Submitting Continuing Reviews and/or Amendments to the IRB

Similar documents
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

Baptist Health Institutional Review Board. Study Closure Report (Expedited Review) IRB #: Study Title:

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board

Independent Ethics Committees

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

Human Research Protection Program Policy

CONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Continuing Review of Approved Research

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

The Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. Cooperative Agreements

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Issue in IRB Approvals:

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the continuing review procedure of approved projects for the IRB.

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Post-Approval Submissions

Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

Lapse in IRB Approval

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: MHC_RP0107. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

7.0 DEVIATION and EXCEPTION of a PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROTOCOL

IRB Chair Responsibilities

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

SOP 5.06 Full Committee Review: Initial IRB Review

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. IRB Review Processes

Review of Research by the Convened IRB

HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS RESEARCH NETWORK

Supersedes Document Dated: 7/7/11. SOP: RR 401 Version No.: 07 Version Date: 9/8/15 EXPEDITED REVIEW 1. POLICY

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 02 06/30/10 08/01/07 1 OF 6

SOP #2-2 Version #1 Date First Effective: December 14, Page 1 of 6

Yale University Institutional Review Boards

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval

The IRB reviews and monitors human subjects research conducted by Columbia College Chicago faculty, staff, and students.

AMENDMENTS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESEARCH 3/01/2016

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

Tuesday, May 15, Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout.

SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Penn as Central IRB FAQ

RESEARCH SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Minot State University Institutional Review Board ANNUAL UPDATE/REVISION/PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

Wayne State University Institutional Review Board

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

Screening and Enrollment Log. List of all subjects screened and all subjects screened and enrolled in the study.

Human Research Protections Program Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

IRB Minutes Quality Improvement Assessment

Version 1. Submission Guide and Policies

Chapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities

Research Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7

Ceded IRB Review. The project involves prisoners or other vulnerable populations that require special considerations.

EXPEDITED REVIEW. Terms used in this policy, but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Glossary.

Harford Community College. Institutional Review Board Charter and Standard Operating Procedures

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

WORKING WITH THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD &

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Interactions with the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

An Author s Guide to Institutional Review Board (IRB)

NONCOMPLIANCE. 1. Overview

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: How to Apply for External IRB Review

CUNY HRPP Policy: Suspension or Termination of Human Subject Research

SOP Title Review of Research: Devices for Humanitarian Uses

EMERGENCY USE 03/02/2016

IRB-REQUIRED INVESTIGATOR ACTIONS

Procedure Department: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM Policy Number: II.B.1

(y9. &i?r, JUL t Certified-Return Receipt Requested WARNING LE7TER

Ceded IRB Review. The University of Arizona has standing agreements in place for the following entities regarding ceded IRB review:

CUNY HRPP Procedures: Multisite Non-Exempt Human Subjects Research

What s New in GCP? FDA, OHRP Issue Harmonized Guidance on Transferring IRB Oversight of Clinical Studies

Centralized IRB Models

Expedited Review for Initial Review, Continuing Review, and Amendments

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: Appendix II. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

Effective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board

Regulations of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) (Human Subjects Committee)

Florida State University IRB Standard Operational Procedures

Institutional Review Board - Restriction s Impo sed

Reliance on Independent/Central IRBs for Multicenter Clinical Trials

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date: 07/18/2011

Title: EXPEDITED IRB REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program

1. Review and approval of the consent document is a responsibility that FDA assigns to the IRB with jurisdiction

Collaborative Research

the HRPP Director will prepare a draft report within three (3) workdays after the IRB meeting at which the determination occurred.

COMPLIANCE MONITORING

Institutional Review Board Submission Requirement Presentation

Humanitarian Use Devices Made Simple

Policy Number: 42 Title: Investigational Devices Date of Last Revision: 06/12/2008; 07/22/2010; 05/29/2013; 05/01/2016; 10/16/2018

Section 8. Continuing Review of Ongoing IRB-Approved Research (Revised 7/1/10)

Date Effective 4/21/2008 Identification

Transcription:

Submitting Continuing Reviews and/or Amendments to the IRB Tufts-New England Medical Center Tufts University Health Sciences IRB Education Series 2006 Presentation may only be reused or reprinted with written permission from the Tufts-New England Medical Center/Tufts University IRB office.

What is continuing review? Periodic review of research previously approved by the IRB According to federal law the IRB must conduct continuing review at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk, but not less than once per year (45 CFR 46.109(e)) Also according to federal law the IRB may observe or have third party observe the consent process and the research. (45 CFR 46.109(e))

and why is it important? On going assessment of the research: Subject safety Compliance with the protocol Update of adverse events Propose amendments Revise and update study documents

Regulatory Interpretation Issued by the Government The regulations make no provision for any grace period extending the conduct of research beyond the expiration date of IRB approval.... Source: OHRP Compliance Activities: Common Findings and Guidance 9/1/2000 (Compliance Oversight Branch Division of Human Subjects Protection, OHRP) Please note that when continuing review does not occur by the date specified by the IRB, IRB approval expires automatically. [emphasis in original] Source: Letter to the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Michael Carome, M.D., OHRP Director, Division of Compliance Oversight in a letter dated October 19, 2000.

