Effect of cell size on Varroa 37 Africanized cells (13.9 and 10.3%, respectively). The Carniolan-sized cells also had a significantly larger number of

Similar documents
Comparison of the reproductive ability of varroa mites in worker and drone brood of Africanized Honey Bees

RAPD identification of Varroa destructor genotypes in Brazil and other regions of the Americas

Bees Biting Mites. Breeding and small cell size. by ERIK OSTERLUND Sweden

Africanized honey bees (Apis mellifera) have low infestation levels of the mite Varroa destructor in different ecological regions in Mexico

Expression of Varroa Sensitive Hygiene (VSH) in Iranian Honey Bees (Apis mellifera meda)

IMPACT OF VARROA DESTRUCTOR ON THE HONEY BEES OF SOUTH AFRICA

VARROA-BEE RELATIONSHIPS -WHAT THEY TELL US ABOUT CONTROLLING VARROA MITES ON THE EUROPEAN HONEY BEE

Notes on Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) parasitic on honeybees in New Zealand

Infestation levels of Varroa destructor in local honey bees of Jordan

Does a remote Brazilian island hold the key to varroa tolerance?

Biology of the Varroa mite: what you need to know to understand its population dynamics

Biology of the Varroa mite: what you need to know to understand its population dynamics

Received 17-vi Corrected 30-vi Accepted 31-vii-2008.

Varroa destructor Infestation in Untreated Honey Bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Colonies Selected for Hygienic Behavior

Experimental infestation of a worker brood cell of Apis mellifera with an adult female of Varroa destructor Lucía Rojas Quesada / DRIADE S.A.

Effect of queen age on hygienic and grooming behavior of Apis mellifera Ligustica against Varroa destructor

Dispersion type of Varroa mite (Acari, Varroidae) Among the Bee hives in Kurdistan Province, Iran

Varroa mite reproductive biology. How Trump Won. How Varroa Won 3/10/2018. Zachary Huang Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan, USA

Figure 1. Thresholds for sticky board types. Threshold of 60 varroa mites. Threshold of 120 varroa mites. Research by the beekeeper for the beekeeper

Nomenclature. David E. MacFawn Master Craftsman Beekeeper SCBA Aiken Journeyman Class Saturday, April 23, 2016

V. Goswami, M.S. Khan/Journal of Natural Products, Vol. 6(2013):

The Varroa Bee Mite 1

EVALUATION OF SOME NATURAL SUBSTANCES AGAINST VARROA DESTRUCTOR INFESTING HONEYBEE, APIS MELLIFERA IN EGYPT

PRACTICAL 16 FAMILIARIZATION WITH ENEMIES OF HONEY BEES AND THEIR CONTROL

Variable Population Growth of Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) in Colonies of Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) During a 10-Year Period

mellifera and Apis dorsata and its effect on the parasitic mites Varroa jacobsoni and Tropilaelaps clareae Grooming behaviour of Apis cerana, Apis

Steven & Angelia Coy Wiggins, MS

SELECTION FOR UNCAPPING OF VARROA INFESTED BROOD CELLS IN THE HONEYBEE (APIS MELLIFERA)

FOR TREATMENT OF VARROOSIS CAUSED BY VARROA DESTRUCTOR IN HONEY BEES (APIS MELLIFERA)

Small-cell comb does not control Varroa mites in colonies of honeybees of European origin

Bangkok 10600, Thailand. Dhonburi, Bangkok 10600, Thailand. *Corresponding author Accepted 12 February, 2016 ABSTRACT

Final Report: UF Development of Varroa destructor in vitro rearing methods. Cameron Jack 1, Jamie Ellis 2

Preparing Honeybee Colonies for Winter

Natural Varroa mite-surviving Apis mellifera honeybee populations

Redacted for Privacy

Newsletter of the Appalachian Beekeepers

The effectiveness of thermotherapy in the elimination of Varroa destructor

Integrated pest management against Varroa destructor reduces colony mite levels and delays treatment threshold

Varroa Management. How do I know if my colonies have Varroa?

