REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN. Robo Rat. Automated rope climbing robot

Similar documents
Re: ENSC 440 Functional Specification for the Wall Climbing Robot. Dear Mr. Leung,

Specifications. The Field:

P r o j e c t M a n a g e M e n t f o r I n t e r a c t I v e D I g I t a l M e D I a

National Robotics Competition 2018 NRC WRO Challenge Manual

2 The Arena The arena consists of a field with a random forest of obstacles, and a goal location marked by a high contrast circle on the ground:

NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS AUTONOMOUS ROBOTICS COMPETITION Task and Rules Document

INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE

Safe Working at Heights Theory Assessment

INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE

World Robot Olympiad 2019

Pokemon Robotics Challenge: Gotta Catch em All 2.12: Introduction to Robotics Project Rules Fall 2016

Large Balls. Actual Supports Will be Different from Picture

Autonomous blimp control with reinforcement learning

LEVEL 2 CERTIFICATE OF COMPETENCE IN THE SAFE USE AND OPERATION OF MOBILE ELEVATED WORK PLATFORMS

MUNIN s Autonomous Bridge

General Rules 2015 Season

A line following vehicle is in a way an entry level autonomous vehicle that can navigate any course while following a on a contrasting background.

Australian Standards. Constraints

IAC WORKMAN 30FT SELF RETRACTING LANYARD

2012 NRC - RULES AND REGULATIONS

??????? is committed to providing a safe work environment for its employees and preventing occupational injuries due to falls.

Lockout/Energy Control

Engineering Design Challenge 3. Mars Colonization. Rules & Game Description

Student Presentations. Example Presentation. Presentation Tips R I T. KGCOE Multidisciplinary Sr. Design Borkholder Project Reviews.

TRAINING SCHEDULE FLUID POWER TRAINING CUSTOM TRAINING PRODUCT TRAINING

Inspection Guide. Inspector Position Summary. Overview

DeZURIK Double Block & Bleed (DBB) Knife Gate Valve Safety Manual

FAIRBANKS MARINE CO-PILOT HANDS-FREE SAILING WITHOUT COMPROMISE

THE CANDU 9 DISTRffiUTED CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN PROCESS

MESHMERIZE - Wildcard

World Robot Olympiad 2018

Safewaze FS983 Cable Safety Climb System Ladder Mount Instructions

2018 ASABE Student Robotics Challenge

General Rules 2010: Regular category

Defibtech AED Training Equipment. User Manual

JOB DESCRIPTION NJ /06 ROCK RIVER VALLEY BLOOD CENTER ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS

Figure 4-1 Possible PLATE assignments

M-06 Nitrogen Generator (Nitrogen Making Machine)

FALLTECH FALL PROTECTION ANCHOR BRACKETS MODEL 7432, Dual Truss/ Ridge Line Roof Anchor Bracket

Fiber Cable Puller with Tuf-Lugger lite

Office of Human Resources. Traffic Signal Technician II CJ2609

H Robotics Engineering Challenge

Robotic Billiards Tournament Robo-pool

Health & Safety Policy and Procedures Manual SECTION 6 ELECTRICAL SAFETY / CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY

DEFINITIONS ROPE ACCESS

MECHATRONICS SCORING MACHINES

Memorial University of Newfoundland Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science

UTAS EH&S INSTRUCTION No. 036 June 2012 Revision No. 3. Purging of Flammable Gas Equipment and/or Piping (Explosion Hazard)

ASME Trebuchet Competition Rules:

LONE WORKING HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDANCE

Alabama Smoke Diver Policies

The Freescale Cup Brazil Rules

Section J. How to develop safety elements for project safety management system. How to develop safety elements for project SMS

Questions & Answers About the Operate within Operate within IROLs Standard

Game Manual. 1.2 The team must have an adult coach who has completed the Maryland 4-H UME Volunteer training.

