Modelling Gas Well Liquid (Un)Loading

Similar documents
Advanced Intermittent Gas Lift Utilizing a Pilot Valve

FLOWING GRADIENTS IN LIQUID LOADED GAS WELLS

Intermittent Gas Lift Utilizing a Pilot Valve

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Sheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado February 20 22, 2017

Using Gas Lift to Unload Horizontal Gas Wells

Two Short Topics 1) Using Compressors More Effectively 2) Improving Upon Poor-Boy Gas-Lift

Optimizing Chemical Injection

Downhole Gas Separation Performance

Don-Nan Pump & Supply. Don-Nan Pump & Supply 1

Correlating Laboratory Approaches to Foamer Product Selectione

Plunger Fall Velocity Model

Downhole Pressure Boosting: A production enhancement tool for both dry and liquid loaded Gas wells

Dynamic IPR and Gas Flow Rate Determined for Conventional Plunger Lift Well

Plunger Fall Velocity Model

Appalachian Basin Gas Well. Marietta College, Marietta, Ohio June 7-8, Development. Robert McKee, P.E. Design Engineer Multi Products Company

Plunger Lift: SCSSSV Applications

Hydraulic Piston Pump Field Trial

Dan Casey Pro-Seal Lift Systems, Inc.

High Pressure Continuous Gas Circulation: A solution for the

Downhole Gas Separator Selection

Weatherford Inverse Gas Lift System (IGLS)

2010 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop Optimizing Production and Reducing Costs by Solving Rod Pumping Problems With The Beam Gas Compressor

Acoustic Troubleshooting of Coal Bed Methane Wells

Downhole Gas Separator Selection

32 nd Gas-Lift Workshop. Optimizing Subsea Well Kick-off Operations Case Study Using FlowLift2

Is The Selection Of Artificial Lift

Pump Fillage Problem Overview. Jim McCoy. 9 th Annual Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop. Renaissance Hotel Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 17-20, 2013

Pressure Test Tubing for Leak

Gas-Well De-Watering Method Field Study

Plunger Lift Algorithms A Review

Pacemaker Plunger Operations in Greater Natural Buttes

Down-Hole Gas Separator Performance Simulation

Sucker Rod Lift Downhole Gas Separators Proposed Industry Testing

Troubleshooting Gas-lift Wells Using Dual Shot Acoustic Technique

Pressure Activated Chamber Technology (PACT)

Downhole Diverter Gas Separator

Acoustic Techniques to Monitor and Troubleshoot Gas-lift Wells

Presented By Dr. Youness El Fadili. February 21 th 2017

Carbon Fiber Sucker Rods versus Steel and Fiberglass

Ball and Sleeve Plunger System Automation Algorithm Utilizing Ball Fall Rates

A Longer Lasting Flowing Gas Well

Intrinsically Safe Acoustic Instrument Used in Troubleshooting Gas Lift Wells

Using Valve Performance in Gas Lift Design Software

Honeywell s On-line Gas Lift Optimization Solution

Packer-Type Gas Separator with Seating Nipple

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop. Gas Assisted Rod Pump

Beam Pumping to Dewater Horizontal Gas Wells

Intermittent Gas Lift and Gas Assist Plunger Lift

Anomaly Marker Method for Gas-Lift Wells

Setting Plunger Fall Velocity Using Venturi Plungers

TROUBLESHOOT ROD PUMPED WELLS USING TUBING FLUID LEVEL SHOTS

Weatherford Inverse Gas Lift System (IGLS)

Jim McCoy. Tubing Anchor Effect on Pump Fillage. Lynn Rowlan Tony Podio Ken Skinner. Gas Well Deliquification Workshop.

37 th Gas-Lift Workshop Houston, Texas, USA February 3 7, Alan Brodie, PTC

New Single Well Gas Lift Process Facilitates Fracture Treatment Flowback

A Combined Experimental & Numerical Research Program to Develop a Computer Simulator for Intermittent Gas-lift

Gas Locked Pumps are NOT Gas Locked!

