Low Volume Road Traffic Counts

Similar documents
Low Volume Road Traffic Counts

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

Pennsylvania Highway Statistics

Owl Canyon Corridor Project Overview and Summary

2016 ANNUAL TRAFFIC REPORT

Bicycle Lanes Planning, Design, Funding South Mountain Partnership Trails Workshop Roy Gothie PennDOT Statewide Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator

Construction Specifications Manual

Verified By: <insert> Date: dd/mm/yyyy. Title: <insert> <electronic signature will appear here>

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

2014 Fishers Trail Count

VILLAGE OF NILES TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

Le Sueur County, MN Tuesday, January 24, 2017 Board Meeting

Overview of FDOT District 7 Safety Programs and Initiatives in Tampa Bay, FL

CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS. Bike / Pedestrian Count Project

National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project Conducting Counts

Multi-Modal Transportation Programs

Special education/504 students shall be adjudged on an individual basis, in accordance with their Individual Education Plans (IEPs)/504 Plans.

Travel Program Operating Procedures

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

Pavement Markings (1 of 3)

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

SPRING-FORD AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

Analysis of 2015 Trail Usage Patterns along the Great Allegheny Passage

World Leading Traffic Analysis

2014 GW Holiday STaC Dec 8-14, 2014 Sanction #ST

City of West Des Moines PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

SIDEWALK GUIDELINES April 14, 2008

Public Transportation and Bicycle & Pedestrian Stakeholder Webinar. April 11, :30 PM

PROJECT OVERVIEW. Auburn Station Access Improvements Project

Design Public Hearing MassDOT Project # February 19, 2015 Chatham Town Hall Annex 7:00 P.M.

Registering Club players in Whole Game Club Official Training Guide

INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 171/12. Risk Based Principal Inspection Intervals

Development of Guidelines for Bicycle Use of Controlled Access Facilities in Virginia

Secondary Road Program

Shimming with VnmrJ 3.1 Software for Peak NMR Performance

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Traffic Calming Policy

Categories Explained. Choices? On sign up you will have to select:

Title: INSTRUMENT AND EQUIPMENT DOCUMENTATION AND RECORDS

Bicycle and Pedestrian

Louisiana-Mississippi Bicycle Racing Association Bylaws

Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning in a Historically Car-Centric Culture: A Focus on Connectivity, Safety, & Accessibility

Pavement Management Report. City Council Meeting of May 21, 2013

FEASIBILITY REPORT ON RED LIGHT CAMERAS PLACED AT CENTRAL AVENUE AND H STREET.

TITLE 16 STREETS AND SIDEWALKS, ETC 1 CHAPTER 1 EXCAVATIONS AND CUTS 2

Third Street Bridge & Corridor Project

Ben Timerson, MnDOT Erik Minge, SRF Consulting Group Greg Lindsey, University of Minnesota

BIA INDIAN HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM FY2016 LAW ENFORCEMENT OVERTIME GRANT

City of Ottawa s Complete Streets Approach to Transportation Projects

Scenarios. The following slides will show existing pictures that deny access, followed by a retrofitted picture that provides access.

Safer Roads by Design TM : Engineering Solutions to Implement irap Surveys. Washington, DC USA March 4-8, Executive Seminar

Instructions for Counting Pedestrians at Intersections. September 2014

Benefits of Center Line Rumble Strips on Rural 2-Lane Highways in Louisiana

City of Edinburg Department of Public Works 415 W. University Dr. Edinburg, TX (956) SPEED HUMPS INSTALLATION POLICY

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual

MEMORANDUM. To: PRL Performance Standards Subgroup From: Donna Pratt Subject: Performance Method Recommendation Date: January 18, 2001

Bicyclist Signing Guidelines

Toward Zero Deaths: Proactive Steps for Your Community


ORGANIZER GUIDE- EXTENDED

Fishery Dependent Data Collection Office of Science and Technology

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study Phase 2

Environmental Review and Permitting for Wild Trout

Rules Governing New Jersey Instant Lottery Games

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

usrap: An Innovation in Data-Driven Safety Analysis

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Magnetic Tape Installation Straight guide tape, embedded magnetic bar, curve segments HG A

CHAPTER 8 STAKING SIGNALS AND LIGHTING FIELD GUIDE. 8.1 Staking Traffic Control Signal Systems

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Kelowna On the Move. Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

BIA INDIAN HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM FY2016 LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT. SECTION A: General Information. This section must be completed for all applicants.

