welcome from the editor

welcome from the editor It seems hard to believe but StatFox just had its 10th anniversary this past May. That means we have spent a decade providing our customers with what we believe is the most powerful sports gaming information available anywhere. The 10 years sure went by quickly though, and a lot has certainly changed in the company and the industry during that time. It s been a great ride, and one of the things I have enjoyed most in being part of the StatFox experience has been in leading our annual football magazine, the StatFox Edge. Not only has the title grown in quality, readership and even the number of titles, but for 2010, we ve also bulked up the football preview publication. Readers asked for more background material on each of the college and pro teams, and we have obliged. This year s StatFox Edge Football Annual has ballooned to an all-time high of 160 pages! We hope you agree that it is a 160-page Ultimate Handicapping Resource jam-packed with only materials that can help you handicap and win this football season. We receive loads of feedback every year, and for the most part, all of our readers want a short list of things, most notably the widely regarded StatFox Trends, the team previews and predictions, and some new winning strategies to employ. We believe we have covered all of those bases once again. In addition to the features you ve come to expect in a football betting preview publications such as stats, game logs, and historical records, here are some of the more powerful pieces you ll want to digest: - Handicapping Streaks in College & Pro Football (pg 2) Evaluating streaks and waves of momentum are such a key factor in handicapping football games. In this year s feature piece, StatFox looks at how much streaks can affect a team s ability to win and/or cover the spread in its next game. - Evaluating Predictive Power of Key Stats & Strength Ratings (pg 45) Evaluating statistics is an essential part of nearly everyone s football handicapping routine. While no two bettors think alike when it comes to what stats or ratings they feel are most important, they can at least agree that SOMETHING is. We help you determine that SOMETHING. - Top Weekly Head-to-Head Football Trends (pgs 46-47) For the third straight season, a week-by-week revealing of the most potent head-to-head patterns that have developed over the years between opponents. - Numerous College Coaching Changes to Impact the 2010 Season (pg 118) This past offseason saw 22 different universities make changes in their football head coaching position. How will these affect the immediate fortunes of the programs? Doug Upston offers his take on the subject. - College Football Stability Chart (pg 141) What began as a simple research article in 2005 has grown into a yearly phenomenon. This charts lets readers quickly dissect which college teams are most and least stable heading into the season. - Analyzing Public Betting Percentage (pg 158) One of the hottest new trends in sports handicapping has grown from a resource now being offered up by sportsbooks themselves, betting percentage breakdowns. We take a look at the past 2-1/2 years of college and pro football to determine if any advantage can be found from utilizing this interesting data. Almost every bit of information in this magazine is dedicated to HANDICAPPING football. I always urge our readers to avoid confusing themselves by handicapping football with other publications that focus on fantasy sports or take a more mainstream view of the sport. They simply won t have what it takes to help you succeed as a football bettor. With that in mind, we ll gladly put the StatFox Edge products head-to-head against any competition when it comes to making you a more knowledgeable and profitable handicapper! If you d like to see more of this type of information every week, be sure to fill out and return the Platinum Sheet subscription form on the back of this magazine, or simply call our subscription office at 1-877-514-4220. As has become tradition in my welcome note, I always like to dig back through my e-mail from the past football season to reread the testimonials we receive. Here is one of my favorites: I kept track of your top weekly head-to-head football trends and they won over 62%. Thanks, but as a fellow businessman, you guys are doing yourselves a disservice charging less than $10 for the magazine! ~ James Mequon, WI WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 1 So enjoy the magazine, as well as the upcoming season on the gridiron. When you get the chance, give us a visit online, either at StatFox.com or FoxSheets.com. Steve Makinen Editor-in-Chief Matt Devine Creative Director Vic Denicola, Jared Tropp Senior Editors Doug Upstone, Bill Doherty, M.R. Holden, Jeff Makinen, Mark Hurlman, Kurt Kragthorpe, Adam Perkowsky, and Rich Thomaselli Contributing Writers John Mitchell IT Director 2010 STATFOX EDGE FOOTBALL ANNUAL Handicapping Streaks in College & Pro Football...2 2010 NFL Outlook...4 AFC East Preview...5 AFC North Preview...10 AFC South Preview...15 AFC West Preview...20 NFC East Preview...25 NFC North Preview...30 NFC South Preview...35 NFC West Preview...40 Evaluating Predictive Power of Key Stats & Strength Ratings...45 Top Weekly Head-to-Head Football Trends...46 2010 College Football Outlook...48 ACC Preview...50 SEC Preview...60 Big 12 Preview...70 Big Ten Preview...80 Big East Preview...90 Pac-10 Preview...98 Independents Preview...108 Mountain West Preview...110 Numerous College Coaching Changes to Impact the 2010 Season...118 Conference USA Preview...120 MAC Preview...130 College Football Stability Handicapping Chart...141 WAC Preview...142 Sun Belt Preview...150 Analyzing the Public Betting Percentages...158 The 2010 StatFox Edge Football Annual is published by Daily Racing Form LLC, Located at 708 Third Avenue 12th Floor, New York, NY 10017. Copyright 2010 by Daily Racing Form LLC. All right reserved. Printed in USA. Printed by Expedi Printing, Inc., 1300 Metropolitan Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11237. Daily Racing Form LLC reserves the right to accept or deny any paid advertisements and is not responsible for any contracts entered in with such advertisers. President: Jim Kostas Vice President Custom Publishing: Duke Dosik THIS PUBLICATION IS NOT SPONSORED OR AUTHORIZED BY ANY ATHLETIC CONFERENCE NOR HOLDER OF ANY TRADEMARK OR SERVICE MARK. ALL TEAM NAMES AND LOGOS ARE TRADEMARKS OF THE TEAMS INDICATED. THIS PUBLICATION MAKES NO REPRESENTATION AS TO WHETHER ONLINE GAMING IS LEGAL IN YOUR JURISDICTION. PLEASE CHECK WITH YOUR LOCAL AUTHORITIES. ALL INFORMATION IS FOR NEWS MATTER ONLY. ** Whether you ve read the StatFox Edge in past years or this is your first time, we d love to hear from you. We take the criticisms just as seriously as the compliments too. So be honest, let us know what you think. Send all comments to editor@statfox.com. INDEX

handicapping streaks in college & pro football by Steve Makinen BETTING THE NFL One of the most important aspects of success nowadays in any level of football is momentum. Winning or losing steaks can create a confidence, or lack thereof, which can bring a team together or tear it apart in just a short time. Naturally, when it comes to betting, how a team is currently playing has a lot to do with how a handicapper looks at a game. The unfortunate part is that this factor also makes up a large part of how oddsmakers set the prices for games. In most cases, when a team gets hot or cold throughout a season, the streak is magnified by media types to the point of oversaturation. This can often lead to unfounded perceptions about teams which in turn lead to over- or underinflating of betting lines. Of course, this is the point where savvy bettors can pick up value. It is for this reason that the handicapper should have a good idea of how much a winning or losing streak can affect the outcome of the next game. With that in mind, I m here to look at winning and losing streaks in both college and pro football, and whether or not there are any points during a streak which offer good systematic betting spots against the number. To complete this study, I took the last five seasons of game logs for every college and pro football team and determined what type of streak that team was on heading into each particular contest. I looked for anything from a game to 13 games, both straight up and against the spread. You ll see from the results below that there are indeed some good fundamental strategies you ll want to consider this season as you analyze teams recent performance. Note that all of the streaks considered were SAME SEASON streaks and there were no carry-over angles considered. After all, it s hard to carry momentum throughout seven or eight months of offseason workouts and personnel changeover. College Football Results The chart just below shows the results of college football teams over the last five years when going into a game on a winning or losing streak, straight up or against the spread. I ve started at as little as a 1-game streak. In other words, for the first row, if a team lost its last game against the spread, but won its prior game, it s records in the various situations are shown on that row, along with a trend of at least 60% ATS success or worse than 40%. If a team has lost its last two games against the spread, its results will be in row two. Of course, you should consider both SU & ATS streaks when analyzing each club, and there are subtle differences in the results. There are some fundamental concepts you should pick up when analyzing the college results chart. First and foremost, there is a point where it doesn t make a whole lot of sense to consider betting teams on measureable losing streaks. That point is about four games, either straight up or against the spread. At no point beyond this do the clubs produce at a winning rate any longer. College football is very different from the NFL in this regard. In the NFL, the game is much more situational, and depending upon the scheduling spot or oddsmaker motivation, teams can bounce back quickly when assumed dead. In college, teams that lose many games in a row can sometimes pack it in if for no other reason than having lost all confidence. In a shorter season, it is hard to get back. Never, and I repeat never should a bettor lay points with a team on a significant straight up losing streak in college football, as you can see from the chart that any team playing as a favorite that has lost its last five games is just 18-36 ATS (33%) over the last five seasons. ATS Records of Streaking COLLEGE FOOTBALL Teams Overall At Home Road/Neutral As Fav or Pick As Underdogs ATS Streak ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) Trend ATS L1 838-891 (48%) 394-437 (47%) 444-454 (49%) 420-445 (49%) 418-446 (48%) * 41-59 ATS (41%) as double-digit home underdog ATS L2 431-370 (54%) 210-178 (54%) 221-192 (54%) 194-178 (52%) 237-192 (55%) * 34-18 ATS (65%) as favorites of 20-points or more ATS L3 166-157 (51%) 66-83 (44%) 100-74 (57%) 68-68 (50%) 98-89 (52%) * 64-37 ATS (63%) as road dogs of less than 20-points ATS L4 65-78 (45%) 27-34 (44%) 38-44 (46%) 21-29 (42%) 44-49 (47%) * 7-13 ATS (35%) as single-digit road underdog ATS L5 28-36 (44%) 11-16 (41%) 17-20 (46%) 12-14 (46%) 16-22 (42%) * 5-10 ATS (33%) as home underdogs ATS L6 12-18 (40%) 6-10 (38%) 6-8 (43%) 2-8 (20%) 10-10 (50%) ATS L7 or more 12-16 (43%) 6-6 (50%) 6-10 (38%) 5-4 (56%) 7-12 (37%) * 3-8 ATS (27%) as home favorites ATS W1 888-829 (52%) 415-385 (52%) 473-444 (52%) 434-458 (49%) 454-371 (55%) * 63-41 ATS (61%) as home favs of 23-points or more ATS W2 389-410 (49%) 195-199 (49%) 194-211 (48%) 207-233 (47%) 182-177 (51%) * 32-64 ATS (33%) as road favorites of 6-points or more ATS W3 169-187 (47%) 80-88 (48%) 89-99 (47%) 103-104 (50%) 66-83 (44%) * 17-30 ATS (36%) as double-digit road dogs ATS W4 71-80 (47%) 32-30 (52%) 39-50 (44%) 44-51 (46%) 27-29 (48%) * 15-34 ATS (31%) in road games w/ single-digit lines ATS W5 34-28 (55%) 17-18 (49%) 17-10 (63%) 25-18 (58%) 9-10 (47%) * 12-4 ATS as favorites of 7-points or less ATS W6 18-15 (55%) 8-6 (57%) 10-9 (53%) 12-10 (55%) 6-5 (55%) ATS W7 or more 9-12 (43%) 5-5 (50%) 4-7 (36%) 9-8 (53%) 0-4 (0%) * 3-6 ATS (33%) as single-digit road underdogs Overall At Home Road/Neutral As Fav or Pick As Underdogs ATS Streak ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) Trend SU L1 715-780 (48%) 343-401 (46%) 372-379 (50%) 352-397 (47%) 363-383 (49%) * 99-138 ATS (42%) as home chalk of 10-points or less SU L2 371-328 (53%) 192-171 (53%) 179-157 (53%) 153-130 (54%) 218-198 (52%) * 41-24 ATS (63%) as single-digit road favorites SU L3 170-165 (51%) 68-77 (47%) 102-88 (54%) 44-45 (49%) 126-120 (51%) * 14-6 ATS (70%) as double-digit home favorites SU L4 88-99 (47%) 46-48 (49%) 42-51 (45%) 24-19 (56%) 64-80 (44%) * 17-27 ATS (39%) as road dogs of 15-points or less SU L5 57-60 (49%) 29-38 (43%) 28-22 (56%) 9-17 (35%) 48-43 (53%) * 24-11 ATS (69%) as double-digit road dogs SU L6 35-41 (46%) 17-17 (50%) 18-24 (43%) 4-8 (33%) 31-33 (48%) SU L7 or more 54-63 (46%) 24-32 (43%) 30-31 (49%) 5-11 (31%) 49-52 (49%) * 18-36 ATS (33%) if favored after losing 5+ SU in a row SU W1 796-751 (51%) 363-340 (52%) 433-411 (51%) 386-403 (49%) 410-348 (54%) * 38-16 ATS (70%) as home underdogs of >13 points SU W2 413-378 (52%) 204-172 (54%) 209-206 (50%) 254-236 (52%) 159-142 (53%) * 44-26 ATS (63%) as home favs of 21-points or more SU W3 201-249 (45%) 95-108 (47%) 106-141 (43%) 126-169 (43%) 75-80 (48%) * 17-33 ATS (34%) as double-digit road favorites SU W4 127-127 (50%) 48-55 (47%) 79-72 (52%) 86-94 (48%) 41-33 (55%) * 16-7 ATS (70%) as road dogs of 7-points or more SU W5 70-82 (46%) 28-45 (38%) 42-37 (53%) 50-58 (46%) 20-24 (45%) * 3-11 ATS (21%) as home underdogs SU W6 54-41 (57%) 21-12 (64%) 33-29 (53%) 43-33 (57%) 11-8 (58%) SU W7 or more 107-80 (57%) 49-34 (59%) 58-46 (56%) 93-73 (56%) 14-7 (67%) * 33-14 ATS as home favorites of 20-points or more 2 WWW.STATFOX.COM

Also, there is a noticeable difference in a team losing its last game against the spread and a team losing its last two games ATS. The latter has exhibited a much greater chance to cover the next game, by a margin of about six percent. That is the difference between winning and losing in betting, and the advantage typically comes from oddsmakers setting prices against the team that has failed to live up to bettors expectations in consecutive weeks. Teams that win numerous games in a row either outright or against the spread have proven to be a solid wager in college football, again contradictory to what happens in the NFL. Overall, if a team has won six or more straight games at the college level, they are a 57% wager in the next contest, and even better at home. If you can catch these teams as underdogs at any point in the streak, the chances of a winning wager are even better. As you look more closely at the results from the college football chart, be sure to analyze the differences in performance when it comes to being at home or on the road, when playing as a favorite or underdog, etc. As you can see from the shaded areas, there are plenty of situational spots to take advantage of this season. Also, the column labeled Trend has even better angles to utilize, more specific to line ranges. Winning in wagering college football can be as simple as calculating what a line should be by most strength indicators and recognizing difference against the actual numbers. In many cases, these differences are built upon perceptions created by winning or losing streaks. Hopefully the chart above better prepares you for gauging the importance of such streaks this fall. NFL Results To reiterate a point made earlier, the NFL tends to be a much more situational game when it comes to the pointspread than college, which is more often predicated upon raw strength indicators. For that reason, you ll notice on the chart below that many of the more successful wagers when handicapping streaks in pro football come when backing teams who have been playing losing football of late. This can best be explained by the old adage the pointspread is the great equalizer. If you look at the column titled Overall, you ll notice a distinct pattern about the ATS success rate of teams going into games on losing streaks. Basically, the more games a team loses in a row against the spread, the better bet they are in the next outing. In fact, there is a Sweet Spot if you will, any team that has dropped its last four games or more against the spread is about a 60% wager. They are especially profitable when playing on the road and/ or as an underdog. The first row of both the ATS and Straight Up losing streak grids indicate an interesting trend in NFL betting, that being there is a better chance of a team winning on the road than at home when that team either lost or failed to cover in the previous week. That thought is certainly contradictory to the home field rebound advantage line of thinking. In fact, if you spot the first trend in the ATS losing streak chart, you ll see that these teams are just 28-45 ATS as home favorites of more than 7-points. In other words, don t lay big points with a home team that failed to cover its prior game. In general, once a NFL team has lost two or more games in a row against the spread, it does become a more profitable wager when playing at home. That is an important break to recognize. If you recall, the highly successful teams in college football, or those on lengthy straight up winning streaks, prove to be a solid wager. Such is not the case at the pro level, as oddsmakers price these teams out of fairmarket value, knowing full-well that public bettors will continue to back them regardless of the price. Most interesting in this phenomena though is the stark contrast in the success rates at home and on the road. When NFL teams have won their last five games or more since 05, they are a 47% wager in the next contest. However, at home they are just a 38% spreadbeater. On the road, they are a lucrative 56%. Don t get caught making the assumption that they are a 3-5 point better team at home. The best teams prove to be just as effective away from home. Finally, again don t forget to study the trends list on the right hand column of the NFL chart. There are specific motivational situations that cause teams to either bounce back or continue to flounder, and in many cases, it s simply because oddsmakers have gone too far or not far enough in setting their lines. For instance, on the row tagged SU W3, home teams on a 3-game winning streak have played well as either a dog or small favorite, perhaps motivated by a lack of respect on the betting board. Alternatively, on the row tagged SU L2, teams that have lost their last two games are a great wager as a road favorite in the next game, fueling the conspiracy theorists who believe the oddsmakers know something. Perhaps they do BETTING THE NFL ATS Records of Streaking NFL Teams Overall At Home Road/Neutral As Fav or Pick As Underdogs ATS Streak ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) Trend ATS L1 312-336 (48%) 138-178 (44%) 174-158 (52%) 154-165 (48%) 158-171 (48%) * 28-45 ATS (38%) as home favorites of >7 points ATS L2 161-147 (52%) 84-72 (54%) 77-75 (51%) 75-65 (54%) 86-82 (51%) * 42-27 (61%) as home favorites of >3 points ATS L3 66-64 (51%) 38-33 (54%) 28-31 (47%) 32-29 (52%) 34-35 (49%) * 12-18 ATS (40%) as road dogs of 5.5 or more points ATS L4 33-25 (57%) 14-13 (52%) 19-12 (61%) 7-11 (39%) 26-14 (65%) * 15-5 ATS (75%) as home underdogs ATS L5 or more 18-11 (62%) 10-5 (67%) 8-6 (57%) 6-4 (60%) 12-7 (63%) * 13-3 ATS (81%) as road dogs of less than 7-points ATS W1 326-322 (50%) 162-170 (49%) 164-152 (52%) 173-171 (50%) 153-151 (50%) * 28-8 ATS (78%) as home favorites of -9 to -11.5 points ATS W2 148-157 (49%) 77-80 (49%) 71-77 (48%) 77-86 (47%) 71-71 (50%) * 21-36 ATS (37%) as road favorites ATS W3 68-68 (50%) 31-31 (50%) 37-37 (50%) 36-37 (49%) 32-31 (51%) * 18-10 ATS (64%) as road dogs of +3 to +7 points ATS W4 32-32 (50%) 18-17 (51%) 14-15 (48%) 22-19 (54%) 10-13 (43%) ATS W5 or more 28-26 (52%) 11-12 (48%) 17-14 (55%) 18-16 (53%) 10-10 (50%) * 19-11 ATS as road favorites Overall At Home Road/Neutral As Fav or Pick As Underdogs SU Streak ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) Trend SU L1 290-303 (49%) 146-164 (47%) 144-139 (51%) 139-162 (46%) 151-141 (52%) * 11-24 ATS (31%) as road favorites of >4 points SU L2 133-136 (49%) 71-77 (48%) 62-59 (51%) 60-48 (56%) 73-88 (45%) * 13-6 ATS (68%) as road favorites SU L3 75-67 (53%) 39-37 (51%) 36-30 (55%) 26-28 (48%) 49-39 (56%) * 20-13 ATS (61%) as home underdogs SU L4 38-34 (53%) 16-20 (44%) 22-14 (61%) 10-10 (50%) 28-24 (54%) * 6-0 ATS (100%) as road underdogs of <6 points SU L5 or more 59-57 (51%) 28-32 (47%) 31-25 (55%) 7-10 (41%) 52-47 (53%) * 15-8 ATS (65%) as double-digit road underdogs SU W1 295-295 (50%) 145-146 (50%) 150-149 (50%) 158-154 (51%) 137-141 (49%) * 11-4 ATS (73%) as home dogs of 7 points or more SU W2 139-158 (47%) 59-65 (48%) 80-93 (46%) 82-88 (48%) 57-70 (45%) * 19-29 ATS (40%) as road dogs of >5 points SU W3 85-57 (60%) 36-25 (59%) 49-32 (60%) 53-36 (60%) 32-21 (60%) * 25-12 (68%) at home when dog or less than 7.5-point fav SU W4 41-40 (51%) 22-20 (52%) 19-20 (49%) 33-28 (54%) 8-12 (40%) * 5-9 ATS (36%) as road underdogs SU W5 or more 66-73 (47%) 26-42 (38%) 40-31 (56%) 47-56 (46%) 19-17 (53%) * 11-23 ATS (32%) at home in the -7 to +7 line range WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 3

2010 nfl Preview by Steve Makinen 2009 NFL Another busy offseason finds us closer to the start of another NFL campaign. The 2010 season promises to have all of the drama and excitement as any in recent memory. With the Saints sitting atop the football world after their improbable Super Bowl win over Indianapolis, the Colts and 30 other teams are gunning for them, hoping they did enough to close the gap between themselves and the NFL perch. Which teams have a legitimate shot at the Lombardi Trophy in February 2011 though? Which are candidates for the biggest turnarounds? The worst declines? We ll get to that in a bit, but first let s take a quick look back at the past few months of noteworthy stories. With the growth of the NFL and associated games like fantasy football, every offseason story is glorified like never before. The combines, the draft, free agency, the police blotter, you name it if it happens in the NFL you re going to know about it. Of course, some stories are more important than others, and as bettors, we are really only concerned with the things that will prove critical to how the upcoming season plays out. In that sense, the biggest stories usually involve the changing of coaches or quarterback at different cities. On both accounts there was a lot of action. Starting in Washington, the Redskins have advanced out of the Jim Zorn era and will now be guided by long time Denver head coach Mike Shanahan. His chances for turning around the organization quickly were aided by the trade for quarterback Donovan McNabb, who was unceremoniously ushered out of Philadelphia. McNabb figures to be motivated by playing his former teammates twice and is coming to a team with an offensive line capable of protecting him. The other huge coaching story involved the Seahawks luring Pete Carroll away from USC after a decade of dominance. Carroll seems to have left the Trojans just in time, as they were handed down punishments from the NCAA for violations involving the recruitment of Reggie Bush, and will be ineligible for a bowl game the next two years. Still, while Carroll may have left a mess at USC, he may have built a bigger one in Seattle. The Seahawks roster was given a major overhaul and it remains to be seen what the future holds in 2010 and beyond. The only other coaching change finds Chan Gailey returning to the NFL head ranks in Buffalo, but the Bills could be in store for a long season. The Cardinals said goodbye to quarterback Kurt Warner in the offseason, as he retired after a prolific and storied career. Standing first in line to replace him in Arizona is Matt Leinart, but he could be pushed by newly acquired Derek Anderson, who was jettisoned from Cleveland. The Browns in turn made a play for Carolina s Jake Delhomme, who struggled horribly in 2009 but is hoping for a fresh start. The Panthers will now be riding the arm of Matt Moore, who was very impressive in the season s final month. As a result of the McNabb trade, two new quarterbacks will have starting jobs as well. Kevin Kolb takes over the Eagles huddle, with the organization hoping that the path they chose for their young signal caller will produce similar results to what has happened in Green Bay with Aaron Rodgers. Former Redskins QB Jason Campbell also gets another opportunity, this time in Oakland. Some of the other major offseason stories involving quarterbacks include the continued indiscretions of Ben Roethlisberger, who figures to sit out at least the first six games of the season for the Steelers for violating the NFL s personal conduct policy. The Titans Vince Young could also face similar discipline for his role in a June strip club incident. He enjoyed a renaissance season in 2009, leading Tennessee back from a 0-6 start to a near playoff qualifying finish. Oh yeah almost forgot Brett Favre of the Vikings was again in the news all spring long, and as of press time, had not decided yet whether or not to come back for another season after a MVP-caliber campaign last year. His team fell just shy of a trip to the Super Bowl, leaving Minnesota fans clamoring his return. Looking closely at the AFC, while New England, Indianapolis, Pittsburgh and San Diego have dominated the top of the conference standings over the past nine seasons, winning 22 division titles and six Super Bowls between them, the bottom feeders in recent years will try to close the gap and set the tone for a playoff push in 2011. Buffalo, Cleveland, Jacksonville and Kansas City have brought up the rear in their respective divisions in each of the past two years, with the Chiefs compiling a conference-worst 6-26 record in the process. The Bills haven t made the playoffs since 1999, the Browns have nine victories in 32 games since a 10-win 2007 campaign, and the Jaguars are 12-20 since winning 11 games in 07. The foursome can only hope it gets better before it gets worse. The Chiefs may be in the best position of any of those four teams, having enjoyed what is being genuinely graded as a favorable offseason. The Jets and Ravens would seem to be the teams most capable of unseating the four frontrunners this season. Both teams boast solid young quarterbacks, bolstered offensive weaponry, and aggressive defenses. A trip to Super Bowl XLV and a Lombardi Trophy would not be a surprise for either. Houston, Miami, and possibly even Oakland in the weak West Division are other teams that could upend the standings. The NFC is far more wide-open and as evidence you need look no further than the fact that nine different teams have represented the conference in the Super Bowl in the last nine seasons. As such, we are projecting a 10th in 10 years, as neither of our two top NFC projected clubs, Dallas and Green Bay, have been in the big game since the 90 s. The next tier of teams would include New Orleans once again, and Minnesota. However, the Saints have suffered some personnel turnover, as most champs do, and the Vikings are a year older and may have missed their magic window of opportunity last January. The Cardinals and Eagles could be in rebuilding seasons, set to drop from the ranks of the NFC s best, while the 49ers, Panthers, and Giants could be ready to re-emerge. A bit further down, the prospects in Detroit, St. Louis, and Seattle seem improved after an in-flux of new young talent to each franchise. Quarterback Sam Bradford was made the first pick of the draft in April by the Rams and could be under center already in September. The Lions, who already boast the 2009 top pick in QB Matt Stafford, added massive DT Ndamukong Suh and playmaking RB Jahvid Best in the early part of the draft this year. With the way things have gone in this NFC over the last decade, don t be surprised to see someone entirely unexpected rise to the top. Still, it was in this same magazine a year ago that you read our prediction of the Saints representing the NFC in Super Bowl XLIV, as well as seven other projected playoff teams reaching their postseason destinations, so we ll unveil our predictions confidently now 2010 STATFOX NFL Playoff Predictions AFC Divisional Winners: NY Jets, Baltimore, Indianapolis, San Diego AFC Wildcards: New England, Houston AFC Wildcard Round: Indianapolis def. New England; NY Jets def. Houston AFC Divisional Playoffs: Baltimore def. NY Jets; San Diego def. Indianapolis AFC Championship: Baltimore def. San Diego NFC Divisional Winners: Dallas, Green Bay, New Orleans, San Francisco NFC Wildcards: Minnesota, Carolina NFC Wildcard Round: Minnesota def. New Orleans; San Francisco def. Carolina NFC Divisional Playoffs: Dallas def. Minnesota; Green Bay def. San Francisco NFC Championship: Dallas def. Green Bay Super Bowl XLV: Baltimore def. Dallas 4 WWW.STATFOX.COM

Afc east Preview After rolling to two playoff victories a season ago and leading the NFL in nearly every important defensive category, the New York Jets appear poised to take over the AFC East Division from the clutches of the New England Patriots. The Jets will be the team featured in HBO s Hard Knocks series and are expected to make another push for the Super Bowl after coming within a game of representing the AFC last season. They have added interesting pieces. LaDainian Tomlinson (Chargers) signed a two-year contract and cornerback Antonio Cromartie (Chargers) was acquired for a third-round pick. Tomlinson, second-year back Shonn Greene and rookie Joe McKnight (4-USC) comprise the backfield, while Cromartie pairs with one of the best defenders in the NFL, Darrelle Revis. At receiver, the Jets kept Braylon Edwards in the fold and stole former Super Bowl MVP Santonio Holmes (Steelers) for a fifth-round pick. The Patriots made a move to go younger, adding 12 picks during the three-day draft extravaganza but come off a first home playoff loss in the Bill Belichick-era. It remains to be seen whether or not the Patriots can maintain the standard they have set for the last decade, but rest assured, Tom Brady will do everything in his power to make sure that happens. New England still possesses the intimidation factor. In Miami, some bold moves make the Dolphins a team to watch in 2010, none bigger than the addition of receiver Brandon Marshall (Broncos), a bonafide weapon missing from this offense for years. GM Jeff Ireland believes his team is now Super Bowl bound. In Buffalo, a new era dawns with the hiring of Chan Gailey as new Head Coach. However, after 10 straight non-playoff seasons, it appears he could be inheriting a lengthy rebuilding job. The Bills ranked dead last in the NFL in several offensive categories, including yards per play and first downs. Perhaps the addition of C.J. Spiller out of Clemson can provide some punch. BUFFALO BILLS Buffalo was doomed from the start of 2009, thanks to injuries and suspension, and didn t do itself any favors by firing the offensive coordinator just days before Week 1. Things haven t gotten much better since the 6-10 campaign concluded, though a new regime, led by GM Buddy Nix and HC Chan Gailey, is now in place. The primary focus for Gailey is an offense that finished 28th in the NFL in scoring (16.1 PPG), and 30th in passing (157.2 YPG) Offensive line injuries mixed with unsteady play from three starting quarterbacks left a recipe for disaster. Things were so bad, they left Terrell Owens speechless in his only season with the team. Given Gailey s background as a QB-friendly coach, Trent Edwards could become a viable starter, and the Bills have upgraded the skill positions by the selection of RB C.J. Spiller (1-Clemson). He is a game-breaker that gives this offensively starved team hope.? Unfortunately, the line as a whole wasn t adequately addressed, and Gailey is going to have his work cut out in protecting the QB and jump-starting the ground game What s most surprising about the Bills defense is how well it held up in the face of a struggling offense. Buffalo managed to avoid wearing down and closed the year by holding six of its final seven opponents to less than 20 points. The unquestioned strength was a pass defense that ranked No. 2 in the NFL (184.2 YPG) and finished second in interceptions (28). As strong as the secondary is, the line was equally as weak, getting pushed around for 156.3 RYPG and a hefty 4.7 yards per carry Buffalo is pegged for the basement no matter how you slice it. The AFC East is loaded at the top. Gailey and Spiller aren t miracle workers, and lacking a solid offensive line means points are still going to be tough to come by. MIAMI DOLPHINS A hiccup was expected in some respects after Miami improved from one win to 11 in head coach Tony Sparano s first season at the helm. But rest assured that director of football operations, Bill Parcells, will not be happy with another mediocre showing in the win column. The Dolphins weathered a storm of injuries that knocked out a host of key players on both sides of the ball to find themselves in the thick of the playoff race in December QB Chad Henne had a solid year considering the lackluster supporting cast he was surrounded by. The top three wide receivers combined for five touchdowns between them as Miami focused its offense around the tandem of Ronnie Brown and Ricky Williams in the backfield. So Parcells and his team acquired Brandon Marshall (Broncos) for two draft picks and gave their franchise QB exactly what he needed, a franchise wide receiver. On his own, Marshall grabbed 10 touchdowns and finished third in the NFL with 101 receptions. Defenses should no longer be able load up on the run. Guards Richie Incognito (Bills) joins an emerging line that also includes left 2009 STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P New England 10-7-0 0.588 441 318 7-5-0 8-1-0 2-6-0 8-8-1 50.0% 6-10-1 NY Jets 11-8-0 0.579 406 294 7-5-0 4-4-0 7-4-0 11-8-0 57.9% 9-9-1 Miami 7-9-0 0.437 360 390 5-7-0 4-4-0 3-5-0 8-8-0 50.0% 9-6-1 Buffalo 6-10-0 0.375 258 326 4-8-0 3-4-0 3-6-0 8-7-1 53.3% 6-10-0 tackle Jake Long Much like the offense, the defense lacked an impact player, but Parcells and the coaching staff added more than one single player to turn around a unit that finished No. 22 in the NFL. The signing of Karlos Dansby (Cardinals) was the big ticket move, but the team also used seven of its eight draft picks on defense All things being equal, the Jets are the clear alpha dog in the AFC East. The Patriots, however, could be ripe for the taking. Don t be fooled by Miami s stumble to the finish. The return of Brown and addition of Marshall might be enough to push the Dolphins back over the playoff bubble. NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS For years Bill Belichick has had the perfect blend of veterans, players hitting their prime and rookies to learn the ropes of the system, allowing the Patriots to turn in a dynasty that lasted nearly a decade. But after New England had its doors blown off by Baltimore in the wild-card round, 33-14, it was evident that the equation changed enough to force drastic changes or the Patriots risked getting buried in the AFC. Belichick is set to take over the controls on both offense and defense as he tries to steady the ship As long as Tom Brady is healthy and that was a major question last season despite 4,398 yards passing and 28 touchdowns he ll carry the offense on his right arm. The weapons surrounding him are getting older, most notably Randy Moss (33 years old), but the offensive line is still at the top of its game, so protection shouldn t be an issue. And when Brady has time to throw, he ll find the open guy. Brady was sacked just 16 times and despite the lack of a dominant runner Laurence Maroney led the way with 757 yards New England still ranked 12th in rushing (120.1 YPG). If offseason reports are true, WR Wes Welker, who led the league with 123 catches, could be back in uniform for Week 1 after tearing an ACL in the season finale The stop unit is going to get a major facelift, if not this fall, then certainly by the start of 2011. Belichick has started laying the new foundation to help out the centerpiece, LB Jerod Mayo, by adding fresh blood at every level of the unit Little separated New England from the rest of the AFC East pack last season, and for once, age appears to be more than just a number. The franchise isn t down & out but might finish out of the playoffs. NEW YORK JETS Rex Ryan hit New York like a fire-breathing dragon, and when the smoke cleared last January, he proved to bring a lot more than just hot air to the Big Apple. Backed by a rookie QB and the No. 1 defense in the NFL, Ryan led the Jets to the AFC Championship Game and has the franchise aiming even higher in 2010 A 2009 Draft Day trade brought Mark Sanchez to town and despite some expected struggles with turnovers (12:20 TD-Int ratio), Ryan constructed the perfect system to aid in the rookie s development The Jets will continue to focus on the run, even if some of the main components are different. At running back, Thomas Jones and Leon Washington are out, and the heavy lifting will now be done by Shonn Green and LaDainian Tomlinson. Ryan dropped guard Alan Faneca, but the line is still borderline dominant after anchoring the No. 1 ground attack in the NFL (172.2 YPG). If any position is make or break for the Jets fortunes, it s at wide receiver. Jerricho Cotchery is as steady as they come, but the tandem of Braylon Edwards and Santonio Holmes is equally explosive for all the right and wrong reasons Stars were born on defense when Ryan came to town, and the second-year head coach was not happy to stand pat even after leading the NFL in total defense. Antonio Cromartie and Jason Taylor join a defensive cast loaded with the likes of CB Darrelle Revis. It s hard to call the run defense the weak link after it finished No. 8 in the league (98.6 YPG), but it s all relative Ryan is building the Jets into a force for both the long and short term, and the continued growth of Sanchez would fast track the franchise. Though there are several new faces to work into the rotation, they are seasoned veterans looking for that elusive Super Bowl ring. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH NY Jets New England Miami Buffalo AFC EAST WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 5

BUFFALO BILLS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 100 to 1 AFC Title: 50 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 21.19 (9th toughest of 32) 9/12/10 MIAMI * BUFFALO is on 8-4 SU & 9-3 ATS run vs. MIAMI 9/19/10 at Green Bay * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in GB-BUF series 9/26/10 at New England * NE-BUF series has gone 17-5 UNDER the total since 99 10/3/10 NY JETS * UNDERDOG is on 8-4 SU & 10-2 ATS run in L12 BUF-NYJ matchups 10/10/10 JACKSONVILLE * UNDERDOG is 3-0 SU & ATS in L3 BUF-JAC games at BUFFALO 10/24/10 at Baltimore * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 BAL-BUF games 10/31/10 at Kansas City * FAVORITE is 10-1 SU & 9-2 ATS in KC-BUF series since 93 11/7/10 CHICAGO * HOME TEAM is 5-0 SU & ATS in L5 BUF-CHI matchups 11/11/10 DETROIT * HOME TEAM is 4-0 SU & 3-0 ATS in L4 BUF-DET games 11/21/10 at Cincinnati * BUFFALO is on 7-0 SU & 6-1 ATS run vs. CINCINNATI 11/28/10 PITTSBURGH * PITTSBURGH is 7-1 SU & 8-0 ATS in its L8 games vs. BUFFALO 12/5/10 at Minnesota * BUFFALO is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. MINNESOTA 12/12/10 CLEVELAND * CLEVELAND has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. BUFFALO 12/19/10 at Miami * FAVORITE has swept L3 MIA-BUF games at MIAMI, both SU & ATS 12/26/10 NEW ENGLAND * FAVORITE is on 7-0 SU & 6-0 ATS run in L7 BUF-NE matchups at BUFFALO 1/2/11 at NY Jets * UNDERDOG is 8-6 SU & 12-2 ATS in NYJ-BUF series at NY JETS SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 8-8 6-10 9-7 5-11 7-9 7-9 7-9 6-10 55-73 (43%) OVERALL ATS 8-6 6-8 10-5 7-9 10-6 10-6 7-9 8-7 66-56 (54%) PRESEASON ATS 0-4 3-1 2-2 2-2 2-2 2-2 3-1 1-3 15-17 (47%) HOME ATS 4-3 3-4 5-3 4-4 5-3 6-2 2-5 3-3 32-27 (54%) ROAD ATS 4-3 3-4 5-2 3-5 5-3 4-4 5-4 5-4 34-29 (54%) vs DIVISION ATS 2-4 2-4 4-2 4-2 4-2 4-2 1-5 3-2 24-23 (51%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 6-5 4-7 6-5 7-5 8-4 7-5 5-7 6-5 49-43 (53%) as FAVORITE ATS 3-1 4-4 7-2 4-2 3-3 2-0 3-5 3-1 29-18 (62%) as UNDERDOG ATS 5-5 2-4 4-3 3-7 7-3 8-6 4-4 5-6 38-38 (50%) OVER-UNDER 7-9 2-14 11-5 9-7 7-9 7-9 8-8 6-10 57-71 (45%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * BUFFALO is on a 13-2 UNDER the total (+10.8 Units) run on the road vs. teams giving up 17 or less PPG The Average Score was BUFFALO 14, OPPONENT 22.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/24 - at Baltimore, 1/2 - at NY Jets * BUFFALO is on a 18-6 OVER the total (+11.4 Units) run at home vs. good rushing teams - averaging >=130 RYPG The Average Score was BUFFALO 21.7, OPPONENT 24.1. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - MIAMI, 10/3 - NY JETS, 12/12 - CLEVELAND * BUFFALO is on a 18-7 ATS (+10.3 Units) run vs. teams giving up 24 or more PPG The Average Score was BUFFALO 25.6, OPPONENT 16.2. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - MIAMI, 10/31 - at Kansas City, 11/11 - DETROIT, 12/19 - at Miami * BUFFALO is 14-5 UNDER the total (+8.5 Units) as underdogs of 3.5 to 10 points since 07. The Average Score was BUFFALO 13.8, OPPONENT 20.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/3 - NY JETS, 12/19 - at Miami, 12/26 - NEW ENGLAND * BUFFALO is 33-18 ATS (+13.2 Units) on the road vs. poor offensive teams - averaging <=310 YPG since 92. The Average Score was BUFFALO 23.4, OPPONENT 16.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - MIAMI, 10/31 - at Kansas City, 11/11 - DETROIT, 12/19 - at Miami 2009 Record: 6-10 (-1.4 ML Units), 8-7 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 6-10 DIVISION: AFC East COACH: Chan Gailey, 1st year STADIUM: Ralph Wilson Stadium Scoring Differential: -4.2 (#23 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 15 (#24 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -3.5 (#23 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 22.31 (#7 of 32) 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring -4.2 23 Yardage -66.5 26 Yards Per Play -0.21 22 Yards Per Point -0.36 17 Turnovers +3 11 Offensive Stats Points Scored 16.1 28 First Downs 14.6 32 Total Yards Per Game 275.9 30 Yards Per Play 4.87 25 Yards Per Point 17.14 24 Rushing Attempts 26.5 21 Rush Yards Per Game 116.7 16 Yards Per Rush 4.40 9 Rushing TD s 6 29 Passing Attempts Per Game 27.6 31 Completions Per Game 16.0 29 Completion Percentage 58.1% 23 Passing Yards Per Game 157.2 30 Passing Yards Per Attempt 5.70 26 Passing TD s 17 23 Sacks Allowed 46 28 Interceptions Thrown 19 23 Fumbles Lost 11 18 Total Turnovers Lost 30 20 Avg. Time of Possession 26:02 26 3rd Down Conversions 25.8% 32 4th Down Conversions 46.7% 18 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 20.4 16 First Downs 19.4 22 Total Yards Per Game 342.4 19 Yards Per Play 5.08 10 Yards Per Point 16.78 9 Rushing Attempts 33.4 31 Rush Yards Per Game 156.3 30 Yards Per Rush 4.67 30 Rushing TD s 19 28 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 32.4 13 Opponent Completions/Game 18.4 5 Opponent Completion % 56.8% 3 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 184.3 2 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 5.85 4 Passing TD s Allowed 18 8 Sacks Recorded 32 18 Interceptions 28 2 Fumbles Recovered 5 32 Total Turnovers Forced 33 5 3rd Down Conversions 40.4% 24 4th Down Conversions 53.8% 23 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 6.7 25 Penalty Yards/Game 53.4 25 Opponent Penalties/Game 6.7 7 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 57.4 4 Punt Return Average 6.6 26 Kick Return Average 23.7 10 Punt Attempts per game 5.6 28 Punt Net Average 42.4 5 Field Goals Made 28 5 Field Goal Percentage 84.8% 14 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 NY JETS 31-37 L +3 L 43 O 9/7 NEW ENGLAND 31-0 W -1.5 W 44.5 U 9/12 JACKSONVILLE 10-13 L -3 L 35 U 9/11 HOUSTON 22-7 W -6 W 37.5 U 9/15 at Minnesota 45-39 W +3.5 W 49.5 O 9/14 at Jacksonville 38-17 W -3 W 41.5 O 9/19 at Oakland 10-13 L +3 T 37.5 U 9/18 at Tampa Bay 3-19 L +3 L 34 U 9/22 at Denver 23-28 L +7.5 W 46.5 O 9/21 at Miami 7-17 L +3 L 41.5 U 10/3 NEW ENGLAND 17-31 L +4.5 L 36 O 9/25 ATLANTA 16-24 L -3 L 35.5 O 9/29 CHICAGO 33-27 W -3 W 46.5 O 9/28 PHILADELPHIA 13-23 L -3 L 39 U 10/10 at NY Jets 14-16 L +6.5 W 37 U 10/2 at New Orleans 7-19 L +1.5 L 38.5 U 10/6 OAKLAND 31-49 L +3 L 53.5 O 10/5 CINCINNATI 22-16 W -7.5 L 40.5 U 10/17 MIAMI 20-13 W -4.5 W 30 O 10/9 MIAMI 20-14 W -3 W 35 U 10/13 at Houston 31-24 W -7 T 44.5 O 10/12 at Ny Jets 3-30 L +0 L 36.5 U 10/24 at Baltimore 6-20 L +4.5 L 31.5 U 10/16 NY JETS 27-17 W -3.5 W 32.5 O 10/20 at Miami 23-10 W +6 W 45.5 U 10/19 WASHINGTON 24-7 W -3 W 38.5 U 10/31 ARIZONA 38-14 W -4.5 W 33.5 O 10/23 at Oakland 17-38 L +3 L 41 O 10/27 DETROIT 24-17 W -7 T 50.5 U 10/26 at Kansas City 5-38 L +5.5 L 44 U 11/7 NY JETS 22-17 W +3 W 34 O 10/30 at New England 16-21 L +9.5 W 44 U 11/3 NEW ENGLAND 7-38 L -3 L 47.5 U 11/9 at Dallas 6-10 L +4 T 37 U 11/14 at New England 6-29 L +7 L 38 U 11/13 KANSAS CITY 14-3 W -2.5 W 41 U 11/17 at Kansas City 16-17 L +3.5 W 52.5 U 11/16 HOUSTON 10-12 L -7 L 37.5 U 11/21 ST LOUIS 37-17 W -2 W 40 O 11/20 at San Diego 10-48 L +13 L 43.5 O 11/24 at NY Jets 13-31 L +3 L 45.5 U 11/23 INDIANAPOLIS 14-17 L +3 T 38.5 U 11/28 at Seattle 38-9 W +4 W 39 O 11/27 CAROLINA 9-13 L +3.5 L 37 U 12/1 MIAMI 38-21 W +2 W 37 O 11/30 at Ny Giants 24-7 W +3 W 36 U 12/5 at Miami 42-32 W -5 W 34 O 12/4 at Miami 23-24 L +5.5 W 35.5 O 12/8 at New England 17-27 L +4 L 45 U 12/7 NY JETS 17-6 W -2.5 W 37 U 12/12 CLEVELAND 37-7 W -11 W 38.5 O 12/11 NEW ENGLAND 7-35 L +4 L 35 O 12/15 SAN DIEGO 20-13 W -3 W 42.5 U 12/14 at Tennessee 26-28 L +5 W 37 O 12/19 at Cincinnati 33-17 W -3 W 41 O 12/17 DENVER 17-28 L +7.5 L 35.5 O 12/22 at Green Bay 0-10 L +6.5 L 43.5 U 12/21 MIAMI 3-20 L -3 L 33.5 U 12/26 at San Francisco 41-7 W -10 W 41.5 O 12/24 at Cincinnati 37-27 W +13.5 W 45 O 12/29 CINCINNATI 27-9 W -7.5 W 45.5 U 12/27 at New England 0-31 L +9.5 L 34.5 U 1/2 PITTSBURGH 24-29 L -9.5 L 33 O 1/1 at NY Jets 26-30 L -2 L 37 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/10 at New England 17-19 L +9.5 W 41 U 9/9 DENVER 14-15 L +3 W 38 U 9/7 SEATTLE 34-10 W -2.5 W 37.5 O 9/14 at New England 24-25 L +13 W 47O 9/17 at Miami 16-6 W +6.5 W 36.5 U 9/16 at Pittsburgh 3-26 L +10 L 40 U 9/14 at Jacksonville 20-16 W +4 W 37 U 9/20 TAMPA BAY 33-20 W -4 W 41.5O 9/24 NY JETS 20-28 L -5.5 L 33 O 9/23 at New England 7-38 L +16.5 L 41 O 9/21 OAKLAND 24-23 W -10 L 37 O 9/27 NEW ORLEANS 7-27 L +5.5 L 51.5U 10/1 MINNESOTA 17-12 W -2 W 34.5 U 9/30 NY JETS 17-14 W +3 W 37.5 U 9/28 at St Louis 31-14 W -9 W 44 O 10/4 at Miami 10-38 L +2 L 37O 10/8 at Chicago 7-40 L +9.5 L 34.5 O 10/8 DALLAS 24-25 L +10.5 W 45 O 10/5 at Arizona 17-41 L +2 L 44.5 O 10/11 CLEVELAND 3-6 L -5.5 L 41.5U 10/15 at Detroit 17-20 L -2 L 40.5 U 10/21 BALTIMORE 19-14 W +3 W 33.5 U 10/19 SAN DIEGO 23-14 W +1 W 45 U 10/18 at NY Jets 16-13 W +9 W 35.5U 10/22 NEW ENGLAND 6-28 L +5.5 L 35.5 U 10/28 at Ny Jets 13-3 W +3 W 38.5 U 10/26 at Miami 16-25 L +1 L 41.5 U 10/25 at Carolina 20-9 W +7 W 37U 11/5 GREEN BAY 24-10 W -3.5 W 41.5 U 11/4 CINCINNATI 33-21 W +1.5 W 44 O 11/2 NY JETS 17-26 L -5 L 43.5 U 11/1 HOUSTON 10-31 L +3 L 42U 11/12 at Indianapolis 16-17 L +12 W 44.5 U 11/11 at Miami 13-10 W -2.5 W 41 U 11/9 at New England 10-20 L +3.5 L 40.5 U 11/15 at Tennessee 17-41 L +7.5 L 40.5O 11/19 at Houston 24-21 W +3 W 36.5 O 11/18 NEW ENGLAND 10-56 L +15.5 L 46.5 O 11/17 CLEVELAND 27-29 L -5 L 41 O 11/22 at Jacksonville 15-18 L +8.5 W 41U 11/26 JACKSONVILLE 27-24 W +3 W 35 O 11/25 at Jacksonville 14-36 L +8.5 L 37 O 11/23 at Kansas City 54-31 W -3 W 43.5 O 11/29 MIAMI 31-14 W +4 W 38O 12/3 SAN DIEGO 21-24 L +5 W 40 O 12/2 at Washington 17-16 W +6.5 W 37 U 11/30 SAN FRANCISCO 3-10 L -6.5 L 43 U 12/3 NY JETS 13-19 L +3.5 L 37U 12/10 at NY Jets 31-13 W +4.5 W 38 O 12/9 MIAMI 38-17 W -6.5 W 34 O 12/7 MIAMI 3-16 L -2.5 L 43 U 12/13 at Kansas City 16-10 W -3 W 38.5U 12/17 MIAMI 21-0 W -1 W 34.5 U 12/16 at Cleveland 0-8 L +4 L 36 U 12/14 at NY Jets 27-31 L +8 W 41 O 12/20 NEW ENGLAND 10-17 L +7 T 41.5U 12/24 TENNESSEE 29-30 L -5.5 L 37.5 O 12/23 NY GIANTS 21-38 L +2 L 31.5 O 12/21 at Denver 30-23 W +6 W 46.5 O 12/27 at Atlanta 3-31 L +8 L 40.5U 12/31 at Baltimore 7-19 L +9.5 L 37 U 12/30 at Philadelphia 9-17 L +9 W 38.5 U 12/28 NEW ENGLAND 0-13 L +5.5 L 34.5 U 1/3 INDIANAPOLIS 30-7 W -7.5 W 32O 6 WWW.STATFOX.COM

MIAMI DOLPHINS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 40 to 1 AFC Title: 15 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 20.88 (13th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 9-7 10-6 4-12 9-7 6-10 1-15 11-6 7-9 57-72 (44%) OVERALL ATS 9-6 7-9 7-9 7-9 6-10 5-9 8-9 8-8 57-69 (45%) PRESEASON ATS 2-2 2-2 1-2 0-4 2-2 2-2 3-1 3-0 15-15 (50%) HOME ATS 7-1 1-7 2-6 3-5 3-5 1-6 2-7 3-5 22-42 (34%) ROAD ATS 2-5 5-2 5-3 4-4 3-5 4-3 6-2 5-3 34-27 (56%) vs DIVISION ATS 2-3 3-3 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-4 4-2 5-1 18-28 (39%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 7-4 5-7 4-8 5-7 3-9 4-7 8-5 7-5 43-52 (45%) as FAVORITE ATS 7-5 4-7 1-3 1-3 3-6 0-2 2-5 1-3 19-34 (36%) as UNDERDOG ATS 1-1 3-2 6-6 6-6 3-4 5-7 6-4 7-5 37-35 (51%) OVER-UNDER 5-11 6-10 9-6 8-8 6-10 9-7 6-11 9-6 58-69 (46%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * MIAMI is on a 11-0 UNDER the total (+11 Units) run at home revenging a home loss against opponent The Average Score was MIAMI 19.4, OPPONENT 14. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/24 - PITTSBURGH * MIAMI is 0-10 ATS (-11 Units) coming off a loss by 6 or less points since 07. The Average Score was MIAMI 15.4, OPPONENT 29.1. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - NY JETS, 10/17 - at Green Bay, 11/14 - TENNESSEE, 12/19 - BUFFALO * MIAMI is 0-9 ATS (-9.9 Units) vs. poor offensive teams - averaging <=285 YPG since 07. The Average Score was MIAMI 16.2, OPPONENT 24.2. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - at Buffalo, 11/28 - at Oakland, 12/5 - CLEVELAND, 12/19 - BUFFALO * MIAMI is on a 4-20 ATS (-18 Units) skid at home vs. poor passing teams averaging 175 or less PYPG. The Average Score was MIAMI 19.3, OPPONENT 20.1. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - NY JETS, 12/5 - CLEVELAND, 12/19 - BUFFALO * MIAMI is 8-0 ATS (+8 Units) on the road vs. teams with a winning record since 07. The Average Score was MIAMI 16, OPPONENT 17.5. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - at Minnesota, 10/17 - at Green Bay, 10/31 - at Cincinnati, 11/7 - at Baltimore, 12/12 - at NY Jets, 1/2 - at New England WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 7 2009 Record: 7-9 (-1.3 ML Units), 8-8 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 9-6 DIVISION: AFC East COACH: Tony Sparano, 3rd year STADIUM: Dolphins Stadium Scoring Differential: -1.9 (#20 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 20 (#16 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +0.3 (#18 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 23.75 (#1 of 32) 9/12/10 at Buffalo * BUFFALO is on 8-4 SU & 9-3 ATS run vs. MIAMI 9/19/10 at Minnesota * HOME TEAM has swept L3 MIN-MIA games, both SU & ATS 9/26/10 NY JETS * NY JETS are 17-7 SU & 16-5 ATS vs. MIAMI since 98 10/4/10 NEW ENGLAND * ROAD TEAM is on 5-1 ATS run in MIA-NE series 10/17/10 at Green Bay * L3 games in GB-MIA series at GREEN BAY went UNDER the total 10/24/10 PITTSBURGH * PITTSBURGH is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games at MIAMI 10/31/10 at Cincinnati * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 CIN-MIA games 11/7/10 at Baltimore * UNDERDOG is 6-2 ATS in L8 BAL-MIA matchups 11/14/10 TENNESSEE * L5 games of MIA-TEN series at MIAMI are 5-0 UNDER the total 11/18/10 CHICAGO * MIAMI has taken L2 games vs. CHICAGO both SU & ATS 11/28/10 at Oakland * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 OAK-MIA games 12/5/10 CLEVELAND * CLEVELAND is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. MIAMI 12/12/10 at NY Jets * UNDERDOG is 10-5 ATS in NYJ-MIA series at NY JETS since 92 12/19/10 BUFFALO * FAVORITE has swept L3 MIA-BUF games at MIAMI, both SU & ATS 12/26/10 DETROIT * MIAMI is 5-0 SU & 4-0 ATS in its L5 games vs. DETROIT 1/2/11 at New England * MIAMI is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in its L3 games visiting NEW ENGLAND 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring -1.9 20 Yardage -12.0 20 Yards Per Play -0.82 26 Yards Per Point -0.68 19 Turnovers -7 24 Offensive Stats Points Scored 22.5 15 First Downs 20.8 8 Total Yards Per Game 339.4 17 Yards Per Play 5.03 22 Yards Per Point 15.08 14 Rushing Attempts 31.8 3 Rush Yards Per Game 139.4 4 Yards Per Rush 4.38 10 Rushing TD s 22 1 Passing Attempts Per Game 34.1 14 Completions Per Game 20.7 18 Completion Percentage 60.7% 16 Passing Yards Per Game 198.1 20 Passing Yards Per Attempt 5.82 23 Passing TD s 15 27 Sacks Allowed 34 15 Interceptions Thrown 19 23 Fumbles Lost 9 8 Total Turnovers Lost 28 18 Avg. Time of Possession 31:55 5 3rd Down Conversions 49.0% 2 4th Down Conversions 72.2% 2 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 24.4 25 First Downs 18.6 15 Total Yards Per Game 351.4 21 Yards Per Play 5.85 30 Yards Per Point 14.40 29 Rushing Attempts 27.2 17 Rush Yards Per Game 114.7 18 Yards Per Rush 4.22 15 Rushing TD s 16 21 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 30.6 3 Opponent Completions/Game 17.6 3 Opponent Completion % 57.5% 4 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 234.6 24 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.49 17 Passing TD s Allowed 19 10 Sacks Recorded 44 3 Interceptions 15 16 Fumbles Recovered 6 29 Total Turnovers Forced 21 27 3rd Down Conversions 34.8% 4 4th Down Conversions 53.3% 22 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 4.9 4 Penalty Yards/Game 40.0 4 Opponent Penalties/Game 4.6 31 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 36.8 31 Punt Return Average 7.2 21 Kick Return Average 23.2 12 Punt Attempts per game 4.7 16 Punt Net Average 41.4 6 Field Goals Made 25 13 Field Goal Percentage 89.3% 7 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 DETROIT 49-21 W -9.5 W 35.5 O 9/7 HOUSTON 20-21 L -14 L 34.5 O 9/11 TENNESSEE 7-17 L +3.5 L 37 U 9/11 DENVER 34-10 W +5.5 W 37 O 9/15 at Indianapolis 21-13 W +0 W 47 U 9/14 at Ny Jets 21-10 W -3 W 37 U 9/19 at Cincinnati 13-16 L +5.5 W 40.5 U 9/18 at NY Jets 7-17 L +5.5 L 37 U 9/22 NY JETS 30-3 W -6 W 40 U 9/21 BUFFALO 17-7 W -3 W 41.5 U 9/26 PITTSBURGH 3-13 L -2.5 L 31 U 9/25 CAROLINA 27-24 W +3 W 36 O 9/29 at Kansas City 30-48 L -3 L 44 O 10/5 at Ny Giants 23-10 W +1.5 W 38 U 10/3 NY JETS 9-17 L +6 L 37 U 10/9 at Buffalo 14-20 L +3 L 35 U 10/6 NEW ENGLAND 26-13 W -3 W 43.5 U 10/12 at Jacksonville 24-10 W -3.5 W 38.5 U 10/10 at New England 10-24 L +11 L 34 T 10/16 at Tampa Bay 13-27 L +3 L 35 O 10/13 at Denver 24-22 W +3.5 W 41.5 O 10/19 NEW ENGLAND 13-19 L -6.5 L 37 U 10/17 at Buffalo 13-20 L +4.5 L 30 O 10/21 KANSAS CITY 20-30 L -1 L 43 O 10/20 BUFFALO 10-23 L -6 L 45.5 U 10/27 at San Diego 26-10 W -6 W 38 U 10/24 ST LOUIS 31-14 W +5 W 38 O 10/30 at New Orleans 21-6 W +2.5 W 41.5 U 11/4 at Green Bay 10-24 L +4 L 41 U 11/2 INDIANAPOLIS 17-23 L -1 L 39 O 11/1 at NY Jets 14-41 L +7 L 36.5 O 11/6 ATLANTA 10-17 L +1 L 40 U 11/10 at NY Jets 10-13 L +3 T 40 U 11/9 at Tennessee 7-31 L +5.5 L 39.5 U 11/7 ARIZONA 23-24 L -3 L 34.5 O 11/13 NEW ENGLAND 16-23 L +3 L 43 U 11/17 BALTIMORE 26-7 W -5 W 34.5 U 11/16 BALTIMORE 9-6 W -4.5 L 32.5 U 11/21 at Seattle 17-24 L +9.5 W 37 O 11/20 at Cleveland 0-22 L +2.5 L 36.5 U 11/24 SAN DIEGO 30-3 W -4 W 36 U 11/23 WASHINGTON 24-23 W -7 L 35.5 O 11/28 at San Francisco 24-17 W -1 W 37.5 O 11/27 at Oakland 33-21 W +7 W 41.5 O 12/1 at Buffalo 21-38 L -2 L 37 O 11/27 at Dallas 40-21 W +3 W 34.5 O 12/5 BUFFALO 32-42 L +5 L 34 O 12/4 BUFFALO 24-23 W -5.5 L 35.5 O 12/9 CHICAGO 27-9 W -10.5 W 37 U 12/7 at New England 0-12 L +3 L 33.5 U 12/12 at Denver 17-20 L +11.5 W 41 U 12/11 at San Diego 23-21 W +13 W 45 U 12/15 OAKLAND 23-17 W -1.5 W 43.5 U 12/15 PHILADELPHIA 27-34 L -3 L 37.5 O 12/20 NEW ENGLAND 29-28 W +10 W 44 O 12/18 NY JETS 24-20 W -8 L 35 O 12/21 at Minnesota 17-20 L -3 L 44.5 U 12/21 at Buffalo 20-3 W +3 W 33.5 U 12/26 CLEVELAND 10-7 W -9 L 40.5 U 12/24 TENNESSEE 24-10 W -5 W 44 U 12/29 at New England 24-27 L -2 L 38 O 12/28 NY JETS 23-21 W -3.5 L 37.5 O 1/2 at Baltimore 23-30 L +11 W 33 O 1/1 at New England 28-26 W +6.5 W 38.5 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/7 at Atlanta 17-28 L +1.5 L 34 O 9/9 at Washington 13-16 L +3 T 34 U 9/7 NY JETS 14-20 L +3 L 37 U 9/13 at Atlanta 7-19 L +4 L 44U 9/17 BUFFALO 6-16 L -6.5 L 36.5 U 9/16 DALLAS 20-37 L +3 L 39 O 9/14 at Arizona 10-31 L +6 L 40.5 O 9/21 INDIANAPOLIS 23-27 L +3 L 41O 9/24 TENNESSEE 13-10 W -10.5 L 35.5 U 9/23 at Ny Jets 28-31 L +3 T 36.5 O 9/21 at New England 38-13 W +12 W 37 O 9/27 at San Diego 13-23 L +5 L 45U 10/1 at Houston 15-17 L -3.5 L 41 U 9/30 OAKLAND 17-35 L -3.5 L 39.5 O 10/5 SAN DIEGO 17-10 W +5.5 W 44.5 U 10/4 BUFFALO 38-10 W -2 W 37O 10/8 at New England 10-20 L +9 L 36.5 U 10/7 at Houston 19-22 L +4.5 W 43.5 U 10/12 at Houston 28-29 L +3 W 44.5 O 10/12 NY JETS 31-27 W +3 W 35.5O 10/15 at NY Jets 17-20 L +1.5 L 36.5 O 10/14 at Cleveland 31-41 L +3.5 L 45 O 10/19 BALTIMORE 13-27 L -3 L 35.5 O 10/25 NEW ORLEANS 34-46 L +6 L 47.5O 10/22 GREEN BAY 24-34 L -6 L 40 O 10/21 NEW ENGLAND 28-49 L +15.5 L 50 O 10/26 BUFFALO 25-16 W -1 W 41.5 U 11/1 at NY Jets 30-25 W +3 W 40O 11/5 at Chicago 31-13 W +12.5 W 37 O 10/28 NY GIANTS 10-13 L +10 W 48 U 11/2 at Denver 26-17 W +4 W 50 U 11/8 at New England 17-27 L +11 W 47U 11/12 KANSAS CITY 13-10 W -2 W 40 U 11/11 BUFFALO 10-13 L +2.5 L 41 U 11/9 SEATTLE 21-19 W -7.5 L 41.5 U 11/15 TAMPA BAY 25-23 W -10 L 43O 11/19 MINNESOTA 24-20 W -3 W 34 O 11/18 at Philadelphia 7-17 L +9.5 L 40.5 U 11/16 OAKLAND 17-15 W -10 L 37.5 U 11/19 at Carolina 24-17 W +3 W 41.5U 11/23 at Detroit 27-10 W -3 W 40.5 U 11/26 at Pittsburgh 0-3 L +15 W 37 U 11/23 NEW ENGLAND 28-48 L +2 L 42 O 11/29 at Buffalo 14-31 L -4 L 38O 12/3 JACKSONVILLE 10-24 L -1 L 35.5 U 12/2 NY JETS 13-40 L -2 L 37 O 11/30 at St Louis 16-12 W -7 L 44.5 U 12/6 NEW ENGLAND 22-21 W +5 W 46U 12/10 NEW ENGLAND 21-0 W +3 W 37 U 12/9 at Buffalo 17-38 L +6.5 L 34 O 12/7 at Buffalo 16-3 W +2.5 W 43 U 12/13 at Jacksonville 14-10 W +2 W 43U 12/17 at Buffalo 0-21 L +1 L 34.5 U 12/16 BALTIMORE 22-16 W +3 W 37 O 12/14 SAN FRANCISCO 14-9 W -5.5 L 41 U 12/20 at Tennessee 24-27 L +5 W 42.5O 12/25 NY JETS 10-13 L -3 L 36.5 U 12/23 at New England 7-28 L +22.5 W 46 U 12/21 at Kansas City 38-31 W -3 W 37 O 12/27 HOUSTON 20-27 L -1.5 L 47T 12/28 at NY Jets 24-17 W +3 W 43 U 12/31 at Indianapolis 22-27 L +9.5 W 44 O 12/30 CINCINNATI 25-38 L +3 L 45 O 1/3 PITTSBURGH 24-30 L +3 L 45O 1/4 (PL) BALTIMORE 9-27 L +3.5 L 38 U

NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 10 to 1 AFC Title: 5 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 21.63 (4th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 9-7 17-2 17-2 11-7 14-5 18-1 11-5 10-7 107-36 (75%) OVERALL ATS 6-10 15-4 13-4 9-9 11-8 10-9 9-7 8-8 81-59 (58%) PRESEASON ATS 2-1 4-0 1-2 2-2 2-1 2-2 0-4 2-2 15-14 (52%) HOME ATS 3-5 9-1 6-1 4-5 3-6 5-5 3-5 5-4 38-32 (54%) ROAD ATS 3-5 6-2 7-3 5-4 8-2 5-4 6-2 3-4 43-26 (62%) vs DIVISION ATS 4-2 5-1 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-2 4-2 1-4 30-17 (64%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 5-7 11-3 9-3 7-7 9-6 8-6 7-5 6-6 62-43 (59%) as FAVORITE ATS 2-7 10-3 11-4 8-5 7-7 10-9 8-6 6-7 62-48 (56%) as UNDERDOG ATS 4-3 5-1 2-0 1-4 4-1 0-0 1-1 2-1 19-11 (63%) OVER-UNDER 6-10 8-10 9-9 9-8 8-11 11-7 9-7 6-10 66-72 (48%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * NEW ENGLAND is on a 21-5 ATS (+15.5 Units) run vs. marginal winning teams (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) The Average Score was NEW ENGLAND 24.9, OPPONENT 16. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - CINCINNATI, 9/19 - at NY Jets, 10/17 - BALTIMORE, 11/14 - at Pittsburgh, 12/6 - NY JETS * NEW ENGLAND is on a 15-3 ATS (+11.7 Units) run vs. excellent passing teams averaging 260 or more PYPG. The Average Score was NEW ENGLAND 27.5, OPPONENT 22.2. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/24 - at San Diego, 10/31 - MINNESOTA, 11/21 - INDIANAPOLIS, 12/19 - GREEN BAY * NEW ENGLAND is on a 27-10 ATS (+16 Units) run revenging a same season loss against opponent The Average Score was NEW ENGLAND 21.9, OPPONENT 19. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/6 - NY JETS, 12/26 - at Buffalo, 1/2 - MIAMI * NEW ENGLAND is on a 24-10 ATS (+13 Units) run in the last 2 weeks of the regular season The Average Score was NEW ENGLAND 23.5, OPPONENT 16.3. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/26 - at Buffalo, 1/2 - MIAMI * NEW ENGLAND is on a 14-4 UNDER the total (+9.6 Units) run vs. terrible teams - outscored by 10+ PPG The Average Score was NEW ENGLAND 22.9, OPPONENT 11.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/25 - at Detroit LINE FINAL ATS 2009 Record: 10-7 (-0.7 ML Units), 8-8 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 6-10 DIVISION: AFC East COACH: Bill Belichick, 11th year STADIUM: Gillette Stadium Scoring Differential: +7.2 (#7 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 26 (#9 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +8.4 (#3 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 22.88 (#4 of 32) 9/12/10 CINCINNATI * CINCINNATI is 0-3 SU but 3-0 ATS in its L3 games visiting NEW ENGLAND 9/19/10 at NY Jets * NEW ENGLAND is 9-2 SU & 10-1 ATS at NY JETS since 99 9/26/10 BUFFALO * NE-BUF series has gone 17-5 UNDER the total since 99 10/4/10 at Miami * ROAD TEAM is on 5-1 ATS run in MIA-NE series 10/17/10 BALTIMORE * L3 NE-BAL series games have gone OVER the total 10/24/10 at San Diego * L3 games in SD-NE series at SAN DIEGO went UNDER the total 10/31/10 MINNESOTA * L4 NE-MIN series games have gone UNDER the total 11/7/10 at Cleveland * FAVORITE is on 8-1 SU & 6-1 ATS run in L9 CLE-NE matchups 11/14/10 at Pittsburgh * UNDERDOG is 7-3 SU & 8-2 ATS in PIT-NE series since 97 11/21/10 INDIANAPOLIS * NEW ENGLAND is 18-10 SU & 19-8 ATS vs. INDIANAPOLIS since 93 11/25/10 at Detroit * FAVORITE is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 DET-NE games at DETROIT 12/6/10 NY JETS * NY JETS are 9-4 ATS at NEW ENGLAND since 97 12/12/10 at Chicago * CHICAGO is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. NEW ENGLAND 12/19/10 GREEN BAY * ROAD TEAM is 3-2 SU & 4-0 ATS in L5 NE-GB matchups 12/26/10 at Buffalo * FAVORITE is on 7-0 SU & 6-0 ATS run in L7 BUF-NE matchups at BUFFALO 1/2/11 MIAMI * MIAMI is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in its L3 games visiting NEW ENGLAND 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +7.2 7 Yardage +68.4 5 Yards Per Play +0.38 12 Yards Per Point +2.08 11 Turnovers +6 8 Offensive Stats Points Scored 26.7 6 First Downs 23.3 1 Total Yards Per Game 385.5 4 Yards Per Play 5.75 11 Yards Per Point 14.88 12 Rushing Attempts 29.1 10 Rush Yards Per Game 120.1 12 Yards Per Rush 4.12 21 Rushing TD s 19 6 Passing Attempts Per Game 37.0 5 Completions Per Game 24.4 4 Completion Percentage 65.9% 6 Passing Yards Per Game 277.3 3 Passing Yards Per Attempt 7.49 9 Passing TD s 28 7 Sacks Allowed 18 3 Interceptions Thrown 13 7 Fumbles Lost 9 8 Total Turnovers Lost 22 6 Avg. Time of Possession 32:45 1 3rd Down Conversions 43.7% 8 4th Down Conversions 50.0% 15 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 17.8 5 First Downs 18.1 10 Total Yards Per Game 317.1 9 Yards Per Play 5.37 18 Yards Per Point 16.96 7 Rushing Attempts 24.9 6 Rush Yards Per Game 110.5 13 Yards Per Rush 4.44 23 Rushing TD s 6 3 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 32.0 12 Opponent Completions/Game 18.8 7 Opponent Completion % 58.6% 11 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 209.7 12 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.55 19 Passing TD s Allowed 25 20 Sacks Recorded 31 23 Interceptions 18 11 Fumbles Recovered 10 16 Total Turnovers Forced 28 12 3rd Down Conversions 37.1% 12 4th Down Conversions 47.6% 13 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 5.1 7 Penalty Yards/Game 46.4 12 Opponent Penalties/Game 5.7 20 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 48.8 15 Punt Return Average 11.4 5 Kick Return Average 22.7 15 Punt Attempts per game 3.5 2 Punt Net Average 36.4 32 Field Goals Made 26 10 Field Goal Percentage 83.9% 17 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/9 PITTSBURGH 30-14 W +2.5 W 37.5 O 9/7 at Buffalo 0-31 L +1.5 L 44.5 U 9/9 INDIANAPOLIS 27-24 W -3 T 44.5 O 9/8 OAKLAND 30-20 W -7.5 W 48.5 O 9/15 at NY Jets 44-7 W +1 W 41 O 9/14 at Philadelphia 31-10 W +4 W 38 O 9/19 at Arizona 23-12 W -7 W 41 U 9/18 at Carolina 17-27 L -3 L 44 T 9/21 NY JETS 23-16 W -6 W 37 O 9/22 KANSAS CITY 41-38 W -8.5 L 43.5 O 10/3 at Buffalo 31-17 W -4.5 W 36 O 9/25 at Pittsburgh 23-20 W +3 W 42 O 9/28 at Washington 17-20 L +3.5 W 43 U 10/10 MIAMI 24-10 W -11 W 34 T 9/29 at San Diego 14-21 L -3 L 40.5 U 10/2 SAN DIEGO 17-41 L -4 L 47.5 O 10/5 TENNESSEE 38-30 W -1 W 40 O 10/17 SEATTLE 30-20 W -3.5 W 42 O 10/9 at Atlanta 31-28 W -2 W 41 O 10/6 at Miami 13-26 L +3 L 43.5 U 10/12 NY GIANTS 17-6 W -2 W 43 U 10/24 NY JETS 13-7 W -6 T 44 U 10/16 at Denver 20-28 L +3.5 L 47 O 10/13 GREEN BAY 10-28 L -6 L 48.5 U 10/19 at Miami 19-13 W +6.5 W 37 U 10/31 at Pittsburgh 20-34 L -3 L 42 O 10/30 BUFFALO 21-16 W -9.5 L 44 U 10/27 DENVER 16-24 L -3 L 45.5 U 10/26 CLEVELAND 9-3 W -4.5 W 37.5 U 11/7 at St Louis 40-22 W +2.5 W 49.5 O 11/7 INDIANAPOLIS 21-40 L +4.5 L 48 O 11/3 at Buffalo 38-7 W +3 W 47.5 U 11/3 at Denver 30-26 W +3 W 35.5 O 11/14 BUFFALO 29-6 W -7 W 38 U 11/16 DALLAS 12-0 W -4.5 W 35 U 11/22 at Kansas City 27-19 W -3 W 54 U 11/13 at Miami 23-16 W -3 W 43 U 11/10 at Chicago 33-30 W -5 L 39 O 11/23 at Houston 23-20 W -5 L 37 O 11/28 BALTIMORE 24-3 W -7 W 34.5 U 11/20 NEW ORLEANS 24-17 W -8 L 48.5 U 11/17 at Oakland 20-27 L +5 L 48 U 11/30 at Indianapolis 38-34 W +3.5 W 43.5 O 12/5 at Cleveland 42-15 W -11 W 41 O 11/27 at Kansas City 16-26 L +4 L 49 U 11/24 MINNESOTA 24-17 W -8 L 47 U 12/7 MIAMI 12-0 W -3 W 33.5 U 12/12 CINCINNATI 35-28 W -10.5 L 47 O 12/4 NY JETS 16-3 W -10.5 W 40.5 U 11/28 at Detroit 20-12 W -6 W 45.5 U 12/14 JACKSONVILLE 27-13 W -6 W 33 O 12/20 at Miami 28-29 L -10 L 44 O 12/11 at Buffalo 35-7 W -4 W 35 O 12/8 BUFFALO 27-17 W -4 W 45 U 12/20 at Ny Jets 21-16 W -3 W 37 T 12/26 at NY Jets 23-7 W +0 W 41.5 U 12/17 TAMPA BAY 28-0 W -6 W 38 U 12/16 at Tennessee 7-24 L +3 L 43.5 U 12/27 BUFFALO 31-0 W -9.5 W 34.5 U 1/2 SAN FRANCISCO 21-7 W -13 W 37 U 12/26 at NY Jets 31-21 W -8 W 37.5 O 1/10 (PL) TENNESSEE 17-14 W -6 L 34.5 U 1/16 (PL) INDIANAPOLIS 20-3 W -1 W 51 U 1/1 MIAMI 26-28 L -6.5 L 38.5 O 12/22 NY JETS 17-30 L -3.5 L 41 O 1/18 (PL) INDIANAPOLIS 24-14 W -3.5 W 42 U 1/23 (PL) at Pittsburgh 41-27 W -3 W 36.5 O 1/7 JACKSONVILLE 28-3 W -7.5 W 37.5 U 12/29 MIAMI 27-24 W +2 W 38 O 2/1 (PL) *vs Carolina 32-29 W -7 L 38 O 2/6 (PL) *vs Philadelphia 24-21 W -7 L 47 U 1/14 (PL) at Denver 13-27 L +3 L 45.5 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 BUFFALO 19-17 W -9.5 L 41 U 9/17 at NY Jets 24-17 W -5.5 W 38 O 9/24 DENVER 7-17 L -6 L 38 U 10/1 at Cincinnati 38-13 W +6 W 46.5 O 10/8 MIAMI 20-10 W -9 W 36.5 U 10/22 at Buffalo 28-6 W -5.5 W 35.5 U 10/30 at Minnesota 31-7 W -1 W 39 U 11/5 INDIANAPOLIS 20-27 L -3 L 48 U 11/12 NY JETS 14-17 L -10 L 37.5 U 11/19 at Green Bay 35-0 W -5.5 W 46 U 11/26 CHICAGO 17-13 W -4.5 L 38 U 12/3 DETROIT 28-21 W -13 L 41 O 12/10 at Miami 0-21 L -3 L 37 U 12/17 HOUSTON 40-7 W -12 W 38.5 O 12/24 at Jacksonville 24-21 W +3 W 36 O 12/31 at Tennessee 40-23 W +3.5 W 41 O 1/7 (PL) NY JETS 37-16 W -9.5 W 39 O 1/14 (PL) at San Diego 24-21 W +5 W 46 U 1/21 (PL) at Indianapolis 34-38 L +3 L 47 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 at Ny Jets 38-14 W -6 W 41.5 O 9/16 SAN DIEGO 38-14 W -3.5 W 46 O 9/23 BUFFALO 38-7 W -16.5 W 41 O 10/1 at Cincinnati 34-13 W -8 W 54 U 10/7 CLEVELAND 34-17 W -15.5 W 48 O 10/14 at Dallas 48-27 W -4.5 W 52 O 10/21 at Miami 49-28 W -15.5 W 50 O 10/28 WASHINGTON 52-7 W -15 W 46.5 O 11/4 at Indianapolis 24-20 W -4.5 L 56 U 11/18 at Buffalo 56-10 W -15.5 W 46.5 O 11/25 PHILADELPHIA 31-28 W -23.5 L 51 O 12/3 at Baltimore 27-24 W -19.5 L 46.5 O 12/9 PITTSBURGH 34-13 W -11 W 49.5 U 12/16 NY JETS 20-10 W -20 L 42 U 12/23 MIAMI 28-7 W -22.5 L 46 U 12/29 at Ny Giants 38-35 W -13 L 46.5 O 1/12 (PL) JACKSONVILLE 31-20 W -13.5 L 51 T 1/20 (PL) SAN DIEGO 21-12 W -14 L 47.5 U 2/3 (PL) vs. NY Giants 14-17 L -12.5 L 54 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/7 KANSAS CITY 17-10 W -16.5 L 43.5 U 9/14 at NY Jets 19-10 W -1 W 37 U 9/21 MIAMI 13-38 L -12 L 37 O 10/5 at San Francisco 30-21 W -3 W 41 O 10/12 at San Diego 10-30 L +6 L 45 U 10/20 DENVER 41-7 W -3 W 47.5 O 10/26 ST LOUIS 23-16 W -9 L 41 U 11/2 at Indianapolis 15-18 L +6.5 W 44 U 11/9 BUFFALO 20-10 W -3.5 W 40.5 U 11/13 NY JETS 31-34 L -3 L 41 O 11/23 at Miami 48-28 W -2 W 42 O 11/30 PITTSBURGH 10-33 L -2.5 L 40 O 12/7 at Seattle 24-21 W -7.5 L 43 O 12/14 at Oakland 49-26 W -7 W 38 O 12/21 ARIZONA 47-7 W -8 W 41 O 12/28 at Buffalo 13-0 W -5.5 W 34.5 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/14 BUFFALO 25-24 W -13 L 47O 9/20 at NY Jets 9-16 L -3.5 L 44.5U 9/27 ATLANTA 26-10 W -4 W 45.5U 10/4 BALTIMORE 27-21 W -2 W 45O 10/11 at Denver 17-20 L -3 L 41U 10/18 TENNESSEE 59-0 W -9 W 39O 10/25 at Tampa Bay 35-7 W -15.5 W 44.5U 11/8 MIAMI 27-17 W -11 L 47U 11/15 at Indianapolis 34-35 L +3 W 48.5O 11/22 NY JETS 31-14 W -11 W 45T 11/30 at New Orleans 17-38 L +2 L 57U 12/6 at Miami 21-22 L -5 L 46U 12/13 CAROLINA 20-10 W -12.5 L 43.5U 12/20 at Buffalo 17-10 W -7 T 41.5U 12/27 JACKSONVILLE 35-7 W -9 W 44.5U 1/3 at Houston 27-34 L +8 W 47O 1/10 (PL) BALTIMORE 14-33 L -3.5 L 43.5O 8 WWW.STATFOX.COM

NEW YORK JETS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 15 to 1 AFC Title: 8 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 20.38 (20th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 10-8 6-10 11-7 4-12 10-7 4-12 9-7 11-8 65-71 (48%) OVERALL ATS 9-7 5-8 10-7 6-10 11-6 6-9 7-9 11-8 65-64 (50%) PRESEASON ATS 4-0 2-3 2-1 3-1 1-3 3-1 2-1 3-1 20-11 (65%) HOME ATS 5-3 3-4 4-4 5-3 5-3 2-5 3-5 4-4 31-31 (50%) ROAD ATS 4-4 2-4 6-3 1-7 6-3 4-4 4-4 7-4 34-33 (51%) vs DIVISION ATS 3-2 2-4 2-3 3-3 4-3 2-3 3-3 2-4 21-25 (46%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 6-6 5-6 8-5 5-7 8-5 5-6 5-7 9-6 51-48 (52%) as FAVORITE ATS 5-3 2-2 8-4 1-2 4-1 0-3 4-7 6-5 30-27 (53%) as UNDERDOG ATS 4-4 3-6 2-3 5-8 7-5 6-6 3-2 5-3 35-37 (49%) OVER-UNDER 8-10 6-9 8-10 9-7 10-7 7-9 8-8 9-9 65-69 (49%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * NY JETS are 1-11 ATS (-11.1 Units) vs. poor passing defenses - allowing 235 or more PYPG since 07. The Average Score was NY JETS 17.8, OPPONENT 21.3. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/7 - at Detroit, 11/14 - at Cleveland * NY JETS are on a 17-4 UNDER the total (+12.6 Units) run at home vs. bad teams (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) The Average Score was NY JETS 16, OPPONENT 12.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 1/2 - BUFFALO * NY JETS are on a 23-8 UNDER the total (+14.2 Units) run on the road vs. good offensive teams - averaging >=5.65 YPP The Average Score was NY JETS 16.2, OPPONENT 22.1. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/6 - at New England, 12/19 - at Pittsburgh * NY JETS are on a 3-13 ATS (-11.3 Units) skid at home in the first two weeks of the season The Average Score was NY JETS 17.8, OPPONENT 25.2. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/13 - BALTIMORE, 9/19 - NEW ENGLAND * Over the L2 seasons, NY JETS are 6-0 ATS (+6 Units) as road underdogs of 7 points or less. The Average Score was NY JETS 28.5, OPPONENT 16.2. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/6 - at New England WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM LINE FINAL ATS 9 2009 Record: 11-8 (-0.3 ML Units), 11-8 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 9-9 DIVISION: AFC East COACH: Rex Ryan, 2nd year STADIUM: New Meadowlands Stadium Scoring Differential: +7.2 (#8 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 28 (#7 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +6.5 (#7 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 21.58 (#8 of 32) 9/13/10 BALTIMORE * BALTIMORE is on 5-1 SU & ATS run vs. NY JETS 9/19/10 NEW ENGLAND * NEW ENGLAND is 9-2 SU & 10-1 ATS at NY JETS since 99 9/26/10 at Miami * NY JETS are 17-7 SU & 16-5 ATS vs. MIAMI since 98 10/3/10 at Buffalo * UNDERDOG is on 8-4 SU & 10-2 ATS run in L12 BUF-NYJ matchups 10/11/10 MINNESOTA * NY JETS are on 4-game SU & ATS winning streak vs. MINNESOTA 10/17/10 at Denver * L4 games in DEN-NYJ series at DENVER went UNDER the total 10/31/10 GREEN BAY * NY JETS has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. GREEN BAY 11/7/10 at Detroit * ROAD TEAM is on 3-2 SU & 4-1 ATS run in DET-NYJ series 11/14/10 at Cleveland * FAVORITE has swept L3 CLE-NYJ games at CLEVELAND, both SU & ATS 11/21/10 HOUSTON * L4 NYJ-HOU series games have gone UNDER the total 11/25/10 CINCINNATI * NY JETS has won its L3 games at home vs. CINCINNATI, both SU & ATS 12/6/10 at New England * NY JETS are 9-4 ATS at NEW ENGLAND since 97 12/12/10 MIAMI * UNDERDOG is 10-5 ATS in NYJ-MIA series at NY JETS since 92 12/19/10 at Pittsburgh * L6 games of PIT-NYJ series are 5-1 UNDER the total 12/26/10 at Chicago * UNDER the total is 5-0 in L5 games of CHI-NYJ series 1/2/11 BUFFALO * UNDERDOG is 8-6 SU & 12-2 ATS in NYJ-BUF series at NY JETS since 94 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +7.2 8 Yardage +69.6 4 Yards Per Play +0.81 5 Yards Per Point +2.49 8 Turnovers +1 15 Offensive Stats Points Scored 21.8 17 First Downs 17.5 23 Total Yards Per Game 322.9 20 Yards Per Play 5.05 21 Yards Per Point 14.74 11 Rushing Attempts 37.9 1 Rush Yards Per Game 172.3 1 Yards Per Rush 4.54 5 Rushing TD s 21 3 Passing Attempts Per Game 24.6 32 Completions Per Game 13.1 32 Completion Percentage 53.4% 29 Passing Yards Per Game 148.8 31 Passing Yards Per Attempt 6.06 21 Passing TD s 12 29 Sacks Allowed 30 10 Interceptions Thrown 21 28 Fumbles Lost 9 8 Total Turnovers Lost 30 20 Avg. Time of Possession 30:05 9 3rd Down Conversions 37.1% 20 4th Down Conversions 75.0% 1 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 14.8 1 First Downs 14.8 1 Total Yards Per Game 253.3 1 Yards Per Play 4.24 1 Yards Per Point 17.23 5 Rushing Attempts 26.3 11 Rush Yards Per Game 98.6 8 Yards Per Rush 3.76 4 Rushing TD s 11 11 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 31.3 7 Opponent Completions/Game 16.2 1 Opponent Completion % 51.7% 1 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 153.7 1 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.88 22 Passing TD s Allowed 31 30 Sacks Recorded 32 18 Interceptions 17 13 Fumbles Recovered 14 4 Total Turnovers Forced 31 8 3rd Down Conversions 31.5% 1 4th Down Conversions 36.8% 3 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 5.5 11 Penalty Yards/Game 42.3 7 Opponent Penalties/Game 5.4 24 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 42.5 27 Punt Return Average 9.1 13 Kick Return Average 24.4 5 Punt Attempts per game 5.0 22 Punt Net Average 39.0 19 Field Goals Made 30 3 Field Goal Percentage 83.3% 18 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 at Buffalo 37-31 W -3 W 43 O 9/4 at Washington 13-16 L +3 T 39.5 U 9/12 CINCINNATI 31-24 W -5.5 W 44.5 O 9/11 at Kansas City 7-27 L +3 L 47.5 U 9/15 NEW ENGLAND 7-44 L -1 L 41 O 9/14 MIAMI 10-21 L +3 L 37 U 9/19 at San Diego 34-28 W -3 W 47 O 9/18 MIAMI 17-7 W -5.5 W 37 U 9/22 at Miami 3-30 L +6 L 40 U 9/21 at New England 16-23 L +6 L 37 O 10/3 at Miami 17-9 W -6 W 37 U 9/25 JACKSONVILLE 20-26 L -2 L 33.5 O 9/29 at Jacksonville 3-28 L +3 L 41.5 U 10/6 KANSAS CITY 25-29 L +3 L 46.5 O 9/28 DALLAS 6-17 L -3 L 36.5 U 10/10 BUFFALO 16-14 W -6.5 L 37 U 10/17 SAN FRANCISCO 22-14 W -9.5 L 43 U 10/2 at Baltimore 3-13 L +7 L 31.5 U 10/20 MINNESOTA 20-7 W -3 W 49 U 10/12 BUFFALO 30-3 W +0 W 36.5 U 10/24 at New England 7-13 L +6 T 44 U 10/9 TAMPA BAY 14-12 W +2 W 32 U 10/27 CLEVELAND 21-24 L -3 L 44 O 10/19 at Houston 19-14 W -3.5 W 38 U 11/1 MIAMI 41-14 W -7 W 36.5 O 10/16 at Buffalo 17-27 L +3.5 L 32.5 O 11/3 at San Diego 44-13 W +8.5 W 41 O 10/26 at Philadelphia 17-24 L +3 L 36 O 11/7 at Buffalo 17-22 L -3 L 34 O 10/24 at Atlanta 14-27 L +8 L 40 O 11/10 MIAMI 13-10 W -3 T 40 U 11/2 NY GIANTS 28-31 L +3 T 40 O 11/14 BALTIMORE 17-20 L +1 L 32 O 11/6 SAN DIEGO 26-31 L +6 W 40 O 11/17 at Detroit 31-14 W -3 W 42.5 O 11/9 at Oakland 27-24 W -3 T 38.5 O 11/21 at Cleveland 10-7 W -1.5 W 38 U 11/13 at Carolina 3-30 L +7.5 L 40.5 U 11/24 BUFFALO 31-13 W -3 W 45.5 U 11/16 at Indianapolis 31-38 L +6 L 44 O 11/28 at Arizona 13-3 W -3 W 36.5 U 11/20 at Denver 0-27 L +14 L 40.5 U 12/2 at Oakland 20-26 L +6 T 48 U 11/23 JACKSONVILLE 13-10 W -4 L 43 U 12/5 HOUSTON 29-7 W -7 W 42 U 11/27 NEW ORLEANS 19-21 L -2.5 L 37 O 12/8 DENVER 19-13 W +1.5 W 43 U 12/1 TENNESSEE 24-17 W +3 W 42 U 12/12 at Pittsburgh 6-17 L +4.5 L 35 U 12/4 at New England 3-16 L +10.5 L 40.5 U 12/15 at Chicago 13-20 L -6.5 L 38 U 12/19 SEATTLE 37-14 W -6.5 W 41.5 O 12/22 at New England 30-17 W +3.5 W 41 O 12/7 at Buffalo 6-17 L +2.5 L 37 U 12/26 NEW ENGLAND 7-23 L +0 L 41.5 U 12/11 OAKLAND 26-10 W +3 W 35.5 O 12/29 GREEN BAY 42-17 W +1 W 40 O 12/14 PITTSBURGH 6-0 W -3 W 36 U 1/2 at St Louis 29-32 L -3.5 L 43.5 O 12/18 at Miami 20-24 L +8 W 35 O 1/4 (PL) INDIANAPOLIS 41-0 W -6 W 42.5 U 12/20 NEW ENGLAND 16-21 L +3 L 37 T 1/8 (PL) at San Diego 20-17 W +6.5 W 42.5 U 12/26 NEW ENGLAND 21-31 L +8 L 37.5 O 1/12 (PL) at Oakland 10-30 L +5.5 L 47.5 U 12/28 at Miami 21-23 L +3.5 W 37.5 O 1/15 (PL) at Pittsburgh 17-20 L +9 W 35.5 O 1/1 BUFFALO 30-26 W +2 W 37 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/10 at Tennessee 23-16 W +3 W 35.5 O 9/9 NEW ENGLAND 14-38 L +6 L 41.5 O 9/7 at Miami 20-14 W -3 W 37 U 9/13 at Houston 24-7 W +4.5 W 44.5U 9/17 NEW ENGLAND 17-24 L +5.5 L 38 O 9/16 at Baltimore 13-20 L +9 W 32.5 O 9/14 NEW ENGLAND 10-19 L +1 L 37 U 9/20 NEW ENGLAND 16-9 W +3.5 W 44.5U 9/24 at Buffalo 28-20 W +5.5 W 33 O 9/27 TENNESSEE 24-17 W -1 W 36O 9/23 MIAMI 31-28 W -3 T 36.5 O 9/22 at San Diego 29-48 L +8 L 46.5 O 10/4 at New Orleans 10-24 L +7.5 L 47U 10/1 INDIANAPOLIS 28-31 L +7.5 W 47 O 9/30 at Buffalo 14-17 L -3 L 37.5 U 9/28 ARIZONA 56-35 W -1.5 W 43.5 O 10/12 at Miami 27-31 L -3 L 35.5O 10/8 at Jacksonville 0-41 L +7.5 L 38.5 O 10/7 at Ny Giants 24-35 L +3.5 L 40.5 O 10/12 CINCINNATI 26-14 W -9.5 W 44 U 10/18 BUFFALO 13-16 L -9 L 35.5U 10/15 MIAMI 20-17 W -1.5 W 36.5 O 10/14 PHILADELPHIA 9-16 L +4 L 43.5 U 10/19 at Oakland 13-16 L -3 L 41 U 10/25 at Oakland 38-0 W -6 W 34O 10/22 DETROIT 31-24 W -4 W 43.5 O 10/21 at Cincinnati 31-38 L +5.5 L 48.5 O 10/26 KANSAS CITY 28-24 W -14 L 40.5 O 11/1 MIAMI 25-30 L -3 L 40O 10/29 at Cleveland 13-20 L +2 L 37 U 11/15 JACKSONVILLE 22-24 L -6.5 L 40.5O 10/28 BUFFALO 3-13 L -3 L 38.5 U 11/2 at Buffalo 26-17 W +5 W 43.5 U 11/12 at New England 17-14 W +10 W 37.5 U 11/22 at New England 14-31 L +11 L 45T 11/4 WASHINGTON 20-23 L +3.5 W 36 O 11/9 ST LOUIS 47-3 W -9.5 W 43.5 O 11/19 CHICAGO 0-10 L +5 L 40 U 11/29 CAROLINA 17-6 W -3 W 41U 11/18 PITTSBURGH 19-16 W +9 W 40.5 U 11/13 at New England 34-31 W +3 W 41 O 12/3 at Buffalo 19-13 W -3.5 W 37U 11/26 HOUSTON 26-11 W -5 W 40.5 U 12/3 at Green Bay 38-10 W +1 W 39 O 11/22 at Dallas 3-34 L +14 L 48 U 11/23 at Tennessee 34-13 W +5.5 W 41 O 12/13 at Tampa Bay 26-3 W -3.5 W 36.5U 12/10 BUFFALO 13-31 L -4.5 L 38 O 12/2 at Miami 40-13 W +2 W 37 O 11/30 DENVER 17-34 L -8 L 48 O 12/20 ATLANTA 7-10 L -5 L 36.5U 12/27 at Indianapolis 29-15 W +3 W 40.5O 12/17 at Minnesota 26-13 W +3.5 W 41 U 12/9 CLEVELAND 18-24 L +3 L 47 U 12/7 at San Francisco 14-24 L -5 L 45.5 U 1/3 CINCINNATI 37-0 W -9.5 W 33.5O 12/25 at Miami 13-10 W +3 W 36.5 U 12/16 at New England 10-20 L +20 W 42 U 12/14 BUFFALO 31-27 W -8 L 41 O 1/9 (PL) at Cincinnati 24-14 W +3 W 34O 12/31 OAKLAND 23-3 W -10 W 33.5 U 12/23 at Tennessee 6-10 L +8 W 37.5 U 12/21 at Seattle 3-13 L -3.5 L 41.5 U 1/17 (PL) at San Diego 17-14 W +8.5 W 43U 1/7 (PL) at New England 16-37 L +9.5 L 39 O 12/30 KANSAS CITY 13-10 W -4.5 L 35.5 U 12/28 MIAMI 17-24 L -3 L 43 U 1/24 (PL) at Indianapolis 17-30 L +7.5 L 40O

AFC NORTH AFC NORTH Afc north Preview After back-to-back trips to the playoffs as a wild card, and three postseason wins during that time, the Ravens will look to take the next step and claim a division title. Once again, general manager Ozzie Newsome deserves a high grade for his offseason work. The biggest splash came when he landed WR Anquan Boldin (Cardinals) in a trade. Baltimore is the recognized favorite in the AFC North after ranking 4th in the NFL a year ago in scoring differential. Defending division champ Cincinnati has a tough time putting back-to-back winning seasons together, but it ll try to buck a trend with all of its major contributors to last year s title team back in the fold. Defensively, the Bengals were hit hard by the injury bug in 2009, yet still finished as the 4th ranked unit league-wide. In Cleveland, no AFC North team enters 2010 on a longer winning streak than the Browns, which saved Eric Mangini from the firing squad by closing an otherwise horrible campaign with four straight victories. Mike Holmgren was lured to town to run the front office show, and it didn t take him long to put his stamp on the situation. At quarterback, the Browns released former Pro Bowler Derek Anderson (Cardinals) and traded former first-round pick Brady Quinn (Broncos), replacing them Jake Delhomme (Panthers), Seneca Wallace (Seahawks), and Colt McCoy (draft-texas). In Pittsburgh, unruly veterans Holmes and Ben Roethlisberger created much of the news over the first three months of an offseason that saw the defending Super Bowl champions miss the playoffs. Big Ben will sit out the first six games of 2010 due to a suspension handed down by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. It ll be Dennis Dixon or Byron Leftwich (Buccaneers) at the controls of the offense until some point in October. Should the Steelers survive the early schedule in decent shape, they should still be stocked enough to contend. BALTIMORE RAVENS The Ravens seem to have this wild-card thing figured out. While Pittsburgh and Cincinnati finished atop the AFC North in 2008 and 09, respectively, Baltimore gained entry to the postseason each season and has a combined three victories. Could the Ravens 33-14 dismantling of the Patriots in Foxboro last January be a sign of things to come? With unflappable QB Joe Flacco entering his third season, along with head coach John Harbaugh, this team isn t too far away. The front office made a bold offseason move, acquiring WR Anquan Boldin (Cardinals), to help achieve the goal of reaching the next step Baltimore s running game has ranked among the NFL s best five in consecutive seasons and elusive Ray Rice (1,339 yards, seven touchdowns) and powerful Willis McGahee (544, 12) comprise one of the best 1-2 punches in the business. Flacco, a year after becoming the first NFL rookie signal-caller to win two playoff games, continued progress with 3,613 yards passing, and 21-12 TD-Int ratio. The addition of Boldin helps his cause and allows coordinator Cam Cameron to go deeper in the playbook. The front line is as solid as they come Ray Lewis & Co. don t need an introduction, but the front office felt a little reinforcement for a unit, aging in certain spots, couldn t hurt. Sergio Kindle (2a-Texas) joins a LB corps that already included Lewis, Terrell Suggs and Jarret Johnson, and beefy Terrence Cody (2b-Alabama) will fit right in with Kelly Gregg and Haloti Ngata in the trenches. In the secondary, when Ed Reed s healthy and doing his thing, it s hard to find a better safety in the business While a wild-card spot would be nothing to complain about, the Ravens have bigger goals in mind. As long as the key parts stay healthy, especially on defense, the AFC North is theirs for the taking. Another double-digit win season and more January action looks like a safe bet. CINCINNATI BENGALS After suffering 10 losses in 2008, the Bengals cleaned up their act on and off the field and the result was a breakthrough 10-win campaign that brought the AFC North title in tow. Though the playoff loss at home to the Jets was a disappointment, the future is as bright as it s been during the Marvin Lewis era as after going 6-0 in division play a year ago, followed by a promising offseason, repeat potential is no laughing matter Much success can be traced to an offense led by a rejuvenated Cedric Benson at RB and a healthy Carson Palmer under center. The passing game ranked just 26th at 180.6 YPG but beginning in late October, Palmer enjoyed a nine-game stretch where he threw for 13 scores and four interceptions. The Bengals invested to make the air attack more potent, drafting TE Jermaine Gresham and WR Jordan Shipley, and signing WR Antonio Bryant. A line largely responsible for 51 sacks against in 2008 improved by leaps and bounds to trim the number to 29 Talented and unlucky are two words that come to mind to 2009 STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Cincinnati 10-7-0 0.588 319 315 7-5-0 6-3-0 4-4-0 7-10-0 41.2% 8-9-0 Pittsburgh 9-7-0 0.562 368 324 6-6-0 6-2-0 3-5-0 5-10-1 33.3% 9-6-1 Baltimore 10-8-0 0.556 427 295 7-5-0 6-2-0 4-6-0 9-8-1 52.9% 7-10-1 Cleveland 5-11-0 0.312 245 375 5-7-0 3-5-0 2-6-0 10-6-0 62.5% 7-9-0 describe a stop unit that finally put it all together for Lewis and coordinator Mike Zimmer. It ranked No. 4 overall, allowing 301.4 YPG, and no worse than seventh against the run and pass, and sixth in scoring defense. Imagine what could have happened in January if right end Antwan Odom, LB Rey Maualuga, and tackle Domata Peko didn t go down with injuries? Needless to say, there is big-time talent back on all levels of the defense for 2010 The Bengals were one of the league s biggest surprises a year ago and may only get better on defense, making them legitimate contenders to return to the playoffs. Still, history would lead one to believe otherwise, as they ve long struggled to string together big seasons. CLEVELAND BROWNS The writing appeared on the wall for Eric Mangini when the Browns hired Mike Holmgren as their new president, giving the win-starved organization a proven commodity to lead its front office. Surprisingly, Mangini was maintained as head coach thanks in large part to a four-game winning streak that salvaged an otherwise tumultuous 5-11 season. Holmgren has turned the page on a QB situation that grabbed plenty of negative headlines, releasing Derek Anderson and trading Brady Quinn. The Browns also let defensive leaders Kamerion Wimbley and Brodney Pool slip away. While the changes could end up being for the better, a third straight last-place finish in the AFC North will be a challenge to avoid Cleveland ranked last in the NFL in total yards, averaging 260.2 per game, and passing yards (129.8 per game), but enjoyed some success on the ground, ranking eighth. Mangini won t be answering QB questions this fall. Jake Delhomme starts, Seneca Wallace is the backup, and rookie Colt McCoy is the future. Rookie WR Mohamed Massaquoi showed flashes averaging 18.4 YPC, and RB James Harrison had an explosive finish (561 yards, 5 TD s in L3 games). The group up front could be the best the Browns have fielded since returning to the league in 1999 The defensive side of the ball was a priority in trades, signings and the draft, as Holmgren did everything in his power to bolster a unit that allowed 375 points. The Browns signed LB Scott Fujita, traded for cornerback Sheldon Brown and LB Chris Gocong, and drafted cornerback Joe Haden among others The early schedule provides the Browns with an opportunity to pick up where they left off, but a brutal four-game stretch starting in Week 6 could derail any momentum they take into October. Look for a transition year with lots of ups and downs to result in five or six wins. PITTSBURGH STEELERS The Steelers have won the Lombardi Trophy six times, but on each of the last three occasions, they failed to reach the playoffs as defending champions. They come off a winning season at 9-7, but to regain division supremacy they ll have to overcome the losses of QB Ben Roethlisberger and WR Santonio Holmes It ll be interesting to see where Mike Tomlin s team stands when Roethlisberger takes his first snap after serving a 6-game suspension. Byron Leftwich, Dennis Dixon, or Charlie Batch will steer the ship until Big Ben is available. The passing game was spectacular in 2009. The Steelers passed for 4,496 yards and 28 touchdowns. Tired of Holmes off-field shenanigans, the Steelers traded him for only a fifth-round pick. Mike Wallace (39 catches, 756 yards, 6 TD s) gets first crack at the starting spot opposite Hines Ward. The health of feature back Rashard Mendenhall (1,100 yards) is crucial to the balance of the RB unit after Willie Parker was lost in free agency. Having allowed 50 sacks last seasons, the Steelers invested their top pick in center Maurkice Pouncey (1-Florida) A year after ranking No. 1 in total defense, the Steelers didn t suffer much of a dropoff. Only four teams allowed fewer total yards. Expect more of the same from coordinator Dick LeBeau s unit. The linebackers will again set the tone led by James Harrison, Lamarr Woodley, and James Farrior. Still, it s a safe bet the Steelers won t reach their potential without Troy Polamalu at strong safety. His left knee, which in part cost him all but five games, is on the mend Roethlisberger will miss only one game against a playoff team from 2009, so if the Steelers can hold their own during his absence they could be on the high road. On the flip side, the suspension could have a major impact and serve as the ignition switch to an implosion. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH Baltimore Pittsburgh Cincinnati Cleveland 10 WWW.STATFOX.COM

BALTIMORE RAVENS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 15 to 1 AFC Title: 8 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 20.69 (16th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 7-9 10-7 9-7 6-10 13-4 5-11 13-6 10-8 73-62 (54%) OVERALL ATS 10-6 8-7 9-7 7-9 10-7 3-13 14-5 9-8 70-62 (53%) PRESEASON ATS 2-2 1-3 3-1 2-2 2-2 1-3 1-3 3-1 15-17 (47%) HOME ATS 4-4 4-3 5-3 5-3 6-3 3-5 6-2 5-3 38-26 (59%) ROAD ATS 6-2 4-4 4-4 2-6 4-4 0-8 8-3 4-5 32-36 (47%) vs DIVISION ATS 4-2 3-3 3-3 3-3 3-3 1-5 5-2 2-3 24-24 (50%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 9-3 6-6 5-7 5-7 7-6 2-10 11-4 6-7 51-50 (50%) as FAVORITE ATS 3-1 6-3 7-4 4-3 6-5 1-7 8-1 6-4 41-28 (59%) as UNDERDOG ATS 7-5 2-4 2-3 3-6 4-2 2-6 6-4 3-4 29-34 (46%) OVER-UNDER 8-8 9-8 8-8 5-11 6-10 10-5 11-8 7-10 64-68 (48%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * Over the L2 seasons, BALTIMORE is 9-1 ATS (+7.9 Units) vs. teams with a losing record. The Average Score was BALTIMORE 31.1, OPPONENT 9.6. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - CLEVELAND, 10/24 - BUFFALO, 11/7 - MIAMI, 11/28 - TAMPA BAY, 12/26 - at Cleveland * BALTIMORE is on a 16-4 ATS (+11.6 Units) run at home vs. poor defensive teams - allowing >=5.65 YPP The Average Score was BALTIMORE 26.4, OPPONENT 14. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - CLEVELAND, 11/7 - MIAMI, 11/28 - TAMPA BAY, 12/19 - NEW ORLEANS * BALTIMORE is on a 18-6 ATS (+11.4 Units) run vs. good rushing teams - averaging >=130 RYPG The Average Score was BALTIMORE 18.2, OPPONENT 16.1. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/13 - at NY Jets, 9/19 - at Cincinnati, 9/26 - CLEVELAND, 11/7 - MIAMI, 11/21 - at Carolina, 12/26 - at Cleveland, 1/2 - CINCINNATI * Over the L2 seasons, BALTIMORE is 6-0 ATS (+6 Units) in September games. The Average Score was BALTIMORE 28, OPPONENT 16. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/13 - at NY Jets, 9/19 - at Cincinnati, 9/26 - CLEVELAND * BALTIMORE is on a 23-10 ATS (+12 Units) run at home in December games The Average Score was BALTIMORE 26.3, OPPONENT 16. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/5 - PITTSBURGH, 12/19 - NEW ORLEANS WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM LINE FINAL ATS 11 2009 Record: 10-8 (-1.2 ML Units), 9-8 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 7-10 DIVISION: AFC North COACH: John Harbaugh, 3rd year STADIUM: M&T Bank Stadium SScoring Differential: +8.8 (#4 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 29 (#3 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +7.8 (#4 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 20.06 (#18 of 32) 9/13/10 at NY Jets * BALTIMORE is on 5-1 SU & ATS run vs. NY JETS 9/19/10 at Cincinnati * FAVORITE is 14-7 SU & ATS in CIN-BAL series since 99 9/26/10 CLEVELAND * FAVORITE is on 7-0 SU & 6-1 ATS run in L7 BAL-CLE matchups at BALTIMORE 10/3/10 at Pittsburgh * L8 games of PIT-BAL series at PITTSBURGH are 7-1 OVER the total 10/10/10 DENVER * L7 games of BAL-DEN series are 6-1 UNDER the total 10/17/10 at New England * L3 NE-BAL series games have gone OVER the total 10/24/10 BUFFALO * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 BAL-BUF games 11/7/10 MIAMI * UNDERDOG is 6-2 ATS in L8 BAL-MIA matchups 11/14/10 at Atlanta * BALTIMORE is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. ATLANTA 11/21/10 at Carolina * CAROLINA has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. BALTIMORE 11/28/10 TAMPA BAY * L3 BAL-TB series games have gone UNDER the total 12/5/10 PITTSBURGH * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 BAL-PIT games at BALTIMORE 12/13/10 at Houston * ROAD TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 HOU-BAL games 12/19/10 NEW ORLEANS * FAVORITE has swept L3 BAL-NO games at BALTIMORE, both SU & ATS 12/26/10 at Cleveland * UNDERDOG is on 6-3 SU & 7-2 ATS run in L9 CLE-BAL matchups at CLEVELAND 1/2/11 CINCINNATI * L3 games in BAL-CIN series at BALTIMORE went UNDER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +8.8 4 Yardage +51.9 8 Yards Per Play +0.72 8 Yards Per Point +4.26 2 Turnovers +11 4 Offensive Stats Points Scored 24.4 9 First Downs 20.0 13 Total Yards Per Game 346.3 14 Yards Per Play 5.47 14 Yards Per Point 13.91 6 Rushing Attempts 29.3 7 Rush Yards Per Game 137.5 5 Yards Per Rush 4.70 4 Rushing TD s 22 1 Passing Attempts Per Game 31.9 25 Completions Per Game 20.1 19 Completion Percentage 62.9% 12 Passing Yards Per Game 213.7 18 Passing Yards Per Attempt 6.70 13 Passing TD s 21 16 Sacks Allowed 36 20 Interceptions Thrown 13 7 Fumbles Lost 8 5 Total Turnovers Lost 21 5 Avg. Time of Possession 29:30 13 3rd Down Conversions 41.6% 11 4th Down Conversions 46.2% 19 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 16.3 3 First Downs 17.5 7 Total Yards Per Game 294.4 2 Yards Per Play 4.75 2 Yards Per Point 18.17 3 Rushing Attempts 27.2 17 Rush Yards Per Game 93.3 5 Yards Per Rush 3.43 1 Rushing TD s 8 6 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 32.8 14 Opponent Completions/Game 19.1 11 Opponent Completion % 58.4% 10 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 207.3 8 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 5.84 3 Passing TD s Allowed 19 10 Sacks Recorded 32 18 Interceptions 22 5 Fumbles Recovered 10 16 Total Turnovers Forced 32 7 3rd Down Conversions 36.7% 11 4th Down Conversions 41.2% 6 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 7.2 28 Penalty Yards/Game 68.4 32 Opponent Penalties/Game 5.5 21 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 46.3 20 Punt Return Average 7.4 20 Kick Return Average 26.2 1 Punt Attempts per game 4.6 14 Punt Net Average 39.7 14 Field Goals Made 21 22 Field Goal Percentage 70.0% 27 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 at Carolina 7-10 L +1 L 32 U 9/7 at Pittsburgh 15-34 L +4 L 38.5 O 9/12 at Cleveland 3-20 L -3.5 L 35 U 9/11 INDIANAPOLIS 7-24 L +3 L 44.5 U 9/15 TAMPA BAY 0-25 L +4.5 L 32 U 9/14 CLEVELAND 33-13 W -2.5 W 39 O 9/19 PITTSBURGH 30-13 W -3.5 W 35 O 9/18 at Tennessee 10-25 L -3.5 L 36.5 U 9/30 DENVER 34-23 W +9 W 34.5 O 9/21 at San Diego 24-10 W +2 W 38.5 U 9/26 at Cincinnati 23-9 W -1.5 W 35 U 10/2 NY JETS 13-3 W -7 W 31.5 U 10/6 at Cleveland 26-21 W +6.5 W 36.5 O 9/28 KANSAS CITY 10-17 L +3 L 43.5 U 10/4 KANSAS CITY 24-27 L -5.5 L 41 O 10/9 at Detroit 17-35 L +1 L 32.5 O 10/13 at Indianapolis 20-22 L +7 W 43.5 U 10/12 at Arizona 26-18 W -6.5 W 37 O 10/10 at Washington 17-10 W +0 W 34 U 10/16 CLEVELAND 16-3 W -6 W 34 U 10/20 JACKSONVILLE 17-10 W +1.5 W 38 U 10/19 at Cincinnati 26-34 L -1.5 L 36 O 10/24 BUFFALO 20-6 W -4.5 W 31.5 U 10/23 at Chicago 6-10 L +2 L 30 U 10/27 PITTSBURGH 18-31 L +3.5 L 37.5 O 10/26 DENVER 26-6 W -2.5 W 36.5 U 10/31 at Philadelphia 10-15 L +7.5 W 37 U 10/31 at Pittsburgh 19-20 L +12.5 W 35 O 11/3 at Atlanta 17-20 L +7 W 40.5 U 11/2 JACKSONVILLE 24-17 W -7 T 37.5 O 11/7 CLEVELAND 27-13 W -6.5 W 36 O 11/6 CINCINNATI 9-21 L +3 L 36.5 U 11/10 CINCINNATI 38-27 W -4 W 37 O 11/9 at St Louis 22-33 L +7 L 43.5 O 11/14 at NY Jets 20-17 W -1 W 32 O 11/13 at Jacksonville 3-30 L +6 L 33.5 U 11/16 at Miami 6-9 L +4.5 W 32.5 U 11/17 at Miami 7-26 L +5 L 34.5 U 11/21 DALLAS 30-10 W -7.5 W 36 O 11/20 PITTSBURGH 16-13 W +3.5 W 33.5 U 11/23 SEATTLE 44-41 W -3 T 36 O 11/24 TENNESSEE 13-12 W +2 W 38.5 U 11/30 SAN FRANCISCO 44-6 W -3 W 37 O 11/28 at New England 3-24 L +7 L 34.5 U 11/27 at Cincinnati 29-42 L +9 L 37.5 O 12/1 at Cincinnati 27-23 W -2 W 38 O 12/7 CINCINNATI 31-13 W -5 W 38.5 O 12/5 CINCINNATI 26-27 L -6.5 L 37 O 12/4 HOUSTON 16-15 W -7.5 L 39 U 12/8 NEW ORLEANS 25-37 L +1.5 L 42 O 12/14 at Oakland 12-20 L -7 L 38 U 12/12 NY GIANTS 37-14 W -10 W 34 O 12/11 at Denver 10-12 L +15 W 40 U 12/15 at Houston 23-19 W -3 W 35 O 12/21 at Cleveland 35-0 W -3 W 35.5 U 12/19 at Indianapolis 10-20 L +7.5 L 48.5 U 12/19 GREEN BAY 48-3 W -3.5 W 34 O 12/22 CLEVELAND 13-14 L -2.5 L 39.5 U 12/28 PITTSBURGH 13-10 W -5.5 L 37 U 12/26 at Pittsburgh 7-20 L +5 L 34 U 12/25 MINNESOTA 30-23 W -3.5 W 36 O 12/29 at Pittsburgh 31-34 L +8 W 39 O 1/3 TENNESSEE 17-20 L +0 L 38 U 1/2 MIAMI 30-23 W -11 L 33 O 1/1 at Cleveland 16-20 L -3 L 36.5 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 at Tampa Bay 27-0 W +3 W 33 U 9/17 OAKLAND 28-6 W -13 W 34 T 9/24 at Cleveland 15-14 W -7 L 32.5 U 10/1 SAN DIEGO 16-13 W +0 W 33.5 U 10/9 at Denver 3-13 L +5 L 33 U 10/15 CAROLINA 21-23 L -3 L 33.5 O 10/29 at New Orleans 35-22 W +3 W 37 O 11/5 CINCINNATI 26-20 W -3 W 41.5 O 11/12 at Tennessee 27-26 W -6.5 L 38 O 11/19 ATLANTA 24-10 W -3 W 41 U 11/26 PITTSBURGH 27-0 W -3 W 40.5 U 11/30 at Cincinnati 7-13 L +3 L 41 U 12/10 at Kansas City 20-10 W +3 W 37 U 12/17 CLEVELAND 27-17 W -12.5 L 35.5 O 12/24 at Pittsburgh 31-7 W +5 W 37 O 12/31 BUFFALO 19-7 W -9.5 W 37 U 1/13 (PL) INDIANAPOLIS 6-15 L -4 L 41 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 at Cincinnati 20-27 L +2.5 L 39.5 O 9/16 NY JETS 20-13 W -9 L 32.5 O 9/23 ARIZONA 26-23 W -7 L 36 O 9/30 at Cleveland 13-27 L -3.5 L 40 T 10/7 at San Francisco 9-7 W -4 L 34.5 U 10/14 ST LOUIS 22-3 W -9 W 36.5 U 10/21 at Buffalo 14-19 L -3 L 33.5 U 11/5 at Pittsburgh 7-38 L +9 L 36 O 11/11 CINCINNATI 7-21 L -3 L 44 U 11/18 CLEVELAND 30-33 L +1 L 43.5 O 11/25 at San Diego 14-32 L +9.5 L 39 O 12/3 NEW ENGLAND 24-27 L +19.5 W 46.5 O 12/9 INDIANAPOLIS 20-44 L +9 L 42 O 12/16 at Miami 16-22 L -3 L 37 O 12/23 at Seattle 6-27 L +13 L 38.5 U 12/30 PITTSBURGH 27-21 W +3 W 34.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/7 CINCINNATI 17-10 W +2 W 38 U 9/21 CLEVELAND 28-10 W -3 W 36.5 O 9/29 at Pittsburgh 20-23 L +6 W 34.5 O 10/5 TENNESSEE 10-13 L +1 L 33.5 U 10/12 at Indianapolis 3-31 L +4 L 39 U 10/19 at Miami 27-13 W +3 W 35.5 O 10/26 OAKLAND 29-10 W -8 W 34.5 O 11/2 at Cleveland 37-27 W +3 W 36.5 O 11/9 at Houston 41-13 W +3 W 44 O 11/16 at NY Giants 10-30 L +6.5 L 39 O 11/23 PHILADELPHIA 36-7 W -2 W 39 O 11/30 at Cincinnati 34-3 W -7 W 36 O 12/7 WASHINGTON 24-10 W -6 W 35 U 12/14 PITTSBURGH 9-13 L -3 L 34 U 12/20 at Dallas 33-24 W +5.5 W 39 O 12/28 JACKSONVILLE 27-7 W -10.5 W 37.5 U 1/4 (PL) at Miami 27-9 W -3.5 W 38 U 1/10 (PL) at Tennessee 13-10 W -3 W 33.5 U 1/18 (PL) at Pittsburgh 14-23 L +6 L 35.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/13 KANSAS CITY 38-24 W -13 W 37O 9/20 at San Diego 31-26 W +1 W 41O 9/27 CLEVELAND 34-3 W -13.5 W 38.5U 10/4 at New England 21-27 L +2 L 45O 10/11 CINCINNATI 14-17 L -9 L 42U 10/18 at Minnesota 31-33 L +3 W 45.5O 11/1 DENVER 30-7 W -4.5 W 42.5U 11/8 at Cincinnati 7-17 L -3 L 45U 11/16 at Cleveland 16-0 W -11 W 39.5U 11/22 INDIANAPOLIS 15-17 L +1 L 44.5U 11/29 PITTSBURGH 20-17 W -7.5 L 34.5O 12/7 at Green Bay 14-27 L +4 L 43U 12/13 DETROIT 48-3 W -14 W 40.5O 12/20 CHICAGO 31-7 W -10.5 W 39.5U 12/27 at Pittsburgh 20-23 L +3 T 43T 1/3 at Oakland 21-13 W -10 L 39.5U 1/10 (PL) at New England 33-14 W +3.5 W 43.5O 1/16 (PL) at Indianapolis 3-20 L +6.5 L 44U

CINCINNATI BENGALS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 30 to 1 AFC Title: 15 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 23.06 (1st toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 2-14 8-8 8-8 11-6 8-8 7-9 4-11-1 10-7 58-71-1 (45%) OVERALL ATS 4-12 9-6 7-9 8-8 8-7 6-9 7-9 7-10 56-70 (44%) PRESEASON ATS 2-2 2-2 1-2 2-2 4-0 2-2 2-2 2-2 17-14 (55%) HOME ATS 1-7 4-3 3-5 2-7 3-4 4-4 4-4 3-6 24-40 (38%) ROAD ATS 3-5 5-3 4-4 6-1 5-3 2-5 3-5 4-4 32-30 (52%) vs DIVISION ATS 1-5 3-3 2-4 4-3 4-2 3-3 1-5 4-2 22-27 (45%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 3-9 8-4 4-8 5-7 7-5 6-6 3-9 5-8 41-56 (42%) as FAVORITE ATS 0-1 2-2 2-2 7-5 5-5 4-6 1-2 0-8 21-31 (40%) as UNDERDOG ATS 4-11 7-4 5-7 1-3 3-2 2-3 6-7 7-2 35-39 (47%) OVER-UNDER 10-5 7-9 9-7 8-9 7-9 7-9 5-10 8-9 61-67 (48%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * CINCINNATI was 0-8 ATS (-8.8 Units) as favorites last season. The Average Score was CINCINNATI 16.8, OPPONENT 16.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/10 - TAMPA BAY, 11/21 - BUFFALO, 12/19 - CLEVELAND * CINCINNATI is 0-9 ATS (-9.9 Units) vs. teams giving up 17 or less PPG since 07. The Average Score was CINCINNATI 10.3, OPPONENT 29.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - BALTIMORE, 11/25 - at NY Jets, 1/2 - at Baltimore * CINCINNATI is 19-43 ATS (-28.3 Units) vs. teams scoring 14 or less PPG since 92. The Average Score was CINCINNATI 17.6, OPPONENT 23.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/10 - TAMPA BAY, 10/31 - MIAMI * CINCINNATI is 11-2 UNDER the total (+8.8 Units) in December games since 07. The Average Score was CINCINNATI 17.4, OPPONENT 17.5. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/5 - NEW ORLEANS, 12/12 - at Pittsburgh, 12/19 - CLEVELAND, 12/26 - SAN DIEGO * CINCINNATI is on a 9-24 ATS (-17.4 Units) skid at home in the first month of the season The Average Score was CINCINNATI 16.2, OPPONENT 22.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - BALTIMORE LINE FINAL ATS 2009 Record: 10-7 (+4.4 ML Units), 7-10 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 8-9 DIVISION: AFC North COACH: Marvin Lewis, 8th year STADIUM: Paul Brown Stadium Scoring Differential: +0.2 (#17 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 18 (#19 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +0.8 (#16 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 21.35 (#9 of 32) 9/12/10 at New England * CINCINNATI is 0-3 SU but 3-0 ATS in its L3 games visiting NEW ENGLAND 9/19/10 BALTIMORE * FAVORITE is 14-7 SU & ATS in CIN-BAL series since 99 9/26/10 at Carolina * CAROLINA is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games hosting CINCINNATI 10/3/10 at Cleveland * UNDERDOG is on 4-2 SU & 6-0 ATS run in L6 CLE-CIN matchups 10/10/10 TAMPA BAY * UNDER the total is 4-1 in L5 games of CIN-TB series 10/24/10 at Atlanta * ATLANTA has taken L2 games vs. CINCINNATI both SU & ATS 10/31/10 MIAMI * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 CIN-MIA games 11/8/10 PITTSBURGH * PITTSBURGH is 10-2 SU & ATS at CINCINNATI since 99 11/14/10 at Indianapolis * FAVORITE is 10-1 SU & 9-2 ATS in IND-CIN series since 92 11/21/10 BUFFALO * BUFFALO is on 7-0 SU & 6-1 ATS run vs. CINCINNATI 11/25/10 at NY Jets * NY JETS has won its L3 games at home vs. CINCINNATI, both SU & ATS 12/5/10 NEW ORLEANS * CINCINNATI has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. NEW ORLEANS 12/12/10 at Pittsburgh * L8 games of PIT-CIN series at PITTSBURGH are 6-2 OVER the total 12/19/10 CLEVELAND * L3 games in CIN-CLE series at CINCINNATI went UNDER the total 12/26/10 SAN DIEGO * OVER the total is 6-0 in L6 games of CIN-SD series 1/2/11 at Baltimore * L3 games in BAL-CIN series at BALTIMORE went UNDER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +0.2 17 Yardage +3.1 16 Yards Per Play -0.13 21 Yards Per Point +0.09 14 Turnovers +0 18 Offensive Stats Points Scored 19.1 22 First Downs 18.4 18 Total Yards Per Game 307.5 24 Yards Per Play 4.87 24 Yards Per Point 16.36 19 Rushing Attempts 31.6 4 Rush Yards Per Game 128.5 9 Yards Per Rush 4.07 24 Rushing TD s 9 22 Passing Attempts Per Game 29.8 27 Completions Per Game 17.9 25 Completion Percentage 60.0% 20 Passing Yards Per Game 180.6 26 Passing Yards Per Attempt 6.06 20 Passing TD s 21 16 Sacks Allowed 29 9 Interceptions Thrown 13 7 Fumbles Lost 12 22 Total Turnovers Lost 25 12 Avg. Time of Possession 24:59 30 3rd Down Conversions 40.6% 13 4th Down Conversions 71.4% 3 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 18.2 6 First Downs 17.3 5 Total Yards Per Game 304.4 4 Yards Per Play 5.00 4 Yards Per Point 16.45 11 Rushing Attempts 24.9 7 Rush Yards Per Game 98.3 7 Yards Per Rush 3.94 7 Rushing TD s 12 14 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 34.2 22 Opponent Completions/Game 19.9 16 Opponent Completion % 58.1% 6 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 203.1 6 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 5.97 7 Passing TD s Allowed 27 24 Sacks Recorded 34 16 Interceptions 19 9 Fumbles Recovered 6 29 Total Turnovers Forced 25 18 3rd Down Conversions 38.6% 16 4th Down Conversions 46.7% 11 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 7.1 27 Penalty Yards/Game 53.9 26 Opponent Penalties/Game 6.2 14 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 47.9 17 Punt Return Average 11.9 2 Kick Return Average 21.9 22 Punt Attempts per game 5.4 24 Punt Net Average 38.6 21 Field Goals Made 23 17 Field Goal Percentage 82.1% 19 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 SAN DIEGO 6-34 L -3 L 37 O 9/7 DENVER 10-30 L +6 L 44 U 9/12 at NY Jets 24-31 L +5.5 L 44.5 O 9/11 at Cleveland 27-13 W -3.5 W 45 U 9/15 at Cleveland 7-20 L +3.5 L 39 U 9/14 at Oakland 20-23 L +11.5 W 45 U 9/19 MIAMI 16-13 W -5.5 L 40.5 U 9/18 MINNESOTA 37-8 W -3.5 W 47.5 U 9/22 at Atlanta 3-30 L +7.5 L 43 U 9/21 PITTSBURGH 10-17 L +5 L 44.5 U 9/26 BALTIMORE 9-23 L +1.5 L 35 U 9/25 at Chicago 24-7 W -3 W 38 U 9/29 TAMPA BAY 7-35 L +6.5 L 33.5 O 9/28 at Cleveland 21-14 W +4.5 W 40.5 U 10/3 at Pittsburgh 17-28 L +6 L 40 O 10/2 HOUSTON 16-10 W -9.5 L 44 U 10/6 at Indianapolis 21-28 L +13.5 W 43 O 10/5 at Buffalo 16-22 L +7.5 W 40.5 U 10/17 at Cleveland 17-34 L +3 L 40 O 10/9 at Jacksonville 20-23 L +3 T 38 O 10/13 PITTSBURGH 7-34 L +6 L 41 P 10/19 BALTIMORE 34-26 W +1.5 W 36 O 10/25 DENVER 23-10 W +7 W 42.5 U 10/16 at Tennessee 31-23 W -3 W 47 O 10/27 TENNESSEE 24-30 L +4.5 L 42 O 10/26 SEATTLE 27-24 W +3 W 41.5 O 10/31 at Tennessee 20-27 L +3 L 39.5 O 10/23 PITTSBURGH 13-27 L -1.5 L 43 U 11/3 at Houston 38-3 W +2.5 W 36.5 O 11/2 at Arizona 14-17 L -3 L 39 U 11/7 DALLAS 26-3 W +0 W 44 U 10/30 GREEN BAY 21-14 W -9 L 45.5 U 11/10 at Baltimore 27-38 L +4 L 37 O 11/9 HOUSTON 34-27 W -4.5 W 40 O 11/14 at Washington 17-10 W +4 W 36.5 U 11/6 at Baltimore 21-9 W -3 W 36.5 U 11/20 INDIANAPOLIS 37-45 L +5 L 47.5 O 11/17 CLEVELAND 20-27 L +3 L 42 O 11/16 KANSAS CITY 24-19 W +6 W 47.5 U 11/21 PITTSBURGH 14-19 L +4 L 40.5 U 11/27 BALTIMORE 42-29 W -9 W 37.5 O 11/24 at Pittsburgh 21-29 L +10.5 W 43.5 O 11/23 at San Diego 34-27 W -3 W 43 O 11/28 CLEVELAND 58-48 W -6 W 37.5 O 12/4 at Pittsburgh 38-31 W +3 W 41 O 12/1 BALTIMORE 23-27 L +2 L 38 O 11/30 at Pittsburgh 24-20 W +3 W 42.5 O 12/5 at Baltimore 27-26 W +6.5 W 37 O 12/11 CLEVELAND 23-20 W -12 L 43.5 U 12/8 at Carolina 31-52 L +3 L 37.5 O 12/7 at Baltimore 13-31 L +5 L 38.5 O 12/12 at New England 28-35 L +10.5 W 47 O 12/18 at Detroit 41-17 W -9.5 W 45 O 12/15 JACKSONVILLE 15-29 L +3 L 45 U 12/14 SAN FRANCISCO 41-38 W -3 T 42 O 12/19 BUFFALO 17-33 L +3 L 41 O 12/24 BUFFALO 27-37 L -13.5 L 45 O 12/22 NEW ORLEANS 20-13 W +7 W 48.5 U 12/21 at St Louis 10-27 L +7 L 54 U 12/26 NY GIANTS 23-22 W -6.5 L 46.5 U 1/1 at Kansas City 3-37 L +10.5 L 48 U 12/29 at Buffalo 9-27 L +7.5 L 45.5 U 12/28 CLEVELAND 14-22 L -8.5 L 42 U 1/2 at Philadelphia 38-10 W -4 W 37.5 O 1/8 (PL) PITTSBURGH 17-31 L +3 L 46.5 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/10 at Kansas City 23-10 W -1.5 W 48.5 U 9/10 BALTIMORE 27-20 W -2.5 W 39.5 O 9/7 at Baltimore 10-17 L -2 L 38 U 9/13 DENVER 7-12 L -5 L 41U 9/17 CLEVELAND 34-17 W -10 W 40.5 O 9/16 at Cleveland 45-51 L -7 L 41.5 O 9/14 TENNESSEE 7-24 L +1 L 37 U 9/20 at Green Bay 31-24 W +9 W 41.5O 9/24 at Pittsburgh 28-20 W +2 W 42 O 9/23 at Seattle 21-24 L +3 T 49 U 9/21 at NY Giants 23-26 L +12.5 W 42.5 O 9/27 PITTSBURGH 23-20 W +3 W 36.5O 10/1 NEW ENGLAND 13-38 L -6 L 46.5 O 10/1 NEW ENGLAND 13-34 L +8 L 54 U 9/28 CLEVELAND 12-20 L -1 L 42 U 10/4 at Cleveland 23-20 W -6 L 37.5O 10/15 at Tampa Bay 13-14 L -4.5 L 44.5 U 10/14 at Kansas City 20-27 L -2.5 L 44 O 10/5 at Dallas 22-31 L +16 W 46 O 10/11 at Baltimore 17-14 W +9 W 42U 10/22 CAROLINA 17-14 W -3 T 44 U 10/21 NY JETS 38-31 W -5.5 W 48.5 O 10/12 at NY Jets 14-26 L +9.5 L 44 U 10/18 HOUSTON 17-28 L -3.5 L 46U 10/29 ATLANTA 27-29 L -4 L 45.5 O 10/28 PITTSBURGH 13-24 L +4 L 48 U 10/19 PITTSBURGH 10-38 L +7.5 L 36.5 O 10/25 CHICAGO 45-10 W +1.5 W 42.5O 11/5 at Baltimore 20-26 L +3 L 41.5 O 11/4 at Buffalo 21-33 L -1.5 L 44 O 10/26 at Houston 6-35 L +9 L 46 U 11/8 BALTIMORE 17-7 W +3 W 45U 11/12 SAN DIEGO 41-49 L +0 L 48 O 11/11 at Baltimore 21-7 W +3 W 44 U 11/2 JACKSONVILLE 21-19 W +7 W 40 T 11/15 at Pittsburgh 18-12 W +7 W 41.5U 11/22 at Oakland 17-20 L -8.5 L 36O 11/19 at New Orleans 31-16 W +3 W 51.5 U 11/18 ARIZONA 27-35 L -3 L 48.5 O 11/16 PHILADELPHIA 13-13 T +8.5 W 41 U 11/29 CLEVELAND 16-7 W -12.5 L 39U 11/26 at Cleveland 30-0 W -3 W 44 U 11/25 TENNESSEE 35-6 W -1 W 47 U 11/20 at Pittsburgh 10-27 L +12 L 34.5 O 12/6 DETROIT 23-13 W -13.5 L 42U 11/30 BALTIMORE 13-7 W -3 W 41 U 12/2 at Pittsburgh 10-24 L +6.5 L 39.5 U 11/30 BALTIMORE 3-34 L +7 L 36 O 12/13 at Minnesota 10-30 L +6 L 42U 12/10 OAKLAND 27-10 W -11 W 39.5 U 12/9 ST LOUIS 19-10 W -10 L 45.5 U 12/7 at Indianapolis 3-35 L +13.5 L 41.5 U 12/20 at San Diego 24-27 L +6.5 W 44O 12/18 at Indianapolis 16-34 L +3 L 54.5 U 12/15 at San Francisco 13-20 L -8 L 43 U 12/14 WASHINGTON 20-13 W +6.5 W 35.5 U 12/27 KANSAS CITY 17-10 W -13 L 39.5U 12/24 at Denver 23-24 L +3 W 44.5 O 12/23 CLEVELAND 19-14 W +2 W 43 U 12/21 at Cleveland 14-0 W +2 W 31 U 1/3 at NY Jets 0-37 L +9.5 L 33.5O 12/31 PITTSBURGH 17-23 L -6 L 45 U 12/30 at Miami 38-25 W -3 W 45 O 12/28 KANSAS CITY 16-6 W -1 W 40 U 1/9 (PL) NY JETS 14-24 L -3 L 34O 12 WWW.STATFOX.COM

CLEVELAND BROWNS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 100 to 1 AFC Title: 50 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 21.88 (2nd toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 9-8 5-11 4-12 6-10 4-12 10-6 4-12 5-11 47-82 (36%) OVERALL ATS 12-5 6-10 6-10 8-8 8-7 12-4 6-9 10-6 68-59 (54%) PRESEASON ATS 1-3 1-3 2-1 4-0 2-2 3-1 0-4 2-2 15-16 (48%) HOME ATS 4-4 2-6 4-4 4-4 4-4 7-1 2-5 5-3 32-31 (51%) ROAD ATS 8-1 4-4 2-6 4-4 4-3 5-3 4-4 5-3 36-28 (56%) vs DIVISION ATS 6-1 2-4 2-4 2-4 3-3 4-2 2-4 4-2 25-24 (51%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 10-3 4-8 4-8 6-6 7-5 9-3 4-7 9-3 53-43 (55%) as FAVORITE ATS 3-3 2-3 1-0 3-1 2-2 8-1 0-4 2-0 21-14 (60%) as UNDERDOG ATS 9-2 4-7 5-10 5-7 6-5 4-3 6-5 8-6 47-45 (51%) OVER-UNDER 8-9 7-9 7-9 4-12 7-9 9-6 6-9 7-9 55-72 (43%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * CLEVELAND is on a 8-0 UNDER the total (+8 Units) run against NFC South division opponents The Average Score was CLEVELAND 13.4, OPPONENT 16.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - at Tampa Bay, 10/10 - ATLANTA, 10/24 - at New Orleans, 11/28 - CAROLINA * CLEVELAND is 19-7 ATS (+11.3 Units) when coming off a win against the spread since 07. The Average Score was CLEVELAND 20.2, OPPONENT 21. Potential Spots for 2010: TBD * CLEVELAND is on a 11-2 ATS (+8.8 Units) run vs. poor defensive teams - allowing >=350 YPG The Average Score was CLEVELAND 23.5, OPPONENT 18.6. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - at Tampa Bay, 9/19 - KANSAS CITY, 10/24 - at New Orleans, 11/21 - at Jacksonville * CLEVELAND is on a 10-24 ATS (-16.4 Units) skid vs. good rushing defenses - allowing <=3.5 YPR The Average Score was CLEVELAND 14.3, OPPONENT 24.3. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - at Baltimore, 12/26 - BALTIMORE * CLEVELAND was 7-1 ATS (+5.9 Units) in the second half of last season. The Average Score was CLEVELAND 20.9, OPPONENT 20.8. Potential Spots for 2010: All games from 11/7 on WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 13 2009 Record: 5-11 (-2.9 ML Units), 10-6 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 7-9 DIVISION: AFC North COACH: Eric Mangini, 2nd year STADIUM: Cleveland Stadium Scoring Differential: -8.1 (#27 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 13 (#27 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -8 (#27 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 20.00 (#19 of 32) 9/12/10 at Tampa Bay * L3 TB-CLE series games have gone UNDER the total 9/19/10 KANSAS CITY * OVER the total is 5-0 in L5 games of CLE-KC series 9/26/10 at Baltimore * FAVORITE is on 7-0 SU & 6-1 ATS run in L7 BAL-CLE matchups at BALTIMORE 10/3/10 CINCINNATI * UNDERDOG is on 4-2 SU & 6-0 ATS run in L6 CLE-CIN matchups 10/10/10 ATLANTA * L3 CLE-ATL series games have gone UNDER the total 10/17/10 at Pittsburgh * L10 games of PIT-CLE series at PITTSBURGH are 8-2 OVER the total 10/24/10 at New Orleans * UNDERDOG has swept L4 NO-CLE games, both SU & ATS 11/7/10 NEW ENGLAND * FAVORITE is on 8-1 SU & 6-1 ATS run in L9 CLE-NE matchups 11/14/10 NY JETS * FAVORITE has swept L3 CLE-NYJ games at CLEVELAND, both SU & ATS 11/21/10 at Jacksonville * ROAD TEAM is 5-1 SU & ATS in L6 JAC-CLE matchups 11/28/10 CAROLINA * CAROLINA is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games at CLEVELAND 12/5/10 at Miami * CLEVELAND is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. MIAMI 12/12/10 at Buffalo * CLEVELAND has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. BUFFALO 12/19/10 at Cincinnati * L3 games in CIN-CLE series at CINCINNATI went UNDER the total 12/26/10 BALTIMORE * UNDERDOG is on 6-3 SU & 7-2 ATS run in L9 CLE-BAL matchups at CLEVELAND 1/2/11 PITTSBURGH * UNDERDOG is 6-9 SU but 10-4 ATS in CLE-PIT series at CLEVELAND since 92 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring -8.1 27 Yardage -129.0 32 Yards Per Play -1.52 32 Yards Per Point -0.38 18 Turnovers -12 29 Offensive Stats Points Scored 15.3 29 First Downs 14.8 30 Total Yards Per Game 260.2 32 Yards Per Play 4.29 32 Yards Per Point 17.01 23 Rushing Attempts 31.1 6 Rush Yards Per Game 130.4 8 Yards Per Rush 4.19 15 Rushing TD s 10 20 Passing Attempts Per Game 27.7 30 Completions Per Game 13.7 31 Completion Percentage 49.4% 32 Passing Yards Per Game 129.8 32 Passing Yards Per Attempt 4.69 32 Passing TD s 11 31 Sacks Allowed 30 10 Interceptions Thrown 18 20 Fumbles Lost 13 26 Total Turnovers Lost 31 22 Avg. Time of Possession 27:09 20 3rd Down Conversions 32.6% 26 4th Down Conversions 66.7% 8 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 23.4 21 First Downs 21.0 32 Total Yards Per Game 389.2 31 Yards Per Play 5.81 28 Yards Per Point 16.63 10 Rushing Attempts 31.6 28 Rush Yards Per Game 144.6 28 Yards Per Rush 4.57 29 Rushing TD s 15 19 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 32.9 15 Opponent Completions/Game 19.6 12 Opponent Completion % 59.5% 14 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 244.7 29 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.17 8 Passing TD s Allowed 14 2 Sacks Recorded 40 8 Interceptions 10 29 Fumbles Recovered 9 25 Total Turnovers Forced 19 30 3rd Down Conversions 38.9% 18 4th Down Conversions 50.0% 17 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 4.8 3 Penalty Yards/Game 42.4 8 Opponent Penalties/Game 6.3 13 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 50.8 12 Punt Return Average 11.7 3 Kick Return Average 24.2 7 Punt Attempts per game 5.9 29 Punt Net Average 39.5 17 Field Goals Made 23 17 Field Goal Percentage 92.0% 4 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 KANSAS CITY 39-40 L -2 L 35.5 O 9/7 INDIANAPOLIS 6-9 L +2 L 48 U 9/12 BALTIMORE 20-3 W +3.5 W 35 U 9/11 CINCINNATI 13-27 L +3.5 L 45 U 9/15 CINCINNATI 20-7 W -3.5 W 39 U 9/14 at Baltimore 13-33 L +2.5 L 39 O 9/19 at Dallas 12-19 L +5.5 L 37.5 U 9/18 at Green Bay 26-24 W +6 W 41 O 9/22 at Tennessee 31-28 W +4.5 W 40.5 O 9/21 at San Francisco 13-12 W +7 W 44 U 9/26 at NY Giants 10-27 L +3 L 38 U 9/25 at Indianapolis 6-13 L +14 W 46.5 U 9/29 at Pittsburgh 13-16 L +6.5 W 44 U 9/28 CINCINNATI 14-21 L -4.5 L 40.5 U 10/3 WASHINGTON 17-13 W +3 W 35 U 10/9 CHICAGO 20-10 W -2.5 W 35 U 10/6 BALTIMORE 21-26 L -6.5 L 36.5 O 10/5 at Pittsburgh 33-13 W +7 W 42 O 10/10 at Pittsburgh 23-34 L +4.5 L 36 O 10/16 at Baltimore 3-16 L +6 L 34 U 10/13 at Tampa Bay 3-17 L +7.5 L 36.5 U 10/12 OAKLAND 13-7 W -3 W 43.5 U 10/17 CINCINNATI 34-17 W -3 W 40 O 10/23 DETROIT 10-13 L -3 L 35 U 10/20 HOUSTON 34-17 W -8.5 W 37 O 10/19 SAN DIEGO 20-26 L -3.5 L 41 O 10/24 PHILADELPHIA 31-34 L +7 W 41 O 10/30 at Houston 16-19 L +1 L 36 U 10/27 at NY Jets 24-21 W +3 W 44 O 10/26 at New England 3-9 L +4.5 L 37.5 U 11/7 at Baltimore 13-27 L +6.5 L 36 O 11/6 TENNESSEE 20-14 W -3 W 35.5 U 11/3 PITTSBURGH 20-23 L +3.5 W 44 U 11/9 at Kansas City 20-41 L +9 L 43.5 O 11/14 PITTSBURGH 10-24 L +3.5 L 41 U 11/13 at Pittsburgh 21-34 L +7 L 34.5 O 11/17 at Cincinnati 27-20 W -3 W 42 O 11/16 ARIZONA 44-6 W -5 W 37.5 O 11/21 NY JETS 7-10 L +1.5 L 38 U 11/20 MIAMI 22-0 W -2.5 W 36.5 U 11/24 at New Orleans 24-15 W +6 W 48.5 U 12/1 CAROLINA 6-13 L -7.5 L 34.5 U 11/23 PITTSBURGH 6-13 L -3 L 40.5 U 11/28 at Cincinnati 48-58 L +6 L 37.5 O 11/27 at Minnesota 12-24 L +4 L 38 U 12/8 at Jacksonville 21-20 W +2.5 W 42 U 11/30 at Seattle 7-34 L +6.5 L 42 U 12/5 NEW ENGLAND 15-42 L +11 L 41 O 12/4 JACKSONVILLE 14-20 L +3 L 31 O 12/15 INDIANAPOLIS 23-28 L +2 L 41.5 O 12/8 ST LOUIS 20-26 L +5 L 43.5 O 12/12 at Buffalo 7-37 L +11 L 38.5 O 12/11 at Cincinnati 20-23 L +12 W 43.5 U 12/22 at Baltimore 14-13 W +2.5 W 39.5 U 12/14 at Denver 20-23 L +11.5 W 42.5 O 12/19 SAN DIEGO 0-21 L +8 L 35 U 12/18 at Oakland 9-7 W +3 W 38 U 12/29 ATLANTA 24-16 W +2.5 W 41 U 12/21 BALTIMORE 0-35 L +3 L 35.5 U 12/26 at Miami 7-10 L +9 W 40.5 U 12/24 PITTSBURGH 0-41 L +6.5 L 33 O 1/5 (PL) at Pittsburgh 33-36 L +8 W 39.5 O 12/28 at Cincinnati 22-14 W +8.5 W 42 U 1/2 at Houston 22-14 W +10 W 41 U 1/1 BALTIMORE 20-16 W +3 W 36.5 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/10 NEW ORLEANS 14-19 L -3 L 36 U 9/9 PITTSBURGH 7-34 L +4.5 L 36.5 O 9/7 DALLAS 10-28 L +6 L 48 U 9/13 MINNESOTA 20-34 L +4 L 39O 9/17 at Cincinnati 17-34 L +10 L 40.5 O 9/16 CINCINNATI 51-45 W +7 W 41.5 O 9/14 PITTSBURGH 6-10 L +6 W 43 U 9/20 at Denver 6-27 L +3 L 39.5U 9/24 BALTIMORE 14-15 L +7 W 32.5 U 9/23 at Oakland 24-26 L +3 W 41.5 O 9/21 at Baltimore 10-28 L +3 L 36.5 O 9/27 at Baltimore 3-34 L +13.5 L 38.5U 10/1 at Oakland 24-21 W -1 W 33.5 O 9/30 BALTIMORE 27-13 W +3.5 W 40 T 9/28 at Cincinnati 20-12 W +1 W 42 U 10/4 CINCINNATI 20-23 L +6 W 37.5O 10/8 at Carolina 12-20 L +8 T 39 U 10/7 at New England 17-34 L +15.5 L 48 O 10/13 NY GIANTS 35-14 W +7.5 W 42.5 O 10/11 at Buffalo 6-3 W +5.5 W 41.5U 10/22 DENVER 7-17 L +4 L 31 U 10/14 MIAMI 41-31 W -3.5 W 45 O 10/19 at Washington 11-14 L +7 W 41.5 U 10/18 at Pittsburgh 14-27 L +13.5 W 37.5O 10/29 NY JETS 20-13 W -2 W 37 U 10/28 at St Louis 27-20 W -3 W 46.5 O 10/26 at Jacksonville 23-17 W +7 W 41.5 U 10/25 GREEN BAY 3-31 L +8.5 L 41.5U 11/5 at San Diego 25-32 L +13 W 42 O 11/4 SEATTLE 33-30 W -1.5 W 46.5 O 11/2 BALTIMORE 27-37 L -3 L 36.5 O 11/1 at Chicago 6-30 L +11 L 39.5U 11/12 at Atlanta 17-13 W +8 W 42 U 11/11 at Pittsburgh 28-31 L +9 W 46.5 O 11/6 DENVER 30-34 L -3 L 46 O 11/16 BALTIMORE 0-16 L +11 L 39.5U 11/19 PITTSBURGH 20-24 L +4.5 W 36 O 11/18 at Baltimore 33-30 W -1 W 43.5 O 11/17 at Buffalo 29-27 W +5 W 41 O 11/22 at Detroit 37-38 L +3 W 37.5O 11/26 CINCINNATI 0-30 L +3 L 44 U 11/25 HOUSTON 27-17 W -3 W 52 U 11/23 HOUSTON 6-16 L -3 L 49.5 U 11/29 at Cincinnati 7-16 L +12.5 W 39U 12/3 KANSAS CITY 31-28 W +3.5 W 36.5 O 12/2 at Arizona 21-27 L +1 L 52 U 11/30 INDIANAPOLIS 6-10 L +4 T 44 U 12/6 SAN DIEGO 23-30 L +13.5 W 42.5O 12/7 at Pittsburgh 7-27 L +7 L 33 O 12/9 at Ny Jets 24-18 W -3 W 47 U 12/7 at Tennessee 9-28 L +13.5 L 36.5 O 12/10 PITTSBURGH 13-6 W +10 W 34U 12/17 at Baltimore 17-27 L +12.5 W 35.5 O 12/16 BUFFALO 8-0 W -4 W 36 U 12/15 at Philadelphia 10-30 L +15.5 L 40 T 12/20 at Kansas City 41-34 W +2 W 39O 12/24 TAMPA BAY 7-22 L -3.5 L 37.5 U 12/23 at Cincinnati 14-19 L -2 L 43 U 12/21 CINCINNATI 0-14 L -2 L 31 U 12/27 OAKLAND 23-9 W -3 W 37U 12/31 at Houston 6-14 L +5.5 L 38.5 U 12/30 SAN FRANCISCO 20-7 W -11.5 W 41 U 12/28 at Pittsburgh 0-31 L +11.5 L 33.5 U 1/3 JACKSONVILLE 23-17 W -2 W 35O

PITTSBURGH STEELERS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 10 to 1 AFC Title: 5 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 21.06 (11th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 11-6-1 6-10 16-2 15-5 8-8 10-7 15-4 9-7 90-49-1 (65%) OVERALL ATS 6-11 8-8 11-7 13-7 7-9 9-8 11-8 5-10 70-68 (51%) PRESEASON ATS 2-2 0-4 2-2 3-1 1-3 3-2 1-3 3-1 15-18 (45%) HOME ATS 2-7 4-4 6-4 3-5 5-3 6-3 6-4 2-5 34-35 (49%) ROAD ATS 4-4 4-4 5-3 10-2 2-6 3-5 5-4 3-5 36-33 (52%) vs DIVISION ATS 2-5 4-2 5-1 4-3 2-4 4-2 5-2 1-4 27-23 (54%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 4-10 7-5 9-5 9-6 4-8 6-7 9-5 4-7 52-53 (50%) as FAVORITE ATS 4-11 5-4 6-5 9-6 6-7 8-7 7-7 4-10 49-57 (46%) as UNDERDOG ATS 2-0 3-4 5-2 4-1 1-2 1-1 4-1 1-0 21-11 (66%) OVER-UNDER 12-5 8-8 10-8 10-9 10-6 9-8 11-8 9-6 79-58 (58%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * PITTSBURGH is on a 30-12 ATS (+16.8 Units) run vs. top-level teams (Win Pct. > 75%) The Average Score was PITTSBURGH 21.3, OPPONENT 18.4. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/31 - at New Orleans * PITTSBURGH is on a 7-19 ATS (-13.9 Units) skid on the road vs. bad teams (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) The Average Score was PITTSBURGH 20.3, OPPONENT 19.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/28 - at Buffalo, 1/2 - at Cleveland * PITTSBURGH is 42-23 ATS (+16.7 Units) on the road in December games since 92. The Average Score was PITTSBURGH 22.6, OPPONENT 15.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/31 - at New Orleans * PITTSBURGH is on a 15-5 OVER the total (+9.5 Units) run at home vs. good teams - outscoring opponents by 6+ PPG The Average Score was PITTSBURGH 22.9, OPPONENT 20.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/3 - BALTIMORE, 11/14 - NEW ENGLAND * PITTSBURGH is on a 8-19 ATS (-12.9 Units) skid as road favorites of 3 points or less The Average Score was PITTSBURGH 20.1, OPPONENT 20.2. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - at Tampa Bay, 11/8 - at Cincinnati, 11/28 - at Buffalo 2009 Record: 9-7 (-8.1 ML Units), 5-10 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 9-6 DIVISION: AFC North COACH: Mike Tomlin, 4th year STADIUM: Heinz Field Scoring Differential: +2.8 (#14 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 22 (#14 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +1.8 (#13 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 19.38 (#24 of 32) 9/12/10 ATLANTA * UNDERDOG is on 3-2 SU & 5-0 ATS run in L5 PIT-ATL matchups 9/19/10 at Tennessee * UNDERDOG is 3-2 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 TEN-PIT matchups at TENNESSEE 9/26/10 at Tampa Bay * L4 TB-PIT series games have gone UNDER the total 10/3/10 BALTIMORE * L8 games of PIT-BAL series at PITTSBURGH are 7-1 OVER the total 10/17/10 CLEVELAND * L10 games of PIT-CLE series at PITTSBURGH are 8-2 OVER the total 10/24/10 at Miami * PITTSBURGH is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games at MIAMI 10/31/10 at New Orleans * L3 NO-PIT series games have gone OVER the total 11/8/10 at Cincinnati * PITTSBURGH is 10-2 SU & ATS at CINCINNATI since 99 11/14/10 NEW ENGLAND * UNDERDOG is 7-3 SU & 8-2 ATS in PIT-NE series since 97 11/21/10 OAKLAND * UNDERDOG is on 5-2 SU & 6-1 ATS run in L7 PIT-OAK matchups 11/28/10 at Buffalo * PITTSBURGH is 7-1 SU & 8-0 ATS in its L8 games vs. BUFFALO 12/5/10 at Baltimore * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 BAL-PIT games at BALTIMORE 12/12/10 CINCINNATI * L8 games of PIT-CIN series at PITTSBURGH are 6-2 OVER the total 12/19/10 NY JETS * L6 games of PIT-NYJ series are 5-1 UNDER the total 12/23/10 CAROLINA * PITTSBURGH is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in its L4 games vs. CAROLINA 1/2/11 at Cleveland * UNDERDOG is 6-9 SU but 10-4 ATS in CLE-PIT series at CLEVELAND since 92 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +2.8 14 Yardage +65.8 6 Yards Per Play +0.80 6 Yards Per Point -1.02 21 Turnovers -3 20 Offensive Stats Points Scored 23.0 12 First Downs 20.7 9 Total Yards Per Game 371.1 7 Yards Per Play 5.85 8 Yards Per Point 16.13 18 Rushing Attempts 26.8 18 Rush Yards Per Game 112.1 19 Yards Per Rush 4.19 16 Rushing TD s 10 20 Passing Attempts Per Game 33.5 18 Completions Per Game 21.9 9 Completion Percentage 65.5% 7 Passing Yards Per Game 259.3 9 Passing Yards Per Attempt 7.74 5 Passing TD s 28 7 Sacks Allowed 50 31 Interceptions Thrown 14 12 Fumbles Lost 11 18 Total Turnovers Lost 25 12 Avg. Time of Possession 31:58 4 3rd Down Conversions 39.4% 17 4th Down Conversions 66.7% 7 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 20.3 12 First Downs 17.1 4 Total Yards Per Game 305.3 5 Yards Per Play 5.05 8 Yards Per Point 15.11 20 Rushing Attempts 23.3 4 Rush Yards Per Game 89.9 3 Yards Per Rush 3.87 5 Rushing TD s 7 4 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 34.3 23 Opponent Completions/Game 19.9 17 Opponent Completion % 58.2% 7 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 215.4 16 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 7.21 25 Passing TD s Allowed 25 20 Sacks Recorded 47 2 Interceptions 12 25 Fumbles Recovered 10 16 Total Turnovers Forced 22 25 3rd Down Conversions 42.3% 28 4th Down Conversions 70.0% 30 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 5.3 9 Penalty Yards/Game 48.1 16 Opponent Penalties/Game 6.4 12 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 56.4 6 Punt Return Average 8.1 18 Kick Return Average 24.0 8 Punt Attempts per game 4.5 12 Punt Net Average 38.2 22 Field Goals Made 27 6 Field Goal Percentage 87.1% 9 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/9 at New England 14-30 L -2.5 L 37.5 O 9/7 BALTIMORE 34-15 W -4 W 38.5 O 9/12 OAKLAND 24-21 W -3.5 L 43 O 9/11 TENNESSEE 34-7 W -7 W 39.5 O 9/15 OAKLAND 17-30 L -4 L 40 O 9/14 at Kansas City 20-41 L +3.5 L 48 O 9/19 at Baltimore 13-30 L +3.5 L 35 O 9/18 at Houston 27-7 W -4.5 W 37.5 U 9/29 CLEVELAND 16-13 W -6.5 L 44 U 9/21 at Cincinnati 17-10 W -5 W 44.5 U 9/26 at Miami 13-3 W +2.5 W 31 U 9/25 NEW ENGLAND 20-23 L -3 L 42 O 10/6 at New Orleans 29-32 L +3 T 43.5 O 10/13 at Cincinnati 34-7 W -6 W 41 P 9/28 TENNESSEE 13-30 L -3 L 44 U 10/3 CINCINNATI 28-17 W -6 W 40 O 10/10 at San Diego 24-22 W +3.5 W 47 U 10/10 CLEVELAND 34-23 W -4.5 W 36 O 10/16 JACKSONVILLE 17-23 L -3 L 33 O 10/21 INDIANAPOLIS 28-10 W -4.5 W 46 U 10/5 CLEVELAND 13-33 L -7 L 42 O 10/23 at Cincinnati 27-13 W +1.5 W 43 U 10/17 at Dallas 24-20 W +3 W 39 O 10/27 at Baltimore 31-18 W -3.5 W 37.5 O 10/12 at Denver 14-17 L +6.5 W 45 U 10/31 BALTIMORE 20-19 W -12.5 L 35 O 10/31 NEW ENGLAND 34-20 W +3 W 42 O 11/6 at Green Bay 20-10 W -3 W 38.5 U 11/3 at Cleveland 23-20 W -3.5 L 44 U 10/26 ST LOUIS 21-33 L -1 L 45.5 O 11/7 PHILADELPHIA 27-3 W +1.5 W 44.5 U 11/13 CLEVELAND 34-21 W -7 W 34.5 O 11/10 ATLANTA 34-34 T -5.5 L 42.5 O 11/2 at Seattle 16-23 L +5 L 44.5 U 11/14 at Cleveland 24-10 W -3.5 W 41 U 11/20 at Baltimore 13-16 L -3.5 L 33.5 U 11/17 at Tennessee 23-31 L -3 L 44 O 11/9 ARIZONA 28-15 W -7 W 40.5 O 11/21 at Cincinnati 19-14 W -4 W 40.5 U 11/28 at Indianapolis 7-26 L +8 L 47.5 U 11/24 CINCINNATI 29-21 W -10.5 L 43.5 O 11/17 at San Francisco 14-30 L +4 L 41.5 O 11/28 WASHINGTON 16-7 W -10 L 34.5 U 12/4 CINCINNATI 31-38 L -3 L 41 O 12/1 at Jacksonville 25-23 W -3 L 44 O 11/23 at Cleveland 13-6 W +3 W 40.5 U 12/5 at Jacksonville 17-16 W -3 L 35.5 U 12/11 CHICAGO 21-9 W -6.5 W 30 T 12/8 HOUSTON 6-24 L -14 L 37.5 U 11/30 CINCINNATI 20-24 L -3 L 42.5 O 12/12 NY JETS 17-6 W -4.5 W 35 U 12/18 at Minnesota 18-3 W -4.5 W 40 U 12/24 at Cleveland 41-0 W -6.5 W 33 O 12/15 CAROLINA 30-14 W -9.5 W 39 O 12/18 at NY Giants 33-30 W -10 L 36.5 O 12/23 at Tampa Bay 17-7 W +4.5 W 37.5 U 12/7 OAKLAND 27-7 W -5.5 W 40.5 U 1/1 DETROIT 35-21 W -16.5 L 36.5 O 12/26 BALTIMORE 20-7 W -5 W 34 U 12/29 BALTIMORE 34-31 W -8 L 39 O 12/14 at Ny Jets 0-6 L +3 L 36 U 1/8 (PL) at Cincinnati 31-17 W -3 W 46.5 O 1/2 at Buffalo 29-24 W +9.5 W 33 O 1/15 (PL) at Indianapolis 21-18 W +10 W 48 U 1/5 (PL) CLEVELAND 36-33 W -8 L 39.5 O 12/21 SAN DIEGO 40-24 W -6.5 W 41.5 O 1/15 (PL) NY JETS 20-17 W -9 L 35.5 O 1/22 (PL) at Denver 34-17 W +3 W 40.5 O 1/11 (PL) at Tennessee 31-34 L +4.5 W 44 O 12/28 at Baltimore 10-13 L +5.5 W 37 U 1/23 (PL) NEW ENGLAND 27-41 L +3 L 36.5 O 2/5 (PL) *vs Seattle 21-10 W -4 W 46.5 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/7 MIAMI 28-17 W -1.5 W 34 O 9/9 at Cleveland 34-7 W -4.5 W 36.5 O 9/7 HOUSTON 38-17 W -6 W 44 O 9/10 TENNESSEE 13-10 W -6 L 36U 9/18 at Jacksonville 0-9 L -3 L 37 U 9/16 BUFFALO 26-3 W -10 W 40 U 9/14 at Cleveland 10-6 W -6 L 43 U 9/20 at Chicago 14-17 L -3 L 38U 9/24 CINCINNATI 20-28 L -2 L 42 O 9/23 SAN FRANCISCO 37-16 W -10 W 37.5 O 9/21 at Philadelphia 6-15 L +3.5 L 44.5 U 10/8 at San Diego 13-23 L +3 L 37 U 9/30 at Arizona 14-21 L -5.5 L 42.5 U 9/29 BALTIMORE 23-20 W -6 L 34.5 O 9/27 at Cincinnati 20-23 L -3 L 36.5O 10/5 at Jacksonville 26-21 W +5.5 W 38 O 10/4 SAN DIEGO 38-28 W -5.5 W 43O 10/15 KANSAS CITY 45-7 W -6.5 W 37 O 10/7 SEATTLE 21-0 W -5 W 41 U 10/19 at Cincinnati 38-10 W -7.5 W 36.5 O 10/11 at Detroit 28-20 W -11 L 44O 10/22 at Atlanta 38-41 L -3 L 39 O 10/21 at Denver 28-31 L -4 L 38 O 10/26 NY GIANTS 14-21 L -3 L 41 U 10/18 CLEVELAND 27-14 W -13.5 L 37.5O 10/29 at Oakland 13-20 L -9 L 38.5 U 10/28 at Cincinnati 24-13 W -4 W 48 U 11/3 at Washington 23-6 W +3 W 37.5 U 10/25 MINNESOTA 27-17 W -6 W 46.5U 11/5 DENVER 20-31 L -3 L 36 O 11/5 BALTIMORE 38-7 W -9 W 36 O 11/9 INDIANAPOLIS 20-24 L -3 L 39 O 11/12 NEW ORLEANS 38-31 W -6.5 W 45.5 O 11/11 CLEVELAND 31-28 W -9 L 46.5 O 11/16 SAN DIEGO 11-10 W -4 L 40 U 11/9 at Denver 28-10 W -3 W 41U 11/18 at Ny Jets 16-19 L -9 L 40.5 U 11/20 CINCINNATI 27-10 W -12 W 34.5 O 11/15 CINCINNATI 12-18 L -7 L 41.5U 11/19 at Cleveland 24-20 W -4.5 L 36 O 11/26 MIAMI 3-0 W -15 L 37 U 11/30 at New England 33-10 W +2.5 W 40 O 11/22 at Kansas City 24-27 L -11 L 39.5O 11/26 at Baltimore 0-27 L +3 L 40.5 U 12/2 CINCINNATI 24-10 W -6.5 W 39.5 U 12/7 DALLAS 20-13 W -4 W 38 U 11/29 at Baltimore 17-20 L +7.5 W 34.5O 12/3 TAMPA BAY 20-3 W -9 W 40 U 12/14 at Baltimore 13-9 W +3 W 34 U 12/9 at New England 13-34 L +11 L 49.5 U 12/6 OAKLAND 24-27 L -15 L 37O 12/7 CLEVELAND 27-7 W -7 W 33 O 12/21 at Tennessee 14-31 L -3 L 34 O 12/16 JACKSONVILLE 22-29 L -3 L 35 O 12/10 at Cleveland 6-13 L -10 L 34U 12/28 CLEVELAND 31-0 W -11.5 W 33.5 U 12/17 at Carolina 37-3 W -3 W 39 O 12/20 at St Louis 41-24 W -8 W 43 O 1/11 (PL) SAN DIEGO 35-24 W -6.5 W 38 O 12/20 GREEN BAY 37-36 W -3 L 42O 12/24 BALTIMORE 7-31 L -5 L 37 O 12/30 at Baltimore 21-27 L -3 L 34.5 O 1/18 (PL) BALTIMORE 23-14 W -6 W 35.5 O 12/27 BALTIMORE 23-20 W -3 T 43T 12/31 at Cincinnati 23-17 W +6 W 45 U 1/5 (PL) JACKSONVILLE 29-31 L +3 W 40 O 2/1 (PL) vs. Arizona 27-23 W -6.5 L 46.5 O 1/3 at Miami 30-24 W -3 W 45O 14 WWW.STATFOX.COM

Afc SOUTH Preview The road to the AFC South title will continue to run through Indianapolis probably as long as Peyton Manning is still under center for the Colts. Indy always seems to find a way to put just enough of the right pieces around Manning to stay on top. For 2010, the defending AFC champions add defensive end Jerry Hughes (1-TCU), who some have compared to Dwight Freeney. Of course, the key offensive pieces remain in place. The Colts, hungry after losing in Super Bowl XLIV to New Orleans, again enter the season as the heavy favorite in this division. Nipping most closely at their heels could be the Houston Texans, still looking for their first-ever postseason trip, and taking a four-game winning streak into the opener against the Colts. Offensively, the Texans match up with anyone, and they ranked 5th in the NFL last season in yardage. Most of the fans in Jacksonville were hoping the Jaguars would come away from the draft with Tim Tebow, who at least could help fill the seats for a franchise in need of an attendance boost. After losing their final four games of 2009 and fading out of the playoff picture, the Jaguars need a fast start against a difficult first month schedule, at least on paper. Their biggest additions in the offseason came on defense, after giving up the 9th most points in the league. Last year was a roller-coaster ride for Tennessee. The Titans opened with six straight losses and but running back Chris Johnson and quarterback Vince Young led a five-game winning streak that eventually brought a.500 finish. Young could face disciplinary action for some offseason transgressions. Johnson leads what was the league s second best rushing attack, but the Titans desperately need to improve on defense after ranking 27th in the NFL. They are hoping that three top draft picks spent on that unit will be a quick remedy. HOUSTON TEXANS Houston has never been to the playoffs, but came close last season with a 9-7 record. While many believe this could finally be the year for a postseason berth, the team took a big hit when LB Brian Cushing, the 2009 NFL Defensive ROY, was suspended for the first four games of the 10 campaign QB Matt Schaub comes off his best season yet (396 completions, 4,770 yards). Both were #1 in the NFL and career highs, as was his number of touchdowns (29). Most importantly, he played in all 16 games. Much of Schaub s success can be attributed to having one of the best wide receivers in the game at his disposal in Andre Johnson (101 catches, 1,569 yards). Running back Steve Slaton endured a sophomore slump (seven fumbles) before suffering a season-ending neck injury in Week 13. Arian Foster showed flashes of brilliance in his two starts and will get a shot to earn the starting job. Schaub s stats are even more impressive when one considers that he plays behind an average offensive line The stop unit was an improved group, having ranked tied for 13th in total yardage and 10th in rushing yards. Cushing s outstanding debut had a lot to do with the improvement and his absence will be tough to overcome early. The line is solid and should be even better with end Mario Williams healthy after battling through a shoulder injury last season. Strong safety Bernard Pollard comes off an outstanding first year with the Texans after signing as a free agent Houston is ready to take that next step. The Texans won t pass Indianapolis in the race for the AFC South crown, but the talent is certainly there to earn a wild-card spot in the playoffs. If they can win two of the four games without Cushing, and improve their division record, they ll see the postseason for the first time. INDIANAPOLIS COLTS In Jim Caldwell s first season as head coach in Indianapolis, the Colts, despite injuries to key players on both sides of scrimmage, went to their second Super Bowl in four years and finished a decade that saw them go 115-45. It was the winningest 10-year span in NFL history and, this year, Indianapolis will try to get into the record book with a league-tying ninth straight postseason berth. Caldwell has made some changes to his staff on offense, with coordinator Clyde Christensen taking over for Tom Moore as the main play caller QB Peyton Manning won his second-straight NFL MVP award, throwing 393 completions for 4,500 yards and a 68.8 completion rate, all team records. He also had a 33:16 TD-Int ratio. And as if Manning didn t have enough weapons with All-Pros Reggie Wayne and Dallas Clark, he should have a healthy Anthony Gonzalez back at his disposal, plus youngsters Pierre Garcon and Austin Collie. Manning will once again play behind arguably the league s best line when the ball is put in the air. If there is one knock 2009 STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Indianapolis 16-3-0 0.842 483 358 10-2-0 9-1-0 7-2-0 12-7-0 63.2% 10-9-0 Houston 9-7-0 0.562 388 333 6-6-0 4-4-0 5-3-0 7-8-1 46.7% 5-10-1 Tennessee 8-8-0 0.500 354 402 4-8-0 5-3-0 3-5-0 6-9-1 40.0% 9-7-0 Jacksonville 7-9-0 0.437 290 380 6-6-0 5-3-0 2-6-0 5-11-0 31.2% 8-8-0 on the offense, it s the virtual lack of a running game. It finished last in the league in ground YPG Had the stop unit been healthy in the Super Bowl, the Colts could well be the defending champion. Still, management thought talent needed to be added, so the top three draft picks were spent on this side of scrimmage. The key will be the health of FS Bob Sanders, who missed all but two games in 2009 with a torn biceps tendon. Draftee DE Jerry Hughes (1-TCU) will have two veteran standouts to learn from in Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis The Colts could well get back to the Super Bowl for the third time in five years. Manning shows no signs of slowing down and the defense should improve if healthy. Another division title is likely. JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS It s not hard to figure out why the fans don t show up to Jacksonville games. The Jaguars were one of the worst teams in the NFL in PPG, despite possessing one of the league s top offensive stars in RB Maurice Jones-Drew. The problem is, the rest of the team is a mess. QB David Garrard has regressed, and there are problems galore with the defense Garrard has yet to show that he is an elite signal-caller. He completed 314 of 516 pass attempts for 3,597 yards, 15 touchdowns and 10 interceptions last year, but twice failed to lead the team to game-winning drives late in the season. Jones-Drew was given a chance to carry the load on his own last year and he responded with a secondteam All-Pro campaign in which he rushed for career highs in carries (312), yards (1,391) and touchdowns (16). Surprisingly, the Jaguars did not draft a WR to help a beleaguered unit, but they did pick one up in free agency, Kassim Osgood (Chargers). Garrard was hit plenty, so the line needs to step up The Jaguars woes on defense (27th in the NFL against the pass, 23rd overall) started with the pass rush, or rather the lack of it. They recorded a league-low 14 sacks, the fifth-lowest total in NFL history, so the Jags first four draft picks were spent on the line. The Jaguars also traded for middle LB Kirk Morrison, who had 133 tackles and two sacks with the Raiders last season With the Colts expected to be their usual explosive selves and the Texans on the rise, it looks like the best the Jaguars can do is battle the Titans to stay out of the AFC South basement. If Jacksonville does not respond this season, it could be the end of the road for head coach Jack Del Rio. TENNESSEE TITANS Tennessee followed up its AFC South title with a 0-6 start to the 2009 campaign that included a 59-0 drubbing at New England. Thankfully, Titans returned from the bye week with Vince Young starting at QB and went on to win seven of eight games. It wasn t enough to get Tennessee to the postseason, so Jeff Fisher will need to regroup and figure out how to complement the best RB in the game and improve a defensive unit that took a huge step back There was no sophomore jinx for RB Chris Johnson, who finished with 2,006 yards and 14 touchdowns. Johnson s success led to the Titans letting crutch Lendale White go. Young will begin the season as the starter and while he ll never post eye-popping passing statistics, his scrambling ability and elusiveness make him a threat every time he touches the ball. Plus, the Titans receiving corps is average at best, with Nate Washington and Kenny Britt the starters at receiver and Bo Scaife, the tight end. Young and Johnson are able to be creative because they play behind one of the better lines in the league Chuck Cecil took over the reins as defensive coordinator last season, and the results were far from positive. The Titans were miserable against the pass and not much better against the run. Tennessee picked DE Derrick Morgan (1-Georgia Tech) in the draft and he could start right away considering Kyle Vanden Bosch left as a free agent. Outside LB Keith Bulluck remained unsigned as of press time. The Titans allowed an AFC-high 258.7 YPG through the air, so the secondary needs to step up Which Titans team will show up in 2010? The 0-6 club that started 09 or that which looked like a defending division titlist at the end? It s the season s biggest question in the AFC South. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH Indianapolis Houston Tennessee Jacksonville AFC SOUTH AFC SOUTH WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 15

HOUSTON TEXANS 2009 Record: 9-7 (+1.5 ML Units), 7-8 ATS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 5-10 DIVISION: AFC South No. Rank Odds to win... COACH: Gary Kubiak, 5th year (31-33 SU, 31-32 ATS) Differentials STADIUM: Reliant Stadium Scoring +3.4 11 Super Bowl XLV: 30 to 1 Scoring Differential: +3.4 (#11 of 32) Yardage +58.0 7 StatFox Power Rating: 24 (#11 of 32) AFC Title: 15 to 1 Yards Per Play +0.53 11 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +1.8 (#14 of 32) Yards Per Point -0.20 15 2010 Schedule Strength: 21.5 (6th toughest of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 18.44 (#30 of 32) Turnovers +0 18 Offensive Stats Points Scored 24.3 10 First Downs 21.3 4 9/12/10 INDIANAPOLIS * L10 games of HOU-IND series are 9-1 OVER the total Total Yards Per Game 382.8 5 Yards Per Play 5.87 7 9/19/10 at Washington * WASHINGTON has taken L2 games vs. HOUSTON both SU & ATS Yards Per Point 15.82 16 9/26/10 DALLAS * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 HOU-DAL games Rushing Attempts 26.6 20 Rush Yards Per Game 92.2 30 10/3/10 at Oakland * UNDERDOG is 3-0 SU & ATS in L3 OAK-HOU games at OAKLAND Yards Per Rush 3.47 31 10/10/10 NY GIANTS * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 HOU-NYG games Rushing TD s 13 18 10/17/10 KANSAS CITY * FAVORITE has swept L3 HOU-KC games at HOUSTON, both SU & ATS Passing Attempts Per Game 37.1 4 Completions Per Game 24.9 2 11/1/10 at Indianapolis * L7 games of IND-HOU series at INDIANAPOLIS are 6-1 OVER the total Completion Percentage 67.3% 3 11/7/10 SAN DIEGO * SAN DIEGO has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. HOUSTON Passing Yards Per Game 290.9 1 Passing Yards Per Attempt 7.85 3 11/14/10 at Jacksonville * UNDERDOG is 10-9 SU & 13-6 ATS in JAC-HOU series since 95 Passing TD s 29 5 11/21/10 at NY Jets * L4 NYJ-HOU series games have gone UNDER the total Sacks Allowed 25 5 11/28/10 TENNESSEE * UNDERDOG is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in L5 HOU-TEN matchups at HOUSTON Interceptions Thrown 17 17 Fumbles Lost 10 12 12/2/10 at Philadelphia * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 ATS in L2 PHI-HOU games Total Turnovers Lost 27 15 12/13/10 BALTIMORE * ROAD TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 HOU-BAL games Avg. Time of Possession 31:53 6 3rd Down Conversions 40.2% 15 12/19/10 at Tennessee * L4 games in TEN-HOU series at TENNESSEE went OVER the total 4th Down Conversions 66.7% 6 Defensive Stats 12/26/10 at Denver * HOME TEAM has won SU & ATS in four straight DEN-HOU games Points Allowed 20.8 17 1/2/11 JACKSONVILLE * HOUSTON is 5-3 SU & 6-2 ATS in its L8 home games vs. JACKSONVILLE First Downs 18.8 16 Total Yards Per Game 324.8 13 Yards Per Play 5.34 17 SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total Yards Per Point 15.62 16 STRAIGHT UP 4-12 5-11 7-9 2-14 6-10 8-8 8-8 9-7 49-79 (38%) Rushing Attempts 24.8 5 Rush Yards Per Game 106.9 11 OVERALL ATS 7-8 9-7 8-7 7-9 7-9 8-8 9-7 7-8 62-63 (50%) Yards Per Rush 4.32 17 PRESEASON ATS 2-3 0-4 1-3 1-3 3-0 2-2 2-1 2-2 13-18 (42%) Rushing TD s 17 24 HOME ATS 3-4 6-2 4-3 2-6 4-4 6-2 5-3 2-5 32-29 (52%) Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 34.3 24 ROAD ATS 4-4 3-5 4-4 5-3 3-5 2-6 4-4 5-3 30-34 (47%) Opponent Completions/Game 21.5 23 Opponent Completion % 62.8% 23 vs DIVISION ATS 3-3 4-2 5-1 3-3 3-3 2-4 5-1 2-4 27-21 (56%) Opponent Pass Yards/Game 217.9 18 vs CONFERENCE ATS 4-7 7-5 7-5 6-6 6-6 5-7 7-5 6-6 48-47 (51%) Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.33 13 as FAVORITE ATS 0-1 1-0 2-2 1-1 1-2 3-3 3-4 3-6 14-19 (42%) Passing TD s Allowed 17 7 as UNDERDOG ATS 7-7 8-7 6-5 6-8 6-7 5-5 6-3 4-2 48-44 (52%) Sacks Recorded 30 25 Interceptions 14 20 OVER-UNDER 7-9 9-7 6-9 9-7 8-8 9-6 10-6 5-10 63-62 (50%) Fumbles Recovered 13 5 STATFOX POWER TRENDS Total Turnovers Forced 27 16 3rd Down Conversions 39.3% 20 * HOUSTON is 9-0 UNDER the total (+9 Units) vs. teams with a losing record since 07. The Average Score was HOUSTON 23, OPPONENT 14.9. 4th Down Conversions 42.9% 8 Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - at Washington, 10/3 - at Oakland, 10/17 - KANSAS CITY, 11/14 - at Jacksonville, 1/2 - JACKSONVILLE Misc. & Special Teams Stats * HOUSTON is on a 10-1 ATS (+8.9 Units) run at home revenging a loss where opponent scored 28 or more points The Average Score was Penalties Committed/Game 5.9 16 HOUSTON 23.7, OPPONENT 19.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - INDIANAPOLIS Penalty Yards/Game 52.1 21 Opponent Penalties/Game 5.8 19 * HOUSTON is 7-0 OVER the total (+7 Units) at home vs. good teams (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 07. The Average Score was HOUSTON 29.7, Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 45.5 22 OPPONENT 27.6. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - DALLAS Punt Return Average 10.0 10 * HOUSTON is 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) at home in December games since 07. The Average Score was HOUSTON 29.9, OPPONENT 16.4. Potential Kick Return Average 22.6 16 Punt Attempts per game 4.2 8 Spots for 2010: 12/13 - BALTIMORE Punt Net Average 41.2 8 * HOUSTON is on a 7-19 ATS (-13.9 Units) skid coming off a home win The Average Score was HOUSTON 18.5, OPPONENT 25.1. Potential Spots Field Goals Made 21 22 for 2010: 9/19 - at Washington, 10/3 - at Oakland, 11/1 - at Indianapolis, 11/14 - at Jacksonville, 12/12 - at Philadelphia, 12/19 - at Tennessee Field Goal Percentage 65.6% 28 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 DALLAS 19-10 W +9 W 34 U 9/7 at Miami 21-20 W +14 W 34.5 O 9/12 SAN DIEGO 20-27 L -5 L 43 O 9/11 at Buffalo 7-22 L +6 L 37.5 U 9/15 at San Diego 3-24 L +13.5 L 34 U 9/14 at New Orleans 10-31 L +8 L 40.5 O 9/19 at Detroit 16-28 L +3 L 43 O 9/18 PITTSBURGH 7-27 L +4.5 L 37.5 U 9/22 INDIANAPOLIS 3-23 L +10 L 37.5 U 9/21 KANSAS CITY 14-42 L +7.5 L 44 O 9/26 at Kansas City 24-21 W +7.5 W 48 U 10/2 at Cincinnati 10-16 L +9.5 W 44 U 9/29 at Philadelphia 17-35 L +19 W 36 O 9/28 JACKSONVILLE 24-20 W +2.5 W 37.5 O 10/3 OAKLAND 30-17 W +2.5 W 45 O 10/9 TENNESSEE 20-34 L -3 L 40.5 O 10/13 BUFFALO 24-31 L +7 T 44.5 O 10/12 at Tennessee 17-38 L +8.5 L 40 O 10/10 MINNESOTA 28-34 L +3.5 L 50 O 10/16 at Seattle 10-42 L +9 L 44 O 10/20 at Cleveland 17-34 L +8.5 L 37 O 10/19 NY JETS 14-19 L +3.5 L 38 U 10/17 at Tennessee 20-10 W +5.5 W 46 U 10/23 INDIANAPOLIS 20-38 L +14 L 44 O 10/27 at Jacksonville 21-19 W +11 W 38 O 10/26 at Indianapolis 21-30 L +13 W 44 O 10/31 JACKSONVILLE 20-6 W -2 W 42 U 10/30 CLEVELAND 19-16 W -1 W 36 U 11/3 CINCINNATI 3-38 L -2.5 L 36.5 O 11/2 CAROLINA 14-10 W +6.5 W 37 U 11/7 at Denver 13-31 L +7 L 44 T 11/6 at Jacksonville 14-21 L +13 W 36.5 U 11/10 at Tennessee 10-17 L +9 W 39 U 11/9 at Cincinnati 27-34 L +4.5 L 40 O 11/14 at Indianapolis 14-49 L +8.5 L 54.5 O 11/13 at Indianapolis 17-31 L +17.5 W 45.5 O 11/17 JACKSONVILLE 21-24 L +6.5 W 36.5 O 11/16 at Buffalo 12-10 W +7 W 37.5 U 11/21 GREEN BAY 13-16 L +3 T 50.5 U 11/20 KANSAS CITY 17-45 L +6.5 L 44 O 11/24 NY GIANTS 16-14 W +5.5 W 34 U 11/23 NEW ENGLAND 20-23 L +5 W 37 O 11/28 TENNESSEE 31-21 W -2 W 43 O 11/27 ST LOUIS 27-33 L +3 L 47 O 12/1 at Indianapolis 3-19 L +11.5 L 39 U 11/30 ATLANTA 17-13 W -3 W 42 U 12/5 at NY Jets 7-29 L +7 L 42 U 12/4 at Baltimore 15-16 L +7.5 W 39 U 12/8 at Pittsburgh 24-6 W +14 W 37.5 U 12/7 at Jacksonville 0-27 L +9 L 37.5 U 12/12 INDIANAPOLIS 14-23 L +10 W 57 U 12/11 at Tennessee 10-13 L +4.5 W 43 U 12/15 BALTIMORE 19-23 L +3 L 35 O 12/14 at Tampa Bay 3-16 L +11.5 L 36 U 12/19 at Chicago 24-5 W +1 W 34 U 12/18 ARIZONA 30-19 W +3 W 42 O 12/22 at Washington 10-26 L +6.5 L 36.5 U 12/21 TENNESSEE 24-27 L +6 W 38.5 O 12/26 at Jacksonville 21-0 W +6.5 W 36.5 U 12/24 JACKSONVILLE 20-38 L +6 L 37 O 12/29 TENNESSEE 3-13 L +9.5 L 35.5 U 12/28 INDIANAPOLIS 17-20 L +9 W 46.5 U 1/2 CLEVELAND 14-22 L -10 L 41 U 1/1 at San Francisco 17-20 L +2 L 34.5 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/10 PHILADELPHIA 10-24 L +5.5 L 38 U 9/9 KANSAS CITY 20-3 W -3 W 37.5 U 9/7 at Pittsburgh 17-38 L +6 L 44 O 9/13 NY JETS 7-24 L -4.5 L 44.5U 9/17 at Indianapolis 24-43 L +11.5 L 47.5 O 9/16 at Carolina 34-21 W +6.5 W 38 O 9/21 at Tennessee 12-31 L +4.5 L 40 O 9/20 at Tennessee 34-31 W +7 W 40.5O 9/24 WASHINGTON 15-31 L +3.5 L 38 O 9/23 INDIANAPOLIS 24-30 L +6.5 W 46 O 9/28 at Jacksonville 27-30 L +6.5 W 43 O 9/27 JACKSONVILLE 24-31 L -4 L 47.5O 10/1 MIAMI 17-15 W +3.5 W 41 U 9/30 at Atlanta 16-26 L -2.5 L 39.5 O 10/5 INDIANAPOLIS 27-31 L +4.5 W 48 O 10/4 OAKLAND 29-6 W -8 W 42.5U 10/15 at Dallas 6-34 L +13 L 44 U 10/7 MIAMI 22-19 W -4.5 L 43.5 U 10/12 MIAMI 29-28 W -3 L 44.5 O 10/11 at Arizona 21-28 L +6 L 50.5U 10/22 JACKSONVILLE 27-7 W +7.5 W 39.5 U 10/14 at Jacksonville 17-37 L +6 L 37 O 10/19 DETROIT 28-21 W -11 L 48 O 10/18 at Cincinnati 28-17 W +3.5 W 46U 10/29 at Tennessee 22-28 L +3 L 41.5 O 10/21 TENNESSEE 36-38 L -2.5 L 37.5 O 10/26 CINCINNATI 35-6 W -9 W 46 U 10/25 SAN FRANCISCO 24-21 W -3 T 44.5O 11/5 at NY Giants 10-14 L +12.5 W 43 U 10/28 at San Diego 10-35 L +10 L 45.5 U 11/2 at Minnesota 21-28 L +5.5 L 46.5 O 11/1 at Buffalo 31-10 W -3 W 42U 11/12 at Jacksonville 13-10 W +10 W 37 U 11/4 at Oakland 24-17 W +3 W 41 T 11/9 BALTIMORE 13-41 L -3 L 44 O 11/8 at Indianapolis 17-20 L +7.5 W 50.5U 11/19 BUFFALO 21-24 L -3 L 36.5 O 11/18 NEW ORLEANS 23-10 W -2 W 49.5 U 11/16 at Indianapolis 27-33 L +7.5 W 50.5 O 11/23 TENNESSEE 17-20 L -3.5 L 48U 11/26 at NY Jets 11-26 L +5 L 40.5 U 11/25 at Cleveland 17-27 L +3 L 52 U 11/23 at Cleveland 16-6 W +3 W 49.5 U 11/29 INDIANAPOLIS 27-35 L +3 L 48.5O 12/3 at Oakland 23-14 W +3 W 35 O 12/2 at Tennessee 20-28 L +3 L 39 O 12/1 JACKSONVILLE 30-17 W -3 W 48.5 U 12/6 at Jacksonville 18-23 L -1 L 48U 12/10 TENNESSEE 20-26 L -1 L 42 O 12/9 TAMPA BAY 28-14 W +3 W 39.5 O 12/7 at Green Bay 24-21 W +7 W 47.5 U 12/13 SEATTLE 34-7 W -7 W 45U 12/17 at New England 7-40 L +12 L 38.5 O 12/13 DENVER 31-13 W +3 W 47.5 U 12/14 TENNESSEE 13-12 W +3 W 45 U 12/20 at St Louis 16-13 W -14 L 43.5U 12/24 INDIANAPOLIS 27-24 W +9 W 47 O 12/23 at Indianapolis 15-38 L +6.5 L 45 O 12/21 at Oakland 16-27 L -6.5 L 43.5 U 12/27 at Miami 27-20 W +1.5 W 47T 12/31 CLEVELAND 14-6 W -5.5 W 38.5 U 12/30 JACKSONVILLE 42-28 W -7 W 42 O 12/28 CHICAGO 31-24 W -3 W 46 O 1/3 NEW ENGLAND 34-27 W -8 L 47O 16 WWW.STATFOX.COM

INDIANAPOLIS COLTS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 6 to 1 AFC Title: 3 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 20.31 (21st toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 10-7 14-5 13-5 14-3 16-4 13-4 12-5 16-3 108-36 (75%) OVERALL ATS 6-11 11-7 10-7 9-7 12-8 9-8 7-9 12-7 76-64 (54%) PRESEASON ATS 2-2 3-1 2-1 0-5 2-2 1-2 2-3 1-3 13-19 (41%) HOME ATS 2-6 5-4 6-3 3-6 7-3 5-4 3-5 5-5 36-36 (50%) ROAD ATS 4-5 6-3 4-4 6-1 5-5 4-4 4-4 7-2 40-28 (59%) vs DIVISION ATS 2-4 3-3 4-2 3-2 2-4 2-4 2-4 4-2 22-25 (47%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 4-9 8-6 7-6 7-5 8-7 5-8 6-6 9-5 54-52 (51%) as FAVORITE ATS 4-8 7-6 9-5 9-6 9-8 8-7 3-8 11-6 60-54 (53%) as UNDERDOG ATS 2-2 4-1 1-2 0-1 3-0 1-1 3-1 1-1 15-9 (63%) OVER-UNDER 8-9 11-8 12-6 6-11 9-11 8-9 8-9 10-9 72-72 (50%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * INDIANAPOLIS is on a 23-4 OVER the total (+18.6 Units) run on the road coming off an upset loss as a favorite The Average Score was INDIANAPOLIS 23.9, OPPONENT 28.1. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - at Denver, 12/9 - at Tennessee * INDIANAPOLIS is on a 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) run when playing on Thursdays The Average Score was INDIANAPOLIS 34.4, OPPONENT 19. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/9 - at Tennessee * INDIANAPOLIS is on a 3-13 ATS (-11.3 Units) skid on the road vs. good rushing teams - averaging >=130 RYPG The Average Score was INDIANAPOLIS 14.4, OPPONENT 25.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/9 - at Tennessee * INDIANAPOLIS is on a 14-30 ATS (-19 Units) skid at home vs. teams with a losing record The Average Score was INDIANAPOLIS 23.6, OPPONENT 18.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/10 - KANSAS CITY, 12/19 - JACKSONVILLE * INDIANAPOLIS is 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) on the road in games where the line is +3 to -3 since 07. The Average Score was INDIANAPOLIS 25.1, OPPONENT 19.5. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - at Houston, 11/7 - at Philadelphia, 11/21 - at New England, 12/9 - at Tennessee WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 17 2009 Record: 16-3 (+12 ML Units), 12-7 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 10-9 DIVISION: AFC South COACH: Jim Caldwell, 2nd year STADIUM: Lucas Oil Stadium Scoring Differential: +6.8 (#9 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 27 (#8 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +7.1 (#6 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 20.84 (#15 of 32) 9/12/10 at Houston * L10 games of HOU-IND series are 9-1 OVER the total 9/19/10 NY GIANTS * ROAD TEAM has swept L3 IND-NYG games, both SU & ATS 9/26/10 at Denver * OVER the total is 7-1 in L8 games of DEN-IND series 10/3/10 at Jacksonville * ROAD TEAM is 4-2 SU & 6-0 ATS in L6 JAC-IND matchups 10/10/10 KANSAS CITY * INDIANAPOLIS is 8-1 SU & 7-2 ATS in its L9 games vs. KANSAS CITY 10/17/10 at Washington * L6 games of WAS-IND series are 5-1 OVER the total 11/1/10 HOUSTON * L7 games of IND-HOU series at INDIANAPOLIS are 6-1 OVER the total 11/7/10 at Philadelphia * INDIANAPOLIS has won four straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. PHILADELPHIA 11/14/10 CINCINNATI * FAVORITE is 10-1 SU & 9-2 ATS in IND-CIN series since 92 11/21/10 at New England * NEW ENGLAND is 18-10 SU & 19-8 ATS vs. INDIANAPOLIS since 93 11/28/10 SAN DIEGO * UNDERDOG is 5-1 SU & 6-0 ATS in L6 IND-SD matchups 12/5/10 DALLAS * HOME TEAM has swept L3 IND-DAL games, both SU & ATS 12/9/10 at Tennessee * UNDER the total is 9-1 in L10 games of TEN-IND series 12/19/10 JACKSONVILLE * JACKSONVILLE is 2-4 SU but 5-1 ATS in its L6 games at INDIANAPOLIS 12/26/10 at Oakland * L3 OAK-IND series games have gone UNDER the total 1/2/11 TENNESSEE * L9 games of IND-TEN series at INDIANAPOLIS are 8-1 UNDER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +6.8 9 Yardage +23.3 14 Yards Per Play +0.91 2 Yards Per Point +3.73 4 Turnovers +1 15 Offensive Stats Points Scored 26.0 7 First Downs 21.2 5 Total Yards Per Game 362.5 9 Yards Per Play 5.91 5 Yards Per Point 13.94 7 Rushing Attempts 22.9 31 Rush Yards Per Game 80.9 32 Yards Per Rush 3.54 30 Rushing TD s 16 12 Passing Attempts Per Game 37.6 2 Completions Per Game 25.1 1 Completion Percentage 66.9% 4 Passing Yards Per Game 282.2 2 Passing Yards Per Attempt 7.51 8 Passing TD s 34 3 Sacks Allowed 13 1 Interceptions Thrown 19 23 Fumbles Lost 5 1 Total Turnovers Lost 24 10 Avg. Time of Possession 27:40 18 3rd Down Conversions 49.2% 1 4th Down Conversions 45.5% 20 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 19.2 8 First Downs 20.0 27 Total Yards Per Game 339.2 18 Yards Per Play 5.00 5 Yards Per Point 17.67 4 Rushing Attempts 29.2 25 Rush Yards Per Game 126.5 24 Yards Per Rush 4.33 19 Rushing TD s 10 7 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 36.4 30 Opponent Completions/Game 23.3 30 Opponent Completion % 63.8% 26 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 212.7 14 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.33 14 Passing TD s Allowed 14 2 Sacks Recorded 34 16 Interceptions 16 15 Fumbles Recovered 9 25 Total Turnovers Forced 25 18 3rd Down Conversions 45.0% 31 4th Down Conversions 31.6% 2 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 4.6 2 Penalty Yards/Game 34.1 2 Opponent Penalties/Game 5.8 18 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 55.6 9 Punt Return Average 5.2 28 Kick Return Average 22.2 18 Punt Attempts per game 4.0 5 Punt Net Average 39.6 16 Field Goals Made 16 31 Field Goal Percentage 80.0% 21 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 at Jacksonville 28-25 W -3.5 L 44 O 9/7 at Cleveland 9-6 W -2 W 48 U 9/9 at New England 24-27 L +3 T 44.5 O 9/11 at Baltimore 24-7 W -3 W 44.5 U 9/15 MIAMI 13-21 L +0 L 47 U 9/14 TENNESSEE 33-7 W -2.5 W 43 U 9/19 at Tennessee 31-17 W -2 W 46.5 O 9/18 JACKSONVILLE 10-3 W -8.5 L 48 U 9/22 at Houston 23-3 W -10 W 37.5 U 9/21 JACKSONVILLE 23-13 W -7.5 W 41.5 U 9/26 GREEN BAY 45-31 W -6 W 50 O 9/28 at New Orleans 55-21 W -1.5 W 42.5 O 9/25 CLEVELAND 13-6 W -14 L 46.5 U 10/6 CINCINNATI 28-21 W -13.5 L 43 O 10/3 at Jacksonville 24-17 W -3.5 W 43.5 U 10/6 at Tampa Bay 38-35 W +4.5 W 37.5 O 10/2 at Tennessee 31-10 W -7 W 46 U 10/13 BALTIMORE 22-20 W -7 L 43.5 U 10/10 OAKLAND 35-14 W -8.5 W 52 U 10/12 CAROLINA 20-23 L -4 L 37.5 O 10/9 at San Francisco 28-3 W -16 W 44.5 U 10/21 at Pittsburgh 10-28 L +4.5 L 46 U 10/26 HOUSTON 30-21 W -13 L 44 O 10/24 JACKSONVILLE 24-27 L -9 L 47 O 10/17 ST LOUIS 45-28 W -13.5 W 50.5 O 10/27 at Washington 21-26 L -1.5 L 46.5 O 11/2 at Miami 23-17 W +1 W 39 O 10/31 at Kansas City 35-45 L -1 L 56.5 O 11/3 TENNESSEE 15-23 L -3 L 47 U 11/9 at Jacksonville 23-28 L -5.5 L 44 O 11/8 MINNESOTA 31-28 W -7.5 L 57.5 O 10/23 at Houston 38-20 W -14 W 44 O 11/10 at Philadelphia 35-13 W +9.5 W 41.5 O 11/16 NY JETS 38-31 W -6 W 44 O 11/14 HOUSTON 49-14 W -8.5 W 54.5 O 11/7 at New England 40-21 W -4.5 W 48 O 11/17 DALLAS 20-3 W -6.5 W 39 U 11/23 at Buffalo 17-14 W -3 T 38.5 U 11/21 at Chicago 41-10 W -8 W 44.5 O 11/13 HOUSTON 31-17 W -17.5 L 45.5 O 11/30 NEW ENGLAND 34-38 L -3.5 L 43.5 O 11/25 at Detroit 41-9 W -8.5 W 54 U 11/20 at Cincinnati 45-37 W -5 W 47.5 O 11/24 at Denver 23-20 W +6 W 42.5 O 12/7 at Tennessee 29-27 W +3.5 W 46.5 O 12/5 TENNESSEE 51-24 W -12 W 54 O 11/28 PITTSBURGH 26-7 W -8 W 47.5 U 12/1 HOUSTON 19-3 W -11.5 W 39 U 12/14 ATLANTA 38-7 W -7.5 W 48 U 12/12 at Houston 23-14 W -10 L 57 U 12/4 TENNESSEE 35-3 W -15 W 50.5 U 12/8 at Tennessee 17-27 L -1 L 43 O 12/21 DENVER 17-31 L -7 L 48.5 U 12/19 BALTIMORE 20-10 W -7.5 W 48.5 U 12/11 at Jacksonville 26-18 W -8 T 42.5 O 12/15 at Cleveland 28-23 W -2 W 41.5 O 12/28 at Houston 20-17 W -9 L 46.5 U 12/26 SAN DIEGO 34-31 W -7 L 56 O 12/18 SAN DIEGO 17-26 L -6.5 L 53 U 12/22 NY GIANTS 27-44 L -4.5 L 41 O 1/4 (PL) DENVER 41-10 W -3 W 49 O 1/2 at Denver 14-33 L +10 L 44 O 12/24 at Seattle 13-28 L +10 L 43.5 U 12/29 JACKSONVILLE 20-13 W -8.5 L 41 U 1/11 (PL) at Kansas City 38-31 W +3 W 53 O 1/9 (PL) DENVER 49-24 W -10 W 56 O 1/1 ARIZONA 17-13 W -7.5 L 45 U 1/18 (PL) at New England 14-24 L +3.5 L 42 U 1/4 (PL) at NY Jets 0-41 L +6 L 42.5 U 1/16 (PL) at New England 3-20 L +1 L 51 U 1/15 (PL) PITTSBURGH 18-21 L -10 L 48 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 at NY Giants 26-21 W -3 W 47.5 U 9/17 HOUSTON 43-24 W -11.5 W 47.5 O 9/24 JACKSONVILLE 21-14 W -6 W 41.5 U 10/1 at NY Jets 31-28 W -7.5 L 47 O 10/8 TENNESSEE 14-13 W -17 L 47.5 U 10/22 WASHINGTON 36-22 W -8 W 47 O 10/29 at Denver 34-31 W +3 W 40 O 11/5 at New England 27-20 W +3 W 48 U 11/12 BUFFALO 17-16 W -12 L 44.5 U 11/19 at Dallas 14-21 L +0 L 49.5 U 11/26 PHILADELPHIA 45-21 W -10.5 W 45 O 12/3 at Tennessee 17-20 L -7.5 L 47 U 12/10 at Jacksonville 17-44 L -1 L 44.5 O 12/18 CINCINNATI 34-16 W -3 W 54.5 U 12/24 at Houston 24-27 L -9 L 47 O 12/31 MIAMI 27-22 W -9.5 L 44 O 1/6 (PL) KANSAS CITY 23-8 W -7.5 W 50.5 U 1/13 (PL) at Baltimore 15-6 W +4 W 41 U 1/21 (PL) NEW ENGLAND 38-34 W -3 W 47 O 2/4 (PL) vs. Chicago 29-17 W -6.5 W 47 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/6 NEW ORLEANS 41-10 W -5.5 W 52.5 U 9/16 at Tennessee 22-20 W -6.5 L 45 U 9/23 at Houston 30-24 W -6.5 L 46 O 9/30 DENVER 38-20 W -10 W 46.5 O 10/7 TAMPA BAY 33-14 W -8.5 W 44.5 O 10/22 at Jacksonville 29-7 W -3 W 44.5 U 10/28 at Carolina 31-7 W -7 W 43.5 U 11/4 NEW ENGLAND 20-24 L +4.5 W 56 U 11/11 at San Diego 21-23 L -3.5 L 47 U 11/18 KANSAS CITY 13-10 W -14.5 L 41.5 U 11/22 at Atlanta 31-13 W -13 W 42.5 O 12/2 JACKSONVILLE 28-25 W -7 L 45 O 12/9 at Baltimore 44-20 W -9 W 42 O 12/16 at Oakland 21-14 W -9.5 L 45 U 12/23 HOUSTON 38-15 W -6.5 W 45 O 12/30 TENNESSEE 10-16 L +4.5 L 41 U 1/13 (PL) SAN DIEGO 24-28 L -10.5 L 46.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/7 CHICAGO 13-29 L -10.5 L 42.5 U 9/14 at Minnesota 18-15 W +0 W 43.5 U 9/21 JACKSONVILLE 21-23 L -4 L 41.5 O 10/5 at Houston 31-27 W -4.5 L 48 O 10/12 BALTIMORE 31-3 W -4 W 39 U 10/19 at Green Bay 14-34 L -2.5 L 46.5 O 10/27 at Tennessee 21-31 L +3.5 L 41 O 11/2 NEW ENGLAND 18-15 W -6.5 L 44 U 11/9 at Pittsburgh 24-20 W +3 W 39 O 11/16 HOUSTON 33-27 W -7.5 L 50.5 O 11/23 at San Diego 23-20 W +3 W 49.5 U 11/30 at Cleveland 10-6 W -4 T 44 U 12/7 CINCINNATI 35-3 W -13.5 W 41.5 U 12/14 DETROIT 31-21 W -16.5 L 45 O 12/18 at Jacksonville 31-24 W -5 W 43.5 O 12/28 TENNESSEE 23-0 W +3 W 39.5 U 1/3 (PL) at San Diego 17-23 L -2.5 L 50 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/13 JACKSONVILLE 14-12 W -6 L 45U 9/21 at Miami 27-23 W -3 W 41O 9/27 at Arizona 31-10 W +3 W 48.5U 10/4 SEATTLE 34-17 W -10 W 43O 10/11 at Tennessee 31-9 W -3 W 44U 10/25 at St Louis 42-6 W -14 W 45O 11/1 SAN FRANCISCO 18-14 W -12.5 L 45U 11/8 HOUSTON 20-17 W -7.5 L 50.5U 11/15 NEW ENGLAND 35-34 W -3 L 48.5O 11/22 at Baltimore 17-15 W -1 W 44.5U 11/29 at Houston 35-27 W -3 W 48.5O 12/6 TENNESSEE 27-17 W -6 W 47U 12/13 DENVER 28-16 W -6.5 W 43.5O 12/17 at Jacksonville 35-31 W -3 W 43O 12/27 NY JETS 15-29 L -3 L 40.5O 1/3 at Buffalo 7-30 L +7.5 L 32O 1/16 (PL) BALTIMORE 20-3 W -6.5 W 44U 1/24 (PL) NY JETS 30-17 W -7.5 W 40O 2/7 (PL) vs. New Orleans 17-31 L -4.5 L 56.5U

JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 60 to 1, AFC Title: 30 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 20.81 (14th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 6-10 5-11 9-7 12-5 8-8 12-6 5-11 7-9 64-67 (49%) OVERALL ATS 8-8 7-8 10-6 9-6 8-8 12-6 4-12 5-11 63-65 (49%) PRESEASON ATS 1-3 3-1 2-2 2-2 3-1 3-1 2-2 2-1 18-13 (58%) HOME ATS 5-3 4-4 5-3 3-3 6-2 5-3 1-7 2-6 31-31 (50%) ROAD ATS 3-5 3-4 5-3 6-3 2-6 7-3 3-5 3-5 32-34 (48%) vs DIVISION ATS 2-4 3-3 2-4 3-2 2-4 3-3 1-5 4-2 20-27 (43%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 6-6 5-6 7-5 7-4 5-7 10-4 2-10 5-7 47-49 (49%) as FAVORITE ATS 3-6 2-2 3-3 6-5 3-6 6-3 1-7 0-5 24-37 (39%) as UNDERDOG ATS 5-2 5-6 7-3 3-1 5-2 6-3 3-5 5-6 39-28 (58%) OVER-UNDER 7-9 8-8 4-12 10-7 9-7 13-4 6-9 8-8 65-64 (50%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * Over the L2 seasons, JACKSONVILLE is 0-10 ATS (-11 Units) as home favorites. The Average Score was JACKSONVILLE 18.8, OPPONENT 22.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - DENVER, 11/21 - CLEVELAND, 12/12 - OAKLAND * Over the L2 seasons, JACKSONVILLE is 0-8 ATS (-8.8 Units) vs. poor passing teams averaging 5.7 or less PYA. The Average Score was JACKSONVILLE 17.6, OPPONENT 20.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/24 - at Kansas City, 11/21 - CLEVELAND, 12/12 - OAKLAND * Over the L2 seasons, JACKSONVILLE is 5-19 ATS (-15.9 Units) after the first month of the season. The Average Score was JACKSONVILLE 17.3, OPPONENT 24. Potential Spots for 2010: All games including and after 10/10 - at Buffalo * Over the L2 seasons, JACKSONVILLE is 0-7 ATS (-7.7 Units) vs. teams scoring 17 or less PPG. The Average Score was JACKSONVILLE 18.7, OPPONENT 21.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/10 - at Buffalo, 11/21 - CLEVELAND, 12/12 - OAKLAND, 12/26 - WASHINGTON * JACKSONVILLE is on a 14-3 OVER the total (+10.7 Units) run at home vs. good offensive teams - averaging >=350 YPG The Average Score was JACKSONVILLE 25.9, OPPONENT 26. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - PHILADELPHIA, 10/3 - INDIANAPOLIS, 10/18 - TENNESSEE, 11/14 - HOUSTON LINE FINAL ATS 2009 Record: 7-9 (-0.8 ML Units), 5-11 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 8-8 DIVISION: AFC South COACH: Jack Del Rio, 8th year STADIUM: Jacksonville Municipal Stadium Scoring Differential: -5.6 (#25 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 15 (#24 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -6.5 (#25 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 19.50 (#23 of 32) 9/12/10 DENVER * UNDERDOG is on 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS run in L5 JAC-DEN matchups 9/19/10 at San Diego * HOME TEAM has swept L3 SD-JAC games, both SU & ATS 9/26/10 PHILADELPHIA * JACKSONVILLE has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. PHILADELPHIA 10/3/10 INDIANAPOLIS * ROAD TEAM is 4-2 SU & 6-0 ATS in L6 JAC-IND matchups 10/10/10 at Buffalo * UNDERDOG is 3-0 SU & ATS in L3 BUF-JAC games at BUFFALO 10/18/10 TENNESSEE * TENNESSEE is 15-8 SU & ATS vs. JACKSONVILLE since 99 10/24/10 at Kansas City * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 ATS in L2 KC-JAC games 10/31/10 at Dallas * UNDERDOG has swept L3 DAL-JAC games, both SU & ATS 11/14/10 HOUSTON * UNDERDOG is 10-9 SU & 13-6 ATS in JAC-HOU series since 95 11/21/10 CLEVELAND * ROAD TEAM is 5-1 SU & ATS in L6 JAC-CLE matchups 11/28/10 at NY Giants * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 NYG-JAC games 12/5/10 at Tennessee * UNDERDOG is on 5-3 SU & 7-1 ATS run in L8 TEN-JAC matchups at TENNESSEE 12/12/10 OAKLAND * FAVORITE has swept L4 JAC-OAK games, both SU & ATS 12/19/10 at Indianapolis * JACKSONVILLE is 2-4 SU but 5-1 ATS in its L6 games at INDIANAPOLIS 12/26/10 WASHINGTON * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 JAC-WAS games 1/2/11 at Houston * HOUSTON is 5-3 SU & 6-2 ATS in its L8 home games vs. JACKSONVILLE 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring -5.6 25 Yardage -15.3 22 Yards Per Play -0.39 23 Yards Per Point -3.82 28 Turnovers +2 13 Offensive Stats Points Scored 18.1 24 First Downs 18.8 16 Total Yards Per Game 336.8 18 Yards Per Play 5.34 15 Yards Per Point 18.61 28 Rushing Attempts 27.9 12 Rush Yards Per Game 126.8 10 Yards Per Rush 4.54 6 Rushing TD s 19 6 Passing Attempts Per Game 32.4 24 Completions Per Game 19.7 21 Completion Percentage 60.7% 17 Passing Yards Per Game 209.8 19 Passing Yards Per Attempt 6.47 16 Passing TD s 15 27 Sacks Allowed 44 25 Interceptions Thrown 10 4 Fumbles Lost 13 26 Total Turnovers Lost 23 7 Avg. Time of Possession 25:42 28 3rd Down Conversions 45.1% 4 4th Down Conversions 57.1% 10 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 23.8 24 First Downs 19.2 19 Total Yards Per Game 352.1 22 Yards Per Play 5.73 27 Yards Per Point 14.79 21 Rushing Attempts 28.6 22 Rush Yards Per Game 116.4 19 Yards Per Rush 4.07 12 Rushing TD s 12 14 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 31.9 10 Opponent Completions/Game 21.6 25 Opponent Completion % 67.6% 31 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 235.9 27 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.36 15 Passing TD s Allowed 19 10 Sacks Recorded 14 32 Interceptions 15 16 Fumbles Recovered 10 16 Total Turnovers Forced 25 18 3rd Down Conversions 45.0% 30 4th Down Conversions 70.6% 32 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 4.4 1 Penalty Yards/Game 33.9 1 Opponent Penalties/Game 4.0 32 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 31.1 32 Punt Return Average 8.6 14 Kick Return Average 22.6 17 Punt Attempts per game 4.5 11 Punt Net Average 39.7 15 Field Goals Made 18 29 Field Goal Percentage 64.3% 31 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 INDIANAPOLIS 25-28 L +3.5 W 44 O 9/7 at Carolina 23-24 L +4 W 34.5 O 9/12 at Buffalo 13-10 W +3 W 35 U 9/11 SEATTLE 26-14 W -3 W 39 O 9/15 at Kansas City 23-16 W +3.5 W 46 U 9/14 BUFFALO 17-38 L +3 L 41.5 O 9/19 DENVER 7-6 W +3 W 37.5 U 9/18 at Indianapolis 3-10 L +8.5 W 48 U 9/29 NY JETS 28-3 W -3 W 41.5 U 9/21 at Indianapolis 13-23 L +7.5 L 41.5 U 9/26 at Tennessee 15-12 W +6 W 34.5 U 9/25 at NY Jets 26-20 W +2 W 33.5 O 10/6 PHILADELPHIA 28-25 W +3 W 42.5 O 9/28 at Houston 20-24 L -2.5 L 37.5 O 10/3 INDIANAPOLIS 17-24 L +3.5 L 43.5 U 10/2 DENVER 7-20 L -3.5 L 36.5 U 10/13 at Tennessee 14-23 L -2 L 43.5 U 10/5 SAN DIEGO 27-21 W -3 W 42.5 O 10/10 at San Diego 21-34 L -2.5 L 37 O 10/9 CINCINNATI 23-20 W -3 T 38 O 10/20 at Baltimore 10-17 L -1.5 L 38 U 10/12 MIAMI 10-24 L +3.5 L 38.5 U 10/17 KANSAS CITY 22-16 W +2.5 W 44 U 10/16 at Pittsburgh 23-17 W +3 W 33 O 10/27 HOUSTON 19-21 L -11 L 38 O 10/26 TENNESSEE 17-30 L +4.5 L 43.5 O 10/24 at Indianapolis 27-24 W +9 W 47 O 10/30 at St Louis 21-24 L -5 L 40.5 O 11/3 at NY Giants 17-24 L +3 L 35.5 O 11/2 at Baltimore 17-24 L +7 T 37.5 O 10/31 at Houston 6-20 L +2 L 42 U 11/6 HOUSTON 21-14 W -13 L 36.5 U 11/10 WASHINGTON 26-7 W -1.5 W 39.5 U 11/9 INDIANAPOLIS 28-23 W +5.5 W 44 O 11/14 DETROIT 23-17 W -3.5 W 34.5 O 11/13 BALTIMORE 30-3 W -6 W 33.5 U 11/20 at Tennessee 31-28 W -3.5 L 39 O 11/17 at Houston 24-21 W -6.5 L 36.5 O 11/16 at Tennessee 3-10 L +9 W 44.5 U 11/21 TENNESSEE 15-18 L -3 L 36 U 11/27 at Arizona 24-17 W -3.5 W 43.5 U 11/24 at Dallas 19-21 L -3 L 34.5 O 11/23 at Ny Jets 10-13 L +4 W 43 U 11/28 at Minnesota 16-27 L +6 L 45.5 U 12/4 at Cleveland 20-14 W -3 W 31 O 12/1 PITTSBURGH 23-25 L +3 W 44 O 11/30 TAMPA BAY 17-10 W +3 W 37 U 12/5 PITTSBURGH 16-17 L +3 W 35.5 U 12/11 INDIANAPOLIS 18-26 L +8 T 42.5 O 12/8 CLEVELAND 20-21 L -2.5 L 42 U 12/7 HOUSTON 27-0 W -9 W 37.5 U 12/12 CHICAGO 22-3 W -7 W 34 U 12/18 SAN FRANCISCO 10-9 W -16 L 36.5 U 12/15 at Cincinnati 29-15 W -3 W 45 U 12/14 at New England 13-27 L +6 L 33 O 12/19 at Green Bay 28-25 W +3.5 W 37 O 12/24 at Houston 38-20 W -6 W 37 O 12/22 TENNESSEE 10-28 L +3 L 41.5 U 12/21 NEW ORLEANS 20-19 W -3 L 42 U 12/26 HOUSTON 0-21 L -6.5 L 36.5 U 1/1 TENNESSEE 40-13 W -4 W 36 O 12/29 at Indianapolis 13-20 L +8.5 W 41 U 12/28 at Atlanta 14-21 L +2.5 L 44 U 1/2 at Oakland 13-6 W -2.5 W 43 U 1/7 at New England 3-28 L +7.5 L 37.5 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 DALLAS 24-17 W +2.5 W 37 O 9/18 PITTSBURGH 9-0 W +3 W 37 U 9/24 at Indianapolis 14-21 L +6 L 41.5 U 10/1 at Washington 30-36 L -2.5 L 34 O 10/8 NY JETS 41-0 W -7.5 W 38.5 O 10/22 at Houston 7-27 L -7.5 L 39.5 U 10/29 at Philadelphia 13-6 W +8 W 38 U 11/5 TENNESSEE 37-7 W -9 W 37 O 11/12 HOUSTON 10-13 L -10 L 37 U 11/20 NY GIANTS 26-10 W -4 W 38.5 U 11/26 at Buffalo 24-27 L -3 L 35 O 12/3 at Miami 24-10 W +1 W 35.5 U 12/10 INDIANAPOLIS 44-17 W +1 W 44.5 O 12/17 at Tennessee 17-24 L -3 L 40.5 O 12/24 NEW ENGLAND 21-24 L -3 L 36 O 12/31 at Kansas City 30-35 L +3 L 36.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 TENNESSEE 10-13 L -7.5 L 39.5 U 9/16 ATLANTA 13-7 W -10 L 34.5 U 9/23 at Denver 23-14 W +3.5 W 36 O 10/7 at Kansas City 17-7 W -2 W 35 U 10/14 HOUSTON 37-17 W -6 W 37 O 10/22 INDIANAPOLIS 7-29 L +3 L 44.5 U 10/28 at Tampa Bay 24-23 W +3.5 W 32.5 O 11/4 at New Orleans 24-41 L +3.5 L 39.5 O 11/11 at Tennessee 28-13 W +5 W 36 O 11/18 SAN DIEGO 24-17 W -3 W 40.5 O 11/25 BUFFALO 36-14 W -8.5 W 37 O 12/2 at Indianapolis 25-28 L +7 W 45 O 12/9 CAROLINA 37-6 W -11 W 38.5 O 12/16 at Pittsburgh 29-22 W +3 W 35 O 12/23 OAKLAND 49-11 W -14 W 40.5 O 12/30 at Houston 28-42 L +7 L 42 O 1/5 (PL) at Pittsburgh 31-29 W -3 L 40 O 1/12 (PL) at New England 20-31 L +13.5 W 51 T DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/7 at Tennessee 10-17 L -3 L 37 U 9/14 BUFFALO 16-20 L -4 L 37 U 9/21 at Indianapolis 23-21 W +4 W 41.5 O 9/28 HOUSTON 30-27 W -6.5 L 43 O 10/5 PITTSBURGH 21-26 L -5.5 L 38 O 10/12 at Denver 24-17 W +3 W 48 U 10/26 CLEVELAND 17-23 L -7 L 41.5 U 11/2 at Cincinnati 19-21 L -7 L 40 T 11/9 at Detroit 38-14 W -6 W 43 O 11/16 TENNESSEE 14-24 L +2.5 L 39.5 U 11/23 MINNESOTA 12-30 L -2 L 41.5 O 12/1 at Houston 17-30 L +3 L 48.5 U 12/7 at Chicago 10-23 L +6.5 L 40 U 12/14 GREEN BAY 20-16 W +3 W 45.5 U 12/18 INDIANAPOLIS 24-31 L +5 L 43.5 O 12/28 at Baltimore 7-27 L +10.5 L 37.5 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/13 at Indianapolis 12-14 L +6 W 45U 9/20 ARIZONA 17-31 L -3 L 44O 9/27 at Houston 31-24 W +4 W 47.5O 10/4 TENNESSEE 37-17 W +3 W 42O 10/11 at Seattle 0-41 L +2 L 44U 10/18 ST LOUIS 23-20 W -9.5 L 42O 11/1 at Tennessee 13-30 L +3 L 44U 11/8 KANSAS CITY 24-21 W -7 L 41.5O 11/15 at NY Jets 24-22 W +6.5 W 40.5O 11/22 BUFFALO 18-15 W -8.5 L 41U 11/29 at San Francisco 3-20 L +3 L 42U 12/6 HOUSTON 23-18 W +1 W 48U 12/13 MIAMI 10-14 L -2 L 43U 12/17 INDIANAPOLIS 31-35 L +3 L 43O 12/27 at New England 7-35 L +9 L 44.5U 1/3 at Cleveland 17-23 L +2 L 35O 18 WWW.STATFOX.COM

TENNESSEE TITANS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 30 to 1 AFC Title: 15 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 21.06 (11th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 12-6 13-5 5-11 4-12 8-8 10-7 13-4 8-8 73-61 (54%) OVERALL ATS 10-8 11-7 5-11 6-10 11-5 8-8 12-4 6-9 69-62 (53%) PRESEASON ATS 2-1 4-0 3-0 1-3 1-3 3-1 1-3 2-2 17-13 (57%) HOME ATS 5-4 5-3 2-6 4-4 5-3 3-4 6-2 3-4 33-30 (52%) ROAD ATS 5-4 6-4 3-5 2-6 6-2 5-4 6-2 3-5 36-32 (53%) vs DIVISION ATS 5-1 2-4 1-5 2-4 5-1 5-1 4-2 2-4 26-22 (54%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 8-6 7-7 3-9 3-9 8-4 6-7 9-4 4-8 48-54 (47%) as FAVORITE ATS 5-6 7-5 2-5 1-1 1-2 4-3 10-4 3-5 33-31 (52%) as UNDERDOG ATS 5-2 4-2 3-6 5-9 10-3 4-5 2-0 3-4 36-31 (54%) OVER-UNDER 10-8 9-9 10-6 9-7 11-4 5-11 8-9 9-7 71-61 (54%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * TENNESSEE is on a 26-9 OVER the total (+16.1 Units) run vs. poor defensive teams - allowing >=350 YPG The Average Score was TENNESSEE 26.4, OPPONENT 23.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - OAKLAND, 10/18 - at Jacksonville, 12/5 - JACKSONVILLE, 12/26 - at Kansas City * TENNESSEE is on a 18-5 ATS (+12.5 Units) run at home in non-conference games The Average Score was TENNESSEE 24.5, OPPONENT 18.5. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - NY GIANTS, 10/24 - PHILADELPHIA, 11/21 - WASHINGTON * TENNESSEE is on a 17-5 ATS (+11.5 Units) run as home favorites of 3 points or less The Average Score was TENNESSEE 23.3, OPPONENT 18.3. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - PITTSBURGH * TENNESSEE is on a 15-4 UNDER the total (+10.6 Units) run on the road vs. teams scoring 24 or more PPG The Average Score was TENNESSEE 15.6, OPPONENT 21.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/31 - at San Diego, 11/28 - at Houston, 1/2 - at Indianapolis * TENNESSEE is on a 15-31 ATS (-19.1 Units) skid as home favorites of 3.5 to 10 points The Average Score was TENNESSEE 22.2, OPPONENT 19.6. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - NY GIANTS, 10/3 - DENVER, 11/21 - WASHINGTON, 12/5 - JACKSONVILLE WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 19 2009 Record: 8-8 (-1.8 ML Units), 6-9 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 9-7 DIVISION: AFC South COACH: Jeff Fisher, 16th year STADIUM: LP Field Scoring Differential: -3 (#21 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 20 (#16 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -2.5 (#21 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 20.44 (#17 of 32) 9/12/10 OAKLAND * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 TEN-OAK matchups 9/19/10 PITTSBURGH * UNDERDOG is 3-2 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 TEN-PIT matchups at TENNESSEE 9/26/10 at NY Giants * TENNESSEE is on 4-game SU & ATS winning streak vs. NY GIANTS 10/3/10 DENVER * FAVORITE has won & covered L2 TEN-DEN games 10/10/10 at Dallas * UNDERDOG is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 DAL-TEN games at DALLAS 10/18/10 at Jacksonville * TENNESSEE is 15-8 SU & ATS vs. JACKSONVILLE since 99 10/24/10 PHILADELPHIA * TENNESSEE has taken L2 games vs. PHILADELPHIA both SU & ATS 10/31/10 at San Diego * SAN DIEGO is on 6-0 SU & ATS run vs. TENNESSEE 11/14/10 at Miami * L5 games of MIA-TEN series at MIAMI are 5-0 UNDER the total 11/21/10 WASHINGTON * L4 TEN-WAS series games have gone OVER the total 11/28/10 at Houston * UNDERDOG is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in L5 HOU-TEN matchups at HOUSTON 12/5/10 JACKSONVILLE * UNDERDOG is on 5-3 SU & 7-1 ATS run in L8 TEN-JAC matchups at TENNESSEE 12/9/10 INDIANAPOLIS * UNDER the total is 9-1 in L10 games of TEN-IND series 12/19/10 HOUSTON * L4 games in TEN-HOU series at TENNESSEE went OVER the total 12/26/10 at Kansas City * ROAD TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 KC-TEN games 1/2/11 at Indianapolis * L9 games of IND-TEN series at INDIANAPOLIS are 8-1 UNDER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring -3 21 Yardage -14.2 21 Yards Per Play +0.05 16 Yards Per Point -1.33 23 Turnovers -4 21 Offensive Stats Points Scored 22.1 16 First Downs 18.0 21 Total Yards Per Game 351.4 13 Yards Per Play 5.68 13 Yards Per Point 15.90 17 Rushing Attempts 31.2 5 Rush Yards Per Game 162.0 2 Yards Per Rush 5.19 1 Rushing TD s 19 6 Passing Attempts Per Game 29.8 28 Completions Per Game 16.9 27 Completion Percentage 56.9% 25 Passing Yards Per Game 189.4 23 Passing Yards Per Attempt 6.37 17 Passing TD s 16 24 Sacks Allowed 15 2 Interceptions Thrown 15 15 Fumbles Lost 16 30 Total Turnovers Lost 31 22 Avg. Time of Possession 26:35 24 3rd Down Conversions 41.6% 12 4th Down Conversions 54.5% 13 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 25.1 28 First Downs 20.2 28 Total Yards Per Game 365.6 27 Yards Per Play 5.63 25 Yards Per Point 14.57 27 Rushing Attempts 25.1 8 Rush Yards Per Game 106.9 12 Yards Per Rush 4.26 16 Rushing TD s 16 21 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 37.8 32 Opponent Completions/Game 25.3 32 Opponent Completion % 66.9% 30 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 258.7 31 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 7.68 31 Passing TD s Allowed 23 18 Sacks Recorded 32 18 Interceptions 20 8 Fumbles Recovered 7 28 Total Turnovers Forced 27 16 3rd Down Conversions 40.8% 26 4th Down Conversions 70.6% 31 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 6.1 19 Penalty Yards/Game 51.3 20 Opponent Penalties/Game 5.9 16 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 45.3 24 Punt Return Average 6.7 25 Kick Return Average 20.5 29 Punt Attempts per game 4.3 9 Punt Net Average 40.4 11 Field Goals Made 27 6 Field Goal Percentage 84.4% 15 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 PHILADELPHIA 27-24 W -2.5 W 37 O 9/7 OAKLAND 25-20 W -3 W 46 U 9/11 at Miami 17-7 W -3.5 W 37 U 9/11 at Pittsburgh 7-34 L +7 L 39.5 O 9/15 at Dallas 13-21 L -3.5 L 37.5 U 9/14 at Indianapolis 7-33 L +2.5 L 43 U 9/19 INDIANAPOLIS 17-31 L +2 L 46.5 O 9/18 BALTIMORE 25-10 W +3.5 W 36.5 U 9/22 CLEVELAND 28-31 L -4.5 L 40.5 O 9/21 NEW ORLEANS 27-12 W -4.5 W 44 U 9/26 JACKSONVILLE 12-15 L -6 L 34.5 U 9/25 at St Louis 27-31 L +7 W 46 O 9/29 at Oakland 25-52 L +6.5 L 45 O 9/28 at Pittsburgh 30-13 W +3 W 44 U 10/6 WASHINGTON 14-31 L -4 L 43.5 O 10/5 at New England 30-38 L +1 L 40 O 10/3 at San Diego 17-38 L -2.5 L 39.5 O 10/2 INDIANAPOLIS 10-31 L +7 L 46 U 10/13 JACKSONVILLE 23-14 W +2 W 43.5 U 10/12 HOUSTON 38-17 W -8.5 W 40 O 10/11 at Green Bay 48-27 W +3 W 44.5 O 10/9 at Houston 34-20 W +3 W 40.5 O 10/27 at Cincinnati 30-24 W -4.5 W 42 O 10/19 at Carolina 37-17 W +0 W 37.5 O 10/17 HOUSTON 10-20 L -5.5 L 46 U 10/16 CINCINNATI 23-31 L +3 L 47 O 11/3 at Indianapolis 23-15 W +3 W 47 U 10/26 at Jacksonville 30-17 W -4.5 W 43.5 O 10/24 at Minnesota 3-20 L +6 L 53 U 10/23 at Arizona 10-20 L +5.5 L 45 U 11/10 HOUSTON 17-10 W -9 L 39 U 11/9 MIAMI 31-7 W -5.5 W 39.5 U 10/31 CINCINNATI 27-20 W -3 W 39.5 O 10/30 OAKLAND 25-34 L +1 L 47.5 O 11/17 PITTSBURGH 31-23 W +3 W 44 O 11/16 JACKSONVILLE 10-3 W -9 L 44.5 U 11/14 CHICAGO 17-19 L -5.5 L 34 O 11/6 at Cleveland 14-20 L +3 L 35.5 U 11/24 at Baltimore 12-13 L -2 L 38.5 U 11/23 at Atlanta 38-31 W -6.5 W 44 O 11/21 at Jacksonville 18-15 W +3 W 36 U 11/20 JACKSONVILLE 28-31 L +3.5 W 39 O 12/1 at NY Giants 32-29 W +3 W 34.5 O 12/1 at Ny Jets 17-24 L -3 L 42 U 11/28 at Houston 21-31 L +2 L 43 O 11/27 SAN FRANCISCO 33-22 W -9 W 42.5 O 12/8 INDIANAPOLIS 27-17 W +1 W 43 O 12/7 INDIANAPOLIS 27-29 L -3.5 L 46.5 O 12/5 at Indianapolis 24-51 L +12 L 54 O 12/4 at Indianapolis 3-35 L +15 L 50.5 U 12/16 NEW ENGLAND 24-7 W -3 W 43.5 U 12/14 BUFFALO 28-26 W -5 L 37 O 12/22 at Jacksonville 28-10 W -3 W 41.5 U 12/21 at Houston 27-24 W -6 L 38.5 O 12/13 KANSAS CITY 38-49 L +2.5 L 53 O 12/11 HOUSTON 13-10 W -4.5 L 43 U 12/29 at Houston 13-3 W -9.5 W 35.5 U 12/28 TAMPA BAY 33-13 W -4 W 39 O 12/19 at Oakland 35-40 L +3.5 L 49.5 O 12/18 SEATTLE 24-28 L +7 W 45 O 1/11 (PL) PITTSBURGH 34-31 W -4.5 L 44 O 1/3 at Baltimore 20-17 W +0 W 38 U 12/25 DENVER 16-37 L +4 L 50.5 O 12/24 at Miami 10-24 L +5 L 44 U 1/19 (PL) at Oakland 24-41 L +9 L 46 O 1/10 (PL) at New England 14-17 L +6 W 34.5 U 1/2 DETROIT 24-19 W +2.5 W 45.5 U 1/1 at Jacksonville 13-40 L +4 L 36 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/10 NY JETS 16-23 L -3 L 35.5 O 9/9 at Jacksonville 13-10 W +7.5 W 39.5 U 9/7 JACKSONVILLE 17-10 W +3 W 37 U 9/10 at Pittsburgh 10-13 L +6 W 36U 9/17 at San Diego 7-40 L +10.5 L 38 O 9/16 INDIANAPOLIS 20-22 L +6.5 W 45 U 9/14 at Cincinnati 24-7 W -1 W 37 U 9/20 HOUSTON 31-34 L -7 L 40.5O 9/24 at Miami 10-13 L +10.5 W 35.5 U 9/24 at New Orleans 31-14 W +4.5 W 46.5 U 9/21 HOUSTON 31-12 W -4.5 W 40 O 9/27 at NY Jets 17-24 L +1 L 36O 10/1 DALLAS 14-45 L +9.5 L 37 O 10/7 ATLANTA 20-13 W -7 T 41.5 U 9/28 MINNESOTA 30-17 W -3 W 34.5 O 10/4 at Jacksonville 17-37 L -3 L 42O 10/8 at Indianapolis 13-14 L +17 W 47.5 U 10/14 at Tampa Bay 10-13 L +2 L 37 U 10/5 at Baltimore 13-10 W -1 W 33.5 U 10/11 INDIANAPOLIS 9-31 L +3 L 44U 10/15 at Washington 25-22 W +13 W 39.5 O 10/21 at Houston 38-36 W +2.5 W 37.5 O 10/19 at Kansas City 34-10 W -8.5 W 35 O 10/18 at New England 0-59 L +9 L 39O 10/29 HOUSTON 28-22 W -3 W 41.5 O 10/28 OAKLAND 13-9 W -6.5 L 39 U 10/27 INDIANAPOLIS 31-21 W -3.5 W 41 O 11/1 JACKSONVILLE 30-13 W -3 W 44U 11/5 at Jacksonville 7-37 L +9 L 37 O 11/4 CAROLINA 20-7 W -5.5 W 35 U 11/2 GREEN BAY 19-16 W -3 T 41 U 11/8 at San Francisco 34-27 W +4 W 40.5O 11/12 BALTIMORE 26-27 L +6.5 W 38 O 11/11 JACKSONVILLE 13-28 L -5 L 36 O 11/9 at Chicago 21-14 W -3 W 37 U 11/15 BUFFALO 41-17 W -7.5 W 40.5O 11/19 at Denver 20-34 L +1 L 38 O 11/16 at Jacksonville 24-14 W -2.5 W 39.5 U 11/19 at Philadelphia 31-13 W +13 W 44 T 11/23 at Houston 20-17 W +3.5 W 48U 11/25 at Cincinnati 6-35 L +1 L 47 U 11/23 NY JETS 13-34 L -5.5 L 41 O 11/26 NY GIANTS 24-21 W +4 W 45.5 U 12/2 HOUSTON 28-20 W -3 W 39 O 11/27 at Detroit 47-10 W -10.5 W 44 O 11/29 ARIZONA 20-17 W -3 T 44U 12/3 INDIANAPOLIS 20-17 W +7.5 W 47 U 12/9 SAN DIEGO 17-23 L +2 L 40 T 12/7 CLEVELAND 28-9 W -13.5 W 36.5 O 12/6 at Indianapolis 17-27 L +6 L 47U 12/10 at Houston 26-20 W +1 W 42 O 12/16 at Kansas City 26-17 W -3.5 W 34.5 O 12/14 at Houston 12-13 L -3 L 45 U 12/13 ST LOUIS 47-7 W -14 W 40O 12/17 JACKSONVILLE 24-17 W +3 W 40.5 O 12/23 NY JETS 10-6 W -8 L 37.5 U 12/21 PITTSBURGH 31-14 W +3 W 34 O 12/20 MIAMI 27-24 W -5 L 42.5O 12/24 at Buffalo 30-29 W +5.5 W 37.5 O 12/30 at Indianapolis 16-10 W -4.5 W 41 U 12/28 at Indianapolis 0-23 L -3 L 39.5 U 12/25 SAN DIEGO 17-42 L -2 L 47.5O 12/31 NEW ENGLAND 23-40 L -3.5 L 41 O 1/6 (PL) at San Diego 6-17 L +10.5 L 39.5 U 1/10 (PL) BALTIMORE 10-13 L -3 L 33.5 U 1/3 at Seattle 17-13 W -5.5 L 46U

AFC SOUTH Afc WEST Preview The Denver Broncos opened the Josh McDaniels-era on an improbable six game winning streak and had already led the Chargers by a full three games in the AFC West standings. From there though, the Chargers ripped off 10 straight wins and eventually finished 12-4, while the Broncos missed out on a playoff berth by going 8-8, including an excruciating 20-point home loss in the season finale. Still, head coach Norv Turner s team fell shy of its postseason goals again by losing at home to the Jets in the divisional round. Now it s life after L.T. in San Diego, which seeks a fifth straight division title. Draft pick Ryan Mathews (1-Fresno State) figures to be the successor. Offense hasn t been the problem for the Bolts though, who ranked just 16th in 09, actually a nine spot improvement. The Broncos, off the second-half flop, dealt WR Brandon Marshall to the Dolphins for a pair of secondround picks and also snagged Tim Tebow (1b-Florida). Tebow should contribute right away in certain offensive packages while Kyle Orton is likely to keep the starting QB job ahead of newly acquired Brady Quinn. On paper, Kansas City made some excellent offseason moves after winning four games in Todd Haley s debut season as head coach. Charlie Weis is in to run the offense and Romeo Crennel will handle the defense. Draft pick Eric Berry (1-Tennessee) is a rare talent at safety and versatile rookie Dexter McCluster (2a-Mississippi) joins Thomas Jones (Jets) and Jamaal Charles in what figures to be a potentially explosive backfield for Weis and QB Matt Cassell. A strong offseason and a sensible draft usually don t go hand in hand with Oakland, but Al Davis made some shrewd moves by getting quarterback Jason Campbell (Redskins) as a nice upgrade over JaMarcus Russell, while also picking up some other widely regarded talent on the offensive line and on defense. Between the Raiders and Chiefs, there is potential for a surprise team to emerge out west. DENVER BRONCOS Josh McDaniels first season as head coach at Denver was filled with ups and downs, as the Broncos got off to a 6-0 start only to lose eight of their last 10 games, missing the postseason. It didn t get much better since. Two key figures parted ways with the team DC Mike Nolan and All-Pro WR Brandon Marshall, traded to Miami Newly acquired QB Brady Quinn will backup Kyle Orton, who set career-highs for completion percentage (62.1), yards (3,802) and TD passes (21). High-profile draftee Tim Tebow is likely to play in only certain sets. Marshall may have been trouble off the field, but his production will be missed on it. Rookie Demaryius Thomas (1a-Georgia Tech) was drafted to replace the superstar, and has similar size to Marshall s. Knowshon Moreno is comes off a rookie campaign in which he rushed for 947 yards and seven touchdowns. The offensive line needs Ryan Clady to recover fully from a partially torn patellar tendon Don Martindale was promoted from linebackers coach to coordinator when Nolan left, and he ll continue to run the 3-4 scheme that ranked third in the NFL in pass defense (186.3 YPG) and seventh in total defense (315.0). The Broncos went the free-agent route to shore up the line, with three new players expected to start, DT Jamal Williams plus ends Justin Bannan and Jarvis Green. The LB corps is strong, led by Elvis Dumervil, who paced the NFL with 17 sacks. The secondary is a veteran unit that still gets the job done, led by ageless FS Brian Dawkins and CB Champ Bailey The early season schedule is tough, so don t expect as fast a start as last year. But if the Broncos can get to.500 before the bye week, they have a chance to vie for a playoff spot. KANSAS CITY CHIEFS The Chiefs have won just 10 games combined since 07, including a 4-12 mark in head coach Todd Haley s debut. Changes needed to be made so Kansas City went out and hired the two most successful assistant coaches on the market, Charlie Weis and Romeo Crennel, who helped orchestrate the New England dynasty Weis takes over an offense that ranked just 25th in the NFL with 303.2 YPG. His first order of business is molding QB Matt Cassel into a player worthy of a $63 million contract. Cassel has the tools, but was inconsistent in his first season with the Chiefs, matching 16 touchdowns with 16 interceptions. Weis will get to work with arguably the best backfield of his coaching career as emerging Jamaal Charles is joined by veteran Thomas Jones (Jets) and all-purpose threat Dexter McCluster (2a-Ole Miss). Dwayne Bowe returns as Cassel s favorite target. The line needs to improve after allowing 42 sacks. Center Casey Wiegmann (Broncos) and guard Ryan Lilja (Colts) were signed to bring a veteran presence Crennel 2009 STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P San Diego 13-4-0 0.765 468 337 9-3-0 6-3-0 7-1-0 8-8-1 50.0% 10-6-1 Denver 8-8-0 0.500 326 324 6-6-0 4-4-0 4-4-0 9-7-0 56.2% 7-9-0 Oakland 5-11-0 0.312 197 379 4-8-0 2-6-0 3-5-0 8-8-0 50.0% 7-9-0 Kansas City 4-12-0 0.250 294 424 3-9-0 1-7-0 3-5-0 7-9-0 43.7% 9-5-2 may have an even harder task than Weis as he builds a defense that ranked 31st in the league against the run (156.5 YPG) and 30th overall (388.2). To help with stopping the run, the Chiefs are mulling the idea of moving end Glenn Dorsey to nose tackle. The LB corps was a surprise last year when the Chiefs moved to a 3-4 scheme. Former end Tamba Hali came on strong as an outside linebacker and the team s top two tacklers Demorrio Williams and Corey Mays are back. The secondary needed some help, and got it in Eric Berry (1-Tennessee), perhaps the finest all around player available in this past draft There s plenty to be optimistic about in Kansas City, and the Chiefs could finish as high as second in the AFC West, but are still steps below the Chargers. OAKLAND RAIDERS Since playing in the Super Bowl in 2002, the Raiders have lost 11 or more games in each of the last seven seasons. Despite troubles both on and off the field, HC Tom Cable was given another chance by owner Al Davis, although he no longer calls the offensive plays. That job will go to new OC Hue Jackson, the former Ravens QB coach Former #1 overall pick QB JaMarcus Russell was released in the offseason, in favor of Jason Campbell, acquired from the Redskins. His 2009 numbers (3,618 yards, 20:15 Td-Int ratio) were respectable so it should be a sizeable upgrade. One problem, the Raiders dropped from 10th in the league in rushing in 2008 to 21st last year, gaining 106.3 YPG. Darren McFadden and Michael Bush will compete for rushing attempts. The Raiders receiving corps was also a huge disappointment last year because Darrius Heyward-Bey failed to live up to promise. Fortunately, Louis Murphy, on the other hand, proved to be reliable. The key to the line will be the health of guard Robert Gallery the leader of the unit who suffered through an injury-plagued 2009 campaign The Oakland stop unit ranked 26th in the NFL in 2009, allowing 361.9 YPG, so it was a surprise that DC John Marshall kept his job. The line is led by veteran DT Richard Seymour. The LB corps lost the team s top tackler in Kirk Morrison, but gained his replacement with draftee Rolando McClain (1-Alabama). The eighth-overall pick is a strong, physical player with a tireless work ethic. The secondary is led by cornerback Nnamdi Asomugha, so good that quarterbacks rarely throw his way Cable is certainly on the hot seat and will need a fast start. That looks to be a tough task with a tough slate before the bye week. If things get ugly real fast, the Raiders could be doomed to another season of double-digit losses. SAN DIEGO CHARGERS The Chargers have won four straight AFC West titles, with little to show for it. Last year, they lost at home in the divisional round as the AFC s #2 seed. A few key contributors are gone, notably RB LaDainian Tomlinson, CB Antonio Cromartie, and NT Jamal Williams. HC Norv Turner s job is safe, but can he lead the Chargers to the next level?... Philip Rivers HAS risen to the next level and he led the AFC in QB rating (104.4), throwing for 4,254 yards, and a 28:9 TD-Int. ratio. The running game will certainly be different. Rookie Ryan Mathews (1-Fresno State) is expected to be the No. 1 RB after leading the FBS in rushing. Darren Sproles will continue in his change-ofpace role. The Chargers passing offense thrives thanks to a receiving corps that keeps getting better. Vincent Jackson is underrated, Malcom Floyd comes off a career year, and of course TE Antonio Gates ( 1,157 yards, 8 TD s) is as good as they come. The Chargers ranked 31st in the league in rushing, but didn t spend any draft picks or sign any free agents on the offensive line. The left side is solid Ron Rivera took over the DC job last year, and the Charger stop unit improved from 31st in the NFL against the pass to 11th (209.2 YPG), and they used three of their first four draft picks on defense in an effort to bolster the unit. The strength is at linebacker as the line is an unspectacular bunch. Cromartie, replaced by Antoine Cason, will be missed in the secondary, but fellow CB Quentin Jammer is improving big-time.if Mathews can step right in and be a productive rusher, the San Diego attack will be scary. A fifth-consecutive AFC West crown is likely, but how far the Chargers go in the playoffs is still the only thing that matters. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH San Diego Oakland Kansas City Denver 20 WWW.STATFOX.COM

DENVER BRONCOS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 60 to 1 AFC Title: 30 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 19.31 (25th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 9-7 10-7 10-7 14-4 9-7 7-9 8-8 8-8 75-57 (57%) OVERALL ATS 7-8 8-9 7-8 12-5 5-11 5-11 4-12 9-7 57-71 (45%) PRESEASON ATS 3-1 3-1 2-3 3-1 2-2 2-2 2-1 2-2 19-13 (59%) HOME ATS 4-4 3-5 4-4 6-3 1-7 4-4 0-8 4-4 26-39 (40%) ROAD ATS 3-4 5-4 3-4 6-2 4-4 1-7 4-4 5-3 31-32 (49%) vs DIVISION ATS 2-3 6-0 3-2 4-1 0-6 2-4 1-5 3-3 21-24 (47%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 3-8 8-5 6-6 9-4 4-8 4-8 3-9 6-6 43-54 (44%) as FAVORITE ATS 4-7 6-5 7-7 9-4 3-9 2-6 1-9 3-3 35-50 (41%) as UNDERDOG ATS 3-1 2-4 0-1 3-1 2-2 3-5 3-3 6-4 22-21 (51%) OVER-UNDER 8-8 8-9 7-9 10-8 8-8 12-4 9-7 7-9 69-62 (53%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * DENVER is 1-14 ATS (-14.4 Units) vs. excellent passing teams with a completion pct. of 64% or better since 07. The Average Score was DENVER 15, OPPONENT 31.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - INDIANAPOLIS, 11/22 - at San Diego, 12/12 - at Arizona, 12/26 - HOUSTON, 1/2 - SAN DIEGO * DENVER is on a 13-1 OVER the total (+11.9 Units) run at home vs. good rushing teams - averaging >=130 RYPG The Average Score was DENVER 27.6, OPPONENT 20.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/17 - NY JETS * Over the L2 seasons, DENVER is 1-10 ATS (-10 Units) as home favorites. The Average Score was DENVER 22.7, OPPONENT 25.5. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - SEATTLE, 10/24 - OAKLAND, 11/14 - KANSAS CITY, 11/28 - ST LOUIS * DENVER is 10-1 OVER the total (+8.9 Units) on the road when coming off a straight up loss since 07. The Average Score was DENVER 19.7, OPPONENT 31.5. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/3 - at Tennessee, 10/10 - at Baltimore, 12/19 - at Oakland * DENVER is on a 0-8 ATS (-8.8 Units) skid vs. terrible teams - outscored by 10+ PPG The Average Score was DENVER 18.5, OPPONENT 23.5. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/24 - OAKLAND, 11/28 - ST LOUIS, 12/19 - at Oakland WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM LINE FINAL ATS 21 2009 Record: 8-8 (-9.1 ML Units), 9-7 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 7-9 DIVISION: AFC West COACH: Josh McDaniels, 2nd year STADIUM: Invesco Field Scoring Differential: +0.1 (#18 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 17 (#21 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -0.1 (#19 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 20.63 (#16 of 32) 9/12/10 at Jacksonville * UNDERDOG is on 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS run in L5 JAC-DEN matchups 9/19/10 SEATTLE * L6 games of DEN-SEA series at DENVER are 5-1 OVER the total 9/26/10 INDIANAPOLIS * OVER the total is 7-1 in L8 games of DEN-IND series 10/3/10 at Tennessee * FAVORITE has won & covered L2 TEN-DEN games 10/10/10 at Baltimore * L7 games of BAL-DEN series are 6-1 UNDER the total 10/17/10 NY JETS * L4 games in DEN-NYJ series at DENVER went UNDER the total 10/24/10 OAKLAND * ROAD TEAM is on 9-4 SU & 10-3 ATS run in DEN-OAK series 10/31/10 vs. San Francisco (London) * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 SF-DEN games 11/14/10 KANSAS CITY * OVER the total is 12-4 in L16 games of DEN-KC series 11/22/10 at San Diego * SAN DIEGO is on 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS run vs. DENVER 11/28/10 ST LOUIS * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 DEN-STL games 12/5/10 at Kansas City * L9 games of KC-DEN series at KANSAS CITY are 8-1 OVER the total 12/12/10 at Arizona * FAVORITE has swept L4 ARZ-DEN games, both SU & ATS 12/19/10 at Oakland * FAVORITE is 8-1 SU & 7-2 ATS in L9 OAK-DEN matchups at OAKLAND 12/26/10 HOUSTON * HOME TEAM has won SU & ATS in four straight DEN-HOU games 1/2/11 SAN DIEGO * SAN DIEGO is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in its L4 games at DENVER 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +0.1 18 Yardage +26.4 13 Yards Per Play +0.28 15 Yards Per Point -1.15 22 Turnovers +7 6 Offensive Stats Points Scored 20.4 20 First Downs 19.1 15 Total Yards Per Game 341.4 15 Yards Per Play 5.29 16 Yards Per Point 16.74 21 Rushing Attempts 27.5 14 Rush Yards Per Game 114.8 18 Yards Per Rush 4.17 17 Rushing TD s 9 22 Passing Attempts Per Game 34.9 9 Completions Per Game 21.3 11 Completion Percentage 61.1% 15 Passing Yards Per Game 226.7 13 Passing Yards Per Attempt 6.50 15 Passing TD s 21 16 Sacks Allowed 34 15 Interceptions Thrown 13 7 Fumbles Lost 10 12 Total Turnovers Lost 23 7 Avg. Time of Possession 29:53 11 3rd Down Conversions 36.3% 22 4th Down Conversions 38.9% 27 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 20.3 12 First Downs 18.1 12 Total Yards Per Game 315.0 7 Yards Per Play 5.01 6 Yards Per Point 15.59 17 Rushing Attempts 28.6 22 Rush Yards Per Game 128.7 26 Yards Per Rush 4.50 27 Rushing TD s 11 11 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 31.9 9 Opponent Completions/Game 18.6 6 Opponent Completion % 58.4% 9 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 186.3 3 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.29 10 Passing TD s Allowed 22 14 Sacks Recorded 39 10 Interceptions 17 13 Fumbles Recovered 13 5 Total Turnovers Forced 30 9 3rd Down Conversions 37.2% 13 4th Down Conversions 50.0% 16 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 5.8 14 Penalty Yards/Game 50.0 18 Opponent Penalties/Game 4.9 30 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 45.4 23 Punt Return Average 9.5 12 Kick Return Average 21.4 27 Punt Attempts per game 4.9 21 Punt Net Average 38.8 20 Field Goals Made 30 3 Field Goal Percentage 85.7% 12 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 ST LOUIS 23-16 W +2.5 W 50.5 U 9/7 at Cincinnati 30-10 W -6 W 44 U 9/12 KANSAS CITY 34-24 W -3 W 48 O 9/11 at Miami 10-34 L -5.5 L 37 O 9/15 at San Francisco 24-14 W +3.5 W 43.5 U 9/14 at San Diego 37-13 W -3 W 43 O 9/19 at Jacksonville 6-7 L -3 L 37.5 U 9/18 SAN DIEGO 20-17 W -3 T 46 U 9/22 BUFFALO 28-23 W -7.5 L 46.5 O 9/22 OAKLAND 31-10 W -5 W 46 U 9/26 SAN DIEGO 23-13 W -9.5 W 46 U 9/26 KANSAS CITY 30-10 W -3 W 47.5 U 9/30 at Baltimore 23-34 L -9 L 34.5 O 9/28 DETROIT 20-16 W -11.5 L 44 U 10/3 at Tampa Bay 16-13 W -3 T 34.5 U 10/2 at Jacksonville 20-7 W +3.5 W 36.5 U 10/6 SAN DIEGO 26-9 W -6.5 W 39.5 U 10/5 at Kansas City 23-24 L +3 W 46.5 O 10/10 CAROLINA 20-17 W -4 L 38 U 10/9 WASHINGTON 21-19 W -7 L 34.5 O 10/13 MIAMI 22-24 L -3.5 L 41.5 O 10/12 PITTSBURGH 17-14 W -6.5 L 45 U 10/17 at Oakland 31-3 W -2.5 W 42 U 10/16 NEW ENGLAND 28-20 W -3.5 W 47 O 10/20 at Kansas City 37-34 W -3 T 50.5 O 10/19 at Minnesota 20-28 L +4 L 44 O 10/25 at Cincinnati 10-23 L -7 L 42.5 U 10/23 at NY Giants 23-24 L +2.5 W 46 O 10/30 PHILADELPHIA 49-21 W -4 W 42.5 O 10/27 at New England 24-16 W +3 W 45.5 U 10/26 at Baltimore 6-26 L +2.5 L 36.5 U 10/31 ATLANTA 28-41 L -7 L 39.5 O 11/13 at Oakland 31-17 W -3 W 47 O 11/11 OAKLAND 10-34 L -6 L 45.5 U 11/3 NEW ENGLAND 26-30 L -3 L 35.5 O 11/7 HOUSTON 31-13 W -7 W 44 T 11/20 NY JETS 27-0 W -14 W 40.5 U 11/16 SAN DIEGO 37-8 W -8.5 W 44 O 11/21 at New Orleans 34-13 W -6 W 48.5 U 11/17 at Seattle 31-9 W -5.5 W 43 U 11/24 at Dallas 24-21 W -1.5 W 41 O 11/23 CHICAGO 10-19 L -10.5 L 38.5 U 11/28 OAKLAND 24-25 L -11.5 L 41.5 O 11/24 INDIANAPOLIS 20-23 L -6 L 42.5 O 12/4 at Kansas City 27-31 L +0 L 46.5 O 11/30 at Oakland 22-8 W -3 W 42 U 12/5 at San Diego 17-20 L +3 T 46.5 U 12/1 at San Diego 27-30 L -3 L 40 O 12/11 BALTIMORE 12-10 W -15 L 40 U 12/7 KANSAS CITY 45-27 W -3 W 46.5 O 12/12 MIAMI 20-17 W -11.5 L 41 U 12/17 at Buffalo 28-17 W -7.5 W 35.5 O 12/8 at NY Jets 13-19 L -1.5 L 43 U 12/14 CLEVELAND 23-20 W -11.5 L 42.5 O 12/19 at Kansas City 17-45 L -3 L 52.5 O 12/24 OAKLAND 22-3 W -13.5 W 43 U 12/15 KANSAS CITY 31-24 W -3.5 W 47.5 O 12/21 at Indianapolis 31-17 W +7 W 48.5 U 12/25 at Tennessee 37-16 W -4 W 50.5 O 12/31 at San Diego 23-7 W +11.5 W 43.5 U 12/22 at Oakland 16-28 L +3.5 L 46.5 U 12/28 at Green Bay 3-31 L +10 L 41.5 U 1/2 INDIANAPOLIS 33-14 W -10 W 44 O 1/14 (PL) NEW ENGLAND 27-13 W -3 W 45.5 U 12/29 ARIZONA 37-7 W -13.5 W 41.5 O 1/4 (PL) at Indianapolis 10-41 L +3 L 49 O 1/9 (PL) at Indianapolis 24-49 L +10 L 56 O 1/22 (PL) PITTSBURGH 17-34 L -3 L 40.5 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 at St Louis 10-18 L -4 L 46 U 9/17 KANSAS CITY 9-6 W -10.5 L 38 U 9/24 at New England 17-7 W +6 W 38 U 10/9 BALTIMORE 13-3 W -5 W 33 U 10/15 OAKLAND 13-3 W -15 L 36.5 U 10/22 at Cleveland 17-7 W -4 W 31 U 10/29 INDIANAPOLIS 31-34 L -3 L 40 O 11/5 at Pittsburgh 31-20 W +3 W 36 O 11/12 at Oakland 17-13 W -8 L 33.5 U 11/19 SAN DIEGO 27-35 L -3 L 42.5 O 11/23 at Kansas City 10-19 L +2 L 39.5 U 12/3 SEATTLE 20-23 L -5 L 40.5 O 12/10 at San Diego 20-48 L +7.5 L 41.5 O 12/17 at Arizona 37-20 W -3 W 44 O 12/24 CINCINNATI 24-23 W -3 L 44.5 O 12/31 SAN FRANCISCO 23-26 L -10.5 L 40 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 at Buffalo 15-14 W -3 L 38 U 9/16 OAKLAND 23-20 W -9.5 L 37 O 9/23 JACKSONVILLE 14-23 L -3.5 L 36 O 9/30 at Indianapolis 20-38 L +10 L 46.5 O 10/7 SAN DIEGO 3-41 L +1.5 L 43.5 O 10/21 PITTSBURGH 31-28 W +4 W 38 O 10/29 GREEN BAY 13-19 L -3 L 43.5 U 11/4 at Detroit 7-44 L +3 L 47 O 11/11 at Kansas City 27-11 W +3 W 37 O 11/19 TENNESSEE 34-20 W -1 W 38 O 11/25 at Chicago 34-37 L +1 L 42.5 O 12/2 at Oakland 20-34 L -3.5 L 41 O 12/9 KANSAS CITY 41-7 W -7.5 W 37 O 12/13 at Houston 13-31 L -3 L 47.5 U 12/24 at San Diego 3-23 L +9 L 47 U 12/30 MINNESOTA 22-19 W +2.5 W 40.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/8 at Oakland 41-14 W -3 W 40 O 9/14 SAN DIEGO 39-38 W -1.5 L 46.5 O 9/21 NEW ORLEANS 34-32 W -5.5 L 51.5 O 9/28 at Kansas City 19-33 L -8 L 47 O 10/5 TAMPA BAY 16-13 W -3.5 L 47 U 10/12 JACKSONVILLE 17-24 L -3 L 48 U 10/20 at New England 7-41 L +3 L 47.5 O 11/2 MIAMI 17-26 L -4 L 50 U 11/6 at Cleveland 34-30 W +3 W 46 O 11/16 at Atlanta 24-20 W +6.5 W 51 U 11/23 OAKLAND 10-31 L -8.5 L 44 U 11/30 at NY Jets 34-17 W +8 W 48 O 12/7 KANSAS CITY 24-17 W -9 L 49.5 U 12/14 at Carolina 10-30 L +7 L 46.5 U 12/21 BUFFALO 23-30 L -6 L 46.5 O 12/28 at San Diego 21-52 L +7 L 50 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/13 at Cincinnati 12-7 W +5 W 41U 9/20 CLEVELAND 27-6 W -3 W 39.5U 9/27 at Oakland 23-3 W -2.5 W 38U 10/4 DALLAS 17-10 W +3 W 44U 10/11 NEW ENGLAND 20-17 W +3 W 41U 10/19 at San Diego 34-23 W +3 W 44.5O 11/1 at Baltimore 7-30 L +4.5 L 42.5U 11/9 PITTSBURGH 10-28 L +3 L 41U 11/15 at Washington 17-27 L -3 L 35.5O 11/22 SAN DIEGO 3-32 L +6 L 41.5U 11/26 NY GIANTS 26-6 W +4.5 W 43.5U 12/6 at Kansas City 44-13 W -5 W 38.5O 12/13 at Indianapolis 16-28 L +6.5 L 43.5O 12/20 OAKLAND 19-20 L -13.5 L 37O 12/27 at Philadelphia 27-30 L +7 W 43.5O 1/3 KANSAS CITY 24-44 L -9 L 38O

KANSAS CITY CHIEFS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 100 to 1 AFC Title: 50 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 18 (30th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 8-8 13-4 7-9 10-6 9-8 4-12 2-14 4-12 57-73 (44%) OVERALL ATS 9-6 10-7 6-10 10-5 8-9 7-8 8-8 7-9 65-62 (51%) PRESEASON ATS 4-0 3-2 1-3 0-4 2-2 0-4 1-3 0-4 11-22 (33%) HOME ATS 4-3 6-3 3-5 7-1 5-3 1-6 3-5 2-6 31-32 (49%) ROAD ATS 5-3 4-4 3-5 3-4 3-6 6-2 5-3 5-3 34-30 (53%) vs DIVISION ATS 2-3 2-4 2-4 4-2 4-2 2-4 5-1 2-4 23-24 (49%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 6-5 7-6 5-7 9-3 5-8 5-7 7-5 5-7 49-48 (51%) as FAVORITE ATS 3-4 9-6 3-8 8-1 5-4 0-3 0-1 0-2 28-29 (49%) as UNDERDOG ATS 6-2 1-1 3-2 2-4 3-5 7-5 8-7 7-7 37-33 (53%) OVER-UNDER 11-5 11-6 10-6 6-10 7-9 8-8 8-8 9-5 70-57 (55%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * KANSAS CITY is 11-1 ATS (+9.9 Units) vs. awful passing defenses - allowing a comp. pct. of 64% or worse since 07. The Average Score was KANSAS CITY 21.1, OPPONENT 22. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/10 - at Indianapolis, 10/24 - JACKSONVILLE, 11/28 - at Seattle, 12/19 - at St Louis, 12/26 - TENNESSEE * KANSAS CITY is on a 23-7 UNDER the total (+15.3 Units) run at home in September games The Average Score was KANSAS CITY 21.8, OPPONENT 15.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/13 - SAN DIEGO, 9/26 - SAN FRANCISCO * KANSAS CITY is 4-14 ATS (-11.4 Units) at home in conference games since 07. The Average Score was KANSAS CITY 18, OPPONENT 27.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/13 - SAN DIEGO, 10/24 - JACKSONVILLE, 10/31 - BUFFALO, 12/5 - DENVER, 12/26 - TENNESSEE, 1/2 - OAKLAND * Over the L2 seasons, KANSAS CITY is 0-6 ATS (-6.6 Units) at home in all games where the line is +3 to -3. The Average Score was KANSAS CITY 20.7, OPPONENT 30.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/24 - JACKSONVILLE, 10/31 - BUFFALO, 11/21 - ARIZONA, 12/5 - DENVER * KANSAS CITY is 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) revenging a loss where team scored less than 14 points since 07. The Average Score was KANSAS CITY 21.2, OPPONENT 22. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/31 - BUFFALO 2009 Record: 4-12 (-2.2 ML Units), 7-9 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 9-5 DIVISION: AFC West COACH: Todd Haley STADIUM: Arrowhead Stadium Scoring Differential: -8.1 (#27 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 13 (#27 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -8.8 (#29 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 19.94 (#21 of 32) 9/13/10 SAN DIEGO * UNDERDOG is 5-14 SU but 12-7 ATS in L19 KC-SD matchups 9/19/10 at Cleveland * OVER the total is 5-0 in L5 games of CLE-KC series 9/26/10 SAN FRANCISCO * KANSAS CITY has won its L3 games at home vs. SAN FRANCISCO, both SU & ATS 10/10/10 at Indianapolis * INDIANAPOLIS is 8-1 SU & 7-2 ATS in its L9 games vs. KANSAS CITY 10/17/10 at Houston * FAVORITE has swept L3 HOU-KC games at HOUSTON, both SU & ATS 10/24/10 JACKSONVILLE * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 ATS in L2 KC-JAC games 10/31/10 BUFFALO * FAVORITE is 10-1 SU & 9-2 ATS in KC-BUF series since 93 11/7/10 at Oakland * ROAD TEAM is on 10-4 SU & 13-1 ATS run in OAK-KC series 11/14/10 at Denver * OVER the total is 12-4 in L16 games of DEN-KC series 11/21/10 ARIZONA * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 KC-ARZ games 11/28/10 at Seattle * KANSAS CITY is 14-6 SU & ATS vs. SEATTLE since 93 12/5/10 DENVER * L9 games of KC-DEN series at KANSAS CITY are 8-1 OVER the total 12/12/10 at San Diego * UNDERDOG is 3-7 SU but 7-3 ATS in L10 SD-KC matchups at SAN DIEGO 12/19/10 at St Louis * KANSAS CITY has won four straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. ST LOUIS 12/26/10 TENNESSEE * ROAD TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 KC-TEN games 1/2/11 OAKLAND * UNDERDOG is 6-5 SU & 9-1 ATS in L11 KC-OAK matchups at KANSAS CITY 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring -8.1 27 Yardage -86.3 28 Yards Per Play -1.09 28 Yards Per Point -1.75 24 Turnovers +1 15 Offensive Stats Points Scored 18.4 23 First Downs 16.0 27 Total Yards Per Game 301.8 25 Yards Per Play 4.75 28 Yards Per Point 16.40 20 Rushing Attempts 27.4 15 Rush Yards Per Game 120.6 11 Yards Per Rush 4.40 8 Rushing TD s 8 25 Passing Attempts Per Game 33.5 19 Completions Per Game 18.5 24 Completion Percentage 55.2% 27 Passing Yards Per Game 182.6 25 Passing Yards Per Attempt 5.45 28 Passing TD s 18 21 Sacks Allowed 45 27 Interceptions Thrown 17 17 Fumbles Lost 10 12 Total Turnovers Lost 27 15 Avg. Time of Possession 24:23 32 3rd Down Conversions 27.3% 31 4th Down Conversions 48.3% 16 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 26.5 29 First Downs 19.9 26 Total Yards Per Game 388.1 30 Yards Per Play 5.84 29 Yards Per Point 14.65 24 Rushing Attempts 33.2 30 Rush Yards Per Game 156.5 31 Yards Per Rush 4.72 31 Rushing TD s 18 26 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 31.8 8 Opponent Completions/Game 18.9 9 Opponent Completion % 59.3% 13 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 231.7 22 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.37 16 Passing TD s Allowed 29 28 Sacks Recorded 22 31 Interceptions 15 16 Fumbles Recovered 13 5 Total Turnovers Forced 28 12 3rd Down Conversions 38.1% 15 4th Down Conversions 54.5% 24 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 5.3 8 Penalty Yards/Game 41.7 6 Opponent Penalties/Game 6.6 8 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 51.3 11 Punt Return Average 6.5 27 Kick Return Average 21.6 25 Punt Attempts per game 6.0 31 Punt Net Average 42.5 4 Field Goals Made 25 13 Field Goal Percentage 86.2% 11 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 at Cleveland 40-39 W +2 W 35.5 O 9/7 SAN DIEGO 27-14 W -4 W 46.5 U 9/12 at Denver 24-34 L +3 L 48 O 9/11 NY JETS 27-7 W -3 W 47.5 U 9/15 JACKSONVILLE 16-23 L -3.5 L 46 U 9/14 PITTSBURGH 41-20 W -3.5 W 48 O 9/19 CAROLINA 17-28 L -7 L 46 U 9/18 at Oakland 23-17 W -1 W 54 U 9/22 at New England 38-41 L +8.5 W 43.5 O 9/21 at Houston 42-14 W -7.5 W 44 O 9/26 HOUSTON 21-24 L -7.5 L 48 U 9/26 at Denver 10-30 L +3 L 47.5 U 9/29 MIAMI 48-30 W +3 W 44 O 9/28 at Baltimore 17-10 W -3 W 43.5 U 10/4 at Baltimore 27-24 W +5.5 W 41 O 10/2 PHILADELPHIA 31-37 L -1.5 L 45.5 O 10/6 at NY Jets 29-25 W -3 W 46.5 O 10/5 DENVER 24-23 W -3 L 46.5 O 10/17 at Jacksonville 16-22 L -2.5 L 44 U 10/16 WASHINGTON 28-21 W -6 W 42.5 O 10/13 at San Diego 34-35 L +4 W 45.5 O 10/12 at Green Bay 40-34 W +2.5 W 47 O 10/24 ATLANTA 56-10 W -3.5 W 44 O 10/21 at Miami 30-20 W +1 W 43 O 10/20 DENVER 34-37 L +3 T 50.5 O 10/20 at Oakland 17-10 W -4 W 48 U 10/31 INDIANAPOLIS 45-35 W +1 W 56.5 O 10/30 at San Diego 20-28 L +5.5 L 52 U 10/27 OAKLAND 20-10 W +2.5 W 55.5 U 10/26 BUFFALO 38-5 W -5.5 W 44 U 11/7 at Tampa Bay 31-34 L -3 L 45.5 O 11/6 OAKLAND 27-23 W -3 W 51 U 11/10 at San Francisco 13-17 L +5 W 49 U 11/9 CLEVELAND 41-20 W -9 W 43.5 O 11/14 at New Orleans 20-27 L -3.5 L 56.5 U 11/13 at Buffalo 3-14 L +2.5 L 41 U 11/16 at Cincinnati 19-24 L -6 L 47.5 U 11/17 BUFFALO 17-16 W -3.5 L 52.5 U 11/22 NEW ENGLAND 19-27 L +3 L 54 U 11/20 at Houston 45-17 W -6.5 W 44 O 11/23 OAKLAND 27-24 W -11 L 44.5 O 11/24 at Seattle 32-39 L -3 L 44 O 11/30 at San Diego 28-24 W -7.5 L 48.5 O 11/28 SAN DIEGO 31-34 L -3 L 54 O 11/27 NEW ENGLAND 26-16 W -4 W 49 U 12/1 ARIZONA 49-0 W -9 W 47 O 12/7 at Denver 27-45 L +3 L 46.5 O 12/5 at Oakland 34-27 W -1 W 52 O 12/4 DENVER 31-27 W +0 W 46.5 O 12/8 ST LOUIS 49-10 W -5 W 46 O 12/14 DETROIT 45-17 W -14.5 W 45 O 12/13 at Tennessee 49-38 W -2.5 W 53 O 12/11 at Dallas 28-31 L +3 T 43.5 O 12/15 at Denver 24-31 L +3.5 L 47.5 O 12/20 at Minnesota 20-45 L -3 L 55 O 12/19 DENVER 45-17 W +3 W 52.5 O 12/17 at NY Giants 17-27 L +2.5 L 48 U 12/22 SAN DIEGO 24-22 W -2.5 L 44 O 12/28 CHICAGO 31-3 W -8 W 44 U 12/25 OAKLAND 31-30 W -9.5 L 60 O 12/24 SAN DIEGO 20-7 W -1 W 45 U 12/28 at Oakland 0-24 L +8.5 L 44.5 U 1/11 (PL) INDIANAPOLIS 31-38 L -3 L 53 O 1/2 at San Diego 17-24 L -6.5 L 51.5 U 1/1 CINCINNATI 37-3 W -10.5 W 48 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 CINCINNATI 10-23 L +1.5 L 48.5 U 9/17 at Denver 6-9 L +10.5 W 38 U 10/1 SAN FRANCISCO 41-0 W -7 W 39 O 10/8 at Arizona 23-20 W -3.5 L 40 O 10/15 at Pittsburgh 7-45 L +6.5 L 37 O 10/22 SAN DIEGO 30-27 W +6 W 38 O 10/29 SEATTLE 35-28 W -5.5 W 37 O 11/5 at St Louis 31-17 W +3 W 48 T 11/12 at Miami 10-13 L +2 L 40 U 11/19 OAKLAND 17-13 W -8 L 36 U 11/23 DENVER 19-10 W -2 W 39.5 U 12/3 at Cleveland 28-31 L -3.5 L 36.5 O 12/10 BALTIMORE 10-20 L -3 L 37 U 12/17 at San Diego 9-20 L +9 L 46.5 U 12/23 at Oakland 20-9 W -7 W 35.5 U 12/31 JACKSONVILLE 35-30 W -3 W 36.5 O 1/6 (PL) at Indianapolis 8-23 L +7.5 L 50.5 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 at Houston 3-20 L +3 L 37.5 U 9/16 at Chicago 10-20 L +11.5 W 35.5 U 9/23 MINNESOTA 13-10 W -3 T 34.5 U 9/30 at San Diego 30-16 W +12.5 W 39 O 10/7 JACKSONVILLE 7-17 L +2 L 35 U 10/14 CINCINNATI 27-20 W +2.5 W 44 O 10/21 at Oakland 12-10 W +2 W 37.5 U 11/4 GREEN BAY 22-33 L -2.5 L 37.5 O 11/11 DENVER 11-27 L -3 L 37 O 11/18 at Indianapolis 10-13 L +14.5 W 41.5 U 11/25 OAKLAND 17-20 L -4 L 34.5 O 12/2 SAN DIEGO 10-24 L +5.5 L 37.5 U 12/9 at Denver 7-41 L +7.5 L 37 O 12/16 TENNESSEE 17-26 L +3.5 L 34.5 O 12/23 at Detroit 20-25 L +6 W 43.5 O 12/30 at Ny Jets 10-13 L +4.5 W 35.5 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/7 at New England 10-17 L +16.5 W 43.5 U 9/14 OAKLAND 8-23 L -3 L 36 U 9/21 at Atlanta 14-38 L +6 L 37.5 O 9/28 DENVER 33-19 W +8 W 47 O 10/5 at Carolina 0-34 L +9.5 L 38 U 10/19 TENNESSEE 10-34 L +8.5 L 35 O 10/26 at NY Jets 24-28 L +14 W 40.5 O 11/2 TAMPA BAY 27-30 L +9.5 W 37 O 11/9 at San Diego 19-20 L +15 W 46.5 U 11/16 NEW ORLEANS 20-30 L +6 L 50.5 U 11/23 BUFFALO 31-54 L +3 L 43.5 O 11/30 at Oakland 20-13 W +3 W 41 U 12/7 at Denver 17-24 L +9 W 49.5 U 12/14 SAN DIEGO 21-22 L +6 W 41.5 O 12/21 MIAMI 31-38 L +3 L 37 O 12/28 at Cincinnati 6-16 L +1 L 40 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/13 at Baltimore 24-38 L +13 L 37O 9/20 OAKLAND 10-13 L -1 L 40U 9/27 at Philadelphia 14-34 L +7.5 L 39O 10/4 NY GIANTS 16-27 L +9 L 43T 10/11 DALLAS 20-26 L +7 W 43.5O 10/18 at Washington 14-6 W +6.5 W 36.5U 10/25 SAN DIEGO 7-37 L +6 L 44T 11/8 at Jacksonville 21-24 L +7 W 41.5O 11/15 at Oakland 16-10 W +3 W 36.5U 11/22 PITTSBURGH 27-24 W +11 W 39.5O 11/29 at San Diego 14-43 L +13 L 44.5O 12/6 DENVER 13-44 L +5 L 38.5O 12/13 BUFFALO 10-16 L +3 L 38.5U 12/20 CLEVELAND 34-41 L -2 L 39O 12/27 at Cincinnati 10-17 L +13 W 39.5U 1/3 at Denver 44-24 W +9 W 38O 22 WWW.STATFOX.COM

OAKLAND RAIDERS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 100 to 1 AFC Title: 50 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 18.88 (26th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 13-6 4-12 5-11 4-12 2-14 4-12 5-11 5-11 42-89 (32%) OVERALL ATS 12-6 3-12 6-9 5-11 6-10 6-10 7-9 8-8 53-75 (41%) PRESEASON ATS 1-2 0-4 1-2 1-3 4-1 2-2 2-2 2-2 13-18 (42%) HOME ATS 7-2 2-5 2-5 2-6 3-5 2-6 2-6 4-4 24-39 (38%) ROAD ATS 5-3 1-7 4-4 3-5 3-5 4-4 5-3 4-4 29-35 (45%) vs DIVISION ATS 4-2 1-5 2-4 0-6 4-2 3-3 2-4 4-2 20-28 (42%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 10-3 2-9 4-7 2-10 5-7 6-6 6-6 7-5 42-53 (44%) as FAVORITE ATS 10-5 0-4 2-3 3-3 0-2 0-4 0-1 0-1 15-23 (39%) as UNDERDOG ATS 2-1 3-8 4-7 2-8 6-8 6-6 7-8 8-7 38-53 (42%) OVER-UNDER 12-6 5-10 10-6 7-9 3-12 10-5 5-9 7-9 59-66 (47%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * OAKLAND is 1-12 ATS (-12.2 Units) after covering the spread in 2 out of their last 3 games since 07. The Average Score was OAKLAND 10.2, OPPONENT 29.1. Potential Spots for 2010: TBD * Over the L2 seasons, OAKLAND is 8-0 UNDER the total (+8 Units) vs. teams giving up 24 or more PPG. The Average Score was OAKLAND 14.8, OPPONENT 21. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - at Tennessee, 9/19 - ST LOUIS, 10/31 - SEATTLE, 11/7 - KANSAS CITY, 11/28 - MIAMI, 1/2 - at Kansas City * OAKLAND is on a 4-18 ATS (-15.8 Units) skid at home vs. teams with a losing record The Average Score was OAKLAND 21.5, OPPONENT 23.4. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - ST LOUIS, 10/31 - SEATTLE, 11/7 - KANSAS CITY, 11/28 - MIAMI * OAKLAND is 1-10 ATS (-10 Units) at home in all games where the line is +3 to -3 since 07. The Average Score was OAKLAND 13, OPPONENT 24.3. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/7 - KANSAS CITY, 12/19 - DENVER * Over the L2 seasons, OAKLAND is 10-2 UNDER the total (+7.8 Units) vs. good offensive teams - averaging >=5.65 YPP. The Average Score was OAKLAND 13.6, OPPONENT 24.1. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - at Tennessee, 9/26 - at Arizona, 10/3 - HOUSTON, 10/10 - SAN DIEGO, 11/21 - at Pittsburgh, 12/5 - at San Diego, 12/26 - INDIANAPOLIS WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 23 2009 Record: 5-11 (+5 ML Units), 8-8 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 7-9 DIVISION: AFC West COACH: Tom Cable, 3rd year STADIUM: Oakland Coliseum Scoring Differential: -11.4 (#30 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 13 (#27 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -10.5 (#30 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 21.25 (#12 of 32) 9/12/10 at Tennessee * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 TEN-OAK matchups 9/19/10 ST LOUIS * ST LOUIS is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. OAKLAND 9/26/10 at Arizona * L2 games in ARZ-OAK series at ARIZONA went OVER the total 10/3/10 HOUSTON * UNDERDOG is 3-0 SU & ATS in L3 OAK-HOU games at OAKLAND 10/10/10 SAN DIEGO * SAN DIEGO is 13-1 SU & 11-3 ATS in its L14 games vs. OAKLAND 10/17/10 at San Francisco * L2 games in SF-OAK series at SAN FRANCISCO went OVER the total 10/24/10 at Denver * ROAD TEAM is on 9-4 SU & 10-3 ATS run in DEN-OAK series 10/31/10 SEATTLE * HOME TEAM is 7-0 SU & ATS in L7 OAK-SEA matchups 11/7/10 KANSAS CITY * ROAD TEAM is on 10-4 SU & 13-1 ATS run in OAK-KC series 11/21/10 at Pittsburgh * UNDERDOG is on 5-2 SU & 6-1 ATS run in L7 PIT-OAK matchups 11/28/10 MIAMI * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 OAK-MIA games 12/5/10 at San Diego * L9 games of SD-OAK series at SAN DIEGO are 8-1 UNDER the total 12/12/10 at Jacksonville * FAVORITE has swept L4 JAC-OAK games, both SU & ATS 12/19/10 DENVER * FAVORITE is 8-1 SU & 7-2 ATS in L9 OAK-DEN matchups at OAKLAND 12/26/10 INDIANAPOLIS * L3 OAK-IND series games have gone UNDER the total 1/2/11 at Kansas City * UNDERDOG is 6-5 SU & 9-1 ATS in L11 KC-OAK matchups at KANSAS CITY 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring -11.4 30 Yardage -95.8 31 Yards Per Play -1.15 29 Yards Per Point -6.36 31 Turnovers -13 30 Offensive Stats Points Scored 12.3 31 First Downs 14.6 31 Total Yards Per Game 266.1 31 Yards Per Play 4.51 31 Yards Per Point 21.63 31 Rushing Attempts 25.6 23 Rush Yards Per Game 106.3 21 Yards Per Rush 4.15 19 Rushing TD s 7 27 Passing Attempts Per Game 30.3 26 Completions Per Game 15.9 30 Completion Percentage 52.6% 31 Passing Yards Per Game 159.8 29 Passing Yards Per Attempt 5.27 30 Passing TD s 10 32 Sacks Allowed 49 30 Interceptions Thrown 18 20 Fumbles Lost 15 28 Total Turnovers Lost 33 27 Avg. Time of Possession 25:00 29 3rd Down Conversions 29.6% 30 4th Down Conversions 47.6% 17 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 23.7 23 First Downs 19.6 25 Total Yards Per Game 361.9 26 Yards Per Play 5.66 26 Yards Per Point 15.27 18 Rushing Attempts 34.3 32 Rush Yards Per Game 155.5 29 Yards Per Rush 4.54 28 Rushing TD s 24 31 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 27.4 1 Opponent Completions/Game 16.2 1 Opponent Completion % 59.1% 12 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 206.4 7 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.88 23 Passing TD s Allowed 28 26 Sacks Recorded 37 11 Interceptions 8 31 Fumbles Recovered 12 13 Total Turnovers Forced 20 29 3rd Down Conversions 35.6% 8 4th Down Conversions 64.3% 28 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 7.3 31 Penalty Yards/Game 57.5 29 Opponent Penalties/Game 5.4 26 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 42.8 26 Punt Return Average 4.9 29 Kick Return Average 18.2 32 Punt Attempts per game 6.0 30 Punt Net Average 46.4 1 Field Goals Made 26 10 Field Goal Percentage 89.7% 6 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 SEATTLE 31-17 W -7.5 W 40 O 9/7 at Tennessee 20-25 L +3 L 46 U 9/12 at Pittsburgh 21-24 L +3.5 W 43 O 9/8 at New England 20-30 L +7.5 L 48.5 O 9/15 at Pittsburgh 30-17 W +4 W 40 O 9/14 CINCINNATI 23-20 W -11.5 L 45 U 9/19 BUFFALO 13-10 W -3 T 37.5 U 9/18 KANSAS CITY 17-23 L +1 L 54 U 9/29 TENNESSEE 52-25 W -6.5 W 45 O 10/6 at Buffalo 49-31 W -3 W 53.5 O 9/22 at Denver 10-31 L +5 L 46 U 9/26 TAMPA BAY 30-20 W -3 W 35.5 O 9/25 at Philadelphia 20-23 L +8.5 W 47 U 10/13 at St Louis 13-28 L -8 L 48 U 9/28 SAN DIEGO 34-31 W -7 L 41.5 O 10/3 at Houston 17-30 L -2.5 L 45 O 10/2 DALLAS 19-13 W -3.5 W 46.5 U 10/20 SAN DIEGO 21-27 L -7 L 47 O 10/5 at Chicago 21-24 L -3.5 L 43 O 10/10 at Indianapolis 14-35 L +8.5 L 52 U 10/16 SAN DIEGO 14-27 L +1 L 51 U 10/27 at Kansas City 10-20 L -2.5 L 55.5 U 10/12 at Cleveland 7-13 L +3 L 43.5 U 10/17 DENVER 3-31 L +2.5 L 42 U 10/23 BUFFALO 38-17 W -3 W 41 O 11/3 SAN FRANCISCO 20-23 L -3 L 49.5 U 10/20 KANSAS CITY 10-17 L +4 L 48 U 10/24 NEW ORLEANS 26-31 L -3 L 45.5 O 10/30 at Tennessee 34-25 W -1 W 47.5 O 11/11 at Denver 34-10 W +6 W 45.5 U 11/2 at Detroit 13-23 L -3.5 L 40 U 10/31 at San Diego 14-42 L +6 L 46 O 11/6 at Kansas City 23-27 L +3 L 51 U 11/17 NEW ENGLAND 27-20 W -5 W 48 U 11/24 at Arizona 41-20 W -9.5 W 44 O 11/9 NY JETS 24-27 L +3 T 38.5 O 11/7 at Carolina 27-24 W +6 W 41 O 11/13 DENVER 17-31 L +3 L 47 O 12/2 NY JETS 26-20 W -6 T 48 U 11/16 MINNESOTA 28-18 W +4.5 W 46 T 11/21 SAN DIEGO 17-23 L +4.5 L 47.5 U 11/20 at Washington 16-13 W +6 W 44 U 12/8 at San Diego 27-7 W -3.5 W 45.5 U 11/23 at Kansas City 24-27 L +11 W 44.5 O 11/28 at Denver 25-24 W +11.5 W 41.5 O 11/27 MIAMI 21-33 L -7 L 41.5 O 12/15 at Miami 17-23 L +1.5 L 43.5 U 11/30 DENVER 8-22 L +3 L 42 U 12/5 KANSAS CITY 27-34 L +1 L 52 O 12/4 at San Diego 10-34 L +11.5 L 51 U 12/22 DENVER 28-16 W -3.5 W 46.5 U 12/7 at Pittsburgh 7-27 L +5.5 L 40.5 U 12/12 at Atlanta 10-35 L +7.5 L 46 U 12/11 at NY Jets 10-26 L -3 L 35.5 O 12/28 KANSAS CITY 24-0 W -8.5 W 44.5 U 1/12 (PL) NY JETS 30-10 W -5.5 W 47.5 U 12/14 BALTIMORE 20-12 W +7 W 38 U 12/19 TENNESSEE 40-35 W -3.5 W 49.5 O 12/18 CLEVELAND 7-9 L -3 L 38 U 1/19 (PL) TENNESSEE 41-24 W -9 W 46 O 12/22 GREEN BAY 7-41 L +5.5 L 43 O 12/25 at Kansas City 30-31 L +9.5 W 60 O 12/24 at Denver 3-22 L +13.5 L 43 U 1/26 (PL) Tampa Bay 21-48 L -3.5 L 44 O 12/28 at San Diego 14-21 L +6 L 46 U 1/2 JACKSONVILLE 6-13 L +2.5 L 43 U 12/31 NY GIANTS 21-30 L +7.5 L 41 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/11 SAN DIEGO 0-27 L +3 L 43 U 9/17 at Baltimore 6-28 L +13 L 34 T 10/1 CLEVELAND 21-24 L +1 L 33.5 O 10/8 at San Francisco 20-34 L +3.5 L 39 O 10/15 at Denver 3-13 L +15 W 36.5 U 10/22 ARIZONA 22-9 W +3 W 39.5 U 10/29 PITTSBURGH 20-13 W +9 W 38.5 U 11/6 at Seattle 0-16 L +7 L 34 U 11/12 DENVER 13-17 L +8 W 33.5 U 11/19 at Kansas City 13-17 L +8 W 36 U 11/26 at San Diego 14-21 L +13.5 W 43 U 12/3 HOUSTON 14-23 L -3 L 35 O 12/10 at Cincinnati 10-27 L +11 L 39.5 U 12/17 ST LOUIS 0-20 L -3 L 39.5 U 12/23 KANSAS CITY 9-20 L +7 L 35.5 U 12/31 at NY Jets 3-23 L +10 L 33.5 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 DETROIT 21-36 L -3 L 39.5 O 9/16 at Denver 20-23 L +9.5 W 37 O 9/23 CLEVELAND 26-24 W -3 L 41.5 O 9/30 at Miami 35-17 W +3.5 W 39.5 O 10/14 at San Diego 14-28 L +9.5 L 44 U 10/21 KANSAS CITY 10-12 L -2 L 37.5 U 10/28 at Tennessee 9-13 L +6.5 W 39 U 11/4 HOUSTON 17-24 L -3 L 41 T 11/11 CHICAGO 6-17 L +3.5 L 38 U 11/18 at Minnesota 22-29 L +4.5 L 35.5 O 11/25 at Kansas City 20-17 W +4 W 34.5 O 12/2 DENVER 34-20 W +3.5 W 41 O 12/9 at Green Bay 7-38 L +10 L 40 O 12/16 INDIANAPOLIS 14-21 L +9.5 W 45 U 12/23 at Jacksonville 11-49 L +14 L 40.5 O 12/30 SAN DIEGO 17-30 L +9 L 41.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/8 DENVER 14-41 L +3 L 40 O 9/14 at Kansas City 23-8 W +3 W 36 U 9/21 at Buffalo 23-24 L +10 W 37 O 9/28 SAN DIEGO 18-28 L +8 L 46 T 10/12 at New Orleans 3-34 L +7 L 47 U 10/19 NY JETS 16-13 W +3 W 41 U 10/26 at Baltimore 10-29 L +8 L 34.5 O 11/2 ATLANTA 0-24 L +3 L 41 U 11/9 CAROLINA 6-17 L +10 L 37.5 U 11/16 at Miami 15-17 L +10 W 37.5 U 11/23 at Denver 31-10 W +8.5 W 44 U 11/30 KANSAS CITY 13-20 L -3 L 41 U 12/4 at San Diego 7-34 L +9 L 41 T 12/14 NEW ENGLAND 26-49 L +7 L 38 O 12/21 HOUSTON 27-16 W +6.5 W 43.5 U 12/28 at Tampa Bay 31-24 W +11 W 39.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/14 SAN DIEGO 20-24 L +10 W 42.5O 9/20 at Kansas City 13-10 W +1 W 40U 9/27 DENVER 3-23 L +2.5 L 38U 10/4 at Houston 6-29 L +8 L 42.5U 10/11 at NY Giants 7-44 L +15 L 38O 10/18 PHILADELPHIA 13-9 W +14 W 40.5U 10/25 NY JETS 0-38 L +6 L 34O 11/1 at San Diego 16-24 L +15.5 W 41.5U 11/15 KANSAS CITY 10-16 L -3 L 36.5U 11/22 CINCINNATI 20-17 W +8.5 W 36O 11/26 at Dallas 7-24 L +13.5 L 40.5U 12/6 at Pittsburgh 27-24 W +15 W 37O 12/13 WASHINGTON 13-34 L +2.5 L 37O 12/20 at Denver 20-19 W +13.5 W 37O 12/27 at Cleveland 9-23 L +3 L 37U 1/3 BALTIMORE 13-21 L +10 W 39.5U

SAN DIEGO CHARGERS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 8 to 1 AFC Title: 4 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 16.88 (32nd toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 8-8 4-12 12-5 9-7 14-3 13-6 9-9 13-4 82-54 (60%) OVERALL ATS 9-7 6-10 13-3 9-6 9-8 14-5 9-9 8-8 77-56 (58%) PRESEASON ATS 2-2 2-2 2-2 2-2 2-2 2-2 3-1 2-1 17-14 (55%) HOME ATS 4-4 3-4 6-2 4-4 5-4 8-1 5-4 3-5 38-28 (58%) ROAD ATS 5-3 3-5 7-1 5-2 4-4 6-4 4-5 5-3 39-27 (59%) vs DIVISION ATS 3-3 3-3 4-1 3-2 4-2 5-1 4-2 3-3 29-17 (63%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 6-6 4-8 9-3 6-5 7-6 12-3 8-6 5-8 57-45 (56%) as FAVORITE ATS 2-3 1-1 5-1 6-5 8-8 11-3 5-8 5-7 43-36 (54%) as UNDERDOG ATS 7-4 5-9 8-2 3-1 1-0 3-2 4-1 3-1 34-20 (63%) OVER-UNDER 8-8 10-6 9-8 5-11 10-7 10-8 8-8 10-6 70-62 (53%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * SAN DIEGO is 14-1 ATS (+12.9 Units) vs. good passing teams with a completion pct. of 61% or better. since 07. The Average Score was SAN DIEGO 27.8, OPPONENT 15.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - at Seattle, 10/3 - ARIZONA, 10/24 - NEW ENGLAND, 11/7 - at Houston, 11/22 - DENVER, 11/28 - at Indianapolis, 1/2 - at Denver * SAN DIEGO is on a 28-8 ATS (+19.2 Units) run after having won 6 or 7 out of their last 8 games The Average Score was SAN DIEGO 25.8, OPPONENT 16.8. Potential Spots for 2010: TBD * SAN DIEGO is 10-1 ATS (+8.9 Units) vs. good offensive teams - averaging >=5.65 YPP since 07. The Average Score was SAN DIEGO 29, OPPONENT 18.5. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/3 - ARIZONA, 10/24 - NEW ENGLAND, 10/31 - TENNESSEE, 11/7 - at Houston, 11/28 - at Indianapolis * SAN DIEGO is on a 22-7 ATS (+14.3 Units) run in dome games The Average Score was SAN DIEGO 22.5, OPPONENT 21.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/17 - at St Louis, 11/28 - at Indianapolis * SAN DIEGO is on a 14-3 ATS (+10.7 Units) run against AFC South division opponents The Average Score was SAN DIEGO 27.6, OPPONENT 17.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - JACKSONVILLE, 10/31 - TENNESSEE, 11/7 - at Houston, 11/28 - at Indianapolis 2009 Record: 13-4 (+6.1 ML Units), 8-8 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 10-6 DIVISION: AFC West COACH: Norv Turner, 4th year STADIUM: Qualcomm Stadium Scoring Differential: +8.4 (#5 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 30 (#1 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +5.8 (#9 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 18.76 (#29 of 32) 9/13/10 at Kansas City * UNDERDOG is 5-14 SU but 12-7 ATS in L19 KC-SD matchups 9/19/10 JACKSONVILLE * HOME TEAM has swept L3 SD-JAC games, both SU & ATS 9/26/10 at Seattle * UNDERDOG is 6-1 ATS in L8 SEA-SD matchups 10/3/10 ARIZONA * ROAD TEAM is on 6-0 ATS run in SD-ARZ series 10/10/10 at Oakland * SAN DIEGO is 13-1 SU & 11-3 ATS in its L14 games vs. OAKLAND 10/17/10 at St Louis * L3 STL-SD series games have gone OVER the total 10/24/10 NEW ENGLAND * L3 games in SD-NE series at SAN DIEGO went UNDER the total 10/31/10 TENNESSEE * SAN DIEGO is on 6-0 SU & ATS run vs. TENNESSEE 11/7/10 at Houston * SAN DIEGO has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. HOUSTON 11/22/10 DENVER * SAN DIEGO is on 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS run vs. DENVER 11/28/10 at Indianapolis * UNDERDOG is 5-1 SU & 6-0 ATS in L6 IND-SD matchups 12/5/10 OAKLAND * L9 games of SD-OAK series at SAN DIEGO are 8-1 UNDER the total 12/12/10 KANSAS CITY * UNDERDOG is 3-7 SU but 7-3 ATS in L10 SD-KC matchups at SAN DIEGO 12/16/10 SAN FRANCISCO * SAN DIEGO has taken L2 games vs. SAN FRANCISCO both SU & ATS 12/26/10 at Cincinnati * OVER the total is 6-0 in L6 games of CIN-SD series 1/2/11 at Denver * SAN DIEGO is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in its L4 games at DENVER 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +8.4 5 Yardage +33.2 11 Yards Per Play +0.64 9 Yards Per Point +3.67 5 Turnovers +7 6 Offensive Stats Points Scored 28.4 4 First Downs 20.6 10 Total Yards Per Game 360.1 10 Yards Per Play 5.92 4 Yards Per Point 12.68 2 Rushing Attempts 26.7 19 Rush Yards Per Game 88.9 31 Yards Per Rush 3.33 32 Rushing TD s 17 11 Passing Attempts Per Game 32.4 23 Completions Per Game 21.1 15 Completion Percentage 65.1% 8 Passing Yards Per Game 271.1 5 Passing Yards Per Attempt 8.36 1 Passing TD s 29 5 Sacks Allowed 26 6 Interceptions Thrown 10 4 Fumbles Lost 7 3 Total Turnovers Lost 17 2 Avg. Time of Possession 28:04 17 3rd Down Conversions 44.4% 7 4th Down Conversions 50.0% 14 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 20.0 11 First Downs 19.3 21 Total Yards Per Game 326.9 15 Yards Per Play 5.28 16 Yards Per Point 16.35 13 Rushing Attempts 26.4 12 Rush Yards Per Game 117.6 20 Yards Per Rush 4.46 24 Rushing TD s 10 7 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 33.4 17 Opponent Completions/Game 20.4 18 Opponent Completion % 61.0% 17 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 209.3 11 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 7.28 26 Passing TD s Allowed 25 20 Sacks Recorded 35 13 Interceptions 14 20 Fumbles Recovered 10 16 Total Turnovers Forced 24 21 3rd Down Conversions 40.4% 23 4th Down Conversions 50.0% 19 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 4.9 4 Penalty Yards/Game 35.6 3 Opponent Penalties/Game 6.4 11 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 49.7 13 Punt Return Average 7.0 22 Kick Return Average 22.9 14 Punt Attempts per game 3.3 1 Punt Net Average 39.9 13 Field Goals Made 32 1 Field Goal Percentage 91.4% 5 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 at Cincinnati 34-6 W +3 W 37 O 9/7 at Kansas City 14-27 L +4 L 46.5 U 9/12 at Houston 27-20 W +5 W 43 O 9/11 DALLAS 24-28 L -4.5 L 40 O 9/15 HOUSTON 24-3 W -13.5 W 34 U 9/14 DENVER 13-37 L +3 L 43 O 9/19 NY JETS 28-34 L +3 L 47 O 9/18 at Denver 17-20 L +3 T 46 U 9/22 at Arizona 23-15 W -3 W 39 U 9/21 BALTIMORE 10-24 L -2 L 38.5 U 9/26 at Denver 13-23 L +9.5 L 46 U 9/25 NY GIANTS 45-23 W -6.5 W 43.5 O 9/29 NEW ENGLAND 21-14 W +3 W 40.5 U 9/28 at Oakland 31-34 L +7 W 41.5 O 10/3 TENNESSEE 38-17 W +2.5 W 39.5 O 10/2 at New England 41-17 W +4 W 47.5 O 10/6 at Denver 9-26 L +6.5 L 39.5 U 10/5 at Jacksonville 21-27 L +3 L 42.5 O 10/10 JACKSONVILLE 34-21 W +2.5 W 37 O 10/10 PITTSBURGH 22-24 L -3.5 L 47 U 10/13 KANSAS CITY 35-34 W -4 L 45.5 O 10/19 at Cleveland 26-20 W +3.5 W 41 O 10/17 at Atlanta 20-21 L +5.5 W 43 U 10/16 at Oakland 27-14 W -1 W 51 U 10/20 at Oakland 27-21 W +7 W 47 O 10/27 MIAMI 10-26 L +6 L 38 U 10/24 at Carolina 17-6 W +3 W 42 U 10/23 at Philadelphia 17-20 L +4 W 47 U 11/3 NY JETS 13-44 L -8.5 L 41 O 11/2 at Chicago 7-20 L +2.5 L 39 U 10/31 OAKLAND 42-14 W -6 W 46 O 10/30 KANSAS CITY 28-20 W -5.5 W 52 U 11/10 at St Louis 24-28 L +6 W 44 O 11/9 MINNESOTA 42-28 W +5.5 W 45 O 11/7 NEW ORLEANS 43-17 W -6.5 W 49.5 O 11/6 at NY Jets 31-26 W -6 L 40 O 11/21 at Oakland 23-17 W -4.5 W 47.5 U 11/17 SAN FRANCISCO 20-17 W +2.5 W 42.5 U 11/16 at Denver 8-37 L +8.5 L 44 O 11/20 BUFFALO 48-10 W -13 W 43.5 O 11/28 at Kansas City 34-31 W +3 W 54 O 11/24 at Miami 3-30 L +4 L 36 U 11/23 CINCINNATI 27-34 L +3 L 43 O 12/5 DENVER 20-17 W -3 T 46.5 U 11/27 at Washington 23-17 W -3.5 W 43 U 12/1 DENVER 30-27 W +3 W 40 O 11/30 KANSAS CITY 24-28 L +7.5 W 48.5 O 12/12 TAMPA BAY 31-24 W -4 W 42.5 O 12/4 OAKLAND 34-10 W -11.5 W 51 U 12/8 OAKLAND 7-27 L +3.5 L 45.5 U 12/7 at Detroit 14-7 W +3 W 44 U 12/19 at Cleveland 21-0 W -8 W 35 U 12/11 MIAMI 21-23 L -13 L 45 U 12/15 at Buffalo 13-20 L +3 L 42.5 U 12/14 GREEN BAY 21-38 L +5 L 45.5 O 12/26 at Indianapolis 31-34 L +7 W 56 O 12/18 at Indianapolis 26-17 W +6.5 W 53 U 12/22 at Kansas City 22-24 L +2.5 W 44 O 12/21 at Pittsburgh 24-40 L +6.5 L 41.5 O 1/2 KANSAS CITY 24-17 W +6.5 W 51.5 U 12/24 at Kansas City 7-20 L +1 L 45 U 12/29 SEATTLE 28-31 L -3 L 42 O 12/28 OAKLAND 21-14 W -6 W 46 U 1/8 (PL) NY JETS 17-20 L -6.5 L 42.5 U 12/31 DENVER 7-23 L -11.5 L 43.5 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/11 at Oakland 27-0 W -3 W 43 U 9/17 TENNESSEE 40-7 W -10.5 W 38 O 10/1 at Baltimore 13-16 L +0 L 33.5 U 10/8 PITTSBURGH 23-13 W -3 W 37 U 10/15 at San Francisco 48-19 W -10 W 41.5 O 10/22 at Kansas City 27-30 L -6 L 38 O 10/29 ST LOUIS 38-24 W -9.5 W 46 O 11/5 CLEVELAND 32-25 W -13 L 42 O 11/12 at Cincinnati 49-41 W +0 W 48 O 11/19 at Denver 35-27 W +3 W 42.5 O 11/26 OAKLAND 21-14 W -13.5 L 43 U 12/3 at Buffalo 24-21 W -5 L 40 O 12/10 DENVER 48-20 W -7.5 W 41.5 O 12/17 KANSAS CITY 20-9 W -9 W 46.5 U 12/24 at Seattle 20-17 W -4 L 45 U 12/31 ARIZONA 27-20 W -14 L 44.5 O 1/14 (PL) NEW ENGLAND 21-24 L -5 L 46 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 CHICAGO 14-3 W -7 W 43 U 9/16 at New England 14-38 L +3.5 L 46 O 9/23 at Green Bay 24-31 L -5.5 L 42.5 O 9/30 KANSAS CITY 16-30 L -12.5 L 39 O 10/7 at Denver 41-3 W -1.5 W 43.5 O 10/14 OAKLAND 28-14 W -9.5 W 44 U 10/28 HOUSTON 35-10 W -10 W 45.5 U 11/4 at Minnesota 17-35 L -7 L 42 O 11/11 INDIANAPOLIS 23-21 W +3.5 W 47 U 11/18 at Jacksonville 17-24 L +3 L 40.5 O 11/25 BALTIMORE 32-14 W -9.5 W 39 O 12/2 at Kansas City 24-10 W -5.5 W 37.5 U 12/9 at Tennessee 23-17 W -2 W 40 T 12/16 DETROIT 51-14 W -9.5 W 45.5 O 12/24 DENVER 23-3 W -9 W 47 U 12/30 at Oakland 30-17 W -9 W 41.5 O 1/6 (PL) TENNESSEE 17-6 W -10.5 W 39.5 U 1/13 (PL) at Indianapolis 28-24 W +10.5 W 46.5 O 1/20 (PL) at New England 12-21 L +14 W 47.5 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/7 CAROLINA 24-26 L -8.5 L 40.5 O 9/14 at Denver 38-39 L +1.5 W 46.5 O 9/22 NY JETS 48-29 W -8 W 46.5 O 9/28 at Oakland 28-18 W -8 W 46 T 10/5 at Miami 10-17 L -5.5 L 44.5 U 10/12 NEW ENGLAND 30-10 W -6 W 45 U 10/19 at Buffalo 14-23 L -1 L 45 U 10/26 vs. New Orleans 32-37 L -3 L 46 O 11/9 KANSAS CITY 20-19 W -15 L 46.5 U 11/16 at Pittsburgh 10-11 L +4 W 40 U 11/23 INDIANAPOLIS 20-23 L -3 L 49.5 U 11/30 ATLANTA 16-22 L -6.5 L 48 U 12/4 OAKLAND 34-7 W -9 W 41 T 12/14 at Kansas City 22-21 W -6 L 41.5 O 12/21 at Tampa Bay 41-24 W +4 W 42 O 12/28 DENVER 52-21 W -7 W 50 O 1/3 (PL) INDIANAPOLIS 23-17 W +2.5 W 50 U 1/11 (PL) at Pittsburgh 24-35 L +6.5 L 38 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/14 at Oakland 24-20 W -10 L 42.5O 9/20 BALTIMORE 26-31 L -1 L 41O 9/27 MIAMI 23-13 W -5 W 45U 10/4 at Pittsburgh 28-38 L +5.5 L 43O 10/19 DENVER 23-34 L -3 L 44.5O 10/25 at Kansas City 37-7 W -6 W 44T 11/1 OAKLAND 24-16 W -15.5 L 41.5U 11/8 at NY Giants 21-20 W +5 W 48.5U 11/15 PHILADELPHIA 31-23 W -1 W 47O 11/22 at Denver 32-3 W -6 W 41.5U 11/29 KANSAS CITY 43-14 W -13 W 44.5O 12/6 at Cleveland 30-23 W -13.5 L 42.5O 12/13 at Dallas 20-17 W +3.5 W 49U 12/20 CINCINNATI 27-24 W -6.5 L 44O 12/25 at Tennessee 42-17 W +2 W 47.5O 1/3 WASHINGTON 23-20 W -3 T 39O 1/17 (PL) NY JETS 14-17 L -8.5 L 43U 24 WWW.STATFOX.COM

NFC EAST Preview The biggest story in the 2010 NFC East is the address change of quarterback Donovan McNabb, who was ushered out of Philadelphia to the nation s capitol, where he will now guide the Redskins offense under the tutelage of longtime Denver offensive guru Mike Shanahan. Certainly the two games against the Eagles will be highlight games, but moreover, his arrival in Washington gives the Redskins instant credibility in the division after a 4-12 finish a year ago. Running backs Willie Parker (Steelers) and Larry Johnson (Bengals) also join a backfield already led by Clinton Portis, and the moves should represent a significant upgrade for an offense that was 26th in scoring (16.6 PPG). The defense switches from a 4-3 to a 3-4 alignment, much to the dismay of unhappy tackle Albert Haynesworth. Philadelphia begins a new era with Kevin Kolb under center and LeSean McCoy taking over the lead back role for the departed Brian Westbrook. Kolb has had limited game experience but has shown great potential, leading management to believe they could have an Aaron Rodgerstype situation on their hands. The Giants also have some question marks after a 3-8 finish ruined a 5-0 start in 2009. New York s biggest need was improving a defense that allowed an uncharacteristic 26.7 PPG, including more than 30 in a game seven times. Some significant moves were made to address that deficiency, including the drafting of Jason Pierre-Paul (1-South Florida), and the signing of safeties Antrel Rolle (Cardinals) and Deon Grant (Seahawks). That leaves what figures to be the NFC East s clear-cut favorite, the Dallas Cowboys. After winning the division in 2009 and a first playoff game in a dozen years, the Cowboys could be on the verge of a Super Bowl-type season. There are some concerns on the offensive line after the retirement of Flozell Adams, but the addition of WR Dez Bryant in the draft leaves Tony Romo with perhaps the best set of offensive weapons in the league. DALLAS COWBOYS By Jerry Jones standards, it was a quiet offseason for the Cowboys and one can only assume one thing Jones feels his franchise is built to become the first team to play in the Super Bowl it is hosting QB Tony Romo fell apart against the Vikings pressure in the playoff loss, but one poor showing shouldn t overshadow what was a banner year. On top of career-highs in passes attempted (550) and yards (4,483), Romo tossed a career-low nine interceptions. More importantly, he knocked the so-called gorilla off his back by beating Philadelphia in the wildcard playoff. The offensive outlook is indeed better with the arrival of WR Dez Bryant, who has wowed team representatives. The Cowboys have so many other weapons for defenses to account for already, inlcluding WR Miles Austin, off a breakout season, and TE Jason Witten, Romo s favorite pass catcher. Don t forget about WR Roy Wlliams, plus RB s Marion Barber and Felix Jones as well. The line didn t lose much with the release of tackle Flozell Adams, and promises to be strong The stop unit doesn t generate the headlines, but it is hard to overlook a unit that ranked fourth against the run (90.5 YPG) and ninth in total defense, and returns almost entirely intact. Consecutive shutouts over NFC East rivals in Weeks 16 and 17 also help raise its profile. The meat of the defense is the linebackers. Few teams can match the all-around play of the group as a whole. If there is any weakness, the secondary was exposed in the playoff loss The strong play down the stretch bought the Wade Phillips regime one more season, but anything less than two steps forward will likely have him pounding the unemployment line. That said, the offense looks even better and the defense can hold up its end of the bargain. It s Super Bowl or bust for the Cowboys. NEW YORK GIANTS The New York Giants franchise has long been known for its bruising running attack and hard-hitting defense. Both misfired last season and as a result, the Giants 5-0 start quickly turned into a 3-8 finish marred by blowouts five losses by at least 20 points. What was once thought to be the most ferocious collection of defensive line talent in the NFL allowed a whopping 26.7 PPG, dropping from second in the NFL to 30th in a span of 12 months with essentially the same personnel For all of the problems that cropped up, few can be pinned on QB Eli Manning, who turned in the best statistical season of his career (4,021 yards, 27:14 TD-Int ratio). Not bad for a signal-caller that lost his top option (Plaxico Burress) to prison and watched his second-favorite target (Amani Toomer) retire before Week 1 rolled around. In their absence, Steve Smith became a star, finishing with a team-record 107 catches. Mario Manningham also turned in a solid rookie campaign (57 catches, 822 yards, five touchdowns) and Hakeem Nicks (47, 790, 6) also set the bar high. As solid as the wide receivers have become, the running backs Brandon Jacobs and Ahmad Bradshaw are inconsistent at best. The line returns mostly intact despite the drop in backfield production How concerned were 2009 STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Dallas 12-6-0 0.667 398 298 9-3-0 7-2-0 5-4-0 10-8-0 55.6% 7-11-0 Philadelphia 11-6-0 0.647 443 371 9-3-0 6-2-0 5-4-0 9-8-0 52.9% 11-6-0 NY Giants 8-8-0 0.500 402 427 6-6-0 4-4-0 4-4-0 7-9-0 43.7% 11-4-1 Washington 4-12-0 0.250 266 336 2-10-0 3-5-0 1-7-0 6-9-1 40.0% 9-7-0 the Giants about the freefall the defense experienced? Worried enough to use their first four draft picks on that side of the field. Head coach Tom Coughlin also brought in a pair of safeties via free agency Antrel Rolle (Cardinals) and safety Deon Grant (Seahawks) to fortify a unit that was borderline horrific With a renewed focus on interior line play and a veteran unit on both sides of the field, Big Blue has a chance to bounce back quickly from last season s hiccup and return to the playoffs. PHILADELPHIA EAGLES The three key faces of the Philadelphia Eagles over the last decade, QB Donovan McNabb, RB Brian Westbrook and S Brian Dawkins are all gone. It s clear that the franchise is headed in a new direction. Are the Eagles better for it? Consecutive losses to Dallas in Week 17 and the Wild-Card Playoff cemented the thinking that changes were needed At the very least, Philadelphia is younger with Kevin Kolb taking over under center, but along with youth comes inexperience. Replacing McNabb s heart and experience will be difficult, but the strong-armed Kolb should have no trouble working with one of the more dynamic wide receiving units in the NFL. Pro Bowl WR DeSean Jackson and TE Brent Celek are on the verge of superstardom. Throw in Jeremy Maclin and Jason Avant and Kolb has an almost unfair group of pass catchers to work with. Kolb s biggest problem is going to be protection. McNabb was sacked 55 times, and no upgrades were made on the line. LeSean McCoy takes over for Westbrook after a strong rookie year (155 carries, 637 yards, 4 TD s) First-year DC Sean McDermott was hit hard by injuries last season. Still, DE Trent Cole has blossomed into a terror, posting 12.5 sacks and now will be joined by draftee Brandon Graham (1-Michigan) in pressuring passers. Veteran CB Asante Samuel tied for the NFL lead in interceptions (nine) and has 29 in the four seasons. Though the pass defense finished middle of the road in terms of big plays allowed, all three NFC East rivals boast top-flight quarterback/wr tandems. Improvement and depth are a must Philadelphia has a lot of moving parts that have to start working in unison on offense. If Kolb doesn t get time, the gamebreakers will do him no good. McDermott s defense also has some question marks, and that could leave the Eagles battling for third in the NFC East. WASHINGTON REDSKINS One of new head coach Mike Shanahan s first moves may well be the most shocking of his coaching career adding QB Donovan McNabb to the huddle, at the expense of the division rival Eagles McNabb wasn t well-protected in his final season with Philadelphia, sacked 35 times, but he should fare better in a city known for keeping leaders safe. Despite losing LT Chris Samuels to retirement, the Redskins are banking on Trent Williams (1-Oklahoma) filling the void. McNabb might be hard-pressed to match his usual numbers in coordinator Kyle Shanahan s run-first system, unless of course, the wheels totally fall off the revamped ground attack Five years ago, the three players currently in the Redskins backfield Clinton Portis, Larry Johnson and Willie Parker all topped 1,200 yards rushing and combined for 35 touchdowns. Father Time has apparently caught them from behind. Santana Moss returns as the lead receiver, and behind him on the depth chart outside of reliable tight end Chris Cooley stand plenty of question marks The Redskins struck gold with OLB Brian Orakpo in the 2009 draft, and he fits even better in new coordinator Jim Haslett s 3-4 scheme. It helps lining up along inside LB London Fletcher, a tackle machine that hasn t missed a game in 12 seasons. The linebackers had a huge hand in the Redskins finish as the No. 10 defense in the NFL. However, 100$M man DT Albert Haynesworth, continues to balk at the change in scheme that could force him inside off the edge and skipped early offseason workouts. The pass defense features CB s DeAngelo Hall and Carlos Rogers, yet big plays were still a big problem Are the Redskins Super Bowl bound? Not by a longshot, and playing in the NFC East, a second consecutive last-place finish isn t out of the question. Still, Shanahan cleaned house, and at least on paper, this team looks better. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH Dallas NY Giants Washington Philadelphia NFC EAST NFC EAST WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 25

DALLAS COWBOYS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 10 to 1 NFC Title: 4.5 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 21.13 (10th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 5-11 10-7 6-10 9-7 9-8 13-4 9-7 12-6 73-60 (55%) OVERALL ATS 7-8 9-7 7-9 7-7 8-7 9-8 7-9 10-8 64-63 (50%) PRESEASON ATS 3-1 3-1 2-2 3-1 3-1 2-2 1-3 2-2 19-13 (59%) HOME ATS 3-4 5-2 4-4 3-3 4-4 5-4 4-4 6-3 34-28 (55%) ROAD ATS 4-4 4-5 3-5 4-4 4-3 4-4 3-5 4-5 30-35 (46%) vs DIVISION ATS 2-4 5-1 3-3 2-3 1-4 3-4 2-4 4-3 22-26 (46%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 5-6 8-5 6-6 6-5 5-6 7-6 6-6 9-5 52-45 (54%) as FAVORITE ATS 0-3 7-2 3-3 2-4 7-7 8-6 7-6 8-7 42-38 (53%) as UNDERDOG ATS 7-5 2-5 4-6 5-3 1-0 1-2 0-3 2-1 22-25 (47%) OVER-UNDER 6-10 8-9 9-7 8-7 10-6 10-7 9-7 7-11 67-64 (51%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * DALLAS is on a 3-20 ATS (-19 Units) skid on the road after covering the spread in 3 out of their last 4 games The Average Score was DALLAS 17, OPPONENT 19.1. Potential Spots for 2010: TBD * Over the L2 seasons, DALLAS is 8-0 UNDER the total (+8 Units) vs. good passing teams with a completion pct. of 61% or better.. The Average Score was DALLAS 13.6, OPPONENT 14. Potential Spots for 2010: Numerous games * DALLAS is on a 0-9 ATS (-9.9 Units) skid on the road vs. poor defensive teams - allowing >=350 YPG The Average Score was DALLAS 16.3, OPPONENT 24.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/25 - at Arizona * DALLAS is on a 4-16 ATS (-13.6 Units) skid on the road vs. good passing teams averaging 235 or more PYPG. The Average Score was DALLAS 15.7, OPPONENT 24.5. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - at Houston, 10/17 - at Minnesota, 11/7 - at Green Bay, 11/14 - at NY Giants, 12/5 - at Indianapolis, 12/25 - at Arizona, 1/2 - at Philadelphia * DALLAS is on a 13-3 UNDER the total (+9.7 Units) run vs. poor defensive teams - allowing >=350 YPG The Average Score was DALLAS 19.6, OPPONENT 19.2. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/10 - TENNESSEE, 10/31 - JACKSONVILLE, 11/21 - DETROIT, 11/25 - NEW ORLEANS, 12/25 - at Arizona 2009 Record: 12-6 (+5.4 ML Units), 10-8 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 7-11 DIVISION: NFC East COACH: Wade Phillips, 4th year STADIUM: Dallas Cowboys Stadium Scoring Differential: +7.7 (#6 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 28 (#6 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +5.9 (#8 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 21.28 (#11 of 32) 9/12/10 at Washington * UNDERDOG is 14-11 SU & 19-6 ATS in WAS-DAL series since 97 9/19/10 CHICAGO * HOME TEAM is 5-1 SU & ATS in L6 DAL-CHI matchups 9/26/10 at Houston * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 HOU-DAL games 10/10/10 TENNESSEE * UNDERDOG is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 DAL-TEN games at DALLAS 10/17/10 at Minnesota * FAVORITE is 8-0 SU & ATS in L8 MIN-DAL matchups 10/25/10 NY GIANTS * HOME TEAM is 23-13 SU & 22-12 ATS in DAL-NYG series since 92 10/31/10 JACKSONVILLE * UNDERDOG has swept L3 DAL-JAC games, both SU & ATS 11/7/10 at Green Bay * HOME TEAM is 10-1 SU & ATS in GB-DAL series since 94 11/14/10 at NY Giants * L9 games of NYG-DAL series at NY GIANTS are 7-2 OVER the total 11/21/10 DETROIT * OVER the total is 4-1 in L5 games of DAL-DET series 11/25/10 NEW ORLEANS * UNDERDOG is on 5-1 SU & 6-0 ATS run in L6 DAL-NO matchups 12/5/10 at Indianapolis * HOME TEAM has swept L3 IND-DAL games, both SU & ATS 12/12/10 PHILADELPHIA * DALLAS has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. PHILADELPHIA 12/19/10 WASHINGTON * UNDERDOG is 10-2 ATS in DAL-WAS series at DALLAS since 97 12/25/10 at Arizona * HOME TEAM is 13-4 SU & 12-5 ATS in ARZ-DAL series since 96 1/2/11 at Philadelphia * L9 games of PHI-DAL series at PHILADELPHIA are 7-2 OVER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +7.7 6 Yardage +83.0 2 Yards Per Play +1.02 1 Yards Per Point +3.23 6 Turnovers +2 13 Offensive Stats Points Scored 22.6 14 First Downs 20.9 6 Total Yards Per Game 400.9 2 Yards Per Play 6.24 25 Yards Per Point 17.28 12 Rushing Attempts 27.3 17 Rush Yards Per Game 131.4 7 Yards Per Rush 4.82 2 Rushing TD s 14 15 Passing Attempts Per Game 34.4 13 Completions Per Game 21.7 10 Completion Percentage 63.1% 11 Passing Yards Per Game 267.9 6 Passing Yards Per Attempt 7.79 4 Passing TD s 26 13 Sacks Allowed 34 15 Interceptions Thrown 9 3 Fumbles Lost 10 12 Total Turnovers Lost 19 4 Avg. Time of Possession 32:32 3 3rd Down Conversions 40.6% 14 4th Down Conversions 36.4% 28 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 15.6 2 First Downs 17.9 9 Total Yards Per Game 317.9 10 Yards Per Play 5.22 14 Yards Per Point 20.51 1 Rushing Attempts 22.8 2 Rush Yards Per Game 90.5 4 Yards Per Rush 3.97 9 Rushing TD s 7 4 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 35.8 26 Opponent Completions/Game 21.5 23 Opponent Completion % 60.1% 15 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 225.4 20 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.27 9 Passing TD s Allowed 23 18 Sacks Recorded 42 7 Interceptions 11 26 Fumbles Recovered 10 16 Total Turnovers Forced 21 27 3rd Down Conversions 35.0% 5 4th Down Conversions 50.0% 14 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 7.2 28 Penalty Yards/Game 55.8 28 Opponent Penalties/Game 5.8 17 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 48.0 16 Punt Return Average 10.9 6 Kick Return Average 22.0 20 Punt Attempts per game 4.5 10 Punt Net Average 40.8 9 Field Goals Made 20 25 Field Goal Percentage 64.5% 30 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 at Houston 10-19 L -9 L 34 U 9/7 ATLANTA 13-27 L -2 L 36.5 O 9/12 at Minnesota 17-35 L +6.5 L 43.5 O 9/11 at San Diego 28-24 W +4.5 W 40 O 9/15 TENNESSEE 21-13 W +3.5 W 37.5 U 9/15 at Ny Giants 35-32 W +7.5 W 36.5 O 9/19 CLEVELAND 19-12 W -5.5 W 37.5 U 9/19 WASHINGTON 13-14 L -5.5 L 35.5 U 9/22 at Philadelphia 13-44 L +10 L 36 O 9/28 at Ny Jets 17-6 W +3 W 36.5 U 9/27 at Washington 21-18 W +1.5 W 35.5 O 9/25 at San Francisco 34-31 W -6.5 L 40.5 O 9/29 at St Louis 13-10 W +11.5 W 44 U 10/5 ARIZONA 24-7 W -7.5 W 39 U 10/10 NY GIANTS 10-26 L -3.5 L 38.5 U 10/2 at Oakland 13-19 L +3.5 L 46.5 U 10/6 NY GIANTS 17-21 L +1.5 L 34.5 O 10/12 PHILADELPHIA 23-21 W -1.5 W 37.5 O 10/17 PITTSBURGH 20-24 L -3 L 39 O 10/9 PHILADELPHIA 33-10 W +3 W 43 T 10/13 CAROLINA 14-13 W -1.5 L 34 U 10/19 at Detroit 38-7 W -3 W 39 O 10/24 at Green Bay 20-41 L +4 L 44 O 10/16 NY GIANTS 16-13 W -3 T 47 U 10/20 at Arizona 6-9 L +4 W 36.5 U 10/26 at Tampa Bay 0-16 L +6 L 37 U 10/31 DETROIT 31-21 W -3 W 40 O 10/23 at Seattle 10-13 L +4.5 W 44 U 10/27 SEATTLE 14-17 L -1.5 L 37 U 11/2 WASHINGTON 21-14 W -6 W 38.5 U 11/7 at Cincinnati 3-26 L +0 L 44 U 10/30 ARIZONA 34-13 W -9 W 38.5 O 11/3 at Detroit 7-9 L +3 W 37 U 11/9 BUFFALO 10-6 W -4 T 37 U 11/15 PHILADELPHIA 21-49 L +7 L 43.5 O 11/14 at Philadelphia 21-20 W +3 W 40.5 O 11/16 at New England 0-12 L +4.5 L 35 U 11/17 at Indianapolis 3-20 L +6.5 L 39 U 11/21 at Baltimore 10-30 L +7.5 L 36 O 11/20 DETROIT 20-7 W -8 W 39 U 11/23 CAROLINA 24-20 W -3 W 33 O 11/24 JACKSONVILLE 21-19 W +3 W 34.5 O 11/27 MIAMI 21-40 L -3 L 34.5 O 11/25 CHICAGO 21-7 W -3.5 W 36 U 11/24 DENVER 21-24 L +1.5 L 41 O 11/28 WASHINGTON 27-20 W +1 W 36 O 12/7 at Philadelphia 10-36 L +5 L 35.5 O 12/6 at Seattle 43-39 W +7 W 43 O 12/4 at NY Giants 10-17 L +3.5 L 40 U 12/8 SAN FRANCISCO 27-31 L +4 T 39.5 O 12/14 at Washington 27-0 W -3 W 34 U 12/12 NEW ORLEANS 13-27 L -7 L 49 U 12/11 KANSAS CITY 31-28 W -3 T 43.5 O 12/15 at NY Giants 7-37 L +5 L 35 O 12/21 NY GIANTS 19-3 W -12.5 W 35.5 U 12/19 at Philadelphia 7-12 L +11.5 W 45 U 12/18 at Washington 7-35 L -1 L 35 O 12/21 PHILADELPHIA 3-27 L +7 L 36.5 U 12/28 at New Orleans 7-13 L +0 L 38 U 12/26 WASHINGTON 13-10 W +2.5 W 35 U 12/24 at Carolina 24-20 W +5 W 38 O 12/29 at Washington 14-20 L +7.5 W 36.5 U 1/3 at Carolina 10-29 L +3 L 33.5 O 1/2 at NY Giants 24-28 L +1 L 38.5 O 1/1 ST LOUIS 10-20 L -10 L 46 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 at Jacksonville 17-24 L -2.5 L 37 O 9/17 WASHINGTON 27-10 W -7 W 37 T 10/1 at Tennessee 45-14 W -9.5 W 37 O 10/8 at Philadelphia 24-38 L +0 L 43.5 O 10/15 HOUSTON 34-6 W -13 W 44 U 10/23 NY GIANTS 22-36 L -3 L 43 O 10/29 at Carolina 35-14 W +4.5 W 40.5 O 11/5 at Washington 19-22 L -3 L 40.5 O 11/12 at Arizona 27-10 W -6 W 43.5 U 11/19 INDIANAPOLIS 21-14 W +0 W 49.5 U 11/23 TAMPA BAY 38-10 W -12.5 W 39 O 12/3 at NY Giants 23-20 W -3 T 43.5 U 12/10 NEW ORLEANS 17-42 L -7.5 L 47.5 O 12/16 at Atlanta 38-28 W -4 W 45.5 O 12/25 PHILADELPHIA 7-23 L -6.5 L 47.5 U 12/31 DETROIT 31-39 L -14 L 45.5 O 1/6 (PL) at Seattle 20-21 L +1 T 48.5 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 NY GIANTS 45-35 W -6 W 44 O 9/16 at Miami 37-20 W -3 W 39 O 9/23 at Chicago 34-10 W +3 W 41.5 O 9/30 ST LOUIS 35-7 W -13 W 47 U 10/8 at Buffalo 25-24 W -10.5 L 45 O 10/14 NEW ENGLAND 27-48 L +4.5 L 52 O 10/21 MINNESOTA 24-14 W -9.5 W 45.5 U 11/4 at Philadelphia 38-17 W -3 W 46 O 11/11 at Ny Giants 31-20 W -2 W 47.5 O 11/18 WASHINGTON 28-23 W -10.5 L 47 O 11/22 NY JETS 34-3 W -14 W 48 U 11/29 GREEN BAY 37-27 W -7 W 51.5 O 12/9 at Detroit 28-27 W -10.5 L 50 O 12/16 PHILADELPHIA 6-10 L -10 L 48.5 U 12/22 at Carolina 20-13 W -10.5 L 42.5 U 12/30 at Washington 6-27 L +9 L 38.5 U 1/13 (PL) NY GIANTS 17-21 L -7 L 47.5 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/7 at Cleveland 28-10 W -6 W 48 U 9/15 PHILADELPHIA 41-37 W -6.5 L 46 O 9/21 at Green Bay 27-16 W -3 W 50.5 U 9/28 WASHINGTON 24-26 L -10 L 46.5 O 10/5 CINCINNATI 31-22 W -16 L 46 O 10/12 at Arizona 24-30 L -4.5 L 53.5 O 10/19 at St Louis 14-34 L -8 L 45.5 O 10/26 TAMPA BAY 13-9 W -1.5 W 40.5 U 11/2 at NY Giants 14-35 L +8.5 L 42.5 O 11/16 at Washington 14-10 W -2 W 42.5 U 11/23 SAN FRANCISCO 35-22 W -9.5 W 45.5 O 11/27 SEATTLE 34-9 W -11.5 W 46 U 12/7 at Pittsburgh 13-20 L +4 L 38 U 12/14 NY GIANTS 20-8 W -3 W 46 U 12/20 BALTIMORE 24-33 L -5.5 L 39 O 12/28 at Philadelphia 6-44 L +2.5 L 40.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/13 at Tampa Bay 34-21 W -4.5 W 39.5O 9/20 NY GIANTS 31-33 L -3 L 45O 9/28 CAROLINA 21-7 W -8 W 48U 10/4 at Denver 10-17 L -3 L 44U 10/11 at Kansas City 26-20 W -7 L 43.5O 10/25 ATLANTA 37-21 W -5.5 W 48O 11/1 SEATTLE 38-17 W -10 W 46.5O 11/8 at Philadelphia 20-16 W +3 W 49U 11/15 at Green Bay 7-17 L -3 L 48U 11/22 WASHINGTON 7-6 W -10.5 L 41.5U 11/26 OAKLAND 24-7 W -13.5 W 40.5U 12/6 at NY Giants 24-31 L -1 L 45.5O 12/13 SAN DIEGO 17-20 L -3.5 L 49U 12/19 at New Orleans 24-17 W +7 W 53.5U 12/27 at Washington 17-0 W -7 W 41.5U 1/3 PHILADELPHIA 24-0 W -3 W 47U 1/9 (PL) PHILADELPHIA 34-14 W -3.5 W 45.5O 1/17 (PL) at Minnesota 3-34 L +3 L 45U 26 WWW.STATFOX.COM

NEW YORK GIANTS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 20 to 1 NFC Title: 9 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 21.44 (8th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 10-7 4-12 6-10 11-6 8-9 14-6 12-5 8-8 73-63 (54%) OVERALL ATS 10-7 3-11 8-8 10-6 8-8 14-6 12-5 7-9 72-60 (55%) PRESEASON ATS 2-2 2-2 1-3 3-1 4-0 1-3 2-0 1-3 16-14 (53%) HOME ATS 4-4 1-7 4-4 7-3 2-5 4-4 6-3 3-5 31-35 (47%) ROAD ATS 6-3 2-4 4-4 3-3 6-3 10-2 6-2 4-4 41-25 (62%) vs DIVISION ATS 4-2 1-5 3-3 3-2 5-1 4-3 4-3 4-2 28-21 (57%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 8-5 3-8 5-7 8-4 8-4 10-5 10-3 5-7 57-43 (57%) as FAVORITE ATS 4-6 0-6 2-2 9-4 4-5 5-4 9-4 5-6 38-37 (51%) as UNDERDOG ATS 6-1 3-5 6-6 1-2 4-3 8-2 3-1 2-3 33-23 (59%) OVER-UNDER 10-7 6-10 7-9 8-9 7-9 9-11 9-8 11-4 67-67 (50%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * NY GIANTS are on a 11-0 UNDER the total (+11 Units) run as road favorites of 3.5 to 7 points The Average Score was NY GIANTS 18.8, OPPONENT 12.1. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/7 - at Seattle * NY GIANTS were 1-8 ATS (-7.8 Units) vs. teams with a winning record last season. The Average Score was NY GIANTS 21.9, OPPONENT 33.7. Potential Spots for 2010: NY Giants schedule features at least eight teams that had winning record in 09 * NY GIANTS were 6-0 OVER the total (+6 Units) vs. division opponents last season. The Average Score was NY GIANTS 31.2, OPPONENT 28.2. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/25 - at Dallas, 11/14 - DALLAS, 11/21 - PHILADELPHIA, 12/5 - WASHINGTON, 12/19 - PHILADELPHIA, 1/2 - at Washington * NY GIANTS are on a 7-0 UNDER the total (+7 Units) run at home revenging an upset loss against opponent as a home favorite The Average Score was NY GIANTS 14.1, OPPONENT 15.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - CAROLINA * NY GIANTS are 20-8 ATS (+11.2 Units) on the road since 07. The Average Score was NY GIANTS 23.7, OPPONENT 21.2. Potential Spots for 2010: All eight scheduled road games WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM LINE FINAL ATS 27 2009 Record: 8-8 (-7.5 ML Units), 7-9 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 11-4 DIVISION: NFC East COACH: Tom Coughlin, 7th year STADIUM: New Meadowlands Stadium Scoring Differential: -1.6 (#19 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 20 (#16 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -0.6 (#20 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 22.38 (#6 of 32) 9/12/10 CAROLINA * L6 games of NYG-CAR series are 5-1 OVER the total 9/19/10 at Indianapolis * ROAD TEAM has swept L3 IND-NYG games, both SU & ATS 9/26/10 TENNESSEE * TENNESSEE is on 4-game SU & ATS winning streak vs. NY GIANTS 10/3/10 CHICAGO * ROAD TEAM is on 7-0 SU & 6-0 ATS run in NYG-CHI series 10/10/10 at Houston * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 HOU-NYG games 10/17/10 DETROIT * ROAD TEAM is 6-0 SU & ATS in L6 NYG-DET matchups 10/25/10 at Dallas * HOME TEAM is 23-13 SU & 22-12 ATS in DAL-NYG series since 92 11/7/10 at Seattle * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 SEA-NYG games 11/14/10 DALLAS * L9 games of NYG-DAL series at NY GIANTS are 7-2 OVER the total 11/21/10 at Philadelphia * UNDERDOG is on 8-3 SU & 10-1 ATS run in L11 PHI-NYG matchups 11/28/10 JACKSONVILLE * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 NYG-JAC games 12/5/10 WASHINGTON * FAVORITE is on 9-2 SU & ATS run in L11 NYG-WAS matchups 12/12/10 at Minnesota * ROAD TEAM is on 5-2 SU & 6-1 ATS run in MIN-NYG series 12/19/10 PHILADELPHIA * NYG-PHI series at NY GIANTS has gone 13-4 UNDER the total since 95 12/26/10 at Green Bay * ROAD TEAM is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in GB-NYG series 1/2/11 at Washington * NY GIANTS are on 4-game SU & ATS winning streak at WASHINGTON 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring -1.6 19 Yardage +42.3 10 Yards Per Play +0.31 14 Yards Per Point -2.46 25 Turnovers -7 24 Offensive Stats Points Scored 25.1 8 First Downs 20.2 12 Total Yards Per Game 366.0 8 Yards Per Play 5.75 12 Yards Per Point 14.58 10 Rushing Attempts 27.7 13 Rush Yards Per Game 114.8 17 Yards Per Rush 4.15 20 Rushing TD s 14 15 Passing Attempts Per Game 33.9 17 Completions Per Game 21.1 14 Completion Percentage 62.4% 13 Passing Yards Per Game 251.2 11 Passing Yards Per Attempt 7.42 10 Passing TD s 28 7 Sacks Allowed 32 12 Interceptions Thrown 14 12 Fumbles Lost 17 31 Total Turnovers Lost 31 22 Avg. Time of Possession 29:39 12 3rd Down Conversions 42.9% 9 4th Down Conversions 60.0% 9 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 26.7 30 First Downs 19.3 20 Total Yards Per Game 323.7 12 Yards Per Play 5.44 19 Yards Per Point 12.12 32 Rushing Attempts 26.4 13 Rush Yards Per Game 110.8 14 Yards Per Rush 4.19 14 Rushing TD s 21 30 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 31.1 6 Opponent Completions/Game 19.6 13 Opponent Completion % 63.1% 24 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 214.1 15 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.85 21 Passing TD s Allowed 31 30 Sacks Recorded 32 18 Interceptions 13 22 Fumbles Recovered 11 14 Total Turnovers Forced 24 21 3rd Down Conversions 38.7% 17 4th Down Conversions 63.2% 27 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 5.9 16 Penalty Yards/Game 50.1 19 Opponent Penalties/Game 5.5 23 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 42.4 28 Punt Return Average 10.9 7 Kick Return Average 20.9 28 Punt Attempts per game 4.0 6 Punt Net Average 36.7 31 Field Goals Made 27 6 Field Goal Percentage 84.4% 16 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/5 SAN FRANCISCO 13-16 L +4 W 39.5 U 9/7 ST LOUIS 23-13 W +1 W 47 U 9/12 at Philadelphia 17-31 L +8.5 L 42.5 O 9/11 ARIZONA 42-19 W -3 W 37.5 O 9/15 at St Louis 26-21 W +12 W 46 O 9/15 DALLAS 32-35 L -7.5 L 36.5 O 9/19 WASHINGTON 20-14 W +3 W 40 U 9/19 NEW ORLEANS 27-10 W -3.5 W 43.5 U 9/22 SEATTLE 9-6 W -6 L 39 U 9/21 at Washington 24-21 W +1 W 43.5 O 9/26 CLEVELAND 27-10 W -3 W 38 U 9/25 at San Diego 23-45 L +6.5 L 43.5 O 9/29 at Arizona 7-21 L -3 L 39 U 10/5 MIAMI 10-23 L -1.5 L 38 U 10/3 at Green Bay 14-7 W +6 W 45 U 10/2 ST LOUIS 44-24 W -3 W 47.5 O 10/6 at Dallas 21-17 W -1.5 W 34.5 O 10/12 at New England 6-17 L +2 L 43 U 10/10 at Dallas 26-10 W +3.5 W 38.5 U 10/16 at Dallas 13-16 L +3 T 47 U 10/13 ATLANTA 10-17 L -4 L 34 U 10/19 PHILADELPHIA 10-14 L -3 L 37 U 10/24 DETROIT 13-28 L -7 L 40 O 10/23 DENVER 24-23 W -2.5 L 46 O 10/28 at Philadelphia 3-17 L +7.5 L 39 U 10/26 at Minnesota 29-17 W +5.5 W 44.5 O 10/31 at Minnesota 34-13 W +6.5 W 48.5 U 10/30 WASHINGTON 36-0 W -1 W 43 U 11/3 JACKSONVILLE 24-17 W -3 W 35.5 O 11/2 at Ny Jets 31-28 W -3 T 40 O 11/7 CHICAGO 21-28 L -9 L 34.5 O 11/6 at San Francisco 24-6 W -10.5 W 43 U 11/10 at Minnesota 27-20 W -1.5 W 45 O 11/9 ATLANTA 7-27 L -11.5 L 41 U 11/14 at Arizona 14-17 L +1 L 39 U 11/13 MINNESOTA 21-24 L -8.5 L 46 U 11/17 WASHINGTON 19-17 W -3.5 L 34.5 O 11/20 PHILADELPHIA 27-17 W -7 W 41 O 11/16 at Philadelphia 10-28 L +3 L 38.5 U 11/21 ATLANTA 10-14 L +3 L 40 U 11/24 at Houston 14-16 L -5.5 L 34 U 11/27 at Seattle 21-24 L +4.5 W 47.5 U 12/1 TENNESSEE 29-32 L -3 L 34.5 O 11/24 at Tampa Bay 13-19 L +6 T 38 U 11/28 PHILADELPHIA 6-27 L +7 L 35.5 U 12/4 DALLAS 17-10 W -3.5 W 40 U 12/8 at Washington 27-21 W +3 W 37.5 O 11/30 BUFFALO 7-24 L -3 L 36 U 12/5 at Washington 7-31 L +3 L 33 O 12/11 at Philadelphia 26-23 W -8 L 36.5 O 12/15 DALLAS 37-7 W -5 W 35 O 12/7 WASHINGTON 7-20 L -3 L 36 U 12/12 at Baltimore 14-37 L +10 L 34 O 12/17 KANSAS CITY 27-17 W -2.5 W 48 U 12/22 at Indianapolis 44-27 W +4.5 W 41 O 12/14 at New Orleans 7-45 L +8 L 41 O 12/18 PITTSBURGH 30-33 L +10 W 36.5 O 12/24 at Washington 20-35 L +3.5 L 39 O 12/28 PHILADELPHIA 10-7 W +1 W 37.5 U 12/21 at Dallas 3-19 L +12.5 L 35.5 U 12/26 at Cincinnati 22-23 L +6.5 W 46.5 U 12/31 at Oakland 30-21 W -7.5 W 41 O 1/5 (PL) at San Francisco 38-39 L +3 W 41 O 12/28 CAROLINA 24-37 L +4.5 L 34.5 O 1/2 DALLAS 28-24 W -1 W 38.5 O 1/8 (PL) CAROLINA 0-23 L -2.5 L 44.5 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 INDIANAPOLIS 21-26 L +3 L 47.5 U 9/17 at Philadelphia 30-24 W +2.5 W 42.5 O 9/24 at Seattle 30-42 L +3 L 42 O 10/8 WASHINGTON 19-3 W -5.5 W 45.5 U 10/15 at Atlanta 27-14 W +3 W 41 T 10/23 at Dallas 36-22 W +3 W 43 O 10/29 TAMPA BAY 17-3 W -8.5 W 36 U 11/5 HOUSTON 14-10 W -12.5 L 43 U 11/12 CHICAGO 20-38 L -1.5 L 37 O 11/20 at Jacksonville 10-26 L +4 L 38.5 U 11/26 at Tennessee 21-24 L -4 L 45.5 U 12/3 DALLAS 20-23 L +3 T 43.5 U 12/10 at Carolina 27-13 W -3 W 38.5 O 12/17 PHILADELPHIA 22-36 L -6 L 45.5 O 12/24 NEW ORLEANS 7-30 L -3 L 47.5 U 12/30 at Washington 34-28 W -1 W 43 O 1/7 (PL) at Philadelphia 20-23 L +6.5 W 46.5 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 at Dallas 35-45 L +6 L 44 O 9/16 GREEN BAY 13-35 L -3 L 39.5 O 9/23 at Washington 24-17 W +3.5 W 42 U 9/30 PHILADELPHIA 16-3 W +2 W 47.5 U 10/7 NY JETS 35-24 W -3.5 W 40.5 O 10/15 at Atlanta 31-10 W -5 W 43.5 U 10/21 SAN FRANCISCO 33-15 W -9.5 W 39 O 10/28 at Miami 13-10 W -10 L 48 U 11/11 DALLAS 20-31 L +2 L 47.5 O 11/18 at Detroit 16-10 W -2.5 W 48 U 11/25 MINNESOTA 17-41 L -7 L 40 O 12/2 at Chicago 21-16 W +0 W 39.5 U 12/9 at Philadelphia 16-13 W +3 W 42 U 12/16 WASHINGTON 10-22 L -6 L 36.5 U 12/23 at Buffalo 38-21 W -2 W 31.5 O 12/29 NEW ENGLAND 35-38 L +13 W 46.5 O 1/6 (PL) at Tampa Bay 24-14 W +3 W 39.5 U 1/13 (PL) at Dallas 21-17 W +7 W 47.5 U 1/20 (PL) at Green Bay 23-20 W +7.5 W 41 O 2/3 (PL) vs. New England 17-14 W +12.5 W 54 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/4 WASHINGTON 16-7 W -4.5 W 41 U 9/14 at St Louis 41-13 W -7.5 W 43.5 O 9/21 CINCINNATI 26-23 W -12.5 L 42.5 O 10/5 SEATTLE 44-6 W -6 W 43.5 O 10/13 at Cleveland 14-35 L -7.5 L 42.5 O 10/19 SAN FRANCISCO 29-17 W -10 W 47 U 10/26 at Pittsburgh 21-14 W +3 W 41 U 11/2 DALLAS 35-14 W -8.5 W 42.5 O 11/9 at Philadelphia 36-31 W +3 W 42.5 O 11/16 BALTIMORE 30-10 W -6.5 W 39 O 11/23 at Arizona 37-29 W -3 W 48 O 11/30 at Washington 23-7 W -3.5 W 41 U 12/7 PHILADELPHIA 14-20 L -6 L 41 U 12/14 at Dallas 8-20 L +3 L 46 U 12/21 CAROLINA 34-28 W -4 W 37.5 O 12/28 at Minnesota 19-20 L +7 W 41 U 1/11 (PL) PHILADELPHIA 11-23 L -4 L 39 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/13 WASHINGTON 23-17 W -5.5 W 37O 9/20 at Dallas 33-31 W +3 W 45O 9/27 at Tampa Bay 24-0 W -6 W 46U 10/4 at Kansas City 27-16 W -9 W 43T 10/11 OAKLAND 44-7 W -15 W 38O 10/18 at New Orleans 27-48 L +3 L 47O 10/25 ARIZONA 17-24 L -7.5 L 47U 11/1 at Philadelphia 17-40 L -3 L 43.5O 11/8 SAN DIEGO 20-21 L -5 L 48.5U 11/22 ATLANTA 34-31 W -7 L 46.5O 11/26 at Denver 6-26 L -4.5 L 43.5U 12/6 DALLAS 31-24 W +1 W 45.5O 12/13 PHILADELPHIA 38-45 L +1 L 42O 12/21 at Washington 45-12 W -3 W 43.5O 12/27 CAROLINA 9-41 L -8 L 43O 1/3 at Minnesota 7-44 L +8 L 47.5O

PHILADELPHIA EAGLES Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 15 to 1 NFC Title: 7 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 21.5 (6th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 13-5 13-5 15-4 6-10 11-7 8-8 11-7-1 11-6 88-52-1 (63%) OVERALL ATS 11-7 11-7 12-7 5-11 10-7 8-8 12-7 9-8 78-62 (56%) PRESEASON ATS 2-2 2-2 1-2 2-2 3-2 1-3 2-2 0-4 13-19 (41%) HOME ATS 7-3 4-6 7-3 3-5 5-4 2-6 6-2 4-4 38-33 (54%) ROAD ATS 4-4 7-1 5-4 2-6 5-3 6-2 6-5 5-4 40-29 (58%) vs DIVISION ATS 5-1 4-2 4-2 1-5 4-2 2-4 4-3 3-4 27-23 (54%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 11-3 8-6 11-3 4-8 9-4 5-7 10-5 8-5 66-41 (62%) as FAVORITE ATS 9-6 6-6 11-5 2-5 6-6 3-7 9-6 8-4 54-45 (55%) as UNDERDOG ATS 2-1 5-1 1-2 3-6 4-1 4-1 3-1 1-4 23-17 (58%) OVER-UNDER 10-7 9-9 5-13 9-6 9-8 7-9 8-10 11-6 68-68 (50%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * PHILADELPHIA is on a 9-0 ATS (+9 Units) run vs. teams scoring 29 or more PPG The Average Score was PHILADELPHIA 24.8, OPPONENT 23.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - GREEN BAY, 12/26 - MINNESOTA * PHILADELPHIA is on a 26-8 UNDER the total (+17.2 Units) run at home in October games The Average Score was PHILADELPHIA 20.6, OPPONENT 14.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/3 - WASHINGTON, 10/17 - ATLANTA * PHILADELPHIA is on a 30-13 ATS (+15.7 Units) run on the road revenging a loss against opponent The Average Score was PHILADELPHIA 19.7, OPPONENT 19.6. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/12 - at Dallas * PHILADELPHIA is 51-28 ATS (+20.2 Units) vs. good rushing teams - averaging >=130 RYPG since 92. The Average Score was PHILADELPHIA 19.9, OPPONENT 18.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/12 - at Dallas, 1/2 - DALLAS * PHILADELPHIA is on a 15-5 ATS (+9.5 Units) run vs. poor defensive teams - allowing >=5.65 YPP The Average Score was PHILADELPHIA 26.8, OPPONENT 17. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - at Detroit, 9/26 - at Jacksonville, 10/17 - ATLANTA, 10/24 - at Tennessee 2009 Record: 11-6 (-4.5 ML Units), 9-8 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 11-6 DIVISION: NFC East COACH: Andy Reid, 12th year STADIUM: Lincoln Financial Field Scoring Differential: +4.2 (#10 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 24 (#11 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +4.1 (#10 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 21.29 (#10 of 32) 9/12/10 GREEN BAY * UNDER the total is 6-1 in L7 games of PHI-GB series 9/19/10 at Detroit * PHILADELPHIA is 5-0 SU & ATS in its L5 games vs. DETROIT 9/26/10 at Jacksonville * JACKSONVILLE has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. PHILADELPHIA 10/3/10 WASHINGTON * ROAD TEAM is 18-16 SU & 20-11 ATS in PHI-WAS series since 93 10/10/10 at San Francisco * PHILADELPHIA has won four straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. SAN FRANCISCO 10/17/10 ATLANTA * PHILADELPHIA is 8-3 SU & 9-1 ATS vs. ATLANTA since 96 10/24/10 at Tennessee * TENNESSEE has taken L2 games vs. PHILADELPHIA both SU & ATS 11/7/10 INDIANAPOLIS * INDIANAPOLIS has won four straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. PHILADELPHIA 11/15/10 at Washington * WAS-PHI series at WASHINGTON has gone 12-5 UNDER the total since 92 11/21/10 NY GIANTS * UNDERDOG is on 8-3 SU & 10-1 ATS run in L11 PHI-NYG matchups 11/28/10 at Chicago * ROAD TEAM is 6-2 SU & ATS in L8 CHI-PHI matchups 12/2/10 HOUSTON * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 ATS in L2 PHI-HOU games 12/12/10 at Dallas * DALLAS has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. PHILADELPHIA 12/19/10 at NY Giants * NYG-PHI series at NY GIANTS has gone 13-4 UNDER the total since 95 12/26/10 MINNESOTA * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & ATS in L6 PHI-MIN matchups 1/2/11 DALLAS * L9 games of PHI-DAL series at PHILADELPHIA are 7-2 OVER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +4.2 10 Yardage +29.6 12 Yards Per Play +0.87 3 Yards Per Point +1.34 13 Turnovers +15 2 Offensive Stats Points Scored 26.8 5 First Downs 18.1 19 Total Yards Per Game 356.8 11 Yards Per Play 5.89 6 Yards Per Point 13.67 5 Rushing Attempts 24.0 28 Rush Yards Per Game 102.3 22 Yards Per Rush 4.26 14 Rushing TD s 14 15 Passing Attempts Per Game 34.6 12 Completions Per Game 20.9 16 Completion Percentage 60.6% 18 Passing Yards Per Game 255.6 10 Passing Yards Per Attempt 7.39 11 Passing TD s 27 10 Sacks Allowed 38 21 Interceptions Thrown 13 7 Fumbles Lost 10 12 Total Turnovers Lost 23 7 Avg. Time of Possession 26:02 25 3rd Down Conversions 36.2% 23 4th Down Conversions 42.9% 22 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 21.1 19 First Downs 18.4 14 Total Yards Per Game 327.2 16 Yards Per Play 5.02 7 Yards Per Point 15.01 21 Rushing Attempts 25.8 10 Rush Yards Per Game 104.7 9 Yards Per Rush 4.06 11 Rushing TD s 11 11 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 36.3 28 Opponent Completions/Game 22.1 28 Opponent Completion % 61.0% 18 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 216.4 17 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.91 24 Passing TD s Allowed 27 24 Sacks Recorded 44 3 Interceptions 25 4 Fumbles Recovered 13 5 Total Turnovers Forced 38 3 3rd Down Conversions 33.0% 2 4th Down Conversions 56.7% 25 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 7.2 28 Penalty Yards/Game 59.4 30 Opponent Penalties/Game 6.5 10 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 49.3 14 Punt Return Average 13.5 1 Kick Return Average 20.5 30 Punt Attempts per game 4.8 17 Punt Net Average 39.4 18 Field Goals Made 32 1 Field Goal Percentage 86.5% 10 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 at Tennessee 24-27 L +2.5 L 37 O 9/8 TAMPA BAY 0-17 L -3 L 36.5 U 9/12 NY GIANTS 31-17 W -8.5 W 42.5 O 9/12 at Atlanta 10-14 L -1 L 44 U 9/16 at Washington 37-7 W -3 W 44 P 9/14 NEW ENGLAND 10-31 L -4 L 38 O 9/20 MINNESOTA 27-16 W -3 W 50.5 U 9/18 SAN FRANCISCO 42-3 W -13 W 40.5 O 9/22 DALLAS 44-13 W -10 W 36 O 9/28 at Buffalo 23-13 W +3 W 39 U 9/26 at Detroit 30-13 W -4.5 W 44 U 9/29 HOUSTON 35-17 W -19 L 36 O 10/5 WASHINGTON 27-25 W -4.5 L 40.5 O 10/3 at Chicago 19-9 W -9 W 40 U 9/25 OAKLAND 23-20 W -8.5 L 47 U 10/6 at Jacksonville 25-28 L -3 L 42.5 O 10/12 at Dallas 21-23 L +1.5 L 37.5 O 10/17 CAROLINA 30-8 W -10 W 42 U 10/2 at Kansas City 37-31 W +1.5 W 45.5 O 10/20 TAMPA BAY 20-10 W -3 W 37 U 10/19 at Ny Giants 14-10 W +3 W 37 U 10/24 at Cleveland 34-31 W -7 L 41 O 10/9 at Dallas 10-33 L -3 L 43 T 10/28 NY GIANTS 17-3 W -7.5 W 39 U 10/26 NY JETS 24-17 W -3 W 36 O 10/31 BALTIMORE 15-10 W -7.5 L 37 U 10/23 SAN DIEGO 20-17 W -4 L 47 U 11/3 at Chicago 19-13 W -7 L 37.5 U 11/2 at Atlanta 23-16 W -3 W 39.5 U 11/7 at Pittsburgh 3-27 L -1.5 L 44.5 U 10/30 at Denver 21-49 L +4 L 42.5 O 11/10 INDIANAPOLIS 13-35 L -9.5 L 41.5 O 11/10 at Green Bay 17-14 W +4.5 W 43 U 11/15 at Dallas 49-21 W -7 W 43.5 O 11/6 at Washington 10-17 L +3 L 39 U 11/17 ARIZONA 38-14 W -12 W 37.5 O 11/16 NY GIANTS 28-10 W -3 W 38.5 U 11/21 WASHINGTON 28-6 W -10 W 38.5 U 11/28 at NY Giants 27-6 W -7 W 35.5 U 11/14 DALLAS 20-21 L -3 L 40.5 O 11/25 at San Francisco 38-17 W +7 W 37.5 O 11/23 NEW ORLEANS 33-20 W -5.5 W 39.5 O 12/5 GREEN BAY 47-17 W -5.5 W 48.5 O 11/20 at NY Giants 17-27 L +7 L 41 O 12/1 ST LOUIS 10-3 W +2 W 38 U 11/30 at Carolina 25-16 W +1.5 W 36.5 O 12/12 at Washington 17-14 W -8.5 L 39 U 11/27 GREEN BAY 19-14 W -4 W 41.5 U 12/8 at Seattle 27-20 W -3 W 38 O 12/7 DALLAS 36-10 W -5 W 35.5 O 12/19 DALLAS 12-7 W -11.5 L 45 U 12/5 SEATTLE 0-42 L +3.5 L 39.5 O 12/15 WASHINGTON 34-21 W -7.5 W 38 O 12/15 at Miami 34-27 W +3 W 37.5 O 12/27 at St Louis 7-20 L +4 L 42.5 U 12/21 at Dallas 27-3 W -7 W 36.5 U 12/21 SAN FRANCISCO 28-31 L -7 L 44 O 12/11 NY GIANTS 23-26 L +8 W 36.5 O 1/2 CINCINNATI 10-38 L +4 L 37.5 O 12/28 at NY Giants 7-10 L -1 L 37.5 U 12/27 at Washington 31-7 W -9.5 W 42 U 1/16 (PL) MINNESOTA 27-14 W -8 W 47 U 12/18 at St Louis 17-16 W +3 W 43 U 1/11 (PL) ATLANTA 20-6 W -7.5 W 38.5 U 1/11 (PL) GREEN BAY 20-17 W -4 L 43 U 1/23 (PL) ATLANTA 27-10 W -6 W 37 T 12/24 at Arizona 21-27 L +3 L 39.5 O 1/19 (PL) TAMPA BAY 10-27 L -4.5 L 33.5 O 1/18 (PL) CAROLINA 3-14 L -4 L 36.5 U 2/6 (PL) *vs New England 21-24 L +7 W 47 U 1/1 WASHINGTON 20-31 L +7.5 L 37.5 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 at Houston 24-10 W -5.5 W 38 U 9/17 NY GIANTS 24-30 L -2.5 L 42.5 O 9/24 at San Francisco 38-24 W -6.5 W 42 O 10/2 GREEN BAY 31-9 W -11.5 W 49.5 U 10/8 DALLAS 38-24 W +0 W 43.5 O 10/15 at New Orleans 24-27 L -3 L 47 O 10/22 at Tampa Bay 21-23 L -6 L 42 O 10/29 JACKSONVILLE 6-13 L -8 L 38 U 11/12 WASHINGTON 27-3 W -8 W 41.5 U 11/19 TENNESSEE 13-31 L -13 L 44 T 11/26 at Indianapolis 21-45 L +10.5 L 45 O 12/4 CAROLINA 27-24 W +3 W 37.5 O 12/10 at Washington 21-19 W -2 T 40.5 U 12/17 at NY Giants 36-22 W +6 W 45.5 O 12/25 at Dallas 23-7 W +6.5 W 47.5 U 12/31 ATLANTA 24-17 W -6.5 W 42.5 U 1/7 (PL) NY GIANTS 23-20 W -6.5 L 46.5 U 1/13 (PL) at New Orleans 24-27 L +5.5 W 49 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 at Green Bay 13-16 L -3 L 41.5 U 9/17 WASHINGTON 12-20 L -6.5 L 39 U 9/23 DETROIT 56-21 W -5 W 44.5 O 9/30 at Ny Giants 3-16 L -2 L 47.5 U 10/14 at Ny Jets 16-9 W -4 W 43.5 U 10/21 CHICAGO 16-19 L -5.5 L 42 U 10/28 at Minnesota 23-16 W +0 W 37.5 O 11/4 DALLAS 17-38 L +3 L 46 O 11/11 at Washington 33-25 W +2.5 W 37.5 O 11/18 MIAMI 17-7 W -9.5 W 40.5 U 11/25 at New England 28-31 L +23.5 W 51 O 12/2 SEATTLE 24-28 L -3 L 40.5 O 12/9 NY GIANTS 13-16 L -3 L 42 U 12/16 at Dallas 10-6 W +10 W 48.5 U 12/23 at New Orleans 38-23 W +3 W 47.5 O 12/30 BUFFALO 17-9 W -9 L 38.5 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/7 ST LOUIS 38-3 W -9 W 43.5 U 9/15 at Dallas 37-41 L +6.5 W 46 O 9/21 PITTSBURGH 15-6 W -3.5 W 44.5 U 9/28 at Chicago 20-24 L -3 L 39 O 10/5 WASHINGTON 17-23 L -6.5 L 41.5 U 10/12 at San Francisco 40-26 W -5 W 41 O 10/26 ATLANTA 27-14 W -9 W 44.5 U 11/2 at Seattle 26-7 W -7 W 44 U 11/9 NY GIANTS 31-36 L -3 L 42.5 O 11/16 at Cincinnati 13-13 T -8.5 L 41 U 11/23 at Baltimore 7-36 L +2 L 39 O 11/27 ARIZONA 48-20 W -3 W 49 O 12/7 at NY Giants 20-14 W +6 W 41 U 12/15 CLEVELAND 30-10 W -15.5 W 40 T 12/21 at Washington 3-10 L -6 L 37.5 U 12/28 DALLAS 44-6 W -2.5 W 40.5 O 1/4 (PL) at Minnesota 26-14 W -3 W 40.5 U 1/11 (PL) at NY Giants 23-11 W +4 W 39 U 1/18 (PL) at Arizona 25-32 L -3 L 47 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/13 at Carolina 38-10 W -2.5 W 43.5O 9/20 NEW ORLEANS 22-48 L +2.5 L 46O 9/27 KANSAS CITY 34-14 W -7.5 W 39O 10/11 TAMPA BAY 33-14 W -16 W 42O 10/18 at Oakland 9-13 L -14 L 40.5U 10/26 at Washington 27-17 W -8.5 W 38O 11/1 NY GIANTS 40-17 W +3 W 43.5O 11/8 DALLAS 16-20 L -3 L 49U 11/15 at San Diego 23-31 L +1 L 47O 11/22 at Chicago 24-20 W -3 W 46.5U 11/29 WASHINGTON 27-24 W -10 L 40.5O 12/6 at Atlanta 34-7 W -4 W 43.5U 12/13 at NY Giants 45-38 W -1 W 42O 12/20 SAN FRANCISCO 27-13 W -7 W 41.5U 12/27 DENVER 30-27 W -7 L 43.5O 1/3 at Dallas 0-24 L +3 L 47U 1/9 (PL) at Dallas 14-34 L +3.5 L 45.5O 28 WWW.STATFOX.COM

WASHINGTON REDSKINS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 30 to 1 NFC Title: 13 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 20.75 (15th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 7-9 5-11 6-10 11-7 5-11 9-8 8-8 4-12 55-76 (42%) OVERALL ATS 7-8 7-8 8-8 11-7 5-9 7-8 6-8 6-9 57-65 (47%) PRESEASON ATS 2-2 2-2 2-2 1-3 0-4 3-1 2-3 2-2 14-19 (42%) HOME ATS 4-4 1-6 4-4 5-3 3-4 3-4 3-5 2-6 25-36 (41%) ROAD ATS 3-4 6-2 4-4 6-4 2-5 4-4 3-3 4-3 32-29 (52%) vs DIVISION ATS 1-5 2-4 2-4 5-1 1-4 4-2 3-3 2-4 20-27 (43%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 4-7 6-6 7-5 10-4 3-7 7-5 6-4 4-8 47-46 (51%) as FAVORITE ATS 2-3 0-2 3-5 7-3 1-2 3-5 2-4 1-4 19-28 (40%) as UNDERDOG ATS 5-5 7-6 5-3 4-4 4-7 4-3 3-4 5-5 37-37 (50%) OVER-UNDER 8-7 8-7 4-12 8-10 8-7 8-9 3-12 9-7 56-71 (44%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * Over the L2 seasons, WASHINGTON is 10-1 UNDER the total (+8.9 Units) as favorites. The Average Score was WASHINGTON 16.5, OPPONENT 15.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - at St Louis, 10/31 - at Detroit, 12/12 - TAMPA BAY, 1/2 - NY GIANTS * WASHINGTON is on a 17-4 ATS (+12.6 Units) run vs. poor rushing teams - averaging <=90 RYPG The Average Score was WASHINGTON 25.1, OPPONENT 17. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/17 - INDIANAPOLIS * WASHINGTON is on a 9-24 ATS (-17.4 Units) skid at home in the first month of the season The Average Score was WASHINGTON 18.9, OPPONENT 21.1. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - DALLAS, 9/19 - HOUSTON * WASHINGTON is on a 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) run vs. terrible defensive teams - allowing >=6 YPP The Average Score was WASHINGTON 30.1, OPPONENT 15. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - at St Louis, 10/31 - at Detroit * WASHINGTON is on a 30-14 ATS (+14.6 Units) run as road underdogs of 3.5 to 7 points The Average Score was WASHINGTON 19.7, OPPONENT 19.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/21 - at Tennessee WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM LINE FINAL ATS 29 2009 Record: 4-12 (-10.6 ML Units), 6-9 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 9-7 DIVISION: NFC East COACH: Mike Shanahan, 1st year STADIUM: FedEx Field Scoring Differential: -4.4 (#24 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 18 (#19 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -5.7 (#24 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 20.00 (#19 of 32) 9/12/10 DALLAS * UNDERDOG is 14-11 SU & 19-6 ATS in WAS-DAL series since 97 9/19/10 HOUSTON * WASHINGTON has taken L2 games vs. HOUSTON both SU & ATS 9/26/10 at St Louis * ROAD TEAM is on 6-3 SU & 7-2 ATS run in STL-WAS series 10/3/10 at Philadelphia * ROAD TEAM is 18-16 SU & 20-11 ATS in PHI-WAS series since 93 10/10/10 GREEN BAY * GREEN BAY is 4-0 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L4 games vs. WASHINGTON 10/17/10 INDIANAPOLIS * L6 games of WAS-IND series are 5-1 OVER the total 10/24/10 at Chicago * WASHINGTON is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games at CHICAGO 10/31/10 at Detroit * UNDER the total is 6-0 in L6 games of DET-WAS series 11/15/10 PHILADELPHIA * WAS-PHI series at WASHINGTON has gone 12-5 UNDER the total since 92 11/21/10 at Tennessee * L4 TEN-WAS series games have gone OVER the total 11/28/10 MINNESOTA * UNDERDOG is 4-3 SU & 6-1 ATS in L7 WAS-MIN matchups 12/5/10 at NY Giants * FAVORITE is on 9-2 SU & ATS run in L11 NYG-WAS matchups 12/12/10 TAMPA BAY * L2 games in WAS-TB series at WASHINGTON went UNDER the total 12/19/10 at Dallas * UNDERDOG is 10-2 ATS in DAL-WAS series at DALLAS since 97 12/26/10 at Jacksonville * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 JAC-WAS games 1/2/11 NY GIANTS * NY GIANTS are on 4-game SU & ATS winning streak at WASHINGTON 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring -4.4 24 Yardage -6.5 18 Yards Per Play +0.05 17 Yards Per Point -3.65 27 Turnovers -11 28 Offensive Stats Points Scored 16.6 26 First Downs 17.5 23 Total Yards Per Game 313.0 22 Yards Per Play 5.17 19 Yards Per Point 18.86 29 Rushing Attempts 24.4 27 Rush Yards Per Game 94.3 27 Yards Per Rush 3.86 29 Rushing TD s 8 25 Passing Attempts Per Game 33.3 20 Completions Per Game 21.3 13 Completion Percentage 63.8% 10 Passing Yards Per Game 218.1 16 Passing Yards Per Attempt 6.55 14 Passing TD s 21 16 Sacks Allowed 46 28 Interceptions Thrown 16 16 Fumbles Lost 12 22 Total Turnovers Lost 28 18 Avg. Time of Possession 28:56 16 3rd Down Conversions 39.8% 16 4th Down Conversions 31.8% 31 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 21.0 18 First Downs 17.5 7 Total Yards Per Game 319.5 11 Yards Per Play 5.12 11 Yards Per Point 15.21 19 Rushing Attempts 28.1 20 Rush Yards Per Game 112.4 16 Yards Per Rush 4.01 10 Rushing TD s 10 7 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 31.9 11 Opponent Completions/Game 19.6 13 Opponent Completion % 61.4% 19 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 207.3 9 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 7.80 32 Passing TD s Allowed 35 32 Sacks Recorded 40 8 Interceptions 11 26 Fumbles Recovered 6 29 Total Turnovers Forced 17 32 3rd Down Conversions 39.7% 21 4th Down Conversions 23.5% 1 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 5.3 9 Penalty Yards/Game 42.4 9 Opponent Penalties/Game 6.1 15 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 47.7 18 Punt Return Average 4.8 30 Kick Return Average 21.7 24 Punt Attempts per game 4.8 19 Punt Net Average 37.7 29 Field Goals Made 22 19 Field Goal Percentage 88.0% 8 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 ARIZONA 31-23 W -6 W 45 O 9/4 NY JETS 16-13 W -3 T 39.5 U 9/12 TAMPA BAY 16-10 W -2.5 W 38 U 9/11 CHICAGO 9-7 W -5 L 33 U 9/16 PHILADELPHIA 7-37 L +3 L 44 P 9/14 at Atlanta 33-31 W +3 W 39.5 O 9/19 at NY Giants 14-20 L -3 L 40 U 9/19 at Dallas 14-13 W +5.5 W 35.5 U 9/22 at San Francisco 10-20 L +10 T 44 U 9/21 NY GIANTS 21-24 L -1 L 43.5 O 10/2 SEATTLE 20-17 W -2 W 36.5 O 9/27 DALLAS 18-21 L -1.5 L 35.5 O 10/6 at Tennessee 31-14 W +4 W 43.5 O 9/28 NEW ENGLAND 20-17 W -3.5 L 43 U 10/9 at Denver 19-21 L +7 W 34.5 O 10/3 at Cleveland 13-17 L -3 L 35 U 10/16 at Kansas City 21-28 L +6 L 42.5 O 10/13 NEW ORLEANS 27-43 L +1 L 46 O 10/5 at Philadelphia 25-27 L +4.5 W 40.5 O 10/10 BALTIMORE 10-17 L +0 L 34 U 10/23 SAN FRANCISCO 52-17 W -13.5 W 36 O 10/20 at Green Bay 9-30 L +7 L 48 U 10/12 TAMPA BAY 13-35 L +3 L 37 O 10/17 at Chicago 13-10 W +1.5 W 33.5 U 10/30 at NY Giants 0-36 L +1 L 43 U 10/27 INDIANAPOLIS 26-21 W +1.5 W 46.5 O 10/19 at Buffalo 7-24 L +3 L 38.5 U 10/31 GREEN BAY 14-28 L +1 L 40.5 O 11/6 PHILADELPHIA 17-10 W -3 W 39 U 11/3 at Seattle 14-3 W +2 W 41.5 U 11/2 at Dallas 14-21 L +6 L 38.5 U 11/7 at Detroit 17-10 W +3.5 W 37 U 11/13 at Tampa Bay 35-36 L -1.5 L 34 O 11/10 at Jacksonville 7-26 L +1.5 L 39.5 U 11/9 SEATTLE 27-20 W +3 W 41 O 11/14 CINCINNATI 10-17 L -4 L 36.5 U 11/20 OAKLAND 13-16 L -6 L 44 U 11/17 at NY Giants 17-19 L +3.5 W 34.5 O 11/16 at Carolina 17-20 L +6 W 37 T 11/21 at Philadelphia 6-28 L +10 L 38.5 U 11/27 SAN DIEGO 17-23 L +3.5 L 43 U 11/24 ST LOUIS 20-17 W +3.5 W 41 U 11/23 at Miami 23-24 L +7 W 35.5 O 12/4 at St Louis 24-9 W -3.5 W 45 U 11/28 at Pittsburgh 7-16 L +10 W 34.5 U 11/28 at Dallas 20-27 L -1 L 36 O 11/30 NEW ORLEANS 20-24 L +1 L 42 O 12/11 at Arizona 17-13 W -3.5 W 40 U 12/5 NY GIANTS 31-7 W -3 W 33 O 12/18 DALLAS 35-7 W +1 W 35 O 12/8 NY GIANTS 21-27 L -3 L 37.5 O 12/7 at Ny Giants 20-7 W +3 W 36 U 12/12 PHILADELPHIA 14-17 L +8.5 W 39 U 12/24 NY GIANTS 35-20 W -3.5 W 39 O 12/15 at Philadelphia 21-34 L +7.5 L 38 O 12/14 DALLAS 0-27 L +3 L 34 U 12/18 at San Francisco 26-16 W -6.5 W 36.5 O 1/1 at Philadelphia 31-20 W -7.5 W 37.5 O 12/22 HOUSTON 26-10 W -6.5 W 36.5 U 12/21 at Chicago 24-27 L +4 W 35 O 12/26 at Dallas 10-13 L -2.5 L 35 U 1/7 at Tampa Bay 17-10 W +1.5 W 37.5 U 12/29 DALLAS 20-14 W -7.5 L 36.5 U 12/27 PHILADELPHIA 7-31 L +9.5 L 42 U 1/2 MINNESOTA 21-18 W +4 W 41 U 1/14 (PL) at Seattle 10-20 L +9.5 L 41 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/11 MINNESOTA 16-19 L -4.5 L 36 U 9/9 MIAMI 16-13 W -3 T 34 U 9/4 at NY Giants 7-16 L +4.5 L 41 U 9/13 at NY Giants 17-23 L +5.5 L 37O 9/17 at Dallas 10-27 L +7 L 37 T 9/17 at Philadelphia 20-12 W +6.5 W 39 U 9/14 NEW ORLEANS 29-24 W +0 W 43.5 O 9/20 ST LOUIS 9-7 W -10 L 37U 9/24 at Houston 31-15 W -3.5 W 38 O 9/23 NY GIANTS 17-24 L -3.5 L 42 U 9/21 ARIZONA 24-17 W -3 W 43.5 U 9/27 at Detroit 14-19 L -6 L 39.5U 10/1 JACKSONVILLE 36-30 W +2.5 W 34 O 10/7 DETROIT 34-3 W -3.5 W 44.5 U 9/28 at Dallas 26-24 W +10 W 46.5 O 10/4 TAMPA BAY 16-13 W -9.5 L 35.5U 10/8 at NY Giants 3-19 L +5.5 L 45.5 U 10/14 at Green Bay 14-17 L +3 T 40.5 U 10/5 at Philadelphia 23-17 W +6.5 W 41.5 U 10/11 at Carolina 17-20 L +5 W 37.5U 10/15 TENNESSEE 22-25 L -13 L 39.5 O 10/21 ARIZONA 21-19 W -8 L 35.5 O 10/12 ST LOUIS 17-19 L -11.5 L 44 U 10/18 KANSAS CITY 6-14 L -6.5 L 36.5U 10/22 at Indianapolis 22-36 L +8 L 47 O 10/28 at New England 7-52 L +15 L 46.5 O 10/19 CLEVELAND 14-11 W -7 L 41.5 U 10/26 PHILADELPHIA 17-27 L +8.5 L 38O 11/5 DALLAS 22-19 W +3 W 40.5 O 11/4 at Ny Jets 23-20 W -3.5 L 36 O 10/26 at Detroit 25-17 W -7 W 42 T 11/8 at Atlanta 17-31 L +8.5 L 40.5O 11/12 at Philadelphia 3-27 L +8 L 41.5 U 11/11 PHILADELPHIA 25-33 L -2.5 L 37.5 O 11/3 PITTSBURGH 6-23 L -3 L 37.5 U 11/15 DENVER 27-17 W +3 W 35.5O 11/19 at Tampa Bay 17-20 L +3 T 33.5 O 11/18 at Dallas 23-28 L +10.5 W 47 O 11/16 DALLAS 10-14 L +2 L 42.5 U 11/22 at Dallas 6-7 L +10.5 W 41.5U 11/26 CAROLINA 17-13 W +6 W 36.5 U 11/25 at Tampa Bay 13-19 L +3.5 L 38 U 11/23 at Seattle 20-17 W -3 T 40 U 11/29 at Philadelphia 24-27 L +10 W 40.5O 12/3 ATLANTA 14-24 L +2 L 39.5 U 12/2 BUFFALO 16-17 L -6.5 L 37 U 11/30 NY GIANTS 7-23 L +3.5 L 41 U 12/6 NEW ORLEANS 30-33 L +8 W 46.5O 12/10 PHILADELPHIA 19-21 L +2 T 40.5 U 12/6 CHICAGO 24-16 W -3 W 39.5 O 12/7 at Baltimore 10-24 L +6 L 35 U 12/13 at Oakland 34-13 W -2.5 W 37O 12/17 at New Orleans 16-10 W +10 W 47 U 12/16 at Ny Giants 22-10 W +6 W 36.5 U 12/14 at Cincinnati 13-20 L -6.5 L 35.5 U 12/21 NY GIANTS 12-45 L +3 L 43.5O 12/23 at Minnesota 32-21 W +6 W 40.5 O 12/24 at St Louis 31-37 L +2 L 43 O 12/21 PHILADELPHIA 10-3 W +6 W 37.5 U 12/27 DALLAS 0-17 L +7 L 41.5U 12/30 DALLAS 27-6 W -9 W 38.5 U 12/30 NY GIANTS 28-34 L +1 L 43 O 12/28 at San Francisco 24-27 L +3 T 37 O 1/3 at San Diego 20-23 L +3 T 39O 1/5 (PL) at Seattle 14-35 L +3 L 39.5 O

NFC NORTH nfc north Preview It was a magical 2009 season in Minnesota, where the Vikings rode the arm of Brett Favre to a near-super Bowl appearance. Everything seemed to click for Favre, as he transformed a once one-dimensional offense to a championship caliber unit. It remains to be seen whether or not it was a one-year wonder, as Favre had yet to commit to coming back for another season this fall. Clearly that is the biggest story affecting the NFC North in 2010. Without Favre, Minnesota could be set back years after the quarterback experiment, as their offensive is aging and it might be impossible to regenerate the momentum established. If the Vikings do slip, Green Bay is ready to establish itself. Many experts, including Sports Illustrated s Peter King, put the Packers near the top of the NFL heap after an 11-5 season in which QB Aaron Rodgers established himself as one of the game s biggest stars. Head coach Mike McCarthy s team was the NFL s top ranked club in yardage differential and is anxious to avenge two defeats at the hands of Favre & the Vikings last fall. In Detroit, if anything, there is more optimism than there has been in years when considering the prospects of the Lions. Between quarterback Matt Stafford s promising rookie season, the continued growth of wideout Calvin Johnson, and some young talent added in the draft, many folks believe the Lions are a candidate for a major turnaround after winning just two games combined in 08 & 09. In Chicago, there is very little positive mojo for the Bears after a 7-9 season marred by a league-high 26 interception total for quarterback Jay Cutler. Compounding the troubles is the fact that the Bears went without a draft pick in the first two rounds after yielding those selections in acquiring Cutler. However, they did add DE Julius Peppers to the defense. Chicago faces a difficult first five weeks and could be in trouble as early as October if things don t go their way early. CHICAGO BEARS Chicago fans are gushing over another prized acquisition, as DE Julius Peppers joins a unit that includes LB s Brian Urlacher and Lance Briggs. It s the second time in as many offseasons the front office put all of its eggs in one basket. Last year those eggs proved mainly rotten, with QB Jay Cutler leading the NFL in interceptions with 26 after a blockbuster trade with Denver. The Bears weren t much of a factor in the NFC North and had the Lions, Rams and Browns to thank for four of their seven wins A year after ranking third in the NFL in passing yards with 4,526, Cutler had never really got untracked and many of his picks came in the red zone or deep in Chicago territory. Overall, the offense ranked 23rd, up slightly from 26th, but the unit wasn t close to meeting expectations. Little changed in personnel, but the presence of new coordinator Mike Martz and the natural progression of some younger players might turn it around. Though not big names at wide receiver, Martz thinks he has enough to get it done, and RB Matt Forte took a step back in 2009, but still totaled 1,400 yards from scrimmage. The line is in good shape Perhaps not the team s biggest problem, the Bears addressed some defensive concerns by investing in Peppers. HC Lovie Smith will be counting on Peppers to apply pressure in a QB-strong division, since there s a chance the team s starting ends, Alex Brown and Adewale Ogunleye, won t be back. Of course, Urlacher s season lasted just three quarters when he dislocated his right wrist in the opener Expectations were high last season and the Bears didn t come close to meeting them. Smith is on the hot seat, and a slow start could spell doom. While the addition of Peppers has created a buzz, he and Cutler need to be big for Chicago to make the playoffs. DETROIT LIONS Remember where you read it first the Lions will be tougher to tame in 2010. A major splash in the draft, a couple of key free agents and a year of experience under QB Matthew Stafford s belt are three reasons why Detroit is a strong candidate to take a considerable step up the ladder just two years removed from a winless season The two-win Lions of 09 had their moments on offense while Stafford got acclimated to coordinator Scott Linehan s playbook and is bound to improve with a better supporting cast. Calvin Johnson (67 catches, 984 yards, 5 TD s) is quickly developing a rapport with Stafford and is joined in the receiving corps by WR Nate Burleson and TE Tony Scheffler. The running game disappointed, ranking 24th in yards. Enter Jahvid Best (1b-California), who brings speed and big-play ability to a unit in desperate for both In the big picture, Detroit improved its defense during the offseason but is moving forward without its most productive member in recent years, LB Ernie Sims as well as tackle leader Larry Foote. The Lions allowed more yards 2009 STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Minnesota 13-5-0 0.722 532 346 9-3-0 9-0-0 4-5-0 11-6-1 64.7% 9-9-0 Green Bay 11-6-0 0.647 506 348 9-3-0 6-2-0 5-4-0 11-5-1 68.7% 9-8-0 Chicago 7-9-0 0.437 327 375 5-7-0 5-3-0 2-6-0 6-10-0 37.5% 6-10-0 Detroit 2-14-0 0.125 262 494 1-11-0 2-6-0 0-8-0 4-10-2 28.6% 8-8-0 (392.1 per game) and points (494) than anyone and managed only 26 sacks. A major facelift on the front four can help fiery coordinator Gunther Cunningham get things moving in the right direction via warp speed. Tackle Ndamukong Suh (1a-Nebraska) is a rare talent and was the most dominant player in college football last season. Schwartz put most of his free-agent eggs in the basket of veteran end Kyle Vanden Bosch (Titans) as well Nobody s expecting the Lions to go from worst to first in a division likely to produce two playoff teams, but maybe they can show they re no longer pushovers. The rookies will contribute on each side of the ball, and as long as the Stafford-Johnson combination is healthy it won t be such a terrible year. GREEN BAY PACKERS Head coach Mike McCarthy and the Packers would love to pick up where they left off last season when they steamrolled to a 7-1 record over the second half and came within a turnover of a road playoff win. Green Bay held six of its last eight regular-season opponents to 14 points or fewer while scoring at least 27 in six second-half games. With starpower on each side of the ball in QB Aaron Rodgers and NFL Defensive POY Charles Woodson, how far the Packers go may ultimately depend on their offensive line For someone sacked more than any other QB, Rodgers didn t let the pressure get to him. He ll come into 2010 with as much confidence as anyone after a huge year (4,434 yards, 30:7 TD-Int ratio). The biggest question mark in Green Bay is up front, where age is starting to catch up. GM Ted Thompson made tackle Bryan Bulaga (1-Iowa) the 23rd pick of the draft. The running game was solid behind Ryan Grant, but not explosive. The Packers had eight players catch at least 20 passes from Rodgers, led by WR s Donald Driver & Greg Jennings, and TE Jermichael Finley, who could be the league s best at the position by the end of 2010 DC Dom Capers was a key factor in turning around a defense that ranked 26th against the run and had 27 sacks in 2008. In its first year under Capers, the new 3-4 unit led the NFL in rushing defense (83.3 YPG) and ranked No. 5 against the pass. Rookie Clay Matthews had a huge year, and while the secondary isn t young, it is loaded with playmakers Rodgers appears to have elevated himself to an elite quarterback, and no defense did a better job against the run or making big plays. The Packers meet all the criteria of a Super Bowl contender and should challenge for the NFC crown. MINNESOTA VIKINGS Brett Favre and the Vikings caught lightning in a bottle last fall, but missed out on a trip to the Super Bowl when Favre threw a costly late interception in the devastating 31-28 overtime loss at New Orleans. As difficult an ending it was, the road to the conference title game had few bumps and many Hollywood moments. Favre s offseason ankle surgery suggests he s coming back for more, and there s no reason to believe Minnesota isn t capable of an encore Only the Saints scored more points than the Vikings, who averaged 29.4 PPG. They ranked fifth in total yards (379.6 per game) as well and picking up where they left off should be no problem. Favre would be coming off what he s calling the best season of his 19-year career. The air attack features a bona fide star in Sidney Rice, who broke out with 83 receptions, 1,312 yards and eight touchdowns. RB Adrian Peterson is the best in the business but had trouble holding onto the ball for the first time in his career, fumbling nine times. The front line returns intact, and is considered one of the league s best Running the ball against the Vikings hasn t been a good idea since 2006. The stop unit has led the league in rushing defense for three consecutive seasons and ranked No. 2 a year ago. The unit wasn t too shabby against the pass, either, topping the league in sacks with 48. DE Jared Allen has been a nightmare for opposing offenses in his two years in Minnesota. If there s any weakness, the secondary could prove porous The Vikings are seeking a third straight playoff appearance and probably won t be pleased with anything less than a trip to the Super Bowl. Assuming Favre is a go, they ve got all the pieces in place and will be playing in January. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH Green Bay Minnesota Detroit Chicago 30 WWW.STATFOX.COM

CHICAGO BEARS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 25 to 1 NFC Title: 11 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 21.56 (5th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 4-12 7-9 5-11 11-6 15-4 7-9 9-7 7-9 65-67 (49%) OVERALL ATS 5-11 8-8 6-9 9-6 11-8 7-9 7-8 6-10 59-69 (46%) PRESEASON ATS 2-2 0-4 2-1 2-2 2-2 1-2 1-3 3-1 13-17 (43%) HOME ATS 3-5 6-2 2-6 6-3 6-4 3-5 4-4 4-4 34-33 (51%) ROAD ATS 2-6 2-6 4-3 3-3 5-4 4-4 3-4 2-6 25-36 (41%) vs DIVISION ATS 0-6 2-4 3-2 4-1 3-3 3-3 2-4 3-3 20-26 (43%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 3-9 5-7 5-6 8-3 8-6 5-7 5-6 4-8 43-52 (45%) as FAVORITE ATS 0-4 3-1 1-4 4-2 9-7 3-5 5-4 4-3 29-30 (49%) as UNDERDOG ATS 5-7 5-7 5-5 5-4 2-1 4-3 2-4 2-7 30-38 (44%) OVER-UNDER 7-9 7-9 6-10 5-11 13-5 9-7 7-9 6-10 60-70 (46%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * CHICAGO is on a 2-16 ATS (-15.6 Units) skid after scoring 25 points or more in 2 straight games The Average Score was CHICAGO 19.2, OPPONENT 24.2. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/7 - at Buffalo, 12/12 - NEW ENGLAND * CHICAGO is on a 2-15 ATS (-14.5 Units) skid on the road vs. excellent offensive teams - averaging >=6 YPP The Average Score was CHICAGO 14.3, OPPONENT 29.5. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - at Dallas, 1/2 - at Green Bay * CHICAGO is on a 7-26 ATS (-21.6 Units) skid on the road in December games The Average Score was CHICAGO 14.8, OPPONENT 24.4. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/5 - at Detroit, 12/20 - at Minnesota * CHICAGO was 8-1 UNDER the total (+6.9 Units) as underdogs or pick last season. The Average Score was CHICAGO 15.4, OPPONENT 23.1. Potential Spots for 2010: Numerous potential underdog spots * CHICAGO is on a 19-6 UNDER the total (+12.4 Units) run vs. good rushing teams - averaging >=4.5 YPR The Average Score was CHICAGO 16.2, OPPONENT 21.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - at Dallas, 10/10 - at Carolina WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM LINE FINAL 31 2009 Record: 7-9 (-0.8 ML Units), 6-10 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 6-10 DIVISION: NFC North COACH: Lovie Smith, 7th year (54-46 SU, 46-50 ATS) STADIUM: Soldier Field Scoring Differential: -3 (#21 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 16 (#23 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -3 (#22 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 19.56 (#22 of 32) 9/12/10 DETROIT * UNDERDOG is 9-12 SU but 14-6 ATS in CHI-DET series since 99 9/19/10 at Dallas * HOME TEAM is 5-1 SU & ATS in L6 DAL-CHI matchups 9/27/10 GREEN BAY * GREEN BAY is 8-3 SU & 9-2 ATS at CHICAGO since 99 10/3/10 at NY Giants * ROAD TEAM is on 7-0 SU & 6-0 ATS run in NYG-CHI series 10/10/10 at Carolina * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 2-0 ATS in L3 CAR-CHI games 10/17/10 SEATTLE * L4 CHI-SEA series games have gone OVER the total 10/24/10 WASHINGTON * WASHINGTON is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games at CHICAGO 11/7/10 at Buffalo * HOME TEAM is 5-0 SU & ATS in L5 BUF-CHI matchups 11/14/10 MINNESOTA * HOME TEAM is on 13-2 SU & 12-3 ATS run in CHI-MIN series 11/18/10 at Miami * MIAMI has taken L2 games vs. CHICAGO both SU & ATS 11/28/10 PHILADELPHIA * ROAD TEAM is 6-2 SU & ATS in L8 CHI-PHI matchups 12/5/10 at Detroit * CHICAGO is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games at DETROIT 12/12/10 NEW ENGLAND * CHICAGO is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. NEW ENGLAND 12/20/10 at Minnesota * MINNESOTA is on 7-1 SU & 6-2 ATS run in its L8 home games vs. CHICAGO 12/26/10 NY JETS * UNDER the total is 5-0 in L5 games of CHI-NYJ series 1/2/11 at Green Bay * FAVORITE is on 7-2 SU & 6-2 ATS run in L9 GB-CHI matchups at GREEN BAY ATS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring -3 21 Yardage -27.5 23 Yards Per Play -0.12 20 Yards Per Point -0.77 20 Turnovers -6 23 Offensive Stats Points Scored 20.4 19 First Downs 16.4 25 Total Yards Per Game 310.3 23 Yards Per Play 5.11 20 Yards Per Point 15.21 15 Rushing Attempts 23.3 29 Rush Yards Per Game 93.3 29 Yards Per Rush 4.00 26 Rushing TD s 6 29 Passing Attempts Per Game 35.2 8 Completions Per Game 21.3 12 Completion Percentage 60.4% 19 Passing Yards Per Game 217.1 17 Passing Yards Per Attempt 6.17 19 Passing TD s 27 10 Sacks Allowed 35 19 Interceptions Thrown 27 30 Fumbles Lost 7 3 Total Turnovers Lost 34 29 Avg. Time of Possession 26:53 22 3rd Down Conversions 37.3% 18 4th Down Conversions 38.9% 26 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 23.4 21 First Downs 19.5 24 Total Yards Per Game 337.8 17 Yards Per Play 5.23 15 Yards Per Point 14.44 28 Rushing Attempts 29.2 25 Rush Yards Per Game 126.4 23 Yards Per Rush 4.33 18 Rushing TD s 14 18 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 33.2 16 Opponent Completions/Game 21.3 21 Opponent Completion % 64.2% 28 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 211.4 13 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 5.96 6 Passing TD s Allowed 29 28 Sacks Recorded 35 13 Interceptions 13 22 Fumbles Recovered 15 1 Total Turnovers Forced 28 12 3rd Down Conversions 41.2% 27 4th Down Conversions 46.2% 10 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 6.3 22 Penalty Yards/Game 52.3 23 Opponent Penalties/Game 5.5 22 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 46.5 19 Punt Return Average 8.5 15 Kick Return Average 25.0 3 Punt Attempts per game 4.8 20 Punt Net Average 37.9 26 Field Goals Made 24 15 Field Goal Percentage 85.7% 12 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 MINNESOTA 27-23 W -4.5 L 40.5 O 9/7 at San Francisco 7-49 L +6.5 L 40.5 O 9/12 DETROIT 16-20 L -1 L 39 U 9/11 at Washington 7-9 L +5 W 33 U 9/15 at Atlanta 14-13 W +3 W 45 U 9/14 at Minnesota 13-24 L +10 L 44 U 9/19 at Green Bay 21-10 W +8.5 W 40 U 9/18 DETROIT 38-6 W +1 W 33 O 9/22 NEW ORLEANS 23-29 L +2.5 L 40.5 O 9/29 GREEN BAY 23-38 L +4 L 41 O 9/26 at Minnesota 22-27 L +12 W 45 O 9/25 CINCINNATI 7-24 L +3 L 38 U 9/29 at Buffalo 27-33 L +3 L 46.5 O 10/5 OAKLAND 24-21 W +3.5 W 43 O 10/3 PHILADELPHIA 9-19 L +9 L 40 U 10/9 at Cleveland 10-20 L +2.5 L 35 U 10/7 GREEN BAY 21-34 L -1 L 44.5 O 10/12 at New Orleans 13-20 L +6.5 L 43.5 U 10/17 WASHINGTON 10-13 L -1.5 L 33.5 U 10/16 MINNESOTA 28-3 W -3 W 37 U 10/20 at Detroit 20-23 L -3 L 44 U 10/19 at Seattle 17-24 L +11 W 41.5 U 10/24 at Tampa Bay 7-19 L +7 L 31.5 U 10/23 BALTIMORE 10-6 W -2 W 30 U 10/27 at Minnesota 7-25 L +2.5 L 46 U 10/26 DETROIT 24-16 W -3 W 37 O 10/31 SAN FRANCISCO 23-13 W -2 W 35.5 O 10/30 at Detroit 19-13 W +3 W 32.5 U 11/3 PHILADELPHIA 13-19 L +7 W 37.5 U 11/2 SAN DIEGO 20-7 W -2.5 W 39 U 11/7 at NY Giants 28-21 W +9 W 34.5 O 11/6 at New Orleans 20-17 W -3 T 34 O 11/10 NEW ENGLAND 30-33 L +5 W 39 O 11/9 at Detroit 10-12 L +0 L 37 U 11/14 at Tennessee 19-17 W +5.5 W 34 O 11/13 SAN FRANCISCO 17-9 W -13 L 30 U 11/20 CAROLINA 13-3 W +3 W 34.5 U 11/18 at St Louis 16-21 L +10 W 43 U 11/16 ST LOUIS 21-23 L +6 W 41 O 11/21 INDIANAPOLIS 10-41 L +8 L 44.5 O 11/27 at Tampa Bay 13-10 W +3 W 31 U 11/24 DETROIT 20-17 W -5.5 L 37.5 U 11/23 at Denver 19-10 W +10.5 W 38.5 U 11/25 at Dallas 7-21 L +3.5 L 36 U 12/4 GREEN BAY 19-7 W -6 W 31 U 12/1 at Green Bay 20-30 L +9.5 L 37.5 O 11/30 ARIZONA 28-3 W -4.5 W 36 U 12/5 MINNESOTA 24-14 W +7 W 40.5 U 12/11 at Pittsburgh 9-21 L +6.5 L 30 T 12/9 at Miami 9-27 L +10.5 L 37 U 12/7 at Green Bay 21-34 L +7 L 39 O 12/12 at Jacksonville 3-22 L +7 L 34 U 12/18 ATLANTA 16-3 W -3.5 W 31 U 12/15 NY JETS 20-13 W +6.5 W 38 U 12/14 MINNESOTA 13-10 W +3 W 39.5 U 12/19 HOUSTON 5-24 L -1 L 34 U 12/25 at Green Bay 24-17 W -7 T 33.5 O 12/22 at Carolina 14-24 L +4 L 36.5 O 12/21 WASHINGTON 27-24 W -4 L 35 O 12/26 at Detroit 13-19 L +6 T 37 U 1/1 at Minnesota 10-34 L +5.5 L 35 O 12/29 TAMPA BAY 0-15 L +7.5 L 31.5 U 12/28 at Kansas City 3-31 L +8 L 44 U 1/2 GREEN BAY 14-31 L -3 L 34 O 1/15 (PL) CAROLINA 21-29 L -2.5 L 31 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 at Green Bay 26-0 W -3.5 W 34.5 U 9/17 DETROIT 34-7 W -7 W 32 O 9/24 at Minnesota 19-16 W -3.5 L 35 T 10/1 SEATTLE 37-6 W -3.5 W 37 O 10/8 BUFFALO 40-7 W -9.5 W 34.5 O 10/16 at Arizona 24-23 W -13 L 40.5 O 10/29 SAN FRANCISCO 41-10 W -16 W 42 O 11/5 MIAMI 13-31 L -12.5 L 37 O 11/12 at NY Giants 38-20 W +1.5 W 37 O 11/19 at NY Jets 10-0 W -5 W 40 U 11/26 at New England 13-17 L +4.5 W 38 U 12/3 MINNESOTA 23-13 W -8.5 W 34 O 12/11 at St Louis 42-27 W -6 W 41.5 O 12/17 TAMPA BAY 34-31 W -13 L 35 O 12/24 at Detroit 26-21 W -6 L 41.5 O 12/31 GREEN BAY 7-26 L -3 L 38 U 1/14 (PL) SEATTLE 27-24 W -9 L 37 O 1/21 (PL) NEW ORLEANS 39-14 W -3 W 42.5 O 2/4 (PL) vs. Indianapolis 17-29 L +6.5 L 47 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 at San Diego 3-14 L +7 L 43 U 9/16 KANSAS CITY 20-10 W -11.5 L 35.5 U 9/23 DALLAS 10-34 L -3 L 41.5 O 9/30 at Detroit 27-37 L -2.5 L 46 O 10/7 at Green Bay 27-20 W +3 W 40.5 O 10/14 MINNESOTA 31-34 L -5 L 35.5 O 10/21 at Philadelphia 19-16 W +5.5 W 42 U 10/28 DETROIT 7-16 L -6 L 45.5 U 11/11 at Oakland 17-6 W -3.5 W 38 U 11/18 at Seattle 23-30 L +6 L 37.5 O 11/25 DENVER 37-34 W -1 W 42.5 O 12/2 NY GIANTS 16-21 L +0 L 39.5 U 12/6 at Washington 16-24 L +3 L 39.5 O 12/17 at Minnesota 13-20 L +10.5 W 43.5 U 12/23 GREEN BAY 35-7 W +7.5 W 31.5 O 12/30 NEW ORLEANS 33-25 W -1 W 42 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/7 at Indianapolis 29-13 W +10.5 W 42.5 U 9/14 at Carolina 17-20 L +3 T 37.5 U 9/21 TAMPA BAY 24-27 L -3 L 34.5 O 9/28 PHILADELPHIA 24-20 W +3 W 39 O 10/5 at Detroit 34-7 W -3 W 45.5 U 10/12 at Atlanta 20-22 L -3 L 43 U 10/19 MINNESOTA 48-41 W -3 W 38 O 11/2 DETROIT 27-23 W -13 L 43.5 O 11/9 TENNESSEE 14-21 L +3 L 37 U 11/16 at Green Bay 3-37 L +3.5 L 43 U 11/23 at St Louis 27-3 W -7 W 44.5 U 11/30 at Minnesota 14-34 L +5.5 L 42 O 12/7 JACKSONVILLE 23-10 W -6.5 W 40 U 12/11 NEW ORLEANS 27-24 W -2.5 W 46 O 12/22 GREEN BAY 20-17 W -4 L 41 U 12/28 at Houston 24-31 L +3 L 46 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/13 at Green Bay 15-21 L +5 L 46.5U 9/20 PITTSBURGH 17-14 W +3 W 38U 9/27 at Seattle 25-19 W -3 W 37.5O 10/4 DETROIT 48-24 W -10 W 43O 10/18 at Atlanta 14-21 L +4 L 46U 10/25 at Cincinnati 10-45 L -1.5 L 42.5O 11/1 CLEVELAND 30-6 W -11 W 39.5U 11/8 ARIZONA 21-41 L -2.5 L 44.5O 11/12 at San Francisco 6-10 L +3 L 43U 11/22 PHILADELPHIA 20-24 L +3 L 46.5U 11/29 at Minnesota 10-36 L +10 L 47U 12/6 ST LOUIS 17-9 W -9 L 41U 12/13 GREEN BAY 14-21 L +3.5 L 42U 12/20 at Baltimore 7-31 L +10.5 L 39.5U 12/28 MINNESOTA 36-30 W +8 W 40.5O 1/3 at Detroit 37-23 W -5 W 44O

DETROIT LIONS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 100 to 1 NFC Title: 50 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 21.75 (3rd toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 3-13 5-11 6-10 5-11 3-13 7-9 0-16 2-14 31-97 (24%) OVERALL ATS 6-9 9-7 8-7 9-7 6-10 6-9 7-9 4-10 55-68 (45%) PRESEASON ATS 2-2 2-2 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 3-0 2-2 13-18 (42%) HOME ATS 5-3 5-3 3-4 4-4 4-4 4-3 1-7 3-5 29-33 (47%) ROAD ATS 1-6 4-4 5-3 5-3 2-6 2-6 6-2 1-5 26-35 (43%) vs DIVISION ATS 4-2 3-3 4-1 2-4 1-5 2-3 4-2 0-5 20-25 (44%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 6-6 7-5 7-4 6-6 4-8 4-7 5-7 2-8 41-51 (45%) as FAVORITE ATS 0-2 1-1 2-3 3-2 0-3 2-1 0-1 0-2 8-15 (35%) as UNDERDOG ATS 6-7 8-6 6-4 6-5 6-7 4-8 7-8 4-8 47-53 (47%) OVER-UNDER 11-5 6-10 7-9 7-9 9-7 11-5 10-5 8-8 69-58 (54%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * DETROIT is on a 0-9 ATS (-9.9 Units) skid vs. teams scoring 14 or less PPG The Average Score was DETROIT 20.7, OPPONENT 22.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/10 - ST LOUIS * DETROIT is 11-1 OVER the total (+9.9 Units) in non-conference games since 07. The Average Score was DETROIT 21.6, OPPONENT 31.6. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/7 - NY JETS, 11/11 - at Buffalo, 11/25 - NEW ENGLAND, 12/26 - at Miami * DETROIT is 2-12 ATS (-11.2 Units) as underdogs of 3.5 to 10 points since 07. The Average Score was DETROIT 15.3, OPPONENT 35. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/31 - WASHINGTON, 12/5 - CHICAGO * DETROIT is on a 3-14 ATS (-12.4 Units) skid vs. teams giving up 27 or more PPG The Average Score was DETROIT 17, OPPONENT 24.4. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/10 - ST LOUIS * DETROIT is on a 17-5 ATS (+11.5 Units) run on the road coming off a home loss by 10 or more points The Average Score was DETROIT 17.1, OPPONENT 21.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - at Minnesota, 11/11 - at Buffalo, 12/19 - at Tampa Bay LINE FINAL ATS 2009 Record: 2-14 (-10.6 ML Units), 4-10 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 8-8 DIVISION: NFC North COACH: Jim Schwartz, 2nd year STADIUM: Ford Field Scoring Differential: -14.5 (#31 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 7 (#31 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -13 (#31 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 20.94 (#14 of 32) 9/12/10 at Chicago * UNDERDOG is 9-12 SU but 14-6 ATS in CHI-DET series since 99 9/19/10 PHILADELPHIA * PHILADELPHIA is 5-0 SU & ATS in its L5 games vs. DETROIT 9/26/10 at Minnesota * L4 MIN-DET series games have gone UNDER the total 10/3/10 at Green Bay * HOME TEAM is 28-9 SU & 24-11 ATS in GB-DET series since 92 10/10/10 ST LOUIS * ST LOUIS is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. DETROIT 10/17/10 at NY Giants * ROAD TEAM is 6-0 SU & ATS in L6 NYG-DET matchups 10/31/10 WASHINGTON * UNDER the total is 6-0 in L6 games of DET-WAS series 11/7/10 NY JETS * ROAD TEAM is on 3-2 SU & 4-1 ATS run in DET-NYJ series 11/11/10 at Buffalo * HOME TEAM is 4-0 SU & 3-0 ATS in L4 BUF-DET games 11/21/10 at Dallas * OVER the total is 4-1 in L5 games of DAL-DET series 11/25/10 NEW ENGLAND * FAVORITE is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 DET-NE games at DETROIT 12/5/10 CHICAGO * CHICAGO is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games at DETROIT 12/12/10 GREEN BAY * GREEN BAY has won its L4 games at DETROIT, both SU & ATS 12/19/10 at Tampa Bay * DETROIT is 8-9 SU but 12-5 ATS vs. TAMPA BAY since 96 12/26/10 at Miami * MIAMI is 5-0 SU & 4-0 ATS in its L5 games vs. DETROIT 1/2/11 MINNESOTA * L3 games in DET-MIN series at DETROIT went UNDER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring -14.5 31 Yardage -93.1 30 Yards Per Play -1.49 31 Yards Per Point -5.54 30 Turnovers -19 32 Offensive Stats Points Scored 16.4 27 First Downs 17.6 22 Total Yards Per Game 299.0 26 Yards Per Play 4.61 29 Yards Per Point 18.23 27 Rushing Attempts 25.6 24 Rush Yards Per Game 101.0 24 Yards Per Rush 3.95 28 Rushing TD s 9 22 Passing Attempts Per Game 36.6 6 Completions Per Game 19.8 20 Completion Percentage 54.0% 28 Passing Yards Per Game 198.0 21 Passing Yards Per Attempt 5.42 29 Passing TD s 16 24 Sacks Allowed 43 24 Interceptions Thrown 32 32 Fumbles Lost 9 8 Total Turnovers Lost 41 32 Avg. Time of Possession 27:06 21 3rd Down Conversions 35.9% 24 4th Down Conversions 26.9% 32 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 30.9 32 First Downs 20.8 30 Total Yards Per Game 392.1 32 Yards Per Play 6.10 32 Yards Per Point 12.69 31 Rushing Attempts 28.6 22 Rush Yards Per Game 126.6 25 Yards Per Rush 4.42 21 Rushing TD s 18 26 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 34.1 21 Opponent Completions/Game 23.2 29 Opponent Completion % 68.1% 32 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 265.6 32 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.30 11 Passing TD s Allowed 19 10 Sacks Recorded 26 29 Interceptions 9 30 Fumbles Recovered 13 5 Total Turnovers Forced 22 25 3rd Down Conversions 40.5% 25 4th Down Conversions 66.7% 29 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 6.1 19 Penalty Yards/Game 48.0 15 Opponent Penalties/Game 7.1 2 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 59.0 3 Punt Return Average 8.3 16 Kick Return Average 21.4 26 Punt Attempts per game 4.6 15 Punt Net Average 38.1 24 Field Goals Made 21 22 Field Goal Percentage 75.0% 25 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 at Miami 21-49 L +9.5 L 35.5 O 9/7 ARIZONA 42-24 W -3.5 W 39 O 9/12 at Chicago 20-16 W +1 W 39 U 9/11 GREEN BAY 17-3 W -3 W 46 U 9/15 at Carolina 7-31 L +3 L 35.5 O 9/14 at Green Bay 6-31 L +7 L 45.5 U 9/19 HOUSTON 28-16 W -3 W 43 O 9/18 at Chicago 6-38 L -1 L 33 O 9/22 GREEN BAY 31-37 L +7.5 W 43.5 O 9/21 MINNESOTA 13-23 L +3.5 L 47.5 U 9/26 PHILADELPHIA 13-30 L +4.5 L 44 U 10/2 at Tampa Bay 13-17 L +6.5 W 34.5 U 9/29 NEW ORLEANS 26-21 W +9 W 44.5 O 9/28 at Denver 16-20 L +11.5 W 44 U 10/10 at Atlanta 17-10 W +6.5 W 41 U 10/9 BALTIMORE 35-17 W -1 W 32.5 O 10/13 at Minnesota 24-31 L +4 L 49 O 10/5 at San Francisco 17-24 L +7.5 W 42.5 U 10/17 GREEN BAY 10-38 L -3 L 45 O 10/16 CAROLINA 20-21 L +2.5 W 40 O 10/20 CHICAGO 23-20 W +3 W 44 U 10/19 DALLAS 7-38 L +3 L 39 O 10/24 at NY Giants 28-13 W +7 W 40 O 10/23 at Cleveland 13-10 W +3 W 35 U 10/27 at Buffalo 17-24 L +7 T 50.5 U 10/26 at Chicago 16-24 L +3 L 37 O 10/31 at Dallas 21-31 L +3 L 40 O 10/30 CHICAGO 13-19 L -3 L 32.5 U 11/3 DALLAS 9-7 W -3 L 37 U 11/2 OAKLAND 23-13 W +3.5 W 40 U 11/7 WASHINGTON 10-17 L -3.5 L 37 U 11/6 at Minnesota 14-27 L +2.5 L 38.5 O 11/10 at Green Bay 14-40 L +10.5 L 42 O 11/9 CHICAGO 12-10 W +0 W 37 U 11/14 at Jacksonville 17-23 L +3.5 L 34.5 O 11/13 ARIZONA 29-21 W -4.5 W 40 O 11/17 NY JETS 14-31 L +3 L 42.5 O 11/16 at Seattle 14-35 L +10.5 L 39.5 O 11/21 at Minnesota 19-22 L +8 W 48 U 11/20 at Dallas 7-20 L +8 L 39 U 11/24 at Chicago 17-20 L +5.5 W 37.5 U 11/23 at Minnesota 14-24 L +10.5 W 47.5 U 11/25 INDIANAPOLIS 9-41 L +8.5 L 54 U 11/24 ATLANTA 7-27 L +3 L 43.5 U 11/28 NEW ENGLAND 12-20 L +6 L 45.5 U 11/27 GREEN BAY 22-14 W +6.5 W 43.5 U 12/5 ARIZONA 26-12 W -6 W 37 O 12/4 MINNESOTA 16-21 L +2.5 L 39.5 U 12/8 at Arizona 20-23 L -1 L 39.5 O 12/7 SAN DIEGO 7-14 L -3 L 44 U 12/12 at Green Bay 13-16 L +9 W 41 U 12/11 at Green Bay 13-16 L +6.5 W 36.5 U 12/15 TAMPA BAY 20-23 L +9.5 W 37 O 12/14 at Kansas City 17-45 L +14.5 L 45 O 12/19 MINNESOTA 27-28 L +3 W 48.5 O 12/18 CINCINNATI 17-41 L +9.5 L 45 O 12/22 at Atlanta 15-36 L +10.5 L 44 O 12/21 at Carolina 14-20 L +7.5 W 37 U 12/26 CHICAGO 19-13 W -6 T 37 U 12/24 at New Orleans 13-12 W +3 W 40.5 U 12/29 MINNESOTA 36-38 L +3.5 W 47 O 12/28 ST LOUIS 30-20 W +12 W 45.5 O 1/2 at Tennessee 19-24 L -2.5 L 45.5 U 1/1 at Pittsburgh 21-35 L +16.5 W 36.5 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/10 SEATTLE 6-9 L +6 W 44 U 9/9 at Oakland 36-21 W +3 W 39.5 O 9/7 at Atlanta 21-34 L -3 L 41 O 9/13 at New Orleans 27-45 L +14 L 49.5O 9/17 at Chicago 7-34 L +7 L 32 O 9/16 MINNESOTA 20-17 W -3 T 43.5 U 9/14 GREEN BAY 25-48 L +3 L 46.5 O 9/20 MINNESOTA 13-27 L +10 L 45U 9/24 GREEN BAY 24-31 L -6 L 41 O 9/23 at Philadelphia 21-56 L +5 L 44.5 O 9/21 at San Francisco 13-31 L +4.5 L 47 U 9/27 WASHINGTON 19-14 W +6 W 39.5U 10/1 at St Louis 34-41 L +5.5 L 41.5 O 9/30 CHICAGO 37-27 W +2.5 W 46 O 10/5 CHICAGO 7-34 L +3 L 45.5 U 10/4 at Chicago 24-48 L +10 L 43O 10/8 at Minnesota 17-26 L +6 L 40.5 O 10/7 at Washington 3-34 L +3.5 L 44.5 U 10/12 at Minnesota 10-12 L +13 W 44.5 U 10/11 PITTSBURGH 20-28 L +11 W 44O 10/15 BUFFALO 20-17 W +2 W 40.5 U 10/21 TAMPA BAY 23-16 W -2.5 W 45 U 10/19 at Houston 21-28 L +11 W 48 O 10/18 at Green Bay 0-26 L +14 L 48.5U 10/22 at NY Jets 24-31 L +4 L 43.5 O 10/28 at Chicago 16-7 W +6 W 45.5 U 10/26 WASHINGTON 17-25 L +7 L 42 T 11/1 ST LOUIS 10-17 L -3 L 43.5U 11/5 ATLANTA 30-14 W +5 W 47.5 U 11/4 DENVER 44-7 W -3 W 47 O 11/2 at Chicago 23-27 L +13 W 43.5 O 11/8 at Seattle 20-32 L +11 L 41.5O 11/12 SAN FRANCISCO 13-19 L -6.5 L 46 U 11/11 at Arizona 21-31 L +2.5 L 45 O 11/9 JACKSONVILLE 14-38 L +6 L 43 O 11/15 at Minnesota 10-27 L +17 T 47.5U 11/19 at Arizona 10-17 L +2.5 L 45.5 U 11/18 NY GIANTS 10-16 L +2.5 L 48 U 11/16 at Carolina 22-31 L +14 W 40.5 O 11/22 CLEVELAND 38-37 W -3 L 37.5O 11/23 MIAMI 10-27 L +3 L 40.5 U 11/22 GREEN BAY 26-37 L +3 L 47 O 11/23 TAMPA BAY 20-38 L +8 L 42 O 11/26 GREEN BAY 12-34 L +11 L 48U 12/3 at New England 21-28 L +13 W 41 O 12/2 at Minnesota 10-42 L +5.5 L 44.5 O 11/27 TENNESSEE 10-47 L +10.5 L 44 O 12/6 at Cincinnati 13-23 L +13.5 W 42U 12/10 MINNESOTA 20-30 L -1 L 40.5 O 12/9 DALLAS 27-28 L +10.5 W 50 O 12/7 MINNESOTA 16-20 L +11 W 44 U 12/13 at Baltimore 3-48 L +14 L 40.5O 12/17 at Green Bay 9-17 L +6 L 46 U 12/16 at San Diego 14-51 L +9.5 L 45.5 O 12/14 at Indianapolis 21-31 L +16.5 W 45 O 12/20 ARIZONA 24-31 L +14 W 46.5O 12/24 CHICAGO 21-26 L +6 W 41.5 O 12/23 KANSAS CITY 25-20 W -6 L 43.5 O 12/21 NEW ORLEANS 7-42 L +6.5 L 50.5 U 12/27 at San Francisco 6-20 L +14 T 41U 12/31 at Dallas 39-31 W +14 W 45.5 O 12/30 at Green Bay 13-34 L +3 L 38.5 O 12/28 at Green Bay 21-31 L +11 W 41.5 O 1/3 CHICAGO 23-37 L +5 L 44O 32 WWW.STATFOX.COM