Beekeeping PARASITIC MITES OF HONEY BEES. Greg Hunt, Bee Specialist, Purdue University

IMPACT OF VARROA MITE INFESTATION ON THE MANDIBULAR AND HYPOPHARYNGEAL GLANDS OF HONEY BEE WORKERS

Varroa Mites. Diagnose the disease first then diagnose the problem with the Honey Bee. Where can You find Varroa Mites?

Natural Beekeeping. Small Hive Beekeeping to Manage Varroa Mites

LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses

Impact of Varroa destructor on honeybee (Apis mellifera scutellata) colony development in South Africa

Clarification of aspects of Varroa reproduction first stage of a possible new control method

Kevin O Donnell, Individual Experimental Project, UM Master Beekeeping Course, August, 2018

LS Gonçalves. has not reached alarming levels, with. no reports of colony losses exclusively. attributable to varroosis.

Launching MAQS in the US: Response from Beekeepers and the Latest Research Rome, 30-March 2012

Resources for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and Varroa Mite Control

INVASION OF BEE SAMPLES WITH VARROA DESTRUCTOR

Varroa Mites: Samples and Controls (Varroa destructor or jacobsoni) -discovered S.E. Asia 1904; U.S. 1987

A survey of Nosema spp. and Varroa destructor mites in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies. throughout Western Dominica Apiaries

Varroa Mite, Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman (Arachnida: Acari:Varroidae) 1

Breeding honey bees for varroa tolerance

Best Management Practices for Varroa Mite Control in Wisconsin Liz Walsh, Texas A&M University and Kent Pegorsch, WHPA President January 2018

A K.I.S.S. Model for Breeding Locally-adapted Varroa-resistant Bees

BREEDING QUEENS IN THE AGE OF VARROA

Managing Varroa Mites in Honey Bee Colonies

Learning to identify a common cause of winter death in Northern Climates

Island population of European honey bees in Northeastern Brazil that have survived Varroa infestations for over 30 years

Beekeepers of Volusia County Florida

NZQA Expiring unit standard version 3 Page 1 of 5. Demonstrate knowledge of the varroa mite and its control in the beekeeping industry

VARROA MITE MONITORING

May 4th Monthly meeting Friends Meeeting House 7:30pm. June Association Apiary visit Richmond Street (date to be announced)

Reliability of the main field diagnostic methods of Varroa in honey bee colonies

Enemies of the Hive. First Lessons in Beekeeping by Keith S. Delaplane Chapter 8 Honey Bee Disorders, Parasites, Predators and Nest Invaders

DEVELOPING NEW TREATMENTS

BEEKEEPING EQUIPMENT

VARROA MITE MONITORING

Kathleen Prough Chief Apiary Inspector IDNR, Div. of Entomology & Plant Pathology Work # Cell # ,

Making Splits. Jeff Harris

SBA Technical Data Sheet Number 8 - Detecting and monitoring Varroa Mites Including instructions on the making and use of a Varroa Floor

DARG Predator Mites An Experience of their use

Week 3: Bee Diseases & Pests. Richard Manley & Rick Moranz

VARROA IS PUBLIC ENEMY # 1

CAGE. ENGLISH INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE Insertion of the cage. lnsertion of the queen. Restriction of brood period. right position

Essential Oils as Potential Control Agents Against Varroa Mite Varroa destructor

Autumn Invasion Rates of Varroa destructor

Diseases and Pests, Tammy Horn, Photo by Jason Gaines, 2015

Do, or do not, treat for mites? Pro s and Con s of. Methods

Occurrence of Varroa Mites Inside Honeybee Colonies and Control It's Using Volatile Oils.

Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2017; 5(2): Vaziritabar Shakib and Esmaeilzade Sayed Mehdi

Integrated Pest Management

VARROA MITE INFESTATION IN APIARIES OF DUHOK PROVINCE, KURDISTAN REGION, IRAQ. Z. N. Ayoub, D. S. Ahmed and H. R. Ismael

Short-Term Fumigation of Honey Bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Colonies with Formic and Acetic Acids for the Control of Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae)

Siting your apiary and the years work. By Michael O Neill and Jacqui Glisson

Pests & Diseases of Honeybees

Varroa Mites on Asian Honeybees in the Torres Strait: Prevalence on Foraging Bees and Rapid Screening of Swarms

The Russians Are Coming (Actually They Are Here) - By Joe Lewis

EVALUATION OF EARLY SUMMER SPLITS ON VARROA MITE REDUCTION AND COLONY PRODUCTIVITY. Kathleen Ciola Evans

President's Buzzz. Upcoming Meeting

This article was written by Christopher Davey in early It was first published in the April 2010 issue of the UK journal Beekeepers Quarterly.

