Suspensions under the Teacher Tenure Act

Similar documents
Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

6. Officials should maintain a high level of personal hygiene and should maintain a professional appearance at all times.

ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. [ NMAC - Rp, NMAC, 01/01/2018]

Community Club Sustainability Program

ON-FIELD DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES PART 1

RULES OF THE COURT 2019 SUMMARY OF MODIFICATIONS

BISMARCK HOCKEY BOOSTERS DISCIPLINARY POLICY Adopted August 31st, 2016

Illinois Institute of Technology Institutional Review Board Handbook of Procedures for the Protection of Human Research Subjects

CODE OF CONDUCT AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

PENALTY CODE The penalty code outlined throughout the handbook and in this section has been adopted by the Association s member schools.

EEA AGREEMENT - PROTOCOL 24 p. 1 PROTOCOL 24 { 1 } ON COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF CONTROL OF CONCENTRATIONS GENERAL PRINCIPLES.

ICC UMPIRES CODE OF CONDUCT

Chamber in Resolving Disputes between Players and Clubs

CODE OF CONDUCT. (Version: 1 January 2018)

SQ BY-LAWS. SQ By-Laws (amended November 2010) 1

FINA RULES ON THE PREVENTION OF THE MANIPULATION OF COMPETITIONS

Arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (O.G. Sydney) 00/015 Mihaela Melinte / International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF), award of 29 September 2000

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

Decision of the Single Judge of the Players Status Committee

Jamberoo Touch Incorporated Judiciary Rules & Procedures

LABOUR LAW. ARR 214 Theme 10

Specifically, the bill addresses:

DISCIPLINE, PROTEST, GRIEVANCE AND APPEAL PROCEDURES Updated with changes approved at the February 22, 2015 GBM

PGA TOUR INTEGRITY PROGRAM MANUAL. Effective January 1, 2018

BEFORE THE POLICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO

UNFAIR DISMISSAL. Objectives. Fair go all round s 381(2); Loty s case. Time Limits

05 - IRS Acquiesces; Hockey Team's Away Game Team Meals Were A De Minimis Fringe

ONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD

APPEALS COMMITTEE UPHOLDS DECISION FOR BALL STATE UNIVERSITY FORMER COACH

Panel: Mr Rui Botica Santos (Portugal), President; Mr Jehangir Baglari (Islamic Republic of Iran); Mr Raymond Hack (South Africa)

TITLE 11. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

Decision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber

ORDER. This is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT UNDER THE ANTI-DOPING RULES OF THE RUGBY FOOTBALL LEAGUE DECISION

REAGAN SOCCER CLUB CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE CONSTITUTIONAL STATEMENT

FIVB TRIBUNAL REGULATIONS

ON-FIELD REGULATIONS SECTION THREE: PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO CATEGORY 5 GENERAL CHARGES. 2 Nothing in this Section Three shall preclude:

ANTI-DOPING REGULATIONS

Arbitration CAS 2009/A/2011 Stephan Schumacher v. International Olympic Committee (IOC), award on costs of 6 May 2010

2010 ICF PARACANOE CLASSIFICATION GUIDELINES

NORTHMEAD BOWLING, RECREATION AND SPORTING CLUB LTD

(HELD AT BRAAMFONTEIN) CASE NO: J4373/02

YARRA JUNIOR FOOTBALL LEAGUE INCORPORATED

Wheaton Warrenville South Tiger Hockey Club

Sam Kimberley Trophy

Discipline Guidance for RFU Clubs

IN THE BARGAINING COUNCIL FOR THE CIVIL ENGINEERING INDUSTRY ( BCCEI ) HELD AT PORT ELIZABETH. In the arbitration between

Arbitration CAS 2011/A/2628 Foolad Mobarakeh Sepahan FC v. Asian Football Confederation (AFC), award of 14 March 2012

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

Iowa Soccer Association Member Rules

RICHMOND JETS MINOR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL POLICY

Board Policy Statement Transportation of Pupils Approved on June 1, 2015

SAASL DISCIPLINARY RULES FOR PLAYERS AND CLUBS

STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES DIVISION

DECISION ITU ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL

New Brunswick Rugby Union, Inc. By-laws 1. Membership Policy 2. Game Regulations

Arbitration CAS anti-doping Division (OG Rio) AD 16/004 International Olympic Committee (IOC) v. Silvia Danekova, award of 12 August 2016