GREEN BAY PACKERS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 12 to 1 NFC Title: 4.5 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 20.5 (19th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 12-5 11-7 10-7 4-12 8-8 14-4 6-10 11-6 76-59 (56%) OVERALL ATS 8-9 11-7 7-9 5-9 8-8 13-4 7-8 11-5 70-59 (54%) PRESEASON ATS 3-1 2-3 2-1 2-2 1-3 2-2 2-2 3-1 17-15 (53%) HOME ATS 5-4 5-4 2-7 2-4 2-6 7-2 3-5 5-2 31-34 (48%) ROAD ATS 3-5 6-3 5-2 3-5 6-2 6-2 4-3 6-3 39-25 (61%) vs DIVISION ATS 3-3 4-2 3-4 0-5 4-2 4-2 5-1 4-2 27-21 (56%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 5-8 8-6 7-6 4-6 7-5 9-4 6-6 8-4 54-45 (55%) as FAVORITE ATS 5-8 8-6 3-7 1-3 2-2 7-3 4-5 8-4 38-38 (50%) as UNDERDOG ATS 3-1 3-1 4-2 4-6 6-6 5-1 3-2 3-1 31-20 (61%) OVER-UNDER 9-8 10-8 11-6 6-10 6-8 13-4 9-6 9-8 73-58 (56%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * GREEN BAY is on a 12-1 ATS (+10.9 Units) run at home vs. good teams - outscoring opponents by 6+ PPG The Average Score was GREEN BAY 25.2, OPPONENT 14.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/24 - MINNESOTA * GREEN BAY is on a 10-1 OVER the total (+8.9 Units) run at home vs. good passing defenses - allowing 5.7 or less PYA The Average Score was GREEN BAY 31.1, OPPONENT 13.5. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - BUFFALO * GREEN BAY is 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) vs. poor passing defenses - allowing 235 or more PYPG since 07. The Average Score was GREEN BAY 31.6, OPPONENT 15.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/3 - DETROIT, 11/28 - at Atlanta, 12/12 - at Detroit * GREEN BAY is 31-17 ATS (+12.3 Units) in all games since 07. The Average Score was GREEN BAY 27.9, OPPONENT 20.8. Potential Spots for 2010: ALL GAMES * GREEN BAY is 47-27 ATS (+17.3 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 35 or more points since 92. The Average Score was GREEN BAY 22.9, OPPONENT 19.2. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/27 - at Chicago WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM LINE FINAL ATS 33 2009 Record: 11-6 (-1.8 ML Units), 11-5 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 9-8 DIVISION: NFC North COACH: Mike McCarthy, 5th year STADIUM: Lambeau Field Scoring Differential: +9.3 (#3 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 29 (#3 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +7.3 (#5 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 17.71 (#31 of 32) 9/12/10 at Philadelphia * UNDER the total is 6-1 in L7 games of PHI-GB series 9/19/10 BUFFALO * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in GB-BUF series 9/27/10 at Chicago * GREEN BAY is 8-3 SU & 9-2 ATS at CHICAGO since 99 10/3/10 DETROIT * HOME TEAM is 28-9 SU & 24-11 ATS in GB-DET series since 92 10/10/10 at Washington * GREEN BAY is 4-0 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L4 games vs. WASHINGTON 10/17/10 MIAMI * L3 games in GB-MIA series at GREEN BAY went UNDER the total 10/24/10 MINNESOTA * UNDERDOG is 11-10 SU & 17-4 ATS in GB-MIN series since 99 10/31/10 at NY Jets * NY JETS has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. GREEN BAY 11/7/10 DALLAS * HOME TEAM is 10-1 SU & ATS in GB-DAL series since 94 11/21/10 at Minnesota * UNDERDOG is 9-8 SU & 13-4 ATS in MIN-GB series at MINNESOTA since 92 11/28/10 at Atlanta * ROAD TEAM is 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 ATL-GB matchups 12/5/10 SAN FRANCISCO * GREEN BAY is 12-1 SU & 9-2 ATS vs. SAN FRANCISCO since 95 12/12/10 at Detroit * GREEN BAY has won its L4 games at DETROIT, both SU & ATS 12/19/10 at New England * ROAD TEAM is 3-2 SU & 4-0 ATS in L5 NE-GB matchups 12/26/10 NY GIANTS * ROAD TEAM is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in GB-NYG series 1/2/11 CHICAGO * FAVORITE is on 7-2 SU & 6-2 ATS run in L9 GB-CHI matchups at GREEN BAY 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +9.3 3 Yardage +86.9 1 Yards Per Play +0.86 4 Yards Per Point +1.63 12 Turnovers +24 1 Offensive Stats Points Scored 28.8 3 First Downs 20.9 6 Total Yards Per Game 385.8 3 Yards Per Play 5.92 3 Yards Per Point 12.95 4 Rushing Attempts 27.4 15 Rush Yards Per Game 117.8 14 Yards Per Rush 4.30 13 Rushing TD s 20 5 Passing Attempts Per Game 34.6 10 Completions Per Game 22.3 8 Completion Percentage 64.6% 9 Passing Yards Per Game 261.3 7 Passing Yards Per Attempt 7.56 6 Passing TD s 30 4 Sacks Allowed 51 32 Interceptions Thrown 8 2 Fumbles Lost 8 5 Total Turnovers Lost 16 1 Avg. Time of Possession 30:19 7 3rd Down Conversions 47.0% 3 4th Down Conversions 33.3% 30 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 18.6 7 First Downs 17.0 3 Total Yards Per Game 298.9 3 Yards Per Play 5.06 9 Yards Per Point 14.58 25 Rushing Attempts 23.2 3 Rush Yards Per Game 83.3 1 Yards Per Rush 3.59 2 Rushing TD s 5 1 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 33.8 20 Opponent Completions/Game 18.4 4 Opponent Completion % 54.4% 2 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 201.1 5 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.31 12 Passing TD s Allowed 22 14 Sacks Recorded 37 11 Interceptions 30 1 Fumbles Recovered 10 16 Total Turnovers Forced 40 1 3rd Down Conversions 36.0% 9 4th Down Conversions 40.0% 4 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 7.4 32 Penalty Yards/Game 66.1 31 Opponent Penalties/Game 6.7 6 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 57.1 5 Punt Return Average 6.9 23 Kick Return Average 22.1 19 Punt Attempts per game 4.1 7 Punt Net Average 37.7 28 Field Goals Made 27 6 Field Goal Percentage 75.0% 25 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 ATLANTA 37-34 W -7.5 L 42.5 O 9/7 MINNESOTA 25-30 L -4 L 47 O 9/13 at Carolina 24-14 W +3.5 W 43 U 9/11 at Detroit 3-17 L +3 L 46 U 9/15 at New Orleans 20-35 L -1.5 L 46 O 9/14 DETROIT 31-6 W -7 W 45.5 U 9/19 CHICAGO 10-21 L -8.5 L 40 U 9/18 CLEVELAND 24-26 L -6 L 41 O 9/22 at Detroit 37-31 W -7.5 L 43.5 O 9/21 at Arizona 13-20 L -7 L 42 U 9/26 at Indianapolis 31-45 L +6 L 50 O 9/25 TAMPA BAY 16-17 L +3.5 W 37 U 9/29 CAROLINA 17-14 W -6.5 L 41.5 U 9/29 at Chicago 38-23 W -4 W 41 O 10/3 NY GIANTS 7-14 L -6 L 45 U 10/3 at Carolina 29-32 L +7 W 43.5 O 10/7 at Chicago 34-21 W +1 W 44.5 O 10/5 SEATTLE 35-13 W -1 W 44.5 O 10/11 TENNESSEE 27-48 L -3 L 44.5 O 10/13 at New England 28-10 W +6 W 48.5 U 10/12 KANSAS CITY 34-40 L -2.5 L 47 O 10/9 NEW ORLEANS 52-3 W -3 W 43 O 10/17 at Detroit 38-10 W +3 W 45 O 10/20 WASHINGTON 30-9 W -7 W 48 U 10/19 at St Louis 24-34 L +4.5 L 48 O 10/23 at Minnesota 20-23 L +2 L 46 U 11/2 at Minnesota 30-27 W +5 W 48.5 O 10/24 DALLAS 41-20 W -4 W 44 O 10/30 at Cincinnati 14-21 L +9 W 45.5 U 11/4 MIAMI 24-10 W -4 W 41 U 11/10 PHILADELPHIA 14-17 L -4.5 L 43 U 10/31 at Washington 28-14 W -1 W 40.5 O 11/6 PITTSBURGH 10-20 L +3 L 38.5 U 11/10 DETROIT 40-14 W -10.5 W 42 O 11/16 at Tampa Bay 20-13 W +4 W 41 U 11/14 MINNESOTA 34-31 W -4.5 L 50 O 11/13 at Atlanta 33-25 W +8.5 W 42.5 O 11/17 at Minnesota 21-31 L -6 L 50.5 O 11/23 SAN FRANCISCO 20-10 W -3.5 W 40 U 11/21 at Houston 16-13 W -3 T 50.5 U 11/21 MINNESOTA 17-20 L -6 L 43.5 U 11/24 at Tampa Bay 7-21 L +3 L 39 U 11/27 at Detroit 14-22 L -6.5 L 43.5 U 11/29 ST LOUIS 45-17 W -7 W 51 O 12/1 CHICAGO 30-20 W -9.5 W 37.5 O 12/7 CHICAGO 34-21 W -7 W 39 O 12/5 at Philadelphia 17-47 L +5.5 L 48.5 O 11/27 at Philadelphia 14-19 L +4 L 41.5 U 12/8 MINNESOTA 26-22 W -9.5 L 43.5 O 12/14 at San Diego 38-21 W -5 W 45.5 O 12/12 DETROIT 16-13 W -9 L 41 U 12/4 at Chicago 7-19 L +6 L 31 U 12/15 at San Francisco 20-14 W +3 W 42.5 U 12/22 at Oakland 41-7 W -5.5 W 43 O 12/19 JACKSONVILLE 25-28 L -3.5 L 37 O 12/11 DETROIT 16-13 W -6.5 L 36.5 U 12/22 BUFFALO 10-0 W -6.5 W 43.5 U 12/28 DENVER 31-3 W -10 W 41.5 U 12/24 at Minnesota 34-31 W +3.5 W 56 O 12/19 at Baltimore 3-48 L +3.5 L 34 O 12/29 at NY Jets 17-42 L -1 L 40 O 1/4 (PL) SEATTLE 33-27 W -7 L 43.5 O 1/2 at Chicago 31-14 W +3 W 34 O 12/25 CHICAGO 17-24 L +7 T 33.5 O 1/4 (PL) ATLANTA 7-27 L -6.5 L 41 U 1/11 (PL) at Philadelphia 17-20 L +4 W 43 U 1/9 (PL) MINNESOTA 17-31 L -6 L 52.5 U 1/1 SEATTLE 23-17 W -6 T 41 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 CHICAGO 0-26 L +3.5 L 34.5 U 9/17 NEW ORLEANS 27-34 L +1 L 40 O 9/24 at Detroit 31-24 W +6 W 41 O 10/2 at Philadelphia 9-31 L +11.5 L 49.5 U 10/8 ST LOUIS 20-23 L +2 L 46 U 10/22 at Miami 34-24 W +6 W 40 O 10/29 ARIZONA 31-14 W -4 W 45 T 11/5 at Buffalo 10-24 L +3.5 L 41.5 U 11/12 at Minnesota 23-17 W +5 W 40 T 11/19 NEW ENGLAND 0-35 L +5.5 L 46 U 11/27 at Seattle 24-34 L +10.5 W 42 O 12/3 NY JETS 10-38 L -1 L 39 O 12/10 at San Francisco 30-19 W +4 W 44.5 O 12/17 DETROIT 17-9 W -6 W 46 U 12/21 MINNESOTA 9-7 W -4 L 37 U 12/31 at Chicago 26-7 W +3 W 38 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 PHILADELPHIA 16-13 W +3 W 41.5 U 9/16 at Ny Giants 35-13 W +3 W 39.5 O 9/23 SAN DIEGO 31-24 W +5.5 W 42.5 O 9/30 at Minnesota 23-16 W +0 W 38 O 10/7 CHICAGO 20-27 L -3 L 40.5 O 10/14 WASHINGTON 17-14 W -3 T 40.5 U 10/29 at Denver 19-13 W +3 W 43.5 U 11/4 at Kansas City 33-22 W +2.5 W 37.5 O 11/11 MINNESOTA 34-0 W -5.5 W 40.5 U 11/18 CAROLINA 31-17 W -10 W 37 O 11/22 at Detroit 37-26 W -3 W 47 O 11/29 at Dallas 27-37 L +7 L 51.5 O 12/9 OAKLAND 38-7 W -10 W 40 O 12/16 at St Louis 33-14 W -7 W 47 T 12/23 at Chicago 7-35 L -7.5 L 31.5 O 12/30 DETROIT 34-13 W -3 W 38.5 O 1/12 (PL) SEATTLE 42-20 W -7.5 W 43.5 O 1/20 (PL) NY GIANTS 20-23 L -7.5 L 41 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/8 MINNESOTA 24-19 W -2 W 37 O 9/14 at Detroit 48-25 W -3 W 46.5 O 9/21 DALLAS 16-27 L +3 L 50.5 U 9/28 at Tampa Bay 21-30 L +2 L 43 O 10/5 ATLANTA 24-27 L -5.5 L 42.5 O 10/12 at Seattle 27-17 W -1 W 44 T 10/19 INDIANAPOLIS 34-14 W +2.5 W 46.5 O 11/2 at Tennessee 16-19 L +3 T 41 U 11/9 at Minnesota 27-28 L +2 W 44.5 O 11/16 CHICAGO 37-3 W -3.5 W 43 U 11/24 at New Orleans 29-51 L +0 L 51.5 O 11/30 CAROLINA 31-35 L -3 L 41.5 O 12/7 HOUSTON 21-24 L -7 L 47.5 U 12/14 at Jacksonville 16-20 L -3 L 45.5 U 12/22 at Chicago 17-20 L +4 W 41 U 12/28 DETROIT 31-21 W -11 L 41.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/13 CHICAGO 21-15 W -5 W 46.5U 9/20 CINCINNATI 24-31 L -9 L 41.5O 9/27 at St Louis 36-17 W -6.5 W 42.5O 10/5 at Minnesota 23-30 L +4.5 L 46.5O 10/18 DETROIT 26-0 W -14 W 48.5U 10/25 at Cleveland 31-3 W -8.5 W 41.5U 11/1 MINNESOTA 26-38 L -3 L 46.5O 11/8 at Tampa Bay 28-38 L -9.5 L 43O 11/15 DALLAS 17-7 W +3 W 48U 11/22 SAN FRANCISCO 30-24 W -6 T 41.5O 11/26 at Detroit 34-12 W -11 W 48U 12/7 BALTIMORE 27-14 W -4 W 43U 12/13 at Chicago 21-14 W -3.5 W 42U 12/20 at Pittsburgh 36-37 L +3 W 42O 12/27 SEATTLE 48-10 W -13 W 43.5O 1/3 at Arizona 33-7 W +3 W 42U 1/10 (PL) at Arizona 45-51 L -3 L 48.5O

MINNESOTA VIKINGS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 15 to 1 NFC Title: 7 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 20.63 (18th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 6-10 9-7 9-9 9-7 6-10 8-8 10-7 13-5 70-63 (53%) OVERALL ATS 8-8 8-8 8-10 9-7 7-9 7-7 6-11 11-6 64-66 (49%) PRESEASON ATS 2-2 1-3 3-1 2-2 3-1 2-2 2-2 3-1 18-14 (56%) HOME ATS 4-4 5-3 3-5 6-2 3-5 4-4 3-6 6-2 34-31 (52%) ROAD ATS 4-4 3-5 5-5 3-5 4-4 3-3 3-5 5-4 30-35 (46%) vs DIVISION ATS 5-1 3-3 2-5 5-1 4-2 2-3 1-5 4-1 26-21 (55%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 6-6 6-6 4-10 8-4 7-5 5-6 4-9 9-4 49-50 (49%) as FAVORITE ATS 2-3 4-7 5-8 7-1 2-4 4-3 3-5 9-5 36-36 (50%) as UNDERDOG ATS 6-5 4-1 3-2 2-6 5-5 3-2 3-5 2-1 28-27 (51%) OVER-UNDER 11-5 8-7 8-10 5-11 7-7 9-7 9-8 9-9 66-64 (51%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * MINNESOTA is on a 5-19 ATS (-15.9 Units) skid vs. poor passing teams averaging 5.7 or less PYA The Average Score was MINNESOTA 22.3, OPPONENT 21.4. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - DETROIT, 1/2 - at Detroit * MINNESOTA is on a 21-6 OVER the total (+14.4 Units) run on the road vs. good teams - outscoring opponents by 6+ PPG The Average Score was MINNESOTA 23.4, OPPONENT 30.6. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/9 - at New Orleans, 10/24 - at Green Bay, 10/31 - at New England * MINNESOTA is on a 7-21 ATS (-16.1 Units) skid on the road vs. teams scoring 17 or less PPG The Average Score was MINNESOTA 20.9, OPPONENT 22.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/28 - at Washington, 1/2 - at Detroit * MINNESOTA is on a 13-3 UNDER the total (+9.7 Units) run at home in the first two weeks of the season The Average Score was MINNESOTA 20.4, OPPONENT 15.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - MIAMI * MINNESOTA is on a 31-16 ATS (+13.4 Units) run vs. excellent ball control teams, 32 or more TOP minutes/game The Average Score was MINNESOTA 25.4, OPPONENT 20.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - MIAMI, 10/17 - DALLAS, 10/24 - at Green Bay, 10/31 - at New England, 11/21 - GREEN BAY LINE FINAL ATS 2009 Record: 13-5 (+2 ML Units), 11-6 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 9-9 DIVISION: NFC North COACH: Brad Childress, 5th year STADIUM: Metrodome Scoring Differential: +9.9 (#2 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 29 (#3 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +9.4 (#2 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 18.78 (#28 of 32) 9/9/10 at New Orleans * NO-MIN series has gone 9-1 OVER the total since 94 9/19/10 MIAMI * HOME TEAM has swept L3 MIN-MIA games, both SU & ATS 9/26/10 DETROIT * L4 MIN-DET series games have gone UNDER the total 10/11/10 at NY Jets * NY JETS are on 4-game SU & ATS winning streak vs. MINNESOTA 10/17/10 DALLAS * FAVORITE is 8-0 SU & ATS in L8 MIN-DAL matchups 10/24/10 at Green Bay * UNDERDOG is 11-10 SU & 17-4 ATS in GB-MIN series since 99 10/31/10 at New England * L4 NE-MIN series games have gone UNDER the total 11/7/10 ARIZONA * UNDERDOG is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 MIN-ARZ games 11/14/10 at Chicago * HOME TEAM is on 13-2 SU & 12-3 ATS run in CHI-MIN series 11/21/10 GREEN BAY * UNDERDOG is 9-8 SU & 13-4 ATS in MIN-GB series at MINNESOTA since 92 11/28/10 at Washington * UNDERDOG is 4-3 SU & 6-1 ATS in L7 WAS-MIN matchups 12/5/10 BUFFALO * BUFFALO is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. MINNESOTA 12/12/10 NY GIANTS * ROAD TEAM is on 5-2 SU & 6-1 ATS run in MIN-NYG series 12/20/10 CHICAGO * MINNESOTA is on 7-1 SU & 6-2 ATS run in its L8 home games vs. CHICAGO 12/26/10 at Philadelphia * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & ATS in L6 PHI-MIN matchups 1/2/11 at Detroit * L3 games in DET-MIN series at DETROIT went UNDER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +9.9 2 Yardage +74.1 3 Yards Per Play +0.56 10 Yards Per Point +2.76 7 Turnovers +6 8 Offensive Stats Points Scored 29.4 2 First Downs 21.4 3 Total Yards Per Game 379.6 6 Yards Per Play 5.76 10 Yards Per Point 12.91 3 Rushing Attempts 29.2 9 Rush Yards Per Game 119.9 13 Yards Per Rush 4.11 22 Rushing TD s 19 6 Passing Attempts Per Game 34.6 11 Completions Per Game 23.6 6 Completion Percentage 68.2% 2 Passing Yards Per Game 259.8 8 Passing Yards Per Attempt 7.52 7 Passing TD s 34 1 Sacks Allowed 34 15 Interceptions Thrown 7 1 Fumbles Lost 11 18 Total Turnovers Lost 18 3 Avg. Time of Possession 32:44 2 3rd Down Conversions 44.8% 5 4th Down Conversions 66.7% 5 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 19.5 10 First Downs 16.9 2 Total Yards Per Game 305.5 6 Yards Per Play 5.20 13 Yards Per Point 15.67 15 Rushing Attempts 22.3 1 Rush Yards Per Game 87.1 2 Yards Per Rush 3.90 6 Rushing TD s 5 1 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 33.4 18 Opponent Completions/Game 21.3 21 Opponent Completion % 63.7% 25 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 218.4 19 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.53 18 Passing TD s Allowed 26 23 Sacks Recorded 48 1 Interceptions 11 26 Fumbles Recovered 13 5 Total Turnovers Forced 24 21 3rd Down Conversions 34.5% 3 4th Down Conversions 41.7% 7 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 6.3 24 Penalty Yards/Game 47.3 13 Opponent Penalties/Game 6.8 5 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 56.4 7 Punt Return Average 9.5 11 Kick Return Average 23.2 13 Punt Attempts per game 4.6 13 Punt Net Average 40.3 12 Field Goals Made 26 10 Field Goal Percentage 92.9% 2 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 at Chicago 23-27 L +4.5 W 40.5 O 9/7 at Green Bay 30-25 W +4 W 47 O 9/12 DALLAS 35-17 W -6.5 W 43.5 O 9/11 TAMPA BAY 13-24 L -5.5 L 43 U 9/15 BUFFALO 39-45 L -3.5 L 49.5 O 9/14 CHICAGO 24-13 W -10 W 44 U 9/20 at Philadelphia 16-27 L +3 L 50.5 U 9/18 at Cincinnati 8-37 L +3.5 L 47.5 U 9/22 CAROLINA 14-21 L -6.5 L 44.5 U 9/21 at Detroit 23-13 W -3.5 W 47.5 U 9/26 CHICAGO 27-22 W -12 L 45 O 9/25 NEW ORLEANS 33-16 W -4 W 44.5 O 9/29 at Seattle 23-48 L +3 L 44 O 9/28 SAN FRANCISCO 35-7 W +0 W 43 U 10/10 at Houston 34-28 W -3.5 W 50 O 10/17 at New Orleans 38-31 W -3.5 W 53 O 10/2 at Atlanta 10-30 L +6.5 L 44.5 U 10/13 DETROIT 31-24 W -4 W 49 O 10/5 at Atlanta 39-26 W -4.5 W 43.5 O 10/24 TENNESSEE 20-3 W -6 W 53 U 10/16 at Chicago 3-28 L +3 L 37 U 10/20 at NY Jets 7-20 L +3 L 49 U 10/19 DENVER 28-20 W -4 W 44 O 10/31 NY GIANTS 13-34 L -6.5 L 48.5 U 10/23 GREEN BAY 23-20 W -2 W 46 U 10/27 CHICAGO 25-7 W -2.5 W 46 U 10/26 NY GIANTS 17-29 L -5.5 L 44.5 O 11/8 at Indianapolis 28-31 L +7.5 W 57.5 O 10/30 at Carolina 13-38 L +7 L 46 O 11/3 at Tampa Bay 24-38 L +7.5 L 37 O 11/2 GREEN BAY 27-30 L -5 L 48.5 O 11/14 at Green Bay 31-34 L +4.5 W 50 O 11/6 DETROIT 27-14 W -2.5 W 38.5 O 11/10 NY GIANTS 20-27 L +1.5 L 45 O 11/9 at San Diego 28-42 L -5.5 L 45 O 11/21 DETROIT 22-19 W -8 L 48 U 11/13 at NY Giants 24-21 W +8.5 W 46 U 11/17 GREEN BAY 31-21 W +6 W 50.5 O 11/16 at Oakland 18-28 L -4.5 L 46 T 11/28 JACKSONVILLE 27-16 W -6 W 45.5 U 11/21 at Green Bay 20-17 W +6 W 43.5 U 11/24 at New England 17-24 L +8 W 47 U 11/23 DETROIT 24-14 W -10.5 L 47.5 U 12/5 at Chicago 14-24 L -7 L 40.5 U 11/27 CLEVELAND 24-12 W -4 W 38 U 12/1 ATLANTA 24-30 L +3.5 L 47.5 O 11/30 at St Louis 17-48 L +6 L 51.5 O 12/12 SEATTLE 23-27 L -6.5 L 54 U 12/4 at Detroit 21-16 W -2.5 W 39.5 U 12/19 at Detroit 28-27 W -3 L 48.5 O 12/8 at Green Bay 22-26 L +9.5 W 43.5 O 12/7 SEATTLE 34-7 W +1 W 52.5 U 12/24 GREEN BAY 31-34 L -3.5 L 56 O 12/11 ST LOUIS 27-13 W -7 W 45.5 U 12/15 at New Orleans 32-31 W +7 W 51 O 12/14 at Chicago 10-13 L -3 L 39.5 U 1/2 at Washington 18-21 L -4 L 41 U 12/18 PITTSBURGH 3-18 L +4.5 L 40 U 12/21 MIAMI 20-17 W +3 W 44.5 U 12/20 KANSAS CITY 45-20 W +3 W 55 O 1/9 (PL) at Green Bay 31-17 W +6 W 52.5 U 12/25 at Baltimore 23-30 L +3.5 L 36 O 12/29 at Detroit 38-36 W -3.5 L 47 O 12/28 at Arizona 17-18 L -8 L 45.5 U 1/16 (PL) at Philadelphia 14-27 L +8 L 47 U 1/1 CHICAGO 34-10 W -5.5 W 35 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/11 at Washington 19-16 W +4.5 W 36 U 9/9 ATLANTA 24-3 W -3 W 34.5 U 9/8 at Green Bay 19-24 L +2 L 37 O 9/13 at Cleveland 34-20 W -4 W 39O 9/17 CAROLINA 16-13 W -2.5 W 37 U 9/16 at Detroit 17-20 L +3 T 43.5 U 9/14 INDIANAPOLIS 15-18 L +0 L 43.5 U 9/20 at Detroit 27-13 W -10 W 45U 9/24 CHICAGO 16-19 L +3.5 W 35 T 9/23 at Kansas City 10-13 L +3 T 34.5 U 9/21 CAROLINA 20-10 W -3 W 37.5 U 9/27 SAN FRANCISCO 27-24 W -6.5 L 39O 10/1 at Buffalo 12-17 L +2 L 34.5 U 9/30 GREEN BAY 16-23 L +0 L 38 O 9/28 at Tennessee 17-30 L +3 L 34.5 O 10/5 GREEN BAY 30-23 W -4.5 W 46.5O 10/8 DETROIT 26-17 W -6 W 40.5 O 10/14 at Chicago 34-31 W +5 W 35.5 O 10/6 at New Orleans 30-27 W +3 W 46.5 O 10/11 at St Louis 38-10 W -10 W 40.5O 10/22 at Seattle 31-13 W +6.5 W 40.5 O 10/21 at Dallas 14-24 L +9.5 L 45.5 U 10/12 DETROIT 12-10 W -13 L 44.5 U 10/18 BALTIMORE 33-31 W -3 L 45.5O 10/30 NEW ENGLAND 7-31 L +1 L 39 U 10/28 PHILADELPHIA 16-23 L +0 L 37.5 O 10/19 at Chicago 41-48 L +3 L 38 O 10/25 at Pittsburgh 17-27 L +6 L 46.5U 11/1 at Green Bay 38-26 W +3 W 46.5O 11/5 at San Francisco 3-9 L -4 L 42.5 U 11/4 SAN DIEGO 35-17 W +7 W 42 O 11/2 HOUSTON 28-21 W -5.5 W 46.5 O 11/15 DETROIT 27-10 W -17 T 47.5U 11/12 GREEN BAY 17-23 L -5 L 40 T 11/11 at Green Bay 0-34 L +5.5 L 40.5 U 11/9 GREEN BAY 28-27 W -2 L 44.5 O 11/22 SEATTLE 35-9 W -10.5 W 47U 11/16 at Tampa Bay 13-19 L +5.5 L 39 U 11/19 at Miami 20-24 L +3 L 34 O 11/18 OAKLAND 29-22 W -4.5 W 35.5 O 11/29 CHICAGO 36-10 W -10 W 47U 11/23 at Jacksonville 30-12 W +2 W 41.5 O 11/26 ARIZONA 31-26 W -7 L 38.5 O 11/25 at Ny Giants 41-17 W +7 W 40 O 12/6 at Arizona 17-30 L -3 L 48U 11/30 CHICAGO 34-14 W -5.5 W 42 O 12/3 at Chicago 13-23 L +8.5 L 34 O 12/2 DETROIT 42-10 W -5.5 W 44.5 O 12/13 CINCINNATI 30-10 W -6 W 42U 12/7 at Detroit 20-16 W -11 L 44 U 12/20 at Carolina 7-26 L -8.5 L 42.5U 12/10 at Detroit 30-20 W +1 W 40.5 O 12/9 at San Francisco 27-7 W -7.5 W 39 U 12/14 at Arizona 35-14 W +4.5 W 46.5 O 12/28 at Chicago 30-36 L -8 L 40.5O 12/17 NY JETS 13-26 L -3.5 L 41 U 12/17 CHICAGO 20-13 W -10.5 L 43.5 U 12/21 ATLANTA 17-24 L -3 L 43 U 1/3 NY GIANTS 44-7 W -8 W 47.5O 12/21 at Green Bay 7-9 L +4 W 37 U 12/23 WASHINGTON 21-32 L -6 L 40.5 O 12/28 NY GIANTS 20-19 W -7 L 41 U 1/17 (PL) DALLAS 34-3 W -3 W 45U 12/31 ST LOUIS 21-41 L +1.5 L 43.5 O 12/30 at Denver 19-22 L -2.5 L 40.5 O 1/4 (PL) PHILADELPHIA 14-26 L +3 L 40.5 U 1/24 (PL) at New Orleans 28-31 L +4 W 53.5O 34 WWW.STATFOX.COM

NFC south Preview Super Bowl Champions usually have a considerable amount of turnover. And New Orleans is no different. Key contributors on both side of the field are now off the roster. However, the general consensus is that as long as quarterback Drew Brees and head coach Sean Payton are around, the Saints shouldn t miss a beat, at least offensively. That unit scored 31.9 PPG last season, most in the NFL. Besides personnel issues and now playing the role of the hunted team, the other thing that could affect the Saints chances of repeating is the history of the NFC South Division, which has been unusual to say the least. No team has ever won back-to-back titles in eight-years, and it s actually more common to go from first to last in a year s time, and vice versa. That gives hope to Atlanta, Carolina, and Tampa Bay as we look towards 2010. In Atlanta, a 2-6 skid in the midst of the playoff run left the Falcons on the outside looking in. They lost two one-score games to New Orleans and were just 3-3 in division play for the second straight season. They ll need to improve on that in order to overtake the Saints. Carolina has plenty of reason for optimism after closing 2009 with three straight wins behind QB Matt Moore, who figures to be the starter now that Jake Delhomme is gone, assuming he holds off Jimmy Clausen (2-Notre Dame). The Panthers will be without DE Julius Peppers, but under John Fox, Carolina has had a habit of bouncing back quickly from down seasons. Speaking of which, things were expectedly ugly for Tampa Bay in 2009, though the growth of potential future franchise QB Josh Freeman was encouraging. He will have some new weapons besides TE Kellen Winslow to work with, most notably receivers Reggie Brown (Eagles), Arrelious Benn (2b-Illinois) and Mike Williams (4-Syracuse). On defense, the Bucs added tackle Gerald McCoy (1-Oklahoma) to a unit that was the worst in the NFL, allowing 158.2 rushing YPG. ATLANTA FALCONS Mike Smith has only roamed the Atlanta sidelines for two seasons, but he s already fast-tracking his way to expectations rarely seen around the franchise. Despite missing out on the postseason, Smith guided the Falcons to their first-ever run of consecutive winning seasons even though a rash of injuries wiped out full campaigns from his top two offensive weapons QB Matt Ryan and RB Michael Turner and ravaged the line in front of them Battling a toe injury Ryan threw more touchdowns in his second season (22-to-16) in two fewer games, but he also tossed three more interceptions (14-to-11) and saw his completion percentage drop almost three points and dip below 60%. Odds are most of the slight drops will be fixed simply by Turner stepping back into the huddle. The offense averaged 25.3 points in eight games with a healthy Turner and 20.1 in eight without. Ryan has no shortage of weapons, led by Turner and WR Roddy White, in the midst of an impressive stretch of three straight seasons with at least 83 catches and 1,153 yards. Of course, Atlanta s ground attack has already proven to be deep and productive, with Jerious Norwood and Jason Snelling filling in admirably for Turner. For 2010, depth along the offensive line was boosted by the arrival of two new draft picks The pass defense was a major Achilles heel, allowing an average of 241.9 YPG (28th), so Atlanta hopes the signing of Dunta Robinson (Texans), a ballhawking cornerback, bolsters the biggest area of need. The addition of LB Sean Weatherspoon (1-Missouri) gives coordinator Brian VanGorder an instant upgrade Atlanta s offense is still growing but despite its youth, and the core has gained valuable experience the last two seasons. Turner s return should lessen the pressure on Ryan and increase scoring. If Smith s fixes on the defense take hold, the Falcons will have no trouble returning to the playoffs. CAROLINA PANTHERS Despite winning their last three games in dominant fashion, the Panthers watched last season s playoffs from home after salvaging a disappointing 8-8 campaign. Head coach John Fox is back and faced with the challenges of fixing an unbalanced offense and keeping the defense competitive in the wake of Julius Peppers departure. Fox has the league s most inexperienced group of QB s following the release of Jake Delhomme, who threw 18 interceptions in 2009. With only eight pro starts under his belt, Matt Moore brings confidence after winning four of five starts a year ago. Pushing him for a starting spot will be Jimmy Claussen (2- Notre Dame). With a dynamic duo of DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart in the backfield, it s no surprise the Panthers had more rushing touchdowns (18) than passing scores (16) and ranked third in the league in rushing offense. If Fox gets the air attack up to speed, the sky is the limit. The receiver corps is of course led by Steve Smith, but he can use help. Up front, tackles Jordan Gross and Jeff Otah set the tone and their health is vital to the unit s success Most fans are salty to see Peppers go, and he leaves a void in the defense, no doubt. The jury is out whether or not the returnees can 2009 STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P New Orleans 16-3-0 0.842 617 400 9-3-0 8-2-0 8-1-0 10-9-0 52.6% 9-10-0 Atlanta 9-7-0 0.562 363 325 6-6-0 6-2-0 3-5-0 11-5-0 68.7% 7-9-0 Carolina 8-8-0 0.500 315 308 8-4-0 5-3-0 3-5-0 9-7-0 56.2% 6-10-0 Tampa Bay 3-13-0 0.187 244 400 3-9-0 1-6-0 2-7-0 6-10-0 37.5% 6-10-0 consistently pressure the quarterback. The starting tackle spots are completely up for grabs, but that could be a positive considering opposing rushers averaged 4.4 YPR. In the middle, Jon Beason is among the best in the business, and while Chris Gamble, Richard Marshall, and Sherrod Martin form perhaps the division s best secondary The Panthers success in 2010 hinges on QB play since the backfield provides more than its share of offensive fuel. The defense, minus Peppers, will need a few players to pick up where they left off late last season in order for Carolina to challenge for division supremacy. NEW ORLEANS SAINTS While not at the typical post-championship level, New Orleans did experience some of the roster raid that comes with being at the top of the profession. Some key contributors, including RB Mike Bell and LB Scott Fujita, skipped town while others were still tied up in free agency, but the fact the Saints return somewhat intact makes another deep playoff run a strong possibility Coming off four consecutive seasons with at least 4,368 yards passing, few quarterbacks have the leeway of Drew Brees in Payton s aggressive West Coast offense. Brees is the total package under center, falling just shy of an NFL record for completion percentage (70.6), and he is surrounded by a diverse group of pass catchers. Seven different players grabbed at least 39 throws and all return to the huddle, led by Marques Colston (70 catches, 1,074 yards, nine scores). The loss of Bell, the shortyardage runner among the three-headed backfield attack, shouldn t impact much. Pierre Thomas ran for a team-high 793 yards and six scores and looked the part of a lead back during the playoff run. He still gives way to Reggie Bush in certain pass situations. Brees directed the NFL s best offense behind a line that had three Pro Bowl selections all five starters return Coordinator Gregg Williams defenses create turnovers, 39 last year, and eight were brought back for touchdowns, breaking the backs of opponents. Don t be fooled by the team s low ranking against the pass (26th), since most opponents were playing catch-up. The loss of Fujita may sting in the short term, but Jonathan Vilma s presence (110 tackles) in the middle will aid any transition at the position Navigating a defending champion s schedule will be tough, as will playing as the hunted team, but the Saints explosiveness gives them a strong chance to defend their title. TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS The Buccaneers were painful to watch at times in their first season under Raheem Morris, who had to wait until November for his first NFL head coaching victory. Unfortunately, despite a string of recent turnarounds in this division, another last-place finish in the NFC South seems likely The Bucs gained more yards than only four teams and need to improve across the board to be competitive in a division with three offensive-minded clubs. QB Josh Freeman made his pro debut and finished with 1,855 yards, 10 touchdowns and 20 giveaways. Tight end Kellen Winslow caught a team-leading 77 balls for 884 yards and five touchdowns. If nothing else, the new wideout corps has promise. It could only be a matter of time before rookies Arrelious Benn (2b-Illinois) and Mike Williams (4-Syracuse) top the depth chart. The front office invested plenty of dough in RB Derrick Ward last offseason, but not many touches. In fact, Carnell Williams had nearly twice as many yards (823) and carries (211) than Ward. The line lacks a household name but brings back four starters It seems like yesterday when Tampa Bay s defense was one of the league s most-feared units but 2009 saw it get pushed around weekly. The Bucs allowed 5,849 yards, worst in the league, and 46 touchdowns. Improvement is vital, and the numbers justify the front office investing three of its first four draft picks on defensive players, including highly touted tackle Gerald McCoy (1-Oklahoma), who brings exceptional quickness and ability to a defense that sorely needs a rising star. LB Barrett Ruud, who paced the team with 142 tackles, should hopefully see a lesser load with McCoy stopping things upfront The Bucs received high grades for their draft but remain in rebuilding mode. It will be at least another year before they ll sniff playoff contention. Continued growth of Freeman would be a positive sign. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH New Orleans Carolina Atlanta Tampa Bay NFC SOUTH NFC SOUTH WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 35

ATLANTA FALCONS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 30 to 1 NFC Title: 13 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 20.69 (16th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 10-7-1 5-11 12-6 8-8 7-9 4-12 11-6 9-7 66-66-1 (50%) OVERALL ATS 11-7 6-10 8-10 8-8 7-9 7-8 9-8 11-5 67-65 (51%) PRESEASON ATS 4-0 0-4 2-1 4-1 1-2 3-1 3-1 2-1 19-11 (63%) HOME ATS 4-4 2-6 4-5 4-4 3-5 3-5 5-3 6-2 31-34 (48%) ROAD ATS 7-3 4-4 4-5 4-4 4-4 4-3 4-5 5-3 36-31 (54%) vs DIVISION ATS 4-2 3-3 2-4 2-4 3-3 2-4 2-4 4-2 22-26 (46%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 9-5 5-7 6-8 5-7 5-7 5-7 6-7 8-4 49-52 (49%) as FAVORITE ATS 6-5 1-1 5-6 5-3 4-6 1-0 3-3 6-2 31-26 (54%) as UNDERDOG ATS 5-2 5-9 3-4 3-5 3-3 6-8 6-5 4-3 35-39 (47%) OVER-UNDER 8-10 7-9 6-11 9-7 4-11 9-7 8-9 7-9 58-73 (44%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * ATLANTA is on a 2-14 ATS (-13.4 Units) skid at home vs. poor passing defenses - allowing a comp. pct. of 61% or worse The Average Score was ATLANTA 20.3, OPPONENT 24.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/7 - TAMPA BAY, 1/2 - CAROLINA * ATLANTA is on a 1-10 ATS (-10 Units) skid vs. terrible defensive teams - allowing >=6 YPP The Average Score was ATLANTA 21.5, OPPONENT 24. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/10 - at Cleveland, 11/21 - at St Louis * ATLANTA is on a 20-7 UNDER the total (+12.3 Units) run on the road coming off a win by 10 or more points The Average Score was ATLANTA 18, OPPONENT 20.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - at New Orleans, 10/10 - at Cleveland, 10/17 - at Philadelphia * ATLANTA is on a 13-28 ATS (-17.8 Units) skid vs. teams scoring 24 or more PPG The Average Score was ATLANTA 18.8, OPPONENT 28.6. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - ARIZONA, 9/26 - at New Orleans, 10/17 - at Philadelphia, 11/28 - GREEN BAY, 12/27 - NEW ORLEANS * ATLANTA is 6-0 UNDER the total (+6 Units) on the road in non-conference games since 07. The Average Score was ATLANTA 14.3, OPPONENT 13.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - at Pittsburgh, 10/10 - at Cleveland 2009 Record: 9-7 (+2.6 ML Units), 11-5 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 7-9 DIVISION: NFC South COACH: Mike Smith, 3rd year STADIUM: Georgia Dome Scoring Differential: +2.4 (#15 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 24 (#11 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +3.3 (#11 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 22.88 (#5 of 32) 9/12/10 at Pittsburgh * UNDERDOG is on 3-2 SU & 5-0 ATS run in L5 PIT-ATL matchups 9/19/10 ARIZONA * L8 games of ATL-ARZ series are 7-1 OVER the total 9/26/10 at New Orleans * UNDERDOG is 8-10 SU but 14-4 ATS in NO-ATL series at NEW ORLEANS since 92 10/3/10 SAN FRANCISCO * FAVORITE has swept L3 ATL-SF games at ATLANTA, both SU & ATS 10/10/10 at Cleveland * L3 CLE-ATL series games have gone UNDER the total 10/17/10 at Philadelphia * PHILADELPHIA is 8-3 SU & 9-1 ATS vs. ATLANTA since 96 10/24/10 CINCINNATI * ATLANTA has taken L2 games vs. CINCINNATI both SU & ATS 11/7/10 TAMPA BAY * TAMPA BAY is 6-4 SU & 8-2 ATS at ATLANTA since 97 11/14/10 BALTIMORE * BALTIMORE is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. ATLANTA 11/21/10 at St Louis * STL-ATL series has gone 13-4 OVER the total since 96 11/28/10 GREEN BAY * ROAD TEAM is 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 ATL-GB matchups 12/5/10 at Tampa Bay * FAVORITE has swept L3 TB-ATL games at TAMPA BAY, both SU & ATS 12/12/10 at Carolina * CAR-ATL series at CAROLINA has gone 12-3 UNDER the total since 95 12/19/10 at Seattle * UNDERDOG is 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 SEA-ATL matchups 12/27/10 NEW ORLEANS * FAVORITE is 12-1 SU & 9-4 ATS in ATL-NO series at ATLANTA since 97 1/2/11 CAROLINA * L6 games of ATL-CAR series at ATLANTA are 5-1 OVER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +2.4 15 Yardage -8.5 19 Yards Per Play -0.40 24 Yards Per Point +2.19 9 Turnovers +3 11 Offensive Stats Points Scored 22.7 13 First Downs 20.6 10 Total Yards Per Game 340.4 16 Yards Per Play 5.20 17 Yards Per Point 15.00 13 Rushing Attempts 28.2 11 Rush Yards Per Game 117.3 15 Yards Per Rush 4.16 18 Rushing TD s 15 14 Passing Attempts Per Game 35.6 7 Completions Per Game 20.8 17 Completion Percentage 58.2% 22 Passing Yards Per Game 223.2 14 Passing Yards Per Attempt 6.26 18 Passing TD s 26 13 Sacks Allowed 27 8 Interceptions Thrown 17 17 Fumbles Lost 8 5 Total Turnovers Lost 25 12 Avg. Time of Possession 25:56 27 3rd Down Conversions 42.1% 10 4th Down Conversions 69.6% 4 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 20.3 14 First Downs 18.9 17 Total Yards Per Game 348.9 20 Yards Per Play 5.60 22 Yards Per Point 17.19 6 Rushing Attempts 27.0 16 Rush Yards Per Game 106.8 10 Yards Per Rush 3.96 8 Rushing TD s 10 7 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 33.6 19 Opponent Completions/Game 21.0 20 Opponent Completion % 62.6% 22 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 242.1 28 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 5.68 2 Passing TD s Allowed 14 2 Sacks Recorded 28 26 Interceptions 15 16 Fumbles Recovered 13 5 Total Turnovers Forced 28 12 3rd Down Conversions 45.3% 32 4th Down Conversions 47.1% 12 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 4.9 4 Penalty Yards/Game 41.5 5 Opponent Penalties/Game 6.9 4 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 55.8 8 Punt Return Average 10.0 9 Kick Return Average 24.3 6 Punt Attempts per game 3.9 4 Punt Net Average 37.8 27 Field Goals Made 19 26 Field Goal Percentage 65.5% 29 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 at Green Bay 34-37 L +7.5 W 42.5 O 9/7 at Dallas 27-13 W +2 W 36.5 O 9/12 at San Francisco 21-19 W -3 L 43 U 9/12 PHILADELPHIA 14-10 W +1 W 44 U 9/15 CHICAGO 13-14 L -3 L 45 U 9/14 WASHINGTON 31-33 L -3 L 39.5 O 9/19 ST LOUIS 34-17 W -1.5 W 46 O 9/18 at Seattle 18-21 L +2 L 43 U 9/22 CINCINNATI 30-3 W -7.5 W 43 U 9/21 TAMPA BAY 10-31 L +6.5 L 35.5 O 9/26 ARIZONA 6-3 W -11 L 44 U 9/25 at Buffalo 24-16 W +3 W 35.5 O 10/6 TAMPA BAY 6-20 L -2.5 L 38.5 U 10/13 at NY Giants 17-10 W +4 W 34 U 9/28 at Carolina 3-23 L +6 L 35.5 U 10/3 at Carolina 27-10 W +3.5 W 37.5 U 10/10 DETROIT 10-17 L -6.5 L 41 U 10/2 MINNESOTA 30-10 W -6.5 W 44.5 U 10/20 CAROLINA 30-0 W -4 W 35.5 U 10/5 MINNESOTA 26-39 L +4.5 L 43.5 O 10/17 SAN DIEGO 21-20 W -5.5 L 43 U 10/9 NEW ENGLAND 28-31 L +2 L 41 O 10/27 at New Orleans 37-35 W +3.5 W 47 O 10/13 at St Louis 0-36 L +10.5 L 46 U 10/24 at Kansas City 10-56 L +3.5 L 44 O 10/16 at New Orleans 34-31 W -5.5 L 43.5 O 11/3 BALTIMORE 20-17 W -7 L 40.5 U 10/19 NEW ORLEANS 17-45 L +3 L 42 O 10/31 at Denver 41-28 W +7 W 39.5 O 10/24 NY JETS 27-14 W -8 W 40 O 11/10 at Pittsburgh 34-34 T +5.5 W 42.5 O 11/2 PHILADELPHIA 16-23 L +3 L 39.5 U 11/14 TAMPA BAY 24-14 W -3.5 W 41 U 11/6 at Miami 17-10 W -1 W 40 U 11/17 NEW ORLEANS 24-17 W -1.5 W 51 U 11/9 at Ny Giants 27-7 W +11.5 W 41 U 11/21 at NY Giants 14-10 W -3 W 40 U 11/13 GREEN BAY 25-33 L -8.5 L 42.5 O 11/24 at Carolina 41-0 W -3.5 W 37 O 11/16 at New Orleans 20-23 L +9 W 44 U 11/28 NEW ORLEANS 24-21 W -9 L 48 U 11/20 TAMPA BAY 27-30 L -6.5 L 39 O 12/1 at Minnesota 30-24 W -3.5 W 47.5 O 11/23 TENNESSEE 31-38 L +6.5 L 44 O 12/5 at Tampa Bay 0-27 L +2 L 39.5 U 11/24 at Detroit 27-7 W -3 W 43.5 U 12/8 at Tampa Bay 10-34 L +4 L 37 O 11/30 at Houston 13-17 L +3 L 42 U 12/12 OAKLAND 35-10 W -7.5 W 46 U 12/4 at Carolina 6-24 L +3 L 43 U 12/15 SEATTLE 24-30 L -9 L 46 O 12/18 CAROLINA 34-31 W -3.5 L 41 O 12/22 DETROIT 36-15 W -10.5 W 44 O 12/7 CAROLINA 20-14 W +1 W 42 U 12/26 at New Orleans 13-26 L +6.5 L 44 U 12/12 NEW ORLEANS 36-17 W -10 W 44.5 O 12/29 at Cleveland 16-24 L -2.5 L 41 U 12/14 at Indianapolis 7-38 L +7.5 L 48 U 1/2 at Seattle 26-28 L +5.5 W 41 O 12/18 at Chicago 3-16 L +3.5 L 31 U 1/4 (PL) at Green Bay 27-7 W +6.5 W 41 U 12/20 at Tampa Bay 30-28 W +8.5 W 38 O 1/15 (PL) ST LOUIS 47-17 W -6.5 W 49.5 O 12/24 at Tampa Bay 24-27 L +4 W 37 O 1/11 (PL) at Philadelphia 6-20 L +7.5 L 38.5 U 12/28 JACKSONVILLE 21-14 W -2.5 W 44 U 1/23 (PL) at Philadelphia 10-27 L +6 L 37 T 1/1 CAROLINA 11-44 L +3 L 42.5 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/10 at Carolina 20-6 W +4 W 38.5 U 9/9 at Minnesota 3-24 L +3 L 34.5 U 9/7 DETROIT 34-21 W +3 W 41 O 9/13 MIAMI 19-7 W -4 W 44U 9/17 TAMPA BAY 14-3 W -4 W 35 U 9/16 at Jacksonville 7-13 L +10 W 34.5 U 9/14 at Tampa Bay 9-24 L +7 L 37.5 U 9/20 CAROLINA 28-20 W -6 W 43.5O 9/25 at New Orleans 3-23 L -4 L 44 U 9/23 CAROLINA 20-27 L +4 L 38 O 9/21 KANSAS CITY 38-14 W -6 W 37.5 O 9/27 at New England 10-26 L +4 L 45.5U 10/1 ARIZONA 32-10 W -7.5 W 41 O 9/30 HOUSTON 26-16 W +2.5 W 39.5 O 9/28 at Carolina 9-24 L +7 L 38.5 U 10/11 at San Francisco 45-10 W +0 W 39.5O 10/15 NY GIANTS 14-27 L -3 L 41 T 10/7 at Tennessee 13-20 L +7 T 41.5 U 10/5 at Green Bay 27-24 W +5.5 W 42.5 O 10/18 CHICAGO 21-14 W -4 W 46U 10/22 PITTSBURGH 41-38 W +3 W 39 O 10/15 NY GIANTS 10-31 L +5 L 43.5 U 10/12 CHICAGO 22-20 W +3 W 43 U 10/25 at Dallas 21-37 L +5.5 L 48O 10/29 at Cincinnati 29-27 W +4 W 45.5 O 10/21 at New Orleans 16-22 L +7.5 W 42.5 U 10/26 at Philadelphia 14-27 L +9 L 44.5 U 11/2 at New Orleans 27-35 L +11 W 56O 11/5 at Detroit 14-30 L -5 L 47.5 U 11/4 SAN FRANCISCO 20-16 W -3.5 W 37 U 11/2 at Oakland 24-0 W -3 W 41 U 11/8 WASHINGTON 31-17 W -8.5 W 40.5O 11/12 CLEVELAND 13-17 L -8 L 42 U 11/11 at Carolina 20-13 W +3 W 35 U 11/9 NEW ORLEANS 34-20 W -1.5 W 50.5 O 11/15 at Carolina 19-28 L -1 L 43.5O 11/16 DENVER 20-24 L -6.5 L 51 U 11/19 at Baltimore 10-24 L +3 L 41 U 11/18 TAMPA BAY 7-31 L +3 L 35.5 O 11/22 at NY Giants 31-34 L +7 W 46.5O 11/23 CAROLINA 45-28 W +1 W 41 O 11/26 NEW ORLEANS 13-31 L -3.5 L 48 U 11/22 INDIANAPOLIS 13-31 L +13 L 42.5 O 11/30 at San Diego 22-16 W +6.5 W 48 U 11/29 TAMPA BAY 20-17 W -13 L 46U 12/3 at Washington 24-14 W -2 W 39.5 U 12/2 at St Louis 16-28 L +3 L 40 O 12/7 at New Orleans 25-29 L +3 L 52 O 12/6 PHILADELPHIA 7-34 L +4 L 43.5U 12/10 at Tampa Bay 17-6 W -3.5 W 37.5 U 12/10 NEW ORLEANS 14-34 L +4 L 44 O 12/14 TAMPA BAY 13-10 W -5 L 43 U 12/13 NEW ORLEANS 23-26 L +10 W 49.5U 12/16 DALLAS 28-38 L +4 L 45.5 O 12/16 at Tampa Bay 3-37 L +13 L 37.5 O 12/21 at Minnesota 24-17 W +3 W 43 U 12/20 at NY Jets 10-7 W +5 W 36.5U 12/24 CAROLINA 3-10 L -6 L 40 U 12/23 at Arizona 27-30 L +11 W 44 O 12/28 ST LOUIS 31-27 W -14 L 44.5 O 12/27 BUFFALO 31-3 W -8 W 40.5U 12/31 at Philadelphia 17-24 L +6.5 L 42.5 U 12/30 SEATTLE 44-41 W +2 W 38.5 O 1/3 (PL) at Arizona 24-30 L +2 L 51.5 O 1/3 at Tampa Bay 20-10 W -3 W 41.5U 36 WWW.STATFOX.COM

CAROLINA PANTHERS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 60 to 1 NFC Title: 28 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 19.38 (24th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 7-9 14-6 7-9 13-6 8-8 7-9 12-5 8-8 76-60 (56%) OVERALL ATS 10-6 10-10 10-6 11-8 5-9 8-8 8-7 9-7 71-61 (54%) PRESEASON ATS 1-2 4-0 3-0 1-3 2-2 1-3 2-2 0-4 14-16 (47%) HOME ATS 5-3 3-6 3-5 4-4 2-5 3-5 5-3 4-4 29-35 (45%) ROAD ATS 5-3 6-4 7-1 7-4 3-4 5-3 3-4 5-3 41-26 (61%) vs DIVISION ATS 2-4 4-2 4-2 4-2 3-3 3-3 3-2 5-1 28-19 (60%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 7-5 8-7 8-4 8-7 4-8 8-4 4-7 8-4 55-46 (54%) as FAVORITE ATS 4-1 3-8 3-5 7-7 3-6 3-3 6-4 3-3 32-37 (46%) as UNDERDOG ATS 6-5 7-2 7-1 4-1 2-3 5-5 2-3 6-4 39-24 (62%) OVER-UNDER 6-10 11-8 7-9 10-8 7-9 6-10 8-9 6-10 61-73 (46%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * CAROLINA is on a 9-0 ATS (+9 Units) run at home vs. excellent offensive teams - averaging >=375 YPG The Average Score was CAROLINA 23.3, OPPONENT 16.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/7 - NEW ORLEANS * CAROLINA is on a 9-0 ATS (+9 Units) run after 3 consecutive games with a turnover margin of +2 or better The Average Score was CAROLINA 27.4, OPPONENT 17.1. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - at NY Giants * CAROLINA is 8-0 UNDER the total (+8 Units) at home vs. excellent offensive teams - averaging >=6 YPP since 07. The Average Score was CAROLINA 18.4, OPPONENT 17.5. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/7 - NEW ORLEANS, 12/19 - ARIZONA * CAROLINA is on a 19-5 UNDER the total (+13.5 Units) run coming off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival The Average Score was CAROLINA 19.6, OPPONENT 14.4. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - CINCINNATI, 11/21 - BALTIMORE, 12/19 - ARIZONA * CAROLINA is on a 19-5 ATS (+13.5 Units) run vs. teams scoring 17 or less PPG The Average Score was CAROLINA 27, OPPONENT 15. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - TAMPA BAY, 10/31 - at St Louis, 11/14 - at Tampa Bay, 11/28 - at Cleveland WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM LINE FINAL ATS 37 2009 Record: 8-8 (+3.1 ML Units), 9-7 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 6-10 DIVISION: NFC South COACH: John Fox, 9th year STADIUM: Bank of America Stadium Scoring Differential: +0.4 (#16 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 26 (#9 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +2.4 (#12 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 23.06 (#3 of 32) 9/12/10 at NY Giants * L6 games of NYG-CAR series are 5-1 OVER the total 9/19/10 TAMPA BAY * FAVORITE is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in L5 CAR-TB matchups 9/26/10 CINCINNATI * CAROLINA is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games hosting CINCINNATI 10/3/10 at New Orleans * ROAD TEAM is 11-6 SU & 14-2 ATS in L17 NO-CAR matchups 10/10/10 CHICAGO * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 2-0 ATS in L3 CAR-CHI games 10/24/10 SAN FRANCISCO * CAROLINA is 8-6 SU & 12-2 ATS vs. SAN FRANCISCO since 96 10/31/10 at St Louis * CAROLINA is 11-5 SU & 12-4 ATS vs. ST LOUIS since 96 11/7/10 NEW ORLEANS * L7 games of CAR-NO series at CAROLINA are 7-0 UNDER the total 11/14/10 at Tampa Bay * L6 games of TB-CAR series at TAMPA BAY are 5-1 OVER the total 11/21/10 BALTIMORE * CAROLINA has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. BALTIMORE 11/28/10 at Cleveland * CAROLINA is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games at CLEVELAND 12/5/10 at Seattle * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 SEA-CAR games 12/12/10 ATLANTA * CAR-ATL series at CAROLINA has gone 12-3 UNDER the total since 95 12/19/10 ARIZONA * ROAD TEAM is on 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS run in CAR-ARZ series 12/23/10 at Pittsburgh * PITTSBURGH is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in its L4 games vs. CAROLINA 1/2/11 at Atlanta * L6 games of ATL-CAR series at ATLANTA are 5-1 OVER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +0.4 16 Yardage +15.0 15 Yards Per Play -0.01 18 Yards Per Point -0.35 16 Turnovers +6 8 Offensive Stats Points Scored 19.7 21 First Downs 18.1 20 Total Yards Per Game 330.9 19 Yards Per Play 5.18 18 Yards Per Point 16.80 22 Rushing Attempts 32.8 2 Rush Yards Per Game 156.1 3 Yards Per Rush 4.76 3 Rushing TD s 18 10 Passing Attempts Per Game 29.1 29 Completions Per Game 16.5 28 Completion Percentage 56.8% 26 Passing Yards Per Game 174.9 27 Passing Yards Per Attempt 6.02 22 Passing TD s 16 24 Sacks Allowed 33 13 Interceptions Thrown 20 27 Fumbles Lost 11 18 Total Turnovers Lost 31 22 Avg. Time of Possession 30:12 8 3rd Down Conversions 37.3% 19 4th Down Conversions 45.0% 21 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 19.3 9 First Downs 18.1 12 Total Yards Per Game 315.9 8 Yards Per Play 5.19 12 Yards Per Point 16.45 11 Rushing Attempts 28.1 21 Rush Yards Per Game 124.8 22 Yards Per Rush 4.44 22 Rushing TD s 15 19 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 30.9 5 Opponent Completions/Game 19.1 10 Opponent Completion % 61.6% 20 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 191.0 4 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 5.94 5 Passing TD s Allowed 18 8 Sacks Recorded 31 23 Interceptions 22 5 Fumbles Recovered 15 1 Total Turnovers Forced 37 4 3rd Down Conversions 35.5% 7 4th Down Conversions 52.9% 21 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 5.5 11 Penalty Yards/Game 43.6 11 Opponent Penalties/Game 5.1 27 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 39.5 29 Punt Return Average 8.3 17 Kick Return Average 19.9 31 Punt Attempts per game 4.8 18 Punt Net Average 38.2 23 Field Goals Made 22 19 Field Goal Percentage 81.5% 20 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 BALTIMORE 10-7 W -1 W 32 U 9/7 JACKSONVILLE 24-23 W -4 L 34.5 O 9/13 GREEN BAY 14-24 L -3.5 L 43 U 9/11 NEW ORLEANS 20-23 L -6.5 L 44.5 U 9/15 DETROIT 31-7 W -3 W 35.5 O 9/14 at Tampa Bay 12-9 W +8.5 W 34 U 9/28 ATLANTA 23-3 W -6 W 35.5 U 9/19 at Kansas City 28-17 W +7 W 46 U 9/18 NEW ENGLAND 27-17 W +3 W 44 T 9/25 at Miami 24-27 L -3 L 36 O 9/22 at Minnesota 21-14 W +6.5 W 44.5 U 10/5 NEW ORLEANS 19-13 W -7 L 37.5 U 10/3 ATLANTA 10-27 L -3.5 L 37.5 U 10/3 GREEN BAY 32-29 W -7 L 43.5 O 9/29 at Green Bay 14-17 L +6.5 W 41.5 U 10/12 at Indianapolis 23-20 W +4 W 37.5 O 10/10 at Denver 17-20 L +4 W 38 U 10/9 at Arizona 24-20 W -1.5 W 43 O 10/6 ARIZONA 13-16 L -5 L 35 U 10/19 TENNESSEE 17-37 L +0 L 37.5 O 10/17 at Philadelphia 8-30 L +10 L 42 U 10/16 at Detroit 21-20 W -2.5 L 40 O 10/13 at Dallas 13-14 L +1.5 W 34 U 10/26 at New Orleans 23-20 W +3 W 39.5 O 11/2 at Houston 10-14 L -6.5 L 37 U 10/24 SAN DIEGO 6-17 L -3 L 42 U 10/30 MINNESOTA 38-13 W -7 W 46 O 10/20 at Atlanta 0-30 L +4 L 35.5 U 11/9 TAMPA BAY 27-24 W +3.5 W 34.5 O 10/31 at Seattle 17-23 L +8 W 39 O 11/6 at Tampa Bay 34-14 W +0 W 36.5 O 10/27 TAMPA BAY 9-12 L +8 W 31.5 U 11/16 WASHINGTON 20-17 W -6 L 37 T 11/7 OAKLAND 24-27 L -6 L 41 O 11/13 NY JETS 30-3 W -7.5 W 40.5 U 11/10 NEW ORLEANS 24-34 L +4 L 39.5 O 11/23 at Dallas 20-24 L +3 L 33 O 11/20 at Chicago 3-13 L -3 L 34.5 U 11/14 at San Francisco 37-27 W +1.5 W 41.5 O 11/17 at Tampa Bay 10-23 L +8 L 35 U 11/30 PHILADELPHIA 16-25 L -1.5 L 36.5 O 11/27 at Buffalo 13-9 W -3.5 W 37 U 12/7 at Atlanta 14-20 L -1 L 42 U 11/21 ARIZONA 35-10 W -3 W 38 O 12/4 ATLANTA 24-6 W -3 W 43 U 11/24 ATLANTA 0-41 L +3.5 L 37 O 12/14 at Arizona 20-17 W -7 L 38.5 U 11/28 TAMPA BAY 21-14 W +3 W 39 U 12/11 TAMPA BAY 10-20 L -6 L 35.5 U 12/1 at Cleveland 13-6 W +7.5 W 34.5 U 12/21 DETROIT 20-14 W -7.5 L 37 U 12/5 at New Orleans 32-21 W -2 W 46.5 O 12/18 at New Orleans 27-10 W -10 W 40 U 12/8 CINCINNATI 52-31 W -3 W 37.5 O 12/28 at Ny Giants 37-24 W -4.5 W 34.5 O 12/12 ST LOUIS 20-7 W -7 W 44.5 U 12/24 DALLAS 20-24 L -5 L 38 O 12/15 at Pittsburgh 14-30 L +9.5 L 39 O 1/3 DALLAS 29-10 W -3 W 33.5 O 1/10 (PL) at St Louis 29-23 W +7 W 46 O 12/18 at Atlanta 31-34 L +3.5 W 41 O 1/1 at Atlanta 44-11 W -3 W 42.5 O 1/8 (PL) at NY Giants 23-0 W +2.5 W 44.5 U 12/22 CHICAGO 24-14 W -4 W 36.5 O 1/18 (PL) at Philadelphia 14-3 W +4 W 36.5 U 12/26 at Tampa Bay 37-20 W +1.5 W 39 O 1/15 (PL) at Chicago 29-21 W +2.5 W 31 O 12/29 at New Orleans 10-6 W +6 W 43.5 U 2/1 (PL) *vs New England 29-32 L +7 W 38 O 1/2 NEW ORLEANS 18-21 L -7 L 46 U 1/22 (PL) at Seattle 14-34 L +4 L 43.5 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 ATLANTA 6-20 L -4 L 38.5 U 9/17 at Minnesota 13-16 L +2.5 L 37 U 9/24 at Tampa Bay 26-24 W -3.5 L 33.5 O 10/1 NEW ORLEANS 21-18 W -7 L 40.5 U 10/8 CLEVELAND 20-12 W -8 T 39 U 10/15 at Baltimore 23-21 W +3 W 33.5 O 10/22 at Cincinnati 14-17 L +3 T 44 U 10/29 DALLAS 14-35 L -4.5 L 40.5 O 11/13 TAMPA BAY 24-10 W -10 W 37.5 U 11/19 ST LOUIS 15-0 W -6 W 44 U 11/26 at Washington 13-17 L -6 L 36.5 U 12/4 at Philadelphia 24-27 L -3 L 37.5 O 12/10 NY GIANTS 13-27 L +3 L 38.5 O 12/17 PITTSBURGH 3-37 L +3 L 39 O 12/24 at Atlanta 10-3 W +6 W 40 U 12/31 at New Orleans 31-21 W -3 W 38 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 at St Louis 27-13 W +1.5 W 43 U 9/16 HOUSTON 21-34 L -6.5 L 38 O 9/23 at Atlanta 27-20 W -4 W 38 O 9/30 TAMPA BAY 7-20 L -3 L 38.5 U 10/7 at New Orleans 16-13 W +3.5 W 43.5 U 10/14 at Arizona 25-10 W +6 W 38.5 U 10/28 INDIANAPOLIS 7-31 L +7 L 43.5 U 11/4 at Tennessee 7-20 L +5.5 L 35 U 11/11 ATLANTA 13-20 L -3 L 35 U 11/18 at Green Bay 17-31 L +10 L 37 O 11/25 NEW ORLEANS 6-31 L +3 L 42 U 12/2 SAN FRANCISCO 31-14 W -3 W 35 O 12/9 at Jacksonville 6-37 L +11 L 38.5 O 12/16 SEATTLE 13-10 W +7 W 37 U 12/22 DALLAS 13-20 L +10.5 W 42.5 U 12/30 at Tampa Bay 31-23 W -3 W 35.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/7 at San Diego 26-24 W +8.5 W 40.5 O 9/14 CHICAGO 20-17 W -3 T 37.5 U 9/21 at Minnesota 10-20 L +3 L 37.5 U 9/28 ATLANTA 24-9 W -7 W 38.5 U 10/5 KANSAS CITY 34-0 W -9.5 W 38 U 10/12 at Tampa Bay 3-27 L +2.5 L 37 U 10/19 NEW ORLEANS 30-7 W -3 W 44.5 U 10/26 ARIZONA 27-23 W -5 L 43.5 O 11/9 at Oakland 17-6 W -10 W 37.5 U 11/16 DETROIT 31-22 W -14 L 40.5 O 11/23 at Atlanta 28-45 L -1 L 41 O 11/30 at Green Bay 35-31 W +3 W 41.5 O 12/8 TAMPA BAY 38-23 W -3 W 40 O 12/14 DENVER 30-10 W -7 W 46.5 U 12/21 at NY Giants 28-34 L +4 L 37.5 O 12/28 at New Orleans 33-31 W -2 T 51.5 O 1/10 (PL) ARIZONA 13-33 L -10 L 50 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/13 PHILADELPHIA 10-38 L +2.5 L 43.5O 9/20 at Atlanta 20-28 L +6 L 43.5O 9/28 at Dallas 7-21 L +8 L 48U 10/11 WASHINGTON 20-17 W -5 L 37.5U 10/18 at Tampa Bay 28-21 W -3 W 40.5O 10/25 BUFFALO 9-20 L -7 L 37U 11/1 at Arizona 34-21 W +9.5 W 43.5O 11/8 at New Orleans 20-30 L +12 W 51U 11/15 ATLANTA 28-19 W +1 W 43.5O 11/19 MIAMI 17-24 L -3 L 41.5U 11/29 at NY Jets 6-17 L +3 L 41U 12/6 TAMPA BAY 16-6 W -3 W 40U 12/13 at New England 10-20 L +12.5 W 43.5U 12/20 MINNESOTA 26-7 W +8.5 W 42.5U 12/27 at NY Giants 41-9 W +8 W 43O 1/3 NEW ORLEANS 23-10 W -10 W 40.5U

NEW ORLEANS SAINTS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 9 to 1 NFC Title: 3.5 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 20.19 (22nd toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 9-7 8-8 8-8 3-13 11-7 7-9 8-8 16-3 70-63 (53%) OVERALL ATS 8-7 9-7 8-8 5-10 10-8 6-10 10-5 10-9 66-64 (51%) PRESEASON ATS 3-1 1-3 2-1 1-3 1-3 3-2 2-2 3-1 16-16 (50%) HOME ATS 3-4 4-4 2-6 2-4 3-6 2-6 5-1 5-5 26-36 (42%) ROAD ATS 5-3 5-3 6-2 3-6 7-2 4-4 5-4 5-4 40-28 (59%) vs DIVISION ATS 3-3 3-3 4-2 2-4 4-2 2-4 3-2 1-5 22-25 (47%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 7-5 7-5 6-6 2-9 9-5 5-7 6-5 7-9 49-51 (49%) as FAVORITE ATS 5-6 5-3 1-3 1-2 2-5 5-7 6-1 9-8 34-35 (49%) as UNDERDOG ATS 3-1 4-4 7-5 4-8 8-3 1-3 3-3 1-1 31-28 (53%) OVER-UNDER 12-4 7-9 7-9 7-9 10-8 10-6 10-5 9-10 72-60 (55%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * Over the L2 seasons, NEW ORLEANS is 9-0 ATS (+9 Units) in non-conference games. The Average Score was NEW ORLEANS 33.2, OPPONENT 19.3. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/24 - CLEVELAND, 10/31 - PITTSBURGH, 12/5 - at Cincinnati, 12/19 - at Baltimore * NEW ORLEANS is on a 8-0 OVER the total (+8 Units) run on the road vs. excellent offensive teams - averaging >=375 YPG The Average Score was NEW ORLEANS 23.4, OPPONENT 29.5. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/25 - at Dallas * NEW ORLEANS is on a 4-16 ATS (-13.6 Units) skid at home vs. poor defensive teams - allowing >=350 YPG The Average Score was NEW ORLEANS 21.6, OPPONENT 22.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/24 - CLEVELAND, 11/21 - SEATTLE, 12/12 - ST LOUIS, 1/2 - TAMPA BAY * NEW ORLEANS is 17-38 ATS (-24.8 Units) at home revenging a loss against opponent by 14 points or more since 92. The Average Score was NEW ORLEANS 20.8, OPPONENT 20.2. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/21 - SEATTLE, 1/2 - TAMPA BAY * NEW ORLEANS is on a 6-19 ATS (-14.9 Units) skid at home vs. terrible teams (Win Pct. <=25%) The Average Score was NEW ORLEANS 21.3, OPPONENT 21.1. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/12 - ST LOUIS, 1/2 - TAMPA BAY LINE FINAL ATS 2009 Record: 16-3 (+4.1 ML Units), 10-9 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 9-10 DIVISION: NFC South COACH: Sean Payton, 5th year STADIUM: Louisiana Superdome Scoring Differential: +10.6 (#1 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 30 (#1 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +10.6 (#1 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 21.16 (#13 of 32) 9/9/10 MINNESOTA * NO-MIN series has gone 9-1 OVER the total since 94 9/20/10 at San Francisco * L6 games of SF-NO series at SAN FRANCISCO are 6-0 OVER the total 9/26/10 ATLANTA * UNDERDOG is 8-10 SU but 14-4 ATS in NO-ATL series at NEW ORLEANS since 92 10/3/10 CAROLINA * ROAD TEAM is 11-6 SU & 14-2 ATS in L17 NO-CAR matchups 10/10/10 at Arizona * NEW ORLEANS is 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS in its L6 games vs. ARIZONA 10/17/10 at Tampa Bay * ROAD TEAM is on 9-5 SU & 11-3 ATS run in TB-NO series 10/24/10 CLEVELAND * UNDERDOG has swept L4 NO-CLE games, both SU & ATS 10/31/10 PITTSBURGH * L3 NO-PIT series games have gone OVER the total 11/7/10 at Carolina * L7 games of CAR-NO series at CAROLINA are 7-0 UNDER the total 11/21/10 SEATTLE * UNDER the total is 4-1 in L5 games of NO-SEA series 11/25/10 at Dallas * UNDERDOG is on 5-1 SU & 6-0 ATS run in L6 DAL-NO matchups 12/5/10 at Cincinnati * CINCINNATI has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. NEW ORLEANS 12/12/10 ST LOUIS * NO-STL series has gone 11-4 OVER the total since 97 12/19/10 at Baltimore * FAVORITE has swept L3 BAL-NO games at BALTIMORE, both SU & ATS 12/27/10 at Atlanta * FAVORITE is 12-1 SU & 9-4 ATS in ATL-NO series at ATLANTA since 97 1/2/11 TAMPA BAY * TAMPA BAY is 5-2 SU & 6-1 ATS in its L7 games at NEW ORLEANS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +10.6 1 Yardage +46.1 9 Yards Per Play +0.78 7 Yards Per Point +4.14 3 Turnovers +12 3 Offensive Stats Points Scored 31.9 1 First Downs 21.8 2 Total Yards Per Game 403.9 1 Yards Per Play 6.27 1 Yards Per Point 12.66 1 Rushing Attempts 29.3 7 Rush Yards Per Game 131.6 6 Yards Per Rush 4.50 7 Rushing TD s 21 3 Passing Attempts Per Game 34.0 15 Completions Per Game 23.6 5 Completion Percentage 69.5% 1 Passing Yards Per Game 272.2 4 Passing Yards Per Attempt 8.01 2 Passing TD s 34 1 Sacks Allowed 20 4 Interceptions Thrown 12 6 Fumbles Lost 15 28 Total Turnovers Lost 27 15 Avg. Time of Possession 29:14 14 3rd Down Conversions 44.7% 6 4th Down Conversions 40.0% 25 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 21.3 20 First Downs 19.4 22 Total Yards Per Game 357.8 24 Yards Per Play 5.49 21 Yards Per Point 16.80 8 Rushing Attempts 27.2 17 Rush Yards Per Game 122.2 21 Yards Per Rush 4.49 26 Rushing TD s 19 28 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 35.9 27 Opponent Completions/Game 20.6 19 Opponent Completion % 57.5% 5 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 235.6 26 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 6.57 20 Passing TD s Allowed 15 5 Sacks Recorded 35 13 Interceptions 26 3 Fumbles Recovered 13 5 Total Turnovers Forced 39 2 3rd Down Conversions 38.0% 14 4th Down Conversions 45.8% 9 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 5.6 13 Penalty Yards/Game 49.2 17 Opponent Penalties/Game 5.4 25 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 44.8 25 Punt Return Average 4.6 31 Kick Return Average 24.4 4 Punt Attempts per game 3.6 3 Punt Net Average 37.4 30 Field Goals Made 22 19 Field Goal Percentage 78.6% 24 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 at Tampa Bay 26-20 W +6 W 37 O 9/7 at Seattle 10-27 L +3 L 48.5 U 9/12 SEATTLE 7-21 L +2.5 L 45.5 U 9/11 at Carolina 23-20 W +6.5 W 44.5 U 9/15 GREEN BAY 35-20 W +1.5 W 46 O 9/14 HOUSTON 31-10 W -8 W 40.5 O 9/19 SAN FRANCISCO 30-27 W -7.5 L 42 O 9/19 at NY Giants 10-27 L +3.5 L 43.5 U 9/22 at Chicago 29-23 W -2.5 W 40.5 O 9/21 at Tennessee 12-27 L +4.5 L 44 U 9/26 at St Louis 28-25 W +6 W 49 O 9/25 at Minnesota 16-33 L +4 L 44.5 O 9/29 at Detroit 21-26 L -9 L 44.5 O 9/28 INDIANAPOLIS 21-55 L +1.5 L 42.5 O 10/3 at Arizona 10-34 L -3 L 40 O 10/2 BUFFALO 19-7 W -1.5 W 38.5 U 10/6 PITTSBURGH 32-29 W -3 T 43.5 O 10/5 at Carolina 13-19 L +7 W 37.5 U 10/10 TAMPA BAY 17-20 L -3 L 38.5 U 10/9 at Green Bay 3-52 L +3 L 43 O 10/13 at Washington 43-27 W -1 W 46 O 10/12 CHICAGO 20-13 W -6.5 W 43.5 U 10/17 MINNESOTA 31-38 L +3.5 L 53 O 10/16 ATLANTA 31-34 L +5.5 W 43.5 O 10/20 SAN FRANCISCO 35-27 W -1 W 48.5 O 10/19 at Atlanta 45-17 W -3 W 42 O 10/24 at Oakland 31-26 W +3 W 45.5 O 10/23 at St Louis 17-28 L +3 L 46 U 10/27 ATLANTA 35-37 L -3.5 L 47 O 10/26 CAROLINA 20-23 L -3 L 39.5 O 11/7 at San Diego 17-43 L +6.5 L 49.5 O 10/30 MIAMI 6-21 L -2.5 L 41.5 U 11/10 at Carolina 34-24 W -4 W 39.5 O 11/2 at Tampa Bay 17-14 W +8 W 39 U 11/14 KANSAS CITY 27-20 W +3.5 W 56.5 U 11/6 CHICAGO 17-20 L +3 T 34 O 11/17 at Atlanta 17-24 L +1.5 L 51 U 11/16 ATLANTA 23-20 W -9 L 44 U 11/21 DENVER 13-34 L +6 L 48.5 U 11/20 at New England 17-24 L +8 W 48.5 U 11/24 CLEVELAND 15-24 L -6 L 48.5 U 11/23 at Philadelphia 20-33 L +5.5 L 39.5 O 11/28 at Atlanta 21-24 L +9 W 48 U 11/27 at NY Jets 21-19 W +2.5 W 37 O 12/1 TAMPA BAY 23-20 W +2 W 40.5 O 11/30 at Washington 24-20 W -1 W 42 O 12/5 CAROLINA 21-32 L +2 L 46.5 O 12/4 TAMPA BAY 3-10 L +3.5 L 39 U 12/8 at Baltimore 37-25 W -1.5 W 42 O 12/7 TAMPA BAY 7-14 L -3 L 40.5 U 12/12 at Dallas 27-13 W +7 W 49 U 12/12 at Atlanta 17-36 L +10 L 44.5 O 12/15 MINNESOTA 31-32 L -7 L 51 O 12/14 NY GIANTS 45-7 W -8 W 41 O 12/19 at Tampa Bay 21-17 W +7.5 W 43.5 U 12/18 CAROLINA 10-27 L +10 L 40 U 12/22 at Cincinnati 13-20 L -7 L 48.5 U 12/21 at Jacksonville 19-20 L +3 W 42 U 12/26 ATLANTA 26-13 W -6.5 W 44 U 12/24 DETROIT 12-13 L -3 L 40.5 U 12/29 CAROLINA 6-10 L -6 L 43.5 U 12/28 DALLAS 13-7 W +0 W 38 U 1/2 at Carolina 21-18 W +7 W 46 U 1/1 at Tampa Bay 13-27 L +13 L 37.5 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/10 at Cleveland 19-14 W +3 W 36 U 9/6 at Indianapolis 10-41 L +5.5 L 52.5 U 9/7 TAMPA BAY 24-20 W -3 W 43 O 9/13 DETROIT 45-27 W -14 W 49.5O 9/17 at Green Bay 34-27 W -1 W 40 O 9/16 at Tampa Bay 14-31 L -5.5 L 41 O 9/14 at Washington 24-29 L +0 L 43.5 O 9/20 at Philadelphia 48-22 W -2.5 W 46O 9/25 ATLANTA 23-3 W +4 W 44 U 9/27 at Buffalo 27-7 W -5.5 W 51.5U 9/24 TENNESSEE 14-31 L -4.5 L 46.5 U 9/21 at Denver 32-34 L +5.5 W 51.5 O 10/1 at Carolina 18-21 L +7 W 40.5 U 10/4 NY JETS 24-10 W -7.5 W 47U 10/8 TAMPA BAY 24-21 W -6.5 L 34 O 10/7 CAROLINA 13-16 L -3.5 L 43.5 U 9/28 SAN FRANCISCO 31-17 W -4 W 48 T 10/18 NY GIANTS 48-27 W -3 W 47O 10/15 PHILADELPHIA 27-24 W +3 W 47 O 10/14 at Seattle 28-17 W +5.5 W 43 O 10/6 MINNESOTA 27-30 L -3 L 46.5 O 10/25 at Miami 46-34 W -6 W 47.5O 10/29 BALTIMORE 22-35 L -3 L 37 O 10/21 ATLANTA 22-16 W -7.5 L 42.5 U 10/12 OAKLAND 34-3 W -7 W 47 U 11/2 ATLANTA 35-27 W -11 L 56O 11/5 at Tampa Bay 31-14 W +2 W 37.5 O 10/28 at San Francisco 31-10 W -2 W 39.5 O 10/19 at Carolina 7-30 L +3 L 44.5 U 11/8 CAROLINA 30-20 W -12 L 51U 11/12 at Pittsburgh 31-38 L +6.5 L 45.5 O 11/4 JACKSONVILLE 41-24 W -3.5 W 39.5 O 10/26 vs. San Diego 37-32 W +3 W 46 O 11/15 at St Louis 28-23 W -14 L 50.5O 11/22 at Tampa Bay 38-7 W -10 W 50.5U 11/19 CINCINNATI 16-31 L -3 L 51.5 U 11/11 ST LOUIS 29-37 L -10 L 47 O 11/9 at Atlanta 20-34 L +1.5 L 50.5 O 11/30 NEW ENGLAND 38-17 W -2 W 57U 11/26 at Atlanta 31-13 W +3.5 W 48 U 11/18 at Houston 10-23 L +2 L 49.5 U 11/16 at Kansas City 30-20 W -6 W 50.5 U 12/6 at Washington 33-30 W -8 L 46.5O 12/3 SAN FRANCISCO 34-10 W -7.5 W 45.5 U 11/25 at Carolina 31-6 W -3 W 42 U 11/24 GREEN BAY 51-29 W +0 W 51.5 O 12/13 at Atlanta 26-23 W -10 L 49.5U 12/10 at Dallas 42-17 W +7.5 W 47.5 O 12/2 TAMPA BAY 23-27 L -6 L 41 O 11/30 at Tampa Bay 20-23 L +3.5 W 44 U 12/19 DALLAS 17-24 L -7 L 53.5U 12/17 WASHINGTON 10-16 L -10 L 47 U 12/24 at NY Giants 30-7 W +3 W 47.5 U 12/10 at Atlanta 34-14 W -4 W 44 O 12/7 ATLANTA 29-25 W -3 W 52 O 12/27 TAMPA BAY 17-20 L -13.5 L 48.5U 12/31 CAROLINA 21-31 L +3 L 38 O 12/16 ARIZONA 31-24 W -4 W 49.5 O 12/11 at Chicago 24-27 L +2.5 L 46 O 1/3 at Carolina 10-23 L +10 L 40.5U 1/16 (PL) ARIZONA 45-14 W -7.5 W 56.5O 1/13 (PL) PHILADELPHIA 27-24 W -5.5 L 49 O 12/23 PHILADELPHIA 23-38 L -3 L 47.5 O 12/21 at Detroit 42-7 W -6.5 W 50.5 U 1/24 (PL) MINNESOTA 31-28 W -4 L 53.5O 1/21 (PL) at Chicago 14-39 L +3 L 42.5 O 12/30 at Chicago 25-33 L +1 L 42 O 12/28 CAROLINA 31-33 L +2 T 51.5 O 2/7 (PL) vs. Indianapolis 31-17 W +4.5 W 56.5U 38 WWW.STATFOX.COM

TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 100 to 1 NFC Title: 50 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 20.06 (23rd toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 15-4 7-9 5-11 11-6 4-12 9-8 9-7 3-13 63-70 (47%) OVERALL ATS 13-6 6-9 5-10 8-9 6-9 9-8 8-8 6-10 61-69 (47%) PRESEASON ATS 1-3 3-2 3-1 3-1 1-2 3-1 3-1 1-3 18-14 (56%) HOME ATS 7-2 2-5 4-3 4-5 3-4 6-3 4-4 1-6 31-32 (49%) ROAD ATS 5-4 4-4 1-7 4-4 3-5 3-5 4-4 5-4 29-37 (44%) vs DIVISION ATS 3-3 2-4 2-4 4-2 2-4 5-1 3-3 2-4 23-25 (48%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 9-5 5-6 4-8 6-7 4-7 8-5 7-5 5-7 48-50 (49%) as FAVORITE ATS 9-5 4-8 3-3 4-7 0-3 6-4 5-5 0-0 31-35 (47%) as UNDERDOG ATS 4-1 2-1 2-7 4-2 6-6 3-4 3-3 6-10 30-34 (47%) OVER-UNDER 8-11 6-10 5-11 6-11 7-9 9-8 8-8 6-10 55-78 (41%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * TAMPA BAY is on a 27-8 UNDER the total (+18.2 Units) run in the first two weeks of the season The Average Score was TAMPA BAY 15.7, OPPONENT 15.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - CLEVELAND, 9/19 - at Carolina * TAMPA BAY is on a 3-15 ATS (-13.5 Units) skid vs. awful passing teams averaging 5.2 or less PYA The Average Score was TAMPA BAY 19.9, OPPONENT 18.4. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - CLEVELAND, 10/24 - ST LOUIS * TAMPA BAY is on a 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) run on the road vs. excellent teams - outscoring opponents by 10+ PPG The Average Score was TAMPA BAY 24.3, OPPONENT 18.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 1/2 - at New Orleans * TAMPA BAY is on a 16-5 UNDER the total (+10.5 Units) run vs. teams giving up 17 or less PPG The Average Score was TAMPA BAY 15.6, OPPONENT 16.9. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/28 - at Baltimore * TAMPA BAY is 10-2 OVER the total (+7.8 Units) vs. teams with a losing record since 07. The Average Score was TAMPA BAY 24.2, OPPONENT 21.1. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - CLEVELAND, 10/24 - ST LOUIS, 12/12 - at Washington, 12/19 - DETROIT, 12/26 - SEATTLE WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 39 2009 Record: 3-13 (-0.5 ML Units), 6-10 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 6-10 DIVISION: NFC South COACH: Raheem Morris, 2nd year STADIUM: Raymond James Stadium Scoring Differential: -9.8 (#29 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 15 (#24 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -7.1 (#26 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 23.69 (#2 of 32) 9/12/10 CLEVELAND * L3 TB-CLE series games have gone UNDER the total 9/19/10 at Carolina * FAVORITE is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in L5 CAR-TB matchups 9/26/10 PITTSBURGH * L4 TB-PIT series games have gone UNDER the total 10/10/10 at Cincinnati * UNDER the total is 4-1 in L5 games of CIN-TB series 10/17/10 NEW ORLEANS * ROAD TEAM is on 9-5 SU & 11-3 ATS run in TB-NO series 10/24/10 ST LOUIS * TAMPA BAY is on 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS run vs. ST LOUIS 10/31/10 at Arizona * L6 games of ARZ-TB series are 5-1 UNDER the total 11/7/10 at Atlanta * TAMPA BAY is 6-4 SU & 8-2 ATS at ATLANTA since 97 11/14/10 CAROLINA * L6 games of TB-CAR series at TAMPA BAY are 5-1 OVER the total 11/21/10 at San Francisco * HOME TEAM is on 7-0 SU & ATS run in SF-TB series 11/28/10 at Baltimore * L3 BAL-TB series games have gone UNDER the total 12/5/10 ATLANTA * FAVORITE has swept L3 TB-ATL games at TAMPA BAY, both SU & ATS 12/12/10 at Washington * L2 games in WAS-TB series at WASHINGTON went UNDER the total 12/19/10 DETROIT * DETROIT is 8-9 SU but 12-5 ATS vs. TAMPA BAY since 96 12/26/10 SEATTLE * L7 games of TB-SEA series are 7-0 UNDER the total 1/2/11 at New Orleans * TAMPA BAY is 5-2 SU & 6-1 ATS in its L7 games at NEW ORLEANS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring -9.8 29 Yardage -78.0 27 Yards Per Play -0.84 27 Yards Per Point -4.30 29 Turnovers -5 22 Offensive Stats Points Scored 15.3 30 First Downs 15.4 28 Total Yards Per Game 287.6 28 Yards Per Play 4.79 27 Yards Per Point 18.92 30 Rushing Attempts 25.2 25 Rush Yards Per Game 101.6 23 Yards Per Rush 4.03 25 Rushing TD s 5 31 Passing Attempts Per Game 32.8 22 Completions Per Game 17.5 26 Completion Percentage 53.3% 30 Passing Yards Per Game 185.9 24 Passing Yards Per Attempt 5.67 27 Passing TD s 18 21 Sacks Allowed 33 13 Interceptions Thrown 29 31 Fumbles Lost 5 1 Total Turnovers Lost 34 29 Avg. Time of Possession 24:47 31 3rd Down Conversions 32.6% 27 4th Down Conversions 40.9% 24 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 25.0 27 First Downs 20.3 29 Total Yards Per Game 365.6 27 Yards Per Play 5.63 24 Yards Per Point 14.62 25 Rushing Attempts 33.1 29 Rush Yards Per Game 158.2 32 Yards Per Rush 4.78 32 Rushing TD s 16 21 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 30.1 2 Opponent Completions/Game 18.8 8 Opponent Completion % 62.4% 21 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 207.4 10 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 7.67 30 Passing TD s Allowed 22 14 Sacks Recorded 28 26 Interceptions 19 9 Fumbles Recovered 10 16 Total Turnovers Forced 29 10 3rd Down Conversions 40.2% 22 4th Down Conversions 60.0% 26 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 5.8 14 Penalty Yards/Game 43.5 10 Opponent Penalties/Game 5.0 29 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 45.7 21 Punt Return Average 11.6 4 Kick Return Average 26.2 2 Punt Attempts per game 5.4 25 Punt Net Average 38.1 25 Field Goals Made 16 31 Field Goal Percentage 61.5% 32 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 NEW ORLEANS 20-26 L -6 L 37 O 9/8 at Philadelphia 17-0 W +3 W 36.5 U 9/12 at Washington 10-16 L +2.5 L 38 U 9/11 at Minnesota 24-13 W +5.5 W 43 U 9/15 at Baltimore 25-0 W -4.5 W 32 U 9/14 CAROLINA 9-12 L -8.5 L 34 U 9/19 SEATTLE 6-10 L +3 L 36.5 U 9/18 BUFFALO 19-3 W -3 W 34 U 9/23 ST LOUIS 26-14 W +3 W 42.5 U 9/29 at Cincinnati 35-7 W -6.5 W 33.5 O 9/21 at Atlanta 31-10 W -6.5 W 35.5 O 9/26 at Oakland 20-30 L +3 L 35.5 O 9/25 at Green Bay 17-16 W -3.5 L 37 U 10/6 at Atlanta 20-6 W +2.5 W 38.5 U 10/6 INDIANAPOLIS 35-38 L -4.5 L 37.5 O 10/3 DENVER 13-16 L +3 T 34.5 U 10/2 DETROIT 17-13 W -6.5 L 34.5 U 10/13 CLEVELAND 17-3 W -7.5 W 36.5 U 10/12 at Washington 35-13 W -3 W 37 O 10/10 at New Orleans 20-17 W +3 W 38.5 U 10/9 at NY Jets 12-14 L -2 L 32 U 10/20 at Philadelphia 10-20 L +3 L 37 U 10/19 at San Francisco 7-24 L -5 L 39 U 10/18 at St Louis 21-28 L +6.5 L 42.5 O 10/16 MIAMI 27-13 W -3 W 35 O 10/27 at Carolina 12-9 W -8 L 31.5 U 10/26 DALLAS 16-0 W -6 W 37 U 10/24 CHICAGO 19-7 W -7 W 31.5 U 10/30 at San Francisco 10-15 L -10 L 36.5 U 11/3 MINNESOTA 38-24 W -7.5 W 37 O 11/2 NEW ORLEANS 14-17 L -8 L 39 U 11/7 KANSAS CITY 34-31 W +3 W 45.5 O 11/6 CAROLINA 14-34 L +0 L 36.5 O 11/17 CAROLINA 23-10 W -8 W 35 U 11/24 GREEN BAY 21-7 W -3 W 39 U 11/9 at Carolina 24-27 L -3.5 L 34.5 O 11/14 at Atlanta 14-24 L +3.5 L 41 U 11/13 WASHINGTON 36-35 W +1.5 W 34 O 11/20 at Atlanta 30-27 W +6.5 W 39 O 12/1 at New Orleans 20-23 L -2 L 40.5 O 11/16 GREEN BAY 13-20 L -4 L 41 U 11/21 SAN FRANCISCO 35-3 W -8 W 42 U 11/27 CHICAGO 10-13 L -3 L 31 U 12/8 ATLANTA 34-10 W -4 W 37 O 11/24 NY GIANTS 19-13 W -6 T 38 U 11/28 at Carolina 14-21 L -3 L 39 U 12/15 at Detroit 23-20 W -9.5 L 37 O 12/4 at New Orleans 10-3 W -3.5 W 39 U 11/30 at Jacksonville 10-17 L -3 L 37 U 12/5 ATLANTA 27-0 W -2 W 39.5 U 12/23 PITTSBURGH 7-17 L -4.5 L 37.5 U 12/11 at Carolina 20-10 W +6 W 35.5 U 12/7 at New Orleans 14-7 W +3 W 40.5 U 12/12 at San Diego 24-31 L +4 L 42.5 O 12/29 at Chicago 15-0 W -7.5 W 31.5 U 12/17 at New England 0-28 L +6 L 38 U 1/12 (PL) SAN FRANCISCO 31-6 W -6 W 38.5 U 12/14 HOUSTON 16-3 W -11.5 W 36 U 12/19 NEW ORLEANS 17-21 L -7.5 L 43.5 U 12/24 ATLANTA 27-24 W -4 L 37 O 1/19 (PL) at Philadelphia 27-10 W +4.5 W 33.5 O 12/20 ATLANTA 28-30 L -8.5 L 38 O 12/26 CAROLINA 20-37 L -1.5 L 39 O 1/1 NEW ORLEANS 27-13 W -13 W 37.5 O 1/26 (PL) Oakland 48-21 W +3.5 W 44 O 12/28 at Tennessee 13-33 L +4 L 39 O 1/2 at Arizona 7-12 L +4 L 38.5 U 1/7 WASHINGTON 10-17 L -1.5 L 37.5 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 BALTIMORE 0-27 L -3 L 33 U 9/17 at Atlanta 3-14 L +4 L 35 U 9/24 CAROLINA 24-26 L +3.5 W 33.5 O 10/8 at New Orleans 21-24 L +6.5 W 34 O 10/15 CINCINNATI 14-13 W +4.5 W 44.5 U 10/22 PHILADELPHIA 23-21 W +6 W 42 O 10/29 at NY Giants 3-17 L +8.5 L 36 U 11/5 NEW ORLEANS 14-31 L -2 L 37.5 O 11/13 at Carolina 10-24 L +10 L 37.5 U 11/19 WASHINGTON 20-17 W -3 T 33.5 O 11/23 at Dallas 10-38 L +12.5 L 39 O 12/3 at Pittsburgh 3-20 L +9 L 40 U 12/10 ATLANTA 6-17 L +3.5 L 37.5 U 12/17 at Chicago 31-34 L +13 W 35 O 12/24 at Cleveland 22-7 W +3.5 W 37.5 U 12/31 SEATTLE 7-23 L -3 L 37 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 at Seattle 6-20 L +6 L 40.5 U 9/16 NEW ORLEANS 31-14 W +5.5 W 41 O 9/23 ST LOUIS 24-3 W -3.5 W 39 U 9/30 at Carolina 20-7 W +3 W 38.5 U 10/7 at Indianapolis 14-33 L +8.5 L 44.5 O 10/14 TENNESSEE 13-10 W -2 W 37 U 10/21 at Detroit 16-23 L +2.5 L 45 U 10/28 JACKSONVILLE 23-24 L -3.5 L 32.5 O 11/4 ARIZONA 17-10 W -3 W 39 U 11/18 at Atlanta 31-7 W -3 W 35.5 O 11/25 WASHINGTON 19-13 W -3.5 W 38 U 12/2 at New Orleans 27-23 W +6 W 41 O 12/9 at Houston 14-28 L -3 L 39.5 O 12/16 ATLANTA 37-3 W -13 W 37.5 O 12/23 at San Francisco 19-21 L -6.5 L 36.5 O 12/30 CAROLINA 23-31 L +3 L 35.5 O 1/6 (PL) NY GIANTS 14-24 L -3 L 39.5 U DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/7 at New Orleans 20-24 L +3 L 43 O 9/14 ATLANTA 24-9 W -7 W 37.5 U 9/21 at Chicago 27-24 W +3 W 34.5 O 9/28 GREEN BAY 30-21 W -2 W 43 O 10/5 at Denver 13-16 L +3.5 W 47 U 10/12 CAROLINA 27-3 W -2.5 W 37 U 10/19 SEATTLE 20-10 W -11 L 40 U 10/26 at Dallas 9-13 L +1.5 L 40.5 U 11/2 at Kansas City 30-27 W -9.5 L 37 O 11/16 MINNESOTA 19-13 W -5.5 W 39 U 11/23 at Detroit 38-20 W -8 W 42 O 11/30 NEW ORLEANS 23-20 W -3.5 L 44 U 12/8 at Carolina 23-38 L +3 L 40 O 12/14 at Atlanta 10-13 L +5 W 43 U 12/21 SAN DIEGO 24-41 L -4 L 42 O 12/28 OAKLAND 24-31 L -11 L 39.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/13 DALLAS 21-34 L +4.5 L 39.5O 9/20 at Buffalo 20-33 L +4 L 41.5O 9/27 NY GIANTS 0-24 L +6 L 46U 10/4 at Washington 13-16 L +9.5 W 35.5U 10/11 at Philadelphia 14-33 L +16 L 42O 10/18 CAROLINA 21-28 L +3 L 40.5O 10/25 NEW ENGLAND 7-35 L +15.5 L 44.5U 11/8 GREEN BAY 38-28 W +9.5 W 43O 11/15 at Miami 23-25 L +10 W 43O 11/22 NEW ORLEANS 7-38 L +10 L 50.5U 11/29 at Atlanta 17-20 L +13 W 46U 12/6 at Carolina 6-16 L +3 L 40U 12/13 NY JETS 3-26 L +3.5 L 36.5U 12/20 at Seattle 24-7 W +6.5 W 39U 12/27 at New Orleans 20-17 W +13.5 W 48.5U 1/3 ATLANTA 10-20 L +3 L 41.5U

NFC WEST nfc west Preview After back-to-back NFC West Division titles, the Arizona Cardinals now face uncertainty. Kurt Warner s retirement was certainly not music to Ken Whisenhunt s ears. The Cardinals offense was explosive with Warner under center, and without him, plus WR Anquan Boldin (Ravens), to say things might be different would be a vast understatement. The job of replacing Warner falls to the winner of a training camp duel between Matt Leinart and Derek Anderson (Browns). However, there are some major concerns on what was an improved defense too, as that unit will be without Bertrand Berry, Karlos Dansby, and Antrel Rolle. It s safe to say that the rest of the west is optimistic heading into 2010. Leading the charge is San Francisco, who beat the Cardinals twice as part of an 8-8 2009 campaign. The 49ers were easily the division s best defensive team, but so much of what San Francisco accomplishes falls on the shoulders of quarterback Alex Smith, still the QB drafted instead of Aaron Rodgers a handful of years ago. To make him more comfortable under center, the 49ers have added a pair of first round draft picks to the offensive line, plus Ted Ginn at wideout opposite of Michael Crabtree. St. Louis seems to have a long-range plan that includes improving line play and building an offense around quarterback Sam Bradford (1-Oklahoma), the No. 1 overall pick. He comes to town with what should be much better protection than his predecessor had in recent years. The Rams win total has dropped from three to two to one over the last three years but reality suggests they will be improved. In Seattle, Pete Carroll, who didn t have much success during his first two NFL stints, hopes the third time s a charm. He appears to have changed almost everything except Seattle s logo and uniform. There are tons of new names and faces on the roster as he looks to quickly turnaround a team that has won nine games over the last two years. ARIZONA CARDINALS The last time the Cardinals won back-to-back division titles prior to 2008 and 09, the team was located in St. Louis. However, just when it seemed like the franchise was set to become a consistent playoff contender, the retirement of QB Kurt Warner, trade of WR Anquan Boldin and the loss of LB Karlos Dansby to free agency has taken away a strong core of talent, putting another postseason berth for head coach Ken Whisenhunt s team in jeopardy Although Arizona s offensive numbers were down a bit from its Super Bowl season, the Cardinals still managed to place 14th in the NFL in total offense (344.4 YPG). Now that Warner is gone, replacing his 8,336 yards passing and 56 touchdowns the past two seasons is a huge question lingering over the offense. Matt Leinart, whose career has been slowed by injury and inconsistency, and newly acquired Derek Anderson (Browns), are next in line. Of course, any receiving corps that has the services of Larry Fitzgerald will present problems for opposing secondaries, and Beanie Wells should continue to improve after leading the team with 793 yards rushing (7 TD s) as a rookie. The offensive line has a new face in free-agent guard Alan Faneca (Jets) After finishing 20th in the NFL in total defense (346.4 YPG) and 14th in scoring defense (20.3 PPG), the stop unit more or less fell apart in the postseason, allowing 90 points in two games. Gone from the unit are LB Karlos Dansby, FS Antrel Rolle, and DE Bertrand Berry With Warner, Fitzgerald and Boldin, the Cardinals had one of the NFL s most potent passing attacks. Now that Warner and Boldin are out of the picture, the running game may play more a prominent role. The defense, minus key contributors, will have to step up for the Cardinals to contend for a third straight NFC West title. SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS Mike Singletary has restored some stability to a wayward franchise, as the 49ers 8-8 mark snapped a string of six consecutive losing seasons. The next goal is to unseat the Cardinals, who they beat twice a year ago, and win the NFC West San Francisco finished 27th in total offense (290.8 YPG) and 18th in scoring (20.6 PPG) in OC Jimmy Raye s first year. Shaun Hill and Alex Smith shared time at QB through the first six weeks, but it became Smith s job over the final 10 games. He may finally be ready to fulfill the promise that made him the #1 overall pick in the 2005 draft. RB Frank Gore keeps the San Francisco running game a threat, with 1,120 yards and a career-best 10 touchdowns in 2009. Highly touted WR Michael Crabtree, new acquisition Ted Ginn Jr. and TE Vernon Davis, off a monster season, make up the best pass-catching unit this team has had in over a decade. The interior may take a little while to mesh with first round rookie starters LT Anthony Davis & RG Mike Iupati The stop unit held seven opponents to 10 points or fewer and allowed just 17.6 PPG overall, good for fourth in the NFL. The unit s 326.4 2009 STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Arizona 11-7-0 0.611 440 415 8-4-0 5-4-0 6-3-0 9-8-1 52.9% 7-11-0 San Francisco 8-8-0 0.500 330 281 7-5-0 6-2-0 2-6-0 9-4-3 69.2% 5-11-0 Seattle 5-11-0 0.312 280 390 4-8-0 4-4-0 1-7-0 6-10-0 37.5% 7-9-0 St Louis 1-15-0 0.062 175 436 1-11-0 0-8-0 1-7-0 7-9-0 43.7% 7-9-0 yards allowed per game ranked 15th. All three starters return to the three-man front, while San Francisco s quartet of linebackers can play both fast and physical. The catalyst is Patrick Willis, who paced the NFL with 152 tackles. The secondary should be better with the return of CB Nate Clements, sidelined for nine games with a shoulder injury If the Niners are going to qualify for the postseason for the first time since 2002, it will be up to Smith to lead the way. He is surrounded by weapons and the defense is easily the division s best. San Francisco could take the NFC West. SEATTLE SEAHAWKS The 2005 season, when Seattle played in its only Super Bowl, seems like ages ago. Architect Mike Holmgren is now in Cleveland, leaving behind a Seahawks team with just nine wins in their last 32 games. Jim Mora s tenure lasted all of 16 games and now Seattle has turned to Pete Carroll, of USC fame. Seattle ruled the NFC West from 2004-07, and Carroll s task will be to reverse the recent losing trend The Seahawks were 25th in the NFL in scoring, averaging just 17.5 PPG. Matt Hasselbeck enters his 12th season and his 17 touchdowns last year were his lowest full-season total since 2002. Seattle was not productive on the ground as Julius Jones and Justin Forsett split time at RB with moderate success. Leon Washington, a multi-talented performer coming off a broken leg, was added through a trade. T.J. Houshmandzadeh leads the Seattle wideouts but Nate Burleson departed as a free agent after 63 catches. TE John Carlson led the team with seven TD s. The newest addition to the line is rookie tackle Russell Okung (1a-OSU), who will have big shoes to fill for the retired Walter Jones. The rest of the line remains intact The Seahawks were 12th in the NFC in total defense, allowing 356.4 YPG, but where Seattle really struggled was against the pass (245.4 YPG), ranking 30th. The pass rush suffered a blow with the retirement of Patrick Kearney, but Lofa Tatupu, who missed the last 10 games with a torn pectoral muscle, returns at middle linebacker. Expect an improved Aaron Curry while CB Marcus Trufant remains the leader in the secondary. He also missed six games with a back injury The Seahawks grabbed one of college football s high-profile coaches to rebuild the team but Carroll has catching up to do. Concerns on the offensive and defensive lines will likely lead to a third straight losing season. ST LOUIS RAMS The Rams finished with a 1-15 mark in 2009 and lost eight of those games by 19 points or more. St. Louis scored the fewest points in the NFL and allowed the second most. Now comes Year Two for HC Steve Spagnuolo, as he tries to fortify a defense that showed a few flashes of potential and build an offense around a premier RB and a QB who was the top overall selection in the draft St. Louis was 29th in total offense (279.4 YPG), and 32nd in scoring (10.9 PPG). Improvement shouldn t be much of a challenge. QB Marc Bulger was released, and will be replaced by either journeyman A.J. Feeley or rookie Sam Bradford (1-Oklahoma). The Rams would like to work Bradford in slowly but may not have that luxury. RB Steven Jackson paced the NFC with 1,416 yards rushing. He also had 51 catches and remains the one productive fixture in the offense. Donnie Avery (47 catches, 589 yards, 5 TD s) will start as one receiver with an open competition for the other. The line is beleaguered and needs to improve The team s offense was bad but the defense wasn t far behind as the Rams finished 29th in total defense (372.8 YPG), and 31st in scoring (27.2 PPG). The line had just 25 sacks, but that may change with the continued maturation of end Chris Long and the addition of tackle Fred Robbins. Second-year LB James Laurinaitis had a standout rookie year and will only get better. The secondary could be a work in progress The Rams have hit rock bottom and now begin the slow climb back to being competitive. If the offensive line affords Bradford some time and Jackson stays healthy, more points will follow. More stability on the defensive line should also help. Spagnuolo could coax five or six wins out of this team if things break right. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH San Francisco Arizona Seattle St. Louis 40 WWW.STATFOX.COM

ARIZONA CARDINALS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 60 to 1 NFC Title: 28 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 18.69 (27th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 5-11 4-12 6-10 5-11 5-11 8-8 12-8 11-7 56-78 (42%) OVERALL ATS 6-10 6-10 9-7 6-10 8-8 9-7 13-7 9-8 66-67 (50%) PRESEASON ATS 1-3 4-0 2-2 3-1 2-2 1-3 2-2 0-4 15-17 (47%) HOME ATS 3-5 6-2 5-3 2-5 4-4 5-3 7-3 5-4 37-29 (56%) ROAD ATS 3-5 0-8 4-4 4-5 4-4 4-4 6-4 4-4 29-38 (43%) vs DIVISION ATS 3-3 2-4 4-2 3-3 3-3 3-3 5-1 3-3 26-22 (54%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 6-6 5-7 8-4 4-8 6-6 5-7 10-5 7-7 51-50 (50%) as FAVORITE ATS 0-2 0-0 2-1 4-2 1-3 3-4 8-2 3-7 21-21 (50%) as UNDERDOG ATS 6-8 6-10 7-6 2-8 7-5 6-3 5-5 6-1 45-46 (49%) OVER-UNDER 8-8 7-9 9-7 10-6 10-5 11-5 14-6 7-11 76-57 (57%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * ARIZONA is 14-3 ATS (+10.7 Units) vs. good passing teams averaging 7 or more PYA since 07. The Average Score was ARIZONA 26.7, OPPONENT 23.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/3 - at San Diego, 10/10 - NEW ORLEANS, 11/7 - at Minnesota, 12/25 - DALLAS * ARIZONA is on a 10-1 ATS (+8.9 Units) run at home vs. poor defensive teams - allowing >=5.65 YPP The Average Score was ARIZONA 29, OPPONENT 18.6. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - OAKLAND, 10/10 - NEW ORLEANS, 10/31 - TAMPA BAY, 11/14 - SEATTLE, 12/5 - ST LOUIS * ARIZONA is on a 34-14 ATS (+18.6 Units) run vs. good teams - outscoring opponents by 6+ PPG The Average Score was ARIZONA 19.7, OPPONENT 23.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/3 - at San Diego, 10/10 - NEW ORLEANS, 11/7 - at Minnesota * Over the L2 seasons, ARIZONA is 8-1 ATS (+6.9 Units) in weeks 5 through 9. The Average Score was ARIZONA 29.9, OPPONENT 19.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/10 - NEW ORLEANS, 10/24 - at Seattle, 10/31 - TAMPA BAY, 11/7 - at Minnesota * Over the L2 seasons, ARIZONA is 6-0 UNDER the total (+6 Units) on the road vs. division opponents. The Average Score was ARIZONA 23.3, OPPONENT 14.3. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - at St Louis, 10/24 - at Seattle, 1/2 - at San Francisco WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM LINE FINAL 41 2009 Record: 11-7 (+0 ML Units), 9-8 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 7-11 DIVISION: NFC West COACH: Ken Whisenhunt, 4th year STADIUM: University of Phoenix StadiumScoring Differential: +3.3 (#12 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 17 (#21 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +0.4 (#17 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 19.06 (#26 of 32) 9/12/10 at St Louis * L4 STL-ARZ series games have gone UNDER the total 9/19/10 at Atlanta * L8 games of ATL-ARZ series are 7-1 OVER the total 9/26/10 OAKLAND * L2 games in ARZ-OAK series at ARIZONA went OVER the total 10/3/10 at San Diego * ROAD TEAM is on 6-0 ATS run in SD-ARZ series 10/10/10 NEW ORLEANS * NEW ORLEANS is 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS in its L6 games vs. ARIZONA 10/24/10 at Seattle * ARIZONA has won four straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. SEATTLE 10/31/10 TAMPA BAY * L6 games of ARZ-TB series are 5-1 UNDER the total 11/7/10 at Minnesota * UNDERDOG is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 MIN-ARZ games 11/14/10 SEATTLE * L6 games of ARZ-SEA series at ARIZONA are 6-0 OVER the total 11/21/10 at Kansas City * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 KC-ARZ games 11/29/10 SAN FRANCISCO * ROAD TEAM is 5-4 SU & 8-1 ATS in L9 ARZ-SF matchups 12/5/10 ST LOUIS * L6 games of ARZ-STL series at ARIZONA are 5-1 UNDER the total 12/12/10 DENVER * FAVORITE has swept L4 ARZ-DEN games, both SU & ATS 12/19/10 at Carolina * ROAD TEAM is on 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS run in CAR-ARZ series 12/25/10 DALLAS * HOME TEAM is 13-4 SU & 12-5 ATS in ARZ-DAL series since 96 1/2/11 at San Francisco * L3 games in SF-ARZ series at SAN FRANCISCO went UNDER the total ATS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +3.3 12 Yardage +0.0 17 Yards Per Play +0.33 13 Yards Per Point +2.14 10 Turnovers -7 24 Offensive Stats Points Scored 23.4 11 First Downs 19.8 14 Total Yards Per Game 355.4 12 Yards Per Play 5.80 9 Yards Per Point 14.16 9 Rushing Attempts 22.8 32 Rush Yards Per Game 93.4 28 Yards Per Rush 4.09 23 Rushing TD s 16 12 Passing Attempts Per Game 37.1 3 Completions Per Game 24.5 3 Completion Percentage 66.0% 5 Passing Yards Per Game 251.0 12 Passing Yards Per Attempt 6.76 12 Passing TD s 27 10 Sacks Allowed 26 6 Interceptions Thrown 18 20 Fumbles Lost 18 32 Total Turnovers Lost 36 31 Avg. Time of Possession 29:57 10 3rd Down Conversions 36.3% 21 4th Down Conversions 55.6% 12 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 20.3 14 First Downs 18.1 10 Total Yards Per Game 355.4 23 Yards Per Play 5.47 20 Yards Per Point 16.30 14 Rushing Attempts 25.1 8 Rush Yards Per Game 112.8 17 Yards Per Rush 4.49 25 Rushing TD s 13 17 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 37.1 31 Opponent Completions/Game 21.6 26 Opponent Completion % 58.3% 8 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 233.7 23 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 4.91 1 Passing TD s Allowed 8 1 Sacks Recorded 43 6 Interceptions 21 7 Fumbles Recovered 8 27 Total Turnovers Forced 29 10 3rd Down Conversions 35.3% 6 4th Down Conversions 50.0% 15 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 6.8 26 Penalty Yards/Game 55.4 27 Opponent Penalties/Game 6.5 9 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 52.5 10 Punt Return Average 6.8 24 Kick Return Average 23.8 9 Punt Attempts per game 5.4 23 Punt Net Average 41.3 7 Field Goals Made 18 29 Field Goal Percentage 94.7% 1 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 at Washington 23-31 L +6 L 45 O 9/7 at Detroit 24-42 L +3.5 L 39 O 9/12 at St Louis 10-17 L +10.5 W 46 U 9/11 at NY Giants 19-42 L +3 L 37.5 O 9/15 at Seattle 24-13 W +4 W 40 U 9/14 SEATTLE 0-38 L +4.5 L 44.5 U 9/19 NEW ENGLAND 12-23 L +7 L 41 U 9/18 ST LOUIS 12-17 L -1.5 L 44 U 9/22 SAN DIEGO 15-23 L +3 L 39 U 9/21 GREEN BAY 20-13 W +7 W 42 U 9/26 at Atlanta 3-6 L +11 W 44 U 9/25 at Seattle 12-37 L +6 L 42 O 9/29 NY GIANTS 21-7 W +3 W 39 U 9/28 at St Louis 13-37 L +11.5 L 45.5 O 10/3 NEW ORLEANS 34-10 W +3 W 40 O 10/2 SAN FRANCISCO 31-14 W -3 W 44 O 10/6 at Carolina 16-13 W +5 W 35 U 10/5 at Dallas 7-24 L +7.5 L 39 U 10/10 at San Francisco 28-31 L +1 L 36.5 O 10/9 CAROLINA 20-24 L +1.5 L 43 O 10/20 DALLAS 9-6 W -4 L 36.5 U 10/12 BALTIMORE 18-26 L +6.5 L 37 O 10/24 SEATTLE 25-17 W +6.5 W 40 O 10/23 TENNESSEE 20-10 W -5.5 W 45 U 10/27 at San Francisco 28-38 L +9 L 40 O 10/26 SAN FRANCISCO 16-13 W +7 W 41 U 10/31 at Buffalo 14-38 L +4.5 L 33.5 O 10/30 at Dallas 13-34 L +9 L 38.5 O 11/3 ST LOUIS 14-27 L +5 L 43.5 U 11/2 CINCINNATI 17-14 W +3 W 39 U 11/7 at Miami 24-23 W +3 W 34.5 O 11/6 SEATTLE 19-33 L +4.5 L 42 O 11/10 SEATTLE 6-27 L -3 L 37 U 11/9 at Pittsburgh 15-28 L +7 L 40.5 O 11/14 NY GIANTS 17-14 W -1 W 39 U 11/13 at Detroit 21-29 L +4.5 L 40 O 11/17 at Philadelphia 14-38 L +12 L 37.5 O 11/16 at Cleveland 6-44 L +5 L 37.5 O 11/21 at Carolina 10-35 L +3 L 38 O 11/20 at St Louis 38-28 W +8 W 50 O 11/24 OAKLAND 20-41 L +9.5 L 44 O 11/23 ST LOUIS 27-30 L +7 W 44 O 11/28 NY JETS 3-13 L +3 L 36.5 U 11/27 JACKSONVILLE 17-24 L +3.5 L 43.5 U 12/1 at Kansas City 0-49 L +9 L 47 O 11/30 at Chicago 3-28 L +4.5 L 36 U 12/5 at Detroit 12-26 L +6 L 37 O 12/4 at San Francisco 17-10 W -3.5 W 44 U 12/8 DETROIT 23-20 W +1 W 39.5 O 12/7 at San Francisco 14-50 L +10.5 L 40.5 O 12/12 SAN FRANCISCO 28-31 L -7 L 36 O 12/11 WASHINGTON 13-17 L +3.5 L 40 U 12/15 at St Louis 28-30 L +11 W 44 O 12/14 CAROLINA 17-20 L +7 W 38.5 U 12/19 ST LOUIS 31-7 W +3 W 41.5 U 12/18 at Houston 19-30 L -3 L 42 O 12/21 SAN FRANCISCO 14-17 L +3.5 W 41 U 12/21 at Seattle 10-28 L +15.5 L 44.5 U 12/26 at Seattle 21-24 L +7 W 44 O 12/24 PHILADELPHIA 27-21 W -3 W 39.5 O 12/29 at Denver 7-37 L +13.5 L 41.5 O 12/28 MINNESOTA 18-17 W +8 W 45.5 U 1/2 TAMPA BAY 12-7 W -4 W 38.5 U 1/1 at Indianapolis 13-17 L +7.5 W 45 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/10 SAN FRANCISCO 34-27 W -9.5 L 44 O 9/10 at San Francisco 17-20 L +3.5 W 47 U 9/7 at San Francisco 23-13 W -2.5 W 42.5 U 9/13 SAN FRANCISCO 16-20 L -4.5 L 45U 9/17 at Seattle 10-21 L +7 L 47.5 U 9/16 SEATTLE 23-20 W +2.5 W 42.5 O 9/14 MIAMI 31-10 W -6 W 40.5 O 9/20 at Jacksonville 31-17 W +3 W 44O 9/21 at Washington 17-24 L +3 L 43.5 U 9/24 ST LOUIS 14-16 L -5 L 43.5 U 9/23 at Baltimore 23-26 L +7 W 36 O 9/27 INDIANAPOLIS 10-31 L -3 L 48.5U 9/28 at NY Jets 35-56 L +1.5 L 43.5 O 10/1 at Atlanta 10-32 L +7.5 L 41 O 9/30 PITTSBURGH 21-14 W +5.5 W 42.5 U 10/5 BUFFALO 41-17 W -2 W 44.5 O 10/11 HOUSTON 28-21 W -6 W 50.5U 10/8 KANSAS CITY 20-23 L +3.5 W 40 O 10/7 at St Louis 34-31 W -3.5 L 40 O 10/12 DALLAS 30-24 W +4.5 W 53.5 O 10/18 at Seattle 27-3 W +3 W 45.5U 10/16 CHICAGO 23-24 L +13 W 40.5 O 10/14 CAROLINA 10-25 L -6 L 38.5 U 10/26 at Carolina 23-27 L +5 W 43.5 O 10/25 at NY Giants 24-17 W +7.5 W 47U 11/2 at St Louis 34-13 W -3 W 49 U 11/1 CAROLINA 21-34 L -9.5 L 43.5O 10/22 at Oakland 9-22 L -3 L 39.5 U 10/21 at Washington 19-21 L +8 W 35.5 O 11/10 SAN FRANCISCO 29-24 W -9.5 L 47.5 O 11/8 at Chicago 41-21 W +2.5 W 44.5O 10/29 at Green Bay 14-31 L +4 L 45 T 11/4 at Tampa Bay 10-17 L +3 L 39 U 11/16 at Seattle 26-20 W -3 W 47.5 U 11/15 SEATTLE 31-20 W -8 W 46.5O 11/12 DALLAS 10-27 L +6 L 43.5 U 11/11 DETROIT 31-21 W -2.5 W 45 O 11/23 NY GIANTS 29-37 L +3 L 48 O 11/22 at St Louis 21-13 W -8.5 L 46.5U 11/19 DETROIT 17-10 W -2.5 W 45.5 U 11/18 at Cincinnati 35-27 W +3 W 48.5 O 11/27 at Philadelphia 20-48 L +3 L 49 O 11/29 at Tennessee 17-20 L +3 T 44U 12/7 ST LOUIS 34-10 W -14.5 W 48 U 11/26 at Minnesota 26-31 L +7 W 38.5 O 11/25 SAN FRANCISCO 31-37 L -10 L 37.5 O 12/6 MINNESOTA 30-17 W +3 W 48U 12/14 MINNESOTA 14-35 L -4.5 L 46.5 O 12/3 at St Louis 34-20 W +5.5 W 46 O 12/2 CLEVELAND 27-21 W -1 W 52 U 12/21 at New England 7-47 L +8 L 41 O 12/14 at San Francisco 9-24 L -4 L 44.5U 12/10 SEATTLE 27-21 W +3 W 44.5 O 12/9 at Seattle 21-42 L +8 L 44 O 12/28 SEATTLE 34-21 W -7 W 47 O 12/20 at Detroit 31-24 W -14 L 46.5O 12/17 DENVER 20-37 L +3 L 44 O 12/16 at New Orleans 24-31 L +4 L 49.5 O 1/3 (PL) ATLANTA 30-24 W -2 W 51.5 O 12/27 ST LOUIS 31-10 W -16.5 W 44U 1/10 (PL) at Carolina 33-13 W +10 W 50 U 1/3 GREEN BAY 7-33 L -3 L 42U 12/24 at San Francisco 26-20 W +3.5 W 45 O 12/23 ATLANTA 30-27 W -11 L 44 O 1/18 (PL) PHILADELPHIA 32-25 W +3 W 47 O 1/10 (PL) GREEN BAY 51-45 W +3 W 48.5O 12/31 at San Diego 20-27 L +14 W 44.5 O 12/30 ST LOUIS 48-19 W -6 W 49.5 O 2/1 (PL) vs. Pittsburgh 23-27 L +6.5 W 46.5 O 1/16 (PL) at New Orleans 14-45 L +7.5 L 56.5O

SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 30 to 1 NFC Title: 13 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 17.94 (31st toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 11-7 7-9 2-14 4-12 7-9 5-11 7-9 8-8 51-79 (39%) OVERALL ATS 4-12 7-7 6-10 8-8 9-7 5-11 7-8 9-4 55-67 (45%) PRESEASON ATS 2-2 3-1 0-3 4-0 2-2 2-2 2-2 1-3 16-15 (52%) HOME ATS 2-6 5-3 2-6 5-3 4-4 3-5 3-4 5-2 29-33 (47%) ROAD ATS 2-6 2-4 4-4 3-5 5-3 2-6 4-4 4-2 26-34 (43%) vs DIVISION ATS 3-3 3-2 3-3 3-3 5-1 2-4 3-3 5-1 27-20 (57%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 3-9 6-5 5-7 6-6 7-5 3-9 4-7 7-3 41-51 (45%) as FAVORITE ATS 3-9 3-4 1-1 1-0 1-2 0-1 2-2 5-1 16-20 (44%) as UNDERDOG ATS 1-3 4-3 5-9 7-8 8-5 5-10 5-6 4-2 39-46 (46%) OVER-UNDER 9-9 7-9 9-7 10-6 9-7 6-10 8-7 5-11 63-66 (49%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * SAN FRANCISCO is on a 16-3 OVER the total (+12.7 Units) run on the road vs. poor rushing teams - averaging <=3.5 YPR The Average Score was SAN FRANCISCO 26.2, OPPONENT 26.4. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/16 - at San Diego * SAN FRANCISCO is 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) vs. excellent passing teams with a completion pct. of 64% or better since 07. The Average Score was SAN FRANCISCO 18.9, OPPONENT 14.4. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/20 - NEW ORLEANS, 11/29 - at Arizona, 12/5 - at Green Bay, 12/16 - at San Diego, 1/2 - ARIZONA * SAN FRANCISCO was 6-0 UNDER the total (+6 Units) vs. division opponents last season. The Average Score was SAN FRANCISCO 24.5, OPPONENT 10.2. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - at Seattle, 11/14 - ST LOUIS, 11/29 - at Arizona, 12/12 - SEATTLE, 12/26 - at St Louis, 1/2 - ARIZONA * SAN FRANCISCO is on a 10-25 ATS (-17.5 Units) skid vs. good rushing defenses - allowing <=90 RYPG The Average Score was SAN FRANCISCO 19.3, OPPONENT 25.5. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/5 - at Green Bay * SAN FRANCISCO is on a 22-9 ATS (+12.1 Units) run when playing on Monday nights The Average Score was SAN FRANCISCO 27.7, OPPONENT 18.4. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/20 - NEW ORLEANS, 11/29 - at Arizona LINE FINAL ATS 2009 Record: 8-8 (+0.3 ML Units), 9-4 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 5-11 DIVISION: NFC West COACH: Mike Singletary, 3rd year STADIUM: Candlestick Park Scoring Differential: +3.1 (#13 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 21 (#15 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +1.0 (#15 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 17.38 (#32 of 32) 9/12/10 at Seattle * UNDER the total is 6-2 in L8 games of SEA-SF series 9/20/10 NEW ORLEANS * L6 games of SF-NO series at SAN FRANCISCO are 6-0 OVER the total 9/26/10 at Kansas City * KANSAS CITY has won its L3 games at home vs. SAN FRANCISCO, both SU & ATS 10/3/10 at Atlanta * FAVORITE has swept L3 ATL-SF games at ATLANTA, both SU & ATS 10/10/10 PHILADELPHIA * PHILADELPHIA has won four straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. SAN FRANCISCO 10/17/10 OAKLAND * L2 games in SF-OAK series at SAN FRANCISCO went OVER the total 10/24/10 at Carolina * CAROLINA is 8-6 SU & 12-2 ATS vs. SAN FRANCISCO since 96 10/31/10 vs. Denver (London) * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 SF-DEN games 11/14/10 ST LOUIS * SAN FRANCISCO is 18-12 SU & 20-8 ATS vs. ST LOUIS since 95 11/21/10 TAMPA BAY * HOME TEAM is on 7-0 SU & ATS run in SF-TB series 11/29/10 at Arizona * ROAD TEAM is 5-4 SU & 8-1 ATS in L9 ARZ-SF matchups 12/5/10 at Green Bay * GREEN BAY is 12-1 SU & 9-2 ATS vs. SAN FRANCISCO since 95 12/12/10 SEATTLE * UNDER the total is 3-1 in L4 games of SF-SEA series at SAN FRANCISCO 12/16/10 at San Diego * SAN DIEGO has taken L2 games vs. SAN FRANCISCO both SU & ATS 12/26/10 at St Louis * L4 games in STL-SF series at ST LOUIS went UNDER the total 1/2/11 ARIZONA * L3 games in SF-ARZ series at SAN FRANCISCO went UNDER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring +3.1 13 Yardage -35.6 24 Yards Per Play -0.03 19 Yards Per Point +4.43 1 Turnovers +9 5 Offensive Stats Points Scored 20.6 18 First Downs 14.9 29 Total Yards Per Game 290.8 27 Yards Per Play 4.95 23 Yards Per Point 14.12 8 Rushing Attempts 23.2 30 Rush Yards Per Game 100.0 25 Yards Per Rush 4.31 12 Rushing TD s 12 19 Passing Attempts Per Game 33.0 21 Completions Per Game 19.5 23 Completion Percentage 59.1% 21 Passing Yards Per Game 190.8 22 Passing Yards Per Attempt 5.78 24 Passing TD s 23 15 Sacks Allowed 40 22 Interceptions Thrown 14 12 Fumbles Lost 10 12 Total Turnovers Lost 24 10 Avg. Time of Possession 26:42 23 3rd Down Conversions 29.8% 29 4th Down Conversions 57.1% 11 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 17.6 4 First Downs 17.4 6 Total Yards Per Game 326.4 14 Yards Per Play 4.98 3 Yards Per Point 18.55 2 Rushing Attempts 26.6 14 Rush Yards Per Game 97.0 6 Yards Per Rush 3.64 3 Rushing TD s 12 14 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 36.3 29 Opponent Completions/Game 22.0 27 Opponent Completion % 60.7% 16 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 229.4 21 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 7.40 27 Passing TD s Allowed 28 26 Sacks Recorded 44 3 Interceptions 18 11 Fumbles Recovered 15 1 Total Turnovers Forced 33 5 3rd Down Conversions 36.7% 10 4th Down Conversions 40.0% 5 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 6.1 19 Penalty Yards/Game 47.4 14 Opponent Penalties/Game 7.1 1 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 60.6 2 Punt Return Average 4.4 32 Kick Return Average 21.8 23 Punt Attempts per game 6.2 32 Punt Net Average 42.6 3 Field Goals Made 19 26 Field Goal Percentage 79.2% 22 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/5 at NY Giants 16-13 W -4 L 39.5 U 9/7 CHICAGO 49-7 W -6.5 W 40.5 O 9/12 ATLANTA 19-21 L +3 W 43 U 9/11 ST LOUIS 28-25 W +6.5 W 46 O 9/15 DENVER 14-24 L -3.5 L 43.5 U 9/14 at St Louis 24-27 L +3 T 47.5 O 9/19 at New Orleans 27-30 L +7.5 W 42 O 9/18 at Philadelphia 3-42 L +13 L 40.5 O 9/22 WASHINGTON 20-10 W -10 T 44 U 9/21 CLEVELAND 12-13 L -7 L 44 U 9/26 at Seattle 0-34 L +10 L 41.5 U 9/25 DALLAS 31-34 L +6.5 W 40.5 O 10/6 ST LOUIS 37-13 W -6 W 41.5 O 10/14 at Seattle 28-21 W -3 W 42 O 9/28 at Minnesota 7-35 L +0 L 43 U 10/3 ST LOUIS 14-24 L +3.5 L 44.5 U 10/2 at Arizona 14-31 L +3 L 44 O 10/20 at New Orleans 27-35 L +1 L 48.5 O 10/5 DETROIT 24-17 W -7.5 L 42.5 U 10/10 ARIZONA 31-28 W -1 W 36.5 O 10/9 INDIANAPOLIS 3-28 L +16 L 44.5 U 10/27 ARIZONA 38-28 W -9 W 40 O 10/12 at Seattle 19-20 L +3.5 W 44 U 10/17 at NY Jets 14-22 L +9.5 W 43 U 10/23 at Washington 17-52 L +13.5 L 36 O 11/3 at Oakland 23-20 W +3 W 49.5 U 10/19 TAMPA BAY 24-7 W +5 W 39 U 10/31 at Chicago 13-23 L +2 L 35.5 O 10/30 TAMPA BAY 15-10 W +10 W 36.5 U 11/10 KANSAS CITY 17-13 W -5 L 49 U 10/26 at Arizona 13-16 L -7 L 41 U 11/7 SEATTLE 27-42 L +7 L 40.5 O 11/6 NY GIANTS 6-24 L +10.5 L 43 U 11/17 at San Diego 17-20 L -2.5 L 42.5 U 11/2 ST LOUIS 30-10 W +4.5 W 44 U 11/14 CAROLINA 27-37 L -1.5 L 41.5 O 11/13 at Chicago 9-17 L +13 W 30 U 11/25 PHILADELPHIA 17-38 L -7 L 37.5 O 11/17 PITTSBURGH 30-14 W -4 W 41.5 O 11/21 at Tampa Bay 3-35 L +8 L 42 U 11/20 SEATTLE 25-27 L +12.5 W 41 O 12/1 SEATTLE 31-24 W -8.5 L 43.5 O 11/23 at Green Bay 10-20 L +3.5 L 40 U 11/28 MIAMI 17-24 L +1 L 37.5 O 11/27 at Tennessee 22-33 L +9 L 42.5 O 12/8 at Dallas 31-27 W -4 T 39.5 O 11/30 at Baltimore 6-44 L +3 L 37 O 12/5 at St Louis 6-16 L +11 W 49 U 12/4 ARIZONA 10-17 L +3.5 L 44 U 12/15 GREEN BAY 14-20 L -3 L 42.5 U 12/21 at Arizona 17-14 W -3.5 L 41 U 12/7 ARIZONA 50-14 W -10.5 W 40.5 O 12/12 at Arizona 31-28 W +7 W 36 O 12/11 at Seattle 3-41 L +16 L 43 O 12/30 at St Louis 20-31 L +3 L 39 O 12/14 at Cincinnati 38-41 L +3 T 42 O 12/18 WASHINGTON 16-26 L +6.5 L 36.5 O 12/18 at Jacksonville 9-10 L +16 W 36.5 U 1/5 (PL) NY GIANTS 39-38 W -3 L 41 O 12/21 at Philadelphia 31-28 W +7 W 44 O 12/26 BUFFALO 7-41 L +10 L 41.5 O 12/24 at St Louis 24-20 W +9 W 42.5 O 1/12 (PL) at Tampa Bay 6-31 L +6 L 38.5 U 12/27 SEATTLE 17-24 L -3 L 46.5 U 1/2 at New England 7-21 L +13 L 37 U 1/1 HOUSTON 20-17 W -2 W 34.5 O 2006 2007 2008 2009 9/10 at Arizona 27-34 L +9.5 W 44 O 9/10 ARIZONA 20-17 W -3.5 L 47 U 9/7 ARIZONA 13-23 L +2.5 L 42.5 U 9/13 at Arizona 20-16 W +4.5 W 45U 9/17 ST LOUIS 20-13 W +3 W 43.5 U 9/16 at St Louis 17-16 W +3 W 44 U 9/14 at Seattle 33-30 W +6 W 38 O 9/20 SEATTLE 23-10 W -1 W 38.5U 9/24 PHILADELPHIA 24-38 L +6.5 L 42 O 9/23 at Pittsburgh 16-37 L +10 L 37.5 O 9/21 DETROIT 31-13 W -4.5 W 47 U 9/27 at Minnesota 24-27 L +6.5 W 39O 10/1 at Kansas City 0-41 L +7 L 39 O 9/30 SEATTLE 3-23 L +1.5 L 40 U 9/28 at New Orleans 17-31 L +4 L 48 T 10/4 ST LOUIS 35-0 W -9 W 36U 10/8 OAKLAND 34-20 W -3.5 W 39 O 10/7 BALTIMORE 7-9 L +4 W 34.5 U 10/5 NEW ENGLAND 21-30 L +3 L 41 O 10/11 ATLANTA 10-45 L +0 L 39.5O 10/15 SAN DIEGO 19-48 L +10 L 41.5 O 10/21 at Ny Giants 15-33 L +9.5 L 39 O 10/12 PHILADELPHIA 26-40 L +5 L 41 O 10/25 at Houston 21-24 L +3 T 44.5O 10/29 at Chicago 10-41 L +16 L 42 O 10/28 NEW ORLEANS 10-31 L +2 L 39.5 O 10/19 at NY Giants 17-29 L +10 L 47 U 11/1 at Indianapolis 14-18 L +12.5 W 45U 11/5 MINNESOTA 9-3 W +4 W 42.5 U 11/4 at Atlanta 16-20 L +3.5 L 37 U 10/26 SEATTLE 13-34 L -5.5 L 41.5 O 11/8 TENNESSEE 27-34 L -4 L 40.5O 11/12 at Detroit 19-13 W +6.5 W 46 U 11/12 at Seattle 0-24 L +8.5 L 37.5 U 11/10 at Arizona 24-29 L +9.5 W 47.5 O 11/12 CHICAGO 10-6 W -3 W 43U 11/19 SEATTLE 20-14 W +3 W 42.5 U 11/18 ST LOUIS 9-13 L +3 L 39 U 11/16 ST LOUIS 35-16 W -7 W 43.5 O 11/22 at Green Bay 24-30 L +6 T 41.5O 11/26 at St Louis 17-20 L +4.5 W 45 U 11/25 at Arizona 37-31 W +10 W 37.5 O 11/23 at Dallas 22-35 L +9.5 L 45.5 O 11/29 JACKSONVILLE 20-3 W -3 W 42U 12/3 at New Orleans 10-34 L +7.5 L 45.5 U 12/2 at Carolina 14-31 L +3 L 35 O 11/30 at Buffalo 10-3 W +6.5 W 43 U 12/6 at Seattle 17-20 L +1 L 41U 12/10 GREEN BAY 19-30 L -4 L 44.5 O 12/9 MINNESOTA 7-27 L +7.5 L 39 U 12/7 NY JETS 24-14 W +5 W 45.5 U 12/14 ARIZONA 24-9 W +4 W 44.5U 12/14 at Seattle 24-14 W +9.5 W 39.5 U 12/15 CINCINNATI 20-13 W +8 W 43 U 12/14 at Miami 9-14 L +5.5 W 41 U 12/20 at Philadelphia 13-27 L +7 L 41.5U 12/24 ARIZONA 20-26 L -3.5 L 45 O 12/23 TAMPA BAY 21-19 W +6.5 W 36.5 O 12/21 at St Louis 17-16 W -3 L 42 U 12/27 DETROIT 20-6 W -14 T 41U 12/31 at Denver 26-23 W +10.5 W 40 O 12/30 at Cleveland 7-20 L +11.5 L 41 U 12/28 WASHINGTON 27-24 W -3 T 37 O 1/3 at St Louis 28-6 W -7 W 39U 42 WWW.STATFOX.COM

SEATTLE SEAHAWKS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 50 to 1 NFC Title: 23 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 18.25 (28th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 7-9 10-7 9-8 15-4 10-8 11-7 4-12 5-11 71-66 (52%) OVERALL ATS 9-7 9-7 5-12 11-7 7-10 10-7 7-8 6-10 64-68 (48%) PRESEASON ATS 0-4 2-2 2-2 2-2 2-2 3-1 4-0 4-0 19-13 (59%) HOME ATS 3-5 5-3 1-8 8-2 4-4 7-1 3-4 5-3 36-30 (55%) ROAD ATS 6-2 4-4 4-4 3-5 3-6 3-6 4-4 1-7 28-38 (42%) vs DIVISION ATS 3-3 4-2 2-5 5-1 1-5 5-1 3-3 3-3 26-23 (53%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 7-5 7-6 5-8 9-4 4-9 9-5 4-7 4-8 49-52 (49%) as FAVORITE ATS 2-2 6-6 4-10 10-4 3-8 9-4 2-1 5-2 41-37 (53%) as UNDERDOG ATS 7-5 3-1 1-2 1-3 4-2 1-3 5-7 1-8 23-31 (43%) OVER-UNDER 9-7 7-10 11-6 11-8 10-8 9-8 7-7 7-9 71-63 (53%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * SEATTLE is 0-11 ATS (-12.1 Units) on the road vs. teams scoring 24 or more PPG since 07. The Average Score was SEATTLE 14.5, OPPONENT 35.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 11/14 - at Arizona, 11/21 - at New Orleans * Over the L2 seasons, SEATTLE is 1-13 ATS (-13.3 Units) vs. good passing teams averaging 235 or more PYPG.. The Average Score was SEATTLE 13, OPPONENT 32.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/26 - SAN DIEGO, 10/24 - ARIZONA, 11/7 - NY GIANTS, 11/14 - at Arizona, 11/21 - at New Orleans * SEATTLE was 0-7 ATS (-7.7 Units) as road underdogs or pick last season. The Average Score was SEATTLE 12.9, OPPONENT 34.7. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - at Denver, 10/17 - at Chicago, 11/14 - at Arizona, 11/21 - at New Orleans, 12/12 - at San Francisco * SEATTLE is on a 24-7 UNDER the total (+16.3 Units) run on the road in September games The Average Score was SEATTLE 16.9, OPPONENT 14.6. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/19 - at Denver * SEATTLE is on a 9-27 ATS (-20.7 Units) skid on the road in October games The Average Score was SEATTLE 15.6, OPPONENT 26. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/3 - at St Louis, 10/17 - at Chicago, 10/31 - at Oakland WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 43 2009 Record: 5-11 (-8.2 ML Units), 6-10 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 7-9 DIVISION: NFC West COACH: Pete Carroll, 1st year STADIUM: Qwest Field Scoring Differential: -6.9 (#26 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 10 (#30 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -8.4 (#28 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 18.88 (#27 of 32) 9/12/10 SAN FRANCISCO * UNDER the total is 6-2 in L8 games of SEA-SF series 9/19/10 at Denver * L6 games of DEN-SEA series at DENVER are 5-1 OVER the total 9/26/10 SAN DIEGO * UNDERDOG is 6-1 ATS in L8 SEA-SD matchups 10/3/10 at St Louis * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & ATS in L6 STL-SEA matchups 10/17/10 at Chicago * L4 CHI-SEA series games have gone OVER the total 10/24/10 ARIZONA * ARIZONA has won four straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. SEATTLE 10/31/10 at Oakland * HOME TEAM is 7-0 SU & ATS in L7 OAK-SEA matchups 11/7/10 NY GIANTS * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 SEA-NYG games 11/14/10 at Arizona * L6 games of ARZ-SEA series at ARIZONA are 6-0 OVER the total 11/21/10 at New Orleans * UNDER the total is 4-1 in L5 games of NO-SEA series 11/28/10 KANSAS CITY * KANSAS CITY is 14-6 SU & ATS vs. SEATTLE since 93 12/5/10 CAROLINA * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 SEA-CAR games 12/12/10 at San Francisco * UNDER the total is 3-1 in L4 games of SF-SEA series at SAN FRANCISCO 12/19/10 ATLANTA * UNDERDOG is 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 SEA-ATL matchups 12/26/10 at Tampa Bay * L7 games of TB-SEA series are 7-0 UNDER the total 1/2/11 ST LOUIS * SEATTLE has won its L3 games at home vs. ST LOUIS, both SU & ATS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring -6.9 26 Yardage -41.0 25 Yards Per Play -0.77 25 Yards Per Point -3.44 26 Turnovers -8 27 Offensive Stats Points Scored 17.5 25 First Downs 18.6 17 Total Yards Per Game 316.8 21 Yards Per Play 4.84 25 Yards Per Point 18.10 26 Rushing Attempts 24.7 26 Rush Yards Per Game 97.9 26 Yards Per Rush 3.96 27 Rushing TD s 7 27 Passing Attempts Per Game 38.1 1 Completions Per Game 23.3 7 Completion Percentage 61.1% 14 Passing Yards Per Game 218.9 15 Passing Yards Per Attempt 5.75 25 Passing TD s 20 20 Sacks Allowed 41 23 Interceptions Thrown 19 23 Fumbles Lost 12 22 Total Turnovers Lost 31 22 Avg. Time of Possession 27:30 19 3rd Down Conversions 33.3% 25 4th Down Conversions 42.1% 23 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 24.4 25 First Downs 19.1 18 Total Yards Per Game 357.8 24 Yards Per Play 5.61 23 Yards Per Point 14.66 23 Rushing Attempts 26.8 15 Rush Yards Per Game 111.0 15 Yards Per Rush 4.15 13 Rushing TD s 17 24 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 35.5 25 Opponent Completions/Game 23.4 31 Opponent Completion % 65.8% 29 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 245.4 30 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 7.44 28 Passing TD s Allowed 22 14 Sacks Recorded 28 26 Interceptions 13 22 Fumbles Recovered 10 16 Total Turnovers Forced 23 24 3rd Down Conversions 39.0% 19 4th Down Conversions 50.0% 18 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 5.9 16 Penalty Yards/Game 52.5 24 Opponent Penalties/Game 6.9 3 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 60.7 1 Punt Return Average 7.5 19 Kick Return Average 21.9 21 Punt Attempts per game 5.6 26 Punt Net Average 40.7 10 Field Goals Made 24 15 Field Goal Percentage 92.3% 3 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 at Oakland 17-31 L +7.5 L 40 O 9/7 NEW ORLEANS 27-10 W -3 W 48.5 U 9/12 at New Orleans 21-7 W -2.5 W 45.5 U 9/11 at Jacksonville 14-26 L +3 L 39 O 9/15 ARIZONA 13-24 L -4 L 40 U 9/14 at Arizona 38-0 W -4.5 W 44.5 U 9/19 at Tampa Bay 10-6 W -3 W 36.5 U 9/18 ATLANTA 21-18 W -2 W 43 U 9/22 at NY Giants 6-9 L +6 W 39 U 9/21 ST LOUIS 24-23 W -3 L 46.5 O 9/26 SAN FRANCISCO 34-0 W -10 W 41.5 U 9/25 ARIZONA 37-12 W -6 W 42 O 9/29 MINNESOTA 48-23 W -3 W 44 O 10/5 at Green Bay 13-35 L +1 L 44.5 O 10/10 ST LOUIS 27-33 L -8 L 44 O 10/2 at Washington 17-20 L +2 L 36.5 O 10/9 at St Louis 37-31 W +3 W 47.5 O 10/14 SAN FRANCISCO 21-28 L +3 L 42 O 10/12 SAN FRANCISCO 20-19 W -3.5 L 44 U 10/17 at New England 20-30 L +3.5 L 42 O 10/16 HOUSTON 42-10 W -9 W 44 O 10/20 at St Louis 20-37 L +6.5 L 44.5 O 10/19 CHICAGO 24-17 W -11 L 41.5 U 10/24 at Arizona 17-25 L -6.5 L 40 O 10/23 DALLAS 13-10 W -4.5 L 44 U 10/27 at Dallas 17-14 W +1.5 W 37 U 10/26 at Cincinnati 24-27 L -3 L 41.5 O 10/31 CAROLINA 23-17 W -8 L 39 O 11/6 at Arizona 33-19 W -4.5 W 42 O 11/3 WASHINGTON 3-14 L -2 L 41.5 U 11/2 PITTSBURGH 23-16 W -5 W 44.5 U 11/7 at San Francisco 42-27 W -7 W 40.5 O 11/13 ST LOUIS 31-16 W -6 W 50 U 11/10 at Arizona 27-6 W +3 W 37 U 11/9 at Washington 20-27 L -3 L 41 O 11/14 at St Louis 12-23 L -2.5 L 50.5 U 11/20 at San Francisco 27-25 W -12.5 L 41 O 11/16 DETROIT 35-14 W -10.5 W 39.5 O 11/21 MIAMI 24-17 W -9.5 L 37 O 11/27 NY GIANTS 24-21 W -4.5 L 47.5 U 11/17 DENVER 9-31 L +5.5 L 43 U 11/23 at Baltimore 41-44 L +3 T 36 O 11/28 BUFFALO 9-38 L -4 L 39 O 12/5 at Philadelphia 42-0 W -3.5 W 39.5 O 11/24 KANSAS CITY 39-32 W +3 W 44 O 11/30 CLEVELAND 34-7 W -6.5 W 42 U 12/6 DALLAS 39-43 L -7 L 43 O 12/11 SAN FRANCISCO 41-3 W -16 W 43 O 12/1 at San Francisco 24-31 L +8.5 W 43.5 O 12/18 at Tennessee 28-24 W -7 L 45 O 12/7 at Minnesota 7-34 L -1 L 52.5 U 12/12 at Minnesota 27-23 W +6.5 W 54 U 12/8 PHILADELPHIA 20-27 L +3 L 38 O 12/24 INDIANAPOLIS 28-13 W -10 W 43.5 U 12/14 at St Louis 22-27 L +7 W 52 U 12/19 at NY Jets 14-37 L +6.5 L 41.5 O 1/1 at Green Bay 17-23 L +6 T 41 U 12/15 at Atlanta 30-24 W +9 W 46 O 12/21 ARIZONA 28-10 W -15.5 W 44.5 U 12/26 ARIZONA 24-21 W -7 L 44 O 1/14 (PL) WASHINGTON 20-10 W -9.5 W 41 U 12/22 ST LOUIS 30-10 W -2.5 W 48.5 U 12/27 at San Francisco 24-17 W +3 W 46.5 U 1/2 ATLANTA 28-26 W -5.5 L 41 O 1/22 (PL) CAROLINA 34-14 W -4 W 43.5 O 12/29 at San Diego 31-28 W +3 W 42 O 1/4 (PL) at Green Bay 27-33 L +7 W 43.5 O 1/8 (PL) ST LOUIS 20-27 L -4 L 51 U 2/5 (PL) *vs Pittsburgh 10-21 L +4 L 46.5 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 at Detroit 9-6 W -6 L 44 U 9/17 ARIZONA 21-10 W -7 W 47.5 U 9/24 NY GIANTS 42-30 W -3 W 42 O 10/1 at Chicago 6-37 L +3.5 L 37 O 10/15 at St Louis 30-28 W -3 L 45.5 O 10/22 MINNESOTA 13-31 L -6.5 L 40.5 O 10/29 at Kansas City 28-35 L +5.5 L 37 O 11/6 OAKLAND 16-0 W -7 W 34 U 11/12 ST LOUIS 24-22 W -3 L 42.5 O 11/19 at San Francisco 14-20 L -3 L 42.5 U 11/27 GREEN BAY 34-24 W -10.5 L 42 O 12/3 at Denver 23-20 W +5 W 40.5 O 12/10 at Arizona 21-27 L -3 L 44.5 O 12/14 SAN FRANCISCO 14-24 L -9.5 L 39.5 U 12/24 SAN DIEGO 17-20 L +4 W 45 U 12/31 at Tampa Bay 23-7 W +3 W 37 U 1/6 (PL) DALLAS 21-20 W -1 T 48.5 U 1/14 (PL) at Chicago 24-27 L +9 W 37 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 TAMPA BAY 20-6 W -6 W 40.5 U 9/16 at Arizona 20-23 L -2.5 L 42.5 O 9/23 CINCINNATI 24-21 W -3 T 49 U 9/30 at San Francisco 23-3 W -1.5 W 40 U 10/7 at Pittsburgh 0-21 L +5 L 41 U 10/14 NEW ORLEANS 17-28 L -5.5 L 43 O 10/21 ST LOUIS 33-6 W -7.5 W 39 T 11/4 at Cleveland 30-33 L +1.5 L 46.5 O 11/12 SAN FRANCISCO 24-0 W -8.5 W 37.5 U 11/18 CHICAGO 30-23 W -6 W 37.5 O 11/25 at St Louis 24-19 W -3 W 46 U 12/2 at Philadelphia 28-24 W +3 W 40.5 O 12/9 ARIZONA 42-21 W -8 W 44 O 12/16 at Carolina 10-13 L -7 L 37 U 12/23 BALTIMORE 27-6 W -13 W 38.5 U 12/30 at Atlanta 41-44 L -2 L 38.5 O 1/5 (PL) WASHINGTON 35-14 W -3 W 39.5 O 1/12 (PL) at Green Bay 20-42 L +7.5 L 43.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/7 at Buffalo 10-34 L +2.5 L 37.5 O 9/14 SAN FRANCISCO 30-33 L -6 L 38 O 9/21 ST LOUIS 37-13 W -8 W 45 O 10/5 at NY Giants 6-44 L +6 L 43.5 O 10/12 GREEN BAY 17-27 L +1 L 44 T 10/19 at Tampa Bay 10-20 L +11 W 40 U 10/26 at San Francisco 34-13 W +5.5 W 41.5 O 11/2 PHILADELPHIA 7-26 L +7 L 44 U 11/9 at Miami 19-21 L +7.5 W 41.5 U 11/16 ARIZONA 20-26 L +3 L 47.5 U 11/23 WASHINGTON 17-20 L +3 T 40 U 11/27 at Dallas 9-34 L +11.5 L 46 U 12/7 NEW ENGLAND 21-24 L +7.5 W 43 O 12/14 at St Louis 23-20 W -1.5 W 43 T 12/21 NY JETS 13-3 W +3.5 W 41.5 U 12/28 at Arizona 21-34 L +7 L 47 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/13 ST LOUIS 28-0 W -7 W 41U 9/20 at San Francisco 10-23 L +1 L 38.5U 9/27 CHICAGO 19-25 L +3 L 37.5O 10/4 at Indianapolis 17-34 L +10 L 43O 10/11 JACKSONVILLE 41-0 W -2 W 44U 10/18 ARIZONA 3-27 L -3 L 45.5U 11/1 at Dallas 17-38 L +10 L 46.5O 11/8 DETROIT 32-20 W -11 W 41.5O 11/15 at Arizona 20-31 L +8 L 46.5O 11/22 at Minnesota 9-35 L +10.5 L 47U 11/29 at St Louis 27-17 W -3 W 42.5O 12/6 SAN FRANCISCO 20-17 W -1 W 41U 12/13 at Houston 7-34 L +7 L 45U 12/20 TAMPA BAY 7-24 L -6.5 L 39U 12/27 at Green Bay 10-48 L +13 L 43.5O 1/3 TENNESSEE 13-17 L +5.5 W 46U

ST. LOUIS RAMS Odds to win... Super Bowl XLV: 100 to 1 NFC Title: 50 to 1 2010 Schedule Strength: 18.06 (29th toughest of 32) SCENARIO 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8-yr Total STRAIGHT UP 7-9 12-5 9-9 6-10 8-8 3-13 2-14 1-15 48-83 (37%) OVERALL ATS 4-12 9-7 7-11 5-11 9-7 5-11 6-10 7-9 52-78 (40%) PRESEASON ATS 0-3 2-2 1-3 3-1 0-4 2-2 2-2 3-1 13-18 (42%) HOME ATS 3-5 6-2 4-4 2-6 4-4 2-6 3-5 3-5 27-37 (42%) ROAD ATS 1-7 3-5 3-7 3-5 5-3 3-5 3-5 4-4 25-41 (38%) vs DIVISION ATS 3-3 2-3 4-3 1-5 3-3 2-4 1-5 1-5 17-31 (35%) vs CONFERENCE ATS 3-9 5-7 6-8 3-9 7-5 4-8 4-8 5-7 37-61 (38%) as FAVORITE ATS 3-9 7-7 3-6 2-6 4-4 2-2 0-0 0-0 21-34 (38%) as UNDERDOG ATS 1-3 2-0 4-5 3-5 5-3 3-9 6-10 7-9 31-44 (41%) OVER-UNDER 7-9 12-5 10-8 9-7 8-7 6-8 7-8 7-9 66-61 (52%) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * ST LOUIS is 1-11 ATS (-11.1 Units) in the first month of the season since 07. The Average Score was ST LOUIS 8.8, OPPONENT 29.8. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - ARIZONA, 9/19 - at Oakland, 9/26 - WASHINGTON, 10/3 - SEATTLE * ST LOUIS is on a 7-25 ATS (-20.5 Units) skid revenging a same season loss against opponent The Average Score was ST LOUIS 16.2, OPPONENT 25.6. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/5 - at Arizona, 12/26 - SAN FRANCISCO, 1/2 - at Seattle * ST LOUIS is on a 1-11 ATS (-11.1 Units) skid on the road vs. good teams - outscoring opponents by 6+ PPG The Average Score was ST LOUIS 19.1, OPPONENT 33.1. Potential Spots for 2010: 12/12 - at New Orleans * ST LOUIS is on a 12-2 ATS (+9.8 Units) run at home vs. good rushing teams - averaging >=4.5 YPR The Average Score was ST LOUIS 34.1, OPPONENT 20.4. Potential Spots for 2010: 10/31 - CAROLINA * Over the L2 seasons, ST LOUIS is 2-10 ATS (-9 Units) vs. division opponents. The Average Score was ST LOUIS 11.2, OPPONENT 29.2. Potential Spots for 2010: 9/12 - ARIZONA, 10/3 - SEATTLE, 11/14 - at San Francisco, 12/5 - at Arizona, 12/26 - SAN FRANCISCO, 1/2 - at Seattle 2009 Record: 1-15 (-12.7 ML Units), 7-9 ATS 2009 Totals (Over-Under): 7-9 DIVISION: NFC West COACH: Steve Spagnulo, 2nd year STADIUM: Edward Jones Dome Scoring Differential: -16.3 (#32 of 32) StatFox Power Rating: 6 (#32 of 32) StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -16 (#32 of 32) 2009 Schedule Strength: 19.38 (#25 of 32) 9/12/10 ARIZONA * L4 STL-ARZ series games have gone UNDER the total 9/19/10 at Oakland * ST LOUIS is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. OAKLAND 9/26/10 WASHINGTON * ROAD TEAM is on 6-3 SU & 7-2 ATS run in STL-WAS series 10/3/10 SEATTLE * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & ATS in L6 STL-SEA matchups 10/10/10 at Detroit * ST LOUIS is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. DETROIT 10/17/10 SAN DIEGO * L3 STL-SD series games have gone OVER the total 10/24/10 at Tampa Bay * TAMPA BAY is on 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS run vs. ST LOUIS 10/31/10 CAROLINA * CAROLINA is 11-5 SU & 12-4 ATS vs. ST LOUIS since 96 11/14/10 at San Francisco * SAN FRANCISCO is 18-12 SU & 20-8 ATS vs. ST LOUIS since 95 11/21/10 ATLANTA * STL-ATL series has gone 13-4 OVER the total since 96 11/28/10 at Denver * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 DEN-STL games 12/5/10 at Arizona * L6 games of ARZ-STL series at ARIZONA are 5-1 UNDER the total 12/12/10 at New Orleans * NO-STL series has gone 11-4 OVER the total since 97 12/19/10 KANSAS CITY * KANSAS CITY has won four straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. ST LOUIS 12/26/10 SAN FRANCISCO * L4 games in STL-SF series at ST LOUIS went UNDER the total 1/2/11 at Seattle * SEATTLE has won its L3 games at home vs. ST LOUIS, both SU & ATS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK No. Rank Differentials Scoring -16.3 32 Yardage -92.1 29 Yards Per Play -1.36 30 Yards Per Point -12.04 32 Turnovers -14 31 Offensive Stats Points Scored 10.9 32 First Downs 16.2 26 Total Yards Per Game 280.7 29 Yards Per Play 4.51 30 Yards Per Point 25.75 32 Rushing Attempts 25.7 22 Rush Yards Per Game 111.5 20 Yards Per Rush 4.34 11 Rushing TD s 4 32 Passing Attempts Per Game 33.9 16 Completions Per Game 19.5 22 Completion Percentage 57.5% 24 Passing Yards Per Game 167.9 28 Passing Yards Per Attempt 4.95 31 Passing TD s 12 29 Sacks Allowed 44 25 Interceptions Thrown 21 28 Fumbles Lost 12 22 Total Turnovers Lost 33 27 Avg. Time of Possession 28:56 15 3rd Down Conversions 32.3% 28 4th Down Conversions 35.7% 29 Defensive Stats Points Allowed 27.3 31 First Downs 20.8 31 Total Yards Per Game 372.8 29 Yards Per Play 5.87 31 Yards Per Point 13.71 30 Rushing Attempts 31.3 27 Rush Yards Per Game 137.6 27 Yards Per Rush 4.40 20 Rushing TD s 24 31 Opponent Pass Attempts/Game 30.7 4 Opponent Completions/Game 19.7 15 Opponent Completion % 64.2% 27 Opponent Pass Yards/Game 235.3 25 Opponent Pass Yards/Attempt 7.54 29 Passing TD s Allowed 16 6 Sacks Recorded 25 30 Interceptions 8 31 Fumbles Recovered 11 14 Total Turnovers Forced 19 30 3rd Down Conversions 43.5% 29 4th Down Conversions 50.0% 20 Misc. & Special Teams Stats Penalties Committed/Game 6.3 22 Penalty Yards/Game 52.1 22 Opponent Penalties/Game 5.0 28 Opponent Penalty Yds/Game 38.3 30 Punt Return Average 10.7 8 Kick Return Average 23.2 11 Punt Attempts per game 5.6 27 Punt Net Average 43.9 2 Field Goals Made 19 26 Field Goal Percentage 79.2% 22 8-YEAR GAME LOGS - 2002 2003 2004 2005 9/8 at Denver 16-23 L -2.5 L 50.5 U 9/7 at Ny Giants 13-23 L -1 L 47 U 9/12 ARIZONA 17-10 W -10.5 L 46 U 9/11 at San Francisco 25-28 L -6.5 L 46 O 9/15 NY GIANTS 21-26 L -12 L 46 O 9/14 SAN FRANCISCO 27-24 W -3 T 47.5 O 9/19 at Atlanta 17-34 L +1.5 L 46 O 9/18 at Arizona 17-12 W +1.5 W 44 U 9/23 at Tampa Bay 14-26 L -3 L 42.5 U 9/21 at Seattle 23-24 L +3 W 46.5 O 9/26 NEW ORLEANS 25-28 L -6 L 49 O 9/25 TENNESSEE 31-27 W -7 L 46 O 9/29 DALLAS 10-13 L -11.5 L 44 U 9/28 ARIZONA 37-13 W -11.5 W 45.5 O 10/3 at San Francisco 24-14 W -3.5 W 44.5 U 10/6 at San Francisco 13-37 L +6 L 41.5 O 10/13 ATLANTA 36-0 W -10.5 W 46 U 10/10 at Seattle 33-27 W +8 W 44 O 10/2 at NY Giants 24-44 L +3 L 47.5 O 10/13 OAKLAND 28-13 W +8 W 48 U 10/19 GREEN BAY 34-24 W -4.5 W 48 O 10/18 TAMPA BAY 28-21 W -6.5 W 42.5 O 10/9 SEATTLE 31-37 L -3 L 47.5 O 10/20 SEATTLE 37-20 W -6.5 W 44.5 O 10/26 at Pittsburgh 33-21 W +1 W 45.5 O 10/24 at Miami 14-31 L -5 L 38 O 10/17 at Indianapolis 28-45 L +13.5 L 50.5 O 11/7 NEW ENGLAND 22-40 L -2.5 L 49.5 O 10/23 NEW ORLEANS 28-17 W -3 W 46 U 11/3 at Arizona 27-14 W -5 W 43.5 U 11/2 at San Francisco 10-30 L -4.5 L 44 U 11/14 SEATTLE 23-12 W +2.5 W 50.5 U 10/30 JACKSONVILLE 24-21 W +5 W 40.5 O 11/10 SAN DIEGO 28-24 W -6 L 44 O 11/9 BALTIMORE 33-22 W -7 W 43.5 O 11/21 at Buffalo 17-37 L +2 L 40 O 11/13 at Seattle 16-31 L +6 L 50 U 11/16 at Chicago 23-21 W -6 L 41 O 11/18 CHICAGO 21-16 W -10 L 43 U 11/29 at Green Bay 17-45 L +7 L 51 O 11/20 ARIZONA 28-38 L -8 L 50 O 11/23 at Arizona 30-27 W -7 L 44 O 11/24 at Washington 17-20 L -3.5 L 41 U 12/5 SAN FRANCISCO 16-6 W -11 L 49 U 11/30 MINNESOTA 48-17 W -6 W 51.5 O 11/27 at Houston 33-27 W -3 W 47 O 12/1 at Philadelphia 3-10 L -2 L 38 U 12/12 at Carolina 7-20 L +7 L 44.5 U 12/8 at Cleveland 26-20 W -5 W 43.5 O 12/4 WASHINGTON 9-24 L +3.5 L 45 U 12/19 at Arizona 7-31 L -3 L 41.5 U 12/8 at Kansas City 10-49 L +5 L 46 O 12/14 SEATTLE 27-22 W -7 L 52 U 12/27 PHILADELPHIA 20-7 W -4 W 42.5 U 12/11 at Minnesota 13-27 L +7 L 45.5 U 12/15 ARIZONA 30-28 W -11 L 44 O 12/21 CINCINNATI 27-10 W -7 W 54 U 1/2 NY JETS 32-29 W +3.5 W 43.5 O 12/18 PHILADELPHIA 16-17 L -3 L 43 U 12/22 at Seattle 10-30 L +2.5 L 48.5 U 12/28 at Detroit 20-30 L -12 L 45.5 O 1/8 (PL) at Seattle 27-20 W +4 W 51 U 12/24 SAN FRANCISCO 20-24 L -9 L 42.5 O 12/30 SAN FRANCISCO 31-20 W -3 W 39 O 1/10 (PL) CAROLINA 23-29 L -7 L 46 O 1/15 (PL) at Atlanta 17-47 L +6.5 L 49.5 O 1/1 at Dallas 20-10 W +10 W 46 U 2006 2007 2008 2009 DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/10 DENVER 18-10 W +4 W 46 U 9/17 at San Francisco 13-20 L -3 L 43.5 U 9/24 at Arizona 16-14 W +5 W 43.5 U 10/1 DETROIT 41-34 W -5.5 W 41.5 O 10/8 at Green Bay 23-20 W -2 W 46 U 10/15 SEATTLE 28-30 L +3 W 45.5 O 10/29 at San Diego 24-38 L +9.5 L 46 O 11/5 KANSAS CITY 17-31 L -3 L 48 T 11/12 at Seattle 22-24 L +3 W 42.5 O 11/19 at Carolina 0-15 L +6 L 44 U 11/26 SAN FRANCISCO 20-17 W -4.5 L 45 U 12/3 ARIZONA 20-34 L -5.5 L 46 O 12/11 CHICAGO 27-42 L +6 L 41.5 O 12/17 at Oakland 20-0 W +3 W 39.5 U 12/24 WASHINGTON 37-31 W -2 W 43 O 12/31 at Minnesota 41-21 W -1.5 W 43.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/9 CAROLINA 13-27 L -1.5 L 43 U 9/16 SAN FRANCISCO 16-17 L -3 L 44 U 9/23 at Tampa Bay 3-24 L +3.5 L 39 U 9/30 at Dallas 7-35 L +13 L 47 U 10/7 ARIZONA 31-34 L +3.5 W 40 O 10/14 at Baltimore 3-22 L +9 L 36.5 U 10/21 at Seattle 6-33 L +7.5 L 39 T 10/28 CLEVELAND 20-27 L +3 L 46.5 O 11/11 at New Orleans 37-29 W +10 W 47 O 11/18 at San Francisco 13-9 W -3 W 39 U 11/25 SEATTLE 19-24 L +3 L 46 U 12/2 ATLANTA 28-16 W -3 W 40 O 12/9 at Cincinnati 10-19 L +10 W 45.5 U 12/16 GREEN BAY 14-33 L +7 L 47 T 12/20 PITTSBURGH 24-41 L +8 L 43 O 12/30 at Arizona 19-48 L +6 L 49.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/7 at Philadelphia 3-38 L +9 L 43.5 U 9/14 NY GIANTS 13-41 L +7.5 L 43.5 O 9/21 at Seattle 13-37 L +8 L 45 O 9/28 BUFFALO 14-31 L +9 L 44 O 10/12 at Washington 19-17 W +11.5 W 44 U 10/19 DALLAS 34-14 W +8 W 45.5 O 10/26 at New England 16-23 L +9 W 41 U 11/2 ARIZONA 13-34 L +3 L 49 U 11/9 at NY Jets 3-47 L +9.5 L 43.5 O 11/16 at San Francisco 16-35 L +7 L 43.5 O 11/23 CHICAGO 3-27 L +7 L 44.5 U 11/30 MIAMI 12-16 L +7 W 44.5 U 12/7 at Arizona 10-34 L +14.5 L 48 U 12/14 SEATTLE 20-23 L +1.5 L 43 T 12/21 SAN FRANCISCO 16-17 L +3 W 42 U 12/28 at Atlanta 27-31 L +14 W 44.5 O DATE OPPONENT SCORE SU FL ATS TOTAL 9/13 at Seattle 0-28 L +7 L 41U 9/20 at Washington 7-9 L +10 W 37U 9/27 GREEN BAY 17-36 L +6.5 L 42.5O 10/4 at San Francisco 0-35 L +9 L 36U 10/11 MINNESOTA 10-38 L +10 L 40.5O 10/18 at Jacksonville 20-23 L +9.5 W 42O 10/25 INDIANAPOLIS 6-42 L +14 L 45O 11/1 at Detroit 17-10 W +3 W 43.5U 11/15 NEW ORLEANS 23-28 L +14 W 50.5O 11/22 ARIZONA 13-21 L +8.5 W 46.5U 11/29 SEATTLE 17-27 L +3 L 42.5O 12/6 at Chicago 9-17 L +9 W 41U 12/13 at Tennessee 7-47 L +14 L 40O 12/20 HOUSTON 13-16 L +14 W 43.5U 12/27 at Arizona 10-31 L +16.5 L 44U 1/3 SAN FRANCISCO 6-28 L +7 L 39U 44 WWW.STATFOX.COM

evaluating predictive power of key stats & strength ratings by Steve Makinen Evaluating statistics is an essential part of nearly everyone s football handicapping routine. While no two bettors think alike when it comes to what stats or ratings they feel are most important, they can at least agree that SOMETHING is. With that in mind, I m going to do a little exercise to evaluate some key numbers generated over the course of the last five college and pro football seasons to see if we can t determine which ones are most effective in predicting success. The way I will be doing this is to take a snapshot of each team s final stats and/or strength indicators in a variety of categories that I personally feel best define a team s overall quality. I will discuss which particular categories I chose and why later, but for now, I wanted to find out which teams were in the top 25% or bottom 25% of the nation or league that year in that category. I matched these teams up with their straight up and against the spread records then took a cumulative total of those teams records. For college, the top 25% and bottom 25% of teams represented 30 teams each by year, while in the NFL, that number was eight. Now I realize that this could be considered more looking back than it is looking ahead in the manner I am doing it, but I figure that if there is consistency among any of the particular categories, that this naturally should be a more predictive strategy to consider at ANY point in the season. For example, if the combined records of the Top 30 college teams in Scoring Differential were consistently better than those in Yardage or Turnover Differential, the idea should be that the teams with the highest Scoring Differentials should be backed more often in wagering opportunities. At the same time, if any particular stat seemed to fluctuate in importance from year to year, it probably should become an integral part of the handicapping process. Hopefully the explanation above is clear enough as to what I am trying to accomplish, as well as how and why. Perhaps by getting right to the results and the explanation of the different categories, it will clear up the picture. So without further ado, let s dig into eight statistical categories or strength indicator ratings that I chose for the analysis. Some of them are common, some are not. I choose to use differentials because I believe these best encapsulate a team s overall strength by considering both offense and defense simultaneously. These are sorted in order of what turned out to be the ranking of most important to least important. Scoring Differential This is simply a team scoring margin per game. Naturally this should be an important factor in a team winning or losing, covering or not covering the pointspread in a game. As it turns out, there is not a single other statistical factor more important than how much a team outscores its opponents by, pointspread or not. As a collective group, college and pro teams that lead the way in this category are the best cover teams and vice versa for those at the bottom Here s a look at annual average SU & ATS results and ranks among the eight categories. Scoring Differential Annual Averages Group SU W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) SU & ATS Rank Top 30 College 299-92 (76%) 212-152 (58%) 1.4 Bottom 30 College 89-267 (25%) 136-197 (41%) 1.0 Average college rank among 8 categories: 1.2 Top 8 NFL 99-43 (70%) 84-55 (60%) 2.2 Bottom 8 NFL 33-95 (26%) 53-72 (42%) 2.0 Average NFL rank among 8 categories: 2.1 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating (Points) The StatFox Outplay Factor Ratings quantify the degree by which teams outplay, or are outplayed by their opponents, and is calculated by using a team s points averages as compared to the combined averages of their previous opponents. This particular chart shows the cumulative records of the teams at the top or bottom of this key strength indicator. The StatFox OF annually ranks among the top 2-3 stats in importance in both college and pro football and should be one of the regular checks in your handicapping routine. StatFox Outplay Factor (Points) Annual Averages Group SU W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) SU & ATS Rank Top 30 College 297-94 (76%) 214-153 (58%) 1.8 Bottom 30 College 95-261 (27%) 135-197 (41%) 2.8 Average college rank among 8 categories: 2.3 Top 8 NFL 100-43 (70%) 84-56 (60%) 2.0 Bottom 8 NFL 33-95 (26%) 52-73 (42%) 3.0 Average NFL rank among 8 categories: 2.5 Yards Per Play Differential Broken down by the individual play, this is the average margin by which a team outgains it opponents per snap. This stat has proven to be a better predictive straight up and against the spread indicator in college football than it has in the pros. Nonetheless you should consider it somewhat important considering the teams that group as the worst in this stat win only about 28% of their games at each level, and are only around 44% ATS. Yards Per Play Differential Annual Averages Group SU W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) SU & ATS Rank Top 30 College 292-98 (75%) 204-158 (56%) 3.6 Bottom 30 College 102-257 (28%) 147-189 (44%) 4.2 Average college rank among 8 categories: 3.9 Top 8 NFL 93-46 (67%) 78-58 (57%) 5.2 Bottom 8 NFL 36-93 (28%) 55-70 (44%) 3.8 Average NFL rank among 8 categories: 4.5 Yards Per Pass Attempt Differential In today s football world of spread offenses and throwing the football around 60% of the time or more, the ability to generate big plays through the air can make a huge difference in games. Although it does prove to be a better indicator than the Yards Per Rush Differential, I have to admit this category didn t rank as highly as I thought it might. Still, taking the best PYA differential teams in college or NFL football each year should give you about a 6% advantage based upon recent history. Yards Per Pass Differential Annual Averages Group SU W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) SU & ATS Rank Top 30 College 284-104 (73%) 204-160 (56%) 5.8 Bottom 30 College 107-252 (30%) 139-194 (42%) 5.2 Average college rank among 8 categories: 5.5 Top 8 NFL 96-45 (68%) 77-60 (56%) 3.8 Bottom 8 NFL 35-93 (27%) 54-72 (43%) 3.0 Average NFL rank among 8 categories: 3.4 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating (Yards) This particular strength indicator is one I began playing around with myself last season. Rather than using points, it takes into account how much a team outplays or is outplayed by its opponents when broken down on an individual play basis. The hope is that it removes some of the flukiness of scoring that can happen in football, putting more onus on 100 plays per game, as opposed to five scoring plays. It ranks only fifth overall among the eight categories, somewhat disappointing results. (Continued on Page 87) FORECASTING NFL 2009 WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 45

TOP WEEKLY HEAD-TO-HEAD FOOTBALL TRENDS by Steve Makinen HEAD-TO-HEAD TRENDS This is a list of the top head-to-head series trends for each week of the college and pro football seasons. They cover angles such as series wins by team, underdog/favorite, home/road, or over/under. Each week s list is Ranked in order of trend above or below.500. Use the W/L column to keep track of how these series trends fare in 10. COLLEGE - WEEK 1 Date # Trend Play W/L 9/4 1 * MISSOURI is 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS in its L8 games vs. ILLINOIS MISSOURI ATS 9/4 2 * UNDERDOG is 6-7 SU but 10-3 ATS in CSU-COL series since '96 UNDERDOG ATS 9/4 3 * FAVORITE has swept L4 RIC-TEX games, both SU & ATS FAVORITE ATS 9/4 4 * MISSISSIPPI ST is on 4-game SU & ATS winning streak vs. MEMPHIS MISSISSIPPI ST ATS 9/4 5 * TEXAS has won four straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. RICE TEXAS ATS 9/4 6 * L4 NLV-WIS series games have gone UNDER the total UNDER the total 9/4 7 * UNDERDOG is 4-13 SU but 11-5 ATS in ND-PUR series since '93 UNDERDOG ATS COLLEGE - WEEK 2 Date # Trend Play W/L 9/11 1 * E CAROLINA is 9-4 SU & 12-1 ATS vs. MEMPHIS since '94 E CAROLINA ATS 9/11 2 * SC-GEO series has gone 12-1 UNDER the total since '96 UNDER the total 9/11 3 * UNDERDOG is 10-4 SU & 12-2 ATS in ND-MIC series since '92 UNDERDOG ATS 9/11 4 * L7 games of SC-GEO series at S CAROLINA are 7-0 UNDER the total UNDER the total 9/11 5 * UNDERDOG is 7-0 SU & ATS in L7 ND-MIC matchups at NOTRE DAME UNDERDOG ATS 9/11 6 * IOWA ST is 7-5 SU & 10-2 ATS vs. IOWA since '98 IOWA ST ATS 9/11 7 * BYU is 6-0 SU & ATS in its L6 games vs. AIR FORCE BYU ATS PRO - WEEK 1 Date # Trend Play W/L 9/12 1 * UNDERDOG is 14-11 SU & 19-6 ATS in WAS-DAL series since '97 UNDERDOG ATS 9/12 2 * L10 games of HOU-IND series are 9-1 OVER the total OVER the total 9/9 3 * MINNESOTA is on 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS run vs. NEW ORLEANS MINNESOTA ATS 9/12 4 * L5 games of HOU-IND series at HOUSTON are 5-0 OVER the total OVER the total 9/12 5 * UNDERDOG is on 3-2 SU & 5-0 ATS run in L5 PIT-ATL matchups UNDERDOG ATS COLLEGE - WEEK 3 Date # Trend Play W/L 9/18 1 * ROAD TEAM is 3-6 SU but 9-0 ATS in L9 KEN-AKR matchups AKRON ATS 9/18 2 * MICHIGAN ST is 9-5 SU & 11-2 ATS vs. NOTRE DAME since '94 MICHIGAN ST ATS 9/18 3 * LSU is 17-1 SU & 14-4 ATS vs. MISSISSIPPI ST since '92 LSU ATS 9/18 4 * UNDERDOG is on 6-0 ATS run in L6 MIS-VAN matchups at OLE MISS UNDERDOG ATS 9/18 5 * ROAD TEAM is on 7-2 SU & 7-1 ATS run in MSY-ND series NOTRE DAME ATS 9/18 6 * L8 games of TT-TEX series are 7-1 OVER the total OVER the total 9/18 7 * UNDERDOG is 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS in L8 TT-TEX matchups at TECH UNDERDOG ATS PRO - WEEK 2 Date # Trend Play W/L 9/19 1 * NEW ENGLAND is 9-2 SU & 10-1 ATS at NY JETS since '99 NEW ENGLAND ATS 9/20 2 * L6 games of SF-NO series at SAN FRANCISCO are 6-0 OVER the total OVER the total 9/20 3 * NEW ORLEANS is 8-3 SU & 9-2 ATS vs. SAN FRANCISCO since '99 NEW ORLEANS ATS 9/19 4 * L8 games of ATL-ARZ series are 7-1 OVER the total OVER the total 9/19 5 * FAVORITE is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in L5 CAR-TB matchups FAVORITE ATS COLLEGE - WEEK 4 Date # Trend Play W/L 9/25 1 * FAVORITE is on 7-0 SU & ATS run in L7 HOU-TUL matchups FAVORITE ATS 9/25 2 * HOUSTON is on 7-0 SU & ATS run vs. TULANE HOUSTON ATS 9/25 3 * L6 games of WSU-USC series at WASH ST are 6-0 OVER the total OVER the total 9/25 4 * UNDERDOG is 4-2 SU & 6-0 ATS in L6 FSU-WF matchups UNDERDOG ATS 9/25 5 * GEORGIA TECH is 11-4 SU & 11-3 ATS vs. NC STATE since '92 GEORGIA TECH ATS 9/25 6 * HOME TEAM is on 5-3 SU & 7-1 ATS run in MAR-OHU series MARSHALL ATS 9/25 7 * HOME TEAM is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in ARI-CAL series ARIZONA ATS PRO - WEEK 3 Date # Trend Play W/L 9/26 1 * NE-BUF series has gone 17-5 UNDER the total since '99 UNDER the total 9/26 2 * NY JETS are 17-7 SU & 16-5 ATS vs. MIAMI since '98 NY JETS ATS 9/26 3 * UNDERDOG is 14-4 ATS in NO-ATL series at NEW ORLEANS since '92 UNDERDOG ATS 9/26 4 * NY JETS are 8-4 SU & 10-2 ATS at MIAMI since '98 NY JETS ATS 9/26 5 * FAVORITE is 15-0 SU & 11-3 ATS in L15 NE-BUF matchups FAVORITE ATS COLLEGE - WEEK 5 Date # Trend Play W/L 10/2 1 * ROAD TEAM is 8-5 SU & 12-1 ATS in MIN-NW series since '93 NORTHWESTERN ATS 10/2 2 * NAVY is 7-4 SU & 9-1 ATS vs. AIR FORCE since '99 NAVY ATS 10/2 3 * NORTH TEXAS is 6-4 SU & 9-1 ATS in its L10 games vs. LA LAFAYETTE NORTH TEXAS ATS 10/2 4 * ROAD TEAM is 14-4 ATS in CM-BLS series since '92 BALL ST ATS 10/2 5 * FAVORITE is on 6-0 SU & ATS run in L6 ISU-TT matchups FAVORITE ATS 10/2 6 * L6 games of MSY-WIS series are 6-0 OVER the total OVER the total 10/2 7 * RICE is 7-0 SU & 6-0 ATS in its L7 home games vs. SMU RICE ATS PRO - WEEK 4 Date # Trend Play W/L 10/3 1 * ROAD TEAM is 11-6 SU & 14-2 ATS in L17 NO-CAR matchups CAROLINA ATS 10/3 2 * HOME TEAM is 28-9 SU & 24-11 ATS in GB-DET series since '92 GREEN BAY ATS 10/3 3 * UNDERDOG is on 8-4 SU & 10-2 ATS run in L12 BUF-NYJ matchups UNDERDOG ATS 10/3 4 * ROAD TEAM is on 6-0 ATS run in SD-ARZ series ARIZONA ATS 10/3 5 * ROAD TEAM is on 7-0 SU & 6-0 ATS run in NYG-CHI series CHICAGO ATS COLLEGE - WEEK 6 Date # Trend Play W/L 10/9 1 * OVER the total is 10-0 in L10 games of WIS-MIN series OVER the total 10/9 2 * BOWLING GREEN is 5-3 SU & 8-0 ATS in its L8 games at OHIO U BOWLING GREEN ATS 10/9 3 * UNDERDOG is on 7-1 SU & 8-0 ATS run in L8 MIA-FSU matchups UNDERDOG ATS 10/9 4 * ROAD TEAM is 8-11 SU but 15-4 ATS in NMS-NM series since '92 NEW MEXICO ATS 10/9 5 * SOUTHERN MISS is 11-3 SU & 11-2 ATS vs. E CAROLINA since '96 SOUTHERN MISS ATS 10/9 6 * UNDERDOG is 3-10 SU but 11-2 ATS in LOU-MEM series since '92 UNDERDOG ATS 10/9 7 * RICE is on 5-2 SU & 7-0 ATS run vs. UTEP RICE ATS PRO - WEEK 5 Date # Trend Play W/L 10/10 1 * SAN DIEGO is 13-1 SU & 11-3 ATS in its L14 games vs. OAKLAND SAN DIEGO ATS 10/10 2 * FAVORITE is 13-0 SU & 10-3 ATS in L13 OAK-SD matchups FAVORITE ATS 10/10 3 * L7 games of BAL-DEN series are 6-1 UNDER the total UNDER the total 10/10 4 * BALTIMORE is on 5-2 SU & 6-1 ATS run vs. DENVER BALTIMORE ATS 10/10 5 * FAVORITE has swept L4 SF-PHI games, both SU & ATS FAVORITE ATS COLLEGE - WEEK 7 Date # Trend Play W/L 10/16 1 * VIRGINIA is 9-0 SU & ATS in its L9 home games vs. N CAROLINA VIRGINIA ATS 10/16 2 * UNDERDOG is 3-8 SU but 10-1 ATS in MIC-IOW series since '93 UNDERDOG ATS 10/16 3 * RUTGERS is 6-1 SU & 7-0 ATS in its L7 games vs. ARMY RUTGERS ATS 10/16 4 * L7 games of WIS-OSU series at WISCONSIN are 7-0 UNDER the total UNDER the total 10/16 5 * SOUTHERN MISS is 12-6 SU & 14-4 ATS vs. MEMPHIS since '92 SOUTHERN MISS ATS 10/16 6 * ROAD TEAM is 11-7 SU & 14-4 ATS in GEO-VAN series since '92 VANDERBILT ATS 10/16 7 * FAVORITE is on 7-0 SU & 6-0 ATS run in L7 TT-OKS matchups at TECH FAVORITE ATS PRO - WEEK 6 Date # Trend Play W/L 10/17 1 * FAVORITE is 8-0 SU & ATS in L8 MIN-DAL matchups FAVORITE ATS 10/17 2 * PHILADELPHIA is 8-3 SU & 9-1 ATS vs. ATLANTA since '96 PHILADELPHIA ATS 10/17 3 * ROAD TEAM is 6-0 SU & ATS in L6 NYG-DET matchups DETROIT ATS 10/17 4 * L6 games of PHI-ATL series are 6-0 UNDER the total UNDER the total 10/17 5 * ROAD TEAM is on 9-5 SU & 11-3 ATS run in TB-NO series NEW ORLEANS ATS COLLEGE - WEEK 8 Date # Trend Play W/L 10/23 1 * ROAD TEAM is 8-7 SU & 14-1 ATS in NAV-ND series since '94 NOTRE DAME ATS 10/23 2 * ROAD TEAM is 9-8 SU & 15-2 ATS in TEN-ALA series since '93 ALABAMA ATS 10/23 3 * NEW MEXICO is 10-5 SU & 13-2 ATS vs. SAN DIEGO ST since '95 NEW MEXICO ATS 10/23 4 * UNDERDOG is 8-4 SU & 11-1 ATS in ARI-WAS series since '98 UNDERDOG ATS 10/23 5 * FAVORITE is 7-0 SU & ATS in L7 SJS-FRS matchups FAVORITE ATS 10/23 6 * HOME TEAM is 8-4 SU & 10-2 ATS in CAL-AZS series since '96 CALIFORNIA ATS 10/23 7 * BYU is 6-0 SU & ATS in its L6 games vs. WYOMING BYU ATS PRO - WEEK 7 Date # Trend Play W/L 10/24 1 * UNDERDOG is 11-10 SU & 17-4 ATS in GB-MIN series since '99 UNDERDOG ATS 10/24 2 * CAROLINA is 8-6 SU & 12-2 ATS vs. SAN FRANCISCO since '96 CAROLINA ATS 10/24 3 * CAR-SF series has gone 10-1 OVER the total since '97 OVER the total 10/24 4 * UNDERDOG is 11-3 ATS in GB-MIN series at GREEN BAY since '97 UNDERDOG ATS 10/24 5 * ROAD TEAM is on 12-4 ATS run in GB-MIN series MINNESOTA ATS 46 WWW.STATFOX.COM

COLLEGE - WEEK 9 Date # Trend Play W/L 10/30 1 * UNDERDOG is 7-3 SU & 10-0 ATS in L10 CSU-NM matchups UNDERDOG ATS 10/28 2 * NC STATE is on 4-5 SU but 8-0 ATS run vs. FLORIDA ST NC STATE ATS 10/30 3 * HOME TEAM is on 6-2 SU & 8-0 ATS run in OKL-COL series OKLAHOMA ATS 10/28 4 * UNDERDOG is 4-5 SU but 8-0 ATS in L9 NCS-FSU matchups UNDERDOG ATS 10/30 5 * N ILLINOIS is 10-2 ATS vs. W MICHIGAN since '98 N ILLINOIS ATS 10/30 6 * ROAD TEAM is 7-5 SU & 10-2 ATS in AF-UTA series since '95 UTAH ATS 10/30 7 * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & ATS in L6 HAW-IDA matchups FAVORITE ATS PRO - WEEK 8 Date # Trend Play W/L 10/31 1 * HOME TEAM is 7-0 SU & ATS in L7 OAK-SEA matchups OAKLAND ATS 10/31 2 * SAN DIEGO is on 6-0 SU & ATS run vs. TENNESSEE SAN DIEGO ATS 10/31 3 * UNDER the total is 6-0 in L6 games of DET-WAS series UNDER the total 10/31 4 * FAVORITE is 10-1 SU & 9-2 ATS in KC-BUF series since '93 FAVORITE ATS 10/31 5 * CAROLINA is 11-5 SU & 12-4 ATS vs. ST LOUIS since '96 CAROLINA ATS COLLEGE - WEEK 10 Date # Trend Play W/L 11/6 1 * ROAD TEAM is 12-6 SU & 13-3 ATS in LSU-ALA series since '92 ALABAMA ATS 11/6 2 * FAVORITE is 14-2 SU & 13-3 ATS in SC-ARK series since '94 FAVORITE ATS 11/6 3 * ROAD TEAM is 9-7 SU & 13-3 ATS in CLM-NCS series since '94 NC STATE ATS 11/6 4 * HOME TEAM is 11-5 SU & 13-3 ATS in TAM-OKL series since '93 TEXAS A&M ATS 11/2 5 * FAVORITE is 7-0 SU & ATS in L7 AKS-MTS matchups FAVORITE ATS 11/6 6 * UNDERDOG is on 3-4 SU but 7-0 ATS run in L7 SYR-LOU matchups UNDERDOG ATS 11/6 7 * FAVORITE is 10-0 SU & 9-1 ATS in L10 OKS-BAY matchups FAVORITE ATS PRO - WEEK 9 Date # Trend Play W/L 11/7 1 * ROAD TEAM is on 10-4 SU & 13-1 ATS run in OAK-KC series KANSAS CITY ATS 11/7 2 * HOME TEAM is 10-1 SU & ATS in GB-DAL series since '94 GREEN BAY ATS 11/7 3 * KANSAS CITY is 10-3 SU & 11-2 ATS visiting OAKLAND since '97 KANSAS CITY ATS 11/7 4 * L7 games of CAR-NO series at CAROLINA are 7-0 UNDER the total UNDER the total 11/8 5 * PITTSBURGH is 10-2 SU & ATS at CINCINNATI since '99 PITTSBURGH ATS COLLEGE - WEEK 11 Date # Trend Play W/L 11/10 1 * MIAMI OHIO is on 6-3 SU & 9-0 ATS run in its L9 games at BGSU MIAMI OHIO ATS 11/13 2 * FAVORITE is on 8-0 SU & ATS run in L8 OSU-PSU matchups at OHIO ST FAVORITE ATS 11/13 3 * HOME TEAM is 9-4 SU & 11-2 ATS in FSU-CLM series since '97 FLORIDA ST ATS 11/13 4 * UNDERDOG is 6-1 SU & 7-0 ATS in L7 HOU-TLS matchups UNDERDOG ATS 11/13 5 * OREGON ST is 7-3 SU & 9-1 ATS vs. WASHINGTON ST since '99 OREGON ST ATS 11/13 6 * WIS-IND series has gone 10-2 OVER the total since '93 OVER the total 11/13 7 * HOME TEAM is 9-3 SU & 10-2 ATS in RUT-SYR series since '98 RUTGERS ATS PRO - WEEK 10 Date # Trend Play W/L 11/14 1 * SAN FRANCISCO is 18-12 SU & 20-8 ATS vs. ST LOUIS since '95 SAN FRANCISCO ATS 11/14 2 * HOME TEAM is on 13-2 SU & 12-3 ATS run in CHI-MIN series CHICAGO ATS 11/14 3 * L6 games of ARZ-SEA series at ARIZONA are 6-0 OVER the total OVER the total 11/14 4 * FAVORITE is 10-1 SU & 9-2 ATS in IND-CIN series since '92 FAVORITE ATS 11/14 5 * OVER the total is 12-4 in L16 games of DEN-KC series OVER the total COLLEGE - WEEK 12 Date # Trend Play W/L 11/20 1 * ROAD TEAM is 12-2 ATS in BAY-OKL series since '96 OKLAHOMA ATS 11/19 2 * FAVORITE is 8-0 SU & ATS in L8 BSU-FRS matchups FAVORITE ATS 11/20 3 * HOME TEAM is 5-3 SU & 8-0 ATS in L8 MSS-ARK matchups MISSISSIPPI ST ATS 11/20 4 * UNDERDOG is 5-8 SU but 11-2 ATS in LSU-MIS series since '97 UNDERDOG ATS 11/20 5 * OLE MISS is on 4-3 SU & 7-0 ATS run in its L7 games at LSU OLE MISS ATS 11/20 6 * UNDERDOG is on 7-0 ATS run in L7 MSS-ARK matchups at MISS ST UNDERDOG ATS 11/20 7 * HOME TEAM is 9-7 SU & 12-3 ATS in MSY-PUR series since '92 MICHIGAN ST ATS PRO - WEEK 11 Date # Trend Play W/L 11/21 1 * HOME TEAM is on 7-0 SU & ATS run in SF-TB series SAN FRANCISCO ATS 11/21 2 * STL-ATL series has gone 13-4 OVER the total since '96 OVER the total 11/21 3 * UNDERDOG is 13-4 ATS in MIN-GB series at MINNESOTA since '92 UNDERDOG ATS 11/21 4 * NEW ENGLAND is 18-10 SU & 19-8 ATS vs. INDIANAPOLIS since '93 NEW ENGLAND ATS 11/21 5 * UNDERDOG is 10-20 SU but 20-9 ATS in NE-IND series since '92 UNDERDOG ATS COLLEGE - WEEK 13 Date # Trend Play W/L 11/27 1 * ROAD TEAM is 8-4 SU & 10-1 ATS in GEO-GAT series since '98 GEORGIA TECH ATS 11/27 2 * FAVORITE is 11-1 SU & 10-2 ATS in FSU-FLA series since '98 FAVORITE ATS 11/26 3 * ROAD TEAM is on 5-4 SU & 8-1 ATS run in EMU-NIL series N ILLINOIS ATS 11/26 4 * ROAD TEAM is 7-2 SU & 8-1 ATS in L9 KS-OHU matchups OHIO U ATS 11/27 5 * HOME TEAM is 6-3 SU & 8-1 ATS in L9 WIS-NW matchups WISCONSIN ATS 11/27 6 * IOWA is 13-4 SU & ATS vs. MINNESOTA since '93 IOWA ATS 11/27 7 * UNDERDOG is 7-10 SU but 13-4 ATS in UTA-BYU series since '93 UNDERDOG ATS PRO - WEEK 12 Date # Trend Play W/L 11/28 1 * PITTSBURGH is 7-1 SU & 8-0 ATS in its L8 games vs. BUFFALO PITTSBURGH ATS 11/28 2 * UNDERDOG is 5-1 SU & 6-0 ATS in L6 IND-SD matchups UNDERDOG ATS 11/29 3 * ROAD TEAM is 5-4 SU & 8-1 ATS in L9 ARZ-SF matchups SAN FRANCISCO ATS 11/28 4 * SAN DIEGO is 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS in its L8 games at INDIANAPOLIS SAN DIEGO ATS 11/29 5 * UNDERDOG is 7-1 ATS in L8 ARZ-SF matchups at ARIZONA UNDERDOG ATS COLLEGE - WEEK 14 Date # Trend Play W/L 12/4 1 * BOISE ST is on 9-0 SU & 8-0 ATS run vs. UTAH ST BOISE ST ATS 12/4 2 * UNDERDOG is 13-3 ATS in WSU-WAS series since '94 UNDERDOG ATS 12/4 3 * OVER the total is 7-0 in L7 games of ORS-ORE series OVER the total 12/2 4 * UNDER the total is 9-1 in L10 games of ARI-AZS series UNDER the total 12/2 5 * UNDERDOG is 14-4 ATS in ARI-AZS series since '92 UNDERDOG ATS 12/4 6 * FAVORITE is on 7-0 SU & 6-0 ATS run in L7 BSU-UTS matchups FAVORITE ATS 12/4 7 * UNDERDOG is on 8-1 ATS run in L9 WSU-WAS matchups at WASH ST UNDERDOG ATS PRO - WEEK 13 Date # Trend Play W/L 12/5 1 * L9 games of KC-DEN series at KANSAS CITY are 8-1 OVER the total OVER the total 12/5 2 * L9 games of SD-OAK series at SAN DIEGO are 8-1 UNDER the total UNDER the total 12/5 3 * FAVORITE is on 9-2 SU & ATS run in L11 NYG-WAS matchups FAVORITE ATS 12/5 4 * GREEN BAY is 12-1 SU & 9-2 ATS vs. SAN FRANCISCO since '95 GREEN BAY ATS 12/5 5 * NY GIANTS are on 7-1 SU & ATS run vs. WASHINGTON NY GIANTS ATS COLLEGE - WEEK 15 Date # Trend Play W/L 12/11 1 * NAVY is 11-5 SU & 12-4 ATS vs. ARMY since '94 NAVY ATS 12/11 2 * L4 NAV-ARM series games have gone UNDER the total UNDER the total 12/11 3 * FAVORITE is on 9-0 SU & 7-2 ATS run in L9 NAV-ARM matchups FAVORITE ATS PRO - WEEK 14 Date # Trend Play W/L 12/9 1 * UNDER the total is 9-1 in L10 games of TEN-IND series UNDER the total 12/12 2 * NO-STL series has gone 11-4 OVER the total since '97 OVER the total 12/12 3 * ROAD TEAM is on 5-2 SU & 6-1 ATS run in MIN-NYG series NY GIANTS ATS 12/13 4 * ROAD TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 HOU-BAL games BALTIMORE ATS 12/12 5 * HOME TEAM has won SU & ATS in four straight CAR-ATL games CAROLINA ATS PRO - WEEK 15 Date # Trend Play W/L 12/19 1 * UNDERDOG is 10-2 ATS in DAL-WAS series at DALLAS since '97 UNDERDOG ATS 12/19 2 * NYG-PHI series at NY GIANTS has gone 13-4 UNDER the total since '95 UNDER the total 12/19 3 * ROAD TEAM is on 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS run in CAR-ARZ series ARIZONA ATS 12/19 4 * UNDERDOG is 6-4 SU & 8-2 ATS in CAR-ARZ series since '95 UNDERDOG ATS 12/19 5 * ROAD TEAM is 3-2 SU & 4-0 ATS in L5 NE-GB matchups GREEN BAY ATS PRO - WEEK 16 Date # Trend Play W/L 12/26 1 * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & ATS in L6 PHI-MIN matchups FAVORITE ATS 12/26 2 * OVER the total is 6-0 in L6 games of CIN-SD series OVER the total 12/26 3 * ROAD TEAM is on 5-3 SU & 7-1 ATS run in TB-SEA series SEATTLE ATS 12/26 4 * NEW ENGLAND is 6-0 SU & 5-0 ATS in its L6 games at BUFFALO NEW ENGLAND ATS 12/26 5 * ROAD TEAM is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in GB-NYG series NY GIANTS ATS PRO - WEEK 17 Date # Trend Play W/L 1/2 1 * L9 games of IND-TEN series at INDIANAPOLIS are 8-1 UNDER the total UNDER the total 1/2 2 * OAKLAND is 6-5 SU & 8-2 ATS visiting KANSAS CITY since '99 OAKLAND ATS 1/2 3 * TAMPA BAY is 5-2 SU & 6-1 ATS in its L7 games at NEW ORLEANS TAMPA BAY ATS 1/2 4 * BUFFALO is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in its L4 games visiting NY JETS BUFFALO ATS 1/2 5 * NY GIANTS are on 4-game SU & ATS winning streak at WASHINGTON NY GIANTS ATS HEAD-TO-HEAD TRENDS WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 47

2010 COLLEGE FOOTBALL OUTLOOK by Steve Makinen 2009 COLLEGE FOOTBALL An SEC team has won the national championship in each of the last four seasons. Why, you ask? The league is college football s version of the Ultimate Fighting Championship. Because the conference is chock-full of future NFL players, SEC teams have their schemes and their manhood tested each week. The upside is that teams that are good enough to run the conference gauntlet have fared well in the one-game, winner-take-all setting of the BCS title game as LSU, Florida (twice) and Alabama have proven in recent years. That s why Alabama, the SEC s most complete team, is StatFox s top ranked team in its annual preseason Top 25. Does that mean Alabama is a sure-fire bet to win this year s national championship? Not so fast, as famed ESPN college football analyst Lee Corso might say there are several team that will be in the running, and most of them have a less treacherous road to the top. Let s face it, Alabama s 2010 slate is loaded with landmines. Ranked as the 16th toughest schedule in the country, the Tide faces home games against Penn State, Florida, and Auburn, while also having to travel to Arkansas, South Carolina, and LSU. Any one of those SEC games could leave Nick Saban s team on the outside of the SEC title game, and hence out of the BCS title picture. Who then are the Tide s biggest threats to the perch? And are their schedules any easier? We believe there are a handful of teams to consider. Starting with, Florida. The Gators may be losing several players to the NFL, including Tim Tebow, but they are reloading and seem to have a hunger back that may have been missing last season. The winner of the SEC has become almost a lock to be in the title games, and thus the winner of the head-to-head match between the Florida and Alabama is automatically a title contender. Ohio State has to be given serious consideration as well. The Buckeyes schedule is rated 58th toughest in the nation and they begin the season ranked in the Top 5 in all polls coming off their impressive Rose Bowl win over Oregon. Quarterback Terrelle Pryor is set for stardom. Trips to Wisconsin and Iowa figure to be all that stand in the way. Of course, the Hawkeyes are pretty good themselves, but may not boast the offense of the national championship team. Boise State is also of interest, if for no other reason than beginning the season ranked higher than ever. For good reason too, as the Broncos are returning 20 starters from the 14-0 team of 2009. Their signal-caller, Kellen Moore, is quietly one of the best in the country. Should they survive nonconference tilts with Virginia Tech and Oregon State, it could be smooth sailing to the championship game. Sticking with the non-bcs conferences, the Mountain West has become a major player in the BCS the last two seasons, and 2010 could be another banner year as TCU comes back almost fully intact offensively from its undefeated regular season team of last fall. Since the Horned Frogs are always good defensively, it is assumed they will pick up right where they left off. Also boasting a lofty preseason ranking, one of the usual hurdles is already removed from the quest for greater BCS respect. TCU s toughest game is its first, versus Oregon State in Arlington. If you haven t paid attention since January s title game, a lot of what you ll see on the field has changed in the college game. An unprecedented number of big name stars have moved on to the NFL, leaving a new crop of less known producers to assume the spotlight. In addition to Tebow, think of college football this year in Austin without Colt McCoy, or in Norman without Sam Bradford. Ndamukong Suh sure made his share of highlight films at Nebraska. The same goes for the departure of Jimmy Clausen from Notre Dame. Speaking of the Irish, change is the name of the game in South Bend, where the football program begins anew under Brian Kelly, after Charlie Weis was let go following a disappointing era of underachievement. That coaching change may be the biggest of 21 such offseason moves across the country. For those of you serious about your college football handicapping, don t put down even a single dollar without catching up on all of them. So who are the players we ll be seeing regularly on the highlight shows this fall? How about RB Mark Ingram, the returning Heisman Trophy winner? He remains relatively obscure despite receiving the greatest honor in college football last December. Perhaps that could be because his backup, Trent Richardson, might be even more talented, and the team around him is so deep on both sides of the ball. We already mentioned Terrelle Pryor and Kellen Moore, but what about the most prolific quarterback of them all, Case Keenum of Houston. His numbers, barring injury will be HUGE, and his team, both fun to watch and a potential BCS crasher. Jacquizz Rodgers is another running back you might want to stay up late for. He is a dynamic back out of Oregon State, who just happens to play on the same team as his nearly equally talented brother James. Staying on the west coast, how about Jake Locker, quarterback at Washington, who came back to school for his senior year after helping turn the Huskies program around nearly instantly? He could be the #1 pick in next year s NFL draft. The names certainly don t stop there though John Clay (RB, Wisconsin), Noel Devine (RB, West Virginia), Ryan Mallett (QB, Arkansas), Dion Lewis (RB, Pittsburgh) the list goes on and on of players that used to shine in the shadow of the big names. So as we prepare for another thrilling season of college football amidst all of the conference expansion and realignment talk, we can at least rest assured that everything will be status quo for this fall. So enjoy the annual StatFox Preseason Top 25, as well as our predicted BCS bowl games. Remember, the preseason Top 25 is how the teams look now, which may or may not entirely coincide with how they finish. BCS Bowl Projections BCS Title Game: Florida over Ohio State Rose Bowl: Oklahoma over Oregon State Orange Bowl: North Carolina over TCU Sugar Bowl: Alabama over Pittsburgh Fiesta Bowl: Nebraska over Boise State 2010 StatFox College Football Preseason Top 25 1. ALABAMA CRIMSON TIDE Strengths: Besides one of the nation s best coaches in Saban, Alabama has quite a collecton of skill players, including an umatched one-two punch at tailback with Heisman Trophy winner Mark Ingram and Trent Richardson, a proven leader under center in quarterback Greg McElroy, and a future first-round pick in wide receiver Julio Jones. In the Way: SEC schedule, re-working of dominant defense. 2. OHIO STATE BUCKEYES Strengths: Ten starters return on offense, including a Heisman candidate in quarterback Terrelle Pryor, nearly the entire line, the whole receiving corps and a game-changing tailback in Brandon Saine, a speed merchant poised to be a 1,000-yard rusher. Six starters return on defense, including All- American candidates at each level. In the Way: Does Pryor pick up where he left at Rose, or regress? Can they survive trips to Madison and Iowa City? 3. BOISE STATE BRONCOS Strengths: The Broncos return 23 of 24 players who started against TCU in the Fiesta Bowl. College football is a quarterback s game and Boise State has a very accurate one in Kellen Moore, who finished second in the nation in passing efficiency a year ago when he threw for 3,536 yards, 39 touchdowns and three interceptions. In the Way: Non-conference versus Virginia Tech and Oregon State are as tough as Boise has played in its run of success. One loss eliminates any national title hope. 4. TEXAS LONGHORNS Strengths: Despite losing quarterback Colt McCoy, super safety Earl Thomas and others from last year s 13-1 squad, there s still talent aplenty in Austin. Head coach Mack Brown believes his secondary has three eventual NFL defensive backs and new quarterback Garrett Gilbert sure looked capable in the BCS title game. 48 WWW.STATFOX.COM

In the Way: Will quarterback Garrett Gilbert live up to the hype or melt under the pressure of being the big man on campus. Can any team beat both Oklahoma and Nebraska away from home in a two-week span? 5. IOWA HAWKEYES Strengths: With 16 starters back from last year s 11-win Orange Bowl champion, Iowa has all the ingredients necessary to be a top 10 fixture in the national polls and to really push Ohio State for Big Ten Conference supremacy. The Hawkeyes feature a star-studded defense (led by All- America end Adrian Clayborn), a veteran quarterback (Ricky Stanzi), a deep stable of running backs and a very good head coach in Kirk Ferentz. In the Way: The Hawkeyes are rebuilding their offensive line and weren t all that dynamic of that side of the ball as it was. 6. OREGON DUCKS Strengths: With Pete Carroll now wearing Seattle Seahawks garb, it appears that there s a new Pac-10 sheriff in town Oregon. Sure, head coach Chip Kelly suspended starting quarterback Jeremiah Masoli for the season, but 19 starters are back from a 10-3 squad including all five starting offensive linemen, a future pro tailback in LaMichael James and a pair of All-Pac-10-caliber linebackers in Spencer Paysinger and Casey Matthews. In the Way: Replacing Masoli, a guy who could beat opposing defenses with both his arm and feet, will be difficult, and perhaps a distraction. 7. FLORIDA GATORS Strengths: There s no truth to the rumor that Florida is dropping football because Tim Tebow has graduated. In fact, Florida s offense will be very good once again. New quarterback John Brantley has an NFL arm and four starters return from a very good offensive line. The Gators are loaded at receiver too and Urban Meyer is a master of using his team s strengths. In the Way: Can the defense overcome massive losses? There s a lot of talent to replace even in Gainesville. 8. TCU HORNED FROGS Strengths: The Horned Frogs have a loaded backfield, as quarterback Andy Dalton and running backs Matthew Tucker and Ed Wesley are all back in the fold. This team outscored its opponents by a nation s best 25.5 PPG last season. In the Way: Do the Frogs have enough playmakers on defense? Is it too easy to assume TCU will not miss a beat defensively? They ve lost a lot. 9. VIRGINIA TECH HOKIES Strengths: Frank Beamer, one of the best head coaches in the college ranks, has an embarrassment of riches in the offensive backfield. Sophomore Ryan Williams (1,655 yards, 22 touchdowns) and Darren Evans, the 2008 ACC Rookie of the Year, are both back. And don t forget about QB Tyron Taylor, a blur with his feet. In the Way: Beamer typically doesn t rely on his offense to win. Can coordinator Bud Foster rebuild the defense? He must replace six starters. Can Taylor become a better passer to provide offensive balance? 10. ARKANSAS RAZORBACKS Strengths: Sixteen starters nine on offense, seven on defense are back for head coach Bobby Petrino, including an All-American candidate in quarterback Ryan Mallet. A second-team All-SEC performer, Mallett threw for 3,642 yards and 30 touchdowns and has the weapons to easily best those numbers. In the Way: Can the defense improve just a little bit? If it does, then Arkansas, which led the SEC in scoring offense (36.0 PPG) but was last in the league in total defense (401.2 YPG), has a chance to push Alabama in the SEC West. 11. PITTSBURGH PANTHERS Strengths: The Panthers two deep is littered with future NFL players, including offensive tackle Jason Pinkston, defensive end Greg Romeus, running back Dion Lewis and wideout Jonathan Baldwin. In the Way: Can Tino be the man? Quarterback Bill Stull has graduated leaving sophomore Tino Sunseri, the son of the Panthers former All- America linebacker Sal Sunseri, as the heir apparent under center. Can ultimate success be reached under oft-maligned head coach Dave Wannstedt? 12. USC TROJANS Strengths: Quarterback Matt Barkley slimmed down during the offseason, which he hopes will make him more mobile and confident throwing on the run. Ronald Johnson and Brice Butler are good enough to replace departed star receiver Damian Williams, but the offensive line has to play better for the Trojans to get the scoring juice back into their offense. In the Way: Is Lane Kiffin the right man to take over for Pete Carroll? It will be a tough act to follow, especially now that opponents are no longer overcome by the USC mystique. 13. NEBRASKA CORNHUSKERS Strengths: Seventeen starters 10 on offense and seven Blackshirts on defense are back for head coach Bo Pelini. Back-to-back 10-win season seem to indicate that Nebraska is climbing back up to the top of the college football ladder. In the Way: Can quarterback Zac Lee be more consistent? Was the Cornhuskers defense only dominant because of tackle Ndamukong Suh, now in the NFL? 14. WISCONSIN BADGERS Strengths: Tough-to-tackle tailback John Clay (1,517 yards rushing, 18 scores) and vastly improved quarterback Scott Tolzien (2,705 yards, 16 touchdowns) are just two of 10 returning starters from an offense that figures to score points galore. In the Way: Wisconsin never seems to respond well to high expectations and the impressive bowl victory over Miami put this team on the radar once again. Iowa has been a thorn in Badgers side as well. 15. FLORIDA STATE SEMINOLES Strengths: Quarterback Christian Ponder (2,717 yards passing, 14 touchdowns) is back and will be protected by the best offensive line Florida State has put on the field since the glory days of the 1990s. All five starters return and collectively they have started 142 games for the Seminoles. In the Way: Can the Florida State defense improve just enough to be okay? What happened? This program was once a factory for speedy yet intimidating defensive players. 16. NORTH CAROLINA TAR HEELS Strengths: The Tar Heels are loaded with NFL players on defense and nine starters return from a unit that led the ACC in total defense (269.6 YPG) and intercepted 19 passes and returned them for 508 yards an ACC record. Seven of the returning nine players have started 22 or more games in their careers. In the Way: Can senior quarterback T.J. Yates hold on to his job by becoming consistent? He doesn t even have to be a huge playmaker, just not horrible to the point where he costs his team games. 17. OKLAHOMA SOONERS Strengths: The lethal pass-catch combo of Landry Jones (3,198 yards passing) and Ryan Broyles (1,120 receiving yards) are back to lead a talentladen offense. Plus, to this point, knock on wood, the injuries that have plagued the Sooners have not reared their ugly head. In the Way: Can the Sooners stay healthy? And will the rebuilt defense a unit with seven new starters hold up against a rugged schedule? 18. AUBURN TIGERS Strengths: Eight starters are back on defense, led by molar-jarring linebacker Josh Bynes (104 tackles). And with Cameron Newton, a 6-6, 247-pound junior-college gem at quarterback, Auburn fans will now see the complete version of coordinator Gus Malzahn s offense. Newton can threaten opposing defenses with both his running and passing skills. In the Way: Ben Tate had a monster senior season (1,362 yards rushing) in this offense and needs to be replaced. The SEC schedule is gruesome with Georgia, South Carolina, and Kentucky the East Division foes for 2010. 19. GEORGIA BULLDOGS Strengths: With 10 starters back on offense, including playmaking wide receiver A.J. Green, Georgia should score points. Last season, the Bulldogs... (Continued on Page 107) 2009 COLLEGE FOOTBALL WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 49

acc Preview The ACC sent seven teams to bowl games a year ago but lost the biggest one of those when Georgia Tech fell to Iowa in the Orange Bowl. The 2010 season is expected to be a transitional one by many accounts for the Atlantic Division, as several big stars have departed, as well as the league s most well-known personality, Bobby Bowden. Jimbo Fisher, longtime offensive coordinator takes over for him at Florida State after some 35 years and not coincidentally, figures to have one of the better offenses in the conference. If the defense improves, the Seminoles could be a threat to Clemson and Boston. In the Coastal Division, four very strong contenders exist in North Carolina, Miami, Virginia Tech, and Georgia Tech. The Yellow Jackets are the defending champs, but the Tar Heels might just have the most favorable home-road slate and a wealth of quality experience returning. Virginia Tech, Georgia Tech, and Miami boast game-breaking quarterbacks. ATLANTIC DIVISION BOSTON COLLEGE EAGLES The Eagles were a mild surprise in 2009. After finishing 11-3 and 9-5 in 2007 and 08, respectively, they were widely expected to finish near the bottom in the ACC. Instead, they won eight games under new head coach Frank Spaziani and finished in second place in the Atlantic Division. However, none of it came easily. Four conference wins came by a total of 16 points. In its three conference losses, BC was outscored, 104-34 The biggest question the Eagles face as a team is who, among four viable options, will run the offense. Dave Shinskie returns after setting school passing records for a freshman with 2,049 yards and 15 touchdowns but completed just 51.7 percent of his passes and was intercepted 14 times. He ll be pushed by sophomore Mike Marscovetra and also also newcomers Josh Bordner and Chase Rettig for the starting job. While the quarterback position is up in the air, there is no question as to who the Eagles will lean on most heavily junior Montel Harris, who started all 13 games as a sophomore and amassed 1,457 yards and 14 touchdowns on the ground. Overall, eight starters return on offense The stop unit was relatively solid, allowing 19.8 points per game and 103.1 yards per contest on the ground. It also limited opponents to 12 passing touchdowns, while picking off 15 passes. Six of 11 starters return to that unit Regardless of who starts at quarterback, it looks like another eight-win season for Spaziani and the Eagles. Boston College s biggest game of the year may decide the Atlantic Division at home against Clemson on Oct. 30. 2009 ATLANTIC STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Clemson 9-5-0 0.643 436 286 6-3-0 6-1-0 3-4-0 8-5-0 61.5% 8-5-0 Boston College 8-5-0 0.615 322 257 5-3-0 6-1-0 2-4-0 6-6-0 50.0% 5-7-0 Florida State 7-6-0 0.538 391 390 4-4-0 3-3-0 4-3-0 4-9-0 30.8% 8-4-0 Wake Forest 5-7-0 0.417 316 315 3-5-0 4-3-0 1-4-0 6-6-0 50.0% 6-5-0 N.C. State 5-7-0 0.417 364 367 2-6-0 5-3-0 0-4-0 6-6-0 50.0% 8-2-0 Maryland 2-10-0 0.167 256 375 1-7-0 2-5-0 0-5-0 4-7-1 36.4% 4-7-0 2009 COASTAL STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Georgia Tech 11-3-0 0.786 473 347 8-1-0 5-1-0 6-2-0 8-5-0 61.5% 5-7-1 Virginia Tech 10-3-0 0.769 414 203 6-2-0 5-1-0 5-2-0 8-5-0 61.5% 6-7-0 Miami 9-4-0 0.692 394 288 5-3-0 5-1-0 4-3-0 6-7-0 46.2% 5-7-0 North Carolina 8-5-0 0.615 309 222 4-4-0 5-2-0 3-3-0 6-6-0 50.0% 5-6-0 Duke 5-7-0 0.417 302 340 3-5-0 2-4-0 3-3-0 5-5-1 50.0% 5-4-1 Virginia 3-9-0 0.250 232 316 2-6-0 1-6-0 2-3-0 6-5-0 54.5% 6-5-0 CLEMSON TIGERS A six-game winning streak from mid- October through late-november propelled the Tigers to a 9-5 record and first place in the ACC s Atlantic Division. Their victories included a 40-37 overtime gem over the Hurricanes in Miami, a 40-24 defeat of Florida State and a triumph over Kentucky in the Music City Bowl. As special a season as Clemson had, it could have been even better if not for close losses all but one by five points or fewer. The only dud was a 34-17 loss to South Carolina, in which the Tigers allowed 228 yards rushing The Tigers were both productive and balanced offensively, gaining 2,688 yards through the air and 2,385 on the ground. While quarterback Kyle Parker, who completed 205 of 369 passes for 2,526 yards and 20 touchdowns against 12 interceptions returns, the Tigers said goodbye to several other key components of their offense, most importantly do-everything running back C.J. Spiller. Seven total offensive starters return The stop unit allowed an average of 20.4 points and 314.3 yards per game, including 151.5 yards per game on the ground. It managed 30 takeaways and converted them into 55 points. Though Clemson lost its leading performer, linebacker Kavell Conner, it returns three other players who amassed 100 tackles or more as part of six returning starters The Tigers are set at quarterback, and that s a big plus. But they ll need someone to step up in a hurry at running back, wide receiver, and special teams. No one can replace Spiller by himself. The defense should be dependable enough, but road games against Auburn, North Carolina, Boston College, Florida State and Wake Forest highlight a tough schedule. FLORIDA STATE SEMINOLES For the first time in 35 years, the Seminoles will play for a coach not named Bobby Bowden, whose 389th victory over West Virginia in the Gator Bowl on Jan. 1 was his last. The venerable coach had 33 consecutive winning seasons, but the Seminoles finished 50 WWW.STATFOX.COM

