Recreational Fishing License Sales in Florida:

Similar documents
Population workforce, and employment in Florida :

FWC DEER HARVEST SURVEY: FINAL REPORT

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Property Tax Oversight 2008 Taxable Value of Real Property by Category Part 1

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Property Tax Oversight 2009 Taxable Value of Real Property by Category - Part 1

FWC DEER HARVEST SURVEY: FINAL REPORT

2018 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY

Single Point of Contacts for the Release of Children s Foster Care Records

Marine Recreational and Commercial Industries and Activities in Lee and Charlotte Counties: Economic Consequences and Impacts

The Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in the Everglades Region

2008 Florida Alligator Hunting Survey Report

Florida LAKEWATCH Expanding to the Coast? CITIZEN'SCIENCE'SINCE'1986'

FEMA-4337-DR-FL Geospatial Information Unit (GIU)

FEMA-4337-DR-FL Geospatial Information Unit (GIU)

JERRY D. PARRISH, PH.D. Chief Economist Florida Chamber

0 / FEMA-4337-DR-FL Geospatial Information Unit (GIU)

Status and Trends Report: 2012 Penaeid Shrimp Species Account FL FWCC FWRI SEDAR-PW6-RD July 2014

San Patricio County Guided Fishing Market Research

Economic Impact of the Recreational Marine Industry Broward, Miami-Dade, and Palm Beach Counties, Florida

Recreational Saltwater Fishing Industry Trends and Economic Impact January 2007

Economic Contribution of the 2018 Recreational Red Snapper Season in the South Atlantic

Economic Analysis of Marine Recreational Fishing at NOAA Fisheries

Nueces County Guided Fishing Market Research

Mike Murphy Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission St Petersburg, FL

Public Transit Tips on How to Use Transportation Options in Florida

Final Report, October 19, Socioeconomic characteristics of reef users

OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION IN THE MATTER OF: CASE NO.: ORDER

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Washington

Black Seabass Length Frequencies and Condition of Released Fish from At-Sea Headboat Observer Surveys, 2004 to 2010.

Ohio Sea Grant ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LAKE ERIE ON NORTHERN OHIO. Ohio State University Sea Grant Program. AGI HDlOl. no.604. c.6

Angling in Manitoba (2000)

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

Reportable Boating Accidents photo detail

The Economic Significance of Florida Bay. Dr. Andrew Stainback GEER April Coral Springs, Florida

2015 Florida Black Bear Hunt Summary Report

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Oregon

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the Matagorda Bay System

Alligator Harvest Unit Maps

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the San Antonio Bay System

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in TEXAS. Prepared by:

Economic Analysis of Recreational Fishing in the Proposed GRNMS Research Area Updated April,

FLORIDA RESIDENTS OPINIONS ON BLACK BEARS AND BLACK BEAR MANAGEMENT

Summer Flounder. Wednesday, April 26, Powered by

Basic Information Everyone Should Know

The 2001 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in MISSOURI. Prepared by:

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL SALTWATER FISHING ON THE LOUISIANA ECONOMY

General Interest Highway Statistics Source Book

August 3, Prepared by Rob Cheshire 1 & Joe O Hop 2. Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research Beaufort, NC

DIVISION OF FRESHWATER FISHERIES MANAGEMENT TOTAL IN-STATE FISH HATCHERY PRODUCTION FISH DISTRIBUTION FOR FY

DIVISION OF FRESHWATER FISHERIES MANAGEMENT TOTAL IN-STATE FISH HATCHERY PRODUCTION FISH DISTRIBUTION FOR FY

Economics of Large (>200 anglers) Fishing Tournaments at Lake Fork, Texas

PRESENTATION TO THE BRITISH COLUMBIA LEGISALTIVE STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE September 26, 2013

VALUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE APALACHICOLA BAY MARINE ECONOMY

Independent Economic Analysis Board. Review of the Estimated Economic Impacts of Salmon Fishing in Idaho. Task Number 99

PRESENTERS / CONTACTS LIST

Go to Reference with Economic Statistics for US by Region and State. NOAA summary of fisheries of the US by state

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in NORTH CAROLINA. Prepared by:

New Sportfishing Data and Industry Trends

Violation Summary photo detail Top picture

Emergency Action on Regulations

Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

Unless otherwise noted, images throughout the presentation are by FWC.

Re: Algae/Cyanobacteria Bloom in St. Lucie, Martin, Palm Beach and Lee Counties.

Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

BOATING ACCIDENTS STATISTICAL REPORT

The Economics of Atlantic Highly Migratory Species For-Hire Fishing Trips July - November 2013 Clifford Hutt and George Silva

Total Fish Hatchery Production: FY

Angling in Manitoba Survey of Recreational Angling

Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve. Team OCEAN at Rookery Bay

Virginia s saltwater recreational fisheries:

Marine fishing tourism in Norway. Structure and economic effects

Goliath grouper management stakeholder project. Kai Lorenzen, Jessica Sutt, Joy Hazell, Bryan Fluech, Martha Monroe University of Florida

SPORTING HERITAGE. Fueling the American Economy 2018 EDITION

2012 Maryland FMP Report (July 2013) Section 15. Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus)

The University of Georgia

Angler Spending on Fishing-related Durable Goods: Results from the 2014 Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey

Estimates of Historic Recreational Landings of Vermilion Snapper in the South Atlantic Using the FHWAR Census Method. Ken Brennan SEDAR 55-WP04

Registry of Certified Court Interpreters Haitian Creole Language

Estimates of Historic Recreational Landings of Red Snapper in the South Atlantic Using the FHWAR Census Method SEDAR 41-DW17

Section 13. Parks and Recreation (PR)

Economic Impact of Hunting Expenditures on Southern U.S

ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SPORTFISHING IN ALASKA

The Economic Impact of Recreational Tarpon Fishing in the Caloosahatchee River and Charlotte Harbor Region of Florida

Discussion Paper: Consideration of a Registration for Self-Guided Halibut Rental Boats

Hook Selectivity in Gulf of Mexico Gray Triggerfish when using circle or J Hooks

Section 12. Information Technology (IT)

Estimates of Historic Recreational Landings of Red Snapper in the South Atlantic Using the FHWAR Census Method SEDAR41-DW17 DRAFT

Registry of Certified Court Interpreters Haitian Creole Language

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Wyoming. Bait

Third Grade Manatee Curriculum Lesson 12: Pollution and Other Threats to Manatees 1

Historical and planned changes in the south Florida ecosystem 1

Integration of Sustainable Development on Long Island s Coastal Industries 1

Florida stone crab, Menippe mercenaria, and gulf stone crab, M. adina

The Economic Gains from Reallocating Specific Saltwater Fisheries

Chapter Saltwater Fishing Regulations

Wildlife Viewing in Utah: Participation &

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Agency Overview. Appropriations Subcommittee on Natural and Economic Resources February 22, 2011

The Economic Impacts of Carolina Beach Inlet Navigability

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Slot Utilization/Residential Programs Report February 03, 2010

Kissimmee Valley Livestock Show 64th ANNUAL STATE 4-H DAIRY SHOW February 10-13, Schedule of Events

Transcription:

Recreational Fishing License Sales in Florida: 1990-2000 1 Kristina Stephan and Chuck Adams 2 Introduction The recreational fishing industry is an important natural resource-based industry in Florida. The tradition of recreational fishing is intrinsically linked with Florida's identity, whether it is bass fishing in the Chain of Lakes region or fishing from a charter boat in the Florida Keys. The number of saltwater anglers in Florida exceeds that of any other state in the nation (United States Department of Commerce, NMFS). During 1999, an estimated 2.4 million anglers went on 19.5 million saltwater recreational fishing trips. These anglers harvested 60 million saltwater fish, while an additional 75 million fish were caught and released. In addition, Florida ranks eighth among all states in terms of the number of freshwater anglers. During 1996 (the most recent data available), a total of 1.1 million anglers engaged in freshwater fishing activities in Florida, spending 18.4 million days fishing while taking 16.5 million freshwater fishing trips (United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service). The various economic activities associated with recreational fishing in Florida generate considerable contributions to Florida's economy. Individuals engaged in recreational fishing purchase a wide variety of fishing gear and supplies, including everything from fishing tackle to fishing boats. Expenditures associated with a given trip include bait, lodging, fuel, and clothing. These expenditures are made by both resident and non-resident anglers. The latter group contributes true economic impact to the Florida economy by bringing new money into the state. The freshwater recreational fishing industry is estimated to generate approximately $1 billion in economic activity to the Florida economy, while creating 18,729 jobs throughout the state. The saltwater recreational industry is much larger, generating $4.7 billion in economic activity while creating 56,270 jobs. The state of Florida has required the purchase of freshwater fishing licenses for many years. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fe302 (1 of 8) [10/9/2002 7:46:02 AM]

