Managed Lanes in California:

Similar documents
Managed Lanes Fundamentals and Opportunities. September 12, 2013

Managed Lanes: A National Perspective Managed Lane Strategies

405 Express Lanes General Information & Frequently Asked Questions

Managed Lanes: A Popular and Effective Urban Solution. Ed Regan Presented by Susan Buse

The I-680 Southbound Express Lane

A Federal Perspective on Congestion Pricing. Wayne Berman Federal Highway Administration July 8, 2010

July 10, :00-11:30 a.m.

Fast Affordable Sustainable Transportation

APPENDIX S REVISED PAGES OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Managed Lanes 2017: What They Are and How They Work. Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Overview of 64 Express Lanes. Secretary of Transportation Aubrey Layne April 12, 2017

COUNTYWIDE EXPRESSLANES STRATEGIC PLAN FINAL REPORT

Toll Express Lanes for the Research Triangle region Including discussion of possible applications on I-40

I-80 Corridor Overhaul

What are Managed Lanes?

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

Priced Managed Lanes in America. October 2013

Technology and the Changing Face of Tollways

Tolling Study. July 23, 2009

DEVELOPING A POLICY TO PLAN AND OPERATE MANAGED LANES IN NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: LBJ IN DALLAS COUNTY AND AIRPORT FREEWAY IN TARRANT COUNTY

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

IMPACTS TO TRANSIT FROM LOS ANGELES CONGESTION REDUCTION DEMONSTRATION. Word Count: 3,386 (body) + 2,000 (8 tables) + 1,500 (6 figures) = 6,886 words

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Program Update. Relationship: RP, RTIP, Budget, POF. Board of Directors Item 16 February 22, Board of Directors Item 16 Feb 22,

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes - Frequently Asked Questions

It s Been 15 Years Already?!

101 Corridor Managed Lanes

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

August 12, The Honorable Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor, State of California State Capitol Sacramento, CA Dear Governor Brown:

Contemporary Approaches in Congestion Pricing:

Final Project Report. Monterey Bay Area Feasibility Study of Bus on Shoulder Operations on State Route 1 and the Monterey Branch Line

Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study Phase III

Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Highway 17 Transportation Improvement Study

Welcome. Background. Goals. Vision

I-105 ExpressLanes Project

York Region Population and Employment Growth

Managed Lanes. Steve Schilke, P.E. Major Projects Unit Head District 1. Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 2016

Where We Live and Work Today

Dumbarton Transportation Corridor Study. San Francisco Bay ITE November 2016

95 Express Annual Operations Report: Fiscal Year

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

North Coast Corridor:

DULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director

4 Ridership Growth Study

INTRODUCTION. The focus of this study is to reduce congestion and improve mobility for all modes of transportation. Figure ES-1 Study Corridor Map

1. Operate along freeways, either in regular traffic lanes, in high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, or along the shoulders.

I-15 Comprehensive Corridor Study. Final Report

Chapter 7: Six-Step Implementation Process

FREEWAY CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT STUDY PHASE 2 DRAFT REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Beyond Congestion: Sex, Neuroscience, and Walkable Urbanism. Jeffrey Tumlin

Report. Effect of MTC Express Lanes on Interregional Travel. Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

Los Angeles Congestion Reduction Demonstration (LA CRD) ExpressLanes Program National Evaluation:

The I-85 Express Lanes Project NASCIO Recognition Award Nomination

Central Freeway and Octavia Circulation Study

VISION Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop. February 10, 2016

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

5.0 FACILITY DESIGN. Design Standards

Van Ness Avenue BRT Overview and Scoping Process. Geary BRT CAC January 8, 2009

Public Hearing Tarrant County. October 11 th, 2012

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

INFRASTRUCTURE: Using the Grid to Create a more Self-Sustaining Downtown. Studio Spring 2013

TOWARDS A BIKE-FRIENDLY CANADA A National Cycling Strategy Overview

Maryland State Highway Mobility Report. Morteza Tadayon

The Future of All Electronic Tolling Brian Patno Raytheon ITS Texas October 26, 2012

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

November 14, Dulles To DC Loop Public-Private Partnership Proposal. Executive Summary

Living Streets Policy

4 Level of Service Results: HOV and Express Lanes

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT March 7, 2018 Page 2 of 4 The following MTSOs are being used across the five subregions: Intersection Level of Service

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Metrolink Ridership and Revenue Quarterly Report. Staff Report

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

Members of the Board of Directors. Wendy Knowles, Clerk of the Board. Metrolink Ridership and Revenue Annual Report

395 Express Lanes Extension

HIGHWAY 11 CORRIDOR STUDY

Congestion Reducing Activities. Toby Carr GDOT Director of Planning April 10, 2014

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

Preview. Tables in your paper Mass Transit as alternative to auto California s problems in urban transportation

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Preview. Second midterm Tables in your paper Mass Transit as alternative to auto California s problems in urban transportation

Silicon Valley Express Lanes Program. Implementation Assessment and Plan. November 21, 2008

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Mobility Greater Johnson County Transportation Coalition. May 23, 2018

MnPASS System Today and the Future

Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

2040 RTP. Chapter 6: Investments in our Transportation Future

DRAFT. The HOV/HOT Alternative: Working Paper #3

e-brief Congestive Traffic Failure: The Case for High-Occupancy and Express Toll Lanes in Canadian Cities August 31, 2011

Transcription:

Managed Lanes in California: Where We ve Been Where We re Going Joe Rouse Managed Lanes Manager California Department of Transportation