Rockhampton Office Brisbane Office Tarong Site. Barron Gorge Hydro PS Kareeya Hydro PS Mica Creek PS

C o d i n g f o r i n t e r a C t i v e d i g i t a l M e d i a

BRILLIANT WONDERS LED BUBBLERS INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS & PRODUCT MANUAL CMP SERIES

LEADER NOTES FOR MAY 2012 STAND-DOWN

Flight manual. Appendix J.1 Tethered flight

Reliance Industries, LLC Operating instructions for the / Bolt-on D-Ring Anchorage. Model # 3071

2011 KIPR Autonomous Arial Vehicle Contest

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT FALL PROTECTION REGULATIONS

Changing into or out of swimsuits other than in locker rooms or other designated areas is prohibited.

BRILLIANT WONDERS LED BUBBLERS INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS CMP SERIES. Brilliant Wonders LED BUBBLERS

In the Teamwork Challenge, an Alliance of two robots works together in each Match.

IEEE RAS Micro/Nano Robotics & Automation (MNRA) Technical Committee Mobile Microrobotics Challenge 2016

LOCK-OUT/TAG-OUT (LO/TO) SAFETY PROGRAM

MEET DURATION: Full meet with time limits as defined by CT/USA Swimming.

2016 Maryland 4-H Robotics Engineering Challenge

SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

PART 4: IMPLEMENTATION & OP

PLANT/EQUIPMENT/ASSET HAZARD REPORT

Lockout/Tagout Safety Policy

A Development of Mechanical Arm for Weight Scale Calibration

Robotathon IEEE Robotics and Automation Society

Mr. Teo Han Ping Head, Programme Management, Occupational Safety & Health Division, Ministry of Manpower

Contractor / Exhibitor Handbook

Lockout / Tagout Safety Program

Texas 4-H Robotics Challenge

Codex Seven HACCP Principles. (Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment & Management)

PRODUCT SPECIFICATION. SFP+ Cage and Cage Assembly 1 of 8 A

SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

The Best Use of Lockout/Tagout and Control Reliable Circuits

RoboWars Problem Statement

Print this activity then complete it and keep it as evidence in your folder, or portfolio.

Results and conclusions of a floating Lidar offshore test

Working at Height Policy Edition 1 27 th October Authorized by. ... Managing Director

Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science. Electrical Safety. for Staff and Students in EECS Instructional Laboratories

Telco Antennas SWMS Working At Height Above 2m

Date Issued: November 2011 Revision Date: December 2012 Review Date: December 2015 Revision #

A MESSAGE FROM THE MD

Buscas una profesión con futuro?

B&B Gas Well Services, LLC HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVRONMENTAL MANUAL HAZARD COMMUNICATION PROGRAM

2018 Wilton Wahoos Summer Invitational May 31-June 3, 2018 Wilton Family YMCA 404 Danbury Rd. Wilton, CT

Conducting An Effective. Welcome!

Isolation and Lockout

11. TDI Semi-Closed Circuit Rebreather Diver Course, Unit Specific- DOLPHIN, RAY, Atlantis, SUBMATIX ST100 & AZIMUTH

FALL PROTECTION (SAF-SPI-06)

VEX IQ Challenge Bank Shot Game Manual

Transcription:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN Robo Rat Automated rope climbing robot Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Department of Mechanical Engineering EGR 3380 Engineering Design I Spring 2010

1. STATEMENT OF WORK Qualified engineering design teams are invited to submit technical proposals for the design of an Automated Rope Climbing Robot, hereinafter referred to as the Robo Rat. Proposals are to be submitted to the instructors of EGR 3380, hereinafter referred to as the client. Upon client approval of a conceptual design, each engineering design team, hereinafter referred to as the team, shall build, test, and evaluate a prototype device, and shall provide the client with full engineering documentation of the prototype design. Additional instructions and schedules not included in this RFP for completing design, presentation, construction, testing, and documentation milestones will be found in the course calendar, milestone assignment documents, and other specific documents to be distributed by the client at appropriate times during the project. The design, construction, testing, and reporting of the Robo Rat is a requirement for completion of Engineering 3380 Engineering Design I at Baylor University for the Spring Semester 2010. 2. DESIGN SPECIFICATION 2.1 Background In recent years there has been a lot of engineering research and development work on autonomous robotic devices capable of various types of locomotion in different environments. These include robots that fly, swim, walk, and climb. There are many reasons for the development of such devices, including performing tasks in hostile environments or locations otherwise difficult or dangerous to access by humans. These include robotic device used to seek out bombs and mines, or to operate in environments with radioactive or toxic substances. Also, autonomous robotic devices can be used to carry out inspections in hard to access locations of structures or machines, such as the hulls of ships, the insides of pipes systems, or inside the walls of buildings. There have even been proposals for micro robotic devices to navigate within the human body for disease diagnosis and treatment. One recent proposed application of a ropeclimbing robot is for the structural inspection of large wind turbines (figure at right: Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation). Robots have also been designed to climb along highvoltage power lines to inspect the wires for damage.

