MS Transportation Common Stop Placement Project

Similar documents
Policy 3541 School Bus Transportation December 2007 I. Introduction The Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education directs the superintendent to

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009

BRIEFING PAPER 29 FINDINGS SERIES. Children s travel to school are we moving in the right direction?

Transportation Improvement Plan Methacton School District. Bob Schoch March 9, 2016

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

Making the Case for Healthy Planning & Initiatives

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

v. STATE BOARD Appellee Opinion No OPINION

CITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

La Plata Opinion Change

NC Demographic Trends Through 2035

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

CHAIR AND MEMBERS CIVIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING ON APRIL 25, 2016

Contents. Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Stop Placement Guidelines

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

Planning for tennis in your Local Government Area. A resource from Tennis Australia

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

MONTGOMERY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE STUDENT PICK-UP / DROP-OFF PROCEDURE CHANGES

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Bike Share Social Equity and Inclusion Target Neighborhoods

September 22, 2015, 6:30 8:00 p.m. City Hall, City Council Chambers

Application of Demographic Analysis to Pedestrian Safety. Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

HALFF TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN. Richardson ISD Northwood Hills Elementary School Dallas, Texas. /? /4O/2o16

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

Bus Safety Rules Handbook

Fairfax County Transportation Funding and Roadway Service Delivery Study. Study Update Transportation Advisory Commission

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

St. Augustine, FL Trends over Time

2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Konstantin Glukhenkiy Economic Affairs Officer


Barnum- Safe Routes to School Meeting #2 January 20, 2015

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey

Merced County Association of Governments: Voter Survey

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Regional Alternatives Analysis. Downtown Corridor Tier 2 Evaluation

Gratiot Avenue Transit Study Tech Memo #4: Ridership

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

NC Demographic Trends Through 2035

Lincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial

Roadways. Roadways III.

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

A New Approach in the GIS Bikeshed Analysis Considering of Topography, Street Connectivity, and Energy Consumption

North Carolina Transportation Issues

Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Service Proposal for the City of Ashland, Oregon

Extracting Maximum Benefit from Parking Policy - 10 Years Experience in Perth, Australia. By Emmerson Richardson Sinclair Knight Merz

Peel Health Initiatives Health and Urban Form

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

Mineral Avenue Corridor Assessment. ITE 2017 Western District Annual Meeting San Diego, CA June 21 st

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

COMMUNITY SCHOOLS AND TRANSPORTATION

Idea-66: Westbound I-66 Inside the Beltway

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Young Researchers Seminar 2009

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015

Governor s Transportation Vision Panel

Arnold Hinojosa

US Soccer Federation Player Development Initiatives

State Health Assessment: Findings from the Ohio Medicaid Assessment Survey

Online Open House Survey Report. December 2016

Traffic Impact Memorandum. May 22, 2018

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

2/25/2015. The Best of Pro Walk Pro Bike Pro Place Continuing Education. Today s presenters

Section 2: Importance-Satisfaction Analysis

Demographic Change in North Carolina

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Oakridge Elementary School

Customer Service and Operations Committee. Board Action Item III-A. February 12, 2015

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

The Partnership for Building Reuse

Summary Report: Built Environment, Health and Obesity

University of Leeds Travel Plan

WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results

TOWN OF WILLIAMSTON, SC BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN TOWN OF WILLIAMSTON, SC BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN

Balboa Area Transportation Demand Management

The role of the Authority in promoting sustainable transport. Gerry Murphy South East Regional Assembly 27 th May 2011

Safe Routes to School as a Transportation Control Measure: Impacts on the Emission Inventory

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

Pedestrian Crosswalk Audit

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Chapter 5. Principles Appropriating Process

Temporal and Spatial Variation in Non-motorized Traffic in Minneapolis: Some Preliminary Analyses

Practicing what we preach in POMONA! Daryl Grigsby, Public Works Director, City of Pomona, California

Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Process and Procedures Manual. September 2017

Safe Routes to School Blue Zones Project, City of

Transcription:

C MS Transportation Common Stop Placement Project Prepared by UNC Charlotte Urban Institute August 2009 9201 University City Boulevard / Charlotte, NC 28223 / 704-687-4224 / www.ui.uncc.edu