Honey Bee Pests and Diseases. Dale McMahan

MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND A MORPHOMETRY MAP FOR VARROA MITES FROM NORTHWEST OF EGYPT

Varroa destructor, How bad could that bee? Philip Moore Research Associate The University of Tennessee

bee. Investigating this is a valuable pursuit, behaviors to proceed with breeding as Another barrier they cite is criticism

Influence of the environment and the host on parasitization by Varroa jacobsoni Oud

Beekeeping in Coastal California. January

Selection of honey bees tolerant or resistant to Varroa jacobsoni

Transcription:

G.A. Piccirillo and D. De Jong 36 The influence of brood cell size on the reproductive behavior of the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor in Africanized honey bee colonies Giancarlo A. Piccirillo 1,2 and D. De Jong 3 1 Departamento de Biologia/Área Entomologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de São Paulo, 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil 2 Departamento Fitosanitario, Museo de Artrópodos (MALUZ), La Universidad del Zulia, AA. 525, Maracaibo, Venezuela 3 Departamento de Genética, FMRP, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil Corresponding author: D. De Jong E-mail: ddjong@fmrp.usp.br Genet. Mol. Res. 2 (1): 36-42 (2003) Received January 24, 2003 Published March 10, 2003 ABSTRACT. Africanized honey bees (Apis mellifera, Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Brazil are tolerant of infestations with the exotic ectoparasitic mite, Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae), while the European honey bees used in apiculture throughout most of the world are severely affected. Africanized honey bees are normally kept in hives with both naturally built small width brood cells and with brood cells made from European-sized foundation, yet we know that cell size has an effect on varroa reproductive behavior. Three types (sizes) of brood s were placed in each of six Africanized honey bee colonies: new (selfbuilt) Africanized, new Italian (that the bees made from Italian-sized commercial foundation), and new Carniolan (built naturally by Carniolan bees). About 100 cells of each type were analyzed in each colony. The Africanized cells were significantly smaller in (inner) width (4.84 mm) than the European-sized cells (5.16 and 5.27 mm for Italian and Carniolan cells, respectively). The brood cell infestation rates (percentage cells infested) were significantly higher in the Carniolan-sized cells (19.3%) than in the Italian and FUNPEC-RP www.funpecrp.com.br