2.2 Design Requirements 2.2.1 General function: The general objective of the Robo Rat device is to autonomously climb a length of rope. The process will begin by securing the Robo Rat to the lower end of the rope. The team will then initiate the device with a single electrical switching action. The device will then ascend the rope until it reaches the ceiling. Upon reaching the ceiling, the device shall switch itself off. The Robo Rat device shall employ a climbing like method of ascension. The use of rollers or wheels to ascend the rope in a rolling type motion, will not be allowed. Desired attributes of the Robo Rat device are, among others, speed of climb, reliability, creativity of concept, and visual appeal. The team shall design the Robo Rat device to meet or exceed all of the criteria listed below. 2.2.2 Climbing: The device shall climb an 8 ft vertical length of rope. The rope shall be secured at the top and bottom. The team shall initially attach the device to the rope within the lower one foot section. The team may have access to the lower end of the rope if necessary. The rope will be of type: TBD. The device shall ascend the rope using a climbing type action. Rolling up the rope on wheels/rollers is not allowed. 2.2.3 Power: Power for the Robo Rat device shall be supplied from a single, 18 V rechargeable battery manufactured for use with cordless hand tools such as drills. The weight of the battery will be in excess of 1 pound. 2.2.4 Control: After the device is attached within the lower one foot section of the rope as is readied for climb, it shall be activated by a single electrical switching action. After activation, the device shall operate autonomously under the control of an onboard microcontroller. The programming of the microcontroller shall guide the climbing action and shall terminate the climbing at the upper end of the rope. No human intervention is allowed once climbing begins. 2.2.5 Setup & Reset: When the team is called upon to test their device, they will have two minutes to secure their device to the lower end of the rope and ready it for operation. When the device has finished climbing (reaches the top and switches itself off), the team will have another two minutes to reset the device to the lower end of the rope and ready it for a second trial.

2.2.6 Safety: The device must be deemed safe by the client. This includes, but is not limited to, to the following considerations with respect to the operator and others nearby: safety from electrical shock hazards; safety from pinch points; safety from sharp edges and points; safety from flying debris; safety from chemical contaminants. The device shall also operate without damaging the rope or any other part of the testing apparatus. 3. SAFETY REQUIREMENTS The team shall conduct all construction and testing with safety as the paramount consideration. Failure to observe workplace safety rules will lead to penalties in performance evaluation. Egregious or repeated safety violations, or disregard for Safety Officers, can result in dismissal from the course. Cleanliness in the workplace is expected at all times and in all work areas. Failure to observe workplace rules will lead to penalties in performance evaluation. The design team shall clean all work areas with each use.

4. REPORTING & DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS The team shall document the design by use of manuscripts, calculations, schematics, flowcharts, computer code, and design models/drawings. Specifications for required documentation and due dates not otherwise contained herein will be contained in the course calendar and/or will be distributed by the client at appropriate points during the project. 4.1 PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW (PCDR) 4.1.1 Date 2/11/2010 4.1.2 Objective The PCDR is a formal presentation. The client should be apprised of your conceptual design progress; i.e., you should describe one or more solution concepts that your team is considering. The main goal is to foster constructive discussion of possible design approaches for the purpose of advancing the team toward concept selection. 4.1.3 Format Duration: 5 8 Minutes Given by one team member. Visual aids using PowerPoint and/or Elmo Business casual dress.