Considerations for Qualifying Elastomers Used in Artificial Lift Equipment

De-Liquification and Revival of Oil & Gas Wells using Surface Jet Pump (SJP) Technology

36 th Gas-Lift Workshop. Reverse Flow Check Valve Reliability and Performance Testing of Gas Lift Barrier Check Valves

31 st Gas-Lift Workshop

Global Gas Lift Optimization Using WellTracer Surveys

Bellows Cycle Life & How Manufacturing Processes Can Impact it

Troubleshooting Unloading Gas Lift Design using DynaLift TM

Gas-liquid flow optimization with a Bubble Breaker device

Wireless I/O, Connecting Remote Sensors in a Wide Range of Environments

Continuous Injection of Hydrate Inhibitor in Gas Lift Gas to Mitigate Downtime Due to Downhole Annular Plugging

How does an unstable GLV affect the producing zones?

Gas Lift Valve Testing

Improving Performance of Gas Lift Compressors in Liquids-Rich Gas Service

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop. Sheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado February 29 March 2, 2016

Selection, optimization and safe operation of bypass plungers

Gas-Lift Test Facility for High- Pressure and High-Temperature Gas Flow Testing

Barrier Philosophy for Wells on Gas lift and Ways of Reducing HSE Risks. Alan Brodie Feb 2011 For more info visit

Plunger Lift Optimize and Troubleshoot

Horizontal Well Artificial Lift Simulation: Unconventional Oil & Gas Well Case Histories

Multi-Stage Plunger Lift: Case Histories

Gas Well De-Liquification Workshop. Denver, Colorado February 27 - March 1, Multi-Staging Wells. Chandler Frost Production Control Services

Deliquification Short Stories

10 Steps to Optimized Production

SPE Copyright 2012, Society of Petroleum Engineers

Dual Gas Lift Well Analysis Using WellTracer

Wellhead Compressor Installation on Liquid Loaded Gas Wells in Sicily: A summary of results and best practices

Artificial Lift Basics Pre Reading

SPE Cyclic Shut in Eliminates Liquid Loading in Gas Wells

Worker Seriously Injured Servicing a Plunger Lift System

Self-Stabilizing Gas Lift Valve (Patent Pending)

Downhole Gas Separators

Wellhead Compression A proven deliquification method for marginal gas wells

Well Test Design. Dr. John P. Spivey Phoenix Reservoir Engineering. Copyright , Phoenix Reservoir Engineering. All rights reserved.

Critical Velocity/ Nodal Stability Gas Well Predictions

Gas Lift Optimization Using Smart Gas Lift Valve

bakerhughes.com CENesis PHASE multiphase encapsulated production solution Keep gas out. Keep production flowing.

Gas Lift Workshop Doha Qatar 4-88 February Gas Lift Optimisation of Long Horizontal Wells. by Juan Carlos Mantecon

International Journal of Petroleum and Geoscience Engineering Volume 03, Issue 02, Pages , 2015

New 1.5 Differential Gas Lift Valve

Oman Central Gas Velocity Strings in deep tight gas wells. September th European Conference on Gas Well Deliquification.

Acoustic Liquid Level Testing of Gas Wells

An approach to account ESP head degradation in gassy well for ESP frequency optimization

Caltec. The world leader in Surface Jet Pump (SJP) and compact separation systems for upstream oil and gas production enhancement

Transcription:

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Adams Mark Hotel, February 25-27, 28 Modelling Gas Well Liquid (Un)Loading Kees Veeken (NAM, Assen) Murat Kerem (Shell, Rijswijk)

Objectives of Modelling Liquid loading Improve capacity forecast to maximise nomination Determine proven and expectation reserves Predict end of field life i.e. abandonment date Predict date that deliquification should be installed Liquid unloading (a.k.a. deliquification) Determine SFR and reserves at stake Generate incremental forecast to justify investment Select best (sequence of) deliquification measures Optimise deliquification techniques and implementation 2

Contents Objectives Well & reservoir model Abandonment pressure & ultimate recovery Production forecast for deliquification Minimum gas rate & metastable production Gas well unloading Future modelling 3

Well Model Cullender-Smith FBHP = FTHP + HH + FF: FBHP 2 = B.FTHP 2 + C.Q 2 Forcheimer Pres = FBHP + DD: P res2 FBHP 2 = A.Q + F.Q 2 Turner Q min = TC.FTHP.5.ID 2 /[(FTHT+273).Z] Abandonment Q = Q min : P ab2 = B.FTHP 2 + A.Q min + (C+F).Q 2 min B & C, Q min FBHP FTHP Hydrostatic Head, Fluid Friction & Minimum Rate A & F Pres Drawdown 4

