Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 5, 2016 Page 2 of 2 by a task force of local staff familiar with safe routes to school programs, projects and

Similar documents
CONTRA COSTA. Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. Executive Summary. July Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT

Vallecito Elementary School. Travel Plan

San Ramon Elementary School. Travel Plan

Applications for Funding

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

SRTS Programs That Increase Walking and Bicycling to School

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

Introduction.

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

Kelowna On the Move. Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan

Venetia Valley Elementary School. Travel Plan

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Living Streets Policy

Berkeley Strategic Transportation Plan A-76

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT March 7, 2018 Page 2 of 4 The following MTSOs are being used across the five subregions: Intersection Level of Service

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Complete Streets. presented by Active Transportation Alliance. Chicagoland s voice for better biking, walking and transit.

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Trades Center

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Oakridge Elementary School

Update of the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Appendix C 3. Bicycle / Pedestrian Planning

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

Where We Live and Work Today

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM

TOWARDS A BIKE-FRIENDLY CANADA A National Cycling Strategy Overview

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study

BD RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE VISION ZERO RAMP INTERSECTION STUDY PHASE 1

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Arlington Traditional School

FOR INFORMATION ONLY

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

The Role of MPOs in Advancing Safe Routes to School through the Transportation Alternatives Program

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study Phase 2

First Mile, Last Mile: Plans for all Shapes and Sizes. Hannah Lindelof, Principal Planner San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit September 18, 2017

Get Oregon kids. Walking, biking and rolling to school planning guide

Caltrain Bicycle Parking Management Plan DRAFT PROJECT SCOPE SUBMITTED TO CALTRANS FALL 2014

TOWN OF MORAGA MORAGA WAY AND CAMINO PABLO/CANYON ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Town Council Meeting March 13, 2019

Summary Report School Walking & Bicycling Audits. Mesa County Regional Transportation Planning Office

First and Last Mile Plan. April 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

Outreach Approach RENEW SF served as the primary liaison with the North Beach community; the Chinatown. Executive Summary

Project Status Update

Section 9. Implementation

Sustainable Transportation Initiatives and Plans in Caledon

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2011

3 Silverton High School Report

Safe Routes to School as a Transportation Control Measure: Impacts on the Emission Inventory

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Background Planning Committee STAFF REPORT March 7, 2018 Page 2 of 2 On June 21, 2017, the Authority approved the programming of second cycle One Bay

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

TRAVEL PLAN: CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY CAMPUS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TRAVEL PLAN. Central European University Campus Redevelopment Project.

Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Bicycle Safety Action Plan

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

Highway 17 Transportation Improvement Study

AGENDA ITEM G-2 Public Works

TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Review Citywide Recommendations, Updated List and Scoring Methodology December 6, 2018

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary. MEAD Number:

Bicycle Friendly Niagara Falls

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

C/CAG. Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit. San Mateo-Foster City School District JUNE 2013

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BERKELEY BICYCLE PLAN UPDATE

Washington State University Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Working Paper #7: Implementation Strategies

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 5b HCAOG TAC meeting of May 8, 2014

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Agenda Staff Report

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

San Mateo County Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee

Lessons Learned from Cycle Tracks (Class IV Bikeways) Design Practice

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

McKenzie Interchange Project Fall 2015 Engagement. Appendix 2: Engagement Materials and Feedback Form

Meadow Woods Elementary School

Caltrain Bicycle Parking Management Plan

San Francisco s Capital Plan & the Mayor s Transportation Task Force 2030: Funding the next steps for transportation

Transcription:

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: October 5, 2016 Subject Contra Costa Safe Routes to School Program Report Summary of Issues Recommendations Financial Implications Options Attachments Changes from Committee As part of the Authority s Safe Routes to Schools Program, Authority staff has been working with local staff and consultants to understand how children get to school and the obstacles in providing safer and healthier ways for them to do so. This work included preparation of a needs assessment to determine the cost of providing school access improvements countywide. For the final phase of work, the consultant team provided assistance to local jurisdictions that sought help in addressing particular school access issues. Staff will provide an overview of this work and its findings. Staff recommends that the Authority accept the report. Accept the report. N/A Modify or reject the report. A. Contra Costa SR2S: Understanding Needs, Moving Ahead Report (Executive Summary), June 2016 Background Providing safe routes to schools for children has become an increasingly pressing issue. On one hand, access conflicts around schools during pick-up and drop-off times have grown into a major issue throughout the US. On the other hand, the significant drop in rates of walking and bicycling to school are being linked to increased rates of childhood obesity and other health problems. To help understand this issue and to estimate the costs to address it, the Authority has engaged a consultant team of experienced practioners in the highly specialized field of Safe Routes to School. Authority staff and consultants have been assisted in this work S:\05-PC Packets\2016\10\01-Bdltr SR2S Report.docx 1-1