4.2 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW (CDR) 4.2.1 Date 2/18/2010 4.2.2 Objective The CDR is a top down formal presentation to the client of the selected design concept. The client should understand how your proposed design will meet the specifications in this RFP. The client should gain a clear picture of the major components/systems and their overall arrangement/function. Furthermore, the client should understand your team s implementation plan for completing the project. 4.2.3 Format Duration: 7 10 Minutes Given by two team members, with approximately equivalent contributions. Professional quality visual aids (PowerPoint as primary platform); other visual aids as appropriate Business casual dress.

4.3 PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW 1 (PDR 1) & DRAWING SET 1 (DS 1) 4.3.1 Date 2/25/2010 4.3.2 Objective PDR 1 & DS 1 is for the purpose of communicating the detailed design of a major subsystem through a presentation and drawings. 4.3.3 Presentation Format Duration: 5 8 Minutes Given by one team member Professional quality visual aids (PowerPoint as primary platform); other visual aids as appropriate Business casual dress 4.3.4 Drawing Format Subsystem Drawings o Assembly drawing(s) of subsystem including bill(s) of materials. o Circuit schematic(s) for subsystem. o Detailed drawings of subsystem parts that must be manufactured 4.4 SUBSYSTEM TEST (SST) 4.4.1 Date 3/4/2010 4.4.2 Objective The subsystem test is a hardware demonstration of the performance of the subsystem described in the PDR 1 & DS 1.

4.5 PDR 2 & DS 2 4.5.1 Date 3/18/2010 4.5.2 Objective PDR 2 is for the purpose of communicating the detailed design and integration of two major subsystems through a presentation and drawings. 4.5.3 Presentation Format Duration: 5 8 Minutes Given by one team member Professional quality visual aids (PowerPoint as primary platform); other visual aids as appropriate Business casual dress 4.5.4 Drawing Format Subsystem Drawings o Assembly drawing(s) of all subsystems involved, including bill(s) of materials (and including revisions of DS 1). o Circuit schematic(s) for subsystems. o Detailed drawings of subsystem parts that must be manufactured 4.6 SYSTEM INTEGRATION TEST (SIT) 4.6.1 Date 3/25/2010 4.6.2 Objective The system integration test is a hardware demonstration of the integrated performance of the two subsystem described in the PDR 2 & DS 2.

4.7 PDR 3 & DS 3 4.7.1 Date 4/1/2010 4.7.2 Objective PDR 3 is for the purpose of communicating the detailed design of the entire device through a presentation and drawings. 4.7.3 Presentation Format Duration: 5 8 Minutes Given by one team member Professional quality visual aids (PowerPoint as primary platform); other visual aids as appropriate Business casual dress 4.7.4 Drawing Format System Drawings o Assembly drawing(s) of entire system and all subsystems including bill(s) of materials. o Circuit schematic(s) for entire system. o Detailed drawings of parts that must be manufactured 4.8 PRELIMINARY SYSTEM TEST (PST) 4.8.1 Date 4/8/2010 4.8.2 Objective The preliminary system test is a preliminary hardware demonstration of the performance of the entire system as described in the PDR 3 & DS 3. 4.9 COMPLIANCE TEST (CT) 4.9.1 Date 4/15/2010

4.9.2 Objective The compliance test is the final and critical hardware evaluation. System performance will be evaluated against all specifications. Data will be collected and analyzed. 4.10 FINAL DESIGN REVIEW (FDR) 4.10.1 Date 4/19/2010 4.10.2 Objective The FDR is a public presentation of the design to a general audience including the client, other design teams, invited faculty, students, and guests. 4.10.3 Presentation Format Duration: 3 4 Minutes Given by one team member Professional quality visual aids (PowerPoint as primary platform); other visual aids as appropriate Professional dress 4.11 Final Report and Final Drawing Set (FR&FDS) 4.11.1 Date 4/26/2010 4.11.2 Objective The Final Report and Drawings are archival documents that provide a complete and permanent record of the design. 4.11.3 Report Format The format for the final report will be communicated to the design teams by the client by 4/9/2010 4.11.4 Drawing Format Subsystem Drawings o Assembly drawing(s) of entire system and all subsystems including bill(s) of materials. o Circuit schematic(s) for entire system. o Detailed drawings of parts that must be manufactured