Managed Lanes Defined Lanes that are proactively managed in response to changing operating conditions in order to achieve improved efficiency i and performance. Includes: High occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes (carpool lanes) High occupancy/ toll (HOT)lanes Express toll lanes

Value of Managed Lanes Support modal shift Reliability Improved air quality Greater throughput h Sustainability Revenue generation

Looking Back California was one of the first states to test and adopt managed lanes Assessment of different operational anddesign design approaches First state to develop design and operational guidelines Have influenced standards of practice nationally

Looking Back First state to embrace a system of managed lanes Regional lhov network plans developed din each major urban area Strong legacy of performance monitoring First demonstration of pricing SR 91 P3 project and I 15 demonstration Extensive research in facility usage and impacts on freeway performance

Today Operating Nearly 1400 lane miles HOV Over200 lane miles HOT In Development Just over 700 lane miles HOV Over 1700 lane miles HOT Extensive regional partnerships insystem development and operation

Today Predominantly HOV 2 Single occupant plug in hybrids & clean air vehicles allowed Limited access, full time in south, continuous o access, part time in north Key component to achieving AB 32 air quality goals

San Francisco Bay Area Golden Gate Bridge I-680 Express Lanes Antioch Bridge Benicia-Martinez Bridge Carquinez Bridge Dumbarton Bridge Richmond-San Rafael Bridge San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge San Mateo-Hayward Bridge I-880 Express Lanes SR 237 Express Lanes Monterey County SR 156 Toll road Los Angeles County I-10 Express Lanes I-110 Express Lanes Orange County SR 241/91 Express Lanes Connector SR 241 Toll Road Extension I-405 Express Lanes Orange County SR 73 Toll Road SR 133 Toll Road SR 241 Toll Road SR 261 Toll Road SR 91 Express Lanes San Francisco Monterey Los Angeles County I-5 Express Lanes I-405 Express Lanes SR 710 Bypass High Desert Corridor Los Angeles Orange San Francisco Bay Area I-580 Express Lanes SR 237 Extension I-680 Southern Segment, Sunol Northbound, Contra Costa County Northern Segment I-880 Express Lanes SR 85 Express Lanes U.S. 101 I-80 Express Lanes San Diego Inland Empire I-10 Express Lanes SANBAG I-15 Express Lanes 91 Express Lanes Extension RCTC I-15 Express Lanes High Desert Corridor San Bernardino Riverside San Diego County SR 11/Otay East Border Crossing I-805 Managed Lanes I-5 Managed Lanes SR 78 Managed Lanes San Diego County I-15 Express Lanes SR 125 South Bay Expressway

Planning for the Future Protect the investment made in the system Get the most productivity out of the system Prepare for growth Addressing Degradation Statewide Policy on Managed Lanes Statewide Tolling Policy Managed Lanes System Plan New Managed Lane Guidelines

Addressing Degradation Federal performance standard for HOV lanes used by hybrid vehicles and HOT lanes 59 percent of system failed to meet federal performance standard 48 percent of degraded facilities were in Caltrans Districts 7 and 8 51 percent of degraded facilities had low frequency of degradation

Addressing Degradation Districts develop Action Plan Short term actions Stepped up enforcement More frequent freeway service patrols Fixing detection systems Long term actions Infrastructure improvements HOT lane conversions Ati Active traffic management strategies t

Addressing Degradation Removing exempt vehicles not an option Not a contributor tib t to degradation d Runs counter to governor s policies Occupancy changes may be considered Must address negative impacts

Statewide Managed Lane Policy Defines the purpose of managed lanes Identifies a process for managed lanes system planning Regional plans developed for each urban area Updated at each RTP cycle, as needed

Statewide Managed Lane Policy Operational changes will be made by Caltrans in consultation with regional agencies and CHP Changing occupancy requirements Changing access control Implementing pricing Defines when changes in operational strategies may be needed Meet State and Federal performance standards Preserve service levels Address other freeway performance issues

Statewide Managed Lane Policy Identifies factors to consider when selecting or changing managed lane operational strategies Safety and mobility considerations Regional consistency Concept of operations required when implementing pricing FHWA California i Division i i requirement

Statewide Tolling Policy Optimize system performance Provide an alternative source of funding for transportation projects, improvements, and services Considered for all new capacity or expansions to existing facilities No existing non toll lanes will be converted to toll, except for existing HOV lanes to HOT lanes Tolls may be collected by Caltrans or by a regional transportation agency

Statewide Tolling Policy Toll revenues cover indebtedness, operations, and maintenance Remaining revenues will be reinvested in the corridor for projects that improve travel reliability, provide travel options, or improve safety and operations Excess revenue may not always be available

Managed Lane System Plan Blueprint for managed lanes on the StateHighwaySystem System Utilize work already done at the regional level Coordinate with ongoing work at the regional level

Managed Lane System Plan Prioritize identified improvements in each regional plan Develop screening criteria, such as degradation, constructability Rank projects based on screening criteria Develop master plan of projects based on prioritization

Managed Lane Guidelines Update to 2003 HOV Guidelines System planning Use of pricing Managed lane facility design Traffic control devices for managed lanes Enforcement strategies

Considerations for the Future Modifying occupancy requirements Carpool registration requirements Changes in tolling technology Occupancy verification technology Impacts of connected and driverless vehicles Expect the State to be a more involved partner Decisions on managed lanes must balance local versus regional needs

Joe Rouse Thank You California Department of Transportation (916) 654 6448 jrouse@dot.ca.gov