Act 47 Exception Application Process (Permitting Bicycle Travel on Freeways)

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

Citizens Advisory Committee March 26, 2014

Request for Participation

BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE COMPONENT REMOVE II PROGRAM GUIDELINES, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

Bicycle and Pedestrian Level of Service Evaluation

Comparison of Turning Movement Count Data Collection Methods for a Signal Optimization Study. White Paper

Measurement along a Length of Road

BIA INDIAN HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM FY2016 TRAFFIC RECORDS GRANT. SECTION A: General Information. This section must be completed for all applicants.

WASHINGTON CONSERVATION DISTRICT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE (S.O.P.)

Student Population Projections By Residence. School Year 2016/2017 Report Projections 2017/ /27. Prepared by:

Improve the livability of our streets by

NACTO Designing Cities Conference Project Evaluation: Tools for Measuring Success and Building Support. October 29, 2015

Purpose and Need. For the. Strava Bicycle Data Project

Executive Summary. September 3, 2014

Introduction This section includes suggestions on how to use this guide, an overview of course philosophy and goals.

Traffic Calming Program Update

NEW YORK STATE 2018 Observational Survey of Seat Belt Use

Introduction This section includes suggestions on how to use this guide, an overview of course philosophy and goals.

Closing Plenary Session

Module 3 Developing Timing Plans for Efficient Intersection Operations During Moderate Traffic Volume Conditions

Kentucky s Safety Circuit Rider Program

TULARE COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ON EDGEWATER BOULEVARD AT PORT ROYAL AVENUE (NORTH)

Transcription:

Low Volume Road Traffic Counts Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above Use Chat box to ask Questions http://metrocount.com If you are reading this, then you are successfully seeing the webinar video. In addition to audio on the webinar, we have opened a phone conference line to allow attendees to listen and ask questions directly: 866-823-7699. Please use either the webinar audio or conference line, but not both (will produce feedback) 1

Webinar, including Q&A, will be recorded and available later. www.dirtandgravelroads.org

Low Volume Road Traffic Counts Note this is essentially the same http://metrocount.com presentation given at 2014 Maintenance Workshop We will answer any logistical questions possible, but focus is on policy. 3

Driving Surface Aggregate LVR Traffic Counts Introduction Overview Policy Use of Existing Data Level 1 Count Level 2 Count Miscellaneous 4

DGLVR Law: Overview

Overview DGLVR Law: To fund safe, efficient, and environmentally sound maintenance of sections of low volume roads that are sealed or paved with an average daily traffic count of 500 vehicles or less. (Unpaved road do not need traffic counts!)

Overview Traffic Counts are not quite as straightforward as they sound: FHWA has a standard method, recommends a 48 hour count. Nobody, including PennDOT, really uses the FHWA method directly. EVERY STATE has their own methods and policies.

Overview Traffic Counts are not quite as straightforward as they sound: 100% 90% 80% For illustration only, not actual numbers. Confidence in count hours days weeks months Length of count

Overview Traffic Counts, Our Goal: Verify within reason a road has <500 vehicles per day. Simple, and accurate enough.

Overview Traffic Counts, Our Goal: Verify within reason a road has <500 vehicles per day. Simple, and accurate enough. AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic

Driving Surface Aggregate LVR Traffic Counts Introduction Overview Policy Use of Existing Data Level 1 Count Level 2 Count Miscellaneous 11

Overview Responsibility: Applicant is responsible for providing traffic counts before a contract can be signed. Conservation District is responsible for verifying that a count exists, and that the count meets the criteria established in state and local policy.

Overview Program Policy (adopted 9/9/14 by SCC): Use existing data. Level 1 count (2 hour). Level 2 count (24 hour).

Overview Program Policy (adopted 9/9/14 by SCC): This policy sets the minimum statewide Program standard. Your County can enact stricter count standards. More to come on this at the end

Traffic Count Validation Form: Standard form Keep with project files.

Traffic Count Validation Form: Standard form Keep with project files. Road Information Use Existing Traffic Data Level 1 Count Level 2 Count Validation

Traffic Count Validation Form: Road Information Standard form Keep with project files.