CORONA PONY YOUTH BASEBALL CODE OF CONDUCT & DISCIPLINARY POLICY

United States Olympic Committee National Anti-Doping Policies

Disciplinary Policy and Procedures

TOWN OF TYNGSBOROUGH RECREATION AND PARKS DEPARTMENT YOUTH SPORTS CODE OF CONDUCT, POLICIES, AND GUIDELINES. Table of Contents

Community Club Sustainability - Player Payment Rule

Disciplinary Procedures for Players in Scottish Women s Football Youth Leagues. Season 2018

RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES (Amended Nov. 26, 2012)

Basketball Australia Integrity Policy

IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY ( the Company / the Employer ) - AND -

FFSA COMPETITION OPERATING REGULATIONS

For cross-country, a UCI MTB team must have at least 3 riders and no more than 10 riders. (text modified on ). (text modified on ).

JUDGEMENT. [1] The applicant, a man aged 68 this year, was employed by the. respondent for many years as a product manager.

Golf North Queensland Men s Open (2017) CONDITIONS OF PLAY

IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT UNDER THE ICC ANTI-CORRUPTION CODE. Between: THE INTERNATIONAL CRICKET COUNCIL. and MR IRFAN AHMED DECISION

COASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION SEPTEMBER 1, 2015

Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1571 Nusaybindemir SC v. Turkish Football Federation (TFF) & Sirnak SC, award of 15 December 2008

Metro Basketball Association Rules of Play

Arbitration CAS 2015/A/4210 Karam Gaber v. United World Wrestling (FILA), award of 28 December 2015

World Boxing Council Consejo Mundial de Boxeo

USTA NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP JUNIOR TEAM TENNIS 2018 REGULATIONS

REGULATIONS FOR EXERCISING THE ROLE OF AGENT FOR BASKETBALL ATHLETES. Definitions

Australian Canoeing. Canoeing Competitions Bylaw. Adopted by the Board 31 October Bylaw #19

PAKISTAN CRICKET BOARD REGISTRATION OF AGENTS REGULATIONS, 2010

2014 Misconduct Regulations

CONTACT: S. David Berst, NCAA Assistant Executive Director for Enforcement. II. Violations of NCAA legislation, as determined by committee.

Decision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber

Disciplinary Procedures For Players in Scottish Women s Football Youth Regional Leagues. Season 2016

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber. taken in Zurich, Switzerland, on Friday, 11 th March by the following composition:

Decision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber

Arbitration CAS anti-doping Division (OG Rio) AD 16/006 International Olympic Committee (IOC) v. Kleber Da Silva Ramos, award of 20 August 2016

Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Policy on IRB Review of Protocol Deviations and Noncompliance for Non-exempt Research

NORTHERN SUBURBS FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION INC. ASSOCIATION REGULATIONS

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY WARREN CIRCUIT COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. LAVONDA JOHNSON, GREG JOHNSON AND JALYN SAVAGE

CHAPTER W-13 - POSSESSION OF WILDLIFE, SCIENTIFIC COLLECTING AND SPECIAL LICENSES INDEX #1300 DEFINITIONS 1 #1301 POSSESSION 1

USA Rugby Disciplinary Regulations and Procedures. General Information and Requirements

Woody s Wanderers FC - Code of Conduct

United States Steel Corporation Sheet and Tin Operations Irvin Works and United Steelworkers of America Local Union 2227

3.01B(2) Section and District/Area. Each Sectional Association shall appoint a Sectional Association League

HORSE SPORT IRELAND GENERAL RULES. Horse Sport Ireland 1st Floor Beech House Millennium Park Osberstown, Naas Co. Kildare

Panel: Mr Malcolm Holmes QC (Australia), Sole Arbitrator

2018 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC WINTER TEAM. Ski & Snowboard Australia NOMINATION CRITERIA CROSS COUNTRY SKIING

Transcription:

Suspensions under the Teacher Tenure Act 469 Chapter 21 Suspensions under the Teacher Tenure Act Detailed Contents Section 2100 Suspension without Pay as Punishment 471 Grounds for the Suspension 472 Maximum Length of the Suspension 472 Three Kinds of Disciplinary Suspensions 472 Procedure for the Suspension 474 Return to Duty following the Suspension 475 Section 2101 Suspension with Pay in Anticipation of Dismissal 475 Grounds for the Suspension 475 Maximum Length of the Suspension 476 Procedure for the Suspension 476 First Way for the Suspension to End 476 Second Way for the Suspension to End 476 Dismissal Even after the End of the Suspension 477 Section 2102 Suspension without Pay in Anticipation of Dismissal 477 Grounds for the Suspension 477 Maximum Length of the Suspension 477 Procedure for the Suspension 478 469