7-6 in three of the last four, and so the powers that be decided it was time for a change. Enter Jimbo Fisher, who endured 22 years as an assistant, the last three as Bowden s offensive coordinator, before getting his shot to run the whole show. He won t be eased into the job, as Florida State faces Oklahoma in its second game The best news for Fisher is that virtually his entire offense, which averaged 30.1 points per game, returns intact. Junior wide receivers Jarmon Fortson (45 catches, 610 yards), Taiwan Easterling (35, 442), and Bert Reed (60, 710) provide quarterback Christian Ponder with plenty of firepower.for all of their success on offense, the Seminoles were awful defensively. In fact, they scored 391 points and allowed 390, an average of 30.0 per game. They allowed 28 points or more in eight games, and three times yielded 40 or more. The Seminoles do return six starters, highlighted by linebackers Kendall Smith (85 tackles) and Nigel Bradham (93) It goes without saying that this is a tough spot for Fisher, but what s going to happen if the Seminoles get off to a bad start? Two of their first three games are against Oklahoma (away), and BYU. They do have winnable road games against Virginia, N.C. State and Maryland, but they close out against Florida. With their leaky defense, another 7-6 season could be in the works. MARYLAND TERRAPINS It all unraveled early for Ralph Friedgen and the Terps. From the moment Cal s Jahvid Best broke off a 73-yard run in the first quarter of the opening game, Maryland was behind the 8-ball. The Terps went on to allow 52 points on that September day and then 323 more in a 2-10 freefall. An overtime win at home against James Madison was an embarrassment in its own right. The highlight of the entire season was a 24-21 victory over Clemson, and even that was put in jeopardy when Maryland allowed a 92-yard kickoff return in the closing minutes. Will it get any better for Friedgen? It can t get much worse The Terrapins will put their offensive fortunes in the hands of Jamarr Robinson, who saw action in seven games and got an extensive look in the final five. He wasn t half bad, completing 46 of 85 pass attempts for 482 yards and a pair of touchdowns. Robinson will have at least two established players with whom to share the load wide receiver Torrey Smith and running back Da Rel Scott You can t allow 31.3 points per game without some bad luck, and Maryland had that in droves, namely injuries. Now the unit has lost six starters. Perhaps it would be better to start from scratch A quick start would go a long way in washing the bad taste of last season out of the Terps mouths, and they have a favorable early schedule. Things start to get a lot more complicated when they travel to Clemson in mid-october. It s hard to see Maryland winning six games, but even a four-win season would be a jumping off point. N.C. STATE WOLFPACK There s not a lot to love here if you re a fan of the Wolfpack. The offensive line is a mess, the two leading rushers are gone and the heir-apparent to the position just had ankle surgery. And there s speculation that the quarterback just wants to play baseball. Plus, injuries, which were a big problem during last year s disappointing season, have already started nagging, as 20 scholarship players sat out the spring game...qb Russell Wilson is a man of many talents. He threw for 3,027 yards and 31 touchdowns, and ran for 481 yards and another four scores. That after a freshman season in which he had a 17:1 TD-Int. ratio. Those illuminating performances should indicate that the Wolfpack is set at quarterback. But Wilson, as of early May, was slugging.519 while splitting time between the infield and the pitchers mound for the Wolfpack baseball team, leading some to speculate that he just might decide to stick with baseball. If he is back, he will be surrounded by six other starters On defense, five of the top six tacklers have moved on, but slot linebacker Audie Cole, who lead the team with 85 stops to go along with four sacks, is back. Linebacker is the only strong part in what figures to be a rebuilt defense In all, it doesn t look very promising for N.C. State. Last year, the Wolfpack started well but were done in by a four-game losing skid. They allowed 176 points in those four games, and they didn t get any better after losing top performers to graduation and suspension. Wilson can keep them in games offensively though. WAKE FOREST DEMON DEACONS The Demon Deacons were riding high after home wins over N.C. State and Maryland last October. The win over the Terps had them at 4-2 overall and 2-1 in the ACC, and another trip to a bowl game was within reach. But then they got smoked in Clemson, lost a nail biter to Navy, then a game to Miami and fell a field goal short of upsetting Georgia Tech. A 41-28 loss to Florida State followed, and by the time they got Duke in the season finale, they were only playing for pride For 2010, the quarterback picture is unsettled, as head coach Jim Grobe played no less than five hopefuls during Wake Forest s final spring game. Skylar Jones may have an inside track to replace Riley Skinner, who threw for 3,160 yards and 26 touchdowns in 2009. Whoever the new quarterback is, he ll have guys to throw to in wide receivers Devon Brown, Marshall, and Chris Givens. Six total starters return on that side of the ball The fact that Wake Forest outscored the competition, 316-315, says more about its offense than it does its defense. However, the Demon Deacons were not horrible. They held opposing quarterbacks to 218.8 WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 51

yards passing per game, while intercepting 12 passes. The Deacons have some holes to fill, with six starters gone, but they just may have enough depth to show improvement It s always a tricky proposition to head into a season without knowing who your quarterback is, and Grobe will probably have to shuffle the deck once or twice. The defense isn t great, but it has depth, and if things bounce just right, Wake Forest could win as many as six games. COASTAL DIVISION DUKE BLUE DEVILS The fact that the Blue Devils have won nine games in two years under David Cutcliffe may not sound especially impressive until you consider that they had won a grand total of 10 games in the previous eight seasons, including zero in 2006. In fact, Duke looked Bowl-bound for the first time in 15 years as late as Oct. 31, when it beat Virginia to improve to 5-3. The Blue Devils then imploded, losing their final four in convincing fashion. They ll try again with a new quarterback, a new running back, and five new starters on defense It won t be easy to replace quarterback Thad Lewis, a four-year starter, but Sean Renfree did perform capably in limited action as a freshman. At any rate, the quarterback should be well protected, as four linemen are back. The Blue Devils are very well manned at receiver, as well, with Donovan Varner who had 65 catches for 1,047 yards and eight touchdowns leading the group No one is sure about the defense, especially after the departures of five starters. The Blue Devils also lost their coordinator when Mike MacIntyre was hired as head coach at San Jose State. In his place, Jim Knowles and Marion Hobby will try to turn around a defense that allowed 340 points Can the Blue Devils get back to a bowl game for the first time since 1994? A glance at the schedule shows winnable games against Elon, Wake Forest, Army, Maryland, Navy, and Virginia. If they should fumble away any of those chances, they ll have to beat the Tar Heels, who they have not beaten since 2003, on the season s final day in order to go bowling. GEORGIA TECH YELLOW JACKETS The Yellow Jackets won 11 games, including their first ever in Tallahassee, and earned their first outright ACC title since 1990, but they weren t entirely satisfied. Their season ended with a 24-14 loss to Iowa in the FedEx Orange Bowl and their defense underperformed all season, allowing an average of 24.8 PPG. As a result, they ve switched schemes and hired three new coaches on defense, including former NFL head coach Al Groh, the new defensive coordinator Seven starters return to an offense that set ACC records with 4,136 yards and 47 touchdowns on the ground. So proficient were the Yellow Jackets that they topped 300 yards rushing in 10 games, and both Josh Nesbitt and Jonathan Dwyer gained 1,000 yards. Nesbitt, who is back, was more or less on the mark with his passes. Despite completing just 46.3 percent of his throws, he made them count, averaging 10.5 yards per attempt while tossing 10 TD s...groh will have to transform a defense that was pushed around, and he ll have to do it without three of the team s four leading playmakers. Just how much difference he can make in game planning remains to be seen, but Johnson has been named ACC Coach of the Year in each of his two seasons in Atlanta. The Jackets enjoyed a 26-19 turnover advantage Departures hurt, but expectations will be high. Johnson has a proven backfield in place to meet those expectations, but the rest will depend on Groh and his unit. Four of the Yellow Jackets last five games are against Clemson (away), Virginia Tech (away), Miami (Fla.) (home) and Georgia (away), a brutal stretch of the schedule. Another 11-win season will be tough, but they can win the ACC again. MIAMI HURRICANES After a couple of lackluster seasons in 2007 and 08, during which the Hurricanes won 12 and lost 13, the team began to show signs of life in head coach Randy Shannon s third season, finishing 9-4, including 5-3 against ACC foes. It s still a long way from its heyday of national prominence, when it won five national titles in an 18-year span, but it had not won as many as nine games since 2005. A 20-14 loss to Wisconsin in the Citrus Bowl shows how far the Hurricanes still have to go, and questions along the offensive line make it doubtful that they ll make a big leap in the upcoming season Start with the quarterback, Jacory Harris, who thrilled with 3,352 yards passing and 24 touchdowns, but also threw 17 interceptions. He ll need to be more careful with the ball, but the pressure will be on his shoulders as the line is in minor disarray. The Hurricanes have the skill players in place (they averaged 30.3 PPG), and all that remains to be seen is whether they ll have the blocking necessary to move the ball and keep Harris from rushing too many throws The Hurricanes did well to limit opponents to 22.2 points and 329.6 YPG, but they did so despite forcing a scant 10 turnovers and sacking the quarterback just 24 times. More experience returns on that side of the ball though, with eight starters back The Hurricanes are always dangerous, especially when they have a quarterback as good as Harris. They re a long way from a national title, but another ninewin season isn t out of the question. Neither is it entirely likely. Miami looks more like a seven-win team. 52 WWW.STATFOX.COM

NORTH CAROLINA TAR HEELS Butch Davis would love nothing more than for quarterback T.J. Yates to have a big year, something in the 2,500-yard, 20-touchdown range, but he d settle for Yates not lousing things up. Word is Davis is so antsy about his signal-caller s inconsistency that he s been eying freshman Bryn Renner all spring. With 19 starters returning, the time for North Carolina to make its move in the ACC Coastal Division is now So much depends upon the quarterback, but Yates season was very pedestrian 2,136 yards, 14 touchdowns, 15 interceptions. In other words, Yates, as a junior, was slightly less effective than Yates as a freshman. Whether he wants to or not, Davis is going to have to live with what he gets from his starter. If what he gets is mostly good, the Tar Heels have a chance to unseat Georgia Tech at the top of the standings, with all but one offensive starter returning Boy oh boy, are the Tar Heels loaded defensively. Despite losing E.J. Wilson and Cam Thomas, this unit has a chance to be more dominant than the one that yielded just 95.6 yards rushing and 17.1 points per game, and ranked sixth nationally After a couple of 8-5 finishes, the Tar Heels appear poised to jump to the next level. Even if the offense plods along, this defense is good enough to win eight games on its own. If Yates plays well, look out. The bet here is that he finds his way. The proof will be in the pudding: North Carolina plays division foes Georgia Tech and Virginia Tech at home, and Miami away. VIRGINIA CAVALIERS Following a 3-9 campaign, its worst since 1982, Virginia said goodbye to old friend Al Groh and hello to Mike London. Groh was 59-53 in nine seasons at his alma mater, and won three bowl games and two ACC Coach of the Year awards, but the team had sputtered to an 8-16 record since 2008, and Groh couldn t hang on. London, who twice previously served as assistant coach in Charlottesville, had made the University of Richmond a power at the FCS level. Groh, the new defensive coordinator at Georgia Tech, will get a crack at the Cavaliers in Atlanta on Oct. 9 The Cavaliers offense lost five starters, including quarterback Jamell Sewell, leading rusher Rashawn Jackson and wide receiver Vic Hall, but it was time to rebuild the unit anyway. Under Sewell, they averaged 19.3 points per game and scored 17 points or fewer in eight games Their defense, more or less, kept the Cavaliers in games, but it didn t exactly break any records. The unit allowed 26.3 points per game, but 173.8 yards per game on the ground. It sacked the quarterback 22 times and picked off 12 passes. Leading tackler, linebacker Steve Greer, is back in the middle of things, among seven starters, offering some hope The Cavaliers will be plodding on offense again. There is no ground game to speak of, no big-time receiver, and the offensive line is only so-so. Don t expect a major increase in production, and don t expect much help from the special teams. While they have a chance to be good defensively, the Cavaliers will struggle to improve on last season s record. VIRGINIA TECH HOKIES Throughout his successful career, head coach Frank Beamer s calling cards have been defense and special teams. What a strange twist it would be, then, if the current edition of the Hokies came up a bit short in those very two areas. Beamer will have to replace seven starters from his vaunted stop unit, including three defensive backs and linebacker Cody Grimm, and both kickers. His offense, meanwhile, has game breakers all over the place, setting the stage for a wild season in Blacksburg The Hokies didn t score 414 points by accident they ve got talent on every level of the offense. Quarterback Tyrod Taylor is slick enough to run away from defenses, savvy enough to get the ball to his playmaking receivers, and mature enough to stay away from mistakes. Tailback Ryan Williams is also dangerous, and rushed for 1,655 yards and a whopping 21 touchdowns, an effort that earned him ACC Rookie of the Year honors If anybody can find a way to make it work with seven new starters on defense, it s Beamer. The Hokies usually dominate defensively, and last year was no exception. They had the No. 1 pass defense in the league, but the Hokies don t have much experience to lean on in 2010 Tech will be in the thick of things in the ACC, but they won t be able to rely on their defense or special teams as they have in recent seasons. Their offense will be good enough to offset some of that slippage, but there s no replacing a great defense. Keep an eye on the opening matchup versus Boise State on Sept. 6. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH ACC Atlantic Florida State Boston College Clemson NC State Wake Forest Maryland ACC Coastal North Carolina Virginia Tech Miami Georgia Tech Duke Virginia WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 53

BOSTON COLLEGE EAGLES 2010 Schedule Strength: 36.75 (#66 of 120) Offense: Multiple Pro-Style - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 40 Where: Chestnut Hill, MA Head Coach: Frank Spaziani, 2nd year (9-5 SU) Conference: ACC 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: Alumni Stadium 9/4/10 WEBER ST 9/11/10 KENT ST * FAVORITE has won & covered L2 BC-KS games 2009 Scoring Differential: +5.0 (#46 of 120) 9/25/10 VIRGINIA TECH * HOME TEAM has swept L3 BC-VAT games, both SU & ATS 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +3.9 (#51 of 120) 10/2/10 NOTRE DAME * UNDERDOG is 3-7 SU but 8-2 ATS in BC-ND series since 98 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 42 (#45 of 120) 10/9/10 at NC State * HOME TEAM is 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 NCS-BC matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 37.23 (#47 of 120) 10/16/10 at Florida St * UNDERDOG has swept L4 FSU-BC games, both SU & ATS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 MARYLAND * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 BC-MD games 10/30/10 CLEMSON * UNDERDOG is 4-1 SU & ATS in L5 BC-CLM matchups Points Scored - Allowed 24.8 (79) 19.8 (21) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 323.9 (98) 327.6 (27) 11/6/10 at Wake Forest * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in WF-BC series YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.12 (91) 4.75 (20) 11/13/10 at Duke YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.78 (80) 2.99 (11) 11/20/10 VIRGINIA * HOME TEAM has covered spread in L2 BC-VIR games YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.92 (75) 6.52 (37) Avg. Time of Possession 29.32 (80) 11/27/10 at Syracuse * HOME TEAM is 4-1 SU & ATS in L5 SYR-BC matchups Turnover Differential -0.2 (75) 3rd Down Conversion % 29.8% (115) 35.7% (28) Straight Up 10-3 11-3 9-5 8-5 38-16 (70%) * BOSTON COLLEGE is on a 14-4 ATS (+9.6 Units) run at home vs. top-level teams (Win Pct. > 75%) Overall ATS 6-6 6-6 7-6 6-6 25-24 (51%) The Average Score was BOSTON COLLEGE 26.8, OPPONENT 19.8. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at Home ATS 5-1 3-2 4-2 5-1 17-6 (74%) VIRGINIA TECH, 10/30 - CLEMSON Away/Neutral ATS 1-5 3-4 3-4 1-5 8-18 (31%) * BOSTON COLLEGE is 7-0 UNDER the total (+7 Units) as road underdogs of 3.5 to 10 points since vs Conference ATS 4-4 5-3 4-5 3-5 16-17 (48%) 07. The Average Score was BOSTON COLLEGE 17.6, OPPONENT 20.4. Potential spots for 2010: Non-Conference ATS 2-2 1-3 3-1 3-1 9-7 (56%) 10/16 - at Florida St, 11/6 - at Wake Forest as Favorite ATS 3-6 3-5 7-5 4-3 17-19 (47%) * BOSTON COLLEGE is 6-0 ATS (+6 Units) vs. good passing teams averaging 250 or more PYPG. as Underdog ATS 3-0 3-1 0-1 2-3 8-5 (62%) since 07. The Average Score was BOSTON COLLEGE 31.3, OPPONENT 17. Potential spots for 2010: Over-Under 6-6 6-7 8-5 5-7 25-25 (50%) 10/2 - NOTRE DAME, 10/9 - at NC State, 10/16 - at Florida St, 11/6 - at Wake Forest, 11/13 - at Duke 8/31 at C Michigan 31-24 W -11.5 L 41 O 9/1 WAKE FOREST 38-28 W -6 W 42 O 8/30 at Kent St 21-0 W -11 W 47.5 U 9/5 NORTHEASTERN 54-0 W - - - 9/9 CLEMSON 34-33 W +1 W 45 O 9/8 NC STATE 37-17 W -13.5 W 50 O 9/6 GEORGIA TECH 16-19 L -6.5 L 38 U 9/12 KENT ST 34-7 W -21 W 45 U 9/16 BYU 30-23 W -6 W 52 O 9/15 at Georgia Tech 24-10 W +6.5 W 48.5 U 9/20 UCF 34-7 W -10 W 40 O 9/19 at Clemson 7-25 L +9 L 44.5 U 9/23 at NC State 15-17 L -6 L 42 U 9/22 ARMY 37-17 W -26.5 L 45.5 O 9/27 RHODE ISLAND 42-0 W - - - 9/26 WAKE FOREST 27-24 W -1 W 41 O 9/30 MAINE 22-0 W - - - 9/29 MASSACHUSETTS 24-14 W - - - 10/4 at NC State 38-31 W -7.5 L 42 O 10/3 FLORIDA ST 28-21 W +3.5 W 45 O 10/6 BOWLING GREEN 55-24 W -20 W 58.5 O 10/18 VIRGINIA TECH 28-23 W -3 W 39.5 O 10/12 VIRGINIA TECH 22-3 W +2 W 42 U 10/10 at Virginia Tech 14-48 L +13.5 L 44.5 O 10/13 at Notre Dame 27-14 W -13.5 L 48 U 10/25 at N Carolina 24-45 L +3 L 41.5 O 10/21 at Florida St 24-19 W +6 W 42 O 10/25 at Virginia Tech 14-10 W +3 W 41.5 U 11/1 CLEMSON 21-27 L -2.5 L 43.5 O 10/17 NC STATE 52-20 W -2.5 W 48.5 O 10/28 BUFFALO 41-0 W -31.5 W 41.5 U 11/3 FLORIDA ST 17-27 L -6.5 L 38.5 O 11/8 NOTRE DAME 17-0 W -3 W 46 U 10/24 at Notre Dame 16-20 L +8 W 53.5 U 11/4 at Wake Forest 14-21 L -4.5 L 41.5 U 11/10 at Maryland 35-42 L -6.5 L 47 O 11/15 at Florida St 27-17 W +6.5 W 45 U 10/31 C MICHIGAN 31-10 W -5.5 W 48 U 11/11 DUKE 28-7 W -29.5 L 47 U 11/17 at Clemson 20-17 W +9 W 54 U 11/22 at Wake Forest 24-21 W -1.5 W 40.5 O 11/14 at Virginia 14-10 W -4.5 L 44 U 11/18 MARYLAND 38-16 W -7.5 W 41 O 11/24 MIAMI 28-14 W -14 T 48.5 U 11/29 MARYLAND 28-21 W -6.5 W 42.5 O 11/21 N CAROLINA 13-31 L -3 L 39.5 O 11/23 at Miami 14-17 L -3 L 37.5 U 12/1 vs. Virginia Tech 16-30 L +4 L 48 U 12/6 vs. Virginia Tech 12-30 L -1 L 38 O 11/28 at Maryland 19-17 W -5 L 45.5 U 12/30 vs. Navy 25-24 W -7.5 L 48 O 12/28 vs. Michigan St 24-21 W -5 L 58.5 U 12/31 vs. Vanderbilt 14-16 L -5 L 40 U 12/26 vs. USC 13-24 L +7.5 L 45 U Offense: Multiple Pro-Style - Starters Returning: 7 CLEMSON TIGERS Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 6 2010 Schedule Strength: 38.83 (#45 of 120) Lettermen Returning: 51 Where: Clemson, SC Head Coach: Dabo Swinney, 2nd year (13-8 SU) Conference: ACC 2009 RECORD: 9-5 SU, 8-5 ATS Facility: Clemson Memorial Stadium 9/4/10 NORTH TEXAS 9/11/10 PRESBYTERIAN 2009 Scoring Differential: +10.7 (#22 of 120) 9/18/10 at Auburn * L2 games in AUB-CLM series at AUBURN went UNDER the total 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +12.1 (#18 of 120) 10/2/10 MIAMI * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 CLM-MIA games 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 47 (#26 of 120) 10/9/10 at N Carolina * FAVORITE is 11-2 SU & 9-4 ATS in UNC-CLM series since 92 2009 Schedule Strength: 38.86 (#31 of 120) 10/16/10 MARYLAND * CLM-MD series has gone 9-1 UNDER the total since 95 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 GEORGIA TECH * UNDERDOG is 10-9 SU & 15-4 ATS in CLM-GAT series since 92 10/30/10 at Boston College * UNDERDOG is 4-1 SU & ATS in L5 BC-CLM matchups Points Scored - Allowed 31.1 (28) 20.4 (25) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 362.4 (74) 314.3 (19) 11/6/10 NC STATE * ROAD TEAM is 9-7 SU & 13-3 ATS in CLM-NCS series since 94 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.73 (49) 4.55 (11) 11/13/10 at Florida St * HOME TEAM is 9-4 SU & 11-2 ATS in FSU-CLM series since 97 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.81 (19) 3.50 (30) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.89 (79) 6.31 (30) 11/20/10 at Wake Forest * HOME TEAM is 7-1 SU & ATS in L8 WF-CLM matchups Avg. Time of Possession 27.88 (106) 11/27/10 S CAROLINA * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 CLM-SC games Turnover Differential +0.4 (28) 3rd Down Conversion % 38.0% (71) 40.3% (68) Straight Up 8-5 9-4 7-6 9-5 33-20 (62%) * CLEMSON is on a 12-25 ATS (-15.5 Units) skid as favorites of 10.5 to 21 points The Average Overall ATS 6-7 6-6 4-7 8-5 24-25 (49%) Score was CLEMSON 30.8, OPPONENT 17.1. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - MARYLAND, at Home ATS 4-3 3-3 2-3 4-2 13-11 (54%) 11/6 - NC STATE Away/Neutral ATS 2-4 3-3 2-4 4-3 11-14 (44%) * The home team is 12-2 ATS when CLEMSON and Florida State meet. Potential spots for 2010: vs Conference ATS 3-5 5-3 3-5 6-3 17-16 (52%) 11/13 - at Florida St Non-Conference ATS 3-2 1-3 1-2 2-2 7-9 (44%) * CLEMSON is 10-18 ATS as ACC home favorite. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - MIAMI, 10/16 - as Favorite ATS 5-7 5-6 3-5 6-4 19-22 (46%) MARYLAND, 10/23 - GEORGIA TECH, 11/6 -NC STATE as Underdog ATS 1-0 1-0 1-2 2-1 5-3 (63%) Over-Under 5-7 6-6 3-8 8-5 22-26 (46%) 9/2 FLA ATLANTIC 54-6 W -28.5 W 43 O 9/3 FLORIDA ST 24-18 W +3.5 W 44 U 8/30 vs. Alabama 10-34 L -4.5 L 46 U 9/5 MIDDLE TENN ST 37-14 W -18.5 W 47.5 O 9/9 at Boston College 33-34 L -1 L 45 O 9/8 LA MONROE 49-26 W -24.5 L 51 O 9/6 THE CITADEL 45-17 W - - - 9/10 at Georgia Tech 27-30 L +5 W 43 O 9/16 at Florida St 27-20 W +4 W 47 T 9/15 FURMAN 38-10 W - - - 9/13 NC STATE 27-9 W -21.5 L 46 U 9/19 BOSTON COLLEGE 25-7 W -9 W 44.5 U 9/23 N CAROLINA 52-7 W -16 W 49 O 9/22 at Nc State 42-20 W -6.5 W 52.5 O 9/20 S CAROLINA ST 54-0 W - - - 9/26 TCU 10-14 L -2 L 41 U 9/30 LOUISIANA TECH 51-0 W -31 W 53.5 U 9/29 at Georgia Tech 3-13 L -3 L 46.5 U 9/27 MARYLAND 17-20 L -12 L 49.5 U 10/3 at Maryland 21-24 L -12.5 L 48 U 10/7 at Wake Forest 27-17 W -14 L 44.5 U 10/6 VIRGINIA TECH 23-41 L -5.5 L 41.5 O 10/9 at Wake Forest 7-12 L -1 L 42 U 10/17 WAKE FOREST 38-3 W -8 W 47.5 U 10/12 vs. Temple 63-9 W -45.5 W 56 O 10/20 C MICHIGAN 70-14 W -16.5 W 61 O 10/18 GEORGIA TECH 17-21 L +2 L 41 U 10/24 at Miami 40-37 W +4 W 42 O 10/31 COASTAL CAROLINA 49-3 W - - - 10/21 GEORGIA TECH 31-7 W -6.5 W 46.5 U 10/27 at Maryland 30-17 W -4 W 48 U 11/1 at Boston College 27-21 W +2.5 W 43.5 O 11/7 FLORIDA ST 40-24 W -8.5 W 57 O 10/26 at Virginia Tech 7-24 L -4 L 43 U 11/3 at Duke 47-10 W -17 W 55 O 11/8 at Florida St 27-41 L +3 L 44.5 O 11/14 at NC State 43-23 W -8 W 55 O 11/4 MARYLAND 12-13 L -18.5 L 48.5 U 11/10 WAKE FOREST 44-10 W -9.5 W 49 O 11/15 DUKE 31-7 W -10 W 46.5 U 11/21 VIRGINIA 34-21 W -20.5 L 45 O 11/11 NC STATE 20-14 W -18.5 L 44 U 11/17 BOSTON COLLEGE 17-20 L -9 L 54 U 11/22 at Virginia 13-3 W -2.5 W 43 U 11/28 at S Carolina 17-34 L -3 L 44 O 11/25 S CAROLINA 28-31 L -5.5 L 48 O 11/24 at S Carolina 23-21 W -3 L 54.5 U 11/29 S CAROLINA 31-14 W 0 W 40 O 12/5 vs. Georgia Tech 34-39 L +1 L 56.5 O 12/29 vs. Kentucky 20-28 L -11 L 58.5 U 12/31 vs. Auburn 20-23 L -2 L 44 U 1/1 vs. Nebraska 21-26 L 0 L 54.5 U 12/27 vs. Kentucky 21-13 W -6.5 W 52.5 U 54 WWW.STATFOX.COM

FLORIDA STATE SEMINOLES 2010 Schedule Strength: 43.17 (#15 of 120) MARYLAND TERRAPINS 2010 Schedule Strength: 37.58 (#60 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 55 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 10 Defense: 4-3 Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 36 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 54 Where: Tallahassee, FL Head Coach: Jimbo Fisher, 1st year Conference: ACC 2009 RECORD: 7-6 SU, 4-9 ATS Facility: Doak S. Campbell Stadium 9/4/10 SAMFORD 9/11/10 at Oklahoma 2009 Scoring Differential: +0.1 (#70 of 120) 9/18/10 BYU * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 ATS in L2 FSU-BYU games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +4.9 (#43 of 120) 9/25/10 WAKE FOREST * UNDERDOG is 4-2 SU & 6-0 ATS in L6 FSU-WF matchups 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 45 (#30 of 120) 10/2/10 at Virginia * L6 games of VIR-FSU series are 6-0 UNDER the total 2009 Schedule Strength: 40.85 (#18 of 120) 10/9/10 at Miami * UNDERDOG is on 7-1 SU & 8-0 ATS run in L8 MIA-FSU matchups 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 BOSTON COLLEGE * UNDERDOG has swept L4 FSU-BC games, both SU & ATS 10/28/10 at NC State * NC STATE is on 4-5 SU but 8-0 ATS run vs. FLORIDA ST Points Scored - Allowed 30.1 (33) 30.0 (94) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 420.5 (29) 434.5 (108) 11/6/10 N CAROLINA * ROAD TEAM is 6-7 SU but 10-3 ATS in FSU-UNC series since 93 YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.36 (15) 6.75 (116) 11/13/10 CLEMSON * HOME TEAM is 9-4 SU & 11-2 ATS in FSU-CLM series since 97 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.60 (34) 5.39 (112) 11/20/10 at Maryland * HOME TEAM is 12-6 SU & 13-5 ATS in MD-FSU series since 92 YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.06 (22) 8.72 (115) Avg. Time of Possession 30.77 (39) 11/27/10 FLORIDA * FAVORITE is 11-1 SU & 10-2 ATS in FSU-FLA series since 98 Turnover Differential +0.1 (60) 3rd Down Conversion % 47.3% (10) 45.5% (106) Straight Up 7-6 7-6 9-4 7-6 30-22 (58%) * FLORIDA ST is 0-6 ATS (-6.6 Units) vs. excellent passing teams averaging 8.5 or more PYA Overall ATS 6-7 5-7 6-5 4-9 21-28 (43%) since 07. The Average Score was FLORIDA ST 19.3, OPPONENT 37.3. Potential spots for 2010: at Home ATS 3-5 2-3 3-3 0-6 8-17 (32%) 9/18 - BYU, 11/27 - FLORIDA Away/Neutral ATS 3-2 3-4 3-2 4-3 13-11 (54%) * FLORIDA ST is 6-0 OVER the total (+6 Units) as underdogs of 3.5 to 10 points since 07. The vs Conference ATS 3-5 3-5 4-4 2-6 12-20 (38%) Average Score was FLORIDA ST 32.5, OPPONENT 31.3. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - at Non-Conference ATS 3-2 2-2 2-1 2-3 9-8 (53%) Miami, 11/27 - FLORIDA as Favorite ATS 3-7 4-5 6-5 0-6 13-23 (36%) * FLORIDA ST is 1-13 ATS at home after scoring 35 or more points. The Average Score was as Underdog ATS 3-0 1-2 0-0 4-2 8-4 (67%) FLORIDA ST 23.1, OPPONENT 29.8. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - BOSTON COLLEGE Over-Under 7-5 6-7 7-4 8-4 28-20 (58%) 9/4 at Miami 13-10 W +3.5 W 38.5 U 9/3 at Clemson 18-24 L -3.5 L 44 U 9/6 W CAROLINA 69-0 W - - - 9/7 MIAMI 34-38 L -6.5 L 46.5 O 9/9 TROY ST 24-17 W -25.5 L 45 U 9/8 UAB 34-24 W -37 L 53.5 O 9/13 UT-CHATTANOOGA 46-7 W - - - 9/12 JACKSONVILLE ST 19-9 W -34 L - 9/16 CLEMSON 20-27 L -4 L 47 T 9/15 at Colorado 16-6 W -5.5 W 47.5 U 9/20 WAKE FOREST 3-12 L -4 L 45 U 9/19 at BYU 54-28 W +8.5 W 54 O 9/23 RICE 55-7 W -30 W 47 O 9/29 vs. Alabama 21-14 W -2.5 W 43.5 U 9/27 COLORADO 39-21 W -6.5 W 42 O 9/26 S FLORIDA 7-17 L -13.5 L 51 U 10/5 at NC State 20-24 L -10.5 L 39.5 O 10/6 NC STATE 27-10 W -18.5 L 45 U 10/4 at Miami 41-39 W 0 W 40.5 O 10/3 at Boston College 21-28 L -3.5 L 45 O 10/14 at Duke 51-24 W -23 W 42 O 10/11 at Wake Forest 21-24 L -5 L 44 O 10/16 at NC State 26-17 W -11 L 48 U 10/10 GEORGIA TECH 44-49 L -3 L 56 O 10/21 BOSTON COLLEGE 19-24 L -6 L 42 O 10/20 MIAMI 29-37 L -5.5 L 42.5 O 10/25 VIRGINIA TECH 30-20 W -7 W 44.5 O 10/22 at N Carolina 30-27 W +1.5 W 47.5 O 10/28 at Maryland 24-27 L -3.5 L 42.5 O 10/27 DUKE 25-6 W -17.5 W 48.5 U 11/1 at Georgia Tech 28-31 L +2.5 L 41.5 O 10/31 NC STATE 45-42 W -10.5 L 66 O 11/4 VIRGINIA 33-0 W -13.5 W 41.5 U 11/3 at Boston College 27-17 W +6.5 W 38.5 O 11/8 CLEMSON 41-27 W -3 W 44.5 O 11/7 at Clemson 24-40 L +8.5 L 57 O 11/11 WAKE FOREST 0-30 L -9.5 L 44.5 U 11/10 at Virginia Tech 21-40 L +6 L 41 O 11/15 BOSTON COLLEGE 17-27 L -6.5 L 45 U 11/14 at Wake Forest 41-28 W +4.5 W 57 O 11/18 W MICHIGAN 28-20 W -16.5 L 43.5 O 11/17 MARYLAND 24-16 W -7.5 W 47 U 11/22 at Maryland 37-3 W -1.5 W 48.5 U 11/21 MARYLAND 29-26 W -16.5 L 58 U 11/25 FLORIDA 14-21 L +7.5 W 44 U 11/24 at Florida 12-45 L +14 L 60 U 11/29 FLORIDA 15-45 L +16.5 L 53 O 11/28 at Florida 10-37 L +26 L 57 U 12/27 vs. UCLA 44-27 W +3 W 37.5 O 12/31 vs. Kentucky 28-35 L +7 T 56.5 O 12/27 vs. Wisconsin 42-13 W -7 W 50.5 O 1/1 vs. W Virginia 33-21 W +3 W 56 U Where: College Park, MD Head Coach: Ralph Friedgen, 10th year (66-46 SU) Conference: ACC 2009 RECORD: 2-10 SU, 4-7-1 ATS Facility: Byrd Stadium 9/6/10 NAVY 9/11/10 MORGAN ST 2009 Scoring Differential: -9.9 (#109 of 120) 9/18/10 at W Virginia * W VIRGINIA has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. MARYLAND 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -6.5 (#91 of 120) 9/25/10 FLA INTERNATIONAL * UNDERDOG is 0-2 SU but 2-0 ATS in L2 MD-FIU games 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 32 (#78 of 120) 10/2/10 DUKE * ROAD TEAM is 3-0-1 ATS in L4 MD-DUK games 2009 Schedule Strength: 37.33 (#46 of 120) 10/16/10 at Clemson * CLM-MD series has gone 9-1 UNDER the total since 95 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Boston College * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 BC-MD games 10/30/10 WAKE FOREST * MARYLAND is 8-3 SU & 9-2 ATS vs. WAKE FOREST since 99 Points Scored - Allowed 21.3 (98) 31.3 (100) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 315.5 (102) 396.2 (83) 11/6/10 at Miami YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.73 (107) 5.81 (87) 11/13/10 at Virginia * VIRGINIA is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in its L4 games hosting MARYLAND YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.10 (110) 3.93 (59) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.43 (97) 8.23 (109) 11/20/10 FLORIDA ST * HOME TEAM is 12-6 SU & 13-5 ATS in MD-FSU series since 92 Avg. Time of Possession 28.77 (98) 11/27/10 NC STATE * UNDERDOG is on 3-6 SU but 7-2 ATS run in L9 MD-NCS matchups at MARYLAND Turnover Differential -0.5 (98) 3rd Down Conversion % 36.0% (84) 39.7% (61) Straight Up 9-4 6-7 8-5 2-10 25-26 (49%) * MARYLAND is on a 11-25 ATS (-16.5 Units) skid on the road vs. good rushing defenses - Overall ATS 5-7 4-8 6-6 4-7 19-28 (40%) allowing <=120 RYPG The Average Score was MARYLAND 17.6, OPPONENT 30.9. Potential at Home ATS 2-4 2-3 4-2 2-5 10-14 (42%) spots for 2010: 10/23 - at Boston College Away/Neutral ATS 3-3 2-5 2-4 2-2 9-14 (39%) * MARYLAND is on a 16-4 ATS (+11.6 Units) run vs. poor rushing defenses - allowing >=4.75 YPR vs Conference ATS 4-4 3-5 3-5 4-3 14-17 (45%) The Average Score was MARYLAND 33.3, OPPONENT 18.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - FLA Non-Conference ATS 1-3 1-3 3-1 0-4 5-11 (31%) INTERNATIONAL, 11/20 - FLORIDA ST as Favorite ATS 1-5 0-2 1-3 0-2 2-12 (14%) * MARYLAND is on a 25-10 ATS (+14 Units) run coming off 2 straight losses against conference as Underdog ATS 4-2 4-6 5-3 4-4 17-15 (53%) rivals The Average Score was MARYLAND 24.7, OPPONENT 24.6. Potential spots for 2010: Over-Under 7-5 4-8 5-7 4-7 20-27 (43%) 10/30 - WAKE FOREST, 11/20 - FLORIDA ST 9/2 WILLIAM & MARY 27-14 W - - - 9/1 VILLANOVA 31-14 W - - - 8/30 DELAWARE 14-7 W - - - 9/5 at California 13-52 L +21 L 50.5 O 9/9 MIDDLE TENN ST 24-10 W -24 L 43 U 9/8 at Fla International 26-10 W -23 L 45.5 U 9/6 at Middle Tenn St 14-24 L -12.5 L 44.5 U 9/12 JAMES MADISON 38-35 W -10 L - 9/14 at W Virginia 24-45 L +17 L 47 O 9/13 W VIRGINIA 14-31 L +15.5 L 61 U 9/13 CALIFORNIA 35-27 W +13.5 W 54 O 9/19 MIDDLE TENN ST 31-32 L -7.5 L 52.5 O 9/23 FLA INTERNATIONAL 14-10 W -23 L 46 U 9/22 at Wake Forest 24-31 L +3.5 L 42 O 9/20 E MICHIGAN 51-24 W -21.5 W 52 O 9/26 RUTGERS 13-34 L -1 L 49 U 10/7 at Georgia Tech 23-27 L +14.5 W 43.5 O 9/29 at Rutgers 34-24 W +17.5 W 46.5 O 9/27 at Clemson 20-17 W +12 W 49.5 U 10/3 CLEMSON 24-21 W +12.5 W 48 U 10/14 at Virginia 28-26 W -3 L 38 O 10/6 GEORGIA TECH 28-26 W +3 W 42 O 10/4 at Virginia 0-31 L -12.5 L 45 U 10/10 at Wake Forest 32-42 L +13.5 W 52.5 O 10/21 NC STATE 26-20 W -1 W 44.5 O 10/20 VIRGINIA 17-18 L -4 L 44 U 10/18 WAKE FOREST 26-0 W +1.5 W 44.5 U 10/17 VIRGINIA 9-20 L +3.5 L 45 U 10/28 FLORIDA ST 27-24 W +3.5 W 42.5 O 10/27 CLEMSON 17-30 L +4 L 48 U 10/25 NC STATE 27-24 W -12 L 47 O 10/24 at Duke 13-17 L +4 T 54.5 U 11/4 at Clemson 13-12 W +18.5 W 48.5 U 11/3 at N Carolina 13-16 L +1.5 L 46 U 11/6 at Virginia Tech 13-23 L +3 L 41.5 U 11/7 at NC State 31-38 L +6.5 L 55.5 O 11/11 MIAMI 14-13 W -3 L 38.5 U 11/10 BOSTON COLLEGE 42-35 W +6.5 W 47 O 11/15 N CAROLINA 17-15 W +3 W 44.5 U 11/14 VIRGINIA TECH 9-36 L +20 L 47 U 11/18 at Boston College 16-38 L +7.5 L 41 O 11/17 at Florida St 16-24 L +7.5 L 47 U 11/22 FLORIDA ST 3-37 L +1.5 L 48.5 U 11/21 at Florida St 26-29 L +16.5 W 58 U 11/25 WAKE FOREST 24-38 L -1 L 40.5 O 11/24 at Nc State 37-0 W +1 W 47.5 U 11/29 at Boston College 21-28 L +6.5 L 42.5 O 11/28 BOSTON COLLEGE 17-19 L +5 W 45.5 U 12/29 vs. Purdue 24-7 W +1.5 W 56 U 12/28 vs. Oregon St 14-21 L +4 L 47 U 12/30 vs. Nevada 42-35 W +2 W 61 O

NC STATE WOLF PACK 2010 Schedule Strength: 42.08 (#21 of 120) WAKE FOREST DEMON DEACONS 2010 Schedule Strength: 41 (#29 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 34 Offense: Pro-Style - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: Multiple 4-3 - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 48 Where: Raleigh, NC Head Coach: Tom O Brien, 4th year (16-21 SU) Conference: ACC 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: Carter-Finley Stadium 9/4/10 W CAROLINA 9/11/10 at UCF 2009 Scoring Differential: -0.3 (#71 of 120) 9/16/10 CINCINNATI 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -5.1 (#89 of 120) 9/25/10 at Georgia Tech * GEORGIA TECH is 11-4 SU & 11-3 ATS vs. NC STATE since 92 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 35 (#66 of 120) 10/2/10 VIRGINIA TECH * L3 NCS-VAT series games have gone UNDER the total 2009 Schedule Strength: 35 (#61 of 120) 10/9/10 BOSTON COLLEGE * HOME TEAM is 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 NCS-BC matchups 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at E Carolina * UNDERDOG has swept L3 ECU-NCS games, both SU & ATS 10/28/10 FLORIDA ST * NC STATE is on 4-5 SU but 8-0 ATS run vs. FLORIDA ST Points Scored - Allowed 30.3 (30) 30.6 (99) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 393.8 (46) 361.3 (55) 11/6/10 at Clemson * ROAD TEAM is 9-7 SU & 13-3 ATS in CLM-NCS series since 94 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.63 (57) 5.69 (78) 11/13/10 WAKE FOREST * HOME TEAM is 12-2 SU & 11-3 ATS in NCS-WF series since 96 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.46 (103) 3.93 (58) 11/20/10 at N Carolina * UNDERDOG is 9-3 SU & 10-2 ATS in UNC-NCS series since 98 YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.78 (29) 7.91 (96) Avg. Time of Possession 29.85 (64) 11/27/10 at Maryland * UNDERDOG is on 3-6 SU but 7-2 ATS run in L9 MD-NCS matchups at MARYLAND Turnover Differential -0.9 (114) 3rd Down Conversion % 41.9% (38) 48.1% (111) Straight Up 3-9 5-7 6-7 5-7 19-30 (39%) * NC STATE is on a 3-12 ATS (-10.2 Units) skid as home favorites of 3 points or less The Average Overall ATS 3-8 5-6 9-2 6-6 23-22 (51%) Score was NC STATE 18.6, OPPONENT 25.1. Potential spots for 2010: 11/13 - WAKE FOREST at Home ATS 2-4 2-4 5-1 5-3 14-12 (54%) * Over the L2 seasons, NC STATE is 9-1 OVER the total (+7.9 Units) at home when playing on Away/Neutral ATS 1-4 3-2 4-1 1-3 9-10 (47%) Saturdays. The Average Score was NC STATE 33, OPPONENT 28.2. Potential spots for 2010: vs Conference ATS 3-5 4-4 8-0 3-5 18-14 (56%) 10/2 - VIRGINIA TECH, 10/9 - BOSTON COLLEGE, 11/13 - WAKE FOREST Non-Conference ATS 0-3 1-2 1-2 3-1 5-8 (38%) * NC STATE is 8-1 ATS (+6.9 Units) vs. good rushing defenses - allowing <=120 RYPG since 07. as Favorite ATS 0-4 1-2 0-0 1-2 2-8 (20%) The Average Score was NC STATE 23.8, OPPONENT 28.3. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at as Underdog ATS 3-4 4-4 9-2 3-4 19-14 (58%) UCF, 10/9 - BOSTON COLLEGE, 11/20 - at N Carolina Over-Under 5-6 5-5 6-6 8-2 24-19 (56%) 9/2 APPALACHIAN ST 23-10 W - - - 9/1 UCF 23-25 L -7.5 L 48 T 8/28 at S Carolina 0-34 L +14 L 43.5 U 9/3 S CAROLINA 3-7 L -5.5 L 48 U 9/9 AKRON 17-20 L -9 L 40.5 U 9/8 at Boston College 17-37 L +13.5 L 50 O 9/6 WILLIAM & MARY 34-24 W - - - 9/12 MURRAY ST 65-7 W -41 W - 9/16 at Southern Miss 17-37 L +3 L 39 O 9/15 WOFFORD 38-17 W - - - 9/13 at Clemson 9-27 L +21.5 W 46 U 9/19 GARDNER WEBB 45-7 W -31 W - 9/23 BOSTON COLLEGE 17-15 W +6 W 42 U 9/22 CLEMSON 20-42 L +6.5 L 52.5 O 9/20 E CAROLINA 30-24 W +7 W 43.5 O 9/26 PITTSBURGH 38-31 W +1 W 48 O 10/5 FLORIDA ST 24-20 W +10.5 W 39.5 O 9/29 LOUISVILLE 10-29 L +9 L 69.5 U 9/27 S FLORIDA 10-41 L +10 L 45.5 O 10/3 at Wake Forest 24-30 L +3 L 50 O 10/14 WAKE FOREST 23-25 L -3 L 40 O 10/6 at Florida St 10-27 L +18.5 W 45 U 10/4 BOSTON COLLEGE 31-38 L +7.5 W 42 O 10/10 DUKE 28-49 L -15.5 L 54 O 10/21 at Maryland 20-26 L +1 L 44.5 O 10/20 at E Carolina 34-20 W +5.5 W 54.5 U 10/16 FLORIDA ST 17-26 L +11 W 48 U 10/17 at Boston College 20-52 L +2.5 L 48.5 O 10/28 at Virginia 7-14 L +2 L 37.5 U 10/27 VIRGINIA 29-24 W +3.5 W 44 O 10/25 at Maryland 24-27 L +12 W 47 O 10/31 at Florida St 42-45 L +10.5 W 66 O 11/4 GEORGIA TECH 23-31 L +4 L 41 O 11/3 at Miami 19-16 W +10 W 45.5 U 11/8 at Duke 27-17 W +4 W 48.5 U 11/7 MARYLAND 38-31 W -6.5 W 55.5 O 11/11 at Clemson 14-20 L +18.5 W 44 U 11/10 N CAROLINA 31-27 W -3.5 W 44 O 11/15 WAKE FOREST 21-17 W +3.5 W 43.5 U 11/14 CLEMSON 23-43 L +8 L 55 O 11/18 at N Carolina 9-23 L -3.5 L 39.5 U 11/17 at Wake Forest 18-38 L +6 L 48.5 O 11/22 at N Carolina 41-10 W +13 W 48 O 11/21 at Virginia Tech 10-38 L +21 L 58.5 U 11/25 E CAROLINA 16-21 L -3 L 43 U 11/24 MARYLAND 0-37 L -1 L 47.5 U 11/29 MIAMI 38-28 W +2 W 49 O 11/28 N CAROLINA 28-27 W +6 W 49 O 12/29 vs. Rutgers 23-29 L +6 T 57.5 U Where: Winston-Salem, NC Head Coach: Jim Grobe, 10th year (59-51 SU) Conference: ACC 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: BB&T Field 9/2/10 PRESBYTERIAN 9/11/10 DUKE * ROAD TEAM is on 4-3 SU & 6-1 ATS run in WF-DUK series 2009 Scoring Differential: +0.1 (#69 of 120) 9/18/10 at Stanford 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +0.3 (#68 of 120) 9/25/10 at Florida St * UNDERDOG is 4-2 SU & 6-0 ATS in L6 FSU-WF matchups 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 37 (#59 of 120) 10/2/10 GEORGIA TECH * UNDERDOG is on 2-3 SU but 5-0 ATS run in L5 WF-GAT matchups at WAKE FOREST 2009 Schedule Strength: 37.58 (#43 of 120) 10/9/10 NAVY * ROAD TEAM is 6-3 SU & 7-2 ATS in L9 WF-NAV matchups 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at Virginia Tech * L2 games in VAT-WF series went UNDER the total 10/30/10 at Maryland * MARYLAND is 8-3 SU & 9-2 ATS vs. WAKE FOREST since 99 Points Scored - Allowed 26.3 (66) 26.3 (65) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 403.4 (42) 383.1 (75) 11/6/10 BOSTON COLLEGE * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in WF-BC series YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.72 (51) 5.75 (81) 11/13/10 at NC State * HOME TEAM is 12-2 SU & 11-3 ATS in NCS-WF series since 96 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.69 (84) 4.55 (93) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.82 (28) 7.15 (66) 11/20/10 CLEMSON * HOME TEAM is 7-1 SU & ATS in L8 WF-CLM matchups Avg. Time of Possession 31.81 (16) 11/27/10 at Vanderbilt * WAKE FOREST is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. VANDERBILT Turnover Differential -0.3 (83) 3rd Down Conversion % 42.8% (32) 42.3% (86) Straight Up 11-3 9-4 8-5 5-7 33-19 (63%) * WAKE FOREST is on a 3-18 ATS (-16.8 Units) skid vs. poor defensive teams - allowing >=425 Overall ATS 8-5 9-4 6-7 6-6 29-22 (57%) YPG The Average Score was WAKE FOREST 28.3, OPPONENT 30.4. Potential spots for 2010: at Home ATS 2-3 5-1 3-4 4-3 14-11 (56%) 9/11 - DUKE, 9/25 - at Florida St, 10/9 - NAVY Away/Neutral ATS 6-2 4-3 3-3 2-3 15-11 (58%) * WAKE FOREST is on a 15-2 ATS (+12.8 Units) run on the road vs. poor passing teams averaging vs Conference ATS 6-3 5-3 3-5 4-4 18-15 (55%) 150 or less PYPG. The Average Score was WAKE FOREST 25.8, OPPONENT 19.6. Potential Non-Conference ATS 2-2 4-1 3-2 2-2 11-7 (61%) spots for 2010: 11/27 - at Vanderbilt as Favorite ATS 1-3 5-2 4-5 3-4 13-14 (48%) * WAKE FOREST is on a 13-2 UNDER the total (+10.8 Units) run at home in non-conference as Underdog ATS 7-2 4-2 2-2 2-2 15-8 (65%) games The Average Score was WAKE FOREST 23.9, OPPONENT 19. Potential spots for 2010: Over-Under 3-10 8-5 6-7 6-5 23-27 (46%) 10/9 - NAVY 9/2 SYRACUSE 20-10 W -14 L 42.5 U 9/1 at Boston College 28-38 L +6 L 42 O 8/28 at Baylor 41-13 W -11.5 W 50.5 O 9/5 BAYLOR 21-24 L -2.5 L 53.5 U 9/9 DUKE 14-13 W -20.5 L 40.5 U 9/8 NEBRASKA 17-20 L +8.5 W 51 U 9/6 OLE MISS 30-28 W -7 L 45 O 9/12 STANFORD 24-17 W -3 W 46.5 U 9/16 at Connecticut 24-13 W +6.5 W 42 U 9/15 ARMY 21-10 W -20.5 L 45 U 9/20 at Florida St 12-3 W +4 W 45 U 9/19 ELON 35-7 W -20 W - 9/23 at Mississippi 27-3 W -1 W 37.5 U 9/22 MARYLAND 31-24 W -3.5 W 42 O 9/27 NAVY 17-24 L -17 L 53 U 9/26 at Boston College 24-27 L +1 L 41 O 9/30 LIBERTY 34-14 W - - - 10/6 at Duke 41-36 W -7.5 L 50.5 O 10/9 CLEMSON 12-7 W +1 W 42 U 10/3 NC STATE 30-24 W -3 W 50 O 10/7 CLEMSON 17-27 L +14 W 44.5 U 10/11 FLORIDA ST 24-21 W +5 W 44 O 10/18 at Maryland 0-26 L -1.5 L 44.5 U 10/10 MARYLAND 42-32 W -13.5 L 52.5 O 10/14 at NC State 25-23 W +3 W 40 O 10/28 at N Carolina 24-17 W -7.5 L 40.5 O 10/20 at Navy 44-24 W -2.5 W 61.5 O 10/25 at Miami 10-16 L +3 L 41 U 10/17 at Clemson 3-38 L +8 L 47.5 U 11/4 BOSTON COLLEGE 21-14 W +4.5 W 41.5 U 10/27 N CAROLINA 37-10 W -5.5 W 50.5 U 11/1 DUKE 33-30 W -8 L 41.5 O 10/24 at Navy 10-13 L -2.5 L 47.5 U 11/11 at Florida St 30-0 W +9.5 W 44.5 U 11/3 at Virginia 16-17 L +1.5 W 44 U 11/8 VIRGINIA 28-17 W -5.5 W 40 O 10/31 MIAMI 27-28 L +6.5 W 52.5 O 11/18 VIRGINIA TECH 6-27 L +1 L 38 U 11/10 at Clemson 10-44 L +9.5 L 49 O 11/15 at NC State 17-21 L -3.5 L 43.5 U 11/7 at Georgia Tech 27-30 L +13.5 W 60 U 11/25 at Maryland 38-24 W +1 W 40.5 O 11/17 NC STATE 38-18 W -6 W 48.5 O 11/22 BOSTON COLLEGE 21-24 L +1.5 L 40.5 O 11/14 FLORIDA ST 28-41 L -4.5 L 57 O 12/2 vs. Georgia Tech 9-6 W +1 W 40 U 11/24 at Vanderbilt 31-17 W +1 W 46.5 O 11/29 VANDERBILT 23-10 W -4 W 37.5 U 11/28 at Duke 45-34 W -3.5 W 53 O 1/2 vs. Louisville 13-24 L +10.5 L 53.5 U 12/29 vs. Connecticut 24-10 W -1.5 W 47 U 12/20 vs. Navy 29-19 W -3 W 44.5 O 56 WWW.STATFOX.COM

DUKE BLUE DEVILS 2010 Schedule Strength: 41 (#29 of 120) GEORGIA TECH YELLOW JACKETS 2010 Schedule Strength: 41 (#29 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 57 Offense: Pro-Set - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 29 Offense: Triple Option - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: 3-4 - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 56 Where: Durham, NC Head Coach: David Cutcliffe, 3rd year (9-15 SU) Conference: ACC 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 5-5-1 ATS Facility: Wallace Wade Stadium 9/4/10 ELON 9/11/10 at Wake Forest * ROAD TEAM is on 4-3 SU & 6-1 ATS run in WF-DUK series 2009 Scoring Differential: -3.2 (#83 of 120) 9/18/10 ALABAMA 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -4.0 (#82 of 120) 9/25/10 ARMY * HOME TEAM is on 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS run in DUK-ARM series 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 32 (#78 of 120) 10/2/10 at Maryland * ROAD TEAM is 3-0-1 ATS in L4 MD-DUK games 2009 Schedule Strength: 32.33 (#75 of 120) 10/16/10 MIAMI * ROAD TEAM is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 DUK-MIA games 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Virginia Tech * L2 games in VAT-DUK series at VIRGINIA TECH went UNDER the total 10/30/10 at Navy * L4 NAV-DUK series games have gone OVER the total Points Scored - Allowed 25.2 (74) 28.3 (83) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 368.5 (69) 368.6 (61) 11/6/10 VIRGINIA * UNDER the total is 6-0 in L6 games of DUK-VIR series YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.26 (78) 5.54 (69) 11/13/10 BOSTON COLLEGE YP Rush Gained - Allowed 2.25 (120) 4.00 (67) 11/20/10 at Georgia Tech * GEORGIA TECH is 6-0 SU & ATS in its L6 games vs. DUKE YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.31 (53) 7.59 (88) Avg. Time of Possession 29.64 (72) 11/27/10 N CAROLINA * N CAROLINA is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in its L6 games at DUKE Turnover Differential +0.2 (50) 3rd Down Conversion % 37.4% (76) 48.3% (112) Straight Up 0-12 1-11 4-8 5-7 10-38 (21%) * DUKE is 9-0 OVER the total (+9 Units) as home underdogs since 07. The Average Score was Overall ATS 5-6 6-6 6-5 5-5 22-22 (50%) DUKE 21.7, OPPONENT 40.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - ALABAMA, 10/16 - MIAMI, 11/13 at Home ATS 2-4 1-4 3-3 1-3 7-14 (33%) - BOSTON COLLEGE, 11/27 - N CAROLINA Away/Neutral ATS 3-2 5-2 3-2 4-2 15-8 (65%) * DUKE is 0-7 ATS (-7.7 Units) at home in the second half of the season since 07. The Average vs Conference ATS 4-4 4-4 3-5 4-3 15-16 (48%) Score was DUKE 20.4, OPPONENT 37.4. Potential spots for 2010: 11/6 - VIRGINIA, 11/13 - Non-Conference ATS 1-2 2-2 3-0 1-2 7-6 (54%) BOSTON COLLEGE, 11/27 - N CAROLINA as Favorite ATS 0-0 0-0 2-1 1-0 3-1 (75%) * DUKE is 11-6 ATS (+4.4 Units) as road underdogs since 07. The Average Score was DUKE as Underdog ATS 5-6 6-6 4-4 4-4 19-20 (49%) 16.6, OPPONENT 25.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at Wake Forest, 10/2 - at Maryland, 10/23 Over-Under 6-5 6-6 4-6 5-4 21-21 (50%) - at Virginia Tech, 10/30 - at Navy, 11/20 - at Georgia Tech 9/2 RICHMOND 0-13 L - - - 9/1 CONNECTICUT 14-45 L +4 L 51.5 O 8/30 JAMES MADISON 31-7 W - - - 9/5 RICHMOND 16-24 L - - - 9/9 at Wake Forest 13-14 L +20.5 W 40.5 U 9/8 at Virginia 13-24 L +17.5 W 43 U 9/6 NORTHWESTERN 20-24 L +5.5 W 44 T 9/12 at Army 35-19 W -2 W 44 O 9/16 at Virginia Tech 0-36 L +35 L 43.5 U 9/15 at Northwestern 20-14 W +16.5 W 53 U 9/13 NAVY 41-31 W -2.5 W 57.5 O 9/19 at Kansas 16-44 L +23.5 L 51.5 O 9/30 VIRGINIA 0-37 L +4 L 37.5 U 9/22 at Navy 43-46 L +14 W 57 O 9/27 VIRGINIA 31-3 W -7 W 45 U 9/26 NC CENTRAL 49-14 W -41 L - 10/7 at Alabama 14-30 L +27 W 40 O 9/29 at Miami 14-24 L +24 W 47 U 10/4 at Georgia Tech 0-27 L +13 L 49 U 10/3 VIRGINIA TECH 26-34 L +17 W 48.5 O 10/14 FLORIDA ST 24-51 L +23 L 42 O 10/6 WAKE FOREST 36-41 L +7.5 W 50.5 O 10/18 MIAMI 31-49 L +3 L 40.5 O 10/10 at NC State 49-28 W +15.5 W 54 O 10/21 MIAMI 15-20 L +20 W 42 U 10/13 VIRGINIA TECH 14-43 L +13.5 L 45.5 O 10/25 at Vanderbilt 10-7 W +9.5 W 42 U 10/24 MARYLAND 17-13 W -4 T 54.5 U 10/28 VANDERBILT 28-45 L +7.5 L 42 O 10/27 at Florida St 6-25 L +17.5 L 48.5 U 11/1 at Wake Forest 30-33 L +8 W 41.5 O 10/31 at Virginia 28-17 W +7.5 W 48 U 11/4 NAVY 13-38 L +9.5 L 47 O 11/3 CLEMSON 10-47 L +17 L 55 O 11/8 NC STATE 17-27 L -4 L 48.5 U 11/7 at N Carolina 6-19 L +9.5 L 45 U 11/11 at Boston College 7-28 L +29.5 W 47 U 11/10 GEORGIA TECH 24-41 L +13.5 L 46.5 O 11/15 at Clemson 7-31 L +10 L 46.5 U 11/14 GEORGIA TECH 10-49 L +13.5 L 59 T 11/18 at Georgia Tech 21-49 L +24.5 L 43 O 11/17 at Notre Dame 7-28 L +7 L 48.5 U 11/22 at Virginia Tech 3-14 L +14.5 W 43 U 11/21 at Miami 16-34 L +19 W 56.5 U 11/25 N CAROLINA 44-45 L +7 W 44 O 11/24 at N Carolina 14-20 L +14 W 51 U 11/29 N CAROLINA 20-28 L +7 L 44 O 11/28 WAKE FOREST 34-45 L +3.5 L 53 O Where: Atlanta, GA Head Coach: Paul Johnson, 3rd year (20-7 SU) Conference: ACC 2009 RECORD: 11-3 SU, 8-5 ATS Facility: Bobby Dodd Stadium 9/4/10 S CAROLINA ST 9/11/10 at Kansas 2009 Scoring Differential: +9.0 (#26 of 120) 9/18/10 at N Carolina * N CAROLINA is on 2-4 SU but 5-1 ATS run vs. GEORGIA TECH 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +11.2 (#20 of 120) 9/25/10 NC STATE * GEORGIA TECH is 11-4 SU & 11-3 ATS vs. NC STATE since 92 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 48 (#20 of 120) 10/2/10 at Wake Forest * UNDERDOG is on 2-3 SU but 5-0 ATS run in L5 WF-GAT matchups at WAKE FOREST 2009 Schedule Strength: 39.64 (#26 of 120) 10/9/10 VIRGINIA * L8 games of GAT-VIR series at GEORGIA TECH are 7-1 UNDER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 MIDDLE TENN ST 10/23/10 at Clemson * UNDERDOG is 10-9 SU & 15-4 ATS in CLM-GAT series since 92 Points Scored - Allowed 33.8 (15) 24.8 (56) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 422.1 (26) 360.3 (53) 11/4/10 at Virginia Tech * UNDERDOG is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 VAT-GAT games YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.16 (24) 6.07 (100) 11/13/10 MIAMI * FAVORITE has swept L3 GAT-MIA games at GEORGIA TECH, both SU & ATS YP Rush Gained - Allowed 5.22 (8) 4.90 (105) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 10.56 (1) 7.34 (76) 11/20/10 DUKE * GEORGIA TECH is 6-0 SU & ATS in its L6 games vs. DUKE Avg. Time of Possession 33.83 (3) 11/27/10 at Georgia * ROAD TEAM is 8-4 SU & 10-1 ATS in GEO-GAT series since 98 Turnover Differential +0.6 (21) 3rd Down Conversion % 51.3% (2) 41.1% (76) Straight Up 9-5 7-6 9-4 11-3 36-18 (67%) * Over the L2 seasons, GEORGIA TECH is 10-1 ATS (+8.9 Units) on the road when playing on Overall ATS 6-5 4-7 8-3 8-5 26-20 (57%) Saturdays. The Average Score was GEORGIA TECH 34.4, OPPONENT 25.6. Potential spots for at Home ATS 3-2 1-4 4-1 2-3 10-10 (50%) 2010: 9/11 - at Kansas, 9/18 - at N Carolina, 10/2 - at Wake Forest, 10/23 - at Clemson, 11/27 - at Away/Neutral ATS 3-3 3-3 4-2 6-2 16-10 (62%) Georgia vs Conference ATS 4-4 3-5 6-2 6-3 19-14 (58%) * GEORGIA TECH is 24-11 UNDER the total (+11.9 Units) at home vs. top-level teams (Win Pct. > Non-Conference ATS 2-1 1-2 2-1 2-2 7-6 (54%) 75%) since 92. The Average Score was GEORGIA TECH 24.9, OPPONENT 21.5. Potential spots as Favorite ATS 3-4 2-6 5-1 6-4 16-15 (52%) for 2010: 10/16 - MIDDLE TENN ST as Underdog ATS 3-1 2-1 3-2 2-1 10-5 (67%) * GEORGIA TECH is on a 16-6 ATS (+9.4 Units) run in the first two weeks of the season The Average Over-Under 7-6 5-6 4-7 5-7 21-26 (45%) Score was GEORGIA TECH 32.4, OPPONENT 15.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at Kansas 9/2 NOTRE DAME 10-14 L +7.5 W 50.5 U 9/1 at Notre Dame 33-3 W -1 W 44 U 8/28 JACKSONVILLE ST 41-14 W - - - 9/5 JACKSONVILLE ST 37-17 W - - - 9/9 SAMFORD 38-6 W - - - 9/8 SAMFORD 69-14 W - - - 9/6 at Boston College 19-16 W +6.5 W 38 U 9/10 CLEMSON 30-27 W -5 L 43 O 9/16 TROY ST 35-20 W -17.5 L 39.5 O 9/15 BOSTON COLLEGE 10-24 L -6.5 L 48.5 U 9/13 at Virginia Tech 17-20 L +6.5 W 40.5 U 9/17 at Miami 17-33 L +4 L 54 U 9/21 VIRGINIA 24-7 W -17 T 39.5 U 9/22 at Virginia 23-28 L -3.5 L 38.5 O 9/20 MISSISSIPPI ST 38-7 W -7 W 38 O 9/26 N CAROLINA 24-7 W -3 W 46 U 9/30 at Virginia Tech 38-27 W +8 W 37.5 O 9/29 CLEMSON 13-3 W +3 W 46.5 U 10/4 DUKE 27-0 W -13 W 49 U 10/3 at Mississippi St 42-31 W -5.5 W 48 O 10/7 MARYLAND 27-23 W -14.5 L 43.5 O 10/6 at Maryland 26-28 L -3 L 42 O 10/11 GARDNER WEBB 10-0 W - - - 10/10 at Florida St 49-44 W +3 W 56 O 10/21 at Clemson 7-31 L +6.5 L 46.5 U 10/28 MIAMI 30-23 W -4 W 37.5 O 10/13 at Miami 17-14 W +2.5 W 44 U 10/18 at Clemson 21-17 W -2 W 41 U 10/17 VIRGINIA TECH 28-23 W +3.5 W 54 U 10/24 at Virginia 34-9 W -5.5 W 48 U 11/4 at NC State 31-23 W -4 W 41 O 10/20 ARMY 34-10 W -24 T 44.5 U 10/25 VIRGINIA 17-24 L -14 L 42.5 U 10/31 at Vanderbilt 56-31 W -13.5 W 48 O 11/11 at N Carolina 7-0 W -13 L 47 U 11/1 VIRGINIA TECH 3-27 L -2.5 L 40.5 U 11/1 FLORIDA ST 31-28 W -2.5 W 41.5 O 11/7 WAKE FOREST 30-27 W -13.5 L 60 U 11/18 DUKE 49-21 W -24.5 W 43 O 11/10 at Duke 41-24 W -13.5 W 46.5 O 11/8 at N Carolina 7-28 L +5 L 43 U 11/14 at Duke 49-10 W -13.5 W 59 T 11/25 at Georgia 12-15 L +3 T 42 U 11/17 N CAROLINA 27-25 W -10.5 L 43 O 11/20 MIAMI 41-23 W -3 W 42.5 O 11/28 GEORGIA 24-30 L -9.5 L 57 U 12/2 vs. Wake Forest 6-9 L -1 L 40 U 11/24 GEORGIA 17-31 L +3.5 L 48 T 11/29 at Georgia 45-42 W +8 W 50 O 12/5 vs. Clemson 39-34 W -1 W 56.5 O 1/1 vs. W Virginia 35-38 L +8.5 W 47.5 O 12/31 vs. Fresno St 28-40 L -5.5 L 55 O 12/31 vs. LSU 3-38 L -4 L 53 U 1/5 vs. Iowa 14-24 L -6 L 51 U

MIAMI HURRICANES 2010 Schedule Strength: 43.33 (#14 of 120) NORTH CAROLINA TAR HEELS 2010 Schedule Strength: 42.42 (#18 of 120) Offense: Pro Set - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 3-4 Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 53 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 10 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 9 Lettermen Returning: 39 Where: Coral Gables, FL Head Coach: Randy Shannon, 4th year (21-17 SU) Conference: ACC 2009 RECORD: 9-4 SU, 6-7 ATS Facility: Land Shark Stadium 9/2/10 FLORIDA AM 9/11/10 at Ohio St * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 OSU-MIA games 2009 Scoring Differential: +8.2 (#31 of 120) 9/23/10 at Pittsburgh * UNDER the total is 4-1 in L5 games of PIT-MIA series 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +11.0 (#21 of 120) 10/2/10 at Clemson * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 CLM-MIA games 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 49 (#18 of 120) 10/9/10 FLORIDA ST * UNDERDOG is on 7-1 SU & 8-0 ATS run in L8 MIA-FSU matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 40.15 (#24 of 120) 10/16/10 at Duke * ROAD TEAM is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 DUK-MIA games 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 N CAROLINA * N CAROLINA is 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS in its L6 games vs. MIAMI 10/30/10 at Virginia * UNDERDOG is on 3-2 SU & 4-1 ATS run in L5 VIR-MIA matchups Points Scored - Allowed 30.3 (31) 22.2 (37) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 399.9 (45) 329.6 (29) 11/6/10 MARYLAND YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.91 (35) 5.16 (45) 11/13/10 at Georgia Tech * FAVORITE has swept L3 GAT-MIA games at GEORGIA TECH, both SU & ATS YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.87 (74) 3.53 (32) 11/20/10 VIRGINIA TECH * VIRGINIA TECH is 10-5 SU & 12-3 ATS vs. MIAMI since 95 YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.19 (15) 7.09 (60) Avg. Time of Possession 30.26 (56) 11/27/10 S FLORIDA * L2 games in MIA-USF series went UNDER the total Turnover Differential +0.0 (61) 3rd Down Conversion % 45.1% (18) 36.9% (37) Straight Up 7-6 5-7 7-6 9-4 28-23 (55%) * MIAMI is on a 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) run as road favorites of 10.5 to 14 points The Average Score Overall ATS 4-8 3-8 6-6 6-7 19-29 (40%) was MIAMI 29.6, OPPONENT 9.4. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - at Duke, 10/30 - at Virginia at Home ATS 3-3 2-5 1-4 3-3 9-15 (38%) * MIAMI is on a 10-4 UNDER the total (+5.6 Units) run as road favorites of 7.5 to 14 points The Away/Neutral ATS 1-5 1-3 5-2 3-4 10-14 (42%) Average Score was MIAMI 30.4, OPPONENT 9.9. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - at Duke, vs Conference ATS 3-5 1-6 3-5 3-5 10-21 (32%) 10/30 - at Virginia Non-Conference ATS 1-3 2-2 3-1 3-2 9-8 (53%) * MIAMI is 2-21 ATS when favored by 24 or less points after a SU loss. Potential spots for 2010: as Favorite ATS 2-5 2-6 4-5 4-6 12-22 (35%) 10/9 - FLORIDA ST, 11/20 - VIRGINIA TECH as Underdog ATS 2-3 1-2 2-1 2-0 7-6 (54%) Over-Under 1-11 6-6 6-6 5-7 18-30 (38%) 9/4 FLORIDA ST 10-13 L -3.5 L 38.5 U 9/1 MARSHALL 31-3 W -18 W 48 U 8/28 CHARLES. SOUTH 52-7 W - - - 9/7 at Florida St 38-34 W +6.5 W 46.5 O 9/9 FLORIDA AM 51-10 W - - - 9/8 at Oklahoma 13-51 L +10.5 L 41 O 9/6 at Florida 3-26 L +24 W 53 U 9/17 GEORGIA TECH 33-17 W -4 W 54 U 9/16 at Louisville 7-31 L +5 L 53 U 9/15 FLA INTERNATIONAL 23-9 W -33 L 46.5 U 9/20 at Texas A&M 41-23 W -2.5 W 40 O 9/26 at Virginia Tech 7-31 L -2 L 45.5 U 9/30 HOUSTON 14-13 W -16.5 L 49 U 9/20 TEXAS A&M 34-17 W -2 W 45.5 O 9/27 N CAROLINA 24-28 L -7 L 41.5 O 10/3 OKLAHOMA 21-20 W +7.5 W 51 U 10/7 N CAROLINA 27-7 W -18.5 W 43 U 9/29 DUKE 24-14 W -24 L 47 U 10/4 FLORIDA ST 39-41 L 0 L 40.5 O 10/10 FLORIDA AM 48-16 W -36.5 L - 10/14 FLA INTERNATIONAL 35-0 W -27 W 40 U 10/6 at N Carolina 27-33 L -7 L 43.5 O 10/11 UCF 20-14 W -17 L 46.5 U 10/17 at UCF 27-7 W -12.5 W 46.5 U 10/21 at Duke 20-15 W -20 L 42 U 10/13 GEORGIA TECH 14-17 L -2.5 L 44 U 10/18 at Duke 49-31 W -3 W 40.5 O 10/24 CLEMSON 37-40 L -4 L 42 O 10/28 at Georgia Tech 23-30 L +4 L 37.5 O 10/20 at Florida St 37-29 W +5.5 W 42.5 O 10/25 WAKE FOREST 16-10 W -3 W 41 U 10/31 at Wake Forest 28-27 W -6.5 L 52.5 O 11/4 VIRGINIA TECH 10-17 L +1.5 L 37.5 U 11/3 NC STATE 16-19 L -10 L 45.5 U 11/1 at Virginia 24-17 W 0 W 42.5 U 11/7 VIRGINIA 52-17 W -14.5 W 44 O 11/11 at Maryland 13-14 L +3 W 38.5 U 11/10 VIRGINIA 0-48 L -4 L 43 O 11/13 VIRGINIA TECH 16-14 W -4 L 41 U 11/14 at N Carolina 24-33 L -3 L 43 O 11/18 at Virginia 7-17 L -3 L 37 U 11/17 at Virginia Tech 14-44 L +16.5 L 41.5 O 11/20 at Georgia Tech 23-41 L +3 L 42.5 O 11/21 DUKE 34-16 W -19 L 56.5 U 11/23 BOSTON COLLEGE 17-14 W +3 W 37.5 U 11/24 at Boston College 14-28 L +14 T 48.5 U 11/29 at NC State 28-38 L -2 L 49 O 11/28 at S Florida 31-10 W -3.5 W 53 U 12/31 vs. Nevada 21-20 W -4 L 43.5 U 12/27 vs. California 17-24 L +10 W 51 U 12/29 vs. Wisconsin 14-20 L -3.5 L 55.5 U Where: Chapel Hill, NC Head Coach: Butch Davis, 4th year (20-18 SU) Conference: ACC 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: Kenan Stadium 9/4/10 vs. LSU (Atlanta, GA) 9/18/10 GEORGIA TECH * N CAROLINA is on 2-4 SU but 5-1 ATS run vs. GEORGIA TECH 2009 Scoring Differential: +6.7 (#38 of 120) 9/25/10 at Rutgers * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 RUT-UNC games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +5.8 (#40 of 120) 10/2/10 E CAROLINA * N CAROLINA is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. E CAROLINA 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 45 (#30 of 120) 10/9/10 CLEMSON * FAVORITE is 11-2 SU & 9-4 ATS in UNC-CLM series since 92 2009 Schedule Strength: 36.08 (#55 of 120) 10/16/10 at Virginia * VIRGINIA is 9-0 SU & ATS in its L9 home games vs. N CAROLINA 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Miami * N CAROLINA is 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS in its L6 games vs. MIAMI 10/30/10 WILLIAM & MARY Points Scored - Allowed 23.8 (83) 17.1 (13) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 307.8 (108) 269.6 (6) 11/6/10 at Florida St * ROAD TEAM is 6-7 SU but 10-3 ATS in FSU-UNC series since 93 YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.73 (106) 4.20 (8) 11/13/10 VIRGINIA TECH * ROAD TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 UNC-VAT games YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.62 (88) 2.83 (7) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.18 (103) 5.71 (11) 11/20/10 NC STATE * UNDERDOG is 9-3 SU & 10-2 ATS in UNC-NCS series since 98 Avg. Time of Possession 30.45 (49) 11/27/10 at Duke * N CAROLINA is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in its L6 games at DUKE Turnover Differential +0.2 (51) 3rd Down Conversion % 37.3% (78) 32.3% (15) Straight Up 3-9 4-8 8-5 8-5 23-27 (46%) * N CAROLINA is 6-0 ATS (+6 Units) vs. good defensive teams - allowing <=310 YPG since 07. Overall ATS 4-7 6-5 7-5 6-6 23-23 (50%) The Average Score was N CAROLINA 28.2, OPPONENT 21. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at at Home ATS 3-3 3-2 3-3 4-2 13-10 (57%) Rutgers, 11/13 - VIRGINIA TECH Away/Neutral ATS 1-4 3-3 4-2 2-4 10-13 (43%) * N CAROLINA is on a 9-21 ATS (-14.1 Units) skid at home in the first month of the season vs Conference ATS 3-5 4-4 4-4 4-4 15-17 (47%) The Average Score was N CAROLINA 25.8, OPPONENT 21.4. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - Non-Conference ATS 1-2 2-1 3-1 2-2 8-6 (57%) GEORGIA TECH as Favorite ATS 0-2 1-2 4-5 2-4 7-13 (35%) * N CAROLINA is on a 2-10 ATS (-9 Units) skid at home vs. poor ball control teams, 28 or less as Underdog ATS 4-5 5-3 3-0 3-2 15-10 (60%) TOP minutes/game The Average Score was N CAROLINA 24, OPPONENT 23.8. Potential spots Over-Under 6-5 4-6 8-4 5-6 23-21 (52%) for 2010: 10/9 - CLEMSON 9/2 RUTGERS 16-21 L -3.5 L 42.5 U 9/1 JAMES MADISON 37-14 W - - - 8/30 MCNEESE ST 35-27 W - - - 9/5 THE CITADEL 40-6 W - - - 9/9 VIRGINIA TECH 10-35 L +13 L 40.5 O 9/8 at E Carolina 31-34 L +5.5 W 42 O 9/11 at Rutgers 44-12 W +6 W 49 O 9/12 at Connecticut 12-10 W -5.5 L 41.5 U 9/16 FURMAN 45-42 W - - - 9/15 VIRGINIA 20-22 L -3 L 42 T 9/20 VIRGINIA TECH 17-20 L -3.5 L 43.5 U 9/19 E CAROLINA 31-17 W -8 W 43.5 O 9/23 at Clemson 7-52 L +16 L 49 O 9/22 at S Florida 10-37 L +12.5 L 50.5 U 9/27 at Miami 28-24 W +7 W 41.5 O 9/26 at Georgia Tech 7-24 L +3 L 46 U 10/7 at Miami 7-27 L +18.5 L 43 U 9/29 at Virginia Tech 10-17 L +19 W 44 U 10/4 CONNECTICUT 38-12 W -8 W 45.5 O 10/3 VIRGINIA 3-16 L -12 L 43 U 10/14 S FLORIDA 20-37 L +3 L 45.5 O 10/6 MIAMI 33-27 W +7 W 43.5 O 10/11 NOTRE DAME 29-24 W -7.5 L 47 O 10/10 GA SOUTHERN 42-12 W -25.5 W - 10/19 at Virginia 0-23 L +7 L 41.5 U 10/13 S CAROLINA 15-21 L +7 W 47 U 10/18 at Virginia 13-16 L -3.5 L 44.5 U 10/22 FLORIDA ST 27-30 L -1.5 L 47.5 O 10/28 WAKE FOREST 17-24 L +7.5 W 40.5 O 10/27 at Wake Forest 10-37 L +5.5 L 50.5 U 10/25 BOSTON COLLEGE 45-24 W -3 W 41.5 O 10/29 at Virginia Tech 20-17 W +14.5 W 43 U 11/4 at Notre Dame 26-45 L +24.5 W 53.5 O 11/3 MARYLAND 16-13 W -1.5 W 46 U 11/8 GEORGIA TECH 28-7 W -5 W 43 U 11/7 DUKE 19-6 W -9.5 W 45 U 11/11 GEORGIA TECH 0-7 L +13 W 47 U 11/10 at Nc State 27-31 L +3.5 L 44 O 11/15 at Maryland 15-17 L -3 L 44.5 U 11/14 MIAMI 33-24 W +3 W 43 O 11/18 NC STATE 23-9 W +3.5 W 39.5 U 11/17 at Georgia Tech 25-27 L +10.5 W 43 O 11/22 NC STATE 10-41 L -13 L 48 O 11/21 at Boston College 31-13 W +3 W 39.5 O 11/25 at Duke 45-44 W -7 L 44 O 11/24 DUKE 20-14 W -14 L 51 U 11/29 at Duke 28-20 W -7 W 44 O 11/28 at NC State 27-28 L -6 L 49 O 12/27 vs. W Virginia 30-31 L +2.5 W 47.5 O 12/26 vs. Pittsburgh 17-19 L +1 L 46 U 58 WWW.STATFOX.COM

VIRIGINA CAVALIERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 37.5 (#61 of 120) VIRGINIA TECH HOKIES 2010 Schedule Strength: 39.75 (#40 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 59 Offense: Pro-Style - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 43 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 4 Lettermen Returning: 44 Where: Charlottesville, VA Head Coach: Mike London, 1st year (First Year SU) Conference: ACC 2009 RECORD: 3-9 SU, 6-5 ATS Facility: Carl Smith Stadium 9/4/10 RICHMOND 9/11/10 at USC 2009 Scoring Differential: -7.0 (#97 of 120) 9/25/10 VMI 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -0.2 (#69 of 120) 10/2/10 FLORIDA ST * L6 games of VIR-FSU series are 6-0 UNDER the total 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 31 (#81 of 120) 10/9/10 at Georgia Tech * L8 games of GAT-VIR series at GEORGIA TECH are 7-1 UNDER the total 2009 Schedule Strength: 38.92 (#30 of 120) 10/16/10 N CAROLINA * VIRGINIA is 9-0 SU & ATS in its L9 home games vs. N CAROLINA 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 E MICHIGAN 10/30/10 MIAMI * UNDERDOG is on 3-2 SU & 4-1 ATS run in L5 VIR-MIA matchups Points Scored - Allowed 19.3 (105) 26.3 (68) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 269.6 (118) 358.4 (52) 11/6/10 at Duke * UNDER the total is 6-0 in L6 games of DUK-VIR series YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.18 (118) 5.05 (34) 11/13/10 MARYLAND * VIRGINIA is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in its L4 games hosting MARYLAND YP Rush Gained - Allowed 2.90 (114) 4.17 (74) 11/20/10 at Boston College * HOME TEAM has covered spread in L2 BC-VIR games YP Pass Gained - Allowed 5.64 (111) 6.29 (28) Avg. Time of Possession 27.23 (112) 11/27/10 at Virginia Tech * FAVORITE is on 8-0 SU & 7-1 ATS run in L8 VAT-VIR matchups Turnover Differential +0.0 (61) 3rd Down Conversion % 34.4% (100) 38.1% (49) Straight Up 5-7 9-4 5-7 3-9 22-27 (45%) * VIRGINIA is on a 3-13 ATS (-11.3 Units) skid on the road vs. good offensive teams - averaging Overall ATS 5-6 6-7 5-6 6-5 22-24 (48%) >=5.9 YPP The Average Score was VIRGINIA 21.9, OPPONENT 32. Potential spots for 2010: at Home ATS 4-2 2-4 3-3 2-4 11-13 (46%) 9/11 - at USC, 10/9 - at Georgia Tech, 11/27 - at Virginia Tech Away/Neutral ATS 1-4 4-3 2-3 4-1 11-11 (50%) * VIRGINIA is 34-12 UNDER the total (+20.8 Units) vs. excellent ball control teams, 32 or more vs Conference ATS 5-2 4-4 4-4 4-4 17-14 (55%) TOP minutes/game since 92. The Average Score was VIRGINIA 18.6, OPPONENT 24.8. Potential Non-Conference ATS 0-4 2-3 1-2 2-1 5-10 (33%) spots for 2010: 10/16 - N CAROLINA, 11/20 - at Boston College as Favorite ATS 3-2 1-6 0-1 2-1 6-10 (38%) * VIRGINIA is on a 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) run at home revenging a loss where opponent scored as Underdog ATS 2-4 5-1 5-5 4-4 16-14 (53%) 35 or more points The Average Score was VIRGINIA 28.3, OPPONENT 26.8. Potential spots for Over-Under 3-9 6-5 4-7 6-5 19-26 (42%) 2010: 10/30 - MIAMI 9/2 at Pittsburgh 13-38 L +6 L 42 O 9/1 at Wyoming 3-23 L -3 L 41.5 U 8/30 USC 7-52 L +20.5 L 43 O 9/5 WILLIAM & MARY 14-26 L - - - 9/9 WYOMING 13-12 W -8 L 45 U 9/8 DUKE 24-13 W -17.5 L 43 U 9/6 RICHMOND 16-0 W - - - 9/12 TCU 14-30 L +11 L 42 O 9/16 W MICHIGAN 10-17 L -10 L 43.5 U 9/15 at N Carolina 22-20 W +3 W 42 T 9/13 at Connecticut 10-45 L +10.5 L 40.5 O 9/19 at Southern Miss 34-37 L +13.5 W 46.5 O 9/21 at Georgia Tech 7-24 L +17 T 39.5 U 9/22 GEORGIA TECH 28-23 W +3.5 W 38.5 O 9/27 at Duke 3-31 L +7 L 45 U 10/3 at N Carolina 16-3 W +12 W 43 U 9/30 at Duke 37-0 W -4 W 37.5 U 9/29 PITTSBURGH 44-14 W -6.5 W 39.5 O 10/4 MARYLAND 31-0 W +12.5 W 45 U 10/10 INDIANA 47-7 W -7 W 47 O 10/7 at E Carolina 21-31 L +3 L 43 O 10/6 at Middle Tenn St 23-21 W -10 L 44 T 10/11 E CAROLINA 35-20 W +5.5 W 44 O 10/17 at Maryland 20-9 W -3.5 W 45 U 10/14 MARYLAND 26-28 L +3 W 38 O 10/13 CONNECTICUT 17-16 W -3 L 45.5 U 10/18 N CAROLINA 16-13 W +3.5 W 44.5 U 10/24 GEORGIA TECH 9-34 L +5.5 L 48 U 10/19 N CAROLINA 23-0 W -7 W 41.5 U 10/20 at Maryland 18-17 W +4 W 44 U 10/25 at Georgia Tech 24-17 W +14 W 42.5 U 10/31 DUKE 17-28 L -7.5 L 48 U 10/28 NC STATE 14-7 W -2 W 37.5 U 10/27 at Nc State 24-29 L -3.5 L 44 O 11/1 MIAMI 17-24 L 0 L 42.5 U 11/7 at Miami 17-52 L +14.5 L 44 O 11/4 at Florida St 0-33 L +13.5 L 41.5 U 11/3 WAKE FOREST 17-16 W -1.5 L 44 U 11/8 at Wake Forest 17-28 L +5.5 L 40 O 11/14 BOSTON COLLEGE 10-14 L +4.5 W 44 U 11/18 MIAMI 17-7 W +3 W 37 U 11/10 at Miami 48-0 W +4 W 43 O 11/22 CLEMSON 3-13 L +2.5 L 43 U 11/21 at Clemson 21-34 L +20.5 W 45 O 11/25 at Virginia Tech 0-17 L +15.5 L 36.5 U 11/24 VIRGINIA TECH 21-33 L +3.5 L 40.5 O 11/29 at Virginia Tech 14-17 L +7 W 39 U 11/28 VIRGINIA TECH 13-42 L +14 L 44 O 1/1 vs. Texas Tech 28-31 L +6.5 W 58.5 O Where: Blacksburg, VA Head Coach: Frank Beamer, 24th year (187-92-2 SU) Conference: ACC 2009 RECORD: 10-3 SU, 8-5 ATS Facility: Lane Stadium 9/6/10 BOISE ST 9/11/10 JAMES MADISON 2009 Scoring Differential: +16.2 (#9 of 120) 9/18/10 E CAROLINA * VIRGINIA TECH is 6-1 SU & 5-2 ATS in its L7 games vs. E CAROLINA 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +20.3 (#6 of 120) 9/25/10 at Boston College * HOME TEAM has swept L3 BC-VAT games, both SU & ATS 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 55 (#9 of 120) 10/2/10 at NC State * L3 NCS-VAT series games have gone UNDER the total 2009 Schedule Strength: 42 (#9 of 120) 10/9/10 C MICHIGAN 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 WAKE FOREST * L2 games in VAT-WF series went UNDER the total 10/23/10 DUKE * L2 games in VAT-DUK series at VIRGINIA TECH went UNDER the total Points Scored - Allowed 31.8 (24) 15.6 (9) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 392.1 (49) 295.5 (12) 11/4/10 GEORGIA TECH * UNDERDOG is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 VAT-GAT games YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.20 (20) 4.60 (13) 11/13/10 at N Carolina * ROAD TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 UNC-VAT games YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.72 (25) 3.57 (34) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 9.60 (3) 5.92 (14) 11/20/10 at Miami * VIRGINIA TECH is 10-5 SU & 12-3 ATS vs. MIAMI since 95 Avg. Time of Possession 30.36 (54) 11/27/10 VIRGINIA * FAVORITE is on 8-0 SU & 7-1 ATS run in L8 VAT-VIR matchups Turnover Differential +0.7 (13) 3rd Down Conversion % 43.3% (29) 35.0% (24) Straight Up 10-3 11-3 10-4 10-3 41-13 (76%) * VIRGINIA TECH is on a 17-4 ATS (+12.6 Units) run as road favorites of 7 points or less The Overall ATS 7-5 7-6 6-7 8-5 28-23 (55%) Average Score was VIRGINIA TECH 27.9, OPPONENT 15.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at at Home ATS 4-3 2-4 1-4 4-2 11-13 (46%) Boston College, 10/2 - at NC State, 11/13 - at N Carolina Away/Neutral ATS 3-2 5-2 5-3 4-3 17-10 (63%) * VIRGINIA TECH is 10-1 ATS (+8.9 Units) in weeks 10 through 13 since 07. The Average Score vs Conference ATS 6-2 7-2 4-5 5-3 22-12 (65%) was VIRGINIA TECH 29.7, OPPONENT 11.5. Potential spots for 2010: 11/4 - GEORGIA TECH, Non-Conference ATS 1-3 0-4 2-2 3-2 6-11 (35%) 11/13 - at N Carolina, 11/20 - at Miami, 11/27 - VIRGINIA as Favorite ATS 6-5 5-5 1-5 7-4 19-19 (50%) * VIRGINIA TECH is 52-25 ATS (+24.5 Units) on the road vs. good passing teams averaging 7 or as Underdog ATS 1-0 2-1 5-2 1-1 9-4 (69%) more PYA since 92. The Average Score was VIRGINIA TECH 33.6, OPPONENT 16.2. Potential Over-Under 4-7 6-7 5-8 6-7 21-29 (42%) spots for 2010: 11/20 - at MiamI 9/2 NORTHEASTERN 38-0 W - - - 9/1 E CAROLINA 17-7 W -28 L 41 U 8/30 vs. E Carolina 22-27 L -8.5 L 44 O 9/5 vs. Alabama 24-34 L +6.5 L 37 O 9/9 at N Carolina 35-10 W -13 W 40.5 O 9/8 at Lsu 7-48 L +11 L 38 O 9/6 FURMAN 24-7 W - - - 9/12 MARSHALL 52-10 W -20 W 44 O 9/16 DUKE 36-0 W -35 W 43.5 U 9/15 OHIO U 28-7 W -22.5 L 44 U 9/13 GEORGIA TECH 20-17 W -6.5 L 40.5 U 9/19 NEBRASKA 16-15 W -5.5 L 51 U 9/23 CINCINNATI 29-13 W -28 L 42 T 9/22 WILLIAM & MARY 44-0 W - - - 9/20 at N Carolina 20-17 W +3.5 W 43.5 U 9/26 MIAMI 31-7 W +2 W 45.5 U 9/30 GEORGIA TECH 27-38 L -8 L 37.5 O 9/29 N CAROLINA 17-10 W -19 L 44 U 9/27 at Nebraska 35-30 W +7 W 48 O 10/3 at Duke 34-26 W -17 L 48.5 O 10/12 at Boston College 3-22 L -2 L 42 U 10/6 at Clemson 41-23 W +5.5 W 41.5 O 10/4 W KENTUCKY 27-13 W -26.5 L 47 U 10/10 BOSTON COLLEGE 48-14 W -13.5 W 44.5 O 10/21 SOUTHERN MISS 36-6 W -16 W 41 O 10/13 at Duke 43-14 W -13.5 W 45.5 O 10/18 at Boston College 23-28 L +3 L 39.5 O 10/17 at Georgia Tech 23-28 L -3.5 L 54 U 10/25 BOSTON COLLEGE 10-14 L -3 L 41.5 U 10/25 at Florida St 20-30 L +7 L 44.5 O 10/26 CLEMSON 24-7 W +4 W 43 U 10/29 N CAROLINA 17-20 L -14.5 L 43 U 11/1 at Georgia Tech 27-3 W +2.5 W 40.5 U 11/6 MARYLAND 23-13 W -3 W 41.5 U 11/4 at Miami 17-10 W -1.5 W 37.5 U 11/10 FLORIDA ST 40-21 W -6 W 41 O 11/13 at Miami 14-16 L +4 W 41 U 11/5 at E Carolina 16-3 W -12.5 W 51.5 U 11/11 KENT ST 23-0 W -30.5 L 41.5 U 11/17 MIAMI 44-14 W -16.5 W 41.5 O 11/22 DUKE 14-3 W -14.5 L 43 U 11/14 at Maryland 36-9 W -20 W 47 U 11/18 at Wake Forest 27-6 W -1 W 38 U 11/24 at Virginia 33-21 W -3.5 W 40.5 O 11/29 VIRGINIA 17-14 W -7 L 39 U 11/21 NC STATE 38-10 W -21 W 58.5 U 11/25 VIRGINIA 17-0 W -15.5 W 36.5 U 12/1 vs. Boston College 30-16 W -4 W 48 U 12/6 vs. Boston College 30-12 W +1 W 38 O 11/28 at Virginia 42-13 W -14 W 44 O 12/30 vs. Georgia 24-31 L -3 L 37.5 O 1/3 vs. Kansas 21-24 L -3 L 50.5 U 1/1 vs. Cincinnati 20-7 W +2.5 W 41 U 12/31 vs. Tennessee 37-14 W -5 W 48 O

SEC The Southeastern Conference is the dominating league in college football. The BCS title results speak for themselves, with Alabama adding the most recent triumph to the list this past January. The bad news for the rest of the power conferences is that this league looks as good as ever heading into 2010. Alabama is the unanimous preseason #1-ranked team, Florida is well Florida, despite numerous player losses to the NFL, and Georgia, Arkansas, and perhaps LSU, all think they have what it takes to crash the BCS party. We can tell you that there are stars a plenty to watch in the SEC this fall, none brighter than returning Heisman Trophy winner Mark Ingram. He and Nick Saban s Crimson Tide will be tested week-in and week-out by the tough SEC slate, so be sure to mark your calendars for key games at Arkansas (9/25), vs. Florida (10/2), and at LSU (11/6). It s quite possible that matchup with the Gators will be the first of two the teams play this season. Of course, there are plenty of other story lines to keep an eye on in the SEC this fall. How will Tim Tebow s replacement, John Brantley fare? Can Derek Dooley resurrect a Tennesse program seemingly in shambles? Is LSU ready to return to the elite ranks? For potential answers, read on for a look at each team s prospects. EAST DIVISION SEC Preview FLORIDA GATORS The raw numbers suggest that Florida lost only half of its 22 starters from last season s Sugar Bowl-winning team. Counted among those 11, however, are quarterback Tim Tebow, and linebacker Brandon Spikes, center Maurkice Pouncey, defensive end Carlos Dunlap and cornerback Joe Haden, all off to the NFL. Head coach Urban Meyer appears to have his hands full, right? Not exactly. This is Florida John Brantley may be the anti- Tebow. Strong-armed and somewhat heavy legged, Brantley is far more a classic drop-back passer than a versatile, tuck-and-run threat. As the Gators transition to more of a conventional passing attack, Brantley will be aided by the return of four starters on the line. If there s a unit threatening to fly under the radar, it s the wide receivers. Expect new names to come up big. Remember too, the Gators finished 10th in the nation in rushing, averaging 221.8 YPG For 12 games, Florida s defense was nearly impenetrable, ranking fourth in the nation in total defense, fourth in scoring defense and 12th against the run. The Gators just managed to turn in their worst game of the year at the SEC Championship getting hammered by Alabama, 32-13. How much of a drop off can be expected now that a half-dozen starters, all big contributors, need to be replaced? Not enough to knock Florida off its perch atop the SEC East even with the additional loss of coordinator Charlie Strong Trying to replace a quarterback that 2009 EAST STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Florida 13-1-0 0.929 502 174 8-1-0 7-0-0 6-1-0 7-6-0 53.8% 5-8-0 Georgia 8-5-0 0.615 376 337 4-4-0 4-2-0 4-3-0 5-7-0 41.7% 5-6-1 Tennessee 7-6-0 0.538 381 289 4-4-0 6-2-0 1-4-0 7-6-0 53.8% 8-5-0 Kentucky 7-6-0 0.538 339 295 3-5-0 3-4-0 4-2-0 6-6-0 50.0% 7-5-0 South Carolina 7-6-0 0.538 268 265 3-5-0 6-1-0 1-5-0 7-6-0 53.8% 5-7-0 Vanderbilt 2-10-0 0.167 196 280 0-8-0 1-5-0 1-5-0 4-6-1 40.0% 2-9-0 2009 WEST STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Alabama 13-0-0 1.000 412 143 9-0-0 7-0-0 6-0-0 8-4-0 66.7% 6-5-1 LSU 9-4-0 0.692 323 211 5-3-0 6-1-0 3-3-0 5-7-1 41.7% 5-8-0 Mississippi 9-4-0 0.692 384 230 4-4-0 6-1-0 3-3-0 7-5-0 58.3% 6-5-0 Auburn 8-5-0 0.615 433 358 3-5-0 6-2-0 2-3-0 6-6-0 50.0% 7-3-2 Arkansas 8-5-0 0.615 468 326 3-5-0 6-1-0 2-4-0 7-5-0 58.3% 6-6-0 Mississippi State 5-7-0 0.417 307 321 3-5-0 2-5-0 3-2-0 6-5-0 54.5% 6-5-0 finished 26-2 over his final 28 games, and won a national title, would be enough to cripple most programs. Not Florida, however, which has routinely ranked among the best recruiting teams in the country. It s simply plug and play for Meyer and the coaching staff, even if it means tweaking the system a little. The Gators October battle in Alabama looms as the biggest non-bowl game of the year. GEORGIA BULLDOGS While the transition from quarterback Matthew Stafford to Joe Cox was a difficult one for Georgia, it was far from the biggest issue that sunk the program to its worst record in head coach Mark Richt s nine seasons. The defense was the big culprit in an 8-5 campaign, allowing at least 27 points five times. To help remedy the problem, Todd Grantham takes over the defensive coordinator responsibilities As fall approaches, the Bulldogs quarterback position is in its biggest state of flux in years. Several options were out there, including freshman Hutson Mason, a 2009 Parade All-American. At the very least, the new quarterback will be well protected. All five starters return on a line that allowed an Southeastern Conference-best 12 sacks. The backfield will also clearly be a major asset. Wide receiver A.J. Green is a playmaker perhaps unrivaled in the SEC ranks The stop unit wasn t just an Achilles heel, it became an outright anchor in dragging down what could have been a special season. Five starters are back on a unit that allowed 25.9 PPG and recovered two fumbles (worst in the nation). But their roles could be vastly different under Grantham, who s installing a 3-4 alignment. The key up front will be unleashing junior Justin Houston Richt has been one of the most successful coaches in the nation since taking over at Georgia. And reshuffling the defensive coaching staff was a must in the wake of last season s disaster. The biggest question isn t how well the new quarterback will fare, because the offensive line and running game will shoulder the workload. It s how quickly the defense can adapt to Grantham s new scheme. It ll be tested early during a streak of three road games in four weeks. 60 WWW.STATFOX.COM

KENTUCKY WILDCATS It s been a long time since the Kentucky football program entered the season on a roll that included four consecutive bowl appearances never to be exact. Even though new head coach Joker Phillips enters his first year leading on the sideline, it s not as if he was plucked off the street. Part of the coaching staff in various positions since 2003, Phillips was most recently the offensive coordinator (2005-09) and returns a stable unit on which the program s building blocks can continue to be laid Interestingly, the Wildcats best quarterback no longer plays the position. Instead, Randall Cobb has excelled as a jack-of-all trades, much like former Florida standout Percy Harvin. The junior racked up 573 yards and 10 touchdowns on 93 carries and pulled down 39 receptions for 447 yards and another four scores. Though Cobb saw spot action at quarterback in a hybrid formation and completed 5 of 13 attempts for 89 yards, the full-time duties will be handled by some combination of senior Mike Hartline and sophomore Morgan Newton. The Wildcats deepest positions are easily running back and wide receiver, thanks in large part to Cobb s versatility. The biggest area of concern is on the line. Junior Stuart Hines is at left guard and the only returning lineman with consistent experience What the Wildcats lack in returning impact players, they more than make up for with veteran depth on defense. Four All-SEC honorees are gone, but the secondary, in particular, seems well-stocked after picking off 16 passes and allowing just 17 touchdowns Could Kentucky breakthrough to the upper echelon of the SEC? It s possible if Locke and Cobb can carry the offense. Will it happen? Only if the Wildcats can steal some games on the road since the home slate is favorable. Consider Kentucky a sleeper. SOUTH CAROLINA GAMECOCKS South Carolina finished above.500 for the fourth time in head coach Steve Spurrier s five seasons, but the campaign can t be counted as anything more than a disappointment. The Gamecocks program reached new heights with a 16-10 victory over then-no. 4 Ole Miss but they ended the campaign in a free fall that included four losses in the season s final five games, all by at least 10 points Spurrier s quarterback of the future Stephen Garcia finally arrived, but with mixed results. He finished second in the SEC with an average of 220.2 PYPG and improved his decision making, throwing just 10 interceptions in 422 attempts despite an inconsistent running game and a line that allowed an SEC-worst 37 sacks. The Gamecocks ranked 91st in the nation and 12th in the SEC averaging 121.2 yards per game on the ground, but things appear to be on the verge of changing for the better. Kenny Miles is back and Spurrier hopes to take advantage of the returning line experience to provide stability. Alshon Jeffrey had a big debut at wideout and is back The Gamecocks, for the most part, abided by the bend-butdon t-break philosophy. They allowed more than 30 points to three teams all on the road and limited the top two teams in the country (Alabama and Florida) to a combined 44 points in two games. The pass defense was particularly stingy (163.0 yards per game) and ranked eighth in the nation. Three of the four starters in the secondary return Garcia enters his second year as a starter with an improved ground attack taking some pressure off of him. The SEC schedule, however, doesn t look any easier. The Gamecocks will again hug the break-even mark at best. TENNESSEE VOLUNTEERS Tennessee is in a major state of flux thanks to the defection of coach Lane Kiffin after just one year, and the trail of players and recruits that have either followed him or flat left the Volunteers program continues to grow. New head coach Derek Dooley s job, at least in the short term, is to pick up the remaining pieces and figure out how the new puzzle fits together Quarterback Matt Simms, of the same bloodline as NFLers Phil (his father) and Chris (brother), is now top dog. Running back Bryce Brown a five-star prospect less than a year ago, ran away from the team prior to start of spring camp despite an opening at the top of the depth chart. Replacing Montario Hardesty s big production will now come down to a combination of inexperienced players. With all the big losses, it leaves only four starters returning on offense, none up front Things look bad for the scoring unit, but they appear even worse on defense. While it s true there are fewer holes to fill, they are in fact much bigger. Safety Eric Berry, linebacker Rico McCoy, and tackle Dan Williams are three major contributors among the five starters being replaced. The run defense posted strong numbers that are sure to inflate due to the influx of new starters and the new scheme implemented by coordinator Justin Wilcox Rocky Top is perilously close to hitting rock bottom. Dooley may be known as a strong recruiter, but 2010 isn t the year for that talent to show. It s going to take time for Tennessee to revitalize itself in the wake of a turbulent offseason that only got worse due to the mass exodus that took place during the spring. It s going to be a long first year for Dooley in a town that is running short on patience. VANDERBILT COMMODORES It only seems as if Vanderbilt makes annual reservations for last place in the SEC s East Division and the Commodores have done their fair share to earn the honors on a regular basis. One would expect some improvement over last season s 2-10 finish, but the way the team was shaping up in the spring, even that may be too optimistic. It also doesn t help that 10 of 12 opponents are coming off bowl game appearances There should be nowhere to go but up well, almost after Vanderbilt ranked 109th out of 120 FBS schools in total offense and 113th in the scoring department (16.3 PPG). Quarterback Larry Smith struggled mightily with accuracy and will be pushed throughout the summer. If Vanderbilt is going to remain competitive in any game, much less SEC competition, Warren Norman ( 1,941 all-purpose yards), SEC WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 61

must be the focal point. Ushering in five new offensive linemen won t help. All three starting wide receivers return but their success is tied directly to the effectiveness of the quarterback and offensive line The stop unit was legitimately banged up and worn out by the end of the season, often left out to dry by a scoring unit that simply couldn t move the ball. No SEC defense was on the field more often than Vanderbilt s stop unit, which averaged nearly 34 minutes per game. Despite being on the field for nearly 850 plays, the unit still managed to allow just 23.3 PPG. Five starters return Woe is the Vanderbilt fan that has witnessed exactly one bowl berth since 1955. At the rate the program is developing, it may be another 50-plus years before a postseason appearance is secured. If the offense can t consistently top 20 points, it ll remain business as usual in the basement of the SEC East. WEST DIVISION ALABAMA CRIMSON TIDE Alabama football is regarded as one of the most storied programs in the game. The Crimson Tide have 13 national championships under their belt, capturing the most recent just a few months ago under head coach Nick Saban In some respects, the offense was pulled along by the stellar play of a defense that featured six players selected in the 2010 NFL Draft. But that s not entirely the case. Greg McElroy was every bit the efficient quarterback necessary in Saban s system, completing 60.6 percent of his throws with 17 touchdowns and just four interceptions. Junior Mark Ingram became the first Heisman Trophy winner in school history and for good reason. The scary part for opponents is the player behind Ingram on the depth chart, Trent Richardson, could be even better. The more defenses stack up against the run, the more McElroy will have a chance to throw to one of the most under-used weapons in college football wide receiver Julio Jones. The offensive line welcomes back three starters...only three starters return from the defense, and there s plenty of work to be done on all three levels. Six of the seven starters on the line and at linebacker need to be replaced, including Rolando McClain. So where do Saban and coordinator Kirby Smart hang their hats? For one, end Marcell Dareus is on the verge of stardom and two, the secondary features several players ready to make their mark Many of the talented Bama players have come aboard thanks to Saban s recruiting. While this strength in numbers could take an entire season to shake out on defense with so many new starters, in terms of wins and losses, the tweaking won t matter much. Alabama will still be in the thick of the national title race. ARKANSAS RAZORBACKS Looking for a sleeper team on the verge of crashing the Bowl Championship Series party? Keep an eye on Arkansas. The offensive pieces are in place nine starters are back from a units that averaged 40.7 PPG over its last six games but the big question is whether the defense is ready to take a step forward It s easy to say quarterback Ryan Mallett was worth the wait. After sitting out one season following his transfer from Michigan, the hefty righty led the SEC in passing yards per game (278.9) and touchdown throws (30). He has fully adopted head coach Bobby Petrino s spread-it-out philosophy, to the benefit of several productive and returning pass catchers. The four returning line starters, led by junior center Seth Oxner and tackle Ray Dominguez, combined to start 46 of a possible 52 games last season and judging by the results form a strong unit. The running attack is just as explosive and diverse as the passing game, and the Razorbacks three top backs return Because the offense seemingly scored at will, many of the sins on defense were either forgiven or flat-out forgotten on most Saturdays. The stop unit was roughed up for more than 150 yards rushing five times and five opponents threw for more than 300 yards in a game. Seven starters return, but there were some heavy losses on both the line and linebacking units that need to be accounted for There isn t a team in the SEC or nation for that matter, that Arkansas couldn t compete with. The Razorbacks are that deep and talented. However, they failed to prove they could hang with the big boys last season, losing three of four games to ranked opponents by a combined 42 points. That must change. AUBURN TIGERS Arguing with Auburn s 8-5 mark might seem petty, but after a 5-0 start so much more was expected. The SEC was particularly tough on the Tigers, though three of the five defeats were by a touchdown or fewer. Moving forward, the difference between eight and 10 wins won t require an overhaul, just a few tweaks Forget baby steps. Auburn went into hyperspeed offensively and the proof is in the pudding. Take a look at almost any stat from 2008-09 and there was massive improvement. Scoring was up 16 points to 33.3 per game, and the offense gained nearly 130 additional yards per game. And while several of the key pieces are gone quarterback Chris Todd and running back Ben Tate coordinator Gus Malzahn has stockpiled plenty of players that will fit well in the system. Chief among them is former Florida Gator Cameron Newton. Annointed the starter coming out of the spring, the 6-6, 247-pounder is a dual threat who stands to flourish in the spread offense...consistency plagued Auburn on both sides of the ball, though it was much more apparent on a defense that allowed at least 26 points in five of the last six games. Only three starters need to be replaced though. Solidifying the line is a must because it simply couldn t stop the run, allowing an average of 156.4 YPG and 25 touchdowns Instead of being a wolf in sheep s clothing, Auburn was almost all sheep. While the Tigers appeared to be on the prowl, they were still a few teeth shy of sinking into the meat-and-potatoes portion of the schedule and it showed on both ends of the field. With another year of preparation and experience for the 15 freshman that were thrown to the wolves, Auburn may finally be a sleeper candidate in the SEC West. 62 WWW.STATFOX.COM

LSU TIGERS The SEC promises to be a roller coaster ride from the opening game, and no team brings more questions to the table than LSU. Will the Tigers take the next step with junior quarterback Jordan Jefferson? Can the ground attack bounce back?...while all the questions surrounding LSU aren t exactly limited to the offense, it s here where head coach Les Miles has to find the biggest answers as soon as possible after it ranked 112th in the nation. Jefferson comes off a solid first full season as a starter (2,166 yards passing, 17 touchdowns, seven interceptions), but one thing is certain for him to grow: The running attack must perform better than 90th in the nation. It has the potential to be explosive. But whether or not a return of the dominant running attack happens for the Tigers depends on a line that s been shuffled more than a deck of cards. Plus, if Jefferson can get some protection, he ll be able to utilize a talented core of wide receivers led by Terrance Tolliver On an annual basis, LSU finds its defense raided by the NFL, yet the Tigers still manage to put together an elite, unit. Despite replacing seven starters from a defense that ranked 26th best in the nation, there s a chance the 2010 version could be even better thanks to one word speed Can LSU make a run in the SEC West and in turn, squeeze its way into a BCS Bowl? In a word yes. For that to happen, Jefferson and the offense need big plays and consistency in both running and passing the ball. Sounds simple, but in reality that is what knocked the Tigers from the SEC elite in the first place. The defense has a number of new starters, but Miles always seems to recruit well on that side of the ball. MISSISSIPPI STATE BULLDOGS Head coach Dan Mullen instantly added some street credibility to the Mississippi State football program by knocking off rival Ole Miss in the Egg Bowl, and hanging tough with Florida, Houston, and LSU. To advance the Bulldogs from five wins to a bowlbound program, however, is going to take a lot more than a growing reputation If there s one thing MSU excelled at in Mullen s debut, it was running the ball. The offense led the SEC, and finished ninth nationally, averaging 227.6 YPG. But there s a problem. The featured back in that powerhouse attack, Anthony Dixon, is in the NFL. The problem now is two-fold: Any regression by the ground attack means relying on a passing attack that is still a major work in progress. Junior Chris Relf ended spring camp atop the quarterback depth chart but may be a better runner than passer. Four starters return along the line, which is a positive given the previous success of the ground attack. It also bodes well for the transition at quarterback. Because of the struggles under center, wide receivers didn t get many opportunities to shine One glaring weakness on the stop unit was a lack of pressure, and Mullen hopes the addition of new coordinator Manny Diaz will help ruffle the feathers of opposing quarterbacks. Mississippi State ranked 104th in the nation with 20 sacks and 89th in tackles for loss. Diaz has eight returning starters to work with It seems somewhat amazing that Mississippi State finished just one win shy of a bowl game in Mullen s debut. The defense gave up a ton of points (26.8 PPG), while the offense was a one-trick pony. Still, too many things need to go right for the Bulldogs to take the next step under Mullen and earn a bowl berth. OLE MISS REBELS Head coach Houston Nutt may have looked the part of a magician in his first two years on the sideline, but it s in 2010 where he may have to use some real smoke and mirrors. The offense lost eight starters, many of them the key components to a scoring unit that averaged 29.5 points and 403.5 yards per game Quarterback Jevan Snead, running back Dexter McCluster and wide receiver Shay Hodge led Ole Miss in nearly every major statistical category. All three have moved on to the NFL. Snead s replacement, whoever that ends up being, shoulders a heavy load, since even after losing McCluster, the backfield may still be Ole Miss deepest area. There s also talent at wideout. The faster the skill position players get up to speed, the better it will be for everyone, because the line is a work in progress Aside from a 41-27 loss to Mississippi State, the stop unit was spectacular. Only one other opponent scored more than 23 points Auburn and the pass defense allowed just 11 touchdowns, while the run defense gave up just 3.92 yards per carry. That good news stands to get even better, thanks to the return of six starters and the addition of a pair of impactful junior-college transfers safety Damien Jackson and end Wayne Dorsey Even with the rebuilding on offense, expectations are high in Oxford. How could they not be after Nutt engineered consecutive top 20 finishes in his first two seasons. Judging by Nutt s prior home runs at Arkansas, and even at Ole Miss, it s only a matter of time before he puts the offensive puzzle together. A brutal October, which includes road trips to Alabama and Arkansas, will determine whether the Rebels steady their ship at nine wins or fall back a step. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH East Division Florida Georgia Kentucky South Carolina Tennessee Vanderbilt West Division Alabama Arkansas LSU Auburn Mississippi State Ole Miss WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 63

FLORIDA GATORS 2010 Schedule Strength: 41.58 (#24 of 120) Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: Multiple 4-3 - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 42 Where: Gainesville, FL Head Coach: Urban Meyer, 6th year (57-10 SU) Conference: SEC 2009 RECORD: 13-1 SU, 7-6 ATS Facility: Ben Hill Griffin Stadium 9/4/10 MIAMI OHIO 9/11/10 S FLORIDA 2009 Scoring Differential: +23.4 (#3 of 120) 9/18/10 at Tennessee * UNDERDOG is 3-4 SU but 5-1 ATS in L7 TEN-FLA matchups at TENNESSEE 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +23.0 (#4 of 120) 9/25/10 KENTUCKY * FLORIDA has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. KENTUCKY 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 62 (#2 of 120) 10/2/10 at Alabama * ALABAMA is 4-3 SU & 5-1 ATS in its L7 games vs. FLORIDA 2009 Schedule Strength: 40 (#25 of 120) 10/9/10 LSU * FLA-LSU series has gone 11-3 UNDER the total since 95 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 MISSISSIPPI ST * HOME TEAM is on 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS run in FLA-MSS series 10/30/10 vs. Georgia (Jacksonville, FL) * FLORIDA is 13-3 SU & 11-5 ATS vs. GEORGIA since 94 Points Scored - Allowed 35.9 (10) 12.4 (4) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 457.9 (7) 252.4 (4) 11/6/10 at Vanderbilt * ROAD TEAM is 6-7 SU but 9-4 ATS in VAN-FLA series since 97 YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.97 (3) 4.19 (7) 11/13/10 S CAROLINA * HOME TEAM is 6-5 SU & 8-3 ATS in FLA-SC series since 99 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 5.59 (3) 3.14 (15) 11/20/10 APPALACHIAN ST YP Pass Gained - Allowed 9.08 (6) 5.37 (6) Avg. Time of Possession 30.75 (41) 11/27/10 at Florida St * FAVORITE is 11-1 SU & 10-2 ATS in FSU-FLA series since 98 Turnover Differential +0.5 (23) 3rd Down Conversion % 48.2% (8) 28.7% (3) Straight Up 13-1 9-4 13-1 13-1 48-7 (87%) * Over the L2 seasons, FLORIDA is 11-3 ATS (+7.7 Units) as road favorites. The Average Score was Overall ATS 5-7 8-4 11-2 7-6 31-19 (62%) FLORIDA 33.6, OPPONENT 14.4. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - at Tennessee, 10/16 - at Mississippi St, at Home ATS 3-2 5-1 4-2 3-3 15-8 (65%) 10/30 - GEORGIA, 11/6 - at Vanderbilt, 11/27 - at Florida St Away/Neutral ATS 2-5 3-3 7-0 4-3 16-11 (59%) * FLORIDA is 18-5 ATS (+12.5 Units) vs. teams with a winning record since 07. The Average Score was vs Conference ATS 2-6 5-3 8-1 3-6 18-16 (53%) FLORIDA 39.2, OPPONENT 19.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - S FLORIDA, 9/18 - at Tennessee, 9/25 Non-Conference ATS 3-1 3-1 3-1 4-0 13-3 (81%) - KENTUCKY, 10/2 - at Alabama, 10/9 - LSU, 10/30 - GEORGIA, 11/13 - S CAROLINA, 11/27 - at Florida as Favorite ATS 3-7 7-4 11-2 7-6 28-19 (60%) St as Underdog ATS 2-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 3-0 (100%) * FLORIDA is 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) in November games since 07. The Average Score was FLORIDA 47.4, Over-Under 5-8 9-3 8-5 5-8 27-24 (53%) OPPONENT 13.8. Potential spots for 2010: 11/6 - at Vanderbilt, 11/13 - S CAROLINA, 11/27 - at Florida St 9/2 SOUTHERN MISS 34-7 W -20 W 46.5 U 9/1 W KENTUCKY 49-3 W - - - 8/30 HAWAII 56-10 W -36.5 W 64 O 9/5 CHARLESTON SOUT 62-3 W - - - 9/9 C FLORIDA 42-0 W -22 W 50 U 9/8 TROY 59-31 W -26 W 53 O 9/6 MIAMI 26-3 W -24 L 53 U 9/12 TROY 56-6 W -37 W 61 O 9/16 at Tennessee 21-20 W -5 L 46.5 U 9/15 TENNESSEE 59-20 W -6.5 W 56 O 9/20 at Tennessee 30-6 W -7.5 W 51.5 U 9/19 TENNESSEE 23-13 W -30 L 52 U 9/23 KENTUCKY 26-7 W -27.5 L 52.5 U 9/22 at Ole Miss 30-24 W -24 L 57.5 U 9/27 OLE MISS 30-31 L -22.5 L 49.5 O 9/26 at Kentucky 41-7 W -20 W 53.5 U 9/30 ALABAMA 28-13 W -15 T 40 O 9/29 AUBURN 17-20 L -17 L 51.5 U 10/4 at Arkansas 38-7 W -26.5 W 57 U 10/10 at LSU 13-3 W -9.5 W 46 U 10/7 LSU 23-10 W 0 W 42.5 U 10/6 at Lsu 24-28 L +7.5 W 47 O 10/11 LSU 51-21 W -7 W 48 O 10/17 ARKANSAS 23-20 W -24 L 57 U 10/14 at Auburn 17-27 L -2 L 39.5 O 10/20 at Kentucky 45-37 W -7 W 63.5 O 10/25 KENTUCKY 63-5 W -25.5 W 48 O 10/24 at Mississippi St 29-19 W -22.5 L 50 U 10/28 vs. Georgia 21-14 W -13.5 L 41 U 11/1 vs. Georgia 49-10 W -8 W 56 O 10/31 vs. Georgia 41-17 W -16.5 W 48.5 O 10/27 vs. Georgia 30-42 L -7 L 54 O 11/4 at Vanderbilt 25-19 W -16.5 L 42.5 O 11/8 at Vanderbilt 42-14 W -23.5 W 49 O 11/7 VANDERBILT 27-3 W -35 L 47 U 11/11 S CAROLINA 17-16 W -13 L 44 U 11/3 VANDERBILT 49-22 W -14.5 W 52.5 O 11/15 S CAROLINA 56-6 W -21.5 W 49 O 11/14 at S Carolina 24-14 W -17 L 44 U 11/18 W CAROLINA 62-0 W - - - 11/10 at S Carolina 51-31 W -6.5 W 58 O 11/22 THE CITADEL 70-19 W - - - 11/21 FLA INTERNATIONAL 62-3 W -47.5 W 60 O 11/25 at Florida St 21-14 W -7.5 L 44 U 11/17 FLA ATLANTIC 59-20 W -34 W 64.5 O 11/29 at Florida St 45-15 W -16.5 W 53 O 11/28 FLORIDA ST 37-10 W -26 W 57 U 12/2 vs. Arkansas 38-28 W -3 W 44.5 O 11/24 FLORIDA ST 45-12 W -14 W 60 U 12/6 vs. Alabama 31-20 W -10 W 54 U 12/5 vs. Alabama 13-32 L -5 L 41 O 1/8 vs. Ohio St 41-14 W +7 W 47 O 1/1 vs. Michigan 35-41 L -10 L 60.5 O 1/8 vs. Oklahoma 24-14 W -4 W 69 U 1/1 vs. Cincinnati 51-24 W -12 W 59 O Offense: Pro Style - Starters Returning: 10 GEORGIA BULLDOGS Defense: Multiple 3-4 - Starters Returning: 5 2010 Schedule Strength: 41.42 (#25 of 120) Lettermen Returning: 49 Where: Athens, GA Head Coach: Mark Richt, 10th year (90-27 SU) Conference: SEC 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 5-7 ATS Facility: Sanford Stadium 9/4/10 LA LAFAYETTE 9/11/10 at S Carolina * SC-GEO series has gone 12-1 UNDER the total since 96 2009 Scoring Differential: +3.0 (#58 of 120) 9/18/10 ARKANSAS * UNDERDOG is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 GEO-ARK games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +5.2 (#42 of 120) 9/25/10 at Mississippi St * MISSISSIPPI ST is 0-2 SU but 2-0 ATS in its L2 games vs. GEORGIA 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 49 (#18 of 120) 10/2/10 at Colorado 2009 Schedule Strength: 41.77 (#10 of 120) 10/9/10 TENNESSEE * L7 games of GEO-TEN series at GEORGIA are 6-1 UNDER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 VANDERBILT * ROAD TEAM is 11-7 SU & 14-4 ATS in GEO-VAN series since 92 10/23/10 at Kentucky * HOME TEAM is on 3-2 SU & 4-1 ATS run in KEN-GEO series Points Scored - Allowed 28.9 (51) 25.9 (64) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 362.2 (75) 339.4 (38) 10/30/10 vs. Florida (Jacksonville, FL) * FLORIDA is 13-3 SU & 11-5 ATS vs. GEORGIA since 94 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.94 (34) 5.08 (38) 11/6/10 IDAHO ST YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.68 (29) 3.42 (25) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.56 (39) 7.14 (64) 11/13/10 at Auburn * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 AUB-GEO games Avg. Time of Possession 29.46 (77) 11/27/10 GEORGIA TECH * ROAD TEAM is 8-4 SU & 10-1 ATS in GEO-GAT series since 98 Turnover Differential -1.2 (118) 3rd Down Conversion % 39.7% (56) 38.2% (51) Straight Up 9-4 11-2 10-3 8-5 38-14 (73%) * GEORGIA is on a 3-15 ATS (-13.5 Units) skid at home vs. top-level teams (Win Pct. > 75%) Overall ATS 5-6 8-4 4-6 5-7 22-23 (49%) The Average Score was GEORGIA 24.4, OPPONENT 27. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - at Home ATS 1-4 4-2 1-3 1-4 7-13 (35%) TENNESSEE, 11/27 - GEORGIA TECH Away/Neutral ATS 4-2 4-2 3-3 4-3 15-10 (60%) * GEORGIA is on a 22-6 ATS (+15.4 Units) run on the road in non-conference games The Average vs Conference ATS 3-5 5-3 1-5 3-5 12-18 (40%) Score was GEORGIA 29.2, OPPONENT 19.5. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at Colorado Non-Conference ATS 2-1 3-1 3-1 2-2 10-5 (67%) * GEORGIA is on a 1-9 ATS (-8.9 Units) skid at home vs. teams scoring 17 or less PPG The Average as Favorite ATS 2-5 6-4 4-6 3-4 15-19 (44%) Score was GEORGIA 24.9, OPPONENT 17.7. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - VANDERBILT as Underdog ATS 3-1 2-0 0-0 2-3 7-4 (64%) Over-Under 5-7 5-6 6-6 5-6 21-25 (46%) 9/2 W KENTUCKY 48-12 W - - - 9/1 OKLAHOMA ST 35-14 W -6 W 56.5 U 8/30 GA SOUTHERN 45-21 W - - - 9/5 at Oklahoma St 10-24 L +5 L 60.5 U 9/9 at S Carolina 18-0 W -3 W 40 U 9/8 S CAROLINA 12-16 L -3.5 L 45 U 9/6 C MICHIGAN 56-17 W -24.5 W 59 O 9/12 S CAROLINA 41-37 W -7 L 40 O 9/16 UAB 34-0 W -18 W 39 U 9/15 W CAROLINA 45-16 W - - - 9/13 at S Carolina 14-7 W -7 T 45 U 9/19 at Arkansas 52-41 W +1.5 W 54.5 O 9/23 COLORADO 14-13 W -26.5 L 36 U 9/22 at Alabama 26-23 W +3 W 46.5 O 9/20 at Arizona St 27-10 W -7 W 52 U 9/26 ARIZONA ST 20-17 W -13.5 L 48.5 U 9/30 at Mississippi 14-9 W -17.5 L 37 U 9/29 OLE MISS 45-17 W -15.5 W 49 O 9/27 ALABAMA 30-41 L -6 L 46 O 10/3 LSU 13-20 L -3.5 L 50.5 U 10/7 TENNESSEE 33-51 L +2.5 L 37.5 O 10/6 at Tennessee 14-35 L -1 L 55.5 U 10/11 TENNESSEE 26-14 W -12 T 43.5 U 10/10 at Tennessee 19-45 L +0 L 46 O 10/14 VANDERBILT 22-24 L -15 L 39.5 O 10/13 at Vanderbilt 20-17 W -7 L 47.5 U 10/18 VANDERBILT 24-14 W -16.5 L 43.5 U 10/17 at Vanderbilt 34-10 W -7.5 W 47.5 U 10/21 MISSISSIPPI ST 27-24 W -16.5 L 39 O 10/27 vs. Florida 42-30 W +7 W 54 O 10/25 at LSU 52-38 W -2 W 49 O 10/31 vs. Florida 17-41 L +16.5 L 48.5 O 10/28 vs. Florida 14-21 L +13.5 W 41 U 11/3 TROY 44-34 W -14 L 54 O 11/1 vs. Florida 10-49 L +8 L 56 O 11/7 TENNESSEE TECH 38-0 W -42 L - 11/4 at Kentucky 20-24 L -6.5 L 49 U 11/10 AUBURN 45-20 W -2.5 W 44.5 O 11/8 at Kentucky 42-38 W -13.5 L 47 O 11/14 AUBURN 31-24 W -4 W 55 T 11/11 at Auburn 37-15 W +11.5 W 39.5 O 11/17 KENTUCKY 24-13 W -7 W 60.5 U 11/15 at Auburn 17-13 W -8.5 L 45 U 11/21 KENTUCKY 27-34 L -10 L 50 O 11/25 GEORGIA TECH 15-12 W -3 T 42 U 11/24 at Georgia Tech 31-17 W -3.5 W 48 T 11/29 GEORGIA TECH 42-45 L -8 L 50 O 11/28 at Georgia Tech 30-24 W +9.5 W 57 U 12/30 vs. Virginia Tech 31-24 W +3 W 37.5 O 1/1 vs. Hawaii 41-10 W -8 W 68 U 1/1 vs. Michigan St 24-12 W -8.5 W 57.5 U 12/28 vs. Texas A&M 44-20 W -6 W 65.5 U 64 WWW.STATFOX.COM

KENTUCKY WILDCATS 2010 Schedule Strength: 37.67 (#59 of 120) SOUTH CAROLINA GAMECOCKS 2010 Schedule Strength: 44.58 (#7 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 65 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 5 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 46 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-2-5 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 54 Where: Lexington, KY Head Coach: Joker Phillips, 1st year Conference: SEC 2009 RECORD: 7-6 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: Commonwealth Stadium 9/4/10 at Louisville * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 LOU-KEN games 9/11/10 W KENTUCKY 2009 Scoring Differential: +3.4 (#56 of 120) 9/18/10 AKRON * ROAD TEAM is 3-6 SU but 9-0 ATS in L9 KEN-AKR matchups 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +4.8 (#45 of 120) 9/25/10 at Florida * FLORIDA has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. KENTUCKY 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 43 (#40 of 120) 10/2/10 at Ole Miss * FAVORITE is 4-0 SU & 3-1 ATS in L3 MIS-KEN games 2009 Schedule Strength: 38.08 (#38 of 120) 10/9/10 AUBURN * KENTUCKY has covered spread in L2 games vs. AUBURN 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 S CAROLINA * S CAROLINA is 7-2 SU & 8-1 ATS in its L9 games at KENTUCKY 10/23/10 GEORGIA * HOME TEAM is on 3-2 SU & 4-1 ATS run in KEN-GEO series Points Scored - Allowed 26.1 (70) 22.7 (43) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 331.5 (93) 360.5 (54) 10/30/10 at Mississippi St * ROAD TEAM has won SU & ATS in four straight MSS-KEN games YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.91 (101) 5.55 (70) 11/6/10 CHARLESTON SOUT YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.51 (45) 4.67 (96) 11/13/10 VANDERBILT * KENTUCKY is 7-2 SU & ATS in its L9 games vs. VANDERBILT YP Pass Gained - Allowed 5.60 (112) 6.87 (49) Avg. Time of Possession 30.39 (53) 11/27/10 at Tennessee * TENNESSEE is 18-0 SU & 13-5 ATS vs. KENTUCKY since 92 Turnover Differential +0.2 (51) 3rd Down Conversion % 37.5% (75) 39.7% (60) Straight Up 8-5 8-5 7-6 7-6 30-22 (58%) * KENTUCKY is 2-10 ATS (-9 Units) at home in conference games since 07. The Average Score Overall ATS 7-5 6-5 6-6 6-6 25-22 (53%) was KENTUCKY 26.6, OPPONENT 35.2. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - AUBURN, 10/16 - S at Home ATS 3-3 4-3 2-4 1-5 10-15 (40%) CAROLINA, 10/23 - GEORGIA, 11/13 - VANDERBILT Away/Neutral ATS 4-2 2-2 4-2 5-1 15-7 (68%) * KENTUCKY is 9-1 OVER the total (+7.9 Units) at home vs. teams with a winning record since vs Conference ATS 6-2 3-5 3-5 4-4 16-16 (50%) 07. The Average Score was KENTUCKY 33.4, OPPONENT 32.9. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 Non-Conference ATS 1-3 3-0 3-1 2-2 9-6 (60%) - AUBURN, 10/16 - S CAROLINA, 10/23 - GEORGIA as Favorite ATS 1-2 3-2 1-3 3-2 8-9 (47%) * KENTUCKY is on a 4-14 ATS (-11.4 Units) skid as road underdogs of 3.5 to 7 points The Average as Underdog ATS 6-3 3-3 5-3 3-4 17-13 (57%) Score was KENTUCKY 18.2, OPPONENT 28.6. Potential spots for 2010: 11/27 - at Tennessee Over-Under 5-7 7-5 5-7 7-5 24-24 (50%) 9/3 at Louisville 28-59 L +24 L 59.5 O 9/1 E KENTUCKY 50-10 W - - - 8/31 at Louisville 27-2 W +3.5 W 55.5 U 9/5 vs. Miami Ohio 42-0 W -15 W 49 U 9/9 SW TEXAS ST 41-7 W - - - 9/8 KENT ST 56-20 W -14 W 53.5 O 9/6 NORFOLK ST 38-3 W - - - 9/19 LOUISVILLE 31-27 W -12.5 L 49 O 9/16 MISSISSIPPI 31-14 W -6 W 48 U 9/15 LOUISVILLE 40-34 W +4.5 W 77.5 U 9/13 MIDDLE TENN ST 20-14 W -19.5 L 46.5 U 9/26 FLORIDA 7-41 L +20 L 53.5 U 9/23 at Florida 7-26 L +27.5 W 52.5 U 9/22 at Arkansas 42-29 W +7.5 W 65.5 O 9/27 W KENTUCKY 41-3 W -19 W 44.5 U 10/3 ALABAMA 20-38 L +16 L 47 O 9/30 C MICHIGAN 45-36 W -10 L 50.5 O 9/29 FLA ATLANTIC 45-17 W -24 W 64 U 10/4 at Alabama 14-17 L +15 W 44.5 U 10/10 at S Carolina 26-28 L +9.5 W 45.5 O 10/7 S CAROLINA 17-24 L +3 L 52 U 10/4 at S Carolina 23-38 L +5 L 56.5 O 10/11 S CAROLINA 17-24 L +1.5 L 37.5 O 10/17 at Auburn 21-14 W +13.5 W 56.5 U 10/14 at LSU 0-49 L +25.5 L 52.5 U 10/13 LSU 43-37 W +10 W 54 O 10/18 ARKANSAS 21-20 W -7 L 46.5 U 10/24 LA MONROE 36-13 W -14 W 47 O 10/28 at Mississippi St 34-31 W 0 W 48.5 O 10/20 FLORIDA 37-45 L +7 L 63.5 O 10/25 at Florida 5-63 L +25.5 L 48 O 10/31 MISSISSIPPI ST 24-31 L -3.5 L 47.5 O 11/4 GEORGIA 24-20 W +6.5 W 49 U 10/27 MISSISSIPPI ST 14-31 L -13 L 60.5 U 11/1 at Mississippi St 14-13 W +1.5 W 38.5 U 11/7 E KENTUCKY 37-12 W -31 L - 11/11 VANDERBILT 38-26 W 0 W 55 O 11/10 at Vanderbilt 27-20 W -3.5 W 57 U 11/8 GEORGIA 38-42 L +13.5 W 47 O 11/14 at Vanderbilt 24-13 W -3.5 W 45 U 11/18 LA MONROE 42-40 W -20 L 57 O 11/17 at Georgia 13-24 L +7 L 60.5 U 11/15 VANDERBILT 24-31 L -3 L 38 O 11/21 at Georgia 34-27 W +10 W 50 O 11/25 at Tennessee 12-17 L +20 W 59.5 U 11/24 TENNESSEE 50-52 L -2.5 L 63 O 11/29 at Tennessee 10-28 L +4 L 38.5 U 11/28 TENNESSEE 24-30 L +3 L 49.5 O 12/29 vs. Clemson 28-20 W +11 W 58.5 U 12/31 vs. Florida St 35-28 W -7 T 56.5 O 1/2 vs. E Carolina 25-19 W +3 W 41 O 12/27 vs. Clemson 13-21 L +6.5 L 52.5 U Where: Columbia, SC Head Coach: Steve Spurrier, 6th year (35-28 SU) Conference: SEC 2009 RECORD: 7-6 SU, 7-6 ATS Facility: Williams-Brice Stadium 9/2/10 SOUTHERN MISS 9/11/10 GEORGIA * SC-GEO series has gone 12-1 UNDER the total since 96 2009 Scoring Differential: +0.2 (#68 of 120) 9/18/10 FURMAN 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +4.9 (#44 of 120) 9/25/10 at Auburn * HOME TEAM has covered spread in L2 AUB-SC games 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 43 (#40 of 120) 10/9/10 ALABAMA * ROAD TEAM has covered spread in four straight SC-ALA games 2009 Schedule Strength: 41.77 (#11 of 120) 10/16/10 at Kentucky * S CAROLINA is 7-2 SU & 8-1 ATS in its L9 games at KENTUCKY 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Vanderbilt * ROAD TEAM is on 3-4 SU but 5-1 ATS run in VAN-SC series 10/30/10 TENNESSEE * ROAD TEAM is 6-7 SU but 9-2 ATS in SC-TEN series since 97 Points Scored - Allowed 20.6 (102) 20.4 (24) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 347.4 (82) 300.7 (15) 11/6/10 ARKANSAS * FAVORITE is 14-2 SU & 13-3 ATS in SC-ARK series since 94 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.16 (86) 4.71 (17) 11/13/10 at Florida * HOME TEAM is 6-5 SU & 8-3 ATS in FLA-SC series since 99 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.62 (87) 3.73 (42) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.68 (88) 6.05 (18) 11/20/10 TROY Avg. Time of Possession 30.41 (50) 11/27/10 at Clemson * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 CLM-SC games Turnover Differential -0.3 (81) 3rd Down Conversion % 36.0% (85) 37.4% (39) Straight Up 8-5 6-6 7-6 7-6 28-23 (55%) * S CAROLINA is 0-7 ATS (-7.7 Units) on the road in the second half of the season since 07. The Overall ATS 9-3 5-5 5-6 7-6 26-20 (57%) Average Score was S CAROLINA 15.8, OPPONENT 34.6. Potential spots for 2010: 10/23 - at at Home ATS 3-3 3-3 3-2 4-3 13-11 (54%) Vanderbilt, 11/13 - at Florida, 11/27 - at Clemson Away/Neutral ATS 6-0 2-2 2-4 3-3 13-9 (59%) * S CAROLINA is on a 15-5 ATS (+9.5 Units) run vs. excellent ball control teams, 32 or more TOP vs Conference ATS 5-3 4-3 4-3 4-4 17-13 (57%) minutes/game The Average Score was S CAROLINA 21, OPPONENT 19.4. Potential spots for Non-Conference ATS 4-0 1-2 1-3 3-2 9-7 (56%) 2010: 10/9 - ALABAMA as Favorite ATS 6-0 2-3 5-3 1-3 14-9 (61%) * S CAROLINA is on a 19-8 ATS (+10.2 Units) run vs. poor offensive teams - averaging <=310 as Underdog ATS 3-3 3-2 0-3 6-2 12-10 (55%) YPG The Average Score was S CAROLINA 30.8, OPPONENT 14.2. Potential spots for 2010: Over-Under 8-4 4-7 5-7 5-7 22-25 (47%) 10/23 - at Vanderbilt 8/31 at Mississippi St 15-0 W -6 W 40.5 U 9/1 LA LAFAYETTE 28-14 W -28.5 L 46 U 8/28 NC STATE 34-0 W -14 W 43.5 U 9/3 at NC State 7-3 W +5.5 W 48 U 9/9 GEORGIA 0-18 L +3 L 40 U 9/8 at Georgia 16-12 W +3.5 W 45 U 9/4 at Vanderbilt 17-24 L -9.5 L 42.5 U 9/12 at Georgia 37-41 L +7 W 40 O 9/16 WOFFORD 27-20 W - - - 9/15 S CAROLINA ST 38-3 W - - - 9/13 GEORGIA 7-14 L +7 T 45 U 9/19 FLA ATLANTIC 38-16 W -20.5 W 52 O 9/23 FLA ATLANTIC 45-6 W -28 W 42 O 9/22 at Lsu 16-28 L +17 W 45.5 U 9/20 WOFFORD 23-13 W - - - 9/24 OLE MISS 16-10 W +4 W 51.5 U 9/28 AUBURN 17-24 L +14 W 38 O 9/29 MISSISSIPPI ST 38-21 W -14 W 42.5 O 9/27 UAB 26-13 W -25.5 L 50.5 U 10/3 S CAROLINA ST 38-14 W -35.5 L - 10/7 at Kentucky 24-17 W -3 W 52 U 10/4 KENTUCKY 38-23 W -5 W 56.5 O 10/4 at Ole Miss 31-24 W +1.5 W 42 O 10/10 KENTUCKY 28-26 W -9.5 L 45.5 O 10/21 at Vanderbilt 31-13 W -3.5 W 42.5 O 10/13 at N Carolina 21-15 W -7 L 47 U 10/11 at Kentucky 24-17 W -1.5 W 37.5 O 10/17 at Alabama 6-20 L +17.5 W 43.5 U 10/28 TENNESSEE 24-31 L +4 L 44 O 10/20 VANDERBILT 6-17 L -12.5 L 48 U 10/18 LSU 17-24 L +1 L 43 U 10/24 VANDERBILT 14-10 W -14 L 41 U 11/4 ARKANSAS 20-26 L +2.5 L 45.5 O 10/27 at Tennessee 24-27 L +3 T 52.5 U 11/1 TENNESSEE 27-6 W -6 W 37.5 U 10/31 at Tennessee 13-31 L +6 L 42.5 O 11/11 at Florida 16-17 L +13 W 44 U 11/3 at Arkansas 36-48 L +5.5 L 50 O 11/8 ARKANSAS 34-21 W -12.5 W 43.5 O 11/7 at Arkansas 16-33 L +7.5 L 55.5 U 11/18 MIDDLE TENN ST 52-7 W -15 W 44 O 11/10 FLORIDA 31-51 L +6.5 L 58 O 11/15 at Florida 6-56 L +21.5 L 49 O 11/14 FLORIDA 14-24 L +17 W 44 U 11/25 at Clemson 31-28 W +5.5 W 48 O 11/24 CLEMSON 21-23 L +3 W 54.5 U 11/29 at Clemson 14-31 L 0 L 40 O 11/28 CLEMSON 34-17 W +3 W 44 O 12/29 vs. Houston 44-36 W -5 W 56 O 1/1 vs. Iowa 10-31 L +3.5 L 42 U 1/2 vs. Connecticut 7-20 L -4 L 50.5 U

TENNESSEE VOLUNTEERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 44.17 (#10 of 120) VANDERBILT COMMODORES 2010 Schedule Strength: 44.92 (#5 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 4 Defense: 3-4 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 43 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 48 Where: Knoxville, TN Head Coach: Derek Dooley, 1st year Conference: SEC 2009 RECORD: 7-6 SU, 7-6 ATS Facility: Neyland Stadium 9/4/10 TENN-MARTIN 9/11/10 OREGON 2009 Scoring Differential: +7.1 (#35 of 120) 9/18/10 FLORIDA * UNDERDOG is 3-4 SU but 5-1 ATS in L7 TEN-FLA matchups at TENNESSEE 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +10.9 (#22 of 120) 9/25/10 UAB * ROAD TEAM is 0-3 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 TEN-UAB games 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 42 (#45 of 120) 10/2/10 at LSU * UNDERDOG is 3-4 SU but 4-0 ATS in L7 LSU-TEN matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 42.15 (#7 of 120) 10/9/10 at Georgia * L7 games of GEO-TEN series at GEORGIA are 6-1 UNDER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 ALABAMA * ROAD TEAM is 9-8 SU & 15-2 ATS in TEN-ALA series since 93 10/30/10 at S Carolina * ROAD TEAM is 6-7 SU but 9-2 ATS in SC-TEN series since 97 Points Scored - Allowed 29.3 (43) 22.2 (38) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 383.6 (60) 318.8 (22) 11/6/10 at Memphis * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in MEM-TEN series YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.69 (55) 4.86 (27) 11/13/10 OLE MISS * UNDERDOG is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 TEN-MIS games at TENNESSEE YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.30 (57) 4.22 (77) 11/20/10 at Vanderbilt * ROAD TEAM is on 6-0 ATS run in VAN-TEN series YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.34 (52) 5.61 (9) Avg. Time of Possession 30.45 (48) 11/27/10 KENTUCKY * TENNESSEE is 18-0 SU & 13-5 ATS vs. KENTUCKY since 92 Turnover Differential +0.2 (46) 3rd Down Conversion % 39.8% (55) 36.1% (31) Straight Up 9-4 10-4 5-7 7-6 31-21 (60%) * TENNESSEE is on a 2-15 ATS (-14.5 Units) skid at home vs. excellent defensive teams - Overall ATS 7-5 8-4 4-7 7-6 26-22 (54%) allowing <=285 YPG The Average Score was TENNESSEE 19.6, OPPONENT 20.4. Potential at Home ATS 3-3 5-1 2-5 4-4 14-13 (52%) spots for 2010: 9/18 - FLORIDA, 10/23 - ALABAMA Away/Neutral ATS 4-2 3-3 2-2 3-2 12-9 (57%) * TENNESSEE is on a 24-8 ATS (+15.2 Units) run on the road in weeks 5 through 9 The Average vs Conference ATS 4-3 4-3 4-3 5-3 17-12 (59%) Score was TENNESSEE 27.2, OPPONENT 19. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at LSU, 10/9 - at Non-Conference ATS 3-2 4-1 0-4 2-3 9-10 (47%) Georgia, 10/30 - at S Carolina as Favorite ATS 5-4 5-2 4-4 4-4 18-14 (56%) * TENNESSEE is on a 8-20 ATS (-14 Units) skid vs. teams scoring 17 or less PPG The Average as Underdog ATS 2-1 3-2 0-3 3-2 8-8 (50%) Score was TENNESSEE 30.8, OPPONENT 13. Potential spots for 2010: 11/20 - at Vanderbilt Over-Under 5-8 8-6 1-11 8-5 22-30 (42%) 9/2 CALIFORNIA 35-18 W +2.5 W 41.5 O 9/1 at California 31-45 L +7 L 55 O 9/1 at UCLA 24-27 L -7 L 45.5 O 9/12 UCLA 15-19 L -10.5 L 46 U 9/9 AIR FORCE 31-30 W -20 L 48 O 9/8 SOUTHERN MISS 39-19 W -10.5 W 46.5 O 9/13 UAB 35-3 W -33 L 61 U 9/19 at Florida 13-23 L +30 W 52 U 9/16 FLORIDA 20-21 L +5 W 46.5 U 9/15 at Florida 20-59 L +6.5 L 56 O 9/20 FLORIDA 6-30 L +7.5 L 51.5 U 9/26 OHIO U 34-23 W -22 L 44 O 9/23 MARSHALL 33-7 W -20.5 W 43 U 9/22 ARKANSAS ST 48-27 W -19 W 58 O 9/27 at Auburn 12-14 L +6 W 40.5 U 10/3 AUBURN 22-26 L -2.5 L 49 U 9/30 at Memphis 41-7 W -14 W 48.5 U 10/6 GEORGIA 35-14 W +1 W 55.5 U 10/4 N ILLINOIS 13-9 W -16.5 L 44.5 U 10/10 GEORGIA 45-19 W +0 W 46 O 10/7 at Georgia 51-33 W -2.5 W 37.5 O 10/13 at Mississippi St 33-21 W -7 W 51 O 10/11 at Georgia 14-26 L +12 T 43.5 U 10/24 at Alabama 10-12 L +14 W 42 U 10/21 ALABAMA 16-13 W -10.5 L 45 U 10/20 at Alabama 17-41 L -2 L 55 O 10/18 MISSISSIPPI ST 34-3 W -9.5 W 38 U 10/31 S CAROLINA 31-13 W -6 W 42.5 O 10/27 S CAROLINA 27-24 W -3 T 52.5 U 10/28 at S Carolina 31-24 W -4 W 44 O 10/25 ALABAMA 9-29 L +6 L 41 U 11/7 MEMPHIS 56-28 W -25.5 W 53 O 11/3 LA LAFAYETTE 59-7 W -27.5 W 65.5 O 11/4 LSU 24-28 L +4 T 44 O 11/10 ARKANSAS 34-13 W +1.5 W 64.5 U 11/1 at S Carolina 6-27 L +6 L 37.5 U 11/14 at Ole Miss 17-42 L +5.5 L 47.5 O 11/11 at Arkansas 14-31 L +5 L 47.5 U 11/17 VANDERBILT 25-24 W -12 L 52.5 U 11/8 WYOMING 7-13 L -25.5 L 41.5 U 11/21 VANDERBILT 31-16 W -17 L 47.5 U 11/18 at Vanderbilt 39-10 W -7.5 W 49.5 U 11/24 at Kentucky 52-50 W +2.5 W 63 O 11/22 at Vanderbilt 20-10 W +3 W 36 U 11/28 at Kentucky 30-24 W -3 W 49.5 O 11/25 KENTUCKY 17-12 W -20 L 59.5 U 12/1 vs. Lsu 14-21 L +7 T 58 U 11/29 KENTUCKY 28-10 W -4 W 38.5 U 12/31 vs. Virginia Tech 14-37 L +5 L 48 O 1/1 vs. Penn St 10-20 L -4 L 41.5 U 1/1 vs. Wisconsin 21-17 W -2.5 W 56.5 U 9/5 W KENTUCKY 63-7 W -29.5 W 44.5 O Where: Nashville, TN Head Coach: Bobby Johnson, 9th year (29-66 SU) Conference: SEC 2009 RECORD: 2-10 SU, 4-6-1 ATS Facility: Vanderbilt Stadium 9/4/10 NORTHWESTERN 9/11/10 LSU * L2 games in VAN-LSU series went UNDER the total 2009 Scoring Differential: -7.0 (#97 of 120) 9/18/10 at Ole Miss * UNDERDOG is on 6-0 ATS run in L6 MIS-VAN matchups at OLE MISS 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -7.9 (#98 of 120) 10/2/10 at Connecticut 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 33 (#75 of 120) 10/9/10 E MICHIGAN 2009 Schedule Strength: 38.42 (#36 of 120) 10/16/10 at Georgia * ROAD TEAM is 11-7 SU & 14-4 ATS in GEO-VAN series since 92 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 S CAROLINA * ROAD TEAM is on 3-4 SU but 5-1 ATS run in VAN-SC series 10/30/10 at Arkansas * UNDERDOG is 2-0 ATS in L2 ARK-VAN games Points Scored - Allowed 16.3 (113) 23.3 (46) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 307.2 (109) 362.8 (56) 11/6/10 FLORIDA * ROAD TEAM is 6-7 SU but 9-4 ATS in VAN-FLA series since 97 YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.58 (109) 5.15 (44) 11/13/10 at Kentucky * KENTUCKY is 7-2 SU & ATS in its L9 games vs. VANDERBILT YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.25 (60) 4.40 (88) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 5.00 (119) 6.49 (36) 11/20/10 TENNESSEE * ROAD TEAM is on 6-0 ATS run in VAN-TEN series Avg. Time of Possession 26.18 (119) 11/27/10 WAKE FOREST * WAKE FOREST is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. VANDERBILT Turnover Differential +0.3 (43) 3rd Down Conversion % 34.9% (98) 41.1% (75) Straight Up 4-8 5-7 7-6 2-10 18-31 (37%) * VANDERBILT is 0-8 ATS (-8.8 Units) at home in the second half of the season since 07. The Overall ATS 6-5 5-6 8-5 4-6 23-22 (51%) Average Score was VANDERBILT 17, OPPONENT 27.9. Potential spots for 2010: 10/23 - S at Home ATS 2-3 3-4 3-3 0-5 8-15 (35%) CAROLINA, 11/6 - FLORIDA, 11/20 - TENNESSEE, 11/27 - WAKE FOREST Away/Neutral ATS 4-2 2-2 5-2 4-1 15-7 (68%) * VANDERBILT is 13-1 UNDER the total (+11.9 Units) in weeks 5 through 9 since 07. The Average vs Conference ATS 4-4 4-4 5-3 3-4 16-15 (52%) Score was VANDERBILT 15.4, OPPONENT 20.6. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at Connecticut, Non-Conference ATS 2-1 1-2 3-2 1-2 7-7 (50%) 10/9 - E MICHIGAN, 10/16 - at Georgia, 10/23 - S CAROLINA, 10/30 - at Arkansas as Favorite ATS 1-2 2-2 1-3 1-2 5-9 (36%) * VANDERBILT is 11-2 UNDER the total (+8.8 Units) at home after playing its last game on the as Underdog ATS 5-3 3-4 7-2 3-4 18-13 (58%) road since 07. The Average Score was VANDERBILT 15.2, OPPONENT 23.3. Potential spots for Over-Under 6-5 2-9 4-9 2-9 14-32 (30%) 2010: 10/9 - E MICHIGAN, 10/23 - S CAROLINA, 11/6 - FLORIDA, 11/20 - TENNESSEE 9/2 at Michigan 7-27 L +27 W 46.5 U 9/1 RICHMOND 41-17 W - - - 8/28 at Miami Ohio 34-13 W +3.5 W 38.5 O 9/5 W CAROLINA 45-0 W - - - 9/9 at Alabama 10-13 L +14 W 40.5 U 9/8 ALABAMA 10-24 L +3.5 L 49 U 9/4 S CAROLINA 24-17 W +9.5 W 42.5 U 9/12 at LSU 9-23 L +14 T 46.5 U 9/16 ARKANSAS 19-21 L +5.5 W 41 U 9/15 OLE MISS 31-17 W -6.5 W 48.5 U 9/13 RICE 38-21 W -9.5 W 58 O 9/19 MISSISSIPPI ST 3-15 L -8.5 L 45 U 9/23 TENNESSEE ST 38-9 W - - - 9/29 E MICHIGAN 30-7 W -21.5 W 45 U 9/20 at Ole Miss 23-17 W +6.5 W 49 U 9/26 at Rice 36-17 W -7.5 W 49.5 O 9/30 TEMPLE 43-14 W -32.5 L 43.5 O 10/6 at Auburn 7-35 L +7.5 L 43.5 U 10/4 AUBURN 14-13 W +3.5 W 38.5 U 10/3 OLE MISS 7-23 L +10 L 43.5 U 10/7 at Mississippi 10-17 L -1 L 40 U 10/13 GEORGIA 17-20 L +7 W 47.5 U 10/11 at Mississippi St 14-17 L -1 L 38 U 10/10 at Army 13-16 L -10 L 37.5 U 10/14 at Georgia 24-22 W +15 W 39.5 O 10/20 at S Carolina 17-6 W +12.5 W 48 U 10/18 at Georgia 14-24 L +16.5 W 43.5 U 10/17 GEORGIA 10-34 L +7.5 L 47.5 U 10/21 S CAROLINA 13-31 L +3.5 L 42.5 O 10/27 MIAMI OHIO 24-13 W -13.5 L 43.5 U 10/25 DUKE 7-10 L -9.5 L 42 U 10/24 at S Carolina 10-14 L +14 W 41 U 10/28 at Duke 45-28 W -7.5 W 42 O 11/3 at Florida 22-49 L +14.5 L 52.5 O 11/8 FLORIDA 14-42 L +23.5 L 49 O 10/31 GEORGIA TECH 31-56 L +13.5 L 48 O 11/4 FLORIDA 19-25 L +16.5 W 42.5 O 11/10 KENTUCKY 20-27 L +3.5 L 57 U 11/15 at Kentucky 31-24 W +3 W 38 O 11/7 at Florida 3-27 L +35 W 47 U 11/11 at Kentucky 26-38 L 0 L 55 O 11/17 at Tennessee 24-25 L +12 W 52.5 U 11/22 TENNESSEE 10-20 L -3 L 36 U 11/14 KENTUCKY 13-24 L +3.5 L 45 U 11/18 TENNESSEE 10-39 L +7.5 L 49.5 U 11/24 WAKE FOREST 17-31 L -1 L 46.5 O 11/29 at Wake Forest 10-23 L +4 L 37.5 U 11/21 at Tennessee 16-31 L +17 W 47.5 U 12/31 vs. Boston College 16-14 W +5 W 40 U 66 WWW.STATFOX.COM

ALABAMA CRIMSON TIDE 2010 Schedule Strength: 42.58 (#16 of 120) ARKANSAS RAZORBACKS 2010 Schedule Strength: 41 (#29 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 67 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 3-4 - Starters Returning: 3 Lettermen Returning: 50 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 59 Where: Tuscaloosa, AL Head Coach: Nick Saban, 4th year (33-8 SU) Conference: SEC 2009 RECORD: 14-0 SU, 9-4 ATS Facility: Bryant-Denny Stadium 9/4/10 SAN JOSE ST 9/11/10 PENN ST 2009 Scoring Differential: +20.4 (#5 of 120) 9/18/10 at Duke 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +23.4 (#3 of 120) 9/25/10 at Arkansas * ROAD TEAM is on 3-5 SU but 6-2 ATS run in ARK-ALA series 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 63 (#1 of 120) 10/2/10 FLORIDA * ALABAMA is 4-3 SU & 5-1 ATS in its L7 games vs. FLORIDA 2009 Schedule Strength: 41.14 (#16 of 120) 10/9/10 at S Carolina * ROAD TEAM has covered spread in four straight SC-ALA games 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 OLE MISS * HOME TEAM is on 7-3 SU & ATS run in ALA-MIS series 10/23/10 at Tennessee * ROAD TEAM is 9-8 SU & 15-2 ATS in TEN-ALA series since 93 Points Scored - Allowed 32.1 (22) 11.7 (2) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 403.0 (43) 245.4 (2) 11/6/10 at LSU * ROAD TEAM is 12-6 SU & 13-3 ATS in LSU-ALA series since 92 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.96 (33) 4.08 (4) 11/13/10 MISSISSIPPI ST * ALA-MSS series has gone 8-2 UNDER the total since 95 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 5.01 (12) 2.83 (6) 11/20/10 GEORGIA ST YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.60 (37) 5.18 (2) Avg. Time of Possession 33.52 (5) 11/26/10 AUBURN * L5 games of ALA-AUB series at ALABAMA are 5-0 UNDER the total Turnover Differential +1.4 (4) 3rd Down Conversion % 40.4% (51) 30.7% (5) Straight Up 6-7 7-6 12-2 14-0 39-15 (72%) * Over the L2 seasons, ALABAMA is 10-1 ATS (+8.9 Units) on the road when playing on Saturdays. Overall ATS 5-7 3-8 9-5 9-4 26-24 (52%) The Average Score was ALABAMA 32.5, OPPONENT 16.2. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - at at Home ATS 2-6 1-4 4-3 3-3 10-16 (38%) Duke, 9/25 - at Arkansas, 10/9 - at S Carolina, 10/23 - at Tennessee, 11/6 - at LSU Away/Neutral ATS 3-1 2-4 5-2 6-1 16-8 (67%) * ALABAMA is 8-0 UNDER the total (+8 Units) as home favorites of 10.5 to 21 points since 07. vs Conference ATS 3-4 2-5 6-3 6-3 17-15 (53%) The Average Score was ALABAMA 25.8, OPPONENT 11. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - PENN Non-Conference ATS 2-3 1-3 3-2 3-1 9-9 (50%) ST, 10/16 - OLE MISS as Favorite ATS 2-5 2-6 7-4 8-4 19-19 (50%) * Over the L2 seasons, ALABAMA is 16-6 ATS (+9.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive straight as Underdog ATS 3-2 1-2 2-1 1-0 7-5 (58%) up wins. The Average Score was ALABAMA 31.6, OPPONENT 12.1. Potential spots for 2010: Over-Under 8-5 6-6 5-9 7-5 26-25 (51%) 9/18 - at Duke, 9/25 - at Arkansas, 10/23 - at Tennessee, 11/26 - at Auburn 9/2 HAWAII 25-17 W -15.5 L 50.5 U 9/1 W CAROLINA 52-6 W - - - 8/30 vs. Clemson 34-10 W +4.5 W 46 U 9/5 vs. Virginia Tech 34-24 W -6.5 W 37 O 9/9 VANDERBILT 13-10 W -14 L 40.5 U 9/8 at Vanderbilt 24-10 W -3.5 W 49 U 9/6 TULANE 20-6 W -29 L 45.5 U 9/12 FLA INTERNATIONAL 40-14 W -33.5 L 50.5 O 9/16 LA MONROE 41-7 W -24.5 W 40 O 9/15 ARKANSAS 41-38 W -3.5 L 46 O 9/13 W KENTUCKY 41-7 W -26 W 47.5 O 9/19 NORTH TEXAS 53-7 W -37 W 51 O 9/23 at Arkansas 23-24 L +3 W 37.5 O 9/22 GEORGIA 23-26 L -3 L 46.5 O 9/20 at Arkansas 49-14 W -9 W 47.5 O 9/26 ARKANSAS 35-7 W -17.5 W 54.5 U 9/30 at Florida 13-28 L +15 T 40 O 9/29 vs. Florida St 14-21 L +2.5 L 43.5 U 9/27 at Georgia 41-30 W +6 W 46 O 10/3 at Kentucky 38-20 W -16 W 47 O 10/7 DUKE 30-14 W -27 L 40 O 10/6 HOUSTON 30-24 W -10.5 L 58 U 10/4 KENTUCKY 17-14 W -15 L 44.5 U 10/10 at Ole Miss 22-3 W -4 W 46 U 10/14 MISSISSIPPI 26-23 W -15.5 L 37 O 10/13 at Ole Miss 27-24 W -6.5 L 48.5 O 10/18 OLE MISS 24-20 W -12.5 L 47 U 10/17 S CAROLINA 20-6 W -17.5 L 43.5 U 10/25 at Tennessee 29-9 W -6 W 41 U 10/24 TENNESSEE 12-10 W -14 L 42 U 10/21 at Tennessee 13-16 L +10.5 W 45 U 10/20 TENNESSEE 41-17 W +2 W 55 O 11/1 ARKANSAS ST 35-0 W -24 W 49 U 11/7 LSU 24-15 W -7 W 38 O 10/28 FLA INTERNATIONAL 38-3 W -28.5 W 43 U 11/3 LSU 34-41 L +7 T 48 O 11/8 at LSU 27-21 W -3.5 W 46 O 11/14 at Mississippi St 31-3 W -11 W 44.5 U 11/4 MISSISSIPPI ST 16-24 L -14.5 L 39 O 11/10 at Mississippi St 12-17 L -3.5 L 49 U 11/15 MISSISSIPPI ST 32-7 W -21 W 42.5 U 11/21 CHATTANOOGA 45-0 W - - - 11/11 at LSU 14-28 L +17.5 W 41 O 11/17 LA MONROE 14-21 L -24 L 56.5 U 11/29 AUBURN 36-0 W -15 W 40.5 U 11/27 at Auburn 26-21 W -10 L 47 T 11/18 AUBURN 15-22 L +3 L 40 U 11/24 at Auburn 10-17 L +6 L 45.5 U 12/6 vs. Florida 20-31 L +10 L 54 U 12/5 vs. Florida 32-13 W +5 W 41 O 12/28 vs. Oklahoma St 31-34 L +1.5 L 49 O 12/30 vs. Colorado 30-24 W -4 W 52.5 O 1/2 vs. Utah 17-31 L -9.5 L 46.5 O 1/7 vs. Texas 37-21 W -3.5 W 44.5 O Where: Fayetteville, AR Head Coach: Bobby Petrino, 3rd year (13-12 SU) Conference: SEC 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 7-5 ATS Facility: Razorback Stadium 9/4/10 TENNESSEE TECH 9/11/10 LA MONROE * HOME TEAM is 5-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L6 ARK-LAM matchups 2009 Scoring Differential: +10.9 (#21 of 120) 9/18/10 at Georgia * UNDERDOG is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 GEO-ARK games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +12.5 (#17 of 120) 9/25/10 ALABAMA * ROAD TEAM is on 3-5 SU but 6-2 ATS run in ARK-ALA series 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 52 (#11 of 120) 10/9/10 vs. Texas A&M (Arlington, TX) 2009 Schedule Strength: 40.62 (#20 of 120) 10/16/10 at Auburn * UNDERDOG has swept L4 AUB-ARK games, both SU & ATS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 OLE MISS * FAVORITE is 10-0 SU & 9-1 ATS in ARK-MIS series at ARKANSAS since 92 10/30/10 VANDERBILT * UNDERDOG is 2-0 ATS in L2 ARK-VAN games Points Scored - Allowed 36.0 (9) 25.1 (58) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 427.3 (19) 401.2 (89) 11/6/10 at S Carolina * FAVORITE is 14-2 SU & 13-3 ATS in SC-ARK series since 94 YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.66 (8) 5.76 (84) 11/13/10 UTEP YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.34 (55) 3.96 (65) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.75 (7) 8.00 (101) 11/20/10 at Mississippi St * HOME TEAM is 5-3 SU & 8-0 ATS in L8 MSS-ARK matchups Avg. Time of Possession 28.84 (97) 11/27/10 LSU * L7 games of ARK-LSU series are 6-1 OVER the total Turnover Differential +1.2 (6) 3rd Down Conversion % 34.0% (102) 37.4% (40) Straight Up 10-4 8-5 5-7 8-5 31-21 (60%) * ARKANSAS is 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) at home in November games since 07. The Average Score Overall ATS 5-8 7-5 5-6 7-5 24-24 (50%) was ARKANSAS 40.7, OPPONENT 25.3. Potential spots for 2010: 11/13 - UTEP, 11/27 - LSU at Home ATS 3-4 4-3 3-2 4-2 14-11 (56%) * ARKANSAS is 10-2 OVER the total (+7.8 Units) as home favorites since 07. The Average Score Away/Neutral ATS 2-4 3-2 2-4 3-3 10-13 (43%) was ARKANSAS 44.5, OPPONENT 24.8. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - LA MONROE, 10/23 - vs Conference ATS 4-5 5-3 4-4 5-3 18-15 (55%) OLE MISS, 10/30 - VANDERBILT, 11/13 - UTEP, 11/27 - LSU Non-Conference ATS 1-3 2-2 1-2 2-2 6-9 (40%) * ARKANSAS is on a 4-13 ATS (-10.3 Units) skid at home vs. excellent defensive teams - allowing as Favorite ATS 4-5 5-4 0-2 4-3 13-14 (48%) <=285 YPG The Average Score was ARKANSAS 16.5, OPPONENT 25.2. Potential spots for as Underdog ATS 1-3 2-1 5-4 3-2 11-10 (52%) 2010: 9/25 - ALABAMA, 11/27 - LSU Over-Under 6-6 8-4 7-4 6-6 27-20 (57%) 9/2 USC 14-50 L +7 L 49 O 9/1 TROY 46-26 W -22 L 46.5 O 8/30 W ILLINOIS 28-24 W - - - 9/5 MISSOURI ST 48-10 W - - - 9/9 UTAH ST 20-0 W -29 L 50 U 9/15 at Alabama 38-41 L +3.5 W 46 O 9/6 vs. LA Monroe 28-27 W -14.5 L 49.5 O 9/19 GEORGIA 41-52 L -1.5 L 54.5 O 9/16 at Vanderbilt 21-19 W -5.5 L 41 U 9/22 KENTUCKY 29-42 L -7.5 L 65.5 O 9/20 ALABAMA 14-49 L +9 L 47.5 O 9/26 at Alabama 7-35 L +17.5 L 54.5 U 9/23 ALABAMA 24-23 W -3 L 37.5 O 9/29 NORTH TEXAS 66-7 W -35.5 W 66 O 9/27 at Texas 10-52 L +27 L 60.5 O 10/3 vs. Texas A&M 47-19 W -2 W 67 U 10/7 at Auburn 27-10 W +13.5 W 43 U 10/6 UT-CHATTANOOGA 34-15 W - - - 10/4 FLORIDA 7-38 L +26.5 L 57 U 10/10 AUBURN 44-23 W +2 W 63 O 10/14 SE MISSOURI ST 63-7 W - - - 10/13 AUBURN 7-9 L -3 L 51.5 U 10/11 at Auburn 25-22 W +16 W 41.5 O 10/17 at Florida 20-23 L +24 W 57 U 10/21 MISSISSIPPI 38-3 W -20 W 41 T 10/20 at Ole Miss 44-8 W -5 W 54.5 U 10/18 at Kentucky 20-21 L +7 W 46.5 U 10/24 at Ole Miss 17-30 L +6.5 L 53.5 U 10/28 LA MONROE 44-10 W -32 W 49.5 O 10/27 FLA INTERNATIONAL 58-10 W -40.5 W 58 O 10/25 OLE MISS 21-23 L +6.5 W 55.5 U 10/31 E MICHIGAN 63-27 W -37 L 60 O 11/4 at S Carolina 26-20 W -2.5 W 45.5 O 11/11 TENNESSEE 31-14 W -5 W 47.5 U 11/3 S CAROLINA 48-36 W -5.5 W 50 O 11/1 TULSA 30-23 W +7.5 W 75 U 11/7 S CAROLINA 33-16 W -7.5 W 55.5 U 11/18 at Mississippi St 28-14 W -14.5 L 45 U 11/10 at Tennessee 13-34 L -1.5 L 64.5 U 11/8 at S Carolina 21-34 L +12.5 L 43.5 O 11/14 TROY 56-20 W -14 W 64 O 11/24 LSU 26-31 L +2 L 44.5 O 11/17 MISSISSIPPI ST 45-31 W -13 W 52 O 11/22 at Mississippi St 28-31 L -2.5 L 43 O 11/21 MISSISSIPPI ST 42-21 W -12 W 57.5 O 12/2 vs. Florida 28-38 L +3 L 44.5 O 11/23 at Lsu 50-48 W +13 W 60.5 O 11/28 LSU 31-30 W +7 W 53.5 O 11/28 at LSU 30-33 L +3.5 W 54 O 1/1 vs. Wisconsin 14-17 L -2 L 45.5 U 1/1 vs. Missouri 7-38 L +4 L 68.5 U 1/2 vs. E Carolina 20-17 W -7.5 L 60 U

AUBURN TIGERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 42.17 (#20 of 120) LSU TIGERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 43.75 (#11 of 120) Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 46 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 4 Lettermen Returning: 46 Where: Auburn, AL Head Coach: Gene Chizik, 2nd year (8-5 SU) Conference: SEC 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: Jordan-Hare Stadium 9/4/10 ARKANSAS ST 9/9/10 at Mississippi St * FAVORITE is 8-0 SU & 7-1 ATS in L8 MSS-AUB matchups at MISSISSIPPI ST 2009 Scoring Differential: +5.8 (#43 of 120) 9/18/10 CLEMSON * L2 games in AUB-CLM series at AUBURN went UNDER the total 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +8.0 (#29 of 120) 9/25/10 S CAROLINA * HOME TEAM has covered spread in L2 AUB-SC games 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 44 (#35 of 120) 10/2/10 LA MONROE * AUBURN is 4-0 SU & 3-1 ATS in its L4 games hosting LA MONROE 2009 Schedule Strength: 40.46 (#23 of 120) 10/9/10 at Kentucky * KENTUCKY has covered spread in L2 games vs. AUBURN 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 ARKANSAS * UNDERDOG has swept L4 AUB-ARK games, both SU & ATS 10/23/10 LSU * UNDER the total is 8-2 in L10 games of AUB-LSU series Points Scored - Allowed 33.3 (17) 27.5 (79) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 431.8 (16) 374.4 (68) 10/30/10 at Ole Miss * HOME TEAM is on 4-1 SU & ATS run in MIS-AUB series YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.14 (25) 5.15 (43) 11/6/10 UT-CHATTANOOGA YP Rush Gained - Allowed 5.01 (11) 4.12 (71) 11/13/10 GEORGIA * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 AUB-GEO games YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.85 (27) 6.27 (26) Avg. Time of Possession 28.07 (105) 11/26/10 at Alabama * L5 games of ALA-AUB series at ALABAMA are 5-0 UNDER the total Turnover Differential +0.2 (51) 3rd Down Conversion % 38.5% (68) 34.4% (20) Straight Up 11-2 9-4 5-7 8-5 33-18 (65%) * AUBURN is 6-0 ATS (+6 Units) at home vs. teams with a winning record since 07. The Average Overall ATS 6-7 7-5 2-9 6-6 21-27 (44%) Score was AUBURN 29, OPPONENT 16.7. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - CLEMSON, 9/25 - S at Home ATS 3-5 3-4 2-4 5-2 13-15 (46%) CAROLINA, 10/16 - ARKANSAS, 10/23 - LSU, 11/13 - GEORGIA Away/Neutral ATS 3-2 4-1 0-5 1-4 8-12 (40%) * Over the L2 seasons, AUBURN is 1-9 ATS (-8.9 Units) on the road. The Average Score was vs Conference ATS 4-4 5-3 1-7 4-4 14-18 (44%) AUBURN 16.1, OPPONENT 26.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/9 - at Mississippi St, 10/9 - at Non-Conference ATS 2-3 2-2 1-2 2-2 7-9 (44%) Kentucky, 10/30 - at Ole Miss, 11/26 - at Alabama as Favorite ATS 5-7 3-4 1-5 3-4 12-20 (38%) * AUBURN is on a 16-6 ATS (+9.4 Units) run at home vs. good defensive teams - allowing <=310 as Underdog ATS 1-0 4-1 1-4 3-2 9-7 (56%) YPG The Average Score was AUBURN 23.3, OPPONENT 16.7. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - S Over-Under 6-7 4-8 3-8 7-3 20-26 (43%) CAROLINA, 10/23 - LSU 9/2 WASHINGTON ST 40-14 W -14 W 50.5 O 9/1 KANSAS ST 23-13 W -13.5 L 46 U 8/30 LA MONROE 34-0 W -25.5 W 49 U 9/5 LOUISIANA TECH 37-13 W -13.5 W 46 O 9/9 at Mississippi St 34-0 W -21.5 W 38 U 9/8 S FLORIDA 23-26 L -7 L 38.5 O 9/6 SOUTHERN MISS 27-13 W -19.5 L 48.5 U 9/12 MISSISSIPPI ST 49-24 W -15.5 W 47 O 9/16 LSU 7-3 W -3.5 W 41.5 U 9/15 MISSISSIPPI ST 14-19 L -12 L 41.5 U 9/13 at Mississippi St 3-2 W -10 L 38.5 U 9/19 W VIRGINIA 41-30 W -7 W 54.5 O 9/23 BUFFALO 38-7 W -41.5 L 47.5 U 9/22 NEW MEXICO ST 55-20 W -17 W 55.5 O 9/20 LSU 21-26 L +2 L 37.5 O 9/26 BALL ST 54-30 W -30.5 L 54.5 O 9/28 at S Carolina 24-17 W -14 L 38 O 9/29 at Florida 20-17 W +17 W 51.5 U 9/27 TENNESSEE 14-12 W -6 L 40.5 U 10/3 at Tennessee 26-22 W +2.5 W 49 U 10/7 ARKANSAS 10-27 L -13.5 L 43 U 10/6 VANDERBILT 35-7 W -7.5 W 43.5 U 10/4 at Vanderbilt 13-14 L -3.5 L 38.5 U 10/10 at Arkansas 23-44 L -2 L 63 O 10/14 FLORIDA 27-17 W +2 W 39.5 O 10/13 at Arkansas 9-7 W +3 W 51.5 U 10/11 ARKANSAS 22-25 L -16 L 41.5 O 10/17 KENTUCKY 14-21 L -13.5 L 56.5 U 10/21 TULANE 38-13 W -28 L 50 O 10/20 at Lsu 24-30 L +10.5 W 41.5 O 10/23 at W Virginia 17-34 L +3.5 L 40 O 10/24 at LSU 10-31 L +7.5 L 49 U 10/28 at Mississippi 23-17 W -18 L 39.5 O 10/27 OLE MISS 17-3 W -18 L 48 U 11/1 at Ole Miss 7-17 L +6.5 L 42.5 U 10/31 OLE MISS 33-20 W +6.5 W 51 O 11/4 ARKANSAS ST 27-0 W -34.5 L 43 U 11/3 TENNESSEE TECH 35-3 W - - - 11/8 TENN-MARTIN 37-20 W - - - 11/7 FURMAN 63-31 W -37.5 L - 11/11 GEORGIA 15-37 L -11.5 L 39.5 O 11/10 at Georgia 20-45 L +2.5 L 44.5 O 11/15 GEORGIA 13-17 L +8.5 W 45 U 11/14 at Georgia 24-31 L +4 L 55 T 11/18 at Alabama 22-15 W -3 W 40 U 11/24 ALABAMA 17-10 W -6 W 45.5 U 11/29 at Alabama 0-36 L +15 L 40.5 U 11/27 ALABAMA 21-26 L +10 W 47 T 1/1 vs. Nebraska 17-14 W -2 W 46.5 U 12/31 vs. Clemson 23-20 W +2 W 44 U 1/1 vs. Northwestern 38-35 W -9 L 54.5 O Where: Baton Rouge, LA Head Coach: Les Miles, 6th year (51-14 SU) Conference: SEC 2009 RECORD: 9-4 SU, 5-7-1 ATS Facility: Tiger Stadium 9/4/10 vs. N Carolina (Atlanta, GA) 9/11/10 at Vanderbilt * L2 games in VAN-LSU series went UNDER the total 2009 Scoring Differential: +8.6 (#28 of 120) 9/18/10 MISSISSIPPI ST * LSU is 17-1 SU & 14-4 ATS vs. MISSISSIPPI ST since 92 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +13.1 (#16 of 120) 9/25/10 W VIRGINIA 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 51 (#13 of 120) 10/2/10 TENNESSEE * UNDERDOG is 3-4 SU but 4-0 ATS in L7 LSU-TEN matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 42.46 (#4 of 120) 10/9/10 at Florida * FLA-LSU series has gone 11-3 UNDER the total since 95 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 MCNEESE ST 10/23/10 at Auburn * UNDER the total is 8-2 in L10 games of AUB-LSU series Points Scored - Allowed 24.8 (76) 16.2 (11) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 304.5 (112) 327.6 (26) 11/6/10 ALABAMA * ROAD TEAM is 12-6 SU & 13-3 ATS in LSU-ALA series since 92 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.13 (89) 4.68 (14) 11/13/10 LA MONROE YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.67 (85) 3.51 (31) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.03 (68) 6.07 (19) 11/20/10 OLE MISS * UNDERDOG is 5-8 SU but 11-2 ATS in LSU-MIS series since 97 Avg. Time of Possession 27.84 (107) 11/27/10 at Arkansas * L7 games of ARK-LSU series are 6-1 OVER the total Turnover Differential +0.3 (35) 3rd Down Conversion % 38.5% (66) 36.8% (36) Straight Up 11-2 12-2 8-5 9-4 40-13 (75%) * LSU is on a 7-28 ATS (-23.8 Units) skid at home in November games The Average Score was Overall ATS 7-5 5-7 3-9 5-7 20-28 (42%) LSU 26.4, OPPONENT 20.8. Potential spots for 2010: 11/6 - ALABAMA, 11/13 - LA MONROE, at Home ATS 5-3 3-4 0-7 3-3 11-17 (39%) 11/20 - OLE MISS Away/Neutral ATS 2-2 2-3 3-2 2-4 9-11 (45%) * LSU is 1-10 ATS (-10 Units) at home in conference games since 07. The Average Score was LSU vs Conference ATS 2-5 1-6 2-6 3-4 8-21 (28%) 27.5, OPPONENT 25.8. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - MISSISSIPPI ST, 10/2 - TENNESSEE, Non-Conference ATS 5-0 4-1 1-3 2-3 12-7 (63%) 11/6 - ALABAMA, 11/20 - OLE MISS as Favorite ATS 7-3 5-7 2-6 3-5 17-21 (45%) * LSU is 3-14 ATS (-12.4 Units) vesus good rushing teams - averaging >=4.75 YPR since 07. The as Underdog ATS 0-2 0-0 1-3 2-2 3-7 (30%) Average Score was LSU 27.4, OPPONENT 26.7. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - MISSISSIPPI Over-Under 7-6 10-4 7-5 5-8 29-23 (56%) ST, 9/25 - W VIRGINIA, 10/9 - at Florida, 10/23 - at Auburn, 11/6 - ALABAMA, 11/20 - OLE MISS 9/2 LA LAFAYETTE 45-3 W -30 W 47 O 8/30 at Mississippi St 45-0 W -19.5 W 44 O 8/30 APPALACHIAN ST 41-13 W - - - 9/5 at Washington 31-23 W -17.5 L 52.5 O 9/9 ARIZONA 45-3 W -17 W 42.5 O 9/8 VIRGINIA TECH 48-7 W -11 W 38 O 9/13 NORTH TEXAS 41-3 W -44.5 L 61 U 9/12 VANDERBILT 23-9 W -14 T 46.5 U 9/16 at Auburn 3-7 L +3.5 L 41.5 U 9/15 MIDDLE TENN ST 44-0 W -41.5 W 56.5 U 9/20 at Auburn 26-21 W -2 W 37.5 O 9/19 LA LAFAYETTE 31-3 W -27 W 52.5 U 9/23 TULANE 49-7 W -36.5 W 49 O 9/22 S CAROLINA 28-16 W -17 L 45.5 U 9/27 MISSISSIPPI ST 34-24 W -23.5 L 42.5 O 9/26 at Mississippi St 30-26 W -12 L 45 O 9/30 MISSISSIPPI ST 48-17 W -33 L 41.5 O 9/29 at Tulane 34-9 W -41 L 52.5 U 10/11 at Florida 21-51 L +7 L 48 O 10/3 at Georgia 20-13 W +3.5 W 50.5 U 10/7 at Florida 10-23 L 0 L 42.5 U 10/6 FLORIDA 28-24 W -7.5 L 47 O 10/18 at S Carolina 24-17 W -1 W 43 U 10/10 FLORIDA 3-13 L +9.5 L 46 U 10/14 KENTUCKY 49-0 W -25.5 W 52.5 U 10/13 at Kentucky 37-43 L -10 L 54 O 10/25 GEORGIA 38-52 L +2 L 49 O 10/24 AUBURN 31-10 W -7.5 W 49 U 10/20 AUBURN 30-24 W -10.5 L 41.5 O 10/21 FRESNO ST 38-6 W -31 W 50 U 11/1 TULANE 35-10 W -30.5 L 53.5 U 10/31 TULANE 42-0 W -37 W 45.5 U 11/3 at Alabama 41-34 W -7 T 48 O 11/4 at Tennessee 28-24 W -4 T 44 O 11/10 LOUISIANA TECH 58-10 W -35.5 W 54.5 O 11/8 ALABAMA 21-27 L +3.5 L 46 O 11/7 at Alabama 15-24 L +7 L 38 O 11/11 ALABAMA 28-14 W -17.5 L 41 O 11/17 at Ole Miss 41-24 W -20 L 52.5 O 11/15 TROY 40-31 W -15.5 L 55 O 11/14 LOUISIANA TECH 24-16 W -22.5 L 47 U 11/18 MISSISSIPPI 23-20 W -27 L 43.5 U 11/23 ARKANSAS 48-50 L -13 L 60.5 O 11/22 OLE MISS 13-31 L -3 L 54.5 U 11/21 at Ole Miss 23-25 L +6 W 45 O 11/24 at Arkansas 31-26 W -2 W 44.5 O 12/1 vs. Tennessee 21-14 W -7 T 58 U 11/28 at Arkansas 30-31 L -7 L 53.5 O 11/28 ARKANSAS 33-30 W -3.5 L 54 O 1/3 vs. Notre Dame 41-14 W -9 W 56 U 1/7 vs. Ohio St 38-24 W -3.5 W 46.5 O 12/31 vs. Georgia Tech 38-3 W +4 W 53 U 1/1 vs. Penn St 17-19 L -2 L 40 U 68 WWW.STATFOX.COM

MISSISSIPPI STATE BULLDOGS 2010 Schedule Strength: 44.75 (#6 of 120) MISSISSIPPI REBELS 2010 Schedule Strength: 38.58 (#49 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 69 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 50 Offense: Pro Set - Starters Returning: 3 Defense: Multiple 4-3 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 47 Where: Starkville, MS Head Coach: Dan Mullen, 2nd year (5-7 SU) Conference: SEC 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 6-5 ATS Facility: Davis-Wade Stadium 9/4/10 MEMPHIS * MISSISSIPPI ST is on 4-game SU & ATS winning streak vs. MEMPHIS 9/9/10 AUBURN * FAVORITE is 8-0 SU & 7-1 ATS in L8 MSS-AUB matchups at MISSISSIPPI ST 2009 Scoring Differential: -1.2 (#76 of 120) 9/18/10 at LSU * LSU is 17-1 SU & 14-4 ATS vs. MISSISSIPPI ST since 92 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +4.6 (#48 of 120) 9/25/10 GEORGIA * MISSISSIPPI ST is 0-2 SU but 2-0 ATS in its L2 games vs. GEORGIA 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 41 (#48 of 120) 10/2/10 ALCORN ST 2009 Schedule Strength: 43.17 (#2 of 120) 10/9/10 at Houston * HOUSTON has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. MISSISSIPPI ST 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at Florida * HOME TEAM is on 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS run in FLA-MSS series 10/23/10 UAB * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 MSS-UAB games Points Scored - Allowed 25.6 (72) 26.8 (71) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 371.9 (65) 366.0 (58) 10/30/10 KENTUCKY * ROAD TEAM has won SU & ATS in four straight MSS-KEN games YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.44 (68) 5.67 (77) 11/13/10 at Alabama * ALA-MSS series has gone 8-2 UNDER the total since 95 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.92 (15) 3.96 (66) 11/20/10 ARKANSAS * HOME TEAM is 5-3 SU & 8-0 ATS in L8 MSS-ARK matchups YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.51 (93) 7.95 (99) Avg. Time of Possession 31.78 (18) 11/27/10 at Ole Miss * FAVORITE is 8-1 SU & 7-1 ATS in L9 MIS-MSS matchups at OLE MISS Turnover Differential -0.4 (87) 3rd Down Conversion % 32.2% (107) 37.8% (46) Straight Up 3-9 8-5 4-8 5-7 20-29 (41%) * MISSISSIPPI ST is on a 7-19 ATS (-13.9 Units) skid at home in non-conference games The Overall ATS 5-5 6-6 4-7 6-5 21-23 (48%) Average Score was MISSISSIPPI ST 31.9, OPPONENT 19.2. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - at Home ATS 1-5 1-4 3-2 3-3 8-14 (36%) MEMPHIS, 10/9 - HOUSTON, 10/23 - UAB Away/Neutral ATS 4-0 5-2 1-5 3-2 13-9 (59%) * MISSISSIPPI STATE is on a 3-7 ATS skid as a road underdog. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 at vs Conference ATS 4-3 3-5 4-4 5-3 16-15 (52%) LSU, 10/16 - at Florida, 11/13 - at Alabama, 11/27 -OLE MISS Non-Conference ATS 1-2 3-1 0-3 1-2 5-8 (38%) * MISSISSIPPI ST is on a 1-8 ATS (-7.8 Units) skid vs. awful passing defenses - allowing 275 or as Favorite ATS 0-1 1-2 0-3 1-1 2-7 (22%) more PYPG The Average Score was MISSISSIPPI ST 16.2, OPPONENT 33.2. Potential spots for as Underdog ATS 5-4 5-4 4-4 5-4 19-16 (54%) 2010: 9/4 - MEMPHIS, 10/23 - UAB Over-Under 6-5 5-7 4-7 6-5 21-24 (47%) 8/31 S CAROLINA 0-15 L +6 L 40.5 U 8/30 LSU 0-45 L +19.5 L 44 O 8/30 at Louisiana Tech 14-22 L -7 L 44 U 9/5 JACKSON ST 45-7 W - - - 9/9 AUBURN 0-34 L +21.5 L 38 U 9/8 at Tulane 38-17 W -5.5 W 46.5 O 9/6 SE LOUISIANA 34-10 W - - - 9/12 at Auburn 24-49 L +15.5 L 47 O 9/16 TULANE 29-32 L -12 L 38 O 9/15 at Auburn 19-14 W +12 W 41.5 U 9/13 AUBURN 2-3 L +10 W 38.5 U 9/19 at Vanderbilt 15-3 W +8.5 W 45 U 9/23 at UAB 16-10 W +9 W 37.5 U 9/22 GARDNER WEBB 31-9 W - - - 9/20 at Georgia Tech 7-38 L +7 L 38 O 9/26 LSU 26-30 L +12 W 45 O 9/30 at LSU 17-48 L +33 W 41.5 O 9/29 at S Carolina 21-38 L +14 L 42.5 O 9/27 at LSU 24-34 L +23.5 W 42.5 O 10/3 GEORGIA TECH 31-42 L +5.5 L 48 O 10/7 W VIRGINIA 14-42 L +20.5 L 47 O 10/6 UAB 30-13 W -17.5 L 51 U 10/11 VANDERBILT 17-14 W +1 W 38 U 10/10 HOUSTON 24-31 L -3 L 68 U 10/14 JACKSONVILLE ST 35-3 W - - - 10/13 TENNESSEE 21-33 L +7 L 51 O 10/18 at Tennessee 3-34 L +9.5 L 38 U 10/17 at Middle Tenn St 27-6 W -5 W 52.5 U 10/21 at Georgia 24-27 L +16.5 W 39 O 10/20 at W Virginia 13-38 L +26 W 57.5 U 10/25 MIDDLE TENN ST 31-22 W -11.5 L 43 O 10/24 FLORIDA 19-29 L +22.5 W 50 U 10/28 KENTUCKY 31-34 L 0 L 48.5 O 10/27 at Kentucky 31-14 W +13 W 60.5 U 11/1 KENTUCKY 13-14 L -1.5 L 38.5 U 10/31 at Kentucky 31-24 W +3.5 W 47.5 O 11/4 at Alabama 24-16 W +14.5 W 39 O 11/10 ALABAMA 17-12 W +3.5 W 49 U 11/15 at Alabama 7-32 L +21 L 42.5 U 11/14 ALABAMA 3-31 L +11 L 44.5 U 11/18 ARKANSAS 14-28 L +14.5 W 45 U 11/17 at Arkansas 31-45 L +13 L 52 O 11/22 ARKANSAS 31-28 W +2.5 W 43 O 11/21 at Arkansas 21-42 L +12 L 57.5 O 11/25 at Mississippi 17-20 L +3 T 38.5 U 11/23 OLE MISS 17-14 W -4.5 L 49 U 11/28 at Ole Miss 0-45 L +18 L 47.5 U 11/28 OLE MISS 41-27 W +7.5 W 48 O 12/29 vs. Ucf 10-3 W +3 W 52.5 U Where: Oxford, MS Head Coach: Houston Nutt, 3rd year (18-8 SU) Conference: SEC 2009 RECORD: 9-4 SU, 7-5 ATS Facility: Vaught-Hemingway Stadium 9/4/10 JACKSONVILLE ST 9/11/10 at Tulane * ROAD TEAM is 2-3 SU but 4-1 ATS in L5 TUL-MIS matchups 2009 Scoring Differential: +11.8 (#19 of 120) 9/18/10 VANDERBILT * UNDERDOG is on 6-0 ATS run in L6 MIS-VAN matchups at OLE MISS 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +9.3 (#27 of 120) 9/25/10 FRESNO ST 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 48 (#20 of 120) 10/2/10 KENTUCKY * FAVORITE is 4-0 SU & 3-1 ATS in L3 MIS-KEN games 2009 Schedule Strength: 35.62 (#56 of 120) 10/16/10 at Alabama * HOME TEAM is on 7-3 SU & ATS run in ALA-MIS series 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Arkansas * FAVORITE is 10-0 SU & 9-1 ATS in ARK-MIS series at ARKANSAS since 92 10/30/10 AUBURN * HOME TEAM is on 4-1 SU & ATS run in MIS-AUB series Points Scored - Allowed 29.5 (39) 17.7 (15) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 403.5 (41) 315.8 (20) 11/6/10 LA LAFAYETTE YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.97 (31) 4.74 (19) 11/13/10 at Tennessee * UNDERDOG is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 TEN-MIS games at TENNESSEE YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.78 (22) 3.92 (56) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.54 (40) 5.71 (10) 11/20/10 at LSU * UNDERDOG is 5-8 SU but 11-2 ATS in LSU-MIS series since 97 Avg. Time of Possession 29.83 (65) 11/27/10 MISSISSIPPI ST * FAVORITE is 8-1 SU & 7-1 ATS in L9 MIS-MSS matchups at OLE MISS Turnover Differential -0.5 (102) 3rd Down Conversion % 40.9% (47) 31.9% (13) Straight Up 4-8 3-9 9-4 9-4 25-25 (50%) * Over the L2 seasons, OLE MISS is 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) in non-conference games. The Average Overall ATS 5-4 6-5 9-3 7-5 27-17 (61%) Score was OLE MISS 41.3, OPPONENT 15.2. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at Tulane, 9/25 - at Home ATS 3-1 4-2 4-2 4-2 15-7 (68%) FRESNO ST, 11/6 - LA LAFAYETTE Away/Neutral ATS 2-3 2-3 5-1 3-3 12-10 (55%) * Over the L2 seasons, OLE MISS is 9-1 UNDER the total (+7.9 Units) revenging a loss against vs Conference ATS 5-2 5-3 5-3 3-5 18-13 (58%) opponent. The Average Score was OLE MISS 22, OPPONENT 16.3. Potential spots for 2010: Non-Conference ATS 0-2 1-2 4-0 4-0 9-4 (69%) 10/16 - at Alabama, 10/30 - AUBURN, 11/27 - MISSISSIPPI ST as Favorite ATS 0-0 1-1 2-3 6-4 9-8 (53%) * OLE MISS is on a 18-6 ATS (+11.4 Units) run on the road vs. good passing teams with a completion as Underdog ATS 5-4 5-4 7-0 0-1 17-9 (65%) pct. of 58% or better. The Average Score was OLE MISS 18.8, OPPONENT 23.6. Potential spots Over-Under 3-7 4-7 6-6 6-5 19-25 (43%) for 2010: 9/11 - at Tulane, 10/16 - at Alabama, 11/13 - at Tennessee, 11/20 - at LSU 9/3 MEMPHIS 28-25 W -3 T 40 O 9/1 at Memphis 23-21 W -2.5 L 46 U 8/30 MEMPHIS 41-24 W -9 W 53 O 9/6 at Memphis 45-14 W -17.5 W 55 O 9/9 at Missouri 7-34 L +10.5 L 47 U 9/8 MISSOURI 25-38 L +6.5 L 54 O 9/6 at Wake Forest 28-30 L +7 W 45 O 9/19 SE LOUISIANA 52-6 W -41 W - 9/16 at Kentucky 14-31 L +6 L 48 U 9/15 at Vanderbilt 17-31 L +6.5 L 48.5 U 9/13 SAMFORD 34-10 W - - - 9/24 at S Carolina 10-16 L -4 L 51.5 U 9/23 WAKE FOREST 3-27 L +1 L 37.5 U 9/22 FLORIDA 24-30 L +24 W 57.5 U 9/20 VANDERBILT 17-23 L -6.5 L 49 U 10/3 at Vanderbilt 23-7 W -10 W 43.5 U 9/30 GEORGIA 9-14 L +17.5 W 37 U 9/29 at Georgia 17-45 L +15.5 L 49 O 9/27 at Florida 31-30 W +22.5 W 49.5 O 10/10 ALABAMA 3-22 L +4 L 46 U 10/7 VANDERBILT 17-10 W +1 W 40 U 10/6 LOUISIANA TECH 24-0 W -12 W 53 U 10/4 S CAROLINA 24-31 L -1.5 L 42 O 10/17 UAB 48-13 W -23 W 55 O 10/14 at Alabama 23-26 L +15.5 W 37 O 10/13 ALABAMA 24-27 L +6.5 W 48.5 O 10/18 at Alabama 20-24 L +12.5 W 47 U 10/24 ARKANSAS 30-17 W -6.5 W 53.5 U 10/21 at Arkansas 3-38 L +20 L 41 T 10/20 ARKANSAS 8-44 L +5 L 54.5 U 10/25 at Arkansas 23-21 W -6.5 L 55.5 U 10/31 at Auburn 20-33 L -6.5 L 51 O 10/28 AUBURN 17-23 L +18 W 39.5 O 10/27 at Auburn 3-17 L +18 W 48 U 11/1 AUBURN 17-7 W -6.5 W 42.5 U 11/7 N ARIZONA 38-14 W -35 L - 11/4 NORTHWESTERN ST 27-7 W - - - 11/3 NORTHWESTERN ST 38-31 W - - - 11/15 LA MONROE 59-0 W -24 W 57 O 11/14 TENNESSEE 42-17 W -5.5 W 47.5 O 11/18 at LSU 20-23 L +27 W 43.5 U 11/17 LSU 24-41 L +20 W 52.5 O 11/22 at LSU 31-13 W +3 W 54.5 U 11/21 LSU 25-23 W -6 L 45 O 11/25 MISSISSIPPI ST 20-17 W -3 T 38.5 U 11/23 at Mississippi St 14-17 L +4.5 W 49 U 11/28 MISSISSIPPI ST 45-0 W -18 W 47.5 U 11/28 at Mississippi St 27-41 L -7.5 L 48 O 1/2 vs. Texas Tech 47-34 W +4 W 66 O 1/2 vs. Oklahoma St 21-7 W -3.5 W 51 U

BIG 12 BIG 12 Preview The Big 12 Conference has not only gotten used to its share of success on the college football gridiron, it has become a fixture at the top of the NFL draft board each spring. Such was the case again this offseason, as the league was raided by the pro teams for star after star, round after round. So while you won t be seeing names like Ndumkong Suh, Sam Bradford, Gerald McCoy, Russell Okung, and Colt McCoy again this fall on their respective campuses, surely a new set of studs are ready to emerge. There are already candidates. In the North Division, Nebraska is loaded on both sides of the ball and goes into the season as the favorite to fill that spot in the league title game. Missouri could be a threat though with Blaine Gibbert under center. Iowa State, which beat Nebraska a year ago, seems to be on the way up, and Colorado hopes to be, boasting a wealth of returning experience. The biggest question marks are in the state of Kansas, where the Jayhawks begin a new under Turner Gill, and the Wildcats replace tons of production. In the South, the title should come down to Oklahoma and Texas once again, despite the loss of their star quarterbacks. Speaking of which, how about studs Robert Griffin of Baylor, Jerrod Johnson of Texas A&M, and Taylor Potts of Texas Tech? All three teams should score plenty of points, but the one who stops opponents best will be the biggest threat to the Big two. Oklahoma State has gotten used to success, but this could be a rebuilding year in Stillwater. NORTH DIVISION COLORADO BUFFALOES It s pretty safe to say that this is probably a lame-duck coaching year for Dan Hawkins and his staff, unless they pull off some kind of miracle and by that we mean win the Big 12 championship Once again it s another season of Who s playing quarterback? It s between Hawkins son, Cody, who threw for 1,277 yards, 10 touchdowns and 11 interceptions and Tyler Hansen (129 of 231 pass attempts, 1,440 yards, eight touchdowns, seven interceptions), who took over the starting job from Hawkins midway through last season and was expected to be the starter coming into spring drills. The problem is, Colorado is no further along offensively with either quarterback. The Buffaloes finished last in the Big 12 in total offense in each of the past two seasons. Ironically, wide receiver is expected to be one of the team s biggest strengths and the entire starting line returns On defense, seven total starts return, including thee on the line, and three of the four starters on the line return, two of the three starters at linebacker have graduated, and three in the backfield. Hawkins likes 2009 NORTH STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Nebraska 10-4-0 0.714 352 146 6-3-0 5-2-0 5-2-0 9-5-0 64.3% 3-11-0 Missouri 8-5-0 0.615 377 330 4-4-0 3-3-0 5-2-0 5-8-0 38.5% 4-8-0 Kansas State 6-6-0 0.500 276 280 4-4-0 5-1-0 1-5-0 7-4-0 63.6% 3-7-0 Iowa State 7-6-0 0.538 267 284 3-5-0 4-2-0 3-4-0 8-4-0 66.7% 3-9-0 Colorado 3-9-0 0.250 267 346 2-6-0 3-3-0 0-6-0 7-5-0 58.3% 7-5-0 Kansas 5-7-0 0.417 353 341 1-7-0 4-2-0 1-5-0 3-8-0 27.3% 7-4-0 2009 SOUTH STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Texas 13-0-0 1.000 529 197 9-0-0 6-0-0 7-0-0 5-7-1 41.7% 6-7-0 Oklahoma State 9-4-0 0.692 369 282 6-2-0 6-2-0 3-2-0 6-6-1 50.0% 4-8-0 Texas Tech 9-4-0 0.692 481 292 5-3-0 6-1-0 3-3-0 7-5-0 58.3% 5-7-0 Oklahoma 8-5-0 0.615 404 189 5-3-0 6-0-0 2-5-0 5-7-1 41.7% 3-9-0 Texas A&M 6-7-0 0.462 427 436 3-5-0 5-2-0 1-5-0 6-6-1 50.0% 8-5-0 Baylor 4-8-0 0.333 249 327 1-7-0 2-4-0 2-4-0 6-6-0 50.0% 3-8-0 to note that Colorado s last three losses came by a total of 18 points, meaning that one mistake per game a missed assignment, a missed block, a turnover was the difference between winning and losing. If that s true, there will be less mistakes on defense than on offense, which should help Colorado s bottom line The schedule isn t nearly as brutal as it has been in the past, and this team has both talent and experience compared to recent years. Expect an improved Colorado team with bowl potential. IOWA STATE CYCLONES In his first meeting with his new team in January of 2009, Iowa State head coach Paul Rhoads told his Cyclones they were going to win a bowl game, despite the fact they lost 10 games in 08 and hadn t been to a bowl game since 05. Damned if he didn t pull it off. The Cyclones went 7-6, including a 14-13 win over Minnesota in the Insight Bowl. Iowa State tied Washington as the mostimproved BCS team nationally with five more wins than the previous season. The seminal moment of the season was a 9-7 victory at Nebraska, accomplished despite the fact Iowa State was without starting quarterback Austen Arnaud and running back Alexander Robinson We ll take a wild guess that with Arnaud and Robinson both returning, the Cyclones will be even better. But that s all relative, of course. Even with those two, Iowa State was dead last in the Big 12 in scoring at 20.5 PPG. Four lineman return from a unit that gave up just 16 quarterback sacks, good for third in the conference and 21st nationally ISU made huge strides on defense under coordinator Wally Burnham. The Cyclones tied for the second-best defensive performance nationally in the red zone, and allowed 21.8 PPG, ranking 34th nationally. Last year s total was a seismic improvement over 2008, when the Cyclones ranked 110th. Only four starters return on defense Sorry guys, but your success last year set the precedent. Anything less than a repeat of a winning record and a bowl bid would be considered unsuccessful. It will be tough, of course. Eight bowl teams from last season are on the slate, including a four-week stretch in which Iowa State faces Texas Tech, Utah, Oklahoma and Texas. 70 WWW.STATFOX.COM

