Northbound San Jose Avenue & I-280 Off-Ramp Road Diet Pilot Project

Similar documents
Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015

Lincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial

25th Avenue Road Diet Project A One Year Evaluation. Transportation Fund for Clean Air Project #05R07

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

WELCOME Public Information Centre

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Draft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan

Dear Mr. Tweed: Sincerely, Min Zhou, P.E. Vice President

PROJECT OVERVIEW. 20th Avenue Project Limits (Lincoln Way to Wawona St)

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

J Street and Folsom Boulevard Lane Conversion Project (T ) Before and After Traffic Evaluation

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. Forest View Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study

Mineral Avenue Corridor Assessment. ITE 2017 Western District Annual Meeting San Diego, CA June 21 st

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

Protected Bike Lanes in San Francisco Mike Sallaberry SFMTA NACTO Workshop - Chicago IL

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

DOWNTOWN TUPELO MAIN STREET: ROAD DIET STUDY

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

LOOP 360 IMPROVEMENT STUDY

Public Information Centre

Edenbrook Hill Drive Traffic Calming Study

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Innovations & Applications

Richmond-Adelaide Cycle Tracks

Enclosure 1. Crimson Drive Traffic Safety and Calming Review Report

CITY OF SLO SEEKS INPUT ON PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FOR BROAD STREET BICYCLE BOULEVARD PROJECT

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Lessons Learned from Cycle Tracks (Class IV Bikeways) Design Practice

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard City Council Study Session Summary

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

MEMORANDUM INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE/OVERALL FINDINGS

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

Project Goal and Description. Why Broadway? Broadway SFMTA.COM/BROADWAY. The goal of the Broadway Safety Improvement

Reference number /VP. Lafayette Downtown Congestion Study - Additional Traffic Analysis

Road Conversion Study Plumas Street

Boston Post Road Design Feasibility Study

Central Avenue Bikeway Traffic and Safety Impact Assessment

COMMUNITY MEETING AGENDA

California Department of Transportation, District 4. Sloat Boulevard Project Skyline Blvd. to 19 th Ave. Community Update January 13, 2016

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Order # 5883 FOR PUBLIC HEARING

Focused Traffic Analysis for the 200 Nellen Avenue Project

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

San Jose Transportation Policy

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

US 41 COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY from University Parkway to Whitfield Avenue

Mission Bay Loop (MBL) Public Meeting

East 12 th Street Bikeway Feasibility Study

MASONIC AVENUE STREET DESIGN STUDY Community Workshop 2. Masonic Ave Street Design Study Community Workshop 2 August 10, 2010

Joshua Saak, P.E., PTOE Traffic Design Engineer Ada County Highway District May 23, 2013

3 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL TIMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

C/CAG. Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit. San Mateo-Foster City School District JUNE 2013

Freeway ramp intersection study

San Francisco 2009 Collisions Report April 21, 2011

LAGUNA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner

Upper Market Street Bike Lane Project

Average Delay/Vehicle (sec/veh) Signalized. Unsignalized Intersection

MASONIC AVENUE STREET DESIGN STUDY Community Workshop 3. Masonic Ave Street Design Study Community Workshop 3 September 30, 2010

City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor

Central Freeway and Octavia Circulation Study

MINERAL AVENUE CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT STUDY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

Station 1: Street & Sidewalk Upgrades

Monterey Road Complete Streets

BD RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE VISION ZERO RAMP INTERSECTION STUDY PHASE 1

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

WELCOME Mission-Geneva Transportation Study

MARKET/JFK VISION ZERO PILOT PROJECT FEBRUARY 2019 EVALUATION REPORT

County of Spartanburg South Carolina

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

SFMTA PROJECT TIMELINE

Polk Streetscape Project

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Multi-Modal Traffic Analysis. Parisi and Associates

8. Collisions INTRODUCTION

Developing Bikeways in South Denver

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Data Analysis February to March Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns.

FOLSOM-HOWARD STREETSCAPE OVERVIEW

CITY OF LOMITA CITY COUNCIL REPORT

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

Broadway Complete Streets Project

ABOUT THIS OPEN HOUSE

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

Golden Gate Park. Project Goal and Description. Lower Great Highway Facts

Date: April 4, Project #: Re: A Street/Binford Street Traffic/Intersection Assessment

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Table 1. Greatest Reductions in Traffic Volume

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

Figure 5A: Diagram of Crashes, May 2005 to May 2008 (Part 1)

Access Routes from US 101 to the Richmond San Rafael Bridge

NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS

Transcription:

Project Overview Fed by a two-lane Interstate-280 (I-280) off-ramp, high vehicular volumes and speeds are longstanding issues along San Jose Avenue. Residents in the surrounding neighborhoods have expressed concerns about the speeds and the negative effects this speeding has on the safety of those who walk, drive and bike along the corridor. After an initial community engagement period initiated by District 8 Supervisor Scott Wiener, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) worked with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to develop the San Jose Avenue & I-280 Off-Ramp Road Diet Pilot Project. The goal of this project is to reduce measured speeds along the corridor by 15 MPH to enhance safety for all road users. 1 Because this reduction was not achieved in Phase I (completed in June 2014), Phase II was implemented in June 2015. The two phases of the pilot included the following scope: Phase I Merged the left lane of the I-280 off-ramp with the northbound lane from San Jose Avenue that passes underneath I-280. Reduced San Jose Avenue from three to two lanes north of St. Marys Avenue, and then opened roadway back up to three lanes just south of Randall Street to maintain the traffic calming effect of the road diet. Upgraded the San Jose Avenue bicycle lane to a more comfortable and separated bikeway (where space allowed). Phase II Maintained Phase I changes on the surface street portion of San Jose Avenue. Merged the two lanes of the I-280 off-ramp into a single lane south of the existing I-280 tunnel, which then merges with the Monterey Boulevard lane. Phase I Evaluation: Key Findings To understand the effects of the pilot on vehicular and bike traffic, this evaluation analyzed morning (AM) peak vehicle volumes, 85 th percentile vehicular speeds, and bicycle counts both before and after the implementation of Phase I of the project. Key findings of the Phase I analysis include: San Jose Avenue and I-280 Off-Ramp AM peak hour traffic volumes and speeds decreased, though speed decreases were minor with a 6 percent decrease in speeds from 49 mph to 46 mph. With the new wider bike lane and buffer zone, evening peak bike traffic increased by 62 percent on northbound San Jose Avenue and the average daily bike traffic and increased by 15 percent on San Jose Avenue. 1 For a project of this nature, speed is measured by observing the 85 th percentile speed observed as a benchmark. 85th percentile speed is defined as the speed 85% of drivers are moving at or below during free-flow traffic.

Staff observations show motorists navigating the two new merges at the foot of the ramp well with no significant problems. Drive time surveys show approximately 2 minutes of traffic delay on northbound I-280 during the AM and PM peak hours. 14 collisions were reported along northbound San Jose Avenue between the I-280 Off-Ramp and Randall Street from 2010 to 2014, resulting in 22 injured persons. The primary collision factor in this area of northbound San Jose Avenue is unsafe speeding. Unsafe speeding accounts for 57% of the collisions reported. Side Streets Rousseau Street: AM peak hour traffic volumes increased 79 percent and speeds increased 18 percent. Milton Street: AM peak hour traffic volumes decreased 22 percent and speeds decreased 4 percent. St. Marys Avenue: Mixed results with general increases in both AM peak speeds and volumes in the southbound direction, and a decrease in volume but a 63 percent increase in speed in the northbound direction. During the PM peak hour, southbound traffic volumes on St. Marys Avenue rose by 125 percent (from 157 to 353 vehicles). In summary, while vehicular volumes and speeds were reduced on San Jose Avenue as a result of Phase I, speeds were not significantly reduced and will need to be reevaluated at the close of Phase II. Though the widening and buffering of the bike lane was not the primary goal of the project, the number of bicyclists on San Jose has risen. This surge may be indicative of an increased feeling of safety on San Jose Avenue. The effect of the pilot on cross streets has been varied with some streets seeing increases in both traffic volumes and speeds. Traffic calming measures may need to be explored for the affected side streets. Some traffic delays during the morning commute have been observed, though these delays will need to be explored further as part of the final evaluation. Phase I Evaluation: Detailed Data Summaries Vehicular Volume Data Post-pilot counts show a decrease in AM peak vehicular volumes on San Jose Avenue. Morning peak traffic increased on southbound Rousseau Street and St. Marys Avenue and will need to be further evaluated. Detailed pre-and post-pilot AM peak volume counts are shown in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1: Area Map and AM Peak Vehicular Volumes San Jose Ave. () Pre: 2,068 Post: 1,628 Change: -440 (-21%) St. Marys Ave. ( and Southbound) NB-AM Peak Volumes SB-AM Peak Volumes Pre: 28 331 Post: 27 374 Change: -1 (-5%) 44 (+13%) Rousseau St. (Southbound) Pre: 354 Post: 634 Change: 280 (+79%) Milton St. () Pre: 42 Post: 32 Change: -10 (-22%) Vehicular Speed Data Speeds on San Jose Avenue and the surrounding cross streets modestly decreased. Speeds were reduced most notably when exiting the I-280 off ramp and merging with San Jose Avenue and were then reduced further while continuing northbound on San Jose. Some cross streets, such as St. Marys Avenue, are experiencing some increased speeds which will need to be further evaluated. Changes in AM peak speeds are detailed in Table 1. Table 1: Vehicular AM Peak Speeds Street AM Peak Speeds AM Peak Speeds Change Pre-Pilot Post-Pilot North I-280 off-ramp 52 MPH 47 MPH -5 MPH (-10%*) before merge w/ NB San Jose San Jose Avenue 49 MPH 46 MPH -3 MPH (-6%) Rousseau Street 13 MPH 15 MPH 2 MPH (+18%*) Southbound Milton Street 23 MPH 22 MPH -1 MPH (-4%) St. Marys Avenue 23 MPH 27 MPH +4 MPH (+19%*) Southbound St. Marys Avenue 16 MPH 26 MPH +10 MPH (+63%) *Note: Percentage change based on unrounded speeds