470 School Employment Law

Suspensions under the Teacher Tenure Act 471 Chapter 21 Suspensions under the Teacher Tenure Act There are three distinct, and easy to confuse, possibilities for suspensions of public school employees protected by the Teacher Tenure Act that is, teachers as the act defines them, 1 contract administrators during their contract term, and tenured administrators (all of whom will be referred to in this chapter, for convenience, as teachers ). The first of the three is used very rarely. It is suspension without pay as discipline or punishment for misconduct. 2 The second is used much more frequently. It is suspension with pay while the superintendent considers whether to go forward with dismissal procedures. 3 The third, and perhaps the most common, is suspension without pay in contemplation of immediate dismissal procedures. 4 Section 2100 Suspension without Pay as Punishment It may occasionally happen that a teacher engages in conduct that falls into a disciplinary middle ground. The conduct is sufficiently unacceptable that a warning or reprimand is insufficient. However, it is not so egregious as to merit dismissal. In that instance, the Teacher Tenure Act provides for a middle ground response a disciplinary suspension without pay for a limited period of time. The statute defines disciplinary suspension as a final decision to 1. See section 1801 of this book. See section 402 for a discussion of special provisions for suspensions of principals assigned to schools identified as low performing under the School-Based Management and Accountability Program. 2. Chapter 115C, Section 325(f)(2), of the North Carolina General Statutes (hereinafter G.S.). 3. G.S. 115C-325(f1). 4. G.S. 115C-325(f)(1). 471

472 School Employment Law Section 2100 suspend a teacher or school administrator without pay for no more than 60 days. 5 Grounds for the Suspension The grounds upon which a disciplinary suspension without pay may be administered are apparently limited to the fifteen grounds upon which a teacher may be dismissed, as discussed in chapter 19 of this book. There are no court opinions or administrative rules to this effect. It is a conclusion drawn in the following way. First, the Teacher Tenure Act says that teachers may be demoted only on the fifteen grounds, just as they may be dismissed only on the fifteen grounds. Second, the definition of demote is to reduce the salary paid to a teacher. Therefore, because a disciplinary suspension without pay necessarily reduces a teacher s salary, it is a demotion and can be accomplished only on the fifteen grounds. This conclusion is buttressed by the fact that the definition of demotion specifically excludes a suspension without pay in contemplation of dismissal (a different kind of suspension discussed below) but does not exclude disciplinary suspensions. Maximum Length of the Suspension The maximum length of the suspension is sixty days. The statute so provides. Three Kinds of Disciplinary Suspensions Under the statute, there are three kinds of disciplinary suspension without pay, and the kind of suspension determines the hearing rights of the teacher who is being suspended. Suspension for ten days or less. The first kind of disciplinary suspension without pay is one that lasts no more than ten days. If the superintendent believes that a disciplinary suspension is necessary, he or she may recommend a suspension of such duration. In that case, if the teacher requests a hearing before the board of education, as is the teacher s right, the hearing is to be a limited-evidence hearing, as described fully in chapter 20. That is, in general, the board hears the following matters: Any documentary evidence the superintendent intends to use to support the recommendation; the superintendent must provide the documentary evidence to the teacher seven days before the hearing. 5. G.S. 115C-325(a)(4a).

Section 2100 Suspensions under the Teacher Tenure Act 473 Any documentary evidence the teacher intends to use to rebut the superintendent s recommendation; the teacher must provide the documentary evidence to the superintendent three days before the hearing. A written statement by the superintendent, which must be submitted at least three days before the hearing. A written statement by the teacher, which must be submitted at least three days before the hearing. Oral arguments to the board by the superintendent, based on the record before the board; presumably, the argument may be made by the attorney for the superintendent. Oral arguments to the board by the teacher, based on the record before the board; presumably, the argument may be made by the attorney for the teacher. There is no provision for receiving further evidence. Suspension for more than ten days. The second kind of disciplinary suspension without pay is one that lasts more than ten days. If the superintendent believes that a disciplinary suspension is necessary, he or she may recommend a suspension of such duration. In that case, if the teacher requests a hearing before the board of education, as is the teacher s right, the hearing is to be a full-evidence hearing of the same nature that applies in the case of dismissals in a reduction in force, as discussed in detail in section 2007 of this book. In general, the full-evidence hearing before the board is very similar to the full-evidence hearing conducted before a case manager in teacher dismissal proceedings. The hearing is to be private, it is to be conducted according to rules adopted by the State Board of Education, the rules of evidence are not to apply but the board (like a case manager) is to give probative effect to evidence that is of a kind commonly relied on by reasonably prudent persons in the conduct of serious affairs. 6 The board may itself subpoena and swear witnesses and compel them to give testimony and produce documents and records. The board decides all procedure issues necessary for a fair and efficient hearing. The rules for exchange of information before the hearing are a little different than with a case manager hearing. At least eight days before the hearing, the superintendent is to provide to the teacher a list of witnesses the superintendent intends to present, together with a brief statement of the nature of the testimony of each witness and a copy of all documentary evidence the superintendent intends to present. At least six days before the hearing, the teacher must make the corresponding material available to the superintendent. 6. G.S. 115C-325(j3)(4).