KANSAS JAYHAWKS It s a new era at Kansas, as former Nebraska star turned Buffalo coach Turner Gill is now calling the shots in Lawrence. Mark Mangino was forced out in a power play after allegations of his verbal abuse of players came to light, so this will certainly be a complete change of pace for the Jayhawks. At least Gill has surrounded himself with experience. Both coordinators are former head coaches Chuck Long (OC) and Carl Torbush (DC) Quarterback Todd Reesing is gone, as is wide receiver Dez Briscoe. That pretty much sums up the state of the offense which, despite all the craziness, was still the 25th-best attack unit in the country. The passing attack was seventh-best. Reesing, who started 38 consecutive games for Kansas, was a big reason for that. The only player on this year s roster to have played quarterback in a game for the Jayhawks is sophomore Kale Pick, who will be among a list of players competing for the starting spot. Whoever eventually mans the leading roles at QB and running back, Kansas returns all five of its regular starters on the line While Kansas lost four dependable defensive players, the cupboard is not bare. Seven starters return to a unit that allowed an uncharacteristic 35.9 PPG in Big 12 play Kansas might surprise some people. Look at the schedule it plays to the Jayhawks advantage. A 6-1 start is possible, but it s hard to forget Kansas started 5-0 last year before closing with seven straight losses. KANSAS STATE WILDCATS Not a bad return to coaching for Bill Snyder, who came out of retirement after the failed Ron Prince experiment and led the Wildcats to a 6-6 mark. Kansas State was right in it until the end, losing the North Division title to Nebraska on the final day of the regular season Nothing was solved in spring ball in terms of who the quarterback will be to replace Grant Gregory. A year ago, Collin Klein lost out in the battle to be the starter. Carson Coffman started the opener but eventually gave way to Gregory. With those two taking snaps, Klein was moved to wide receiver. Now the 6-3, 235-pound sophomore is back trying to again win the job, one of four vying for the spot. KSU s fortunes will rise and fall with Doak Walker and All-America candidate, running back Daniel Thomas, who finished 2009 as the Big 12 s leader in rushing yards, attempts and yards per game Defensively, the Wildcats showed slight improvement from the 2008 season to the 09 campaign. They went from 10th in the conference to seventh in points allowed, 11th to fifth in rushing yards per game and eighth to seventh in pass defense. With two key starters from the line gone, as well as two linebackers, the secondary, returning virtually intact, will be the strength The Wildcats did themselves no favors with this year s schedule, and it s not fun to break in a new quarterback, either, when three of your first five games are UCLA, Iowa State and Nebraska. Snyder didn t come back to churn out.500 records, but it s looking a lot like that s what the 2010 campaign is shaping up to be. MISSOURI TIGERS It was going to be difficult to replace Chase Daniel and the rest of the highflying offense that put 22 wins on the board in 2007 and 08. Yet, somehow, head coach Gary Pinkel made it all work. It was tough. The Tigers got off to a 0-3 start in the Big 12, but quarterback Blaine Gabbert came into his own and Missouri finished 8-5 after a bowl game loss to Navy With Gabbert back, the offense should be potent and he can spread the wealth. Last year, he completed 226 of 445 pass attempts for 3,593 yards, 24 touchdowns and nine interceptions. Finding a replacement for Danario Alexander, who led the nation in receiving yards, will be a challenge. The Tigers want a more a productive running game and the line is expected to be fairly solid On defense, the Tigers have a terrific end duo in sophomore Aldon Smith and junior Jacquies Smith but replacing the playmaking and leadership of linebacker Sean Weatherspoon, a three-time All-Big 12 selection, will go a long way in determining how well the defense performs. The secondary gave up 251.5 yards per game in the air, making the Tigers 11th out of 12 teams in the conference in pass defense but should be much improved Pinkel s program is averaging nine wins per year since 2005 and the Tigers have to be considered a darkhorse in the Big 12 North. Unfortunately, they get all of their toughest opponents except one Oklahoma on the road, including a key division game against Nebraska. NEBRASKA CORNHUSKERS Nebraska is back, baby. When last we left the Cornhuskers, they were thumping Arizona in the Holiday Bowl by 33 points which, all things considered, was a pretty impressive performance. Why? Because Nebraska could have gone into the game feeling rightfully ripped off that it wasn t Big 12 champions and playing in a BCS game. Only a generous timekeeper kept the Cornhuskers from taking a 12-10 win against Texas and turning it into a 13-12 loss Can it get any better? Nebraska returns four starters on the line, in addition to starters at quarterback, fullback, I-back, both wide receiver spots, and a pair of veteran tight ends. Zac Lee is back under center after starting 12 games and senior Roy Helu Jr. ranked among the Big 12 s best running backs for the second straight year and earned second-team all-league honors. The Cornhuskers did pedestrian work overall on offense 11th in total offense in the conference, 11th in passing offense, sixth in rushing offense, and eighth in scoring offense at 25.1 PPG, but should be more prolific...nebraska lost five BIG 12 WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 71

senior starters from last year s Blackshirt unit, including All-American Ndamukong Suh, but despite those losses, Nebraska expects to again field one of the nation s top stop units with the return of nine players who started at least five games last season. Nebraska led the Big 12 in scoring defense at just 10.4 PPG This is going to be a season where the Cornhuskers should return to national prominence and, perhaps, play for the national title. They will have a tough road getting there. If the offense can come around and show some explosiveness then you re looking at a national championship contender. SOUTH DIVISION BAYLOR BEARS Every year we expect Baylor to turn the corner toward a.500 record and a bowl bid, and every year we get disappointed. Now, to be fair, last year was plagued by injury, and we re cautiously optimistic that good things are indeed about to come, especially with several returning starters and another strong recruiting year (rated 39th nationally by Rivals.com) Robert Griffin III, affectionately known around Waco as RG3, burst on the national scene in 08, throwing for 19 touchdowns against just three interceptions, and rushing for 61.3 yards a game. Then he blew out a knee in the third game of the 09 season and was done. Now back, head coach Art Briles knows he has great depth. Problem is, Baylor lost its top wideouts and its starting tight end, so whom to throw to could be an issue There s much work to be done on defense. This is a unit that gave up 30 or more points six times. You simply can t expect to give up that many points per game and still contend, even with a healthy Griffin presumably piling up points with the offense. Briles will have to revamp his front four in order to have a successful season Here we go again, hoping against hope and rooting for this perennially downtrodden program to inch close to.500 or, surprise, surprise, earn a bowl bid. Let s start by assuming Griffin returns to form after rehabbing his knee. Frankly, there s no reason why Baylor shouldn t be 5-3 through its first eight games. That leaves the Bears needing a 1-3 mark in their final four games, difficult ones, to secure a bowl bid. OKLAHOMA SOONERS Oklahoma is still Oklahoma. Let s not forget that. A devastating season of injuries took place, and an 8-5 record and a trip to the Sun Bowl where the Sooners beat Stanford, 31-27 is most certainly not what fans have come to expect and enjoy under head coach Bob Stoops. But let s keep it all in perspective. This was a team that lost a Heisman Trophy-winning quarterback in the first game of the season (Sam Bradford), an All-America tight end (Jermaine Gresham), and a variety of players on defense, yet still managed to win eight times. And, of the five losses, four came by a total of 12 points Of the 11 starters on offense in the season opener, only five made it to the finale. Quarterback Landry Jones responded well for a freshman. He threw for 3,198 yards and 26 touchdowns, and unless the sophomore jinx strikes he ll be even better. He has a lot of help in junior wide receiver Ryan Broyles, who led the Sooners with 86 receptions for 1,120 yards and 15 touchdowns and senior running back DeMarco Murray, another dangerous option. The line could use some patch jobs, but it will be solid by the time Big 12 play rolls around There were big losses from what was a good stop unit, which finished second in the Big 12 in scoring and third in total defense. The concerns are more up front than in the secondary...the schedule is daunting, not difficult. Florida State and Air Force come to Norman, and Oklahoma travels to Cincinnati. As always, the game against Texas should determine the South Division champion. Barring all those injuries, the Sooners are a conference title contender again. OKLAHOMA STATE COWBOYS Half-empty or half-full? It s hard to look at the Oklahoma State season and decide whether or not it was successful. On one hand, the Cowboys went 9-4 and head coach Mike Gundy joined his college coach Pat Jones as the only Cowboy head coaches to take the school to four bowl games. On the other hand, the Cowboys had a chance to go to a BCS game if they won their regularseason finale against a depleted Oklahoma team. Instead, they laid an egg and lost, 27-0. Now Gundy is looking at a heavy rebuilding job Quarterback Zac Robinson, a threeyear starter, is gone. So is tackle Russell Okung, the sixth player selected in the NFL Draft. Wide receiver Dez Bryant, who was suspended for the second half of 2009, declared himself eligible for the draft and was also a first-round pick. Ugh. This offense is going to have trouble, especially early. Brandon Weeden, a 26-year-old junior, is the new starter at quarterback. Oklahoma State must replace four starters on the o-line The defense? In a word depleted. The Oklahoma State pre-spring depth chart features just two starters from the pre-cotton Bowl depth chart on the defensive side of the ball. And this was a solid stop unit last year, too, as the Cowboys finished fourth in both scoring and overall defense in the Big 12 Conference. Oklahoma State allowed 21.7 points per game, compared to 28.1 in 2008 If the Cowboys have a lot to work on, at least they ll enjoy it from the comforts of home. All four September games are at home, and its possible they could start 5-0. Beyond that, all bets are off. 72 WWW.STATFOX.COM

TEXAS LONGHORNS The burning image of the 2009 football season in Austin is that of quarterback Colt McCoy going down to injury at the Rose Bowl in the national championship game against Alabama. College football s winningest quarterback never came back, and the Longhorns lost to the Crimson Tide, 37-21. The burning image of the upcoming football season is also that of a quarterback, Garrett Gilbert, who came on for McCoy and was terrific after a rough start versus the Crimson Tide The offense lost McCoy, his favorite target Jordan Shipley and the anchor of the line center Chris Hall. Still, this might be an easier transition than some might think. Gilbert was fabulous against Alabama in the second half (10-for-13 passing, 165 yards). There s no reason to think he can t step up and do it for an entire season. That said, the run game or lack thereof could place pressure on him to deliver. Texas hasn t had a stud running back since Ricky Williams. The line, as usual, is big and beefy on defense, four stud players have moved on and are gone. That s a lot to replace if the Longhorns have any designs on repeating as Big 12 champs with a defense that last year allowed only 72.4 yards rushing per game, tops in the nation So what do we make of this version of the Longhorns? Let s make the assumption that Gilbert plays well. If Texas can develop a running game, then this is a national championship contender. If those two things happen, book a trip to the Big 12 title game, especially with the schedule and the way it breaks. TEXAS A&M AGGIES There was improvement last year in College Station, however small it might have been. The Aggies went from winning four games in 2008 to winning six in 09, earning a bowl bid but falling to Georgia in the Independence Bowl, 44-20. And therein lies the problem 44 points given up. And that was a good day. Texas A&M allowed games of 47, 49, 62, & 65 points. There s no question the offense is going to get theirs. But the big question is how much is the defense going to give up?...the Aggies are going to put up video game-like numbers with the return of several players. The offense has the potential to be outstanding. Senior Jerrod Johnson, if he isn t the best returning quarterback in the Big 12 then he s certainly the most versatile with his running and passing skills. Johnson threw for 3,579 yards and 30 touchdowns against just eight interceptions. He also rushed for 506 yards and eight scores. A&M boasts a terrific tandem of running backs and wide receivers as well, plus the line will see four returnees Defense is the problem. The unit was, in a word, awful. It ranked last in the Big 12 in scoring (33.5 PPG) and last in total defense (426.3 YPG). With the retirement of veteran Joe Kines, head coach Mike Sherman hired Tim DeRuyter from Air Force to take over as coordinator. DeRuyter spent most of the spring teaching his players the ins and outs of his 3-4 schemes. Nine starters are back for this group Can the Aggies continue their improvement under Sherman? A lot of this answer falls on his offense s ability to outscore opponents. TEXAS TECH RED RAIDERS Wow, did that get ugly last year. The Red Raiders successful 9-4 season was nothing. Never happened. Not when you consider what took place just days before the Alamo Bowl against Michigan State (which Texas Tech won, by the way, 41-31). After mistreatment and insubordination claims, the university decided the best course of action for its football program was to terminate its relationship with head football coach Mike Leach So here comes new head coach Tommy Tuberville a great hiring, by the way, considering everything that went down surrounding the Leach situation who says he plans on not only keeping, but refining, Leach s high-octane offense. Tuberville wants to continue Texas Tech s reputation as a pass-happy offense but he also wants a solid running game. He believes the best way to make sure both happen is to turn the Red Raiders offense into a fast break. The goal is to run 100 plays per game. Quarterback Taylor Potts led the Big 12 in passing at 312.0 yards per game and should be ready to go in the fall after offseason surgery. His top two wide receivers are both back Unlike, say, Texas A&M, whose potent offense struggles to keep up with a sieve-like defense, Texas Tech s defense is fairly good. It gave up 22.5 PPG, sixth in the Big 12. Still, Tuberville stresses defense and sixth isn t quite good enough. So he went out and signed 18 players who play on the defensive side of the ball during the recruiting period to join six returning starters...as usual, the schedule in the Big 12 South is tough. With as much as this program has gone through, a bowl bid would make for a successful season. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH North Division Nebraska Missouri Colorado Iowa State Kansas Kansas State South Division Oklahoma Texas Texas A&M Texas Tech Baylor Oklahoma State WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 73

COLORADO BUFFALOES 2010 Schedule Strength: 43.58 (#13 of 120) IOWA STATE CYCLONES 2010 Schedule Strength: 45.17 (#4 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 54 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 4 Lettermen Returning: 41 Where: Boulder, CO Head Coach: Dan Hawkins, 5th year (16-33 SU) Conference: Big 12 2009 RECORD: 3-9 SU, 7-5 ATS Facility: Folsom Field 9/4/10 vs. Colorado St (Denver, CO) * UNDERDOG is 6-7 SU but 10-3 ATS in CSU-COL series since 96 9/11/10 at California 2009 Scoring Differential: -6.6 (#93 of 120) 9/18/10 HAWAII 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -4.5 (#85 of 120) 10/2/10 GEORGIA 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 37 (#59 of 120) 10/9/10 at Missouri * FAVORITE is 7-0 SU & 6-0 ATS in L7 MIZ-COL matchups at MISSOURI 2009 Schedule Strength: 39.33 (#29 of 120) 10/16/10 BAYLOR * L2 games in COL-BAY series went OVER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 TEXAS TECH * L5 games of COL-TT series are 5-0 UNDER the total 10/30/10 at Oklahoma * HOME TEAM is on 6-2 SU & 8-0 ATS run in OKL-COL series Points Scored - Allowed 22.3 (92) 28.8 (88) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 314.2 (104) 363.0 (57) 11/6/10 at Kansas * FAVORITE is on 6-2 SU & ATS run in L8 KAN-COL matchups at KANSAS YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.42 (115) 5.41 (61) 11/13/10 IOWA ST * OVER the total is 6-1 in L7 games of COL-ISU series YP Rush Gained - Allowed 2.78 (116) 4.13 (72) 11/20/10 KANSAS ST * KANSAS ST is on 3-2 SU & 5-0 ATS run vs. COLORADO YP Pass Gained - Allowed 5.74 (108) 7.19 (71) Avg. Time of Possession 30.04 (61) 11/26/10 at Nebraska * COLORADO is 4-10 SU but 11-3 ATS vs. NEBRASKA since 96 Turnover Differential -0.5 (98) 3rd Down Conversion % 35.8% (86) 34.1% (19) Straight Up 2-10 6-7 5-7 3-9 16-33 (33%) * COLORADO hasn t won a true road game since 10/27/07 & is 4-8 ATS in that span. The Average Overall ATS 3-8 6-7 4-7 7-5 20-27 (43%) Score was COLORADO 19.3, OPPONENT 34.8. Potential spots for 2010: ALL ROAD GAMES at Home ATS 2-3 3-3 2-3 4-2 11-11 (50%) * COLORADO is 6-0 UNDER the total (+6 Units) at home in September games since 07. The Away/Neutral ATS 1-5 3-4 2-4 3-3 9-16 (36%) Average Score was COLORADO 23.4, OPPONENT 14.4. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - vs Conference ATS 2-6 4-4 2-6 5-3 13-19 (41%) HAWAII Non-Conference ATS 1-2 2-3 2-1 2-2 7-8 (47%) * COLORADO is on a 8-1 ATS (+6.9 Units) run on the road coming off a cover where the team lost as Favorite ATS 1-2 4-1 1-2 1-2 7-7 (50%) as an underdog The Average Score was COLORADO 33.8, OPPONENT 26.4. Potential spots for as Underdog ATS 2-6 2-6 3-5 6-3 13-20 (39%) 2010: 10/9 - at Missouri, 10/30 - at Oklahoma, 11/6 - at Kansas Over-Under 5-6 7-6 4-7 7-5 23-24 (49%) 9/2 MONTANA ST 10-19 L - - - 9/1 vs. Colorado St 31-28 W -2.5 W 45.5 O 8/31 vs. Colorado St 38-17 W -13.5 W 56 U 9/6 COLORADO ST 17-23 L -13 L 50.5 U 9/9 vs. Colorado St 10-14 L 0 L 43 U 9/8 at Arizona St 14-33 L +15.5 L 53 U 9/6 E WASHINGTON 31-24 W - - - 9/11 at Toledo 38-54 L -4 L 55 O 9/16 ARIZONA ST 3-21 L +12 L 48 U 9/15 FLORIDA ST 6-16 L +5.5 L 47.5 U 9/18 W VIRGINIA 17-14 W +3 W 57 U 9/19 WYOMING 24-0 W -7 W 52 U 9/23 at Georgia 13-14 L +26.5 W 36 U 9/22 MIAMI OHIO 42-0 W -13.5 W 48.5 U 9/27 at Florida St 21-39 L +6.5 L 42 O 10/1 at W Virginia 24-35 L +17 W 55.5 O 9/30 at Missouri 13-28 L +13.5 L 40 O 9/29 OKLAHOMA 27-24 W +23.5 W 55.5 U 10/4 TEXAS 14-38 L +11 L 51.5 O 10/10 at Texas 14-38 L +33.5 W 59 U 10/7 BAYLOR 31-34 L -6 L 37.5 O 10/6 at Baylor 43-23 W -8 W 48.5 O 10/11 at Kansas 14-30 L +13.5 L 51 U 10/17 KANSAS 34-30 W +7.5 W 54.5 O 10/14 TEXAS TECH 30-6 W +5.5 W 48 U 10/13 at Kansas St 20-47 L +4 L 50.5 O 10/18 KANSAS ST 14-13 W -3 L 57.5 U 10/24 at Kansas St 6-20 L +4.5 L 49.5 U 10/21 at Oklahoma 3-24 L +13.5 L 39 U 10/20 KANSAS 14-19 L +3 L 54 U 10/25 at Missouri 0-58 L +24 L 59.5 U 10/31 MISSOURI 17-36 L +3 L 46 O 10/28 at Kansas 15-20 L +1 L 42 U 10/27 at Texas Tech 31-26 W +13 W 61 U 11/1 at Texas A&M 17-24 L +4 L 51 U 11/7 TEXAS A&M 35-34 W +3 W 56 O 11/4 KANSAS ST 21-34 L -4.5 L 37.5 O 11/3 MISSOURI 10-55 L +3.5 L 57.5 O 11/8 IOWA ST 28-24 W -10.5 L 46.5 O 11/14 at Iowa St 10-17 L +4.5 L 48.5 U 11/11 IOWA ST 33-16 W -9 W 42 O 11/10 at Iowa St 28-31 L -4 L 47.5 O 11/15 OKLAHOMA ST 17-30 L +17 W 55.5 U 11/19 at Oklahoma St 28-31 L +17 W 47 O 11/24 at Nebraska 14-37 L +13 L 46.5 O 11/23 NEBRASKA 65-51 W -3 W 60.5 O 11/28 at Nebraska 31-40 L +18.5 W 56.5 O 11/27 NEBRASKA 20-28 L +10 W 41 O 12/30 vs. Alabama 24-30 L +4 L 52.5 O Where: Ames, IA Head Coach: Paul Rhoads, 2nd year (7-6 SU) Conference: Big 12 2009 RECORD: 7-6 SU, 8-4 ATS Facility: Jack Trice Stadium 9/2/10 N ILLINOIS * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 ISU-NIL games 9/11/10 at Iowa * IOWA ST is 7-5 SU & 10-2 ATS vs. IOWA since 98 2009 Scoring Differential: -1.3 (#78 of 120) 9/18/10 vs. Kansas St (Kansas City, MO) * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 ISU-KSU games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -2.1 (#75 of 120) 9/25/10 N IOWA 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 35 (#66 of 120) 10/2/10 TEXAS TECH * FAVORITE is on 6-0 SU & ATS run in L6 ISU-TT matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 34.92 (#62 of 120) 10/9/10 UTAH 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at Oklahoma * FAVORITE is on 5-0 SU & 4-1 ATS run in L5 OKL-ISU matchups 10/23/10 at Texas * ROAD TEAM has covered spread in four straight TEX-ISU games Points Scored - Allowed 20.5 (103) 21.8 (34) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 364.7 (73) 415.8 (99) 10/30/10 KANSAS * IOWA ST is 4-5 SU but 7-1 ATS in its L9 home games vs. KANSAS YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.29 (75) 5.82 (88) 11/6/10 NEBRASKA * L4 ISU-NEB series games have gone UNDER the total YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.54 (38) 4.35 (84) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.31 (100) 7.49 (85) 11/13/10 at Colorado * OVER the total is 6-1 in L7 games of COL-ISU series Avg. Time of Possession 28.28 (103) 11/20/10 MISSOURI * ROAD TEAM is 5-7 SU but 9-3 ATS in ISU-MIZ series since 98 Turnover Differential +0.3 (35) 3rd Down Conversion % 40.8% (49) 37.7% (44) Straight Up 4-8 3-9 2-10 7-6 16-33 (33%) * IOWA ST is on a 2-10 ATS (-9 Units) skid on the road vs. excellent rushing defenses - allowing Overall ATS 3-8 6-5 5-6 8-4 22-23 (49%) <=90 RYPG The Average Score was IOWA ST 14.5, OPPONENT 51.6. Potential spots for 2010: at Home ATS 1-5 4-2 2-3 3-2 10-12 (45%) 10/23 - at Texas Away/Neutral ATS 2-3 2-3 3-3 5-2 12-11 (52%) * IOWA ST is 10-1 ATS (+8.9 Units) as underdogs of 10.5 to 21 points since 07. The Average vs Conference ATS 2-6 5-3 3-5 5-3 15-17 (47%) Score was IOWA ST 20.6, OPPONENT 29.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at Iowa, 10/2 - Non-Conference ATS 1-2 1-2 2-1 3-1 7-6 (54%) TEXAS TECH, 11/6 - NEBRASKA as Favorite ATS 0-3 0-2 1-1 4-1 5-7 (42%) * IOWA ST is on a 13-2 UNDER the total (+10.8 Units) run at home vs. good teams (Win Pct. as Underdog ATS 3-5 6-3 4-5 4-3 17-16 (52%) 60% to 75%) The Average Score was IOWA ST 20.3, OPPONENT 28.9. Potential spots for 2010: Over-Under 3-8 4-7 8-3 3-9 18-27 (40%) 10/2 - TEXAS TECH, 11/6 - NEBRASKA, 11/20 - MISSOURI 8/31 TOLEDO 45-43 W -9.5 L 53 O 8/30 KENT ST 14-23 L -3.5 L 45.5 U 8/30 S DAKOTA ST 44-17 W - - - 9/3 N DAKOTA ST 34-17 W - - - 9/9 UNLV 16-10 W -15 L 54.5 U 9/8 N IOWA 13-24 L - - - 9/6 KENT ST 48-28 W -10 W 45 O 9/12 IOWA 3-35 L +6.5 L 47 U 9/16 at Iowa 17-27 L +14 W 48 U 9/15 IOWA 15-13 W +17.5 W 44 U 9/13 at Iowa 5-17 L +13 W 47 U 9/19 at Kent St 34-14 W -3 W 47 O 9/23 at Texas 14-37 L +25 W 54 U 9/22 at Toledo 35-36 L -2 L 53.5 O 9/20 at UNLV 31-34 L +2 L 50 O 9/26 ARMY 31-10 W -10.5 W 46.5 U 9/30 N IOWA 28-27 W - - - 9/29 at Nebraska 17-35 L +21 W 54.5 U 10/4 KANSAS 33-35 L +11.5 W 49.5 O 10/3 vs. Kansas St 23-24 L -3 L 49 U 10/7 NEBRASKA 14-28 L +7 L 54.5 U 10/6 at Texas Tech 17-42 L +24.5 L 65 U 10/11 at Baylor 10-38 L +4.5 L 55.5 U 10/10 at Kansas 36-41 L +19.5 W 58.5 O 10/14 at Oklahoma 9-34 L +18 L 50.5 U 10/13 TEXAS 3-56 L +16.5 L 52 O 10/18 NEBRASKA 7-35 L +7 L 54 U 10/17 BAYLOR 24-10 W -2.5 W 53 U 10/21 TEXAS TECH 26-42 L +2 L 50.5 O 10/20 OKLAHOMA 7-17 L +30 W 57.5 U 10/25 TEXAS A&M 35-49 L -2.5 L 52 O 10/24 at Nebraska 9-7 W +20 W 52 U 10/28 at Kansas St 10-31 L +5 L 46 U 10/27 at Missouri 28-42 L +28 W 57 O 11/1 at Oklahoma St 17-59 L +29.5 L 61 O 10/31 at Texas A&M 10-35 L +6.5 L 61 U 11/4 KANSAS 10-41 L -1 L 52 U 11/3 KANSAS ST 31-20 W +14 W 52.5 U 11/8 at Colorado 24-28 L +10.5 W 46.5 O 11/7 OKLAHOMA ST 8-34 L +7.5 L 54 U 11/11 at Colorado 16-33 L +9 L 42 O 11/10 COLORADO 31-28 W +4 W 47.5 O 11/15 MISSOURI 20-52 L +27 L 63.5 O 11/14 COLORADO 17-10 W -4.5 W 48.5 U 11/18 MISSOURI 21-16 W +13.5 W 52.5 U 11/17 at Kansas 7-45 L +26 L 56 U 11/22 at Kansas St 30-38 L +10.5 W 67 O 11/21 at Missouri 24-34 L +15.5 W 51.5 O 12/31 vs. Minnesota 14-13 W +1.5 W 47 U 74 WWW.STATFOX.COM

KANSAS JAYHAWKS 2010 Schedule Strength: 37.83 (#56 of 120) KANSAS STATE WILDCATS 2010 Schedule Strength: 40.08 (#38 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 75 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-2-5 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 39 Offense: Pro Set - Starters Returning: 5 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 41 Where: Lawrence, KS Head Coach: Turner Gill, 1st year Conference: Big 12 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 3-8 ATS Facility: Memorial Field 9/4/10 N DAKOTA ST 9/11/10 GEORGIA TECH 2009 Scoring Differential: +1.0 (#65 of 120) 9/17/10 at Southern Miss 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +2.5 (#55 of 120) 9/25/10 NEW MEXICO ST 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 42 (#45 of 120) 10/2/10 at Baylor * KANSAS is on 3-2 SU & 4-1 ATS run vs. BAYLOR 2009 Schedule Strength: 39.5 (#28 of 120) 10/16/10 KANSAS ST * FAVORITE is 11-3 SU & ATS in KAN-KSU series since 96 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 TEXAS A&M * ROAD TEAM is 3-2 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 KAN-TAM matchups 10/30/10 at Iowa St * IOWA ST is 4-5 SU but 7-1 ATS in its L9 home games vs. KANSAS Points Scored - Allowed 29.4 (42) 28.4 (85) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 422.4 (25) 383.3 (76) 11/6/10 COLORADO * FAVORITE is on 6-2 SU & ATS run in L8 KAN-COL matchups at KANSAS YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.73 (48) 5.50 (67) 11/13/10 at Nebraska * FAVORITE is 16-0 SU & 12-4 ATS in NEB-KAN series since 94 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.55 (96) 4.02 (68) 11/20/10 OKLAHOMA ST * OKLAHOMA ST is on 5-3 SU & 7-1 ATS run vs. KANSAS YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.36 (50) 6.95 (53) Avg. Time of Possession 30.82 (36) 11/27/10 vs. Missouri (Kansas City, MO) * UNDERDOG is 5-2 SU & 6-1 ATS in L7 MIZ-KAN matchups Turnover Differential -0.4 (87) 3rd Down Conversion % 41.7% (40) 40.2% (67) Straight Up 6-6 12-1 8-5 5-7 31-19 (62%) * KANSAS is on a 6-22 ATS (-18.2 Units) skid on the road in weeks 10 through 13 The Average Overall ATS 6-5 11-1 7-5 3-8 27-19 (59%) Score was KANSAS 22.1, OPPONENT 37.7. Potential spots for 2010: 11/13 - at Nebraska, 11/27 at Home ATS 3-3 6-0 3-3 1-4 13-10 (57%) - at Missouri Away/Neutral ATS 3-2 5-1 4-2 2-4 14-9 (61%) * KANSAS is on a 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) run at home vs. poor rushing teams - averaging <=120 vs Conference ATS 5-3 7-1 4-4 1-7 17-15 (53%) RYPG The Average Score was KANSAS 35.9, OPPONENT 16.6. Potential spots for 2010: 11/6 Non-Conference ATS 1-2 4-0 3-1 2-1 10-4 (71%) - COLORADO as Favorite ATS 3-2 9-1 4-2 2-4 18-9 (67%) * KANSAS is on a 6-16 ATS (-11.6 Units) skid on the road revenging a loss where opponent as Underdog ATS 3-3 2-0 3-3 1-4 9-10 (47%) scored 35 or more points The Average Score was KANSAS 19.9, OPPONENT 43. Potential spots Over-Under 6-5 5-7 8-4 7-4 26-20 (57%) for 2010: 11/27 - at Missouri 9/2 NORTHWESTERN ST 49-18 W - - - 9/1 C MICHIGAN 52-7 W -7.5 W 51 O 8/30 FLA INTERNATIONAL 40-10 W -36 L 56.5 U 9/5 N COLORADO 49-3 W - - - 9/9 LA MONROE 21-19 W -26 L 46 U 9/8 SE LOUISIANA 62-0 W - - - 9/6 LOUISIANA TECH 29-0 W -22 W 52.5 U 9/12 at UTEP 34-7 W -13 W 62.5 U 9/15 at Toledo 31-37 L +5 L 49.5 O 9/15 TOLEDO 45-13 W -27.5 W 65 U 9/12 at S Florida 34-37 L +4.5 W 51.5 O 9/19 DUKE 44-16 W -23.5 W 51.5 O 9/23 S FLORIDA 13-7 W -4 W 42 U 9/22 FLA INTERNATIONAL 55-3 W -35 W 56 O 9/20 SAM HOUSTON ST 38-14 W - - - 9/26 SOUTHERN MISS 35-28 W -11.5 L 58 O 9/30 at Nebraska 32-39 L +22.5 W 46.5 O 10/6 at Kansas St 30-24 W +3.5 W 54.5 U 10/4 at Iowa St 35-33 W -11.5 L 49.5 O 10/10 IOWA ST 41-36 W -19.5 L 58.5 O 10/7 TEXAS A&M 18-21 L +1 L 52 U 10/13 BAYLOR 58-10 W -26 W 57.5 O 10/11 COLORADO 30-14 W -13.5 W 51 U 10/17 at Colorado 30-34 L -7.5 L 54.5 O 10/14 OKLAHOMA ST 32-42 L -2.5 L 52 O 10/20 at Colorado 19-14 W -3 W 54 U 10/18 at Oklahoma 31-45 L +19.5 W 60.5 O 10/24 OKLAHOMA 13-35 L +8.5 L 55 U 10/21 at Baylor 35-36 L +3.5 W 49.5 O 10/27 at Texas A&M 19-11 W -2.5 W 54 U 10/25 TEXAS TECH 21-63 L +2 L 69 O 10/31 at Texas Tech 21-42 L +6.5 L 66 U 10/28 COLORADO 20-15 W -1 W 42 U 11/3 NEBRASKA 76-39 W -19.5 W 54.5 O 11/1 KANSAS ST 52-21 W -7.5 W 68.5 O 11/7 at Kansas St 10-17 L -1.5 L 54.5 U 11/4 at Iowa St 41-10 W +1 W 52 U 11/10 at Oklahoma St 43-28 W -4 W 66.5 O 11/8 at Nebraska 35-45 L +2 L 62 O 11/14 NEBRASKA 17-31 L +4 L 45.5 O 11/18 KANSAS ST 39-20 W -2.5 W 51.5 O 11/17 IOWA ST 45-7 W -26 W 56 U 11/15 TEXAS 7-35 L +13.5 L 64.5 U 11/21 at Texas 20-51 L +28 L 57.5 O 11/25 at Missouri 17-42 L +6.5 L 52 O 11/24 vs. Missouri 28-36 L -1 L 67 U 11/29 vs. Missouri 40-37 W +16.5 W 69.5 O 11/28 vs. Missouri 39-41 L +3 W 57.5 O 1/3 vs. Virginia Tech 24-21 W +3 W 50.5 U 12/31 vs. Minnesota 42-21 W -9 W 58.5 O Where: Manhattan, KS Head Coach: Bill Snyder, 2nd year (142-74-1 SU) Conference: Big 12 2009 RECORD: 6-6 SU, 7-4 ATS Facility: Snyder Family Stadium 9/4/10 UCLA 9/11/10 MISSOURI ST 2009 Scoring Differential: -0.3 (#72 of 120) 9/18/10 vs. Iowa St (Kansas City, MO) * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 ISU-KSU games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -1.1 (#73 of 120) 9/25/10 UCF 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 35 (#66 of 120) 10/7/10 NEBRASKA * KSU-NEB series has gone 9-2 OVER the total since 98 2009 Schedule Strength: 35 (#60 of 120) 10/16/10 at Kansas * FAVORITE is 11-3 SU & ATS in KAN-KSU series since 96 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Baylor * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 BAY-KSU games 10/30/10 OKLAHOMA ST * KANSAS ST is 5-0 SU & ATS in its L5 home games vs. OKLAHOMA ST Points Scored - Allowed 23.0 (87) 23.3 (46) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 349.3 (80) 339.9 (39) 11/6/10 TEXAS * UNDERDOG is 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 KSU-TEX matchups YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.23 (81) 5.39 (59) 11/13/10 at Missouri * ROAD TEAM is 4-5 SU but 7-2 ATS in L9 MIZ-KSU matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.28 (58) 3.49 (29) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.82 (81) 7.12 (62) 11/20/10 at Colorado * KANSAS ST is on 3-2 SU & 5-0 ATS run vs. COLORADO Avg. Time of Possession 33.8 (4) 11/27/10 at North Texas * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 NTX-KSU games Turnover Differential +0.5 (23) 3rd Down Conversion % 31.9% (108) 44.3% (96) Straight Up 7-6 5-7 5-7 6-6 23-26 (47%) * KANSAS ST is on a 17-6 ATS (+10.4 Units) run at home vs. good teams (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) Overall ATS 6-6 5-6 4-7 7-4 22-23 (49%) The Average Score was KANSAS ST 33, OPPONENT 18.2. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - UCF, at Home ATS 5-2 2-3 1-5 4-1 12-11 (52%) 10/7 - NEBRASKA, 10/30 - OKLAHOMA ST Away/Neutral ATS 1-4 3-3 3-2 3-3 10-12 (45%) * KANSAS ST is 9-1 OVER the total (+7.9 Units) at home when coming off a straight up loss since vs Conference ATS 4-4 4-4 3-5 6-2 17-15 (53%) 07. The Average Score was KANSAS ST 39.8, OPPONENT 28. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - Non-Conference ATS 2-2 1-2 1-2 1-2 5-8 (38%) UCF, 10/30 - OKLAHOMA ST, 11/6 - TEXAS as Favorite ATS 3-1 2-5 2-3 1-1 8-10 (44%) * KANSAS ST is 11-3 OVER the total (+7.7 Units) vs. teams scoring 31 or more PPG since 07. as Underdog ATS 3-5 3-1 2-4 5-3 13-13 (50%) The Average Score was KANSAS ST 30.3, OPPONENT 41.6. Potential spots for 2010: 10/7 Over-Under 6-6 8-3 8-3 3-7 25-19 (57%) NEBRASKA, 10/30 - OKLAHOMA ST, 11/6 - TEXAS, 11/13 - at Missouri 9/2 ILLINOIS ST 24-23 W - - - 9/1 at Auburn 13-23 L +13.5 W 46 U 8/30 NORTH TEXAS 45-6 W -29 W 65 U 9/5 MASSACHUSETTS 21-17 W - - - 9/9 FLA ATLANTIC 45-0 W -23.5 W 45.5 U 9/8 SAN JOSE ST 34-14 W -20.5 L 44.5 O 9/6 MONTANA ST 69-10 W - - - 9/12 at LA Lafayette 15-17 L -6.5 L 54 U 9/16 MARSHALL 23-7 W -9 W 46 U 9/15 MISSOURI ST 61-10 W - - - 9/17 at Louisville 29-38 L -6 L 56 O 9/19 at UCLA 9-23 L +11 L 44.5 U 9/23 LOUISVILLE 6-24 L +13 L 53 U 9/29 at Texas 41-21 W +14 W 56 O 9/27 LA LAFAYETTE 45-37 W -21.5 L 63.5 O 9/26 TENNESSEE TECH 49-7 W -35.5 W - 9/30 at Baylor 3-17 L -1.5 L 41 U 10/6 KANSAS 24-30 L -3.5 L 54.5 U 10/4 TEXAS TECH 28-58 L +7 L 66 O 10/3 vs. Iowa St 24-23 W +3 W 49 U 10/7 OKLAHOMA ST 31-27 W +2.5 W 43.5 O 10/13 COLORADO 47-20 W -4 W 50.5 O 10/11 at Texas A&M 44-30 W -3.5 W 58.5 O 10/10 at Texas Tech 14-66 L +16 L 54.5 O 10/14 NEBRASKA 3-21 L +9 L 44.5 U 10/20 at Oklahoma St 39-41 L +3 W 60 O 10/18 at Colorado 13-14 L +3 W 57.5 U 10/17 TEXAS A&M 62-14 W +5.5 W 59 O 10/21 at Missouri 21-41 L +14 L 44 O 10/27 BAYLOR 51-13 W -26.5 W 59.5 O 10/25 OKLAHOMA 35-58 L +17.5 L 71 O 10/24 COLORADO 20-6 W -4.5 W 49.5 U 10/28 IOWA ST 31-10 W -5 W 46 U 11/3 at Iowa St 20-31 L -14 L 52.5 U 11/1 at Kansas 21-52 L +7.5 L 68.5 O 10/31 at Oklahoma 30-42 L +28 W 47.5 O 11/4 at Colorado 34-21 W +4.5 W 37.5 O 11/10 at Nebraska 31-73 L -7.5 L 62 O 11/8 at Missouri 24-41 L +26 W 72 U 11/7 KANSAS 17-10 W +1.5 W 54.5 U 11/11 TEXAS 45-42 W +16.5 W 50.5 O 11/17 MISSOURI 32-49 L +7 L 69.5 O 11/15 NEBRASKA 28-56 L +6 L 65.5 O 11/14 MISSOURI 12-38 L +2 L 51 U 11/18 at Kansas 20-39 L +2.5 L 51.5 O 11/24 at Fresno St 29-45 L -1.5 L 64 O 11/22 IOWA ST 38-30 W -10.5 L 67 O 11/21 at Nebraska 3-17 L +15.5 W 44 U 12/28 vs. Rutgers 10-37 L +9 L 44.5 O

MISSOURI TIGERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 38.83 (#45 of 120) NEBRASKA CORNHUSKERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 36.92 (#65 of 120) Offense: Pro-Style - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 9 Lettermen Returning: 40 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 10 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 59 Where: Columbia, MO Head Coach: Gary Pinkel, 10th year (67-46 SU) Conference: Big 12 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 5-8 ATS Facility: Faurot Field 9/4/10 vs. Illinois (St. Louis, MO) * MISSOURI is 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS in its L8 games vs. ILLINOIS 9/11/10 MCNEESE ST 2009 Scoring Differential: +3.6 (#50 of 120) 9/18/10 SAN DIEGO ST 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +4.2 (#49 of 120) 9/25/10 MIAMI OHIO 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 43 (#40 of 120) 10/9/10 COLORADO * FAVORITE is 7-0 SU & 6-0 ATS in L7 MIZ-COL matchups at MISSOURI 2009 Schedule Strength: 38 (#40 of 120) 10/16/10 at Texas A&M * TEXAS A&M has covered spread in L2 games vs. MISSOURI 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 OKLAHOMA * UNDERDOG is 1-9 SU but 7-3 ATS in MIZ-OKL series since 94 10/30/10 at Nebraska * FAVORITE has swept L4 NEB-MIZ games, both SU & ATS Points Scored - Allowed 29.0 (49) 25.4 (59) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 412.5 (32) 370.1 (64) 11/6/10 at Texas Tech * MISSOURI is 5-1 SU & ATS in its L6 games vs. TEXAS TECH YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.89 (40) 5.13 (41) 11/13/10 KANSAS ST * ROAD TEAM is 4-5 SU but 7-2 ATS in L9 MIZ-KSU matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.72 (83) 3.33 (18) 11/20/10 at Iowa St * ROAD TEAM is 5-7 SU but 9-3 ATS in ISU-MIZ series since 98 YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.95 (24) 6.88 (50) Avg. Time of Possession 27.73 (109) 11/27/10 vs. Kansas (Kansas City, MO) * UNDERDOG is 5-2 SU & 6-1 ATS in L7 MIZ-KAN matchups Turnover Differential +0.3 (35) 3rd Down Conversion % 35.3% (91) 41.6% (81) Straight Up 8-5 12-2 10-4 8-5 38-16 (70%) * Over the L2 seasons, MISSOURI is 3-11 ATS (-9.1 Units) vs. teams with a winning record. Overall ATS 7-5 10-3 5-8 5-8 27-24 (53%) The Average Score was MISSOURI 29.6, OPPONENT 29.9. Potential spots for 2010: 10/23 - at Home ATS 5-1 3-2 2-3 1-5 11-11 (50%) OKLAHOMA, 10/30 - at Nebraska, 11/6 - at Texas Tech, 11/20 - at Iowa St Away/Neutral ATS 2-4 7-1 3-5 4-3 16-13 (55%) * MISSOURI is 9-1 ATS (+7.9 Units) as favorites of 3.5 to 10 points since 07. The Average Score vs Conference ATS 4-4 6-3 3-6 2-6 15-19 (44%) was MISSOURI 39.8, OPPONENT 22.2. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - COLORADO, 11/13 - Non-Conference ATS 3-1 4-0 2-2 3-2 12-5 (71%) KANSAS ST, 11/20 - at Iowa St as Favorite ATS 5-3 8-2 5-6 3-5 21-16 (57%) * MISSOURI is 8-1 ATS (+6.9 Units) as road favorites since 07. The Average Score was as Underdog ATS 2-2 2-1 0-2 1-3 5-8 (38%) MISSOURI 42.4, OPPONENT 20.2. Potential spots for 2010: 11/20 - at Iowa St Over-Under 6-6 8-5 7-6 4-8 25-25 (50%) 9/2 MURRAY ST 47-7 W - - - 9/1 vs. Illinois 40-34 W -5.5 W 58 O 8/30 vs. Illinois 52-42 W -9.5 W 59.5 O 9/5 vs. Illinois 37-9 W +6.5 W 60.5 U 9/9 MISSISSIPPI 34-7 W -10.5 W 47 U 9/8 at Ole Miss 38-25 W -6.5 W 54 O 9/6 SE MISSOURI ST 52-3 W - - - 9/12 BOWLING GREEN 27-20 W -20 L 56.5 U 9/16 at New Mexico 27-17 W -13.5 L 51.5 U 9/15 W MICHIGAN 52-24 W -19.5 W 67.5 O 9/13 NEVADA 69-17 W -26 W 69 O 9/19 FURMAN 52-12 W -33.5 W - 9/23 OHIO U 31-6 W -20.5 W 44.5 U 9/22 ILLINOIS ST 38-17 W - - - 9/20 BUFFALO 42-21 W -31.5 L 68 U 9/25 at Nevada 31-21 W -7 W 61 U 9/30 COLORADO 28-13 W -13.5 W 40 O 10/6 NEBRASKA 41-6 W -6.5 W 69 U 10/4 at Nebraska 52-17 W -10.5 W 66 O 10/8 NEBRASKA 12-27 L +3.5 L 49.5 U 10/7 at Texas Tech 38-21 W +7.5 W 52 O 10/13 at Oklahoma 31-41 L +13.5 W 63 O 10/11 OKLAHOMA ST 23-28 L -13.5 L 76.5 U 10/17 at Oklahoma St 17-33 L +6.5 L 55 U 10/14 at Texas A&M 19-25 L +1.5 L 51 U 10/20 TEXAS TECH 41-10 W -3.5 W 73.5 U 10/18 at Texas 31-56 L +4 L 65 O 10/24 TEXAS 7-41 L +13 L 51.5 U 10/27 IOWA ST 42-28 W -28 L 57 O 10/25 COLORADO 58-0 W -24 W 59.5 U 10/31 at Colorado 36-17 W -3 W 46 O 10/21 KANSAS ST 41-21 W -14 W 44 O 11/3 at Colorado 55-10 W -3.5 W 57.5 O 11/1 at Baylor 31-28 W -21 L 65 U 11/7 BAYLOR 32-40 L -15 L 45.5 O 10/28 OKLAHOMA 10-26 L -1 L 45 U 11/10 TEXAS A&M 40-26 W -17 L 61 O 11/8 KANSAS ST 41-24 W -26 L 72 U 11/14 at Kansas St 38-12 W -2 W 51 U 11/4 at Nebraska 20-34 L +6.5 L 52.5 O 11/17 at Kansas St 49-32 W -7 W 69.5 O 11/15 at Iowa St 52-20 W -27 W 63.5 O 11/21 IOWA ST 34-24 W -15.5 L 51.5 O 11/18 at Iowa St 16-21 L -13.5 L 52.5 U 11/24 vs. Kansas 36-28 W +1 W 67 U 11/29 vs. Kansas 37-40 L -16.5 L 69.5 O 11/28 vs. Kansas 41-39 W -3 L 57.5 O 11/25 KANSAS 42-17 W -6.5 W 52 O 12/1 vs. Oklahoma 17-38 L +3 L 64.5 U 12/6 vs. Oklahoma 21-62 L +16.5 L 78.5 O 12/31 vs. Navy 13-35 L -6.5 L 54.5 U 12/29 vs. Oregon St 38-39 L +3.5 W 53 O 1/1 vs. Arkansas 38-7 W -4 W 68.5 U 12/29 vs. Northwestern 30-23 W -14 L 66.5 U Where: Lincoln, NE Head Coach: Bo Pelini, 3rd year (20-8 SU) Conference: Big 12 2009 RECORD: 10-4 SU, 9-5 ATS Facility: Memorial Stadium 9/4/10 W KENTUCKY 9/11/10 IDAHO 2009 Scoring Differential: +14.7 (#12 of 120) 9/18/10 at Washington * NEBRASKA is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. WASHINGTON 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +18.2 (#8 of 120) 9/25/10 S DAKOTA ST 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 58 (#5 of 120) 10/7/10 at Kansas St * KSU-NEB series has gone 9-2 OVER the total since 98 2009 Schedule Strength: 40.64 (#19 of 120) 10/16/10 TEXAS * UNDER the total is 6-0 in L6 games of NEB-TEX series 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Oklahoma St * OKLAHOMA ST is on 5-1 ATS run vs. NEBRASKA 10/30/10 MISSOURI * FAVORITE has swept L4 NEB-MIZ games, both SU & ATS Points Scored - Allowed 25.1 (75) 10.4 (1) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 322.8 (99) 271.3 (7) 11/6/10 at Iowa St * L4 ISU-NEB series games have gone UNDER the total YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.16 (87) 3.98 (3) 11/13/10 KANSAS * FAVORITE is 16-0 SU & 12-4 ATS in NEB-KAN series since 94 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.02 (71) 2.78 (4) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.76 (85) 5.11 (1) 11/20/10 at Texas A&M * L3 games in TAM-NEB series at TEXAS A&M went OVER the total Avg. Time of Possession 30.49 (47) 11/26/10 COLORADO * COLORADO is 4-10 SU but 11-3 ATS vs. NEBRASKA since 96 Turnover Differential +0.4 (32) 3rd Down Conversion % 38.6% (65) 32.3% (14) Straight Up 9-5 5-7 9-4 10-4 33-20 (62%) * NEBRASKA is 0-8 ATS (-8.8 Units) at home in weeks 5 through 9 since 07. The Average Overall ATS 7-6 3-9 7-6 9-5 26-26 (50%) Score was NEBRASKA 19.9, OPPONENT 30.6. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - TEXAS, 10/30 at Home ATS 5-1 2-5 3-5 4-3 14-14 (50%) - MISSOURI Away/Neutral ATS 2-5 1-4 4-1 5-2 12-12 (50%) * NEBRASKA is on a 7-0 UNDER the total (+7 Units) run at home after allowing 100 or less vs Conference ATS 5-4 2-6 4-4 4-5 15-19 (44%) rushing yards in 2 straight games The Average Score was NEBRASKA 36.3, OPPONENT 10.7. Non-Conference ATS 2-2 1-3 3-2 5-0 11-7 (61%) Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - TEXAS, 11/26 - COLORADO as Favorite ATS 6-3 1-5 6-4 6-5 19-17 (53%) * NEBRASKA is on a 15-4 ATS (+10.6 Units) run at home vs. teams scoring 34 or more PPG as Underdog ATS 1-3 2-4 1-2 3-0 7-9 (44%) The Average Score was NEBRASKA 37.5, OPPONENT 21.2. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - Over-Under 7-6 6-6 8-5 3-11 24-28 (46%) TEXAS 9/2 LOUISIANA TECH 49-10 W -24.5 W 45.5 O 9/1 NEVADA 52-10 W -21 W 50 O 8/30 W MICHIGAN 47-24 W -13.5 W 55 O 9/5 FLA ATLANTIC 49-3 W -23 W 60.5 U 9/9 NICHOLLS ST 56-7 W - - - 9/8 at Wake Forest 20-17 W -8.5 L 51 U 9/6 SAN JOSE ST 35-12 W -26.5 L 55.5 U 9/12 ARKANSAS ST 38-9 W -21.5 W 52 U 9/16 at USC 10-28 L +17 L 55.5 U 9/15 USC 31-49 L +10 L 50 O 9/13 NEW MEXICO ST 38-7 W -26.5 W 66 U 9/19 at Virginia Tech 15-16 L +5.5 W 51 U 9/23 TROY ST 56-0 W -24 W 46.5 O 9/22 BALL ST 41-40 W -24 L 62 O 9/27 VIRGINIA TECH 30-35 L -7 L 48 O 9/26 LA LAFAYETTE 55-0 W -30.5 W 54 O 9/30 KANSAS 39-32 W -22.5 L 46.5 O 9/29 IOWA ST 35-17 W -21 L 54.5 U 10/4 MISSOURI 17-52 L +10.5 L 66 O 10/8 at Missouri 27-12 W -3.5 W 49.5 U 10/7 at Iowa St 28-14 W -7 W 54.5 U 10/6 at Missouri 6-41 L +6.5 L 69 U 10/11 at Texas Tech 31-37 L +19 W 67 O 10/17 TEXAS TECH 10-31 L -10.5 L 58.5 U 10/14 at Kansas St 21-3 W -9 W 44.5 U 10/13 OKLAHOMA ST 14-45 L -3.5 L 64 U 10/18 at Iowa St 35-7 W -7 W 54 U 10/24 IOWA ST 7-9 L -20 L 52 U 10/21 TEXAS 20-22 L +5.5 W 47 U 10/31 at Baylor 20-10 W -13.5 L 46 U 10/20 TEXAS A&M 14-36 L -1.5 L 58.5 U 10/25 BAYLOR 32-20 W -14 L 56.5 U 10/28 at Oklahoma St 29-41 L -5 L 55 O 11/7 OKLAHOMA 10-3 W +4.5 W 41 U 11/4 MISSOURI 34-20 W -6.5 W 52.5 O 10/27 at Texas 25-28 L +20.5 W 58.5 U 11/1 at Oklahoma 28-62 L +21 L 71 O 11/14 at Kansas 31-17 W -4 W 45.5 O 11/11 at Texas A&M 28-27 W -1.5 L 52.5 O 11/3 at Kansas 39-76 L +19.5 L 54.5 O 11/8 KANSAS 45-35 W -2 W 62 O 11/21 KANSAS ST 17-3 W -15.5 L 44 U 11/24 COLORADO 37-14 W -13 W 46.5 O 11/10 KANSAS ST 73-31 W +7.5 W 62 O 11/15 at Kansas St 56-28 W -6 W 65.5 O 11/27 at Colorado 28-20 W -10 L 41 O 12/2 vs. Oklahoma 7-21 L +3.5 L 44.5 U 11/23 at Colorado 51-65 L +3 L 60.5 O 11/28 COLORADO 40-31 W -18.5 L 56.5 O 12/5 vs. Texas 12-13 L +14 W 46.5 U 1/1 vs. Auburn 14-17 L +2 L 46.5 U 1/1 vs. Clemson 26-21 W 0 W 54.5 U 12/30 vs. Arizona 33-0 W -2 W 42 U 76 WWW.STATFOX.COM

BAYLOR BEARS 2010 Schedule Strength: 42.25 (#19 of 120) OKLAHOMA SOONERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 44.58 (#7 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 77 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 47 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 4 Lettermen Returning: 42 Where: Waco, TX Head Coach: Arthur Briles, 3rd year (8-16 SU) Conference: Big 12 2009 RECORD: 4-8 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: Floyd Casey Stadium 9/4/10 SAM HOUSTON ST 9/11/10 BUFFALO 2009 Scoring Differential: -6.5 (#92 of 120) 9/18/10 at TCU * ROAD TEAM is 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 TCU-BAY matchups 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -4.0 (#84 of 120) 9/25/10 at Rice * FAVORITE has swept L4 RIC-BAY games, both SU & ATS 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 37 (#59 of 120) 10/2/10 KANSAS * KANSAS is on 3-2 SU & 4-1 ATS run vs. BAYLOR 2009 Schedule Strength: 41.67 (#12 of 120) 10/9/10 vs. Texas Tech (Dallas, TX) * TEXAS TECH is 16-2 SU & 13-5 ATS vs. BAYLOR since 92 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at Colorado * L2 games in COL-BAY series went OVER the total 10/23/10 KANSAS ST * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 BAY-KSU games Points Scored - Allowed 20.8 (101) 27.3 (72) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 342.5 (85) 405.5 (94) 10/30/10 at Texas * ROAD TEAM is 6-8 SU but 11-3 ATS in TEX-BAY series since 98 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.30 (73) 5.36 (55) 11/6/10 at Oklahoma St * FAVORITE is 10-0 SU & 9-1 ATS in L10 OKS-BAY matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.51 (100) 4.50 (91) 11/13/10 TEXAS A&M * FAVORITE is 16-1 SU & 13-4 ATS in BAY-TAM series since 93 YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.74 (86) 6.33 (31) Avg. Time of Possession 27.4 (111) 11/20/10 OKLAHOMA * ROAD TEAM is 12-2 ATS in BAY-OKL series since 96 Turnover Differential -0.4 (87) 3rd Down Conversion % 34.8% (99) 45.2% (104) Straight Up 4-8 3-9 4-8 4-8 15-33 (31%) * BAYLOR is on a 2-12 ATS (-11.2 Units) skid at home vs. excellent defensive teams - allowing Overall ATS 3-8 4-7 8-3 6-6 21-24 (47%) <=4.25 YPP The Average Score was BAYLOR 10.3, OPPONENT 39.2. Potential spots for 2010: at Home ATS 1-5 2-3 4-2 2-4 9-14 (39%) 11/20 - OKLAHOMA Away/Neutral ATS 2-3 2-4 4-1 4-2 12-10 (55%) * BAYLOR is on a 8-20 ATS (-14 Units) skid at home in November games The Average Score vs Conference ATS 2-6 2-6 6-2 4-4 14-18 (44%) was BAYLOR 20, OPPONENT 36.5. Potential spots for 2010: 11/13 - TEXAS A&M, 11/20 - Non-Conference ATS 1-2 2-1 2-1 2-2 7-6 (54%) OKLAHOMA as Favorite ATS 0-2 2-0 8-0 0-2 10-4 (71%) * BAYLOR is on a 12-25 ATS (-15.5 Units) skid at home revenging a loss against opponent by as Underdog ATS 3-6 2-7 0-3 5-4 10-20 (33%) 14 points or more The Average Score was BAYLOR 16.4, OPPONENT 37.6. Potential spots for Over-Under 6-5 6-5 6-5 3-8 21-23 (48%) 2010: 11/13 - TEXAS A&M, 11/20 - OKLAHOMA 9/3 TCU 7-17 L +7 L 48 U 9/1 at Tcu 0-27 L +21.5 L 46.5 U 8/28 WAKE FOREST 13-41 L +11.5 L 50.5 O 9/5 at Wake Forest 24-21 W +2.5 W 53.5 U 9/9 NORTHWESTERN ST 47-10 W - - - 9/8 RICE 42-17 W -7.5 W 46.5 O 9/6 NORTHWESTERN ST 51-6 W - - - 9/19 CONNECTICUT 22-30 L -10.5 L 44.5 O 9/16 at Washington St 15-17 L +13 W 52.5 U 9/15 TEXAS ST UNIV 34-27 W - - - 9/12 WASHINGTON ST 45-17 W -6.5 W 51.5 O 9/26 NORTHWESTERN ST 68-13 W -37.5 W - 9/23 ARMY 20-27 L -13 L 41.5 O 9/22 at Buffalo 34-21 W -1.5 W 53 O 9/19 at Connecticut 28-31 L +13 W 52 O 10/3 KENT ST 31-15 W -22.5 L 48.5 U 9/30 KANSAS ST 17-3 W +1.5 W 41 U 9/29 at Texas A&M 10-34 L +16.5 L 57.5 U 10/4 OKLAHOMA 17-49 L +24 L 61 O 10/10 at Oklahoma 7-33 L +28 W 52 U 10/7 at Colorado 34-31 W +6 W 37.5 O 10/6 COLORADO 23-43 L +8 L 48.5 O 10/11 IOWA ST 38-10 W -4.5 W 55.5 U 10/17 at Iowa St 10-24 L +2.5 L 53 U 10/14 at Texas 31-63 L +27.5 L 49 O 10/13 at Kansas 10-58 L +26 L 57.5 O 10/18 at Oklahoma St 6-34 L +17 L 64.5 U 10/24 OKLAHOMA ST 7-34 L +7.5 L 52 U 10/21 KANSAS 36-35 W -3.5 L 49.5 O 10/20 TEXAS 10-31 L +26.5 W 60 U 10/25 at Nebraska 20-32 L +14 W 56.5 U 10/31 NEBRASKA 10-20 L +13.5 W 46 U 10/28 TEXAS A&M 21-31 L +4 L 54 U 10/27 at Kansas St 13-51 L +26.5 L 59.5 O 11/1 MISSOURI 28-31 L +21 W 65 U 11/7 at Missouri 40-32 W +15 W 45.5 O 11/4 at Texas Tech 21-55 L +17 L 56 O 11/3 TEXAS TECH 7-38 L +19 L 66 U 11/8 at Texas 21-45 L +25.5 W 62 O 11/14 TEXAS 14-47 L +22.5 L 51.5 O 11/11 at Oklahoma St 24-66 L +16.5 L 59.5 O 11/10 at Oklahoma 21-52 L +38.5 W 59.5 O 11/15 TEXAS A&M 41-21 W -8 W 59.5 O 11/21 at Texas A&M 3-38 L +6 L 61 U 11/18 OKLAHOMA 10-36 L +20.5 L 53 U 11/17 OKLAHOMA ST 14-45 L +14 L 65.5 U 11/29 at Texas Tech 28-35 L +22 W 70 U 11/28 vs. Texas Tech 13-20 L +20.5 W 59 U Where: Norman, OK Head Coach: Bob Stoops, 12th year (117-29 SU) Conference: Big 12 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 5-7-1 ATS Facility: Memorial Stadium 9/4/10 UTAH ST 9/11/10 FLORIDA ST 2009 Scoring Differential: +16.5 (#7 of 120) 9/18/10 AIR FORCE 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +18.8 (#7 of 120) 9/25/10 at Cincinnati 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 60 (#4 of 120) 10/2/10 vs. Texas (Dallas, TX) * TEXAS is 4-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in its L5 games vs. OKLAHOMA 2009 Schedule Strength: 42.54 (#3 of 120) 10/16/10 IOWA ST * FAVORITE is on 5-0 SU & 4-1 ATS run in L5 OKL-ISU matchups 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Missouri * UNDERDOG is 1-9 SU but 7-3 ATS in MIZ-OKL series since 94 10/30/10 COLORADO * HOME TEAM is on 6-2 SU & 8-0 ATS run in OKL-COL series Points Scored - Allowed 31.1 (29) 14.5 (7) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 423.8 (24) 272.6 (8) 11/6/10 at Texas A&M * HOME TEAM is 11-5 SU & 13-3 ATS in TAM-OKL series since 93 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.49 (63) 4.09 (5) 11/13/10 TEXAS TECH * HOME TEAM has won SU & ATS in four straight OKL-TT games YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.61 (92) 2.80 (5) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.24 (54) 5.38 (7) 11/20/10 at Baylor * ROAD TEAM is 12-2 ATS in BAY-OKL series since 96 Avg. Time of Possession 28.71 (101) 11/27/10 at Oklahoma St * FAVORITE is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in L5 OKS-OKL matchups Turnover Differential +0.3 (35) 3rd Down Conversion % 40.7% (50) 31.6% (11) Straight Up 11-3 11-3 12-2 8-5 42-13 (76%) * OKLAHOMA is on a 2-11 ATS (-10.1 Units) skid revenging a blowout loss against opponent by 21 points Overall ATS 9-4 7-7 10-3 5-7 31-21 (60%) or more The Average Score was OKLAHOMA 21.1, OPPONENT 36.8. Potential spots for 2010: 11/13 - at Home ATS 4-1 5-2 4-1 4-2 17-6 (74%) TEXAS TECH Away/Neutral ATS 5-3 2-5 6-2 1-5 14-15 (48%) * OKLAHOMA was 9-2 UNDER the total (+6.8 Units) when playing on Saturdays last season. The Average vs Conference ATS 7-2 3-6 7-2 3-4 20-14 (59%) Score was OKLAHOMA 31.1, OPPONENT 13.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - UTAH ST, 9/11 - FLORIDA Non-Conference ATS 2-2 4-1 3-1 2-3 11-7 (61%) ST, 9/18 - AIR FORCE, 9/25 - at Cincinnati, 10/2 - at Texas, 10/16 - IOWA ST, 10/23 - at Missouri, 10/30 - as Favorite ATS 7-3 7-7 10-3 4-7 28-20 (58%) COLORADO, 11/6 - at Texas A&M, 11/13 - TEXAS TECH, 11/20 - at Baylor, 11/27 - at Oklahoma St as Underdog ATS 2-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 2-1 (67%) * OKLAHOMA is on a 10-24 ATS (-16.4 Units) skid at home in weeks 5 through 9 The Average Score was Over-Under 5-9 6-8 11-2 3-9 25-28 (47%) OKLAHOMA 30.3, OPPONENT 20.2. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - IOWA ST, 10/30 - COLORADO 9/2 UAB 24-17 W -24 L 41.5 U 9/1 NORTH TEXAS 79-10 W -38.5 W 54 O 8/30 UT-CHATTANOOGA 57-2 W - - - 9/5 vs. BYU 13-14 L -22 L 65 U 9/9 WASHINGTON 37-20 W -17 T 42.5 O 9/8 MIAMI 51-13 W -10.5 W 41 O 9/6 CINCINNATI 52-26 W -22 W 53.5 O 9/12 IDAHO ST 64-0 W -52 W - 9/16 at Oregon 33-34 L +6 W 49 O 9/15 UTAH ST 54-3 W -47 W 64 U 9/13 at Washington 55-14 W -20.5 W 61.5 O 9/19 TULSA 45-0 W -18 W 57 U 9/23 MIDDLE TENN ST 59-0 W -28.5 W 46.5 O 9/21 at Tulsa 62-21 W -23 W 66 O 9/27 TCU 35-10 W -18 W 53.5 U 10/3 at Miami 20-21 L -7.5 L 51 U 10/7 vs. Texas 10-28 L +4 L 47.5 U 9/29 at Colorado 24-27 L -23.5 L 55.5 U 10/4 at Baylor 49-17 W -24 W 61 O 10/10 BAYLOR 33-7 W -28 L 52 U 10/14 IOWA ST 34-9 W -18 W 50.5 U 10/6 vs. Texas 28-21 W -12.5 L 57 U 10/11 vs. Texas 35-45 L -7 L 56.5 O 10/17 vs. Texas 13-16 L +3 T 52 U 10/21 COLORADO 24-3 W -13.5 W 39 U 10/13 MISSOURI 41-31 W -13.5 L 63 O 10/18 KANSAS 45-31 W -19.5 L 60.5 O 10/24 at Kansas 35-13 W -8.5 W 55 U 10/28 at Missouri 26-10 W +1 W 45 U 10/20 at Iowa St 17-7 W -30 L 57.5 U 10/25 at Kansas St 58-35 W -17.5 W 71 O 10/31 KANSAS ST 42-30 W -28 L 47.5 O 11/4 at Texas A&M 17-16 W -2.5 L 46.5 U 11/3 TEXAS A&M 42-14 W -21.5 W 56.5 U 11/1 NEBRASKA 62-28 W -21 W 71 O 11/11 TEXAS TECH 34-24 W -7.5 W 52.5 O 11/10 BAYLOR 52-21 W -38.5 L 59.5 O 11/8 at Texas A&M 66-28 W -27.5 W 73 O 11/7 at Nebraska 3-10 L -4.5 L 41 U 11/18 at Baylor 36-10 W -20.5 W 53 U 11/17 at Texas Tech 27-34 L -7 L 67 U 11/22 TEXAS TECH 65-21 W -7 W 76.5 O 11/14 TEXAS A&M 65-10 W -19.5 W 57.5 O 11/25 at Oklahoma St 27-21 W -4.5 W 52.5 U 11/24 OKLAHOMA ST 49-17 W -13.5 W 66.5 U 11/29 at Oklahoma St 61-41 W -10 W 75 O 11/21 at Texas Tech 13-41 L -6.5 L 54.5 U 12/2 vs. Nebraska 21-7 W -3.5 W 44.5 U 12/1 vs. Missouri 38-17 W -3 W 64.5 U 12/6 vs. Missouri 62-21 W -16.5 W 78.5 O 11/28 OKLAHOMA ST 27-0 W -8 W 48 U 1/1 vs. Boise St 42-43 L -7 L 50.5 O 1/2 vs. W Virginia 28-48 L -8 L 61 O 1/8 vs. Florida 14-24 L +4 L 69 U 12/31 vs. Stanford 31-27 W -10.5 L 54.5 O

OKLAHOMA STATE COWBOYS 2010 Schedule Strength: 42.58 (#16 of 120) TEXAS LONGHORNS 2010 Schedule Strength: 40.33 (#36 of 120) Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 4 Lettermen Returning: 32 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 43 Where: Stillwater, OK Head Coach: Mike Gundy, 6th year (36-27 SU) Conference: Big 12 2009 RECORD: 9-4 SU, 6-6-1 ATS Facility: Boone PickensStadium 9/4/10 WASHINGTON ST 9/11/10 TROY * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 OKS-TRO games 2009 Scoring Differential: +6.7 (#38 of 120) 9/18/10 TULSA * UNDERDOG is on 4-5 SU but 7-2 ATS run in L9 OKS-TLS matchups 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +6.3 (#38 of 120) 9/30/10 TEXAS A&M * L4 games in OKS-TAM series at OKLAHOMA ST went OVER the total 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 44 (#35 of 120) 10/8/10 at LA Lafayette 2009 Schedule Strength: 39.62 (#27 of 120) 10/16/10 at Texas Tech * FAVORITE is on 7-0 SU & 6-0 ATS run in L7 TT-OKS matchups at TEXAS TECH 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 NEBRASKA * OKLAHOMA ST is on 5-1 ATS run vs. NEBRASKA 10/30/10 at Kansas St * KANSAS ST is 5-0 SU & ATS in its L5 home games vs. OKLAHOMA ST Points Scored - Allowed 28.4 (56) 21.7 (31) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 367.2 (70) 332.4 (30) 11/6/10 BAYLOR * FAVORITE is 10-0 SU & 9-1 ATS in L10 OKS-BAY matchups YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.36 (71) 4.70 (16) 11/13/10 at Texas * TEXAS is 11-0 SU & 8-3 ATS vs. OKLAHOMA ST since 99 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.40 (51) 3.00 (12) 11/20/10 at Kansas * OKLAHOMA ST is on 5-3 SU & 7-1 ATS run vs. KANSAS YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.94 (73) 6.10 (21) Avg. Time of Possession 31.84 (15) 11/27/10 OKLAHOMA * FAVORITE is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in L5 OKS-OKL matchups Turnover Differential +0.0 (61) 3rd Down Conversion % 36.1% (82) 35.2% (26) Straight Up 7-6 7-6 9-4 9-4 32-20 (62%) * OKLAHOMA ST is on a 2-14 ATS (-13.4 Units) skid on the road vs. poor rushing teams - averaging Overall ATS 6-5 6-6 8-4 6-6 26-21 (55%) <=120 RYPG The Average Score was OKLAHOMA ST 18.8, OPPONENT 32.3. Potential spots for at Home ATS 3-2 2-3 5-1 4-4 14-10 (58%) 2010: 10/16 - at Texas Tech, 11/20 - at Kansas Away/Neutral ATS 3-3 4-3 3-3 2-2 12-11 (52%) * OKLAHOMA ST is 12-3 UNDER the total (+8.7 Units) on the road since 07. The Average Score vs Conference ATS 3-4 4-4 5-3 4-3 16-14 (53%) was OKLAHOMA ST 27.5, OPPONENT 25.8. Potential spots for 2010: 10/8 - at La Lafayette, Non-Conference ATS 3-1 2-2 3-1 2-3 10-7 (59%) 10/16 - at Texas Tech, 10/30 - at Kansas St, 11/13 - at Texas, 11/20 - at Kansas as Favorite ATS 4-2 3-2 8-0 5-3 20-7 (74%) * OKLAHOMA ST is on a 12-3 OVER the total (+8.7 Units) run in all games where the line is +3 as Underdog ATS 2-3 3-4 0-4 0-3 5-14 (26%) to -3 The Average Score was OKLAHOMA ST 26.4, OPPONENT 28.6. Potential spots for 2010: Over-Under 8-4 6-6 6-6 4-8 24-24 (50%) 11/20 - at Kansas 9/2 SW MISSOURI ST 52-10 W - - - 9/1 at Georgia 14-35 L +6 L 56.5 U 8/30 at Washington St 39-13 W -8 W 64 U 9/5 GEORGIA 24-10 W -5 W 60.5 U 9/9 at Arkansas St 35-7 W -12.5 W 46 U 9/8 FLA ATLANTIC 42-6 W -24 W 56.5 U 9/6 HOUSTON 56-37 W -14.5 W 61.5 O 9/12 HOUSTON 35-45 L -16.5 L 71 O 9/16 FLA ATLANTIC 48-8 W -31 W 46.5 O 9/14 at Troy 23-41 L -10 L 61.5 O 9/13 MISSOURI ST 57-13 W - - - 9/19 RICE 41-24 W -32.5 L 66.5 U 9/23 at Houston 25-34 L +2.5 L 55 O 9/22 TEXAS TECH 49-45 W +5.5 W 72 O 9/27 TROY 55-24 W -17.5 W 61.5 O 9/26 GRAMBLING 56-6 W -40.5 W - 10/7 at Kansas St 27-31 L -2.5 L 43.5 O 9/29 SAM HOUSTON ST 39-3 W - - - 10/4 TEXAS A&M 56-28 W -24.5 W 62 O 10/10 at Texas A&M 36-31 W -5 T 60.5 O 10/14 at Kansas 42-32 W +2.5 W 52 O 10/6 at Texas A&M 23-24 L +7 W 64.5 U 10/11 at Missouri 28-23 W +13.5 W 76.5 U 10/17 MISSOURI 33-17 W -6.5 W 55 U 10/21 TEXAS A&M 33-34 L -2.5 L 56 O 10/13 at Nebraska 45-14 W +3.5 W 64 U 10/18 BAYLOR 34-6 W -17 W 64.5 U 10/24 at Baylor 34-7 W -7.5 W 52 U 10/28 NEBRASKA 41-29 W +5 W 55 O 10/20 KANSAS ST 41-39 W -3 L 60 O 10/25 at Texas 24-28 L +12 W 66.5 U 10/31 TEXAS 14-41 L +9 L 53 O 11/4 at Texas 10-36 L +18 L 62.5 U 11/3 TEXAS 35-38 L +2 L 62 O 11/1 IOWA ST 59-17 W -29.5 W 61 O 11/7 at Iowa St 34-8 W -7.5 W 54 U 11/11 BAYLOR 66-24 W -16.5 W 59.5 O 11/10 KANSAS 28-43 L +4 L 66.5 O 11/8 at Texas Tech 20-56 L +4 L 71.5 O 11/14 TEXAS TECH 24-17 W -4.5 W 60.5 U 11/18 at Texas Tech 24-30 L +6 T 69.5 U 11/17 at Baylor 45-14 W -14 W 65.5 U 11/15 at Colorado 30-17 W -17 L 55.5 U 11/19 COLORADO 31-28 W -17 L 47 O 11/25 OKLAHOMA 21-27 L +4.5 L 52.5 U 11/24 at Oklahoma 17-49 L +13.5 L 66.5 U 11/29 OKLAHOMA 41-61 L +10 L 75 O 11/28 at Oklahoma 0-27 L +8 L 48 U 12/28 vs. Alabama 34-31 W -1.5 W 49 O 12/31 vs. Indiana 49-33 W -6.5 W 69.5 O 12/30 vs. Oregon 31-42 L +1 L 75.5 U 1/2 vs. Ole Miss 7-21 L +3.5 L 51 U Where: Austin, TX Head Coach: Mack Brown, 13th year (128-27 SU) Conference: Big 12 2009 RECORD: 13-1 SU, 5-8-1 ATS Facility: Memorial Stadium 9/4/10 at Rice * TEXAS has won four straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. RICE 9/11/10 WYOMING 2009 Scoring Differential: +22.6 (#4 of 120) 9/18/10 at Texas Tech * L8 games of TT-TEX series are 7-1 OVER the total 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +26.3 (#1 of 120) 9/25/10 UCLA * UCLA is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. TEXAS 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 61 (#3 of 120) 10/2/10 vs. Oklahoma (Dallas, TX) * TEXAS is 4-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in its L5 games vs. OKLAHOMA 2009 Schedule Strength: 42.14 (#8 of 120) 10/16/10 at Nebraska * UNDER the total is 6-0 in L6 games of NEB-TEX series 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 IOWA ST * ROAD TEAM has covered spread in four straight TEX-ISU games 10/30/10 BAYLOR * ROAD TEAM is 6-8 SU but 11-3 ATS in TEX-BAY series since 98 Points Scored - Allowed 39.3 (3) 16.7 (12) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 421.2 (28) 251.9 (3) 11/6/10 at Kansas St * UNDERDOG is 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 KSU-TEX matchups YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.60 (60) 3.84 (1) 11/13/10 OKLAHOMA ST * TEXAS is 11-0 SU & 8-3 ATS vs. OKLAHOMA ST since 99 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.03 (69) 2.21 (1) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.09 (64) 5.47 (8) 11/20/10 FLA ATLANTIC Avg. Time of Possession 30.56 (45) 11/25/10 TEXAS A&M * HOME TEAM is 8-5 SU & 10-3 ATS in TEX-TAM series since 98 Turnover Differential +0.6 (15) 3rd Down Conversion % 46.1% (13) 27.1% (1) Straight Up 10-3 10-3 12-1 13-1 45-8 (85%) * TEXAS is on a 29-15 ATS (+12.5 Units) run vs. teams with a losing record The Average Score Overall ATS 5-7 7-6 9-4 5-8 26-25 (51%) was TEXAS 40.2, OPPONENT 16.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - at Rice, 10/30 - BAYLOR, at Home ATS 3-3 3-3 5-2 2-4 13-12 (52%) 11/20 - FLA ATLANTIC, 11/25 - TEXAS A&M Away/Neutral ATS 2-4 4-3 4-2 3-4 13-13 (50%) * TEXAS is on a 25-9 ATS (+15.1 Units) run on the road after having won 3 out of their last 4 vs Conference ATS 3-5 4-4 5-3 4-4 16-16 (50%) games The Average Score was TEXAS 33.5, OPPONENT 21.9. Potential spots for 2010: WATCH Non-Conference ATS 2-2 3-2 4-1 1-4 10-9 (53%) FOR STRAIGHT UP WINNING STREAKS as Favorite ATS 5-7 6-6 6-4 5-7 22-24 (48%) * TEXAS is on a 6-18 ATS (-13.8 Units) skid on the road as a hot team, having won 8 or more of its as Underdog ATS 0-0 1-0 3-0 0-1 4-1 (80%) last 10 games The Average Score was TEXAS 31.3, OPPONENT 26.5. Potential spots for 2010: Over-Under 5-7 9-4 6-7 7-7 27-25 (52%) WATCH FOR STRAIGHT UP WINNING STREAKS 9/2 NORTH TEXAS 56-7 W -40.5 W 53 O 9/1 ARKANSAS ST 21-13 W -40 L 54.5 U 8/30 FLA ATLANTIC 52-10 W -23.5 W 62.5 U 9/5 LA MONROE 59-20 W -42.5 L 61 O 9/9 OHIO ST 7-24 L -3 L 52 U 9/8 TCU 34-13 W -7.5 W 43 O 9/6 at UTEP 42-13 W -26 W 61 U 9/12 at Wyoming 41-10 W -32 L 56 U 9/16 at Rice 52-7 W -36 W 54 O 9/15 at Ucf 35-32 W -16.5 L 51 O 9/20 RICE 52-10 W -29 W 68 U 9/19 TEXAS TECH 34-24 W -19.5 L 66 U 9/23 IOWA ST 37-14 W -25 L 54 U 9/22 RICE 58-14 W -38 W 65 O 9/27 ARKANSAS 52-10 W -27 W 60.5 O 9/26 UTEP 64-7 W -37 W 64.5 O 9/30 SAM HOUSTON ST 56-3 W - - - 9/29 KANSAS ST 21-41 L -14 L 56 O 10/4 at Colorado 38-14 W -11 W 51.5 O 10/10 COLORADO 38-14 W -33.5 L 59 U 10/7 vs. Oklahoma 28-10 W -4 W 47.5 U 10/6 vs. Oklahoma 21-28 L +12.5 W 57 U 10/11 vs. Oklahoma 45-35 W +7 W 56.5 O 10/17 vs. Oklahoma 16-13 W -3 T 52 U 10/14 BAYLOR 63-31 W -27.5 W 49 O 10/13 at Iowa St 56-3 W -16.5 W 52 O 10/18 MISSOURI 56-31 W -4 W 65 O 10/24 at Missouri 41-7 W -13 W 51.5 U 10/31 at Oklahoma St 41-14 W -9 W 53 O 10/21 at Nebraska 22-20 W -5.5 L 47 U 10/20 at Baylor 31-10 W -26.5 L 60 U 10/25 OKLAHOMA ST 28-24 W -12 L 66.5 U 11/7 UCF 35-3 W -35.5 L 47 U 10/28 at Texas Tech 35-31 W -10 L 55.5 O 10/27 NEBRASKA 28-25 W -20.5 L 58.5 U 11/1 at Texas Tech 33-39 L -3.5 L 71 O 11/14 at Baylor 47-14 W -22.5 W 51.5 O 11/4 OKLAHOMA ST 36-10 W -18 W 62.5 U 11/3 at Oklahoma St 38-35 W -2 W 62 O 11/8 BAYLOR 45-21 W -25.5 L 62 O 11/21 KANSAS 51-20 W -28 W 57.5 O 11/11 at Kansas St 42-45 L -16.5 L 50.5 O 11/10 TEXAS TECH 59-43 W -6 W 65 O 11/15 at Kansas 35-7 W -13.5 W 64.5 U 11/26 at Texas A&M 49-39 W -20.5 L 63.5 O 11/24 TEXAS A&M 7-12 L -13.5 L 54 U 11/23 at Texas A&M 30-38 L -7 L 60.5 O 11/27 TEXAS A&M 49-9 W -35 W 66 U 12/5 vs. Nebraska 13-12 W -14 L 46.5 U 12/30 vs. Iowa 26-24 W -9 L 54 U 12/27 vs. Arizona St 52-34 W -1 W 62.5 O 1/5 vs. Ohio St 24-21 W -9 L 51.5 U 1/7 vs. Alabama 21-37 L +3.5 L 44.5 O 78 WWW.STATFOX.COM

TEXAS A&M AGGIES 2010 Schedule Strength: 44.25 (#9 of 120) TEXAS TECH RED RAIDERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 40.33 (#36 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 79 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 3-4 - Starters Returning: 9 Lettermen Returning: 42 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: 3-4 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 46 Where: College Station, TX Head Coach: Mike Sherman, 3rd year (10-14 SU) Conference: Big 12 2009 RECORD: 6-7 SU, 6-6-1 ATS Facility: Kyle Field 9/4/10 SF AUSTIN 9/11/10 LOUISIANA TECH * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in TAM-LAT series 2009 Scoring Differential: -0.7 (#75 of 120) 9/18/10 FLA INTERNATIONAL 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +1.7 (#60 of 120) 9/30/10 at Oklahoma St * L4 games in OKS-TAM series at OKLAHOMA ST went OVER the total 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 41 (#48 of 120) 10/9/10 vs. Arkansas (Arlington, TX) 2009 Schedule Strength: 41.54 (#13 of 120) 10/16/10 MISSOURI * TEXAS A&M has covered spread in L2 games vs. MISSOURI 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Kansas * ROAD TEAM is 3-2 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 KAN-TAM matchups 10/30/10 TEXAS TECH * TEXAS TECH is 11-5 SU & 12-4 ATS vs. TEXAS A&M since 94 Points Scored - Allowed 32.8 (19) 33.5 (105) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 465.8 (6) 426.3 (104) 11/6/10 OKLAHOMA * HOME TEAM is 11-5 SU & 13-3 ATS in TAM-OKL series since 93 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.75 (45) 5.93 (92) 11/13/10 at Baylor * FAVORITE is 16-1 SU & 13-4 ATS in BAY-TAM series since 93 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.40 (50) 4.60 (94) 11/20/10 NEBRASKA * L3 games in TAM-NEB series at TEXAS A&M went OVER the total YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.19 (58) 7.37 (81) Avg. Time of Possession 29.96 (63) 11/25/10 at Texas * HOME TEAM is 8-5 SU & 10-3 ATS in TEX-TAM series since 98 Turnover Differential -0.1 (68) 3rd Down Conversion % 50.5% (5) 37.5% (41) Straight Up 9-4 7-6 4-8 6-7 26-25 (51%) * TEXAS A&M is on a 3-12 ATS (-10.2 Units) skid as road underdogs of 3.5 to 10 points The Overall ATS 9-3 5-7 4-8 6-6 24-24 (50%) Average Score was TEXAS A&M 16.9, OPPONENT 33.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/30 - at at Home ATS 5-1 3-3 2-5 5-1 15-10 (60%) Oklahoma St, 10/9 - ARKANSAS, 10/23 - at Kansas Away/Neutral ATS 4-2 2-4 2-3 1-5 9-14 (39%) * TEXAS A&M is on a 11-27 ATS (-18.7 Units) skid on the road vs. teams scoring 31 or more PPG vs Conference ATS 7-1 4-4 3-5 4-3 18-13 (58%) The Average Score was TEXAS A&M 18.4, OPPONENT 36.1. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - Non-Conference ATS 2-2 1-3 1-3 2-3 6-11 (35%) ARKANSAS, 11/25 - at Texas as Favorite ATS 5-2 2-2 2-2 4-3 13-9 (59%) * Over the L2 seasons, TEXAS A&M is 8-1 OVER the total (+6.9 Units) on the road. The Average as Underdog ATS 4-1 3-5 2-6 2-3 11-15 (42%) Score was TEXAS A&M 27.2, OPPONENT 43.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/30 - at Oklahoma St, Over-Under 7-5 5-7 8-4 8-5 28-21 (57%) 10/23 - at Kansas, 11/13 - at Baylor, 11/25 - at Texas 9/2 THE CITADEL 35-3 W - - - 9/1 MONTANA ST 38-7 W - - - 8/30 ARKANSAS ST 14-18 L -18.5 L 50.5 U 9/5 NEW MEXICO 41-6 W -14.5 W 55 U 9/9 LA LAFAYETTE 51-7 W -23 W 53 O 9/8 FRESNO ST 47-45 W -17.5 L 52 O 9/6 at New Mexico 28-22 W -1.5 W 39.5 O 9/19 UTAH ST 38-30 W -21 L 58.5 O 9/16 vs. Army 28-24 W -27.5 L 49 O 9/15 LA MONROE 54-14 W -22 W 61 O 9/20 MIAMI 23-41 L +2.5 L 40 O 9/26 UAB 56-19 W -15 W 64.5 O 9/23 LOUISIANA TECH 45-14 W -23.5 W 57 O 9/20 at Miami 17-34 L +2 L 45.5 O 9/27 ARMY 21-17 W -27 L 44.5 U 10/3 vs. Arkansas 19-47 L +2 L 67 U 9/30 TEXAS TECH 27-31 L -2.5 L 55 O 9/29 BAYLOR 34-10 W -16.5 W 57.5 U 10/4 at Oklahoma St 28-56 L +24.5 L 62 O 10/10 OKLAHOMA ST 31-36 L +5 T 60.5 O 10/7 at Kansas 21-18 W -1 W 52 U 10/6 OKLAHOMA ST 24-23 W -7 L 64.5 U 10/11 KANSAS ST 30-44 L +3.5 L 58.5 O 10/17 at Kansas St 14-62 L -5.5 L 59 O 10/14 MISSOURI 25-19 W -1.5 W 51 U 10/13 at Texas Tech 7-35 L +10 L 68 U 10/18 TEXAS TECH 25-43 L +20.5 W 61.5 O 10/24 at Texas Tech 52-30 W +22.5 W 65.5 O 10/21 at Oklahoma St 34-33 W +2.5 W 56 O 10/20 at Nebraska 36-14 W +1.5 W 58.5 U 10/25 at Iowa St 49-35 W +2.5 W 52 O 10/31 IOWA ST 35-10 W -6.5 W 61 U 10/28 at Baylor 31-21 W -4 W 54 U 10/27 KANSAS 11-19 L +2.5 L 54 U 11/1 COLORADO 24-17 W -4 W 51 U 11/7 at Colorado 34-35 L -3 L 56 O 11/4 OKLAHOMA 16-17 L +2.5 W 46.5 U 11/3 at Oklahoma 14-42 L +21.5 L 56.5 U 11/8 OKLAHOMA 28-66 L +27.5 L 73 O 11/14 at Oklahoma 10-65 L +19.5 L 57.5 O 11/11 NEBRASKA 27-28 L +1.5 W 52.5 O 11/10 at Missouri 26-40 L +17 W 61 O 11/15 at Baylor 21-41 L +8 L 59.5 O 11/21 BAYLOR 38-3 W -6 W 61 U 11/24 at Texas 12-7 W +13.5 W 54 U 11/23 TEXAS 38-30 W +7 W 60.5 O 11/27 at Texas 9-49 L +35 L 66 U 11/26 TEXAS 39-49 L +20.5 W 63.5 O 12/28 vs. California 10-45 L +3.5 L 54.5 O 12/29 vs. Penn St 17-24 L +5 L 52 U 12/28 vs. Georgia 20-44 L +6 L 65.5 U Where: Lubbock, TX Head Coach: Tommy Tuberville, 1st year Conference: Big 12 2009 RECORD: 9-4 SU, 7-5 ATS Facility: Jones AT&T Stadium 9/5/10 SMU * L4 TT-SMU series games have gone UNDER the total 9/11/10 at New Mexico * TEXAS TECH is 7-1 SU & 6-2 ATS in its L8 games vs. NEW MEXICO 2009 Scoring Differential: +14.5 (#13 of 120) 9/18/10 TEXAS * L8 games of TT-TEX series are 7-1 OVER the total 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +14.5 (#11 of 120) 10/2/10 at Iowa St * FAVORITE is on 6-0 SU & ATS run in L6 ISU-TT matchups 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 52 (#11 of 120) 10/9/10 vs. Baylor (Dallas, TX) * TEXAS TECH is 16-2 SU & 13-5 ATS vs. BAYLOR since 92 2009 Schedule Strength: 37.69 (#41 of 120) 10/16/10 OKLAHOMA ST * FAVORITE is on 7-0 SU & 6-0 ATS run in L7 TT-OKS matchups at TEXAS TECH 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Colorado * L5 games of COL-TT series are 5-0 UNDER the total 10/30/10 at Texas A&M * TEXAS TECH is 11-5 SU & 12-4 ATS vs. TEXAS A&M since 94 Points Scored - Allowed 37.0 (7) 22.5 (41) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 470.7 (5) 352.0 (48) 11/6/10 MISSOURI * MISSOURI is 5-1 SU & ATS in its L6 games vs. TEXAS TECH YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.19 (21) 4.83 (24) 11/13/10 at Oklahoma * HOME TEAM has won SU & ATS in four straight OKL-TT games YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.42 (104) 3.42 (26) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.51 (43) 6.29 (27) 11/20/10 WEBER ST Avg. Time of Possession 28.91 (94) 11/27/10 HOUSTON * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 TT-HOU games Turnover Differential -0.5 (95) 3rd Down Conversion % 41.4% (43) 40.4% (71) Straight Up 8-5 9-4 11-2 9-4 37-15 (71%) * TEXAS TECH is on a 5-16 ATS (-12.6 Units) skid as road underdogs of 3.5 to 10 points The Overall ATS 5-6 6-6 5-5 7-5 23-22 (51%) Average Score was TEXAS TECH 21.2, OPPONENT 39. Potential spots for 2010: 10/30 - at at Home ATS 3-1 3-2 2-2 4-2 12-7 (63%) Texas A&M, 11/13 - at Oklahoma Away/Neutral ATS 2-5 3-4 3-3 3-3 11-15 (42%) * TEXAS TECH is on a 18-6 OVER the total (+11.4 Units) run vs. excellent offensive teams - vs Conference ATS 4-3 4-4 4-4 5-3 17-14 (55%) averaging >=6.25 YPP The Average Score was TEXAS TECH 32.1, OPPONENT 34.6. Potential Non-Conference ATS 1-3 2-2 1-1 2-2 6-8 (43%) spots for 2010: 9/18 - TEXAS, 11/6 - MISSOURI, 11/13 - at Oklahoma, 11/27 - HOUSTON as Favorite ATS 3-4 5-4 4-4 4-4 16-16 (50%) * TEXAS TECH is 44-24 ATS (+17.6 Units) on the road vs. good passing teams averaging 235 or as Underdog ATS 2-2 1-2 1-1 3-1 7-6 (54%) more PYPG. since 92. The Average Score was TEXAS TECH 38.9, OPPONENT 20.2. Potential Over-Under 8-4 5-7 8-3 5-7 26-21 (55%) spots for 2010: 9/5 - SMU, 10/16 - OKLAHOMA ST, 11/6 - MISSOURI, 11/27 - HOUSTON 9/2 SMU 35-3 W -24.5 W 52.5 U 9/3 at Smu 49-9 W -8.5 W 60.5 U 8/30 E WASHINGTON 49-24 W - - - 9/5 N DAKOTA 38-13 W - - - 9/9 at UTEP 38-35 W -7 L 58 O 9/8 UTEP 45-31 W -24 L 62 O 9/6 at Nevada 35-19 W -10.5 W 71 U 9/12 RICE 55-10 W -28 W 64 O 9/16 at TCU 3-12 L +1 L 54 U 9/15 at Rice 59-24 W -27 W 64 O 9/13 SMU 43-7 W -36 T 68.5 U 9/19 at Texas 24-34 L +19.5 W 66 U 9/23 SE LOUISIANA 62-0 W - - - 9/22 at Oklahoma St 45-49 L -5.5 L 72 O 9/20 MASSACHUSETTS 56-14 W - - - 9/26 at Houston 28-29 L -2 L 75.5 U 9/30 at Texas A&M 31-27 W +2.5 W 55 O 9/29 NW LOUISIANA 75-7 W - - - 10/4 at Kansas St 58-28 W -7 W 66 O 10/3 NEW MEXICO 48-28 W -34.5 L 56 O 10/7 MISSOURI 21-38 L -7.5 L 52 O 10/6 IOWA ST 42-17 W -24.5 W 65 U 10/11 NEBRASKA 37-31 W -19 L 67 O 10/10 KANSAS ST 66-14 W -16 W 54.5 O 10/14 at Colorado 6-30 L -5.5 L 48 U 10/13 TEXAS A&M 35-7 W -10 W 68 U 10/18 at Texas A&M 43-25 W -20.5 L 61.5 O 10/17 at Nebraska 31-10 W +10.5 W 58.5 U 10/21 at Iowa St 42-26 W -2 W 50.5 O 10/20 at Missouri 10-41 L +3.5 L 73.5 U 10/25 at Kansas 63-21 W -2 W 69 O 10/24 TEXAS A&M 30-52 L -22.5 L 65.5 O 10/28 TEXAS 31-35 L +10 W 55.5 O 10/27 COLORADO 26-31 L -13 L 61 U 11/1 TEXAS 39-33 W +3.5 W 71 O 10/31 KANSAS 42-21 W -6.5 W 66 U 11/4 BAYLOR 55-21 W -17 W 56 O 11/3 at Baylor 38-7 W -19 W 66 U 11/8 OKLAHOMA ST 56-20 W -4 W 71.5 O 11/14 at Oklahoma St 17-24 L +4.5 L 60.5 U 11/11 at Oklahoma 24-34 L +7.5 L 52.5 O 11/10 at Texas 43-59 L +6 L 65 O 11/22 at Oklahoma 21-65 L +7 L 76.5 O 11/21 OKLAHOMA 41-13 W +6.5 W 54.5 U 11/18 OKLAHOMA ST 30-24 W -6 T 69.5 U 11/17 OKLAHOMA 34-27 W +7 W 67 U 11/29 BAYLOR 35-28 W -22 L 70 U 11/28 vs. Baylor 20-13 W -20.5 L 59 U 12/29 vs. Minnesota 44-41 W -8 L 63 O 1/1 vs. Virginia 31-28 W -6.5 L 58.5 O 1/2 vs. Ole Miss 34-47 L -4 L 66 O 1/2 vs. Michigan St 41-31 W -9.5 W 60 O

BIG TEN BIG 10 Preview The Big Ten Conference is being projected as a three-horse race for 2010, as Ohio State, Iowa, and Wisconsin are all receiving high praise in preseason polls, including that of StatFox. The season figures to be a coming out party for Buckeyes QB Terrelle Pryor, the most highly-sought recruit of the 2008 class who will now be a junior. Pryor had an incredible game in Ohio State s Rose Bowl win over Oregon this past January and is expected to pick up where he left off. He isn t the only star from the three frontrunners though, as Iowa s Adrian Clayborn is a defensive beast and Wisconsin s John Clay can run roughshod over opposing defenses. Of the three teams, Iowa has the most favorable schedule, hosting the other two. Beyond the top three, Penn State is usually tough, but this could be a rebuilding season by Nittany Lion standards. Michigan State should score a lot of points, as could Purdue and Indiana, a pair of darkhorses. Many eyes will be on Ann Arbor, where plenty of pressure is on coach Rich Rodriguez to pull the storied Michigan program out of one of its worst football droughts ever. He s not the only coach on the hot seat though, as Ron Zook could be in search of a new home if pessimistic expectations are realized in Champaign. If you re wondering why we forgot about Northwestern and Minnesota now, it might be even easier to do so to come September. ILLINOIS FIGHTING ILLINI Illinois head coach Ron Zook enters the season on a short leash. Win and his critics will back off. Lose and he ll lose his job. Following a surprise trip to Pasadena in 2007, the Fighting Illini have won a total of eight games since. Despite going 3-9 last year, Zook maintained his job, but his staff underwent more shakeup than a Shakira video as the Illini have six new coaches, including offensive coordinator (Paul Petrino) and defensive coordinator (Vic Koenning) Petrino must replace Illinois most experienced quarterback (Juice Williams), its game-changing wideout (Arrelious Benn) and its best offensive lineman (Jon Asamoah). Redshirt freshman Nathan Scheelhaase takes over at quarterback. Scheelhaase is nearly as green as Al Gore, but the Illini coaches like his elusiveness and leadership skills. Expect Zook to rely on the running game though only two starting linemen are back. Running backs Mikel Leshoure and Jason Ford, both battering ramtypes, combined for 1,322 yards, nine touchdowns and 6.4 2009 STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Ohio State 11-2-0 0.846 377 163 7-1-0 6-1-0 5-1-0 10-3-0 76.9% 3-8-2 Penn State 11-2-0 0.846 375 159 6-2-0 6-2-0 5-0-0 7-6-0 53.8% 2-9-1 Iowa 11-2-0 0.846 301 200 6-2-0 6-1-0 5-1-0 8-4-0 66.7% 4-8-0 Wisconsin 10-3-0 0.769 413 283 5-3-0 6-1-0 4-2-0 7-6-0 53.8% 7-5-0 Northwestern 8-5-0 0.615 337 318 5-3-0 5-2-0 3-3-0 6-6-0 50.0% 5-6-1 Michigan State 6-7-0 0.462 386 342 4-4-0 4-3-0 2-4-0 4-7-1 36.4% 8-4-0 Purdue 5-7-0 0.417 334 349 4-4-0 3-4-0 2-3-0 6-4-2 60.0% 5-5-2 Minnesota 6-7-0 0.462 272 309 3-5-0 4-3-0 2-4-0 5-7-0 41.7% 7-5-0 Illinois 3-9-0 0.250 290 362 2-6-0 2-4-0 1-5-0 3-8-1 27.3% 4-7-0 Michigan 5-7-0 0.417 354 330 1-7-0 5-3-0 0-4-0 4-7-0 36.4% 6-5-0 Indiana 4-8-0 0.333 282 354 1-7-0 3-3-0 1-5-0 7-4-0 63.6% 6-3-2 yards per carry Koenning introduced a new defensive scheme that features a new bandit position, an outside linebacker/end hybrid spot and Michael Buchanan is expected be man that key spot. Koenning has playmakers aplenty in the middle of his defense, but there is a gaping hole at safety, because Garrett Edwards didn t return for his final year of eligibility The Illini needs to go bowling, after a two-year hiatus, to save Zook s hide. The defense and running game should be strengths, but Scheelhaase will hold the key to the season. If Scheelhaase blossoms early, then a second-tier bowl is possible. If not, Zook will be shopping for a new job. INDIANA HOOSIERS After implementing a Pistol offense last year, embattled Indiana head coach Bill Lynch focused on installing a new 3-4 defensive scheme in spring ball. Coaches believe that it better suits their personnel big tackles, like Adam Replogle, who are athletic and versatile. Color us skeptical that the new scheme will work as defensive woes have doomed the Hoosiers for the last decade, as they finished no better than 71st nationally in total defense since 2000 The Hoosiers had the Big Ten s No. 3 passer in quarterback Ben Chappell and two of the league s top six receivers in Tandon Doss and Damarlo Belcher. They also had a running back in Darius Willis with breakaway ability, but Indiana still finished 10th in the league in red-zone offense. All four are back, and Indiana has more than enough weapons to be better in the red zone. Chappell established himself as a quality Big Ten quarterback with 2,941 passing yards and 17 touchdowns. He s got all-league potential if he can cut down on his 15 interceptions Despite a veteran-laden unit, Indiana ranked 10th in the Big Ten in points allowed (29.5 points per game) and total yards allowed (401.0 yards per game). The Hoosiers lost seven starters on defense, which may or may not be a negative when considering the scheme change and past performance Indiana s first six games will tell 80 WWW.STATFOX.COM

the story of the season. Five of those should be considered winnable games. If the Hoosiers get off to a 5-1 or 4-2 start, they should be in good shape to return to a bowl. If not, then Lynch could be a goner. IOWA HAWKEYES With 14 starters back from last year s 11-win Orange Bowl champion, Iowa has all the ingredients necessary to be a top 10 fixture in the national polls and really push Ohio State for Big Ten supremacy. The Hawkeyes feature a star-studded defense (led by All-American end Adrian Clayborn), a veteran quarterback (Ricky Stanzi), a deep stable of running backs and a very good head coach in Kirk Ferentz Stanzi is a proven winner (he s 18-4 as the starting quarterback), but decision making has been an issue. He ll need to significantly cut down on his 15 interceptions in order for the Hawkeyes to stay near the top of both the national and the Big Ten charts. He has two of the Big Ten s best wideouts to play catch with and the rest of the skill position cupboard is well-stocked too. However, the Hawkeyes must replace four starting linemen, including left tackle Bryan Bulaga, an NFL first-rounder Iowa must replace two first first-team All-Big Ten players but the defense won t lack star power. This figures to be one of the most feared units in the land as eight starters return. Last year s group allowed just 15.4 PPG, including 14 to powerful Georgia Tech in the Orange Bowl win Iowa has few obvious weaknesses and a pretty favorable schedule. Its toughest non-conference game is a Sept. 18 trip to Arizona and it plays all three of the other expected Big Ten heavyweights Penn State, Wisconsin and Ohio State at home. In short, it looks like another January bowl berth for Ferentz and Co. MICHIGAN WOLVERINES It s a make-or-break season for Michigan head coach Rich Rodriguez, who led the nation in votes of confidence from an athletic director. Richie Rod needs to get a bowl any bowl to quiet his growing legion of critics who are tired of the losing and the NCAA investigations into him at both West Virginia (his previous stop) and Michigan The pivotal season for the Maize and Blue could come down to Denard Robinson and an improved line. If Robinson builds off a strong spring, and wins the starting quarterback job over Tate Forcier, then Rodriguez will have the runpass threat a la Pat White at West Virginia needed to run his spread option attack. Regardless, the Wolverines need a more reliable ground attack and seem to have a deep enough stable of backs. In the trenches, senior left guard Stephen Schilling (6-5, 303) will lead an extremely young, but gifted line Greg Robinson, a successful coordinator at the college and NFL levels, has work to do as the Wolverines allowed the second-most points in school history last season. Adding to Robinson s anxiety is the fact that one-man wrecking crew Brandon Graham (10.5 sacks, 26 tackles for loss) is now cashing large first-round paychecks from the Philadelphia Eagles. Robinson will rely on the return of eight experienced starting defenders for improvement No college head coach is on a hotter seat than Rodriguez. Whether he can win enough to save his job will be one of college football s most-followed stories. It won t be easy as the Maize and Blue enter the season with an unsettled quarterback competition, a shaky kicking game and a new defensive scheme. MICHIGAN STATE SPARTANS With bowl berths in his first three seasons, head coach Mark Dantonio has stabilized the Michigan State program. Now comes the hard part, cracking the upper echelon of Big Ten teams and earning better party invites than last year s Alamo Bowl. Dantonio has leaders on both sides of the ball in All- American LB Greg Jones and QB Kirk Cousins, but he must fill holes along the offensive line and secondary to have any hope of threatening the Big Ten s elite teams Cousins was just the eighth sophomore in the last 60 years to lead the Spartans in passing and he should be one of the best quarterbacks in the Big Ten Conference, with plenty of goodhands people to throw the ball to. Sophomore tailbacks Larry Caper and Edwin Baker will split carries again. The left side of the line is rock solid with guard Joel Foreman (6-4, 306) and tackle D.J. Young (6-5, 315), but the right side is still unsettled Jones is the state of Michigan s biggest hitmaker since Eminem. Last season, Jones finished third in the nation in tackles with 154 and also registered nine sacks. While linebacker is clearly an area of strength, pass defense is a big concern. Michigan State struggled mightily against the pass, ranking last in the Big Ten and 112th nationally (267.6 YPG allowed) The Spartans will score points and go bowling for a fourth straight year. But there appears to be a few too many questions i.e. three new starters on the offensive line and uncertainty at safety and placekicker for Spartans to finish ahead of the Big Ten s elite teams. Still, with the first half-dozen games in the state of Michigan, a fast start and a fourth-place finish both seem possible. BIG TEN WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 81

MINNESOTA GOLDEN GOPHERS Minnesota made a trip to the Insight Bowl, despite an inconsistent offense. Will things be better in 2010? The offense must adjust to life without wideout Eric Decker, now playing for the Denver Broncos. The defense will sport eight new starters, including an all-new linebacking crew In Year One A.D. (after Decker), new coordinator Jeff Horton is committed to running the ball much more effectively. Not only a reliable ground attack would take pressure off senior quarterback Adam Weber, but it will also allow the defense to get more rest. Weber knew his job was on the line this spring, and he stepped up and solidified his hold on the No. 1 job. Aside from his miscues, Weber is hurt by the lack of a consistent running attack (the Gophers were last in the Big Ten in rushing yards the past two seasons), which results in him taking a weekly pounding from opposing defenses. The line has some talent The Gopher defensive coaches have their work cut out as a slew of new starters must be found between now and the season opener. For instance, all three starting linebackers are gone. Plus, Minnesota must replace both of its starting tackles. The linebacking corps has some candidates to fill all the vacancies. Even still, the biggest hole for the defense could be the cornerback spot, as the Gophers must replace Traye Simmons and Marcus Sherels This team s two primary shortcomings the lack of a ground game and inconsistency on defense killed them at times in 2009 and could so again. This team should score points even with Decker now playing on Sundays. However, they must do a better job of stopping foes or they ll finish around.500 again. NORTHWESTERN WILDCATS Northwestern is in the midst of the most successful stretch in school history and that should continue as 14 starters are back from last year s eight-win Outback Bowl team. Eight incumbents return for head coach Pat Fitzgerald on offense, but one of the newbies junior quarterback Dan Persa has huge cleats to fill as All-Big Ten selection Mike Kafka is now a member of the Philadelphia Eagles. The defense returns six starters, but must replace steady safeties Brad Phillips and Brendan Smith Persa has limited game experience, but established himself as the new man under center in Northwestern s spread offense with a strong performance in spring drills. At least Persa will operate behind an experienced line that only touts one senior guard Keegan Grant. All told, the five returning linemen enter the season with 87 combined starts. The skill position players are inexperienced but expected to develop as dynamic threats as they have in recent seasons... With all three starting linebackers back, along with a host of key reserves, that position group could be the strength of the stop unit. The first line of defense isn t quite as stccked and three-fourths of last year s starting secondary has departed, making line & safety the biggest defensive items on Fitzgerald s to-do list...if Fitzgerald can plug the holes in the defense, as well as at tailback and punter, and if Persa can emerge as a real threat under center, then the Wildcats could go to a bowl for a third straight year something the program has never done before. OHIO STATE BUCKEYES Ohio State enters this campaign as one of the top three teams in the preseason polls. If quarterback Terrelle Pryor can build on his brilliant Rose Bowl performance versus Oregon, then no one would be surprised to see the Buckeyes in the national title game. Pryor won t have to do it alone. Nine other starters return on offense and head coach Jim Tressel also has All-America candidates at each level of the defense, as usual Pryor, the most-coveted high school recruit in the Class of 2008, is living up to all the hype finally. His performance in the Buckeyes 26-17 Rose Bowl victory was a sign of good things to come and heshould be even better during his junior season, after undergoing arthroscopic surgery in February to repair his right knee, which bothered him throughout last year. The Buckeyes will have an explosive wide receiving corps, plus with tailbacks Dan Boom Herron and Brandon Saine, a duo that combined for 1,339 yards and 11 scores, both back, Ohio State should be much more explosive on offense. Herron and Saine will run behind a beefy and talented line Despite losing defensive stalwarts again to the NFL, Ohio State still figures to field one of the Big Ten s most feared defenses. Although there is some re-tooling to do most notably at safety, the stop unit should be downright scary Led by Pryor and a star-studded defense, the Buckeyes will win a sixth straight Big Ten title. Is yet another BCS title game appearance possible? Yep. Is the program s first national title since 2002 possible? You bet. If the Buckeyes beat Miami in mid-september, then an undefeated season is possible given Ohio State s remarkable talent level. PENN STATE NITTANY LIONS At Penn State, Joe Paterno needs six wins to see 400 victories in his Hall of Fame career. He figures to have 82 WWW.STATFOX.COM

a terrific ground game, but JoePa loses serious star power from this past season s 11-win team as four defensive studs are pros now Quarterback Daryll Clark, a run-pass threat who led the Nittany Lions to a 22-4 mark over the last two seasons, is gone as well, leaving three young pups Kevin Newsome, Matt McGloin and Paul Jones to battle for the No. 1 signal-caller spot. The new quarterback, whoever that is, will operate behind a rebuilt line, but will turn and hand the ball often to Royster, one of the best running backs in the college game. Royster needs to rush for 481 more yards to break Curt Warner s career record of 3,398, and has rushed for 2,405 yards over the last two seasons, an average of 92.5 yards per contest. The Nittany Lions have a pair of tall, sure-handed wide receivers in Derek Moye and Graham Zug Jared Odrick is now playing on Sundays instead of Saturdays, but the defensive line will be fine as a pair of gifted ends, Jack Crawford and Eric Latimore, return. The school with the moniker Linebacker U had one of the best collections of linebackers in the land last year but all three are in the NFL now, meaning new guys will need to step up. The secondary also needs work If Paterno can find a quarterback and some linebackers, there s enough talent for Penn State to win nine or 10 games, but it will have to survive three brutal road contests. Paterno will get to 400 career wins, but it appears that the Nittany Lions are at least the fourth-best team in the Big Ten. PURDUE BOILERMAKERS Psst looking for a Big Ten Conference sleeper? Purdue, a team that lost five games by seven points or fewer last year, might be ready for a breakthrough. Talent returns in perhaps the team s two best players defensive end Ryan Kerrigan (Big Ten-leading 13 sacks) and wide receiver Keith Smith (Big Ten-leading 91 catches, 1,100 yards). But there are voids for head coach Danny Hope to fill, too. Perhaps the biggest concerns are the secondary (four starters have departed) and tailback (Ralph Bolden tore an ACL in his right knee and is likely lost for the season) The most important position on the team, quarterback, will need to be filled for the second consecutive year as Joey Elliott is gone. But never fear, Miami transfer Robert Marve is here. Marve should be one of the Big Ten s top newcomers thanks to his mobility and arm strength. Marve has a future pro to play catch with in Smith, who might catch 110 balls this season. The big skillposition question for the Boilers is running back, and the line will be showcasing three new starters He doesn t get a fraction of the ink that Iowa s Adrian Clayborn garners, but Purdue s Ryan Kerrigan is a big-time star. Kerrigan is the headliner, but there are other proven stars in a front seven that returns all but one starter. Purdue must replace all four starters in the secondary...the opener at Notre Dame will be tough the Irish usually find a way to win those but the next three games are must-wins if Purdue intends to make it to a bowl game for the first time since 2007. WISCONSIN BADGERS Running back John Clay, who led the Big Ten in rushing with 1,517 yards, sat out spring ball while recovering from two offseason ankle surgeries. He doesn t need the practice. He ll combine with returning quarterback Scott Tolzien (2,705 passing yards) to give the Badgers a very good offense. Six starters on offense and five on defense return for a Wisconsin team that figures to be a top 15 fixture all season long Tolzien showed up to Wisconsin in 2006 as your average, unassuming, withinthe-offense Badger quarterback who proves the rating service wrong by winning tons of games. Tolzien excelled at sucking in linebackers with play action to All-Big Ten thumper Clay and pulling to find open receivers and tight ends open between the linebackers and safeties. Clay is a human sledgehammer who eventually wears down opposing defenses and he will operate behind a mammoth line that averages over 300 pounds each. Nick Toon, the son of former Wisconsin and New York Jets star Al Toon, will blossom into a star in his own right Head coach Brett Bielema appears to have the pieces to survive key losses on defense. Remember the names of defensive ends J.J. Watt and Louis Nzegwu, as well as LB Chris Borland. Senior Niles Brinkley is poised for a big year at cornerback. In all five starters return Yet again, much is expected of the Badgers and that s when the program has struggled in recent years. But this year figures to be different. Toughto-tackle Clay (18 touchdowns) and the vastly improved Tolzien are just two of several returning starters from an offense that figures to score points galore in Big Ten play. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH Ohio State Iowa Wisconsin Michigan State Penn State Purdue Michigan Indiana Northwestern Minnesota Illinois WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 83

ILLINOIS FIGHTING ILLINI 2010 Schedule Strength: 38.33 (#53 of 120) INDIANA HOOSIERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 35.92 (#70 of 120) Offense: Pro Style - Starters Returning: 5 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 48 9/4/10 vs. Missouri (St. Louis, MO) * MISSOURI is 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS in its L8 games vs. ILLINOIS 9/11/10 S ILLINOIS 9/18/10 N ILLINOIS * ROAD TEAM is on 1-4 SU but 5-0 ATS run in ILL-NIL series 10/2/10 OHIO ST * OHIO ST is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. ILLINOIS 10/9/10 at Penn St * ROAD TEAM is 4-7 SU but 9-2 ATS in PSU-ILL series since 97 10/16/10 at Michigan St * MICHIGAN ST is 10-1 SU & 9-2 ATS vs. ILLINOIS since 95 10/23/10 INDIANA * L3 games in ILL-IND series at ILLINOIS went OVER the total 10/30/10 PURDUE * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 ILL-PUR games at ILLINOIS 11/6/10 at Michigan * L2 games in MIC-ILL series at MICHIGAN went OVER the total 11/13/10 MINNESOTA * ROAD TEAM is 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 ILL-MIN matchups 11/20/10 at Northwestern * L8 games of NW-ILL series are 7-1 UNDER the total 12/3/10 at Fresno St SCENARIO 2006 2007 2008 2009 4-yr Total Straight Up 2-10 9-4 5-7 3-9 19-30 (39%) Overall ATS 5-6 7-5 4-7 3-8 19-26 (42%) at Home ATS 2-4 3-2 2-3 1-5 8-14 (36%) Away/Neutral ATS 3-2 4-3 2-4 2-3 11-12 (48%) vs Conference ATS 5-3 6-2 4-4 2-5 17-14 (55%) Non-Conference ATS 0-3 1-3 0-3 1-3 2-12 (14%) as Favorite ATS 0-5 5-2 2-5 0-4 7-16 (30%) as Underdog ATS 5-1 2-3 2-2 3-3 12-9 (57%) Over-Under 4-7 8-4 6-5 4-7 22-23 (49%) Where: Champaign, IL Head Coach: Ron Zook, 6th year (21-39 SU) Conference: Big Ten 2009 RECORD: 3-9 SU, 3-8-1 ATS Facility: Memorial Stadium 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK Points Scored - Allowed 24.2 (81) 30.2 (96) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 393.5 (47) 403.3 (92) YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.70 (52) 5.97 (95) YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.84 (17) 4.23 (78) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.00 (71) 8.01 (102) Avg. Time of Possession 29.83 (66) Turnover Differential -0.3 (83) 3rd Down Conversion % 39.4% (58) 44.7% (98) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * Over the L2 seasons, ILLINOIS is 2-9 ATS (-7.9 Units) as favorites. The Average Score was ILLINOIS 23.4, OPPONENT 26.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - N ILLINOIS, 10/23 - INDIANA, 10/30 - PURDUE, 11/13 - MINNESOTA, 12/3 - at Fresno St * ILLINOIS is on a 8-20 ATS (-14 Units) skid at home in non-conference games The Average Score was ILLINOIS 28.3, OPPONENT 18.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - N ILLINOIS * ILLINOIS is 1-11 ATS on the road after allowing 35 or more points. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - at Penn St, 10/16 - at Michigan St Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 3-4 - Starters Returning: 4 Lettermen Returning: 45 2009 Scoring Differential: -6.0 (#89 of 120) 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -3.8 (#81 of 120) 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 35 (#66 of 120) 2009 Schedule Strength: 36.58 (#52 of 120) 9/2 E ILLINOIS 42-17 W - - - 9/1 vs. Missouri 34-40 L +5.5 L 58 O 8/30 vs. Missouri 42-52 L +9.5 L 59.5 O 9/5 vs. Missouri 9-37 L -6.5 L 60.5 U 9/9 at Rutgers 0-33 L +11 L 52 U 9/8 W ILLINOIS 21-0 W - - - 9/6 E ILLINOIS 47-21 W - - - 9/12 ILLINOIS ST 45-17 W -33.5 L - 9/16 SYRACUSE 21-31 L -3.5 L 39.5 O 9/15 at Syracuse 41-20 W -10.5 W 44.5 O 9/13 LA LAFAYETTE 20-17 W -25.5 L 62 U 9/26 at Ohio St 0-30 L +14 L 50 U 9/23 IOWA 7-24 L +20.5 W 46 U 9/22 at Indiana 27-14 W -2 W 61 U 9/27 at Penn St 24-38 L +15.5 W 54 O 10/3 PENN ST 17-35 L +8 L 48 O 9/30 at Michigan St 23-20 W +24 W 54 U 9/29 PENN ST 27-20 W +3 W 46 O 10/4 at Michigan 45-20 W +1 W 49 O 10/10 MICHIGAN ST 14-24 L +4 L 55 U 10/7 INDIANA 32-34 L -7 L 46.5 O 10/6 WISCONSIN 31-26 W -2.5 W 52 O 10/11 MINNESOTA 20-27 L -12 L 58.5 U 10/17 at Indiana 14-27 L -3.5 L 53.5 U 10/14 OHIO U 17-20 L -6.5 L 43 U 10/13 at Iowa 6-10 L -3.5 L 44 U 10/18 INDIANA 55-13 W -17 W 54.5 O 10/24 at Purdue 14-24 L +10 T 55 U 10/21 at Penn St 12-26 L +18.5 W 44.5 U 10/20 MICHIGAN 17-27 L +1.5 L 50.5 U 10/25 at Wisconsin 17-27 L -2 L 52 U 10/31 MICHIGAN 38-13 W +7 W 53.5 U 10/28 at Wisconsin 24-30 L +21 W 45 O 10/27 BALL ST 28-17 W -13.5 L 58 U 11/1 IOWA 27-24 W -2.5 W 50.5 O 11/7 at Minnesota 35-32 W +6 W 54 O 11/4 OHIO ST 10-17 L +25.5 W 48 U 11/3 at Minnesota 44-17 W -11 W 59 O 11/8 vs. W Michigan 17-23 L -8 L 64 U 11/14 NORTHWESTERN 16-21 L -6.5 L 50.5 U 11/11 PURDUE 31-42 L -3 L 46.5 O 11/10 at Ohio St 28-21 W +14.5 W 46.5 O 11/15 OHIO ST 20-30 L +8 L 43 O 11/27 at Cincinnati 36-49 L +19 W 59 O 11/18 at Northwestern 16-27 L -2.5 L 48 U 11/17 NORTHWESTERN 41-22 W -14.5 W 57 O 11/22 at Northwestern 10-27 L -3 L 54.5 U 12/5 FRESNO ST 52-53 L -2 L 58.5 O 1/1 vs. Usc 17-49 L +13 L 48 O Where: Bloomington, IN Head Coach: Bill Lynch, 4th year (14-23 SU) Conference: Big Ten 2009 RECORD: 4-8 SU, 7-4 ATS Facility: Memorial Stadium 9/2/10 TOWSON 9/18/10 at W Kentucky 2009 Scoring Differential: -6.0 (#89 of 120) 9/25/10 AKRON * INDIANA has taken L2 games vs. AKRON both SU & ATS 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -5.0 (#87 of 120) 10/2/10 MICHIGAN * ROAD TEAM is 9-2 ATS in IND-MIC series since 92 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 29 (#89 of 120) 10/9/10 at Ohio St * FAVORITE is on 8-0 SU & 7-1 ATS run in L8 OSU-IND matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 35.17 (#58 of 120) 10/16/10 ARKANSAS ST 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Illinois * L3 games in ILL-IND series at ILLINOIS went OVER the total 10/30/10 NORTHWESTERN * UNDERDOG is 4-3 SU & 6-1 ATS in L7 IND-NW matchups Points Scored - Allowed 23.5 (84) 29.5 (91) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 365.0 (72) 401.0 (88) 11/6/10 IOWA * OVER the total is 7-1 in L8 games of IND-IOW series YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.41 (69) 5.76 (83) 11/13/10 at Wisconsin * WIS-IND series has gone 10-2 OVER the total since 93 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.81 (77) 4.03 (69) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.76 (84) 8.02 (104) 11/20/10 vs. Penn St (Landover, MD) * UNDERDOG is 0-3 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 IND-PSU games Avg. Time of Possession 29.49 (75) 11/27/10 at Purdue * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 PUR-IND matchups at PURDUE Turnover Differential +0.6 (19) 3rd Down Conversion % 38.5% (66) 49.0% (115) Straight Up 5-7 7-6 3-9 4-8 19-30 (39%) * INDIANA is on a 15-3 ATS (+11.7 Units) run as home favorites of 3.5 to 10 points The Average Overall ATS 5-6 7-5 3-8 7-4 22-23 (49%) Score was INDIANA 28.6, OPPONENT 16.7. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - ARKANSAS ST at Home ATS 3-3 5-1 2-5 3-2 13-11 (54%) * INDIANA is on a 6-17 ATS (-12.7 Units) skid at home vs. teams giving up 17 or less PPG The Away/Neutral ATS 2-3 2-4 1-3 4-2 9-12 (43%) Average Score was INDIANA 15.8, OPPONENT 34.1. Potential spots for 2010: 11/6 - IOWA vs Conference ATS 4-4 4-4 2-6 5-3 15-17 (47%) * INDIANA is on a 13-27 ATS (-16.7 Units) skid on the road revenging a home loss against Non-Conference ATS 1-2 3-1 1-2 2-1 7-6 (54%) opponent The Average Score was INDIANA 15.9, OPPONENT 39.9. Potential spots for 2010: as Favorite ATS 1-1 3-1 1-2 1-0 6-4 (60%) 10/9 - at Ohio St, 11/13 - at Wisconsin, 11/27 - at Purdue as Underdog ATS 4-5 4-4 2-6 6-4 16-19 (46%) Over-Under 6-5 6-6 7-4 6-3 25-18 (58%) 9/2 W MICHIGAN 39-20 W -8 W 50 O 9/1 INDIANA ST 55-7 W - - - 8/30 W KENTUCKY 31-13 W -17 W 53 U 9/3 E KENTUCKY 19-13 W - - - 9/9 at Ball St 24-23 W -3.5 L 52.5 U 9/8 at W Michigan 37-27 W +1.5 W 59 O 9/6 MURRAY ST 45-3 W - - - 9/12 W MICHIGAN 23-19 W -1 W 54 U 9/16 S ILLINOIS 28-35 L - - - 9/15 AKRON 41-24 W -13.5 W 49 O 9/20 BALL ST 20-42 L -1.5 L 61 O 9/19 at Akron 38-21 W +3 W 45 O 9/23 CONNECTICUT 7-14 L +1.5 L 44.5 U 9/22 ILLINOIS 14-27 L +2 L 61 U 9/27 MICHIGAN ST 29-42 L +7.5 L 53 O 9/26 at Michigan 33-36 L +18.5 W 53.5 O 9/30 WISCONSIN 17-52 L +10 L 42 O 9/29 at Iowa 38-20 W +9.5 W 45 O 10/4 at Minnesota 7-16 L +6.5 L 62 U 10/3 OHIO ST 14-33 L +17.5 L 47 T 10/7 at Illinois 34-32 W +7 W 46.5 O 10/6 MINNESOTA 40-20 W -12 W 66.5 U 10/11 IOWA 9-45 L +6 L 46 O 10/10 at Virginia 7-47 L +7 L 47 O 10/14 IOWA 31-28 W +19.5 W 50.5 O 10/13 at Michigan St 27-52 L +3.5 L 62 O 10/18 at Illinois 13-55 L +17 L 54.5 O 10/17 ILLINOIS 27-14 W +3.5 W 53.5 U 10/21 at Ohio St 3-44 L +31.5 L 52.5 U 10/20 PENN ST 31-36 L +7 W 53 O 10/25 NORTHWESTERN 21-19 W +7 W 54 U 10/24 at Northwestern 28-29 L +4.5 W 53 O 10/28 MICHIGAN ST 46-21 W +7.5 W 58 O 10/27 at Wisconsin 3-33 L +9 L 60 U 11/1 C MICHIGAN 34-37 L -1.5 L 60.5 O 10/31 at Iowa 24-42 L +17 L 47 O 11/4 at Minnesota 26-63 L +6 L 58.5 O 11/3 BALL ST 38-20 W -7 W 62.5 U 11/8 WISCONSIN 20-41 L +10 L 51 O 11/7 WISCONSIN 28-31 L +13.5 W 54 O 11/11 MICHIGAN 3-34 L +19.5 L 49.5 U 11/10 at Northwestern 28-31 L -2.5 L 61.5 U 11/15 at Penn St 7-34 L +35 W 57.5 U 11/14 at Penn St 20-31 L +24 W 55.5 U 11/18 at Purdue 19-28 L +12 W 58 U 11/17 PURDUE 27-24 W +1 W 62 U 11/22 at Purdue 10-62 L +11 L 54.5 O 11/21 PURDUE 21-38 L +3 L 59 T 12/31 vs. Oklahoma St 33-49 L +6.5 L 69.5 O 84 WWW.STATFOX.COM

IOWA HAWKEYES 2010 Schedule Strength: 38.33 (#53 of 120) MICHIGAN WOLVERINES 2010 Schedule Strength: 41.08 (#28 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 85 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 48 Offense: Spread Option - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: 3-3-5 - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 53 Where: Iowa City, IA Head Coach: Kirk Ferentz, 12th year (81-55 SU) Conference: Big Ten 2009 RECORD: 11-2 SU, 8-4 ATS Facility: Kinnick Stadium 9/4/10 E ILLINOIS 9/11/10 IOWA ST * IOWA ST is 7-5 SU & 10-2 ATS vs. IOWA since 98 2009 Scoring Differential: +7.8 (#32 of 120) 9/18/10 at Arizona * FAVORITE has won & covered L2 ARI-IOW games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +11.7 (#19 of 120) 9/25/10 BALL ST 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 48 (#20 of 120) 10/2/10 PENN ST * IOWA is 8-2 SU & ATS vs. PENN ST since 96 2009 Schedule Strength: 36.62 (#51 of 120) 10/16/10 at Michigan * UNDERDOG is 3-8 SU but 10-1 ATS in MIC-IOW series since 93 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 WISCONSIN * IOWA is 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS in its L8 games vs. WISCONSIN 10/30/10 MICHIGAN ST * IOWA is 5-3 SU & 7-1 ATS in its L8 games vs. MICHIGAN ST Points Scored - Allowed 23.2 (86) 15.4 (8) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 336.3 (89) 276.5 (10) 11/6/10 at Indiana * OVER the total is 7-1 in L8 games of IND-IOW series YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.17 (85) 4.26 (9) 11/13/10 at Northwestern * UNDERDOG is 8-4 SU & 10-2 ATS in NW-IOW series since 96 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.27 (106) 3.49 (28) 11/20/10 OHIO ST * FAVORITE is 12-0 SU & 10-2 ATS in IOW-OSU series since 92 YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.36 (48) 5.19 (3) Avg. Time of Possession 30.98 (29) 11/27/10 at Minnesota * IOWA is 13-4 SU & ATS vs. MINNESOTA since 93 Turnover Differential +0.2 (51) 3rd Down Conversion % 39.2% (62) 35.2% (25) Straight Up 6-7 6-6 9-4 11-2 32-19 (63%) * Over the L2 seasons, IOWA is 12-1 ATS (+10.9 Units) on the road. The Average Score was Overall ATS 2-10 6-6 8-4 8-4 24-24 (50%) IOWA 27.8, OPPONENT 12.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - at Arizona, 10/16 - at Michigan, at Home ATS 1-5 3-3 3-3 2-4 9-15 (38%) 11/6 - at Indiana, 11/13 - at Northwestern, 11/27 - at Minnesota Away/Neutral ATS 1-5 3-3 5-1 6-0 15-9 (63%) * IOWA is 10-1 UNDER the total (+8.9 Units) in the first month of the season since 07. The vs Conference ATS 1-7 4-4 5-3 5-3 15-17 (47%) Average Score was IOWA 25.9, OPPONENT 8.7. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - IOWA ST, 9/18 Non-Conference ATS 1-3 2-2 3-1 3-1 9-7 (56%) - at Arizona, 9/25 - BALL ST as Favorite ATS 1-6 2-4 5-3 4-4 12-17 (41%) * IOWA is 12-3 ATS (+8.7 Units) as underdogs since 07. The Average Score was IOWA 18.9, as Underdog ATS 1-4 4-2 3-1 5-0 13-7 (65%) OPPONENT 19.1. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - PENN ST, 11/20 - OHIO ST Over-Under 5-7 3-9 5-7 4-8 17-31 (35%) 9/2 MONTANA 41-7 W - - - 9/1 vs. N Illinois 16-3 W -12 W 45.5 U 8/30 MAINE 46-3 W - - - 9/5 N IOWA 17-16 W - - - 9/9 at Syracuse 20-13 W -15.5 L 38 U 9/8 SYRACUSE 35-0 W -24 W 43.5 U 9/6 FLA INTERNATIONAL 42-0 W -27 W 44 U 9/12 at Iowa St 35-3 W -6.5 W 47 U 9/16 IOWA ST 27-17 W -14 L 48 U 9/15 at Iowa St 13-15 L -17.5 L 44 U 9/13 IOWA ST 17-5 W -13 L 47 U 9/19 ARIZONA 27-17 W -4.5 W 41 O 9/23 at Illinois 24-7 W -20.5 L 46 U 9/22 at Wisconsin 13-17 L +7 W 44.5 U 9/20 at Pittsburgh 20-21 L +2 W 41.5 U 9/26 at Penn St 21-10 W +9.5 W 40.5 U 9/30 OHIO ST 17-38 L +6.5 L 43.5 O 9/29 INDIANA 20-38 L -9.5 L 45 O 9/27 NORTHWESTERN 17-22 L -9 L 43 U 10/3 ARKANSAS ST 24-21 W -21 L 45.5 U 10/7 PURDUE 47-17 W -9.5 W 53 O 10/6 at Penn St 7-27 L +9.5 L 40.5 U 10/4 at Michigan St 13-16 L +6 W 48 U 10/10 MICHIGAN 30-28 W -9.5 L 47 O 10/14 at Indiana 28-31 L -19.5 L 50.5 O 10/13 ILLINOIS 10-6 W +3.5 W 44 U 10/11 at Indiana 45-9 W -6 W 46 O 10/17 at Wisconsin 20-10 W +1.5 W 46.5 U 10/21 at Michigan 6-20 L +13 L 45 U 10/20 at Purdue 6-31 L +7 L 46.5 U 10/18 WISCONSIN 38-16 W -5 W 41 O 10/24 at Michigan St 15-13 W +2 W 43 U 10/28 N ILLINOIS 24-14 W -14 L 48 U 10/27 MICHIGAN ST 34-27 W +2.5 W 42.5 O 11/1 at Illinois 24-27 L +2.5 L 50.5 O 10/31 INDIANA 42-24 W -17 W 47 O 11/4 NORTHWESTERN 7-21 L -20.5 L 46.5 U 11/3 at Northwestern 28-17 W +2 W 46 U 11/8 PENN ST 24-23 W +7.5 W 42.5 O 11/7 NORTHWESTERN 10-17 L -15 L 45 U 11/11 WISCONSIN 21-24 L +1 L 38.5 O 11/10 MINNESOTA 21-16 W -14.5 L 50 U 11/15 PURDUE 22-17 W -17 L 43 U 11/14 at Ohio St 24-27 L +16.5 W 38 O 11/18 at Minnesota 24-34 L +2.5 L 53.5 O 11/17 W MICHIGAN 19-28 L -13 L 46 O 11/22 at Minnesota 55-0 W -7 W 45 O 11/21 MINNESOTA 12-0 W -12.5 L 43 U 12/30 vs. Texas 24-26 L +9 W 54 U 1/1 vs. S Carolina 31-10 W -3.5 W 42 U 1/5 vs. Georgia Tech 24-14 W +6 W 51 U Where: Ann Arbor, MI Head Coach: Rich Rodriguez, 3rd year (8-16 SU) Conference: Big Ten 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 4-7 ATS Facility: Michigan Stadium 9/4/10 CONNECTICUT 9/11/10 at Notre Dame * UNDERDOG is 10-4 SU & 12-2 ATS in ND-MIC series since 92 2009 Scoring Differential: +2.0 (#59 of 120) 9/18/10 MASSACHUSETTS 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -1.0 (#72 of 120) 9/25/10 BOWLING GREEN 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 35 (#66 of 120) 10/2/10 at Indiana * ROAD TEAM is 9-2 ATS in IND-MIC series since 92 2009 Schedule Strength: 35.08 (#59 of 120) 10/9/10 MICHIGAN ST * FAVORITE has swept L4 MIC-MSY games, both SU & ATS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 IOWA * UNDERDOG is 3-8 SU but 10-1 ATS in MIC-IOW series since 93 10/30/10 at Penn St * FAVORITE has swept L3 PSU-MIC games at PENN ST, both SU & ATS Points Scored - Allowed 29.5 (41) 27.5 (77) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 384.5 (59) 393.3 (82) 11/6/10 ILLINOIS * L2 games in MIC-ILL series at MICHIGAN went OVER the total YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.61 (59) 5.63 (76) 11/13/10 at Purdue * HOME TEAM is 7-3 SU & 7-2 ATS in PUR-MIC series since 96 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.52 (40) 4.35 (85) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.23 (55) 7.30 (75) 11/20/10 WISCONSIN * UNDERDOG is on 3-5 SU but 6-1 ATS run in L8 MIC-WIS matchups Avg. Time of Possession 26.42 (116) 11/27/10 at Ohio St * OHIO ST is 9-3 SU & ATS vs. MICHIGAN since 98 Turnover Differential -1 (115) 3rd Down Conversion % 39.1% (63) 39.9% (63) Straight Up 11-2 9-4 3-9 5-7 28-22 (56%) * Over the L2 seasons, MICHIGAN is 2-9 ATS (-7.9 Units) as favorites. The Average Score was MICHIGAN Overall ATS 7-5 7-5 2-10 4-7 20-27 (43%) 23.7, OPPONENT 25.3. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - BOWLING GREEN, 10/2 - at Indiana, 11/6 - at Home ATS 2-4 4-3 1-6 3-4 10-17 (37%) ILLINOIS Away/Neutral ATS 5-1 3-2 1-4 1-3 10-10 (50%) * Over the L2 seasons, MICHIGAN is 1-10 ATS (-10 Units) in the second half of the season. The Average vs Conference ATS 6-1 5-3 2-6 1-7 14-17 (45%) Score was MICHIGAN 20.3, OPPONENT 34.1. Potential spots for 2010: 10/30 - at Penn St, 11/6 - ILLINOIS, Non-Conference ATS 1-4 2-2 0-4 3-0 6-10 (38%) 11/13 - at Purdue, 11/20 - WISCONSIN, 11/27 - at Ohio St as Favorite ATS 5-5 5-4 0-6 2-3 12-18 (40%) * Over the L2 seasons, MICHIGAN is 3-13 ATS (-11.3 Units) in conference games. The Average Score was as Underdog ATS 2-0 2-1 2-4 2-4 8-9 (47%) MICHIGAN 22.1, OPPONENT 33.4. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at Indiana, 10/9 - MICHIGAN ST, 10/16 Over-Under 5-8 5-7 8-4 6-5 24-24 (50%) - IOWA, 10/30 - at Penn St, 11/6 - ILLINOIS, 11/13 - at Purdue, 11/20 - WISCONSIN, 11/27 - at Ohio St 9/2 VANDERBILT 27-7 W -27 L 46.5 U 9/1 APPALACHIAN ST 32-34 L - - - 8/30 UTAH 23-25 L -3 L 43 O 9/5 W MICHIGAN 31-7 W -13 W 53.5 U 9/9 C MICHIGAN 41-17 W -27 L 44.5 O 9/8 OREGON 7-39 L -9 L 64.5 U 9/6 MIAMI OHIO 16-6 W -14.5 L 40 U 9/12 NOTRE DAME 38-34 W +3 W 46.5 O 9/16 at Notre Dame 47-21 W +5.5 W 49 O 9/15 NOTRE DAME 38-0 W -9.5 W 45.5 U 9/13 at Notre Dame 17-35 L -1.5 L 37 O 9/19 E MICHIGAN 45-17 W -24 W 54.5 O 9/23 WISCONSIN 27-13 W -14 T 41 U 9/22 PENN ST 14-9 W +2 W 45.5 U 9/27 WISCONSIN 27-25 W +4.5 W 42 O 9/26 INDIANA 36-33 W -18.5 L 53.5 O 9/30 at Minnesota 28-14 W -10 W 49.5 U 9/29 at Northwestern 28-16 W -16.5 L 52 U 10/4 ILLINOIS 20-45 L -1 L 49 O 10/3 at Michigan St 20-26 L +4 L 54 U 10/7 MICHIGAN ST 31-13 W -15 W 52.5 U 10/6 E MICHIGAN 33-22 W -28.5 L 45.5 O 10/11 TOLEDO 10-13 L -15 L 49 U 10/10 at Iowa 28-30 L +9.5 W 47 O 10/14 at Penn St 17-10 W -5 W 40.5 U 10/13 PURDUE 48-21 W -5 W 57.5 O 10/18 at Penn St 17-46 L +24 L 47.5 O 10/17 DELAWARE ST 63-6 W -39.5 W - 10/21 IOWA 20-6 W -13 W 45 U 10/20 at Illinois 27-17 W -1.5 W 50.5 U 10/25 MICHIGAN ST 21-35 L +3 L 44 O 10/24 PENN ST 10-35 L +3.5 L 48 U 10/28 NORTHWESTERN 17-3 W -29.5 L 42.5 U 10/27 MINNESOTA 34-10 W -21.5 W 58 U 11/1 at Purdue 42-48 L +3 L 47.5 O 10/31 at Illinois 13-38 L -7 L 53.5 U 11/4 BALL ST 34-26 W -33.5 L 49.5 O 11/3 at Michigan St 28-24 W -3.5 W 51 O 11/8 at Minnesota 29-6 W +7 W 49.5 U 11/7 PURDUE 36-38 L -7 L 51.5 O 11/11 at Indiana 34-3 W -19.5 W 49.5 U 11/10 at Wisconsin 21-37 L -2.5 L 48 O 11/15 NORTHWESTERN 14-21 L -3 L 45.5 U 11/14 at Wisconsin 24-45 L +8 L 54.5 O 11/18 at Ohio St 39-42 L +7 W 40.5 O 11/17 OHIO ST 3-14 L +4 L 46 U 11/22 at Ohio St 7-42 L +20 L 45 O 11/21 OHIO ST 10-21 L +10.5 L 48 U 1/1 vs. USC 18-32 L -2.5 L 47.5 O 1/1 vs. Florida 41-35 W +10 W 60.5 O

MICHIGAN STATE SPARTANS 2010 Schedule Strength: 36.75 (#66 of 120) MINNESOTA GOPHERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 41.92 (#22 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 4 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 40 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: Multiple 4-3 - Starters Returning: 3 Lettermen Returning: 38 Where: East Lansing, MI Head Coach: Mark Dantonio, 4th year (22-17 SU) Conference: Big Ten 2009 RECORD: 6-7 SU, 4-7-1 ATS Facility: Spartan Stadium 9/4/10 W MICHIGAN 9/11/10 vs. Fla Atlantic (Detroit, MI) 2009 Scoring Differential: +3.4 (#56 of 120) 9/18/10 NOTRE DAME * MICHIGAN ST is 9-5 SU & 11-2 ATS vs. NOTRE DAME since 94 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +4.7 (#46 of 120) 9/25/10 N COLORADO 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 40 (#54 of 120) 10/2/10 WISCONSIN * L6 games of MSY-WIS series are 6-0 OVER the total 2009 Schedule Strength: 37.54 (#44 of 120) 10/9/10 at Michigan * FAVORITE has swept L4 MIC-MSY games, both SU & ATS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 ILLINOIS * MICHIGAN ST is 10-1 SU & 9-2 ATS vs. ILLINOIS since 95 10/23/10 at Northwestern * ROAD TEAM is 6-3 SU & 8-1 ATS in L9 NW-MSY matchups Points Scored - Allowed 29.7 (36) 26.3 (67) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 406.2 (38) 380.8 (73) 10/30/10 at Iowa * IOWA is 5-3 SU & 7-1 ATS in its L8 games vs. MICHIGAN ST YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.27 (16) 5.42 (62) 11/6/10 MINNESOTA * UNDERDOG is 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS in L8 MSY-MIN matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.25 (61) 3.40 (24) 11/20/10 PURDUE * HOME TEAM is 9-7 SU & 12-3 ATS in MSY-PUR series since 92 YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.28 (13) 7.23 (72) Avg. Time of Possession 28.85 (96) 11/27/10 at Penn St * PSU-MSY series has gone 11-3 OVER the total since 96 Turnover Differential -0.5 (95) 3rd Down Conversion % 35.3% (92) 45.2% (103) Straight Up 4-8 7-6 9-4 6-7 26-25 (51%) * MICHIGAN ST is 13-2 OVER the total (+10.8 Units) on the road since 07. The Average Score Overall ATS 3-8 8-5 6-7 4-7 21-27 (44%) was MICHIGAN ST 31.9, OPPONENT 30.7. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - at Michigan, 10/23 - at at Home ATS 1-5 3-4 3-4 2-4 9-17 (35%) Northwestern, 10/30 - at Iowa, 11/27 - at Penn St Away/Neutral ATS 2-3 5-1 3-3 2-3 12-10 (55%) * MICHIGAN ST is on a 4-13 ATS (-10.3 Units) skid after failing to cover the spread in 5 or 6 out of vs Conference ATS 1-7 5-3 4-4 2-5 12-19 (39%) their last 7 games The Average Score was MICHIGAN ST 23.9, OPPONENT 27.5. Potential spots Non-Conference ATS 2-1 3-2 2-3 2-2 9-8 (53%) for 2010: WATCH FOR ATS LOSING STREAKS as Favorite ATS 1-5 3-4 6-7 3-4 13-20 (39%) * MICHIGAN ST is on a 7-14 ATS (-8.4 Units) skid vs. poor rushing teams - averaging <=120 as Underdog ATS 2-3 5-1 0-0 1-3 8-7 (53%) RYPG The Average Score was MICHIGAN ST 29, OPPONENT 25.7. Potential spots for 2010: Over-Under 5-7 9-4 6-6 8-4 28-21 (57%) 9/4 - W MICHIGAN, 10/23 - at Northwestern, 10/30 - at Iowa, 11/6 - MINNESOTA 9/2 IDAHO 27-17 W -29 L 57 U 9/1 UAB 55-18 W -24 W 49.5 O 8/30 at California 31-38 L +6 L 54 O 9/5 MONTANA ST 44-3 W - - - 9/9 E MICHIGAN 52-20 W -26.5 W 52.5 O 9/8 BOWLING GREEN 28-17 W -17.5 L 57 U 9/6 E MICHIGAN 42-10 W -21 W 56 U 9/12 C MICHIGAN 27-29 L -15 L 50 O 9/16 at Pittsburgh 38-23 W +2.5 W 52 O 9/15 PITTSBURGH 17-13 W -11.5 L 48.5 U 9/13 FLA ATLANTIC 17-0 W -18.5 L 61 U 9/19 at Notre Dame 30-33 L +10.5 W 54 O 9/23 NOTRE DAME 37-40 L +3 T 58 O 9/22 at Notre Dame 31-14 W -9 W 44 O 9/20 NOTRE DAME 23-7 W -9 W 48 U 9/26 at Wisconsin 30-38 L +1.5 L 52.5 O 9/30 ILLINOIS 20-23 L -24 L 54 U 9/29 at Wisconsin 34-37 L +7 W 45 O 9/27 at Indiana 42-29 W -7.5 W 53 O 10/3 MICHIGAN 26-20 W -4 W 54 U 10/7 at Michigan 13-31 L +15 L 52.5 U 10/6 NORTHWESTERN 41-48 L -15 L 54.5 O 10/4 IOWA 16-13 W -6 L 48 U 10/10 at Illinois 24-14 W -4 W 55 U 10/14 OHIO ST 7-38 L +14 L 51 U 10/13 INDIANA 52-27 W -3.5 W 62 O 10/11 at Northwestern 37-20 W -2.5 W 49 O 10/17 NORTHWESTERN 24-14 W -14 L 48.5 U 10/21 at Northwestern 41-38 W -9.5 L 47.5 O 10/20 at Ohio St 17-24 L +17 W 51.5 U 10/18 OHIO ST 7-45 L +3.5 L 42 O 10/24 IOWA 13-15 L -2 L 43 U 10/28 at Indiana 21-46 L -7.5 L 58 O 10/27 at Iowa 27-34 L -2.5 L 42.5 O 10/25 at Michigan 35-21 W -3 W 44 O 10/31 at Minnesota 34-42 L -3.5 L 45.5 O 11/4 PURDUE 15-17 L -3 L 58.5 U 11/3 MICHIGAN 24-28 L +3.5 L 51 O 11/1 WISCONSIN 25-24 W -5.5 L 49 T 11/7 W MICHIGAN 49-14 W -20.5 W 55.5 O 11/11 MINNESOTA 18-31 L 0 L 58 U 11/10 at Purdue 48-31 W +4.5 W 58 O 11/8 PURDUE 21-7 W -10 W 54 U 11/14 at Purdue 40-37 W -3 T 53 O 11/18 at Penn St 13-17 L +18.5 W 45 U 11/17 PENN ST 35-31 W +3 W 51.5 O 11/22 at Penn St 18-49 L +16.5 L 47 O 11/21 PENN ST 14-42 L +3 L 50.5 O 12/28 vs. Boston College 21-24 L +5 W 58.5 U 1/1 vs. Georgia 12-24 L +8.5 L 57.5 U 1/2 vs. Texas Tech 31-41 L +9.5 L 60 O Where: Minneapolis, MN Head Coach: Tim Brewster, 4th year (14-24 SU) Conference: Big Ten 2009 RECORD: 6-7 SU, 5-7 ATS Facility: TCF Bank Stadium 9/2/10 at Middle Tenn St 9/11/10 S DAKOTA 2009 Scoring Differential: -2.8 (#82 of 120) 9/18/10 USC 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +1.4 (#64 of 120) 9/25/10 N ILLINOIS 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 33 (#75 of 120) 10/2/10 NORTHWESTERN * ROAD TEAM is 8-5 SU & 12-1 ATS in MIN-NW series since 93 2009 Schedule Strength: 38.77 (#33 of 120) 10/9/10 at Wisconsin * OVER the total is 10-0 in L10 games of WIS-MIN series 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at Purdue * FAVORITE is 9-1 SU & 8-1 ATS in PUR-MIN series since 97 10/23/10 PENN ST * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 MIN-PSU games Points Scored - Allowed 20.9 (100) 23.8 (51) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 306.5 (110) 369.2 (63) 10/30/10 OHIO ST * OHIO ST is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in its L6 games at MINNESOTA YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.89 (104) 5.25 (50) 11/6/10 at Michigan St * UNDERDOG is 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS in L8 MSY-MIN matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.01 (112) 3.84 (50) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.99 (72) 7.05 (56) 11/13/10 at Illinois * ROAD TEAM is 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 ILL-MIN matchups Avg. Time of Possession 28.91 (93) 11/27/10 IOWA * IOWA is 13-4 SU & ATS vs. MINNESOTA since 93 Turnover Differential -0.1 (68) 3rd Down Conversion % 35.6% (89) 46.7% (108) Straight Up 6-7 1-11 7-6 6-7 20-31 (39%) * MINNESOTA is on a 1-9 ATS (-8.9 Units) skid as road underdogs of 7.5 to 10 points The Average Overall ATS 7-5 4-6 7-5 5-7 23-23 (50%) Score was MINNESOTA 17.7, OPPONENT 37.5. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - at Purdue, 11/6 at Home ATS 4-1 2-3 2-4 3-3 11-11 (50%) - at Michigan St Away/Neutral ATS 3-4 2-3 5-1 2-4 12-12 (50%) * Over the L2 seasons, MINNESOTA is 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) on the road revenging a home loss vs Conference ATS 4-4 4-3 5-3 4-4 17-14 (55%) against opponent. The Average Score was MINNESOTA 24.9, OPPONENT 21.1. Potential spots for Non-Conference ATS 3-1 0-3 2-2 1-3 6-9 (40%) 2010: 10/9 - at Wisconsin, 11/13 - at Illinois as Favorite ATS 4-1 0-3 3-3 3-4 10-11 (48%) * MINNESOTA is on a 23-8 OVER the total (+14.2 Units) run at home vs. teams with a winning record as Underdog ATS 3-4 4-3 4-2 2-3 13-12 (52%) The Average Score was MINNESOTA 24.8, OPPONENT 32.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - USC, Over-Under 7-5 7-4 5-7 7-5 26-21 (55%) 9/25 - N ILLINOIS, 10/2 - NORTHWESTERN, 10/23 - PENN ST, 10/30 - OHIO ST, 11/27 - IOWA 8/31 at Kent St 44-0 W -14.5 W 48.5 U 9/1 BOWLING GREEN 31-32 L -14 L 53.5 O 8/30 N ILLINOIS 31-27 W -9.5 L 56.5 O 9/5 at Syracuse 23-20 W -7 L 47 U 9/9 at California 17-42 L +9 L 56 O 9/8 MIAMI OHIO 41-35 W -8 L 49 O 9/6 at Bowling Green 42-17 W +3.5 W 59.5 U 9/12 AIR FORCE 20-13 W -3 W 49.5 U 9/16 TEMPLE 62-0 W -40.5 W 57 O 9/15 at Fla Atlantic 39-42 L -6.5 L 52 O 9/13 MONTANA ST 35-23 W - - - 9/19 CALIFORNIA 21-35 L +13.5 L 52.5 O 9/23 at Purdue 21-27 L -2.5 L 59.5 U 9/22 PURDUE 31-45 L +14 T 70.5 O 9/20 FLA ATLANTIC 37-3 W -5.5 W 62 U 9/26 at Northwestern 35-24 W -1 W 49.5 O 9/30 MICHIGAN 14-28 L +10 L 49.5 U 9/29 OHIO ST 7-30 L +23.5 W 60.5 U 9/27 at Ohio St 21-34 L +20 W 49.5 O 10/3 WISCONSIN 28-31 L -2.5 L 51.5 O 10/7 PENN ST 27-28 L +1.5 W 48 O 10/6 at Indiana 20-40 L +12 L 66.5 U 10/4 INDIANA 16-7 W -6.5 W 62 U 10/10 PURDUE 35-20 W -3 W 51.5 O 10/14 at Wisconsin 12-48 L +8 L 52 O 10/13 at Northwestern 48-49 L +6.5 W 66 O 10/11 at Illinois 27-20 W +12 W 58.5 U 10/17 at Penn St 0-20 L +17 L 44 U 10/21 N DAKOTA ST 10-9 W - - - 10/20 N DAKOTA ST 21-27 L - - - 10/25 at Purdue 17-6 W 0 W 52.5 U 10/24 at Ohio St 7-38 L +17 L 41.5 O 10/28 at Ohio St 0-44 L +27 L 47 U 10/27 at Michigan 10-34 L +21.5 L 58 U 11/1 NORTHWESTERN 17-24 L -7.5 L 48 U 10/31 MICHIGAN ST 42-34 W +3.5 W 45.5 O 11/4 INDIANA 63-26 W -6 W 58.5 O 11/3 ILLINOIS 17-44 L +11 L 59 O 11/8 MICHIGAN 6-29 L -7 L 49.5 U 11/7 ILLINOIS 32-35 L -6 L 54 O 11/11 at Michigan St 31-18 W 0 W 58 U 11/10 at Iowa 16-21 L +14.5 W 50 U 11/15 at Wisconsin 32-35 L +13.5 W 47.5 O 11/14 S DAKOTA ST 16-13 W -17 L - 11/18 IOWA 34-24 W -2.5 W 53.5 O 11/17 WISCONSIN 34-41 L +13 W 62 O 11/22 IOWA 0-55 L +7 L 45 O 11/21 at Iowa 0-12 L +12.5 W 43 U 12/29 vs. Texas Tech 41-44 L +8 W 63 O 12/31 vs. Kansas 21-42 L +9 L 58.5 O 12/31 vs. Iowa St 13-14 L -1.5 L 47 U 86 WWW.STATFOX.COM

Strength Ratings (Continued from Page 45) StatFox Outplay Factor (Yards) Annual Averages Group SU W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) SU & ATS Rank Top 30 College 291-98 (75%) 205-159 (56%) 3.8 Bottom 30 College 102-255 (29%) 143-191 (43%) 4.8 Average college rank among 8 categories: 4.3 Top 8 NFL 93-47 (66%) 78-58 (57%) 4.4 Bottom 8 NFL 37-92 (29%) 56-70 (44%) 5.2 Average NFL rank among 8 categories: 4.8 Yardage Differential How much a team outgains or is outgained by in yardage per game. Take a look as to how this relates to wins/losses as compared to the Scoring Differential. It clearly is more important in college football than it is in the NFL. That makes sense too, since at the pro level, many losing teams pile up big yardage in garbage time, where in college that doesn t happen nearly as often because the team behind is losing in many cases as a result of a physical mismatch. Total Yardage Differential Annual Averages Group SU W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) SU & ATS Rank Top 30 College 288-100 (74%) 205-156 (57%) 4.6 Bottom 30 College 100-258 (28%) 148-187 (44%) 3.8 Average college rank among 8 categories: 4.2 Top 8 NFL 91-48 (65%) 78-58 (57%) 5.4 Bottom 8 NFL 38-90 (30%) 58-67 (46%) 4.6 Average NFL rank among 8 categories: 5.0 Yards Per Rush Differential Some handicappers believe the ability to control the line of scrimmage and the running game are the most crucial factor to winning football. The chart below should tell whether or not that is the case. To me, the answer is no. In fact, the teams in the NFL that are best or worst in this stat don t even win or lose 60% NORTHWESTERN WILDCATS 2010 Schedule Strength: 37.08 (#64 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 87 of their games, respectively. That makes this the single LEAST important stat for handicapping NFL. In college it is only slightly more important. Yards Per Rush Differential Annual Averages Group SU W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) SU & ATS Rank Top 30 College 271-115 (70%) 200-160 (56%) 7.0 Bottom 30 College 115-245 (32%) 150-188 (44%) 6.2 Average college rank among 8 categories: 6.6 Top 8 NFL 78-57 (58%) 69-61 (53%) 7.0 Bottom 8 NFL 56-76 (42%) 62-66 (48%) 7.6 Average NFL rank among 8 categories: 7.3 Turnover Differential You hear it all the time, if a team can win the turnover battle, they should win the game. Over the course of entire seasons, does that theory hold true? The chart below would seem to indicate no. Turnovers may be a crucial element in games between like-strength opponents, but there is only a small percentage of those each week. In most cases, the better team wins and covers, regardless of what happens in the turnover department. As you can see, in college football, turnovers have been the least important of all of the key stats in all five years, both top & bottom collectively. Turnover Differential Annual Averages Group SU W-L (%) ATS W-L (%) SU & ATS Rank Top 30 College 245-137 (64%) 202-154 (57%) 8.0 Bottom 30 College 147-219 (40%) 145-196 (43%) 8.0 Average college rank among 8 categories: 8.0 Top 8 NFL 88-52 (63%) 76-60 (56%) 6.0 Bottom 8 NFL 49-81 (38%) 55-71 (44%) 6.8 Average NFL rank among 8 categories: 6.4 Give these findings some consideration this season in both college and pro football and be sure to keep track of the teams on the top of the rankings in the stats or strength indicators deemed to be most important. From one season to the next, no one can fault a handicapper that consistently is backing the best clubs and fading the worst. Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 55 Where: Evanston, IL Head Coach: Pat Fitzgerald, 4th year (27-23 SU) Conference: Big Ten 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: Ryan Field 9/4/10 at Vanderbilt 9/11/10 ILLINOIS ST 2009 Scoring Differential: +1.5 (#62 of 120) 9/18/10 at Rice * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 RIC-NW games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -2.6 (#77 of 120) 9/25/10 C MICHIGAN 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 36 (#62 of 120) 10/2/10 at Minnesota * ROAD TEAM is 8-5 SU & 12-1 ATS in MIN-NW series since 93 2009 Schedule Strength: 32.46 (#74 of 120) 10/9/10 PURDUE * L7 games of NW-PUR series are 6-1 UNDER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 MICHIGAN ST * ROAD TEAM is 6-3 SU & 8-1 ATS in L9 NW-MSY matchups 10/30/10 at Indiana * UNDERDOG is 4-3 SU & 6-1 ATS in L7 IND-NW matchups Points Scored - Allowed 25.9 (71) 24.5 (55) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 404.4 (40) 350.5 (47) 11/6/10 at Penn St * HOME TEAM is 6-5 SU & 8-3 ATS in PSU-NW series since 95 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.08 (95) 5.41 (60) 11/13/10 IOWA * UNDERDOG is 8-4 SU & 10-2 ATS in NW-IOW series since 96 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.05 (111) 3.80 (48) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.02 (70) 7.17 (69) 11/20/10 ILLINOIS * L8 games of NW-ILL series are 7-1 UNDER the total Avg. Time of Possession 30.93 (34) 11/27/10 at Wisconsin * HOME TEAM is 6-3 SU & 8-1 ATS in L9 WIS-NW matchups Turnover Differential +0.2 (46) 3rd Down Conversion % 43.4% (28) 34.0% (18) Straight Up 4-8 6-6 9-4 8-5 27-23 (54%) * Over the L2 seasons, NORTHWESTERN is 9-1 ATS (+7.9 Units) on the road after the first month Overall ATS 5-6 4-7 7-5 6-6 22-24 (48%) of the season. The Average Score was NORTHWESTERN 22.3, OPPONENT 20.8. Potential at Home ATS 2-3 2-4 3-3 1-5 8-15 (35%) spots for 2010: 10/2 - at Minnesota, 10/30 - at Indiana, 11/6 - at Penn St, 11/27 - at Wisconsin Away/Neutral ATS 3-3 2-3 4-2 5-1 14-9 (61%) * Over the L2 seasons, NORTHWESTERN is 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) as road underdogs. The Average vs Conference ATS 4-4 3-5 5-3 5-3 17-15 (53%) Score was NORTHWESTERN 20.9, OPPONENT 17. Potential spots for 2010: 11/6 - at Penn St, Non-Conference ATS 1-2 1-2 2-2 1-3 5-9 (36%) 11/27 - at Wisconsin as Favorite ATS 1-1 1-4 2-3 0-4 4-12 (25%) * NORTHWESTERN is on a 16-4 ATS (+11.6 Units) run at home vs. good rushing teams as Underdog ATS 4-5 3-3 5-2 6-2 18-12 (60%) - averaging >=200 RYPG The Average Score was NORTHWESTERN 24, OPPONENT 29.5. Over-Under 4-7 5-6 3-8 5-6 17-27 (39%) Potential spots for 2010: 10/23 - MICHIGAN ST, 11/20 - ILLINOIS 8/31 at Miami Ohio 21-3 W -5.5 W 54 U 9/1 NORTHEASTERN 27-0 W - - - 8/30 SYRACUSE 30-10 W -12.5 W 54.5 U 9/5 TOWSON 47-14 W - - - 9/9 NEW HAMPSHIRE 17-34 L - - - 9/8 NEVADA 36-31 W -10.5 L 52.5 O 9/6 at Duke 24-20 W -5.5 L 44 T 9/12 E MICHIGAN 27-24 W -22 L 51.5 U 9/16 E MICHIGAN 14-6 W -17 L 49.5 U 9/15 DUKE 14-20 L -16.5 L 53 U 9/13 S ILLINOIS 33-7 W - - - 9/19 at Syracuse 34-37 L -1.5 L 45.5 O 9/22 at Nevada 21-31 L +7 L 46.5 O 9/22 at Ohio St 7-58 L +23.5 L 49 O 9/20 OHIO U 16-8 W -10.5 L 52.5 U 9/26 MINNESOTA 24-35 L +1 L 49.5 O 9/30 at Penn St 7-33 L +20 L 42 U 9/29 MICHIGAN 16-28 L +16.5 W 52 U 9/27 at Iowa 22-17 W +9 W 43 U 10/3 at Purdue 27-21 W +7 W 56.5 U 10/7 at Wisconsin 9-41 L +18.5 L 42 O 10/6 at Michigan St 48-41 W +15 W 54.5 O 10/11 MICHIGAN ST 20-37 L +2.5 L 49 O 10/10 MIAMI OHIO 16-6 W -17 L 55.5 U 10/14 PURDUE 10-31 L +7 L 51 U 10/13 MINNESOTA 49-48 W -6.5 L 66 O 10/18 PURDUE 48-26 W -3.5 W 50 O 10/17 at Michigan St 14-24 L +14 W 48.5 U 10/21 MICHIGAN ST 38-41 L +9.5 W 47.5 O 10/19 vs. E Michigan 26-14 W -10.5 W 59 U 10/25 at Indiana 19-21 L -7 L 54 U 10/24 INDIANA 29-28 W -4.5 L 53 O 10/28 at Michigan 3-17 L +29.5 W 42.5 U 10/27 at Purdue 17-35 L +13.5 L 64 U 11/1 at Minnesota 24-17 W +7.5 W 48 U 10/31 PENN ST 13-34 L +17 L 47 T 11/4 at Iowa 21-7 W +20.5 W 46.5 U 11/3 IOWA 17-28 L -2 L 46 U 11/8 OHIO ST 10-45 L +12.5 L 39 O 11/7 at Iowa 17-10 W +15 W 45 U 11/11 OHIO ST 10-54 L +22 L 42.5 O 11/10 INDIANA 31-28 W +2.5 W 61.5 U 11/15 at Michigan 21-14 W +3 W 45.5 U 11/14 at Illinois 21-16 W +6.5 W 50.5 U 11/18 ILLINOIS 27-16 W +2.5 W 48 U 11/17 at Illinois 22-41 L +14.5 L 57 O 11/22 ILLINOIS 27-10 W +3 W 54.5 U 11/21 WISCONSIN 33-31 W +7 W 49 O 12/29 vs. Missouri 23-30 L +14 W 66.5 U 1/1 vs. Auburn 35-38 L +9 W 54.5 O

OHIO STATE BUCKEYES 2010 Schedule Strength: 37.75 (#58 of 120) PENN STATE NITTANY LIONS 2010 Schedule Strength: 38.67 (#48 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 10 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 46 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 45 Where: Columbus, OH Head Coach: Jim Tressel, 10th year (94-21 SU) Conference: Big Ten 2009 RECORD: 11-2 SU, 10-3 ATS Facility: Ohio Stadium 9/2/10 MARSHALL 9/11/10 MIAMI * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 OSU-MIA games 2009 Scoring Differential: +16.5 (#8 of 120) 9/18/10 OHIO U * OHIO U is 0-2 SU but 2-0 ATS in its L2 games at OHIO ST 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +18.0 (#9 of 120) 9/25/10 E MICHIGAN 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 56 (#7 of 120) 10/2/10 at Illinois * OHIO ST is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. ILLINOIS 2009 Schedule Strength: 38.46 (#35 of 120) 10/9/10 INDIANA * FAVORITE is on 8-0 SU & 7-1 ATS run in L8 OSU-IND matchups 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at Wisconsin * L7 games of WIS-OSU series at WISCONSIN are 7-0 UNDER the total 10/23/10 PURDUE * UNDER the total is 5-0 in L5 games of OSU-PUR series Points Scored - Allowed 29.0 (49) 12.5 (5) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 369.0 (68) 262.3 (5) 10/30/10 at Minnesota * OHIO ST is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in its L6 games at MINNESOTA YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.46 (66) 4.12 (6) 11/13/10 PENN ST * FAVORITE is on 8-0 SU & ATS run in L8 OSU-PSU matchups at OHIO ST YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.52 (44) 2.88 (9) 11/20/10 at Iowa * FAVORITE is 12-0 SU & 10-2 ATS in IOW-OSU series since 92 YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.14 (61) 5.35 (5) Avg. Time of Possession 31.49 (21) 11/27/10 MICHIGAN * OHIO ST is 9-3 SU & ATS vs. MICHIGAN since 98 Turnover Differential +1.3 (5) 3rd Down Conversion % 42.0% (37) 30.9% (7) Straight Up 12-1 11-2 10-3 11-2 44-8 (85%) * OHIO ST is 10-1 ATS (+8.9 Units) on the road vs. teams with a winning record since 07. Overall ATS 8-4 7-5 6-6 10-3 31-18 (63%) The Average Score was OHIO ST 28.4, OPPONENT 14.6. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - at at Home ATS 4-2 3-3 1-5 5-2 13-12 (52%) Wisconsin, 11/20 - at Iowa Away/Neutral ATS 4-2 4-2 5-1 5-1 18-6 (75%) * OHIO ST is 11-2 ATS (+8.8 Units) as road favorites since 07. The Average Score was OHIO ST vs Conference ATS 6-2 5-3 5-3 6-2 22-10 (69%) 29.8, OPPONENT 11.7. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at Illinois, 10/16 - at Wisconsin, 10/30 - at Non-Conference ATS 2-2 2-2 1-3 4-1 9-8 (53%) Minnesota, 11/20 - at Iowa as Favorite ATS 7-4 7-4 5-4 7-3 26-15 (63%) * Over the L2 seasons, OHIO ST is 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) in the second half of the season. The as Underdog ATS 1-0 0-1 1-2 3-0 5-3 (63%) Average Score was OHIO ST 30.8, OPPONENT 12.2. Potential spots for 2010: 10/23 - PURDUE, Over-Under 4-9 7-5 5-7 3-8 19-29 (40%) 10/30 - at Minnesota, 11/13 - PENN ST, 11/20 - at Iowa, 11/27 - MICHIGAN 9/2 N ILLINOIS 35-12 W -17.5 W 49.5 U 9/1 YOUNGSTOWN ST 38-6 W - - - 8/30 YOUNGSTOWN ST 43-0 W - - - 9/5 NAVY 31-27 W -22 L 46.5 O 9/9 at Texas 24-7 W +3 W 52 U 9/8 AKRON 20-2 W -28 L 46 U 9/6 OHIO U 26-14 W -34.5 L 47 U 9/12 USC 15-18 L +7 W 45.5 U 9/16 CINCINNATI 37-7 W -30 T 48 U 9/15 at Washington 33-14 W -3 W 40.5 O 9/13 at USC 3-35 L +11.5 L 44.5 U 9/19 vs. Toledo 38-0 W -22.5 W 58.5 U 9/23 PENN ST 28-6 W -17 W 42.5 U 9/22 NORTHWESTERN 58-7 W -23.5 W 49 O 9/20 TROY 28-10 W -20.5 L 47.5 U 9/26 ILLINOIS 30-0 W -14 W 50 U 9/30 at Iowa 38-17 W -6.5 W 43.5 O 9/29 at Minnesota 30-7 W -23.5 L 60.5 U 9/27 MINNESOTA 34-21 W -20 L 49.5 O 10/3 at Indiana 33-14 W -17.5 W 47 T 10/7 BOWLING GREEN 35-7 W -37 L 51.5 U 10/6 at Purdue 23-7 W -6.5 W 52 U 10/4 at Wisconsin 20-17 W -1.5 W 43.5 U 10/10 WISCONSIN 31-13 W -14 W 46 U 10/14 at Michigan St 38-7 W -14 W 51 U 10/13 KENT ST 48-3 W -30 W 47 O 10/11 PURDUE 16-3 W -20.5 L 49.5 U 10/17 at Purdue 18-26 L -13 L 44 T 10/21 INDIANA 44-3 W -31.5 W 52.5 U 10/20 MICHIGAN ST 24-17 W -17 L 51.5 U 10/18 at Michigan St 45-7 W -3.5 W 42 O 10/24 MINNESOTA 38-7 W -17 W 41.5 O 10/28 MINNESOTA 44-0 W -27 W 47 U 10/27 at Penn St 37-17 W -3 W 40 O 10/25 PENN ST 6-13 L +2 L 44 U 10/31 NEW MEXICO ST 45-0 W -44 W 48.5 U 11/4 at Illinois 17-10 W -25.5 L 48 U 11/3 WISCONSIN 38-17 W -16 W 45 O 11/8 at Northwestern 45-10 W -12.5 W 39 O 11/7 at Penn St 24-7 W +5 W 41.5 U 11/11 at Northwestern 54-10 W -22 W 42.5 O 11/10 ILLINOIS 21-28 L -14.5 L 46.5 O 11/15 at Illinois 30-20 W -8 W 43 O 11/14 IOWA 27-24 W -16.5 L 38 O 11/18 MICHIGAN 42-39 W -7 L 40.5 O 11/17 at Michigan 14-3 W -4 W 46 U 11/22 MICHIGAN 42-7 W -20 W 45 O 11/21 at Michigan 21-10 W -10.5 W 48 U 1/8 vs. Florida 14-41 L -7 L 47 O 1/7 vs. Lsu 24-38 L +3.5 L 46.5 O 1/5 vs. Texas 21-24 L +9 W 51.5 U 1/1 vs. Oregon 26-17 W +4.5 W 51 U Where: State College, PA Head Coach: Joe Paterno, 45th year (394-129-3 SU) Conference: Big Ten 2009 RECORD: 11-2 SU, 7-6 ATS Facility: Beaver Stadium 9/4/10 YOUNGSTOWN ST 9/11/10 at Alabama 2009 Scoring Differential: +16.6 (#6 of 120) 9/18/10 KENT ST 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +14.1 (#12 of 120) 9/25/10 TEMPLE * L3 PSU-TEM series games have gone UNDER the total 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 51 (#13 of 120) 10/2/10 at Iowa * IOWA is 8-2 SU & ATS vs. PENN ST since 96 2009 Schedule Strength: 34.31 (#66 of 120) 10/9/10 ILLINOIS * ROAD TEAM is 4-7 SU but 9-2 ATS in PSU-ILL series since 97 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Minnesota * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 MIN-PSU games 10/30/10 MICHIGAN * FAVORITE has swept L3 PSU-MIC games at PENN ST, both SU & ATS Points Scored - Allowed 28.8 (52) 12.2 (3) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 406.9 (37) 274.5 (9) 11/6/10 NORTHWESTERN * HOME TEAM is 6-5 SU & 8-3 ATS in PSU-NW series since 95 YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.12 (26) 4.40 (10) 11/13/10 at Ohio St * FAVORITE is on 8-0 SU & ATS run in L8 OSU-PSU matchups at OHIO ST YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.73 (24) 2.85 (8) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.77 (32) 5.99 (17) 11/20/10 vs. Indiana (Landover, MD) * UNDERDOG is 0-3 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 IND-PSU games Avg. Time of Possession 32.61 (6) 11/27/10 MICHIGAN ST * PSU-MSY series has gone 11-3 OVER the total since 96 Turnover Differential +0.5 (26) 3rd Down Conversion % 48.6% (7) 31.6% (12) Straight Up 9-4 9-4 11-2 11-2 40-12 (77%) * PENN ST is on a 0-16 ATS (-17.6 Units) skid vs. teams giving up 12 or less PPG The Average Overall ATS 5-7 6-7 7-4 7-6 25-24 (51%) Score was PENN ST 16.7, OPPONENT 28.1. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at Alabama, 10/2 - at at Home ATS 3-3 4-3 4-2 2-6 13-14 (48%) Iowa, 11/13 - at Ohio St Away/Neutral ATS 2-4 2-4 3-2 5-0 12-10 (55%) * PENN ST is on a 3-19 ATS (-17.9 Units) skid on the road vs. good defensive teams - allowing vs Conference ATS 2-6 2-6 4-3 5-3 13-18 (42%) <=310 YPG The Average Score was PENN ST 15.1, OPPONENT 24.1. Potential spots for 2010: Non-Conference ATS 3-1 4-1 3-1 2-3 12-6 (67%) 9/11 - at Alabama, 10/2 - at Iowa, 11/13 - at Ohio St as Favorite ATS 4-3 6-6 7-4 5-6 22-19 (54%) * Over the L2 seasons, PENN ST is 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) in October games. The Average Score as Underdog ATS 1-4 0-1 0-0 1-0 2-5 (29%) was PENN ST 33.7, OPPONENT 8.8. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at Iowa, 10/9 - ILLINOIS, Over-Under 4-8 6-7 8-4 2-9 20-28 (42%) 10/23 - at Minnesota, 10/30 - MICHIGAN 9/2 AKRON 34-16 W -17.5 W 40.5 O 9/1 FLA INTERNATIONAL 59-0 W -37 W 49 O 8/30 COASTAL CAROLINA 66-10 W - - - 9/5 AKRON 31-7 W -29.5 L 59 U 9/9 at Notre Dame 17-41 L +9 L 47 O 9/8 NOTRE DAME 31-10 W -17.5 W 43.5 U 9/6 OREGON ST 45-14 W -15 W 49 O 9/12 SYRACUSE 28-7 W -29.5 L 51 U 9/16 YOUNGSTOWN ST 37-3 W - - - 9/15 BUFFALO 45-24 W -33 L 50 O 9/13 at Syracuse 55-13 W -27.5 W 50.5 O 9/19 TEMPLE 31-6 W -29.5 L 48 U 9/23 at Ohio St 6-28 L +17 L 42.5 U 9/22 at Michigan 9-14 L -2 L 45.5 U 9/20 TEMPLE 45-3 W -28.5 W 54 U 9/26 IOWA 10-21 L -9.5 L 40.5 U 9/30 NORTHWESTERN 33-7 W -20 W 42 U 9/29 at Illinois 20-27 L -3 L 46 O 9/27 ILLINOIS 38-24 W -15.5 L 54 O 10/3 at Illinois 35-17 W -8 W 48 O 10/7 at Minnesota 28-27 W -1.5 L 48 O 10/6 IOWA 27-7 W -9.5 W 40.5 U 10/4 at Purdue 20-6 W -14 T 58 U 10/10 E ILLINOIS 52-3 W -39.5 W - 10/14 MICHIGAN 10-17 L +5 L 40.5 U 10/13 WISCONSIN 38-7 W -7 W 46.5 U 10/11 at Wisconsin 48-7 W -5 W 47 O 10/17 MINNESOTA 20-0 W -17 W 44 U 10/21 ILLINOIS 26-12 W -18.5 L 44.5 U 10/20 at Indiana 36-31 W -7 L 53 O 10/18 MICHIGAN 46-17 W -24 W 47.5 O 10/24 at Michigan 35-10 W -3.5 W 48 U 10/28 at Purdue 12-0 W -2.5 W 46.5 U 10/27 OHIO ST 17-37 L +3 L 40 O 10/25 at Ohio St 13-6 W -2 W 44 U 10/31 at Northwestern 34-13 W -17 W 47 T 11/4 at Wisconsin 3-13 L +6.5 L 36.5 U 11/3 PURDUE 26-19 W -8 L 53 U 11/8 at Iowa 23-24 L -7.5 L 42.5 O 11/7 OHIO ST 7-24 L -5 L 41.5 U 11/11 TEMPLE 47-0 W -36.5 W 45.5 O 11/10 at Temple 31-0 W -25.5 W 47 U 11/15 INDIANA 34-7 W -35 L 57.5 U 11/14 INDIANA 31-20 W -24 L 55.5 U 11/18 MICHIGAN ST 17-13 W -18.5 L 45 U 11/17 at Michigan St 31-35 L -3 L 51.5 O 11/22 MICHIGAN ST 49-18 W -16.5 W 47 O 11/21 at Michigan St 42-14 W -3 W 50.5 O 1/1 vs. Tennessee 20-10 W +4 W 41.5 U 12/29 vs. Texas A&M 24-17 W -5 W 52 U 1/1 vs. USC 24-38 L +10 L 44.5 O 1/1 vs. LSU 19-17 W +2 W 40 U 88 WWW.STATFOX.COM

PURDUE BOILERMAKERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 35.58 (#71 of 120) WISCONSIN BADGERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 35.58 (#71 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 89 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: Multiple 4-3 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 44 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 42 Where: West Lafayette, IN Head Coach: Danny Hope, 2nd year (5-7 SU) Conference: Big Ten 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 6-4-2 ATS Facility: Ross-Ade Stadium 9/4/10 at Notre Dame * UNDERDOG is 4-13 SU but 11-5 ATS in ND-PUR series since 93 9/11/10 W ILLINOIS 2009 Scoring Differential: -1.3 (#77 of 120) 9/18/10 BALL ST * ROAD TEAM is on 0-5 SU but 4-1 ATS run in PUR-BLS series 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +1.6 (#62 of 120) 9/25/10 TOLEDO * ROAD TEAM is 2-3 SU but 4-1 ATS in L5 PUR-TOL matchups 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 40 (#54 of 120) 10/9/10 at Northwestern * L7 games of NW-PUR series are 6-1 UNDER the total 2009 Schedule Strength: 38.83 (#32 of 120) 10/16/10 MINNESOTA * FAVORITE is 9-1 SU & 8-1 ATS in PUR-MIN series since 97 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Ohio St * UNDER the total is 5-0 in L5 games of OSU-PUR series 10/30/10 at Illinois * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 ILL-PUR games at ILLINOIS Points Scored - Allowed 27.8 (58) 29.1 (89) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 391.3 (53) 376.6 (69) 11/6/10 WISCONSIN * WISCONSIN is 6-2 SU & 6-1 ATS in its L8 games vs. PURDUE YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.61 (58) 5.35 (54) 11/13/10 MICHIGAN * HOME TEAM is 7-3 SU & 7-2 ATS in PUR-MIC series since 96 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.21 (63) 4.41 (89) 11/20/10 at Michigan St * HOME TEAM is 9-7 SU & 12-3 ATS in MSY-PUR series since 92 YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.82 (82) 6.55 (38) Avg. Time of Possession 29.8 (69) 11/27/10 INDIANA * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 PUR-IND matchups at PURDUE Turnover Differential -0.4 (87) 3rd Down Conversion % 42.4% (33) 40.7% (73) Straight Up 8-6 8-5 4-8 5-7 25-26 (49%) * PURDUE is on a 12-3 ATS (+8.7 Units) run at home vs. bad teams (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) The Overall ATS 6-7 5-6 5-5 6-4 22-22 (50%) Average Score was PURDUE 37.5, OPPONENT 18.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - TOLEDO, at Home ATS 1-5 3-3 3-2 3-2 10-12 (45%) 11/27 - INDIANA Away/Neutral ATS 5-2 2-3 2-3 3-2 12-10 (55%) * PURDUE is 8-0 UNDER the total (+8 Units) at home in weeks 5 through 9 since 07. The Average vs Conference ATS 4-4 3-4 4-3 3-3 14-14 (50%) Score was PURDUE 21, OPPONENT 17.9. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - MINNESOTA Non-Conference ATS 2-3 2-2 1-2 3-1 8-8 (50%) * PURDUE is on a 6-18 ATS (-13.8 Units) skid as road underdogs of 7 points or less The Average as Favorite ATS 1-4 4-4 2-2 2-2 9-12 (43%) Score was PURDUE 19.9, OPPONENT 32. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - at Northwestern, as Underdog ATS 5-3 1-2 3-3 4-2 13-10 (57%) 10/30 - at Illinois, 11/20 - at Michigan St Over-Under 5-8 5-7 4-7 5-5 19-27 (41%) 9/2 INDIANA ST 60-35 W - - - 9/1 at Toledo 52-24 W -6 W 54.5 O 9/6 N COLORADO 42-10 W - - - 9/5 TOLEDO 52-31 W -10 W 47.5 O 9/9 MIAMI OHIO 38-31 W -19 L 53.5 O 9/8 E ILLINOIS 52-6 W - - - 9/13 OREGON 26-32 L +7 W 58.5 U 9/12 at Oregon 36-38 L +13 W 57.5 O 9/16 BALL ST 38-28 W -17 L 58.5 O 9/15 C MICHIGAN 45-22 W -21 W 67.5 U 9/20 C MICHIGAN 32-25 W -10.5 L 68.5 U 9/19 N ILLINOIS 21-28 L -12 L 52.5 U 9/23 MINNESOTA 27-21 W +2.5 W 59.5 U 9/22 at Minnesota 45-31 W -14 T 70.5 O 9/27 at Notre Dame 21-38 L +2 L 48 O 9/26 NOTRE DAME 21-24 L +6 W 59 U 9/30 at Notre Dame 21-35 L +15 W 59 U 9/29 NOTRE DAME 33-19 W -21 L 56 U 10/4 PENN ST 6-20 L +14 T 58 U 10/3 NORTHWESTERN 21-27 L -7 L 56.5 U 10/7 at Iowa 17-47 L +9.5 L 53 O 10/6 OHIO ST 7-23 L +6.5 L 52 U 10/11 at Ohio St 3-16 L +20.5 W 49.5 U 10/10 at Minnesota 20-35 L +3 L 51.5 O 10/14 at Northwestern 31-10 W -7 W 51 U 10/13 at Michigan 21-48 L +5 L 57.5 O 10/18 at Northwestern 26-48 L +3.5 L 50 O 10/17 OHIO ST 26-18 W +13 W 44 T 10/21 WISCONSIN 3-24 L +6 L 55 U 10/20 IOWA 31-6 W -7 W 46.5 U 10/25 MINNESOTA 6-17 L 0 L 52.5 U 10/24 ILLINOIS 24-14 W -10 T 55 U 10/28 PENN ST 0-12 L +2.5 L 46.5 U 11/4 at Michigan St 17-15 W +3 W 58.5 U 10/27 NORTHWESTERN 35-17 W -13.5 W 64 U 11/1 MICHIGAN 48-42 W -3 W 47.5 O 10/31 at Wisconsin 0-37 L +7 L 53 U 11/11 at Illinois 42-31 W +3 W 46.5 O 11/3 at Penn St 19-26 L +8 W 53 U 11/8 at Michigan St 7-21 L +10 L 54 U 11/7 at Michigan 38-36 W +7 W 51.5 O 11/18 INDIANA 28-19 W -12 L 58 U 11/10 MICHIGAN ST 31-48 L -4.5 L 58 O 11/15 at Iowa 17-22 L +17 W 43 U 11/14 MICHIGAN ST 37-40 L +3 T 53 O 11/25 at Hawaii 35-42 L +19.5 W 75 O 11/17 at Indiana 24-27 L -1 L 62 U 11/22 INDIANA 62-10 W -11 W 54.5 O 11/21 at Indiana 38-21 W -3 W 59 T 12/29 vs. Maryland 7-24 L -1.5 L 56 U 12/26 vs. C Michigan 51-48 W -8 L 71.5 O Where: Madison, WI Head Coach: Bret Bielema, 5th year (38-14 SU) Conference: Big Ten 2009 RECORD: 10-3 SU, 7-6 ATS Facility: Camp Randall Stadium 9/4/10 at UNLV * L4 NLV-WIS series games have gone UNDER the total 9/11/10 SAN JOSE ST 2009 Scoring Differential: +10.0 (#23 of 120) 9/18/10 ARIZONA ST 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +10.3 (#24 of 120) 9/25/10 AUSTIN PEAY 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 48 (#20 of 120) 10/2/10 at Michigan St * L6 games of MSY-WIS series are 6-0 OVER the total 2009 Schedule Strength: 34.38 (#64 of 120) 10/9/10 MINNESOTA * OVER the total is 10-0 in L10 games of WIS-MIN series 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 OHIO ST * L7 games of WIS-OSU series at WISCONSIN are 7-0 UNDER the total 10/23/10 at Iowa * IOWA is 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS in its L8 games vs. WISCONSIN Points Scored - Allowed 31.8 (25) 21.8 (33) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 416.9 (31) 305.7 (17) 11/6/10 at Purdue * WISCONSIN is 6-2 SU & 6-1 ATS in its L8 games vs. PURDUE YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.88 (41) 5.08 (37) 11/13/10 INDIANA * WIS-IND series has gone 10-2 OVER the total since 93 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.56 (36) 2.89 (10) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.15 (17) 7.34 (77) 11/20/10 at Michigan * UNDERDOG is on 3-5 SU but 6-1 ATS run in L8 MIC-WIS matchups Avg. Time of Possession 33.91 (1) 11/27/10 NORTHWESTERN * HOME TEAM is 6-3 SU & 8-1 ATS in L9 WIS-NW matchups Turnover Differential +0.2 (46) 3rd Down Conversion % 46.8% (11) 34.6% (21) Straight Up 12-1 9-4 7-6 10-3 38-14 (73%) * WISCONSIN is 0-11 ATS (-12.1 Units) vs. good defensive teams - allowing <=310 YPG since Overall ATS 9-2 4-8 5-7 7-6 25-23 (52%) 07. The Average Score was WISCONSIN 16.3, OPPONENT 31.7. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 at Home ATS 4-2 4-2 2-4 4-3 14-11 (56%) - ARIZONA ST, 10/16 - OHIO ST, 10/23 - at Iowa Away/Neutral ATS 5-0 0-6 3-3 3-3 11-12 (48%) * WISCONSIN is 1-10 ATS (-10 Units) vs. good teams - outscoring opponents by 10+ PPG since vs Conference ATS 6-1 2-6 3-5 4-4 15-16 (48%) 07. The Average Score was WISCONSIN 18.9, OPPONENT 33. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 Non-Conference ATS 3-1 2-2 2-2 3-2 10-7 (59%) - OHIO ST, 10/23 - at Iowa as Favorite ATS 8-2 3-4 3-3 4-5 18-14 (56%) * WISCONSIN is on a 11-2 OVER the total (+8.8 Units) run vs. poor ball control teams, 28 or less as Underdog ATS 1-0 1-4 2-4 2-1 6-9 (40%) TOP minutes/game The Average Score was WISCONSIN 29.9, OPPONENT 23.8. Potential spots Over-Under 6-6 6-6 8-3 7-5 27-20 (57%) for 2010: 11/20 - at Michigan 9/2 at Bowling Green 35-14 W -11 W 46.5 O 9/1 WASHINGTON ST 42-21 W -14 W 49.5 O 8/30 AKRON 38-17 W -26.5 L 52 O 9/5 N ILLINOIS 28-20 W -16.5 L 49.5 U 9/9 W ILLINOIS 34-10 W - - - 9/8 at Unlv 20-13 W -25 L 50.5 U 9/6 MARSHALL 51-14 W -20.5 W 50.5 O 9/12 FRESNO ST 34-31 W -7.5 L 51.5 O 9/16 SAN DIEGO ST 14-0 W -12.5 W 44.5 U 9/15 THE CITADEL 45-31 W - - - 9/13 at Fresno St 13-10 W -2 W 51 U 9/19 WOFFORD 44-14 W -21.5 W - 9/23 at Michigan 13-27 L +14 T 41 U 9/22 IOWA 17-13 W -7 L 44.5 U 9/27 at Michigan 25-27 L -4.5 L 42 O 9/26 MICHIGAN ST 38-30 W -1.5 W 52.5 O 9/30 at Indiana 52-17 W -10 W 42 O 9/29 MICHIGAN ST 37-34 W -7 L 45 O 10/4 OHIO ST 17-20 L +1.5 L 43.5 U 10/3 at Minnesota 31-28 W +2.5 W 51.5 O 10/7 NORTHWESTERN 41-9 W -18.5 W 42 O 10/6 at Illinois 26-31 L +2.5 L 52 O 10/11 PENN ST 7-48 L +5 L 47 O 10/10 at Ohio St 13-31 L +14 L 46 U 10/14 MINNESOTA 48-12 W -8 W 52 O 10/13 at Penn St 7-38 L +7 L 46.5 U 10/18 at Iowa 16-38 L +5 L 41 O 10/17 IOWA 10-20 L -1.5 L 46.5 U 10/21 at Purdue 24-3 W -6 W 55 U 10/20 N ILLINOIS 44-3 W -23 W 51 U 10/25 ILLINOIS 27-17 W +2 W 52 U 10/31 PURDUE 37-0 W -7 W 53 U 10/28 ILLINOIS 30-24 W -21 L 45 O 10/27 INDIANA 33-3 W -9 W 60 U 11/1 at Michigan St 24-25 L +5.5 W 49 T 11/7 at Indiana 31-28 W -13.5 L 54 O 11/4 PENN ST 13-3 W -6.5 W 36.5 U 11/3 at Ohio St 17-38 L +16 L 45 O 11/8 at Indiana 41-20 W -10 W 51 O 11/14 MICHIGAN 45-24 W -8 W 54.5 O 11/11 at Iowa 24-21 W -1 W 38.5 O 11/10 MICHIGAN 37-21 W +2.5 W 48 O 11/15 MINNESOTA 35-32 W -13.5 L 47.5 O 11/21 at Northwestern 31-33 L -7 L 49 O 11/18 BUFFALO 35-3 W -38 L 47 U 11/17 at Minnesota 41-34 W -13 L 62 O 11/22 CAL POLY SLO 36-35 W - - - 12/5 at Hawaii 51-10 W -12 W 59 O 1/1 vs. Arkansas 17-14 W +2 W 45.5 U 1/1 vs. Tennessee 17-21 L +2.5 L 56.5 U 12/27 vs. Florida St 13-42 L +7 L 50.5 O 12/29 vs. Miami 20-14 W +3.5 W 55.5 U

BIG east Preview The 2010 Big East season figures to be an exciting one if for no other reason than the volume of offensive players returning, not just starters, but stars. The list of playmakers from this league is deep and includes Pittsburgh s Dion Lewis, West Virginia s Noel Devine, Connecticut s Jordan Todman, plus quarterbacks Tom Savage of Rutgers and B.J. Daniels of South Florida. It could be a run-first league though, as Savage is the only quarterback with 11 or more career college starts to his credit. All five of those players teams could compete for the league title and BCS berth this season, with Cincinnati certainly in the mix as well. Pittsburgh plays as the early favorite but has games at UConn, South Florida, and Cincinnati as potential stumbling blocks. South Florida may be on the outside looking in simply because of its schedule, which features four brutal road games in new head coach Skip Holtz s first campaign. CINCINNATI BEARCATS By the time the opening snap rolls around for the first game of 2010, it may look as if the Bearcats changed everything but their name. Former coach Brian Kelly jumped ship to Notre Dame, quarterback Tony Pike and wide receiver Mardy Gilyard are now in the NFL and several other key players have moved on New head coach Butch Jones will ride Pike s injury replacement, junior Zach Collaros, who posted strong numbers when in control of the huddle 1,434 yards passing and 10 touchdowns on just 93 completions. He also rushed for 344 yards and four touchdowns. Collaros will be throwing to plenty of talent at wide receiver. The line returns a pair of All-Big East while Junior Isaiah Pead is more of a speed back than a tackle-breaker and averaged a healthy 6.7 yards per run on 121 attempts Cincinnati s stop unit lost several high-impact players and now lacks significant experience. The only senior penciled into the starting lineup is middle linebacker Dorian Davis. The Bearcats allowed a combined 95 points to Pittsburgh and 2009 STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Cincinnati 12-1-0 0.923 502 300 7-0-0 6-0-0 6-1-0 7-6-0 53.8% 6-6-0 Pittsburgh 10-3-0 0.769 417 257 5-2-0 6-1-0 4-2-0 7-4-1 63.6% 4-8-0 West Virgnina 9-4-0 0.692 340 282 5-2-0 7-0-0 2-4-0 5-7-0 41.7% 6-6-0 Rutgers 9-4-0 0.692 375 233 3-4-0 4-3-0 5-1-0 6-7-0 46.2% 5-6-0 South Florida 8-5-0 0.615 344 257 3-4-0 4-2-0 4-3-0 6-6-0 50.0% 6-5-0 Connecticut 8-5-0 0.615 405 307 3-4-0 4-2-0 4-3-0 11-2-0 84.6% 8-4-0 Louisville 4-8-0 0.333 217 315 1-6-0 4-2-0 0-6-0 5-6-0 45.5% 4-7-0 Syracuse 4-8-0 0.333 254 335 1-6-0 4-4-0 0-4-0 6-6-0 50.0% 3-8-0 Florida and that drop off in production actually started to fester several weeks earlier. The big question is if that slide will continue The Bearcats are out to defend their Big East title for the second straight season, and are one of just six schools from BCS conferences to go back-toback since 2000. While the offense will miss Pike and Gilyard, plenty of experience still returns, and Collaros adds another dimension with the ability to run. After racking up a 23-4 mark in the last two years, some may consider four losses in 2010 a step back. If the defense can regroup, Cincinnati could be a darkhorse in the Big East. CONNECTICUT HUSKIES Head coach Randy Edsall has made a strong running attack the staple of his 11-year tenure at Connecticut, and the road to the end zone will still be primarily paved by the offensive line and tailback Jordan Todman. But if there s a new wrinkle to the Huskies, it may have been unveiled during the spring game, as quarterback Zach Frazer unleashed four touchdown passes of longer than 55 yards Frazer split time with Cody Endres, and the reason why is the biggest issue facing Connecticut s offense health. Both quarterbacks missed time due to injury, yet the reliance on Todman & Co., in the backfield helped keep the scoring unit potent (31.2 PPG). A line featuring four returning starters only stands to get better after paving the way for 170.7 yards rushing per game and allowing just 21 sacks The stop unit was pushed around by several opponents, allowing 135 points in the four games prior to the Papajohns.com Bowl, but it happened as the offense hit its stride. The secondary is the biggest area of need, more for a loss of experience than a lack of talent, but eight total defensive starters return The Huskies closed last season on a roll with four consecutive wins, including an upset of South Carolina in the Papajohns.com Bowl. Add in the 90 WWW.STATFOX.COM

experience that comes along with 16 returning starters, and maybe, just maybe, Edsall s gearing up for a run in the Big East. Consider the Huskies a darkhorse for the Big East crown, especially because they host games with both West Virginia and Pittsburgh. LOUISVILLE CARDINALS Louisville has struggled over the last three seasons, racking up a 15-21 mark since its last bowl appearance in 2007. But change is on the horizon in the form of first-year head coach Charlie Strong, who took the reins after a seven-year stint as defensive coordinator with Florida The 2009 offense struggled, but it wasn t due to a lack of talent. What the Cardinals need is health and consistency, plain and simple. Due to injuries and ineffectiveness, three different quarterbacks started games, and top running back Victor Anderson followed up his 2008 Big East Freshman of the Year performance with just 473 yards rushing. As a result, the Cardinals struggled to move the ball. They finished 111th in the nation in scoring (18.1 points per game) and 91st in total offense (334.1 yards per game). As many as four quarterbacks could be in the mix heading into the first game, but thankfully, all five starters are back on the line Strong s strength is defense, and his former Gators flexed plenty of muscle. Along with an almost entirely new staff comes a new scheme, and the biggest problem could be finding people to help anchor a run defense that needs shoring up after getting steamrolled for 165.1 yards per game Strong has a considerable amount of talent to work with on offense, it s just a matter of getting it all to fit together the right way. Once he settles on a starting quarterback, it ll speed up the curve for getting the rest of the scoring unit on the same page. If the program s going to move forward in Strong s first year, the push must be the result of putting points on the board. PITTSBURGH PANTHERS Pittsburgh bounced back from a crushing home defeat to Cincinnati in the Big East Championship Game to knock off North Carolina in the Meineke Car Care Bowl. But the victory couldn t possibly wipe away the terrible taste left after the Panthers blew a 21-point lead to the Bearcats at Heinz Field and lost 45-44 in overtime. Changes from the top down are likely to keep Cincinnati from being a thorn in Pittsburgh s side this season, and the returning big-play exploits of sophomore running back Dion Lewis and junior wide receiver Jon Baldwin will keep the program among the Big East elite Lewis ran for 1,799 yards and scored 17 touchdowns, while averaging a healthy 5.5 yards per carry. As the alpha dog of the offense, there s no doubt he ll assume another large workload in the neighborhood of 300 carries. Bill Stull, who racked up a 19-7 mark as the starter, is gone, and the most likely candidate to take over the huddle is sophomore Tino Sunseri. He will be lined up behind a pair of new guards and taking snaps from a new center Head coach Dave Wannstedt has crafted his program through a potent ground attack and dominating defense. For 2010, he has six starters back from a unit that allowed the 19th fewest points in college football Pittsburgh is the early favorite to capture the Big East crown and a definite contender for the BCS title. Backed by a still-potent defense and high-scoring offense, last season s meltdown in the Big East title game should only serve as additional motivation. Lewis is on the short list of Heisman Trophy contenders three consecutive sophomores have won it. RUTGERS SCARLET KNIGHTS Rutgers has lost some heavy hitters from not only the most successful senior class in program history, but also junior offensive tackle Anthony Davis, who left school a year early. Even with the losses, however, the Scarlet Knights are still strong bets to continue their string of bowl appearances (five) Sophomore quarterback Tom Savage was thrown into the fire from the start, seeing action in the second half of the opener and never giving up the starting gig. A 9-4 mark is nothing to sneeze at, and neither were the 2,211 yards he threw for (Big East-freshman record). There will be significant changes to the line around Savage, but he will be working with a well-rounded backfield while sophomore wide BIG EAST WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 91

receiver Mohammed Sanu adds a major wrinkle to the offense, spelling Savage in a Wildcat role Rutgers lacks name recognition on a national level, and its defense could be one of the most underrated in the nation. It was tops among all 120 FBS teams in tackles for loss and fumble recoveries, second in turnover margin and fourth in sacks. Several key contributors are gone, but there are still six starters returning, including three along the line. If there s work to be done, it s probably at linebacker The weapons are there for Savage, who is now the most experienced quarterback in the Big East Conference with 11 career starts. While it may be a year early to consider Rutgers a major contender for the conference crown, there is potential for that to happen depending on how big of a step the offense takes in Savage s second season. A somewhat-stacked defensive line will be a help until the rest of the pieces on the unit fall into place. SOUTH FLORIDA BULLS If head coach Skip Holtz played his cards right, then he made the jump from East Carolina to South Florida at the perfect time. On top of stepping up from Conference USA to the Big East, Holtz inherits a program that has an experienced offense and plenty of talent on defense to compete for a bowl berth A year ago, sophomore quarterback B.J. Daniels was nothing but an afterthought behind Matt Grothe on the depth chart. But after Grothe suffered a season-ending knee injury in the third game, Daniels was pressed into service and proved to be every bit as talented, running for 772 yards and nine touchdowns while throwing for 1,983 yards passing and 14 touchdowns against nine interceptions. He ll lead a unit that scored 26.5 PPG and returns all but one starter The bad news? Seven starters are gone from a very talented defense, including both ends who combined for 10 sacks and 26 tackles for loss. The top four tacklers are gone as well so this unit will be rebuilding after allowing less than 20 PPG a year ago Aside from a few tweaks perhaps opening up the passing game there is little for Holtz to do with the offense. It worked well, and the spread attack is still option No. 1, and a great fit for Daniels. Holtz s major work will come on a defense that has lost impact players on the line and the secondary. While the unit can t be expected to match last year s effort, the drop off will ultimately determine how high up the Big East food chain the Bulls can climb. SYRACUSE ORANGE The optimist says Syracuse made headway in head coach Doug Marrone s first season. The Orange won four games, knocked off Rutgers by 18, split their eight home games and lost a pair of others by four combined points. The pessimist, however, would point out that the team dropped four key Big East games by a combined 94 points and the defense allowed nearly 28 PPG. The truth, as always, lies somewhere in between Greg Paulus made for a nice story, transferring from Duke so that he could use up his remaining year of football eligibility, but Marrone has moved on and wasted no time making sweeping changes to the offense. Marrone s now the coordinator, hoping to improve a unit that ranked 78th in passing, 87th in rushing and 99th in scoring. Syracuse is likely to turn to sophomore Ryan Nassib under center, so the receivers better be ready for the vertical game. The line returns three starters The stop unit is on much better footing, if only because it was outstanding against the run (13th in the nation) and returns three starters on the line. As the season progressed, the linebackers became more than just a strength, they dominated, and the defense actually cut almost five points per game off what it allowed prior to Marrone s arrival. The next step comes in slowing down the pass after the Orange allowed 235.2 yards per game The offense is going to look plenty different, and not only because there s a new quarterback. Marrone is out to attack teams and stretch the field. So at the very least, Syracuse will play an exciting brand of football. The forward progress may take one more year before it truly shows in the win column, and the schedule isn t friendly. WEST VIRGINIA MOUNTAINEERS West Virginia has flown under the national radar for much of the last decade 92 WWW.STATFOX.COM

despite eight consecutive first- or second-place finishes in the Big East. Welcoming back a combined 18 starters on offense and defense is certainly a boost to a program still looking to stamp itself as a perennial contender for more than just a conference crown Nine starters return to the offense, and while tailback Noel Devine is among the smallest of them, he definitely makes up for it with his production. The Heisman Trophy candidate ran for a career-high 1,465 yards on just 241 attempts (6.1-yard average) and topped the century mark seven times on the way to earning All-Big East first-team honors. Big plays are expected of Devine after he broke off seven runs of at least 50 yards, scoring on four of them. He ll again be the focal point for an offense ushering in its third different starting quarterback in the last three years. Sophomores Geno Smith and Coley White are expected to battle for the position heading into late summer behind a veteran line bringing back four starters The defense is far from a pushover, however, even if it s largely ignored on paper. Nine starters are back on a unit that allowed just 3.7 yards per carry and picked off 17 passes West Virginia may not play the most exciting brand of football outside of Devine running wild on a weekly basis, but it s hard to argue with the success. Given the returning experience, and rebuilding of several teams within the Big East, the Mountaineers are again in the thick of the conference title hunt. The game for all the marbles will likely be the annual Backyard Brawl with Pittsburgh. The last three games have been decided by a total of 11 points. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH Pittsburgh West Virginia Cincinnati Connecticut Rutgers South Florida Syracuse Louisville The Platinum Sheet Platinum Sheet Best Bet Records in 2009-10 NFL: 57-38 (60%) College Football: 37-39 (49%) NBA: 69-44 (61%) College Basketball: 53-33 (62%) Combined, 62 games over.500!!! Order your season long subscription for just $149.99, call 1-877-514-4220 WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 93

CINCINNATI BEARCATS 2010 Schedule Strength: 39 (#44 of 120) CONNECTICUT HUSKIES 2010 Schedule Strength: 38.58 (#49 of 120) Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 41 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 39 Where: Cincinnati, OH Head Coach: Butch Jones, 1st year Conference: Big East 2009 RECORD: 12-1 SU, 7-6 ATS Facility: Nippert Stadium 9/4/10 at Fresno St 9/11/10 INDIANA ST 2009 Scoring Differential: +15.5 (#10 of 120) 9/16/10 at NC State 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +13.3 (#15 of 120) 9/25/10 OKLAHOMA 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 47 (#26 of 120) 10/9/10 MIAMI OHIO * HOME TEAM is 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 CIN-MOH matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 37 (#50 of 120) 10/15/10 at Louisville * FAVORITE is 11-2 SU & 10-3 ATS in LOU-CIN series since 97 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/22/10 S FLORIDA * CINCINNATI is on 5-1 SU & 6-0 ATS run vs. S FLORIDA 10/30/10 SYRACUSE * UNDER the total is 6-1 in L7 games of CIN-SYR series Points Scored - Allowed 38.6 (4) 23.1 (44) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 447.5 (11) 374.0 (67) 11/13/10 at W Virginia * ROAD TEAM is on 5-2 SU & 5-0 ATS run in WV-CIN series YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.98 (2) 5.20 (47) 11/20/10 RUTGERS * UNDERDOG is on 4-3 SU & 6-1 ATS run in L7 CIN-RUT matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.99 (13) 3.63 (36) 11/27/10 at Connecticut * UNDERDOG is on 2-4 SU but 5-1 ATS run in L6 CON-CIN matchups YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.50 (12) 7.13 (63) Avg. Time of Possession 25.96 (120) 12/4/10 PITTSBURGH * OVER the total is 4-1 in L5 games of CIN-PIT series Turnover Differential +0.7 (13) 3rd Down Conversion % 39.2% (59) 41.0% (74) Straight Up 8-5 10-3 11-3 12-1 41-12 (77%) * CINCINNATI is on a 12-3 ATS (+8.7 Units) run as home favorites of 3.5 to 7 points The Average Overall ATS 7-3 8-3 6-7 7-6 28-19 (60%) Score was CINCINNATI 28.1, OPPONENT 15. Potential spots for 2010: 11/20 - RUTGERS at Home ATS 5-1 3-1 3-2 2-4 13-8 (62%) * CINCINNATI is on a 28-10 ATS (+17 Units) run vs. good teams - outscoring opponents by 10+ Away/Neutral ATS 2-2 5-2 3-5 5-2 15-11 (58%) PPG The Average Score was CINCINNATI 23.3, OPPONENT 28.3. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 vs Conference ATS 4-2 4-2 4-3 5-2 17-9 (65%) - OKLAHOMA, 11/20 - RUTGERS, 12/4 - PITTSBURGH Non-Conference ATS 3-1 4-1 2-4 2-4 11-10 (52%) * CINCINNATI is on a 13-3 ATS (+9.7 Units) run at home vs. good rushing defenses - allowing as Favorite ATS 3-2 5-3 4-6 4-5 16-16 (50%) <=120 RYPG The Average Score was CINCINNATI 27.2, OPPONENT 19.6. Potential spots for as Underdog ATS 4-1 3-0 2-1 2-1 11-3 (79%) 2010: 9/25 - OKLAHOMA, 10/30 - SYRACUSE, 11/20 - RUTGERS, 12/4 - PITTSBURGH Over-Under 5-6 5-6 7-6 6-6 23-24 (49%) 9/2 E KENTUCKY 31-0 W - - - 8/30 SE MISSOURI ST 59-3 W - - - 8/28 E KENTUCKY 40-7 W - - - 9/7 at Rutgers 47-15 W +5 W 47 O 9/8 PITTSBURGH 15-33 L +7 L 44.5 O 9/6 OREGON ST 34-3 W +3 W 43.5 U 9/6 at Oklahoma 26-52 L +22 L 53.5 O 9/12 SE MISSOURI ST 70-3 W -47 W - 9/16 at Ohio St 7-37 L +30 T 48 U 9/15 at Miami Ohio 47-10 W -6.5 W 48 O 9/20 MIAMI OHIO 45-20 W -12.5 W 48.5 O 9/19 at Oregon St 28-18 W -1 W 57.5 U 9/23 at Virginia Tech 13-29 L +28 W 42 T 9/22 MARSHALL 40-14 W -24 W 53.5 O 9/27 at Akron 17-15 W -11.5 L 56.5 U 9/26 FRESNO ST 28-20 W -17 L 63.5 U 9/30 MIAMI OHIO 24-10 W -11 W 45.5 U 9/29 at San Diego St 52-23 W -14 W 55 O 10/3 at Marshall 33-10 W -3 W 47.5 U 10/3 at Miami Ohio 37-13 W -29.5 L 59 U 10/7 AKRON 20-14 W -4 W 44 U 10/6 at Rutgers 28-23 W +3.5 W 51 T 10/11 RUTGERS 13-10 W -6.5 L 48.5 U 10/15 at S Florida 34-17 W -1 W 48.5 O 10/14 at Louisville 17-23 L +25.5 W 54 U 10/13 LOUISVILLE 24-28 L -8 L 67 U 10/25 at Connecticut 16-40 L -2.5 L 44 O 10/24 LOUISVILLE 41-10 W -16.5 W 54.5 U 10/30 S FLORIDA 24-10 W +2 W 48.5 U 10/22 S FLORIDA 23-6 W +1 W 42.5 U 10/20 at Pittsburgh 17-24 L -10.5 L 50 U 10/31 at Syracuse 28-7 W -15.5 W 52 U 11/8 at W Virginia 26-23 W +7 W 48 O 10/28 SYRACUSE 17-3 W -6.5 W 38 U 11/3 at S Florida 38-33 W +5 W 50 O 11/14 at Louisville 28-20 W -4 W 47 O 11/7 CONNECTICUT 47-45 W -16 L 51 O 11/11 at W Virginia 24-42 L +18 T 46.5 O 11/10 CONNECTICUT 27-3 W -7 W 51 U 11/22 PITTSBURGH 28-21 W -6 W 48 O 11/13 W VIRGINIA 24-21 W -9.5 L 56.5 U 11/18 RUTGERS 30-11 W +6.5 W 38 O 11/17 W VIRGINIA 23-28 L +5 T 56 U 11/29 SYRACUSE 30-10 W -21.5 L 51 U 11/27 ILLINOIS 49-36 W -19 L 59 O 11/25 at Connecticut 26-23 W -5 L 40.5 O 11/24 at Syracuse 52-31 W -20.5 W 53.5 O 12/6 at Hawaii 29-24 W -9 L 48.5 O 12/5 at Pittsburgh 45-44 W +1 W 56 O 1/6 vs. W Michigan 27-24 W -7 L 42 O 12/22 vs. Southern Miss 31-21 W -11 L 54.5 U 1/1 vs. Virginia Tech 7-20 L -2.5 L 41 U 1/1 vs. Florida 24-51 L +12 L 59 O Where: Storrs, CT Head Coach: Randy Edsall, 12th year (66-65 SU) Conference: Big East 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 11-2 ATS Facility: Rentschler Field 9/4/10 at Michigan 9/11/10 TEXAS SOUTHERN 2009 Scoring Differential: +7.5 (#33 of 120) 9/18/10 at Temple * TEMPLE is on 2-3 SU but 5-0 ATS run vs. CONNECTICUT 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +7.6 (#33 of 120) 9/25/10 BUFFALO * CONNECTICUT is 5-0 SU & ATS in its L5 games vs. BUFFALO 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 45 (#30 of 120) 10/2/10 VANDERBILT 2009 Schedule Strength: 37.46 (#45 of 120) 10/8/10 at Rutgers * UNDERDOG is on 2-3 SU but 5-0 ATS run in L5 RUT-CON matchups 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Louisville * CONNECTICUT is on 5-1 ATS run vs. LOUISVILLE 10/29/10 W VIRGINIA * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 CON-WV matchups Points Scored - Allowed 31.2 (27) 23.6 (49) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 387.2 (56) 368.8 (62) 11/11/10 PITTSBURGH * UNDERDOG is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 CON-PIT games YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.57 (62) 5.56 (72) 11/20/10 at Syracuse * FAVORITE is on 6-0 SU & ATS run in L6 SYR-CON matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.20 (64) 3.77 (46) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.51 (45) 7.59 (87) 11/27/10 CINCINNATI * UNDERDOG is on 2-4 SU but 5-1 ATS run in L6 CON-CIN matchups Avg. Time of Possession 29.19 (82) 12/4/10 at S Florida * HOME TEAM is 5-0 SU & 4-1 ATS in L5 USF-CON matchups Turnover Differential +0.2 (46) 3rd Down Conversion % 39.8% (54) 41.1% (77) Straight Up 4-8 9-4 8-5 8-5 29-22 (57%) * Over the L2 seasons, CONNECTICUT is 11-3 ATS (+7.7 Units) on the road. The Average Score Overall ATS 5-6 8-4 6-6 11-2 30-18 (63%) was CONNECTICUT 24.7, OPPONENT 21.8. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - at Michigan, 9/18 - at at Home ATS 3-3 5-1 2-3 4-2 14-9 (61%) Temple, 10/8 - at Rutgers, 10/23 - at Louisville, 11/20 - at Syracuse, 12/4 - at S Florida Away/Neutral ATS 2-3 3-3 4-3 7-0 16-9 (64%) * CONNECTICUT was 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) as underdogs last season. The Average Score was vs Conference ATS 3-4 5-2 4-3 5-2 17-11 (61%) CONNECTICUT 26.1, OPPONENT 24.3. Potential spots for 2010: 10/8 - at Rutgers, 11/11 - Non-Conference ATS 2-2 3-2 2-3 6-0 13-7 (65%) PITTSBURGH, 11/27 - CINCINNATI, 12/4 - at S Florida as Favorite ATS 2-1 3-1 3-3 3-2 11-7 (61%) * CONNECTICUT is on a 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) run in the first two weeks of the season The as Underdog ATS 3-5 5-3 3-3 7-0 18-11 (62%) Average Score was CONNECTICUT 29.4, OPPONENT 19.4. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - at Over-Under 5-6 5-7 7-5 8-4 25-22 (53%) Michigan 8/31 RHODE ISLAND 52-7 W - - - 9/1 at Duke 45-14 W -4 W 51.5 O 8/28 HOFSTRA 35-3 W - - - 9/5 at Ohio U 23-16 W -3.5 W 44.5 U 9/16 WAKE FOREST 13-24 L -6.5 L 42 U 9/8 MAINE 38-0 W - - - 9/6 at Temple 12-9 W -6.5 L 39.5 U 9/12 N CAROLINA 10-12 L +5.5 W 41.5 U 9/23 at Indiana 14-7 W -1.5 W 44.5 U 9/15 TEMPLE 22-17 W -31.5 L 51.5 U 9/13 VIRGINIA 45-10 W -10.5 W 40.5 O 9/19 at Baylor 30-22 W +10.5 W 44.5 O 9/30 NAVY 17-41 L 0 L 42 O 9/22 at Pittsburgh 34-14 W +7 W 44 O 9/19 BAYLOR 31-28 W -13 L 52 O 9/26 RHODE ISLAND 52-10 W -34.5 W - 10/7 at S Florida 16-38 L +5 L 39.5 O 9/29 AKRON 44-10 W -14.5 W 45.5 O 9/26 at Louisville 26-21 W +3.5 W 51 U 10/10 at Pittsburgh 21-24 L +6.5 W 47.5 U 10/14 ARMY 21-7 W -6 W 42.5 U 10/13 at Virginia 16-17 L +3 W 45.5 U 10/4 at N Carolina 12-38 L +8 L 45.5 O 10/17 LOUISVILLE 38-25 W -12.5 W 47 O 10/20 W VIRGINIA 11-37 L +23 L 48.5 U 10/19 LOUISVILLE 21-17 W +3 W 56 U 10/18 at Rutgers 10-12 L +3 W 44 U 10/24 at W Virginia 24-28 L +8 W 47 O 10/29 at Rutgers 13-24 L +19.5 W 39 U 10/27 S FLORIDA 22-15 W +3.5 W 43 U 10/25 CINCINNATI 40-16 W +2.5 W 44 O 10/31 RUTGERS 24-28 L -7.5 L 44 O 11/11 PITTSBURGH 46-45 W +7 W 41.5 O 11/3 RUTGERS 38-19 W +1 W 42 O 11/1 W VIRGINIA 13-35 L +3 L 46.5 O 11/7 at Cincinnati 45-47 L +16 W 51 O 11/18 at Syracuse 14-20 L +1 L 40 U 11/10 at Cincinnati 3-27 L +7 L 51 U 11/15 at Syracuse 39-14 W -9.5 W 47 O 11/21 at Notre Dame 33-30 W +6 W 58 O 11/25 CINCINNATI 23-26 L +5 W 40.5 O 11/17 SYRACUSE 30-7 W -19.5 W 47.5 U 11/23 at S Florida 13-17 L +3 L 48.5 U 11/28 SYRACUSE 56-31 W -12.5 W 44.5 O 12/2 at Louisville 17-48 L +28 L 54.5 O 11/24 at W Virginia 21-66 L +20.5 L 52.5 O 12/6 PITTSBURGH 10-34 L -2 L 44.5 U 12/5 S FLORIDA 29-27 W -7 L 47.5 O 12/29 vs. Wake Forest 10-24 L +1.5 L 47 U 1/3 vs. Buffalo 38-20 W -7 W 51 O 1/2 vs. S Carolina 20-7 W +4 W 50.5 U 94 WWW.STATFOX.COM