Bicycle Volumes After Phase I of the Pilot, evening peak bike traffic on northbound San Jose Avenue rose significantly with an increase of 62 percent, and average daily bike traffic increased 15 percent. Detailed volumes are listed in Table 2. It also should be noted that some motorists have been observed driving in the bike lane, particularly between Milton Street and St. Marys Avenue. Potential solutions for this issue are currently being considered. Table 2: Bicycle Volumes on San Jose Avenue San Jose Ave. (Monterey Blvd. before merge with San Jose) Number of Bikes Pre-Pilot Number of Bikes Post-Pilot % Change AM Peak 24 27 +14% PM Peak 19 31 +62% Ave. Daily Volume 174 200 +15% Drive Time Analysis The drive time surveys took place over four days in July and August of 2015. Four runs were conducted during this phase of evaluation. Two runs occurred during the AM peak and two during the PM peak. Data collection began on the northbound I-280 Ocean Avenue on-ramp and stopped at the far side of the Randall Street and San Jose Avenue intersection. During free-flow traffic, the average drive time is 4 minutes. The analysis showed approximately 2 minutes of delay in the AM and PM peak periods. Most of the delay is occurring near the approach to Randall Street, primarily due to the left turn lane from San Jose Avenue onto Dolores Street. At this left turn on San Jose, vehicles sometimes have to wait more than one signal cycle to make the left turn onto Dolores Street during peak traffic. Collision History The SFMTA has evaluated collision data from 2010 to 2014 to identify any issues and patterns for this portion of San Jose Avenue. There 14 collisions were reported along northbound San Jose Avenue between the I-280 Off- Ramp and Randall Street between 2010 and 2014, resulting in 22 injured persons. The predominant collision factor was unsafe speed, accounting for 57 percent of all collisions. Forty-three (43) percent of the collisions were rear-end collisions, and 42 percent of the collisions involved a single vehicle; all of these single-vehicle collisions were with a fixed object. Collisions peaked in the early morning, midday and in the evenings, mostly during off-peak hours in free flow traffic. Most of the collisions occurred midblock between St. Marys Avenue and Randall Street or at the intersection of San Jose Avenue and Randall Street. Phase II Evaluation and Next Steps SFMTA and Caltrans will continue to observe conditions post-phase II and will collect additional data for traffic volumes, speeds, and drive times in September 2015 (with school back in session). This data will inform a final evaluation of the pilot project along with recommended next steps.

Based on the final evaluation and findings, SFMTA and Caltrans will recommend next steps and seek all necessary approvals. SFMTA will work with the San Francisco Department of Public Works to implement a postpilot preferred design in coordination with a re-paving project scheduled to begin in March 2016. Notes on Evaluation Methodology Vehicular volume and speed data was collected in January 2014, September 2014, and January 2015 for the analysis of Phase I. During each data collection period, vehicle volumes, peak traffic volumes, vehicular speeds, and bicycle counts were taken on various segments of San Jose Avenue, the I-280 off-ramp, and adjacent streets. With the majority of vehicular traffic taking place in the morning rush hour on northbound I-280 and San Jose Avenue, AM peak hour vehicular data provided the most useful information and was used as the vehicular baseline data for this evaluation. Traffic delay estimates were collected over the course of two days in July and August of 2015, in both the AM and PM peak hours. Collision data was analyzed using San Francisco police report records from 2010 through 2014. SFMTA is currently refining reported collision data from January to June of 2015 and gathering additional collision history for the I-280 off ramp area. Specific Data Collection Details and Assumptions Automatic tube vehicle and speed surveys were conducted 24 hours a day over a 72-hr period. AM and PM peak volumes were averaged over the three-day period. Bicycle counts were recorded at the Monterey Boulevard ramp (before the merge with San Jose Avenue) and averaged over a 72-hr period. For the purposes of this analysis, pre-pilot data collected in January of 2014 was compared to the postpilot data collected in January 2015 to minimize the effect of seasonal traffic changes on the data. Data collected this fall will be compared to pre-pilot data gathered in September of 2014 for further evaluation.