474 School Employment Law Section 2100 At the hearing, both the superintendent and the teacher have the right to be present and to be heard, to be represented by counsel, and to present through witnesses any competent testimony relevant to the issue of whether the grounds for a dismissal or demotion due to a reduction in force is [sic] justified. 7 No evidence that is not on the exchange list between the superintendent and the teacher may be introduced at the hearing unless the board finds that the new evidence is critical to the matter at issue and the party making the request could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered and produced the evidence in a timely way. Suspension for certain conduct. The third kind of disciplinary suspension without pay is defined by the conduct that underlies it, not by its length. If the suspension is based on any of the kinds of listed conduct, the teacher is entitled to the full-evidence hearing, just as for suspensions of greater than ten days, no matter how short the proposed suspension is to be. The statute applies this provision to intentional misconduct, such as inappropriate sexual or physical conduct, immorality, insubordination, habitual or excessive alcohol use or nonmedical use of a controlled substance as defined in Article 5 of Chapter 90 of the General Statutes, any cause that constitutes grounds for the revocation of the teacher s or school administrator s certificate, or providing false information. 8 Procedure for the Suspension Any of the three kinds of disciplinary suspensions without pay begin with the recommendation of the superintendent. The superintendent should meet face-to-face with the teacher, explain the reasons that the superintendent is contemplating recommending disciplinary suspension, and give the teacher an opportunity to respond. If the superintendent continues to believe that suspension is proper, he or she should give the teacher a written notice of intent to make the recommendation. The written notice should specify which of the three kinds of disciplinary suspension is involved and should notify the teacher of the teacher s right to request a hearing before the board within fifteen days of receipt of the notice. This procedure is not fully spelled out in the statute, but it represents good practice. The teacher then decides whether to ask for a hearing. If the teacher does request a hearing, the type of hearing depends on which of the three kinds of disciplinary suspension is involved. If the teacher does not request a hearing, the superintendent may file his or her recommendation with the board. 7. G.S. 115C-325(j3)(3). 8. G.S. 115C-325(f)(2)a.2.

Section 2101 Suspensions under the Teacher Tenure Act 475 If, after considering the recommendation of the superintendent and the evidence at the hearing if there is one the board makes a determination as to whether the grounds for the recommendation are true and substantiated by a preponderance of the evidence. 9 If so, the board may vote to suspend the teacher. Return to Duty following the Suspension The statute makes no provision regarding the suspended teacher s return to duty at the end of the suspension period. Presumably, he or she is available for assignment at the end of the suspension just as he or she would have been before the suspension. That is, the teacher has no right to insist on returning to the same duties he or she was engaged in before. Section 2101 Suspension with Pay in Anticipation of Dismissal The Teacher Tenure Act provides that the superintendent may suspend a teacher with pay in instances in which grounds for dismissal may exist, not as discipline, but in anticipation of dismissal. 10 Grounds for the Suspension The superintendent may suspend a teacher with pay if the superintendent believes three things. First, the superintendent must believe that one or more of the grounds for dismissal of the teacher exist. Second, the superintendent must believe that additional investigation of the facts is necessary. And, third, the superintendent must believe that circumstances are such that the teacher should be removed immediately from his or her duties. There is no court case concerning a challenge to the superintendent s determination, but clearly his or her belief must be rational and must be made in good faith. 9. G.S. 115C-325(f)(2). This is the statutory standard that applied to teacher dismissals under the Teacher Tenure Act before the 1997 amendments changed it, as discussed in chapter 20 of this book. The 1997 changes simply did not affect the standard as stated here for suspensions. 10. G.S. 115C-325(f1).