LOUISVILLE CARDINALS 2010 Schedule Strength: 39.42 (#42 of 120) PITTSBURGH PANTHERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 39.83 (#39 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 95 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 46 Offense: Pro Style - Starters Returning: 5 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 50 Where: Louisville, KY Head Coach: Charlie Strong, 1st year Conference: Big East 2009 RECORD: 4-8 SU, 5-6 ATS Facility: Papa John s Cardinal Stadium 9/4/10 KENTUCKY * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 LOU-KEN games 9/11/10 E KENTUCKY 2009 Scoring Differential: -8.2 (#102 of 120) 9/18/10 at Oregon St 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -4.0 (#83 of 120) 10/2/10 at Arkansas St 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 31 (#81 of 120) 10/9/10 MEMPHIS * UNDERDOG is 3-10 SU but 11-2 ATS in LOU-MEM series since 92 2009 Schedule Strength: 37.67 (#42 of 120) 10/15/10 CINCINNATI * FAVORITE is 11-2 SU & 10-3 ATS in LOU-CIN series since 97 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 CONNECTICUT * CONNECTICUT is on 5-1 ATS run vs. LOUISVILLE 10/30/10 at Pittsburgh * FAVORITE has swept L3 PIT-LOU games at PITTSBURGH, both SU & ATS Points Scored - Allowed 18.1 (111) 26.3 (65) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 334.1 (91) 371.1 (65) 11/6/10 at Syracuse * UNDERDOG is on 3-4 SU but 7-0 ATS run in L7 SYR-LOU matchups YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.08 (96) 5.80 (86) 11/13/10 S FLORIDA * HOME TEAM is 7-0 SU & 6-1 ATS in L7 LOU-USF matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.54 (97) 4.25 (81) 11/20/10 W VIRGINIA * ROAD TEAM is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 LOU-WV games YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.87 (80) 8.19 (107) Avg. Time of Possession 29.32 (79) 11/26/10 at Rutgers * L4 RUT-LOU series games have gone OVER the total Turnover Differential -0.3 (77) 3rd Down Conversion % 38.3% (70) 39.9% (62) Straight Up 12-1 6-6 5-7 4-8 27-22 (55%) * LOUISVILLE is 6-15 ATS (-10.5 Units) in conference games since 07. The Average Score Overall ATS 9-4 4-7 4-7 5-6 22-24 (48%) was LOUISVILLE 20, OPPONENT 32.4. Potential spots for 2010: 10/15 - CINCINNATI, 10/23 - at Home ATS 5-1 1-4 3-4 2-3 11-12 (48%) CONNECTICUT, 10/30 - at Pittsburgh, 11/6 - at Syracuse, 11/13 - S FLORIDA, 11/20 - W VIRGINIA, Away/Neutral ATS 4-3 3-3 1-3 3-3 11-12 (48%) 11/26 - at Rutgers vs Conference ATS 4-3 3-4 1-6 2-5 10-18 (36%) * LOUISVILLE is on a 8-0 UNDER the total (+8 Units) run as home favorites of 3.5 to 10 points The Non-Conference ATS 5-1 1-3 3-1 3-1 12-6 (67%) Average Score was LOUISVILLE 22, OPPONENT 17.6. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - MEMPHIS as Favorite ATS 9-4 2-6 2-3 1-1 14-14 (50%) * Over the L2 seasons, LOUISVILLE is 0-6 ATS (-6.6 Units) revenging a close loss by 7 points or as Underdog ATS 0-0 2-1 2-4 4-5 8-10 (44%) less to opponent. The Average Score was LOUISVILLE 16.7, OPPONENT 27.2. Potential spots for Over-Under 7-6 6-5 6-5 4-7 23-23 (50%) 2010: 9/4 - KENTUCKY 9/3 KENTUCKY 59-28 W -24 W 59.5 O 8/30 MURRAY ST 73-10 W - - - 8/31 KENTUCKY 2-27 L -3.5 L 55.5 U 9/5 INDIANA ST 30-10 W - - - 9/9 at Temple 62-0 W -40 W 58 O 9/6 MIDDLE TENN ST 58-42 W -41 L 63.5 O 9/6 TENNESSEE TECH 51-10 W - - - 9/19 at Kentucky 27-31 L +12.5 W 49 O 9/16 MIAMI 31-7 W -5 W 53 U 9/15 at Kentucky 34-40 L -4.5 L 77.5 U 9/17 KANSAS ST 38-29 W +6 W 56 O 9/26 at Utah 14-30 L +14 L 52.5 U 9/23 at Kansas St 24-6 W -13 W 53 U 9/22 SYRACUSE 35-38 L -37 L 64 O 9/26 CONNECTICUT 21-26 L -3.5 L 51 U 10/2 PITTSBURGH 10-35 L +7 L 52.5 U 10/6 at Middle Tenn St 44-17 W -29.5 L 53.5 O 9/29 at Nc State 29-10 W -9 W 69.5 U 10/10 at Memphis 35-28 W -6 W 56.5 O 10/10 SOUTHERN MISS 25-23 W +2 W 50 U 10/14 CINCINNATI 23-17 W -25.5 L 54 U 10/5 UTAH 35-44 L -14.5 L 63 O 10/18 MIDDLE TENN ST 42-23 W -14.5 W 48.5 O 10/17 at Connecticut 25-38 L +12.5 L 47 O 10/21 at Syracuse 28-13 W -18.5 L 54 U 10/13 at Cincinnati 28-24 W +8 W 67 U 10/25 S FLORIDA 24-20 W +6 W 52 U 10/24 at Cincinnati 10-41 L +16.5 L 54.5 U 11/2 W VIRGINIA 44-34 W -1 W 56 O 10/19 at Connecticut 17-21 L -3 L 56 U 11/1 at Syracuse 21-28 L -11 L 51.5 U 10/31 ARKANSAS ST 21-13 W -1.5 W 50 U 11/9 at Rutgers 25-28 L -6 L 51 O 10/27 PITTSBURGH 24-17 W -10 L 61.5 U 11/8 at Pittsburgh 7-41 L +6.5 L 53.5 U 11/7 at W Virginia 9-17 L +17.5 W 55 U 11/18 S FLORIDA 31-8 W -17 W 54 U 11/8 at W Virginia 31-38 L +17 W 63.5 O 11/14 CINCINNATI 20-28 L +4 L 47 O 11/14 SYRACUSE 10-9 W -7.5 L 46.5 U 11/25 at Pittsburgh 48-24 W -10.5 W 58.5 O 11/17 at S Florida 17-55 L +8.5 L 61 O 11/22 W VIRGINIA 21-35 L +7.5 L 49 O 11/21 at S Florida 22-34 L +12.5 W 45 O 12/2 CONNECTICUT 48-17 W -28 W 54.5 O 11/29 RUTGERS 41-38 W -2 W 59.5 O 12/4 at Rutgers 14-63 L +11.5 L 54 O 11/27 RUTGERS 14-34 L +3 L 42.5 O 1/2 vs. Wake Forest 24-13 W -10.5 W 53.5 U Where: Pittsburgh, PA Head Coach: Dave Wannstedt, 6th year (35-26 SU) Conference: Big East 2009 RECORD: 10-3 SU, 7-4-1 ATS Facility: Heinz Field 9/2/10 at Utah 9/11/10 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2009 Scoring Differential: +12.3 (#16 of 120) 9/23/10 MIAMI * UNDER the total is 4-1 in L5 games of PIT-MIA series 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +13.5 (#14 of 120) 10/2/10 FLA INTERNATIONAL 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 51 (#13 of 120) 10/9/10 at Notre Dame * ROAD TEAM is on 4-1 SU & 4-0 ATS run in ND-PIT series 2009 Schedule Strength: 36.54 (#53 of 120) 10/16/10 at Syracuse * HOME TEAM is 10-8 SU & 12-6 ATS in SYR-PIT series since 92 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 RUTGERS * ROAD TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 PIT-RUT games 10/30/10 LOUISVILLE * FAVORITE has swept L3 PIT-LOU games at PITTSBURGH, both SU & ATS Points Scored - Allowed 32.1 (21) 19.8 (19) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 391.6 (52) 319.3 (23) 11/11/10 at Connecticut * UNDERDOG is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 CON-PIT games YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.23 (18) 4.97 (30) 11/20/10 at S Florida * L2 games in USF-PIT series at S FLORIDA went UNDER the total YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.89 (16) 3.25 (17) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.13 (18) 6.74 (43) 11/26/10 W VIRGINIA * L3 PIT-WV series games have gone UNDER the total Avg. Time of Possession 30.94 (30) 12/4/10 at Cincinnati * OVER the total is 4-1 in L5 games of CIN-PIT series Turnover Differential +0.8 (10) 3rd Down Conversion % 45.4% (17) 37.6% (42) Straight Up 6-6 5-7 9-4 10-3 30-20 (60%) * PITTSBURGH is 8-0 ATS (+8 Units) on the road revenging a home loss against opponent since Overall ATS 5-6 6-5 6-7 7-4 24-22 (52%) 07. The Average Score was PITTSBURGH 23.1, OPPONENT 17.4. Potential spots for 2010: at Home ATS 2-4 2-4 2-4 3-2 9-14 (39%) 12/4 - at Cincinnati Away/Neutral ATS 3-2 4-1 4-3 4-2 15-8 (65%) * PITTSBURGH is 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) on the road on grass fields since 07. The Average Score vs Conference ATS 2-5 4-3 4-3 4-3 14-14 (50%) was PITTSBURGH 29, OPPONENT 23.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/2 - at Utah, 10/9 - at Notre Non-Conference ATS 3-1 2-2 2-4 3-1 10-8 (56%) Dame, 11/11 - at Connecticut, 11/20 - at S Florida as Favorite ATS 5-4 1-3 2-4 7-3 15-14 (52%) * PITTSBURGH is on a 4-13 ATS (-10.3 Units) skid vs. poor defensive teams - allowing >=425 as Underdog ATS 0-2 5-2 4-3 0-1 9-8 (53%) YPG The Average Score was PITTSBURGH 30.6, OPPONENT 28.6. Potential spots for 2010: Over-Under 8-3 4-7 5-8 4-8 21-26 (45%) 10/2 - FLA INTERNATIONAL 9/2 VIRGINIA 38-13 W -6 W 42 O 9/1 E MICHIGAN 27-3 W -20.5 W 46.5 U 8/30 BOWLING GREEN 17-27 L -14 L 54 U 9/5 YOUNGSTOWN ST 38-3 W - - - 9/8 at Cincinnati 33-15 W -7 W 44.5 O 9/8 GRAMBLING 34-10 W - - - 9/6 BUFFALO 27-16 W -13.5 L 46.5 U 9/12 at Buffalo 54-27 W -11.5 W 42.5 O 9/16 MICHIGAN ST 23-38 L -2.5 L 52 O 9/15 at Michigan St 13-17 L +11.5 W 48.5 U 9/20 IOWA 21-20 W -2 L 41.5 U 9/19 NAVY 27-14 W -8 W 49.5 U 9/23 THE CITADEL 51-6 W - - - 9/22 CONNECTICUT 14-34 L -7 L 44 O 9/27 at Syracuse 34-24 W -14 L 48 O 9/26 at NC State 31-38 L -1 L 48 O 9/30 TOLEDO 45-3 W -16.5 W 44.5 O 9/29 at Virginia 14-44 L +6.5 L 39.5 O 10/2 at S Florida 26-21 W +13.5 W 50 U 10/2 at Louisville 35-10 W -7 W 52.5 U 10/7 at Syracuse 21-11 W -7 W 44 U 10/10 NAVY 45-48 L -4 L 54 O 10/18 at Navy 42-21 W -3 W 51 O 10/10 CONNECTICUT 24-21 W -6.5 L 47.5 U 10/13 at C Florida 52-7 W -10.5 W 48.5 O 10/20 CINCINNATI 24-17 W +10.5 W 50 U 10/25 RUTGERS 34-54 L -9.5 L 41 O 10/16 at Rutgers 24-17 W -6 W 46 U 10/21 RUTGERS 10-20 L -6 L 43.5 U 10/27 at Louisville 17-24 L +10 W 61.5 U 11/1 at Notre Dame 36-33 W +4 W 48 O 10/24 S FLORIDA 41-14 W -6.5 W 48 O 11/4 at S Florida 12-22 L -4.5 L 44.5 U 11/3 SYRACUSE 20-17 W -13.5 L 47.5 U 11/8 LOUISVILLE 41-7 W -6.5 W 53.5 U 11/7 SYRACUSE 37-10 W -21 W 49.5 U 11/11 at Connecticut 45-46 L -7 L 41.5 O 11/17 at Rutgers 16-20 L +12 W 48.5 U 11/22 at Cincinnati 21-28 L +6 L 48 O 11/14 NOTRE DAME 27-22 W -5 T 59 U 11/16 W VIRGINIA 27-45 L +10 L 51 O 11/24 S FLORIDA 37-48 L +9.5 L 45 O 11/28 W VIRGINIA 19-15 W +2.5 W 48.5 U 11/27 at W Virginia 16-19 L +0 L 48 U 11/25 LOUISVILLE 24-48 L +10.5 L 58.5 O 12/1 at W Virginia 13-9 W +28 W 59.5 U 12/6 at Connecticut 34-10 W +2 W 44.5 U 12/5 CINCINNATI 44-45 L -1 L 56 O 12/31 vs. Oregon St 0-3 L +1.5 L 51 U 12/26 vs. N Carolina 19-17 W -1 W 46 U

RUTGERS SCARLET KNIGHTS 2010 Schedule Strength: 34.08 (#81 of 120) 9/2/10 NORFOLK ST 9/11/10 at Fla International 9/25/10 N CAROLINA * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 RUT-UNC games 10/2/10 TULANE * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 RUT-TUL games 10/8/10 CONNECTICUT * UNDERDOG is on 2-3 SU but 5-0 ATS run in L5 RUT-CON matchups 10/16/10 vs. Army (East Rutherford, N.J.) * RUTGERS is on 6-1 SU & 7-0 ATS run vs. ARMY 10/16/10 ARMY * RUTGERS is 6-1 SU & 7-0 ATS in its L7 games vs. ARMY 10/23/10 at Pittsburgh * ROAD TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 PIT-RUT games 11/3/10 at S Florida * RUTGERS has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. S FLORIDA 11/13/10 SYRACUSE * HOME TEAM is 9-3 SU & 10-2 ATS in RUT-SYR series since 98 11/20/10 at Cincinnati * UNDERDOG is on 4-3 SU & 6-1 ATS run in L7 CIN-RUT matchups 11/26/10 LOUISVILLE * L4 RUT-LOU series games have gone OVER the total 12/4/10 at W Virginia * ROAD TEAM is 5-3 SU & 7-1 ATS in L8 WV-RUT matchups SCENARIO 2006 2007 2008 2009 4-yr Total Straight Up 11-2 8-5 8-5 9-4 36-16 (69%) Overall ATS 8-3 6-6 7-4 6-7 27-20 (57%) at Home ATS 3-1 3-4 3-3 1-6 10-14 (42%) Away/Neutral ATS 5-2 3-2 4-1 5-1 17-6 (74%) vs Conference ATS 4-3 2-5 6-1 3-4 15-13 (54%) Non-Conference ATS 4-0 4-1 1-3 3-2 12-6 (67%) as Favorite ATS 3-3 5-4 0-4 4-5 12-16 (43%) as Underdog ATS 5-0 1-2 7-0 2-1 15-3 (83%) Over-Under 6-6 6-5 5-7 5-6 22-24 (48%) SOUTH FLORIDA BULLS 2010 Schedule Strength: 39.25 (#43 of 120) Offense: Pro Style - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 45 Where: New Brunswick, NJ Head Coach: Greg Schiano, 10th year (55-55 SU) Conference: Big East 2009 RECORD: 9-4 SU, 6-7 ATS Facility: Rutgers Stadium 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK Points Scored - Allowed 28.8 (52) 17.9 (16) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 326.3 (97) 307.8 (18) YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.23 (79) 4.84 (25) YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.61 (91) 3.04 (13) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.63 (35) 6.89 (52) Avg. Time of Possession 31.14 (26) Turnover Differential +1.5 (2) 3rd Down Conversion % 33.5% (103) 30.9% (8) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * RUTGERS is 11-3 ATS (+7.7 Units) on the road after the first month of the season since 07. The Average Score was RUTGERS 32.9, OPPONENT 22.8. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - at Army, 10/23 - at Pittsburgh, 11/3 - at S Florida, 11/20 - at Cincinnati, 12/4 - at W Virginia * Over the L2 seasons, RUTGERS is 6-0 ATS (+6 Units) as road underdogs. The Average Score was RUTGERS 32, OPPONENT 20.7. Potential spots for 2010: 10/23 - at Pittsburgh, 11/3 - at S Florida, 11/20 - at Cincinnati, 12/4 - at W Virginia * RUTGERS is 36-19 ATS (+15.1 Units) vs. terrible rushing teams - averaging <=2.75 YPR since 92. The Average Score was RUTGERS 25.2, OPPONENT 24.4. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - N CAROLINA, 11/26 - LOUISVILLE Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 10 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 4 Lettermen Returning: 59 2009 Scoring Differential: +10.9 (#20 of 120) 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +4.6 (#47 of 120) 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 46 (#28 of 120) 2009 Schedule Strength: 29.92 (#90 of 120) 9/2 at N Carolina 21-16 W +3.5 W 42.5 U 8/30 BUFFALO 38-3 W -31 W 49.5 U 9/1 FRESNO ST 7-24 L -3.5 L 57 U 9/7 CINCINNATI 15-47 L -5 L 47 O 9/9 ILLINOIS 33-0 W -11 W 52 U 9/7 NAVY 41-24 W -16 W 49 O 9/11 N CAROLINA 12-44 L -6 L 49 O 9/12 HOWARD 45-7 W -46 L - 9/16 OHIO U 24-7 W -17 T 43 U 9/15 NORFOLK ST 59-0 W - - - 9/20 at Navy 21-23 L -5.5 L 59 U 9/19 FLA INTERNATIONAL 23-15 W -16 L 51.5 U 9/23 HOWARD 56-7 W - - - 9/29 MARYLAND 24-34 L -17.5 L 46.5 O 9/27 MORGAN ST 38-0 W - - - 9/26 at Maryland 34-13 W +1 W 49 U 9/29 at S Florida 22-20 W -4 L 41.5 O 10/6 CINCINNATI 23-28 L -3.5 L 51 T 10/4 at W Virginia 17-24 L +14 W 49.5 U 10/10 TEXAS SOUTHERN 42-0 W -52 L - 10/14 at Navy 34-0 W +3 W 45.5 U 10/13 at Syracuse 38-14 W -17 W 54 U 10/11 at Cincinnati 10-13 L +6.5 W 48.5 U 10/16 PITTSBURGH 17-24 L +6 L 46 U 10/21 at Pittsburgh 20-10 W +6 W 43.5 U 10/18 S FLORIDA 30-27 W +1.5 W 51.5 O 10/18 CONNECTICUT 12-10 W -3 L 44 U 10/23 at Army 27-10 W -10.5 W 38.5 U 10/29 CONNECTICUT 24-13 W -19.5 L 39 U 10/27 W VIRGINIA 3-31 L +6.5 L 56.5 U 10/25 at Pittsburgh 54-34 W +9.5 W 41 O 10/31 at Connecticut 28-24 W +7.5 W 44 O 11/9 LOUISVILLE 28-25 W +6 W 51 O 11/3 at Connecticut 19-38 L -1 L 42 O 11/8 SYRACUSE 35-17 W -14 W 49 O 11/12 S FLORIDA 31-0 W -1.5 W 43 U 11/18 at Cincinnati 11-30 L -6.5 L 38 O 11/9 at Army 41-6 W -19 W 49 U 11/15 at S Florida 49-16 W +8.5 W 49.5 O 11/21 at Syracuse 13-31 L -10 L 45 U 11/25 SYRACUSE 38-7 W -16.5 W 40 O 11/17 PITTSBURGH 20-16 W -12 L 48.5 U 11/22 ARMY 30-3 W -17.5 W 43.5 U 11/27 at Louisville 34-14 W -3 W 42.5 O 12/2 at W Virginia 39-41 L +10 W 49.5 O 11/29 at Louisville 38-41 L +2 L 59.5 O 12/4 LOUISVILLE 63-14 W -11.5 W 54 O 12/5 W VIRGINIA 21-24 L -1 L 43.5 O 12/28 vs. Kansas St 37-10 W -9 W 44.5 O 1/5 vs. Ball St 52-30 W -11 W 61 O 12/29 vs. NC State 29-23 W -6 T 57.5 U 12/19 vs. UCF 45-24 W -2.5 W 45 O Where: Tampa, FL Head Coach: Skip Holtz, 1st year Conference: Big East 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: Raymond James Stadium 9/4/10 STONY BROOK 9/11/10 at Florida 2009 Scoring Differential: +6.7 (#38 of 120) 9/25/10 W KENTUCKY 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +2.2 (#58 of 120) 10/2/10 FLA ATLANTIC 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 44 (#35 of 120) 10/9/10 SYRACUSE * FAVORITE is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in L5 USF-SYR matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 32.62 (#71 of 120) 10/14/10 at W Virginia * S FLORIDA is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in its L4 games vs. W VIRGINIA 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/22/10 at Cincinnati * CINCINNATI is on 5-1 SU & 6-0 ATS run vs. S FLORIDA 11/3/10 RUTGERS * RUTGERS has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. S FLORIDA Points Scored - Allowed 26.5 (64) 19.8 (19) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 365.6 (71) 321.8 (24) 11/13/10 at Louisville * HOME TEAM is 7-0 SU & 6-1 ATS in L7 LOU-USF matchups YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.90 (36) 5.00 (32) 11/20/10 PITTSBURGH * L2 games in USF-PIT series at S FLORIDA went UNDER the total YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.37 (53) 3.92 (57) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.52 (11) 6.26 (25) 11/27/10 at Miami * L2 games in MIA-USF series went UNDER the total Avg. Time of Possession 30.2 (59) 12/4/10 CONNECTICUT * HOME TEAM is 5-0 SU & 4-1 ATS in L5 USF-CON matchups Turnover Differential +0.0 (61) 3rd Down Conversion % 39.5% (57) 41.4% (79) Straight Up 9-4 9-4 8-5 8-5 34-18 (65%) * S FLORIDA is on a 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) run vs. poor defensive teams - allowing >=5.9 YPP Overall ATS 8-4 7-5 5-7 6-6 26-22 (54%) The Average Score was S FLORIDA 36.9, OPPONENT 16. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - W at Home ATS 4-1 4-1 2-3 2-3 12-8 (60%) KENTUCKY, 10/2 - FLA ATLANTIC Away/Neutral ATS 4-3 3-4 3-4 4-3 14-14 (50%) * Over the L2 seasons, S FLORIDA is 8-0 UNDER the total (+8 Units) vs. good teams (Win Pct. vs Conference ATS 5-2 4-3 3-4 3-4 15-13 (54%) 60% to 75%). The Average Score was S FLORIDA 12.8, OPPONENT 21.1. Potential spots for Non-Conference ATS 3-2 3-2 2-3 3-2 11-9 (55%) 2010: 10/14 - at W Virginia, 11/3 - RUTGERS, 11/27 - at Miami, 12/4 - CONNECTICUT as Favorite ATS 5-2 5-5 3-7 2-2 15-16 (48%) * S FLORIDA is on a 12-2 UNDER the total (+9.8 Units) run on the road vs. good rushing defenses as Underdog ATS 3-2 2-0 2-0 3-4 10-6 (63%) - allowing <=120 RYPG The Average Score was S FLORIDA 14.3, OPPONENT 26.1. Potential Over-Under 3-9 8-3 5-7 6-5 22-24 (48%) spots for 2010: 9/11 - at Florida 9/2 MCNEESE ST 41-10 W - - - 9/1 ELON 28-13 W - - - 8/30 TENN-MARTIN 56-7 W - - - 9/5 WOFFORD 40-7 W - - - 9/9 FLA INTERNATIONAL 21-20 W -20 L 43 U 9/8 at Auburn 26-23 W +7 W 38.5 O 9/6 at UCF 31-24 W -14 L 47.5 O 9/12 at W Kentucky 35-13 W -26 L 52 U 9/16 at C Florida 24-17 W -2.5 W 44 U 9/22 N CAROLINA 37-10 W -12.5 W 50.5 U 9/12 KANSAS 37-34 W -4.5 L 51.5 O 9/19 CHARLESTON SOUT 59-0 W -38 W - 9/23 at Kansas 7-13 L +4 L 42 U 9/28 W VIRGINIA 21-13 W +7 W 56.5 U 9/20 at Fla International 17-9 W -29.5 L 55.5 U 9/26 at Florida St 17-7 W +13.5 W 51 U 9/29 RUTGERS 20-22 L +4 W 41.5 O 10/6 at Fla Atlantic 35-23 W -17.5 L 45 O 9/27 at NC State 41-10 W -10 W 45.5 O 10/3 at Syracuse 34-20 W -7 W 47 O 10/7 CONNECTICUT 38-16 W -5 W 39.5 O 10/13 UCF 64-12 W -10 W 51.5 O 10/2 PITTSBURGH 21-26 L -13.5 L 50 U 10/15 CINCINNATI 17-34 L +1 L 48.5 O 10/14 at N Carolina 37-20 W -3 W 45.5 O 10/18 at Rutgers 27-30 L -1.5 L 51.5 O 10/18 SYRACUSE 45-13 W -24 W 51.5 O 10/24 at Pittsburgh 14-41 L +6.5 L 48 O 10/22 at Cincinnati 6-23 L -1 L 42.5 U 10/27 at Connecticut 15-22 L -3.5 L 43 U 10/25 at Louisville 20-24 L -6 L 52 U 10/30 W VIRGINIA 30-19 W +2.5 W 47.5 O 11/4 PITTSBURGH 22-12 W +4.5 W 44.5 U 11/3 CINCINNATI 33-38 L -5 L 50 O 10/30 at Cincinnati 10-24 L -2 L 48.5 U 11/12 at Rutgers 0-31 L +1.5 L 43 U 11/11 SYRACUSE 27-10 W -10 W 40.5 U 11/10 at Syracuse 41-10 W -19.5 W 51 T 11/15 RUTGERS 16-49 L -8.5 L 49.5 O 11/21 LOUISVILLE 34-22 W -12.5 L 45 O 11/18 at Louisville 8-31 L +17 L 54 U 11/17 LOUISVILLE 55-17 W -8.5 W 61 O 11/23 CONNECTICUT 17-13 W -3 W 48.5 U 11/28 MIAMI 10-31 L +3.5 L 53 U 11/25 at W Virginia 24-19 W +21 W 54.5 U 11/24 at Pittsburgh 48-37 W -9.5 W 45 O 12/6 at W Virginia 7-13 L +7 W 46.5 U 12/5 at Connecticut 27-29 L +7 W 47.5 O 12/23 vs. E Carolina 24-7 W -5.5 W 42 U 12/31 vs. Oregon 21-56 L -5.5 L 52 O 12/20 vs. Memphis 41-14 W -10.5 W 56.5 U 1/2 vs. N Illinois 27-3 W -6.5 W 50 U 96 WWW.STATFOX.COM

SYRACUSE ORANGE 2010 Schedule Strength: 37.83 (#56 of 120) WEST VIRGINIA MOUNTAINEERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 38.25 (#55 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 97 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 5 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 10 Lettermen Returning: 41 Offense: Spread Option - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 3-3-5 Stack - Starters Returning: 9 Lettermen Returning: 34 Where: Syracuse, NY Head Coach: Doug Marrone, 2nd year (4-8 SU) Conference: Big East 2009 RECORD: 4-8 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: Carrier Dome 9/4/10 at Akron 9/11/10 at Washington 2009 Scoring Differential: -6.8 (#96 of 120) 9/18/10 MAINE 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -3.6 (#79 of 120) 9/25/10 COLGATE 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 31 (#81 of 120) 10/9/10 at S Florida * FAVORITE is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in L5 USF-SYR matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 37.08 (#48 of 120) 10/16/10 PITTSBURGH * HOME TEAM is 10-8 SU & 12-6 ATS in SYR-PIT series since 92 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at W Virginia * ROAD TEAM is 3-2 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 WV-SYR matchups 10/30/10 at Cincinnati * UNDER the total is 6-1 in L7 games of CIN-SYR series Points Scored - Allowed 21.2 (99) 27.9 (81) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 330.4 (94) 337.0 (37) 11/6/10 LOUISVILLE * UNDERDOG is on 3-4 SU but 7-0 ATS run in L7 SYR-LOU matchups YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.12 (92) 5.44 (64) 11/13/10 at Rutgers * HOME TEAM is 9-3 SU & 10-2 ATS in RUT-SYR series since 98 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.61 (93) 3.05 (14) 11/20/10 CONNECTICUT * FAVORITE is on 6-0 SU & ATS run in L6 SYR-CON matchups YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.91 (76) 8.25 (110) Avg. Time of Possession 31.16 (25) 11/27/10 BOSTON COLLEGE * HOME TEAM is 4-1 SU & ATS in L5 SYR-BC matchups Turnover Differential -0.5 (98) 3rd Down Conversion % 32.9% (104) 36.4% (33) Straight Up 4-8 2-10 3-9 4-8 13-35 (27%) * SYRACUSE is 1-9 ATS (-8.9 Units) vs. teams scoring 31 or more PPG since 07. The Average Overall ATS 8-4 3-9 5-6 6-6 22-25 (47%) Score was SYRACUSE 17, OPPONENT 39.9. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - PITTSBURGH, at Home ATS 5-1 1-6 2-3 4-4 12-14 (46%) 10/30 - at Cincinnati, 11/20 - CONNECTICUT Away/Neutral ATS 3-3 2-3 3-3 2-2 10-11 (48%) * SYRACUSE is 0-6 ATS (-6.6 Units) as home underdogs of 14.5 or more points since 07. vs Conference ATS 3-4 2-5 4-3 2-5 11-17 (39%) The Average Score was SYRACUSE 14.8, OPPONENT 44.8. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 Non-Conference ATS 5-0 1-4 1-3 4-1 11-8 (58%) - PITTSBURGH as Favorite ATS 3-0 1-0 0-1 1-0 5-1 (83%) * SYRACUSE is on a 15-5 UNDER the total (+9.5 Units) run at home in October games The as Underdog ATS 5-4 2-9 5-5 5-5 17-23 (43%) Average Score was SYRACUSE 30.5, OPPONENT 21.5. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - Over-Under 5-7 5-6 6-5 3-8 19-26 (42%) PITTSBURGH 9/2 at Wake Forest 10-20 L +14 W 42.5 U 8/31 WASHINGTON 12-42 L +3 L 43.5 O 8/30 at Northwestern 10-30 L +12.5 L 54.5 U 9/5 MINNESOTA 20-23 L +7 W 47 U 9/9 IOWA 13-20 L +15.5 W 38 U 9/8 at Iowa 0-35 L +24 L 43.5 U 9/6 AKRON 28-42 L -4.5 L 43.5 O 9/12 at Penn St 7-28 L +29.5 W 51 U 9/16 at Illinois 31-21 W +3.5 W 39.5 O 9/15 ILLINOIS 20-41 L +10.5 L 44.5 O 9/13 PENN ST 13-55 L +27.5 L 50.5 O 9/19 NORTHWESTERN 37-34 W +1.5 W 45.5 O 9/23 MIAMI OHIO 34-14 W -7.5 W 42 O 9/22 at Louisville 38-35 W +37 W 64 O 9/20 NORTHEASTERN 30-21 W - - - 9/26 MAINE 41-24 W -21 L - 9/30 WYOMING 40-34 W -4.5 W 37 O 9/29 at Miami Ohio 14-17 L +1 L 51 U 9/27 PITTSBURGH 24-34 L +14 W 48 O 10/3 S FLORIDA 20-34 L +7 L 47 O 10/7 PITTSBURGH 11-21 L +7 L 44 U 10/6 W VIRGINIA 14-55 L +27 L 57.5 O 10/11 at W Virginia 6-17 L +23 W 47 U 10/10 W VIRGINIA 13-34 L +10.5 L 54.5 U 10/14 at W Virginia 17-41 L +24.5 W 50.5 O 10/13 RUTGERS 14-38 L +17 L 54 U 10/18 at S Florida 13-45 L +24 L 51.5 O 10/24 AKRON 28-14 W -11 W 47.5 U 10/21 LOUISVILLE 13-28 L +18.5 W 54 U 10/20 BUFFALO 20-12 W -3.5 W 56 U 11/1 LOUISVILLE 28-21 W +11 W 51.5 U 10/31 CINCINNATI 7-28 L +15.5 L 52 U 10/28 at Cincinnati 3-17 L +6.5 L 38 U 11/3 at Pittsburgh 17-20 L +13.5 W 47.5 U 11/8 at Rutgers 17-35 L +14 L 49 O 11/7 at Pittsburgh 10-37 L +21 L 49.5 U 11/11 at S Florida 10-27 L +10 L 40.5 U 11/10 S FLORIDA 10-41 L +19.5 L 51 T 11/15 CONNECTICUT 14-39 L +9.5 L 47 O 11/14 at Louisville 9-10 L +7.5 W 46.5 U 11/18 CONNECTICUT 20-14 W -1 W 40 U 11/17 at Connecticut 7-30 L +19.5 L 47.5 U 11/22 at Notre Dame 24-23 W +20 W 47.5 U 11/21 RUTGERS 31-13 W +10 W 45 U 11/25 at Rutgers 7-38 L +16.5 L 40 O 11/24 CINCINNATI 31-52 L +20.5 L 53.5 O 11/29 at Cincinnati 10-30 L +21.5 W 51 U 11/28 at Connecticut 31-56 L +12.5 L 44.5 O Where: Morgantown, WV Head Coach: Bill Stewart, 3rd year (19-8 SU) Conference: Big East 2009 RECORD: 9-4 SU, 5-7 ATS Facility: Milan Puskar Stadium 9/4/10 COASTAL CAROLINA 9/10/10 at Marshall * L2 games in MAR-WV series went UNDER the total 2009 Scoring Differential: +4.5 (#47 of 120) 9/18/10 MARYLAND * W VIRGINIA has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. MARYLAND 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +6.5 (#37 of 120) 9/25/10 at LSU 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 45 (#30 of 120) 10/9/10 UNLV 2009 Schedule Strength: 37.08 (#49 of 120) 10/14/10 S FLORIDA * S FLORIDA is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in its L4 games vs. W VIRGINIA 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 SYRACUSE * ROAD TEAM is 3-2 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 WV-SYR matchups 10/29/10 at Connecticut * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 CON-WV matchups Points Scored - Allowed 26.2 (67) 21.7 (31) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 377.5 (61) 336.5 (36) 11/13/10 CINCINNATI * ROAD TEAM is on 5-2 SU & 5-0 ATS run in WV-CIN series YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.74 (47) 5.06 (35) 11/20/10 at Louisville * ROAD TEAM is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 LOU-WV games YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.77 (23) 3.73 (41) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.16 (59) 6.45 (35) 11/26/10 at Pittsburgh * L3 PIT-WV series games have gone UNDER the total Avg. Time of Possession 30.26 (57) 12/4/10 RUTGERS * ROAD TEAM is 5-3 SU & 7-1 ATS in L8 WV-RUT matchups Turnover Differential -0.2 (71) 3rd Down Conversion % 41.6% (41) 34.9% (23) Straight Up 11-2 11-2 9-4 9-4 40-12 (77%) * W VIRGINIA is on a 17-4 ATS (+12.6 Units) run on the road vs. teams with a losing record Overall ATS 5-6 7-5 4-8 5-7 21-26 (45%) The Average Score was W VIRGINIA 38.1, OPPONENT 17. Potential spots for 2010: 9/10 - at at Home ATS 2-3 3-3 2-4 2-4 9-14 (39%) Marshall, 11/20 - at Louisville Away/Neutral ATS 3-3 4-2 2-4 3-3 12-12 (50%) * W VIRGINIA is on a 9-0 ATS (+9 Units) run on the road vs. poor offensive teams - averaging vs Conference ATS 2-4 3-3 2-5 4-3 11-15 (42%) <=310 YPG The Average Score was W VIRGINIA 40.1, OPPONENT 14. Potential spots for 2010: Non-Conference ATS 3-2 4-2 2-3 1-4 10-11 (48%) 9/10 - at Marshall, 9/25 - at LSU as Favorite ATS 5-5 6-5 4-8 2-6 17-24 (41%) * W VIRGINIA is on a 11-2 OVER the total (+8.8 Units) run vs. marginal winning teams (Win Pct. as Underdog ATS 0-1 1-0 0-0 3-1 4-2 (67%) 51% to 60%) The Average Score was W VIRGINIA 31.8, OPPONENT 24.7. Potential spots for Over-Under 9-3 6-7 5-7 6-6 26-23 (53%) 2010: 9/10 - at Marshall, 10/15 - S FLORIDA 9/2 MARSHALL 42-10 W -21.5 W 45.5 O 9/1 W MICHIGAN 62-24 W -24 W 58.5 O 8/30 VILLANOVA 48-21 W - - - 9/5 LIBERTY 33-20 W - - - 9/9 E WASHINGTON 52-3 W - - - 9/8 at Marshall 48-23 W -25.5 L 63.5 O 9/6 at E Carolina 3-24 L -7.5 L 48.5 U 9/12 E CAROLINA 35-20 W -6 W 44 O 9/14 MARYLAND 45-24 W -17 W 47 O 9/13 at Maryland 31-14 W -15.5 W 61 U 9/18 at Colorado 14-17 L -3 L 57 U 9/19 at Auburn 30-41 L +7 L 54.5 O 9/23 at E Carolina 27-10 W -20.5 L 56 U 9/22 E CAROLINA 48-7 W -24 W 59 U 9/27 MARSHALL 27-3 W -16 W 53.5 U 10/1 COLORADO 35-24 W -17 L 55.5 O 10/7 at Mississippi St 42-14 W -20.5 W 47 O 9/28 at S Florida 13-21 L -7 L 56.5 U 10/4 RUTGERS 24-17 W -14 L 49.5 U 10/10 at Syracuse 34-13 W -10.5 W 54.5 U 10/14 SYRACUSE 41-17 W -24.5 L 50.5 O 10/6 at Syracuse 55-14 W -27 W 57.5 O 10/11 SYRACUSE 17-6 W -23 L 47 U 10/17 MARSHALL 24-7 W -20 L 51.5 U 10/20 at Connecticut 37-11 W -23 W 48.5 U 10/20 MISSISSIPPI ST 38-13 W -26 L 57.5 U 10/23 AUBURN 34-17 W -3.5 W 40 O 10/24 CONNECTICUT 28-24 W -8 L 47 O 11/2 at Louisville 34-44 L +1 L 56 O 10/27 at Rutgers 31-3 W -6.5 W 56.5 U 11/1 at Connecticut 35-13 W -3 W 46.5 O 10/30 at S Florida 19-30 L -2.5 L 47.5 O 11/11 CINCINNATI 42-24 W -18 T 46.5 O 11/8 LOUISVILLE 38-31 W -17 L 63.5 O 11/8 CINCINNATI 23-26 L -7 L 48 O 11/7 LOUISVILLE 17-9 W -17.5 L 55 U 11/16 at Pittsburgh 45-27 W -10 W 51 O 11/17 at Cincinnati 28-23 W -5 T 56 U 11/22 at Louisville 35-21 W -7.5 W 49 O 11/13 at Cincinnati 21-24 L +9.5 W 56.5 U 11/25 S FLORIDA 19-24 L -21 L 54.5 U 11/24 CONNECTICUT 66-21 W -20.5 W 52.5 O 11/28 at Pittsburgh 15-19 L -2.5 L 48.5 U 11/27 PITTSBURGH 19-16 W +0 W 48 U 12/2 RUTGERS 41-39 W -10 L 49.5 O 12/1 PITTSBURGH 9-13 L -28 L 59.5 U 12/6 S FLORIDA 13-7 W -7 L 46.5 U 12/5 at Rutgers 24-21 W +1 W 43.5 O 1/1 vs. Georgia Tech 38-35 W -8.5 L 47.5 O 1/2 vs. Oklahoma 48-28 W +8 W 61 O 12/27 vs. N Carolina 31-30 W -2.5 L 47.5 O 1/1 vs. Florida St 21-33 L -3 L 56 U

pac 10 Preview With perennial power USC slipping from its customary perch both nationally and in the conference standings, the Pac 10 fell below the other power leagues in the 2009 college football landscape. What s more, the seven teams that did qualify for bowl games uncharacteristically struggled, with only UCLA and USC winning their relatively minor contests. Oregon, the league champion, fell to Ohio State in the Rose Bowl game. The Ducks were expected to be a heavy favorite in the conference for 2010, but those aspirations took a hit with the season-long suspension of dual threat QB Jeremiah Masoli. While still expected to be a Pac 10 contender, perhaps national title consideration is no longer reachable for Oregon. Same goes for Oregon State, who boasts the potent Rodgers brothers but has nonconference tilts versus both TCU and Boise State before league play even commences. Could the Trojans be back atop the conference standings then? If you ask new head coach Lane Kiffin, he d say yes. Other potential contenders would have to include Washington and QB Jake Locker, the potential first pick in next spring s NFL draft, as well as California, who is always loaded. As you can see, this league is again deep, as teams like Stanford, UCLA, and Arizona haven t even been mentioned to this point yet are clearly bowl caliber teams. Perhaps it s just best to pity fans in Tempe, AZ and Pullman, WA. ARIZONA WILDCATS Though spanked by Nebraska in the Holiday Bowl, the Wildcats had their moments and are no longer a pushover. Arizona won five of six home games, falling only in double overtime to Oregon, and beat USC on the road. They ve have won eight games in back-toback campaigns, and after going 10 years without a bowl appearance they re gunning for a third straight. The return of 17 starters, including 10 on offense, provides head coach Mike Stoops with a solid foundation Arizona averaged 31 PPG in three years with Sonny Dykes as coordinator. Ten starters are back in the fold, but not Dykes, who left to become head coach at Louisiana Tech. Balance was one of the Wildcats biggest assets they passed for 2,927 yards and 20 touchdowns and rushed for 2,072 yards and 19 scores and this season should be no different with junior Nick Foles leading the air assault and senior Nic Grigsby the ground attack. Up front, senior center Colin 2009 STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Oregon 10-3-0 0.769 469 309 8-1-0 7-0-0 3-3-0 7-6-0 53.8% 9-4-0 Stanford 8-5-0 0.615 461 345 6-3-0 6-1-0 2-4-0 8-5-0 61.5% 8-5-0 Oregon State 8-5-0 0.615 409 325 6-3-0 4-2-0 4-3-0 7-5-0 58.3% 6-6-0 Arizona 8-5-0 0.615 356 311 6-3-0 5-1-0 3-4-0 6-7-0 46.2% 5-7-0 USC 9-4-0 0.692 344 258 5-4-0 4-2-0 5-2-0 4-9-0 30.8% 5-8-0 California 8-5-0 0.615 378 331 5-4-0 4-2-0 4-3-0 6-7-0 46.2% 6-6-0 Washington 5-7-0 0.417 313 320 4-5-0 5-2-0 0-5-0 7-5-0 58.3% 6-6-0 UCLA 7-6-0 0.538 286 276 3-6-0 4-2-0 3-4-0 7-6-0 53.8% 3-10-0 Arizona State 4-8-0 0.333 268 253 2-7-0 3-4-0 1-4-0 6-5-0 54.5% 2-9-0 Washington State 1-11-0 0.083 144 462 0-9-0 1-4-0 0-7-0 5-7-0 41.7% 4-8-0 Baxter has made 37 consecutive starts and leads a line that yielded only 13 sacks Four starters return to a defense that also lost its coordinator Mark Stoops who accepted the same position at Florida State. Last year s unit was particularly strong against the run, holding opponents to 3.87 yards per carry, and also managed 34 sacks. Senior ends Ricky Elmore and Brooks Reed give the Wildcats a pair of physical pass rushers, and two solid secondary performers are back, but no starters return at linebacker A fast start is mandatory and likely. The Wildcats play three of their first four conference games at home, with a trip to Washington State mixed in. As long as Grigsby stays healthy and the revamped defense jells, the wins will outweigh the losses and Stoops will guide the troops to another bowl appearance. ARIZONA STATE SUN DEVILS The Sun Devils have plummeted to the depths of the Pac-10 after winning 10 games and a share of the conference title in 2007. They ve suffered six-game losing streaks in back-to-back seasons and last year s skid capped off a ninth-place finish in the conference. Still, the outlook for 2010 isn t horrible. Fourthyear head coach Dennis Erickson has a solid defensive nucleus, and the arrival of new offensive coordinator Noel Mazzone should make for an improved air attack and more excitement With Mazzone in Tempe to revitalize an offense that produced just 95 points in the season-ending six-game skid, opponents can expect a no-huddle attack geared toward chewing up yards through the air. The spring saw a spirited battle between redshirt junior Steven Threet and sophomore Brock Osweiler for the starting quarterback job, and it ll carry over to August. Threet started eight games at Michigan in 2008. The line has been hit with a rash of injuries and needs stability. Multiple-receiver sets will be common so expect increased production and notoriety at wide receiver, while youth is the theme at tailback Clouded by the poor record was a defense that led the Pac- 10 in nearly every major category and ranked 13th in the 98 WWW.STATFOX.COM

country in fewest yards allowed (297.6 YPG). The unit packs a punch up front. Graduation was tough on the linebacker corps but Vontaze Burfict is a star in the making and the other starters are solid With Portland State and Northern Arizona visiting in its first two games, Arizona State should build some confidence while opening 2-0 for the second year in a row. But with Oregon as their first conference opponent, followed by three straight on the road, the Sun Devils won t have an easy time surpassing last year s win total. CALIFORNIA GOLDEN BEARS The Golden Bears are seeking a ninth straight winning season under Jeff Tedford, who is the longest tenured head coach in the Pac-10 and eight victories away from surpassing Andy Smith as the school s all-time leader. Cal has been ranked in the Top 10 at some point in five of the last seven years and is 5-2 in bowl games over that same span. Tedford brings back 20 players who started at least four games from last year s 8-5 squad that closed with a disappointing loss to Utah in the Poinsettia Bowl, and the experience should put the Golden Bears square in the conference title picture A unit that posted an average of 29.1 PPG, and enjoyed practically an equal share of rushing (2,203 yards, 27 touchdowns) and passing (2,895, 18) success, should continue to thrive despite the departure of tailback Jahvid Best to the NFL. Still, Best s replacement, Shane Vereen, is a bonafide threat. At quarterback, senior Kevin Riley is expected to keep his job as the starter but he could be challenged. He was sacked 31 times, but that number could shrink thanks to return of 80 percent of the starting line The stop unit failed to pull its weight last December, allowing 42 points against Washington in the conference finale and 37 to Utah in the bowl defeat. Senior linebacker Mike Mohamed is the catalyst and someone bound to wear a pro uniform. He s the reigning Pac-10 tackles leader (112). In all, seven defensive starters are back There s a lot to like on both sides of the ball. The non-conference slate should be challenging enough where the Golden Bears need to do more than show up, and the Pac-10 schedule doesn t get hairy until a trip to USC in mid- October. A double-digit win season isn t out of the question. OREGON DUCKS Way to go, Chip. The Ducks, who won 116 games in 14 seasons with Mike Belotti at the helm, not only kept the ball rolling under head coach Chip Kelly but captured the Pac-10 title and were ranked seventh in the country prior to losing the Rose Bowl to Ohio State. Coming off a second straight 10-3 campaign, Oregon s chances of repeating as conference champion took a serious hit when quarterback Jeremiah Masoli, a potential Heisman Trophy candidate, was slapped with a season-long suspension. Fifteen other starters return, so nobody s throwing in the towel The Ducks averaged 36.1 PPG, thanks in large part to a running game that totaled 38 touchdowns and racked up an average of 231.7 yards per game. Masoli will be dearly missed, but fifth-year senior Nate Costa may prove capable. Of the 2,213 yards produced on the ground by Oregon s running backs, the sources of 1,979 of it returns. Sophomores LaMichael James (1,546 yards, 14 touchdowns) and Kenjon Barner (366, 3) lead a deep group. The quarterback will have an experienced group of wide receivers at his disposal too, and the entire starting line remains intact The defense had more positive moments than not and was particularly strong against the run, holding the competition to 128.7 RYPG, including 3.37 yards per carry. Coordinator Nick Aliotti will be counting on a wealth of talent at linebacker to lead the unit once again, which returns seven of 11 starters Nobody is underestimating the loss of Masoli, who let down the entire Duck Nation. Most of Oregon s tough opponents Tennessee, USC, California and Oregon State are on the road, presenting an even bigger challenge with a relatively inexperienced player under center. The Ducks probably won t produce another 10-win campaign, but don t count them out. OREGON STATE BEAVERS Oregon State s perfect record in bowls under head coach Mike Riley is no longer, with BYU ending the winning streak at five by taking a 44-20 decision in Las Vegas, however the Beavers tied for second place in the Pac-10 for a second straight season and won at least eight games for a third consecutive year. With the electrifying Rodgers brothers senior wide receiver James and junior running back Jacquizz serving as one of the premier one-two punches in the nation, and a solid supporting cast behind them, a conference title and major bowl is well within reach Corvallis is Mr. Rodgers neighborhood. James and Jacquizz combined for 1,743 yards rushing, 1,556 yards receiving and 32 touchdowns to lead an offense that averaged 31.5 PPG and over 410 YPG. Jacquizz Rodgers is a legitimate Heisman Trophy candidate. James Rodgers is a triple threat likely to become the Beavers all- WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 99

time leader in all-purpose yards. The biggest question mark facing the offense is quarterback. Topping the depth chart is sophomore Ryan Katz, who has four games of experience. The line returns largely intact and is led by senior center Alex Linnenkohl A year after the lack of a consistent pass rush and late-game performance plagued the unit, the Beavers are counting on their front four to return to previous form. Senior Stephen Paea, who declined to enter the NFL Draft, is one of the premier tackles in the nation. The secondary is the deepest position and needs to step up in the turnover department Perhaps the toughest trio of out-of-conference games within the nation makes for a challenging September TCU, Louisville and Boise State. Although getting Cal, USC and Oregon in Corvallis helps the cause within the Pac-10. The Rodgers boys are sure to thrill and thus the Beavers will fight for the top spot. STANFORD CARDINAL Perhaps no team in the country is going to miss a player as much as Stanford will Heisman Trophy runner-up Toby Gerhart, who scored 28 touchdowns and averaged 144 yards rushing per game to lead the Cardinal to its first winning season since 2001. Head coach Jim Harbaugh welcomes back a healthy portion of the starters eight on offense, six on defense from an exciting Sun Bowl defeat to Oklahoma, 31-27, and will be counting on sophomore quarterback Andrew Luck to take another step and help the program to another bowl appearance Especially considering Gerhart s departure, a repeat performance can t be expected after Stanford set a new school record for points in a season with 461, an average of 35.5 PPG. Luck kept defenses honest enough with 2,575 yards through the air and 13 touchdowns, with only four interceptions. His mobility was a big reason why the Cardinal allowed only seven sacks, the second-fewest in the nation next to Boise State. Eighty percent of the starting line is back, and Luck s group of targets is led by wideouts Ryan Whalen and Chris Owusu After a Jekyll-and-Hyde campaign that saw five opponents score 31 points or more and five others held to 17 or fewer, the Cardinal brings back more than half of their starters, including three of the top four tacklers. More takeaways (17) is one thing that would please new coordinator Vic Fangio Back-to-back games at Oregon and home against USC to open October could determine the Cardinal s ultimate direction. As long as the ground attack does enough to balance the offense, Stanford will finish in the upper half of the Pac-10 again. UCLA BRUINS UCLA has sputtered to back-to-back 3-6 finishes in the Pac-10 in Rick Neuheisel s second head coaching stint, but the big difference between 2009 and the previous season was the Bruins success in non-conference games. They went 4-0, including a win at Tennessee and a victory over Temple in the Eagle Bank Bowl. The Bruins need to get their offense going if they want to move up the conference ranks and qualify for a more prestigious bowl. They ve averaged fewer than 20 points over their last 25 games, but the return of their starting quarterback, leading rusher and leading receiver is reason for optimism Coordinator Norm Chow was brought to campus prior to the 2008 season to get UCLA s offense up to standards. However, it has yet to happen. The unit averaged 30 points in the team s last four victories and will seek to carry over the success. Sophomore quarterback Kevin Prince brings a strong arm and experience to the table. The return of the top two wide receivers in terms of receptions and yards juniors Taylor Embree (45 catches, 608 yards) and Nelson Rosario (42, 723) can only aid Prince s growth. The line is full of depth with seven players with starting experience, while the backfield boasts minimal returning production beyond Johnathan Franklin The Bruins return five starters to a unit that ranked near the top of the Pac-10 in total yardage (334.0 YPG) and scoring (21.2 PPG). The unquestioned leaders of the unit are All-America junior free safety Rahim Moore, and junior linebacker Akeem Ayers October killed the Bruins a year ago as they lost all five games. This year, it could be September The defense can only be counted on to do so much, and if Chow doesn t get the offense to click it ll be another mediocre finish. USC TROJANS USC s amazing nine-year run with Pete Carroll ended in January when he returned to the NFL and the Seahawks. Under Carroll, the Trojans won 97 of 116 games, two national championships and seven Pac- 10 titles. The program is now in the hands of one of Carroll s former assistants Lane Kiffin who last season guided Tennessee to a 7-6 mark in his first experience as a college head coach. Kiffin, who hired his father, Monte, as assistant head coach and heralded Ed Orgeron to run the defense, inherits a roster with 11 returning starters Last year s unit produced its fewest yards since 2001, but inexperience at the quarterback position, and a rash of 100 WWW.STATFOX.COM

injuries, had a lot to do with it. Freshman quarterback Matt Barkley set the tone for a bright future when he directed a late game-winning drive at Ohio State in Week 2. On the year, he completed nearly 60 percent of his passes for 2,735 yards and 15 touchdowns with 14 interceptions. The jury is out at tailback after Joe McKnight s early departure to the NFL but surely someone will emerge. At wideout, senior Ronald Johnson has speed to burn and 11 touchdowns over the past two seasons and it s his time to be the man. Three players return up front The Trojans allowed 19.8 PPG after leading the country in scoring and pass defense the previous campaign. This year s group will be tested out of the gate by pass-happy Hawaii. Developing cohesiveness and toughness are the biggest challenges facing Monte Kiffin, who has a half-dozen returning starters to lean on... Another fifth-place (tied) finish in the Pac-10? No way. The Trojans were bound to come down from the clouds, and they ll want to re-establish themselves as one of the nation s best. It won t be easy, but the schedule is soft early and that should help Kiffin quickly restore confidence. WASHINGTON HUSKIES After hitting rock bottom in 2008 becoming the first team in Pac-10 history to finish 0-12 while being outscored by an eyepopping 304 points Washington got things pointed north in its first year under head coach Steve Sarkisian with a couple of winning streaks and five victories overall. The Huskies closed with a flurry, beating Washington State and California by a combined 72-10, and they ll try to pick up where they left off behind 10 returning starters on offense, including highly touted quarterback Jake Locker A year after failing to crack 20 points in all but two games, and averaging 13.2 per outing, Locker led a unit that surpassed 20 on eight occasions and almost doubled (26.1) the 2008 standard. Locker dazzled as a junior and has a deep group of weapons at his disposal, with five players who caught at least 25 balls. Experience is thick up front with seniors Cody Habben, Ryan Tolar and Gregory Christine, and junior Senio Kelemete When the defense was shining, good things happened for the Huskies. The unit allowed 23 points or fewer in four of five wins and for the year gave up 143 fewer points than 2008. A wealth of experience returns to the secondary, and the face of the defense is senior weakside linebacker Mason Foster. Developing a consistent pass rush in the wake of Daniel Te o-nesheim s departure to the NFL will be a challenge Nobody picked Washington to knock off USC and California, and on top of those upsets Sarkisian s club came within inches of winning at Notre Dame and UCLA. Locker has all the tools and big plans after putting his NFL career on hold, but he ll need as much support as he got last season to go out a happy Husky. WASHINGTON STATE COUGARS Paul Wulff brought a respectable headcoaching record to his alma mater but back-to-back dreadful seasons for the Cougars took his mark from 13 games over.500 to six games under. They won only twice in Wulff s first year on the job and needed overtime to secure their lone win of 2009, 30-27, at home over SMU. Washington State hardly put up a fight against any of its conference rivals, with nine losses by an average of a whopping 30.8 PPG. However, the return of 17 starters should allow it to play meaningful second halves at the very least The Cougars failed to score more than 17 points in a Pac-10 game and closed with a thud, totaling just three touchdowns and 24 points in their last 16 quarters. Eight starters return to the unit, including a good chunk of the front line and the top four wide receivers. As a true freshman quarterback, Jeff Tuel held his own in five starts and completed 58.7 percent of his 121 pass attempts for 789 yards and six touchdowns, with five interceptions. However, the jury is out on a ground attack that produced merely 848 net yards and five touchdowns The Cougars will try to avoid finishing last in the Pac-10 in scoring defense for a fourth straight season. Last year (38.5 PPG) wasn t as bad as 2008 (43.8), but it s tough to win when opponents are rolling up 533.3 yards and more than five touchdowns per game. The unit is experienced, with nine starters back. That may or may not be a good thing Wulff is working with as much experience and depth as he s had here, but the roster isn t oozing with talent and anything more than three wins would be a big surprise. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH Oregon State USC Oregon Washington California Arizona Stanford UCLA Arizona State Washington State WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 101

ARIZONA WILDCATS 2010 Schedule Strength: 40.75 (#34 of 120) ARIZONA STATE SUN DEVILS 2010 Schedule Strength: 40.42 (#35 of 120) Offense: Multiple-Spread - Starters Returning: 10 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 42 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 51 Where: Tucson, AZ Head Coach: Mike Stoops, 7th year (33-39 SU) Conference: Pac 10 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 6-7 ATS Facility: Arizona Stadium 9/3/10 at Toledo 9/11/10 THE CITADEL 2009 Scoring Differential: +3.5 (#54 of 120) 9/18/10 IOWA * FAVORITE has won & covered L2 ARI-IOW games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +5.8 (#41 of 120) 9/25/10 CALIFORNIA * HOME TEAM is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in ARI-CAL series 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 45 (#30 of 120) 10/9/10 OREGON ST * OREGON ST is 9-2 SU & ATS vs. ARIZONA since 99 2009 Schedule Strength: 40.85 (#17 of 120) 10/16/10 at Washington St * UNDERDOG is on 2-4 SU but 6-0 ATS run in L6 WSU-ARI matchups at WASHINGTON ST 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 WASHINGTON * UNDERDOG is 8-4 SU & 11-1 ATS in ARI-WAS series since 98 10/30/10 at UCLA * FAVORITE is 5-0 SU & ATS in L5 UCL-ARI matchups at UCLA Points Scored - Allowed 27.4 (61) 23.9 (53) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 384.5 (58) 322.0 (25) 11/6/10 at Stanford * L5 games of STA-ARI series at STANFORD are 5-0 UNDER the total YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.47 (65) 5.07 (36) 11/13/10 USC * ARIZONA is 1-4 SU but 5-0 ATS in its L5 games vs. USC YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.82 (18) 3.87 (52) 11/26/10 at Oregon * HOME TEAM is 5-1 ATS in L6 ORE-ARI matchups YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.05 (106) 6.22 (24) Avg. Time of Possession 31.49 (22) 12/2/10 ARIZONA ST * UNDER the total is 9-1 in L10 games of ARI-AZS series Turnover Differential -0.1 (68) 3rd Down Conversion % 40.1% (53) 34.7% (22) Straight Up 6-6 5-7 8-5 8-5 27-23 (54%) * ARIZONA is 11-2 ATS (+8.8 Units) at home in conference games since 07. The Average Score Overall ATS 5-6 6-5 8-5 6-7 25-23 (52%) was ARIZONA 34.1, OPPONENT 21.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - CALIFORNIA, 10/9 - at Home ATS 2-4 3-2 6-1 4-2 15-9 (63%) OREGON ST, 10/23 - WASHINGTON, 11/13 - USC, 12/2 - ARIZONA ST Away/Neutral ATS 3-2 3-3 2-4 2-5 10-14 (42%) * ARIZONA is on a 5-20 ATS (-17 Units) skid vs. bad teams (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) The Average vs Conference ATS 5-4 6-3 5-4 6-3 22-14 (61%) Score was ARIZONA 25.6, OPPONENT 24.6. Potential spots for 2010: 12/2 - ARIZONA ST Non-Conference ATS 0-2 0-2 3-1 0-4 3-9 (25%) * Over the L2 seasons, ARIZONA is 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) at home. The Average Score was as Favorite ATS 1-3 1-2 6-4 3-3 11-12 (48%) ARIZONA 36.2, OPPONENT 17.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - IOWA, 9/25 - CALIFORNIA, as Underdog ATS 4-3 4-3 2-1 3-3 13-10 (57%) 10/9 - OREGON ST, 10/23 - WASHINGTON, 11/13 - USC, 12/2 - ARIZONA ST Over-Under 3-8 5-6 6-7 5-7 19-28 (40%) 9/2 BYU 16-13 W -7 L 53.5 U 9/1 at Byu 7-20 L +3.5 L 47.5 U 8/30 IDAHO 70-0 W -26.5 W 60 O 9/5 C MICHIGAN 19-6 W -13.5 L 55.5 U 9/9 at LSU 3-45 L +17 L 42.5 O 9/8 N ARIZONA 45-24 W - - - 9/6 TOLEDO 41-16 W -24.5 W 61 U 9/12 N ARIZONA 34-17 W -30 L - 9/16 SF AUSTIN 28-10 W - - - 9/15 NEW MEXICO 27-29 L -9 L 44.5 O 9/13 at New Mexico 28-36 L -10 L 50.5 O 9/19 at Iowa 17-27 L +4.5 L 41 O 9/23 USC 3-20 L +21 W 46.5 U 9/22 at California 27-45 L +14 L 56.5 O 9/20 at UCLA 31-10 W -4 W 50.5 U 9/26 at Oregon St 37-32 W +2.5 W 46 O 9/30 WASHINGTON 10-21 L -3 L 41 U 9/29 WASHINGTON ST 48-20 W -3 W 58.5 O 10/4 WASHINGTON 48-14 W -23 W 61 O 10/10 at Washington 33-36 L -4 L 54 O 10/7 at UCLA 7-27 L +11.5 L 40.5 U 10/6 at Oregon St 16-31 L +2.5 L 53.5 U 10/11 at Stanford 23-24 L -6.5 L 52.5 U 10/17 STANFORD 43-38 W -4 W 53.5 O 10/14 at Stanford 20-7 W -4 W 40.5 U 10/13 at Usc 13-20 L +21 W 56 U 10/18 CALIFORNIA 42-27 W +2.5 W 53 O 10/24 UCLA 27-13 W -7.5 W 49.5 U 10/21 OREGON ST 10-17 L +2.5 L 38.5 U 10/20 STANFORD 20-21 L -13.5 L 54.5 U 10/25 USC 10-17 L +14.5 W 52.5 U 11/7 WASHINGTON ST 48-7 W -32.5 W 56.5 U 11/4 at Washington St 27-17 W +16 W 40 O 10/27 at Washington 48-41 W +3.5 W 55 O 11/8 at Washington St 59-28 W -39 L 56 O 11/14 at California 16-24 L +2.5 L 55.5 U 11/11 CALIFORNIA 24-20 W +13.5 W 44.5 U 11/3 UCLA 34-27 W +0 W 48.5 O 11/15 at Oregon 45-55 L +6 L 62 O 11/21 OREGON 41-44 L +5 W 60 O 11/18 at Oregon 37-10 W +14 W 44.5 O 11/15 OREGON 34-24 W +10.5 W 65.5 U 11/22 OREGON ST 17-19 L -3 L 57 U 11/28 at Arizona St 20-17 W -3.5 L 44.5 U 11/25 ARIZONA ST 14-28 L -3 L 42.5 U 12/1 at Arizona St 17-20 L +7 W 56 U 12/6 ARIZONA ST 31-10 W -13 W 51 U 12/5 at USC 21-17 W +7 W 50 U 12/20 vs. BYU 31-21 W -3 W 62 U 12/30 vs. Nebraska 0-33 L +2 L 42 U Where: Tempe, AZ Head Coach: Dennis Erickson, 4th year (19-17 SU) Conference: Pac 10 2009 RECORD: 4-8 SU, 6-5 ATS Facility: Sun Devil Stadium 9/4/10 PORTLAND ST 9/11/10 N ARIZONA 2009 Scoring Differential: +1.3 (#63 of 120) 9/18/10 at Wisconsin 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -2.0 (#74 of 120) 9/25/10 OREGON * OREGON is 5-0 SU & ATS in its L5 games vs. ARIZONA ST 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 41 (#48 of 120) 10/2/10 at Oregon St * HOME TEAM is 12-4 SU & 11-4 ATS in ORS-AZS series since 92 2009 Schedule Strength: 38.25 (#37 of 120) 10/9/10 at Washington * FAVORITE is on 6-0 SU & ATS run in L6 WAS-AZS matchups 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at California * HOME TEAM is 8-4 SU & 10-2 ATS in CAL-AZS series since 96 10/30/10 WASHINGTON ST * L6 games of AZS-WSU series are 5-1 UNDER the total Points Scored - Allowed 22.3 (91) 21.1 (26) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 335.3 (90) 297.6 (13) 11/6/10 at USC * FAVORITE is 14-2 SU & 11-5 ATS in USC-AZS series since 92 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.03 (97) 4.76 (21) 11/13/10 STANFORD * HOME TEAM is on 9-1 SU & 8-2 ATS run in AZS-STA series YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.78 (79) 3.39 (21) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.16 (104) 6.20 (23) 11/26/10 UCLA * UCLA is 4-3 SU & 6-1 ATS in its L7 games vs. ARIZONA ST Avg. Time of Possession 30.65 (43) 12/2/10 at Arizona * UNDER the total is 9-1 in L10 games of ARI-AZS series Turnover Differential -0.2 (72) 3rd Down Conversion % 31.0% (111) 31.4% (10) Straight Up 7-6 10-3 5-7 4-8 26-24 (52%) * ARIZONA ST is 10-2 UNDER the total (+7.8 Units) in weeks 5 through 9 since 07. The Average Overall ATS 7-5 6-7 4-7 6-5 23-24 (49%) Score was ARIZONA ST 23, OPPONENT 23.7. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at Oregon St, 10/9 at Home ATS 3-2 5-3 2-4 5-1 15-10 (60%) - at Washington, 10/23 - at California, 10/30 - WASHINGTON ST Away/Neutral ATS 4-3 1-4 2-3 1-4 8-14 (36%) * ARIZONA ST is on a 11-1 ATS (+9.9 Units) run at home revenging a blowout loss against vs Conference ATS 5-4 4-5 4-5 4-5 17-19 (47%) opponent by 21 points or more The Average Score was ARIZONA ST 31.2, OPPONENT 23.7. Non-Conference ATS 2-1 2-2 0-2 2-0 6-5 (55%) Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - OREGON. as Favorite ATS 5-2 6-4 3-2 2-2 16-10 (62%) * ARIZONA ST is on a 8-19 ATS (-12.9 Units) skid on the road vs. top-level teams (Win Pct. > 75%) as Underdog ATS 2-3 0-3 1-5 4-3 7-14 (33%) The Average Score was ARIZONA ST 21.1, OPPONENT 34.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - at Over-Under 4-7 4-9 4-7 2-9 14-32 (30%) Wisconsin, 10/23 - at California, 11/6 - at USC 8/31 N ARIZONA 35-14 W - - - 9/1 SAN JOSE ST 45-3 W -16.5 W 52 U 8/30 N ARIZONA 30-13 W - - - 9/5 IDAHO ST 50-3 W - - - 9/9 NEVADA 52-21 W -17.5 W 59 O 9/8 COLORADO 33-14 W -15.5 W 53 U 9/6 STANFORD 41-17 W -14.5 W 51.5 O 9/19 LA MONROE 38-14 W -21 W 50 O 9/16 at Colorado 21-3 W -12 W 48 U 9/15 SAN DIEGO ST 34-13 W -28 L 57.5 U 9/13 UNLV 20-23 L -25.5 L 53.5 U 9/26 at Georgia 17-20 L +13.5 W 48.5 U 9/23 at California 21-49 L +7.5 L 58 O 9/22 OREGON ST 44-32 W -11.5 W 51 O 9/20 GEORGIA 10-27 L +7 L 52 U 10/3 OREGON ST 17-28 L -5 L 45.5 U 9/30 OREGON 13-48 L -2.5 L 61 T 9/29 at Stanford 41-3 W -14 W 60.5 U 10/4 at California 14-24 L +9.5 L 53 U 10/10 at Washington St 27-14 W -20.5 L 47 U 10/14 at USC 21-28 L +19 W 54.5 U 10/6 at Washington St 23-20 W -9 L 63.5 U 10/11 at USC 0-28 L +27.5 L 49.5 U 10/17 WASHINGTON 24-17 W -6.5 W 47.5 U 10/21 STANFORD 38-3 W -23.5 W 49.5 U 10/13 WASHINGTON 44-20 W -11.5 W 57 O 10/25 OREGON 20-54 L +3 L 54.5 O 10/24 at Stanford 14-33 L +7 L 49 U 10/28 at Washington 26-23 W -2 W 49.5 U 10/27 CALIFORNIA 31-20 W -3 W 63.5 U 11/1 at Oregon St 25-27 L +14.5 W 51 O 10/31 CALIFORNIA 21-23 L +6 W 51.5 U 11/4 at Oregon St 10-44 L +1.5 L 48 O 11/3 at Oregon 23-35 L +8.5 L 61.5 U 11/8 at Washington 39-19 W -13 W 49.5 O 11/7 USC 9-14 L +12 W 45.5 U 11/11 WASHINGTON ST 47-14 W -2.5 W 49 O 11/10 at Ucla 24-20 W -7 L 51.5 U 11/15 WASHINGTON ST 31-0 W -35 L 56.5 U 11/14 at Oregon 21-44 L +21 L 51 O 11/18 UCLA 12-24 L -5.5 L 52 U 11/22 USC 24-44 L +3 L 51.5 O 11/28 UCLA 34-9 W -10 W 45 U 11/21 at UCLA 13-23 L +5.5 L 41 U 11/25 at Arizona 28-14 W +3 W 42.5 U 12/1 ARIZONA 20-17 W -7 L 56 U 12/6 at Arizona 10-31 L +13 L 51 U 11/28 ARIZONA 17-20 L +3.5 W 44.5 U 12/24 at Hawaii 24-41 L +8.5 L 72.5 U 12/27 vs. Texas 34-52 L +1 L 62.5 O 102 WWW.STATFOX.COM

CALIFORNIA GOLDEN BEARS 2010 Schedule Strength: 41.67 (#23 of 120) OREGON DUCKS 2010 Schedule Strength: 39.58 (#41 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 103 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 55 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 46 Where: Berkeley, CA Head Coach: Jeff Tedford, 9th year (67-35 SU) Conference: Pac 10 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 6-7 ATS Facility: Memorial Stadium 9/4/10 CAL DAVIS 9/11/10 COLORADO 2009 Scoring Differential: +3.6 (#50 of 120) 9/17/10 at Nevada * ROAD TEAM is 0-2 SU but 2-0 ATS in L2 NEV-CAL games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +0.4 (#67 of 120) 9/25/10 at Arizona * HOME TEAM is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in ARI-CAL series 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 44 (#35 of 120) 10/9/10 UCLA * HOME TEAM is on 9-1 SU & 7-2 ATS run in CAL-UCL series 2009 Schedule Strength: 38 (#39 of 120) 10/16/10 at USC * UNDER the total is 6-0 in L6 games of USC-CAL series 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 ARIZONA ST * HOME TEAM is 8-4 SU & 10-2 ATS in CAL-AZS series since 96 10/30/10 at Oregon St * ROAD TEAM is 6-1 SU & ATS in L7 ORS-CAL matchups Points Scored - Allowed 29.1 (48) 25.5 (60) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 392.0 (50) 377.9 (71) 11/6/10 at Washington St * ROAD TEAM is 6-0 ATS in L6 WSU-CAL matchups YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.89 (38) 5.53 (68) 11/13/10 OREGON * UNDER the total is 7-1 in L8 games of CAL-ORE series YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.66 (31) 3.34 (19) 11/20/10 STANFORD * ROAD TEAM is 9-10 SU but 13-5 ATS in CAL-STA series since 92 YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.37 (47) 7.62 (90) Avg. Time of Possession 29.17 (83) 11/27/10 WASHINGTON * CAL-WAS series has gone 9-2 OVER the total since 92 Turnover Differential +0.3 (35) 3rd Down Conversion % 35.1% (94) 36.3% (32) Straight Up 10-3 7-6 9-4 8-5 34-18 (65%) * CALIFORNIA is 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) at home revenging an upset loss against opponent as a Overall ATS 6-6 4-9 9-4 6-7 25-26 (49%) favorite since 07. The Average Score was CALIFORNIA 41.7, OPPONENT 18.6. Potential spots at Home ATS 3-3 2-4 7-0 3-3 15-10 (60%) for 2010: 11/13 - OREGON, 11/27 - WASHINGTON Away/Neutral ATS 3-3 2-5 2-4 3-4 10-16 (38%) * CALIFORNIA is on a 12-27 ATS (-17.7 Units) skid as road favorites The Average Score was vs Conference ATS 4-5 2-7 7-2 3-6 16-20 (44%) CALIFORNIA 28.8, OPPONENT 22.7. Potential spots for 2010: 9/17 - at Nevada, 11/6 - at Non-Conference ATS 2-1 2-2 2-2 3-1 9-6 (60%) Washington St as Favorite ATS 6-5 3-7 8-3 4-6 21-21 (50%) * CALIFORNIA is on a 8-1 OVER the total (+6.9 Units) run at home revenging an upset loss as Underdog ATS 0-1 1-2 1-1 1-1 3-5 (38%) against opponent as a favorite The Average Score was CALIFORNIA 36.5, OPPONENT 22.7. Over-Under 7-5 5-7 8-5 6-6 26-23 (53%) Potential spots for 2010: 11/13 - OREGON, 11/27 - WASHINGTON 9/2 at Tennessee 18-35 L -2.5 L 41.5 O 9/1 TENNESSEE 45-31 W -7 W 55 O 8/30 MICHIGAN ST 38-31 W -6 W 54 O 9/5 MARYLAND 52-13 W -21 W 50.5 O 9/9 MINNESOTA 42-17 W -9 W 56 O 9/8 at Colorado St 34-28 W -14 L 62 T 9/6 at Washington St 66-3 W -13.5 W 52 O 9/12 E WASHINGTON 59-7 W -34 W - 9/16 PORTLAND ST 42-16 W - - - 9/15 LOUISIANA TECH 42-12 W -33.5 L 66.5 U 9/13 at Maryland 27-35 L -13.5 L 54 O 9/19 at Minnesota 35-21 W -13.5 W 52.5 O 9/23 ARIZONA ST 49-21 W -7.5 W 58 O 9/22 ARIZONA 45-27 W -14 W 56.5 O 9/27 COLORADO ST 42-7 W -28 W 59 U 9/26 at Oregon 3-42 L -5.5 L 55 U 9/30 at Oregon St 41-13 W -8.5 W 55 U 9/29 at Oregon 31-24 W +7 W 72.5 U 10/4 ARIZONA ST 24-14 W -9.5 W 53 U 10/3 USC 3-30 L +4.5 L 45 U 10/7 OREGON 45-24 W -5.5 W 60 O 10/13 OREGON ST 28-31 L -14 L 57.5 O 10/18 at Arizona 27-42 L -2.5 L 53 O 10/17 at UCLA 45-26 W -3.5 W 44 O 10/14 at Washington St 21-3 W -9.5 W 54.5 U 10/20 at Ucla 21-30 L -3 L 57 U 10/25 UCLA 41-20 W -19.5 W 51 O 10/24 WASHINGTON ST 49-17 W -36.5 L 60 O 10/21 WASHINGTON 31-24 W -24 L 53 O 10/27 at Arizona St 20-31 L +3 L 63.5 U 11/1 OREGON 26-16 W -2.5 W 55.5 U 10/31 at Arizona St 23-21 W -6 L 51.5 U 11/4 UCLA 38-24 W -17.5 L 51.5 O 11/3 WASHINGTON ST 20-17 W -16 L 63.5 U 11/8 at USC 3-17 L +22 W 48 U 11/7 OREGON ST 14-31 L -6.5 L 61 U 11/11 at Arizona 20-24 L -13.5 L 44.5 U 11/10 USC 17-24 L +4 L 50 U 11/15 at Oregon St 21-34 L +3 L 50.5 O 11/14 ARIZONA 24-16 W -2.5 W 55.5 U 11/18 at USC 9-23 L +5.5 L 55 U 11/17 at Washington 23-37 L -6.5 L 58.5 O 11/22 STANFORD 37-16 W -9.5 W 50.5 O 11/21 at Stanford 34-28 W +7 W 60 O 12/2 STANFORD 26-17 W -29 L 46 U 12/1 at Stanford 13-20 L -14 L 54 U 12/6 WASHINGTON 48-7 W -34.5 W 54 O 12/5 at Washington 10-42 L -6.5 L 57 U 12/28 vs. Texas A&M 45-10 W -3.5 W 54.5 O 12/31 vs. Air Force 42-36 W -4 W 57 O 12/27 vs. Miami 24-17 W -10 L 51 U 12/23 vs. Utah 27-37 L -2.5 L 52.5 O Where: Eugene, OR Head Coach: Chip Kelly, 2nd year (10-3 SU) Conference: Pac 10 2009 RECORD: 10-3 SU, 7-6 ATS Facility: Autzen Stadium 9/4/10 NEW MEXICO 9/11/10 at Tennessee 2009 Scoring Differential: +12.3 (#16 of 120) 9/18/10 PORTLAND ST 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +16.5 (#10 of 120) 9/25/10 at Arizona St * OREGON is 5-0 SU & ATS in its L5 games vs. ARIZONA ST 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 56 (#7 of 120) 10/2/10 STANFORD * OVER the total is 5-0 in L5 games of ORE-STA series 2009 Schedule Strength: 43.77 (#1 of 120) 10/9/10 at Washington St * OVER the total is 6-1 in L7 games of WSU-ORE series 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/21/10 UCLA * ROAD TEAM is 5-3 SU & 6-1 ATS in L8 ORE-UCL matchups 10/30/10 at USC * HOME TEAM has won SU & ATS in four straight USC-ORE games Points Scored - Allowed 36.1 (8) 23.8 (51) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 412.0 (33) 336.3 (35) 11/6/10 WASHINGTON * FAVORITE is on 7-0 SU & ATS run in L7 ORE-WAS matchups YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.05 (27) 4.59 (12) 11/13/10 at California * UNDER the total is 7-1 in L8 games of CAL-ORE series YP Rush Gained - Allowed 5.51 (4) 3.37 (20) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.93 (74) 5.92 (15) 11/26/10 ARIZONA * HOME TEAM is 5-1 ATS in L6 ORE-ARI matchups Avg. Time of Possession 26.31 (117) 12/4/10 at Oregon St * OVER the total is 7-0 in L7 games of ORS-ORE series Turnover Differential +0.2 (51) 3rd Down Conversion % 35.1% (94) 37.9% (48) Straight Up 7-6 9-4 10-3 10-3 36-16 (69%) * OREGON is on a 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) run vs. terrible defensive teams - allowing >=6.25 YPP The Average Overall ATS 5-6 9-4 7-6 7-6 28-22 (56%) Score was OREGON 50.7, OPPONENT 15. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - at Washington St, 11/6 - at Home ATS 2-2 5-2 3-3 5-2 15-9 (63%) WASHINGTON Away/Neutral ATS 3-4 4-2 4-3 2-4 13-13 (50%) * Over the L2 seasons, OREGON is 13-3 OVER the total (+9.7 Units) on turf fields. The Average Score vs Conference ATS 4-4 5-4 5-4 6-3 20-15 (57%) was OREGON 43.1, OPPONENT 23.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - NEW MEXICO, 10/2 - STANFORD, Non-Conference ATS 1-2 4-0 2-2 1-3 8-7 (53%) 10/9 - at Washington St, 10/21 - UCLA, 11/6 - WASHINGTON, 11/26 - ARIZONA, 12/4 - at Oregon St as Favorite ATS 3-3 7-4 6-4 5-5 21-16 (57%) * OREGON is 40-23 ATS (+14.7 Units) at home vs. good offensive teams - averaging >=5.65 YPP as Underdog ATS 2-3 2-0 1-2 2-1 7-6 (54%) since 92. The Average Score was OREGON 31.5, OPPONENT 27.3. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at Over-Under 7-4 6-7 7-5 9-4 29-20 (59%) Tennessee, 11/6 - WASHINGTON, 11/26 - ARIZONA, 12/4 - at Oregon St 9/2 STANFORD 48-10 W -11.5 W 52 O 9/1 HOUSTON 48-27 W -18 W 58 O 8/30 WASHINGTON 44-10 W -14.5 W 61.5 U 9/3 at Boise St 8-19 L +3 L 64 U 9/9 at Fresno St 31-24 W -3 W 52 O 9/8 at Michigan 39-7 W +9 W 64.5 U 9/6 UTAH ST 66-24 W -36 W 51.5 O 9/12 PURDUE 38-36 W -13 L 57.5 O 9/16 OKLAHOMA 34-33 W -6 L 49 O 9/15 FRESNO ST 52-21 W -17 W 64 O 9/13 at Purdue 32-26 W -7 L 58.5 U 9/19 UTAH 31-24 W -4 W 53.5 O 9/30 at Arizona St 48-13 W +2.5 W 61 T 9/22 at Stanford 55-31 W -19 W 60.5 O 9/20 BOISE ST 32-37 L -10.5 L 52 O 9/26 CALIFORNIA 42-3 W +5.5 W 55 U 10/7 at California 24-45 L +5.5 L 60 O 9/29 CALIFORNIA 24-31 L -7 L 72.5 U 9/27 at Washington St 63-14 W -21 W 56.5 O 10/3 WASHINGTON ST 52-6 W -35 W 55.5 O 10/14 UCLA 30-20 W -10 T 52 U 10/13 WASHINGTON ST 53-7 W -20 W 69 U 10/4 at USC 10-44 L +16 L 56.5 U 10/10 at UCLA 24-10 W -3 W 44 U 10/21 at Washington St 23-34 L -3.5 L 51.5 O 10/20 at Washington 55-34 W -12 W 63 O 10/11 UCLA 31-24 W -20.5 L 55 T 10/24 at Washington 43-19 W -9.5 W 55.5 O 10/28 PORTLAND ST 55-12 W - - - 10/27 USC 24-17 W -3 W 60.5 U 10/25 at Arizona St 54-20 W -3 W 54.5 O 10/31 USC 47-20 W +3 W 48.5 O 11/4 WASHINGTON 34-14 W -14.5 W 49.5 U 11/3 ARIZONA ST 35-23 W -8.5 W 61.5 U 11/1 at California 16-26 L +2.5 L 55.5 U 11/7 at Stanford 42-51 L -6.5 L 57.5 O 11/11 at USC 10-35 L +10 L 56 U 11/15 at Arizona 24-34 L -10.5 L 65.5 U 11/8 STANFORD 35-28 W -13.5 L 56 O 11/14 ARIZONA ST 44-21 W -21 W 51 O 11/18 ARIZONA 10-37 L -14 L 44.5 O 11/24 at Ucla 0-16 L -2 L 51.5 U 11/15 ARIZONA 55-45 W -6 W 62 O 11/21 at Arizona 44-41 W -5 L 60 O 11/24 at Oregon St 28-30 L +3 W 50 O 12/1 OREGON ST 31-38 L -1.5 L 41 O 11/29 at Oregon St 65-38 W +2 W 58 O 12/3 OREGON ST 37-33 W -9.5 L 63 O 12/21 vs. BYU 8-38 L +3 L 62 U 12/31 vs. S Florida 56-21 W +5.5 W 52 O 12/30 vs. Oklahoma St 42-31 W -1 W 75.5 U 1/1 vs. Ohio St 17-26 L -4.5 L 51 U

OREGON STATE BEAVERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 46 (#3 of 120) STANFORD CARDINAL 2010 Schedule Strength: 41.33 (#27 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 58 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3-4 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 43 Where: Corvallis, OR Head Coach: Mike Riley, 8th year (64-47 SU) Conference: Pac 10 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 7-5 ATS Facility: Reser Stadium 9/4/10 vs. TCU (Arlington, TX) 9/18/10 LOUISVILLE 2009 Scoring Differential: +6.5 (#42 of 120) 9/25/10 at Boise St * BOISE ST is 3-0 ATS in its L4 games vs. OREGON ST 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +6.8 (#36 of 120) 10/2/10 ARIZONA ST * HOME TEAM is 12-4 SU & 11-4 ATS in ORS-AZS series since 92 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 48 (#20 of 120) 10/9/10 at Arizona * OREGON ST is 9-2 SU & ATS vs. ARIZONA since 99 2009 Schedule Strength: 38.62 (#34 of 120) 10/16/10 at Washington * OREGON ST is on 6-0 SU & ATS run vs. WASHINGTON 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/30/10 CALIFORNIA * ROAD TEAM is 6-1 SU & ATS in L7 ORS-CAL matchups 11/6/10 at UCLA * UCLA is 5-2 SU & 6-1 ATS in its L7 games vs. OREGON ST Points Scored - Allowed 31.5 (26) 25.0 (57) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 410.6 (34) 349.5 (46) 11/13/10 WASHINGTON ST * OREGON ST is 7-3 SU & 9-1 ATS vs. WASHINGTON ST since 99 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.81 (43) 5.42 (63) 11/20/10 USC * HOME TEAM is on 6-1 SU & ATS run in ORS-USC series YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.13 (66) 3.79 (47) 11/27/10 at Stanford * OREGON ST is 9-4 SU & 10-3 ATS vs. STANFORD since 96 YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.36 (49) 6.85 (48) Avg. Time of Possession 31.88 (14) 12/4/10 OREGON * OVER the total is 7-0 in L7 games of ORS-ORE series Turnover Differential +0.4 (30) 3rd Down Conversion % 45.0% (19) 37.3% (38) Straight Up 10-4 9-4 9-4 8-5 36-17 (68%) * OREGON ST is 14-2 ATS (+11.8 Units) on the road after the first month of the season since 07. Overall ATS 7-6 8-4 9-4 7-5 31-19 (62%) The Average Score was OREGON ST 28.3, OPPONENT 21.6. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - at at Home ATS 3-3 4-1 4-2 2-3 13-9 (59%) Arizona, 10/16 - at Washington, 11/6 - at UCLA, 11/27 - at Stanford Away/Neutral ATS 4-3 4-3 5-2 5-2 18-10 (64%) * OREGON ST is 13-0 ATS (+13 Units) after covering the spread in 2 out of their last 3 games vs Conference ATS 5-4 6-3 6-3 7-2 24-12 (67%) since 07. The Average Score was OREGON ST 32.1, OPPONENT 18.4. Potential spots for 2010: Non-Conference ATS 2-2 2-1 3-1 0-3 7-7 (50%) WATCH FOR ATS WINNING STREAKS as Favorite ATS 4-2 5-2 6-3 2-4 17-11 (61%) * OREGON ST is on a 11-1 ATS (+9.9 Units) run vs. teams scoring 17 or less PPG The Average as Underdog ATS 3-4 3-2 3-1 5-1 14-8 (64%) Score was OREGON ST 34.4, OPPONENT 14.2. Potential spots for 2010: 11/13 - WASHINGTON Over-Under 4-9 6-6 7-6 6-6 23-27 (46%) ST 8/31 E WASHINGTON 56-17 W - - - 8/30 UTAH 24-7 W -5 W 52 U 8/28 at Stanford 28-36 L -2.5 L 45 O 9/5 PORTLAND ST 34-7 W - - - 9/7 at Boise St 14-42 L +7.5 L 59 U 9/6 at Cincinnati 3-34 L -3 L 43.5 U 9/6 at Penn St 14-45 L +15 L 49 O 9/12 at UNLV 23-21 W -6.5 L 53 U 9/23 IDAHO 38-0 W -26 W 55 U 9/15 IDAHO ST 61-10 W - - - 9/13 HAWAII 45-7 W -14 W 56.5 U 9/19 CINCINNATI 18-28 L +1 L 57.5 U 9/30 CALIFORNIA 13-41 L +8.5 L 55 U 9/22 at Arizona St 32-44 L +11.5 L 51 O 9/25 USC 27-21 W +24 W 55.5 U 9/26 ARIZONA 32-37 L -2.5 L 46 O 10/7 WASHINGTON ST 6-13 L +3 L 52.5 U 9/29 UCLA 14-40 L -3 L 52 O 10/2 at Utah 28-31 L +11.5 W 53 O 10/3 at Arizona St 28-17 W +5 W 45.5 U 10/14 at Washington 27-17 W +8.5 W 46.5 U 10/6 ARIZONA 31-16 W -2.5 W 53.5 U 10/11 WASHINGTON ST 66-13 W -28.5 W 54.5 O 10/10 STANFORD 38-28 W +2 W 52.5 O 10/21 at Arizona 17-10 W -2.5 W 38.5 U 10/13 at California 31-28 W +14 W 57.5 O 10/18 at Washington 34-13 W -16.5 W 59 U 10/24 at USC 36-42 L +21 W 52 O 10/28 USC 33-31 W +10.5 W 47 O 10/27 STANFORD 23-6 W -14 W 52.5 U 11/1 ARIZONA ST 27-25 W -14.5 L 51 O 10/31 UCLA 26-19 W -10 L 48 U 11/4 ARIZONA ST 44-10 W -1.5 W 48 O 11/11 at UCLA 7-25 L +2 L 47 U 11/3 at Usc 3-24 L +17 L 46.5 U 11/8 at UCLA 34-6 W -7.5 W 48.5 U 11/7 at California 31-14 W +6.5 W 61 U 11/18 at Stanford 30-7 W -14.5 W 42 U 11/10 WASHINGTON 29-23 W -3 W 49.5 O 11/15 CALIFORNIA 34-21 W -3 W 50.5 O 11/14 WASHINGTON 48-21 W -13.5 W 58 O 11/24 OREGON 30-28 W -3 L 50 O 11/17 at Washington St 52-17 W +3.5 W 49 O 11/22 at Arizona 19-17 W +3 W 57 U 11/21 at Washington St 42-10 W -31 W 56 U 12/2 at Hawaii 35-32 W +8 W 70 U 12/1 at Oregon 38-31 W +1.5 W 41 O 11/29 OREGON 38-65 L -2 L 58 O 12/3 at Oregon 33-37 L +9.5 W 63 O 12/29 vs. Missouri 39-38 W -3.5 L 53 O 12/28 vs. Maryland 21-14 W -4 W 47 U 12/31 vs. Pittsburgh 3-0 W -1.5 W 51 U 12/22 vs. BYU 20-44 L -2.5 L 58 O Where: Stanford, CA Head Coach: Jim Harbaugh, 4th year (17-20 SU) Conference: Pac 10 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 8-5 ATS Facility: Stanford Stadium 9/4/10 SACRAMENTO ST 9/11/10 at UCLA * UNDER the total is 7-1 in L8 games of UCL-STA series 2009 Scoring Differential: +8.9 (#27 of 120) 9/18/10 WAKE FOREST 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +9.5 (#26 of 120) 9/25/10 at Notre Dame * NOTRE DAME is 11-4 SU & ATS vs. STANFORD since 93 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 50 (#17 of 120) 10/2/10 at Oregon * OVER the total is 5-0 in L5 games of ORE-STA series 2009 Schedule Strength: 41.38 (#14 of 120) 10/9/10 USC * STA-USC series has gone 10-3 OVER the total since 95 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 WASHINGTON ST * STANFORD is 10-6 SU & 12-4 ATS vs. WASHINGTON ST since 92 10/30/10 at Washington * STANFORD is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games at WASHINGTON Points Scored - Allowed 35.5 (12) 26.5 (69) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 427.6 (18) 402.8 (90) 11/6/10 ARIZONA * L5 games of STA-ARI series at STANFORD are 5-0 UNDER the total YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.55 (10) 5.96 (93) 11/13/10 at Arizona St * HOME TEAM is on 9-1 SU & 8-2 ATS run in AZS-STA series YP Rush Gained - Allowed 5.29 (6) 4.23 (79) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.70 (9) 7.56 (86) 11/20/10 at California * ROAD TEAM is 9-10 SU but 13-5 ATS in CAL-STA series since 92 Avg. Time of Possession 32.08 (10) 11/27/10 OREGON ST * OREGON ST is 9-4 SU & 10-3 ATS vs. STANFORD since 96 Turnover Differential +0.0 (61) 3rd Down Conversion % 44.6% (21) 42.9% (88) Straight Up 1-11 4-8 5-7 8-5 18-31 (37%) * Over the L2 seasons, STANFORD is 8-0 ATS (+8 Units) vs. good teams - outscoring opponents Overall ATS 3-9 5-7 7-5 8-5 23-26 (47%) by 10+ PPG. The Average Score was STANFORD 33.1, OPPONENT 28.4. Potential spots for at Home ATS 0-5 3-5 5-0 5-2 13-12 (52%) 2010: 10/2 - at Oregon, 10/9 - USC, 11/20 - at California Away/Neutral ATS 3-4 2-2 2-5 3-3 10-14 (42%) * Over the L2 seasons, STANFORD is 12-2 OVER the total (+9.8 Units) as underdogs. The vs Conference ATS 2-7 3-6 6-3 6-3 17-19 (47%) Average Score was STANFORD 28.7, OPPONENT 32.6. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at Non-Conference ATS 1-2 2-1 1-2 2-2 6-7 (46%) Oregon, 10/9 - USC, 11/20 - at California as Favorite ATS 0-1 1-1 2-1 5-3 8-6 (57%) * Over the L2 seasons, STANFORD is 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) at home. The Average Score was as Underdog ATS 3-8 4-6 5-4 3-2 15-20 (43%) STANFORD 35.1, OPPONENT 23.4. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - WAKE FOREST, 10/9 - USC, Over-Under 2-10 3-9 9-3 8-5 22-27 (45%) 10/23 - WASHINGTON ST, 11/6 - ARIZONA, 11/27 - OREGON ST 9/2 at Oregon 10-48 L +11.5 L 52 O 9/1 UCLA 17-45 L +16.5 L 45 O 8/28 OREGON ST 36-28 W +2.5 W 45 O 9/5 at Washington St 39-13 W -17 W 52.5 U 9/9 at San Jose St 34-35 L -11 L 54.5 O 9/15 SAN JOSE ST 37-0 W -7.5 W 49.5 U 9/6 at Arizona St 17-41 L +14.5 L 51.5 O 9/12 at Wake Forest 17-24 L +3 L 46.5 U 9/16 NAVY 9-37 L +1 L 57 U 9/22 OREGON 31-55 L +19 L 60.5 O 9/13 at TCU 14-31 L +15.5 L 39.5 O 9/19 SAN JOSE ST 42-17 W -18 W 47.5 O 9/23 WASHINGTON ST 10-36 L +9 L 53 U 9/29 ARIZONA ST 3-41 L +14 L 60.5 U 9/20 SAN JOSE ST 23-10 W -6.5 W 44.5 U 9/26 WASHINGTON 34-14 W -9 W 54 U 9/30 at UCLA 0-31 L +23 L 50.5 U 10/6 at Usc 24-23 W +39 W 57.5 U 9/27 at Washington 35-28 W +3.5 W 54.5 O 10/3 UCLA 24-16 W -4.5 W 45 U 10/7 at Notre Dame 10-31 L +29 W 55 U 10/13 TCU 36-38 L +6 W 46 O 10/4 at Notre Dame 21-28 L +6 L 48 O 10/10 at Oregon St 28-38 L -2 L 52.5 O 10/14 ARIZONA 7-20 L +4 L 40.5 U 10/20 at Arizona 21-20 W +13.5 W 54.5 U 10/11 ARIZONA 24-23 W +6.5 W 52.5 U 10/17 at Arizona 38-43 L +4 L 53.5 O 10/21 at Arizona St 3-38 L +23.5 L 49.5 U 10/27 at Oregon St 6-23 L +14 L 52.5 U 10/18 at UCLA 20-23 L -2 L 46 U 10/24 ARIZONA ST 33-14 W -7 W 49 U 11/4 USC 0-42 L +29 L 49 U 11/3 WASHINGTON 9-27 L +3 L 57 U 11/1 WASHINGTON ST 58-0 W -28 W 51 O 11/7 OREGON 51-42 W +6.5 W 57.5 O 11/11 at Washington 20-3 W +18.5 W 41 U 11/10 at Washington St 17-33 L +11.5 L 52.5 U 11/8 at Oregon 28-35 L +13.5 W 56 O 11/14 at USC 55-21 W +11.5 W 58 O 11/18 OREGON ST 7-30 L +14.5 L 42 U 11/24 NOTRE DAME 14-21 L -5 L 45.5 U 11/15 USC 23-45 L +23.5 W 48.5 O 11/21 CALIFORNIA 28-34 L -7 L 60 O 12/2 at California 17-26 L +29 W 46 U 12/1 CALIFORNIA 20-13 W +14 W 54 U 11/22 at California 16-37 L +9.5 L 50.5 O 11/28 NOTRE DAME 45-38 W -10 L 64 O 12/31 vs. Oklahoma 27-31 L +10.5 W 54.5 O 104 WWW.STATFOX.COM

UCLA BRUINS 2010 Schedule Strength: 46.33 (#1 of 120) USC TROJANS 2010 Schedule Strength: 41.38 (#26 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 105 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 43 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 5 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 53 Where: Los Angeles, CA Head Coach: Rick Neuheisel, 3rd year (11-14 SU) Conference: Pac 10 2009 RECORD: 7-6 SU, 7-6 ATS Facility: Rose Bowl 9/4/10 at Kansas St 9/11/10 STANFORD * UNDER the total is 7-1 in L8 games of UCL-STA series 2009 Scoring Differential: +0.8 (#66 of 120) 9/18/10 HOUSTON * HOME TEAM has covered spread in L2 UCL-HOU games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +2.5 (#56 of 120) 9/25/10 at Texas * UCLA is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. TEXAS 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 41 (#48 of 120) 10/2/10 WASHINGTON ST * WASHINGTON ST is 6-3 SU & 7-2 ATS in its L9 games vs. UCLA 2009 Schedule Strength: 40.54 (#22 of 120) 10/9/10 at California * HOME TEAM is on 9-1 SU & 7-2 ATS run in CAL-UCL series 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/21/10 at Oregon * ROAD TEAM is 5-3 SU & 6-1 ATS in L8 ORE-UCL matchups 10/30/10 ARIZONA * FAVORITE is 5-0 SU & ATS in L5 UCL-ARI matchups at UCLA Points Scored - Allowed 22.0 (94) 21.2 (27) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 337.4 (88) 334.0 (32) 11/6/10 OREGON ST * UCLA is 5-2 SU & 6-1 ATS in its L7 games vs. OREGON ST YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.12 (90) 5.19 (46) 11/13/10 at Washington * UCLA is 11-2 SU & 10-3 ATS vs. WASHINGTON since 97 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.54 (98) 3.96 (64) 11/26/10 at Arizona St * UCLA is 4-3 SU & 6-1 ATS in its L7 games vs. ARIZONA ST YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.64 (91) 6.77 (45) Avg. Time of Possession 29.77 (70) 12/4/10 USC * HOME TEAM is 9-5 SU & 11-3 ATS in UCL-USC series since 96 Turnover Differential +0.5 (26) 3rd Down Conversion % 34.1% (101) 33.1% (17) Straight Up 7-6 6-7 4-8 7-6 24-27 (47%) * UCLA is on a 21-7 ATS (+13.3 Units) run in the first two weeks of the season The Average Overall ATS 8-4 9-4 7-5 7-6 31-19 (62%) Score was UCLA 30.2, OPPONENT 20.3. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - at Kansas St, 9/11 - at Home ATS 5-2 5-1 5-2 3-3 18-8 (69%) STANFORD Away/Neutral ATS 3-2 4-3 2-3 4-3 13-11 (54%) * UCLA is 15-3 UNDER the total (+11.7 Units) at home when playing on Saturdays since 07. The vs Conference ATS 6-2 7-2 5-4 3-6 21-14 (60%) Average Score was UCLA 21.5, OPPONENT 21.8. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - STANFORD, Non-Conference ATS 2-2 2-2 2-1 4-0 10-5 (67%) 9/18 - HOUSTON, 10/2 - WASHINGTON ST, 10/30 - ARIZONA, 11/6 - OREGON ST, 12/4 - USC as Favorite ATS 4-4 3-3 2-0 5-1 14-8 (64%) * UCLA is on a 21-8 ATS (+12.2 Units) run as home underdogs The Average Score was UCLA as Underdog ATS 4-0 6-0 5-5 2-5 17-10 (63%) 24, OPPONENT 26.3. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - STANFORD, 10/30 - ARIZONA, 11/6 - Over-Under 3-10 5-8 4-7 3-10 15-35 (30%) OREGON ST, 12/4 - USC 9/2 UTAH 31-10 W -3 W 52.5 U 9/1 at Stanford 45-17 W -16.5 W 45 O 9/1 TENNESSEE 27-24 W +7 W 45.5 O 9/5 SAN DIEGO ST 33-14 W -18.5 W 47.5 U 9/9 RICE 26-16 W -27.5 L 56.5 U 9/8 BYU 27-17 W -8.5 W 47.5 U 9/13 at BYU 0-59 L +8.5 L 51 O 9/12 at Tennessee 19-15 W +10.5 W 46 U 9/23 at Washington 19-29 L -3 L 51 U 9/15 at Utah 6-44 L -14.5 L 44 O 9/20 ARIZONA 10-31 L +4 L 50.5 U 9/19 KANSAS ST 23-9 W -11 W 44.5 U 9/30 STANFORD 31-0 W -23 W 50.5 U 9/22 WASHINGTON 44-31 W -5.5 W 47.5 O 9/27 FRESNO ST 31-36 L +7 W 48 O 10/3 at Stanford 16-24 L +4.5 L 45 U 10/7 ARIZONA 27-7 W -11.5 W 40.5 U 9/29 at Oregon St 40-14 W +3 W 52 O 10/4 WASHINGTON ST 28-3 W -15.5 W 54 U 10/10 OREGON 10-24 L +3 L 44 U 10/14 at Oregon 20-30 L +10 T 52 U 10/6 NOTRE DAME 6-20 L -21 L 50 U 10/11 at Oregon 24-31 L +20.5 W 55 T 10/17 CALIFORNIA 26-45 L +3.5 L 44 O 10/21 at Notre Dame 17-20 L +13 W 49.5 U 10/20 CALIFORNIA 30-21 W +3 W 57 U 10/18 STANFORD 23-20 W +2 W 46 U 10/24 at Arizona 13-27 L +7.5 L 49.5 U 10/28 WASHINGTON ST 15-37 L -3 L 44.5 O 10/27 at Washington St 7-27 L -5 L 55.5 U 10/25 at California 20-41 L +19.5 L 51 O 10/31 at Oregon St 19-26 L +10 W 48 U 11/4 at California 24-38 L +17.5 W 51.5 O 11/3 at Arizona 27-34 L +0 L 48.5 O 11/8 OREGON ST 6-34 L +7.5 L 48.5 U 11/7 WASHINGTON 24-23 W -4.5 L 52 U 11/11 OREGON ST 25-7 W -2 W 47 U 11/10 ARIZONA ST 20-24 L +7 W 51.5 U 11/15 at Washington 27-7 W -6.5 W 47 U 11/14 at Washington St 43-7 W -18 W 48 O 11/18 at Arizona St 24-12 W +5.5 W 52 U 11/24 OREGON 16-0 W +2 W 51.5 U 11/28 at Arizona St 9-34 L +10 L 45 U 11/21 ARIZONA ST 23-13 W -5.5 W 41 U 12/2 USC 13-9 W +12 W 47.5 U 12/1 at Usc 7-24 L +19.5 W 46.5 U 12/6 USC 7-28 L +32 W 46.5 U 11/28 at USC 7-28 L +13 L 47 U 12/27 vs. Florida St 27-44 L -3 L 37.5 O 12/22 vs. Byu 16-17 L +6 W 47 U 12/29 vs. Temple 30-21 W -4.5 W 44 O Where: Los Angeles, CA Head Coach: Lane Kiffin, 1st year Conference: Pac 10 2009 RECORD: 9-4 SU, 4-9 ATS Facility: Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum 9/2/10 at Hawaii * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in HAW-USC series 9/11/10 VIRGINIA 9/18/10 at Minnesota 2009 Scoring Differential: +6.6 (#41 of 120) 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +7.7 (#32 of 120) 9/25/10 at Washington St * L6 games of WSU-USC series at WASHINGTON ST are 6-0 OVER the total 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 51 (#13 of 120) 10/2/10 WASHINGTON * HOME TEAM is 9-5 SU & 10-4 ATS in USC-WAS series since 94 2009 Schedule Strength: 41.23 (#15 of 120) 10/9/10 at Stanford * STA-USC series has gone 10-3 OVER the total since 95 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 CALIFORNIA * UNDER the total is 6-0 in L6 games of USC-CAL series 10/30/10 OREGON * HOME TEAM has won SU & ATS in four straight USC-ORE games Points Scored - Allowed 26.5 (64) 19.8 (22) 11/6/10 ARIZONA ST * FAVORITE is 14-2 SU & 11-5 ATS in USC-AZS series since 92 Total YPG Gained - Allowed 389.1 (55) 340.5 (40) 11/13/10 at Arizona * ARIZONA is 1-4 SU but 5-0 ATS in its L5 games vs. USC YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.19 (22) 4.82 (23) 11/20/10 at Oregon St * HOME TEAM is on 6-1 SU & ATS run in ORS-USC series YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.95 (14) 3.65 (38) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.63 (36) 5.96 (16) 11/27/10 NOTRE DAME * FAVORITE is 5-0 SU & ATS in L5 USC-ND matchups at USC Avg. Time of Possession 29.17 (84) 12/4/10 at UCLA * HOME TEAM is 9-5 SU & 11-3 ATS in UCL-USC series since 96 Turnover Differential +0.0 (61) 3rd Down Conversion % 35.7% (88) 37.8% (45) Straight Up 11-2 11-2 12-1 9-4 43-9 (83%) * USC is 20-6 UNDER the total (+13.4 Units) in conference games since 07. The Average Score was USC 29.1, Overall ATS 7-6 7-6 8-5 4-9 26-26 (50%) OPPONENT 15.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at Washington St, 10/2 - WASHINGTON, 10/9 - at Stanford, at Home ATS 4-2 2-4 5-1 2-4 13-11 (54%) 10/16 - CALIFORNIA, 10/30 - OREGON, 11/6 - ARIZONA ST, 11/13 - at Arizona, 11/20 - at Oregon St, 12/4 - at Away/Neutral ATS 3-4 5-2 3-4 2-5 13-15 (46%) UCLA. vs Conference ATS 3-6 4-5 4-5 2-7 13-23 (36%) * USC is 13-3 UNDER the total (+9.7 Units) when coming off a win against the spread since 07. The Average Non-Conference ATS 4-0 3-1 4-0 2-2 13-3 (81%) Score was USC 29.2, OPPONENT 13.9. Potential spots for 2010: POTENTIALLY NUMEROUS GAMES as Favorite ATS 6-6 7-5 8-5 4-9 25-25 (50%) * USC is 10-17 ATS (-8.7 Units) in conference games since 07. The Average Score was USC 29.1, OPPONENT as Underdog ATS 1-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 1-1 (50%) 15.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at Washington St, 10/2 - WASHINGTON, 10/9 - at Stanford, 10/16 - Over-Under 5-8 3-10 4-8 5-8 17-34 (33%) CALIFORNIA, 10/30 - OREGON, 11/6 - ARIZONA ST, 11/13 - at Arizona, 11/20 - at Oregon St, 12/4 - at UCLA 9/2 at Arkansas 50-14 W -7 W 49 O 9/1 IDAHO 38-10 W -49 L 58.5 U 8/30 at Virginia 52-7 W -20.5 W 43 O 9/5 SAN JOSE ST 56-3 W -34 W 47 O 9/16 NEBRASKA 28-10 W -17 W 55.5 U 9/15 at Nebraska 49-31 W -10 W 50 O 9/13 OHIO ST 35-3 W -11.5 W 44.5 U 9/12 at Ohio St 18-15 W -7 L 45.5 U 9/23 at Arizona 20-3 W -21 L 46.5 U 9/22 WASHINGTON ST 47-14 W -25 W 63 U 9/25 at Oregon St 21-27 L -24 L 55.5 U 9/19 at Washington 13-16 L -20 L 53 U 9/30 at Washington St 28-22 W -14 L 49 O 9/29 at Washington 27-24 W -19.5 L 56.5 U 10/4 OREGON 44-10 W -16 W 56.5 U 9/26 WASHINGTON ST 27-6 W -45.5 L 57.5 U 10/7 WASHINGTON 26-20 W -19 L 48.5 U 10/6 STANFORD 23-24 L -39 L 57.5 U 10/11 ARIZONA ST 28-0 W -27.5 W 49.5 U 10/3 at California 30-3 W -4.5 W 45 U 10/14 ARIZONA ST 28-21 W -19 L 54.5 U 10/13 ARIZONA 20-13 W -21 L 56 U 10/18 at Washington St 69-0 W -41.5 W 56.5 O 10/17 at Notre Dame 34-27 W -9.5 L 51 O 10/28 at Oregon St 31-33 L -10.5 L 47 O 10/20 at Notre Dame 38-0 W -17 W 44.5 U 10/25 at Arizona 17-10 W -14.5 L 52.5 U 10/24 OREGON ST 42-36 W -21 L 52 O 11/4 at Stanford 42-0 W -29 W 49 U 10/27 at Oregon 17-24 L +3 L 60.5 U 11/1 WASHINGTON 56-0 W -44.5 W 56 T 10/31 at Oregon 20-47 L -3 L 48.5 O 11/11 OREGON 35-10 W -10 W 56 U 11/3 OREGON ST 24-3 W -17 W 46.5 U 11/8 CALIFORNIA 17-3 W -22 L 48 U 11/7 at Arizona St 14-9 W -12 L 45.5 U 11/18 CALIFORNIA 23-9 W -5.5 W 55 U 11/10 at California 24-17 W -4 W 50 U 11/15 at Stanford 45-23 W -23.5 L 48.5 O 11/14 STANFORD 21-55 L -11.5 L 58 O 11/25 NOTRE DAME 44-24 W -9.5 W 56 O 11/22 at Arizona St 44-24 W -3 W 51.5 O 11/29 NOTRE DAME 38-3 W -33.5 W 51 U 11/28 UCLA 28-7 W -13 W 47 U 12/2 at UCLA 9-13 L -12 L 47.5 U 12/1 UCLA 24-7 W -19.5 L 46.5 U 12/6 at UCLA 28-7 W -32 L 46.5 U 12/5 ARIZONA 17-21 L -7 L 50 U 1/1 vs. Michigan 32-18 W +2.5 W 47.5 O 1/1 vs. Illinois 49-17 W -13 W 48 O 1/1 vs. Penn St 38-24 W -10 W 44.5 O 12/26 vs. Boston College 24-13 W -7.5 W 45 U

WASHINGTON HUSKIES 2010 Schedule Strength: 46.17 (#2 of 120) WASHINGTON STATE COUGARS 2010 Schedule Strength: 43.75 (#11 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 10 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 50 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3-4 - Starters Returning: 9 Lettermen Returning: 50 Where: Seattle, WA Head Coach: Steve Sarkisian, 2nd year (5-7 SU) Conference: Pac 10 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 7-5 ATS Facility: Husky Stadium 9/4/10 at BYU * FAVORITE is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 BYU-WAS games at BYU 9/11/10 SYRACUSE 2009 Scoring Differential: -0.6 (#73 of 120) 9/18/10 NEBRASKA * NEBRASKA is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. WASHINGTON 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +1.6 (#61 of 120) 10/2/10 at USC * HOME TEAM is 9-5 SU & 10-4 ATS in USC-WAS series since 94 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 41 (#48 of 120) 10/9/10 ARIZONA ST * FAVORITE is on 6-0 SU & ATS run in L6 WAS-AZS matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 42.42 (#5 of 120) 10/16/10 OREGON ST * OREGON ST is on 6-0 SU & ATS run vs. WASHINGTON 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Arizona * UNDERDOG is 8-4 SU & 11-1 ATS in ARI-WAS series since 98 10/30/10 STANFORD * STANFORD is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games at WASHINGTON Points Scored - Allowed 26.1 (69) 26.7 (70) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 375.5 (62) 389.5 (79) 11/6/10 at Oregon * FAVORITE is on 7-0 SU & ATS run in L7 ORE-WAS matchups YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.73 (50) 6.17 (102) 11/13/10 UCLA * UCLA is 11-2 SU & 10-3 ATS vs. WASHINGTON since 97 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.28 (59) 4.52 (92) 11/27/10 at California * CAL-WAS series has gone 9-2 OVER the total since 92 YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.15 (60) 7.96 (100) Avg. Time of Possession 30.41 (51) 12/4/10 at Washington St * UNDERDOG is 13-3 ATS in WSU-WAS series since 94 Turnover Differential +0.3 (34) 3rd Down Conversion % 46.2% (12) 40.4% (69) Straight Up 5-7 4-9 0-12 5-7 14-35 (29%) * WASHINGTON is 2-11 ATS (-10.1 Units) on the road in conference games since 07. The Overall ATS 6-5 6-7 1-11 7-5 20-28 (42%) Average Score was WASHINGTON 16.9, OPPONENT 36. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at at Home ATS 2-4 3-4 1-6 5-2 11-16 (41%) USC, 10/23 - at Arizona, 11/6 - at Oregon, 11/27 - at California, 12/4 - at Washington St Away/Neutral ATS 4-1 3-3 0-5 2-3 9-12 (43%) * WASHINGTON is on a 6-19 ATS (-14.9 Units) skid at home vs. poor rushing teams - averaging vs Conference ATS 5-4 3-6 0-9 5-4 13-23 (36%) <=120 RYPG The Average Score was WASHINGTON 27.7, OPPONENT 23.7. Potential spots Non-Conference ATS 1-1 3-1 1-2 2-1 7-5 (58%) for 2010: 11/13 - UCLA as Favorite ATS 0-3 2-2 0-2 1-1 3-8 (27%) * WASHINGTON is on a 3-13 ATS (-11.3 Units) skid vs. marginal winning teams (Win Pct. 51% as Underdog ATS 6-2 4-5 1-9 6-4 17-20 (46%) to 60%) The Average Score was WASHINGTON 23, OPPONENT 27.1. Potential spots for 2010: Over-Under 4-8 9-4 6-5 6-6 25-23 (52%) 11/13 - UCLA 9/2 SAN JOSE ST 35-29 W -21 L 47 O 8/31 at Syracuse 42-12 W -3 W 43.5 O 8/30 at Oregon 10-44 L +14.5 L 61.5 U 9/5 LSU 23-31 L +17.5 W 52.5 O 9/9 at Oklahoma 20-37 L +17 T 42.5 O 9/8 BOISE ST 24-10 W +2.5 W 58.5 U 9/6 BYU 27-28 L +7.5 W 54.5 O 9/12 IDAHO 42-23 W -20.5 L 55 O 9/16 FRESNO ST 21-20 W +2.5 W 50 U 9/15 OHIO ST 14-33 L +3 L 40.5 O 9/13 OKLAHOMA 14-55 L +20.5 L 61.5 O 9/19 USC 16-13 W +20 W 53 U 9/23 UCLA 29-19 W +3 W 51 U 9/22 at Ucla 31-44 L +5.5 L 47.5 O 9/27 STANFORD 28-35 L -3.5 L 54.5 O 9/26 at Stanford 14-34 L +9 L 54 U 9/30 at Arizona 21-10 W +3 W 41 U 9/29 USC 24-27 L +19.5 W 56.5 U 10/4 at Arizona 14-48 L +23 L 61 O 10/3 at Notre Dame 30-37 L +12 W 55 O 10/7 at USC 20-26 L +19 W 48.5 U 10/13 at Arizona St 20-44 L +11.5 L 57 O 10/18 OREGON ST 13-34 L +16.5 L 59 U 10/10 ARIZONA 36-33 W +4 W 54 O 10/14 OREGON ST 17-27 L -8.5 L 46.5 U 10/20 OREGON 34-55 L +12 L 63 O 10/25 NOTRE DAME 7-33 L +9 L 55 U 10/17 at Arizona St 17-24 L +6.5 L 47.5 U 10/21 at California 24-31 L +24 W 53 O 10/27 ARIZONA 41-48 L -3.5 L 55 O 11/1 at USC 0-56 L +44.5 L 56 T 10/24 OREGON 19-43 L +9.5 L 55.5 O 10/28 ARIZONA ST 23-26 L +2 L 49.5 U 11/3 at Stanford 27-9 W -3 W 57 U 11/8 ARIZONA ST 19-39 L +13 L 49.5 O 11/7 at UCLA 23-24 L +4.5 W 52 U 11/4 at Oregon 14-34 L +14.5 L 49.5 U 11/10 at Oregon St 23-29 L +3 L 49.5 O 11/15 UCLA 7-27 L +6.5 L 47 U 11/14 at Oregon St 21-48 L +13.5 L 58 O 11/11 STANFORD 3-20 L -18.5 L 41 U 11/17 CALIFORNIA 37-23 W +6.5 W 58.5 O 11/22 at Washington St 13-16 L -6.5 L 47 U 11/28 WASHINGTON ST 30-0 W -25.5 W 60.5 U 11/18 at Washington St 35-32 W +8 W 43 O 11/24 WASHINGTON ST 35-42 L -6.5 L 63.5 O 12/6 at California 7-48 L +34.5 L 54 O 12/5 CALIFORNIA 42-10 W +6.5 W 57 U 12/1 at Hawaii 28-35 L +13 W 73 U Where: Pullman, WA Head Coach: Paul Wulff, 3rd year (3-22 SU) Conference: Pac 10 2009 RECORD: 1-11 SU, 5-7 ATS Facility: Martin Stadium 9/4/10 at Oklahoma St 9/11/10 MONTANA ST 2009 Scoring Differential: -26.5 (#120 of 120) 9/18/10 at SMU 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -23.0 (#119 of 120) 9/25/10 USC * L6 games of WSU-USC series at WASHINGTON ST are 6-0 OVER the total 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 17 (#112 of 120) 10/2/10 at UCLA * WASHINGTON ST is 6-3 SU & 7-2 ATS in its L9 games vs. UCLA 2009 Schedule Strength: 42.42 (#6 of 120) 10/9/10 OREGON * OVER the total is 6-1 in L7 games of WSU-ORE series 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 ARIZONA * UNDERDOG is on 2-4 SU but 6-0 ATS run in L6 WSU-ARI matchups at WASHINGTON ST 10/23/10 at Stanford * STANFORD is 10-6 SU & 12-4 ATS vs. WASHINGTON ST since 92 Points Scored - Allowed 12.0 (119) 38.5 (118) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 247.1 (119) 533.3 (120) 10/30/10 at Arizona St * L6 games of AZS-WSU series are 5-1 UNDER the total YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.08 (119) 7.40 (120) 11/6/10 CALIFORNIA * ROAD TEAM is 6-0 ATS in L6 WSU-CAL matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 2.40 (118) 5.95 (116) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 5.69 (109) 9.18 (120) 11/13/10 at Oregon St * OREGON ST is 7-3 SU & 9-1 ATS vs. WASHINGTON ST since 99 Avg. Time of Possession 26.3 (118) 12/4/10 WASHINGTON * UNDERDOG is 13-3 ATS in WSU-WAS series since 94 Turnover Differential -0.4 (87) 3rd Down Conversion % 23.8% (120) 41.7% (82) Straight Up 6-6 5-7 2-11 1-11 14-35 (29%) * WASHINGTON ST is on a 4-19 ATS (-16.9 Units) skid on the road after 2 or more consecutive Overall ATS 6-6 6-6 4-8 5-7 21-27 (44%) losses against the spread The Average Score was WASHINGTON ST 14.3, OPPONENT 37.2 at Home ATS 3-4 3-2 2-4 2-3 10-13 (43%) Potential spots for 2010: WATCH FOR ATS LOSING STREAKS. * WASHINGTON ST is on a 7-20 Away/Neutral ATS 3-2 3-4 2-4 3-4 11-14 (44%) ATS (-15 Units) skid on the road after scoring 14 points or less last game The Average Score was vs Conference ATS 5-4 5-4 3-6 3-6 16-20 (44%) WASHINGTON ST 17.8, OPPONENT 32. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at UCLA, 10/23 - at Non-Conference ATS 1-2 1-2 1-2 2-1 5-7 (42%) Stanford, 10/30 - at Arizona, 11/13 - at Oregon St as Favorite ATS 3-3 2-2 0-0 0-0 5-5 (50%) * WASHINGTON ST is on a 3-12 ATS (-10.2 Units) skid vs. marginal losing teams (Win Pct. 40% as Underdog ATS 3-3 4-4 4-8 5-7 16-22 (42%) to 49%) The Average Score was WASHINGTON ST 25.7, OPPONENT 30.9. Potential spots for Over-Under 8-4 6-6 7-5 4-8 25-23 (52%) 2010: 12/4 - WASHINGTON 9/2 at Auburn 14-40 L +14 L 50.5 O 9/1 at Wisconsin 21-42 L +14 L 49.5 O 8/30 OKLAHOMA ST 13-39 L +8 L 64 U 9/5 STANFORD 13-39 L +17 L 52.5 U 9/9 IDAHO 56-10 W -18 W 54 O 9/8 vs. San Diego St 45-17 W -13 W 52 O 9/6 CALIFORNIA 3-66 L +13.5 L 52 O 9/12 vs. Hawaii 20-38 L +2.5 L 55 O 9/16 BAYLOR 17-15 W -13 L 52.5 U 9/15 IDAHO 45-28 W -25 L 56 O 9/12 at Baylor 17-45 L +6.5 L 51.5 O 9/19 SMU 30-27 W +4 W 58 U 9/23 at Stanford 36-10 W -9 W 53 U 9/22 at Usc 14-47 L +25 L 63 U 9/20 PORTLAND ST 48-9 W - - - 9/26 at USC 6-27 L +45.5 W 57.5 U 9/30 USC 22-28 L +14 W 49 O 9/29 at Arizona 20-48 L +3 L 58.5 O 9/27 OREGON 14-63 L +21 L 56.5 O 10/3 at Oregon 6-52 L +35 L 55.5 O 10/7 at Oregon St 13-6 W -3 W 52.5 U 10/6 ARIZONA ST 20-23 L +9 W 63.5 U 10/4 at UCLA 3-28 L +15.5 L 54 U 10/10 ARIZONA ST 14-27 L +20.5 W 47 U 10/14 CALIFORNIA 3-21 L +9.5 L 54.5 U 10/13 at Oregon 7-53 L +20 L 69 U 10/11 at Oregon St 13-66 L +28.5 L 54.5 O 10/24 at California 17-49 L +36.5 W 60 O 10/21 OREGON 34-23 W +3.5 W 51.5 O 10/27 UCLA 27-7 W +5 W 55.5 U 10/18 USC 0-69 L +41.5 L 56.5 O 10/31 vs. Notre Dame 14-40 L +28 W 62 U 10/28 at UCLA 37-15 W +3 W 44.5 O 11/3 at California 17-20 L +16 W 63.5 U 11/1 at Stanford 0-58 L +28 L 51 O 11/7 at Arizona 7-48 L +32.5 L 56.5 U 11/4 ARIZONA 17-27 L -16 L 40 O 11/10 STANFORD 33-17 W -11.5 W 52.5 U 11/8 ARIZONA 28-59 L +39 W 56 O 11/14 UCLA 7-43 L +18 L 48 O 11/11 at Arizona St 14-47 L +2.5 L 49 O 11/17 OREGON ST 17-52 L -3.5 L 49 O 11/15 at Arizona St 0-31 L +35 W 56.5 U 11/21 OREGON ST 10-42 L +31 L 56 U 11/18 WASHINGTON 32-35 L -8 L 43 O 11/24 at Washington 42-35 W +6.5 W 63.5 O 11/22 WASHINGTON 16-13 W +6.5 W 47 U 11/28 at Washington 0-30 L +25.5 L 60.5 U 11/29 at Hawaii 10-24 L +27.5 W 51.5 U 106 WWW.STATFOX.COM

College Football Top 25 (Continued from Page 45)...are 118th nationally in turnover margin (minus-16). That negative luck tends to turn around. In the Way: Besides an unproven quarterback in Murray, who is as green as Al Gore, the big question in Athens is Will the new 3-4 defense create more turnovers? Will it be more effective? 20. PENN STATE NITTANY LIONS Strengths: Head coach Joe Paterno needs six wins to reach 400 victories in his Hall-of-Fame career. He figures to have a terrific ground game with Evan Royster running behind a proven offensive line. In the Way: Paterno lost serious star power from this past season s 11-win team. Quarterback Daryll Clark left State College too. Not helping are three brutal road games at Alabama, Iowa, and Ohio State. 21. GEORGIA TECH YELLOW JACKETS Strengths: Georgia Tech now has a defensive identity, thanks to the arrival of new coordinator Al Groh, who has been the head coach at Wake Forest, Virginia and the New York Jets. Groh installed a 3-4 defense that will allow Georgia Tech to be more aggressive. In the Way: Georgia Tech lost a pair of huge difference makers on both sides of the ball. Can the Yellow Jackets replace that big-play potential? Are ACC foes finally familiarizing themselves with Paul Johnson s triple option attack? 22. HOUSTON COUGARS Strengths: Houston s high-octane offense with quarterback Case Keenum (5,449 yards, 43 touchdowns and only nine picks should continue to hum along. That s because eight other starters are back on the attack for the Cougars (10-4), a team that led the nation in scoring (44 PPG). In the Way: Can Brian Stewart, a former NFL assistant coach for the Eagles, Cowboys, Chargers and Texans, fix the Cougars leaky defense? Does weak schedule (#98 of 120) hold Houston back? 23. OREGON STATE BEAVERS Strengths: The Rodgers brothers, and seven other starters, are back for head coach Mike Riley s offense. Remember, this team was a heartbreak loss at home to Oregon away from representing the Pac 10 in the Rose Bowl, and almost all of the big conference games this season will be in Corvallis. In the Way: Can Oregon State get off the mat in September? Recent early seasons have been a nightmare for Riley and this year s schedule features two high profile games versus non-bcs league powers in TCU & Boise State. 24. TEXAS A&M AGGIES Strengths: The Aggies offense will again light up scoreboards with quarterback Jerrod Johnson (3,579 yards passing) and running backs Christine Michael and Cyrus Gray coming back. Nine starters return on defense, including end Von Miller, who led the country in sacks with 17. In the Way: Texas A&M surrendered far too many big plays last season, so the question is Will new defensive coordinator Tim DeRuyter and his aggressive 3-4 scheme reverse that curse? 25. TEMPLE OWLS Strengths: Nope, you re not hallucinating. After winning nine games, recording their first winning season since 1990 and going to the Eagle Bank Bowl (the program s first bowl trip in three decades), the Owls figure to be the class of the MAC thanks to an excellent young head coach (Al Golden), the program s best running back since Paul Palmer in Bernard Pierce, and the fact that Temple possesses perhaps the biggest and most physical offensive line in the league. In the Way: The MAC seems to slip further and further down the college football ladder each season, and games against Connecticut and at Penn State in late September could doom the respect for the Owls early. The FoxSheets Power Searches The hottest thing in sports betting since the advent of the pointspread. Learn more: www.foxsheets.com WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 107

independents Preview ARMY BLACK KNIGHTS (2009 Record: 5-7) Despite finishing two games under.500, head coach Rich Ellerson s first season at Army had to be considered a success since the Black Knights hadn t won more than four contests in a campaign since 1997. With 16 starters returning, Army looks to be closer to contending for the Commander-in- Chief s Trophy that has been owned by Navy for nearly a decade The Black Knights picked up on Ellerson s triple-option attack quickly and ranked 16th in the country in rushing offense (203.6 YPG). But they scored just 18 offensive touchdowns, so it will be up to sophomore quarterback Trent Steelman to engineer more scoring drives. As a freshman, Steelman became the first West Point plebe to start every game. He put up modest but encouraging stat numbers. He will lead an offense that will mesh in several new skill position players, but boasts four starters returning to the front line The stop unit worked well in Ellerson s Double-Eagle Flex system, ranking fourth in the nation in pass defense (153.0 YPG) and 16th in total defense (305.2). Eight starters return, including the entire linebacker corps This season s team has the chance to be the best in over a decade, but the schedule is much tougher than last year s. Still, will one year of experience in Ellerson s complex schemes already under their belts, the Black Knights could possibly be bowl eligible before the Navy game. NAVY MIDSHIPMEN (2009 Record: 10-4) Navy covered mostly familiar territory in the 2009 season as it recorded its seventh-straight winning season and earned a seventh consecutive bowl berth (the Midshipmen beat Missouri, 35-13, in the Texas Bowl). What was unfamiliar was that head coach Ken Niumatalolo s squad did not lead the nation in rushing for a fifth straight time, instead falling to fourth with an average of 280.5 YPG The pieces are back that could help Navy regain its rushing title. Leading the way is quarterback Ricky Dobbs. Now ARMY BLACK KNIGHTS 2010 Schedule Strength: 31.15 (#102 of 120) a senior, he finished as only the third signal-caller in school history to rush and pass for 1,000 yards in a season with 1,203 and 1,031, respectively. He also set an NCAA record for rushing touchdowns by a quarterback with 27. The Middies return their top five rushers, but the line returns just two full-time starters The Midshipmen ranked a respectable 18th in the country in scoring defense (19.4 PPG) and 34th in total defense (335.2 YPG). They also have not give up a touchdown against the other two service academy teams. Coordinator Buddy Green has plenty of talent to work with, including five returning starters Navy should have no trouble winning its eighth straight Commander-in-Chief s Trophy and, as long as it is bowl eligible, will play in the Poinsettia Bowl. Postseason eligibility should not be an issue, and the Midshipmen could very well improve on last year s 10-win total. NOTRE DAME FIGHTING IRISH (2009 Record: 6-6) The roof caved in on the Charlie Weis era last November when the Fighting Irish dropped four games by a combined 17 points to stagger home with a 6-6 record. Notre Dame didn t accept a meager bowl invitation and dismissed Weis after five mostly disappointing seasons, replacing him with Brian Kelly, who guided Cincinnati to back-to-back Big East titles and BCS bowl games. He has a wealth of experience to work with on defense but question marks on offense following the early departures of star quarterback Jimmy Clausen and Biletnikoff Award winner Golden Tate to the NFL To say replacing a secondround draft pick in Clausen, who passed for 3,722 yards and 28 touchdowns with only four interceptions, presents a challenge is a serious understatement. Throw in the fact Kelly brings a spread concept to South Bend, and junior Dayne Crist has his work cut out. Crist has four games of experience. Notre Dame brings back the sources of almost 95 percent of its rushing yards, but the receiving corps has been depleted and only the two starting guards return to the front line The Irish defense faltered down the stretch in allowing 23, 27, 33 and 45 points over the season-ending four-game slide. The unit is going back to a 3-4 alignment after last year s experiment, and the return of eight starters should make good things happen The defense should pull its weight, but Kelly and offensive coordinator Charlie Molnar need to be creative if the attack is going to hold up its end of the bargain. The schedule will be challenging at times with seven bowl teams from a year ago, so additional mediocrity can be expected in what is a transitional season. Offense: Triple-Option - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: Double-Eagle Flex - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 49 Where: West Point, NY Head Coach: Rich Ellerson, 2nd year (5-7 SU) Conference: 1A-Independent 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 4-7 ATS Facility: Michie Stadium 9/4/10 at E Michigan * L2 games in EMU-ARM series went UNDER the total 9/11/10 HAWAII 2009 Scoring Differential: -6.6 (#93 of 120) 9/18/10 NORTH TEXAS * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 ARM-NTX games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -9.6 (#105 of 120) 9/25/10 at Duke * HOME TEAM is on 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS run in DUK-ARM series 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 21 (#106 of 120) 10/2/10 TEMPLE * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in ARM-TEM series 2009 Schedule Strength: 26.42 (#114 of 120) 10/9/10 at Tulane * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 TUL-ARM games 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 vs. Rutgers (East Rutherford, N.J.) * RUTGERS is on 6-1 SU & 7-0 ATS run vs. ARMY 10/30/10 VMI Points Scored - Allowed 15.3 (117) 21.9 (35) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 275.3 (117) 305.2 (16) 11/6/10 AIR FORCE * AIR FORCE is 6-0 SU & ATS in its L6 games at ARMY YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.38 (116) 5.04 (33) 11/13/10 at Kent St YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.12 (67) 3.90 (54) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 5.35 (116) 7.12 (61) 11/20/10 vs. Notre Dame (Bronx, N.Y.) Avg. Time of Possession 31.95 (11) 12/11/10 vs. Navy (Philadelphia, PA) * NAVY is 11-5 SU & 12-4 ATS vs. ARMY since 94 Turnover Differential +0.4 (29) 3rd Down Conversion % 26.7% (119) 37.6% (43) Straight Up 3-9 3-9 3-9 5-7 14-34 (29%) * ARMY is 1-10 ATS (-10 Units) revenging a loss against opponent since 07. The Average Score Overall ATS 3-8 4-6 6-5 4-7 17-26 (40%) was ARMY 7.2, OPPONENT 26.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at Duke, 10/2 - TEMPLE, 10/9 at Home ATS 0-4 2-2 2-3 1-4 5-13 (28%) - at Tulane, 10/16 - RUTGERS, 11/6 - AIR FORCE, 12/11 - at Navy Away/Neutral ATS 3-4 2-4 4-2 3-3 12-13 (48%) * ARMY is on a 7-21 ATS (-16.1 Units) skid on the road vs. poor passing teams averaging 150 vs Conference ATS 1-1 0-1 0-1 1-0 2-3 (40%) or less PYPG. The Average Score was ARMY 15.5, OPPONENT 29.4. Potential spots for 2010: Non-Conference ATS 2-7 4-5 6-4 3-7 15-23 (39%) 12/11 - at Navy as Favorite ATS 0-3 1-1 2-0 0-2 3-6 (33%) * ARMY is on a 12-25 ATS (-15.5 Units) skid revenging a loss where team scored less than 14 as Underdog ATS 3-5 3-5 4-5 4-5 14-20 (41%) points The Average Score was ARMY 16.4, OPPONENT 31.1. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - Over-Under 6-5 4-7 4-7 3-8 17-27 (39%) TEMPLE, 10/16 - RUTGERS, 11/6 - AIR FORCE, 12/11 - at Navy 9/2 at Arkansas St 6-14 L -4 L 41 U 9/1 vs. Akron 14-22 L +5.5 L 42 U 8/29 TEMPLE 7-35 L +7 L 40 O 9/5 at E Michigan 27-14 W +3.5 W 48 U 9/9 KENT ST 17-14 W -6.5 L 40 U 9/8 RHODE ISLAND 14-7 W - - - 9/6 NEW HAMPSHIRE 10-28 L - - - 9/12 DUKE 19-35 L +2 L 44 O 9/16 vs. Texas A&M 24-28 L +27.5 W 49 O 9/15 at Wake Forest 10-21 L +20.5 W 45 U 9/20 AKRON 3-22 L +10 L 47 U 9/19 BALL ST 24-17 W -9 L 42 U 9/23 at Baylor 27-20 W +13 W 41.5 O 9/22 at Boston College 17-37 L +26.5 W 45.5 O 9/27 at Texas A&M 17-21 L +27 W 44.5 U 9/26 at Iowa St 10-31 L +10.5 L 46.5 U 9/30 RICE 14-48 L -10 L 44.5 O 9/29 TEMPLE 37-21 W -6 W 45.5 O 10/4 at Tulane 44-13 W +18.5 W 43 O 10/3 TULANE 16-17 L -6 L 45 U 10/7 VMI 62-7 W - - - 10/6 TULANE 20-17 W -5 L 44.5 U 10/11 E MICHIGAN 17-13 W -2.5 W 45.5 U 10/10 VANDERBILT 16-13 W +10 W 37.5 U 10/14 at Connecticut 7-21 L +6 L 42.5 U 10/13 at C Michigan 23-47 L +13.5 L 54 O 10/18 at Buffalo 24-27 L +11 W 46 O 10/17 at Temple 13-27 L +10.5 L 36.5 O 10/21 TCU 17-31 L +10.5 L 40 O 10/20 at Georgia Tech 10-34 L +24 T 44.5 U 10/25 LOUISIANA TECH 14-7 W 0 W 41.5 U 10/23 RUTGERS 10-27 L +10.5 L 38.5 U 10/28 at Tulane 28-42 L +3.5 L 50.5 O 11/3 at Air Force 10-30 L +16.5 L 44.5 U 11/1 AIR FORCE 7-16 L +7.5 L 41 U 11/7 at Air Force 7-35 L +17 L 37.5 O 11/3 AIR FORCE 7-43 L +4.5 L 47.5 O 11/9 RUTGERS 6-41 L +19 L 49 U 11/8 at Rice 31-38 L +8.5 W 55.5 O 11/14 VMI 22-17 W -25 L - 11/18 at Notre Dame 9-41 L +29 L 54 U 11/17 TULSA 39-49 L +15.5 W 61.5 O 11/22 at Rutgers 3-30 L +17.5 L 43.5 U 11/21 at North Texas 17-13 W +1 W 53 U 12/2 vs. Navy 14-26 L +19 W 49 U 12/1 vs. Navy 3-38 L +13.5 L 64 U 12/6 vs. Navy 0-34 L +10 L 43 U 12/12 vs. Navy 3-17 L +14.5 W 41.5 U 108 WWW.STATFOX.COM

NAVY MIDSHIPMEN 2010 Schedule Strength: 34.23 (#80 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 109 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 37 Where: Annapolis, MD Head Coach: Ken Niumatalolo, 3rd year (18-10 SU) Conference: 1A-Independent 2009 RECORD: 10-4 SU, 6-6-1 ATS Facility: Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium 9/6/10 at Maryland 9/11/10 GA SOUTHERN 2009 Scoring Differential: +8.6 (#29 of 120) 9/18/10 at Louisiana Tech 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +7.8 (#31 of 120) 10/2/10 at Air Force * NAVY is 7-4 SU & 9-1 ATS vs. AIR FORCE since 99 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 39 (#56 of 120) 10/9/10 at Wake Forest * ROAD TEAM is 6-3 SU & 7-2 ATS in L9 WF-NAV matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 31.14 (#81 of 120) 10/16/10 SMU * FAVORITE has swept L3 NAV-SMU games at NAVY, both SU & ATS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 vs. Notre Dame (East Rutherford, N.J.) * NAVY is 2-15 SU but 12-5 ATS vs. NOTRE DAME since 92 10/30/10 DUKE * L4 NAV-DUK series games have gone OVER the total Points Scored - Allowed 28.0 (57) 19.4 (18) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 356.1 (77) 335.2 (34) 11/6/10 at E Carolina YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.36 (70) 5.48 (66) 11/13/10 C MICHIGAN YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.79 (21) 3.93 (60) 11/20/10 ARKANSAS ST YP Pass Gained - Allowed 9.62 (2) 7.09 (58) Avg. Time of Possession 33.91 (2) 12/11/10 vs. Army (Philadelphia, PA) * NAVY is 11-5 SU & 12-4 ATS vs. ARMY since 94 Turnover Differential +0.6 (15) 3rd Down Conversion % 45.9% (14) 31.2% (9) Straight Up 9-4 8-5 8-5 10-4 35-18 (66%) * NAVY is on a 32-9 ATS (+22.1 Units) run on the road vs. teams with a losing record The Average Overall ATS 7-5 5-7 6-6 6-6 24-24 (50%) Score was NAVY 31, OPPONENT 22.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/6 - at Maryland, 9/18 - at at Home ATS 1-3 1-4 2-2 2-2 6-11 (35%) Louisiana Tech, 10/9 - at Wake Forest Away/Neutral ATS 6-2 4-3 4-4 4-4 18-13 (58%) * NAVY is on a 17-2 ATS (+14.8 Units) run on the road vs. poor defensive teams - allowing >=5.9 vs Conference ATS 1-2 2-0 1-1 1-1 5-4 (56%) YPP The Average Score was NAVY 37.1, OPPONENT 21.3. Potential spots for 2010: 10/23 - vs. Non-Conference ATS 6-3 3-7 5-5 5-5 19-20 (49%) Notre Dame as Favorite ATS 4-4 2-5 2-1 2-5 10-15 (40%) * NAVY is 42-16 ATS (+24.4 Units) at home vs. poor ball control teams, 28 or less TOP minutes/ as Underdog ATS 3-1 3-2 4-5 4-1 14-9 (61%) game since 92. The Average Score was NAVY 21.9, OPPONENT 30.7. Potential spots for 2010: Over-Under 6-6 8-4 5-7 5-8 24-25 (49%) 10/2 - at Air Force, 10/9 - at Wake Forest, 11/6 - at E Carolina 9/2 E CAROLINA 28-23 W -12 L 50.5 O 8/31 at Temple 30-19 W -21 L 52.5 U 8/30 TOWSON 41-13 W - - - 9/5 at Ohio St 27-31 L +22 W 46.5 O 9/9 MASSACHUSETTS 21-20 W - - - 9/7 at Rutgers 24-41 L +16 L 49 O 9/5 at Ball St 23-35 L +6.5 L 64 U 9/12 LOUISIANA TECH 32-14 W -7 W 50.5 U 9/16 at Stanford 37-9 W -1 W 57 U 9/15 BALL ST 31-34 L -7 L 58 O 9/13 at Duke 31-41 L +2.5 L 57.5 O 9/19 at Pittsburgh 14-27 L +8 L 49.5 U 9/23 TULSA 23-24 L -4 L 49.5 U 9/22 DUKE 46-43 W -14 L 57 O 9/20 RUTGERS 23-21 W +5.5 W 59 U 9/26 W KENTUCKY 38-22 W -31 L 51 O 9/30 at Connecticut 41-17 W 0 W 42 O 9/29 AIR FORCE 31-20 W -2.5 W 55.5 U 9/27 at Wake Forest 24-17 W +17 W 53 U 10/3 AIR FORCE 16-13 W -3 T 48.5 U 10/7 at Air Force 24-17 W +2 W 49.5 U 10/10 at Pittsburgh 48-45 W +4 W 54 O 10/4 at Air Force 33-27 W +4.5 W 51.5 O 10/10 at Rice 63-14 W -10 W 56 O 10/14 RUTGERS 0-34 L -3 L 45.5 U 10/20 WAKE FOREST 24-44 L +2.5 L 61.5 O 10/18 PITTSBURGH 21-42 L +3 L 51 O 10/17 at SMU 38-35 W -7 L 53.5 O 10/24 WAKE FOREST 13-10 W +2.5 W 47.5 U 10/28 vs. Notre Dame 14-38 L +13.5 L 47 O 10/27 DELAWARE 52-59 L - - - 10/25 SMU 34-7 W -14 W 61.5 U 10/31 TEMPLE 24-27 L -6.5 L 41 O 11/4 at Duke 38-13 W -9.5 W 47 O 11/3 at Notre Dame 46-44 W +3.5 W 57.5 O 11/1 TEMPLE 33-27 W -8 L 44.5 O 11/7 at Notre Dame 23-21 W +13 W 56 U 11/11 at E Michigan 49-21 W -15 W 46 O 11/10 at North Texas 74-62 W -15.5 L 71 O 11/15 vs. Notre Dame 21-27 L +4.5 L 51.5 U 11/14 DELAWARE 35-18 W -21 L - 11/18 TEMPLE 42-6 W -31.5 W 55.5 U 11/17 N ILLINOIS 35-24 W -17.5 L 72 U 11/25 at N Illinois 16-0 W +2.5 W 51.5 U 11/28 at Hawaii 17-24 L -9 L 56 U 12/2 vs. Army 26-14 W -19 L 49 U 12/1 vs. Army 38-3 W -13.5 W 64 U 12/6 vs. Army 34-0 W -10 W 43 U 12/12 vs. Army 17-3 W -14.5 L 41.5 U 12/30 vs. Boston College 24-25 L +7.5 W 48 O 12/20 vs. Utah 32-35 L +8.5 W 63.5 O 12/20 vs. Wake Forest 19-29 L +3 L 44.5 O 12/31 vs. Missouri 35-13 W +6.5 W 54.5 U NOTRE DAME FIGHTING IRISH 2010 Schedule Strength: 40.85 (#33 of 120) Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 3-4 - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 42 Where: South Bend, IN Head Coach: Brian Kelly, 1st year Conference: 1A-Independent 2009 RECORD: 6-6 SU, 3-8-1 ATS Facility: Notre Dame Stadium 9/4/10 PURDUE * UNDERDOG is 4-13 SU but 11-5 ATS in ND-PUR series since 93 9/11/10 MICHIGAN * UNDERDOG is 10-4 SU & 12-2 ATS in ND-MIC series since 92 2009 Scoring Differential: +4.2 (#48 of 120) 9/18/10 at Michigan St * MICHIGAN ST is 9-5 SU & 11-2 ATS vs. NOTRE DAME since 94 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +7.1 (#35 of 120) 9/25/10 STANFORD * NOTRE DAME is 11-4 SU & ATS vs. STANFORD since 93 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 41 (#48 of 120) 10/2/10 at Boston College * UNDERDOG is 3-7 SU but 8-2 ATS in BC-ND series since 98 2009 Schedule Strength: 40.58 (#21 of 120) 10/9/10 PITTSBURGH * ROAD TEAM is on 4-1 SU & 4-0 ATS run in ND-PIT series 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 W MICHIGAN 10/23/10 vs. Navy (East Rutherford, N.J.) * NAVY is 2-15 SU but 12-5 ATS vs. NOTRE DAME since 92 Points Scored - Allowed 30.1 (32) 25.9 (63) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 473.0 (4) 397.8 (86) 10/30/10 TULSA YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.69 (7) 6.19 (103) 11/13/10 UTAH YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.84 (75) 4.75 (101) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 9.26 (5) 8.01 (103) 11/20/10 vs. Army (Bronx, N.Y.) Avg. Time of Possession 31.9 (13) 11/27/10 at USC * FAVORITE is 5-0 SU & ATS in L5 USC-ND matchups at USC Turnover Differential +0.3 (43) 3rd Down Conversion % 41.0% (46) 39.5% (57) Straight Up 10-3 3-9 7-6 6-6 26-24 (52%) * NOTRE DAME is on a 5-17 ATS (-13.7 Units) skid as favorites of 21.5 to 31 points The Average Overall ATS 4-8 5-7 7-6 3-8 19-29 (40%) Score was NOTRE DAME 32.3, OPPONENT 16. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - W MICHIGAN, at Home ATS 2-5 2-5 3-3 2-5 9-18 (33%) 11/20 - ARMY Away/Neutral ATS 2-3 3-2 4-3 1-3 10-11 (48%) * NOTRE DAME is on a 19-6 ATS (+12.4 Units) run on the road in October games The Average vs Conference ATS 2-0 0-1 1-0 0-1 3-2 (60%) Score was NOTRE DAME 33.3, OPPONENT 19.4. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at Boston Non-Conference ATS 2-8 5-6 6-6 3-7 16-27 (37%) College, 10/23 - NAVY as Favorite ATS 4-6 1-1 5-3 1-8 11-18 (38%) * NOTRE DAME is 1-8 ATS (-7.8 Units) at home in the second half of the season since 07. The as Underdog ATS 0-2 4-6 2-3 2-0 8-11 (42%) Average Score was NOTRE DAME 24.8, OPPONENT 29.3. Potential spots for 2010: 10/30 - Over-Under 7-6 3-9 6-7 6-6 22-28 (44%) TULSA, 11/13 - UTAH 9/2 at Georgia Tech 14-10 W -7.5 L 50.5 U 9/1 GEORGIA TECH 3-33 L +1 L 44 U 9/6 SAN DIEGO ST 21-13 W -21.5 L 46 U 9/5 NEVADA 35-0 W -14.5 W 62.5 U 9/9 PENN ST 41-17 W -9 W 47 O 9/8 at Penn St 10-31 L +17.5 L 43.5 U 9/13 MICHIGAN 35-17 W +1.5 W 37 O 9/12 at Michigan 34-38 L -3 L 46.5 O 9/16 MICHIGAN 21-47 L -5.5 L 49 O 9/15 at Michigan 0-38 L +9.5 L 45.5 U 9/20 at Michigan St 7-23 L +9 L 48 U 9/19 MICHIGAN ST 33-30 W -10.5 L 54 O 9/23 at Michigan St 40-37 W -3 T 58 O 9/22 MICHIGAN ST 14-31 L +9 L 44 O 9/27 PURDUE 38-21 W -2 W 48 O 9/26 at Purdue 24-21 W -6 L 59 U 9/30 PURDUE 35-21 W -15 L 59 U 9/29 at Purdue 19-33 L +21 W 56 U 10/4 STANFORD 28-21 W -6 W 48 O 10/3 WASHINGTON 37-30 W -12 L 55 O 10/7 STANFORD 31-10 W -29 L 55 U 10/6 at Ucla 20-6 W +21 W 50 U 10/11 at N Carolina 24-29 L +7.5 W 47 O 10/17 USC 27-34 L +9.5 W 51 O 10/21 UCLA 20-17 W -13 L 49.5 U 10/13 BOSTON COLLEGE 14-27 L +13.5 W 48 U 10/25 at Washington 33-7 W -9 W 55 U 10/24 BOSTON COLLEGE 20-16 W -8 L 53.5 U 10/28 vs. Navy 38-14 W -13.5 W 47 O 10/20 USC 0-38 L +17 L 44.5 U 11/1 PITTSBURGH 33-36 L -4 L 48 O 10/31 vs. Washington St 40-14 W -28 L 62 U 11/4 N CAROLINA 45-26 W -24.5 L 53.5 O 11/3 NAVY 44-46 L -3.5 L 57.5 O 11/8 at Boston College 0-17 L +3 L 46 U 11/7 NAVY 21-23 L -13 L 56 U 11/11 at Air Force 39-17 W -10 W 54 O 11/10 AIR FORCE 24-41 L +4 L 45.5 O 11/15 vs. Navy 27-21 W -4.5 W 51.5 U 11/14 at Pittsburgh 22-27 L +5 T 59 U 11/18 ARMY 41-9 W -29 W 54 U 11/17 DUKE 28-7 W -7 W 48.5 U 11/22 SYRACUSE 23-24 L -20 L 47.5 U 11/21 CONNECTICUT 30-33 L -6 L 58 O 11/25 at USC 24-44 L +9.5 L 56 O 11/24 at Stanford 21-14 W +5 W 45.5 U 11/29 at USC 3-38 L +33.5 L 51 U 11/28 at Stanford 38-45 L +10 W 64 O 1/3 vs. LSU 14-41 L +9 L 56 U 12/24 at Hawaii 49-21 W -2.5 W 48.5 O

mountain west Preview TCU had national championship aspirations at the conclusion of the 2009 regular season. It settled for a first-ever BCS bowl invitation to the Fiesta Bowl where it eventually lost to Boise State. A win there would have meant a second straight perfect season for a team from the Mountain West Conference. What made the Horned Frogs so dominant was a potent and much improved offense, and with most of that unit back for 2010, expectations are higher than ever in Fort Worth. A national title is now the goal, not the hope. Obviously with that comes the expectation of dominating the MWC, a boast to be challenged by the likes of Utah and Air Force. Perennial frontrunner BYU faces some major questions this season and could take a step or two back if those situations aren t resolved. Beyond that aforementioned group, several bowl game hopefuls await in San Diego State, Wyoming, and perhaps even Colorado State, a candidate for a most-improved team this season. In Las Vegas and Albuquerque, the home teams could be in for long seasons of rebuilding. AIR FORCE FALCONS Even after making three bowl appearances in a row under head coach Troy Calhoun, Air Force has basically remained stuck behind TCU, BYU and Utah in the Mountain West Conference. The Falcons also have been unable to overtake Navy in the Commander-in-Chief s Trophy series. So there s room for improvement, even within a generally solid, overachieving program The Falcons return 100 percent of their rushing and passing production from last season, meaning that quarterbacks Tim Jefferson and Connor Dietz are back and so is a stable of running backs, led by Jared Tew and Asher Clark. Kevin Fogler and Jonathan Warzeka are the leading receivers returning, among underclassmen who accounted for 90 percent of Air Force s receiving yardage. The projected starters include two seniors, two juniors and a sophomore Air Force ranked second in the conference and 11th in the country in total defense, allowing only 288.3 YPG. The loss of coordinator Tim DeRuyter to Texas A&M could hurt (Matt Wallerstedt was promoted to replace him), and so could the loss of six starters. However, the Falcons return two of the league s best cornerbacks Anthony Wright and Reggie Rembert along with safety Jon Davis The Falcons season could hinge on one game Sept. 11 versus BYU in Colorado Springs, where Air Force is 14-4 over the last three years. The Cougars are the only conference rivals that Air Force has failed to beat in 2009 STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P TCU 12-1-0 0.923 498 166 8-0-0 6-0-0 6-1-0 8-5-0 61.5% 5-6-1 BYU 11-2-0 0.846 461 280 7-1-0 4-2-0 7-0-0 6-7-0 46.2% 8-5-0 Utah 10-3-0 0.769 388 263 6-2-0 6-0-0 4-3-0 6-7-0 46.2% 5-8-0 Air Force 8-5-0 0.615 386 204 5-3-0 5-1-0 3-4-0 7-4-1 63.6% 6-6-0 Wyoming 7-6-0 0.538 238 355 4-4-0 3-3-0 4-3-0 9-3-0 75.0% 7-5-0 UNLV 5-7-0 0.417 298 389 3-5-0 4-3-0 1-4-0 3-8-0 27.3% 5-6-0 San Diego State 4-8-0 0.333 280 366 2-6-0 3-3-0 1-5-0 4-8-0 33.3% 5-6-0 New Mexico 1-11-0 0.083 196 431 1-7-0 1-5-0 0-6-0 5-7-0 41.7% 6-6-0 Colorado State 3-9-0 0.250 260 358 0-8-0 2-4-0 1-5-0 4-8-0 33.3% 5-6-0 Calhoun s three seasons, but will be. If the Falcons win that game, they would put themselves in position to challenge TCU and Utah for the league title. Otherwise, fourth place looks like the best they can do. BYU COUGARS BYU was overwhelmed in losses to Florida State and TCU, somewhat obscuring the fact that the Cougars won 10-plus games for the fourth year in a row. That run will be difficult to extend with a non-conference schedule that features a rematch with Florida State and conference visits to TCU and Utah, particularly with a new quarterback. This season will serve as a major test of the consistency of head coach Bronco Mendenhall s program There s a huge variable in BYU s program at the moment, even beyond the replacing of three-year starting quarterback Max Hall, who won a school record 32 games (against seven losses). Running back Harvey Unga, the Cougars career rushing leader, withdrew from BYU in April following an honor code violation, the school said. Unga hopes to be reinstated, which may or may not allow him to play football as a senior. Without Unga, the offense would be in trouble, even with four offensive line starters returning. The quarterback situation will be interesting. Junior Riley Nelson, and freshman Jake Heaps, a highly recruited prospect are the top candidates. BYU ranked second in the Mountain West and 20th in the country in total offense, averaging 427.0 YPG...Some rebuilding of the front seven is necessary, although BYU usually seems to find replacements on the line. The secondary should be solid. The Cougars ranked fourth in the conference and 28th in the country in total defense, allowing 329.1 YPG Unga s availability could make a difference of two or three wins. He s that good and that important. Even with him, the Cougars would have all kinds of trouble beating TCU or Utah on the road, so a third-place finish is about the ceiling. Without him, the Cougars will do well to finish in the top five and play in a bowl game for a sixth season in a row. 110 WWW.STATFOX.COM

COLORADO STATE RAMS After a successful first season for head coach Steve Fairchild, and a 3-0 start in 2009, everything came crashing down for Colorado State. The Rams lost their last nine games, including all eight Mountain West Conference contests. Fairchild still believes in what he s doing in the interest of long-term results, but it is obvious that immediate improvement is necessary if any of those goals are to be achieved The Rams were below average on both sides of the ball, but they were not horrible. After ranking sixth in the conference in total offense at 350.8 YPG, the Rams will likely introduce a new quarterback. Jon Eastman, now a senior, was overtaken by freshman Pete Thomas and redshirt freshman Niko Ranieri in spring drills. The Rams should have a strong running game again with Leonard Mason returning after rushing for 791 yards, so long as a young offensive line develops sufficiently. The receiving corps is a question mark, with fullback Zac Pauga s 25 receptions the most of any returning player Larry Kerr was the coordinator in Colorado State s glory years under coach Sonny Lubick, but has yet to restore the Rams defensive strength, although he made some progress last year. Almost duplicating the offense s rankings, Colorado State was sixth in the conference and 78th in the country in total defense, allowing 387.8 YPG. Linebacker Mychal Sisson is the star in Kerr s scheme, one of 10 returning starters, so moderate improvement appears likely, even if the Rams are not quite ready to become dominant defensively Fairchild says he likes the attitude, unity and leadership of this team, but it will have to produce some results for any belief to take hold, inside or outside of the program. Colorado State is not capable of beating any of the top four teams in the league, but fifth place is not out of reach. NEW MEXICO LOBOS Mike Locksley hardly could have scripted a worse first year as a head coach, even if he had wanted to. A lawsuit, a suspension and 11 losses added up to one long nightmare, leaving only this consolation: His second season can only be better, right?...veteran quarterback Donovan Porterie struggled in New Mexico s new spread offense, so it is just as well that the Lobos are moving on without him. New Mexico ranked eighth in the Mountain West Conference and 103rd in the country in total offense, averaging 315.3 YPG. The next quarterback, B.R. Holbrook, showed positive signs in the spring game, although he may struggle with little experience around him at the skill positions. Most of the six returning offensive starters are on the interior line The stop unit was just as bad as the offense. New Mexico ranked eighth in the conference and 100th in the country in total defense, allowing 418.3 YPG. The good news is that New Mexico had one incredibly productive player linebacker Carmen Messina and he s back along with five other starters By the end of the 2009 season, New Mexico was better than a 1-11 football team. Sure, that s not saying a lot, but it had to be encouraging that the Lobos actually had the ball in the last minute with a chance to upset BYU in November. Moving up from eighth place in the Mountain West Conference will remain difficult, but the Lobos have a chance to pick off about three wins, which would represent a big step forward in Locksley s second season. SAN DIEGO STATE AZTECS Brady Hoke inspired some hope in his first season as San Diego State s head coach, although the Aztecs faded in November. He will try to give the program more staying power this year. After winning just two Mountain West Conference games, but losing two others by a total of seven points, the Aztecs believe they can work their way into the league s top five and possibly even play in a bowl game, which they have not done since the conference began playing football in 1999. A total of 17 starters are back With quarterback Ryan Lindley as a third-year starter, the Aztecs are on the verge of offensive improvement. There s considerable work to be done offensively by the Aztecs after they ranked eighth in the conference and 86th in the country in total offense, averaging 341.9 YPG. The biggest deficiency is still in the running game, but Lindley produced big numbers, passing for 3,054 yards and 23 touchdowns, but he also threw 16 interceptions. He s blessed with outstanding receivers, with DeMarco Sampson and Vincent Brown forming the best tandem in the MWC The Aztecs ranked fifth in the conference and 74th in the country in total defense, allowing 382.0 YPG, outstanding work by coordinator Rocky Long, formerly New Mexico s long-time coach. Defensive shortcomings always held the Aztecs back, and the improvement on that side of the ball gives them a genuine chance of becoming more competitive One of the biggest mysteries in the Mountain West, if not all of college football, is why San Diego State can t build a better program. The Aztecs have the climate, recruiting base and facilities to compete at a much higher level than they do. There are signs of life under Hoke, but San Diego State is still a long way from the conference s top tier. Below the top four, though, everybody s fairly indistinguishable, so the Aztecs should get closer to the.500 mark. WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 111

TCU HORNED FROGS TCU s formerly perfect season ended in a disappointing loss to Boise State in the Fiesta Bowl. But the Horned Frogs dominated the Mountain West Conference on their way to their first Bowl Championship Series appearance, and have established themselves as the team to beat in the league until proven otherwise In 2009, TCU s offense caught up to its defense. That s saying something. If there was a shortcoming for the Horned Frogs program under head coach Gary Patterson, it was an inability to roll over opponents with an explosive offense and not rely so much on defense. That changed dramatically, as quarterback Andy Dalton became a highly effective passer to complement the stable of running backs. The Horned Frogs led the Mountain West and ranked seventh in the country in total offense, averaging 455.5 YPG. They should be just as good in 2010. Running backs Matthew Tucker and Ed Wesley return, and Dalton struggled in the Fiesta Bowl, but otherwise had a strong junior seasonthe line features tackle Marcus Cannon and center Jake Kirkpatrick, the only returning finalist for the 2009 Rimington Trophy TCU will miss end Jerry Hughes and linebacker Daryl Washington, after each were selected in the first two rounds of the NFL Draft. Yet the Horned Frogs never seem to drop off defensively from one year to the next, and their seven returning starters will ensure that they field another formidable unit. Linebacker Tank Carder is the headliner in TCU s 4-2-5 scheme, and TCU has fielded the country s top-ranked stop unit four times since 2000 Patterson wonders if this TCU team will be as hungry as the 2009 Horned Frogs. TCU s not shying away from high expectations a national championship remains a publicized goal. The conference title will likely be decided in November at Utah. Any national aspirations hinge on the season opener at Oregon State in Dallas Cowboys Stadium. UNLV REBELS UNLV s program was improving by the end of Mike Sanford s coaching tenure, but not sufficiently to give him a sixth season. So here comes Bobby Hauck, who will try to do what other highly successful Montana coaches could not do succeed elsewhere. Mick Dennehy was fired at Utah State and Joe Glenn was fired at Wyoming after posting records similar to Hauck s 80-17 mark with the Grizzlies. Thanks to Sanford, Hauck will have a better foundation at UNLV It took him a while, but Sanford eventually made his spread offense reasonably productive. The Rebels ranked fifth in the Mountain West Conference in total offense, averaging 351.3 YPG. As they transition to Hauck s offense that is more traditional and run-oriented, the Rebels do have some weapons. Among them are quarterback Omar Clayton, who passed for 2,230 yards and 13 touchdowns, running back Channing Trotter. Hauck will keep some elements of the spread, not wanting to make his personnel switch completely to a new scheme. Eight total starters are back on offense The defensive side of the ball was Sanford s downfall, and this is also where Hauck s expertise lies. Sanford repeatedly changed coordinators, only to produce the same dismal results. Last season, the Rebels ranked last in the conference and 115th in the country in total defense, allowing 456.2 YPG. Another eight returning starters will look to turn the tide Like every other team in the Mountain West, except unbeaten TCU and winless Colorado State, the Rebels were good enough to beat the teams below them in the standings and no match for the teams ahead of them. That s unlikely to change right away, meaning sixth or seventh place is probably the best Hauck can do in his first season. To make matters worse, the non-conference schedule is challenging. UTAH UTES Losing three games, and finishing third in the Mountain West Conference, represented a big drop off from Utah s 13-0 season of 2008 that was topped by a Sugar Bowl victory over Alabama. Then again, posting 10 victories during basically a rebuilding year and extending their bowl winning streak to eight games made the season successful for the Utes. With quarterback Jordan Wynn now an established starter as a sophomore, the Utes expect to challenge TCU for the conference title Head coach Kyle Whittingham showed he was not satisfied with just getting by last season when the Utes were 6-1. He switched the play-calling assignments within his staff for the eighth game and changed quarterbacks at halftime of that contest. The Utes still lost later in the season at TCU and BYU, but the way the offense played in a Poinsettia Bowl victory over California justified the moves and set up the Utes for big things in 2010. Utah should have an excellent running game to complement Wynn. Caleb Schlauderaff and Zane Taylor will lead a solid offensive line, but the wide receivers are mostly inexperienced The Utes were vulnerable against the run in their losses to Oregon, TCU and BYU, but they responded with a strong effort against Cal in the Poinsettia Bowl. Utah finished third in the Mountain West in total defense, allowing 315.9 YPG. Utah lost most of its defensive playmakers, but everything suggests that Whittingham and coordinator Kalani Sitake will field another solid unit, led by four returning starters The Utes play the kind of ambitious non-conference schedule that could either get them some national attention 112 WWW.STATFOX.COM

or leave them with a mediocre record. Yet no matter what happens in those games, they should contend for the MWC championship, considering that TCU and BYU will come to Salt Lake City. WYOMING COWBOYS All the Cowboys did was beat the bottom four teams in the Mountain West Conference, while struggling offensively against the top four clubs. Yet a.500 record was sufficient to get them into a bowl game, and they gained some credibility with a 35-28, double-overtime victory over Fresno State in the New Mexico Bowl. The Cowboys will try to make another upward move, hoping that their spread offense becomes effective enough for them to knock off a team in the top tier of the league As a freshman, quarterback Austyn Carta-Samuels used his athletic ability to make plays in Wyoming s spread offense. Carta-Samuels should become more of a proficient, complete quarterback as he develops in head coach Dave Christensen s system. Wide receiver David Leonard returns after catching 77 passes, and Christensen believes his team will be improved in the areas of wide receiver and offensive line The Cowboys lost three linemen, making coordinator Marty English s move to a 4-3 scheme seem curious. However, AIR FORCE FALCONS 2010 Schedule Strength: 35.33 (#74 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 5 Defense: 3-4 - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 45 Where: Colorado Springs, CO Head Coach: Troy Calhoun, 4th year (25-14 SU) Conference: Mountain West 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 7-4-1 ATS Facility: Falcon Stadium 9/4/10 NORTHWESTERN ST 9/11/10 BYU * BYU is 6-0 SU & ATS in its L6 games vs. AIR FORCE 2009 Scoring Differential: +14.0 (#14 of 120) 9/18/10 at Oklahoma 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +10.6 (#23 of 120) 9/25/10 at Wyoming * ROAD TEAM is 9-3 ATS in WYO-AF series since 98 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 44 (#35 of 120) 10/2/10 NAVY * NAVY is 7-4 SU & 9-1 ATS vs. AIR FORCE since 99 2009 Schedule Strength: 30.69 (#83 of 120) 10/9/10 COLORADO ST * L3 AF-CSU series games have gone OVER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at San Diego St * UNDERDOG is 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS in L8 SDS-AF matchups at SAN DIEGO ST 10/23/10 at TCU * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 TCU-AF games Points Scored - Allowed 29.7 (36) 15.7 (10) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 371.8 (66) 288.3 (11) 10/30/10 UTAH * UNDERDOG is 7-6 SU & 12-1 ATS in AF-UTA series since 94 YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.99 (100) 4.73 (18) 11/6/10 at Army * AIR FORCE is 6-0 SU & ATS in its L6 games at ARMY YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.52 (41) 3.75 (44) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.51 (44) 6.12 (22) 11/13/10 NEW MEXICO * AIR FORCE is 5-1 SU & 6-0 ATS in its L6 games vs. NEW MEXICO Avg. Time of Possession 32.32 (9) 11/18/10 at UNLV * HOME TEAM is 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 NLV-AF matchups Turnover Differential +1.7 (1) 3rd Down Conversion % 43.6% (24) 32.9% (16) Straight Up 4-8 9-4 8-5 8-5 29-22 (57%) * AIR FORCE is 11-2 ATS (+8.8 Units) vs. teams with a losing record since 07. The Average Score Overall ATS 4-8 9-3 7-5 7-4 27-20 (57%) was AIR FORCE 33.6, OPPONENT 16.2. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - COLORADO ST, 10/16 - at at Home ATS 1-5 5-0 3-2 3-2 12-9 (57%) San Diego St, 11/6 - at Army, 11/13 - NEW MEXICO, 11/18 - at UNLV Away/Neutral ATS 3-3 4-3 4-3 4-2 15-11 (58%) * AIR FORCE is on a 6-19 ATS (-14.9 Units) skid vs. excellent passing teams averaging 275 or more vs Conference ATS 2-6 7-1 5-3 5-3 19-13 (59%) PYPG. The Average Score was AIR FORCE 25.6, OPPONENT 33.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 Non-Conference ATS 2-2 2-2 2-2 2-1 8-7 (53%) - BYU, 9/18 - at Oklahoma as Favorite ATS 3-4 5-0 4-2 4-2 16-8 (67%) * AIR FORCE is 13-4 ATS (+8.6 Units) as favorites since 07. The Average Score was AIR FORCE as Underdog ATS 1-4 4-3 3-3 3-2 11-12 (48%) 31.3, OPPONENT 15. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at Wyoming, 10/2 - NAVY, 10/9 - COLORADO Over-Under 6-6 6-6 7-5 6-6 25-23 (52%) ST, 10/16 - at San Diego St, 10/30 - UTAH, 11/6 - at Army, 11/13 - NEW MEXICO, 11/18 - at UNLV 9/9 at Tennessee 30-31 L +20 W 48 O 9/1 S CAROLINA ST 34-3 W - - - 8/30 S UTAH 41-7 W - - - 9/5 NICHOLLS ST 72-0 W - - - 9/23 at Wyoming 31-24 W -1 W 46 O 9/8 at Utah 20-12 W +7 W 46.5 U 9/6 at Wyoming 23-3 W +3 W 42.5 U 9/12 at Minnesota 13-20 L +3 L 49.5 U 9/30 NEW MEXICO 24-7 W -13.5 W 53 U 9/13 TCU 20-17 W +8.5 W 42.5 U 9/13 vs. Houston 31-28 W +2 W 51.5 O 9/19 at New Mexico 37-13 W -16.5 W 45.5 O 10/7 NAVY 17-24 L -2 L 49.5 U 9/22 at Byu 6-31 L +14 L 54 U 9/20 UTAH 23-30 L +9.5 W 50.5 O 9/26 SAN DIEGO ST 26-14 W -17 L 52.5 U 10/12 COLORADO ST 24-21 W -6.5 L 46 U 9/29 at Navy 20-31 L +2.5 L 55.5 U 10/4 NAVY 27-33 L -4.5 L 51.5 O 10/3 at Navy 13-16 L +3 T 48.5 U 10/21 at San Diego St 12-19 L -10 L 46 U 10/6 UNLV 31-14 W -5.5 W 44 O 10/11 at San Diego St 35-10 W -10.5 W 48 U 10/10 TCU 17-20 L +10 W 43 U 10/28 BYU 14-33 L +9.5 L 57 U 10/13 at Colorado St 45-21 W +2.5 W 45.5 O 10/18 at UNLV 29-28 W -3.5 L 52 O 10/17 WYOMING 10-0 W -11.5 L 45 U 11/3 at Army 43-7 W -4.5 W 47.5 O 10/20 WYOMING 20-12 W -2.5 W 46.5 U 10/23 NEW MEXICO 23-10 W -4 W 44.5 U 10/24 at Utah 16-23 L +9 W 43 U 11/11 NOTRE DAME 17-39 L +10 L 54 O 10/25 at New Mexico 31-34 L +6.5 W 47.5 O 11/1 at Army 16-7 W -7.5 W 41 U 10/31 at Colorado St 34-16 W -7 W 45 O 11/18 UTAH 14-17 L +1.5 L 51 U 11/3 ARMY 30-10 W -16.5 W 44.5 U 11/8 COLORADO ST 38-17 W -10.5 W 51.5 O 11/7 ARMY 35-7 W -17 W 37.5 O 11/24 at UNLV 39-42 L -10 L 46 O 11/10 at Notre Dame 41-24 W -4 W 45.5 O 11/15 BYU 24-38 L +3.5 L 52 O 11/14 UNLV 45-17 W -17 W 47 O 12/2 at TCU 14-38 L +17 L 49 O 11/17 SAN DIEGO ST 55-23 W -13 W 53 O 11/22 at TCU 10-44 L +20.5 L 42 O 11/21 at BYU 21-38 L +9 L 47.5 O 12/31 vs. California 36-42 L +4 L 57 O 12/31 vs. Houston 28-34 L +5.5 L 65 U 12/31 vs. Houston 47-20 W +4.5 W 65.5 O WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 113 shifting linebackers Gabe Knapton and Josh Biezuns to end positions will bolster the line. Brian Hendricks remains a productive linebacker and the Cowboys are solid in the secondary with Chris Prosinski at safety and brothers Tashaun and Marcell Gipson at cornerback Wyoming will finish 6-6 once again. The Cowboys are easier to pin down than any other Mountain West Conference team, because their non-conference schedule is starkly divided with probable wins over Southern Utah and Toledo and likely losses to Texas and Boise State, and they still fit in the middle of the league. Only if their offense makes huge strides can they hope to upset any of the four teams in front of them and go 7-5 or better. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH TCU Air Force Utah San Diego State BYU Wyoming Colorado State New Mexico UNLV

BYU COUGARS 2010 Schedule Strength: 37.17 (#62 of 120) COLORADO STATE RAMS 2010 Schedule Strength: 36.33 (#68 of 120) Offense: Pro Set - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 3-4 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 45 Offense: Pro - Starters Returning: 4 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 10 Lettermen Returning: 41 Where: Provo, UT Head Coach: Bronco Mendenhall, 6th year (49-15 SU) Conference: Mountain West 2009 RECORD: 11-2 SU, 6-7 ATS Facility: LaVell Edwards Stadium 9/4/10 WASHINGTON * FAVORITE is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 BYU-WAS games at BYU 9/11/10 at Air Force * BYU is 6-0 SU & ATS in its L6 games vs. AIR FORCE 2009 Scoring Differential: +13.9 (#15 of 120) 9/18/10 at Florida St * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 ATS in L2 FSU-BYU games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +13.6 (#13 of 120) 9/25/10 NEVADA * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 BYU-NEV games 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 48 (#20 of 120) 10/1/10 at Utah St * L3 UTS-BYU series games have gone UNDER the total 2009 Schedule Strength: 34.85 (#63 of 120) 10/9/10 SAN DIEGO ST * FAVORITE is 11-2 SU & 9-4 ATS in BYU-SDS series since 95 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at TCU * TCU is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. BYU 10/23/10 WYOMING * BYU is 6-0 SU & ATS in its L6 games vs. WYOMING Points Scored - Allowed 35.5 (10) 21.5 (29) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 427.0 (20) 329.1 (28) 11/6/10 UNLV * ROAD TEAM is 8-5 SU & 10-3 ATS in BYU-NLV series since 96 YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.24 (17) 4.92 (29) 11/13/10 at Colorado St * UNDERDOG is on 2-4 SU but 5-1 ATS run in L6 CSU-BYU matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.03 (68) 3.39 (22) 11/20/10 NEW MEXICO * ROAD TEAM is on 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS run in BYU-NM series YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.73 (8) 6.35 (32) Avg. Time of Possession 30.85 (35) 11/27/10 at Utah * UNDERDOG is 7-10 SU but 13-4 ATS in UTA-BYU series since 93 Turnover Differential +0.0 (61) 3rd Down Conversion % 56.0% (1) 38.3% (52) Straight Up 11-2 11-2 10-3 11-2 43-9 (83%) * BYU is on a 7-21 ATS (-16.1 Units) skid vs. teams giving up 31 or more PPG The Average Overall ATS 10-3 6-6 3-9 6-7 25-25 (50%) Score was BYU 35.6, OPPONENT 24. Potential spots for 2010: 10/1 - at Utah St, 11/6 - UNLV, at Home ATS 5-1 3-2 2-3 1-5 11-11 (50%) 11/20 - NEW MEXICO Away/Neutral ATS 5-2 3-4 1-6 5-2 14-14 (50%) * BYU is 3-13 ATS (-11.3 Units) after scoring 37 points or more last game since 07. The Average vs Conference ATS 6-2 5-3 2-6 3-5 16-16 (50%) Score was BYU 30.9, OPPONENT 24. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at Air Force, 10/16 - at TCU, Non-Conference ATS 4-1 1-3 1-3 3-2 9-9 (50%) 11/13 - at Colorado St, 11/20 - NEW MEXICO as Favorite ATS 8-2 6-5 3-9 4-6 21-22 (49%) * BYU is on a 3-12 ATS (-10.2 Units) skid at home vs. poor rushing defenses - allowing >=200 as Underdog ATS 2-1 0-1 0-0 2-1 4-3 (57%) RYPG The Average Score was BYU 40.2, OPPONENT 24.9. Potential spots for 2010: 11/6 - Over-Under 8-5 4-8 6-6 8-5 26-24 (52%) UNLV 9/2 at Arizona 13-16 L +7 W 53.5 U 9/1 ARIZONA 20-7 W -3.5 W 47.5 U 8/30 N IOWA 41-17 W - - - 9/5 vs. Oklahoma 14-13 W +22 W 65 U 9/9 TULSA 49-24 W -5.5 W 53 O 9/8 at Ucla 17-27 L +8.5 L 47.5 U 9/6 at Washington 28-27 W -7.5 L 54.5 O 9/12 at Tulane 54-3 W -18.5 W 52.5 O 9/16 at Boston College 23-30 L +6 L 52 O 9/15 at Tulsa 47-55 L -6.5 L 51.5 O 9/13 UCLA 59-0 W -8.5 W 51 O 9/19 FLORIDA ST 28-54 L -8.5 L 54 O 9/23 UTAH ST 38-0 W -25 W 48.5 U 9/22 AIR FORCE 31-6 W -14 W 54 U 9/20 WYOMING 44-0 W -28 W 52 U 9/26 COLORADO ST 42-23 W -19.5 L 56 O 9/28 at TCU 31-17 W +6.5 W 47 O 9/29 at New Mexico 31-24 W -4 W 53.5 O 10/3 at Utah St 34-14 W -28.5 L 60 U 10/2 UTAH ST 35-17 W -24 L 62.5 U 10/7 SAN DIEGO ST 47-17 W -28 W 50 O 10/13 at Unlv 24-14 W -11.5 L 52.5 U 10/11 NEW MEXICO 21-3 W -22 L 48 U 10/10 at UNLV 59-21 W -17 W 64.5 O 10/21 UNLV 52-7 W -28 W 55.5 O 10/20 E WASHINGTON 42-7 W - - - 10/16 at TCU 7-32 L +1.5 L 44 U 10/17 at San Diego St 38-28 W -17 L 54 O 10/28 at Air Force 33-14 W -9.5 W 57 U 11/3 COLORADO ST 35-16 W -20.5 L 54 U 10/25 UNLV 42-35 W -23 L 62.5 O 10/24 TCU 7-38 L +2.5 L 51 U 11/4 at Colorado St 24-3 W -14 W 49 U 11/8 TCU 27-22 W -7 L 46.5 O 11/1 at Colorado St 45-42 W -16 L 59.5 O 11/7 at Wyoming 52-0 W -13.5 W 49 O 11/9 WYOMING 55-7 W -18 W 45 O 11/17 at Wyoming 35-10 W -10 W 45.5 U 11/8 SAN DIEGO ST 41-12 W -36 L 65.5 U 11/14 at New Mexico 24-19 W -27 L 57.5 U 11/18 NEW MEXICO 42-17 W -27 L 52 O 11/24 UTAH 17-10 W -4.5 W 49.5 U 11/15 at Air Force 38-24 W -3.5 W 52 O 11/21 AIR FORCE 38-21 W -9 W 47.5 O 11/25 at Utah 33-31 W -10.5 L 54.5 O 12/1 at San Diego St 48-27 W -16.5 W 58.5 O 11/22 at Utah 24-48 L +6.5 L 56 O 11/28 UTAH 26-23 W -8 L 55.5 U 12/21 vs. Oregon 38-8 W -3 W 62 U 12/22 vs. Ucla 17-16 W -6 L 47 U 12/20 vs. Arizona 21-31 L +3 L 62 U 12/22 vs. Oregon St 44-20 W +2.5 W 58 O Where: Fort Collins, CO Head Coach: Steve Fairchild, 3rd year (10-15 SU) Conference: Mountain West 2009 RECORD: 3-9 SU, 4-8 ATS Facility: Hughes Stadium 9/4/10 vs. Colorado (Denver, CO) * UNDERDOG is 6-7 SU but 10-3 ATS in CSU-COL series since 96 9/11/10 at Nevada * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 NEV-CSU games 2009 Scoring Differential: -8.2 (#102 of 120) 9/18/10 at Miami Ohio 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -6.9 (#93 of 120) 9/25/10 IDAHO 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 24 (#95 of 120) 10/2/10 TCU * L6 games of CSU-TCU series are 5-1 UNDER the total 2009 Schedule Strength: 32.25 (#76 of 120) 10/9/10 at Air Force * L3 AF-CSU series games have gone OVER the total 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 UNLV * HOME TEAM is 4-3 SU & 6-1 ATS in L7 CSU-NLV matchups 10/23/10 at Utah * FAVORITE is on 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS run in L6 UTA-CSU matchups Points Scored - Allowed 21.7 (97) 29.8 (93) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 350.8 (79) 387.8 (78) 10/30/10 NEW MEXICO * UNDERDOG is 7-3 SU & 10-0 ATS in L10 CSU-NM matchups YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.69 (54) 5.70 (79) 11/6/10 at San Diego St * UNDERDOG is on 5-1 SU & 6-0 ATS run in L6 SDS-CSU matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.16 (65) 4.21 (76) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.65 (34) 7.40 (82) 11/13/10 BYU * UNDERDOG is on 2-4 SU but 5-1 ATS run in L6 CSU-BYU matchups Avg. Time of Possession 30.01 (62) 11/20/10 at Wyoming * ROAD TEAM is 10-8 SU & 12-6 ATS in WYO-CSU series since 92 Turnover Differential +0.1 (58) 3rd Down Conversion % 37.3% (77) 55.0% (120) Straight Up 4-8 3-9 7-6 3-9 17-32 (35%) * COLORADO ST is on a 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) run at home vs. teams scoring 34 or more PPG Overall ATS 4-7 5-6 7-5 4-8 20-26 (43%) The Average Score was COLORADO ST 27, OPPONENT 26.3. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at Home ATS 1-3 2-3 5-0 2-4 10-10 (50%) TCU, 11/13 - BYU Away/Neutral ATS 3-4 3-3 2-5 2-4 10-16 (38%) * Over the L2 seasons, COLORADO ST is 1-10 ATS (-10 Units) coming off a loss against a vs Conference ATS 2-6 4-4 5-3 2-6 13-19 (41%) conference rival. The Average Score was COLORADO ST 20.8, OPPONENT 32.6. Potential Non-Conference ATS 2-1 1-2 2-2 2-2 7-7 (50%) spots for 2010: 9/18 - at Miami Ohio, 10/9 - at Air Force, 10/16 - UNLV, 11/20 - at Wyoming as Favorite ATS 1-2 1-2 1-1 0-4 3-9 (25%) * Over the L2 seasons, COLORADO ST is 0-7 ATS (-7.7 Units) on the road when coming off a as Underdog ATS 3-5 4-4 6-4 4-3 17-16 (52%) straight up loss. The Average Score was COLORADO ST 21.3, OPPONENT 37.1. Potential spots Over-Under 3-8 5-5 7-5 5-6 20-24 (45%) for 2010: 9/11 - at Nevada, 9/18 - at Miami Ohio, 10/9 - at Air Force, 11/20 - at Wyoming 9/2 WEBER ST 30-6 W - - - 9/1 vs. Colorado 28-31 L +2.5 L 45.5 O 8/31 vs. Colorado 17-38 L +13.5 L 56 U 9/6 at Colorado 23-17 W +13 W 50.5 U 9/9 vs. Colorado 14-10 W 0 W 43 U 9/8 CALIFORNIA 28-34 L +14 W 62 T 9/6 SACRAMENTO ST 23-20 W - - - 9/12 WEBER ST 24-23 W -13.5 L - 9/16 at Nevada 10-28 L +3.5 L 51 U 9/22 at Houston 27-38 L +6.5 L 64.5 O 9/20 HOUSTON 28-25 W +5.5 W 62.5 U 9/19 NEVADA 35-20 W +5 W 57 U 9/30 at Fresno St 35-23 W +14.5 W 42.5 O 9/29 at Tcu 12-24 L +9.5 L 45.5 U 9/27 at California 7-42 L +28 L 59 U 9/26 at BYU 23-42 L +19.5 W 56 O 10/7 UNLV 28-7 W -16 W 41.5 U 10/6 SAN DIEGO ST 20-24 L -13.5 L 58 U 10/4 UNLV 41-28 W -1.5 W 51.5 O 10/3 at Idaho 29-31 L -4.5 L 57 O 10/12 at Air Force 21-24 L +6.5 W 46 U 10/13 AIR FORCE 21-45 L -2.5 L 45.5 O 10/11 TCU 7-13 L +17 W 45.5 U 10/10 UTAH 17-24 L +9 W 50.5 U 10/21 at Wyoming 0-24 L +5 L 39.5 U 10/20 at Unlv 48-23 W +3 W 47.5 O 10/18 at Utah 16-49 L +21 L 49.5 O 10/17 at TCU 6-44 L +22.5 L 50.5 U 10/28 NEW MEXICO 19-20 L -6 L 43.5 U 10/27 UTAH 3-27 L +5 L 51.5 U 10/25 at San Diego St 38-34 W -7.5 L 53.5 O 10/24 SAN DIEGO ST 28-42 L -8 L 50.5 O 11/4 BYU 3-24 L +14 L 49 U 11/3 at Byu 16-35 L +20.5 W 54 U 11/1 BYU 42-45 L +16 W 59.5 O 10/31 AIR FORCE 16-34 L +7 L 45 O 11/11 at Utah 22-35 L +12 L 43 O 11/10 at New Mexico 23-26 L +9 W 51 U 11/8 at Air Force 17-38 L +10.5 L 51.5 O 11/7 at UNLV 16-35 L +2 L 62 U 11/25 TCU 14-45 L +9.5 L 40 O 11/17 GA SOUTHERN 42-34 W - - - 11/15 NEW MEXICO 20-6 W +3.5 W 51 U 11/21 at New Mexico 27-29 L -3.5 L 54 O 12/2 at San Diego St 6-17 L -1 L 42 U 11/23 WYOMING 36-28 W -3.5 W 51 O 11/22 at Wyoming 31-20 W +2 W 47 O 11/27 WYOMING 16-17 L -2.5 L 48.5 U 12/20 vs. Fresno St 40-35 W +1.5 W 61 O 114 WWW.STATFOX.COM

NEW MEXICO LOBOS 2010 Schedule Strength: 38.83 (#45 of 120) SAN DIEGO STATE AZTECS 2010 Schedule Strength: 33.83 (#82 of 120) Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 40 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 3-3-5 - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 45 Where: Albuquerque, NM Head Coach: Mike Locksley, 2nd year (1-11 SU) Conference: Mountain West 2009 RECORD: 1-11 SU, 5-7 ATS Facility: University Stadium 9/4/10 at Oregon 9/11/10 TEXAS TECH * TEXAS TECH is 7-1 SU & 6-2 ATS in its L8 games vs. NEW MEXICO 2009 Scoring Differential: -19.6 (#114 of 120) 9/18/10 UTAH * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 NM-UTA games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -17.4 (#113 of 9/25/10 at UNLV * L3 NLV-NM series games have gone UNDER the total 120) 10/2/10 UTEP * HOME TEAM has won SU & ATS in four straight NM-UTP games 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 21 (#106 of 120) 10/9/10 at New Mexico St * ROAD TEAM is 8-11 SU but 15-4 ATS in NMS-NM series since 92 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 SAN DIEGO ST * NEW MEXICO is 10-5 SU & 13-2 ATS vs. SAN DIEGO ST since 95 10/30/10 at Colorado St * UNDERDOG is 7-3 SU & 10-0 ATS in L10 CSU-NM matchups Points Scored - Allowed 16.3 (113) 35.9 (113) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 315.3 (103) 418.3 (100) 11/6/10 WYOMING * FAVORITE is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 NM-WYO games at NEW MEXICO YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.55 (111) 5.75 (82) 11/13/10 at Air Force * AIR FORCE is 5-1 SU & 6-0 ATS in its L6 games vs. NEW MEXICO YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.33 (105) 3.89 (53) 11/20/10 at BYU * ROAD TEAM is on 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS run in BYU-NM series YP Pass Gained - Allowed 5.49 (115) 8.35 (113) Avg. Time of Possession 28.08 (104) 11/27/10 TCU * FAVORITE is 7-0 SU & 6-1 ATS in L7 NM-TCU matchups Turnover Differential -0.6 (103) 3rd Down Conversion % 30.1% (114) 48.0% (110) Straight Up 6-7 9-4 4-8 1-11 20-30 (40%) * NEW MEXICO is on a 16-6 ATS (+9.4 Units) run vs. marginal losing teams (Win Pct. 40% to Overall ATS 8-4 5-7 6-6 5-7 24-24 (50%) 49%) The Average Score was NEW MEXICO 26.9, OPPONENT 20.6. Potential spots for 2010: at Home ATS 4-3 3-3 4-2 2-4 13-12 (52%) 9/25 - at UNLV Away/Neutral ATS 4-1 2-4 2-4 3-3 11-12 (48%) * NEW MEXICO is on a 2-11 ATS (-10.1 Units) skid on the road vs. teams giving up 31 or more vs Conference ATS 5-3 2-6 4-4 4-4 15-17 (47%) PPG The Average Score was NEW MEXICO 26.4, OPPONENT 25.9. Potential spots for 2010: Non-Conference ATS 3-1 3-1 2-2 1-3 9-7 (56%) 9/25 - at UNLV, 10/9 - at New Mexico St as Favorite ATS 3-1 3-4 3-2 0-1 9-8 (53%) * NEW MEXICO is on a 15-5 ATS (+9.5 Units) run on the road revenging a close loss by 7 points or as Underdog ATS 5-3 2-3 3-4 5-6 15-16 (48%) less to opponent The Average Score was NEW MEXICO 18.7, OPPONENT 24.1. Potential spots Over-Under 6-6 4-8 5-7 6-6 21-27 (44%) for 2010: 10/9 - at New Mexico St, 11/20 - at BYU 9/2 PORTLAND ST 6-17 L - - - 9/1 at Utep 6-10 L -4 L 52 U 8/30 TCU 3-26 L +6 L 41.5 U 9/5 at Texas A&M 6-41 L +14.5 L 55 U 9/9 at New Mexico St 34-28 W -5.5 W 48.5 O 9/8 NEW MEXICO ST 44-34 W -7 W 53.5 O 9/6 TEXAS A&M 22-28 L +1.5 L 39.5 O 9/12 TULSA 10-44 L +17 L 57 U 9/16 MISSOURI 17-27 L +13.5 W 51.5 U 9/15 at Arizona 29-27 W +9 W 44.5 O 9/13 ARIZONA 36-28 W +10 W 50.5 O 9/19 AIR FORCE 13-37 L +16.5 L 45.5 O 9/23 UTEP 26-13 W +9 W 54 U 9/22 SACRAMENTO ST 58-0 W - - - 9/20 at Tulsa 14-56 L +10.5 L 61.5 O 9/26 NEW MEXICO ST 17-20 L -11.5 L 44 U 9/30 at Air Force 7-24 L +13.5 L 53 U 9/29 BYU 24-31 L +4 L 53.5 O 9/27 at New Mexico St 35-24 W -3 W 54 O 10/3 at Texas Tech 28-48 L +34.5 W 56 O 10/7 WYOMING 10-14 L +2 L 41 U 10/13 at Wyoming 20-3 W +3.5 W 47.5 U 10/4 WYOMING 24-0 W -10 W 41 U 10/10 at Wyoming 13-37 L +10 L 45 O 10/14 at UNLV 39-36 W -2.5 W 39.5 O 10/20 at San Diego St 20-17 W -9 L 53.5 U 10/11 at BYU 3-21 L +22 W 48 U 10/24 UNLV 17-34 L +1 L 60 U 10/19 UTAH 34-31 W +6.5 W 41 O 10/25 AIR FORCE 34-31 W -6.5 L 47.5 O 10/18 SAN DIEGO ST 70-7 W -17 W 44 O 10/31 at San Diego St 20-23 L +16.5 W 54 U 10/28 at Colorado St 20-19 W +6 W 43.5 U 11/3 at Tcu 0-37 L +4 L 44.5 U 10/23 at Air Force 10-23 L +4 L 44.5 U 11/7 at Utah 14-45 L +27 L 47.5 O 11/11 TCU 21-27 L +4.5 L 43 O 11/10 COLORADO ST 26-23 W -9 L 51 U 11/1 UTAH 10-13 L +7.5 W 45.5 U 11/14 BYU 19-24 L +27 W 57.5 U 11/18 at BYU 17-42 L +27 W 52 O 11/17 at Utah 10-28 L +15.5 L 46.5 U 11/8 at UNLV 20-27 L -6 L 48.5 U 11/21 COLORADO ST 29-27 W +3.5 W 54 O 11/25 SAN DIEGO ST 41-14 W -10 W 44.5 O 11/24 UNLV 27-6 W -12.5 W 47.5 U 11/15 at Colorado St 6-20 L -3.5 L 51 U 11/28 at TCU 10-51 L +44 W 57.5 O 12/23 SAN JOSE ST 12-20 L -2.5 L 48.5 U 12/22 NEVADA 23-0 W -2 W 56.5 U Where: San Diego, CA Head Coach: Brady Hoke, 2nd year (4-8 SU) Conference: Mountain West 2009 RECORD: 4-8 SU, 4-8 ATS Facility: Qualcomm Stadium 9/4/10 NICHOLLS ST 9/11/10 at New Mexico St 2009 Scoring Differential: -7.2 (#99 of 120) 9/18/10 at Missouri 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -9.0 (#101 of 120) 9/25/10 UTAH ST 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 24 (#95 of 120) 10/9/10 at BYU * FAVORITE is 11-2 SU & 9-4 ATS in BYU-SDS series since 95 2009 Schedule Strength: 30.42 (#85 of 120) 10/16/10 AIR FORCE * UNDERDOG is 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS in L8 SDS-AF matchups at SAN DIEGO ST 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at New Mexico * NEW MEXICO is 10-5 SU & 13-2 ATS vs. SAN DIEGO ST since 95 10/30/10 at Wyoming * HOME TEAM is 10-3 SU & 9-3 ATS in WYO-SDS series since 96 Points Scored - Allowed 23.3 (85) 30.5 (98) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 341.9 (86) 382.0 (74) 11/6/10 COLORADO ST * UNDERDOG is on 5-1 SU & 6-0 ATS run in L6 SDS-CSU matchups YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.29 (76) 5.39 (58) 11/13/10 at TCU * HOME TEAM is on 2-3 SU but 4-1 ATS run in TCU-SDS series YP Rush Gained - Allowed 2.87 (115) 3.95 (62) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.06 (65) 7.47 (84) 11/20/10 UTAH * UTAH is on 6-1 SU & ATS run vs. SAN DIEGO ST Avg. Time of Possession 27.78 (108) 11/27/10 UNLV * SAN DIEGO ST is on 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS run vs. UNLV Turnover Differential -0.8 (111) 3rd Down Conversion % 43.0% (31) 48.7% (113) Straight Up 3-9 4-8 2-10 4-8 13-35 (27%) * SAN DIEGO ST is on a 4-17 ATS (-14.7 Units) skid at home vs. good offensive teams - averaging Overall ATS 4-7 6-5 5-6 4-8 19-26 (42%) >=5.9 YPP The Average Score was SAN DIEGO ST 27.7, OPPONENT 36.5. Potential spots for at Home ATS 3-2 3-2 3-2 1-5 10-11 (48%) 2010: 9/18 - at Missouri, 10/9 - at BYU, 11/13 - at TCU, 11/20 - UTAH Away/Neutral ATS 1-5 3-3 2-4 3-3 9-15 (38%) * SAN DIEGO ST is on a 9-1 OVER the total (+7.9 Units) run at home vs. good defensive teams vs Conference ATS 4-4 5-3 3-5 4-4 16-16 (50%) - allowing <=310 YPG The Average Score was SAN DIEGO ST 21.1, OPPONENT 44.9. Potential Non-Conference ATS 0-3 1-2 2-1 0-4 3-10 (23%) spots for 2010: 10/16 - AIR FORCE, 11/13 - at TCU as Favorite ATS 1-2 0-1 1-0 0-4 2-7 (22%) * SAN DIEGO ST is on a 12-27 ATS (-17.7 Units) skid at home revenging a road loss against as Underdog ATS 3-5 6-5 4-6 4-3 17-19 (47%) opponent The Average Score was SAN DIEGO ST 22.7, OPPONENT 32.9. Potential spots for Over-Under 6-5 7-4 6-5 5-6 24-20 (55%) 2010: 10/16 - AIR FORCE, 11/20 - UTAH, 11/27 - UNLV 8/31 UTEP 27-34 L -2.5 L 48.5 O 9/8 vs. Washington St 17-45 L +13 L 52 O 8/30 CAL POLY SLO 27-29 L - - - 9/5 at UCLA 14-33 L +18.5 L 47.5 U 9/16 at Wisconsin 0-14 L +12.5 L 44.5 U 9/15 at Arizona St 13-34 L +28 W 57.5 U 9/6 at Notre Dame 13-21 L +21.5 W 46 U 9/12 S UTAH 35-19 W -19 L - 9/23 UTAH 7-38 L +8.5 L 42 O 9/22 PORTLAND ST 52-17 W - - - 9/13 at San Jose St 10-35 L +7 L 43.5 O 9/19 at Idaho 20-34 L -3.5 L 58 U 9/30 at San Jose St 10-31 L -2 L 47.5 U 9/29 CINCINNATI 23-52 L +14 L 55 O 9/27 IDAHO 45-17 W -12 W 54.5 O 9/26 at Air Force 14-26 L +17 W 52.5 U 10/7 at BYU 17-47 L +28 L 50 O 10/6 at Colorado St 24-20 W +13.5 W 58 U 10/4 at TCU 7-41 L +25 L 49 U 10/3 NEW MEXICO ST 34-17 W -17.5 L 46.5 O 10/21 AIR FORCE 19-12 W +10 W 46 U 10/13 at Utah 7-23 L +14.5 L 55 U 10/11 AIR FORCE 10-35 L +10.5 L 48 U 10/17 BYU 28-38 L +17 W 54 O 10/28 CAL POLY SLO 14-16 L - - - 10/20 NEW MEXICO 17-20 L +9 W 53.5 U 10/18 at New Mexico 7-70 L +17 L 44 O 10/24 at Colorado St 42-28 W +8 W 50.5 O 11/4 at Wyoming 24-27 L +14.5 W 38.5 O 11/3 WYOMING 27-24 W +4 W 46 O 10/25 COLORADO ST 34-38 L +7.5 W 53.5 O 10/31 NEW MEXICO 23-20 W -16.5 L 54 U 11/11 UNLV 21-7 W -10 W 43 U 11/10 at Unlv 38-30 W +3 W 49 O 11/1 at Wyoming 10-35 L +6 L 47 U 11/7 TCU 12-55 L +24.5 L 48 O 11/18 at TCU 0-52 L +17.5 L 40.5 O 11/17 at Air Force 23-55 L +13 L 53 O 11/8 at BYU 12-41 L +36 W 65.5 U 11/14 WYOMING 27-30 L -7 L 49 O 11/25 at New Mexico 14-41 L +10 L 44.5 O 11/24 TCU 33-45 L +13.5 W 51 O 11/15 UTAH 14-63 L +28 L 53 O 11/21 at Utah 7-38 L +21 L 54.5 U 12/2 COLORADO ST 17-6 W +1 W 42 U 12/1 BYU 27-48 L +16.5 L 58.5 O 11/22 UNLV 42-21 W +10 W 60 O 11/28 at UNLV 24-28 L +6.5 W 60.5 U WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 115