What does the IRB Consider at CR? Review is expected to be as rigorous as initial review Application of the Belmont Report Respect for Persons Informed consent Voluntary participation Freedom to withdraw from a study without penalty Protect privacy and confidentiality Beneficence Risks are minimized Benefits are maximized Risks are justified by potential benefits Conflicts of interest are managed or eliminated Justice Protection of vulnerable populations Those who may benefit are not excluded

Type of Review: Expedited or Full Studies initially granted expedited approval may qualify for expedited CR if there have been no changes to the research. Studies initially approved by full IRB review may be expedited if: The research is permanently closed to the enrollment of new subjects; All subjects have completed all research related interventions; and; The research remains active only for long-term follow-up of subjects; No subjects have been enrolled and no additional risks have been identified; The remaining research activities are limited to data analysis; The IRB determined and documented at a convened meeting that the research involves no greater than minimal risk and no additional risks have been identified.

Expedited or Full: How Is It Decided? Determined in IRB office, based on: Federal guidance Discretion of reviewer IRB office will process based on above.

Continuing Review Applications if the Study is Open to Enrollment (Full IRB Review) Form V Protocol current version ICF(s) version used over the past year, current copy Education requirements satisfied Advertisement(s) Questionnaire(s) Form II (drug/compound) Form III (device) Form IV (research radiation) Form VI (tissue-banking) Optional TB ICF HIPAA documentation

FORM V Submit an original and TWO (2) copies of all documentation (protocol, ICF(s), Forms II, III, IV, VI, as applicable, and all necessary supporting documentation) to the IRB office, Box 817. Please ensure that at least one set of copies is singlesided. If you wish to terminate a study (or close a completed study) because no further work will be done or if the study was never initiated please submit a Termination letter. This, and all forms submitted to the IRB office, should be typed. http://www.tufts.edu/central/research/msword/irb/formv%20ver%2014.doc

FORM V D. Mandatory Human Subject Protection Education Especially important if new research team members have been added (remember to revise other documents: protocol, ICF, etc.) The completion of the education modules is mandatory for each research team member. Research Team Members: Those who are responsible for the design, conduct, or reporting of this research, such as the Principal and Co-Investigators, Research Nurses and Coordinators, Project Managers, etc. Based on an individual s role (e.g., Co-I, coordinator) Education requirements and modules are accessible at: http://www.tufts.edu/central/research/irb.htm#req

OHRP Investigator 101 Barnes lectures Education Modules September lecture, Research Compliance: Basic Requirements and Accurate Record Keeping October lecture, Recognizing and Reporting Adverse Events During a Clinical Trial November lecture, The Impact of HIPAA on Clinical Research; OR lecture given by Steven D. Schwaitzberg, MD, A Practical Guide to HIPAA Issues for Research at T-NEMC and TUHS December lecture, What Researchers need to Know about Investigational Drugs and Devices under FDA Regulations (INDs/IDEs)

FORM V F. Subject Population Do you wish to request additional subjects: Yes No If yes: submit a revised protocol. Number of subjects enrolled since the last continuing review (if applicable): Total number of subjects enrolled to date (since study initiated): In the past year, have any subjects withdrawn their participation from the study? Yes No Briefly state the reason. In the past year, have any subjects been withdrawn by the PI or Sponsor? Yes No Briefly state the reason. Number of subjects that are being followed (if applicable):

FORM V J. Status Report: Has this research changed in any way since the last continuing review? Yes No If Yes, itemize the changes that have been approved. Are there revisions or changes that are being submitted with this application? Yes No Please attach a summary of any amendments, revisions, modifications to the research since the last review; any relevant multi-trial reports, any relevant recent literature, interim findings, or any other relevant information associated with the research.

FORM V K. Serious Adverse or Unanticipated Events Have there been any serious adverse events or unanticipated events at Tufts-NEMC/TUHS? Yes No If yes, attach a spread sheet or chart and address the events by itemizing all serious adverse events or unanticipated events that have occurred involving this research protocol since the initial review or the most recent continuing review. Does this research study have a Data and Safety Monitoring Board? Yes No If yes, attach the most recent DSMB report (if available).

Advertisements and Questionnaires All ads, questionnaires, pamphlets, summaries, etc., must be reviewed and approved by the IRB at CR All documents approved for use will be validated (stamped).