Licenses are currently required for residents and non-residents fishing in freshwater or saltwater. However the saltwater fishing license is a relatively new requirement, having been implemented in 1989. With several exceptions such as fishing from shore or bridge/pier, anyone engaging in recreational saltwater angling must have a saltwater fishing license. This applies to both Florida residents and non-residents. The purpose of this publication is to briefly document the trends in recreational fishing license sales in Florida. License sales data used in the analysis were obtained from the Bureau of Licensing and Permitting, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC). Trends in License Sales During the 1999-2000 fiscal year, a total of 1,532,000 fishing licenses were sold in Florida. The total value of license sales to the FFWCC during that period was $19.6 million. Of this amount, $7.7 million were associated with non-resident license sales, while $11.9 million were attributed to resident license sales. Disaggregated another way, $12.2 million were generated by saltwater license sales, while the remaining $7.4 million was generated by freshwater license sales. Saltwater License Sales Sales of both resident and non-resident saltwater licenses have followed an upward trend over the last 10 years ( Figure 1 ). Florida offers a 12-month resident saltwater license, and 12-month, 7-day, and 3-day non-resident saltwater licenses. Sales of resident saltwater licenses increased from 513,000 units during the 1990-1991 fiscal year to 602,000 units during 1999-2000. Non-resident saltwater license sales have also followed an upward trend over the last 10 years, increasing from 270,000 units in 1990-1991 to 404,000 units during 1999-2000. This represents an increase of 50%, a much more dramatic increase than exhibited by the 17% increase in resident saltwater license sales over the same period. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fe302 (2 of 8) [10/9/2002 7:46:02 AM]

Figure 1. Ten-year trends for recreational fishing license units sold in Florida. Freshwater License Sales Sales of resident and non-resident freshwater licenses have exhibited divergent trends during the 10-year period from 1990-1991 to 1999-2000 ( Figure 1 ). Unit sales of resident freshwater licenses have decreased from 459,000 units in 1990-1991 to 396,00 units in 1999-2000. This represents a 14% decrease over the 10-year period. Non-resident freshwater license sales have remained steady. Unit sales of non-resident freshwater licenses decreased from 158,000 units in 1990-1991 to 129,000 units in 1995-1996, then increased to 163,000 units in 1998-1999, only to decrease yet again to a 10-year low of 131,000 units in 1999-2000. Unit Sales by County Sales of recreational fishing licenses vary considerably from county to county in Florida. And as expected, sales of saltwater licenses are highest in coastal counties, while freshwater license sales are dominated by sales in the inland counties, with a few notable exceptions. The top ten http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fe302 (3 of 8) [10/9/2002 7:46:02 AM]

counties in terms of resident saltwater license sales (revenue and units) during 1999-2000 are shown in Tables 1 through 4. Note that the counties are ranked based on revenue, not unit sales, although both data series are shown. Given that there are non-resident licenses of different duration and price, the rank ordering of the top ten counties by units sold for non-resident licenses may not mirror the ordering based on revenue (i.e., relatively more units of the lesser valued, short-term licenses may be have been sold). Resident Saltwater Licenses The top ten counties in terms of resident saltwater license revenue are shown in Table 1. Since there is only one type of resident saltwater license, counties have the same ranking either by revenue or units sold. Monroe County led the state with $401,884 (33,487 units sold). Note that all of the counties are coastal, and six of the counties are located on the east coast (Monroe County is considered a west coast county in terms of state and federal fisheries management). None of the counties are located in the Panhandle region of Florida. These top ten counties represent 46% of the total revenue generated by resident saltwater license sales in Florida. Non-Resident Saltwater Licenses The top ten counties in terms of non-resident license revenue are shown in Table 2. Again, Monroe County led the state in non-resident saltwater license sales, with $599,140 (45,543 units sold). These values exceed resident saltwater licenses both in terms of revenue and units sold by almost 50%, emphasizing the importance of the tourist industry to Monroe County's recreational fishing industry. Again, all of the top ten counties are coastal. However, all ten of the counties are located on the west coast. Three of the counties are located in the Panhandle region of the state. These top ten counties represent 71% of the total revenue generated by non-resident saltwater license sales in Florida. Resident Freshwater Licenses The top ten counties in terms of resident freshwater license revenue are shown in Table 3. The rank ordering on the basis of revenue and units sold are identical. Polk County led the state in terms of resident freshwater license sales, with $322,056 (26,838 units sold). In contrast to the saltwater licenses sales, only five of the top ten counties are coastal, with most counties located in the central Florida region. A notable exception is Broward County. These top ten counties represent 51% of the total revenue generated by resident freshwater license sales in Florida. Non-Resident Freshwater Licenses The top ten counties in terms of non-resident freshwater fishing licenses are shown in Table 4. Okeechobee County is the most important county, with non-resident license sales of $319,470 (14,724 units sold). Of the top ten counties, only one is a coastal county. And with the exception of Marion and Putnam Counties, all the remaining counties are located in the south central Florida region. These top ten counties represent 54% of the total revenue generated by http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fe302 (4 of 8) [10/9/2002 7:46:02 AM]