TCU HORNED FROGS 2010 Schedule Strength: 33.58 (#84 of 120) UNLV REBELS 2010 Schedule Strength: 38.38 (#52 of 120) 9/4/10 WISCONSIN * L4 NLV-WIS series games have gone UNDER the total 9/11/10 at Utah * L2 games in UTA-NLV series at UTAH went OVER the total 9/18/10 at Idaho * ROAD TEAM is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 IDA-NLV games 9/25/10 NEW MEXICO * L3 NLV-NM series games have gone UNDER the total 10/2/10 NEVADA * NEVADA is on 5-0 SU & ATS run vs. UNLV 10/9/10 at W Virginia 10/16/10 at Colorado St * HOME TEAM is 4-3 SU & 6-1 ATS in L7 CSU-NLV matchups 10/30/10 TCU * TCU is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in its L6 games vs. UNLV 11/6/10 at BYU * ROAD TEAM is 8-5 SU & 10-3 ATS in BYU-NLV series since 96 11/13/10 WYOMING * OVER the total is 8-1 in L9 games of NLV-WYO series 11/18/10 AIR FORCE * HOME TEAM is 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 NLV-AF matchups 11/27/10 at San Diego St * SAN DIEGO ST is on 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS run vs. UNLV 12/4/10 at Hawaii * HAWAII is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. UNLV SCENARIO 2006 2007 2008 2009 4-yr Total Straight Up 2-10 2-10 5-7 5-7 14-34 (29%) Overall ATS 4-7 5-7 7-5 3-8 19-27 (41%) at Home ATS 3-2 3-3 4-3 2-4 12-12 (50%) Away/Neutral ATS 1-5 2-4 3-2 1-4 7-15 (32%) vs Conference ATS 3-5 3-5 5-3 2-6 13-19 (41%) Non-Conference ATS 1-2 2-2 2-2 1-2 6-8 (43%) as Favorite ATS 0-0 1-2 7-3 2-3 10-8 (56%) as Underdog ATS 4-7 4-5 0-2 1-5 9-19 (32%) Over-Under 5-6 4-8 8-4 5-6 22-24 (48%) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 4-2-5 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 54 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 48 Where: Fort Worth, TX Head Coach: Gary Patterson, 10th year (83-28 SU) Conference: Mountain West 2009 RECORD: 12-1 SU, 8-5 ATS Facility: Amon G. Carter Stadium 9/4/10 vs. Oregon St (Arlington, TX) 9/11/10 TENNESSEE TECH 2009 Scoring Differential: +25.5 (#1 of 120) 9/18/10 BAYLOR * ROAD TEAM is 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 TCU-BAY matchups 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +24.1 (#2 of 120) 9/24/10 at SMU * ROAD TEAM is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 SMU-TCU games 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 58 (#5 of 120) 10/2/10 at Colorado St * L6 games of CSU-TCU series are 5-1 UNDER the total 2009 Schedule Strength: 31.92 (#77 of 120) 10/9/10 WYOMING * TCU is on 4-1 SU & 4-0 ATS run vs. WYOMING 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 BYU * TCU is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. BYU 10/23/10 AIR FORCE * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 TCU-AF games Points Scored - Allowed 38.3 (5) 12.8 (6) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 455.5 (8) 239.7 (1) 10/30/10 at UNLV * TCU is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in its L6 games vs. UNLV YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.43 (13) 3.89 (2) 11/6/10 at Utah * HOME TEAM is on 4-1 SU & ATS run in UTA-TCU series YP Rush Gained - Allowed 5.21 (9) 2.59 (2) 11/13/10 SAN DIEGO ST * HOME TEAM is on 2-3 SU but 4-1 ATS run in TCU-SDS series YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.66 (10) 5.20 (4) Avg. Time of Possession 31.79 (17) 11/27/10 at New Mexico * FAVORITE is 7-0 SU & 6-1 ATS in L7 NM-TCU matchups Turnover Differential +0.2 (51) 3rd Down Conversion % 39.2% (61) 27.2% (2) Straight Up 11-2 8-5 11-2 12-1 42-10 (81%) * TCU is 10-2 ATS (+7.8 Units) at home in conference games since 07. The Average Score was Overall ATS 9-3 6-6 8-4 8-5 31-18 (63%) TCU 39.8, OPPONENT 10.3. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - WYOMING, 10/16 - BYU, 10/23 - at Home ATS 4-1 4-2 5-0 3-3 16-6 (73%) AIR FORCE, 11/13 - SAN DIEGO ST Away/Neutral ATS 5-2 2-4 3-4 5-2 15-12 (56%) * TCU is 12-1 UNDER the total (+10.9 Units) coming off a loss against the spread since 07. The vs Conference ATS 5-3 4-3 6-2 6-2 21-10 (68%) Average Score was TCU 26.5, OPPONENT 11.8. Potential spots for 2010: AFTER ANY ATS Non-Conference ATS 4-0 2-3 2-2 2-2 10-7 (59%) LOSS as Favorite ATS 9-2 5-5 8-4 7-4 29-15 (66%) * Over the L2 seasons, TCU is 15-5 ATS (+9.5 Units) when playing on Saturdays. The Average as Underdog ATS 0-1 1-1 0-0 1-0 2-2 (50%) Score was TCU 39.4, OPPONENT 11.8. Potential spots for 2010: ALL SATURDAY GAMES IN Over-Under 6-6 5-8 5-7 5-6 21-27 (44%) 2010 9/3 at Baylor 17-7 W -7 W 48 U 9/1 BAYLOR 27-0 W -21.5 W 46.5 U 8/30 at New Mexico 26-3 W -6 W 41.5 U 9/12 at Virginia 30-14 W -11 W 42 O 9/9 CAL DAVIS 46-13 W - - - 9/8 at Texas 13-34 L +7.5 L 43 O 9/6 SF AUSTIN 67-7 W - - - 9/19 TEXAS ST UNIV 56-21 W -40 L - 9/16 TEXAS TECH 12-3 W -1 W 54 U 9/13 at Air Force 17-20 L -8.5 L 42.5 U 9/13 STANFORD 31-14 W -15.5 W 39.5 O 9/26 at Clemson 14-10 W +2 W 41 U 9/28 BYU 17-31 L -6.5 L 47 O 9/22 SMU 21-7 W -23.5 L 52.5 U 9/20 at SMU 48-7 W -24 W 52.5 O 10/3 SMU 39-14 W -28.5 L 53 T 10/5 at Utah 7-20 L +3 L 40 U 9/29 COLORADO ST 24-12 W -9.5 W 45.5 U 9/27 at Oklahoma 10-35 L +18 L 53.5 U 10/10 at Air Force 20-17 W -10 L 43 U 10/21 at Army 31-17 W -10.5 W 40 O 10/6 at Wyoming 21-24 L +3 T 39.5 O 10/4 SAN DIEGO ST 41-7 W -25 W 49 U 10/17 COLORADO ST 44-6 W -22.5 W 50.5 U 10/28 WYOMING 26-3 W -8 W 39 U 10/13 at Stanford 38-36 W -6 L 46 O 10/11 at Colorado St 13-7 W -17 L 45.5 U 10/24 at BYU 38-7 W -2.5 W 51 U 11/4 at UNLV 25-10 W -19 L 43 U 10/18 UTAH 20-27 L -3.5 L 48 U 10/16 BYU 32-7 W -1.5 W 44 U 10/31 UNLV 41-0 W -35 W 57.5 U 11/11 at New Mexico 27-21 W -4.5 W 43 O 11/3 NEW MEXICO 37-0 W -4 W 44.5 U 10/25 WYOMING 54-7 W -32 W 42.5 O 11/7 at San Diego St 55-12 W -24.5 W 48 O 11/18 SAN DIEGO ST 52-0 W -17.5 W 40.5 O 11/8 at Byu 22-27 L +7 W 46.5 O 11/1 at UNLV 44-14 W -16.5 W 51 O 11/14 UTAH 55-28 W -19.5 W 49 O 11/25 at Colorado St 45-14 W -9.5 W 40 O 11/17 UNLV 34-10 W -20.5 W 46.5 U 11/6 at Utah 10-13 L -1.5 L 42 U 11/21 at Wyoming 45-10 W -30.5 W 50 O 12/2 AIR FORCE 38-14 W -17 W 49 O 11/24 at San Diego St 45-33 W -13.5 L 51 O 11/22 AIR FORCE 44-10 W -20.5 W 42 O 11/28 NEW MEXICO 51-10 W -44 L 57.5 O 12/19 vs. N Illinois 37-7 W -12.5 W 46 U 12/28 vs. Houston 20-13 W -6.5 W 57 U 12/23 vs. Boise St 17-16 W -3 L 46 U 1/4 vs. Boise St 10-17 L -7.5 L 54.5 U Where: Las Vegas, NV Head Coach: Bobby Hauck, 1st year Conference: Mountain West 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 3-8 ATS Facility: Sam Boyd Stadium 2009 Scoring Differential: -7.6 (#100 of 120) 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -8.1 (#99 of 120) 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 24 (#95 of 120) 2009 Schedule Strength: 33.25 (#70 of 120) 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK Points Scored - Allowed 24.8 (77) 32.4 (103) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 351.3 (78) 456.2 (115) YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.23 (80) 6.64 (114) YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.91 (73) 5.67 (114) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.46 (96) 7.92 (97) Avg. Time of Possession 29.81 (67) Turnover Differential -0.3 (77) 3rd Down Conversion % 45.9% (15) 50.4% (116) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * UNLV is 13-27 ATS (-16.7 Units) on the road revenging a home loss against opponent since 92. The Average Score was UNLV 20.4, OPPONENT 32.3. Potential spots for 2010: 11/13 - WYOMING, 11/18 - AIR FORCE * UNLV is on a 13-2 OVER the total (+10.8 Units) run vs. good teams - outscoring opponents by 10+ PPG The Average Score was UNLV 23.2, OPPONENT 38. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - WISCONSIN, 10/30 - TCU, 11/6 - at BYU, 11/18 - AIR FORCE * Over the L2 seasons, UNLV is 0-6 ATS (-6.6 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 42 or more points. The Average Score was UNLV 20, OPPONENT 43.8. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - NEVADA, 11/6 - at BYU, 11/18 - AIR FORCE 9/2 IDAHO ST 54-10 W - - - 8/30 at Utah St 23-16 W -6 W 47 U 8/30 UTAH ST 27-17 W -11 L 46.5 U 9/5 SACRAMENTO ST 38-3 W - - - 9/9 at Iowa St 10-16 L +15 W 54.5 U 9/8 WISCONSIN 13-20 L +25 W 50.5 U 9/6 at Utah 21-42 L +21.5 W 44 O 9/12 OREGON ST 21-23 L +6.5 W 53 U 9/16 at Hawaii 13-42 L +14 L 57.5 U 9/15 HAWAII 14-49 L +17 L 68 U 9/13 at Arizona St 23-20 W +25.5 W 53.5 U 9/19 HAWAII 34-33 W -7 L 56 O 9/30 NEVADA 3-31 L +2.5 L 48 U 9/22 UTAH 27-0 W +7 W 48.5 U 9/20 IOWA ST 34-31 W -2 W 50 O 9/26 at Wyoming 27-30 L -3 L 46 O 10/7 at Colorado St 7-28 L +16 L 41.5 U 9/29 at Nevada 20-27 L +4 L 52 U 9/27 NEVADA 27-49 L -3.5 L 57 O 10/3 at Nevada 28-63 L +6.5 L 58.5 O 10/14 NEW MEXICO 36-39 L +2.5 L 39.5 O 10/6 at Air Force 14-31 L +5.5 L 44 O 10/4 at Colorado St 28-41 L +1.5 L 51.5 O 10/10 BYU 21-59 L +17 L 64.5 O 10/21 at BYU 7-52 L +28 L 55.5 O 10/13 BYU 14-24 L +11.5 W 52.5 U 10/18 AIR FORCE 28-29 L +3.5 W 52 O 10/17 UTAH 15-35 L +14.5 L 60 U 10/28 at Utah 23-45 L +21 L 46.5 O 10/20 COLORADO ST 23-48 L -3 L 47.5 O 10/25 at BYU 35-42 L +23 W 62.5 O 10/24 at New Mexico 34-17 W -1 W 60 U 11/4 TCU 10-25 L +19 W 43 U 10/27 at Wyoming 24-29 L +10.5 W 45.5 O 11/1 TCU 14-44 L +16.5 L 51 O 10/31 at TCU 0-41 L +35 L 57.5 U 11/11 at San Diego St 7-21 L +10 L 43 U 11/10 SAN DIEGO ST 30-38 L -3 L 49 O 11/8 NEW MEXICO 27-20 W +6 W 48.5 U 11/7 COLORADO ST 35-16 W -2 W 62 U 11/18 WYOMING 26-34 L +9 W 42.5 O 11/17 at Tcu 10-34 L +20.5 L 46.5 U 11/13 WYOMING 22-14 W -6 W 48 U 11/14 at Air Force 17-45 L +17 L 47 O 11/24 AIR FORCE 42-39 W +10 W 46 O 11/24 at New Mexico 6-27 L +12.5 L 47.5 U 11/22 at San Diego St 21-42 L -10 L 60 O 11/28 SAN DIEGO ST 28-24 W -6.5 L 60.5 U 116 WWW.STATFOX.COM

UTAH UTES 2010 Schedule Strength: 36.17 (#69 of 120) WYOMING COWBOYS 2010 Schedule Strength: 38.42 (#51 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 117 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 4 Lettermen Returning: 49 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 35 Where: Salt Lake City, UT Head Coach: Kyle Whittingham, 6th year (48-17 SU) Conference: Mountain West 2009 RECORD: 10-3 SU, 6-7 ATS Facility: Rice-Eccles Stadium 9/2/10 PITTSBURGH 9/11/10 UNLV * L2 games in UTA-NLV series at UTAH went OVER the total 2009 Scoring Differential: +9.6 (#25 of 120) 9/18/10 at New Mexico * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 NM-UTA games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +8.4 (#28 of 120) 9/25/10 SAN JOSE ST 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 46 (#28 of 120) 10/9/10 at Iowa St 2009 Schedule Strength: 33.69 (#67 of 120) 10/16/10 at Wyoming * HOME TEAM is 6-3 SU & 7-2 ATS in L9 WYO-UTA matchups 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 COLORADO ST * FAVORITE is on 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS run in L6 UTA-CSU matchups 10/30/10 at Air Force * UNDERDOG is 7-6 SU & 12-1 ATS in AF-UTA series since 94 Points Scored - Allowed 29.8 (34) 20.2 (23) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 389.5 (54) 315.9 (21) 11/6/10 TCU * HOME TEAM is on 4-1 SU & ATS run in UTA-TCU series YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.69 (53) 4.68 (15) 11/13/10 at Notre Dame YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.30 (56) 3.74 (43) 11/20/10 at San Diego St * UTAH is on 6-1 SU & ATS run vs. SAN DIEGO ST YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.36 (51) 5.82 (13) Avg. Time of Possession 31.06 (27) 11/27/10 BYU * UNDERDOG is 7-10 SU but 13-4 ATS in UTA-BYU series since 93 Turnover Differential +0.4 (30) 3rd Down Conversion % 37.8% (74) 30.3% (4) Straight Up 8-5 9-4 13-0 10-3 40-12 (77%) * UTAH is on a 14-1 ATS (+12.9 Units) run at home vs. poor rushing teams - averaging <=120 Overall ATS 8-4 7-6 8-4 6-7 29-21 (58%) RYPG The Average Score was UTAH 41.3, OPPONENT 16.1. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at Home ATS 4-1 4-2 3-2 3-3 14-8 (64%) SAN JOSE ST Away/Neutral ATS 4-3 3-4 5-2 3-4 15-13 (54%) * UTAH is on a 29-6 ATS (+22.4 Units) run vs. poor rushing teams - averaging <=120 RYPG The vs Conference ATS 6-2 5-3 5-3 4-4 20-12 (63%) Average Score was UTAH 34.7, OPPONENT 17. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - at New Mexico, Non-Conference ATS 2-2 2-3 3-1 2-3 9-9 (50%) 9/25 - SAN JOSE ST, 11/20 - at San Diego St as Favorite ATS 7-3 4-4 0-4 4-5 15-16 (48%) * UTAH is 38-16 ATS (+20.4 Units) at home revenging a loss against opponent since 92. The as Underdog ATS 1-1 3-2 8-0 2-2 14-5 (74%) Average Score was UTAH 34.4, OPPONENT 19.3. Potential spots for 2010: 9/2 - PITTSBURGH Over-Under 7-5 5-8 10-2 5-8 27-23 (54%) 9/2 at UCLA 10-31 L +3 L 52.5 U 8/30 at Oregon St 7-24 L +5 L 52 U 8/30 at Michigan 25-23 W +3 W 43 O 9/3 UTAH ST 35-17 W -20.5 L 50 O 9/9 N ARIZONA 45-7 W - - - 9/8 AIR FORCE 12-20 L -7 L 46.5 U 9/6 UNLV 42-21 W -21.5 L 44 O 9/12 at San Jose St 24-14 W -13.5 L 48 U 9/16 at Utah St 48-0 W -18.5 W 44 O 9/15 UCLA 44-6 W +14.5 W 44 O 9/13 at Utah St 58-10 W -24.5 W 50.5 O 9/19 at Oregon 24-31 L +4 L 53.5 O 9/23 at San Diego St 38-7 W -8.5 W 42 O 9/22 at Unlv 0-27 L -7 L 48.5 U 9/20 at Air Force 30-23 W -9.5 L 50.5 O 9/26 LOUISVILLE 30-14 W -14 W 52.5 U 9/30 BOISE ST 3-36 L -4.5 L 49.5 U 9/29 UTAH ST 34-18 W -21.5 L 45 O 9/27 WEBER ST 37-21 W - - - 10/10 at Colorado St 24-17 W -9 L 50.5 U 10/5 TCU 20-7 W -3 W 40 U 10/5 at Louisville 44-35 W +14.5 W 63 O 10/2 OREGON ST 31-28 W -11.5 L 53 O 10/17 at UNLV 35-15 W -14.5 W 60 U 10/14 at Wyoming 15-31 L -4 L 40 O 10/13 SAN DIEGO ST 23-7 W -14.5 W 55 U 10/11 at Wyoming 40-7 W -21.5 W 41 O 10/24 AIR FORCE 23-16 W -9 L 43 U 10/19 at New Mexico 31-34 L -6.5 L 41 O 10/18 at Tcu 27-20 W +3.5 W 48 U 10/18 COLORADO ST 49-16 W -21 W 49.5 O 10/31 WYOMING 22-10 W -17 L 44.5 U 10/28 UNLV 45-23 W -21 W 46.5 O 10/27 at Colorado St 27-3 W -5 W 51.5 U 11/1 at New Mexico 13-10 W -7.5 L 45.5 U 11/7 NEW MEXICO 45-14 W -27 W 47.5 O 11/11 COLORADO ST 35-22 W -12 W 43 O 11/10 WYOMING 50-0 W -12 W 44.5 O 11/6 TCU 13-10 W +1.5 W 42 U 11/14 at TCU 28-55 L +19.5 L 49 O 11/18 at Air Force 17-14 W -1.5 W 51 U 11/17 NEW MEXICO 28-10 W -15.5 W 46.5 U 11/15 at San Diego St 63-14 W -28 W 53 O 11/21 SAN DIEGO ST 38-7 W -21 W 54.5 U 11/25 BYU 31-33 L +10.5 W 54.5 O 11/24 at Byu 10-17 L +4.5 L 49.5 U 11/22 BYU 48-24 W -6.5 W 56 O 11/28 at BYU 23-26 L +8 W 55.5 U 12/23 vs. Tulsa 25-13 W -3 W 49 U 12/20 vs. Navy 35-32 W -8.5 L 63.5 O 1/2 vs. Alabama 31-17 W +9.5 W 46.5 O 12/23 vs. California 37-27 W +2.5 W 52.5 O Where: Laramie, WY Head Coach: Dave Christensen, 2nd year (7-6 SU) Conference: Mountain West 2009 RECORD: 7-6 SU, 9-3 ATS Facility: War Memorial Stadium 9/4/10 S UTAH 9/11/10 at Texas 2009 Scoring Differential: -9.0 (#105 of 120) 9/18/10 BOISE ST * UNDERDOG is 0-3 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 WYO-BSU games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -6.6 (#92 of 120) 9/25/10 AIR FORCE * ROAD TEAM is 9-3 ATS in WYO-AF series since 98 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 25 (#93 of 120) 10/2/10 at Toledo 2009 Schedule Strength: 33.69 (#68 of 120) 10/9/10 at TCU * TCU is on 4-1 SU & 4-0 ATS run vs. WYOMING 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 UTAH * HOME TEAM is 6-3 SU & 7-2 ATS in L9 WYO-UTA matchups 10/23/10 at BYU * BYU is 6-0 SU & ATS in its L6 games vs. WYOMING Points Scored - Allowed 18.3 (109) 27.3 (73) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 309.4 (107) 392.1 (80) 10/30/10 SAN DIEGO ST * HOME TEAM is 10-3 SU & 9-3 ATS in WYO-SDS series since 96 YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.44 (114) 5.59 (74) 11/6/10 at New Mexico * FAVORITE is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 NM-WYO games at NEW MEXICO YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.57 (95) 4.36 (86) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 5.49 (114) 7.16 (67) 11/13/10 at UNLV * OVER the total is 8-1 in L9 games of NLV-WYO series Avg. Time of Possession 28.74 (99) 11/20/10 COLORADO ST * ROAD TEAM is 10-8 SU & 12-6 ATS in WYO-CSU series since 92 Turnover Differential +0.6 (17) 3rd Down Conversion % 36.1% (81) 39.4% (56) Straight Up 6-6 5-7 4-8 7-6 22-27 (45%) * WYOMING is 1-12 ATS vs opponents with revenge. Potential spots for 2010: 10/30 - SAN Overall ATS 6-6 2-9 2-9 9-3 19-27 (41%) DIEGO ST, 11/6 - at New Mexico, 11/13 - at UNLV, 11/20 - COLORADO ST at Home ATS 4-2 1-4 1-5 3-2 9-13 (41%) * WYOMING is on a 12-2 OVER the total (+9.8 Units) run vs. poor defensive teams - allowing Away/Neutral ATS 2-4 1-5 1-4 6-1 10-14 (42%) >=5.9 YPP The Average Score was WYOMING 31.3, OPPONENT 24.3. Potential spots for 2010: vs Conference ATS 3-5 0-7 1-7 6-2 10-21 (32%) 11/13 - at UNLV Non-Conference ATS 3-1 2-2 1-2 3-1 9-6 (60%) * WYOMING is 7-0 UNDER the total (+7 Units) on the road revenging a loss against opponent as Favorite ATS 3-2 0-5 1-3 1-0 5-10 (33%) since 07. The Average Score was WYOMING 7.6, OPPONENT 22.9. Potential spots for 2010: as Underdog ATS 3-4 2-4 1-6 8-3 14-17 (45%) 9/11 - at Texas, 10/9 - at TCU, 10/23 - at BYU Over-Under 7-5 7-5 4-7 7-5 25-22 (53%) 9/2 UTAH ST 38-7 W -12 W 44 O 9/1 VIRGINIA 23-3 W +3 W 41.5 U 8/30 OHIO U 21-20 W -14 L 47 U 9/5 WEBER ST 29-22 W - - - 9/9 at Virginia 12-13 L +8 W 45 U 9/8 UTAH ST 32-18 W -25.5 L 43.5 O 9/6 AIR FORCE 3-23 L -3 L 42.5 U 9/12 TEXAS 10-41 L +32 W 56 U 9/16 BOISE ST 10-17 L +7.5 W 47 U 9/15 at Boise St 14-24 L +12 W 51 U 9/13 N DAKOTA ST 16-13 W - - - 9/19 at Colorado 0-24 L +7 L 52 U 9/23 AIR FORCE 24-31 L +1 L 46 O 9/22 at Ohio U 34-33 W -4.5 L 44 O 9/20 at BYU 0-44 L +28 L 52 U 9/26 UNLV 30-27 W +3 W 46 O 9/30 at Syracuse 34-40 L +4.5 L 37 O 10/6 TCU 24-21 W -3 T 39.5 O 9/27 BOWLING GREEN 16-45 L +3 L 44.5 O 10/3 at Fla Atlantic 30-28 W +5.5 W 54.5 O 10/7 at New Mexico 14-10 W -2 W 41 U 10/13 NEW MEXICO 3-20 L -3.5 L 47.5 U 10/4 at New Mexico 0-24 L +10 L 41 U 10/10 NEW MEXICO 37-13 W -10 W 45 O 10/14 UTAH 31-15 W +4 W 40 O 10/20 at Air Force 12-20 L +2.5 L 46.5 U 10/11 UTAH 7-40 L +21.5 L 41 O 10/17 at Air Force 0-10 L +11.5 W 45 U 10/21 COLORADO ST 24-0 W -5 W 39.5 U 10/27 UNLV 29-24 W -10.5 L 45.5 O 10/25 at TCU 7-54 L +32 L 42.5 O 10/31 at Utah 10-22 L +17 W 44.5 U 10/28 at TCU 3-26 L +8 L 39 U 11/3 at San Diego St 24-27 L -4 L 46 O 11/1 SAN DIEGO ST 35-10 W -6 W 47 U 11/7 BYU 0-52 L +13.5 L 49 O 11/4 SAN DIEGO ST 27-24 W -14.5 L 38.5 O 11/10 at Utah 0-50 L +12 L 44.5 O 11/8 at Tennessee 13-7 W +25.5 W 41.5 U 11/14 at San Diego St 30-27 W +7 W 49 O 11/9 at BYU 7-55 L +18 L 45 O 11/17 BYU 10-35 L +10 L 45.5 U 11/13 at UNLV 14-22 L +6 L 48 U 11/21 TCU 10-45 L +30.5 L 50 O 11/18 at UNLV 34-26 W -9 L 42.5 O 11/23 at Colorado St 28-36 L +3.5 L 51 O 11/22 COLORADO ST 20-31 L -2 L 47 O 11/27 at Colorado St 17-16 W +2.5 W 48.5 U 12/19 vs. Fresno St 35-28 W +10 W 54.5 O

numerous college coaching changes to impact the 2010 season by Doug Upstone The college football coaching profession certainly isn t what it used to be. Before the turn of the century, almost every coach was given a five-year contract, being able to have four years of recruiting under his belt to prove he could do the job. Universities stuck to their obligation even if it meant suffering an extra year or two with a coach they felt was not going to succeed. In the past four seasons, however, there have been 82 coaching changes, some twice in the same location. This past college football season 22 different coaches resigned, were fired, retired or moved on to different jobs, a figure that s a tad higher than the average of the aforementioned fouryear number. For the most part, new coaches are brought in to reverse the negative impact the prior coaching staff had produced. A new coach brings shot of enthusiasm, as he talks about changing the culture, and beating the school s most hated rival. Ultimately, this joy wears off as the coaches contend with upperclassmen used to losing to a certain extent or not thrilled about the decision of the school impacting their current or future football careers. The thing we re most concerned with here is what exactly a coaching change means to on-field performance. The following numbers support that change seldom happens overnight with a new head coach taking over a program. 2009 99-150 2008 105-124 2007 122-165 Total 326-439 While that works out to an unimpressive.426 win percentage, the general direction was positive in that 33 of the 61 universities showed improvement in the first year, eight remained the same and 20 took a step backward, with the hope of taking a leap forward the following season. It s important to note that not every move has to immediately result in a winning season in order to be considered a success: While Steve Sarkisian was 5-7 in his first campaign at Washington, for example, home upsets over USC, Arizona and California has brought the U-Dub fans back, dreaming about better days ahead. The news in terms of potential profits for the sports bettor is better, but hardly illuminating. Here is the against the spread record of all the teams involved in a coaching change. 2009 108-106-3 ATS 2008 120-118-2 ATS 2007 128-135-8 ATS Total 356-359-13 ATS Of the 61 changes that resulted in a head man that promised to alter the football program fortunes, only 18 were two or more games above.500 taking on the oddsmakers number. The next batch of teams was fairly predictable against the number. Twenty-two squads were +1 to -1 ATS, leaving 21 places of higher learning at 41.6 percent or lower butting heads with those setting the odds. Similar to the schools showing first year upward movement, the same was also the case for those betting on a head coach s success. Of the 61 new field generals, 35 showed improvement taking on the linemakers, with 22 dipping below previous totals and four being the same. Last year s big winner was Dave Christiansen of Wyoming, who took the Cowboys from 4-8 and 2-9 ATS in 2008, to 7-6 and 9-3 ATS, a +6.5 game spread improvement, which included New Mexico Bowl overtime victory. So,what are the prospects of success for these guardians of the gridiron? Here s a look at all of them for the upcoming 2010 campaign. Mid-American Conference (3): Akron, Central Michigan, Buffalo The Zips jettisoned J.D. Brookhart after four non-winning seasons, with a 17-31 (18-28-2 ATS) record. In comes Rob Ianello, the former assistant coach at Notre Dame under Charlie Weis. Ianello prefers a pro-style attack, which will include a learning curve for the entire offense after running out of the spread. Defensively, the adjustment is severe going from a 3-3-5 to conventional 4-3 scheme. The talent level is down at Akron, making this a tough transition for the Zips and last year s 3-9 and 4-8 ATS could be duplicated. Former coach Turner Gill put the University of Buffalo on the college map by being MAC champions in 2008 and left after last season. Jeff Quinn returns to the league after serving as offensive coordinator under Brian Kelly at Central Michigan and later Cincinnati. Quinn will have better than expected talent to work with, though a quarterback has to surface. If coach Quinn can find a quarterback, the Bulls return to being solid wager like they were from 2005-2008 (29-20-1 ATS). Former Michigan State assistant Dan Enos has a tough act to follow in Mt. Pleasant, MI, becoming the head man at Central Michigan. The Chippewas have won the MAC championship three of the last four years and were the first team from this league to participate in four straight bowl games, with QB Dan LeFevour, the do-everything offensive performer. CMU is expected to come back to the MAC pack and football bettors should be weary of the Chippewas, with oddsmakers possibly using higher numbers based on perception. Conference USA (3): East Carolina, Marshall, Memphis Skip Holtz s replacement is Ruffin McNeill, who was on the Texas Tech defensive staff for a decade and will implement 4-3 alignment with just two starters returning. After years of seeing power football, ECU fans will have to adjust to spread attack with new coordinator Lincoln Riley to run the offense. This was a curious hire and the fall could be swift, leaving bettors on high alert. Marshall s first bowl appearance since 2004 was not enough to keep Mark Snyder employed. Marshall alumni yearn for the days when Randy Moss, Byron Leftwich and Chad Pennington were on the field. John Doc Holliday takes over the reins of a team that was second in C-USA in total defense in 2009 and the main principles return. The Herd s program looked to be headed in the right direction anyway and another bowl bid and winning spread record should occur. Tommy West was an offense-minded head coach and he took Memphis to five bowls in six years then the wheels came off with 2-10 and 3-9 ATS record a year ago. Former Memphis star RB Larry Porter returns to his alma mater as the head coach. About the only aspect that will look familiar to those at the Liberty Bowl will the offensive and defensive linemen. If Memphis fans didn t like last year s record, they might have to suffer again. Big East (3): Louisville, South Florida, Cincinnati If former Florida DC Charlie Strong is as good as many believe, in a few years Louisville will again be an elite Big East squad just don t bet on that happening this season following a three-year run over which Steve Kragthorpe went 15-21 overall and 13-20 ATS. Skip Holtz will instill his multiple offense with 10 South Florida starters returning. If USF can adjust quickly, he may be able to mask defensive inadequacies. Holtz was 38-26 ATS at ECU and should continue as a good bet at South Florida. The Cincinnati offense might look a bit different, but where Butch Jones will earn his new salary is fixing the defense. Nobody is expecting Jones 118 WWW.STATFOX.COM

to follow up three years of 33-7 (21-16-1 ATS), but if he wants a smooth transition, he better not be too far from those figures. ACC (2): Florida State, Virginia For the first time since 1976, someone other than Bobby Bowden will be one sidelines at Florida State calling the shots. Jimbo Fisher will have one big advantage: The last three years the offense the Seminoles have been running has been of his design and 10 starters return. He ll have to repair a leaky defense that allowed 30 points per game if Florida State is to reclaim elite status in the ACC after four years of 16-16 and 12-20 ATS. Virginia lacks playmakers on both sides of the ball, thus assuring Mike London will have to depend on overachieving to turnaround 3-9 (6-5 ATS) season. Former starter Marc Verica is expected to call the signals; however he s not good enough to carry the load by himself. WAC (2): Louisiana Tech, San Jose State Louisiana Tech went radical and brought in the spread offense of Sonny Dykes to juice things up in Ruston. Dykes hopes to have quarterback to run the offense effectively, but that could be a reach for team used to balanced attack. Louisiana Tech hasn t had a losing spread record in three years; expect that to change in 2010. Dick Tomey at least revitalized the San Jose State football program and Mike MacIntyre is considered a strong head coaching prospect that has 15 starters back who didn t play with a whole lot passion a year ago (2-10 SU & ATS). If MacIntyre can fire up the troops and improve run defense, (119th in the country) the record might not be much better because of schedule, but.500 betting record possible. Sun Belt (2): Louisiana-Monroe, Western Kentucky In Charlie Weatherbie s seven seasons at Louisiana-Monroe, he never had a winning season with 31-51 record; though pretty good ATS mark at 42-34. Todd Berry has ties to the team being offensive coordinator, but he hasn t been a head coach in seven years and for good reason considering his 29-60 career mark. With only 10 starters back from last year s 6-6 campaign, this might look like an oasis for Warhawks faithful. After 12 straight winning seasons at FCS (D-1 AA previously) and Independent level, which included five tournament bids, Western Coaching Changes for 2010 School Out Years at New Coach School Akron J.D. Brookhart 6 Rob Ianello Buffalo Turner Gill 4 Jeff Quinn Cincinnati Brian Kelly 3 Butch Jones Central Michigan Butch Jones 3 Dan Enos East Carolina Skip Holtz 5 Ruffin McNeill Florida State Bobby Bowden 34 Jimbo Fisher Kansas Mark Mangino 8 Turner Gill Kentucky Rich Brooks 7 Joker Phillips Louisville Steve Kragthorpe 3 Charlie Strong Louisiana-Monroe Charlie Weatherbie 7 Todd Berry Louisiana Tech Derek Dooley 3 Sonny Dykes Marshall Mark Snyder 5 John Holliday Memphis Tommy West 9 Larry Porter Notre Dame Charlie Weis 5 Brian Kelly San Jose State Dick Tomey 5 Mike MacIntyre Southern California Pete Carroll 10 Lane Kiffin South Florida Jim Leavitt 13 Skip Holtz Tennessee Lane Kiffin 1 Derek Dooley Texas Tech Mike Leach 10 Tommy Tuberville UNLV Mike Sanford 5 Bobby Hauck Virginia Al Groh 9 Mike London Western Kentucky David Elson 7 Willie Taggart Kentucky made the change to big boy football joining the Sun Belt. Evidently the Hilltoppers hierarchy believed they were going to be immediate contender but 2-22 and 8-13-1 ATS didn t cut it. Willie Taggert has 18 returning starters, which could be curse or blessing after 0-12 year. Big 12 (2): Kansas, Texas Tech Turner Gill will delight Kansas fans with his enthusiasm and positive attitude and be a breath of fresh air in Lawrence. Gill has to overhaul the offense, losing several top players and fix offensive line. The defense should be better with experience, nonetheless another losing season and faulty spread record is expected. Of the 21 coaching changes, perhaps nowhere will there be such remodeling as at Texas Tech. The brash and outspoken Mike Leach was removed and replaced by soft-spoken Tommy Tuberville. He has said he will keep Leach s high-octane, pass-happy offense, using a few refinements he has in mind, but don t bet on this being long term solution. Tuberville definitely prefers to run the pigskin. SEC (2): Kentucky, Tennessee In the Southeastern Conference, the Kentucky football program heads a different direction with the retirement of Rich Brooks. The new head coach is Joker Phillips who s been the offensive coordinator since 2005. With a favorable home slate, Kentucky might well be no joke this season. Derek Dooley could turn out to be the right man for the job at Tennessee, but chances are it will take awhile to find out the talent level has been dwindling in Knoxville for a few years. With only 10 starters back and juniors and seniors on their third head coach in as many years in a conference as arduous as the SEC, the Vols could use several qualified Volunteers to make this year a successful campaign. Pac-10 (1): USC Lane Kiffin leaves dirty laundry at each stop lately and one presumes he would like to see grass grow under his feet without a strenuous relationship for change. At USC, he will certainly have more talent than he had in Knoxville, yet not necessarily as much as he saw in first go round when an assistant to Pete Carroll. Kiffin s second-greatest challenge is winning over the upperclassmen that are used to loosey-goosey style under Carroll. His greatest challenge will be motivating players in a program that got hammered with NCAA sanctions back in June. Mountain West (1): UNLV UNLV hired former Montana head coach Bobby Hauck to take over stale Rebels program. Hauck prefers multiple offense and 4-3 defense and has far more talent to work with (16 starters) than what his predecessor Mike Sanford did. Independents (1): Notre Dame What Brian Kelly lacks in bravado compared to the previous Notre Dame coach, he makes up for in results. Kelly is the first Fighting Irish coach to have a true track record of success since Lou Holtz. What is not seen on Kelly s resume is what kind of expectations he creates for his teams. Whatever the weaknesses of his squads are, he sees no reason they still shouldn t win games. Notre Dame still has weaponry to score points and should move the ball well if the offensive line comes together quickly. Notre Dame begins another era and a 7-5 SU and ATS record feels right having their fourth different coach since 2001. WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 119

conference usa Preview Conference USA has become widely known for its offensive prowess, or perhaps rather, its defensive ineptitude. There figures to be much of the same in 2010 as quite possibly the country s best offense resides in this league, that of Kevin Sumlin and Houston. The Cougars, led by Heisman Trophy candidate Case Keenum will be tough to stop, albeit by their regular C-USA foes, or by two of its bigger non-conference opponents, UCLA and Texas Tech. There is a good chance that they could go unbeaten if the defense can shoulder more of its share of the load this season. In any case, they will be fun to watch and are the overwhelming favorite to take the title in this league, which could be down for 2010. In the East Division, two-time defending champion East Carolina is beginning anew under Ruffin McNeil, minus many major contributors. UCF is being recognized as the new favorite to represent that division in the league title game in December. Marshall can t be overlooked though and Southern Miss is usually a threat as well. In the West, should Houston slip up, the top challengers will be SMU and to a lesser degree, Tulsa and UTEP. Other than at Houston and Tulsa, many of the real big offensive names from the last few years have left this conference, could this be the year that the defenses finally gain some ground? EAST DIVISION EAST CAROLINA PIRATES After leading East Carolina to back-toback victories in the Conference USA Championship Game, coach Skip Holtz ended his five-year tenure by moving on to South Florida. Replacing Holtz is Ruffin McNeill, who for the past 10 years has been at Texas Tech, serving as defensive coordinator the last two seasons. McNeill has his work cut out, having to replace 28 seniors, including nine who were starters on defense East Carolina will be switching from the multiple offense it ran under Holtz to a spread attack that new coordinator Lincoln Riley was familiar with at Texas Tech, with Riley having served as a receivers coach. The Pirates ranked just eighth in total offense in C-USA, averaging 369.4 YPG. Replacing multi-year starter Patrick Pinkney at quarterback is sophomore walk-on Brad Wornick, who didn t see any game action in 2009. The most starting experience on the offense returns in the interior line, with a trio of senior starters The defensive unit has been a key factor in the Pirates winning 18 games and a pair of C-USA titles over the past two seasons. In 2009, the Pirates led C-USA in scoring defense for the second straight year (21.9 PPG) and were third in total defense (378.3 YPG). The early part of the campaign could be bumpy, however, with McNeill 2009 EAST STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P East Carolina 9-5-0 0.643 378 307 8-1-0 6-1-0 3-4-0 7-6-0 53.8% 7-6-0 UCF 8-5-0 0.615 340 293 6-2-0 6-1-0 2-4-0 9-3-0 75.0% 5-6-1 Southern Miss 7-6-0 0.538 428 336 5-3-0 6-0-0 1-6-0 6-6-0 50.0% 5-7-0 Marshall 7-6-0 0.538 283 316 4-4-0 4-2-0 3-4-0 7-5-0 58.3% 3-9-0 UAB 5-7-0 0.417 333 388 4-4-0 3-2-0 2-5-0 5-7-0 41.7% 8-4-0 Memphis 2-10-0 0.167 262 418 1-7-0 2-4-0 0-6-0 3-9-0 25.0% 4-6-1 2009 WEST STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Houston 10-4-0 0.714 591 421 6-3-0 6-0-0 4-4-0 8-5-0 61.5% 8-5-0 Southern Meth. 8-5-0 0.615 380 359 6-2-0 5-1-0 3-4-0 7-5-0 58.3% 5-6-1 Tulsa 5-7-0 0.417 351 328 3-5-0 2-4-0 3-3-0 5-6-1 45.5% 4-7-0 UTEP 4-8-0 0.333 358 402 3-5-0 3-3-0 1-5-0 5-7-0 41.7% 7-5-0 Tulane 3-9-0 0.250 193 440 1-7-0 2-4-0 1-5-0 4-8-0 33.3% 3-8-0 Rice 2-10-0 0.167 219 517 2-6-0 2-4-0 0-6-0 4-7-1 36.4% 8-4-0 switching from a multiple to a 4-3 alignment while finding nine new starters A third straight C-USA championship isn t in the cards for the Pirates, as they break in a new head coach and coaching staff and new systems on both offense and defense. How quickly the passing game and the inexperienced defense come together will determine if the Pirates can somehow snare another bowl bid. MARSHALL THUNDERING HERD Marshall ended its string of four straight losing seasons under head coach Mark Snyder by going 6-6, but he resigned at the end of the regular season. The Thundering Herd finished on a high note, however, posting the school s first bowl victory since 2002 by defeating Ohio, 21-17, in Detroit. Doc Holliday, the associate head coach at West Virginia the past two years and a 31-year sideline veteran, is the new head coach Marshall continued to have its trouble on offense, going through a six-game stretch where it scored 17 points or fewer. The Thundering Herd were ninth in Conference USA in total offense (349.1 YPG) and 10th in scoring offense (21.8 PPG). As was the case in 2008, the running game proved to be more successful for the Herd, as they were fourth in rushing (142.7 yards per game) and just 10th in passing (206.4). However, leading rusher Darius Marshall declared early for the NFL Draft. Senior Brian Anderson, who started every game last season, is expected to retain his hold on the starting quarterback spot Marshall s stop unit fared much better on C-USA s stat charts than did the offense, as the Herd were second in the conference in total defense, allowing 371.8 YPG, and third overall in scoring defense, giving up 24.3 PPG. The standout among the unit s seven returning starters is junior linebacker Mario Harvey Holliday has made numerous coaching stops is known as a skilled recruiter. He inherits a team that finally pushed over the.500 mark after a long dry spell, and one that has its sights set on returning to another bowl game. Expect Holliday to help Marshall continue its climb up the ladder in C-USA. 120 WWW.STATFOX.COM

MEMPHIS TIGERS Larry Porter, who spent four years as a running back for Memphis in the early 1990s, has returned as the Tigers new head coach. Porter has spent the last five years at LSU, overseeing the running backs while also serving as assistant head coach and chief recruiter. He is replacing Tommy West, who did lead the Tigers to a pair of bowl wins during his nine years, but who was just 49-61 overall and 2-10 in 2009 The offense was all but gutted by the departure of several skill position players, including the top two receivers, the leading rusher and the starting quarterback. With those players in the lineup the Tigers were seventh in Conference USA in total offense (374.3 YPG) and ninth in scoring (21.8 PPG). Redshirt sophomore Tyler Bass is the most experienced quarterback returnee but will be pushed. The strength of the offense will no doubt be the line, where all five starters return The Tigers gave up 249 points during a season-closing sixgame losing streak, and that stretch sunk Memphis down to 11th in C-USA in total defense (457.5 YPG) and 10th in scoring defense (34.8 PPG). If the Tigers hope to avoid double digits in losses again those numbers will have to show a significant improvement. Seven starters are back The Tigers have finished below the.500 mark in three of the past four seasons, and with a first-time head coach at the helm, and the loss of several key skill position players from the offensive unit, another difficult campaign is looming for Memphis. The odds appear too steep for the Tigers to be able to win more than three or four games. SOUTHERN MISS GOLDEN EAGLES Southern Miss wrapped up a 16th straight winning season in 09, but the Golden Eagles didn t finish up the campaign the way they were hoping, losing their C-USA finale at East Carolina and then dropping a 42-32 decision to Middle Tennessee in the New Orleans Bowl, the school s eighth consecutive bowl trip. Head coach Larry Fedora has put together back-to-back 7-6 campaigns, but with just four starters back on offense, producing a school record-tying 17th straight winning season could be a tough task For the second consecutive season the Golden Eagles showcased a very effective runpass balance, winding up second in C-USA in rushing (183.3 YPG) and fifth in passing (235.0). They placed fourth in total offense (418.3) and second in scoring (32.9 PPG). Offensive questions abound with a potential shared quarterback situation between Austin Davis and Martevious Young, as well as the departure of RB Damion Fletcher. The team s leading receiver, junior DeAndre Brown does return. The loss of starting personnel on the line is not encouraging either, with only the center returning for action... A veteran defensive unit helped the Golden Eagles place fourth in conference in both scoring (25.8 PPG) and total defense (392.5 YPG). The good news is that the losses aren t nearly as severe, and in fact nine starters return to the stop unit. The foundation of the defense will be at linebacker, with all four starters returning Southern Miss usually has one of the better defensive units in the conference, and this year will prove no exception. But with the loss of so many productive players on offense, it may take a while for the Golden Eagles to recover. UAB BLAZERS Tough late season matchups with East Carolina and Central Florida left UAB shy of a winning season for the first time since 04. However, this is head coach Neil Callaway s fourth season at the school and he has improved the program each year. With 17 starters returning a winning season may be within reach Led by the arm and legs of multi-talented quarterback Joe Webb, the Conference USA Offensive Player of the Year, the Blazers attack was ranked third in Conference USA, averaging 425.9 yards per game. UAB was sixth in scoring (27.8 PPG) and had C-USA s best rushing attack, averaging just a shade under 230 YPG. Webb has departed, leaving a huge hole in the UAB offense, considering he passed for 2,229 yards and 21 touchdowns and was the team leader in rushing with 1,427 yards and 11 touchdowns. That kind of production is tough to replace but sophomore David Isabelle is looking to take over the quarterback job. UAB is well stocked with returning talent in the receiving corps, and four veteran starters return to the line Giving up 71 points over the final two games ended any hopes of a bowl bid for the Blazers. Nine starters return to the field for a unit that was eighth in C-USA in scoring defense (32.3 PPG) and 10th in total defense (453.3 YPG). The pass defense was particularly weak Webb was the offense, so without him in the lineup, the pressure will be on the other returning offensive players to step it up. A winning season will ride on Isabelle s play and an improved defensive effort. UCF KNIGHTS There are two things that Central Florida has been unable to accomplish in George O Leary s six years as head coach put together back-to-back winning seasons and win a bowl game. Last season the Knights placed second in the East Division of Conference USA with a 6-2 mark and finished 8-5 overall, but they were whipped by Rutgers, 45-24, in the St. Petersburg Bowl. UCF has 15 starters returning to try and give O Leary consecutive winning campaigns Things weren t quite as bad on offense for UCF as they were in 08, when the Knights finished last in C-USA in total offense. Last season the Knights showed some improvement, moving up to 10th in the conference with 340.8 YPG. As WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 121

for scoring, the Knights were eighth, averaging 26.2 PPG. Rob Calabrese, who made three starts at QB, had only 260 yards passing and three touchdowns and entered spring camp with a hold on the starting job. He ll be blessed with a good mix of skill position talent and four returning starting linemen For the second straight season, UCF put forth an excellent defensive effort, leading C-USA in total defense (352.5 yards YPG), placing second in scoring defense (22.5 PPG) and topping the conference against the rush (84.7 YPG). Senior end Bruce Miller, the C-USA Defensive Player of the Year, is the leader of the unit that returns seven total starters The Knights have enough returning talent to again be a factor in C-USA s East Division race, and another winning campaign and bowl berth appear to be safe bets for the Knights. WEST DIVISION HOUSTON COUGARS Charged by a lethal passing attack that shredded opposing secondaries for over 6,000 yards, Houston is coming off only its second 10-win season since 1991. The Cougars won Conference USA s West Division title but were knocked off by East Carolina 38-32 in the championship game. The Cougars faced Air Force in the Armed Forces Bowl, but they fell short of making it two in a row over the Falcons, losing 47-20. Most of the highpowered offense returns and the West Division should again be Houston s The Cougars scored 591 points, making the 2009 squad the most prolific in school history, as it easily led C-USA in scoring (42.2 PPG), total yardage (563.2 YPG) and passing offense (430.9 YPG). The total offense and passing numbers were also the top marks in the nation. The player at the controls is senior quarterback Case Keenum, the reigning C-USA MVP. The bad news for opposing defenses is that Keenum has his top three receivers back as well as four starters returning on the line Houston ranked only ninth in C-USA in total defense, giving up 451.3 YPG, but that was due largely to a weak run defense, which surrendered a conference-high total of 3,172 yards, or 226.6 per game. New coordinator Brian Stewart has installed a 3-4 alignment and will strive to strengthen the unit s run-stopping ability. Seven starters return Keenum is looking to wrap up his career in record-breaking fashion, and if he and his wideouts can maintain their production, the Cougars should be able to capture the school s second C-USA title in the past six years. If all goes really well, this team could go undefeated. RICE OWLS Rice has experienced some wild swings, record-wise, in the three years that David Bailiff has served as head coach. In his first season, 2007, the Owls were just 3-9. But they rebounded the following year, winning 10 games.last season, flying low again, dropping back to 2-10. There are 18 starters returning and they will look to get the program back on track The Owls were held under 20 points in seven of their 10 losses, ranking 11th in Conference USA in scoring (18.3 PPG) and 12th in total offense (304.6 YPG). Junior Nick Fanuzzi will again be calling signals at quarterback. A year ago he played in 10 games and managed to throw for 1,598 yards, 11 touchdowns and eight picks, but those numbers were a big drop off from the ones that former starter Chase Clement generated. The two leading ground gainers return in the backfield and they will be looking to take some pressure off Fanuzzi. The interior returns intact, which should bode well for Fanuzzi s improvement From the opening-game loss to UAB, which resulted in 44 points for the Blazers to a season-closing 73-14 setback to Houston, the defense was pretty much shredded on a weekly basis, allowing a school-record number of points and finishing last in C-USA in scoring (43.1 PPG) and total defense (464.0 YPG). Nine starters return from the wreckage with an obvious collective chip on their shoulders Injuries, inconsistency and mounting losses made for a seemingly endless 2009 for Rice. A large group of players who endured that adversity have returned to make amends, but huge improvements on both sides of the ball will be necessary for the Owls to make any progress. SMU MUSTANGS Head coach June Jones and his SMU squad entered last season in search of a little stability, having dropped 11 of 12 games the previous year and with the program going 11 straight seasons without posting a winning record. Not only did the Mustangs find stability, they flourished, winning six of eight C-USA games and advancing to a postseason game for the first time since 1984, whipping Nevada, 45-10, in the Hawaii Bowl to finish at 8-5. Jones will rely on 15 returning starters to try and put together back-to-back winning seasons... Although SMU s Run-and-Shoot passing attack was not in the same galaxy as Houston s potent air game, the Mustangs still finished second in C-USA, averaging 282.0 yards per game and producing 22 touchdowns. Overall the Ponies were sixth in the conference in total offense (391.8 YPG) and fifth in scoring (29.2 PPG). Sophomore Kyle Padron returns as the starter, after going 6-1 in that role. Although the receiving corps does return three starters, it will be without Emmanuel Sanders, who caught 98 balls. Four experienced linemen, all juniors, return to the interior to give Padron time in the pocket SMU made huge strides on defense and that played a big part in the team s turnaround. After finishing last in C-USA in total and scoring defense in 2008, the Mustangs made a strong recovery and moved up to fifth 122 WWW.STATFOX.COM

in total defense (397.1 YPG) and sixth in scoring defense (27.6 PPG). Seven starters are back SMU had the biggest turnaround of any Division I-A team in the nation and now has the attention of every C-USA opponent. There s a solid base of personnel returning, but challenges are ahead. TULANE GREEN WAVE Tulane s 2009 season was nearly a carbon copy of 2008. Both times Tulane split the first four games to drum up some optimism but then fell off the cliff the rest of the way, losing eight straight in 08 and seven of eight a year ago. After last season s 2-2 start the Green Wave lost the next four games by a combined score of 160-32. The two biggest playmakers on offense have departed, so even with a schedule that has seven games in New Orleans, an eighth straight losing season is very likely Tulane had the most anemic offense in Conference USA, scoring just 24 touchdowns and 193 points for an average of 16.1 per game, while being shut out twice. Head coach Bob Toledo used two quarterbacks to run the offense, Joe Kemp and Ryan Griffin. Griffin entered spring camp as the incumbent starter, after throwing for 1,382 yards and nine touchdowns, with six interceptions. Two big holes will need to be filled with the losses of RB Andre Anderson( 1,036 yards, 8 TD s) and WR Jeremy Williams (84 catches, 1,113 yards, 7 TD s). The line should be cohesive with four starters back... Rice was the only defense in C-USA that surrendered more than the 440 points that Tulane allowed, working out to an average of 36.7 PPG. Strangely enough the Green Wave were seventh in the conference in total defense, allowing 422.8 YPG. Only four of last year s starters have returned Combining the holes on defense and in the kicking game, with the loss of two of the biggest producers on offense, it s shaping up as another tough year for the Green Wave. Back-to-back games against Mississippi and Houston may help damage team morale. TULSA GOLDEN HURRICANE During his first two seasons as Tulsa s head coach, Todd Graham led the Golden Hurricane to an impressive 21-7 record and a pair of bowl victories. The program lost some momentum last year by suffering six losses over the final seven games to finish with a 5-7 mark, its first sub-.500 record since 2004. There is some rebuilding to do on defense with the loss of six starters, but with nine offensive starters back in the fold, the expectations are for Tulsa to return to its winning ways The offensive attack was an absolute juggernaut in 2008, leading C-USA in scoring, total offense and rushing. The offense put in a respectable effort last season, but was not nearly as potent, ranking fourth in the conference in scoring (29.3 PPG) and fifth in total offense (410.1 YPG). G.J. Kinne returns as the starter at quarterback after winning the job as a sophomore while having to fill the huge shoes of David Johnson. Running back Jahmad Williams and WR Damaris Johnson are skilled positional players that should put up big numbers. Stability on the line shouldn t be an issue with four starters returning... The stop unit placed fifth in C-USA in scoring (27.3 PPG) and sixth in total defense (397.0 YPG). Defense, however, was an issue during the six-game losing skein that sank the season as the unit allowed an average of 36.0 PPG The offense fell off a notch last season, but Kinne should improve his numbers, as should the attack unit as a whole. The key will be establishing a running game. Provided there isn t another defensive collapse, Tulsa should move back over the.500 mark. UTEP MINERS The 2009 season was one of inconsistency for UTEP as the Miners were never able to tack together two wins in a row while also falling prey to losing streaks of two and four games. UTEP had its moments of overachieving in wins over Houston and Marshall and its moments of underachieving in losses to Memphis and Rice. Head coach Mike Price has been unable to lift the Miners over the.500 mark for four straight seasons but he s hoping some offensive standouts and a reworked defense will help turn the tide Led by two of the biggest stars in C-USA, the Miners placed second in total offense (426.8 YPG) and were third in scoring (29.8 PPG). Returning for a fourth consecutive season as quarterback is senior Trevor Vittatoe, whose career totals include 75 touchdowns and 29 interceptions. UTEP s other stud on offense is senior running back Donald Buckram, who had a school-record 1,594 yards rushing and 18 touchdowns. The line lost two starters but returns a strong senior core to protect Vittatoe and spring Buckram loose The stop unit has a new look, led by a new coordinator in Andre Patterson and moving from a 3-3-5 base defense to a 4-3. Throw in the fact that seven starters, including the top two tacklers, have departed, and Patterson has plenty of work to do. The Miners were eighth in the conference in total defense (446.9 YPG) and ninth in scoring defense (33.5 PPG) It will take a while for the defense to jell, so the arm of Vittatoe and the legs of Buckram will have to carry this team for at least the first month. If the pair can have big years, UTEP could squeeze out six wins. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH EAST DIVISION UCF Marshall Southern Miss UAB East Carolina Memphis WEST DIVISION Houston SMU Tulsa UTEP Rice Tulsa WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 123

EAST CAROLINA PIRATES 2010 Schedule Strength: 35.58 (#71 of 120) Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 5 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 2 Lettermen Returning: 43 Where: Greenville, NC Head Coach: Ruffin McNeill, 1st year Conference: Conf.-USA 2009 RECORD: 9-5 SU, 7-6 ATS Facility: Dowdy-Ficklen Stadium 9/5/10 TULSA * FAVORITE has swept L3 ECU-TLS games at E CAROLINA, both SU & ATS 9/11/10 MEMPHIS * E CAROLINA is 9-4 SU & 12-1 ATS vs. MEMPHIS since 94 2009 Scoring Differential: +5.1 (#45 of 120) 9/18/10 at Virginia Tech * VIRGINIA TECH is 6-1 SU & 5-2 ATS in its L7 games vs. E CAROLINA 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +6.1 (#39 of 120) 10/2/10 at N Carolina * N CAROLINA is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. E CAROLINA 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 38 (#58 of 120) 10/9/10 at Southern Miss * SOUTHERN MISS is 11-3 SU & 11-2 ATS vs. E CAROLINA since 96 2009 Schedule Strength: 32.57 (#72 of 120) 10/16/10 NC STATE * UNDERDOG has swept L3 ECU-NCS games, both SU & ATS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 MARSHALL * L3 ECU-MAR series games have gone UNDER the total 10/30/10 at UCF * UNDERDOG is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 UCF-ECU games Points Scored - Allowed 27.0 (62) 21.9 (36) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 369.4 (67) 378.3 (72) 11/6/10 NAVY YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.27 (77) 5.38 (57) 11/11/10 at UAB * UNDERDOG is 4-0 ATS in L4 UAB-ECU games at UAB YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.02 (70) 3.75 (45) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.73 (87) 6.75 (44) 11/20/10 at Rice * HOME TEAM has swept L3 RIC-ECU games, both SU & ATS Avg. Time of Possession 30.94 (31) 11/26/10 SMU * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 ECU-SMU games Turnover Differential +0.8 (9) 3rd Down Conversion % 43.6% (25) 39.9% (64) Straight Up 7-6 8-5 9-5 9-5 33-21 (61%) * E CAROLINA is on a 18-4 ATS (+13.6 Units) run as road underdogs of 7 points or less The Overall ATS 10-3 8-5 5-9 7-6 30-23 (57%) Average Score was E CAROLINA 24.8, OPPONENT 23.6. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at N at Home ATS 5-1 3-3 3-2 3-3 14-9 (61%) Carolina, 10/9 - at Southern Miss, 10/30 - at UCF Away/Neutral ATS 5-2 5-2 2-7 4-3 16-14 (53%) * E CAROLINA is 11-3 ATS (+7.7 Units) vs. poor defensive teams - allowing >=5.9 YPP since 07. vs Conference ATS 6-2 6-2 3-6 6-3 21-13 (62%) The Average Score was E CAROLINA 32.7, OPPONENT 21.4. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - Non-Conference ATS 4-1 2-3 2-3 1-3 9-10 (47%) MEMPHIS, 11/11 - at UAB, 11/20 - at Rice as Favorite ATS 5-1 3-3 2-8 4-3 14-15 (48%) * E CAROLINA is on a 13-4 ATS (+8.6 Units) run on the road vs. poor passing defenses - allowing as Underdog ATS 5-2 5-2 3-1 3-3 16-8 (67%) 250 or more PYPG The Average Score was E CAROLINA 29.4, OPPONENT 26.5. Potential spots Over-Under 5-8 7-6 7-7 7-6 26-27 (49%) for 2010: 10/9 - at Southern Miss, 10/30 - at UCF, 11/11 - at UAB, 11/20 - at Rice 9/2 at Navy 23-28 L +12 W 50.5 O 9/1 at Virginia Tech 7-17 L +28 W 41 U 8/30 vs. Virginia Tech 27-22 W +8.5 W 44 O 9/5 APPALACHIAN ST 29-24 W - - - 9/9 at UAB 12-17 L +6.5 W 49 U 9/8 N CAROLINA 34-31 W -5.5 L 42 O 9/6 W VIRGINIA 24-3 W +7.5 W 48.5 U 9/12 at W Virginia 20-35 L +6 L 44 O 9/16 MEMPHIS 35-20 W -3 W 49.5 O 9/15 SOUTHERN MISS 21-28 L +1 L 45.5 O 9/13 at Tulane 28-24 W -11.5 L 45 O 9/19 at N Carolina 17-31 L +8 L 43.5 O 9/23 W VIRGINIA 10-27 L +20.5 W 56 U 9/22 at W Virginia 7-48 L +24 L 59 U 9/20 at NC State 24-30 L -7 L 43.5 O 9/26 UCF 19-14 W -9 L 43.5 U 10/7 VIRGINIA 31-21 W -3 W 43 O 9/29 at Houston 37-35 W +13 W 57.5 O 9/27 HOUSTON 24-41 L -10.5 L 61 O 10/3 at Marshall 21-17 W -1.5 W 48 U 10/14 TULSA 10-31 L +3 L 47.5 U 10/6 UCF 52-38 W +4 W 53.5 O 10/11 at Virginia 20-35 L -5.5 L 44 O 10/10 at SMU 21-28 L -4 L 53 U 10/21 SMU 38-21 W -5 W 47.5 O 10/13 at Utep 45-42 W +3 W 65 O 10/18 MEMPHIS 30-10 W -9 W 53.5 U 10/17 RICE 49-13 W -18 W 56 O 11/2 at UCF 13-10 W -6 L 47 U 10/27 at Memphis 38-19 W -6 W 49 O 10/28 at Southern Miss 20-17 W +5.5 W 48 U 10/20 NC STATE 20-34 L -5.5 L 54.5 U 11/8 MARSHALL 19-16 W -8 L 47 U 11/5 VIRGINIA TECH 3-16 L +12.5 L 51.5 U 11/4 at C Florida 23-10 W -4 W 56 U 10/27 UAB 41-6 W -16 W 56.5 U 11/15 at Southern Miss 3-21 L +3 L 50 U 11/15 at Tulsa 44-17 W +4 W 51 O 11/11 MARSHALL 33-20 W -7 W 51.5 O 11/3 at Memphis 56-40 W -5.5 W 60 O 11/22 at UAB 17-13 W -6.5 L 50.5 U 11/21 UAB 37-21 W -14.5 W 56.5 O 11/18 at Rice 17-18 L -2.5 L 57 U 11/10 at Marshall 7-26 L -6 L 64 U 11/28 UTEP 53-21 W -6.5 W 55 O 11/28 SOUTHERN MISS 25-20 W -6 L 54.5 U 11/25 at NC State 21-16 W +3 W 43 U 11/24 TULANE 35-12 W -13 W 61 U 12/6 at Tulsa 27-24 W +12 W 66.5 U 12/5 HOUSTON 38-32 W +1 W 68.5 O 12/23 vs. S Florida 7-24 L +5.5 L 42 U 12/23 vs. Boise St 41-38 W +11 W 66 O 1/2 vs. Kentucky 19-25 L -3 L 41 O 1/2 vs. Arkansas 17-20 L +7.5 W 60 U Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 7 MARSHALL THUNDERING HERD Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 2010 Schedule Strength: 34.75 (#78 of 120) Lettermen Returning: 45 Where: Huntington, WV Head Coach: John Holliday, 1st year Conference: Conf.-USA 2009 RECORD: 7-6 SU, 7-5 ATS Facility: Joan Edwards Stadium 9/2/10 at Ohio St 9/10/10 W VIRGINIA * L2 games in MAR-WV series went UNDER the total 2009 Scoring Differential: -2.5 (#80 of 120) 9/18/10 at Bowling Green * BOWLING GREEN is 2-4 SU but 4-1 ATS in its L6 games vs. MARSHALL 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -2.7 (#78 of 120) 9/25/10 OHIO U * HOME TEAM is on 5-3 SU & 7-1 ATS run in MAR-OHU series 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 27 (#91 of 120) 10/2/10 at Southern Miss * ROAD TEAM has swept L3 SM-MAR games, both SU & ATS 2009 Schedule Strength: 30.23 (#86 of 120) 10/13/10 UCF * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 ATS in L2 MAR-UCF games 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at E Carolina * L3 ECU-MAR series games have gone UNDER the total 10/30/10 UTEP * HOME TEAM has swept L3 MAR-UTP games, both SU & ATS Points Scored - Allowed 21.8 (96) 24.3 (54) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 349.1 (81) 371.8 (66) 11/6/10 at UAB * UNDERDOG is 3-2 SU & 4-1 ATS in L5 UAB-MAR matchups YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.19 (84) 5.71 (80) 11/13/10 MEMPHIS * L3 MAR-MEM series games have gone UNDER the total YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.94 (72) 4.33 (83) 11/20/10 at SMU * SMU is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. MARSHALL YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.64 (92) 6.97 (54) Avg. Time of Possession 32.37 (7) 11/27/10 TULANE * MARSHALL has taken L2 games vs. TULANE both SU & ATS Turnover Differential -0.3 (81) 3rd Down Conversion % 42.4% (33) 36.7% (35) Straight Up 5-7 3-9 4-8 7-6 19-30 (39%) * MARSHALL is on a 6-17 ATS (-12.7 Units) skid on the road coming off a non-conference game Overall ATS 4-7 5-6 4-7 7-5 20-25 (44%) The Average Score was MARSHALL 23, OPPONENT 26.3. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - at at Home ATS 3-1 3-2 2-3 2-3 10-9 (53%) Bowling Green Away/Neutral ATS 1-6 2-4 2-4 5-2 10-16 (38%) * Over the L2 seasons, MARSHALL is 7-0 UNDER the total (+7 Units) in October games. The vs Conference ATS 4-4 4-4 4-4 4-4 16-16 (50%) Average Score was MARSHALL 21.4, OPPONENT 20.1. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at Non-Conference ATS 0-3 1-2 0-3 3-1 4-9 (31%) Southern Miss, 10/13 - UCF, 10/23 - at E Carolina, 10/30 - UTEP as Favorite ATS 3-1 1-1 0-3 2-1 6-6 (50%) * MARSHALL is 12-27 ATS (-17.7 Units) vesus good rushing teams - averaging >=4.75 YPR since as Underdog ATS 1-6 4-5 4-4 5-4 14-19 (42%) 92. The Average Score was MARSHALL 31.1, OPPONENT 22.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/2 - at Over-Under 8-2 4-7 4-7 3-9 19-25 (43%) Ohio St, 10/2 - at Southern Miss 9/2 at W Virginia 10-42 L +21.5 L 45.5 O 9/9 HOFSTRA 54-31 W - - - 9/16 at Kansas St 7-23 L +9 L 46 U 9/23 at Tennessee 7-33 L +20.5 L 43 U 10/4 C FLORIDA 22-23 L -3.5 L 44 O 10/14 at SMU 21-31 L +6 L 44 O 10/21 at UAB 31-24 W +6 W 45.5 O 10/28 MEMPHIS 41-27 W -9 W 49 O 11/4 TULANE 42-21 W -6.5 W 58 O 11/11 at E Carolina 20-33 L +7 L 51.5 O 11/18 UTEP 49-21 W -3 W 56 O 11/25 at Southern Miss 7-42 L +7 L 49 T 9/1 at Miami 3-31 L +18 L 48 U 9/8 W VIRGINIA 23-48 L +25.5 W 63.5 O 9/15 NEW HAMPSHIRE 35-48 L - - - 9/22 at Cincinnati 14-40 L +24 L 53.5 O 10/2 at Memphis 21-24 L +2.5 L 60 U 10/13 at Tulsa 31-38 L +14 W 70 U 10/21 SOUTHERN MISS 24-33 L +3 L 55.5 O 10/27 RICE 34-21 W -9 W 67 U 11/3 at Ucf 13-47 L +14 L 62.5 U 11/10 E CAROLINA 26-7 W +6 W 64 U 11/17 at Houston 28-35 L +12 W 65.5 U 11/24 UAB 46-39 W -14.5 L 59 O 8/30 ILLINOIS ST 35-10 W - - - 9/6 at Wisconsin 14-51 L +20.5 L 50.5 O 9/13 MEMPHIS 17-16 W -6 L 60 U 9/20 at Southern Miss 34-27 W +7.5 W 54 O 9/27 at W Virginia 3-27 L +16 L 53.5 U 10/3 CINCINNATI 10-33 L +3 L 47.5 U 10/18 at UAB 21-23 L -2.5 L 55.5 U 10/28 HOUSTON 37-23 W +7 W 60.5 U 11/8 at E Carolina 16-19 L +8 W 47 U 11/15 UCF 14-30 L -7.5 L 39.5 O 11/22 at Rice 10-35 L +8.5 L 68 U 11/29 TULSA 35-38 L +16 W 66 O 9/5 S ILLINOIS 31-28 W - - - 9/12 at Virginia Tech 10-52 L +20 L 44 O 9/19 BOWLING GREEN 17-10 W +3 W 52 U 9/26 at Memphis 27-16 W +3 W 49 U 10/3 E CAROLINA 17-21 L +1.5 L 48 U 10/10 at Tulane 31-10 W -3 W 48 U 10/17 at W Virginia 7-24 L +20 W 51.5 U 10/24 UAB 27-7 W -7 W 51.5 U 11/1 at UCF 20-21 L +7 W 43 U 11/14 SOUTHERN MISS 20-27 L +3 L 51.5 U 11/21 SMU 34-31 W -3.5 L 48.5 O 11/28 at UTEP 21-52 L +2 L 60 O 12/26 vs. Ohio U 21-17 W +3 W 49 U 124 WWW.STATFOX.COM

MEMPHIS TIGERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 37.17 (#62 of 120) 9/2/10 at S Carolina 9/11/10 PRAIRIE VIEW 9/17/10 KANSAS 9/25/10 at Louisiana Tech 10/2/10 MARSHALL * ROAD TEAM has swept L3 SM-MAR games, both SU & ATS 10/9/10 E CAROLINA * SOUTHERN MISS is 11-3 SU & 11-2 ATS vs. E CAROLINA since 96 10/16/10 at Memphis * SOUTHERN MISS is 12-6 SU & 14-4 ATS vs. MEMPHIS since 92 10/30/10 UAB * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 SM-UAB games 11/6/10 at Tulane * L4 TUL-SM series games have gone UNDER the total 11/13/10 at UCF * L3 UCF-SM series games have gone UNDER the total 11/20/10 HOUSTON * HOME TEAM is 8-3 SU & 9-2 ATS in SM-HOU series since 96 11/26/10 at Tulsa * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 TLS-SM games WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 125 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 45 Where: Memphis, TN Head Coach: Larry Porter, 1st year Conference: Conf.-USA 2009 RECORD: 2-10 SU, 3-9 ATS Facility: Liberty Bowl Memorial Stadium 9/4/10 at Mississippi St * MISSISSIPPI ST is on 4-game SU & ATS winning streak vs. MEMPHIS 9/11/10 at E Carolina * E CAROLINA is 9-4 SU & 12-1 ATS vs. MEMPHIS since 94 2009 Scoring Differential: -13.0 (#111 of 120) 9/18/10 MIDDLE TENN ST * L2 games in MEM-MTS series went UNDER the total 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -11.4 (#110 of 120) 9/25/10 at UTEP * L3 UTP-MEM series games have gone UNDER the total 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 22 (#101 of 120) 10/2/10 TULSA * ROAD TEAM is on 5-1 ATS run in MEM-TLS series 2009 Schedule Strength: 33.42 (#69 of 120) 10/9/10 at Louisville * UNDERDOG is 3-10 SU but 11-2 ATS in LOU-MEM series since 92 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 SOUTHERN MISS * SOUTHERN MISS is 12-6 SU & 14-4 ATS vs. MEMPHIS since 92 10/30/10 HOUSTON * L3 MEM-HOU series games have gone UNDER the total Points Scored - Allowed 21.8 (95) 34.8 (110) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 374.3 (63) 457.5 (116) 11/6/10 TENNESSEE * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in MEM-TEN series YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.35 (72) 6.43 (109) 11/13/10 at Marshall * L3 MAR-MEM series games have gone UNDER the total YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.39 (52) 4.43 (90) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.38 (99) 8.90 (116) 11/20/10 at UAB * UAB is on 8-2 SU & 7-1 ATS run vs. MEMPHIS Avg. Time of Possession 29.34 (78) 11/27/10 UCF * UCF has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. MEMPHIS Turnover Differential -0.8 (107) 3rd Down Conversion % 36.1% (83) 41.7% (83) Straight Up 2-10 7-6 6-7 2-10 17-33 (34%) * MEMPHIS is on a 10-0 ATS (+10 Units) run at home vs. teams scoring 31 or more PPG The Average Score was Overall ATS 3-6 7-5 5-6 3-9 18-26 (41%) MEMPHIS 26.6, OPPONENT 27.7. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - MIDDLE TENN ST, 10/16 - SOUTHERN MISS, at Home ATS 2-4 3-3 3-3 2-4 10-14 (42%) 10/30 - HOUSTON Away/Neutral ATS 1-2 4-2 2-3 1-5 8-12 (40%) * MEMPHIS is on a 18-6 ATS (+11.4 Units) run coming off a close loss by 7 points or less to a conference rival The Average vs Conference ATS 3-4 5-3 4-3 2-6 14-16 (47%) Score was MEMPHIS 26.9, OPPONENT 18.8. Potential spots for 2010: Follow Conference Schedule & Results Non-Conference ATS 0-2 2-2 1-3 1-3 4-10 (29%) * MEMPHIS was 2-8 ATS (-6.8 Units) as underdogs last season. The Average Score was MEMPHIS 20.5, OPPONENT as Favorite ATS 0-1 2-2 2-2 0-1 4-6 (40%) 37.7. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - at Mississippi St, 9/11 - at E Carolina, 9/18 - MIDDLE TENN ST, 9/25 - at UTEP, 10/2 as Underdog ATS 3-5 5-3 3-4 2-8 13-20 (39%) - TULSA, 10/9 - at Louisville, 10/16 - SOUTHERN MISS, 10/30 - HOUSTON, 11/6 - TENNESSEE, 11/13 - at Marshall, Over-Under 6-5 6-6 6-6 4-6 22-23 (49%) 11/20 - at UAB, 11/27 - UCF 9/3 at Mississippi 25-28 L +3 T 40 O 9/1 OLE MISS 21-23 L +2.5 W 46 U 8/30 at Ole Miss 24-41 L +9 L 53 O 9/6 OLE MISS 14-45 L +17.5 L 55 O 9/9 UT-CHATTANOOGA 33-14 W - - - 9/15 NICHOLLS ST 35-14 W - - - 9/6 RICE 35-42 L -2.5 L 67 O 9/12 at Middle Tenn St 14-31 L +0 L 53 U 9/16 at E Carolina 20-35 L +3 L 49.5 O 9/22 at Ucf 20-56 L +7 L 56.5 O 9/13 at Marshall 16-17 L +6 W 60 U 9/19 TENN-MARTIN 41-14 W -19 W - 9/30 TENNESSEE 7-41 L +14 L 48.5 U 9/27 at Arkansas St 31-35 L +6 W 61.5 O 9/20 NICHOLLS ST 31-10 W - - - 9/26 MARSHALL 16-27 L -3 L 49 U 10/7 at UAB 29-35 L +6 T 41.5 O 10/2 MARSHALL 24-21 W -2.5 W 60 U 9/27 ARKANSAS ST 29-17 W +1 W 55 U 10/3 at UCF 14-32 L +7 L 46 T 10/14 ARKANSAS ST 23-26 L -8 L 45.5 O 10/13 MIDDLE TENN ST 7-21 L -3.5 L 56 U 10/2 at UAB 33-30 W -3 T 58 O 10/10 UTEP 35-20 W +1 W 58 U 10/21 TULSA 14-35 L +14 L 50 U 10/20 at Rice 38-35 W +1 W 64.5 O 10/10 LOUISVILLE 28-35 L +6 L 56.5 O 10/17 at Southern Miss 16-36 L +14.5 L 54 U 10/28 at Marshall 27-41 L +9 L 49 O 10/27 at Tulane 28-27 W +2.5 W 57 U 10/18 at E Carolina 10-30 L +9 L 53.5 U 10/27 E CAROLINA 19-38 L +6 L 49 O 11/5 SOUTHERN MISS 21-42 L +7 L 48.5 O 11/3 E CAROLINA 40-56 L +5.5 L 60 O 10/25 SOUTHERN MISS 36-30 W +3.5 W 52 O 11/7 at Tennessee 28-56 L +25.5 L 53 O 11/11 C FLORIDA 24-26 L +2.5 W 59.5 U 11/10 at Southern Miss 29-26 W +16.5 W 59.5 U 11/8 at SMU 31-26 W 0 W 61 U 11/14 UAB 21-31 L +1 L 64 U 11/18 HOUSTON 20-23 L +17 W 60 U 11/17 UAB 25-9 W -9.5 W 62 U 11/22 UCF 21-28 L -6 L 46.5 O 11/21 at Houston 14-55 L +23 L 74 U 11/25 at UTEP 38-19 W +13.5 W 57.5 U 11/24 SMU 55-52 W -6.5 L 69.5 O 11/29 TULANE 45-6 W -14 W 53 U 11/27 at Tulsa 30-33 L +16 W 61 O 12/21 vs. Fla Atlantic 27-44 L +3.5 L 67.5 O 12/20 vs. S Florida 14-41 L +10.5 L 56.5 U SOUTHERN MISS GOLDEN EAGLES 2010 Schedule Strength: 32.83 (#87 of 120) Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 4 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 9 Lettermen Returning: 42 Where: Hattiesburg, MS Head Coach: Larry Fedora, 3rd year (14-12 SU) Conference: Conf.-USA 2009 RECORD: 7-6 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: Roberts Stadium 2009 Scoring Differential: +7.1 (#35 of 120) 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +1.4 (#63 of 120) 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 36 (#62 of 120) 2009 Schedule Strength: 29.15 (#99 of 120) 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK Points Scored - Allowed 32.9 (18) 25.8 (62) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 418.3 (30) 392.5 (81) YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.02 (29) 5.38 (56) YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.66 (30) 3.64 (37) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.77 (30) 7.07 (57) Avg. Time of Possession 29.16 (86) Turnover Differential +0.8 (10) 3rd Down Conversion % 41.8% (39) 43.4% (90) Straight Up 9-5 7-6 7-6 7-6 30-23 (57%) * SOUTHERN MISS is on a 23-7 ATS (+15.3 Units) run on the road in the first month of the season Overall ATS 6-7 6-6 8-5 6-6 26-24 (52%) The Average Score was SOUTHERN MISS 17.8, OPPONENT 21.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/2 at Home ATS 3-2 1-4 3-3 3-2 10-11 (48%) - at S Carolina, 9/25 - at Louisiana Tech Away/Neutral ATS 3-5 5-2 5-2 3-4 16-13 (55%) * Over the L2 seasons, SOUTHERN MISS is 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) in November games. The Average vs Conference ATS 4-5 5-3 4-4 5-3 18-15 (55%) Score was SOUTHERN MISS 32.4, OPPONENT 16.3. Potential spots for 2010: 11/6 - at Tulane, Non-Conference ATS 2-2 1-3 4-1 1-3 8-9 (47%) 11/13 - at UCF, 11/20 - HOUSTON, 11/26 - at Tulsa as Favorite ATS 6-3 5-4 5-3 4-5 20-15 (57%) * SOUTHERN MISS is 25-12 UNDER the total (+11.8 Units) vs. teams giving up 24 or more PPG as Underdog ATS 0-4 1-2 3-2 2-1 6-9 (40%) since 92. The Average Score was SOUTHERN MISS 25.8, OPPONENT 18.6. Potential spots for Over-Under 5-6 6-6 7-6 5-7 23-25 (48%) 2010: 9/2 - at S Carolina plus MOST C-USA GAMES 9/2 at Florida 7-34 L +20 L 46.5 U 9/9 SE LOUISIANA 45-0 W - - - 9/16 NC STATE 37-17 W -3 W 39 O 9/26 at C Florida 19-14 W -6 L 47 U 10/3 at Tulsa 6-20 L +5.5 L 46 U 10/14 HOUSTON 31-27 W -1 W 48.5 O 10/21 at Virginia Tech 6-36 L +16 L 41 O 10/28 E CAROLINA 17-20 L -5.5 L 48 U 11/5 at Memphis 42-21 W -7 W 48.5 O 11/11 at Tulane 31-3 W -5.5 W 54 U 11/18 UAB 25-20 W -15 L 45 T 11/25 MARSHALL 42-7 W -7 W 49 T 12/1 at Houston 20-34 L +5.5 L 53.5 O 1/7 vs. Ohio U 28-7 W -6.5 W 42 U 9/1 TENN-MARTIN 35-13 W - - - 9/8 at Tennessee 19-39 L +10.5 L 46.5 O 9/15 at E Carolina 28-21 W -1 W 45.5 O 9/27 at Boise St 16-38 L +10.5 L 50 O 10/3 RICE 29-31 L -20.5 L 54 O 10/13 SMU 28-7 W -9 W 55.5 U 10/21 at Marshall 33-24 W -3 W 55.5 O 10/28 UCF 17-34 L -3 L 57.5 U 11/3 at Uab 37-7 W -11.5 W 50.5 U 11/10 MEMPHIS 26-29 L -16.5 L 59.5 U 11/17 at Utep 56-30 W -3 W 64 O 11/24 ARKANSAS ST 16-10 W -15 L 53 U 12/22 vs. Cincinnati 21-31 L +11 W 54.5 U 8/30 LA LAFAYETTE 51-21 W -9 W 52.5 O 9/6 at Auburn 13-27 L +19.5 W 48.5 U 9/13 at Arkansas St 27-24 W +1 W 55 U 9/20 MARSHALL 27-34 L -7.5 L 54 O 10/4 UTEP 37-40 L -8 L 62 O 10/11 BOISE ST 7-24 L +9.5 L 58 U 10/18 at Rice 40-45 L +2 L 69 O 10/25 at Memphis 30-36 L -3.5 L 52 O 11/1 UAB 70-14 W -7.5 W 62.5 O 11/8 at UCF 17-6 W -2.5 W 49.5 U 11/15 E CAROLINA 21-3 W -3 W 50 U 11/29 at SMU 28-12 W -14 W 59 U 12/21 vs. Troy 30-27 W +4.5 W 55 O 9/5 ALCORN ST 52-0 W - - - 9/12 UCF 26-19 W -15.5 L 50.5 U 9/19 VIRGINIA 37-34 W -13.5 L 46.5 O 9/26 at Kansas 28-35 L +11.5 W 58 O 10/1 at UAB 17-30 L -10 L 58.5 U 10/10 at Louisville 23-25 L -2 L 50 U 10/17 MEMPHIS 36-16 W -14.5 W 54 U 10/24 TULANE 43-6 W -21 W 52 U 10/31 at Houston 43-50 L +6.5 L 65 O 11/14 at Marshall 27-20 W -3 W 51.5 U 11/21 TULSA 44-34 W -9 W 55 O 11/28 at E Carolina 20-25 L +6 W 54.5 U 12/20 vs. Middle Tenn St 32-42 L -3.5 L 61.5 O

UAB BLAZERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 33 (#86 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 9 Lettermen Returning: 54 Where: Birmingham, AL Head Coach: Neil Callaway, 4th year (11-25 SU) Conference: Conf.-USA 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 5-7 ATS Facility: Legion Field 9/4/10 FLA ATLANTIC * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 UAB-FAU games 9/11/10 at SMU * SMU has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. UAB 2009 Scoring Differential: -4.6 (#87 of 120) 9/18/10 TROY * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in UAB-TRO series 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -6.1 (#90 of 120) 9/25/10 at Tennessee * ROAD TEAM is 0-3 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 TEN-UAB games 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 30 (#85 of 120) 10/6/10 at UCF * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 UCF-UAB games 2009 Schedule Strength: 31.67 (#79 of 120) 10/16/10 UTEP * ROAD TEAM has swept L3 UAB-UTP games, both SU & ATS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Mississippi St * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 MSS-UAB games 10/30/10 at Southern Miss * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 SM-UAB games Points Scored - Allowed 27.8 (59) 32.3 (102) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 425.9 (22) 453.3 (113) 11/6/10 MARSHALL * UNDERDOG is 3-2 SU & 4-1 ATS in L5 UAB-MAR matchups YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.78 (6) 6.36 (105) 11/11/10 E CAROLINA * UNDERDOG is 4-0 ATS in L4 UAB-ECU games at UAB YP Rush Gained - Allowed 5.96 (2) 4.19 (75) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.08 (20) 8.35 (112) 11/20/10 MEMPHIS * UAB is on 8-2 SU & 7-1 ATS run vs. MEMPHIS Avg. Time of Possession 29.16 (85) 11/27/10 at Rice * HOME TEAM has swept L3 RIC-UAB games, both SU & ATS Turnover Differential +0.8 (12) 3rd Down Conversion % 36.9% (80) 44.9% (101) Straight Up 3-9 2-10 4-8 5-7 14-34 (29%) * UAB is on a 7-12 ATS slide as a underdog of a touchdown or more. The Average Score was UAB Overall ATS 3-8 6-5 6-4 5-7 20-24 (45%) 18.5, OPPONENT 41.1. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at SMU, 9/18 TROY, 9/25 - at Tennessee, at Home ATS 1-4 2-2 2-1 3-2 8-9 (47%) 10/6 - at UCF, 10/23 - at Mississippi St, 10/30 - at Southern Miss Away/Neutral ATS 2-4 4-3 4-3 2-5 12-15 (44%) * UAB is on a 9-1 ATS (+7.9 Units) run as home underdogs of 3.5 to 10 points The Average vs Conference ATS 1-6 4-4 4-3 4-4 13-17 (43%) Score was UAB 26.4, OPPONENT 23.9. Potential spots for 2010: 11/6 - MARSHALL, 11/11 - E Non-Conference ATS 2-2 2-1 2-1 1-3 7-7 (50%) CAROLINA as Favorite ATS 1-5 1-0 0-0 3-1 5-6 (45%) * UAB is 7-1-1 ATS vs Memphis. Potential spots for 2010: 11/20 - MEMPHIS as Underdog ATS 2-3 5-5 6-4 2-6 15-18 (45%) Over-Under 5-6 4-7 4-6 8-4 21-23 (48%) 9/2 at Oklahoma 17-24 L +24 W 41.5 U 9/1 at Michigan St 18-55 L +24 L 49.5 O 8/30 TULSA 22-45 L +13 L 67 T 9/5 RICE 44-24 W -6 W 60 O 9/9 E CAROLINA 17-12 W -6.5 L 49 U 9/8 at Florida St 24-34 L +37 W 53.5 O 9/6 at Fla Atlantic 34-49 L +14 L 56.5 O 9/12 SMU 33-35 L -11 L 59.5 O 9/16 at Georgia 0-34 L +18 L 39 U 9/15 ALCORN ST 22-0 W - - - 9/13 at Tennessee 3-35 L +33 W 61 U 9/19 at Troy 14-27 L +6.5 L 59.5 U 9/23 MISSISSIPPI ST 10-16 L -9 L 37.5 U 9/29 at Tulsa 30-38 L +24 W 69 U 9/20 ALABAMA ST 45-10 W - - - 9/26 at Texas A&M 19-56 L +15 L 64.5 O 9/30 TROY ST 21-3 W -6 W 41 U 10/6 at Mississippi St 13-30 L +17.5 W 51 U 9/27 at S Carolina 13-26 L +25.5 W 50.5 U 10/1 SOUTHERN MISS 30-17 W +10 W 58.5 U 10/7 MEMPHIS 35-29 W -6 T 41.5 O 10/13 TULANE 26-21 W -2.5 W 51 U 10/2 MEMPHIS 30-33 L +3 T 58 O 10/17 at Ole Miss 13-48 L +23 L 55 O 10/14 at Rice 33-34 L -5 L 48 O 10/20 HOUSTON 10-49 L +13 L 61 U 10/9 at Houston 20-45 L +18.5 L 67.5 U 10/24 at Marshall 7-27 L +7 L 51.5 U 10/21 MARSHALL 24-31 L -6 L 45.5 O 10/27 at E Carolina 6-41 L +16 L 56.5 U 10/18 MARSHALL 23-21 W +2.5 W 55.5 U 10/31 at UTEP 38-33 W +7.5 W 63.5 O 10/31 at SMU 9-22 L +5 L 48.5 U 11/3 SOUTHERN MISS 7-37 L +11.5 L 50.5 U 11/1 at Southern Miss 14-70 L +7.5 L 62.5 O 11/7 FLA ATLANTIC 56-29 W -7 W 63.5 O 11/10 UTEP 17-36 L -2.5 L 51.5 O 11/10 UCF 31-45 L +19.5 W 59.5 O 11/15 at Tulane 41-24 W +4 W 54.5 O 11/14 at Memphis 31-21 W -1 W 64 U 11/18 at Southern Miss 20-25 L +15 W 45 T 11/17 at Memphis 9-25 L +9.5 L 62 U 11/22 E CAROLINA 13-17 L +6.5 W 50.5 U 11/21 at E Carolina 21-37 L +14.5 L 56.5 O 11/25 at C Florida 22-31 L +3.5 L 47 O 11/24 at Marshall 39-46 L +14.5 W 59 O 11/29 at UCF 15-0 W +9 W 47 U 11/28 UCF 27-34 L +3 L 52.5 O UCF KNIGHTS 2010 Schedule Strength: 29.67 (#108 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 46 Where: Orlando, FL Head Coach: George O Leary, 5th year (34-41 SU) Conference: Conf.-USA 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 9-3 ATS Facility: Bright House Networks Stadium 9/4/10 S DAKOTA 9/11/10 NC STATE 2009 Scoring Differential: +3.6 (#50 of 120) 9/18/10 at Buffalo 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +3.4 (#54 of 120) 9/25/10 at Kansas St 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 35 (#66 of 120) 10/6/10 UAB * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 UCF-UAB games 2009 Schedule Strength: 31.23 (#80 of 120) 10/13/10 at Marshall * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 ATS in L2 MAR-UCF games 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 RICE 10/30/10 E CAROLINA * UNDERDOG is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 UCF-ECU games Points Scored - Allowed 26.2 (67) 22.5 (42) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 340.8 (87) 352.5 (49) 11/5/10 at Houston YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.16 (88) 5.26 (51) 11/13/10 SOUTHERN MISS * L3 UCF-SM series games have gone UNDER the total YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.54 (99) 2.66 (3) 11/20/10 at Tulane YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.21 (57) 7.62 (89) Avg. Time of Possession 30.93 (33) 11/27/10 at Memphis * UCF has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. MEMPHIS Turnover Differential +0.6 (17) 3rd Down Conversion % 37.3% (78) 43.7% (91) Straight Up 4-8 10-4 4-8 8-5 26-25 (51%) * UCF is 21-9 ATS (+11.1 Units) on grass fields since 07. The Average Score was UCF 28, OPPONENT Overall ATS 3-7 8-6 6-5 9-3 26-21 (55%) 23. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - NC STATE, 9/18 - at Buffalo, 10/6 - UAB, 10/23 - RICE, 10/30 - E at Home ATS 2-4 5-2 3-2 4-2 14-10 (58%) CAROLINA, 11/5 - at Houston, 11/13 - SOUTHERN MISS, 11/27 - at Memphis Away/Neutral ATS 1-3 3-4 3-3 5-1 12-11 (52%) * UCF is 11-2 UNDER the total (+8.8 Units) at home after the first month of the season since 07. The vs Conference ATS 3-4 6-3 4-4 7-1 20-12 (63%) Average Score was UCF 28.6, OPPONENT 18.2. Potential spots for 2010: 10/6 - UAB, 10/23 - RICE, Non-Conference ATS 0-3 2-3 2-1 2-2 6-9 (40%) 10/30 - E CAROLINA, 11/13 - SOUTHERN MISS as Favorite ATS 1-2 5-5 1-2 5-1 12-10 (55%) * UCF was 7-1 ATS (+5.9 Units) in conference games last season. The Average Score was UCF 31.9, as Underdog ATS 2-5 3-1 5-3 4-2 14-11 (56%) OPPONENT 18.1. Potential spots for 2010: 10/6 - UAB, 10/13 - at Marshall, 10/23 - RICE, 10/30 - E Over-Under 5-6 5-8 5-5 5-6 20-25 (44%) CAROLINA, 11/5 - at Houston, 11/13 - SOUTHERN MISS, 11/20 - at Tulane, 11/27 - at Memphis 9/2 VILLANOVA 35-16 W - - - 9/1 at Nc State 25-23 W +7.5 W 48 T 8/30 S CAROLINA ST 17-0 W - - - 9/5 SAMFORD 28-24 W - - - 9/9 at Florida 0-42 L +22 L 50 U 9/15 TEXAS 32-35 L +16.5 W 51 O 9/6 S FLORIDA 24-31 L +14 W 47.5 O 9/12 at Southern Miss 19-26 L +15.5 W 50.5 U 9/16 S FLORIDA 17-24 L +2.5 L 44 U 9/22 MEMPHIS 56-20 W -7 W 56.5 O 9/20 at Boston College 7-34 L +10 L 40 O 9/19 BUFFALO 23-17 W -5 W 46.5 U 9/26 SOUTHERN MISS 14-19 L +6 W 47 U 9/29 LA LAFAYETTE 37-19 W -22.5 L 61.5 U 9/27 at UTEP 13-58 L -3.5 L 50.5 O 9/26 at E Carolina 14-19 L +9 W 43.5 U 10/4 at Marshall 23-22 W +3.5 W 44 O 10/6 at E Carolina 38-52 L -4 L 53.5 O 10/4 SMU 31-17 W -13.5 W 55 U 10/3 MEMPHIS 32-14 W -7 W 46 T 10/13 PITTSBURGH 7-52 L +10.5 L 48.5 O 10/13 at S Florida 12-64 L +10 L 51.5 O 10/11 at Miami 14-20 L +17 W 46.5 U 10/17 MIAMI 7-27 L +12.5 L 46.5 U 10/21 RICE 29-40 L -6.5 L 55.5 O 10/20 TULSA 44-23 W -3 W 73.5 U 10/26 at Tulsa 19-49 L +23 L 68 T 10/24 at Rice 49-7 W -10 W 51 O 10/28 at Southern Miss 34-17 W +3 W 57.5 U 10/28 at Houston 31-51 L +15 L 56 O 11/2 E CAROLINA 10-13 L +6 W 47 U 11/1 MARSHALL 21-20 W -7 L 43 U 11/3 MARSHALL 47-13 W -14 W 62.5 U 11/4 E CAROLINA 10-23 L +4 L 56 U 11/10 at Uab 45-31 W -19.5 L 59.5 O 11/8 SOUTHERN MISS 6-17 L +2.5 L 49.5 U 11/7 at Texas 3-35 L +35.5 W 47 U 11/11 at Memphis 26-24 W -2.5 L 59.5 U 11/17 at Smu 49-20 W -10.5 W 71 U 11/15 at Marshall 30-14 W +7.5 W 39.5 O 11/14 HOUSTON 37-32 W +3.5 W 67.5 O 11/18 at Tulane 9-10 L +1 T 57 U 11/24 UTEP 36-20 W -21 L 72 U 11/22 at Memphis 28-21 W +6 W 46.5 O 11/21 TULANE 49-0 W -22.5 W 47 O 11/25 UAB 31-22 W -3.5 W 47 O 12/1 TULSA 44-25 W -7.5 W 73 U 11/29 UAB 0-15 L -9 L 47 U 11/28 at UAB 34-27 W -3 W 52.5 O 12/29 vs. Mississippi St 3-10 L -3 L 52.5 U 12/19 vs. Rutgers 24-45 L +2.5 L 45 O 126 WWW.STATFOX.COM

HOUSTON COUGARS 2010 Schedule Strength: 31.67 (#98 of 120) RICE OWLS 2010 Schedule Strength: 35 (#76 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 127 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 3-4 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 47 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 4-2-5 - Starters Returning: 9 Lettermen Returning: 51 Where: Houston, TX Head Coach: Kevin Sumlin, 3rd year (18-9 SU) Conference: Conf.-USA 2009 RECORD: 10-4 SU, 8-5 ATS Facility: Robertson Stadium 9/4/10 TEXAS ST UNIV 9/10/10 UTEP * UNDERDOG is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 HOU-UTP games 2009 Scoring Differential: +12.1 (#18 of 120) 9/18/10 at UCLA * HOME TEAM has covered spread in L2 UCL-HOU games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +7.8 (#30 of 120) 9/25/10 TULANE * FAVORITE is on 7-0 SU & ATS run in L7 HOU-TUL matchups 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 43 (#40 of 120) 10/9/10 MISSISSIPPI ST * HOUSTON has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. MISSISSIPPI ST 2009 Schedule Strength: 31.07 (#82 of 120) 10/16/10 at Rice * UNDERDOG is 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 RIC-HOU matchups at RICE 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at SMU * UNDERDOG is 4-6 SU but 7-3 ATS in SMU-HOU series since 92 10/30/10 at Memphis * L3 MEM-HOU series games have gone UNDER the total Points Scored - Allowed 42.2 (1) 30.1 (95) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 563.2 (1) 451.3 (111) 11/5/10 UCF YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.86 (5) 6.02 (99) 11/13/10 TULSA * UNDERDOG is 6-1 SU & 7-0 ATS in L7 HOU-TLS matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.56 (35) 5.11 (108) 11/20/10 at Southern Miss * HOME TEAM is 8-3 SU & 9-2 ATS in SM-HOU series since 96 YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.11 (19) 7.35 (78) Avg. Time of Possession 26.78 (115) 11/27/10 at Texas Tech * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 TT-HOU games Turnover Differential +0.3 (42) 3rd Down Conversion % 50.8% (4) 43.8% (92) Straight Up 10-4 8-5 8-5 10-4 36-18 (67%) * Over the L2 seasons, HOUSTON is 2-10 ATS (-9 Units) as road favorites. The Average Score Overall ATS 8-5 4-8 5-7 8-5 25-25 (50%) was HOUSTON 34.3, OPPONENT 38.3. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - at Rice, 10/23 - at SMU, at Home ATS 6-1 1-4 3-1 5-0 15-6 (71%) 10/30 - at Memphis, 11/20 - at Southern Miss Away/Neutral ATS 2-4 3-4 2-6 3-5 10-19 (34%) * HOUSTON is on a 7-21 ATS (-16.1 Units) skid on the road in November games The Average vs Conference ATS 6-3 2-6 4-4 5-4 17-17 (50%) Score was HOUSTON 21.6, OPPONENT 36.2. Potential spots for 2010: 11/20 - at Southern Miss, Non-Conference ATS 2-2 2-2 1-3 3-1 8-8 (50%) 11/27 - at Texas Tech as Favorite ATS 6-3 3-6 3-6 5-5 17-20 (46%) * Over the L2 seasons, HOUSTON is 8-1 ATS (+6.9 Units) at home. The Average Score was as Underdog ATS 2-2 1-2 2-1 3-0 8-5 (62%) HOUSTON 49.3, OPPONENT 23.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/10 - UTEP, 9/25 - TULANE, 10/9 Over-Under 9-4 4-8 7-5 8-5 28-22 (56%) - MISSISSIPPI ST, 11/5 - UCF, 11/13 - TULSA 9/2 at Rice 31-30 W -14.5 L 51 O 9/1 at Oregon 27-48 L +18 L 58 O 8/30 SOUTHERN 55-3 W - - - 9/5 NORTHWESTERN ST 55-7 W - - - 9/9 TULANE 45-7 W -14 W 51 O 9/15 at Tulane 34-10 W -14.5 W 62.5 U 9/6 at Oklahoma St 37-56 L +14.5 L 61.5 O 9/12 at Oklahoma St 45-35 W +16.5 W 71 O 9/16 GRAMBLING 42-22 W - - - 9/22 COLORADO ST 38-27 W -6.5 W 64.5 O 9/13 vs. Air Force 28-31 L -2 L 51.5 O 9/26 TEXAS TECH 29-28 W +2 W 75.5 U 9/23 OKLAHOMA ST 34-25 W -2.5 W 55 O 9/29 E CAROLINA 35-37 L -13 L 57.5 O 9/20 at Colorado St 25-28 L -5.5 L 62.5 U 10/3 at UTEP 41-58 L -14 L 69.5 O 9/30 at Miami 13-14 L +16.5 W 49 U 10/6 at Alabama 24-30 L +10.5 W 58 U 9/27 at E Carolina 41-24 W +10.5 W 61 O 10/10 at Mississippi St 31-24 W +3 W 68 U 10/7 LA LAFAYETTE 28-31 L -17 L 52 O 10/13 RICE 56-48 W -23 L 66.5 O 10/9 UAB 45-20 W -18.5 W 67.5 U 10/17 at Tulane 44-16 W -17 W 68.5 U 10/14 at Southern Miss 27-31 L +1 L 48.5 O 10/20 at Uab 49-10 W -13 W 61 U 10/18 at SMU 44-38 W -14.5 L 70 O 10/24 SMU 38-15 W -16 W 71 U 10/21 UTEP 34-17 W -7 W 60.5 U 10/31 SOUTHERN MISS 50-43 W -6.5 W 65 O 10/27 at Utep 34-31 W -6 L 74.5 U 10/28 at Marshall 23-37 L -7 L 60.5 U 10/28 C FLORIDA 51-31 W -15 W 56 O 11/7 at Tulsa 46-45 W -2 L 70.5 O 11/4 TULSA 27-10 W +2.5 W 54.5 U 11/4 SMU 38-28 W -20 L 68 U 11/8 TULANE 42-14 W -18 W 57.5 U 11/14 at UCF 32-37 L -3.5 L 67.5 O 11/11 at SMU 37-27 W -3.5 W 54 O 11/10 at Tulsa 7-56 L -1 L 74.5 U 11/15 TULSA 70-30 W +3.5 W 80.5 O 11/21 MEMPHIS 55-14 W -23 W 74 U 11/18 at Memphis 23-20 W -17 L 60 U 11/17 MARSHALL 35-28 W -12 L 65.5 U 11/22 UTEP 42-37 W -19 L 73.5 O 11/28 RICE 73-14 W -30.5 W 71.5 O 12/1 SOUTHERN MISS 34-20 W -5.5 W 53.5 O 11/24 TEXAS SOUTHERN 59-6 W - - - 11/29 at Rice 42-56 L -3.5 L 79 O 12/5 at E Carolina 32-38 L -1 L 68.5 O 12/29 vs. S Carolina 36-44 L +5 L 56 O 12/28 vs. Tcu 13-20 L +6.5 L 57 U 12/31 vs. Air Force 34-28 W -5.5 W 65 U 12/31 vs. Air Force 20-47 L -4.5 L 65.5 O Where: Houston, TX Head Coach: David Bailiff, 4th year (15-22 SU) Conference: Conf.-USA 2009 RECORD: 2-10 SU, 4-7-1 ATS Facility: Rice Stadium 9/4/10 TEXAS * TEXAS has won four straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. RICE 9/11/10 at North Texas 2009 Scoring Differential: -24.8 (#119 of 120) 9/18/10 NORTHWESTERN * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 RIC-NW games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -23.3 (#120 of 120) 9/25/10 BAYLOR * FAVORITE has swept L4 RIC-BAY games, both SU & ATS 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 15 (#115 of 120) 10/2/10 SMU * RICE is 7-0 SU & 6-0 ATS in its L7 home games vs. SMU 2009 Schedule Strength: 35.33 (#57 of 120) 10/9/10 at UTEP * RICE is on 5-2 SU & 7-0 ATS run vs. UTEP 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 HOUSTON * UNDERDOG is 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 RIC-HOU matchups at RICE 10/23/10 at UCF Points Scored - Allowed 18.3 (110) 43.1 (120) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 304.6 (111) 464.0 (117) 11/6/10 at Tulsa * L5 games of TLS-RIC series are 4-1 OVER the total YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.25 (117) 6.60 (113) 11/13/10 at Tulane * UNDERDOG is 7-2 SU & ATS in L9 TUL-RIC matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.22 (107) 4.73 (99) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 5.19 (117) 9.09 (118) 11/20/10 E CAROLINA * HOME TEAM has swept L3 RIC-ECU games, both SU & ATS Avg. Time of Possession 28.49 (102) 11/27/10 UAB * HOME TEAM has swept L3 RIC-UAB games, both SU & ATS Turnover Differential -0.8 (107) 3rd Down Conversion % 31.1% (110) 44.1% (94) Straight Up 7-6 3-9 10-3 2-10 22-28 (44%) * RICE is on a 17-4 ATS (+12.6 Units) run at home vs. good passing teams with a completion pct. of 58% or Overall ATS 9-4 5-6 9-4 4-7 27-21 (56%) better. The Average Score was RICE 34.2, OPPONENT 25.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - TEXAS, 9/18 - at Home ATS 4-1 2-3 5-1 2-3 13-8 (62%) NORTHWESTERN, 9/25 - BAYLOR, 10/2 - SMU, 10/16 - HOUSTON, 11/20 - E CAROLINA, 11/27 - UAB Away/Neutral ATS 5-3 3-3 4-3 2-4 14-13 (52%) * RICE is on a 15-1 ATS (+13.9 Units) run at home vs. poor ball control teams, 28 or less TOP minutes/ vs Conference ATS 7-1 5-3 7-1 3-4 22-9 (71%) game The Average Score was RICE 36.3, OPPONENT 23.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - BAYLOR, Non-Conference ATS 2-3 0-3 2-3 1-3 5-12 (29%) 10/16 - HOUSTON as Favorite ATS 0-2 0-2 9-1 1-0 10-5 (67%) * RICE is on a 13-1 OVER the total (+11.9 Units) run at home coming off a road loss against a conference as Underdog ATS 9-2 5-4 0-3 3-7 17-16 (52%) rival The Average Score was RICE 30.4, OPPONENT 28.2. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - HOUSTON, Over-Under 11-2 10-1 9-4 8-4 38-11 (78%) 11/20 - E CAROLINA 9/2 HOUSTON 30-31 L +14.5 W 51 O 9/1 NICHOLLS ST 14-16 L - - - 8/29 SMU 56-27 W -4 W 70 O 9/5 at UAB 24-44 L +6 L 60 O 9/9 at UCLA 16-26 L +27.5 W 56.5 U 9/8 at Baylor 17-42 L +7.5 L 46.5 O 9/6 at Memphis 42-35 W +2.5 W 67 O 9/12 at Texas Tech 10-55 L +28 L 64 O 9/16 TEXAS 7-52 L +36 L 54 O 9/15 TEXAS TECH 24-59 L +27 L 64 O 9/13 at Vanderbilt 21-38 L +9.5 L 58 O 9/19 at Oklahoma St 24-41 L +32.5 W 66.5 U 9/23 at Florida St 7-55 L +30 L 47 O 9/22 at Texas 14-58 L +38 L 65 O 9/20 at Texas 10-52 L +29 L 68 U 9/26 VANDERBILT 17-36 L +7.5 L 49.5 O 9/30 at Army 48-14 W +10 W 44.5 O 10/3 at Southern Miss 31-29 W +20.5 W 54 O 9/27 NORTH TEXAS 77-20 W -15.5 W 67.5 O 10/3 TULSA 10-27 L +17 T 63 U 10/7 at Tulane 24-38 L -1 L 55.5 O 10/13 at Houston 48-56 L +23 W 66.5 O 10/4 at Tulsa 28-63 L +16.5 L 79.5 O 10/10 NAVY 14-63 L +10 L 56 O 10/14 UAB 34-33 W +5 W 48 O 10/20 MEMPHIS 35-38 L -1 L 64.5 O 10/18 SOUTHERN MISS 45-40 W -2 W 69 O 10/17 at E Carolina 13-49 L +18 L 56 O 10/21 at C Florida 40-29 W +6.5 W 55.5 O 10/27 at Marshall 21-34 L +9 L 67 U 10/25 at Tulane 42-17 W +1.5 W 66.5 U 10/24 UCF 7-49 L +10 L 51 O 11/4 at UTEP 37-31 W +10 W 58 O 11/3 UTEP 56-48 W +7.5 W 71 O 11/1 at UTEP 49-44 W -2.5 W 76.5 O 11/7 at SMU 28-31 L +18 W 57 O 11/11 at Tulsa 41-38 W +14 W 54.5 O 11/10 at Smu 43-42 W +6 W 70 O 11/8 ARMY 38-31 W -8.5 L 55.5 O 11/14 TULANE 28-20 W -3 W 58 U 11/18 E CAROLINA 18-17 W +2.5 W 57 U 11/17 TULANE 31-45 L -2 L 70 O 11/22 MARSHALL 35-10 W -8.5 W 68 U 11/21 UTEP 30-29 W +6.5 W 70.5 U 11/25 SMU 31-27 W +2 W 55 O 11/24 TULSA 43-48 L +13.5 W 76 O 11/29 HOUSTON 56-42 W +3.5 W 79 O 11/28 at Houston 14-73 L +30.5 L 71.5 O 12/22 vs. Troy St 17-41 L -5 L 55 O 12/30 vs. W Michigan 38-14 W -2 W 73.5 U

SMU MUSTANGS 2010 Schedule Strength: 34.75 (#78 of 120) TULANE GREEN WAVE 2010 Schedule Strength: 32.83 (#87 of 120) Offense: Run-and-Shoot - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 3-4 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 43 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 4 Lettermen Returning: 48 Where: Dallas, TX Head Coach: June Jones, 3rd year (9-16 SU) Conference: Conf.-USA 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 7-5 ATS Facility: Gerald Ford Stadium 9/5/10 at Texas Tech * L4 TT-SMU series games have gone UNDER the total 9/11/10 UAB * SMU has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. UAB 2009 Scoring Differential: +1.6 (#61 of 120) 9/18/10 WASHINGTON ST 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -0.5 (#71 of 120) 9/24/10 TCU * ROAD TEAM is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 SMU-TCU games 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 30 (#85 of 120) 10/2/10 at Rice * RICE is 7-0 SU & 6-0 ATS in its L7 home games vs. SMU 2009 Schedule Strength: 29.08 (#100 of 120) 10/9/10 TULSA * SMU is 8-4 SU & 10-2 ATS vs. TULSA since 98 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at Navy * FAVORITE has swept L3 NAV-SMU games at NAVY, both SU & ATS 10/23/10 HOUSTON * UNDERDOG is 4-6 SU but 7-3 ATS in SMU-HOU series since 92 Points Scored - Allowed 29.2 (45) 27.6 (80) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 391.8 (51) 397.1 (85) 10/30/10 at Tulane * ROAD TEAM is on 4-2 SU & 6-0 ATS run in TUL-SMU series YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.99 (30) 5.56 (71) 11/6/10 at UTEP * UTEP is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. SMU YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.78 (81) 4.39 (87) 11/20/10 MARSHALL * SMU is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. MARSHALL YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.77 (31) 6.89 (51) Avg. Time of Possession 31.03 (28) 11/26/10 at E Carolina * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 ECU-SMU games Turnover Differential +0.2 (51) 3rd Down Conversion % 31.7% (109) 42.1% (85) Straight Up 6-6 1-11 1-11 8-5 16-33 (33%) * SMU is on a 5-16 ATS (-12.6 Units) skid at home vs. teams giving up 31 or more PPG The Overall ATS 6-5 4-8 3-7 7-5 20-25 (44%) Average Score was SMU 23.5, OPPONENT 26.7. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - UAB, 9/18 - at Home ATS 4-1 0-6 2-3 2-3 8-13 (38%) WASHINGTON ST Away/Neutral ATS 2-4 4-2 1-4 5-2 12-12 (50%) * SMU is 0-8 ATS (-8.8 Units) as favorites since 07. The Average Score was SMU 35.6, vs Conference ATS 5-3 3-5 3-5 4-4 15-17 (47%) OPPONENT 34.1. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - UAB, 9/18 - WASHINGTON ST, 10/2 - at Rice, Non-Conference ATS 1-2 1-3 0-2 3-1 5-8 (38%) 10/30 - at Tulane, 11/20 - MARSHALL as Favorite ATS 4-2 0-4 0-1 0-4 4-11 (27%) * SMU is 0-7 ATS (-7.7 Units) at home in November games since 07. The Average Score was as Underdog ATS 2-3 4-4 3-6 7-1 16-14 (53%) SMU 27.4, OPPONENT 33. Potential spots for 2010: 11/20 - MARSHALL Over-Under 7-4 6-6 4-7 5-6 22-23 (49%) 9/2 at Texas Tech 3-35 L +24.5 L 52.5 U 9/3 TEXAS TECH 9-49 L +8.5 L 60.5 U 8/29 at Rice 27-56 L +4 L 70 O 9/5 STEPH F AUSTIN 31-23 W - - - 9/9 at North Texas 6-24 L -3.5 L 41 U 9/8 NORTH TEXAS 45-31 W -18.5 L 49.5 O 9/6 TEXAS ST UNIV 47-36 W - - - 9/12 at UAB 35-33 W +11 W 59.5 O 9/16 SAM HOUSTON ST 45-14 W - - - 9/15 at Arkansas St 28-45 L +3 L 51 O 9/13 at Texas Tech 7-43 L +36 T 68.5 U 9/19 at Washington St 27-30 L -4 L 58 U 9/23 ARKANSAS ST 55-9 W -7 W 37.5 O 9/22 at Tcu 7-21 L +23.5 W 52.5 U 9/20 TCU 7-48 L +24 L 52.5 O 10/3 at TCU 14-39 L +28.5 W 53 T 9/30 at Tulane 33-28 W -3 W 50 O 9/29 UTEP 45-48 L -1 L 60 O 9/25 at Tulane 27-34 L +17.5 W 52.5 O 10/10 E CAROLINA 28-21 W +4 W 53 U 10/7 at UTEP 21-24 L +13.5 W 50.5 U 10/13 at Southern Miss 7-28 L +9 L 55.5 U 10/4 at UCF 17-31 L +13.5 L 55 U 10/17 NAVY 35-38 L +7 W 53.5 O 10/14 MARSHALL 31-21 W -6 W 44 O 10/20 TULANE 34-41 L -6 L 56 O 10/11 TULSA 31-37 L +23 W 77.5 U 10/24 at Houston 15-38 L +16 L 71 U 10/21 at E Carolina 21-38 L +5 L 47.5 O 10/27 at Tulsa 23-29 L +13.5 W 71.5 U 10/18 HOUSTON 38-44 L +14.5 W 70 O 10/31 at Tulsa 27-13 W +14.5 W 53 U 10/31 UAB 22-9 W -5 W 48.5 U 11/4 at Houston 28-38 L +20 W 68 U 10/25 at Navy 7-34 L +14 L 61.5 U 11/7 RICE 31-28 W -18 L 57 O 11/11 HOUSTON 27-37 L +3.5 L 54 O 11/10 RICE 42-43 L -6 L 70 O 11/8 MEMPHIS 26-31 L 0 L 61 U 11/14 UTEP 35-31 W -6.5 L 62 O 11/18 TULSA 34-24 W +6 W 49.5 O 11/17 UCF 20-49 L +10.5 L 71 U 11/15 at UTEP 10-36 L +13.5 L 66 U 11/21 at Marshall 31-34 L +3.5 W 48.5 O 11/25 at Rice 27-31 L -2 L 55 O 11/24 at Memphis 52-55 L +6.5 W 69.5 O 11/29 SOUTHERN MISS 12-28 L +14 L 59 U 11/28 TULANE 26-21 W -20 L 55.5 U 12/24 vs. Nevada 45-10 W +11 W 69.5 U Where: New Orleans, LA Head Coach: Bob Toledo, 4th year (9-27 SU) Conference: Conf.-USA 2009 RECORD: 3-9 SU, 4-8 ATS Facility: Superdome 9/4/10 SE LOUISIANA 9/11/10 OLE MISS * ROAD TEAM is 2-3 SU but 4-1 ATS in L5 TUL-MIS matchups 2009 Scoring Differential: -20.6 (#116 of 120) 9/25/10 at Houston * FAVORITE is on 7-0 SU & ATS run in L7 HOU-TUL matchups 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -20.5 (#116 of 10/2/10 at Rutgers * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 RUT-TUL games 120) 10/9/10 ARMY * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 TUL-ARM games 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 11 (#118 of 120) 10/16/10 at Tulsa * FAVORITE is 5-0 SU & ATS in L5 TLS-TUL matchups 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at UTEP * TULANE is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. UTEP 10/30/10 SMU * ROAD TEAM is on 4-2 SU & 6-0 ATS run in TUL-SMU series Points Scored - Allowed 16.1 (115) 36.7 (115) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 313.0 (105) 422.8 (102) 11/6/10 SOUTHERN MISS * L4 TUL-SM series games have gone UNDER the total YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.89 (103) 6.31 (104) 11/13/10 RICE * UNDERDOG is 7-2 SU & ATS in L9 TUL-RIC matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.22 (108) 4.94 (106) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.66 (89) 8.63 (114) 11/20/10 UCF Avg. Time of Possession 30.22 (58) 11/27/10 at Marshall * MARSHALL has taken L2 games vs. TULANE both SU & ATS Turnover Differential -1.3 (119) 3rd Down Conversion % 43.8% (23) 48.8% (114) Straight Up 4-8 4-8 2-10 3-9 13-35 (27%) * TULANE is on a 2-11 ATS (-10.1 Units) skid on the road vs. good offensive teams - averaging Overall ATS 4-7 5-6 5-7 4-8 18-28 (39%) >=425 YPG The Average Score was TULANE 17.6, OPPONENT 43.8. Potential spots for 2010: at Home ATS 2-2 2-4 2-4 2-4 8-14 (36%) 9/25 - at Houston, 10/23 - at UTEP Away/Neutral ATS 2-5 3-2 3-3 2-4 10-14 (42%) * Over the L2 seasons, TULANE is 11-1 UNDER the total (+9.9 Units) as road underdogs. The vs Conference ATS 1-6 3-5 2-6 2-6 8-23 (26%) Average Score was TULANE 10.7, OPPONENT 35.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at Houston, Non-Conference ATS 3-1 2-1 3-1 2-2 10-5 (67%) 10/2 - at Rutgers, 10/16 - at Tulsa, 10/23 - at UTEP, 11/27 - at Marshall as Favorite ATS 1-0 0-1 1-4 0-0 2-5 (29%) * TULANE is 19-39 ATS (-23.9 Units) at home coming off a loss by 14 or more points since 92. as Underdog ATS 3-7 5-5 4-3 3-8 15-23 (39%) The Average Score was TULANE 17.2, OPPONENT 38.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - OLE Over-Under 8-4 4-7 4-8 3-8 19-27 (41%) MISS, 11/6 - SOUTHERN MISS 9/9 at Houston 7-45 L +14 L 51 O 9/8 MISSISSIPPI ST 17-38 L +5.5 L 46.5 O 9/6 at Alabama 6-20 L +29 W 45.5 U 9/4 TULSA 13-37 L +13.5 L 64 U 9/16 at Mississippi St 32-29 W +12 W 38 O 9/15 HOUSTON 10-34 L +14.5 L 62.5 U 9/13 E CAROLINA 24-28 L +11.5 W 45 O 9/12 BYU 3-54 L +18.5 L 52.5 O 9/23 at LSU 7-49 L +36.5 L 49 O 9/22 SE LOUISIANA 35-27 W - - - 9/20 LA MONROE 24-10 W -4.5 W 46 U 9/26 MCNEESE ST 42-32 W -3 W - 9/30 SMU 28-33 L +3 L 50 O 9/29 LSU 9-34 L +41 W 52.5 U 9/25 SMU 34-27 W -17.5 L 52.5 O 10/3 at Army 17-16 W +6 W 45 U 10/7 RICE 38-24 W +1 W 55.5 O 10/6 at Army 17-20 L +5 W 44.5 U 10/4 ARMY 13-44 L -18.5 L 43 O 10/10 MARSHALL 10-31 L +3 L 48 U 10/14 at UTEP 20-34 L +13 L 60.5 U 10/13 at Uab 21-26 L +2.5 L 51 U 10/11 at UTEP 21-24 L +6 W 56 U 10/17 HOUSTON 16-44 L +17 L 68.5 U 10/21 at Auburn 13-38 L +28 W 50 O 10/20 at Smu 41-34 W +6 W 56 O 10/25 RICE 17-42 L -1.5 L 66.5 U 10/24 at Southern Miss 6-43 L +21 L 52 U 10/28 ARMY 42-28 W -3.5 W 50.5 O 10/27 MEMPHIS 27-28 L -2.5 L 57 U 11/1 at LSU 10-35 L +30.5 W 53.5 U 10/31 at LSU 0-42 L +37 L 45.5 U 11/4 at Marshall 21-42 L +6.5 L 58 O 11/3 TULSA 25-49 L +6 L 66.5 O 11/8 at Houston 14-42 L +18 L 57.5 U 11/7 UTEP 45-38 W +6.5 W 57.5 O 11/11 SOUTHERN MISS 3-31 L +5.5 L 54 U 11/10 UTEP 34-19 W +3 W 69.5 U 11/15 UAB 24-41 L -4 L 54.5 O 11/14 at Rice 20-28 L +3 L 58 U 11/18 C FLORIDA 10-9 W -1 T 57 U 11/17 at Rice 45-31 W +2 W 70 O 11/22 at Tulsa 7-56 L +28.5 L 69 U 11/21 at UCF 0-49 L +22.5 L 47 O 11/24 at Tulsa 3-38 L +17 L 52.5 U 11/24 at E Carolina 12-35 L +13 L 61 U 11/29 at Memphis 6-45 L +14 L 53 U 11/28 at SMU 21-26 L +20 W 55.5 U 128 WWW.STATFOX.COM

TULSA GOLDEN HURRICANES 2010 Schedule Strength: 31.08 (#103 of 120) UTEP MINERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 27.58 (#117 of 120) Offense: Spread No-Huddle - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 3-3-5 - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 42 Offense: One-Back - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 4 Lettermen Returning: 45 Where: Tulsa, OK Head Coach: Todd Graham, 4th year (26-14 SU) Conference: Conf.-USA 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 5-6-1 ATS Facility: Chapman Stadium 9/5/10 at E Carolina * FAVORITE has swept L3 ECU-TLS games at E CAROLINA, both SU & ATS 9/11/10 BOWLING GREEN 2009 Scoring Differential: +1.9 (#60 of 120) 9/18/10 at Oklahoma St * UNDERDOG is on 4-5 SU but 7-2 ATS run in L9 OKS-TLS matchups 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -3.7 (#80 of 120) 9/25/10 C ARKANSAS 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 34 (#73 of 120) 10/2/10 at Memphis * ROAD TEAM is on 5-1 ATS run in MEM-TLS series 2009 Schedule Strength: 29.75 (#94 of 120) 10/9/10 at SMU * SMU is 8-4 SU & 10-2 ATS vs. TULSA since 98 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 TULANE * FAVORITE is 5-0 SU & ATS in L5 TLS-TUL matchups 10/30/10 at Notre Dame Points Scored - Allowed 29.3 (44) 27.3 (74) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 410.1 (35) 397.0 (84) 11/6/10 RICE * L5 games of TLS-RIC series are 4-1 OVER the total YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.66 (56) 5.61 (75) 11/13/10 at Houston * UNDERDOG is 6-1 SU & 7-0 ATS in L7 HOU-TLS matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.77 (82) 3.86 (51) 11/20/10 UTEP * UNDERDOG is 5-1 ATS in L6 TLS-UTP matchups YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.00 (23) 7.65 (94) Avg. Time of Possession 29.21 (81) 11/26/10 SOUTHERN MISS * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 TLS-SM games Turnover Differential -0.2 (72) 3rd Down Conversion % 38.4% (69) 36.0% (30) Straight Up 8-5 10-4 11-3 5-7 34-19 (64%) * TULSA is on a 3-13 ATS (-11.3 Units) skid as home favorites of 7.5 to 14 points The Average Overall ATS 6-6 5-9 8-5 5-6 24-26 (48%) Score was TULSA 31.1, OPPONENT 24.9. Potential spots for 2010: 11/6 - RICE, 11/20 - UTEP at Home ATS 3-2 2-4 5-1 3-3 13-10 (57%) * TULSA is 0-7 ATS (-7.7 Units) on the road after scoring 31 points or more in 2 straight games Away/Neutral ATS 3-4 3-5 3-4 2-3 11-16 (41%) since 07. The Average Score was TULSA 29.3, OPPONENT 39.4. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 vs Conference ATS 4-4 2-7 5-4 2-5 13-20 (39%) - at SMU, 11/13 - at Houston Non-Conference ATS 2-2 3-2 3-1 3-1 11-6 (65%) * TULSA is on a 9-25 ATS (-18.5 Units) skid on the road coming off a playing a game where as Favorite ATS 5-4 3-6 8-5 2-4 18-19 (49%) 60 total points or more were scored The Average Score was TULSA 24.6, OPPONENT 33.9. as Underdog ATS 1-2 2-3 0-0 2-2 5-7 (42%) Potential spots for 2010: POTENTIALLY NUMEROUS GAMES Over-Under 3-9 6-8 6-5 4-7 19-29 (40%) 8/31 SF AUSTIN 45-7 W - - - 8/30 at La Monroe 35-17 W -3.5 W 53 U 8/30 at UAB 45-22 W -13 W 67 T 9/4 at Tulane 37-13 W -13.5 W 64 U 9/9 at BYU 24-49 L +5.5 L 53 O 9/15 BYU 55-47 W +6.5 W 51.5 O 9/6 at North Texas 56-26 W -21.5 W 70 O 9/12 at New Mexico 44-10 W -17 W 57 U 9/16 NORTH TEXAS 28-3 W -15.5 W 48 U 9/21 OKLAHOMA 21-62 L +23 L 66 O 9/20 NEW MEXICO 56-14 W -10.5 W 61.5 O 9/19 at Oklahoma 0-45 L +18 L 57 U 9/23 at Navy 24-23 W +4 W 49.5 U 9/29 UAB 38-30 W -24 L 69 U 9/27 C ARKANSAS 62-34 W - - - 9/26 SAM HOUSTON ST 56-3 W -38 W - 10/3 SOUTHERN MISS 20-6 W -5.5 W 46 U 10/6 at Utep 47-48 L -3 L 71.5 O 10/4 RICE 63-28 W -16.5 W 79.5 O 10/3 at Rice 27-10 W -17 T 63 U 10/14 at E Carolina 31-10 W -3 W 47.5 U 10/13 MARSHALL 38-31 W -14 L 70 U 10/11 at SMU 37-31 W -23 L 77.5 U 10/14 BOISE ST 21-28 L +9 W 56 U 10/21 at Memphis 35-14 W -14 W 50 U 10/20 at Ucf 23-44 L +3 L 73.5 U 10/18 UTEP 77-35 W -20 W 73.5 O 10/21 at UTEP 24-28 L -8.5 L 60 U 10/27 SMU 29-23 W -13.5 L 71.5 U 10/26 UCF 49-19 W -23 W 68 T 10/27 UTEP 30-20 W -15 L 54.5 U 10/31 SMU 13-27 L -14.5 L 53 U 11/3 at Tulane 49-25 W -6 W 66.5 O 11/1 at Arkansas 23-30 L -7.5 L 75 U 11/4 at Houston 10-27 L -2.5 L 54.5 U 11/10 HOUSTON 56-7 W +1 W 74.5 U 11/15 at Houston 30-70 L -3.5 L 80.5 O 11/7 HOUSTON 45-46 L +2 W 70.5 O 11/11 RICE 38-41 L -14 L 54.5 O 11/17 at Army 49-39 W -15.5 L 61.5 O 11/22 TULANE 56-7 W -28.5 W 69 U 11/15 E CAROLINA 17-44 L -4 L 51 O 11/18 at SMU 24-34 L -6 L 49.5 O 11/24 at Rice 48-43 W -13.5 L 76 O 11/29 at Marshall 38-35 W -16 L 66 O 11/21 at Southern Miss 34-44 L +9 L 55 O 11/24 TULANE 38-3 W -17 W 52.5 U 12/1 at Ucf 25-44 L +7.5 L 73 U 12/6 E CAROLINA 24-27 L -12 L 66.5 U 11/27 MEMPHIS 33-30 W -16 L 61 O 12/23 vs. Utah 13-25 L +3 L 49 U 1/6 vs. Bowling Green 63-7 W -6 W 76 U 1/6 vs. Ball St 45-13 W -2 W 70.5 U Where: El Paso, TX Head Coach: Mike Price, 7th year (34-38 SU) Conference: Conf.-USA 2009 RECORD: 4-8 SU, 5-7 ATS Facility: Sun Bowl 9/4/10 AK-PINE BLUFF 9/10/10 at Houston * UNDERDOG is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 HOU-UTP games 2009 Scoring Differential: -3.7 (#86 of 120) 9/18/10 NEW MEXICO ST * NEW MEXICO ST is 2-6 SU but 6-2 ATS in its L8 games at UTEP 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -7.5 (#96 of 120) 9/25/10 MEMPHIS * L3 UTP-MEM series games have gone UNDER the total 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 29 (#89 of 120) 10/2/10 at New Mexico * HOME TEAM has won SU & ATS in four straight NM-UTP games 2009 Schedule Strength: 29.42 (#96 of 120) 10/9/10 RICE * RICE is on 5-2 SU & 7-0 ATS run vs. UTEP 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at UAB * ROAD TEAM has swept L3 UAB-UTP games, both SU & ATS 10/23/10 TULANE * TULANE is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. UTEP Points Scored - Allowed 29.8 (35) 33.5 (104) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 426.8 (21) 446.9 (110) 10/30/10 at Marshall * HOME TEAM has swept L3 MAR-UTP games, both SU & ATS YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.23 (19) 6.09 (101) 11/6/10 SMU * UTEP is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. SMU YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.52 (42) 5.03 (107) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.86 (26) 7.36 (80) 11/13/10 at Arkansas Avg. Time of Possession 29.47 (76) 11/20/10 at Tulsa * UNDERDOG is 5-1 ATS in L6 TLS-UTP matchups Turnover Differential -0.3 (77) 3rd Down Conversion % 41.4% (42) 46.8% (109) Straight Up 5-7 4-8 5-7 4-8 18-30 (38%) * UTEP is on a 1-10 ATS (-10 Units) skid as road favorites of 7 points or less The Average Score Overall ATS 5-7 6-5 5-7 5-7 21-26 (45%) was UTEP 25.5, OPPONENT 31.5. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at New Mexico, 10/16 - at at Home ATS 2-4 3-2 2-4 3-3 10-13 (43%) UAB Away/Neutral ATS 3-3 3-3 3-3 2-4 11-13 (46%) * UTEP is 0-7 ATS (-7.7 Units) as favorites of 3.5 to 10 points since 07. The Average Score was vs Conference ATS 3-5 4-4 4-4 4-4 15-17 (47%) UTEP 31.7, OPPONENT 35.3. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - MEMPHIS, 10/2 - at New Mexico Non-Conference ATS 2-2 2-1 1-3 1-3 6-9 (40%) * UTEP is on a 4-15 ATS (-12.5 Units) skid on the road vs. terrible teams (Win Pct. <=25%) The as Favorite ATS 1-5 0-3 1-2 2-5 4-15 (21%) Average Score was UTEP 23.4, OPPONENT 32.6. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at New Mexico, as Underdog ATS 4-2 6-2 4-5 3-2 17-11 (61%) 10/16 - at UAB Over-Under 6-6 6-5 8-4 7-5 27-20 (57%) 8/31 at San Diego St 34-27 W +2.5 W 48.5 O 9/1 NEW MEXICO 10-6 W +4 W 52 U 8/28 at Buffalo 17-42 L +3 L 56.5 O 9/5 BUFFALO 17-23 L -9.5 L 61.5 U 9/9 TEXAS TECH 35-38 L +7 W 58 O 9/8 at Texas Tech 31-45 L +24 W 62 O 9/6 TEXAS 13-42 L +26 L 61 U 9/12 KANSAS 7-34 L +13 L 62.5 U 9/23 at New Mexico 13-26 L -9 L 54 U 9/15 at New Mexico St 24-29 L +4.5 L 64 U 9/20 NEW MEXICO ST 33-34 L -7.5 L 62.5 O 9/19 at New Mexico St 38-12 W -14 W 48 O 9/30 NEW MEXICO ST 44-38 W -17 L 59.5 O 9/22 TEXAS SOUTHERN 52-12 W - - - 9/27 UCF 58-13 W +3.5 W 50.5 O 9/26 at Texas 7-64 L +37 L 64.5 O 10/7 SMU 24-21 W -13.5 L 50.5 U 9/29 at Smu 48-45 W +1 W 60 O 10/4 at Southern Miss 40-37 W +8 W 62 O 10/3 HOUSTON 58-41 W +14 W 69.5 O 10/14 TULANE 34-20 W -13 W 60.5 U 10/6 TULSA 48-47 W +3 W 71.5 O 10/11 TULANE 24-21 W -6 L 56 U 10/10 at Memphis 20-35 L -1 L 58 U 10/21 at Houston 17-34 L +7 L 60.5 U 10/13 E CAROLINA 42-45 L -3 L 65 O 10/18 at Tulsa 35-77 L +20 L 73.5 O 10/21 TULSA 28-24 W +8.5 W 60 U 10/27 at Tulsa 20-30 L +15 W 54.5 U 10/27 HOUSTON 31-34 L +6 W 74.5 U 11/1 RICE 44-49 L +2.5 L 76.5 O 10/31 UAB 33-38 L -7.5 L 63.5 O 11/4 RICE 31-37 L -10 L 58 O 11/3 at Rice 48-56 L -7.5 L 71 O 11/8 at LA Lafayette 37-24 W +13.5 W 71.5 U 11/7 at Tulane 38-45 L -6.5 L 57.5 O 11/10 at UAB 36-17 W +2.5 W 51.5 O 11/10 at Tulane 19-34 L -3 L 69.5 U 11/15 SMU 36-10 W -13.5 W 66 U 11/14 at SMU 31-35 L +6.5 W 62 O 11/18 at Marshall 21-49 L +3 L 56 O 11/17 SOUTHERN MISS 30-56 L +3 L 64 O 11/22 at Houston 37-42 L +19 W 73.5 O 11/21 at Rice 29-30 L -6.5 L 70.5 U 11/25 MEMPHIS 19-38 L -13.5 L 57.5 U 11/24 at Ucf 20-36 L +21 W 72 U 11/28 at E Carolina 21-53 L +6.5 L 55 O 11/28 MARSHALL 52-21 W -2 W 60 O WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 129

The Mid-American Conference will have a different look in 2010 than what college football fans have become accustomed to, if for no other reason than the turnover that has occurred at Central Michigan. The Chippewas have been the class of the league the last few seasons but gone for this fall are four-year starting quarterback Dan LeFevour as well as head coach Butch Jones, who became CMU s second straight head man to leave for Cincinnati. West Division opponents are ready to pounce and teams like Northern Illinois and Toledo have their eyes on the prize. Ball State could be much-improved. In the East, which appears from all intensive purposes to be the stronger division, Temple and Ohio U. go into the season as the favorites. They tied for the division championship last season, although the Bobcats represented in the title game. Both clubs lost their bowl games and are hungry for more. Kent State could prove to be a surprise, and don t be caught off guard if Miami Ohio takes a big step forward, as clubs like Bowling Green and Buffalo are starting anew for various reasons. EAST DIVISION MAC Preview AKRON ZIPS Akron hasn t had a winning season since 2005, and after an injury-plagued campaign in which it went a dismal 3-9 overall and 2-6 in the Mid- American Conference, J.D. Brookhart and his entire staff was fired. Rob Ianello, the former assistant head coach/ wide receiver coach/recruiting coordinator at Notre Dame under Charlie Weis, was hired for his first head coaching stint Ianello brings with him a pro-style attack, and the person who will be in charge of it is still unknown. It figures to be either junior Matt Rodgers or sophomore Patrick Nicely, both of whom started at times last season. The receiving crew figures to see a changed role, and the running game will have a more prominent spot in the offense as well, now that Akron no longer runs the spread. The line returns three starters New coordinator Curt Mallory, who came to Akron from Illinois, will have eight returning starters to work with. The Zips will now feature a 4-3 scheme instead of the 3-3-5 used under Brookhart. The linebacker corps should be the strength of the unit with the return of two starters in sophomore Brian Wagner and senior Mike Thomas Not much is expected in Year One of the Ianello era at Akron, so the Zips should live up to expectations. An improvement over last year s three-win total would be an accomplishment, but it is going to take some time before Akron can even get to the.500 mark. 2009 EAST STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Ohio 9-5-0 0.643 347 298 7-2-0 4-2-0 5-3-0 9-5-0 64.3% 6-7-0 Temple 9-4-0 0.692 384 290 7-1-0 5-1-0 4-3-0 8-4-0 66.7% 9-3-0 Bowling Green 7-6-0 0.538 370 357 6-2-0 3-3-0 4-3-0 7-6-0 53.8% 6-7-0 Kent State 5-7-0 0.417 231 269 4-4-0 3-3-0 2-4-0 7-4-0 63.6% 5-6-0 Buffao 5-7-0 0.417 289 282 3-5-0 2-4-0 3-3-0 5-7-0 41.7% 6-5-0 Akron 3-9-0 0.250 231 345 2-6-0 3-3-0 0-6-0 4-8-0 33.3% 5-6-0 Miami (OH) 1-11-0 0.083 187 410 1-7-0 1-4-0 0-7-0 5-7-0 41.7% 5-7-0 2009 WEST STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Central Michigan 12-2-0 0.857 475 265 9-0-0 5-0-0 7-2-0 9-4-1 69.2% 6-7-0 Northern Illinois 7-6-0 0.538 372 281 5-3-0 5-1-0 2-5-0 6-6-1 50.0% 5-6-1 Western Michigan 5-7-0 0.417 296 330 4-4-0 3-2-0 2-5-0 3-9-0 25.0% 4-7-0 Toledo 5-7-0 0.417 356 452 3-5-0 3-2-0 2-5-0 5-7-0 41.7% 8-4-0 Ball State 2-10-0 0.167 230 338 2-6-0 0-6-0 2-4-0 6-6-0 50.0% 3-7-1 Eastern Michigan 0-12-0 0.000 197 459 0-8-0 0-5-0 0-7-0 4-8-0 33.3% 6-6-0 BOWLING GREEN FALCONS In his first season as head coach at Bowling Green, Dave Clawson led the Falcons to a 7-6 campaign and their second straight bowl berth. But of the 19 lettermen lost going into the 2010 season, 18 were starters, including four All-Mid American Conference honorees. With so many key losses, can Clawson work his magic again and get the Falcons back to the postseason?...the Falcons boasted the best passing offense in the league (316.2 YPG, #6 nationally), but the main catalysts of that dynamic aerial attack are gone All-MAC third-team quarterback Tyler Sheehan and Biletnikoff Award finalist and All-MAC firstteam receiver Freddie Barnes, who caught an NCAA-record 155 passes. Perhaps Clawson s toughest job this offseason was to find Sheehan s replacement. That man had not been named as of spring. However, that s just one part of the job as many other holes are left to be filled, including three new starters up front The defense got better as last season went along, but coordinator Mike Elko will almost have to start from scratch again with only four starters returning. The line returns three players with starting experience...it was a huge accomplishment for the Falcons to make it to a bowl game last year considering they were predicted to finish fifth in their division. Can lightning strike twice? It s highly doubtful. Bowling Green suffered too many significant losses to believe it can make it to the.500 mark this year. BUFFALO BULLS Buffalo s quest for a third straight MAC East title fell far short as the Bulls finished fifth in the division with a 3-5 mark. Nevertheless, head coach Turner Gill, who in four years turned the Bulls into a perennial MAC title contender, took off to greener pastures at Kansas. It took the school little time to hire Jeff Quinn, who was last seen on the sideline at Cincinnati, where he served as offensive coordinator. Quinn is no stranger to the MAC, having served as Central Michigan s offensive boss under Brian Kelly Quinn will have some work to do with 130 WWW.STATFOX.COM

an offense that loses standouts at wide receiver and tight end, as well as the starting quarterback. With the departure of Zach Maynard, Quinn will have to find a new signalcaller from an inexperienced bunch. Sophomore Jerry Davis is No. 1 on the depth chart. The line returns four starters, including All-MAC second-team guard Peter Bittner New coordinator William Inge came over with Quinn from Cincinnati, where he served as linebackers coach. He ll have most of last year s starters back, including the entire linebacker corps. The unit is led by senior Justin Winters, who followed up a 2008 All-MAC campaign with 79 tackles, seven for loss, and 4.5 sacks The loss of stud RB James Starks early last season likely knocked the Bulls out of title contention, but the silver lining is his replacements got much needed playing experience. If the backfield does its job, and Davis is the right guy at quarterback, Buffalo can get back to contending for the East Division crown. KENT STATE GOLDEN FLASHES Kent State hasn t finished over the.500 mark since 2001, but with 16 starters returning, plus former leading rusher Eugene Jarvis back from injury, the Golden Flashes are poised to finish with their best record in the Doug Martin era Heading into last season, there was a huge hole to fill with the departure of star quarterback Julien Edelman. But a new standout was quick to emerge as Spencer Keith took over and proceeded to set school freshman records for passing yards (2,147) and touchdowns (14) despite starting seven games before suffering a shoulder injury. The running game will be the team s strength and should be one of the better units in the league. In fact, most of the yardage leaders in both rushing and receiving are back for 2010, as are three starting linemen Seven starters return to a much-improved stop unit, including the team s top six tacklers. Leading the way is All-MAC first-team linebacker Cobrani Mixon. When considering the secondary, the Golden Flashes could feature one of the strongest defensive backfields in the conference Kent State has a nice mix of up-and-coming stars on offense and veteran talent on defense. If the Golden Flashes can get through a tough schedule that sees them play five of six games on the road early on, they can cruise in the latter half of the campaign in which they play four of their last five contests at home. MIAMI (OHIO) REDHAWKS Not much was expected from the RedHawks in 2009, considering they had a new coach, a new system and a ton of new players, and they lived up to expectations. But a one-win campaign in head coach Michael Haywood s debut means that it shouldn t be difficult to show improvement, at least in the standings The RedHawks couldn t run (70.1 YPG, #119 nationally),or score (15.6 PPG, 116th in the nation), but out of the misery came a bright spot in quarterback Zac Dysert. As a redshirt freshman, Dysert started nine games and threw for 2,611 yards and 12 touchdowns. His 16 interceptions are a concern, but he should decrease his mistakes with a year s worth of experience under his belt. Dysert s top two targets are back in seniors Armand Robinson and Jamal Rogers. The entire starting line returns to pave the road The stop unit gave up 34.2 PPG, and most of the damage was done on the ground, where the RedHawks gave up 186.9 YPG. The linebacker corps should be the strength of the 2010 defense and three of the four primary starters in the secondary are back to a unit that helped the RedHawks rank second in the MAC in pass defense (190.4 YPG) It would be hard to think that the RedHawks would suffer as many injuries this season as last year. If the team stays healthy, and Dysert continues to improve his game and cuts down on the interceptions, Miami (Ohio) is sure to win a few more games. OHIO BOBCATS Ohio comes off a 2009 campaign in which it represented the East Division in the MAC Championship after sharing the division title with Temple. But the Bobcats ended the season on a two-game losing streak, with setbacks against Central Michigan in the league title game and Marshall in the Little Caesars Pizza Bowl. Head coach Frank Solich and crew are still looking for the program s first bowl victory...senior quarterback Boo Jackson, who set school records for passing yards, touchdown passes and total offense in 2008, redshirted last year after suffering a season-ending shoulder injury in the second game and is back. The running game will need to improve after averaging just 112 YPG. The receiving corps should be solid, as will be the line, with three starters returning, including both tackles The stop unit was one of the better groups in the league, ranking second in scoring (21.3 PPG) and first in turnovers gained by a wide margin with 37. The front four remains intact, and is joined by three other returning starters behind them Perhaps the biggest question mark in all of the MAC is the health of Boo Jackson. If he s ready to go, the Bobcats will once again contend for the East Division title. But if he isn t on the field, Ohio could be a step or two behind Temple and maybe even a couple of other teams. TEMPLE OWLS In his first three seasons as head coach at Temple, Al Golden s Owls amassed 10 wins combined. In 2009, they nearly matched that win total with a 9-4 mark and the MAC East Division co-championship. Golden earned conference Coach of the Year honors WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 131

for his efforts, and with 16 starters back, he could make it two in a row Temple lost just two players on offense, both All-MAC honorees, but the Owls still are stacked with talent and experience. It all starts with running back Bernard Pierce, who comes off a season in which he rushed for 1,361 yards and 16 touchdowns. The Owls East Coast offense features three wide receivers and a tight end, and the team is deep at both positions. Throwing to that group once again will be the duo of senior Vaughn Charlton and junior Chester Stewart. The line, which was voted the team s offensive MVP last year, returns four starters...the stop unit boasted five All-MAC first-team honorees and four of them are back. Two of those players come from the line, arguably the best in the conference, led by MAC Defensive Player of the Year Adrian Robinson Expect Temple to be back in the MAC title race. The defense could be even better, and Pierce should be an even greater force. A late September trip to Penn State will be tough, but if the Owls don t lose their composure, they could make plans for a trip to Detroit for the league title game. WEST DIVISION BALL STATE CARDINALS Talk about a reversal of fortune. One year after going 12-2, and winning the MAC West Division title, Ball State won just two games under Stan Parrish, who began his head coaching stint with a loss in the previous year s GMAC Bowl and then with seven straight losses to begin 2009. There s really nowhere to go but up for the Cardinals Replacing 2008 MAC Offensive Player of the Year Nate Davis at quarterback was going to be a tough job, and freshman Kelly Page was given the shot from the get-go. He threw for 1,019 yards, seven touchdowns and nine interceptions in seven games before going down with a thumb injury. Since his replacement, Tanner Justice, is gone, the job is Page s to lose. Fifth-year senior MiQuale Lewis comes off an All-MAC second-team campaign as running back and both of his primary spot fillers are in place as well. The Cardinals top three wide receivers juniors Briggs Orsbon, Toreal Gibson and Daniel Ifft return too, as do all five starters along the line Five of the team s top six tacklers return to a unit that allowed 386.7 YPG and 28.2 PPG. The group will be run by a new coordinator, as former linebackers coach Jay Hood was promoted to coordinator shortly thereafter The Cardinals should get off to a better start since they start the season with home games against Southeast Missouri State and Liberty. But MAC wins will be harder to come by again. Expect better, but how much remains to be seen. CENTRAL MICHIGAN CHIPPEWAS Central Michigan became the first Mid-American Conference team to appear in bowl games in four consecutive years after the Chippewas dominated the league with a 8-0 MAC record, 12-2 overall, a 20-10 win over Ohio in the championship game, and a 44-41 double-overtime victory over Troy in the GMAC Bowl. But Central Michigan s success enabled Butch Jones to leave for greener pastures of a BCS school, Cincinnati. Former Michigan State assistant Dan Enos takes over a program that returns 11 starters, but loses the MAC s best player in quarterback Dan LeFevour Replacing LeFevour is this year s biggest job in the MAC, and taking over behind center will be sophomore Ryan Radcliff. LeFevour s favorite target, Antonio Brown, is also gone after hauling in 110 passes for 1,198 yards and nine touchdowns as has Bryan Anderson, an All-MAC secondteamer. Most of the line is back, but that might not offset the skill position void The offense got most of the accolades in the undefeated MAC campaign, but the defense wasn t too shabby, either. The unit led the conference in scoring (18.9 PPG). The linebacker corps should be the strength of the 2010 defense, which returns five starters Year One of the Enos era is certainly not going to be as good as the last season under Jones. Radcliff is an unknown commodity at quarterback, and the wide receiver corps is green. But there seems to be enough talent to believe that Central Michigan shouldn t be counted out of a fifth straight bowl appearance. EASTERN MICHIGAN EAGLES Ron English s first season as head coach at Eastern Michigan was a disaster. The Eagles came into the campaign as a young and inexperienced team, and a rash of injuries forced even younger players to step in. That resulted in a winless season but it s hard to believe that could happen again, especially since those youngsters now have a year s worth of experience under their belts English was forced to use three quarterbacks because of injury and inconsistency, and the last of the trio, sophomore Alex Gillett, gets the starting nod this season. He is a dual threat, passing and running. Senior Dwayne Priest returns as the primary ball carrier after rushing for 633 yards and seven touchdowns. The receiving corps isn t anything to write home about and much of last year s limited production is gone. The line boasts three returnees as starters The stop unit, which ranked dead last in the conference in yardage and scoring defense, has a new coordinator in Phil Snow, who comes off a four-year stint as linebackers coach of the NFL s Detroit Lions. The defense returns six full-time starters, and the line 132 WWW.STATFOX.COM

seems to have the most depth Can the Eagles go winless for a second straight season? It s not out of the question. They figure to be underdogs in each of their games and with no clear-cut all-conference-type players on the roster, it would be a very bold prediction if we were to say that EMU would finish anywhere but the bottom of the West Division. NORTHERN ILLINOIS HUSKIES Northern Illinois has been to bowl games in each of Jerry Kill s first two seasons as head coach. But the Huskies failed to win both and are 0-11 against teams with winning records under Kill. Fourteen starters return The big question mark is the health of quarterback Chandler Harnish. The junior has been plagued with injuries the last two campaigns and he may not be 100 percent after putting off knee surgery and sitting out most of spring drills. In 10 games last year, Harnish completed 143 of 223 passes for 1,670 yards, 11 touchdowns and six interceptions. Senior tailback Chad Spann emerged as one of the best running backs in the conference, despite starting just four games. The All-MAC first-teamer rushed for 1,038 yards and a conference-leading 19 touchdowns, but was limited during the spring as he recovered from shoulder surgery. NIU will be mostly starting fresh at wide receiver and tight end. The line suffered significant losses in the departures of two All-MAC first-teamers but three other starters return The stop unit was the best in the MAC, allowing 332.8 YPG. Eight starters return, including several that are getting preseason all-conference type recognition The defense should remain solid, and Spann is a MAC Offensive Player of the Year candidate. So, the key to the success of the Huskies will be Harnish. If he stays healthy, they could win the West Division crown. And if he doesn t, they still could make it to another bowl game. TOLEDO ROCKETS When your head coach is a rookie, all you can ask for is improvement from the previous campaign, and that s what Toledo got as the Rockets won five games in Tim Beckman s first season. But three of the team s top players quarterback Aaron Opelt, running back DaJuane Collins and safety Barry Church are gone, leaving some huge holes to fill The Rockets led the MAC in total offense (437.9 YPG), thanks in large part to the efforts of Opelt. He missed three games due to injury, though, and that allowed then-true freshman Austin Dantin to start and earn valuable playing time. Dantin threw for 962 yards, four touchdowns and four interceptions. Despite the loss of Collins, the backfield will be deep. The offensive star will likely be sophomore wide receiver Eric Page, a secondteam All-MAC honoree who led all freshmen in the country with 82 catches for 1,159 yards. Four starters return to the line The stop unit finished 11th in the MAC in total defense (407.4 YPG) and that was with four-time All-MAC first-teamer Church in the lineup. Without him, the onus of improvement falls on six returning starters, headlined by third-team All-MAC honoree Archie Donald With a tough non-conference schedule on tap, too many big holes to fill on both sides of the ball and a number of players returning from injury-plagued campaigns, it won t be easy for Toledo to match last year s five-win total. Look for the Rockets to take a step back in Beckman s sophomore season. WESTERN MICHIGAN BRONCOS Western Michigan took a step back in the first season of head coach Bill Cubit s five-year contract, which he signed last offseason. The Broncos had been to two bowl games in three years, but they failed to reach the.500 mark for the second time under Cubit Heading into the 2010 campaign, Cubit will be focused on replacing his two biggest offensive stars quarterback Tim Hiller and running back Brandon West, and both earned All-MAC second-team honors, so filling their spots won t be easy. Sophomore Alex Carder, who saw action in nine games as Hiller s backup but went just 5-for-7 for 27 yards, is expected to start at quarterback. Carder will have a deep receiving corps to throw to and replacing West in the backfield will be junior Aaron Winchester and redshirt freshman Brian Fields. The line returns four starters, including All-MAC second-team tackle Anthony Parker Only Eastern Michigan allowed more total yards than Western Michigan (419.7 per game), and the Broncos lose their top tackler in All-MAC second-team linebacker Austin Pritchard. Seven starters are back though, so expect this unit to be better With Hiller and West, the Broncos weren t able to make it to.500, and the non-conference schedule Michigan State and Notre Dame on the docket is just as tough as last year s. With an inexperienced quarterback, Western Michigan is more likely to take another step downward rather than make it back into the West Division title race. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH East Division Temple Ohio U Kent State Miami Ohio Buffalo Bowling Green Akron West Division Northern Illinois Toledo Ball State Western Michigan Central Michigan Eastern Michigan WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 133

AKRON ZIPS 2010 Schedule Strength: 29.42 (#109 of 120) BOWLING GREEN FALCONS 2010 Schedule Strength: 31.75 (#96 of 120) Offense: Pro-Style - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 53 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 3 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 4 Lettermen Returning: 41 Where: Akron, OH Head Coach: Rob Ianello, 1st year Conference: MAC 2009 RECORD: 3-9 SU, 4-8 ATS Facility: InfoCision Stadium 9/4/10 SYRACUSE 9/11/10 GARDNER WEBB 2009 Scoring Differential: -9.5 (#108 of 120) 9/18/10 at Kentucky * ROAD TEAM is 3-6 SU but 9-0 ATS in L9 KEN-AKR matchups 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -11.8 (#111 of 120) 9/25/10 at Indiana * INDIANA has taken L2 games vs. AKRON both SU & ATS 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 18 (#111 of 120) 10/2/10 N ILLINOIS * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & ATS in L4 AKR-NIL games 2009 Schedule Strength: 28.92 (#101 of 120) 10/9/10 at Kent St * HOME TEAM is 4-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L5 KS-AKR matchups 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at Ohio U * HOME TEAM is 4-1 SU & ATS in L5 OHU-AKR matchups 10/23/10 W MICHIGAN * ROAD TEAM is on 3-6 SU but 8-1 ATS run in AKR-WM series Points Scored - Allowed 19.3 (106) 28.8 (87) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 300.9 (113) 367.7 (59) 10/30/10 at Temple * TEMPLE has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. AKRON YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.91 (102) 5.30 (52) 11/6/10 at Ball St * ROAD TEAM is on 4-5 SU but 6-2 ATS run in BLS-AKR series YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.62 (89) 4.29 (82) 11/17/10 MIAMI OHIO * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & 5-0 ATS in L6 AKR-MOH matchups YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.40 (98) 6.67 (40) Avg. Time of Possession 27.21 (113) 11/26/10 BUFFALO * UNDERDOG is 1-3 SU but 4-0 ATS in L4 AKR-BUF games Turnover Differential -0.4 (87) 3rd Down Conversion % 27.8% (118) 51.9% (117) Straight Up 5-7 4-8 5-7 3-9 17-31 (35%) * AKRON is on a 4-18 ATS (-15.8 Units) skid as road underdogs of 10.5 to 21 points The Average Overall ATS 3-9 6-5 6-5 4-8 19-27 (41%) Score was AKRON 18, OPPONENT 39.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at Indiana, 10/16 - at at Home ATS 2-3 3-1 2-3 2-4 9-11 (45%) Ohio U, 10/30 - at Temple Away/Neutral ATS 1-6 3-4 4-2 2-4 10-16 (38%) * AKRON is on a 8-1 ATS (+6.9 Units) run as road underdogs of 7.5 to 10 points The Average vs Conference ATS 1-7 4-3 2-5 2-6 9-21 (30%) Score was AKRON 27.7, OPPONENT 31.1. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - at Kent St Non-Conference ATS 2-2 2-2 4-0 2-2 10-6 (63%) * AKRON is on a 8-3 OVER the total (+4.7 Units) run as road underdogs of 10.5 to 21 points The as Favorite ATS 2-5 1-1 3-2 1-2 7-10 (41%) Average Score was AKRON 18, OPPONENT 39.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at Indiana, as Underdog ATS 1-4 5-3 3-3 3-6 12-16 (43%) 10/16 - at Ohio U, 10/30 - at Temple Over-Under 5-6 7-5 9-3 5-6 26-20 (57%) 9/2 at Penn St 16-34 L +17.5 L 40.5 O 9/1 vs. Army 22-14 W -5.5 W 42 U 8/30 at Wisconsin 17-38 L +26.5 W 52 O 9/5 at Penn St 7-31 L +29.5 W 59 U 9/9 at NC State 20-17 W +9 W 40.5 U 9/8 at Ohio St 2-20 L +28 W 46 U 9/6 at Syracuse 42-28 W +4.5 W 43.5 O 9/12 MORGAN ST 41-0 W -27 W - 9/16 at C Michigan 21-24 L +1 L 45 T 9/15 at Indiana 24-41 L +13.5 L 49 O 9/13 BALL ST 24-41 L +7 L 60.5 O 9/19 INDIANA 21-38 L -3 L 45 O 9/23 NORTH TEXAS 33-13 W -15 W 41 O 9/22 KENT ST 27-20 W +2.5 W 46 O 9/20 at Army 22-3 W -10 W 47 U 9/26 at C Michigan 21-48 L +15 L 54 O 9/30 at Kent St 15-37 L -2.5 L 41 O 9/29 at Connecticut 10-44 L +14.5 L 45.5 O 9/27 CINCINNATI 15-17 L +11.5 W 56.5 U 10/10 OHIO U 7-19 L +3.5 L 52.5 U 10/7 at Cincinnati 14-20 L +4 L 44 U 10/6 at W Michigan 39-38 W +9 W 56.5 O 10/4 at Kent St 30-27 W -3 T 51 O 10/17 at Buffalo 17-21 L +7.5 W 46.5 U 10/21 MIAMI OHIO 24-13 W -9.5 W 47.5 U 10/13 TEMPLE 20-24 L -12.5 L 51 U 10/11 BOWLING GREEN 33-37 L +2 L 52 O 10/24 at Syracuse 14-28 L +11 L 47.5 U 10/28 at Toledo 20-35 L -3 L 45 O 10/27 at Buffalo 10-26 L +0 L 48.5 U 10/18 at E Michigan 42-35 W -4.5 W 53.5 O 10/31 at N Illinois 10-27 L +12 L 41 U 11/4 BOWLING GREEN 35-28 W -7.5 L 45.5 O 11/2 at Bowling Green 20-44 L +6.5 L 56 O 11/5 TOLEDO 47-30 W -7 W 55 O 11/7 KENT ST 28-20 W +3.5 W 42.5 O 11/9 BUFFALO 31-16 W -17 L 47.5 U 11/7 OHIO U 48-37 W +2.5 W 50.5 O 11/13 BUFFALO 40-43 L -2.5 L 61 O 11/13 TEMPLE 17-56 L +6 L 46 O 11/16 at Ohio U 7-17 L +4 L 38 U 11/14 at Miami Ohio 0-7 L +7 T 52.5 U 11/22 at Ohio U 42-49 L -2.5 L 54.5 O 11/20 at Bowling Green 20-36 L +12 L 55 O 11/24 W MICHIGAN 0-17 L -2 L 44.5 U 11/23 C MICHIGAN 32-35 L +3.5 W 61.5 O 11/28 at Temple 6-27 L +3 L 58 U 11/27 E MICHIGAN 28-21 W -14.5 L 51.5 U Where: Bowling Green, OH Head Coach: Dave Clawson, 2nd year (7-6 SU) Conference: MAC 2009 RECORD: 7-6 SU, 7-6 ATS Facility: Perry Stadium 9/4/10 at Troy 9/11/10 at Tulsa 2009 Scoring Differential: +1.0 (#64 of 120) 9/18/10 MARSHALL * BOWLING GREEN is 2-4 SU but 4-1 ATS in its L6 games vs. MARSHALL 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +0.8 (#66 of 120) 9/25/10 at Michigan 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 30 (#85 of 120) 10/2/10 BUFFALO * UNDERDOG is on 3-2 SU & 5-0 ATS run in L5 BG-BUF matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 29.77 (#92 of 120) 10/9/10 at Ohio U * BOWLING GREEN is 5-3 SU & 8-0 ATS in its L8 games at OHIO U 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at Temple * TEMPLE has covered spread in L2 games vs. BOWLING GREEN 10/23/10 KENT ST * UNDERDOG is on 2-4 SU but 4-1 ATS run in L6 BG-KS matchups Points Scored - Allowed 28.5 (55) 27.5 (76) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 402.7 (44) 398.2 (87) 10/30/10 at C Michigan * ROAD TEAM is 5-6 SU but 8-3 ATS in CM-BG series since 92 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.48 (64) 6.02 (98) 11/10/10 MIAMI OHIO * MIAMI OHIO is on 6-3 SU & 9-0 ATS run in its L9 games at BOWLING GREEN YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.13 (109) 5.36 (110) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.90 (78) 6.82 (47) 11/17/10 at Toledo * HOME TEAM is 9-2 SU & 8-2 ATS in TOL-BG series since 99 Avg. Time of Possession 31.37 (23) 11/26/10 W MICHIGAN * W MICHIGAN is on 3-4 SU but 6-1 ATS run in its L7 games at BOWLING GREEN Turnover Differential +0.3 (35) 3rd Down Conversion % 45.6% (16) 36.6% (34) Straight Up 4-8 8-5 6-6 7-6 25-25 (50%) * BOWLING GREEN is 11-1 ATS (+9.9 Units) in November games since 07. The Average Score Overall ATS 4-8 7-5 8-4 7-6 26-23 (53%) was BOWLING GREEN 36.3, OPPONENT 20.8. Potential spots for 2010: 11/10 - MIAMI OHIO, at Home ATS 0-5 2-2 1-4 3-3 6-14 (30%) 11/17 - at Toledo, 11/26 - W MICHIGAN Away/Neutral ATS 4-3 5-3 7-0 4-3 20-9 (69%) * BOWLING GREEN is 16-4 ATS (+11.6 Units) on the road since 07. The Average Score was vs Conference ATS 2-6 5-3 5-3 5-3 17-15 (53%) BOWLING GREEN 27.3, OPPONENT 24.2. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - at Troy, 9/11 - at Tulsa, Non-Conference ATS 2-2 2-2 3-1 2-3 9-8 (53%) 9/25 - at Michigan, 10/9 - at Ohio U, 10/16 - at Temple, 10/30 - at C Michigan, 11/17 - at Toledo as Favorite ATS 1-5 3-3 4-4 4-3 12-15 (44%) * BOWLING GREEN is 1-8 ATS (-7.8 Units) at home when playing on Saturdays since 07. The as Underdog ATS 3-3 4-2 4-0 3-3 14-8 (64%) Average Score was BOWLING GREEN 28, OPPONENT 33.4. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - Over-Under 5-7 7-5 4-8 6-7 22-27 (45%) MARSHALL, 10/2 - BUFFALO, 10/23 - KENT ST 9/2 WISCONSIN 14-35 L +11 L 46.5 O 9/1 at Minnesota 32-31 W +14 W 53.5 O 1/6 vs. Tulsa 7-63 L +6 L 76 U 9/3 TROY 31-14 W +7.5 W 55 U 9/9 BUFFALO 48-40 W -22 L 43.5 O 9/8 at Michigan St 17-28 L +17.5 W 57 U 8/30 at Pittsburgh 27-17 W +14 W 54 U 9/12 at Missouri 20-27 L +20 W 56.5 U 9/16 at Fla International 33-28 W -3.5 W 48 O 9/22 TEMPLE 48-35 W -21 L 52 O 9/6 MINNESOTA 17-42 L -3.5 L 59.5 U 9/19 at Marshall 10-17 L -3 L 52 U 9/23 KENT ST 3-38 L -7 L 45.5 U 9/29 W KENTUCKY 41-21 W - - - 9/13 at Boise St 7-20 L +17.5 W 55.5 U 9/26 BOISE ST 14-49 L +16.5 L 52 O 9/30 at Ohio U 21-9 W +7 W 44 U 10/6 at Boston College 24-55 L +20 L 58.5 O 9/27 at Wyoming 45-16 W -3 W 44.5 O 10/3 OHIO U 37-44 L -2.5 L 48.5 O 10/7 at Ohio St 7-35 L +37 W 51.5 U 10/13 at Miami Ohio 14-47 L -1.5 L 56.5 O 10/4 E MICHIGAN 21-24 L -18.5 L 55 U 10/10 at Kent St 36-35 W -2 L 53.5 O 10/14 E MICHIGAN 24-21 W -10 L 48 U 10/20 at Kent St 31-20 W +5 W 57 U 10/11 at Akron 37-33 W -2 W 52 O 10/17 at Ball St 31-17 W -3 W 55.5 U 10/19 at C Michigan 14-31 L +7.5 L 50.5 U 10/27 OHIO U 27-38 L -7 L 60.5 O 10/18 MIAMI OHIO 20-27 L -9.5 L 51 U 10/24 C MICHIGAN 10-24 L +9.5 L 61.5 U 10/28 at Temple 14-28 L -15 L 47.5 U 11/2 AKRON 44-20 W -6.5 W 56 O 10/25 at N Illinois 13-16 L +6.5 W 48 U 11/3 at Buffalo 30-29 W +3 W 57.5 O 11/4 at Akron 28-35 L +7.5 W 45.5 O 11/9 at E Michigan 39-32 W -3 W 57 O 11/1 KENT ST 45-30 W -6 W 53 O 11/12 at Miami Ohio 35-14 W -4 W 59 U 11/15 MIAMI OHIO 7-9 L -4 L 44 U 11/17 at Buffalo 31-17 W +1.5 W 61 U 11/8 at Ohio U 28-3 W -2.5 W 49.5 U 11/20 AKRON 36-20 W -12 W 55 O 11/21 at Toledo 21-31 L +6.5 L 46.5 O 11/23 TOLEDO 37-10 W -6.5 W 71.5 U 11/21 BUFFALO 34-40 L -5.5 L 55 O 11/27 TOLEDO 38-24 W -7 W 66.5 U 11/28 at Toledo 38-10 W -2.5 W 51.5 U 12/30 vs. Idaho 42-43 L +0 L 69 O 134 WWW.STATFOX.COM

BUFFALO BULLS 2010 Schedule Strength: 29 (#111 of 120) KENT STATE GOLDEN FLASHES 2010 Schedule Strength: 28.92 (#112 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 5 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 51 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 3-4 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 49 Where: Buffalo, NY Head Coach: Jeff Quinn, 1st year Conference: MAC 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 5-7 ATS Facility: UB Stadium 9/2/10 RHODE ISLAND 9/11/10 at Baylor 2009 Scoring Differential: +0.6 (#67 of 120) 9/18/10 UCF 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -2.3 (#76 of 120) 9/25/10 at Connecticut * CONNECTICUT is 5-0 SU & ATS in its L5 games vs. BUFFALO 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 30 (#85 of 120) 10/2/10 at Bowling Green * UNDERDOG is on 3-2 SU & 5-0 ATS run in L5 BG-BUF matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 27.92 (#105 of 120) 10/16/10 at N Illinois * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 ATS in L2 NIL-BUF games 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 TEMPLE * L3 BUF-TEM series games have gone OVER the total 10/30/10 MIAMI OHIO * L5 games of BUF-MOH series are 5-0 OVER the total Points Scored - Allowed 24.1 (82) 23.5 (48) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 405.4 (39) 342.7 (42) 11/4/10 at Ohio U * UNDERDOG has swept L3 OHU-BUF games, both SU & ATS YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.82 (42) 5.21 (48) 11/12/10 BALL ST * L3 BUF-BLS series games have gone OVER the total YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.52 (43) 4.07 (70) 11/20/10 E MICHIGAN * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 ATS in L2 BUF-EMU games YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.22 (56) 6.30 (29) Avg. Time of Possession 29.57 (73) 11/26/10 at Akron * UNDERDOG is 1-3 SU but 4-0 ATS in L4 AKR-BUF games Turnover Differential -0.6 (103) 3rd Down Conversion % 39.2% (60) 44.2% (95) Straight Up 2-10 5-7 8-6 5-7 20-30 (40%) * BUFFALO is on a 3-12 ATS (-10.2 Units) skid against Big East conference opponents The Overall ATS 7-4 7-5 9-5 5-7 28-21 (57%) Average Score was BUFFALO 10.9, OPPONENT 34.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at at Home ATS 2-2 3-2 2-4 2-4 9-12 (43%) Connecticut Away/Neutral ATS 5-2 4-3 7-1 3-3 19-9 (68%) * BUFFALO is 11-2 OVER the total (+8.8 Units) on the road in conference games since 07. The vs Conference ATS 5-3 6-2 6-3 3-5 20-13 (61%) Average Score was BUFFALO 30.1, OPPONENT 26.8. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at Bowling Non-Conference ATS 2-1 1-3 3-2 2-2 8-8 (50%) Green, 10/16 - at N Illinois, 11/4 - at Ohio U, 11/26 - at Akron as Favorite ATS 0-0 1-1 2-4 1-4 4-9 (31%) * BUFFALO is 10-3 ATS (+6.7 Units) on the road in conference games since 07. The Average as Underdog ATS 7-4 5-4 7-1 3-3 22-12 (65%) Score was BUFFALO 30.1, OPPONENT 26.8. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at Bowling Green, Over-Under 6-6 7-5 10-4 6-5 29-20 (59%) 10/16 - at N Illinois, 11/4 - at Ohio U, 11/26 - at Akron 8/31 TEMPLE 9-3 W -6 T 44.5 U 8/30 at Rutgers 3-38 L +31 L 49.5 U 8/28 UTEP 42-17 W -3 W 56.5 O 9/5 at UTEP 23-17 W +9.5 W 61.5 U 9/9 at Bowling Green 40-48 L +22 W 43.5 O 9/8 at Temple 42-7 W +3 W 47.5 O 9/6 at Pittsburgh 16-27 L +13.5 W 46.5 U 9/12 PITTSBURGH 27-54 L +11.5 L 42.5 O 9/16 at N Illinois 13-31 L +25.5 W 48 U 9/15 at Penn St 24-45 L +33 W 50 O 9/13 TEMPLE 30-28 W -7 L 45 O 9/19 at UCF 17-23 L +5 L 46.5 U 9/23 at Auburn 7-38 L +41.5 W 47.5 U 9/22 BAYLOR 21-34 L +1.5 L 53 O 9/20 at Missouri 21-42 L +31.5 W 68 U 9/26 at Temple 13-37 L +3.5 L 46 O 10/7 BALL ST 25-55 L +3 L 49 O 9/29 at Ball St 14-49 L +13.5 L 62 O 9/27 at C Michigan 25-27 L +7 W 61.5 U 10/3 C MICHIGAN 13-20 L +9.5 W 53.5 U 10/15 MIAMI OHIO 31-38 L +9 W 46.5 O 10/6 OHIO U 31-10 W +3.5 W 52.5 U 10/11 W MICHIGAN 28-34 L -1 L 54 O 10/10 GARDNER WEBB 40-0 W -17 W - 10/21 at Ohio U 7-42 L +17.5 L 43 O 10/13 TOLEDO 43-33 W -3.5 W 56 O 10/18 ARMY 27-24 W -11 L 46 O 10/17 AKRON 21-17 W -7.5 L 46.5 U 10/28 at Ohio U 32-19 W +1.5 W 49 O 10/28 at Boston College 0-41 L +31.5 L 41.5 U 10/20 at Syracuse 12-20 L +3.5 L 56 U 10/24 at W Michigan 31-34 L +5 W 51.5 O 11/4 MIAMI OHIO 37-17 W -8 W 50.5 O 11/4 KENT ST 41-14 W +16.5 W 41 O 10/27 AKRON 26-10 W +0 W 48.5 U 11/13 at Akron 43-40 W +2.5 W 61 O 11/3 BOWLING GREEN 29-30 L -3 L 57.5 O 11/9 at Akron 16-31 L +17 W 47.5 U 11/3 at Miami Ohio 28-31 L +6 W 50 O 11/21 at Bowling Green 40-34 W +5.5 W 55 O 11/10 OHIO U 24-27 L -2 L 46.5 O 11/18 at Wisconsin 3-35 L +38 W 47 U 11/17 BOWLING GREEN 17-31 L -1.5 L 61 U 11/28 KENT ST 21-24 L -9 L 58.5 U 11/18 at Miami Ohio 42-17 W -4.5 W 52.5 O 11/24 C MICHIGAN 28-55 L +14.5 L 48 O 11/24 at Kent St 30-23 W +1.5 W 51 O 12/5 vs. Ball St 42-24 W +15 W 62.5 O 11/27 at Kent St 9-6 W -3.5 L 49 U 1/3 vs. Connecticut 20-38 L +7 L 51 O Where: Kent, OH Head Coach: Doug Martin, 7th year (24-46 SU) Conference: MAC 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 7-4 ATS Facility: Dix Stadium 9/2/10 MURRAY ST 9/11/10 at Boston College * FAVORITE has won & covered L2 BC-KS games 2009 Scoring Differential: -3.2 (#83 of 120) 9/18/10 at Penn St 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -9.4 (#103 of 120) 10/2/10 at Miami Ohio * ROAD TEAM is on 4-1 SU & ATS run in MOH-KS series 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 25 (#93 of 120) 10/9/10 AKRON * HOME TEAM is 4-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L5 KS-AKR matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 25.67 (#117 of 120) 10/16/10 at Toledo 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Bowling Green * UNDERDOG is on 2-4 SU but 4-1 ATS run in L6 BG-KS matchups 10/30/10 BALL ST * BALL ST is 3-0 SU & 2-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. KENT ST Points Scored - Allowed 19.3 (106) 22.4 (40) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 327.7 (96) 356.3 (51) 11/6/10 TEMPLE * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 KS-TEM games YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.00 (99) 4.97 (31) 11/13/10 ARMY YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.50 (101) 3.65 (39) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.51 (94) 6.42 (33) 11/20/10 at W Michigan * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 WM-KS games Avg. Time of Possession 28.99 (90) 11/26/10 OHIO U * ROAD TEAM is 7-2 SU & 8-1 ATS in L9 KS-OHU matchups Turnover Differential -0.2 (72) 3rd Down Conversion % 30.7% (112) 40.2% (66) Straight Up 6-6 3-9 4-8 5-7 18-30 (38%) * KENT ST is on a 8-1 ATS (+6.9 Units) run vs. excellent ball control teams, 32 or more TOP Overall ATS 6-6 2-9 3-6 7-4 18-25 (42%) minutes/game The Average Score was KENT ST 32.4, OPPONENT 28.2. Potential spots for at Home ATS 2-3 0-4 1-3 4-1 7-11 (39%) 2010: 9/18 - at Penn St Away/Neutral ATS 4-3 2-5 2-3 3-3 11-14 (44%) * KENT ST is 8-1 OVER the total (+6.9 Units) in September games since 07. The Average Score vs Conference ATS 4-4 1-7 3-3 6-2 14-16 (47%) was KENT ST 23.2, OPPONENT 28.2. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at Boston College, 9/18 - at Non-Conference ATS 2-2 1-2 0-3 1-2 4-9 (31%) Penn St as Favorite ATS 1-4 1-5 1-1 3-1 6-11 (35%) * KENT ST is 6-0 OVER the total (+6 Units) at home revenging a road loss against opponent as Underdog ATS 5-2 1-3 2-5 4-3 12-13 (48%) since 07. The Average Score was KENT ST 25.7, OPPONENT 35. Potential spots for 2010: Over-Under 3-9 6-5 8-3 5-6 22-23 (49%) 10/9 - AKRON, 11/6 - TEMPLE 8/31 MINNESOTA 0-44 L +14.5 L 48.5 U 8/30 at Iowa St 23-14 W +3.5 W 45.5 U 8/30 BOSTON COLLEGE 0-21 L +11 L 47.5 U 9/3 COASTAL CAROLINA 18-0 W - - - 9/9 at Army 14-17 L +6.5 W 40 U 9/8 at Kentucky 20-56 L +14 L 53.5 O 9/6 at Iowa St 28-48 L +10 L 45 O 9/12 at Boston College 7-34 L +21 L 45 U 9/16 at Miami Ohio 16-14 W +13.5 W 45 U 9/15 DELAWARE ST 38-7 W - - - 9/13 DELAWARE ST 24-3 W - - - 9/19 IOWA ST 14-34 L +3 L 47 O 9/23 at Bowling Green 38-3 W +7 W 45.5 U 9/22 at Akron 20-27 L -2.5 L 46 O 9/20 at LA Lafayette 27-44 L +2.5 L 51 O 9/26 MIAMI OHIO 29-19 W -7 W 47 O 9/30 AKRON 37-15 W +2.5 W 41 O 9/29 at Ohio U 33-25 W -2 W 47 O 9/27 at Ball St 20-41 L +21 T 60 O 10/3 at Baylor 15-31 L +22.5 W 48.5 U 10/7 at Temple 28-17 W -23.5 L 45.5 U 10/6 MIAMI OHIO 13-20 L -8 L 50.5 U 10/4 AKRON 27-30 L +3 T 51 O 10/10 BOWLING GREEN 35-36 L +2 W 53.5 O 10/14 TOLEDO 40-14 W -6.5 W 47 O 10/13 at Ohio St 3-48 L +30 L 47 O 10/11 OHIO U 19-26 L -1 L 51.5 U 10/17 at E Michigan 28-6 W -6.5 W 49 U 10/28 OHIO U 7-17 L -6.5 L 39.5 U 10/20 BOWLING GREEN 20-31 L -5 L 57 U 10/25 at Miami Ohio 54-21 W +3.5 W 46.5 O 10/24 at Ohio U 20-11 W +10 W 46.5 U 11/4 at Buffalo 14-41 L -16.5 L 41 O 10/27 C MICHIGAN 32-41 L +3 L 58.5 O 11/1 at Bowling Green 30-45 L +6 L 53 O 10/31 W MICHIGAN 26-14 W -2.5 W 50.5 U 11/11 at Virginia Tech 0-23 L +30.5 W 41.5 U 11/10 at N Illinois 20-27 L -3.5 L 50.5 U 11/12 TEMPLE 41-38 W 0 W 46 O 11/7 at Akron 20-28 L -3.5 L 42.5 O 11/17 E MICHIGAN 14-6 W -12 L 40 U 11/17 at Temple 14-24 L +0 L 47.5 U 11/18 N ILLINOIS 14-42 L +2.5 L 51 O 11/21 at Temple 13-47 L +10 L 46 O 11/24 at Ball St 6-30 L +3 L 46 U 11/24 BUFFALO 23-30 L -1.5 L 51 O 11/28 at Buffalo 24-21 W +9 W 58.5 U 11/27 BUFFALO 6-9 L +3.5 W 49 U WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 135

MIAMI (OH) REDHAWKS 2010 Schedule Strength: 35.33 (#74 of 120) OHIO BOBCATS 2010 Schedule Strength: 27.17 (#119 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 9 Lettermen Returning: 51 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 64 Where: Oxford, OH Head Coach: Michael Haywood, 2nd year (1-11 SU) Conference: MAC 2009 RECORD: 1-11 SU, 5-7 ATS Facility: Yager Stadium 9/4/10 at Florida 9/11/10 E MICHIGAN * ROAD TEAM is 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS in L8 MOH-EMU matchups 2009 Scoring Differential: -18.6 (#112 of 120) 9/18/10 COLORADO ST 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -14.4 (#112 of 120) 9/25/10 at Missouri 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 17 (#112 of 120) 10/2/10 KENT ST * ROAD TEAM is on 4-1 SU & ATS run in MOH-KS series 2009 Schedule Strength: 34.33 (#65 of 120) 10/9/10 at Cincinnati * HOME TEAM is 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 CIN-MOH matchups 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at C Michigan * C MICHIGAN is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. MIAMI OHIO 10/23/10 OHIO U * FAVORITE is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in L5 MOH-OHU matchups Points Scored - Allowed 15.6 (116) 34.2 (108) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 343.5 (84) 377.3 (70) 10/30/10 at Buffalo * L5 games of BUF-MOH series are 5-0 OVER the total YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.65 (108) 5.83 (89) 11/10/10 at Bowling Green * MIAMI OHIO is on 6-3 SU & 9-0 ATS run in its L9 games at BOWLING GREEN YP Rush Gained - Allowed 2.39 (119) 4.89 (104) 11/17/10 at Akron * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & 5-0 ATS in L6 AKR-MOH matchups YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.14 (105) 7.19 (70) Avg. Time of Possession 31.56 (20) 11/23/10 TEMPLE * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 MOH-TEM games Turnover Differential -2 (120) 3rd Down Conversion % 39.0% (64) 40.7% (72) Straight Up 2-10 6-7 2-10 1-11 11-38 (22%) * MIAMI OHIO is on a 17-5 ATS (+11.5 Units) run vs. good teams (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) The Overall ATS 4-8 6-6 4-7 5-7 19-28 (40%) Average Score was MIAMI OHIO 30.3, OPPONENT 22.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at at Home ATS 1-4 2-2 1-4 3-2 7-12 (37%) Missouri, 10/23 - OHIO U, 11/23 - TEMPLE Away/Neutral ATS 3-4 4-4 3-3 2-5 12-16 (43%) * MIAMI OHIO is 7-0 UNDER the total (+7 Units) on the road in October games since 07. The vs Conference ATS 3-5 3-4 3-5 3-5 12-19 (39%) Average Score was MIAMI OHIO 14.7, OPPONENT 20.3. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - at Non-Conference ATS 1-3 3-2 1-2 2-2 7-9 (44%) Cincinnati, 10/16 - at C Michigan, 10/30 - at Buffalo as Favorite ATS 0-3 1-2 0-3 0-0 1-8 (11%) * MIAMI OHIO is 2-11 ATS (-10.1 Units) vs. teams with a losing record since 07. The Average as Underdog ATS 4-5 5-3 4-4 5-7 18-19 (49%) Score was MIAMI OHIO 16.8, OPPONENT 31. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - E MICHIGAN, 9/18 Over-Under 5-7 5-8 6-5 5-7 21-27 (44%) - COLORADO ST, 10/2 - KENT ST, 10/30 - at Buffalo, 11/17 - at Akron 8/31 NORTHWESTERN 3-21 L +5.5 L 54 U 8/30 at Ball St 14-13 W +4 W 53.5 U 8/28 VANDERBILT 13-34 L -3.5 L 38.5 O 9/5 vs. Kentucky 0-42 L +15 L 49 U 9/9 at Purdue 31-38 L +19 W 53.5 O 9/8 at Minnesota 35-41 L +8 W 49 O 9/6 at Michigan 6-16 L +14.5 W 40 U 9/12 at Boise St 0-48 L +38 L 52.5 U 9/16 KENT ST 14-16 L -13.5 L 45 U 9/15 CINCINNATI 10-47 L +6.5 L 48 O 9/13 CHARLESTON SOUT 38-27 W - - - 9/19 at W Michigan 26-48 L +16 L 48.5 O 9/23 at Syracuse 14-34 L +7.5 L 42 O 9/22 at Colorado 0-42 L +13.5 L 48.5 U 9/20 at Cincinnati 20-45 L +12.5 L 48.5 O 9/26 at Kent St 19-29 L +7 L 47 O 9/30 at Cincinnati 10-24 L +11 L 45.5 U 9/29 SYRACUSE 17-14 W -1 W 51 U 10/4 TEMPLE 10-28 L -7 L 41 U 10/3 CINCINNATI 13-37 L +29.5 W 59 U 10/8 N ILLINOIS 25-28 L +13.5 W 54.5 U 10/6 at Kent St 20-13 W +8 W 50.5 U 10/11 at N Illinois 13-17 L +10 W 43 U 10/10 at Northwestern 6-16 L +17 W 55.5 U 10/15 at Buffalo 38-31 W -9 L 46.5 O 10/13 BOWLING GREEN 47-14 W +1.5 W 56.5 O 10/18 at Bowling Green 27-20 W +9.5 W 51 U 10/17 at Ohio U 7-28 L +14 L 47.5 U 10/21 at Akron 13-24 L +9.5 L 47.5 U 10/20 at Temple 17-24 L -6.5 L 50.5 U 10/25 KENT ST 21-54 L -3.5 L 46.5 O 10/24 N ILLINOIS 22-27 L +10 W 45 O 10/28 BALL ST 17-20 L -3 L 51.5 U 10/27 at Vanderbilt 13-24 L +13.5 W 43.5 U 11/4 at Buffalo 17-37 L +8 L 50.5 O 10/31 TOLEDO 31-24 W +5 W 57.5 U 11/4 at W Michigan 24-27 L +12.5 W 44 O 11/3 BUFFALO 31-28 W -6 L 50 O 11/11 BALL ST 16-31 L +17.5 W 54 U 11/5 at Temple 32-34 L +17 W 44.5 O 11/15 at Bowling Green 9-7 W +4 W 44 U 11/14 AKRON 7-0 W -7 T 52.5 U 11/21 at Toledo 14-42 L +3.5 L 48.5 O 11/12 BOWLING GREEN 14-35 L +4 L 59 U 11/24 OHIO U 24-34 L +3.5 L 38 O 11/24 at Ohio U 29-38 L +0 L 53 O 11/28 OHIO U 26-41 L +3 L 48.5 O 11/18 BUFFALO 17-42 L +4.5 L 52.5 O 12/1 vs. C Michigan 10-35 L +3 L 64 U Where: Athens, OH Head Coach: Frank Solich, 6th year (32-31 SU) Conference: MAC 2009 RECORD: 9-5 SU, 9-5 ATS Facility: Peden Stadium 9/4/10 WOFFORD 9/11/10 TOLEDO * HOME TEAM is 4-0 ATS in L4 OHU-TOL games 2009 Scoring Differential: +3.5 (#53 of 120) 9/18/10 at Ohio St * OHIO U is 0-2 SU but 2-0 ATS in its L2 games at OHIO ST 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +2.0 (#59 of 120) 9/25/10 at Marshall * HOME TEAM is on 5-3 SU & 7-1 ATS run in MAR-OHU series 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 31 (#81 of 120) 10/2/10 at E Michigan * HOME TEAM is on 4-1 SU & 4-0 ATS run in EMU-OHU series 2009 Schedule Strength: 27.07 (#111 of 120) 10/9/10 BOWLING GREEN * BOWLING GREEN is 5-3 SU & 8-0 ATS in its L8 games at OHIO U 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 AKRON * HOME TEAM is 4-1 SU & ATS in L5 OHU-AKR matchups 10/23/10 at Miami Ohio * FAVORITE is on 5-0 SU & ATS run in L5 MOH-OHU matchups Points Scored - Allowed 24.8 (78) 21.3 (28) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 311.5 (106) 349.3 (45) 10/30/10 LA LAFAYETTE YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.09 (94) 4.89 (28) 11/4/10 BUFFALO * UNDERDOG has swept L3 OHU-BUF games, both SU & ATS YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.50 (102) 3.92 (55) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.90 (77) 6.09 (20) 11/16/10 at Temple * OHIO U is 2-1 SU & 2-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. TEMPLE Avg. Time of Possession 28.96 (92) 11/26/10 at Kent St * ROAD TEAM is 7-2 SU & 8-1 ATS in L9 KS-OHU matchups Turnover Differential +0.9 (7) 3rd Down Conversion % 29.8% (116) 39.1% (55) Straight Up 9-5 6-6 4-8 9-5 28-24 (54%) * OHIO U is 11-2 ATS (+8.8 Units) as road underdogs since 07. The Average Score was OHIO U Overall ATS 7-5 7-4 6-4 9-5 29-18 (62%) 22.7, OPPONENT 26.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - at Ohio St, 11/16 - at Temple at Home ATS 3-1 4-1 1-3 4-2 12-7 (63%) * OHIO U is on a 0-9 ATS (-9.9 Units) skid on the road vs. teams giving up 34 or more PPG Away/Neutral ATS 4-4 3-3 5-1 5-3 17-11 (61%) The Average Score was OHIO U 22.9, OPPONENT 25.9. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at E vs Conference ATS 6-3 4-4 3-4 7-2 20-13 (61%) Michigan, 10/23 - at Miami Ohio Non-Conference ATS 1-2 3-0 3-0 2-3 9-5 (64%) * OHIO U is 6-0 ATS (+6 Units) on the road revenging a home loss against opponent since 07. as Favorite ATS 3-2 2-2 1-1 3-4 9-9 (50%) The Average Score was OHIO U 27.5, OPPONENT 24.7. Potential spots for 2010: 11/26 - at as Underdog ATS 4-3 4-2 5-3 5-1 18-9 (67%) Kent St Over-Under 4-9 8-3 5-6 6-7 23-25 (48%) 9/2 TENN-MARTIN 29-3 W - - - 9/1 GARDNER WEBB 36-14 W - - - 8/30 at Wyoming 20-21 L +14 W 47 U 9/5 CONNECTICUT 16-23 L +3.5 L 44.5 U 9/9 at N Illinois 35-23 W +20 W 45.5 O 9/8 at La Lafayette 31-23 W +1 W 42 O 9/6 at Ohio St 14-26 L +34.5 W 47 U 9/12 at North Texas 31-30 W -2.5 L 52 O 9/16 at Rutgers 7-24 L +17 T 43 U 9/15 at Virginia Tech 7-28 L +22.5 W 44 U 9/13 C MICHIGAN 28-31 L +2.5 L 53.5 O 9/19 CAL POLY SLO 28-10 W -5.5 W - 9/23 at Missouri 6-31 L +20.5 L 44.5 U 9/22 WYOMING 33-34 L +4.5 W 44 O 9/20 at Northwestern 8-16 L +10.5 W 52.5 U 9/26 at Tennessee 23-34 L +22 W 44 O 9/30 BOWLING GREEN 9-21 L -7 L 44 U 9/29 KENT ST 25-33 L +2 L 47 O 9/27 VMI 51-31 W - - - 10/3 at Bowling Green 44-37 W +2.5 W 48.5 O 10/7 W MICHIGAN 27-20 W +4 W 41 O 10/6 at Buffalo 10-31 L -3.5 L 52.5 U 10/4 at W Michigan 20-41 L +8 L 48.5 O 10/10 at Akron 19-7 W -3.5 W 52.5 U 10/14 at Illinois 20-17 W +6.5 W 43 U 10/13 E MICHIGAN 48-42 W -4 W 46 O 10/11 at Kent St 26-19 W +1 W 51.5 U 10/17 MIAMI OHIO 28-7 W -14 W 47.5 U 10/21 BUFFALO 42-7 W -17.5 W 43 O 10/24 KENT ST 11-20 L -10 L 46.5 U 10/20 at Toledo 40-43 L +1.5 L 60.5 O 10/21 at Temple 10-14 L +4 T 40 U 10/28 at Kent St 17-7 W +6.5 W 39.5 U 10/31 at Ball St 20-17 W -5.5 L 44 U 11/4 at E Michigan 16-10 W -6.5 L 38 U 10/27 at Bowling Green 38-27 W +7 W 60.5 O 10/28 BUFFALO 19-32 L -1.5 L 49 O 11/10 at Buffalo 27-24 W +2 W 46.5 O 11/16 AKRON 17-7 W -4 W 38 U 11/2 TEMPLE 23-7 W -9.5 W 53.5 U 11/8 BOWLING GREEN 3-28 L +2.5 L 49.5 U 11/21 N ILLINOIS 38-31 W -1 W 44.5 O 11/24 at Miami Ohio 34-24 W -3.5 W 38 O 11/7 at Akron 37-48 L -2.5 L 50.5 O 11/22 AKRON 49-42 W +2.5 W 54.5 O 11/27 TEMPLE 35-17 W +1.5 W 43.5 O 11/30 vs. C Michigan 10-31 L +3 L 46.5 U 11/24 MIAMI OHIO 38-29 W +0 W 53 O 11/28 at Miami Ohio 41-26 W -3 W 48.5 O 12/4 vs. C Michigan 10-20 L +13.5 W 57 U 1/7 vs. Southern Miss 7-28 L +6.5 L 42 U 12/26 vs. Marshall 17-21 L -3 L 49 U 136 WWW.STATFOX.COM

TEMPLE OWLS 2010 Schedule Strength: 31.08 (#103 of 120) Offense: East Coast - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 56 Where: Philadelphia, PA Head Coach: Al Golden, 5th year (19-30 SU) Conference: MAC 2009 RECORD: 9-4 SU, 8-4 ATS Facility: Lincoln Financial Field 9/3/10 VILLANOVA 9/11/10 C MICHIGAN * HOME TEAM has covered spread in L2 TEM-CM games 2009 Scoring Differential: +7.2 (#34 of 120) 9/18/10 CONNECTICUT * TEMPLE is on 2-3 SU but 5-0 ATS run vs. CONNECTICUT 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +3.9 (#50 of 120) 9/25/10 at Penn St * L3 PSU-TEM series games have gone UNDER the total 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 36 (#62 of 120) 10/2/10 at Army * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in ARM-TEM series 2009 Schedule Strength: 25 (#119 of 120) 10/9/10 at N Illinois * TEMPLE is 2-0 ATS in its L2 games vs. N ILLINOIS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 BOWLING GREEN * TEMPLE has covered spread in L2 games vs. BOWLING GREEN 10/23/10 at Buffalo * L3 BUF-TEM series games have gone OVER the total Points Scored - Allowed 29.5 (39) 22.3 (39) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 333.5 (92) 334.0 (33) 10/30/10 AKRON * TEMPLE has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. AKRON YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.22 (82) 5.08 (39) 11/6/10 at Kent St * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 KS-TEM games YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.41 (49) 3.22 (16) 11/16/10 OHIO U * OHIO U is 2-1 SU & 2-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. TEMPLE YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.80 (83) 7.01 (55) Avg. Time of Possession 30.65 (44) 11/23/10 at Miami Ohio * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 MOH-TEM games Turnover Differential +0.3 (35) 3rd Down Conversion % 35.2% (93) 35.4% (27) Straight Up 1-11 4-8 5-7 9-4 19-30 (39%) * Over the L2 seasons, TEMPLE is 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) revenging a road loss against opponent. Overall ATS 5-6 8-4 7-4 8-4 28-18 (61%) The Average Score was TEMPLE 22.3, OPPONENT 14.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at Penn at Home ATS 3-1 4-2 3-1 3-2 13-6 (68%) St, 11/16 - OHIO U Away/Neutral ATS 2-5 4-2 4-3 5-2 15-12 (56%) * Over the L2 seasons, TEMPLE is 7-0 OVER the total (+7 Units) on the road in the second half of vs Conference ATS 0-1 6-2 4-3 5-3 15-9 (63%) the season. The Average Score was TEMPLE 32.3, OPPONENT 29.1. Potential spots for 2010: Non-Conference ATS 5-5 2-2 3-1 3-1 13-9 (59%) 10/23 - at Buffalo, 11/6 - at Kent St, 11/23 - at Miami Ohio as Favorite ATS 0-0 0-1 2-1 5-3 7-5 (58%) * TEMPLE is 11-3 ATS (+7.7 Units) on the road when playing on Saturdays since 07. The Average as Underdog ATS 5-6 7-3 5-3 3-1 20-13 (61%) Score was TEMPLE 21.2, OPPONENT 26.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at Penn St, 10/2 - at Over-Under 8-4 3-9 5-7 9-3 25-23 (52%) Army, 10/9 - at N Illinois, 10/23 - at Buffalo, 11/6 - at Kent St 8/31 at Buffalo 3-9 L +6 T 44.5 U 8/31 NAVY 19-30 L +21 W 52.5 U 8/29 at Army 35-7 W -7 W 40 O 9/3 VILLANOVA 24-27 L - - - 9/9 LOUISVILLE 0-62 L +40 L 58 O 9/8 BUFFALO 7-42 L -3 L 47.5 O 9/6 CONNECTICUT 9-12 L +6.5 W 39.5 U 9/19 at Penn St 6-31 L +29.5 W 48 U 9/16 at Minnesota 0-62 L +40.5 L 57 O 9/15 at Connecticut 17-22 L +31.5 W 51.5 U 9/13 at Buffalo 28-30 L +7 W 45 O 9/26 BUFFALO 37-13 W -3.5 W 46 O 9/23 at W Michigan 7-41 L +29 L 46 O 9/22 at Bowling Green 35-48 L +21 W 52 O 9/20 at Penn St 3-45 L +28.5 L 54 U 10/3 at E Michigan 24-12 W -6.5 W 44.5 U 9/30 at Vanderbilt 14-43 L +32.5 W 43.5 O 9/29 at Army 21-37 L +6 L 45.5 O 9/27 W MICHIGAN 3-7 L +4.5 W 47.5 U 10/10 BALL ST 24-19 W -14.5 L 45.5 U 10/7 KENT ST 17-28 L +23.5 W 45.5 U 10/6 N ILLINOIS 16-15 W +3.5 W 54 U 10/4 at Miami Ohio 28-10 W +7 W 41 U 10/17 ARMY 27-13 W -10.5 W 36.5 O 10/12 vs. Clemson 9-63 L +45.5 L 56 O 10/13 at Akron 24-20 W +12.5 W 51 U 10/11 at C Michigan 14-24 L +8 L 48 U 10/24 at Toledo 40-24 W +0 W 53.5 O 10/21 at N Illinois 21-43 L +31 W 56 O 10/20 MIAMI OHIO 24-17 W +6.5 W 50.5 U 10/21 OHIO U 14-10 W -4 T 40 U 10/31 at Navy 27-24 W +6.5 W 41 O 10/28 BOWLING GREEN 28-14 W +15 W 47.5 U 11/2 at Ohio U 7-23 L +9.5 L 53.5 U 11/1 at Navy 27-33 L +8 W 44.5 O 11/5 MIAMI OHIO 34-32 W -17 L 44.5 O 11/4 C MICHIGAN 26-42 L +20.5 W 51 O 11/10 PENN ST 0-31 L +25.5 L 47 U 11/12 at Kent St 38-41 L 0 L 46 O 11/13 at Akron 56-17 W -6 W 46 O 11/11 at Penn St 0-47 L +36.5 L 45.5 O 11/17 KENT ST 24-14 W +0 W 47.5 U 11/22 E MICHIGAN 55-52 W -11.5 L 48 O 11/21 KENT ST 47-13 W -10 W 46 O 11/18 at Navy 6-42 L +31.5 L 55.5 U 11/24 at W Michigan 3-16 L +14.5 W 51 U 11/28 AKRON 27-6 W -3 W 58 U 11/27 at Ohio U 17-35 L -1.5 L 43.5 O 12/29 vs. UCLA 21-30 L +4.5 L 44 O Power Searches: Bigger profits, less time consuming. Get all of the best available information you ve come to love from the Fox- Sheets quickly, including: - Top Against the Spread, Over/Under, Money Line, and Halftime Line Super Situations - Summaries of available betting systems for every board game - Top Team, Coach, and Over/Under Trends - All of the daily or weekly StatFox Simulator results with Edges on a single page - The full betting board of StatFox Power Rating Lines with Edge Stars - The widely-renowned StatFox Outplay Factor Ratings for every season game Learn more: www.foxsheets.com WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 137

BALL STATE CARDINALS 2010 Schedule Strength: 27.67 (#116 of 120) CENTRAL MICHIGAN CHIPPEWAS 2010 Schedule Strength: 30.08 (#107 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 10 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 42 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 43 Where: Muncie, IN Head Coach: Stan Parrish, 2nd year (2-11 SU) Conference: MAC 2009 RECORD: 2-10 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: Scheumann Stadium 9/2/10 SE MISSOURI ST 9/11/10 LIBERTY 2009 Scoring Differential: -9.0 (#105 of 120) 9/18/10 at Purdue * ROAD TEAM is on 0-5 SU but 4-1 ATS run in PUR-BLS series 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -9.1 (#102 of 120) 9/25/10 at Iowa 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 22 (#101 of 120) 10/2/10 at C Michigan * ROAD TEAM is 14-4 ATS in CM-BLS series since 92 2009 Schedule Strength: 25.33 (#118 of 120) 10/9/10 W MICHIGAN * BALL ST is on 7-2 SU & ATS run vs. W MICHIGAN 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 E MICHIGAN * ROAD TEAM is 10-8 SU & 13-5 ATS in BLS-EMU series since 92 10/23/10 at Toledo * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in TOL-BLS series Points Scored - Allowed 19.2 (108) 28.2 (82) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 295.3 (114) 386.7 (77) 10/30/10 at Kent St * BALL ST is 3-0 SU & 2-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. KENT ST YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.74 (105) 5.58 (73) 11/6/10 AKRON * ROAD TEAM is on 4-5 SU but 6-2 ATS run in BLS-AKR series YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.44 (47) 3.96 (63) 11/12/10 at Buffalo * L3 BUF-BLS series games have gone OVER the total YP Pass Gained - Allowed 5.15 (118) 7.62 (91) Avg. Time of Possession 28.74 (100) 11/20/10 N ILLINOIS * FAVORITE is 5-0 SU & 4-1 ATS in L5 BLS-NIL matchups at BALL ST Turnover Differential -0.6 (103) 3rd Down Conversion % 34.9% (97) 40.4% (69) Straight Up 5-7 7-6 12-2 2-10 26-25 (51%) * BALL ST is 9-1 ATS (+7.9 Units) in September games since 07. The Average Score was BALL Overall ATS 8-3 7-5 8-4 6-6 29-18 (62%) ST 32.8, OPPONENT 25.8. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - at Purdue, 9/25 - at Iowa at Home ATS 3-2 2-2 3-1 1-5 9-10 (47%) * BALL ST is 10-1 ATS (+8.9 Units) as road underdogs since 07. The Average Score was BALL Away/Neutral ATS 5-1 5-3 5-3 5-1 20-8 (71%) ST 26.2, OPPONENT 29.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - at Purdue, 9/25 - at Iowa, 10/2 - at C vs Conference ATS 5-3 4-3 5-3 4-4 18-13 (58%) Michigan, 10/23 - at Toledo, 10/30 - at Kent St, 11/12 - at Buffalo Non-Conference ATS 3-0 3-2 3-1 2-2 11-5 (69%) * BALL ST is on a 8-1 UNDER the total (+6.9 Units) run on the road in November games The as Favorite ATS 3-0 3-3 7-3 0-2 13-8 (62%) Average Score was BALL ST 23.6, OPPONENT 27. Potential spots for 2010: 11/12 - at Buffalo as Underdog ATS 5-3 4-2 1-1 6-3 16-9 (64%) Over-Under 6-5 6-6 6-7 3-7 21-25 (46%) 8/31 E MICHIGAN 38-20 W -5.5 W 49 O 8/30 MIAMI OHIO 13-14 L -4 L 53.5 U 8/28 NORTHEASTERN 48-14 W - - - 9/3 NORTH TEXAS 10-20 L -15 L 54 U 9/9 INDIANA 23-24 L +3.5 W 52.5 U 9/8 at E Michigan 38-16 W -3.5 W 45 O 9/5 NAVY 35-23 W -6.5 W 64 U 9/12 NEW HAMPSHIRE 16-23 L -7 L - 9/16 at Purdue 28-38 L +17 W 58.5 O 9/15 at Navy 34-31 W +7 W 58 O 9/13 at Akron 41-24 W -7 W 60.5 O 9/19 at Army 17-24 L +9 W 42 U 9/23 N DAKOTA ST 24-29 L - - - 9/22 at Nebraska 40-41 L +24 W 62 O 9/20 at Indiana 42-20 W +1.5 W 61 O 9/26 at Auburn 30-54 L +30.5 W 54.5 O 9/30 N ILLINOIS 28-40 L +7 L 57 O 9/29 BUFFALO 49-14 W -13.5 W 62 O 9/27 KENT ST 41-20 W -21 T 60 O 10/3 TOLEDO 30-37 L +5.5 L 59 O 10/7 at Buffalo 55-25 W -3 W 49 O 10/6 C MICHIGAN 38-58 L -13 L 67.5 O 10/4 at Toledo 31-0 W -7.5 W 61.5 U 10/10 at Temple 19-24 L +14.5 W 45.5 U 10/14 at C Michigan 7-18 L +10.5 L 57 U 10/13 W KENTUCKY 35-12 W - - - 10/11 at W Kentucky 24-7 W -16 W 51 U 10/17 BOWLING GREEN 17-31 L +3 L 55.5 U 10/25 E MICHIGAN 38-16 W -27.5 L 57 U 10/21 W MICHIGAN 27-41 L +1.5 L 51 O 10/20 at W Michigan 27-23 W +1 W 69 U 10/24 at E Michigan 29-27 W -2.5 L 44 O 11/5 N ILLINOIS 45-14 W -7.5 W 47 O 10/28 at Miami Ohio 20-17 W +3 W 51.5 U 10/27 at Illinois 17-28 L +13.5 W 58 U 11/11 at Miami Ohio 31-16 W -17.5 L 54 U 10/31 OHIO U 17-20 L +5.5 W 44 U 11/4 at Michigan 26-34 L +33.5 W 49.5 O 11/3 at Indiana 20-38 L +7 L 62.5 U 11/19 at C Michigan 31-24 W -6.5 W 62 U 11/12 at N Illinois 20-26 L +16 W 46 T 11/14 at Toledo 20-17 W +4 W 55.5 U 11/13 TOLEDO 41-20 W -7 W 71.5 U 11/25 W MICHIGAN 45-22 W -10 W 56 O 11/18 C MICHIGAN 3-35 L +14.5 L 51 U 11/24 KENT ST 30-6 W -3 W 46 U 11/24 at N Illinois 27-21 W -9.5 L 56.5 U 12/5 vs. Buffalo 24-42 L -15 L 62.5 O 11/24 at W Michigan 22-17 W +10 W 54 U 1/5 vs. Rutgers 30-52 L +11 L 61 O 1/6 vs. Tulsa 13-45 L +2 L 70.5 U Where: Mount Pleasant, MI Head Coach: Dan Enos, 1st year Conference: MAC 2009 RECORD: 12-2 SU, 9-4-1 ATS Facility: Kelly/Shorts Stadium 9/2/10 HAMPTON 9/11/10 at Temple * HOME TEAM has covered spread in L2 TEM-CM games 2009 Scoring Differential: +15.0 (#11 of 120) 9/18/10 at E Michigan * L3 EMU-CM series games have gone OVER the total 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +9.8 (#25 of 120) 9/25/10 at Northwestern 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 39 (#56 of 120) 10/2/10 BALL ST * ROAD TEAM is 14-4 ATS in CM-BLS series since 92 2009 Schedule Strength: 27.21 (#108 of 120) 10/9/10 at Virginia Tech 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 MIAMI OHIO * C MICHIGAN is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. MIAMI OHIO 10/23/10 at N Illinois * N ILLINOIS is 5-1 SU & ATS in its L6 home games vs. C MICHIGAN Points Scored - Allowed 33.9 (13) 18.9 (17) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 423.9 (23) 344.2 (43) 10/30/10 BOWLING GREEN * ROAD TEAM is 5-6 SU but 8-3 ATS in CM-BG series since 92 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.96 (32) 5.13 (42) 11/5/10 W MICHIGAN * C MICHIGAN is 4-0 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L4 games vs. W MICHIGAN YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.55 (37) 3.66 (40) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.48 (46) 6.61 (39) 11/13/10 at Navy Avg. Time of Possession 30.33 (55) 11/26/10 at Toledo * C MICHIGAN is on 5-1 SU & ATS run vs. TOLEDO Turnover Differential +0.4 (32) 3rd Down Conversion % 50.9% (3) 40.2% (65) Straight Up 10-4 8-6 8-5 12-2 38-17 (69%) * C MICHIGAN is on a 18-3 ATS (+14.7 Units) run in all games where the total is between 49.5 Overall ATS 12-2 7-5 6-6 9-4 34-17 (67%) and 56 The Average Score was C MICHIGAN 32.8, OPPONENT 23.7. Potential spots for 2010: at Home ATS 5-0 3-1 2-2 4-0 14-3 (82%) POTENTIALLY NUMEROUS GAMES Away/Neutral ATS 7-2 4-4 4-4 5-4 20-14 (59%) * C MICHIGAN is 6-0 ATS (+6 Units) in all games where the line is +3 to -3 since 07. The Average vs Conference ATS 8-1 5-2 4-4 6-2 23-9 (72%) Score was C MICHIGAN 38.3, OPPONENT 27.7. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at Northwestern, Non-Conference ATS 4-1 2-3 2-2 3-2 11-8 (58%) 11/13 - at Navy as Favorite ATS 8-2 5-2 2-1 6-3 21-8 (72%) * C MICHIGAN is on a 16-6 ATS (+9.4 Units) run vs. excellent passing teams averaging 275 or as Underdog ATS 4-0 2-3 4-5 2-1 12-9 (57%) more PYPG. The Average Score was C MICHIGAN 26.8, OPPONENT 30.7. Potential spots for Over-Under 6-7 10-3 6-6 6-7 28-23 (55%) 2010: 9/25 - at Northwestern, 10/30 - BOWLING GREEN, 11/5 - W MICHIGAN, 11/26 - at Toledo 8/31 BOSTON COLLEGE 24-31 L +11.5 W 41 O 9/1 at Kansas 7-52 L +7.5 L 51 O 8/28 E ILLINOIS 31-12 W - - - 9/5 at Arizona 6-19 L +13.5 W 55.5 U 9/9 at Michigan 17-41 L +27 W 44.5 O 9/8 TOLEDO 52-31 W -3 W 53 O 9/6 at Georgia 17-56 L +24.5 L 59 O 9/12 at Michigan St 29-27 W +15 W 50 O 9/16 AKRON 24-21 W -1 W 45 T 9/15 at Purdue 22-45 L +21 L 67.5 U 9/13 at Ohio U 31-28 W -2.5 W 53.5 O 9/19 ALCORN ST 48-0 W -43 W - 9/23 at E Michigan 24-17 W -5.5 W 45 U 9/22 N DAKOTA ST 14-44 L - - - 9/20 at Purdue 25-32 L +10.5 W 68.5 U 9/26 AKRON 48-21 W -15 W 54 O 9/30 at Kentucky 36-45 L +10 W 50.5 O 9/29 N ILLINOIS 35-10 W -3.5 W 61.5 U 9/27 BUFFALO 27-25 W -7 L 61.5 U 10/3 at Buffalo 20-13 W -9.5 L 53.5 U 10/7 at Toledo 42-20 W +2 W 50 O 10/6 at Ball St 58-38 W +13 W 67.5 O 10/11 TEMPLE 24-14 W -8 W 48 U 10/10 E MICHIGAN 56-8 W -24 W 54 O 10/14 BALL ST 18-7 W -10.5 W 57 U 10/13 ARMY 47-23 W -13.5 W 54 O 10/18 W MICHIGAN 38-28 W +1.5 W 59.5 O 10/17 at W Michigan 34-23 W -7 W 59 U 10/19 BOWLING GREEN 31-14 W -7.5 W 50.5 U 10/20 at Clemson 14-70 L +16.5 L 61 O 10/25 at Toledo 24-23 W -4 L 56.5 U 10/24 at Bowling Green 24-10 W -9.5 W 61.5 U 11/4 at Temple 42-26 W -20.5 L 51 O 10/27 at Kent St 41-32 W -3 W 58.5 O 11/10 W MICHIGAN 31-7 W -6.5 W 46.5 U 11/6 at W Michigan 34-31 W -3 T 61 O 11/1 at Indiana 37-34 W +1.5 W 60.5 O 10/31 at Boston College 10-31 L +5.5 L 48 U 11/17 at N Illinois 10-31 L -4 L 48 U 11/16 E MICHIGAN 45-48 L -13.5 L 64.5 O 11/12 at N Illinois 33-30 W +4 W 52 O 11/11 TOLEDO 56-28 W -17.5 W 64 O 11/24 at Buffalo 55-28 W -14.5 W 48 O 11/23 at Akron 35-32 W -3.5 L 61.5 O 11/19 BALL ST 24-31 L +6.5 L 62 U 11/18 at Ball St 35-3 W -14.5 W 51 U 11/30 vs. Ohio U 31-10 W -3 W 46.5 U 12/1 vs. Miami Ohio 35-10 W -3 W 64 U 11/28 at E Michigan 52-56 L -11 L 65.5 O 11/27 N ILLINOIS 45-31 W -14 T 52.5 O 12/26 vs. Middle Tenn St 31-14 W -9 W 51 U 12/26 vs. Purdue 48-51 L +8 W 71.5 O 12/26 vs. Fla Atlantic 21-24 L -7 L 70 U 12/4 vs. Ohio U 20-10 W -13.5 L 57 U 138 WWW.STATFOX.COM