UNC Charlotte Urban Institute CMS Transportation Review of Stop Placement August 2009 Background The UNC Charlotte Urban Institute (the Institute) began work with Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools (CMS) on an exploratory study in 2007. This exploratory work examined the complex CMS transportation system for potential operational efficiencies. The framework and strategy for this initiative were outlined and recommended in the CMS Transportation Board Oversight Report presented in November 2007, as well as the annual Transportation Continuous Improvement Plan. In the Institute s preliminary analysis, it was clear that the number and locations of CMS bus stops was a major contributor to stress in the system s operation as well as increasing the length of time students were riding on buses. The Institute recommended a review of the ways and the degree to which the very large number of stops could be consolidated. Based on the work done in the exploratory study, the Institute began work with the CMS Transportation staff in July 2008 on a year-long project to review current bus stop placement. It was important that work of this type be done fairly and systematically with emphasis on safety. The Institute suggested an approach that used the Charlotte Neighborhood Quality of Life Study (QoL) defined neighborhoods to organize and inform this process. These neighborhoods are manageable in size and have accompanying demographic data that would be useful in the project. The recent economic downturn has expedited the need for review and approval to put many of these initiatives in place effective this school year. Goals of Study: Reduce student ride time Reduce the number of stops in neighborhoods Create identifiable and constant community stops for pick up and drop off, if feasible, regardless of the school of attendance Improve operational efficiency Reduce overall fleet costs Improve fuel efficiency Streamline driver routes and directions Understanding CMS Transportation CMS is the largest pupil transportation operation in North Carolina supporting more than 1600 vehicles with a team of more than 1,400 employees. Safety is the primary goal for all maintenance and services while supporting the safest method of transportation for students to and from school. During the 2008-2009 school year, CMS transported more than 85,000 of the 112,000 students eligible for transportation. 1

To transport this large number of students the district uses tiered bell times for the opening of school. This strategy is very effective and is needed for the system to function with the number of vehicles available. In areas with a relatively large number of students, this strategy would result in three stops in many locations just to accommodate the separate High School, Middle School and Elementary School pickups. With the district s other policy and program initiatives, federal requirements and district allowances for individual students transportation outside of normal parameters the number of pickup and drop off locations can quickly multiply. Below are the major influences that challenge transportation resources and quality of services: Significant numbers of county-wide and zoned magnet programs with smaller populations Five Pre-K centers serving students in larger than normal attendance zones Federally mandated transportation for NCLB and McKinney Vento students County-wide transportation offered for CMS specialized academic, special needs, and alternative programs such as Midwood High, Performance Learning Center, Morgan, Hawthorne, Metro and Turning Point Academy Schools. These schools generally serve small populations of students distributed throughout the county. The map displayed in Exhibit 1 summarizes the size of zones and distance CMS is transporting students throughout Mecklenburg County. Continuing growth in traffic congestion throughout the county has made coverage of these zones progressively more challenging in recent years. These deteriorating traffic situations result in the need for more vehicles with lower loads for the set of routes that must cover these larger geographic areas. Taken together, these factors create additional bus stops and number of buses serving any given neighborhood, creating a very complex operation with separate buses picking up and discharging students to and from school each day. Exhibit 1 Factors Contributing to the Number of Bus Stops Methodology QoL neighborhood definitions of the 2008 Charlotte Mecklenburg Quality of Life Neighborhood study were used as the organizing geography for the study. A complete set of maps covering the entire district were created for review which contained all stop locations for every school that served the neighborhood. A series of meetings were held with CMS transportation staff to bring everyone in the organization together that was involved with routing decisions. Consultants from the Institute worked with staff at CMS Transportation and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Dept. (CMPD) to review the issues of safety, efficiency, and operational implementation involved. Teams of staff were developed to work with Institute staff systematically to review all neighborhoods in the district. Staff involvement was considered critical to the success of the project from the beginning. CMS Transportation staff visited the neighborhoods they normally serve during the school day. It was quickly recognized that each neighborhood had its own unique characteristics that were very 2

important when making bus stop placement decisions. Careful consideration for bus stop locations were made individually for each neighborhood s situation rather than applying rigid rules globally to all neighborhoods. Within this approach, however, there were goals and agreed-upon strategies that guided decisions. A key was to set goals of walking distances. The goal for elementary stops was to be within.2 miles from students. For secondary students the goal was to be within.4 miles of students. These parameters fall below the state requirements for student distances, and would not be held as strict guidelines if the situation in any of the neighborhoods made that distance difficult and/or would greatly increase student ride times or present safety issues (i.e. dangerous or difficult bus turns or turnarounds). Exhibit 2 Quality of Life Study Area Red lines represent specific neighborhoods and their Quality of Life features; dimensions on social well being, physical characteristics, crime and economic vitality are measured and compared Neighborhoods are defined as stable, transitioning or challenged according to data collected from each neighborhood for the Quality of Life report Exhibit 3: Sample Neighborhood Map Using the QOL maps gave a systematic way to look at the county that also included useful information to be used in consideration of the stop location process. Establishing Stop Landmarks Staff was able to use the Transportation Information Management System (TIMS) to review neighborhood zones, stop locations, and current bus stop locations. Neighborhood stop location decisions were recorded on the QoL maps of existing conditions. Those locations were used by Institute staff to create a template of landmark locations in TIMS to be used as a universal resource for all staff in CMS for future creation of bus stop records in TIMS. Two layers of stop landmarks were created to address the difference in walking distance goals for elementary and secondary students. In the following exhibits, these layers are shown on maps with two different symbols. Locations shown as stop signs are more numerous and represent the elementary stop locations needed to meet shorter walking distance goals. Other locations have a school bus symbol on top of the stop sign or in a separate location. Those represent the secondary stops that meet the longer walking distance for older students. Note that many elementary and secondary stop locations occur at the same locations in the Hidden Valley neighborhood. In the exhibits for Carmel, there are some stops for secondary students that are not at the same location as elementary stops. This situation could occur in any area of the county. As a result, it will be important for transportation staff to review and update common stop locations as neighborhoods are developed and student populations change. Exhibit 4: Hidden Valley Area Neighborhood Stops Using TIMS landmarks, a consistent set of stop locations using the established parameters were created for each neighborhood to be used by any school serving the neighborhood. 3