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 5, 2016 Page 2 of 2 by a task force of local staff familiar with safe routes to school programs, projects and issue areas. The consultant team developed a needs assessment to estimate the total cost countywide for improving school-related transportation, and also provided technical assistance to jurisdictions throughout Contra Costa. This assistance ranged from documenting travel patterns around schools to developing designs for safer crosswalks and developing a safe routes map for a new elementary school. The attached report summarizes the work performed over the last few years as part of the Authority s SR2S program. The full report includes a detailed description of the work, including the technical assistance documents developed for individual school sites and issue areas. Once accepted, staff will post the full report on the Authority's website. S:\05-PC Packets\2016\10\01-Bdltr SR2S Report.docx 1-2

Photo Credit: Dan Burden, 2006, U.S. Photo Credit: Chris Metka, 2007, Boulder, CO. Photo Credit: Mike Cynecki, 2010, Phoenix, AZ. Attachment A (Executive Summary) Prepared by 100 Pringle Avenue Suite 600 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 June 2016 Contra Costa Safe Routes to School: Understanding Needs, Moving Ahead 1-3

Contra Costa Safe Routes to School: Understanding Needs, Moving Ahead There is sustained and growing interest in Safe Routes to School efforts throughout the Bay Area. Safe Routes to School (often abbreviated as SR2S) activities can take many forms, but all have the basic objective of improving safety for pedestrians and cyclists around schools. When more children walk or bike to school there can be a wide range of benefits, from reduced vehicular traffic in the school vicinity, to improved public health outcomes through increased physical activity, to an enhanced sense of community for the neighborhood around the school. There have been and continue to be significant SR2S efforts in Contra Costa. These efforts generally fall into two categories: capital improvements and programs. Capital improvement projects enhance the physical infrastructure around schools to allow for safer and more convenient walking and bicycling. Programs promote safety and encourage walking and bicycling activities through student and parent education and encouragement. Bike/Ped Road Simulation at Knightsen Elementary School in Knightsen. Source: Street Smarts Diablo. Benefits of SR2S Activities SR2S projects and programs can encourage physical activity, improve safety and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Walking or biking to school can help more students reach the recommended goal of at least 60 minutes of physical activity every day. Reducing vehicle speeds in school zones is a common goal of SR2S projects and programs; research has consistently shown a link between higher-speed collisions and increased risk of injuries and fatalities. In addition to personal health and safety benefits, International Walk to School Day at Timber Point Elementary School in Discovery Bay. Source: Street Smarts Diablo. research suggests that SR2S projects and programs may have a modest effect on reducing the total number of vehicle trips in a community, thereby contributing to reductions in vehicle miles of 1-4 1

travel (VMT) and associated greenhouse gas emissions. MTC, for example, has estimated that the regional SR2S programs funded through the Climate Initiatives Program reduced VMT by about 34 miles annually for every $1000 spent. If that same relationship holds in Contra Costa, and the county were to fund all its SR2S needs over a 20-year period, that could reduce annual VMT by over 2 million miles. The SR2S Needs Assessment To understand what was needed to encourage more walking and bicycling to school, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA, or the Authority) initiated a comprehensive assessment of SR2S projects and programs in Contra Costa. The purpose was to understand SR2S activities occurring throughout Contra Costa, estimate the funding needed to support future SR2S capital improvements and programs, provide resources to local communities as they plan, design and implement improvements, and offer targeted technical assistance to specific school sites. This summary offers a brief overview of the Authority s efforts. Detailed documentation of each element is attached. Understanding Current Activities The Authority s efforts began with an Existing Conditions report summarizing the SR2S programs being offered and the level of participation in those programs. Much of the information came from detailed surveys of schools and local jurisdictions, as well as input from a SR2S Task Force made up of local staff involved in SR2S activities throughout the county. The survey found that, on average, about 65 percent of the students in Contra Costa traveled to school using a car, while 5 percent rode a bicycle and 17 percent walked. Approximately 13 percent used public buses or yellow school buses. Results varied by location: walking, for example, is more common in West County and East County, but less common in the Lamorinda and Danville/San Ramon areas. Survey respondents cited a number of barriers to walking or bicycling to school. These included physical barriers such as a lack of sidewalks or crosswalks, concerns about student safety when using high-speed or high-volume roads, and the inconvenience of walking or biking when there are long distances between home and school. The Existing Conditions report also goes into detail about the nature of the current SR2S programs and the number of schools participating in them. 1-5 2