Effect of cell size on Varroa 37 Africanized cells (13.9 and 10.3%, respectively). The Carniolan-sized cells also had a significantly larger number of invading adult female mites per 100 brood cells (24.4) than did the Italian-sized cells (17.7) and the natural-sized Africanized worker brood cells (15.6). European-sized worker brood cells were always more infested than the Africanized worker brood cells in the same colony. There was a highly significant correlation (P<0.01) between cell width and the rate of infestation with varroa in four of the six colonies. The small width cells produced by Africanized honey bees may have a role in the ability of these bees to tolerate infestations by Varroa destructor, furthermore it appears that natural-sized cells are superior to over-sized cells for disease resistance. Key words: Reproduction, Resistance, Natural cell size, Honey bee, Varroa destructor INTRODUCTION The ectoparasitic bee mite, Varroa destructor, causes serious damage to the western honey bee (Apis mellifera), while it appears well adapted with and does little harm to its natural host, the Asian hive bee, Apis cerana (De Jong et al., 1982b). In A. cerana this mite almost exclusively reproduces on drone brood, while in A. mellifera it reproduces on both worker and drone brood (Koeninger et al., 1981; De Jong, 1988). The adult worker bees that develop from infested brood are smaller than normal (De Jong et al., 1982a) and have a greatly reduced life span (De Jong and De Jong, 1983). Nevertheless, in Brazil, where apiculture is based on the Africanized honey bee, there have been no losses of colonies due to this mite (De Jong, 1997). Numerous studies have been made to investigate possible mechanisms of resistance of honey bees to varroa, especially in Africanized honey bees. Factors that affect the mite infestation rates include: local climate conditions (Ritter and De Jong, 1984; De Jong et al., 1984), bee race (Moretto et al., 1991), infertility of adult females (Camazine, 1986; Correa-Marques et al., 2003), absence of the queen (De Jong, 1981), decreased development time of Africanized worker brood (Message, 1986) and rate of removal of infested brood (Correa-Marques and De Jong 1998; Guerra Jr. et al., 2000). Drone brood, which is reared in cells much larger than those of workers, is more heavily infested by varroa than is worker brood (Fuchs, 1990). Drone larvae transplanted into worker-sized cells become less infested with varroa than when reared in drone cells (Issa et al., 1993), indicating that cell size affects the attractiveness. Tall worker brood cells, which protrude above the surface, are also significantly more infested than normal cells (De Jong and Morse, 1988; De Ruijter and Calis, 1988; Kuenen and Calderone, 2000). This may be due to a shorter distance between the larva and the cell rim at the time that the brood cell is sealed (Boot et al., 1995). In Brazil, beehives normally contain natural-sized (self-made) s with relatively small cells or s with larger, European-sized cells drawn from wax foundation. Many have s with both types of cells. These cell size differences could affect the development of varroa populations; however, this possibility has been little studied. In Brazil, as in other

G.A. Piccirillo and D. De Jong 38 countries (Arnst, 1996; Coggshall and Morse, 1984), beekeepers have tried to make bees bigger than they are naturally by inducing them to build large cells from foundation wax stamped with cell patterns larger than they would make themselves naturally. The relative benefit of natural versus oversized foundation has been a controversial subject for more than 100 years (Birkey, 2000). Beekeepers can artificially induce the production of larger bees; however, it is not clear whether there is an advantage to such a management practice. Message and Gonçalves (1995) compared varroa infestation levels in an Africanized honey bee colony and in a first-generation hybrid (Italian/Africanized) honey bee colony in Italian and Africanized worker brood s. They found that the Italian-sized brood cells were twice as infested as the Africanized cells in both colonies. We extended this experiment by examining varroa infestation levels and brood cell sizes in Carniolan-, Italian- and Africanizedsized worker brood s placed in six Africanized honey bee colonies. MATERIAL AND METHODS Three s were placed side by side in the middle of the brood area of each of six Africanized colonies maintained in standard 10 frame Langstroth hives at our university apiary in Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo State. One frame was initially introduced without foundation wax, and the bees built their own (worker-size). A second frame contained a sheet of commercial wax foundation with Italian bee cell base spacing (cells about 5.4 mm wide, including one cell wall). This is the type of foundation normally used in Brazil. The third frame had a new naturally produced in a Carniolan colony in the same apiary, but that had not been previously used for brood. All of the colonies received supplemental feeding with sucrose syrup. There was no drone brood in any of the colonies during the experiment. After the sealed worker brood in these marked s began to emerge, the s were taken to the laboratory daily. As each bee hatched, it was examined carefully for varroa, and the cell it hatched from was searched thoroughly with the aid of an otoscope. The inside width of each cell was measured with a caliper with a precision of 0.05 mm. Three measurements were made of each cell, corresponding to the distance between the parallel sides of the hexagonal cell in all three directions. This procedure was repeated until about 100 cells were examined and measured in each (50 on each side). Comparisons between brood cell infestation rates were made with a chi-square test for proportions and with a binomial test. The Pearson correlation test was used to calculate the relationship between the number of mites infesting each brood cell and the width of the cell in each colony. The Tukey test was used to compare cell width means whenever a one-way ANOVA indicated significant differences between means. RESULTS The widths of the cells of the three types of s (Table 1) were significantly different (P<0.001, F = 103.38, one-way ANOVA). The inner width of the Africanized worker brood cells was approximately 4.84 mm, and the cross-sectional area of the Italian and Carniolan brood cells was about 14 and 19%, respectively, larger than that of the natural-sized Africanized brood cells. Carniolan cells were significantly wider than Italian cells, which in turn were significantly wider than the Africanized cells (Table 1, Tukey test).