Traffic Count Validation Form: Road Information

Driving Surface Aggregate LVR Traffic Counts Introduction Overview Policy Use of Existing Data Level 1 Count Level 2 Count Miscellaneous 19

Use Existing Data Municipal Roads Less than 5% have actual counts. Many more have estimates, but estimates cannot be used. Counts are valid for 5 years. Check with your planning commission.

Use Existing Data PennDOT Roads Have good traffic data http://www.dot.state.pa.us/internet/bureaus/pdplanres.nsf/info BPRTrafficInfoTrafficVolumeMap Can be used to extrapolate to local roads

Use Existing Data PennDOT Roads: example map P. Matilda SC

Use Existing Data PennDOT Roads: example map P. Matilda SC

Use Existing Data PennDOT Roads: example map unknown P. Matilda SC

Use Existing Data PennDOT Roads: example map P. Matilda SC

Use Existing Data PennDOT Roads: example map < 500 < 500 P. Matilda SC

Traffic Count Validation Form: Standard form Keep with project files. Use Existing Traffic Data

Traffic Count Validation Form: Existing Data front back

Driving Surface Aggregate LVR Traffic Counts Introduction Overview Policy Use of Existing Data Level 1 Count Level 2 Count Miscellaneous 29

Level 1 Counts: 2 hours Level 1 Counts Count traffic for two hours at the busiest time of the day (3-6pm) on a Tue, Wed, or Thr. While not as accurate, it is an overestimation of traffic counts. Counts of <500 mean road is eligible.

Level 1 Counts: 2 hours Level 1 Counts Simple and quick. Designed to eliminate a lot of the very low volume roads with minimal effort. Hopefully it will suffice for >75% of the traffic counts we need.

Level 1 Counts: 2 hours Level 1 Counts Types of two Hour Counts Manual Counts Video Counts Use of Counter (might as well do level 2!) Other?

Level 1 Counts: 2 hours Level 1 Counts Must be done between March 1 and the week before Thanksgiving.

Level 1 Counts: 2 hours Level 1 Counts Between March 1 and the week before Thanksgiving. On a Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday. Two consecutive hours between 3:00 pm & 6:00 pm.

Level 1 Counts: 2 hours Level 1 Counts Between March 1 and the week before Thanksgiving. On a Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday. Two consecutive hours between 3:00 pm & 6:00 pm. No holidays, or the day before or after a holiday. Direction of travel or type of vehicle does not matter. The traffic count for the time period will be adjusted to a 24 hour period by simply multiplying the 2 hour count volume times twelve (12) Only licensed motor vehicles should be counted.

Level 1 Counts: 2 hours Only licensed motor vehicles should be counted...

Level 1 Counts: 2 hours Level 1 Counts A Level 1 count that yields 600 vehicles per day does not disqualify a road since it represents an overestimation. It simply means that a Level 2 count is needed if they wish to pursue the project.

Level 1 Counts: 2 hours Level 1 Counts Example 1: A count for two consecutive hours between 4:00 & 6:00 pm produces a count of 25.

Level 1 Counts: 2 hours Level 1 Counts Example 1: A count for two consecutive hours between 4:00 & 6:00 pm produces a count of 25. 12 x 25 =300 average daily count. This worksite would be eligible (no level 2 count needed).

Level 1 Counts: 2 hours Level 1 Counts Example 1: A count for two consecutive hours between 4:00 & 6:00 pm produces a count of 25. 12 x 25 =300 average daily count. This worksite would be eligible (no level 2 count needed). Example 2: A traffic count for two consecutive hours between 3:30 pm & 5:30 pm produces a count of 53.

Level 1 Counts: 2 hours Level 1 Counts Example 1: A count for two consecutive hours between 4:00 &6:00 pm produces a count of 25. 12 x 25 =300 average daily count. This worksite would be eligible (no level 2 count needed). Example 2: A traffic count for two consecutive hours between 3:30 pm & 5:30 pm produces a count of 53. 12 x 53 = 636 average daily count. This does not disqualify the road. It simply means that a more accurate Level 2 Count is required if the applicant wants to continue to pursue Program funding.