How Students Get to School in Contra Costa 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% WCCTAC TRANSPAC TRANSPLAN SWAT Private vehicle Carpool Yellow School Bus Public Bus Walking Biking Other 1-6 3

SR2S Needs in Contra Costa Building upon the understanding of Existing Conditions and with important assistance from the SR2S Task Force, a needs assessment exercise was undertaken to estimate the funding required to address SR2S needs for all 217 of Contra Costa s public elementary, middle, and high schools. (Private schools were outside the scope of this effort, but could be added later using a similar approach.) The needs assessment could be used as a basis for establishing new funding programs and advocating for new funding sources. Given the size and complexity of the county and the diversity of its needs, this effort necessarily required a number of assumptions and simplifications to complete the assessment within the available timeframe and resources. The needs assessment thus presents an order-of-magnitude estimate of costs for both capital and programmatic categories, unconstrained by available funding levels. For capital projects, the approach involved assembling information from recently completed local SR2S infrastructure projects and extrapolating that information across all public school locations countywide. Example projects were categorized based on the type of improvements involved; an average cost was calculated for each project type, and that cost was applied to an estimated proportion of schools that have unmet needs for SR2S improvements. The assessment estimated the unmet countywide need for future SR2S capital improvements at $243 million. There are currently three organizations in Contra Costa providing SR2S programs: Contra Costa Health Services, San Ramon Valley Street Smarts, and Street Smarts Diablo. Staff from these three organizations provided essential information to understand current SR2S programs and to determine future needs. First, all currently active programs were divided into categories by program type, and an average cost to provide each type of program was calculated based on the experiences of the current providers. Next, the stakeholders identified a series of new programs that could be implemented Walking School Bus at Meadow Homes Elementary School in Concord Source: Contra Costa Health Services. to augment the current offerings, and the cost per school of each new program was also calculated. The new programs would include substantial investments in subsidized transit passes and 1-7 4

expansion of the yellow school bus programs currently active in certain parts of the county. Finally, the average annual cost per school for both the current and new programs was applied to all schools. The assessment estimated the unmet countywide cost of all SR2S programs at $58 million annually. SR2S Resource Guide To support local SR2S efforts, the Authority developed an online resource guide (http://www.ccta.net/uploads/536d436cbe703.pdf). The guide contains important information for local communities in planning, designing and implementing SR2S infrastructure improvements and support programs. The resource guide is a directory of best practices, case studies, model policies and programs, standards and guidelines. Several SR2S resources already exist, so the Authority s online resource guide compiles and synthesizes available documents, best practices and current research. The tools provided assist local jurisdictions in becoming more strategic about supporting bicycling and walking to school activities, improve its chances in applying for funding, and in addressing engineering, programmatic and funding. The intent of the online resource guide is to provide a single, consolidated location individual jurisdictions can explore to find what is most applicable to their situation. Bike rodeo with parent volunteers at Hidden Hills Elementary School in San Ramon. Source: San Ramon Valley Street Smarts. There are essentially two types of SR2S programs local communities can pursue: those hosted by an independent program provider (such as Contra Costa Health Services, Street Smarts Diablo, and San Ramon Valley Street Smarts), or local volunteer-driven efforts run by the school itself or an active parents group. Many programs function as a hybrid of the two. Regardless of the type of program pursued, involvement of the school district is essential for success. The Authority s online resource guide provides information on both types Bike rodeo with parent volunteers at Green Valley Elementary School in Danville. Source: San Ramon Valley Street Smarts. 1-8 5

of programs, describing the programs available through local providers, as well as offering insights to communities seeking to develop other activities not currently hosted by these providers. SR2S Technical Assistance As part of the overall SR2S effort, the Authority provided direct technical support to local jurisdictions throughout Contra Costa to help them identify barriers to walking and bicycling, and to plan for specific SR2S improvements at individual school sites. Technical assistance resources were allocated to the four Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPCs) based on school enrollment, and each RTPC led an effort to prioritize requests from the local jurisdictions. In total, 17 requests from 14 different jurisdictions were submitted and received funding. Solano County SR2S The table below shows the locations where technical assistance was provided. Site visits and data collection at all 17 school locations were conducted in spring 2015, with the involvement of staff from local agencies and school administration, and work products were delivered in the summer and fall. Several of the local jurisdictions have indicated they are moving ahead with implementation of the improvements that were addressed in these technical assistance efforts. Jurisdiction School Technical Assistance Provided West County WCCTAC El Cerrito San Pablo Contra Costa County Korematsu Middle School Downer Elementary School John Swett High School and Carquinez Middle School Prepare traffic control plan and a walk-and-roll to school map. Prepare concept plan for crosswalk, sidewalk and street improvements. Field observations and counts to determine pedestrian circulation patterns during bell times. Recommendations for enhanced crosswalk treatments at four locations. East County TRANSPLAN Pittsburg Marina Vista Elementary School Prepare concept plan for street improvements and parking access changes. 1-9 6