FORM II For any drug, substance, or biologic administered as part of the research. Don t leave ANY blank fields N/A Need the: Investigator s Brochure Package insert information don t send the actual insert! Micromedex printout MSDS sheets Reason for submission: updates, new information, etc. http://www.nemc.org/resadmin/forms/hirc/form2.doc

FORM III For any device used as part of the research. Don t leave ANY blank fields N/A If there is FDA correspondence/documentation, submit a copy Need the: Investigator s Brochure Operator's Manual User s Guide Reason for submission: updates, new information, etc. http://www.nemc.org/resadmin/forms/hirc/form3.doc

FORM IV For any radiation exposure as part of the research. X-ray CT scan Fluoroscopy PET scan Nuclear medicine scan Only needs to be submitted if there has been a change in research-related radiation exposure since last approval by the Radiation Safety Officer (RSO). If there hasn t been a change in research-related exposure, submit a cover letter signed by the Principal Investigator stating such and a copy of the last RSO signed Form IV. If a revised form is submitted it must be signed by the Radiation Safety Officer http://www.nemc.org/resadmin/forms/hirc/form4.doc

For any sample banking FORM VI Submit a copy of the tissue bank's written policies A copy of the optional tissue banking ICF version used over the last year version to be validated http://www.tufts.edu/central/research/msword/irb/formvi.doc

HIPAA Documentation Copy of the RAF or a letter signed by the PI that there have been no changes If a waiver was previously granted and < 50 records reviewed, etc: names > 50 records reviewed, etc: profile Submit names/profile to the HIPAA Privacy Officer for Research Jeffrey Weinstein (Tufts-NEMC) XXX (TUSDM)

If the Research is Closed to Enrollment (Original and 2 copies) Form V Protocol ICF(s) if anyone was enrolled in the past year Education requirements satisfied Questionnaire(s), or any other document(s) still being administered/used

Submitted: Reviewed for: Completeness Education requirements Conflict of Interest Info Accordance with federal and state regulations and institutional policies

Reviewed by the Full IRB Assigned to an IRB agenda Reviewer Assigned Reviewed at a convened IRB meeting IRB letter sent to PI within 2 weeks of the meeting if changes/clarifications are needed Approval letter is generated, signed, and sent to the PI.

Principal Investigator responds to IRB review requests for clarification/change: Submission is reviewed by expedited review procedures unless it s stipulated that it must return to the convened IRB If necessary, additional information, etc., is requested from the PI. Approval letter is generated, signed, and sent to the PI. IRB members are notified.

What If IRB Approval Lapses? Don t let it happen! Courtesy reminders are sent to the Principal Investigator If CR doesn't take place and IRB approval lapses, the research must stop all aspects (including follow-up and data analysis) The IRB will assess the medical interests of individual subjects and may determine interventions or interactions can continue (very limited circumstances). Enrollment of new subjects cannot occur after the expiration of IRB approval.

Amendments At Continuing Review Kills 2 birds with 1 stone Submit tracked and untracked copies of all documents Submit a detailed letter signed by the PI Explain rationale/need for changes New safety information Additional (or deleted) procedures Explain who initiated changes PI? Sponsor?

Continuing Review Common Problems Incomplete submission missing copies/documents ICF too technical or missing elements Required documents not provided Forms not complete or inaccurate/conflicting info on forms Signature of PI not provided Education requirements are not satisfied COI information is missing

Helpful Tips When Submitting Continuing Reviews Re-review ICF prior to submission Write ICF at an 8 th grade reading level. Address all issues if changes/clarifications are requested PI signatures present as required. If applicable, provide a copy of the grant. Provide requisite supporting documentation. Provide tracked and untracked copies of revised documents. Ensure all documents have a version date or number. Ensure education requirements are satisfied. Re-read information entered on the forms

Amendments Between Reviews Submit a detailed letter signed by the PI Explain rationale/need for changes New safety information SAE Additional (or deleted) procedures DSMB report/interim analysis Explain who initiated changes PI? Sponsor? Submit tracked and untracked copies of all documents

Things to Consider When Submitting Amendments Do study documents need to be revised? Protocol ICF Advertisements Which, if any, subjects does the amendment effect? Prospective/new subjects Those already enrolled and actively receiving intervention Those enrolled in the study no longer receiving intervention but still being followed? Detail the plan for notifying subjects Will everyone re-consent?

Common Problems With Amendments Incomplete submission Cover letter only revised protocol not provided Documents requiring revision (ICF, ads, questionnaires) not submitted Revised documents are too technical Signature of PI not provided Required documents not provided

More Information OHRP: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/ Guidance on Continuing Review (copy provided) http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/contrev2002.htm Code of Federal Regulations http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm ICF Tips http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/ictips.htm FDA: http://www.fda.gov/default.htm http://www.fda.gov/oc/ohrt/irbs/review.html http://www.irbforum.org/

IRB Leadership IRB Chair: David P. Chelmow, MD IRB Vice-Chairs: Edward L. Decker, PharmD Judith A. Frazier, RN, MEd Nicholas G. Guerina, MD, PhD IRB Members are from more than 17 divisions at Tufts-NEMC and Tufts University, including TUSM, TUSDM, HNRCA, etc., and community representatives who are not affiliated with either institution.

IRB office IRB Admin. and Operations Manager: Jennifer A. Graf IRB Coordinators: Julie Morelli Novak (IRB-RED) Elizabeth Kervis (IRB-BLUE) Continuing Review Coordinators: André Briola TBA Assistant IRB Coordinator: Kelly J. Shipman Administrative Assistant: Jennifer C. Coes

IRB Office Box 817 (617) 636-7512 http://www.tufts.edu/central/research/irb.htm