City of Prince Albert Statement of POLICY and PROCEDURE. Department: Public Works Policy No. 66. Section: Transportation Issued: July 14, 2014

Similar documents
CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Traffic Signal Design

ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC INVESTIGATIONS

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

Markings Technical Committee Chapter 3H: Roundabout Markings APPROVED IN NCUTCD COUNCIL ON JANUARY 20, 2006

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

1.3.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASSIFICATIONS

Southside Road. Prepared for: City of St. John s Police & Traffic Committee. Prepared by: City of St. John s Traffic Division

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

The Corporation of the City of Sarnia. School Crossing Guard Warrant Policy

Document 2 - City of Ottawa Pedestrian Crossover (PXO) Program

Intersection Improvement: Sturgeon Road, Silver Avenue and Murray Park Road Roundabout. Welcome. Public Information Session

4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES

Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices

Traffic Control Inspection Checklist Segment:

CHAPTER 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS, BARRICADES, AND GATES Section 2B.01 Application of Regulatory Signs Standard:

Appendix B. Environmental Resource Technical Memorandum. Assessment on Travel Pattern and Access Impacts

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

2003 Edition Page 2B-1

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Traffic Engineering and Highway Safety Bulletin June Overview

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

RE: 100 VARLEY LANE TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CLAY COUNTY

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

UNCONTROLLED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ON EDGEWATER BOULEVARD AT PORT ROYAL AVENUE (NORTH)

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

Chapter 5 5. INTERSECTIONS 5.1. INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

NEIGHBOURHOOD TRAFFIC COMMITTEE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

MEMORANDUM. Nantasket Road at Kingsley Road Kingsley Road at Sumner Street Kingsley Road at Revere Street Kingsley Road at Kenberma Street

INTERSECTIONS AT GRADE INTERSECTIONS

SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

Chapter 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

All-way stop control request at the intersection of Stevenson Road North at Fairglen Avenue

Intersec ons. Alignment. Chapter 3 Design Elements. Standards AASHTO & PennDOT: As close to 90 as possible, but a minimum of 60.

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

City of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets

New Seward and 36 th Avenue Intersection Conceptual Design

#!! "$% ##! &! # '#! % $ #!

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY NEWTOWN TOWNSHIP DELAWARE COUNTY, PA

Traffic Management Guidelines for Structure Rehabilitation Projects

Safety at Unsignalized Intersections. Unsignalized Intersections

Date: April 4, Project #: Re: A Street/Binford Street Traffic/Intersection Assessment

APPENDIX B(2) MULTIMODAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MIXED-USE URBAN CENTERS

CHAPTER 313 Traffic Control Devices

Traffic Calming Policy

CITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING

The major street is typically the intersecting street with greater traffic volume, larger cross-section, and higher functional class.

Attachment No. 13. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02

Proposed Harmonized Warrants for Installation of 40 km/h Speed Limits and All-Way Stop Sign Control

US Hwy. 64/264 Pedestrian Crossing at the Little Bridge Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

County of Spartanburg South Carolina

Traffic Control Devices

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy & Guidelines

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

91

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

CITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

Driveway Design Criteria

1 To provide direction to Administration when determining the appropriate Pedestrian Crossing Control Device for a particular location.

STREET AND HIGHWAY PLAN

INTERSECTION SAFETY AUDIT: STH 16/67 AND CTH Z

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

CHAPTER 7 ACCESS MANAGEMENT. Background. Principles of Access Management. Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP)

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

2017 Changes to the 2011 MMUTCD January 2017

MASER ASSOCIATES. Engineers Planners Surveyors TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY SEA GULL VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF COLTS NECK

TRAFFIC AND SAFETY NOTE 608A. Spacing for Commercial Drives and Streets. To Promote a Uniform Practice in Determining Access Spacing

Grade Separated Intersection

Tonight we will be discussing accidents

Updated Roundabout Analysis Methodology

Module 5: Navigating Roadways

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

Transcription:

Page: 1 of 8 1 POLICY 1.01 The City shall follow all of the specifications in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Canada, prepared by the National Committee of Uniform Traffic Control, and engineering judgement when processing the installation of traffic control devices. 2 PURPOSE 2.01 To regulate the utilization of Stop and Yield signs in the City. 2.02 To define the specifications for the installation of Stop and Yield signs. 2.03 To prevent or minimize collision rates, optimize capacity of intersections, and decide right-of-way by an adequate use of Stop and Yield signs. 2.04 To facilitate and organize traffic flow on streets. 3 SCOPE 3.01 The Statement of Policy and Procedure herein applies to the Public Works Department.

