Michelle Dolske, ORA 2

Laura Orem, IRB

Must be in list of Categories (see IRBNet Forms and Templates) No more than minimal risk Minor changes to previously approved research IRB Review by Chair or experienced IRB member reviewers designated by the Chair Full IRB to be notified at next IRB meeting

Minutes to include: Research presents no more than minimal risk to subjects Identification of subjects or their responses will not reasonably place them at risk Research is not classified The category or categories of research which permitted expedited review

All documents are available to assigned IRB reviewers IRB records will document which IRB member(s) reviewed the study Typically, researchers are not made aware of which IRB member(s) reviewed their study Researcher must abide by same rules as for studies that go through full IRB review

IRB approval required prior to initiation of research study ORA WRITTEN CLEARANCE MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO BEGINNING RESEARCH STUDY Approval period one year

PI notified in writing of required changes; Revisions reviewed by the IRB reviewer; If questions are of a substantive nature, the protocol may be referred to the convened IRB; If revisions are not approved by the IRB reviewer, the reviewer may refer the study to convened meeting; Approval period is one year from approval date noted on initial letter of approval.

IRB Chair or convened IRB may suspend study if determination is made that the study requires further review/evaluation; Determination may result from: Adverse event Noncompliance Other issues regarding welfare of subject Chair may suspend, full IRB may terminate

Reviewers may exercise all the authorities of the IRB except disapprove research minor changes to previously approved research may be disapproved through expedited review

IRB sends written notification of actions taken to PI; No regulatory requirement that IRB action documents be signed; Florida Hospital IRB does not require signatures on such documents; Action documents are generated electronically by a password-protected IRB information system with access limited to authorized IRB personnel.

Summaries of actions taken provided to the Institutional Official (O) and/or the VP for Research through minutes. If revisions to new or continuing human subjects applications are required, the PI is notified in writing. Office of Research Administration has access to IRB action letters through IRBNet.

Must fit one of the exemption categories (see IRBNet Forms and Templates); IRB is not required to exempt studies that is an IRB decision; Changes to exempted studies that might change the exempt status must be brought back to the IRB; FHIRB DOES require renewal of the study on a yearly basis to determine if the study is still ongoing.

Do not apply to prisoners; Do not apply to FDA regulated research with the exception of Category 6; IRB Minutes will include the name of the IRB reviewer for the Exempt study

IRB review and approval required before investigators can start using modified research studies, except to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to subjects; Any proposed change must be submitted as an amendment and may be reviewed by expedited or full board review, depending on the Chair s or designated IRB member s assessment of associated risks.

Minor changes may be approved by expedited review. Minor changes are those that do not involve procedures that increase risk more than minimally or add procedures that would make the protocol ineligible for initial review using the expedited procedure. Major modifications should be reviewed by the convened IRB.

Modifications involving new findings: The IRB will determine whether the new findings may be related to participants willingness to continue participation and if the findings should be shared with the subjects. If that determination is made, a change request form shall accompany a copy of the notification (letter) to be sent to the subjects.

If the change must be made immediately to protect human subjects, the changes should be made as appropriate. Within five (5) business days, the investigator should describe the change using the change request form, which will be reviewed by the IRB Chair or his designee to determine if a change in risk has occurred in the research and if further changes are warranted. A deviation from the approved research should be submitted, as well. If the deviation was approved by the sponsor but not sent to the IRB prior to the change which caused the deviation, a copy of the sponsor s approval is to be sent to the IRB, as well.

IRB shall (must) conduct continuing review (renewal) of research at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk, but not less than once per year. IRB may determine to review a study more often than once per year. Study expires on midnight on the expiration date. IRBNet automates these calculations and accounts for leap years.

IRB responsibilities include: Reviewing reports of unanticipated problems that involve risk to subjects or others. This information may be gathered through: Investigator or sponsor reports Third party observations IRB inquiring. Renewal may stop only when the research is permanently closed to enrollment, all participants have completed research related interventions or activities, and collection and active analysis of private identifiable information has been completed. Sponsored studies renewal continues until after the sponsor s close out visit, unless sponsor requires termination prior to close out visit.

Nature, probability and magnitude of anticipated risks to subjects; Medical/psychological condition of proposed subjects; Qualifications of the PI and other members of the research team; Specific experience of the PI and other members of the research team in conducting similar research; Nature and frequency of adverse events observed in similar research at this and other facilities; Vulnerability of the population being studied.