Effect of cell size on Varroa 39 Table 1. Inner width (in mm ± standard deviation) of worker brood cells in Africanized, Italian and Carniolan s placed in Africanized honey bee colonies. See Table 2 for the number of cells analyzed. Colony 43 47 66 73 74 117 Africanized 4.97 ± 0.11 4.82 ± 0.12 4.82 ± 0.13 4.81 ± 0.12 4.79 ± 0.15 4.82 ± 0.12 Italian 5.22 ± 0.13 5.15 ± 0.09 5.16 ± 0.14 5.09 ± 0.09 5.20 ± 0.14 5.15 ± 0.15 Mean 4.84 ± 0.07 a 5.16 ± 0.05 b Means followed by different letters were significantly different (Tukey test, P<0.05). Carniolan 5.33 ± 0.17 5.28 ± 0.16 5.26 ± 0.17 5.20 ± 0.13 5.31 ± 0.24 5.23 ± 0.13 5.27 ± 0.05 c The percentage of worker brood cells infested with varroa was highest in the Carniolan, followed by the Italian, and lowest in the Africanized, in all six colonies (Table 2). These differences were significant (P<0.05, binomial comparison test). The mean percent worker brood cells infested in the Carniolan s was about double that found in the Africanized s (Table 3); this percentage was significantly higher in the Carniolan s, compared to the infestation rates in Italian and Africanized s (P<0.05, chi-square test). The Italian cells were more frequently infested than the Africanized cells; however, the difference was not significant (P = 0.07). Table 2. Percent worker brood cells infested by the mite Varroa destructor in different-sized brood s placed in Africanized honey bee colonies*. Colony 43 47 66 73 74 117 Africanized 7.8 12 15 7 16 4 Italian 8.7 15 17 10 22 11 Carniolan 15.1 17 22 17 26 18 *One hundred cells analyzed in one of each type in each colony, except for N = 90, 103 and 86, for the Africanized, Italian and Carniolan, respectively, in colony 43. In each colony the Carniolan cells were more infested than the Italian cells, which in turn were more infested than the Africanized cells. These differences were significant (binomial comparison test). Table 3. Percent worker brood cells infested with the mite Varroa destructor and mean number of mites per 100 cells in Africanized, Italian and Carniolan brood s in six colonies of Africanized honey bees. Africanized 590 Italian 603 Carniolan 586 Number of brood cells examined Mean percent of cells infested* 10.3 a 13.9 a 19.3 b Mean number of 15.6 a 17.7 a 24.4 b mites per 100 cells** *Means followed by different letters (in the same row) were significantly different (P<0.05, chi-square proportions test). **Means followed by different letters (in the same row) were significantly different (P<0.05, Tukey test).