Exhibit 5: Hidden Valley Before / After 1.18 mile saving; 6 minutes saved on run Areas across the county were reviewed in a similar fashion. Below are samples of other areas and some routing changes that resulted from the realignment of bus stop locations. Exhibit 6: Carmel Area Neighborhood Stops Exhibit 7: Carmel Area: Before / After Exhibit 8: South Mecklenburg: Before / After Summary of Changes as Related to Common Bus Stops Below are bus stop changes that resulted from the project. 1) Common stops in neighborhoods a) Walk distances for some may increase i) Elementary up to.2 mile or slightly above ii) Secondary up to.4 mile or slightly above b) Avg. assigned distance to stop for students is projected to be.12 tenths of a mile this equates to a little less a half lap around an athletic track (avg. last year was.07 hundredths of a mile) c) Likely more students per stop - those students can walk and stand together, and provide CMPD with fewer locations to monitor This strategy has contributed significantly to a total reduction in stops, buses, miles and projected cost to operate buses. Service Improvement These changes, while they may require a slightly longer walking distance (.05 miles or 264 feet on average) may likely decrease the time each child is actually riding the bus. 4

Comparison of Opening Day of School Assigned TIMS Data 2008-09 2009-10* Estimated Change # Students Assigned to a Bus 112,000 111,000 (1,000) # Total Bus Stops 37,000 26,000 (11,000) # Total Bus Runs 5,652 5,292 (360) # Total Routes or Buses 1,255 1,155 (100) # Daily Miles 140,000 129,000 (11,000) Average Walk Distance to Bus Stop (miles) 0.07 0.12 0.05 *2009-10 Data are projections and subject to change as the year progresses Numbers in ( ) are projected reductions; without ( ) represents an increase 5

Exhibit 1: Factors Contributing to the Number of Bus Stops Tiered School Opening Times McKinney Vento Act Requirements NCLB Requirements County Wide Magnet Programs Large Magnet Zones and Transportation Zones Pre-K Transportation E.C. Transportation Alternative Schools 6

Exhibit 2: Quality of Life Study Area Red lines represent specific neighborhoods and their Quality of Life (QoL) features; dimensions on social well being, physical characteristics, crime and economic vitality are measured and compared Neighborhoods are defined as stable, transitioning or challenged according to data collected from each neighborhood Areas shown in blue boxes have not been part of the QoL continuing study, however maps of these neighborhood zones were created using census tracks and the same methodology used by staff to cover those areas. 7

Exhibit 3: Sample Neighborhood Map 8

Exhibit 4: Hidden Valley Area Neighborhood Stops A Transitioning Neighborhood Area visited and checked for where to locate neighborhood stops Stop Sign = Elementary Only Bus = Middle/High Only Before = 536 am stops, 545 pm stops After = 52 stops 9

Exhibit 5: Hidden Valley Before / After: 1.18 mile savings; 6 minutes saved on run Before After 10

Exhibit 6: Carmel Area Neighborhood Stops Before 141 am stops, 166 pm stops Created 35 neighborhood stop locations Average distance to am stop before: 0.095 Average distance to am stop after 0.163 Average distance to pm stop before: 0.107 Average distance to pm stop after 0.156 Stop Sign = elementary stop Bus = Middle / High School stop 11

Exhibit 7: Quality of Life Study Area South Mecklenburg High School Run in Carmel Neighborhood Before Actually increased based on HS stop added. Further review indicates that this stop can be moved After 12

Exhibit 8: Quality of Life Study Area Another South Mecklenburg Run 1.96 miles / 7 minutes saved Before After 13

14

9201 University City Boulevard / Charlotte, NC 28223 / 704-687-4224 / www.ui.uncc.edu 15