GROWING INEQUALITY AND ITS IMPACTS: Bulgaria and Romania Vassil Tsanov Economic Research Institute of BAS Concluding Conference, Amsterdam, 4-5 Jun 2013
INCOME INEQUALITY DEVELOPMENT 1. Similarities: - Upward trend in both countries; - Remarkable increase in the first half of 90s (8-9 points for both countries); - Periodically increase of inequality (two wages in Bulgaria and 3 waves in Romania). 2. Differences: - Two periods of declining inequality in Bulgaria (80 s by 4 points, 1995-2002 by 5 points); - Periods of unchanged inequality in Romania (1991-1994, 1995-2000). 0.4 The evolution of inequality in Bulgaria and Romania 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Source: Transmonee, based on NIS data; S. Frederick, 2011, SWIID, Version 3.1. Bulgaria Romania
INCOME INEQUALITY DEVELOPMENT 3. Key determinants of inequality: - Similar driving forces for Bulgaria and Romania: - The transition to a market economy (reforms, privatization, etc.); - The pattern of economic growth; - External migration; - Ethnic differences. - Country specific features: Bulgaria: Romania: - Incomes and pension policy; - Taxation policy. - Non-transparent privatization; - Corruption and shadow economy; - Inefficient social and income policy.
Social impacts of inequality 1. Inequality and poverty relationship - Joint movement of and poverty in Bulgaria; - Joint movement of and Poverty in Romania in the period 2007-2010. Inequality and poverty trends in Bulgaria and Romania % Bulgaria 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Poverty rate 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 Source: National Statistical Institute, Eurostat (EU-SILC). % 27 25 23 21 19 17 15 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Romania Poverty rate 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 0.38 0.37 0.36 0.35 0.34 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.3 0.29 0.28
Social impacts of inequality 2. Patterns and trend in family formation: Similarities: - downward trend in fertility rate passing by periods of decrease and increase in both countries; - stronger dependency from the economic development than from the inequality; - changes in the family model (from families, formed on the marital basis, into families based on extramarital co-habitation; - strong decline of number of marriages while the number of divorces remains stable. Differences: - stronger impact of economic development on fertility rate in Bulgaria; - stronger decline of marriages in Bulgaria. Fertility rate and Bulgaria Romania 2.2 0.4 2.6 0.4 Fertility rate 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 Fertility rate 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 Fertility rate 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 Fertility rate 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 0.36 0.32 0.28 0.24 0.2 Source: Eurostat
Social impacts of inequality 3. Health inequality: More similarities than differences: - life expectancy in both countries follow upward trend during the last 30 years passing by periods of increase and decrease; - growing gender difference in life expectancy; - life expectancy closely follows the trend of economic development; - majority of Bulgarian and Romanian population self-evaluated their health status as good/very good. Differences appeared in details.
Social impacts of inequality 4. Hosing tenure patterns - the housing pattern in Bulgaria and Romania is very similar and not differ to the other CEEC: high share of private houses without mortgage and loans; minor portion of tenants; majority of tenants have municipal or institutional accommodation with regulated rent below market prices - income inequality does not significantly affect the tenure status of poor and not poor; - high percentage of poor people live in own houses with no mortgage or loans; - bigger percentage of poor people paying rent below market prices. Differences: - higher share of private house in Romania (95-96% vrs. 90-91% in Bulgaria); - lower level of the housing cost overburden rate in Bulgaria (Bulgaria - 5.9% in 2009; Romania 15% in 2009).
Social impacts of inequality 5. Live satisfaction and happiness: - very low level of life satisfaction and happiness in both countries (different data sources depict the same picture); - more people are extremely dissatisfied than extremely satisfied; - a trail tendency to improvement.
Political impacts of inequality 1. Political and civil participation: - downward trends in voter turnout at parliamentary, presidential and local elections; - low participation in civil organizations; - unclear link between inequality and voter turnout (while the coefficient fluctuated, voter turnout constantly declined). 2. Trust in public institutions: - relatively low trust in the Parliament, Government and judicial system; - confidence in public institutions has declined during the last decade; - confidence in Government is strongly affected by electoral cycle; - no clear link between confidence in public institution and income inequality.
Political impacts of inequality 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Trust in Government 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Bulgaria Romania Source: Eurobarometers
Political impacts of inequality 3. Political values and legitimacy - Left-right wing position: Unclear identification in Romania; Collapse of the bipolar political model in Bulgaria after 2000 (outflow from the right to the centre, while the left remained stable); Probably there is relationship between inequality and Left-Right-Centre winners at the elections. Percentage of votes for the winners in elections and inequality, 1990-2009 60.0 0.4 50.0 0.35 % 40.0 30.0 20.0 0.3 0.25 10.0 0.2 0.0 1990 -left 1991 -right 1994 - left 1997 - right 2001 centre 2005 - left 2009 - right/centre 0.15 Source: Cental Election Committee. Results from the elections in Bulgaria.
Political impacts of inequality - attitudes towards inequality and poverty: High sensitivity to inequality, poverty and social policy: Over 70 per cent of Bulgarians agreed that inequality in the country is high; Over 91 per cent of Romanians agreed that inequality in the country is high; Over 80 per cent of Bulgarians and Romanians think that the Government should take measures to reduce income inequality.
Effectiveness of the policies in combating inequality 1. Minimum wage policy: Similarities: - an increase of the MW; - relatively low proportion to the AW (Bulgaria around 36-37%; Romania around 30-32%. Differences: - Romania no effects on the income inequality; - Bulgaria remarkable interaction with income inequality. Dynamics of the real minimum wage and in Bulgaria and Romania % 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 Bulgaria Real MW 2002 2004 2006 GINI Source: National Statistical Institute. 2008 2010 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 PPS 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Romania MW (PPS) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 39 37 35 33 31 29 27 25
Effectiveness of the policies in combating inequality - Effects on income inequality Bulgaria Romania 30 39 28 37 35 26 33 24 31 29 22-40 -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 27-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 MW rates of growth MW growth
Effectiveness of policy in combating inequality 2. Taxation policy - cyclical development depending from taxation policy and economic development; - relatively low total tax revenue (fluctuate in a range of 28-33% from GDP with a strong decline after 2008); - taxation policy is orientated to increase the indirect taxes at a expense of direct taxation; - introduction of a flat-rate income tax (Bulgaria -10%, Romania 16%). 34.0 Total tax revenue as % of GDP 32.0 30.0 % 28.0 26.0 24.0 22.0 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 Bulgaria Romania Source: Eurostat
Effectiveness of policy in combating inequality - The impact of taxation policy on income inequality in Bulgaria - strong decline during the last decade. Difference between gross and net coefficient, 1980-2010 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Source: Own calculations.
Effectiveness of policy in combating inequality 3. Effects of pension and social assistance policy on inequality in Bulgaria - pension policy has a positive effect on reducing inequality; - social assistance policy has negative impact on inequality. Evolution of ratios AP/AW and GMI/AW, 1990-2010 60 50 40 % 30 20 10 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 GMI/AW Source: National Statistical Institute. AP/AW
Conclusions 1. Income inequality in Bulgaria and Romania grows during the last three decades passing through the periods of increase and decrease. 2. Similar determinants of inequality with specific features in income policy and privatization processes. 3. The development of poverty risk is more closely related to the evolution of economic inequality. 4. The evolution of family formation, housing patterns, health status, and satisfaction in both countries are more correlated with economic development than income inequality. 5. Similar trends and impacts of inequality on political development. 6. Different impacts of social policy on combating inequality.
Thank you for your attention