G.A. Piccirillo and D. De Jong 40 The mean infestation rate (mean number of original female mites per brood cell) was also significantly higher in the Carniolan s than in the Italian and Africanized s (Table 3, P<0.05, Tukey test). This infestation rate was also greater in the Italian compared to the Africanized cells, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.17). A further analysis was made of the relationship between the number of original invading female varroa (infestation rate) and the widths of the brood cells in each colony, including all the cells examined in each of the three types of s. There was a positive correlation between cell width and brood cell infestation rate in all six colonies (Table 4). This correlation was significant in four of the six colonies (P<0.05, Pearson correlation coefficient). Table 4. Correlation between the inside width of the brood cell and the number of female varroa (including only the original females that had invaded the cell) in all the worker cells examined in each of six Africanized honey bee colonies. Three hundred cells were analyzed in all of the colonies except for N = 279 for colony 43. Colony 43 47 66 73 74 117 r = Pearson correlation coefficient. DISCUSSION r +0.038 +0.078 +0.164 +0.160 +0.150 +0.220 P value 0.531 0.178 0.004 0.007 0.011 0.00014 Varroa mite infestations in Africanized honey bee brood are clearly affected by cell width. When compared in the same colony, the largest brood cells, those in Carniolan s (mean of about 5.3 mm inside width) were about 38% more infested than the Italian brood cells (mean of about 5.15 mm), which in turn were about 13% more infested than the self-built Africanized s (mean of about 4.8 mm). This same tendency was found in all six colonies. Message and Gonçalves (1995) found more than twice as many mites in Italiansized compared to Africanized-sized brood cells; however, they used old Africanized s, with much smaller cells (4.5-4.6 mm inside width); our Africanized s were newly built and therefore had larger cells. This may be the reason for the greater difference in infestation rates in the two types of s in the study made by Message and Gonçalves (1995), compared to our study. Additionally, in our experimental colonies the mites could choose between small Africanized cells, medium-sized Italian cells and large Carniolan cells. They preferred the largest cells. The varroa females also chose the largest cells in the study by Message and Gonçalves (1995); however, in their colonies the mites only had a choice between small Africanized cells and larger Italian cells. When all of the approximately 300 worker brood cells analyzed in each colony were compared, we found a significant positive correlation between cell width and the number of invading varroa females per cell in four of the six colonies. One of the colonies (colony 43, Table 4) for which the correlation was positive, but not significant, had unusually large, naturally built brood cells (Table 1). These were closer to the size of the Italian and Carniolan cells than in the other colonies. The reduced difference between the Africanized and the European cells in that colony may be the reason that the correlation between cell width and varroa

Effect of cell size on Varroa 41 infestation was not as strongly positive as in the other colonies. Adult female varroa invade worker and drone brood cells during a short period before the cell is sealed: 15-20 h before sealing in worker cells and 40-50 h in drone cells. These periods may be a consequence of a critical attraction distance between the cell opening and the larva. This is 6.9-7.9 mm in worker cells and 7.2-7.8 mm in drone cells (Boot et al., 1995). Calis et al. (1993) and Beetsma et al. (1999) found that shortened cells became more infested. The higher infestation rates we found in wider cells could be a consequence of a shorter distance from the cell rim to the larva, since in wider cells the larva takes longer to fill the bottom of the cell and come close to the cell rim (Calis et al., 1993). As varroa is more prevalent in the larger European-sized brood cells than in the naturally built Africanized worker brood cells, the use of unnaturally large cell size should be reexamined in the light of its effect on parasite levels. Varroa s preference for larger cells could be a contributing factor to the 60% higher infestation rates of adult bees that was found in apiary colonies, which contain both Italian- and Africanized-sized, compared to feral Africanized colonies, with only natural-sized Africanized, examined in the same region in Brazil (Gonçalves et al., 1982). REFERENCES Arnst, M. (1996). Natural size foundation is the best. Am. Bee J. 136: 757-758. Beetsma, J., Boot, J.W. and Calis, J. (1999). Invasion behaviour of Varroa jacobsoni Oud. from bees into brood cells. Apidologie 30: 125-140. Birkey, B. (2000). Historical data on the influence of cell size. Available at http://www.beesource.com/pov/ lusby/celldata.htm. Accessed January 15, 2003. Boot, W.J., Driessen, R.S., Calis, J.N.M. and Beetsma, J. (1995). Further observations on the correlation between attractiveness of honey bee brood cells to Varroa jacobsoni and the distance from larva to cell rim. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 76: 223-232. Calis, J.N.M, Boot, W.J. and Beetsma, J. (1993). Behavior of Varroa mites invading honey bee brood cells of different sizes. In: Asian Apiculture (Connor, L.J., Rinderer, T., Sylvester, H.A. and Wongsiri, S., eds.). Wicwas Press, Cheshire, CT, USA, pp. 499-509. Camazine, S. (1986). Differential reproduction of the mite Varroa jacobsoni (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) on Africanized and European honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79: 801-803. Coggshall, W.L. and Morse, R.A. (1984). Beeswax. Production, Harvesting, Processing and Products. Wicwas Press, Ithaca, NY, USA. Correa-Marques, M.H. and De Jong, D. (1998). Uncapping of worker bee brood, a component of the hygienic behavior of Africanized honey bees against the mite Varroa jacobsoni Oudemans. Apidologie 29: 283-289. Correa-Marques, M.H., Medina, L.M., Martin, S.J. and De Jong, D. (2003). Comparing data on the reproduction of Varroa destructor. Genet. Mol. Res. 2: 1-6. De Jong, D. (1981). Effect of queen cell construction on the rate of invasion of honeybee brood cells by Varroa jacobsoni. J. Apic. Res. 20: 254-257. De Jong, D. (1988). Varroa jacobsoni does reproduce in worker cells of Apis cerana in South Korea. Apidologie 19: 241-244. De Jong, D. (1997). Mites: Varroa and other parasites of brood. In: Honey Bee Pests, Predators and Diseases (Morse, R.A. and Flottum, K., eds.). A.I. Root Co., Medina, OH, USA, pp. 279-327. De Jong, D. and De Jong, PH. (1983). Longevity of Africanized honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) infested by Varroa jacobsoni. J. Econ. Entomol. 76: 766-768. De Jong, D. and Morse, R.A. (1988). Utilisation of raised brood cells of the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae), by the mite Varroa jacobsoni (Acarina: Varroidae). Entomol. Gen. 14: 103-106. De Jong, D., De Jong, P.H. and Gonçalves, L.S. (1982a). Weight loss and other damage to developing worker honeybees from infestation with Varroa jacobsoni. J. Apic. Res. 21: 165-167. De Jong, D., Morse, R.A. and Eickwort, G.C. (1982b). Mite pests of honey bees. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 27: 229-252.