Jurisdiction School Technical Assistance Provided Pittsburg Antioch Oakley Oakley Oakley Brentwood Pittsburg High School Marsh Elementary School Orchard Park School O'Hara Park School Vintage Parkway School Heritage High School and Adams Middle School Field observations and traffic counts to look at auto/pedestrian conflicts. Recommendations for operational improvements to enhance pedestrian safety. Prepare concept plan and cost estimate for crosswalk, sidewalk and street improvements. Prepare concept plan for street improvements and parking access changes. Prepare concept plan for street improvements and parking access changes. Prepare concept plan and cost estimate for changes to parking access and pedestrian accommodations. Field observations and counts; recommendations for operational improvements. Central County TRANSPAC Concord Contra Costa County (Saranap) Pleasant Hill Walnut Creek Silverwood Elementary School Parkmead Elementary School Valley View Middle School, College Park High School Walnut Creek Intermediate School, Walnut Heights Elementary School, and Las Lomas High School Field observations of pedestrian activity and volumes, assessment of missing sidewalk facilities along Claycord Avenue, and recommendations for safety improvements. Field observations of pedestrian and bicycle activity and recommendations for safety improvements. Field observations of vehicle circulation, drop-off/pickup activity, and pedestrian and bicycle activity along Viking Drive; prepare traffic control plan. Data collection of vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle counts and vehicle speed surveys along Walnut Boulevard. Southwest County SWAT Moraga Danville Lafayette Campolindo High School San Ramon Valley High School Stanley Middle School Field observations and traffic counts; signal warrant assessment; evaluation of potential changes to parking and access; conceptual design plans. Field observations of pedestrian crossing; prepare concept plan for crosswalk improvements. Field observations of school bus stop on Reliez Valley Road; prepare concept plan for crossing and street improvements. 1-10 7

Funding Opportunities SR2S projects can be eligible for funding from a range of sources. Typical funding sources at the state level are the Active Transportation Program (ATP) or the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and certain plans or programs may be eligible for Caltrans Transportation Planning Grants. At the regional level, these projects may be eligible for funding through the One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) program administered by MTC, and bicycle infrastructure projects may be funded through the Bay Area Air Quality Management District s (BAAQMD) Transportation Fund for Clean Air. Measure J, the transportation sales tax program administered by CCTA, is also a potential source of funds for SR2S projects. Most grant funding programs are highly competitive, and assembling sufficient financial resources to construct these types of projects can be challenging. Local jurisdictions may consider the following strategies, which have helped achieve success in other competitive funding situations: Consider partnering with another agency, such as the school district or public health department, to prepare a joint application, which can demonstrate broad project need and support and thereby improve the project s ranking in the competitive decisionmaking process Leverage existing local funding sources as matching funds for state or federal grants Prepare scaled concept plans and include them in the grant application to demonstrate project readiness Develop a solid cost estimate, based on justifiable unit costs, and include it in the grant application to underscore the reliability of the project s financial plans Take advantage of opportunities associated with new private developments, which might be conditioned to construct needed elements of the pedestrian and bicycle systems 1-11 8

Next Steps This package of materials is intended to be a helpful resource to all local jurisdictions and public agencies intending to sponsor SR2S projects and programs. To leverage the materials created as part of this effort, the Authority intends to: Periodically refresh the online resource guide to stay up-to-date with the latest state and national SR2S trends Provide ongoing opportunities for local jurisdictions to receive technical assistance at specific school sites; by taking on responsibility for procurement and contract management, the Authority removes barriers and makes it more efficient for individual local agencies to pursue smaller-scale projects From time to time, update the SR2S needs assessment for application in future funding cycles 1-12 9

Attachments 1. Contra Costa County Safe Routes to School Master Plan Existing Conditions: Data Summary 2. Contra Costa Safe Routes to School Needs Assessment 3. Contra Costa Safe Routes to School Online Resource Guide 4. Contra Costa Safe Routes to School Technical Assistance Documentation 1-13 10

This Page Intentionally Blank