Turner 2 7/8" 3 1/2" 5" 7" 3 25 Q min (e 3 m 3 /d) 2 15 1 5 2 4 6 8 1 FTHP (bar) 5

Abandonment Pressure & Reserves P i UR = GIIP x (P i P ab ) / P i P res P ab G p UR GIIP 6

Wellhead Pressure & Tubing Size P ab (bar) 16 12 8 4 Compression benefit for all A Velocity string benefit increases with A Compression 5", 5 bar FTHP 3-1/2", 5 bar FTHP 5", 1 bar FTHP 3-1/2", 1 bar FTHP Velocity String 5 1 15 2 Prolific A (bar 2 /1 3 m 3 /d) Tight 7

Stim., Foam, Gas Lift, Plunger & Pump TC= TC=1 TC=2 TC=285 16 12 Stimulation increases reserves Foam lift benefit increases with A P ab (bar) 8 Stimulation Gas Lift Pump Plunger Foam 4 5 1 15 2 A (bar 2 /1 3 m 3 /d) 8

Prolific Gas Well (Low A) GIIP = 1 9 m 3, A = 4 bar 2 /(1 3 m 3 /d), 5" tubing Base Case Compression Foamer Gas Lift Base Case Compression Foamer Gas Lift 4 77% 22% 1% 1% 1 Gas Rate (1 3 m 3 /d) 3 2 1 75 5 25 Gas Volume (1 6 m 3 ) 1 2 3 4 5 Time (yrs) 9

Prolific Gas Well (Low A) GIIP = 1 9 m 3, A = 4 bar 2 /(1 3 m 3 /d), 5" tubing Base Case Compression Foamer Gas Lift Gas Rate (1 3 m 3 /d) 4 3 2 1 77% 22% 1% 1% Compression/eductor most useful Reduced scope for other measures 2 4 6 8 1 Gas Volume (1 6 m 3 ) 1

Tight Gas Well (High A) GIIP = 1 6 m 3, A = 4 bar 2 /(1 3 m 3 /d), 5" tubing Base Case Compression Foamer Gas Lift Base Case Compression Foamer Gas Lift 4 37% 32% 21% 1% 1 Gas Rate (1 3 m 3 /d) 3 2 1 75 5 25 Gas Volume (1 6 m 3 ) 4 8 12 16 2 Time (yrs) 11

Tight Gas Well (High A) GIIP = 1 6 m 3, A = 4 bar 2 /(1 3 m 3 /d), 5" tubing Base Case Compression Foamer Gas Lift Gas Rate (1 3 m 3 /d) 4 3 2 1 37% 32% 21% 1% Deliquification critical for recovery Scope for wide range of measures Sharing the same cake Selection is key 2 4 6 8 1 Gas Volume (1 6 m 3 ) 12

Tight Gas Outflow Challenge RF (%) 1% 8% 6% 4% Outflow as challenging as inflow! 2-7/8 tubing THP 5 bar H 1m, 1x RF=% if K < 1 µd 2% % Gas well deliquification essential to maximise recovery for tight gas wells.1 1 1 1 1 KH (md.m) 13

Minimum Rate Actual & Turner 25 Number of Wells (-) 2 15 1 5 <1. 1.-1.5 1.5-2. 2.-2.5 >2.5 Actual minimum rate / Turner criterion (-) 14

Modified Turner Actual/Turner (-) 4. 3.5 3. 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5. Well more sensitive to pressure fluctuations at low pressure y = 3.4441x -.1717 R 2 =.285 2 4 6 8 1 A.5 x FTHP 15

Turner Literature Data 12 Unloaded Loaded Questionable 1:1 1:1.5 Success Failure 1 Actual Gas Rate (Mscf/d) 8 6 4 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Calculated Loading Rate (Mscf/d) 16

Dependency on A in Simulator Qmin increases as A decreases FTHP Poor Prolific Well more sensitive to pressure fluctuations at low pressure Q gas 17