G.A. Piccirillo and D. De Jong 42 De Jong D., Gonçalves, L.S. and Morse, R.A. (1984). Dependence on climate of the virulence of Varroa jacobsoni. Bee World 65: 117-121. De Ruijter, A. and Calis, J.N.M. (1988). Distribution of Varroa jacobsoni female mites in honey bee worker brood cells of normal and manipulated depth (Acarina: Varroidae). Entomol. Gen. 14: 107-109. Fuchs, S. (1990). Preference for drone brood cells by Varroa jacobsoni Oud. in colonies of Apis mellifera carnica. Apidologie 21: 193-199. Gonçalves, L.S., De Jong, D. and Nogueira, R.H. (1982). Infestation of feral honey bee colonies in Brazil by Varroa jacobsoni. Am. Bee J. 122: 249-251. Guerra Jr., J.C., Gonçalves, L.S. and De Jong, D. (2000). Africanized honey bees (Apis mellifera) are more efficient at removing worker brood artificially infested with the parasitic mite Varroa jacobsoni Oud. than are Italian bees or Italian/Africanized hybrids. Genet. Mol. Biol. 23: 89-92. Issa, M.R., De Jong, D. and Gonçalves, L.S. (1993). Reproductive strategies of the mite Varroa jacobsoni (Mesostigmata, Varroidae): Influence of larva type and cell size on honey bee brood infestation rates. Rev. Bras. Genet. 16: 219-224. Koeninger, N., Koeninger, G. and Wijayagunasekara, H.H. (1981). Beobachttngen uber die Anpassung von Varroa jacobsoni an ihren naturlichen wirt Apis cerana in Sri Lanka. Apidologie 12: 37-40. Kuenen, L.P.S. and Calderone, N.W. (2000). Varroa mite infestations in elevated honey bee brood cells: Effect of context and caste. J. Insect Behav. 13: 201-215. Message, D. (1986). Aspectos reprodutivos do ácaro Varroa jacobsoni e seus efeitos em colônias de abelhas africanizadas. M.Sc. thesis, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. Message, D. and Gonçalves, L.S. (1995). Effect of the size of worker brood cells of Africanized honey bees on infestation and reproduction of the ectoparasitic mite Varroa jacobsoni Oud. Apidologie 26: 381-386. Moretto, G., Gonçalves, L.S. and De Jong, D. (1991). The effects of climate and bee race on Varroa jacobsoni Oud. infestations in Brazil. Apidologie 22: 197-203. Ritter, W. and De Jong, D. (1984). Reproduction of Varroa jacobsoni Oud. in Europe, the middle East and tropical South America. Z. Angew. Entomol. 98: 55-57.