Page: 2 of 8 4 RESPONSIBILITY 4.01 The Public Works Department is responsible for ensuring that any installation of Stop or Yield signs conforms to this Policy. 4.02 Drivers approaching an intersection with a Stop sign facing them are responsible for bringing their vehicles to a complete stop before entering the intersection area and not proceed until it is safe to do so. 4.03 Drivers approaching an intersection with a Yield sign facing them are responsible for yielding the right-of-way to the oncoming traffic on the intersecting roadway, stop their vehicles completely if necessary, and not proceed until it is safe to do so. 4.04 City shall be responsible for approving any changes to this policy recommended by the Public Works Department. 5 DEFINITIONS 5.01 Traffic Control Device means a sign, signal, pavement marking or other device, placed upon, over or adjacent to a roadway, by a public authority or official having jurisdiction, which is intended to regulate, warn, or guide the road user. 5.02 Stop Sign - a sign that indicates to the drivers who are facing the sign that they must stop their vehicles completely, before entering the

Page: 3 of 8 intersection area, and shall not proceed until it is safe to do so. 5.03 Yield Sign - a sign that indicates to the drivers who are facing the sign that they must yield the right-of-way, stopping if necessary before entering the intersection area, to approaching traffic on the intersecting roadway and must not proceed until it is safe to do so. 6 REFERENCES and RELATED STATEMENTS of POLICY and PROCEDURE 7 PROCEDURE 7.01 General 7.01.1 The City shall only employ right-of-way control signs when they are needed and shall employ the least traffic control devices possible to accomplish the desired outcome and safety. 7.01.2 Street system and land zone should be taken into consideration when employing traffic control devices. 7.01.3 When making recommendations for the installation of Stop or Yield signs, the following requirements should be studied: a. Traffic volume on each street of the intersection; b. Safe approach speed and sight distance;

Page: 4 of 8 c. Street conditions and geometrics; d. Land use zone (industrial, residential, agricultural, etc.); e. Nature of the surrounding area (vegetation, open area, distracting d devices, etc.); and f. Accident records for the intersection. 7.02 Stop Signs 7.02.1 General Stop signs are utilized to organize and assign the right-of-way between vehicles advancing toward an intersection from all different directions. Particularly, when other intersection control devices, Yield signs or traffic signals, are not warranted or recommended for achieving the desired results and safety. Stop signs shall not be utilized: a. At major roadways intersecting minor roadways. b. As traffic calming or speed controlling devices. c. At crosswalks as a crossing device. d. As portable or temporary Stop signs, except in emergency or temporary situations (construction sites, traffic signals are temporarily not operating, etc.).

Page: 5 of 8 e. At an unsignalized intersection that is adjacent to a signalized intersection if a stop condition would interfere with traffic progression. 7.02.2 All-Way Stop Signs The advantages of implementing all-way Stop control devices are to optimize traffic progression and operation of an intersection along intersecting roadways as well as improve safety at an intersection. To warrant all-way Stop control at an intersection, the following conditions have to be met: 1. When the traffic volume on the minor roadway is at least 30% of the total traffic volume at the intersection for a three-way intersection (directional split of 70/30) and at least 40% of the total traffic volume for a four-way intersection (directional split of 60/40) during peak hours. 2. The proposed intersection for installing all-way traffic control cannot be located within a 250 meter radius of another all-way traffic control or traffic signal. In addition to the previous conditions, at least one of the following conditions has to be satisfied to warrant the installation of all-way Stop signs:

Page: 6 of 8 a. An average of 3 accidents per year in the past 2 years or 4 or more reported accidents in the last 12 months that could be preventable by an all-way Stop control. b. An average vehicular volume of 350 vehicles per hour during peak hours from all directions at the intersection. c. The average delay per vehicle entering the intersection from the minor roadway is no less than 30 seconds during peak hours. d. When a traffic signal has been warranted and could not be installed immediately, then all-way Stop signs are implemented as interim measure to control vehicular movement. e. When engineering studies identify a unique problem that is correctable by the installation of all-way Stop signs. 7.02.3 Two-Way Stop Signs One or more of the following conditions may warrant the installation of two-way Stop signs: a. When a collector or local street intersects with an arterial street. b. When a grid road intersects with a provincial highway. c. At an intersection of two roadways where one of them has a bus route. d. When the geometry or alignment of a street results in an

Page: 7 of 8 inadequate sight line. e. When the application of the right-hand rule at an intersection is unduly dangerous. f. When the safe approaching speed at an intersection is less than 15 km/h. g. If the vehicular volume entering the intersection of major and minor streets exceeds 250 during the peak hour. h. At an intersection where the number of reportable accidents occurred in the last 12 months is three or more and that could only be preventable by the installation of two-way Stop signs. i. At an intersection where engineering studies identify a unique problem that is correctable by the installation of two-way Stop signs. 7.03 Yield Signs 7.03.1 General Yield signs are used to regulate traffic movement at an intersection but in a less restrictive manner than Stop signs. Therefore, Yield signs are adequate at an intersection where the right-of-way rules fail to provide safe and efficient traffic movement and Stop signs or traffic signals are inadequate at this particular intersection.

Page: 8 of 8 Yield signs shall not be utilized: a. As traffic calming or speed controlling devices. b. At an intersection of a minor street with a highway. c. At an intersection where Stop signs are used on one or more approach of the intersecting streets. d. At a right turn lane where an adequate acceleration lane is provided. 7.03.2 Warrants One or more of the following conditions may warrant the installation of Yield signs: a. At the approach of a minor roadway to a major roadway where vehicles stopping at the intersection is not always necessary and the safe approach speed is at least 20 km/h. b. At a channelized or separate right turn lane if an acceleration lane is not provided or inadequate. c. At an entrance ramp to a freeway, expressway, or a more major roadway where an acceleration lane is not provided or inadequate. d. At an intersection where engineering studies identify a unique problem that is correctable by the installation of Yield signs. e. At all approaches to a roundabout to indicate the right-of-way to vehicles in the roundabout.