Model Limitations Underestimates hydrostatic head Calculated abandonment pressure too low Uplift when injecting foam just above critical rate (?) No recharging due to tight or slow gas Connected volume increases with time Intermittent production Monobore only i.e. no wet foot across larger liner Extra back pressure No metastable flow 18

Metastable Gas Production Gas Rate (m3/d) 8 6 4 2 Gas Rate THP BHP Gas bubbles through liquid column (SPE 95282) Stable rate 4, m3/d Metastable rate 12, m3/d 4 3 2 1 THP, BHP (bar) 29-Dec 18-Jan 7-Feb 27-Feb 19-Mar 8-Apr 19

Metastable Gas Production Offshore wellhead temperature provides indication of liquid loading & metastable production.8.7 7 8 MILJ.NM3/D BARG DEG.CELC..6.5.4.3.2.1 Q min = 18, m 3 /d -1-12 24/4/26 8:3:12 9. Day(s) 23/7/26 8:3:12 2

Unloading Gas Well Gas well unloads far below Turner criterion Initial unloading via piston like displacement Critical velocity of Taylor gas bubble 1x lower than Turner critical velocity Piston model OLGA multiphase dynamic flow simulator 21

Unloading Well with 7 Tubing Q min,water ~4E5 m 3 /d, Q min,condensate ~2E5 m 3 /d FTHP Model vs Actual FTHP Actual FTHP Piston FTHP OLGA Choke Gas Rate 25 5E+5 FTHP (bar), Choke (1/64") 2 15 1 5 Gas @ surface Liq @ surface 4E+5 3E+5 2E+5 1E+5 Gas Rate (m 3 /d) 6 12 18 24 3 36 42 48 E+ Time (min) 22

Volume Fraction @ 24 min (OLGA) Oil Based Mud Completion Brine Base Oil 1. Q gas ~4E4 m 3 /d.8 Fraction (-).6.4.2. 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 Along Hole Distance from Toe (m) 23

Volume Fraction @ 48 min (OLGA) Oil Based Mud Completion Brine Base Oil 1. Q gas ~4E5 m 3 /d.8 Fraction (-).6.4.2. 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 Along Hole Distance from Toe (m) 24

Future Modelling Liquid loading Update & upgrade modified Turner Resolve abandonment pressure discrepancy Support multiphase dynamic modelling of liquid loading Liquid unloading (a.k.a. deliquification) Model interaction between reservoir and well in liquid loading domain to produce better deliquification forecasts & to optimise deliquification techniques 25

Copyright Rights to this presentation are owned by the company(ies) and/or author(s) listed on the title page. By submitting this presentation to the Gas Well Deliquification Workshop, they grant to the Workshop, the Artificial Lift Research and Development Council (ALRDC), and the Southwestern Petroleum Short Course (SWPSC), rights to: Display the presentation at the Workshop. Place it on the www.alrdc.com web site, with access to the site to be as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee. Place it on a CD for distribution and/or sale as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee. Other uses of this presentation are prohibited without the expressed written permission of the company(ies) and/or author(s) who own it and the Workshop Steering Committee. 26

Disclaimer The following disclaimer shall be included as the last page of a Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Course. A similar disclaimer is included on the front page of the Gas Well Deliquification Web Site. The Artificial Lift Research and Development Council and its officers and trustees, and the Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Steering Committee members, and their supporting organizations and companies (here-in-after referred to as the Sponsoring Organizations), and the author(s) of this Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Training Course and their company(ies), provide this presentation and/or training material at the Gas Well Deliquification Workshop "as is" without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the information or the products or services referred to by any presenter (in so far as such warranties may be excluded under any relevant law) and these members and their companies will not be liable for unlawful actions and any losses or damage that may result from use of any presentation as a consequence of any inaccuracies in, or any omission from, the information which therein may be contained. The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in these presentations and/or training materials are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Sponsoring Organizations. The author is solely responsible for the content of the materials. The Sponsoring Organizations cannot and do not warrant the accuracy of these documents beyond the source documents, although we do make every attempt to work from authoritative sources. The Sponsoring Organizations provide these presentations and/or training materials as a service. The Sponsoring Organizations make no representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the presentations and/or training materials, or any part thereof, including any warrantees of title, non-infringement of copyright or patent rights of others, merchantability, or fitness or suitability for any purpose. 27