non-resident freshwater license sales in Florida. Conclusion The recreational fishing industry generates considerable economic activity in the Florida economy. Approximately $5.7 billion in economic activity and 75,000 jobs result from this important natural resource-based industry. Sales of 1.5 million recreational fishing licenses during the 1999-2000 fiscal year generated $19.6 million in revenue for the FFWCC. The majority of the saltwater licenses were sold in coastal counties, primarily in south Florida, while inland counties in the south central region of the state accounted for the majority of freshwater fishing licenses. Sales of non-resident recreational fishing licenses ($7.7 million) represent 40% of the total recreational fishing revenue and provide some insight into the importance of angling by tourists in Florida. References Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Unpublished licenses sales data. Bureau of Licensing and Permitting, Tallahassee, FL. 2001. United States Department of Commerce. Fisheries of the United States, 1999. Current Fishery Statistics Number 9900. Silver Springs, MD: National Marine Fisheries Service. 2000. United States Department of the Interior. National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation, FHW/96-FL. Bethesda, MD: Fish and Wildlife Service. 1996. Tables Table 1. Top ten counties: resident saltwater fishing license sales, 1999-2000 fiscal year. Rank Florida Counties Monroe 1 2 Dade 3 Pinellas Resident Saltwater Fishing License Revenue Units ($) 401,844 33,487 393,384 32,782 392,676 32,723 4 Hillsborough 374,316 31,193 http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fe302 (5 of 8) [10/9/2002 7:46:02 AM]

5 6 7 8 9 10 Duval Broward Palm Beach Brevard Lee Volusia 340,908 28,409 335,424 27,952 319,819 26,655 282,156 23,513 266,376 22,198 208,836 17,403 Table 2. Top ten counties: non-resident saltwater fishing license sales, 1999-2000 fiscal year. Rank Florida Counties Non-Resident Saltwater Fishing License Revenue ($) Units 1 Monroe 599,140 45,543 2 Lee 454,395 32,486 3 Collier 335,620 22,297 4 Bay 313,945 31,737 5 Charlotte 260,110 16,709 6 Sarasota 214,730 16,347 7 Pinellas 209,975 16,337 8 Okaloosa 176,820 18,980 9 Manatee 163,545 11,275 10 Franklin 154,525 16,559 Table 3. Top ten counties: resident freshwater fishing license sales, 1999-2000 fiscal year. Rank Florida Counties Resident Freshwater Fishing License Revenue ($) Units 1 Polk 322,056 26,838 2 Broward 249,588 20,799 http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fe302 (6 of 8) [10/9/2002 7:46:02 AM]

3 Hillsborough 237,504 19,792 4 Orange 218,244 18,187 5 Duval 210,240 17,520 6 Palm Beach 200,928 16,744 7 Marion 182,940 15,425 8 Volusia 140,604 11,717 9 Seminole 128,568 10,714 10 Lake 128,508 10,709 Table 4. Top ten counties: non-resident freshwater fishing license sales, 1999-2000 fiscal year. Rank Florida Counties Non-Resident Freshwater Fishing License Revenue ($) Units 1 Okeechobee 319,470 14,724 2 Polk 208,200 9,979 3 Osceola 143,040 7,804 4 Lake 140,850 6,415 5 Putnam 124,755 6,287 6 Hendry 118,950 6,482 7 Volusia 115,730 6,017 8 Highlands 112,480 4,784 9 Glades 96,660 4,879 10 Marion 90,620 4,957 Footnotes 1. This is EDIS document FE 302, a publication of the Department of Food and Resource Economics, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Published September 2001. Please visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Kristina Stephan, graduate assistant, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, and Chuck Adams, professor, Department of Food and Resource Economics, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences is an equal opportunity/affirmative action http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fe302 (7 of 8) [10/9/2002 7:46:02 AM]

employer authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function without regard to race color, sex, age, handicap, or national origin. For information on obtaining other extension publications, contact your county Cooperative Extension Service office. Florida Cooperative Extension Service / Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences / University of Florida / Christine Taylor Waddill, Dean Copyright Information This document is copyrighted by the University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS) for the people of the State of Florida. UF/IFAS retains all rights under all conventions, but permits free reproduction by all agents and offices of the Cooperative Extension Service and the people of the State of Florida. Permission is granted to others to use these materials in part or in full for educational purposes, provided that full credit is given to the UF/IFAS, citing the publication, its source, and date of publication. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fe302 (8 of 8) [10/9/2002 7:46:02 AM]