476 School Employment Law Section 2101 Maximum Length of the Suspension The statute provides that the suspension with pay in anticipation of dismissal may be for a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 90 days. 11 The superintendent and the teacher may agree to extend the period. Procedure for the Suspension The statute grants the superintendent the power to initiate the suspension with pay in anticipation of dismissal on his or her own initiative. The superintendent is required only to notify the teacher and the board of education of his or her action within two days and to notify the teacher of the reasons for it. The suspension statute does not provide the teacher a right to an appeal to the board of education to challenge the superintendent s decision to begin a suspension with pay. No court cases address the question of whether that decision could be appealed under G.S. 115C-45(c) or G.S. 115C-305. (See chapter 15.) First Way for the Suspension to End The suspension with pay in anticipation of dismissal may end with a recommendation by the superintendent to the board that the teacher be dismissed. At that point, the suspension may be changed by the superintendent to a suspension without pay. Or, the suspension may be continued as a suspension with pay during the dismissal procedures. Second Way for the Suspension to End The maximum length for a suspension with pay is ninety days, unless extended by agreement of the superintendent and the teacher. 12 If the superintendent has not initiated dismissal procedures against the teacher within the ninety-day maximum suspension period, the teacher must be reinstated to his or her duties immediately and all records of the suspension with pay in anticipation of dismissal must be removed from the teacher s personnel file if the teacher so requests. The records of the suspension itself are what must be removed, not documents related to the underlying misconduct. 11. G.S. 115C-325(f1). 12. G.S. 115C-325(f1).

Section 2102 Suspensions under the Teacher Tenure Act 477 Dismissal Even after the End of the Suspension Two opinions of the North Carolina Court of Appeals make clear that, despite the statutory provision discussed in the paragraph immediately above, even if the ninety-day period has been exhausted and the teacher has been returned to duties, the superintendent may still, after that time, initiate dismissal proceedings. 13 Section 2102 Suspension without Pay in Anticipation of Dismissal The Teacher Tenure Act provides that the superintendent may suspend a teacher without pay in instances in which grounds for dismissal may exist, not as discipline but in anticipation of dismissal. 14 Grounds for the Suspension The superintendent may suspend a teacher without pay if the superintendent believes two things. First, the superintendent must believe that one or more of the grounds for dismissal of the teacher exist. Second, the superintendent must believe that immediate suspension of the teacher is necessary. Maximum Length of the Suspension Within five days of the beginning of the suspension without pay, the superintendent must begin dismissal proceedings. 15 If the superintendent does begin dismissal proceedings, the suspension without pay continues indefinitely, until it is finally determined that no grounds for dismissal exist; that is, until the superintendent determines not to pursue the dismissal or until the final vote of the board of education in the teacher s favor. At that point the teacher is to be reinstated immediately and paid for the period of the suspension. The statute does not explicitly set out what is to happen if the superintendent does not begin the dismissal procedure within five days of the beginning of the suspension 13. Evers v. Pender County Bd. of Educ., 104 N.C. App. 1, 407 S.E.2d 879 (1991), aff d, 331 N.C. 380, 416 S.E.2d 3 (1992); Davis v. Public Sch. of Robeson County, 115 N.C. App. 98, 443 S.E.2d 781, disc. review denied, 337 N.C. 690, 448 S.E.2d 519 (1994). 14. G.S. 115C-325(f1). 15. Alternatively, the superintendent may decide to recommend demotion or disciplinary suspension without pay rather than dismissal. G.S. 115C-325(f)(1).

478 School Employment Law Section 2102 without pay. Presumably the teacher is to be immediately reinstated at the end of the five days and paid for the five days. Also, presumably, the superintendent could, after that time, initiate another suspension without pay or go directly to dismissal proceedings. Procedure for the Suspension Before suspending a teacher without pay, the superintendent must meet with the teacher and give the teacher written notice of the charges against him or her, an explanation of the basis of the charges, and an opportunity to respond. This procedure need not be elaborate, but the written statement of charges and the explanation must be clear, meaningful, and reasonably complete. This statutory provision is designed to meet the due process requirement for pretermination hearings described in section 202. As discussed immediately above, the superintendent must decide within five days whether to go forward with dismissal proceedings. The teacher is not entitled to appeal to the board of education the imposition of the suspension without pay, but must wait to see whether dismissal proceedings are begun, at which time the teacher may begin the appeal proceedings. Presumably, if the superintendent begins the suspension without pay and then decides not to go forward with the dismissal so that the teacher is reinstated to duties and pay at that point the teacher could demand a hearing under G.S. 115C-45(c) or G.S. 115C-305 on the superintendent s original decision to begin the suspension. (See chapter 15.)