IRB may define the period of approval time with either a time interval or a research milestone, e.g. number of subjects enrolled. Minutes will clearly reflect any determination requiring a review more frequently than annually. Written reminders automatically generated by IRBNet and sent to the project owner at approximately 90, 60, 30 days before the expiration date and on the expiration date.

Progress report or Termination report located in IRBNet in Forms and Templates. Once the renewal application is received, it is checked by an IRB staff member and, if everything is in order, it is sent on to 1 or 2 reviewers. Submissions for renewal will include the progress report with the Narrative thoughtfully completed, along with the most current informed consent.

If study initially approved by expedited review, generally available for expedited renewal; If study initially approved by full board, generally receives full board review for renewal unless it fits into Category 8 or 9 in SOP 13.0; IRB will determine if subjects need any modifications; IRB will determine if protocol requires verification from sources other than the investigator that no material changes have occurred since previous IRB review. PIs are notified in writing of the decision of the IRB and any required changes. Final approval is not granted until all required changes have been made and submitted for IRB review and approval.

IRB approval expires automatically at end of day on expiration date; All research activities involving human subjects must stop (including new enrollment); IRB may approve temporarily continuing participation of already enrolled subjects; During time period between when lapse occurs and the determination is approved by the IRB, subjects may continue intervention, as necessary, for their help and welfare.

If the IRB determines that the investigation should continue with the PI completing the appropriate paperwork, IRB will notify the PI regarding that. If the IRB decides that already enrolled subjects should continue to receive interventions under unapproved research protocol and data collection, the IRB will also determine how follow-up will be reviewed.

IRB should document why the lapse occurred and identify steps to be taken to prevent any future lapses. Once the study is back on track the IRB approval will be one year from when the renewal should take place.

Failure to meet continuing review obligations may be grounds for suspension or termination; May affect future research you wish to conduct at FH; May prompt a requirement for continuing education; If the study is suspended or terminated, appropriate federal agencies must be notified.

Michelle Dolske, PhD Michelle Kilponen 29

Laura Orem, IRB 30

Office of Research Administration Julie Pepe, PhD

* IRBNet Forms should be completed at this stage. ORA package with the RRA needs to be submitted.

Principal investigator or Mentor (along with sub- investigators) should be present at the initial meeting to discuss the project and answer questions. After initial meeting, several versions of the protocol may be necessary. Contact at the protocol stage will eliminate most problems at the analysis stage.

Julie Pepe, ORA Michelle McKinney, IRB Maria Rizzo, Volunteer Services 39

FH Research Volunteer Process

Definition: Volunteer Individuals that provide services without any expectation of compensation, and without any coercion or intimidation. Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

Steps: Department completes a job description and request form

Department Request Form

Contact: Volunteer Services Maria Rizzo Manager Volunteer Services Orlando 407/303-1813 office 407/303-1947 fax If you have an intern or a specific volunteer already, then you can provide that information to Volunteer Services. Volunteer Services will provide a general orientation (sessions monthly), background check, badge and any additional checks (credit, drug, or criminal) necessary. On the first day, a Training/Competency form will need to be completed and faxed to Volunteer Services.

Research Specifics Volunteers may only participate on a study through an established FH Research Department. Must complete CITI training. FH Volunteer must be IRB credentialed and register in the IRB electronic submission software system. Volunteers can be assigned tasks for which they have appropriate background, experience, training and/or education. If the Volunteer needs access to the EMR, this must be indicated on their job description.

Research Volunteers may not: Take the place of an employee, (i.e., their absence should not adversely affect the daily operations of a department). Be solely responsible for a specific project or meeting a deadline. Sign legal documents Obtain informed consent* Be Principal Investigator or a Sub-Investigator* for a FH research project.

*A new classification for volunteers will be developed that will allow a volunteer (in this classification) to: Obtain informed consent- for minimal risk studies Be a Sub-investigator for minimal risk studies

Details Consider whether or not the volunteer needs access to EMR, Email or Department H drive. Access needs to be arranged with your IS manager. Upon departure: Retrieve FH identification badge. Ensure FH system access is terminated. Instruct Volunteer to schedule exit interview with Volunteer Services.

Comments or Questions ORA has gone through the process to acquire a biostatistics intern. Maria Rizzo, Manager Volunteer Services, is here to answer questions. Michelle Tall, intern, can comment on the process from the volunteer perspective.

Michelle McKinney, IRB and Michelle Kilponen, ORA 50

Laura Orem, IRB Thank you for coming! Please be sure you ve signed in to reflect your training of the new SOPs! 51