EASTERN MICHIGAN EAGLES 2010 Schedule Strength: 32.08 (#92 of 120) NORTHERN ILLINOIS HUSKIES 2010 Schedule Strength: 28.5 (#114 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 139 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 44 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 48 Where: Ypsilanti, MI Head Coach: Ron English, 2nd year (0-12 SU) Conference: MAC 2009 RECORD: 0-12 SU, 4-8 ATS Facility: Rynearson Stadium 9/4/10 ARMY * L2 games in EMU-ARM series went UNDER the total 9/11/10 at Miami Ohio * ROAD TEAM is 6-2 SU & 7-1 ATS in L8 MOH-EMU matchups 2009 Scoring Differential: -21.8 (#118 of 120) 9/18/10 C MICHIGAN * L3 EMU-CM series games have gone OVER the total 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -21.5 (#118 of 120) 9/25/10 at Ohio St 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 11 (#118 of 120) 10/2/10 OHIO U * HOME TEAM is on 4-1 SU & 4-0 ATS run in EMU-OHU series 2009 Schedule Strength: 30.17 (#87 of 120) 10/9/10 at Vanderbilt 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at Ball St * ROAD TEAM is 10-8 SU & 13-5 ATS in BLS-EMU series since 92 10/23/10 at Virginia Points Scored - Allowed 16.4 (112) 38.3 (117) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 278.6 (116) 426.9 (105) 10/30/10 TOLEDO * TOLEDO is on 7-1 SU & ATS run vs. E MICHIGAN YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.48 (113) 6.85 (117) 11/13/10 at W Michigan * L4 WM-EMU series games have gone UNDER the total YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.61 (90) 6.34 (120) 11/20/10 at Buffalo * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 ATS in L2 BUF-EMU games YP Pass Gained - Allowed 5.58 (113) 8.04 (105) Avg. Time of Possession 30.8 (37) 11/26/10 N ILLINOIS * ROAD TEAM is on 5-4 SU & 8-1 ATS run in EMU-NIL series Turnover Differential -0.3 (77) 3rd Down Conversion % 37.8% (73) 45.4% (105) Straight Up 1-11 4-8 3-9 0-12 8-40 (17%) * E MICHIGAN is 4-15 ATS (-12.5 Units) after playing its last game on the road since 07. The Average Overall ATS 6-6 4-7 4-7 4-8 18-28 (39%) Score was E MICHIGAN 21.5, OPPONENT 35.7. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - C MICHIGAN, 10/2 at Home ATS 2-3 1-2 1-3 1-4 5-12 (29%) - OHIO U, 10/16 - at Ball St, 10/23 - at Virginia, 11/20 - at Buffalo, 11/26 - N ILLINOIS Away/Neutral ATS 4-3 3-5 3-4 3-4 13-16 (45%) * E MICHIGAN is on a 6-21 ATS (-17.1 Units) skid on the road in non-conference games The Average vs Conference ATS 5-3 3-4 4-4 2-6 14-17 (45%) Score was E MICHIGAN 12.3, OPPONENT 40.4. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at Ohio St, 10/9 - at Non-Conference ATS 1-3 1-3 0-3 2-2 4-11 (27%) Vanderbilt, 10/23 - at Virginia as Favorite ATS 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-3 (0%) * E MICHIGAN is 4-14 ATS (-11.4 Units) in the first half of the season since 07. The Average Score as Underdog ATS 6-6 4-7 4-6 4-7 18-26 (41%) was E MICHIGAN 18.5, OPPONENT 31.3. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - ARMY, 9/11 - at Miami Over-Under 4-8 6-5 5-6 6-6 21-25 (46%) Ohio, 9/18 - C MICHIGAN, 9/25 - at Ohio St, 10/2 - OHIO U, 10/9 - at Vanderbilt, 10/16 - at Ball St 8/31 at Ball St 20-38 L +5.5 L 49 O 9/1 at Pittsburgh 3-27 L +20.5 L 46.5 U 8/28 INDIANA ST 52-0 W - - - 9/5 ARMY 14-27 L -3.5 L 48 U 9/9 at Michigan St 20-52 L +26.5 L 52.5 O 9/8 BALL ST 16-38 L +3.5 L 45 O 9/6 at Michigan St 10-42 L +21 L 56 U 9/12 at Northwestern 24-27 L +22 W 51.5 U 9/16 at Northwestern 6-14 L +17 W 49.5 U 9/15 at N Illinois 21-19 W +12.5 W 44 U 9/13 TOLEDO 17-41 L -2 L 54 O 9/19 at Michigan 17-45 L +24 L 54.5 O 9/23 C MICHIGAN 17-24 L +5.5 L 45 U 9/22 HOWARD 38-15 W - - - 9/20 at Maryland 24-51 L +21.5 L 52 O 10/3 TEMPLE 12-24 L +6.5 L 44.5 U 9/30 at La Lafayette 14-33 L +8 L 44 O 9/29 at Vanderbilt 7-30 L +21.5 L 45 U 9/27 N ILLINOIS 0-37 L +5.5 L 51 U 10/10 at C Michigan 8-56 L +24 L 54 O 10/14 at Bowling Green 21-24 L +10 W 48 U 10/6 at Michigan 22-33 L +28.5 W 45.5 O 10/4 at Bowling Green 24-21 W +18.5 W 55 U 10/17 KENT ST 6-28 L +6.5 L 49 U 10/21 TOLEDO 17-13 W +2.5 W 47 U 10/13 at Ohio U 42-48 L +4 L 46 O 10/11 at Army 13-17 L +2.5 L 45.5 U 10/24 BALL ST 27-29 L +2.5 W 44 O 10/28 at W Michigan 15-18 L +13.5 W 42.5 U 10/19 vs. Northwestern 14-26 L +10.5 L 59 U 10/18 AKRON 35-42 L +4.5 L 53.5 O 10/31 at Arkansas 27-63 L +37 W 60 O 11/4 OHIO U 10-16 L +6.5 W 38 U 10/27 W MICHIGAN 19-2 W +5 W 55 U 10/25 at Ball St 16-38 L +27.5 W 57 U 11/5 at N Illinois 6-50 L +21.5 L 48 O 11/11 NAVY 21-49 L +15 L 46 O 11/3 at Toledo 28-52 L +8 L 61.5 O 11/1 at W Michigan 10-31 L +19 L 59 U 11/14 W MICHIGAN 14-35 L +13 L 59 U 11/17 at Kent St 6-14 L +12 W 40 U 11/9 BOWLING GREEN 32-39 L +3 L 57 O 11/22 at Temple 52-55 L +11.5 W 48 O 11/20 at Toledo 21-47 L +16 L 62 O 11/24 N ILLINOIS 0-27 L +10 L 42.5 U 11/16 at C Michigan 48-45 W +13.5 W 64.5 O 11/28 C MICHIGAN 56-52 W +11 W 65.5 O 11/27 at Akron 21-28 L +14.5 W 51.5 U Where: DeKalb, IL Head Coach: Jerry Kill, 3rd year (13-13 SU) Conference: MAC 2009 RECORD: 7-6 SU, 6-6-1 ATS Facility: Huskie Stadium 9/2/10 at Iowa St * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 ISU-NIL games 9/11/10 N DAKOTA 2009 Scoring Differential: +7.0 (#37 of 120) 9/18/10 at Illinois * ROAD TEAM is on 1-4 SU but 5-0 ATS run in ILL-NIL series 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +1.4 (#65 of 120) 9/25/10 at Minnesota 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 32 (#78 of 120) 10/2/10 at Akron * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & ATS in L4 AKR-NIL games 2009 Schedule Strength: 25.85 (#116 of 120) 10/9/10 TEMPLE * TEMPLE is 2-0 ATS in its L2 games vs. N ILLINOIS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 BUFFALO * ROAD TEAM is 2-0 ATS in L2 NIL-BUF games 10/23/10 C MICHIGAN * N ILLINOIS is 5-1 SU & ATS in its L6 home games vs. C MICHIGAN Points Scored - Allowed 28.6 (54) 21.6 (30) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 346.0 (83) 332.8 (31) 10/30/10 at W Michigan * N ILLINOIS is 10-2 ATS vs. W MICHIGAN since 98 YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.59 (61) 5.45 (65) 11/9/10 TOLEDO * TOLEDO is 9-2 SU & ATS vs. N ILLINOIS since 99 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.81 (20) 3.94 (61) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.12 (63) 7.14 (65) 11/20/10 at Ball St * FAVORITE is 5-0 SU & 4-1 ATS in L5 BLS-NIL matchups at BALL ST Avg. Time of Possession 31.19 (24) 11/26/10 at E Michigan * ROAD TEAM is on 5-4 SU & 8-1 ATS run in EMU-NIL series Turnover Differential +0.5 (22) 3rd Down Conversion % 43.0% (30) 42.0% (84) Straight Up 7-6 2-10 6-7 7-6 22-29 (43%) * Over the L2 seasons, N ILLINOIS is 0-7 ATS (-7.7 Units) vs. teams with a winning record. The Overall ATS 4-8 5-6 6-6 6-6 21-26 (45%) Average Score was N ILLINOIS 18.8, OPPONENT 31.9. Potential spots for 2010: 9/2 - at Iowa St, at Home ATS 1-4 3-1 1-4 4-2 9-11 (45%) 10/9 - TEMPLE, 10/23 - C MICHIGAN Away/Neutral ATS 3-4 2-5 5-2 2-4 12-15 (44%) * N ILLINOIS is on a 9-0 UNDER the total (+9 Units) run after having lost 3 out of their last 4 vs Conference ATS 3-5 3-4 4-4 3-4 13-17 (43%) games The Average Score was N ILLINOIS 20.7, OPPONENT 27.9. Potential spots for 2010: Non-Conference ATS 1-3 2-2 2-2 3-2 8-9 (47%) 10/16 - BUFFALO, 11/9 - TOLEDO as Favorite ATS 2-6 0-2 3-4 3-4 8-16 (33%) * N ILLINOIS is on a 9-1 UNDER the total (+7.9 Units) run at home in October games The Average as Underdog ATS 2-2 5-4 3-2 2-2 12-10 (55%) Score was N ILLINOIS 29.2, OPPONENT 18.4. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - TEMPLE, 10/16 Over-Under 3-9 2-9 5-7 5-6 15-31 (33%) - BUFFALO, 10/23 - C MICHIGAN 9/2 at Ohio St 12-35 L +17.5 L 49.5 U 9/1 vs. Iowa 3-16 L +12 L 45.5 U 8/30 at Minnesota 27-31 L +9.5 W 56.5 O 9/5 at Wisconsin 20-28 L +16.5 W 49.5 U 9/9 OHIO U 23-35 L -20 L 45.5 O 9/8 S ILLINOIS 31-34 L - - - 9/6 at W Michigan 26-29 L +6 W 52 O 9/12 W ILLINOIS 41-7 W -13.5 W - 9/16 BUFFALO 31-13 W -25.5 L 48 U 9/15 E MICHIGAN 19-21 L -12.5 L 44 U 9/20 INDIANA ST 48-3 W - - - 9/19 at Purdue 28-21 W +12 W 52.5 U 9/23 INDIANA ST 48-14 W - - - 9/22 at Idaho 42-35 W +3 W 48.5 O 9/27 at E Michigan 37-0 W -5.5 W 51 U 9/26 IDAHO 31-34 L -14 L 54.5 O 9/30 at Ball St 40-28 W -7 W 57 O 9/29 at C Michigan 10-35 L +3.5 L 61.5 U 10/4 at Tennessee 9-13 L +16.5 W 44.5 U 10/3 W MICHIGAN 38-3 W -6 W 49 U 10/8 at Miami Ohio 28-25 W -13.5 L 54.5 U 10/6 at Temple 15-16 L -3.5 L 54 U 10/11 MIAMI OHIO 17-13 W -10 L 43 U 10/17 at Toledo 19-20 L -7 L 60.5 U 10/14 at W Michigan 14-16 L -3 L 51 U 10/13 W MICHIGAN 13-17 L +4.5 W 60 U 10/18 TOLEDO 38-7 W -8.5 W 46.5 U 10/24 at Miami Ohio 27-22 W -10 L 45 O 10/21 TEMPLE 43-21 W -31 L 56 O 10/20 at Wisconsin 3-44 L +23 L 51 U 10/25 BOWLING GREEN 16-13 W -6.5 L 48 U 10/31 AKRON 27-10 W -12 W 41 U 10/28 at Iowa 14-24 L +14 W 48 U 10/27 at Toledo 21-70 L +3.5 L 57 O 11/5 at Ball St 14-45 L +7.5 L 47 O 11/5 E MICHIGAN 50-6 W -21.5 W 48 O 11/7 TOLEDO 13-17 L -13.5 L 53.5 U 11/10 KENT ST 27-20 W +3.5 W 50.5 U 11/12 C MICHIGAN 30-33 L -4 L 52 O 11/12 BALL ST 26-20 W -16 L 46 T 11/17 C MICHIGAN 31-10 W +4 W 48 U 11/17 at Navy 24-35 L +17.5 W 72 U 11/18 at Kent St 42-14 W -2.5 W 51 O 11/21 at Ohio U 31-38 L +1 L 44.5 O 11/24 at E Michigan 27-0 W -10 W 42.5 U 11/24 BALL ST 21-27 L +9.5 W 56.5 U 11/25 NAVY 0-16 L -2.5 L 51.5 U 11/27 at C Michigan 31-45 L +14 T 52.5 O 12/19 vs. TCU 7-37 L +12.5 L 46 U 12/28 vs. Louisiana Tech 10-17 L +2.5 L 46 U 1/2 vs. S Florida 3-27 L +6.5 L 50 U

TOLEDO ROCKETS 2010 Schedule Strength: 33.5 (#85 of 120) WESTERN MICHIGAN BRONCOS 2010 Schedule Strength: 28.08 (#115 of 120) Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 42 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 35 Where: Toledo, OH Head Coach: Tim Beckman, 2nd year (5-7 SU) Conference: MAC 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 5-7 ATS Facility: Glass Bowl 9/3/10 ARIZONA 9/11/10 at Ohio U * HOME TEAM is 4-0 ATS in L4 OHU-TOL games 2009 Scoring Differential: -8.0 (#101 of 120) 9/18/10 at W Michigan * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 WM-TOL games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -10.2 (#106 of 120) 9/25/10 at Purdue * ROAD TEAM is 2-3 SU but 4-1 ATS in L5 PUR-TOL matchups 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 22 (#101 of 120) 10/2/10 WYOMING 2009 Schedule Strength: 30.17 (#88 of 120) 10/9/10 at Boise St 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 KENT ST 10/23/10 BALL ST * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in TOL-BLS series Points Scored - Allowed 29.7 (38) 37.7 (116) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 437.9 (13) 407.4 (95) 10/30/10 at E Michigan * TOLEDO is on 7-1 SU & ATS run vs. E MICHIGAN YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.16 (23) 5.77 (85) 11/9/10 at N Illinois * TOLEDO is 9-2 SU & ATS vs. N ILLINOIS since 99 YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.69 (27) 4.73 (98) 11/17/10 BOWLING GREEN * HOME TEAM is 9-2 SU & 8-2 ATS in TOL-BG series since 99 YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.52 (42) 6.78 (46) Avg. Time of Possession 30.71 (42) 11/26/10 C MICHIGAN * C MICHIGAN is on 5-1 SU & ATS run vs. TOLEDO Turnover Differential -0.8 (111) 3rd Down Conversion % 41.1% (44) 46.0% (107) Straight Up 5-7 5-7 3-9 5-7 18-30 (38%) * TOLEDO is on a 21-6 ATS (+14.4 Units) run as favorites of 3.5 to 10 points The Average Score Overall ATS 5-6 4-7 6-6 5-7 20-26 (43%) was TOLEDO 34.5, OPPONENT 20.6. Potential spots for 2010: 10/23 - BALL ST, 10/30 - at E at Home ATS 3-2 4-2 3-3 3-2 13-9 (59%) Michigan Away/Neutral ATS 2-4 0-5 3-3 2-5 7-17 (29%) * TOLEDO is 0-7 ATS (-7.7 Units) as road underdogs of 3.5 to 10 points since 07. The Average vs Conference ATS 3-5 3-5 4-4 3-5 13-19 (41%) Score was TOLEDO 22.1, OPPONENT 42.3. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - at W Michigan Non-Conference ATS 2-1 1-2 2-2 2-2 7-7 (50%) * TOLEDO is on a 11-2 ATS (+8.8 Units) run at home in the first month of the season The Average as Favorite ATS 2-4 3-0 1-1 2-2 8-7 (53%) Score was TOLEDO 35.9, OPPONENT 22.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/3 - ARIZONA as Underdog ATS 3-2 1-6 5-5 3-5 12-18 (40%) Over-Under 7-4 8-3 4-8 8-4 27-19 (59%) 8/31 at Iowa St 43-45 L +9.5 W 53 O 9/1 PURDUE 24-52 L +6 L 54.5 O 9/6 at Arizona 16-41 L +24.5 L 61 U 9/5 at Purdue 31-52 L +10 L 47.5 O 9/9 at W Michigan 10-31 L -10.5 L 50.5 U 9/8 at C Michigan 31-52 L +3 L 53 O 9/13 at E Michigan 41-17 W +2 W 54 O 9/11 COLORADO 54-38 W +4 W 55 O 9/15 KANSAS 37-31 W -5 W 49.5 O 9/15 at Kansas 13-45 L +27.5 L 65 U 9/20 FRESNO ST 54-55 L +6 W 52.5 O 9/19 vs. Ohio St 0-38 L +22.5 L 58.5 U 9/23 MCNEESE ST 41-7 W - - - 9/22 IOWA ST 36-35 W +2 W 53.5 O 9/27 FLA INTERNATIONAL 16-35 L -18 L 53 U 9/26 at Fla International 41-31 W +1 W 58.5 O 9/30 at Pittsburgh 3-45 L +16.5 L 44.5 O 9/29 W MICHIGAN 28-42 L +0 L 64 O 10/4 BALL ST 0-31 L +7.5 L 61.5 U 10/3 at Ball St 37-30 W -5.5 W 59 O 10/7 C MICHIGAN 20-42 L -2 L 50 O 10/6 LIBERTY 35-34 W - - - 10/11 at Michigan 13-10 W +15 W 49 U 10/10 W MICHIGAN 26-58 L -7.5 L 63 O 10/14 at Kent St 14-40 L +6.5 L 47 O 10/13 at Buffalo 33-43 L +3.5 L 56 O 10/18 at N Illinois 7-38 L +8.5 L 46.5 U 10/17 N ILLINOIS 20-19 W +7 W 60.5 U 10/21 at E Michigan 13-17 L -2.5 L 47 U 10/20 OHIO U 43-40 W -1.5 W 60.5 O 10/25 C MICHIGAN 23-24 L +4 W 56.5 U 10/24 TEMPLE 24-40 L +0 L 53.5 O 10/28 AKRON 35-20 W +3 W 45 O 10/27 N ILLINOIS 70-21 W -3.5 W 57 O 11/5 at Akron 30-47 L +7 L 55 O 10/31 at Miami Ohio 24-31 L -5 L 57.5 U 11/7 at N Illinois 17-13 W +13.5 W 53.5 U 11/3 E MICHIGAN 52-28 W -8 W 61.5 O 11/15 at W Michigan 17-27 L +14.5 W 53.5 U 11/11 at C Michigan 28-56 L +17.5 L 64 O 11/14 BALL ST 17-20 L -4 L 55.5 U 11/13 at Ball St 20-41 L +7 L 71.5 U 11/21 MIAMI OHIO 42-14 W -3.5 W 48.5 O 11/20 E MICHIGAN 47-21 W -16 W 62 O 11/21 BOWLING GREEN 31-21 W -6.5 W 46.5 O 11/23 at Bowling Green 10-37 L +6.5 L 71.5 U 11/28 BOWLING GREEN 10-38 L +2.5 L 51.5 U 11/27 at Bowling Green 24-38 L +7 L 66.5 U Where: Kalamazoo, MI Head Coach: Bill Cubit, 6th year (34-27 SU) Conference: MAC 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 3-9 ATS Facility: Waldo Stadium 9/4/10 at Michigan St 9/11/10 NICHOLLS ST 2009 Scoring Differential: -2.8 (#81 of 120) 9/18/10 TOLEDO * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 WM-TOL games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -7.2 (#94 of 120) 10/2/10 IDAHO 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 23 (#98 of 120) 10/9/10 at Ball St * BALL ST is on 7-2 SU & ATS run vs. W MICHIGAN 2009 Schedule Strength: 25 (#120 of 120) 10/16/10 at Notre Dame 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Akron * ROAD TEAM is on 3-6 SU but 8-1 ATS run in AKR-WM series 10/30/10 N ILLINOIS * N ILLINOIS is 10-2 ATS vs. W MICHIGAN since 98 Points Scored - Allowed 24.7 (80) 27.5 (77) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 385.3 (57) 419.7 (101) 11/5/10 at C Michigan * C MICHIGAN is 4-0 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L4 games vs. W MICHIGAN YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.30 (74) 5.96 (94) 11/13/10 E MICHIGAN * L4 WM-EMU series games have gone UNDER the total YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.82 (76) 4.69 (97) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.26 (101) 7.46 (83) 11/20/10 KENT ST * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 WM-KS games Avg. Time of Possession 29.08 (88) 11/26/10 at Bowling Green * W MICHIGAN is on 3-4 SU but 6-1 ATS run in its L7 games at BOWLING GREEN Turnover Differential -0.5 (98) 3rd Down Conversion % 40.9% (48) 38.2% (50) Straight Up 8-5 5-7 9-4 5-7 27-23 (54%) * W MICHIGAN is on a 5-18 ATS (-14.8 Units) skid vs. excellent passing teams with a completion Overall ATS 8-5 2-8 5-7 3-9 18-29 (38%) pct. of 62% or better The Average Score was W MICHIGAN 23.3, OPPONENT 33.7. Potential at Home ATS 3-2 0-4 2-2 1-4 6-12 (33%) spots for 2010: 10/16 - at Notre Dame, 11/5 - at C Michigan, 11/26 - at Bowling Green Away/Neutral ATS 5-3 2-4 3-5 2-5 12-17 (41%) * W MICHIGAN is 10-23 ATS (-15.3 Units) in all games since 07. The Average Score was W vs Conference ATS 4-4 1-5 3-5 3-5 11-19 (37%) MICHIGAN 25.7, OPPONENT 28.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - at Michigan St, 9/18 - TOLEDO, Non-Conference ATS 4-1 1-3 2-2 0-4 7-10 (41%) 10/2 - IDAHO, 10/9 - at Ball St, 10/16 - at Notre Dame, 10/23 - at Akron, 10/30 - N ILLINOIS, 11/5 as Favorite ATS 2-3 0-6 3-4 2-2 7-15 (32%) - at C Michigan, 11/13 - E MICHIGAN, 11/20 - KENT ST, 11/26 - at Bowling Green as Underdog ATS 6-2 1-2 2-3 1-6 10-13 (43%) * W MICHIGAN is 0-6 ATS (-6.6 Units) in the first two weeks of the season since 07. The Average Over-Under 7-6 7-4 7-5 4-7 25-22 (53%) Score was W MICHIGAN 21.7, OPPONENT 37.7. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - at Michigan St 9/2 at Indiana 20-39 L +8 L 50 O 9/1 at W Virginia 24-62 L +24 L 58.5 O 8/30 at Nebraska 24-47 L +13.5 L 55 O 9/5 at Michigan 7-31 L +13 L 53.5 U 9/9 TOLEDO 31-10 W +10.5 W 50.5 U 9/8 INDIANA 27-37 L -1.5 L 59 O 9/6 N ILLINOIS 29-26 W -6 L 52 O 9/12 at Indiana 19-23 L +1 L 54 U 9/16 at Virginia 17-10 W +10 W 43.5 U 9/15 at Missouri 24-52 L +19.5 L 67.5 O 9/13 at Idaho 51-28 W -9.5 W 57 O 9/19 MIAMI OHIO 48-26 W -16 W 48.5 O 9/23 TEMPLE 41-7 W -29 W 46 O 9/22 C CONN ST 51-14 W - - - 9/20 TENNESSEE TECH 41-7 W - - - 9/26 HOFSTRA 24-10 W -22 L - 10/7 at Ohio U 20-27 L -4 L 41 O 9/29 at Toledo 42-28 W +0 W 64 O 9/27 at Temple 7-3 W -4.5 L 47.5 U 10/3 at N Illinois 3-38 L +6 L 49 U 10/14 N ILLINOIS 16-14 W +3 W 51 U 10/6 AKRON 38-39 L -9 L 56.5 O 10/4 OHIO U 41-20 W -8 W 48.5 O 10/10 at Toledo 58-26 W +7.5 W 63 O 10/21 at Ball St 41-27 W -1.5 W 51 O 10/13 at N Illinois 17-13 W -4.5 L 60 U 10/11 at Buffalo 34-28 W +1 W 54 O 10/17 C MICHIGAN 23-34 L +7 L 59 U 10/28 E MICHIGAN 18-15 W -13.5 L 42.5 U 10/20 BALL ST 23-27 L -1 L 69 U 10/18 at C Michigan 28-38 L -1.5 L 59.5 O 10/24 BUFFALO 34-31 W -5 L 51.5 O 11/4 MIAMI OHIO 27-24 W -12.5 L 44 O 10/27 at E Michigan 2-19 L -5 L 55 U 11/1 E MICHIGAN 31-10 W -19 W 59 U 10/31 at Kent St 14-26 L +2.5 L 50.5 U 11/10 at C Michigan 7-31 L +6.5 L 46.5 U 11/6 C MICHIGAN 31-34 L +3 T 61 O 11/8 vs. Illinois 23-17 W +8 W 64 U 11/7 at Michigan St 14-49 L +20.5 L 55.5 O 11/18 at Florida St 20-28 L +16.5 W 43.5 O 11/17 at Iowa 28-19 W +13 W 46 O 11/15 TOLEDO 27-17 W -14.5 L 53.5 U 11/14 at E Michigan 35-14 W -13 W 59 U 11/24 at Akron 17-0 W +2 W 44.5 U 11/24 TEMPLE 16-3 W -14.5 L 51 U 11/25 at Ball St 22-45 L +10 L 56 O 11/24 BALL ST 17-22 L -10 L 54 U 1/6 vs. Cincinnati 24-27 L +7 W 42 O 12/30 vs. Rice 14-38 L +2 L 73.5 U 140 WWW.STATFOX.COM

college football stability handicapping chart by Steve Makinen The following chart details the college football programs that have changed formula. The details of the formula are not as important as the total. The any aspect of their coaching staff or the sets they run offensively or team are sorted in order of MOST INSTABLE team to LEAST, the idea being defensively since the end of last season. Any team with very few returning that the teams at the top of the list will likely struggle out of the gate in starters is also noted. On the far right column, you ll see a tabulated 2010, while those at the bottom of the list, or more importantly, not even INSTABILITY TOTAL, which is calculated from a proprietary StatFox mentioned, will not. list will likely struggle out of the gate in 2010, while those at the bottom of the list, or more importantly, not even mentioned, will not. NEW OFFENSE NEW NEW NEW DEFENSE NEW NEW RET. STARTERS INSTABILITY TEAM 2009 RECORD COACH? TYPE TYPE? QB? OC? TYPE TYPE? DC? OFF DEF TOTAL E CAROLINA 9-5 SU, 7-6 ATS Yes Spread Yes Yes Yes 4-3 Yes Yes 5 2 28 VIRGINIA 3-9 SU, 6-5 ATS Yes Pro-Style Yes Yes Yes 4-3 Yes Yes 6 7 27 NOTRE DAME 6-6 SU, 3-8-1 ATS Yes Spread Yes Yes Yes 3-4 Yes Yes 6 8 26 MEMPHIS 2-10 SU, 3-9 ATS Yes Multiple Yes Yes Yes Multiple Yes Yes 7 7 26 KANSAS 5-7 SU, 3-8 ATS Yes Spread Yes Yes Yes 4-2-5 Yes Yes 8 7 26 W KENTUCKY 0-12 SU, 6-6 ATS Yes West Coast Yes Yes Yes 4-3 Yes Yes 9 9 24 TEXAS TECH 9-4 SU, 7-5 ATS Yes Spread Yes - Yes 3-4 Yes Yes 7 6 23 AKRON 3-9 SU, 4-8 ATS Yes Pro-Style Yes - Yes 4-3 Yes Yes 6 8 22 TENNESSEE 7-6 SU, 7-6 ATS Yes Multiple - Yes - 3-4 Yes Yes 4 6 20 LA MONROE 6-6 SU, 6-6 ATS Yes Multiple - - Yes 3-3-5 Yes Yes 6 4 19 C MICHIGAN 12-2 SU, 9-4-1 ATS Yes Multiple - Yes Yes Multiple - Yes 6 5 19 BUFFALO 5-7 SU, 5-7 ATS Yes Multiple - Yes Yes 4-3 - Yes 5 8 19 LOUISIANA TECH 4-8 SU, 8-4 ATS Yes Spread Yes - Yes Multiple Yes - 8 6 19 ILLINOIS 3-9 SU, 3-8-1 ATS - Pro Style Yes Yes Yes Multiple - Yes 5 7 18 CINCINNATI 12-1 SU, 7-6 ATS Yes Spread - - Yes Multiple Yes Yes 8 6 18 MARSHALL 7-6 SU, 7-5 ATS Yes Multiple - - Yes 4-3 Yes Yes 7 7 18 LOUISVILLE 4-8 SU, 5-6 ATS Yes Multiple - Yes Yes 4-3 - Yes 9 6 18 BOWLING GREEN 7-6 SU, 7-6 ATS - Multiple Yes Yes - Multiple Yes - 3 4 17 UNLV 5-7 SU, 3-8 ATS Yes Multiple Yes - Yes 4-3 - Yes 8 8 17 TEXAS 13-1 SU, 5-8-1 ATS - Spread Yes Yes - 4-3 Yes - 6 7 16 USC 9-4 SU, 4-9 ATS Yes Multiple - - Yes 4-3 - Yes 5 6 15 DUKE 5-7 SU, 5-5-1 ATS - Pro-Set Yes Yes - 4-3 Yes - 9 6 15 S FLORIDA 8-5 SU, 6-6 ATS Yes Spread - - Yes 4-3 - Yes 10 4 14 SAN JOSE ST 2-10 SU, 2-10 ATS Yes Multiple - - Yes 4-3 - Yes 8 7 14 GEORGIA TECH 11-3 SU, 8-5 ATS - Triple Option Yes - - 3-4 Yes Yes 7 8 14 GEORGIA 8-5 SU, 5-7 ATS - Pro Style - Yes - Multiple 3-4 Yes Yes 10 5 14 FLORIDA ST 7-6 SU, 4-9 ATS Yes Multiple - - Yes 4-3 Multiple - Yes 10 6 13 WAKE FOREST 5-7 SU, 6-6 ATS - Pro-Style Yes Yes - Multiple 4-3 - - 6 5 12 BYU 11-2 SU, 6-7 ATS - Pro Set Yes Yes - 3-4 - - 6 6 12 KENTUCKY 7-6 SU, 6-6 ATS Yes Multiple - - Yes 4-3 - - 5 7 12 CLEMSON 9-5 SU, 8-5 ATS - Multiple Pro-Style Yes - - 4-3 Yes - 7 6 12 OKLAHOMA ST 9-4 SU, 6-6-1 ATS - Spread - Yes Yes 4-3 - - 6 4 11 AIR FORCE 8-5 SU, 7-4-1 ATS - Multiple - - - 3-4 Yes Yes 5 5 11 FLORIDA 13-1 SU, 7-6 ATS - Spread - Yes - Multiple 4-3 - Yes 6 5 11 UTEP 4-8 SU, 5-7 ATS - One-Back - - - 4-3 Yes Yes 7 4 11 ARIZONA ST 4-8 SU, 6-5 ATS - Multiple - Yes Yes Multiple - - 7 5 11 NORTHWESTERN 8-5 SU, 6-6 ATS - Spread Yes Yes - 4-3 - - 8 6 11 HAWAII 6-7 SU, 6-6 ATS - Spread - - Yes 4-3 - Yes 4 7 10 SYRACUSE 4-8 SU, 6-6 ATS - Multiple - Yes Yes Multiple - - 5 10 10 NEVADA 8-5 SU, 7-6 ATS - Pistol Yes - - 4-3 - Yes 9 6 10 MISSISSIPPI ST 5-7 SU, 6-5 ATS - Spread - Yes - 4-3 - Yes 7 8 10 MICHIGAN 5-7 SU, 4-7 ATS - Spread Option - - - 3-3-5 Yes Yes 7 8 10 OLE MISS 9-4 SU, 7-5 ATS - Pro Set - Yes - Multiple 4-3 - - 3 6 9 TROY 9-4 SU, 9-4 ATS - Spread - Yes - 4-2-5 - - 6 3 9 MICHIGAN ST 6-7 SU, 4-7-1 ATS - Multiple - - - Multiple Yes - 4 5 9 HOUSTON 10-4 SU, 8-5 ATS - Multiple - - - 3-4 Yes Yes 9 7 9 ARIZONA 8-5 SU, 6-7 ATS - Multiple-Spread Yes - - 4-3 - Yes 10 7 9 TEXAS A&M 6-7 SU, 6-6-1 ATS - Multiple - - - 3-4 Yes Yes 8 9 9 MISSOURI 8-5 SU, 5-8 ATS - Pro-Style Yes - - Multiple Yes - 9 9 9 PITTSBURGH 10-3 SU, 7-4-1 ATS - Pro Style - Yes - 4-3 - - 5 6 8 IOWA ST 7-6 SU, 8-4 ATS - Spread Yes - - 4-3 - - 8 4 8 VANDERBILT 2-10 SU, 4-6-1 ATS - Spread Yes - - 4-3 - - 7 5 8 PENN ST 11-2 SU, 7-6 ATS - Multiple - Yes - 4-3 - - 7 5 8 TOLEDO 5-7 SU, 5-7 ATS - Spread - Yes - Multiple - - 6 6 8 PURDUE 5-7 SU, 6-4-2 ATS - Spread - Yes - Multiple 4-3 - - 6 6 8 KANSAS ST 6-6 SU, 7-4 ATS - Pro Set - Yes - Multiple - - 5 7 8 NEW MEXICO 1-11 SU, 5-7 ATS - Spread - Yes - 4-3 - - 6 6 8 INDIANA 4-8 SU, 7-4 ATS - Multiple - - - 3-4 Yes - 8 4 8 OKLAHOMA 8-5 SU, 5-7-1 ATS - Multiple - Yes - Multiple - - 9 4 8 MINNESOTA 6-7 SU, 5-7 ATS - Multiple - - Yes Multiple 4-3 - - 9 3 7 E MICHIGAN 0-12 SU, 4-8 ATS - Multiple - - - Multiple - Yes 6 6 7 BOSTON COLLEGE 8-5 SU, 6-6 ATS - Multiple Pro-Style Yes - - 4-3 - - 8 6 7 W MICHIGAN 5-7 SU, 3-9 ATS - Multiple - Yes - 4-3 - - 7 7 7 COLORADO ST 3-9 SU, 4-8 ATS - Pro - Yes - 4-3 - - 4 10 7 MIAMI 9-4 SU, 6-7 ATS - Pro Set - - - 3-4 Multiple Yes - 6 8 7 AUBURN 8-5 SU, 6-6 ATS - Spread - Yes - Multiple - - 7 8 7 OREGON 10-3 SU, 7-6 ATS - Multiple - Yes - 4-3 - - 8 7 7 SMU 8-5 SU, 7-5 ATS - Run-and-Shoot - - - 3-4 Yes - 8 7 7 UCF 8-5 SU, 9-3 ATS - Multiple - - - 4-3 Yes - 8 7 7 NEW MEXICO ST 3-10 SU, 6-7 ATS - Pro - - Yes 4-3 - - 8 6 6 STANFORD 8-5 SU, 8-5 ATS - Multiple - - - 4-3 - Yes 8 6 6 FRESNO ST 8-5 SU, 7-5 ATS - Pro Set Yes - - 4-3 - - 8 8 6 TEMPLE 9-4 SU, 8-4 ATS - East Coast Yes - - 4-3 - - 9 7 6 ARMY 5-7 SU, 4-7 ATS - Triple-Option Yes - - Double-Eagle Flx - - 8 8 6 WASHINGTON 5-7 SU, 7-5 ATS - Multiple Yes - - 4-3 - - 10 6 6 NEBRASKA 10-4 SU, 9-5 ATS - Multiple - - - Multiple Yes - 10 6 6 OREGON ST 8-5 SU, 7-5 ATS - Multiple - Yes - Multiple - - 9 8 6 UAB 5-7 SU, 5-7 ATS - Multiple - Yes - 4-3 - - 8 9 6 WASHINGTON ST 1-11 SU, 5-7 ATS - Spread - - - 4-3-4 Yes - 8 9 6 IDAHO 8-5 SU, 8-5 ATS - Multiple - - - 3-4 Yes - 7 10 6 ARKANSAS ST 4-8 SU, 2-9 ATS - Multiple - - - 4-3 - - 2 3 5 BALL ST 2-10 SU, 6-6 ATS - Multiple - - - 4-3 - Yes 10 7 5 NORTH TEXAS 2-10 SU, 5-7 ATS - Spread - Yes - 4-3 - - 10 8 5 W VIRGINIA 9-4 SU, 5-7 ATS - Spread Option - Yes - 3-3-5 Stack - - 9 9 5 BOISE ST 14-0 SU, 9-5 ATS - Multiple - - - 4-3 - Yes 10 10 3 TEN COLLEGE FOOTBALL WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 141

WAC WAC Preview Is there any team playing as more of an overwhelming favorite in its conference than Boise State in the WAC? After a thrilling 14-0 season that was capped by a Fiesta Bowl win, the Broncos return not 50%, not 75%, but 91% of their starters! Plus, they are challenging themselves with non-conference tilts versus Oregon State and Virginia Tech. Should they survive those games unbeaten, there is little reason to believe they won t sweep through the WAC schedule rather easily en route to the national championship game. This team is that good, and with so much veteran experience back, it won t get rattled easily nor make smallschool mistakes in big games. Enough about Boise though, we re here to discuss the WAC as a whole. Beyond the Broncos, you ll find the usual cast of bridesmaids. Nevada looks solid, on offense at least, and could actually score more points than Boise this season. Fresno is a bit more balanced but has proven capable of stubbing its toe too much of late. Idaho, Hawaii, and Utah State are programs on the rise, but there is little room in the upper half of the division. Louisiana Tech is in the beginning stages of a new regime and could be rebuilding, while San Jose State and New Mexico State figure to not be able to offensively match the points they figure to give up. BOISE STATE BRONCOS With a 17-10 victory over TCU in the Fiesta Bowl, Boise State showed it could play some serious defense, moving beyond the stage of having to outscore opponents, as it did against Oklahoma in the Fiesta Bowl three years earlier. And with a phenomenal amount of returning talent, and a schedule that offers a chance for more credibility, Boise State is in position to do something even bigger in 2010 It says something about the WAC that the Broncos were only third in the conference in total offense, yet ranked 10th in the country by averaging 450.3 YPG. The offense brings back 10 starters and should be as dynamic as ever, with junior quarterback Kellen Moore leading the way. Perhaps the most remarkable statistic from Moore s season, even beyond his 39 touchdown passes, is that he threw only three interceptions among 431 attempts. Nate Potter leads an experienced line that allowed only five sacks, while Austin Pettis and Titus Young are outstanding wide receivers and the Broncos also run the ball effectively with a variety of weapons As the Fiesta Bowl illustrated, defense is truly the reason that Boise State dominates the WAC. Plenty of teams in this league can move the football, but only the Broncos can really stop anybody. Boise State ranked 14th in the country in total defense, allowing only 300.2 YPG, and that s a major achievement against the 2009 EAST STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Boise State 14-0-0 1.000 591 240 8-0-0 7-0-0 7-0-0 9-5-0 64.3% 7-6-0 Nevada 8-5-0 0.615 497 371 7-1-0 5-1-0 3-4-0 7-6-0 53.8% 6-7-0 Fresno State 8-5-0 0.615 440 369 6-2-0 4-1-0 4-4-0 7-5-0 58.3% 6-6-0 Idaho 8-5-0 0.615 425 468 4-4-0 4-2-0 4-3-0 8-5-0 61.5% 9-4-0 Hawaii 6-7-0 0.462 296 383 3-5-0 4-3-0 2-4-0 6-6-0 50.0% 5-7-0 Louisiana Tech 4-8-0 0.333 350 309 3-5-0 4-1-0 0-7-0 8-4-0 66.7% 6-5-0 Utah State 4-8-0 0.333 349 408 3-5-0 3-2-0 1-6-0 8-4-0 66.7% 6-5-0 New Mexico State 3-10-0 0.231 149 411 1-7-0 2-4-0 1-6-0 6-7-0 46.2% 4-8-0 San Jose State 2-10-0 0.167 165 414 1-7-0 2-4-0 0-6-0 2-10-0 16.7% 6-5-0 diverse, productive offenses of the WAC. Boise State lost coordinator Justin Wilcox to Tennessee, but with Pete Kwiatkowski promoted to replace him and 10 starters coming back, no drop off is expected The 2010 opener against Virginia Tech at FedEx Field could propel Boise State toward a national title shot. A 12-0 season is not out of the question, and they start the season high enough in the polls to become a genuine national title contender. Having lost only six lettermen from a 14-0 team, head coach Chris Petersen is positioned to do something special in his fifth season. FRESNO STATE BULLDOGS Fresno State lost some credibility for itself and the WAC in the New Mexico Bowl as the league s No. 3 team lost to the Mountain West s No. 5 team (Wyoming) in double overtime. The Bulldogs also lost in double overtime at Wisconsin, preventing them from enjoying a very successful season. They will miss running back Ryan Mathews, but otherwise have the makings of another solid team There s no telling how much Mathews was personally responsible for with his nation-leading 1,808 rushing yards. But the Bulldogs would like to think their line and offensive system played enough of a role in his success that someone like Robbie Rouse can step into his position and be productive. With right guard Andrew Jackson, who has started 31 straight games, leading the way, the Bulldogs have all five starters returning up front including four seniors. Quarterback Ryan Colburn s continued development should help diversify an offense that ranked sixth in the WAC (17th nationally), averaging 430.5 YPG The Bulldogs defense let them down in some big games, and their 413.7 YPG average ranked only fifth in the league and 98th in the country in total defense. Relatively speaking, the defense can say it outperformed an offense that ranked sixth in the league, but that yardage figure speaks for itself. With eight returning starters, Fresno State hopes that more experience translates into better results The fact the Bulldogs had a minus-10 turnover ratio, and still won eight games, is probably a good sign, because a Hill-coached team rarely has such a deficiency. Fresno State faces another challenging schedule as the only WAC school to meet three teams from BCS leagues, but 142 WWW.STATFOX.COM

if recent history continues, the Bulldogs will play better against those non-conference opponents than they do against the WAC s top-tier teams. So it shapes up as another winning season and an 11th bowl appearance in 12 seasons for Fresno State, but without a conference title in its future. HAWAII WARRIORS Recovering from a slow start, the Warriors made a late run at qualifying for the hometown Hawaii Bowl, but fell one win short with a 6-7 record when Wisconsin ended Hawaii s fourgame winning streak in the season finale. It was a classic case of doing some things well, but just not consistently enough, with the biggest disappointment being a 3-5 record in WAC play. If a revamped coaching staff performs the way head coach Greg McMackin hopes, and if the Warriors can hold onto the ball and convert more of their drives into points, they should improve Bryant Moniz gained a following as a walk-on starting quarterback, and he also served up a good share of yards and points. Starting eight of Hawaii s last nine games, Moniz threw for 2,396 yards and 14 touchdowns. He helped the Warriors average 337.0 yards through the air as they ranked in the country s top four in passing yards for the 10th time in 11 years. He again will throw to a pair of outstanding receivers, Greg Salas and Kealoha Pilares Nick Rolovich, a former Hawaii quarterback, was promoted to coordinator in the staff s reshuffling and promises to be even more aggressive. For that to happen, a young offensive line will have to protect Moniz sufficiently McMackin also demoted his former coordinator, giving the job to Dave Aranda. Even though the Warriors ranked third in the WAC in total defense, they were only 91st in the country, allowing 403.0 YPG. Aranda s defense will be built around a solid secondary with five returning players Hawaii again should be right on the fence of the seven-win level for eligibility in its hometown bowl game. The biggest variable could be turnover margin. Anything better than a WAC-worst minus-11 figure would probably be enough to give the Warriors that one extra victory to become bowl eligible. IDAHO VANDALS After winning only three games in his first two seasons, head coach Robb Akey staged a stunning turnaround of Idaho s program in 2009. The Vandals went 8-5, closing with a dramatic win over Bowling Green in the Humanitarian Bowl, and becoming one of the best stories in college football. With Idaho s offensive playmakers returning, there s potential for Akey to keep his program at its new level The Vandals return seven offensive starters, but that overlooks the fact that four linemen with starting experience have departed. The best of them was guard Mike Iupati, a highly regarded NFL prospect. Matt Cleveland, a tackle, will become the anchor of a line that helped the Vandals rank second in the WAC and ninth in the country in total offense, averaging 451.0 YPG. Having endured some rough times early in his career, quarterback Nathan Enderle enjoyed better protection and was very effective last season, passing for 264.1 yards per game and 22 touchdowns with only nine interceptions Safety Shiloh Keo and end Aaron Lavarias are the defensive stars. The Vandals basically had to outscore opponents, though, as the defense ranked only seventh in the WAC by allowing 433.5 YPG. That figure will have to improve if Idaho is going to solidify itself in its new-found position as a top four program in the conference. It should help that as a result of some job-sharing, the school lists 12 returning starters on defense Going from having won just one conference game in two seasons to four victories was a huge jump. Just maintaining the 4-4 WAC record will be an achievement, so the key to Idaho s season will be the nonconference schedule. Factoring in a loss at Nebraska, games against UNLV, Colorado State and Western Michigan likely will determine whether the Vandals can make another bowl appearance and maintain last year s success. LOUISIANA TECH BULLDOGS Having lost coach Derek Dooley to Tennessee, the Bulldogs are looking to Sonny Dykes to revitalize their offense and help make a move in the WAC standings. Louisiana Tech battled through injuries and narrow defeats last season and is capable of threatening for an upper-division if Dykes spread offense catches on with the players Like any new head coach, Dykes was faced with the challenge of plugging his players into a system that s far different from what the Bulldogs were running under Dooley. The immediate task is finding a quarterback who can be effective in the spread scheme, and that person may not be returning starter Ross Jenkins, but rather former tight end, Steven Ensminger. Phillip Livas is one player who should thrive in the new system that Dykes brought from Arizona as the Wildcats former coordinator. A dynamic kick returner, Livas accomplished as much as a runner taking direct snaps as he did as a receiver catching passes. Up front, the Bulldogs will be led by lineman Rob McGill, who s dependable. Tech has eight returning starters on offense, but the question is how readily their experience translates to a new scheme. The Bulldogs ranked seventh in the WAC, averaging 372.3 TYPG Injuries took a toll on the Bulldogs defense, as 18 players missed at least half of a game, but the unit held up reasonably well. Tech ranked 60th in the country in total defense, allowing 368.2 YPG. In the WAC, that was good enough for second. Six starters return, led by lineman Matt Broha and linebacker Tank Calais The Bulldogs non-conference schedule remains difficult, but if they can stay more healthy than last season, and pull out some close games after losing three WAC WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 143

contests by a total of five points, they have a chance for bowl eligibility. The big variable, obviously, is how quickly the offense can embrace Dykes scheme and make it work. NEVADA WOLF PACK Nevada s offense was either unstoppable or non-existent. The Wolf Pack opened the season by being shut out at Notre Dame and posted only 10 points in a Hawaii Bowl loss to SMU. In between, Nevada registered totals such as 52, 62, 63 (twice) and 70, while racking up all kinds of rushing yards. If the Wolf Pack can be more consistent offensively and if a new defensive scheme can make two stars even more productive, this team should stay in the WAC race right up until the late-november clash with Boise State Nevada s personnel will frighten a lot of defensive coordinators. It all starts with 6-6 quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who is equally proficient as a runner and passer in the Pistol scheme developed by veteran head coach Chris Ault. Right behind him in the Pistol scheme is running back Vai Taua, whose 1,345 yards made him another of Nevada s three 1,000-yard rushers in 2009. The Wolf Pack lead the nation with 344.9 rushing yards per game. With nine returning starters, Nevada s offense may even improve on its No. 2 ranking with 505.6 total yards Like most WAC defenses, Nevada looked better compared with its conference rivals than with the rest of the country. The Wolf Pack ranked fourth in the conference and 96th nationally, allowing 409.3 YPG. Coordinator Andy Buh, who most recently coached at Stanford, has returned to Nevada. He s installing his own version of a 4-3 scheme. The front seven that also includes All-WAC linebacker James-Michael Johnson should be strong. Rebuilding the secondary will be a priority, especially in preparing to face WAC offenses Nevada s non-conference performance was disappointing. The Wolf Pack will hope for a much better start, with the rare opportunity of three home games to begin the schedule. The Wolf Pack are sure to play in a sixth consecutive bowl game, but overtaking Boise State for the WAC title remains a huge challenge. NEW MEXICO STATE AGGIES After winning only three games and ranking last in the country in total offense in head coach DeWayne Walker s first season, New Mexico State faces an upgraded non-conference schedule in 2010. The Aggies defeated an improved Utah State team, but that was their only conference victory. The offense is sure to be better because it could not get any worse. The question is whether it will improve enough to give New Mexico State any chance of winning Walker, whose background is on defense, radically changed the Aggies offensive approach. Instead of keeping the spread scheme and the all-out passing attacked, Walker turned the Aggies into a power running outfit. The result was an average of 229.5 TYPG, making New Mexico State s three victories in close, low-scoring games seem like quite an achievement. The tradeoff may have been helping the Aggie defense by shortening games, but the offense obviously needs an upgrade if the Aggies are to climb out of the WAC cellar. That s the task awaiting new coordinator Jeff Dunbar, a veteran coach who most recently worked as Minnesota s OC in 2008. It should help that quarterback Jeff Fleming has a year s experience Walker did manage to improve one of the country s worst defenses, as he was expected to do after coming from UCLA s coordinator position. The Aggies moved up to sixth in the WAC and 106th nationally by allowing 430.1 YPG, and the defense kept them in the three games they eventually won by three points. The return of six starters should enable Walker to keep making progress with his defense A different scheduling approach gave both Mumme and Walker the chance to experience winning, but success against those FCS opponents did not seem to carry over into WAC play. Gone is the FCS opponent (or two) from recent seasons. Only if the Aggies offense is dramatically better can they even hope to match last season s three-win total. SAN JOSE STATE SPARTANS Dick Tomey revived San Jose State s program, only to regress in his last couple of years before retiring after a successful career. Now comes Mike MacIntyre, who knows something about working in a downtrodden program, having made Duke s defense more than respectable. MacIntyre s challenge is about equal on each side of the ball, after the Spartans tied for eighth place in the WAC last season...macintyre s rebuilding of the offense experienced a setback when his original choice as coordinator moved to Arkansas State after two months on the job. Tim Landis was moved from special teams to take over the offense, although the basic plans remained intact. The first issue is choosing a quarterback, whether it s returning starter Jordan La Secla, Matt Faulkner or Dasmen Stewart. The Spartans also return running back Lamon Muldrow, whose 592 yards included a 184-yard game against Cal Poly. The line is led by guard Isaac Leatiota, who has made 30 career starts. But whether the improvement comes from a new scheme, individual development or personnel changes, San Jose State will have to be much more productive after ranking eighth in the WAC and 111th nationally with 286.3 YPG If MacIntyre could succeed in the ACC with Duke s level of recruiting, he should make an impact with San Jose State s defense, which ranked eighth in the WAC and 109th nationally at 442.9 YPG. Senior safety Duke Ihenacho is the kind of player he can build a defense around. The defense will be severely tested by a non-conference schedule that includes trips to Alabama, Wisconsin and Utah San Jose State is a long way 144 WWW.STATFOX.COM

from the top half of the WAC. MacIntyre has a chance to build something with the Spartans, but it will take awhile. Winning more than one WAC game will be difficult the Spartans had better beat New Mexico State. UTAH STATE AGGIES Gary Andersen made progress in his first season as Utah State s head coach, getting the Aggies to the four-win level for the first time since 2002. Now comes the hard part. Moving up into the WAC s top half remains challenging, and Andersen acknowledges underestimating the league s offenses after spending much of his career at Utah of the Mountain West Conference Coordinator Dave Baldwin may have made as much of an impact as any assistant coach. Utah State ranked fourth in the WAC in total offense, which would be sufficient improvement even if the Aggies were not 12th in the country, averaging 439.3 YPG. Diondre Borel became a complete quarterback in his junior season and Robert Turbin thrived with the running lanes created by the spread scheme. Borel led the WAC in total offense at 278.6 yards, while Turbin, averaged 108.0 yards on the ground and scored 18 touchdowns. Turbin sustained a knee injury in winter workouts and may miss the 2010 season, but the Aggies are fairly well stocked at his position. Stanley Morrison leads a capable group of wide receivers and the line is solid as well The irony of Andersen s arrival from a highly successful tenure as Utah s DC was that Utah State regressed defensively, often wearing down after intermission. Andersen hopes that increased depth will solve that problem. In addition, coordinator Bill Busch has made some personnel moves from the defensive line to linebacker in an effort to get some bigger bodies on the field. In any case, the Aggies have room for improvement after allowing 455.1 YPG to rank last in the WAC and 114th in the country The Aggies believe they re on the verge of bowl eligibility for the first time since 1997. They are likely to need four WAC wins to reach six victories overall, which would require a much better effort from the defense. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH Boise State Nevada Fresno State Idaho Utah State Hawaii Louisiana Tech San Jose State New Mexico State BOISE STATE BRONCOS 2010 Schedule Strength: 32 (#93 of 120) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 145 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 10 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 10 Lettermen Returning: 54 Where: Boise, ID Head Coach: Chris Petersen, 5th year (49-4 SU) Conference: WAC 2009 RECORD: 14-0 SU, 9-5 ATS Facility: Bronco Stadium 9/6/10 at Virginia Tech 9/18/10 at Wyoming * UNDERDOG is 0-3 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 WYO-BSU games 2009 Scoring Differential: +25.1 (#2 of 120) 9/25/10 OREGON ST * BOISE ST is 3-0 ATS in its L4 games vs. OREGON ST 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +21.5 (#5 of 120) 10/2/10 at New Mexico St * L3 NMS-BSU series games have gone UNDER the total 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 55 (#9 of 120) 10/9/10 TOLEDO 2009 Schedule Strength: 28.57 (#103 of 120) 10/16/10 at San Jose St * UNDER the total is 5-1 in L6 games of SJS-BSU series 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/26/10 LOUISIANA TECH * HOME TEAM is 6-4 SU & 8-2 ATS in BSU-LAT series since 98 11/6/10 HAWAII * HAWAII is 1-4 SU but 4-1 ATS in its L5 games vs. BOISE ST Points Scored - Allowed 42.2 (1) 17.1 (14) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 450.3 (10) 300.2 (14) 11/12/10 at Idaho * HOME TEAM is on 5-3 SU & 6-1 ATS run in IDA-BSU series YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.53 (11) 4.78 (22) 11/19/10 FRESNO ST * FAVORITE is 8-0 SU & ATS in L8 BSU-FRS matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 5.13 (10) 3.83 (49) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.07 (21) 5.74 (12) 11/26/10 at Nevada * FAVORITE is 11-0 SU & 9-2 ATS in NEV-BSU series since 98 Avg. Time of Possession 30.55 (46) 12/4/10 UTAH ST * BOISE ST is on 9-0 SU & 8-0 ATS run vs. UTAH ST Turnover Differential +1.5 (3) 3rd Down Conversion % 37.8% (72) 30.7% (6) Straight Up 13-0 10-3 12-1 14-0 49-4 (92%) * BOISE ST is on a 17-3 ATS (+13.7 Units) run at home vs. teams with a winning record The Overall ATS 7-5 6-6 8-2 9-5 30-18 (63%) Average Score was BOISE ST 44.6, OPPONENT 20.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - OREGON at Home ATS 4-1 4-2 2-2 4-3 14-8 (64%) ST, 11/19 - FRESNO ST Away/Neutral ATS 3-4 2-4 6-0 5-2 16-10 (62%) * BOISE ST is on a 30-7 ATS (+22.3 Units) run at home in the second half of the season vs Conference ATS 4-4 5-3 5-1 5-3 19-11 (63%) The Average Score was BOISE ST 49.1, OPPONENT 15.9. Potential spots for 2010: 10/26 - Non-Conference ATS 3-1 1-3 3-1 4-2 11-7 (61%) LOUISIANA TECH, 11/6 - HAWAII, 11/19 - FRESNO ST, 12/4 - UTAH ST as Favorite ATS 5-5 6-5 1-2 8-4 20-16 (56%) * Over the L2 seasons, BOISE ST is 11-2 ATS (+8.8 Units) on the road when coming off a straight as Underdog ATS 2-0 0-1 7-0 1-0 10-1 (91%) up win. The Average Score was BOISE ST 38.6, OPPONENT 18.6. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 Over-Under 7-5 5-7 5-7 7-6 24-25 (49%) - at New Mexico St, 10/16 - at San Jose St, 11/12 - at Idaho, 11/26 - at Nevada 9/2 SACRAMENTO ST 45-0 W - - - 8/30 WEBER ST 56-7 W - - - 8/30 IDAHO ST 49-7 W - - - 9/3 OREGON 19-8 W -3 W 64 U 9/7 OREGON ST 42-14 W -7.5 W 59 U 9/8 at Washington 10-24 L -2.5 L 58.5 U 9/13 BOWLING GREEN 20-7 W -17.5 L 55.5 U 9/12 MIAMI OHIO 48-0 W -38 W 52.5 U 9/16 at Wyoming 17-10 W -7.5 L 47 U 9/15 WYOMING 24-14 W -12 L 51 U 9/20 at Oregon 37-32 W +10.5 W 52 O 9/18 at Fresno St 51-34 W -7.5 W 52.5 O 9/23 HAWAII 41-34 W -15 L 59 O 9/27 SOUTHERN MISS 38-16 W -10.5 W 50 O 10/1 LOUISIANA TECH 38-3 W -24 W 57 U 9/26 at Bowling Green 49-14 W -16.5 W 52 O 9/30 at Utah 36-3 W +4.5 W 49.5 U 10/7 NEW MEXICO ST 58-0 W -26 W 63 U 10/11 at Southern Miss 24-7 W -9.5 W 58 U 10/3 CAL DAVIS 34-16 W -47.5 L - 10/7 LOUISIANA TECH 55-14 W -37 W 56.5 O 10/14 NEVADA 69-67 W -25.5 L 62 O 10/17 HAWAII 27-7 W -23 L 51.5 U 10/14 at Tulsa 28-21 W -9 L 56 U 10/15 at New Mexico St 40-28 W -27.5 L 62 O 10/20 at Louisiana Tech 45-31 W -16.5 L 53.5 O 10/24 at San Jose St 33-16 W -7 W 40.5 O 10/24 at Hawaii 54-9 W -25 W 59 O 10/31 SAN JOSE ST 45-7 W -36 W 54 U 10/21 at Idaho 42-26 W -20.5 L 56 O 10/26 at Fresno St 34-21 W -2.5 W 63.5 U 11/1 at New Mexico St 49-0 W -21 W 56 U 11/6 at Louisiana Tech 45-35 W -20 L 53 O 11/1 FRESNO ST 45-21 W -21.5 W 56.5 O 11/3 SAN JOSE ST 42-7 W -26.5 W 58 U 11/8 UTAH ST 49-14 W -35 T 52 O 11/14 IDAHO 63-25 W -32 W 63.5 O 11/11 at San Jose St 23-20 W -13 L 56 U 11/10 at Utah St 52-0 W -24 W 60.5 U 11/15 at Idaho 45-10 W -35 T 60 U 11/20 at Utah St 52-21 W -22 W 62.5 O 11/18 UTAH ST 49-10 W -37.5 W 56 O 11/17 IDAHO 58-14 W -35 W 64 O 11/22 at Nevada 41-34 W -6.5 W 62.5 O 11/27 NEVADA 44-33 W -12 L 71 O 11/25 at Nevada 38-7 W -2.5 W 54 U 11/23 at Hawaii 27-39 L +2.5 L 76 U 11/28 FRESNO ST 61-10 W -21 W 57 O 12/5 NEW MEXICO ST 42-7 W -46.5 L 58.5 U 1/1 vs. Oklahoma 43-42 W +7 W 50.5 O 12/23 vs. E Carolina 38-41 L -11 L 66 O 12/23 vs. TCU 16-17 L +3 W 46 U 1/4 vs. TCU 17-10 W +7.5 W 54.5 U

FRESNO STATE BULLDOGS 2010 Schedule Strength: 32.67 (#91 of 120) HAWAII WARRIORS 2010 Schedule Strength: 31.54 (#99 of 120) SCENARIO 2006 2007 2008 2009 4-yr Total Straight Up 11-3 12-1 7-7 6-7 36-18 (67%) Overall ATS 9-3 4-7 6-6 6-6 25-22 (53%) at Home ATS 5-3 2-3 3-3 2-4 12-13 (48%) Away/Neutral ATS 4-0 2-4 3-3 4-2 13-9 (59%) vs Conference ATS 6-1 3-5 5-2 3-5 17-13 (57%) Non-Conference ATS 3-2 1-2 1-4 3-1 8-9 (47%) as Favorite ATS 7-3 4-6 2-3 2-1 15-13 (54%) as Underdog ATS 2-0 0-1 4-3 4-5 10-9 (53%) Over-Under 8-5 3-8 7-6 5-7 23-26 (47%) Offense: Pro Set - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 58 9/4/10 CINCINNATI 9/18/10 at Utah St * UNDERDOG is 1-4 SU but 5-0 ATS in L5 UTS-FRS matchups 9/25/10 at Ole Miss 10/2/10 CAL POLY SLO 10/9/10 HAWAII * ROAD TEAM is 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 FRS-HAW matchups 10/16/10 NEW MEXICO ST * UNDER the total is 5-0 in L5 games of FRS-NMS series 10/23/10 at San Jose St * FAVORITE is 7-0 SU & ATS in L7 SJS-FRS matchups 11/6/10 at Louisiana Tech * LOUISIANA TECH is 6-0 ATS in its L6 games vs. FRESNO ST 11/13/10 NEVADA * ROAD TEAM is 7-6 SU & 9-4 ATS in FRS-NEV series since 94 11/19/10 at Boise St * FAVORITE is 8-0 SU & ATS in L8 BSU-FRS matchups 11/27/10 IDAHO * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 FRS-IDA games 12/3/10 ILLINOIS SCENARIO 2006 2007 2008 2009 4-yr Total Straight Up 4-8 9-4 7-6 8-5 28-23 (55%) Overall ATS 1-11 7-5 2-11 7-5 17-32 (35%) at Home ATS 1-5 2-3 0-5 1-3 4-16 (20%) Away/Neutral ATS 0-6 5-2 2-6 6-2 13-16 (45%) vs Conference ATS 1-7 4-4 1-7 4-4 10-22 (31%) Non-Conference ATS 0-4 3-1 1-4 3-1 7-10 (41%) as Favorite ATS 1-6 2-3 1-6 4-3 8-18 (31%) as Underdog ATS 0-5 5-2 1-5 3-2 9-14 (39%) Over-Under 5-7 7-5 7-6 6-6 25-24 (51%) Where: Fresno, CA Head Coach: Pat Hill, 14th year (100-66 SU) Conference: WAC 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 7-5 ATS Facility: Bulldog Stadium 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK Points Scored - Allowed 33.8 (14) 28.4 (84) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 430.5 (17) 413.7 (98) YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.39 (14) 6.49 (110) YP Rush Gained - Allowed 5.36 (5) 6.01 (117) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.17 (16) 7.09 (59) Avg. Time of Possession 31.9 (12) Turnover Differential -0.8 (109) 3rd Down Conversion % 43.5% (26) 41.4% (79) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * FRESNO ST is 3-11 ATS (-9.1 Units) at home since 07. The Average Score was FRESNO ST 30.2, OPPONENT 25.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - CINCINNATI, 10/9 - HAWAII, 10/16 - NEW MEXICO ST, 11/13 - NEVADA, 11/27 - IDAHO, 12/3 - ILLINOIS * FRESNO ST is 0-7 ATS (-7.7 Units) at home coming off a loss against the spread since 07. The Average Score was FRESNO ST 30.1, OPPONENT 26.1. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - NEW MEXICO ST, 11/13 - NEVADA, 11/27 - IDAHO, 12/3- ILLINOIS * FRESNO ST is on a 10-26 ATS (-18.6 Units) skid on the road in weeks 5 through 9 The Average Score was FRESNO ST 26.1, OPPONENT 29.4. Potential spots for 2010: 10/23 - at San Jose St Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 4 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 60 9/2/10 USC * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in HAW-USC series 9/11/10 at Army 9/18/10 at Colorado 9/25/10 CHARLESTON SOUT 10/2/10 LOUISIANA TECH * HOME TEAM is on 5-1 SU & 5-0 ATS run in HAW-LAT series 10/9/10 at Fresno St * ROAD TEAM is 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 FRS-HAW matchups 10/16/10 NEVADA * HOME TEAM is on 9-1 SU & 8-2 ATS run in HAW-NEV series 10/23/10 at Utah St * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 UTS-HAW games 10/30/10 IDAHO * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & ATS in L6 HAW-IDA matchups 11/6/10 at Boise St * HAWAII is 1-4 SU but 4-1 ATS in its L5 games vs. BOISE ST 11/20/10 SAN JOSE ST * SAN JOSE ST is 6-2 ATS in its L8 games at HAWAII 11/27/10 at New Mexico St * L2 games in NMS-HAW series at NEW MEXICO ST went OVER the total 12/4/10 UNLV * HAWAII is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. UNLV 2009 Scoring Differential: +5.5 (#44 of 120) 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +2.3 (#57 of 120) 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 33 (#75 of 120) 2009 Schedule Strength: 29.38 (#97 of 120) 9/1 NEVADA 28-19 W -12.5 L 55.5 U 9/1 SACRAMENTO ST 24-3 W - - - 9/1 at Rutgers 24-7 W +3.5 W 57 U 9/5 CAL DAVIS 51-0 W - - - 9/9 OREGON 24-31 L +3 L 52 O 9/8 at Texas A&M 45-47 L +17.5 W 52 O 9/13 WISCONSIN 10-13 L +2 L 51 U 9/12 at Wisconsin 31-34 L +7.5 W 51.5 O 9/16 at Washington 20-21 L -2.5 L 50 U 9/15 at Oregon 21-52 L +17 L 64 O 9/20 at Toledo 55-54 W -6 L 52.5 O 9/18 BOISE ST 34-51 L +7.5 L 52.5 O 9/30 COLORADO ST 23-35 L -14.5 L 42.5 O 9/29 LOUISIANA TECH 17-6 W -12 L 62 U 9/27 at UCLA 36-31 W -7 L 48 O 9/26 at Cincinnati 20-28 L +17 W 63.5 U 10/7 at Utah St 12-13 L -25 L 45.5 U 10/6 at Nevada 49-41 W +3 W 53 O 10/4 HAWAII 29-32 L -21.5 L 56.5 O 10/10 at Hawaii 42-17 W -11 W 59.5 U 10/14 HAWAII 37-68 L +3 L 57 O 10/13 at Idaho 37-24 W -9.5 W 55.5 O 10/11 IDAHO 45-32 W -34 L 65 O 10/17 SAN JOSE ST 41-21 W -19.5 W 58 O 10/21 at LSU 6-38 L +31 L 50 U 10/20 SAN JOSE ST 30-0 W -13 W 57 U 10/25 at Utah St 30-28 W -16 L 58.5 U 10/24 at New Mexico St 34-3 W -24 W 51 U 11/1 at Boise St 21-45 L +21.5 L 56.5 O 10/26 BOISE ST 21-34 L +2.5 L 63.5 U 11/1 at Louisiana Tech 35-38 L -4 L 57 O 10/31 UTAH ST 31-27 W -17 L 62.5 U 11/11 NEW MEXICO ST 23-18 W -14 L 60 U 11/3 UTAH ST 38-27 W -20.5 L 55.5 O 11/7 NEVADA 28-41 L +2 L 71 U 11/7 at Idaho 31-21 W -9.5 W 67 U 11/18 IDAHO 34-0 W -12 W 52 U 11/10 at Hawaii 30-37 L +19.5 W 73 U 11/15 NEW MEXICO ST 24-17 W -17 L 63.5 U 11/14 at Nevada 14-52 L +7.5 L 68.5 U 11/24 at Louisiana Tech 34-27 W -13.5 L 52 O 11/24 KANSAS ST 45-29 W +1.5 W 64 O 11/21 at San Jose St 24-10 W -3 W 47.5 U 11/21 LOUISIANA TECH 30-28 W -9.5 L 54.5 O 12/2 at San Jose St 14-24 L +4.5 L 50 U 11/30 at New Mexico St 30-23 W -13 L 65.5 U 11/28 at Boise St 10-61 L +21 L 57 O 12/5 at Illinois 53-52 W +2 W 58.5 O 12/31 vs. Georgia Tech 40-28 W +5.5 W 55 O 12/20 vs. Colorado St 35-40 L -1.5 L 61 O 12/19 vs. Wyoming 28-35 L -10 L 54.5 O Where: Honolulu, HI Head Coach: Greg McMackin, 3rd year (13-14 SU) Conference: WAC 2009 RECORD: 6-7 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: Aloha Stadium 2009 Scoring Differential: -6.7 (#95 of 120) 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -7.7 (#97 of 120) 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 22 (#101 of 120) 2009 Schedule Strength: 27.85 (#106 of 120) 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK Points Scored - Allowed 22.8 (89) 29.5 (90) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 437.5 (14) 403.0 (91) YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.61 (9) 6.01 (97) YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.47 (46) 4.89 (103) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.70 (33) 7.83 (95) Avg. Time of Possession 29 (89) Turnover Differential -0.8 (113) 3rd Down Conversion % 43.9% (22) 44.7% (98) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * HAWAII is on a 3-12 ATS (-10.2 Units) skid as road underdogs of 3.5 to 10 points The Average Score was HAWAII 17.8, OPPONENT 37.7. Potential spots for 2010: 10/23 - at Utah St * HAWAII is 13-4 UNDER the total (+8.6 Units) coming off a playing a game where 60 total points or more were scored since 07. The Average Score was HAWAII 34.7, OPPONENT 23.7. Potential spots for 2010: POTENTIALLY NUMEROUS GAMES * HAWAII is on a 17-6 ATS (+10.4 Units) run at home after allowing 6.75 or more YPP in their previous game The Average Score was HAWAII 35.5, OPPONENT 27.9. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - NEVADA, 11/20 - SAN JOSE ST 9/2 at Alabama 17-25 L +15.5 W 50.5 U 9/1 N COLORADO 63-6 W - - - 8/30 at Florida 10-56 L +36.5 L 64 O 9/5 C ARKANSAS 25-20 W - - - 9/16 UNLV 42-13 W -14 W 57.5 U 9/8 at Louisiana Tech 45-44 W -28 L 75.5 O 9/6 WEBER ST 36-17 W - - - 9/12 vs. Washington St 38-20 W -2.5 W 55 O 9/23 at Boise St 34-41 L +15 W 59 O 9/15 at Unlv 49-14 W -17 W 68 U 9/13 at Oregon St 7-45 L +14 L 56.5 U 9/19 at UNLV 33-34 L +7 W 56 O 9/30 E ILLINOIS 44-9 W - - - 9/22 CHARLESTON SOUT 66-10 W - - - 9/27 SAN JOSE ST 17-20 L -3 L 48 U 9/30 at Louisiana Tech 6-27 L +4.5 L 55.5 U 10/7 NEVADA 41-34 W -13.5 L 64 O 9/29 at Idaho 48-20 W -24.5 W 74 U 10/4 at Fresno St 32-29 W +21.5 W 56.5 O 10/10 FRESNO ST 17-42 L +11 L 59.5 U 10/14 at Fresno St 68-37 W -3 W 57 O 10/6 UTAH ST 52-37 W -40.5 L 69 O 10/11 LOUISIANA TECH 24-14 W -10 T 49.5 U 10/17 at Idaho 23-35 L +7.5 L 62.5 U 10/21 at New Mexico St 49-30 W -19 T 72.5 O 10/12 at San Jose St 42-35 W -16 L 67 O 10/17 at Boise St 7-27 L +23 W 51.5 U 10/24 BOISE ST 9-54 L +25 L 59 O 10/28 IDAHO 68-10 W -25 W 69.5 O 10/25 NEVADA 38-31 W +3.5 W 60 O 10/27 NEW MEXICO ST 50-13 W -30.5 W 80 U 10/31 at Nevada 21-31 L +29 W 69 U 11/4 at Utah St 63-10 W -24 W 64.5 O 11/1 at Utah St 14-30 L -5 L 49 U 11/11 LOUISIANA TECH 61-17 W -37.5 W 76 O 11/10 FRESNO ST 37-30 W -19.5 L 73 U 11/8 at New Mexico St 42-30 W -3.5 W 53.5 O 11/7 UTAH ST 49-36 W +2 W 61 O 11/18 SAN JOSE ST 54-17 W -24 W 74 U 11/16 at Nevada 28-26 W -5 L 75 U 11/22 IDAHO 49-17 W -25 W 57.5 O 11/14 NEW MEXICO ST 24-6 W -19.5 L 53.5 U 11/25 PURDUE 42-35 W -19.5 L 75 O 11/23 BOISE ST 39-27 W -2.5 W 76 U 11/29 WASHINGTON ST 24-10 W -27.5 L 51.5 U 11/21 at San Jose St 17-10 W -2 W 54 U 12/2 OREGON ST 32-35 L -8 L 70 U 12/1 WASHINGTON 35-28 W -13 L 73 U 12/6 CINCINNATI 24-29 L +9 W 48.5 O 11/28 NAVY 24-17 W +9 W 56 U 12/24 ARIZONA ST 41-24 W -8.5 W 72.5 U 1/1 vs. Georgia 10-41 L +8 L 68 U 12/24 NOTRE DAME 21-49 L +2.5 L 48.5 O 12/5 WISCONSIN 10-51 L +12 L 59 O 146 WWW.STATFOX.COM

IDAHO VANDALS 2010 Schedule Strength: 31.46 (#100 of 120) LOUISIANA TECH BULLDOGS 2010 Schedule Strength: 31.33 (#101 of 120) 9/2/10 N DAKOTA 9/11/10 at Nebraska 9/18/10 UNLV * ROAD TEAM is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 IDA-NLV games 9/25/10 at Colorado St 10/2/10 at W Michigan 10/16/10 at Louisiana Tech * LOUISIANA TECH is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. IDAHO 10/23/10 NEW MEXICO ST * UNDERDOG is 5-6 SU but 9-2 ATS in IDA-NMS series since 98 10/30/10 at Hawaii * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & ATS in L6 HAW-IDA matchups 11/6/10 NEVADA * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 IDA-NEV matchups 11/12/10 BOISE ST * HOME TEAM is on 5-3 SU & 6-1 ATS run in IDA-BSU series 11/20/10 at Utah St * IDAHO is on 2-4 SU but 5-1 ATS run in its L6 games at UTAH ST 11/27/10 at Fresno St * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 FRS-IDA games 12/4/10 SAN JOSE ST * IDAHO has covered spread in L2 games vs. SAN JOSE ST SCENARIO 2006 2007 2008 2009 4-yr Total Straight Up 3-10 5-7 8-5 4-8 20-30 (40%) Overall ATS 3-9 6-5 6-5 8-4 23-23 (50%) at Home ATS 2-2 2-2 4-1 5-0 13-5 (72%) Away/Neutral ATS 1-7 4-3 2-4 3-4 10-18 (36%) vs Conference ATS 2-6 5-3 4-3 6-2 17-14 (55%) Non-Conference ATS 1-3 1-2 2-2 2-2 6-9 (40%) as Favorite ATS 1-1 2-2 2-3 3-0 8-6 (57%) as Underdog ATS 2-8 4-3 4-2 4-4 14-17 (45%) Over-Under 8-4 4-7 5-7 6-5 23-23 (50%) WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 147 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 7 Defense: 3-4 - Starters Returning: 10 Lettermen Returning: 47 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 42 Where: Moscow, ID Head Coach: Robb Akey, 5th year (11-26 SU) Conference: WAC 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 8-5 ATS Facility: Kibbie Dome 9/2/10 N DAKOTA 9/11/10 at Nebraska 9/18/10 UNLV * ROAD TEAM is 1-2 SU but 3-0 ATS in L3 IDA-NLV games 2009 Scoring Differential: -3.3 (#85 of 120) 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -4.6 (#86 of 120) 9/25/10 at Colorado St 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 23 (#98 of 120) 10/2/10 at W Michigan 2009 Schedule Strength: 29.77 (#93 of 120) 10/16/10 at Louisiana Tech * LOUISIANA TECH is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. IDAHO 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 NEW MEXICO ST * UNDERDOG is 5-6 SU but 9-2 ATS in IDA-NMS series since 98 10/30/10 at Hawaii * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & ATS in L6 HAW-IDA matchups Points Scored - Allowed 32.7 (20) 36.0 (114) 11/6/10 NEVADA * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 IDA-NEV matchups Total YPG Gained - Allowed 451.0 (9) 433.5 (107) 11/12/10 BOISE ST * HOME TEAM is on 5-3 SU & 6-1 ATS run in IDA-BSU series YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.88 (4) 6.50 (111) 11/20/10 at Utah St * IDAHO is on 2-4 SU but 5-1 ATS run in its L6 games at UTAH ST YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.68 (28) 4.75 (100) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 9.41 (4) 8.19 (108) 11/27/10 at Fresno St * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 FRS-IDA games Avg. Time of Possession 30.76 (40) 12/4/10 SAN JOSE ST * IDAHO has covered spread in L2 games vs. SAN JOSE ST Turnover Differential -0.6 (106) 3rd Down Conversion % 47.8% (9) 52.1% (118) Straight Up 4-8 1-11 2-10 8-5 15-34 (31%) * Over the L2 seasons, IDAHO is 7-0 OVER the total (+7 Units) on the road revenging a loss against Overall ATS 5-6 3-8 3-7 8-5 19-26 (42%) opponent. The Average Score was IDAHO 25.6, OPPONENT 48.6. Potential spots for 2010: 11/20 - at at Home ATS 2-2 0-5 2-2 3-3 7-12 (37%) Utah St, 11/27 - at Fresno St Away/Neutral ATS 3-4 3-3 1-5 5-2 12-14 (46%) * Over the L2 seasons, IDAHO is 11-1 OVER the total (+9.9 Units) as road underdogs. The Average Score vs Conference ATS 4-4 1-7 3-4 3-5 11-20 (35%) was IDAHO 22.8, OPPONENT 44.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at Nebraska, 9/25 - at Colorado St, Non-Conference ATS 1-2 2-1 0-3 5-0 8-6 (57%) 10/2 - at W Michigan, 10/16 - at Louisiana Tech, 10/30 - at Hawaii, 11/20 - at Utah St, 11/27 - at Fresno St as Favorite ATS 2-0 0-2 0-0 1-2 3-4 (43%) * IDAHO is on a 10-23 ATS (-15.3 Units) skid in weeks 10 through 13 The Average Score was IDAHO as Underdog ATS 3-6 3-6 3-7 7-3 16-22 (42%) 25.9, OPPONENT 37.4. Potential spots for 2010: 11/6 - NEVADA, 11/12 - BOISE ST, 11/20 - at Utah St, Over-Under 4-7 5-6 8-3 9-4 26-20 (57%) 11/27 - at Fresno St 9/2 at Michigan St 17-27 L +29 W 57 U 9/1 at Usc 10-38 L +49 W 58.5 U 8/30 at Arizona 0-70 L +26.5 L 60 O 9/5 at New Mexico St 21-6 W +2.5 W 52.5 U 9/9 at Washington St 10-56 L +18 L 54 O 9/8 CAL POLY SLO 20-13 W - - - 9/6 IDAHO ST 42-27 W - - - 9/12 at Washington 23-42 L +20.5 W 55 O 9/16 IDAHO ST 27-24 W - - - 9/15 at Washington St 28-45 L +25 W 56 O 9/13 W MICHIGAN 28-51 L +9.5 L 57 O 9/19 SAN DIEGO ST 34-20 W +3.5 W 58 U 9/23 at Oregon St 0-38 L +26 L 55 U 9/22 N ILLINOIS 35-42 L -3 L 48.5 O 9/20 at Utah St 17-42 L +4 L 57.5 O 9/26 at N Illinois 34-31 W +14 W 54.5 O 9/30 at Utah St 41-21 W -2 W 44.5 O 9/29 HAWAII 20-48 L +24.5 L 74 U 9/27 at San Diego St 17-45 L +12 L 54.5 O 10/3 COLORADO ST 31-29 W +4.5 W 57 O 10/7 NEW MEXICO ST 28-20 W -3 W 61 U 10/6 at San Jose St 20-28 L +7.5 L 50.5 U 10/4 NEVADA 14-49 L +23 L 68 U 10/10 at San Jose St 29-25 W +6.5 W 53.5 O 10/14 at Louisiana Tech 24-14 W +3 W 56 U 10/13 FRESNO ST 24-37 L +9.5 L 55.5 O 10/11 at Fresno St 32-45 L +34 W 65 O 10/17 HAWAII 35-23 W -7.5 W 62.5 U 10/21 BOISE ST 26-42 L +20.5 W 56 O 10/20 at New Mexico St 31-45 L +8 L 59 O 10/18 at Louisiana Tech 14-46 L +20.5 L 58.5 O 10/24 at Nevada 45-70 L +16.5 L 67.5 O 10/28 at Hawaii 10-68 L +25 L 69.5 O 10/27 at Nevada 21-37 L +18 W 66 U 10/25 NEW MEXICO ST 20-14 W +11.5 W 64 U 10/31 LOUISIANA TECH 35-34 W -2.5 L 56 O 11/4 NEVADA 7-45 L +9 L 54.5 U 11/3 LOUISIANA TECH 16-28 L +3 L 54 U 11/1 SAN JOSE ST 24-30 L +14.5 W 47.5 O 11/7 FRESNO ST 21-31 L +9.5 L 67 U 11/18 at Fresno St 0-34 L +12 L 52 U 11/17 at Boise St 14-58 L +35 L 64 O 11/15 BOISE ST 10-45 L +35 T 60 U 11/14 at Boise St 25-63 L +32 L 63.5 O 11/25 SAN JOSE ST 13-28 L +6.5 L 51 U 11/24 UTAH ST 19-24 L -1.5 L 58.5 U 11/22 at Hawaii 17-49 L +25 L 57.5 O 11/28 UTAH ST 49-52 L -3 L 70 O 12/30 vs. Bowling Green 43-42 W +0 W 69 O Where: Ruston, LA Head Coach: Sonny Dykes, 1st year Conference: WAC 2009 RECORD: 4-8 SU, 8-4 ATS Facility: Joe Aillet Stadium 2009 Scoring Differential: +3.4 (#55 of 120) 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -0.4 (#70 of 120) 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 35 (#66 of 120) 2009 Schedule Strength: 29.67 (#95 of 120) 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK Points Scored - Allowed 29.2 (46) 25.8 (61) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 372.3 (64) 368.2 (60) YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.45 (67) 5.34 (53) YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.43 (48) 4.24 (80) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.05 (66) 6.70 (41) Avg. Time of Possession 29.54 (74) Turnover Differential +0.6 (19) 3rd Down Conversion % 40.3% (52) 39.1% (54) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * Over the L2 seasons, LOUISIANA TECH is 8-1 ATS (+6.9 Units) at home. The Average Score was LOUISIANA TECH 39.4, OPPONENT 23. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - NAVY, 9/25 - SOUTHERN MISS, 10/9 - UTAH ST, 10/16 - IDAHO, 11/6 - FRESNO ST, 12/4 - NEVADA * Over the L2 seasons, LOUISIANA TECH is 8-1 ATS (+6.9 Units) vs. teams with a winning record. The Average Score was LOUISIANA TECH 25.9, OPPONENT 27.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - NAVY, 9/25 - SOUTHERN MISS, 10/16 - IDAHO, 10/26 - at Boise St, 11/6 - FRESNO ST, 12/4 - NEVADA * LOUISIANA TECH is on a 6-17 ATS (-12.7 Units) skid vs. poor defensive teams - allowing >=425 YPG The Average Score was LOUISIANA TECH 29.2, OPPONENT 26.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at Texas A&M, 10/9 - UTAH ST, 10/16 - IDAHO, 11/13 - at New Mexico St, 11/27 - at San Jose St 9/2 at Nebraska 10-49 L +24.5 L 45.5 O 9/1 C ARKANSAS 28-7 W - - - 8/30 MISSISSIPPI ST 22-14 W +7 W 44 U 9/5 at Auburn 13-37 L +13.5 L 46 O 9/16 NICHOLLS ST 31-21 W - - - 9/8 HAWAII 44-45 L +28 W 75.5 O 9/6 at Kansas 0-29 L +22 L 52.5 U 9/12 at Navy 14-32 L +7 L 50.5 U 9/23 at Texas A&M 14-45 L +23.5 L 57 O 9/15 at California 12-42 L +33.5 W 66.5 U 9/20 SE LOUISIANA 41-26 W - - - 9/19 NICHOLLS ST 48-13 W -27.5 W - 9/30 at Clemson 0-51 L +31 L 53.5 U 9/29 at Fresno St 6-17 L +12 W 62 U 10/1 at Boise St 3-38 L +24 L 57 U 9/30 HAWAII 27-6 W -4.5 W 55.5 U 10/7 at Boise St 14-55 L +37 L 56.5 O 10/6 at Ole Miss 0-24 L +12 L 53 U 10/11 at Hawaii 14-24 L +10 T 49.5 U 10/9 at Nevada 14-37 L +10.5 L 58 U 10/14 IDAHO 14-24 L -3 L 56 U 10/13 NEW MEXICO ST 22-21 W -7.5 L 48.5 U 10/18 IDAHO 46-14 W -20.5 W 58.5 O 10/17 NEW MEXICO ST 45-7 W -20.5 W 41.5 O 10/21 UTAH ST 48-35 W -5.5 W 47.5 O 10/20 BOISE ST 31-45 L +16.5 W 53.5 O 10/25 at Army 7-14 L 0 L 41.5 U 10/24 at Utah St 21-23 L +1.5 L 52.5 U 10/28 at San Jose St 10-44 L +9 L 56 U 10/27 at Utah St 31-21 W -2 W 50.5 O 11/1 FRESNO ST 38-35 W +4 W 57 O 10/31 at Idaho 34-35 L +2.5 W 56 O 11/4 at North Texas 34-31 W +2.5 W 46.5 O 11/3 at Idaho 28-16 W -3 W 54 U 11/8 at San Jose St 21-0 W +7 W 40.5 U 11/6 BOISE ST 35-45 L +20 W 53 O 11/11 at Hawaii 17-61 L +37.5 L 76 O 11/10 at Lsu 10-58 L +35.5 L 54.5 O 11/15 UTAH ST 45-38 W -15 L 48 O 11/14 at LSU 16-24 L +22.5 W 47 U 11/18 NEVADA 0-42 L +17 L 57.5 U 11/17 SAN JOSE ST 27-23 W -5.5 L 53 U 11/22 at New Mexico St 35-31 W -6.5 L 54 O 11/21 at Fresno St 28-30 L +9.5 W 54.5 O 11/24 FRESNO ST 27-34 L +13.5 W 52 O 12/1 at Nevada 10-49 L +7 L 62 U 11/29 NEVADA 31-35 L +4.5 W 62.5 O 12/5 SAN JOSE ST 55-20 W -24 W 49 O 12/2 at New Mexico St 23-50 L +13 L 65.5 O 12/28 vs. N Illinois 17-10 W -2.5 W 46 U

NEVADA WOLF PACK 2010 Schedule Strength: 30.46 (#105 of 120) 9/2/10 E WASHINGTON 9/11/10 COLORADO ST * HOME TEAM is 3-1 SU & 4-0 ATS in L4 NEV-CSU games 9/17/10 CALIFORNIA * ROAD TEAM is 0-2 SU but 2-0 ATS in L2 NEV-CAL games 9/25/10 at BYU * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 BYU-NEV games 10/2/10 at UNLV * NEVADA is on 5-0 SU & ATS run vs. UNLV 10/9/10 SAN JOSE ST * FAVORITE is on 9-1 SU & ATS run in L10 NEV-SJS matchups 10/16/10 at Hawaii * HOME TEAM is on 9-1 SU & 8-2 ATS run in HAW-NEV series 10/30/10 UTAH ST * HOME TEAM is on 2-3 SU but 5-0 ATS run in NEV-UTS series 11/6/10 at Idaho * FAVORITE is 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS in L6 IDA-NEV matchups 11/13/10 at Fresno St * ROAD TEAM is 7-6 SU & 9-4 ATS in FRS-NEV series since 94 11/20/10 NEW MEXICO ST * L5 games of NEV-NMS series are 5-0 OVER the total 11/26/10 BOISE ST * FAVORITE is 11-0 SU & 9-2 ATS in NEV-BSU series since 98 12/4/10 at Louisiana Tech * HOME TEAM is on 4-2 SU & 5-1 ATS run in LAT-NEV series SCENARIO 2006 2007 2008 2009 4-yr Total Straight Up 8-5 6-7 7-6 8-5 29-23 (56%) Overall ATS 11-2 5-7 5-7 7-6 28-22 (56%) at Home ATS 5-1 3-2 2-3 4-2 14-8 (64%) Away/Neutral ATS 6-1 2-5 3-4 3-4 14-14 (50%) vs Conference ATS 7-1 3-5 4-4 6-2 20-12 (63%) Non-Conference ATS 4-1 2-2 1-3 1-4 8-10 (44%) as Favorite ATS 8-0 2-5 4-4 6-4 20-13 (61%) as Underdog ATS 3-2 3-2 1-3 1-2 8-9 (47%) Over-Under 4-9 5-7 8-4 6-7 23-27 (46%) NEW MEXICO STATE AGGIES 2010 Schedule Strength: 32.75 (#89 of 120) Offense: Pistol - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 46 Where: Reno, NV Head Coach: Chris Ault, 7th year (206-95-1 SU) Conference: WAC 2009 RECORD: 8-5 SU, 7-6 ATS Facility: Mackay Stadium 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK Points Scored - Allowed 38.2 (6) 28.5 (86) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 505.6 (2) 409.3 (96) YP Play Gained - Allowed 7.30 (1) 6.40 (108) YP Rush Gained - Allowed 7.39 (1) 3.63 (35) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.13 (62) 8.98 (117) Avg. Time of Possession 30.94 (32) Turnover Differential -0.2 (75) 3rd Down Conversion % 49.7% (6) 39.5% (59) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * NEVADA is on a 1-9 ATS (-8.9 Units) skid as road favorites of 3.5 to 7 points The Average Score was NEVADA 29.7, OPPONENT 33.1. Potential spots for 2010: 10/16 - at Hawaii, 11/6 - at Idaho, 11/13 - at Fresno St, 12/4 - at Louisiana Tech * NEVADA is on a 11-2 ATS (+8.8 Units) run vs. mistake free teams - 42 or less penalty YPG The Average Score was NEVADA 38, OPPONENT 25.2. Potential spots for 2010: 11/13 - at Fresno St * NEVADA is on a 24-10 ATS (+13 Units) run as home favorites The Average Score was NEVADA 38.9, OPPONENT 23.8. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - COLORADO ST, 9/17 - CALIFORNIA, 10/9 - SAN JOSE ST, 10/30 - UTAH ST, 11/20 - NEW MEXICO ST Offense: Pro - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 41 2009 Scoring Differential: +9.7 (#24 of 120) 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +7.5 (#34 of 120) 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 43 (#40 of 120) 2009 Schedule Strength: 29.31 (#98 of 120) 9/1 at Fresno St 19-28 L +12.5 W 55.5 U 9/1 at Nebraska 10-52 L +21 L 50 O 8/30 GRAMBLING 49-13 W - - - 9/5 at Notre Dame 0-35 L +14.5 L 62.5 U 9/9 at Arizona St 21-52 L +17.5 L 59 O 9/8 at Northwestern 31-36 L +10.5 W 52.5 O 9/6 TEXAS TECH 19-35 L +10.5 L 71 U 9/19 at Colorado St 20-35 L -5 L 57 U 9/16 COLORADO ST 28-10 W -3.5 W 51 U 9/15 NICHOLLS ST 52-17 W - - - 9/13 at Missouri 17-69 L +26 L 69 O 9/25 MISSOURI 21-31 L +7 L 61 U 9/22 NORTHWESTERN 31-21 W -7 W 46.5 O 9/29 UNLV 27-20 W -4 W 52 U 9/27 at UNLV 49-27 W +3.5 W 57 O 10/3 UNLV 63-28 W -6.5 W 58.5 O 9/30 at UNLV 31-3 W -2.5 W 48 U 10/6 FRESNO ST 41-49 L -3 L 53 O 10/4 at Idaho 49-14 W -23 W 68 U 10/9 LOUISIANA TECH 37-14 W -10.5 W 58 U 10/7 at Hawaii 34-41 L +13.5 W 64 O 10/14 at Boise St 67-69 L +25.5 W 62 O 10/11 NEW MEXICO ST 45-48 L -19.5 L 65.5 O 10/17 at Utah St 35-32 W -8 L 65.5 O 10/21 SAN JOSE ST 23-7 W -13.5 W 56 U 10/20 at Utah St 31-28 W -7 L 60.5 U 10/18 UTAH ST 44-17 W -23.5 W 62.5 U 10/24 IDAHO 70-45 W -16.5 W 67.5 O 10/28 NEW MEXICO ST 48-21 W -17.5 W 61.5 O 10/27 IDAHO 37-21 W -18 L 66 U 10/25 at Hawaii 31-38 L -3.5 L 60 O 10/31 HAWAII 31-21 W -29 L 69 U 11/4 at Idaho 45-7 W -9 W 54.5 U 11/2 at New Mexico St 40-38 W -6.5 L 69.5 O 11/7 at Fresno St 41-28 W -2 W 71 U 11/8 at San Jose St 62-7 W -14 W 60 O 11/11 UTAH ST 42-0 W -28.5 W 50 U 11/16 HAWAII 26-28 L +5 W 75 U 11/15 SAN JOSE ST 41-17 W -16 W 51 O 11/14 FRESNO ST 52-14 W -7.5 W 68.5 U 11/18 at Louisiana Tech 42-0 W -17 W 57.5 U 11/24 at San Jose St 24-27 L -3 L 62 U 11/22 BOISE ST 34-41 L +6.5 L 62.5 O 11/21 at New Mexico St 63-20 W -31 W 59.5 O 11/25 BOISE ST 7-38 L +2.5 L 54 U 12/1 LOUISIANA TECH 49-10 W -7 W 62 U 11/29 at Louisiana Tech 35-31 W -4.5 L 62.5 O 11/27 at Boise St 33-44 L +12 W 71 O 12/31 vs. Miami 20-21 L +4 W 43.5 U 12/22 at New Mexico 0-23 L +2 L 56.5 U 12/30 vs. Maryland 35-42 L -2 L 61 O 12/24 vs. SMU 10-45 L -11 L 69.5 U Where: Las Cruces, NM Head Coach: DeWayne Walker, 2nd year (3-10 SU) Conference: WAC 2009 RECORD: 3-10 SU, 6-7 ATS Facility: Aggie Memorial Stadium 9/11/10 SAN DIEGO ST 9/18/10 at UTEP * NEW MEXICO ST is 2-6 SU but 6-2 ATS in its L8 games at UTEP 2009 Scoring Differential: -20.2 (#115 of 120) 9/25/10 at Kansas 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -20.8 (#117 of 120) 10/2/10 BOISE ST * L3 NMS-BSU series games have gone UNDER the total 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 12 (#117 of 120) 10/9/10 NEW MEXICO * ROAD TEAM is 8-11 SU but 15-4 ATS in NMS-NM series since 92 2009 Schedule Strength: 28.77 (#102 of 120) 10/16/10 at Fresno St * UNDER the total is 5-0 in L5 games of FRS-NMS series 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Idaho * UNDERDOG is 5-6 SU but 9-2 ATS in IDA-NMS series since 98 10/30/10 SAN JOSE ST * FAVORITE is on 5-0 SU & 4-1 ATS run in L5 NMS-SJS matchups Points Scored - Allowed 11.5 (120) 31.6 (101) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 229.5 (120) 430.1 (106) 11/6/10 at Utah St * L6 games of UTS-NMS series are 5-1 UNDER the total YP Play Gained - Allowed 3.87 (120) 6.39 (107) 11/13/10 LOUISIANA TECH * HOME TEAM is 4-1 SU & ATS in L5 NMS-LAT matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.66 (86) 5.78 (115) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 4.24 (120) 7.25 (74) 11/20/10 at Nevada * L5 games of NEV-NMS series are 5-0 OVER the total Avg. Time of Possession 30.39 (52) 11/27/10 HAWAII * L2 games in NMS-HAW series at NEW MEXICO ST went OVER the total Turnover Differential -0.8 (109) 3rd Down Conversion % 28.5% (117) 45.0% (102) Straight Up 4-8 4-9 3-9 3-10 14-36 (28%) * Over the L2 seasons, NEW MEXICO ST is 7-0 UNDER the total (+7 Units) on the road in the Overall ATS 5-4 5-6 4-7 6-7 20-24 (45%) second half of the season. The Average Score was NEW MEXICO ST 8, OPPONENT 30.7. at Home ATS 2-2 4-1 1-4 1-5 8-12 (40%) Potential spots for 2010: 10/23 - at Idaho, 11/6 - at Utah St, 11/20 - at Nevada Away/Neutral ATS 3-2 1-5 3-3 5-2 12-12 (50%) * NEW MEXICO ST is on a 0-9 ATS (-9.9 Units) skid vs. good passing defenses - allowing 5.75 vs Conference ATS 4-3 4-4 3-5 4-4 15-16 (48%) or less PYA The Average Score was NEW MEXICO ST 13.5, OPPONENT 42.9. Potential spots Non-Conference ATS 1-1 1-2 1-2 2-3 5-8 (38%) for 2010: 10/2 - BOISE ST as Favorite ATS 2-0 2-1 0-1 0-1 4-3 (57%) * NEW MEXICO ST is on a 5-17 ATS (-13.7 Units) skid after allowing 475 or more total YPG in as Underdog ATS 3-4 3-5 4-6 6-5 16-20 (44%) each of their last 3 games The Average Score was NEW MEXICO ST 20.6, OPPONENT 37.2. Over-Under 7-3 5-6 5-6 4-8 21-23 (48%) Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - NEW MEXICO, 11/6 - at Utah St 9/2 SE LOUISIANA 30-15 W - - - 8/30 SE LOUISIANA 35-14 W - - - 9/13 at Nebraska 7-38 L +26.5 L 66 U 9/5 IDAHO 6-21 L -2.5 L 52.5 U 9/9 NEW MEXICO 28-34 L +5.5 L 48.5 O 9/8 at New Mexico 34-44 L +7 L 53.5 O 9/20 at UTEP 34-33 W +7.5 W 62.5 O 9/12 PRAIRIE VIEW 21-18 W -17 L - 9/16 TEXAS SOUTHERN 48-14 W - - - 9/15 UTEP 29-24 W -4.5 W 64 U 9/27 NEW MEXICO 24-35 L +3 L 54 O 9/19 UTEP 12-38 L +14 L 48 O 9/30 at UTEP 38-44 L +17 W 59.5 O 9/22 at Auburn 20-55 L +17 L 55.5 O 10/4 ALCORN ST 45-10 W - - - 9/26 at New Mexico 20-17 W +11.5 W 44 U 10/7 at Idaho 20-28 L +3 L 61 U 9/29 AK-PINE BLUFF 20-17 W - - - 10/11 at Nevada 48-45 W +19.5 W 65.5 O 10/3 at San Diego St 17-34 L +17.5 W 46.5 O 10/15 BOISE ST 28-40 L +27.5 W 62 O 10/7 at Boise St 0-58 L +26 L 63 U 10/18 SAN JOSE ST 14-31 L +1 L 52 U 10/10 UTAH ST 20-17 W +10.5 W 49.5 U 10/21 HAWAII 30-49 L +19 T 72.5 O 10/13 at Louisiana Tech 21-22 L +7.5 W 48.5 U 10/25 at Idaho 14-20 L -11.5 L 64 U 10/17 at Louisiana Tech 7-45 L +20.5 L 41.5 O 10/28 at Nevada 21-48 L +17.5 L 61.5 O 10/20 IDAHO 45-31 W -8 W 59 O 11/1 BOISE ST 0-49 L +21 L 56 U 10/24 FRESNO ST 3-34 L +24 L 51 U 11/4 SAN JOSE ST 21-31 L +6 L 61.5 U 10/27 at Hawaii 13-50 L +30.5 L 80 U 11/8 HAWAII 30-42 L +3.5 L 53.5 O 10/31 at Ohio St 0-45 L +44 L 48.5 U 11/11 at Fresno St 18-23 L +14 W 60 U 11/2 NEVADA 38-40 L +6.5 W 69.5 O 11/15 at Fresno St 17-24 L +17 W 63.5 U 11/14 at Hawaii 6-24 L +19.5 W 53.5 U 11/25 at Utah St 42-20 W -6 W 54.5 O 11/10 at San Jose St 17-51 L +5 L 59 O 11/22 LOUISIANA TECH 31-35 L +6.5 W 54 O 11/21 NEVADA 20-63 L +31 L 59.5 O 12/2 LOUISIANA TECH 50-23 W -13 W 65.5 O 11/17 UTAH ST 17-35 L -7 L 62.5 U 11/29 at Utah St 2-47 L +6 L 57.5 U 11/28 at San Jose St 10-13 L +11.5 W 42 U 11/30 FRESNO ST 23-30 L +13 W 65.5 U 12/5 at Boise St 7-42 L +46.5 W 58.5 U 148 WWW.STATFOX.COM

SAN JOSE STATE SPARTANS 2010 Schedule Strength: 35 (#76 of 120) 9/4/10 at Alabama 9/11/10 at Wisconsin 9/18/10 S UTAH 9/25/10 at Utah 10/2/10 CAL DAVIS 10/9/10 at Nevada * FAVORITE is on 9-1 SU & ATS run in L10 NEV-SJS matchups 10/16/10 BOISE ST * UNDER the total is 5-1 in L6 games of SJS-BSU series 10/23/10 FRESNO ST * FAVORITE is 7-0 SU & ATS in L7 SJS-FRS matchups 10/30/10 at New Mexico St * FAVORITE is on 5-0 SU & 4-1 ATS run in L5 NMS-SJS matchups 11/13/10 UTAH ST * UNDER the total is 5-0 in L5 games of SJS-UTS series 11/20/10 at Hawaii * SAN JOSE ST is 6-2 ATS in its L8 games at HAWAII 11/27/10 LOUISIANA TECH * L5 games of SJS-LAT series are 4-1 UNDER the total 12/4/10 at Idaho * IDAHO has covered spread in L2 games vs. SAN JOSE ST SCENARIO 2006 2007 2008 2009 4-yr Total Straight Up 9-4 5-7 6-6 2-10 22-27 (45%) Overall ATS 9-3 7-4 5-6 2-10 23-23 (50%) at Home ATS 5-1 4-0 2-3 2-4 13-8 (62%) Away/Neutral ATS 4-2 3-4 3-3 0-6 10-15 (40%) vs Conference ATS 5-3 6-2 3-5 0-8 14-18 (44%) Non-Conference ATS 4-0 1-2 2-1 2-2 9-5 (64%) as Favorite ATS 4-1 2-0 3-2 0-2 9-5 (64%) as Underdog ATS 5-2 5-4 2-4 1-8 13-18 (42%) Over-Under 2-10 3-8 4-7 6-5 15-30 (33%) UTAH STATE AGGIES 2010 Schedule Strength: 33.67 (#83 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 7 Lettermen Returning: 41 Where: San Jose, CA Head Coach: Mike MacIntyre, 1st year (First Year SU) Conference: WAC 2009 RECORD: 2-10 SU, 2-10 ATS Facility: Spartan Stadium 2009 Scoring Differential: -20.8 (#117 of 120) 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -19.1 (#115 of 120) 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 15 (#115 of 120) 2009 Schedule Strength: 32.5 (#73 of 120) 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK Points Scored - Allowed 13.8 (118) 34.5 (109) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 286.3 (115) 442.9 (109) YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.56 (110) 6.68 (115) YP Rush Gained - Allowed 2.64 (117) 6.13 (118) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.22 (102) 7.63 (92) Avg. Time of Possession 28.9 (95) Turnover Differential -0.3 (83) 3rd Down Conversion % 32.2% (106) 44.9% (100) STATFOX POWER TRENDS * Over the L2 seasons, SAN JOSE ST is 0-10 ATS (-11 Units) after playing 3 straight conference games. The Average Score was SAN JOSE ST 13.2, OPPONENT 31.1. Potential spots for 2010: 10/30 - at New Mexico St, 11/13 - UTAH ST, 11/20 - at Hawaii, 11/27 - LOUISIANA TECH, 12/4 - at Idaho * Over the L2 seasons, SAN JOSE ST is 0-9 ATS (-9.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses against the spread. The Average Score was SAN JOSE ST 10.3, OPPONENT 33.2. Potential spots for 2010: WATCH FOR ATS LOSING STREAKS * Over the L2 seasons, SAN JOSE ST is 1-11 ATS (-11.1 Units) in the second half of the season. The Average Score was SAN JOSE ST 14.2, OPPONENT 30.8. Potential spots for 2010: 10/23 - FRESNO ST, 10/30 - at New Mexico St, 11/13 - UTAH ST, 11/20 - at Hawaii, 11/27 - LOUISIANA TECH, 12/4 - at Idaho 9/2 at Washington 29-35 L +21 W 47 O 9/1 at Arizona St 3-45 L +16.5 L 52 U 8/30 CAL DAVIS 13-10 W - - - 9/5 at USC 3-56 L +34 L 47 O 9/9 STANFORD 35-34 W +11 W 54.5 O 9/8 at Kansas St 14-34 L +20.5 W 44.5 O 9/6 at Nebraska 12-35 L +26.5 W 55.5 U 9/12 UTAH 14-24 L +13.5 W 48 U 9/23 CAL POLY SLO 17-7 W - - - 9/15 at Stanford 0-37 L +7.5 L 49.5 U 9/13 SAN DIEGO ST 35-10 W -7 W 43.5 O 9/19 at Stanford 17-42 L +18 L 47.5 O 9/30 SAN DIEGO ST 31-10 W +2 W 47.5 U 9/22 at Utah St 23-20 W +2 W 43.5 U 9/20 at Stanford 10-23 L +6.5 L 44.5 U 9/26 CAL POLY SLO 19-9 W -6.5 W - 10/14 UTAH ST 21-14 W -16 L 47.5 U 9/29 CAL DAVIS 34-14 W - - - 9/27 at Hawaii 20-17 W +3 W 48 U 10/10 IDAHO 25-29 L -6.5 L 53.5 O 10/21 at Nevada 7-23 L +13.5 L 56 U 10/6 IDAHO 28-20 W -7.5 W 50.5 U 10/11 UTAH ST 30-7 W -11.5 W 46 U 10/17 at Fresno St 21-41 L +19.5 L 58 O 10/28 LOUISIANA TECH 44-10 W -9 W 56 U 10/12 HAWAII 35-42 L +16 W 67 O 10/18 at New Mexico St 31-14 W -1 W 52 U 10/31 at Boise St 7-45 L +36 L 54 U 11/4 at New Mexico St 31-21 W -6 W 61.5 U 10/20 at Fresno St 0-30 L +13 L 57 U 10/24 BOISE ST 16-33 L +7 L 40.5 O 11/8 NEVADA 7-62 L +14 L 60 O 11/11 BOISE ST 20-23 L +13 W 56 U 11/3 at Boise St 7-42 L +26.5 L 58 U 11/1 at Idaho 30-24 W -14.5 L 47.5 O 11/14 at Utah St 9-24 L +12.5 L 57 U 11/18 at Hawaii 17-54 L +24 L 74 U 11/10 NEW MEXICO ST 51-17 W -5 W 59 O 11/8 LOUISIANA TECH 0-21 L -7 L 40.5 U 11/21 HAWAII 10-17 L +2 L 54 U 11/25 at Idaho 28-13 W -6.5 W 51 U 11/17 at Louisiana Tech 23-27 L +5.5 W 53 U 11/15 at Nevada 17-41 L +16 L 51 O 11/28 NEW MEXICO ST 13-10 W -11.5 L 42 U 12/2 FRESNO ST 24-14 W -4.5 W 50 U 11/24 NEVADA 27-24 W +3 W 62 U 11/21 FRESNO ST 10-24 L +3 L 47.5 U 12/5 at Louisiana Tech 20-55 L +24 L 49 O 12/23 at New Mexico 20-12 W +2.5 W 48.5 U Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 9 Lettermen Returning: 45 Where: Logan, UT Head Coach: Gary Andersen, 2nd year (4-8 SU) Conference: WAC 2009 RECORD: 4-8 SU, 8-4 ATS Facility: Romney Stadium 9/4/10 at Oklahoma 9/11/10 IDAHO ST 2009 Scoring Differential: -4.9 (#88 of 120) 9/18/10 FRESNO ST * UNDERDOG is 1-4 SU but 5-0 ATS in L5 UTS-FRS matchups 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -5.1 (#88 of 120) 9/25/10 at San Diego St 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 27 (#91 of 120) 10/1/10 BYU * L3 UTS-BYU series games have gone UNDER the total 2009 Schedule Strength: 30.67 (#84 of 120) 10/9/10 at Louisiana Tech * FAVORITE is on 5-0 SU & 4-1 ATS run in L5 LAT-UTS matchups 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 HAWAII * UNDERDOG is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 UTS-HAW games 10/30/10 at Nevada * HOME TEAM is on 2-3 SU but 5-0 ATS run in NEV-UTS series Points Scored - Allowed 29.1 (47) 34.0 (107) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 439.3 (12) 455.1 (114) 11/6/10 NEW MEXICO ST * L6 games of UTS-NMS series are 5-1 UNDER the total YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.05 (28) 6.36 (106) 11/13/10 at San Jose St * UNDER the total is 5-0 in L5 games of SJS-UTS series YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.66 (32) 5.29 (109) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.88 (25) 7.64 (93) 11/20/10 IDAHO * IDAHO is on 2-4 SU but 5-1 ATS run in its L6 games at UTAH ST Avg. Time of Possession 29.09 (87) 12/4/10 at Boise St * BOISE ST is on 9-0 SU & 8-0 ATS run vs. UTAH ST Turnover Differential +0.5 (23) 3rd Down Conversion % 35.7% (87) 43.2% (89) Straight Up 1-11 2-10 3-9 4-8 10-38 (21%) * UTAH ST is 13-4 ATS (+8.6 Units) as road underdogs since 07. The Average Score was UTAH Overall ATS 3-9 7-5 7-4 8-4 25-22 (53%) ST 23.4, OPPONENT 38.6. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - at Oklahoma, 9/25 - at San Diego St, at Home ATS 1-4 1-4 5-1 3-2 10-11 (48%) 10/9 - at Louisiana Tech, 10/30 - at Nevada, 12/4 - at Boise St Away/Neutral ATS 2-5 6-1 2-3 5-2 15-11 (58%) * UTAH ST is on a 12-2 ATS (+9.8 Units) run on the road revenging a loss against opponent by vs Conference ATS 2-6 5-3 5-2 5-3 17-14 (55%) 14 points or more The Average Score was UTAH ST 20.2, OPPONENT 36.1. Potential spots for Non-Conference ATS 1-3 2-2 2-2 3-1 8-8 (50%) 2010: 12/4 - at Boise St as Favorite ATS 0-0 0-1 2-0 2-2 4-3 (57%) * Over the L2 seasons, UTAH ST is 8-1 UNDER the total (+6.9 Units) in weeks 5 through 9. The as Underdog ATS 3-9 7-4 5-4 6-1 21-18 (54%) Average Score was UTAH ST 20.2, OPPONENT 31.1. Potential spots for 2010: 10/1 - BYU, 10/9 Over-Under 7-5 5-7 5-7 6-5 23-24 (49%) - at Louisiana Tech, 10/23 - HAWAII, 10/30 - at Nevada 9/2 at Wyoming 7-38 L +12 L 44 O 8/30 UNLV 16-23 L +6 L 47 U 8/30 at UNLV 17-27 L +11 W 46.5 U 9/3 at Utah 17-35 L +20.5 W 50 O 9/9 at Arkansas 0-20 L +29 W 50 U 9/8 at Wyoming 18-32 L +25.5 W 43.5 O 9/6 at Oregon 24-66 L +36 L 51.5 O 9/19 at Texas A&M 30-38 L +21 W 58.5 O 9/16 UTAH 0-48 L +18.5 L 44 O 9/15 at Oklahoma 3-54 L +47 L 64 U 9/13 UTAH 10-58 L +24.5 L 50.5 O 9/26 S UTAH 53-34 W -19.5 L - 9/23 at BYU 0-38 L +25 L 48.5 U 9/22 SAN JOSE ST 20-23 L -2 L 43.5 U 9/20 IDAHO 42-17 W -4 W 57.5 O 10/2 at BYU 17-35 L +24 W 62.5 U 9/30 IDAHO 21-41 L +2 L 44.5 O 9/29 at Utah 18-34 L +21.5 W 45 O 10/3 BYU 14-34 L +28.5 W 60 U 10/10 at New Mexico St 17-20 L -10.5 L 49.5 U 10/7 FRESNO ST 13-12 W +25 W 45.5 U 10/6 at Hawaii 37-52 L +40.5 W 69 O 10/11 at San Jose St 7-30 L +11.5 L 46 U 10/17 NEVADA 32-35 L +8 W 65.5 O 10/14 at San Jose St 14-21 L +16 W 47.5 U 10/20 NEVADA 28-31 L +7 W 60.5 U 10/18 at Nevada 17-44 L +23.5 L 62.5 U 10/24 LOUISIANA TECH 23-21 W -1.5 W 52.5 U 10/21 at Louisiana Tech 35-48 L +5.5 L 47.5 O 10/27 LOUISIANA TECH 21-31 L +2 L 50.5 O 10/25 FRESNO ST 28-30 L +16 W 58.5 U 10/31 at Fresno St 27-31 L +17 W 62.5 U 11/4 HAWAII 10-63 L +24 L 64.5 O 11/3 at Fresno St 27-38 L +20.5 W 55.5 O 11/1 HAWAII 30-14 W +5 W 49 U 11/7 at Hawaii 36-49 L -2 L 61 O 11/11 at Nevada 0-42 L +28.5 L 50 U 11/10 BOISE ST 0-52 L +24 L 60.5 U 11/8 at Boise St 14-49 L +35 T 52 O 11/14 SAN JOSE ST 24-9 W -12.5 W 57 U 11/18 at Boise St 10-49 L +37.5 L 56 O 11/17 at New Mexico St 35-17 W +7 W 62.5 U 11/15 at Louisiana Tech 38-45 L +15 W 48 O 11/20 BOISE ST 21-52 L +22 L 62.5 O 11/25 NEW MEXICO ST 20-42 L +6 L 54.5 O 11/24 at Idaho 24-19 W +1.5 W 58.5 U 11/29 NEW MEXICO ST 47-2 W -6 W 57.5 U 11/28 at Idaho 52-49 W +3 W 70 O WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 149

SUN BELT SUN BELT Preview The Sun Belt Conference seems to be improving each and every year and the fact that two teams won at least nine games a season ago is all the proof anyone should need. The next thing on the list to accomplishment is some more consistent non-conference upsets early in the season. Middle Tennessee State certainly seems capable of pulling one or two, as does Troy. Those are the two overwhelming favorites, thanks in part to a wealth of returning talent. In fact, of the teams that proved competitive last year in the Sun Belt, they are the only clubs that don t have massive holes to fill. That might make life better for a club like North Texas, who boasts a ton of returning production in the quest to get back to the top of a league it dominated in the beginning to middle of the last decade. Arkansas State was really ravaged by personnel losses, with a nation-low five starters returning in 2010. The rest of the league seems to be in status quo mode, meaning the one game that truly matters, and should decide the conference title, comes on October 5th, in Murfreesboro, when Middle Tennessee welcomes Troy to town. It could be another coming out party for Blue Raiders QB Dwight Dasher, who you re sure to be seeing on highlight films. ARKANSAS STATE RED WOLVES Arkansas State s 6-6 record in 2008 fostered an optimism that a bowl bid could be realized for the first time since 05 and that mounting a challenge to the Sun Belt hierarchy would happen more often. However, a pair of four-game losing streaks last season relegated the Red Wolves to a 4-8 campaign three of which saw Steve Roberts team lose by a field goal. Roberts has yet to compile a winning record since coming to Jonesboro in 2002 and a sluggish offense must improve if the Red Wolves are to accomplish that The offense was in the lower half of nearly every offensive category and a feeble passing attack produced only 10 touchdowns to 12 interceptions. The rushing attack was nothing to brag about, either, and only FIU and Louisiana-Lafayette averaged fewer yards per carry (3.8) than Arkansas State. Hopefully, quarterback Ryan Aplin used 2009 as a learning curve and should improve upon his 889 passing yards and three touchdowns. A huge void in the running game is apparent with the departure of Reggie Arnold, who tallied 12 touchdowns. Roberts will now lean on junior Derek Lawson for rushing production. Like the running game, the receiving corps is also littered 2009 EAST STANDINGS W-L PCT PF PA CONF HOME ROAD ATS PCT O/U/P Troy 9-4-0 0.692 438 387 8-0-0 5-0-0 4-4-0 9-4-0 69.2% 9-4-0 Middle Tenn. St. 10-3-0 0.769 416 308 7-1-0 5-1-0 5-2-0 10-3-0 76.9% 8-5-0 LA Monroe 6-6-0 0.500 307 328 5-3-0 4-1-0 2-5-0 6-6-0 50.0% 6-5-0 Florida Atlantic 5-7-0 0.417 329 405 5-3-0 2-3-0 3-4-0 4-8-0 33.3% 6-6-0 LA Lafayette 6-6-0 0.500 266 364 4-4-0 4-2-0 2-4-0 5-6-0 45.5% 5-6-0 Arkansas State 4-8-0 0.333 272 279 3-5-0 3-2-0 1-6-0 2-9-0 18.2% 3-8-0 Fla. International 3-9-0 0.250 275 424 3-5-0 2-3-0 1-6-0 4-8-0 33.3% 7-5-0 North Texas 2-10-0 0.167 319 427 1-7-0 1-5-0 1-5-0 5-7-0 41.7% 8-4-0 Western Kentucky 0-12-0 0.000 245 475 0-8-0 0-6-0 0-6-0 6-6-0 50.0% 6-5-0 with new faces. Even with some departures on the line, the unit should be better For all the criticism of the offense, the stop unit was tops in the Sun Belt in total defense (341.4 YPG) and scoring (23.3 PPG). This time around, Arkansas State will need plenty of players to step up and contribute, since only three starters are back This squad is littered with question marks. It s tough to see who will emerge as the go-to guy on the offense, which means the defense will have to come up big once again. Experience won t be the factor that leads to successes. FLORIDA ATLANTIC OWLS A quest for a third straight bowl appearance came to an end for Florida Atlantic, which lost to the two teams that mattered in Troy and Middle Tennessee. From that rationalization, it s probably appropriate the Owls did not go bowling last season since the defense let them down on too many occasions and they were 0-4 against teams outside the conference. Offensively, the team will have to deal with the loss of quarterback Rusty Smith and wideout Jason Harmon Even with a majority of starters gone, FAU still boasts a bevy of talent at the skill positions and should be able maintain. With Smith gone, the starting quarterbacking job has been left to senior Jeff Van Camp, who played in 10 games and threw for 1,372 yards and 12 touchdowns. While FAU is more known for its passing, it also boasted the conference s top rusher in junior Alfred Morris, who rushed for 1,392 yards and 11 touchdowns. A throw-happy offense usually attracts plenty of effective receivers, such is the case here. A big concern is a line that allowed 21 sacks and was mostly replaced The defensive unit should be better with a year of experience and some spring practice to work out any kinks. Fortunately, the front four returns the team s top two sack men in tackle Dino Cox and Kevin Cyrille. Even with the loss of Ed Bradwell, the linebacker corps boast the best experience and pedigree While a bowl bid can t be ruled out, given the strength of the skill positions on offense, the offensive line may go through some growing pains and the front seven on defense must stop the run on a more consistent basis in order to finish with a winning record. 150 WWW.STATFOX.COM

If the stop unit fails to come together, Schnellenberger will need Van Camp and Morris to have huge games and win via shootouts. FIU GOLDEN PANTHERS Year Three of the Mario Cristobal rebuilding project was supposed to be when Florida International turned the corner. Instead, the Golden Panthers dropped six of their first seven games, en route to a 3-9 campaign. The offseason got worse when the team lost running back Kendall Berry in a fatal stabbing on the school s campus. It remains to be seen how the Golden Panthers will respond There isn t a lot FIU did correctly on offense and the putrid 105.0 YPG on the ground, and 2.99 yards per carry, was easily the worst in the Sun Belt Conference. The passing attack was only slightly better, and senior QB Wayne Younger is expected to man the controls, but it would not be a surprise to see junior Wesley Carroll get some snaps. With no running back above the 400-yard rushing mark, one can see why FIU was a bit of a joke when trying to establish the ground game. A line that allowed a porous 34 sacks must improve dramatically if Younger is to gain confidence in the pocket. Seniors Brad Serini (center) and Cedric Mack (right guard) lead the starting five, hoping to improve the run blocking For all the bashing of the offense, the defense was probably worse, allowing 491.6 YPG and 53 touchdowns would make any respectable head coach vomit. Losing a few starters on the front four might be a good thing for FIU. Linebacker is clearly the best part of the stop unit, since the secondary was constantly shredded...after last season s setback, it may take Cristobal a year or so to build the program back up like he did in 2008. The team will also be facing early season games versus Rutgers, Texas A&M, Maryland and Pittsburgh. Don t be surprised if the Golden Panthers have a similar season like a year ago and Cristobal is given the boot. LA.-LAFAYETTE RAGIN CAJUNS Three 6-6 records in the last four years put La.-Lafayette on a mission for that elusive winning campaign and an even more unattainable bowl bid, which was last realized in 1970. Head coach Ricky Bustle has certainly brought more wins to the program in his eight-year tenure, but fans are certainly antsy about attaining a seven- or eight-win season La.-Lafayette did not score as many points as it did in 2008, but won plenty of close games on some timely scores, including the 17-15 upset of Kansas State. Placing seventh in the Sun Belt Conference in rushing offense, a little more out of the running game could be the difference in 2010. Fortunately, Bustle has plenty of stability behind center with junior Chris Masson, whose breakout season has upped the ante. His ability to both throw and tuck it under and run should bode well in tight situations. The committee approach is the name of the game at running back while wide receiver and tight end provide the most depth on the offense and should be better as Masson progresses. The line took the biggest hit by losing three starters...the stop unit was decent at times last season, but certainly not near conference-title worthy or consistent. In fact, the Cajuns allowed 30+ points six times on the season. Five starters return The Ragin Cajuns seemed to be right where they were a year ago with plenty of potential and plenty of nagging questions. An opening-day tilt with SEC power Georgia will quickly parlay into key conference affairs at home with Arkansas State and Middle Tennessee, meaning the learning curve will be steep and the margin of error very slim. LA.-MONROE WARHAWKS The inability to post a winning record in seven seasons cost Charlie Weatherbie his job, despite a respectable 6-6 record that included a brutal out-of-conference schedule. Former Louisiana-Monroe offensive coordinator Todd Berry returns to the head coaching ranks for the first time since 2003 with Army. Only time will tell if Berry can win more than six games and shake up the Sun Belt Conference s relatively rigid hierarchy Running the ball was the way to go for the Warhawks, who averaged 183.9 yards per game on the ground and tallied 21 touchdowns. Now, if only the passing attack can cut down on the interceptions, then Berry s team could upend the likes of a Troy or a Middle Tennessee. The quarterback situation is uncertain, but the rushing attack boasts a second-team All-Conference tailback in Frank Goodin, a senior who rushed for 1,126 yards and 13 touchdowns. Luther Ambrose leads a receiving corps that will be reshuffled after losing a few playmakers. A line that allowed only 16 sacks is young, but should continue with more solid run blocking Tops in the Sun Belt Conference in rushing defense and second in total defense, the stop unit kept Louisiana-Monroe in most games and won a few, too. The Warhawks were also third best in the conference in scoring defense (27.3 PPG) and sacks (27), which showed the starting 11 could defend against the run and pass. The 3-3-5 scheme Berry employs stars an extremely solid front three While the Warhawks might hit a few potholes in Berry s first season, don t be surprised if this team wins five conference games like it did a year ago. To be fair, the former Army coach did not have a lot to work with at Bear WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 151

Mountain and this current squad grabbed road wins at Florida Atlantic and North Texas last season. A few lucky bounces and the glass may be half full and not half empty. MID. TENNESSEE BLUE RAIDERS There was an air that a slew of talented starters returning would be the catalyst for better things to come for Middle Tennessee. Even with the loss to Sun Belt champion Troy, the Blue Raiders ripped off seven straight wins to become bowl eligible and then dropped 42 points on Southern Miss in a victory in the New Orleans Bowl. Even better, the 2010 schedule has plenty of beatable opponents for a replication of last season s 10-3 mark, including a visit by Minnesota to Murfreesboro to open the season Name an offensive category and head coach Rick Stockstill s team either topped the charts or was in the top three. The unit averaged 421.7 yards a game. Aside from driving the team bus, senior quarterback Dwight Dasher did everything and was the Sun Belt s second-best passer (2,789 yards, 23 touchdowns) to go along with his MVP Honors at the New Orleans Bowl. Dasher s 3,943 all-purpose yards and 36 touchdowns set a new school record and his 1,154 rushing yards and 13 touchdowns shows how much he impacts the running game. YES, he is back and should be bolstered by a talented group of running backs. Despite three receivers departing, the Blue Raiders boast a slew of capable replacements, and four of the o-line spots will have last season s starters The ability to limit opponents on third down and 38 sacks (both tops in the Sun Belt) were a big reason Middle Tennessee won 10 games. The biggest uncertainty will be at linebacker now that the top two tacklers are gone. Still, six starters are back and this unit is certainly capable of holding up its end of the bargain If the defense does come together, there s no reason why Middle Tennessee won t make a bowl game. The offense will score a ton of points. The Oct. 5 home game against Troy could decide the Sun Belt title. NORTH TEXAS MEAN GREEN If you thought rebuilding New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina was slow, you might want to look at head coach Todd Dodge s three-year tenure at North Texas. A miserable 1-11 campaign in 2008 was followed up by a miserable 2-10 in 09, making the upward climb back to respectability tortoise-like to say the least. The bright side is 82 percent of the starting lineups return, including the Sun Belt s top scorer in Lance Dunbar and tackling machine Craig Robertson Fourth in the Sun Belt in total yardage (408.7 YPG) and scoring offense (26.6 PPG) is an indication fortunes may be turning. The one area the Mean Green must improve is holding onto the ball, as the team was last in the conference in turnovers at a minus-14. Riley Dodge, the coach s son, will move from quarterback to wide receiver, opening a TBD quarterback battle. Pacing the rushing attack are Dunbar and his 1,378 yards, 17 touchdowns and a hefty 6.9 yards per carry. Adding Dodge to an already effective receiving trio may transform the Mean Green into one of the top passing attacks in the conference. The line should be competent returning in full Losing five games by four points or fewer may have been prevented by a key turnover, which North Texas had only 15. Still, there are positive signs with a unit that was the Sun Belt s best against the pass (216.8 YPG). A better effort stopping the run could go a long way. The secondary is the soundest part of the defense If Stalin was big on five-year plans, Dodge may be a man who believes in four-year cycles to turn around a program. All the talent is in place to move up the standings and non-league affairs versus Army and Rice are games the Mean Green can win. TROY TROJANS Four consecutive Sun Belt Conference titles (two shared) and three bowl appearances have certainly raised Troy s expectations to almost Yankee-esque status, meaning head coach Larry Blakeney now expects his troops to make college football s version of the postseason nearly every year. Even George Steinbrenner would be overjoyed with a perfect 8-0 Sun Belt record and the win over UAB showed the Trojans can punch above their weight As gaudy as the numbers were in 2008, Troy outdid those tallies in convincing fashion in 09 in passing offense (336.5 YPG) and total offense (485.7) by margins of 90 and 71 yards, respectively. The Trojans also led the Sun Belt in scoring (33.7 PPG) and seniors RB DuJuan Harris and WR Jerrel Jernigan the team s two main contributors in stats and leadership will likely do so again. The big question will be at quarterback, where standout Levi Brown has departed, leaving the open slot to a handful of candidates. The line lost only two starters and should be ready to go for the most part Troy was second in the Sun Belt in sacks (33) and was fourth against the run. The problem is eight starters are gone, including the two top tacklers. End Brandon Lang and his 8.5 sacks are gone too, but Blakeney feels he may boast another gem in Jonathan Massaquoi. The secondary came out the most unscathed, and should be better after finishing dead last against the pass (286.8 YPG) and allowing an astounding 29 touchdowns While nobody should expect another 8-0 conference record, Blakeney 152 WWW.STATFOX.COM

expects his players to come in and make an impact right away. If Parker makes the smooth transition, the Trojans have enough talent in the skill positions to grab one of the two bowl spots the Sun Belt gets. Hopefully, the defense can use the three non-league games in the beginning of the season as a primer for conference play. WESTERN KENTUCKY HILLTOPPERS After two years of being an Independent, a miserable 0-12 campaign was not what Western Kentucky had in mind for its first year in the Sun Belt. In fact, the defeats came so fast and furious that the upper brass in Bowling Green decided to part ways with coach David Elson in early November, even with three games left. The Hilltoppers decided to go with a former standout quarterback of their own Willie Taggart to revive a program that was dominant on the Division I-AA level, but is now having trouble getting traction in I-A Nine starters return to an offense that was at the bottom of most statistical categories, although the team was fourth in the conference in rushing with a 173.8 YPG average. Protecting the quarterback and converting on third downs will have to be improved if games are to be won. Junior-college transfer Matt Pelesasa locked down the starting QB job in spring ARKANSAS STATE RED WOLVES 2010 Schedule Strength: 29.33 (#110 of 120) ball mostly due to his knowledge and ability to run a newly installed West Coast Offense. A line that allowed a putrid 39 sacks has an improved left side Allowing nearly 40 points (39.6) and 478.3 yards per contest was a major reason Elson was let go, as the stop unit surrendered more than 60 points on two occasions. The linebacking corps is clearly the best part of the unit. Taggart, obviously an offensive mind by trade, has nine defensive returning starters to lean on Taggart may be one of four men in school history to have his jersey retired, but the rookie head coach needs to get his current players to play like he used to in the mid-1990s. Even with a slew of starters returning on both sides, the rebuilding process will be a long and arduous one, meaning a one- or two-win season seems like the most realistic bet. 2010 PREDICTED FINISH Middle Tennessee State Troy Florida Atlantic LA-Monroe LA-Lafayette North Texas Arkansas State Florida International Western Kentucky Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 2 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 3 Lettermen Returning: 53 Where: Jonesboro, AR Head Coach: Steve Roberts, 9th year (41-55 SU) Conference: Sun Belt 2009 RECORD: 4-8 SU, 2-9 ATS Facility: ASU Stadium 9/4/10 at Auburn 9/11/10 at LA Lafayette * LA LAFAYETTE is 3-2 SU & 4-1 ATS in its L5 games vs. ARKANSAS ST 2009 Scoring Differential: -0.6 (#73 of 120) 9/18/10 LA MONROE * UNDERDOG is 5-4 SU & 8-1 ATS in L9 AKS-LAM matchups 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -8.2 (#100 of 120) 9/25/10 at Troy * TROY has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. ARKANSAS ST 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 21 (#106 of 120) 10/2/10 LOUISVILLE 2009 Schedule Strength: 26.17 (#115 of 120) 10/9/10 at North Texas * NORTH TEXAS is 0-3 SU but 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. ARKANSAS ST 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 at Indiana 10/23/10 FLA ATLANTIC * UNDER the total is 4-1 in L5 games of AKS-FAU series Points Scored - Allowed 22.7 (90) 23.3 (45) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 328.8 (95) 341.4 (41) 11/2/10 MIDDLE TENN ST * FAVORITE is 7-0 SU & ATS in L7 AKS-MTS matchups YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.21 (83) 5.23 (49) 11/13/10 W KENTUCKY YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.79 (78) 3.54 (33) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.04 (67) 7.16 (68) 11/20/10 at Navy Avg. Time of Possession 29.81 (68) 11/27/10 at Fla International * UNDERDOG is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 FIU-AKS games at FLA INTERNATIONAL Turnover Differential -0.4 (87) 3rd Down Conversion % 32.8% (105) 43.8% (92) Straight Up 7-6 10-3 5-7 4-8 26-24 (52%) * Over the L2 seasons, ARKANSAS ST is 0-9 ATS (-9.9 Units) on the road in the second half of the Overall ATS 7-5 6-7 4-7 6-5 23-24 (49%) season. The Average Score was ARKANSAS ST 17.2, OPPONENT 29.1. Potential spots for 2010: at Home ATS 3-2 5-3 2-4 5-1 15-10 (60%) 11/20 - at Navy, 11/27 - at Fla International Away/Neutral ATS 4-3 1-4 2-3 1-4 8-14 (36%) * Over the L2 seasons, ARKANSAS ST is 0-8 ATS (-8.8 Units) on the road in conference games. vs Conference ATS 5-4 4-5 4-5 4-5 17-19 (47%) The Average Score was ARKANSAS ST 19, OPPONENT 27.8. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at LA Non-Conference ATS 2-1 2-2 0-2 2-0 6-5 (55%) Lafayette, 9/25 - at Troy, 10/9 - at North Texas, 11/27 - at Fla International as Favorite ATS 5-2 6-4 3-2 2-2 16-10 (62%) * ARKANSAS ST is 16-4 UNDER the total (+11.6 Units) on the road since 07. The Average Score was as Underdog ATS 2-3 0-3 1-5 4-3 7-14 (33%) ARKANSAS ST 16.6, OPPONENT 27.8. Potential spots for 2010: 9/4 - at Auburn, 9/11 - at La Lafayette, Over-Under 4-7 4-9 4-7 2-9 14-32 (30%) 9/25 - at Troy, 10/9 - at North Texas, 10/16 - at Indiana, 11/20 - at Navy, 11/27 - at Fla International 9/2 ARMY 14-6 W +4 W 41 U 9/1 at Texas 13-21 L +40 W 54.5 U 8/30 at Texas A&M 18-14 W +18.5 W 50.5 U 9/5 MISS VALLEY ST 61-0 W - - - 9/9 OKLAHOMA ST 7-35 L +12.5 L 46 U 9/15 SMU 45-28 W -3 W 51 O 9/6 TEXAS SOUTHERN 83-10 W - - - 9/12 at Nebraska 9-38 L +21.5 L 52 U 9/23 at SMU 9-55 L +7 L 37.5 O 9/22 at Tennessee 27-48 L +19 L 58 O 9/13 SOUTHERN MISS 24-27 L -1 L 55 U 9/26 TROY 27-30 L -3 L 50.5 O 9/30 at Fla International 31-6 W +7.5 W 41 U 9/27 MEMPHIS 35-31 W -6 L 61.5 O 9/20 MIDDLE TENN ST 31-14 W -6.5 W 51 U 10/3 at Iowa 21-24 L +21 W 45.5 U 10/7 LA MONROE 10-6 W -7 L 42.5 U 10/6 at La Monroe 13-30 L -2.5 L 57 U 9/27 at Memphis 17-29 L -1 L 55 U 10/13 at LA Monroe 10-16 L +2.5 L 51 U 10/14 at Memphis 26-23 W +8 W 45.5 O 10/13 LA LAFAYETTE 52-21 W -10.5 W 57.5 O 10/11 LA MONROE 37-29 W -13.5 L 53.5 O 10/24 FLA INTERNATIONAL 27-10 W -11.5 W 58 U 10/21 NORTH TEXAS 29-10 W -8 W 38.5 O 10/20 at Middle Tenn St 7-24 L +2.5 L 56 U 10/18 at LA Lafayette 23-28 L +2.5 L 61 U 10/31 at Louisville 13-21 L +1.5 L 50 U 10/28 at Fla Atlantic 0-29 L -5 L 40.5 U 10/27 TROY 0-27 L +4.5 L 59 U 11/1 at Alabama 0-35 L +24 L 49 U 11/7 LA LAFAYETTE 18-21 L -13.5 L 48.5 U 11/4 at Auburn 0-27 L +34.5 W 43 U 11/3 FLA INTERNATIONAL 27-24 W -16.5 L 50.5 O 11/8 at Fla International 21-22 L -3 L 44.5 U 11/14 at Fla Atlantic 18-35 L -3 L 55.5 U 11/11 MIDDLE TENN ST 10-38 L +3 L 41.5 O 11/10 at Fla Atlantic 31-34 L +6 W 53.5 O 11/22 FLA ATLANTIC 28-14 W -3 W 51 U 11/21 at Middle Tenn St 14-38 L +10.5 L 51 O 11/18 at Troy St 33-26 W +8 W 40 O 11/15 NORTH TEXAS 31-27 W -15.5 L 67 U 11/29 at North Texas 33-28 W -20.5 L 58 O 11/28 NORTH TEXAS 30-26 W -7.5 L 55.5 O 11/25 at La Lafayette 13-28 L +6.5 L 42.5 U 11/24 at Southern Miss 10-16 L +15 W 53 U 12/6 at Troy 9-35 L +13 L 53 U 12/3 at W Kentucky 24-20 W -6.5 L 51.5 U WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 153

FLORIDA ATLANTIC OWLS 2010 Schedule Strength: 32 (#93 of 120) FIU GOLDEN PANTHERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 31.75 (#96 of 120) Offense: Pro Set - Starters Returning: 3 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 9 Lettermen Returning: 32 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 3 Lettermen Returning: 44 Where: Boca Raton, FL Head Coach: Howard Schnellenberger, 12th year (53-55 SU) Conference: Sun Belt 2009 RECORD: 5-7 SU, 4-8 ATS Facility: Lockhart Stadium 9/4/10 at UAB * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 UAB-FAU games 9/11/10 vs. Michigan St (Detroit, MI) 2009 Scoring Differential: -6.3 (#91 of 120) 9/25/10 NORTH TEXAS * FLA ATLANTIC is on 6-0 SU & 5-0 ATS run vs. NORTH TEXAS 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -9.5 (#104 of 120) 10/2/10 at S Florida 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 23 (#98 of 120) 10/9/10 at LA Monroe * UNDERDOG is on 5-1 SU & 6-0 ATS run in L6 LAM-FAU matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 28.17 (#104 of 120) 10/23/10 at Arkansas St * UNDER the total is 4-1 in L5 games of AKS-FAU series 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/30/10 FLA INTERNATIONAL * FAVORITE has swept L3 FAU-FIU games at FLA ATLANTIC, both SU & ATS 11/6/10 at W Kentucky * L2 games in WKU-FAU series went UNDER the total Points Scored - Allowed 27.4 (60) 33.8 (106) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 432.0 (15) 453.2 (112) 11/13/10 LA LAFAYETTE * FLA ATLANTIC is on 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS run vs. LA LAFAYETTE YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.90 (37) 7.02 (119) 11/20/10 at Texas YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.22 (62) 6.14 (119) 11/27/10 at Middle Tenn St * L3 MTS-FAU series games have gone UNDER the total YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.54 (41) 8.11 (106) Avg. Time of Possession 31.68 (19) 12/4/10 TROY * FAVORITE is 5-1 SU & ATS in L6 FAU-TRO matchups Turnover Differential +0.1 (58) 3rd Down Conversion % 44.8% (20) 41.3% (78) Straight Up 5-7 8-5 7-6 5-7 25-25 (50%) * FLA ATLANTIC is on a 15-5 ATS (+9.5 Units) run on the road in conference games The Average Overall ATS 5-6 8-5 8-5 4-8 25-24 (51%) Score was FLA ATLANTIC 28.6, OPPONENT 24.7. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - at La Monroe, at Home ATS 2-1 3-2 3-1 1-4 9-8 (53%) 10/23 - at Arkansas St, 11/6 - at W Kentucky, 11/27 - at Middle Tenn St Away/Neutral ATS 3-5 5-3 5-4 3-4 16-16 (50%) * FLA ATLANTIC is on a 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) run on the road vs. poor teams - outscored by 10+ vs Conference ATS 5-2 5-2 5-3 4-4 19-11 (63%) PPG The Average Score was FLA ATLANTIC 31.8, OPPONENT 19. Potential spots for 2010: Non-Conference ATS 0-4 3-3 3-2 0-4 6-13 (32%) 11/6 - at W Kentucky as Favorite ATS 1-0 5-2 5-1 1-4 12-7 (63%) * FLA ATLANTIC is on a 2-11 ATS (-10.1 Units) skid as road underdogs of 21.5 or more points The as Underdog ATS 4-6 3-3 3-4 3-4 13-17 (43%) Average Score was FLA ATLANTIC 11.3, OPPONENT 46.5. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at S Over-Under 5-6 9-4 4-9 6-6 24-25 (49%) Florida, 11/20 - at Texas 9/2 at Clemson 6-54 L +28.5 L 43 O 9/1 MIDDLE TENN ST 27-14 W -2.5 W 43.5 U 8/30 at Texas 10-52 L +23.5 L 62.5 U 9/5 at Nebraska 3-49 L +23 L 60.5 U 9/9 at Kansas St 0-45 L +23.5 L 45.5 U 9/8 at Oklahoma St 6-42 L +24 L 56.5 U 9/6 UAB 49-34 W -14 W 56.5 O 9/19 at S Carolina 16-38 L +20.5 L 52 O 9/16 at Oklahoma St 8-48 L +31 L 46.5 O 9/15 MINNESOTA 42-39 W +6.5 W 52 O 9/13 at Michigan St 0-17 L +18.5 W 61 U 9/26 LA MONROE 25-27 L -3.5 L 56.5 U 9/23 at S Carolina 6-45 L +28 L 42 O 9/22 at North Texas 30-20 W -6 W 61.5 U 9/20 at Minnesota 3-37 L +5.5 L 62 U 10/3 WYOMING 28-30 L -5.5 L 54.5 O 9/30 at La Monroe 21-19 W +12 W 47 U 9/29 at Kentucky 17-45 L +24 L 64 U 9/30 at Middle Tenn St 13-14 L +2.5 W 51.5 U 10/17 at North Texas 44-40 W -1 W 61.5 O 10/12 S UTAH 32-7 W - - - 10/6 S FLORIDA 23-35 L +17.5 W 45 O 10/7 TROY 17-30 L +4 L 54 U 10/24 at LA Lafayette 51-29 W +3 W 60 O 10/18 LA LAFAYETTE 0-6 L +8.5 W 47 U 10/20 at La Lafayette 39-32 W -5.5 W 60.5 O 10/18 at W Kentucky 24-20 W -3 W 47 U 10/31 MIDDLE TENN ST 20-27 L -3 L 61.5 U 10/28 ARKANSAS ST 29-0 W +5 W 40.5 U 10/27 LA MONROE 30-33 L -6 L 55 O 10/25 at LA Monroe 29-28 W -3 L 54 O 11/7 at UAB 29-56 L +7 L 63.5 O 11/4 at Middle Tenn St 14-35 L +13.5 L 40.5 O 11/10 ARKANSAS ST 34-31 W -6 L 53.5 O 11/8 NORTH TEXAS 46-13 W -22.5 W 64 U 11/14 ARKANSAS ST 35-18 W +3 W 55.5 U 11/11 TROY ST 17-24 L +3 L 40 O 11/17 at Florida 20-59 L +34 L 64.5 O 11/15 LA LAFAYETTE 40-29 W -1.5 W 62.5 O 11/21 at Troy 21-47 L +17 L 64.5 O 11/18 at North Texas 17-16 W +5 W 39 U 11/24 vs. Fla International 55-23 W -9 W 56 O 11/22 at Arkansas St 14-28 L +3 L 51 U 11/28 W KENTUCKY 29-23 W -12.5 L 66 U 11/25 vs. Fla International 31-0 W -3 W 37.5 U 12/1 at Troy 38-32 W +16 W 61 O 11/29 vs. Fla International 57-50 W -5.5 W 50.5 O 12/5 at Fla International 28-21 W +1.5 W 64 U 12/21 vs. Memphis 44-27 W -3.5 W 67.5 O 12/26 vs. C Michigan 24-21 W +7 W 70 U Where: Miami, FL Head Coach: Mario Cristobal, 4th year (9-27 SU) Conference: Sun Belt 2009 RECORD: 3-9 SU, 4-8 ATS Facility: FIU Stadium 9/11/10 RUTGERS 9/18/10 at Texas A&M 2009 Scoring Differential: -12.4 (#110 of 120) 9/25/10 at Maryland * UNDERDOG is 0-2 SU but 2-0 ATS in L2 MD-FIU games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -11.3 (#108 of 120) 10/2/10 at Pittsburgh 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 19 (#110 of 120) 10/9/10 W KENTUCKY 2009 Schedule Strength: 31.83 (#78 of 120) 10/16/10 at North Texas * FAVORITE is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 NTX-FIU games at NORTH TEXAS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/30/10 at Fla Atlantic * FAVORITE has swept L3 FAU-FIU games at FLA ATLANTIC, both SU & ATS 11/6/10 LA MONROE * UNDERDOG is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 FIU-LAM games at FLA INTERNATIONAL Points Scored - Allowed 22.9 (88) 35.3 (111) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 321.7 (100) 491.6 (119) 11/13/10 at Troy * FLA INTERNATIONAL is 0-3 SU but 3-0 ATS in its L3 games at TROY YP Play Gained - Allowed 4.51 (112) 6.58 (112) 11/20/10 at LA Lafayette * FAVORITE is on 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS run in L6 LAL-FIU matchups YP Rush Gained - Allowed 2.99 (113) 5.36 (111) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.00 (107) 8.26 (111) 11/27/10 ARKANSAS ST * UNDERDOG is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 FIU-AKS games at FLA INTERNATIONAL Avg. Time of Possession 27.06 (114) 12/4/10 MIDDLE TENN ST * HOME TEAM has swept L3 FIU-MTS games, both SU & ATS Turnover Differential -0.3 (83) 3rd Down Conversion % 35.1% (96) 42.4% (87) Straight Up 0-12 1-11 5-7 3-9 9-39 (19%) * FLA INTERNATIONAL is on a 12-1 UNDER the total (+10.9 Units) run at home coming off a loss against Overall ATS 3-8 5-7 8-4 4-8 20-27 (43%) the spread The Average Score was FLA INTERNATIONAL 19.8, OPPONENT 23.6. Potential spots for at Home ATS 0-4 3-1 4-1 1-4 8-10 (44%) 2010: 10/9 - W KENTUCKY, 11/6 - LA MONROE, 11/27 - ARKANSAS ST, 12/4 - MIDDLE TENN ST Away/Neutral ATS 3-4 2-6 4-3 3-4 12-17 (41%) * FLA INTERNATIONAL is 12-3 OVER the total (+8.7 Units) on the road after the first month of the season vs Conference ATS 1-5 3-4 5-3 2-6 11-18 (38%) since 07. The Average Score was FLA INTERNATIONAL 23.5, OPPONENT 39. Potential spots for 2010: Non-Conference ATS 2-3 2-3 3-1 2-2 9-9 (50%) 10/2 - at Pittsburgh, 10/16 - at North Texas, 10/30 - at Fla Atlantic, 11/13 - at Troy, 11/20 - at La Lafayette as Favorite ATS 0-2 3-4 3-1 2-3 8-10 (44%) * FLA INTERNATIONAL is 7-2 ATS (+4.8 Units) at home coming off a loss against the spread since 07. as Underdog ATS 3-6 5-7 5-3 2-5 15-21 (42%) The Average Score was FLA INTERNATIONAL 22, OPPONENT 21.4. Potential spots for 2010: 10/9 - W Over-Under 3-9 7-5 6-6 7-5 23-25 (48%) KENTUCKY, 11/6 - LA MONROE, 11/27 - ARKANSAS ST, 12/4 - MIDDLE TENN ST 8/31 at Middle Tenn St 6-7 L +10 W 46.5 U 9/1 at Penn St 0-59 L +37 L 49 O 8/30 at Kansas 10-40 L +36 W 56.5 U 9/12 at Alabama 14-40 L +33.5 W 50.5 O 9/9 at S Florida 20-21 L +20 W 43 U 9/8 MARYLAND 10-26 L +23 W 45.5 U 9/6 at Iowa 0-42 L +27 L 44 U 9/19 at Rutgers 15-23 L +16 W 51.5 U 9/16 BOWLING GREEN 28-33 L +3.5 L 48 O 9/15 at Miami 9-23 L +33 W 46.5 U 9/20 S FLORIDA 9-17 L +29.5 W 55.5 U 9/26 TOLEDO 31-41 L -1 L 58.5 O 9/23 at Maryland 10-14 L +23 W 46 U 9/22 at Kansas 3-55 L +35 L 56 O 9/27 at Toledo 35-16 W +18 W 53 U 10/3 at LA Monroe 35-48 L +6.5 L 55 O 9/30 ARKANSAS ST 6-31 L -7.5 L 41 U 9/29 at Middle Tenn St 6-47 L +9 L 47 O 10/4 at North Texas 42-10 W -5.5 W 48 O 10/10 at W Kentucky 37-20 W -6 W 56.5 O 10/7 at North Texas 22-25 L +2.5 L 41 O 10/6 TROY 16-34 L +19 W 53.5 U 10/11 MIDDLE TENN ST 31-21 W -1 W 42.5 O 10/17 TROY 33-42 L +8 L 58.5 O 10/14 at Miami 0-35 L +27 L 40 U 10/20 at La Monroe 14-28 L +13 L 50.5 U 10/18 at Troy 23-33 L +11.5 W 46.5 O 10/24 at Arkansas St 10-27 L +11.5 L 58 U 10/28 at Alabama 3-38 L +28.5 L 43 U 10/27 at Arkansas 10-58 L +40.5 L 58 O 11/1 at LA Lafayette 20-49 L +12 L 57 O 10/31 LA LAFAYETTE 20-17 W -5 L 56.5 U 11/11 LA MONROE 0-35 L -2.5 L 43 U 11/3 at Arkansas St 24-27 L +16.5 W 50.5 O 11/8 ARKANSAS ST 22-21 W +3 W 44.5 U 11/7 at Middle Tenn St 21-48 L +12.5 L 55.5 O 11/18 LA LAFAYETTE 7-17 L +3.5 L 45 U 11/17 LA LAFAYETTE 28-38 L +3 L 56 O 11/22 LA MONROE 27-31 L -8 L 51.5 O 11/14 NORTH TEXAS 35-28 W -3 W 67 U 11/25 vs. Fla Atlantic 0-31 L +3 L 37.5 U 11/24 vs. Fla Atlantic 23-55 L +9 L 56 O 11/29 vs. Fla Atlantic 50-57 L +5.5 L 50.5 O 11/21 at Florida 3-62 L +47.5 L 60 O 12/2 TROY ST 13-26 L +13 T 37.5 O 12/1 NORTH TEXAS 38-19 W +2.5 W 63.5 U 12/6 W KENTUCKY 27-3 W -7 W 49.5 U 12/5 FLA ATLANTIC 21-28 L -1.5 L 64 U 154 WWW.STATFOX.COM

LOUISIANA-LAFAYETTE RAGIN CAJUNS 2010 Schedule Strength: 31.83 (#95 of 120) LOUISIANA-MONROE WARHAWKS 2010 Schedule Strength: 30.42 (#106 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 5 Lettermen Returning: 43 Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 3-3-5 - Starters Returning: 4 Lettermen Returning: 40 Where: Lafayette, LA Head Coach: Ricky Bustle, 9th year (38-56 SU) Conference: Sun Belt 2009 RECORD: 6-6 SU, 5-6 ATS Facility: Cajun Field 9/4/10 at Georgia 9/11/10 ARKANSAS ST * LA LAFAYETTE is 3-2 SU & 4-1 ATS in its L5 games vs. ARKANSAS ST 2009 Scoring Differential: -8.2 (#102 of 120) 9/25/10 MIDDLE TENN ST * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 LAL-MTS games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -11.3 (#107 of 120) 10/2/10 at North Texas * NORTH TEXAS is 6-4 SU & 9-1 ATS in its L10 games vs. LA LAFAYETTE 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 20 (#109 of 120) 10/8/10 OKLAHOMA ST 2009 Schedule Strength: 27.17 (#109 of 120) 10/16/10 at Troy * FAVORITE has swept L4 TRO-LAL games, both SU & ATS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 W KENTUCKY 10/30/10 at Ohio U Points Scored - Allowed 22.2 (93) 30.3 (97) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 361.8 (76) 404.3 (93) 11/6/10 at Ole Miss YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.01 (98) 5.99 (96) 11/13/10 at Fla Atlantic * FLA ATLANTIC is on 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS run vs. LA LAFAYETTE YP Rush Gained - Allowed 3.57 (94) 4.61 (95) 11/20/10 FLA INTERNATIONAL * FAVORITE is on 6-0 SU & 5-1 ATS run in L6 LAL-FIU matchups YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.65 (90) 7.94 (98) Avg. Time of Possession 30.15 (60) 11/27/10 at LA Monroe * ROAD TEAM is 7-4 SU & 8-2 ATS in LAM-LAL series since 99 Turnover Differential +0.3 (43) 3rd Down Conversion % 41.1% (44) 44.4% (97) Straight Up 6-6 3-9 6-6 6-6 21-27 (44%) * LA LAFAYETTE is 11-2 OVER the total (+8.8 Units) as favorites since 07. The Average Score Overall ATS 4-7 4-7 8-4 5-6 21-24 (47%) was LA LAFAYETTE 37.4, OPPONENT 30.4. Potential spots for 2010: 10/2 - at North Texas, at Home ATS 2-3 0-5 4-1 2-3 8-12 (40%) 10/23 - W KENTUCKY, 11/20 - FLA INTERNATIONAL Away/Neutral ATS 2-4 4-2 4-3 3-3 13-12 (52%) * Over L2 seasons, LA LAFAYETTE is 7-0 ATS (+7 Units) coming off a game where 70 total points vs Conference ATS 2-5 2-5 5-2 4-4 13-16 (45%) or more were scored. The Average Score was LA LAFAYETTE 33.1, OPPONENT 27.9. Potential Non-Conference ATS 2-2 2-2 3-2 1-2 8-8 (50%) spots for 2010: 10/16 - at Troy, 10/23 - W KENTUCKY, 11/13 - at Fla Atlantic as Favorite ATS 3-4 1-2 6-1 1-2 11-9 (55%) * LA LAFAYETTE is 0-6 ATS (-6.6 Units) at home vs. teams giving up 31 or more PPG since 07. as Underdog ATS 1-3 3-5 2-3 4-4 10-15 (40%) The Average Score was LA LAFAYETTE 32, OPPONENT 39.7. Potential spots for 2010: 10/23 - Over-Under 7-4 7-4 8-4 5-6 27-18 (60%) W KENTUCKY, 11/20 - FLA INTERNATIONAL 9/2 at LSU 3-45 L +30 L 47 O 9/1 at S Carolina 14-28 L +28.5 W 46 U 8/30 at Southern Miss 21-51 L +9 L 52.5 O 9/5 SOUTHERN 42-19 W - - - 9/9 at Texas A&M 7-51 L +23 L 53 O 9/8 OHIO U 23-31 L -1 L 42 O 9/13 at Illinois 17-20 L +25.5 W 62 U 9/12 KANSAS ST 17-15 W +6.5 W 54 U 9/23 N CAROLINA A&T 48-7 W - - - 9/15 MCNEESE ST 17-38 L - - - 9/20 KENT ST 44-27 W -2.5 W 51 O 9/19 at LSU 3-31 L +27 L 52.5 U 9/30 E MICHIGAN 33-14 W -8 W 44 O 9/22 TROY 31-48 L +8 L 62 O 9/27 at Kansas St 37-45 L +21.5 W 63.5 O 9/26 at Nebraska 0-55 L +30.5 L 54 O 10/7 at Houston 31-28 W +17 W 52 O 9/29 at Ucf 19-37 L +22.5 W 61.5 U 10/4 at LA Monroe 44-35 W -1.5 W 55.5 O 10/10 NORTH TEXAS 38-34 W -4.5 L 52.5 O 10/18 at Fla Atlantic 6-0 W -8.5 L 47 U 10/6 NORTH TEXAS 38-29 W -9.5 L 64 O 10/11 at North Texas 59-30 W -17 W 68 O 10/17 at W Kentucky 30-22 W -6.5 W 51 O 10/28 MIDDLE TENN ST 20-34 L -3 L 43 O 10/13 at Arkansas St 21-52 L +10.5 L 57.5 O 10/18 ARKANSAS ST 28-23 W -2.5 W 61 U 10/24 FLA ATLANTIC 29-51 L -3 L 60 O 11/4 at Troy St 28-42 L +2.5 L 42.5 O 10/20 FLA ATLANTIC 32-39 L +5.5 L 60.5 O 11/1 FLA INTERNATIONAL 49-20 W -12 W 57 O 10/31 at Fla International 17-20 L +5 W 56.5 U 11/11 NORTH TEXAS 7-16 L -10 L 44 U 11/3 at Tennessee 7-59 L +27.5 L 65.5 O 11/8 UTEP 24-37 L -13.5 L 71.5 U 11/7 at Arkansas St 21-18 W +13.5 W 48.5 U 11/18 at Fla International 17-7 W -3.5 W 45 U 11/10 at Middle Tenn St 34-24 W +13.5 W 61 U 11/15 at Fla Atlantic 29-40 L +1.5 L 62.5 O 11/14 at Middle Tenn St 17-34 L +13.5 L 54 U 11/25 ARKANSAS ST 28-13 W -6.5 W 42.5 U 11/17 at Fla International 38-28 W -3 W 56 O 11/22 at Troy 3-48 L +11 L 64 U 11/21 LA MONROE 21-17 W +5 W 51.5 U 12/2 LA MONROE 20-39 L -3 L 47 O 11/24 LA MONROE 11-17 L +4.5 L 60 U 12/3 MIDDLE TENN ST 42-28 W -6 W 58 O 11/28 TROY 31-48 L +10.5 L 58 O Where: Monroe, LA Head Coach: Todd Berry, 1st year Conference: Sun Belt 2009 RECORD: 6-6 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: Malone Stadium 9/11/10 at Arkansas * HOME TEAM is 5-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L6 ARK-LAM matchups 9/18/10 at Arkansas St * UNDERDOG is 5-4 SU & 8-1 ATS in L9 AKS-LAM matchups 2009 Scoring Differential: -1.8 (#79 of 120) 9/25/10 SE LOUISIANA 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -7.3 (#95 of 120) 10/2/10 at Auburn * AUBURN is 4-0 SU & 3-1 ATS in its L4 games hosting LA MONROE 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 22 (#101 of 120) 10/9/10 FLA ATLANTIC * UNDERDOG is on 5-1 SU & 6-0 ATS run in L6 LAM-FAU matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 27.08 (#110 of 120) 10/16/10 at W Kentucky 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at Middle Tenn St * ROAD TEAM is 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 MTS-LAM matchups 10/30/10 TROY * HOME TEAM has swept L3 LAM-TRO games, both SU & ATS Points Scored - Allowed 25.6 (72) 27.3 (74) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 392.3 (48) 348.7 (44) 11/6/10 at Fla International * UNDERDOG is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 FIU-LAM games at FLA INTERNATIONAL YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.76 (44) 5.11 (40) 11/13/10 at LSU YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.52 (39) 3.39 (23) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.60 (38) 6.71 (42) 11/20/10 NORTH TEXAS * L5 games of LAM-NTX series are 5-0 UNDER the total Avg. Time of Possession 32.34 (8) 11/27/10 LA LAFAYETTE * ROAD TEAM is 7-4 SU & 8-2 ATS in LAM-LAL series since 99 Turnover Differential -0.4 (87) 3rd Down Conversion % 42.3% (35) 39.5% (57) Straight Up 4-8 6-6 4-8 6-6 20-28 (42%) * LA MONROE is on a 11-2 ATS (+8.8 Units) run as road underdogs of 7 points or less The Overall ATS 7-4 6-5 6-5 6-6 25-20 (56%) Average Score was LA MONROE 26.5, OPPONENT 21.8. Potential spots for 2010: 9/18 - at at Home ATS 1-2 2-2 2-2 3-2 8-8 (50%) Arkansas St, 11/6 - at Fla International Away/Neutral ATS 6-2 4-3 4-3 3-4 17-12 (59%) * LA MONROE is on a 8-21 ATS (-15.1 Units) skid as road underdogs of 21.5 or more points vs Conference ATS 5-2 4-3 5-2 4-4 18-11 (62%) The Average Score was LA MONROE 8.9, OPPONENT 47.1. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at Non-Conference ATS 2-2 2-2 1-3 2-2 7-9 (44%) Arkansas, 10/2 - at Auburn, 11/13 - at LSU as Favorite ATS 1-1 2-1 0-1 3-2 6-5 (55%) * LA MONROE is on a 12-25 ATS (-15.5 Units) skid on the road in non-conference games The as Underdog ATS 6-3 4-4 6-4 2-4 18-15 (55%) Average Score was LA MONROE 10.9, OPPONENT 42.4. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at Over-Under 5-5 4-7 7-4 6-5 22-21 (51%) Arkansas, 10/2 - at Auburn, 11/13 - at LSU 9/2 ALCORN ST 24-6 W - - - 8/30 TULSA 17-35 L +3.5 L 53 U 8/30 at Auburn 0-34 L +25.5 L 49 U 9/5 at Texas 20-59 L +42.5 W 61 O 9/9 at Kansas 19-21 L +26 W 46 U 9/8 at Clemson 26-49 L +24.5 W 51 O 9/6 vs. Arkansas 27-28 L +14.5 W 49.5 O 9/12 TEXAS SOUTHERN 58-0 W -43 W - 9/16 at Alabama 7-41 L +24.5 L 40 O 9/15 at Texas A&M 14-54 L +22 L 61 O 9/12 ALABAMA A&M 37-15 W - - - 9/19 at Arizona St 14-38 L +21 L 50 O 9/30 FLA ATLANTIC 19-21 L -12 L 47 U 9/29 at Troy 7-24 L +11.5 L 67 U 9/20 at Tulane 10-24 L +4.5 L 46 U 9/26 at Fla Atlantic 27-25 W +3.5 W 56.5 U 10/7 at Arkansas St 6-10 L +7 W 42.5 U 10/6 ARKANSAS ST 30-13 W +2.5 W 57 U 10/4 LA LAFAYETTE 35-44 L +1.5 L 55.5 O 10/3 FLA INTERNATIONAL 48-35 W -6.5 W 55 O 10/14 at Troy St 19-24 L +10.5 W 43 T 10/13 at North Texas 21-31 L -8 L 61 U 10/11 at Arkansas St 29-37 L +13.5 W 53.5 O 10/13 ARKANSAS ST 16-10 W -2.5 W 51 U 10/21 MIDDLE TENN ST 21-35 L +3.5 L 43 O 10/20 FLA INTERNATIONAL 28-14 W -13 W 50.5 U 10/18 NORTH TEXAS 35-23 W -16.5 L 61 U 10/24 at Kentucky 13-36 L +14 L 47 O 10/28 at Arkansas 10-44 L +32 L 49.5 O 10/27 at Fla Atlantic 33-30 W +6 W 55 O 10/25 FLA ATLANTIC 28-29 L +3 W 54 O 10/31 at Troy 21-42 L +13.5 L 58 O 11/11 at Fla International 35-0 W +2.5 W 43 U 11/3 MIDDLE TENN ST 40-43 L +2.5 L 50.5 O 11/1 TROY 31-30 W +10.5 W 56 O 11/7 at North Texas 33-6 W -3 W 64 U 11/18 at Kentucky 40-42 L +20 W 57 O 11/10 GRAMBLING 28-14 W - - - 11/8 at Middle Tenn St 21-24 L +5.5 W 51 U 11/14 W KENTUCKY 21-18 W -21.5 L 61 U 11/25 NORTH TEXAS 23-3 W -7 W 44.5 U 11/17 at Alabama 21-14 W +24 W 56.5 U 11/15 at Ole Miss 0-59 L +24 L 57 O 11/21 at LA Lafayette 17-21 L -5 L 51.5 U 12/2 at La Lafayette 39-20 W +3 W 47 O 11/24 at La Lafayette 17-11 W -4.5 W 60 U 11/22 at Fla International 31-27 W +8 W 51.5 O 11/28 MIDDLE TENN ST 19-38 L +2.5 L 54.5 O WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 155

MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE BLUE RAIDERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 27.33 (#118 of 120) NORTH TEXAS MEAN GREEN 2010 Schedule Strength: 27.33 (#118 of 120) Offense: Multiple - Starters Returning: 8 Defense: 4-3 Multiple - Starters Returning: 6 Lettermen Returning: 42 Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 10 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 8 Lettermen Returning: 48 Where: Murfreesboro, TN Head Coach: Rick Stockstill, 5th year (27-23 SU) Conference: Sun Belt 2009 RECORD: 10-3 SU, 10-3 ATS Facility: Floyd Stadium 9/2/10 MINNESOTA 9/11/10 AUSTIN PEAY 2009 Scoring Differential: +8.3 (#30 of 120) 9/18/10 at Memphis * L2 games in MEM-MTS series went UNDER the total 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +3.7 (#52 of 120) 9/25/10 at LA Lafayette * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 LAL-MTS games 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 36 (#62 of 120) 10/5/10 TROY * FAVORITE is 7-1 SU & ATS in L8 MTS-TRO matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 26.77 (#112 of 120) 10/16/10 at Georgia Tech 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 LA MONROE * ROAD TEAM is 4-1 SU & 5-0 ATS in L5 MTS-LAM matchups 11/2/10 at Arkansas St * FAVORITE is 7-0 SU & ATS in L7 AKS-MTS matchups Points Scored - Allowed 32.0 (23) 23.7 (50) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 421.7 (27) 354.8 (50) 11/13/10 NORTH TEXAS * MIDDLE TENN ST is on 4-game SU & ATS winning streak vs. NORTH TEXAS YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.74 (46) 4.85 (26) 11/20/10 at W Kentucky * MIDDLE TENN ST is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. W KENTUCKY YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.66 (33) 3.47 (27) 11/27/10 FLA ATLANTIC * L3 MTS-FAU series games have gone UNDER the total YP Pass Gained - Allowed 7.03 (69) 6.44 (34) Avg. Time of Possession 27.5 (110) 12/4/10 at Fla International * HOME TEAM has swept L3 FIU-MTS games, both SU & ATS Turnover Differential +0.9 (7) 3rd Down Conversion % 35.6% (90) 35.7% (28) Straight Up 7-6 5-7 5-7 10-3 27-23 (54%) * Over the L2 seasons, MIDDLE TENN ST is 10-3 ATS (+6.7 Units) in the second half of the Overall ATS 7-5 7-4 5-7 10-3 29-19 (60%) season. The Average Score was MIDDLE TENN ST 35.3, OPPONENT 23.5. Potential spots for at Home ATS 2-2 3-1 2-3 5-1 12-7 (63%) 2010: 10/23 - LA MONROE, 11/2 - at Arkansas St, 11/13 - NORTH TEXAS, 11/20 - at W Kentucky, Away/Neutral ATS 5-3 4-3 3-4 5-2 17-12 (59%) 11/27 - FLA ATLANTIC, 12/4 - at Fla International vs Conference ATS 5-2 4-3 2-6 7-1 18-12 (60%) * MIDDLE TENN ST is on a 10-1 ATS (+8.9 Units) run coming off an upset win as an underdog The Non-Conference ATS 2-3 3-1 3-1 3-2 11-7 (61%) Average Score was MIDDLE TENN ST 32.7, OPPONENT 20. Potential spots for 2010: 9/25 - at as Favorite ATS 3-2 4-1 2-2 6-0 15-5 (75%) LA Lafayette, 10/16 - at Georgia Tech as Underdog ATS 4-3 3-3 3-9 4-3 14-18 (44%) * MIDDLE TENN ST is 6-1 ATS vs Arkansas State. Potential spots for 2010: 11/2 - at Arkansas Over-Under 7-5 4-6 5-7 8-5 24-23 (51%) St 8/31 FLA INTERNATIONAL 7-6 W -10 L 46.5 U 9/1 at Fla Atlantic 14-27 L +2.5 L 43.5 U 8/28 TROY 17-31 L +6 L 49.5 U 9/5 at Clemson 14-37 L +18.5 L 47.5 O 9/9 at Maryland 10-24 L +24 W 43 U 9/6 at Louisville 42-58 L +41 W 63.5 O 9/6 MARYLAND 24-14 W +12.5 W 44.5 U 9/12 MEMPHIS 31-14 W +0 W 53 U 9/14 TENNESSEE TECH 44-0 W - - - 9/15 at Lsu 0-44 L +41.5 L 56.5 U 9/13 at Kentucky 14-20 L +19.5 W 46.5 U 9/19 at Maryland 32-31 W +7.5 W 52.5 O 9/23 at Oklahoma 0-59 L +28.5 L 46.5 O 9/20 W KENTUCKY 17-20 L - - - 9/20 at Arkansas St 14-31 L +6.5 L 51 U 9/26 at North Texas 37-21 W -5 W 56 O 9/30 at North Texas 35-0 W +4 W 40 U 9/29 FLA INTERNATIONAL 47-6 W -9 W 47 O 9/30 FLA ATLANTIC 14-13 W -2.5 L 51.5 U 10/6 at Troy 7-31 L +6.5 L 56 U 10/6 LOUISVILLE 17-44 L +29.5 W 53.5 O 10/6 VIRGINIA 21-23 L +10 W 44 T 10/11 at Fla International 21-31 L +1 L 42.5 O 10/17 MISSISSIPPI ST 6-27 L +5 L 52.5 U 10/21 at La Monroe 35-21 W -3.5 W 43 O 10/13 at Memphis 21-7 W +3.5 W 56 U 10/18 at Louisville 23-42 L +14.5 L 48.5 O 10/24 W KENTUCKY 62-24 W -17 W 53.5 O 10/28 at La Lafayette 34-20 W +3 W 43 O 10/20 ARKANSAS ST 24-7 W -2.5 W 56 U 10/25 at Mississippi St 22-31 L +11.5 W 43 O 10/31 at Fla Atlantic 27-20 W +3 W 61.5 U 11/4 FLA ATLANTIC 35-14 W -13.5 W 40.5 O 10/27 at North Texas 48-28 W -13 W 54.5 O 11/8 LA MONROE 24-21 W -5.5 L 51 U 11/7 FLA INTERNATIONAL 48-21 W -12.5 W 55.5 O 11/11 at Arkansas St 38-10 W -3 W 41.5 O 11/3 at La Monroe 43-40 W -2.5 W 50.5 O 11/15 at W Kentucky 21-10 W 0 W 43.5 U 11/14 LA LAFAYETTE 34-17 W -13.5 W 54 U 11/18 at S Carolina 7-52 L +15 L 44 O 11/10 LA LAFAYETTE 24-34 L -13.5 L 61 U 11/22 NORTH TEXAS 52-13 W -18 W 60 O 11/21 ARKANSAS ST 38-14 W -10.5 W 51 O 11/25 TROY ST 20-21 L -7 L 47.5 U 11/20 at Troy 7-45 L +13.5 L 59 U 12/3 at LA Lafayette 28-42 L +6 L 58 O 11/28 at LA Monroe 38-19 W -2.5 W 54.5 O 12/26 vs. C Michigan 14-31 L +9 L 51 U 12/20 vs. Southern Miss 42-32 W +3.5 W 61.5 O Where: Denton, TX Head Coach: Todd Dodge, 4th year (5-31 SU) Conference: Sun Belt 2009 RECORD: 2-10 SU, 5-7 ATS Facility: Fouts Field 9/4/10 at Clemson 9/11/10 RICE 2009 Scoring Differential: -9.0 (#105 of 120) 9/18/10 at Army * ROAD TEAM is 2-1 SU & 3-0 ATS in L3 ARM-NTX games 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -11.3 (#109 of 120) 9/25/10 at Fla Atlantic * FLA ATLANTIC is on 6-0 SU & 5-0 ATS run vs. NORTH TEXAS 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 16 (#114 of 120) 10/2/10 LA LAFAYETTE * NORTH TEXAS is 6-4 SU & 9-1 ATS in its L10 games vs. LA LAFAYETTE 2009 Schedule Strength: 27.25 (#107 of 120) 10/9/10 ARKANSAS ST * NORTH TEXAS is 0-3 SU but 3-0 ATS in its L3 games vs. ARKANSAS ST 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/16/10 FLA INTERNATIONAL * FAVORITE is 2-0 SU & ATS in L2 NTX-FIU games at NORTH TEXAS 10/30/10 at W Kentucky * NORTH TEXAS is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. W KENTUCKY Points Scored - Allowed 26.6 (63) 35.6 (112) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 408.7 (36) 412.3 (97) 11/6/10 TROY * TROY has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. NORTH TEXAS YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.89 (39) 5.87 (90) 11/13/10 at Middle Tenn St * MIDDLE TENN ST is on 4-game SU & ATS winning streak vs. NORTH TEXAS YP Rush Gained - Allowed 5.29 (7) 4.85 (102) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 6.49 (95) 7.25 (73) 11/20/10 at LA Monroe * L5 games of LAM-NTX series are 5-0 UNDER the total Avg. Time of Possession 30.78 (38) 11/27/10 KANSAS ST * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 NTX-KSU games Turnover Differential -1.2 (117) 3rd Down Conversion % 42.1% (36) 37.8% (47) Straight Up 3-9 2-10 1-11 2-10 8-40 (17%) * Over the L2 seasons, NORTH TEXAS is 1-9 ATS (-8.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored Overall ATS 4-8 5-6 4-8 5-7 18-29 (38%) 35 or more points. The Average Score was NORTH TEXAS 22.5, OPPONENT 43.5. Potential spots at Home ATS 2-3 2-2 1-4 2-4 7-13 (35%) for 2010: 9/25 - at Fla Atlantic, 10/2 - LA LAFAYETTE, 10/16 - FLA INTERNATIONAL, 11/6 - TROY, Away/Neutral ATS 2-5 3-4 3-4 3-3 11-16 (41%) 11/13 - at Middle Tenn St vs Conference ATS 3-4 3-4 3-5 3-5 12-18 (40%) * NORTH TEXAS is on a 0-8 ATS (-8.8 Units) skid as road underdogs of 21.5 to 28 points The Average Non-Conference ATS 1-4 2-2 1-3 2-2 6-11 (35%) Score was NORTH TEXAS 6.4, OPPONENT 48.3. Potential spots for 2010: 11/13 - at Middle Tenn St as Favorite ATS 1-3 0-1 0-0 1-1 2-5 (29%) * Over the L2 seasons, NORTH TEXAS is 6-0 OVER the total (+6 Units) at home in the first half of the as Underdog ATS 3-5 5-5 4-8 4-6 16-24 (40%) season. The Average Score was NORTH TEXAS 26.2, OPPONENT 44.8. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 Over-Under 5-7 6-5 7-5 8-4 26-21 (55%) - RICE, 10/2 - LA LAFAYETTE, 10/9 - ARKANSAS ST, 10/16 - FLA INTERNATIONAL 9/2 at Texas 7-56 L +40.5 L 53 O 9/1 at Oklahoma 10-79 L +38.5 L 54 O 8/30 at Kansas St 6-45 L +29 L 65 U 9/3 at Ball St 20-10 W +15 W 54 U 9/9 SMU 24-6 W +3.5 W 41 U 9/8 at Smu 31-45 L +18.5 W 49.5 O 9/6 TULSA 26-56 L +21.5 L 70 O 9/12 OHIO U 30-31 L +2.5 W 52 O 9/16 at Tulsa 3-28 L +15.5 L 48 U 9/22 FLA ATLANTIC 20-30 L +6 L 61.5 U 9/13 at LSU 3-41 L +44.5 W 61 U 9/19 at Alabama 7-53 L +37 L 51 O 9/23 at Akron 13-33 L +15 L 41 O 9/29 at Arkansas 7-66 L +35.5 L 66 O 9/27 at Rice 20-77 L +15.5 L 67.5 O 9/26 MIDDLE TENN ST 21-37 L +5 L 56 O 9/30 MIDDLE TENN ST 0-35 L -4 L 40 U 10/6 at La Lafayette 29-38 L +9.5 W 64 O 10/4 FLA INTERNATIONAL 10-42 L +5.5 L 48 O 10/10 at LA Lafayette 34-38 L +4.5 W 52.5 O 10/7 FLA INTERNATIONAL 25-22 W -2.5 W 41 O 10/13 LA MONROE 31-21 W +8 W 61 U 10/11 LA LAFAYETTE 30-59 L +17 L 68 O 10/17 FLA ATLANTIC 40-44 L +1 L 61.5 O 10/21 at Arkansas St 10-29 L +8 L 38.5 O 10/20 at Troy 7-45 L +23.5 L 64.5 U 10/18 at LA Monroe 23-35 L +16.5 W 61 U 10/24 at Troy 26-50 L +20.5 L 60.5 O 10/28 at Troy St 6-14 L +11.5 W 42 U 10/27 MIDDLE TENN ST 28-48 L +13 L 54.5 O 10/25 TROY 17-45 L +23.5 L 63 U 10/31 W KENTUCKY 68-49 W -14 W 64.5 O 11/4 LOUISIANA TECH 31-34 L -2.5 L 46.5 O 11/10 NAVY 62-74 L +15.5 W 71 O 11/1 at W Kentucky 51-40 W +18 W 55 O 11/7 LA MONROE 6-33 L +3 L 64 U 11/11 at La Lafayette 16-7 W +10 W 44 U 11/15 at Arkansas St 27-31 L +15.5 W 67 U 11/8 at Fla Atlantic 13-46 L +22.5 L 64 U 11/14 at Fla International 28-35 L +3 L 67 U 11/18 FLA ATLANTIC 16-17 L -5 L 39 U 11/24 W KENTUCKY 27-26 W - - - 11/22 at Middle Tenn St 13-52 L +18 L 60 O 11/21 ARMY 13-17 L -1 L 53 U 11/25 at La Monroe 3-23 L +7 L 44.5 U 12/1 at Fla International 19-38 L -2.5 L 63.5 U 11/29 ARKANSAS ST 28-33 L +20.5 W 58 O 11/28 at Arkansas St 26-30 L +7.5 W 55.5 O 156 WWW.STATFOX.COM

TROY TROJANS 2010 Schedule Strength: 28.58 (#113 of 120) WESTERN KENTUCKY HILLTOPPERS 2010 Schedule Strength: 32.75 (#89 of 120) Offense: Spread - Starters Returning: 6 Defense: 4-2-5 - Starters Returning: 3 Lettermen Returning: 44 Offense: West Coast - Starters Returning: 9 Defense: 4-3 - Starters Returning: 9 Lettermen Returning: 44 Where: Troy, AL Head Coach: Larry Blakeney, 20th year (153-77-1 SU) Conference: Sun Belt 2009 RECORD: 9-4 SU, 9-4 ATS Facility: Movie Gallery Veterans Stadium 9/4/10 BOWLING GREEN 9/11/10 at Oklahoma St * HOME TEAM has won & covered L2 OKS-TRO games 2009 Scoring Differential: +3.9 (#49 of 120) 9/18/10 at UAB * FAVORITE is on 3-game SU & ATS winning streak in UAB-TRO series 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: +3.7 (#53 of 120) 9/25/10 ARKANSAS ST * TROY has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. ARKANSAS ST 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 34 (#73 of 120) 10/5/10 at Middle Tenn St * FAVORITE is 7-1 SU & ATS in L8 MTS-TRO matchups 2009 Schedule Strength: 29.85 (#91 of 120) 10/16/10 LA LAFAYETTE * FAVORITE has swept L4 TRO-LAL games, both SU & ATS 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/30/10 at LA Monroe * HOME TEAM has swept L3 LAM-TRO games, both SU & ATS 11/6/10 at North Texas * TROY has won three straight games, both SU & ATS, vs. NORTH TEXAS Points Scored - Allowed 33.7 (16) 29.8 (92) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 485.7 (3) 424.5 (103) 11/13/10 FLA INTERNATIONAL * FLA INTERNATIONAL is 0-3 SU but 3-0 ATS in its L3 games at TROY YP Play Gained - Allowed 6.49 (12) 5.89 (91) 11/20/10 at S Carolina YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.37 (54) 4.17 (73) 11/27/10 W KENTUCKY * W KENTUCKY is 0-2 SU but 2-0 ATS in its L2 games vs. TROY YP Pass Gained - Allowed 8.27 (14) 7.35 (79) Avg. Time of Possession 28.96 (91) 12/4/10 at Fla Atlantic * FAVORITE is 5-1 SU & ATS in L6 FAU-TRO matchups Turnover Differential -0.5 (95) 3rd Down Conversion % 43.5% (26) 38.6% (53) Straight Up 8-5 8-4 8-5 9-4 33-18 (65%) * TROY is 13-3 ATS (+9.7 Units) coming off an OVER the total since 07. The Average Score Overall ATS 6-5 8-3 7-5 9-4 30-17 (64%) was TROY 37.1, OPPONENT 21.5. Potential spots for 2010: ANY GAME AFTER AN OVER THE at Home ATS 1-3 4-1 2-2 5-0 12-6 (67%) TOTAL Away/Neutral ATS 5-2 4-2 5-3 4-4 18-11 (62%) * TROY is on a 9-0 ATS (+9 Units) run after gaining 450 or more total yards in 2 consecutive vs Conference ATS 3-3 5-2 5-3 7-1 20-9 (69%) games The Average Score was TROY 35.7, OPPONENT 19.7. Potential spots for 2010: 10/5 - at Non-Conference ATS 3-2 3-1 2-2 2-3 10-8 (56%) Middle Tenn St, 11/20 - at S Carolina as Favorite ATS 2-3 5-2 5-4 7-2 19-11 (63%) * TROY is 9-1 OVER the total (+7.9 Units) as road underdogs since 07. The Average Score was as Underdog ATS 4-2 3-1 2-1 2-2 11-6 (65%) TROY 25.3, OPPONENT 45.5. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at Oklahoma St, 10/5 - at Middle Over-Under 7-4 6-5 5-7 9-4 27-20 (57%) Tenn St, 11/20 - at S Carolina 9/2 ALABAMA ST 38-0 W - - - 9/1 at Arkansas 26-46 L +22 W 46.5 O 8/28 at Middle Tenn St 31-17 W -6 W 49.5 U 9/3 at Bowling Green 14-31 L -7.5 L 55 U 9/9 at Florida St 17-24 L +25.5 W 45 U 9/8 at Florida 31-59 L +26 L 53 O 9/13 ALCORN ST 65-0 W - - - 9/12 at Florida 6-56 L +37 L 61 O 9/16 at Georgia Tech 20-35 L +17.5 W 39.5 O 9/14 OKLAHOMA ST 41-23 W +10 W 61.5 O 9/20 at Ohio St 10-28 L +20.5 W 47.5 U 9/19 UAB 27-14 W -6.5 W 59.5 U 9/23 at Nebraska 0-56 L +24 L 46.5 O 9/22 at La Lafayette 48-31 W -8 W 62 O 9/27 at Oklahoma St 24-55 L +17.5 L 61.5 O 9/26 at Arkansas St 30-27 W +3 W 50.5 O 9/30 at UAB 3-21 L +6 L 41 U 9/29 LA MONROE 24-7 W -11.5 W 67 U 10/7 at Fla Atlantic 30-17 W -4 W 54 U 10/6 MIDDLE TENN ST 31-7 W -6.5 W 56 U 10/14 LA MONROE 24-19 W -10.5 L 43 T 10/6 at Fla International 34-16 W -19 L 53.5 U 10/18 FLA INTERNATIONAL 33-23 W -11.5 L 46.5 O 10/17 at Fla International 42-33 W -8 W 58.5 O 10/28 NORTH TEXAS 14-6 W -11.5 L 42 U 10/20 NORTH TEXAS 45-7 W -23.5 W 64.5 U 10/25 at North Texas 45-17 W -23.5 W 63 U 10/24 NORTH TEXAS 50-26 W -20.5 W 60.5 O 11/4 LA LAFAYETTE 42-28 W -2.5 W 42.5 O 10/27 at Arkansas St 27-0 W -4.5 W 59 U 11/1 at LA Monroe 30-31 L -10.5 L 56 O 10/31 LA MONROE 42-21 W -13.5 W 58 O 11/11 at Fla Atlantic 24-17 W -3 W 40 O 11/3 at Georgia 34-44 L +14 W 54 O 11/8 W KENTUCKY 17-7 W -18 L 54 U 11/7 at W Kentucky 40-20 W -24 L 63 U 11/18 ARKANSAS ST 26-33 L -8 L 40 O 11/10 at W Kentucky 21-17 W - - - 11/15 at LSU 31-40 L +15.5 W 55 O 11/14 at Arkansas 20-56 L +14 L 64 O 11/25 at Middle Tenn St 21-20 W +7 W 47.5 U 11/20 MIDDLE TENN ST 45-7 W -13.5 W 59 U 11/22 LA LAFAYETTE 48-3 W -11 W 64 U 11/21 FLA ATLANTIC 47-21 W -17 W 64.5 O 12/2 at Fla International 26-13 W -13 T 37.5 O 12/1 FLA ATLANTIC 32-38 L -16 L 61 O 12/6 ARKANSAS ST 35-9 W -13 W 53 U 11/28 at LA Lafayette 48-31 W -10.5 W 58 O 12/22 vs. Rice 41-17 W +5 W 55 O 12/21 vs. Southern Miss 27-30 L -4.5 L 55 O 1/6 vs. C Michigan 41-44 L +3.5 W 63 O Where: Bowling Green, KY Head Coach: Willie Taggart, 1st year Conference: Sun Belt 2009 RECORD: 0-12 SU, 6-6 ATS Facility: L.T. Smith Stadium 9/4/10 at Nebraska 9/11/10 at Kentucky 2009 Scoring Differential: -19.2 (#113 of 120) 9/18/10 INDIANA 2009 StatFox Outplay Factor Rating: -18.8 (#114 of 120) 9/25/10 at S Florida 2010 StatFox Power Rating: 11 (#118 of 120) 10/9/10 at Fla International 2009 Schedule Strength: 26.58 (#113 of 120) 10/16/10 LA MONROE 2009 TEAM STATISTICS/RANK 10/23/10 at LA Lafayette 10/30/10 NORTH TEXAS * NORTH TEXAS is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. W KENTUCKY Points Scored - Allowed 20.4 (104) 39.6 (119) Total YPG Gained - Allowed 321.7 (101) 478.3 (118) 11/6/10 FLA ATLANTIC * L2 games in WKU-FAU series went UNDER the total YP Play Gained - Allowed 5.10 (93) 6.92 (118) 11/13/10 at Arkansas St YP Rush Gained - Allowed 4.70 (26) 5.63 (113) YP Pass Gained - Allowed 5.67 (110) 9.12 (119) 11/20/10 MIDDLE TENN ST * MIDDLE TENN ST is 2-0 SU & ATS in its L2 games vs. W KENTUCKY Avg. Time of Possession 29.7 (71) 11/27/10 at Troy * W KENTUCKY is 0-2 SU but 2-0 ATS in its L2 games vs. TROY Turnover Differential -1 (115) 3rd Down Conversion % 30.5% (113) 53.6% (119) Straight Up 6-5 7-5 2-10 0-12 15-32 (32%) * W KENTUCKY is 1-7 ATS over the L2 years when it goes OVER the total, 7-6 ATS when Overall ATS 0-0 0-0 2-8 6-6 8-14 (36%) UNDER. Potential spots for 2010: OVER & OPP. vs. high scoring teams, UNDER & WKU vs. low at Home ATS 0-0 0-0 0-4 3-3 3-7 (30%) scoring teams Away/Neutral ATS 0-0 0-0 2-4 3-3 5-7 (42%) * W KENTUCKY is 6-12-1 ATS since joining the FBS. Potential spots for 2010: ALL SUN BELT vs Conference ATS 0-0 0-0 1-4 4-4 5-8 (38%) GAMES Non-Conference ATS 0-0 0-0 1-4 2-2 3-6 (33%) * W KENTUCKY is 6-4 ATS when catching +17 to +30 points. Potential spots for 2010: 9/11 - at as Favorite ATS 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-2 (0%) Kentucky, 9/25 - at S Florida, 11/27 - at Troy as Underdog ATS 0-0 0-0 2-6 6-5 8-11 (42%) Over-Under 0-0 0-0 2-8 6-5 8-13 (38%) 9/2 at Georgia 12-48 L - - - 9/1 at Florida 3-49 L - - - 8/30 at Indiana 13-31 L +17 L 53 U 9/5 at Tennessee 7-63 L +29.5 L 44.5 O 9/9 at E Kentucky 21-26 L - - - 9/8 W VIRGINIA TECH 87-0 W - - - 9/6 at E Kentucky 37-13 W - - - 9/12 S FLORIDA 13-35 L +26 W 52 U 9/16 CHATTANOOGA 28-21 W - - - 9/15 E KENTUCKY 26-6 W - - - 9/13 at Alabama 7-41 L +26 L 47.5 O 9/19 C ARKANSAS 7-28 L +2 L - 9/30 W ILLINOIS 38-35 W - - - 9/20 at Middle Tenn St 20-17 W - - - 9/20 MURRAY ST 50-9 W - - - 9/26 at Navy 22-38 L +31 W 51 O 10/7 ILLINOIS ST 27-28 L - - - 9/29 at Bowling Green 21-41 L - - - 9/27 at Kentucky 3-41 L +19 L 44.5 U 10/10 FLA INTERNATIONAL 20-37 L +6 L 56.5 O 10/14 at Missouri St 17-14 W - - - 10/13 at Ball St 12-35 L - - - 10/4 at Virginia Tech 13-27 L +26.5 W 47 U 10/17 LA LAFAYETTE 22-30 L +6.5 L 51 O 10/21 at S Illinois 27-24 W - - - 10/20 at Indiana St 56-7 W - - - 10/11 BALL ST 7-24 L +16 L 51 U 10/24 at Middle Tenn St 24-62 L +17 L 53.5 O 10/28 INDIANA ST 41-3 W - - - 10/27 NC CENTRAL 50-14 W - - - 10/18 FLA ATLANTIC 20-24 L +3 L 47 U 10/31 at North Texas 49-68 L +14 L 64.5 O 11/4 at N Iowa 20-31 L - - - 11/3 at Chattanooga 28-21 W - - - 11/1 NORTH TEXAS 40-51 L -18 L 55 O 11/7 TROY 20-40 L +24 W 63 U 11/11 YOUNGSTOWN ST 3-19 L - - - 11/10 TROY 17-21 L - - - 11/8 at Troy 7-17 L +18 W 54 U 11/14 at LA Monroe 18-21 L +21.5 W 61 U 11/18 AUSTIN PEAY 24-14 W - - - 11/17 MOREHEAD ST 52-12 W - - - 11/15 MIDDLE TENN ST 10-21 L 0 L 43.5 U 11/28 at Fla Atlantic 23-29 L +12.5 W 66 U 11/24 at North Texas 26-27 L - - - 12/6 at Fla International 3-27 L +7 L 49.5 U 12/3 ARKANSAS ST 20-24 L +6.5 W 51.5 U WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 157

analyzing the public percentages by Steve Makinen TOP TEAM STATFOX I would argue that sports handicapping has been affected as much by technology and new ideas as any other similar passion. Increased media coverage, the growth of the internet, and ever-evolving statistical data services have all played a role. Even the sportsbooks themselves contribute to the cause by sharing their own key data. I m here to look at one of the hot subjects nowadays in the sports betting industry Public Betting Percentages. In their plainest definition, Public Betting Percentages are the breakdown of what percentage bets are on one side of a game or total and how many are on the other at a particular. In today s modernized sports betting world, leading online sportsbooks will offer this type of info to their customers or prospective customers for free. There are also specific pay services out there that will analyze this data more in-depth, looking for edges. Perhaps the leader in delivering this data to viewers is the Sportsbook. com family, which shares the betting data from several well-known leading brands. Sportsbook is a big name in itself but when combined with other sites, the volume of samples increases and thus the accuracy of the data gains more credibility. Most of the brands taking part would be considered recreational books, meaning sharps or wise-guys aren t playing there, more average- Joe s. To me this is a big distinction in interpreting data. After all, the masses tend to believe one side of things while sharps beliefs aren t so cut-&-dried. If you were to ask a sharp, surely he would choose to be on the side going against public sentiment in most cases as opposed to being with the public. Think about it this way, if oddsmakers are building lines after watching media outlets gush all over a team week after week like most public bettors do, they are going to be inclined to overprice such teams. This is where a lot of sharps get their value, fading these overinflated prices. This happens every single week in college & pro football. Don t misread the overall message though being a sharp doesn t guarantee a win when matched against the public sentiment. Truthfully, the public does win sometimes, and often times, it s in the biggest of games. If that weren t the case, do you think they d keep coming back season after season? As with any other data analysis, the key is in finding opportunities. I m here to look at some of the potential opportunities that you can use to build your bankroll this coming season. Whether it be looking for certain matchups, certain line range scenarios, or even various situational spots, surely there are better times to either fade or follow the public sentiment. With that said, I ve pulled the data for the last 2-1/2 seasons in both college and pro football from the Public Betting Percentage feed courtesy of Sportsbook.com. I will use this as the basis to analyze potential strategies to employ in the coming season. Once you re sold on the foundation of the findings, be sure to stay current with the weekly data on sites like Sportsbook. com or ScoresandOdds.com by simply looking for the link named Betting Trends. Like it has for me, I figure this data will become an integral part of your football handicapping routine. Before getting into more specific, and hopefully profit-inducing data, it s important to expound on the point before about the public sentiment not always losing. Take a look at these trends regarding the public betting data over the last 2-1/2 seasons: Public bettors are 333-340-14 ATS (49.5%) on sides for -41.0 net units since 10/07 in NFL wagering. Public bettors are 330-336-17 (49.5%) on totals for -39.6 units in NFL over the last 2-1/2 seasons. On NFL games where the public has shown 80% or more support for one option of the wager, they are 70-73-3 ATS (49.0%) on sides and 69-67-3 (50.7%) on totals. Public bettors are 945-926-28 ATS (50.5%) on sides for -73.6 net units since 10/07 in college football wagering. Public bettors are 969-872-21 (52.6%) on totals for +9.8 units in college football over the last 2-1/2 seasons. On college games where the public has shown 80% or more support for one option of the wager, they are 211-225-6 ATS (48.4%) on sides and 283-238-2 (54.3%) on totals. Now in looking at the figures above, nothing is overwhelming positive or negative, however it is good for the bookmaker who wins on vig and the concept loyal customers sticking around for awhile then re-depositing. Of course, for us handicappers hoping to develop sound strategies, the public performance on college totals actually gives us a good starting point at which to begin our digging for more golden nuggets. Favorites and Overs It s fundamentally important to recognize that public bettors love two bets in particular, favorites and over s on the total. Surely this isn t earth-shattering news to those who have roomed with a naïve gambling buddy, or have simply been doing this hobby for a long time and have learned key lessons, but you still might be shocked to see the degree by which this is true. Take a look: On NFL sides, the public has backed, or given majority percentage support to, the favorite in 590 out 681 games, or 86.6% of the time. In games where there was 80% support or more for a team, the disparity is even greater, with the favorite being the choice in 141 of 144 games (97.9%). On NFL Totals, the OVER was the preferred choice in 608 of 683 games (89%) since 07 by public bettors and in 137 of 139 games (98.6%) with support of 80%-plus for either total option, the OVER was backed. On College Football sides since mid- 07, public bettors sides with the favored team in 1,394 of 1,683 games (82.8%) overall, and in 431 of 441 (97.7%) of games with 80%-plus support. While both of these figures represent small declines off the NFL numbers, they are still heavily weighted. On College Football Totals, the OVER was the preferred choice in 1,429 of 1,862 games (76.7%) since 07 by public bettors and in 470 of 523 games (89.8%) with support of 80%-plus for either total option, the OVER was backed. It s simply amazing to me that the disparity of favorite/over bettors in the NFL reaches such heights after all of these years of NFL betting. I reason that the growth of fantasy football may have fueled the expectation of higher scoring games and more sensationalized results. Most Publicly Backed College Football Teams The following listing shows the team that have averaged the greatest amount of public betting support over the last 2-1/2 seasons in college football. Fortunately for bettors, the list includes quality programs at the least. While the names of Florida and USC are among the powers absent, at least the rest have been successful in general. On the other hand, there are two teams, LSU & West Virginia, which the public backs religiously yet has very little handle on according to the Public s Worst-Read Teams List (average support) below. TEXAS 67.5% BOISE ST 67.3% TEXAS TECH 66.6% MISSOURI 64.5% BYU 64.1% LSU 63.8% USC 63.6% OKLAHOMA 63.5% CENTRAL MICHIGAN 63.1% PENN ST 62.8% OKLAHOMA ST 62.7% TCU 62.6% ALABAMA 62.1% GEORGIA 61.8% WEST VIRGINIA 61.2% CINCINNATI 60.8% HOUSTON 60.4% SOUTH FLORIDA 60.0% Least Publicly Backed College Football Teams These are the teams that the betting public has avoided on average, or faded most often of late. It s clear the public likes a winner. However, the pointspread being the great equalizer, the strategy is far from perfect. 158 WWW.STATFOX.COM

ARMY 39.6% WYOMING 39.5% KENT ST 39.1% SAN JOSE ST 39.1% MARSHALL 38.2% NORTH TEXAS 36.7% VIRGINIA 36.1% SAN DIEGO ST 36.0% AKRON 35.2% UAB 35.0% UTAH ST 34.8% BAYLOR 34.6% DUKE 34.5% TULANE 32.8% MIAMI OHIO 31.6% EASTERN MICHIGAN 31.4% SYRACUSE 30.7% WESTERN KENTUCKY 28.1% Most Publicly Backed NFL Teams The list of most-backed NFL teams includes many of the best teams of recent years in terms of wins and losses. However, these teams success rates against the spread don t entirely coincide as they are generally the clubs laying the big numbers week-in and week-out. All eight teams have averaged 60% or more support in the last 2-1/2 seasons of games. INDIANAPOLIS 70.1% NEW ENGLAND 66.0% NEW ORLEANS 63.1% NY GIANTS 62.9% GREEN BAY 61.4% DALLAS 61.2% PITTSBURGH 61.0% SAN DIEGO 60.8% Least Publicly Backed NFL Teams The betting public s fascination with favorites is reflected first-hand in the list of teams with the least average support in 2-1/2 seasons of NFL action. These four teams have been the who s not of the NFL of late, and their inability to generate success in the standings nor at the betting window has probably kept a few bankrolls alive longer than normal. KANSAS CITY 38.3% DETROIT 35.4% OAKLAND 32.1% ST LOUIS 30.4% Public s Best-Read College Football Teams Be it by predictability level, matchup, location, or just plain luck, there have been certain teams in college football that the betting public has had a better handle on. The following list shows the teams that the public has generated the best ATS records on. For instance, if the public supports a team at 53% in a game and that team covers the spread, it is counted as a win, if it doesn t cover, it is considered a loss. Perhaps this is more to this list than coincidence. Follow the early season results and see if you can t take advantage of the public perception. SAN JOSE ST 21-8 (72.4%) RICE 23-9 (71.9%) AIR FORCE 21-9 (70.0%) LA LAFAYETTE 19-10 (65.5%) FLA ATLANTIC 22-12 (64.7%) OKLAHOMA ST 20-11 (64.5%) TOLEDO 20-11 (64.5%) OKLAHOMA 21-12 (63.6%) USC 21-13 (61.8%) KANSAS 19-12 (61.3%) FLORIDA 22-14 (61.1%) RUTGERS 17-11 (60.7%) AKRON 18-12 (60.0%) MEMPHIS 18-12 (60.0%) NORTH TEXAS 18-12 (60.0%) W MICHIGAN 18-12 (60.0%) It s interesting to see the names of Florida, Oklahoma, and USC on this list. Perhaps because the coverage of these teams is so magnified nationally, more bettors understand their matchup strengths and weaknesses. Public s Worst-Read College Football Teams These are the teams with which the betting public has struggled most. It seems that if the bettors support these clubs on a given week, they fail to beat the number. If bettors fade them, they cover. COLORADO ST 12-18 (40.0%) IOWA ST 12-18 (40.0%) MISSISSIPPI ST 12-18 (40.0%) NEW MEXICO ST 12-18 (40.0%) BUFFALO 13-20 (39.4%) MARYLAND 12-19 (38.7%) MINNESOTA 12-19 (38.7%) ARIZONA 12-20 (37.5%) ARKANSAS 12-20 (37.5%) PITTSBURGH 12-20 (37.5%) BYU 13-22 (37.1%) LSU 12-21 (36.4%) NAVY 11-21 (34.4%) W VIRGINIA 10-24 (29.4%) UTEP 8-24 (25.0%) Public s Best Read NFL Teams The NFL s list of best-read teams by bettors isn t flashy or distinctive in many ways, but still, these are the teams that the public seems to have had the best read on over the last 2-1/2 seasons. SEATTLE 27-14 (65.9%) BALTIMORE 29-16 (64.4%) CHICAGO 25-15 (62.5%) ST LOUIS 24-16 (60.0%) GREEN BAY 24-18 (57.1%) TENNESSEE 23-18 (56.1%) DETROIT 22-18 (55.0%) Public s Worst-Read NFL Teams While NFL bettors at sites like Sportsbook.com have thrived in games involving teams like the Seahawks and Ravens, they haven t had a clue as to what to expect from the Steelers, Broncos, or Bengals of late. The following are the teams that have consistently fooled the public with their unpredictability. CAROLINA 18-23 (43.9%) DALLAS 18-24 (42.9%) NY JETS 17-25 (40.5%) JACKSONVILLE 17-27 (38.6%) ARIZONA 17-28 (37.8%) CINCINNATI 15-27 (35.7%) DENVER 15-27 (35.7%) PITTSBURGH 15-29 (34.1%) The Steelers, Jaguars, and Bengals are particularly noteworthy since their coaching staffs have remained stable this offseason and therefore should perform similarly to how they have in recent years. If these results continue, you should expect bettors to be wrong on about 10 of each of these teams 16 games. More Precise Betting Strategies using the Public Betting Percentages Everything I ve discussed to this point has been generic in nature, or background material. Let s get into some more specific angles and strategies you can employ in the coming season utilizing the Betting Trends data on sites like Sportsbook.com or Scoresandodds.com. COLLEGE FOOTBALL You ll see by reading through the NFL analysis just below that public bettors have been stronger overall in college football than they have in the NFL. I suspect this is because college football is more of a raw strength type of game where in the pro s, situations, momentum, and other less-measurable factors are more ciritcal. In any case, here are some noteworthy trends regarding the betting public s performance in analyzing college football games since mid- 07. Type of Game Public bettors have fared well on both sides (51-43 ATS, 54.3%) and totals (55-37, 59.8%) on Friday night college football games over the last 2-1/2 years. No other particular day of the week boasts such distinctive numbers. TOP TEAM STATFOX WWW.FOXSHEETS.COM 159

The public has fared better in conference games on sides (615-584 ATS, 51.3%) than it has in bowl games (48-55 ATS, 46.6%) or non-conference regular season games (282-287 ATS, 49.6%). In terms of totals, bettors have also been their sharpest when analyzing conference games. They are 637-559, 53.3%) over the last 2-1/2 years, as opposed to 52-52 in bowl games, and 280-261 in non-conference tilts. The rest of the records by month for the betting public in the last 2-1/2 years on side wagers are as follows: October: 57-64 ATS, November: 99-100 ATS, December: 96-104 ATS. Bettors have shown a strength on totals in the latter months of the regular season, going 109-94 (53.7%) in November games of the last 2-1/2 years, and 111-86 (56.3%) in December games. FADING Month of the Year Bettors have enjoyed their best totals month in September, going 286-216 (57.0%), including 84-54 (60.9%) in conference play. However the November totals performance has been noteworthy as well, 346-288 (54.6%). October (242-263, 47.9%) and December (46-66, 41.1%) have been tough months for bettors when it s come to totals in college football of late. The heavy regular season months of October & November happen to be the betting public s best when it comes to sides. They have gone 258-237 ATS in October and 328-311 ATS in November since mid- 07. The bookend months of the season, September (257-282, 47.7%) and December (47-61, 43.5%) have been the money-making months for the house in college football. Line Range Very similarly to the NFL as you ll see a bit later, in college football games over the last 2-1/2 years where the home teams ended up favored by more than a field goal, public bettors have showed a mediocre record of 16-games under.500 record. However, in games where the home team has finished favored in the 0 to -3 range or as an underdog, the public has produced a respectable 446-412 ATS (52.0%) mark. They ve been even sharper on totals in those same games, going 466-387 (54.6%), producing some 40.3 units of profit. Total Range The games that have shown the greatest break in public betting performance on totals are those at the bottom of the scale. On low totaled games, or those at 42.5 or less, bettors have gone just 66-77 (46.2%) in supporting the eventual winning option. On all other total ranges, the public success rate has been 52.5% or higher. Analyzing Line Moves For whatever the reason, the public has been much more sharp in college football when analyzing lines that move towards the road team throughout the week. They are 370-331 ATS (52.8%) in such games since mid- 07 as compared to 449-476 ATS (48.5%) on those that shade towards the hosts. Line Range On NFL games over the last 2-1/2 years where the home teams ended up favored by more than a field goal, public bettors have showed a modest 155-157 ATS record. However, in games where the home team has finished favored in the -1 to -3 range or as a pick em, bettors were just 56-79 ATS (41.5%). Alternatively, in games where there has been a home underdog, the public has produced a rewarding 123-104 ATS (54.2%) mark. Total Range The games that have shown the greatest break in public betting performance on totals are those at the bottom and top of the scale. On low totaled games, or those at 36.5 or less, bettors have gone 37-25 (59.7%) in supporting the eventual winning option. On very high total games, or those 48 or greater, the public has gone just 31-45 (40.8%) since mid- 07. Analyzing Line Moves The betting public s most noteworthy system when analyzing how a line moves as compared to where their support lies comes in the situation where they are favoring a road team and the line has also moved toward that road team. In such cases over the last 2-1/2 years, public bettors have produced an impressive 82-62 ATS (56.9%) mark. Though no other generic Line Move/Public Support combination has produced anything more than a 3% advantage either way, there has proven to be a fade opportunity when 80% or more of the public is on a home team and the line is also shifting that way. Bettors have gone just 7-14 ATS (33.3%) in their L21 such situations. Analyzing Total Moves The combination of a total moving towards the OVER and public bettors favoring that same OVER has proven a winning proposition, to the tune of a 102-87 (54%) record. Alternatively, the opposite combination of total moving downward throughout the week as a possible result of the public supporting the UNDER has meant a 21-35 (37.5%) record for bettors. In other words, those games most often go OVER the total. Analyzing Total Moves Whenever the public has simply rode a total movement, or caused it by supporting that particular option of the wager, they have been successful. When a OVER supported total has risen, or a UNDER supported total has dropped throughout the week, the record of the betting public is a gawdy 529-450, good for 54.0% and 34 units of profit. NFL Here are some trends regarding the betting public s performance in analyzing NFL games since mid- 07. Type of Game Public bettors are 22-21 ATS on Monday Night Football over the last 2-1/2 years, and 24-16 (60%) on totals. They are just 4-8 ATS (33%) when siding with a team at 75% or greater support. The public is 4-12 (25%) ATS in their L16 Saturday games, including 0-5 ATS in non-playoff contest. Thursday games have been a boon for bettors, who boast a 17-8 ATS (68%) record since mid- 07 in such contests, including 7-2 ATS (77.8%) on Thanksgiving Day. The high-profile playoff games haven t gone well for public bettors, as they are 12-20 ATS (37.5%) in the last three postseasons. When broken down by division (121-121 ATS), conference (119-121 ATS), and non-conference (81-78 ATS) games, there has been little disparity in the performance of the betting public in the NFL. Month of the Year Bettors have enjoyed their best month in September, going 61-45 ATS (57.5%) on sides and 54-48 (52.9%) on totals in 08 & 09, both profit producing records. January-February has been the worst measured performance by bettors on sides, as they ve gone just 20-27 ATS (42.6%) in the last three years. Combination NFL Systems So far we ve learned that the public has not fared well on Saturday games or in playoff games but has done particularly well in Thursday contests, especially on Thanksgiving. We ve also learned that bettors have gotten off to fast starts in the last two seasons, and have built much of their bankrolls on road favorites. Finally, we know that when the public follows the line/ total movement, or perhaps causes them, distinctive results follow. After combining some of these thoughts, we come up with the following betting angles: In September games where the opening line has moved towards the road team and the home team ends up either being the underdog or favored by less than 6-points, public bettors have been very sharp, 27-8 ATS (77%). In the L22 Monday Night Football games that have seen the total drop from its opening number, the public has gone an impressive 16-6 (73%) in fading that total move, or in essence, supporting the OVER. Summary If you ve picked up anything through this exercise, hopefully it s that isn t always bad to be on the same side of the betting public. After all, they tend to follow good teams, and they can do well in many different circumstances. If you think about, would the bookmakers ever stand a chance to do business year-after-year if the overwhelming majority of their bettors lost ALL the time? They know that sports betting is virtually a 50/50 proposition for the uneducated when using the pointspread and are counting on other mistakes like poor money management principles to sink people s bankrolls, not constant losing. However, with sound money management practices and a few successful strategies using key data like the Public Betting Percentages, the football handicapper can enjoy the fruits of his labor and even take home a few extra bucks in the process. 160 WWW.STATFOX.COM