Traffic Count Validation Form: Standard form Keep with project files. Level 1 Counts

Traffic Count Validation Form: Level 1 Counts

Driving Surface Aggregate LVR Traffic Counts Introduction Overview Policy Use of Existing Data Level 1 Count Level 2 Count Miscellaneous 44

Level 2 Counts: 24 hours Level 2 Counts 24 hour automated count. Why 24 hours

Overview Traffic Counts not quite as straightforward as they sound: FHWA

Overview Traffic Counts not quite as straightforward as they sound: 24 hour 9% error 48 hour 7.6% error 72 hour 7% error FHWA

Level 2 Counts: 24 hours Level 2 Counts Any Counter type. Air tube most common. Only total traffic is needed, not vehicle type or hourly breakdowns.

Level 2 Counts: 24 hours Level 2 Counts Must be done Between March 1 and the week before Thanksgiving.

Level 2 Counts: 24 hours Level 2 Counts It must be conducted between March 1 and the week before Thanksgiving. It cannot be conducted on a holiday, or the day before or after a holiday.

Level 2 Counts: 24 hours Level 2 Counts It must be conducted between March 1 and the week before Thanksgiving. It cannot be conducted on a holiday, or the day before or after a holiday. It must be conducted between 12 AM Tuesday and 12 AM Friday. It must be conducted for a minimum of 24 consecutive hours (hourly breakdowns not required). Only the number of vehicle passes is counted, regardless of direction of travel or type of vehicle.

Level 2 Counts: 24 hours Level 2 Counts A Level 2 count that yields >500 vehicles per day means a road is not eligible. Multiple Counts??? Up to you locally.

Level 2 Counts: 24 hours Level 2 Counts Can be done by applicant. Can be contracted. Could even be done by District

Level 2 Counts: 24 hours Cost of Contracted Counts Two 48 hour counts done for workshop ~$300 each Company was not local (90 min, added to cost) Grouping counts will result in cost savings

Level 2 Counts: 24 hours Cost of Contracted Counts 125 125

Traffic Count Validation Form: Standard form Keep with project files. Level 2 Counts

Traffic Count Validation Form: Level 2 Counts

Traffic Count Validation Form: Standard form Keep with project files. Validation

Traffic Count Validation Form: Keep with project files.

Driving Surface Aggregate LVR Traffic Counts Introduction Overview Policy Use of Existing Data Level 1 Count Level 2 Count Miscellaneous 60

Miscellaneous Conservation Districts may, at their discretion, use administrative and education funding to facilitate or support traffic counts for applicants. Buying and loaning counters. Paying for third party counts. Districts should insure that all potential applicants have equal access to any traffic count facilitation measures they may employ.

Miscellaneous NORMAL Traffic Counts A traffic count survey cannot be conducted in a timeframe or manner that intentionally causes artificially low average daily traffic counts on a particular road segment Summer recess for a school access road When access is partially restricted or reduced Any other timeframe or manner that intentionally causes low average daily traffic counts. We can t make a rule for everything. Use common sense.

Miscellaneous Sharing Count Data You may want to partner with your planning commission and/or share data with PennDOT. Note that PennDOT has additional requirements above our Level 2: 24 hours must start and end at midnight Must include hourly breakdowns May need vehicle class breakdowns PennDOT has specific counter vendors

Miscellaneous Traffic Count Data 500 vehicles per day is simply a door that is open or closed for Program eligibility. We have not, and don t recommend, using traffic data to rank sites.

Miscellaneous This policy sets the minimum statewide Program standard. Your County can enact stricter count standards. Level 1 counts on video only? Only level 2 counts accepted? 48 Hour or longer counts for level 2? Third party counts only? CD doing counts? Must have hourly traffic breakdowns? Mandatory counts with application?

Miscellaneous Webinar, including Q&A, will be recorded and available later. www.dirtandgravelroads.org

Miscellaneous Other webinars planned for Fall / Winter. Look for future announcements Quality Assurance Board Issues DSA: Aggregate Clearinghouse Stream Crossing Replacement Policy Developing Application Ranking Criteria Update and review of new forms. GIS system updates. Permitting issues with DGLVR projects. Specific sections of admin manual. Pavement / LVR issues.

Low Volume Road Traffic Counts Steve Bloser PSU Center for Dirt and Gravel Roads smb201@psu.edu http://metrocount.com 69