Road Safety Management for Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Similar documents
Ongoing Challenges with Pedestrian Safety Data May 15: 10:15AM-11:45AM. PedsCount! 2014 May 14-16, 2014 Sacramento, CA

STEP. Proactively Addressing Crash Risk with Systemic Safety Analysis. Safe Transportation for Every Pedestrian

Vision Zero & ITE. April 11, Toole Design Group. Jason DeGray, P.E., PTOE. Vision Zero & ITE

FHWA Resources for Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals

Pedestrian Safety and the Highway Safety Improvement Program

Cycling Road Safety Audits

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

Bicycle RSAs: How to Conduct Road Safety Audits and How to Use Them to Promote Bicyclist Safety. Dan Nabors, PE, VHB Bill DeSantis, PE, VHB

Relative Vulnerability Matrix for Evaluating Multimodal Traffic Safety. O. Grembek 1

USDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Initiative: Safer People and Safer Streets. Barbara McCann, USDOT Office of Policy

Designing for Pedestrians: An Engineering Symposium. Rutgers University March 21, 2013

Vision Zero Task Force February 28, Collision Landscape Analysis

REDUCING COLLISIONS AT HIGH CRASH LOCATIONS

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015

Pedestrian injuries in San Francisco: distribution, causes, and solutions

Safe Transportation Research & Education Center UC Berkeley

Traffic Safety Barriers to Walking and Bicycling Analysis of CA Add-On Responses to the 2009 NHTS

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

FHWA s Strategic Agenda for Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation. Purdue Road School March 8, 2017

TODAY S WEBINAR AGENDA

CHAPTER 9: SAFETY 9.1 TRAFFIC SAFETY INTERSECTION COLLISIONS

Safer Cycling: How the City of Vancouver is Proactively Improving Cycling Safety

The Traffic Monitoring Guide: Counting Bicyclists and Pedestrians. APBP 2017 June 28: 11:15am-12:45pm

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

Strategies for Making Multimodal Environments Safer. Kim Kolody Silverman, CH2M

LOUISIANA COMPLETE STREETS POLICY. Ellen W. Soll, AICP Principal Soll Planning

What Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety

Designing Complete Streets: What you need to know

COMPLETE STREETS DESIGN STATE OF THE PRACTICE

Road Diets: Reconfiguring Streets for Multi-Modal Travel

8. Collisions INTRODUCTION

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

Why Zone In on Speed Reduction?

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS. Guidelines for Marked Crosswalks

Notes to Benefit-Cost Analysis

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Analyzing Spatial Patterns, Statistics Based on FAST Act Safety Performance Measures

Bicycle Facilities Planning

STANLEY STREET December 19, 2017

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

PHOTOVOICE for Pedestrian Safety: Students Saving Lives One Block at a Time. Marissa A Rodriguez Jimma Njoku Shelli Stephens-Stidham

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

Pedestrian Safety at Roundabouts. Presentation to the Howard-Suamico School Board November 26, 2007

Relationship of Road Lane Width to Safety for Urban and Suburban Arterials

Development of Arlington County s Marked Crosswalk Guidelines. Jon Lawler, P.E. Design Engineer Arlington County, VA

Speed Management Action Plan

A TECHNICAL GUIDE FOR CONDUCTING TRAFFIC SAFETY ASSESSMENTS FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES

Vision Zero: No more traffic deaths on Berkeley streets

and Rural Multimodal Networks 2017 ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool

LANE ELIMINATION PROJECTS

FINAL PLAN APPENDIX D CITY OF BERKELEY BIKE PLAN D-1

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLIST CRASH ANALYSIS 2015

Vision Zero Task Force June 28, 2017 COUNTERMEASURE PAIRING

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Transportation Planning Division

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Board of County Commissioners Work Session

PBIC Webinar. Improving Multimodal Outcomes through Performance Measurement and Design Flexibility. November 14, 2016

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Speed Limits in the Hoddle Grid

APPENDIX C. Systems Performance Report C-1

Bike Planning: A New Day

VISIONZEROPHL.COM #VISIONZEROPHL

Creating Complete Streets to Accommodate All Users

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

Instructions for Counting Pedestrians at Intersections. September 2014

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

Safety Emphasis Areas & Safety Project Development Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Tampa Bay

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Safety and Active Transport. Dr. Maureen Carew, Medical Officer of Health Renfrew County and District Health Unit May 30, 2014

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Closing Plenary Session

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide

SPEED MANAGEMENT FOR VISION ZERO

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

EE16B Designing Information Devices and Systems II

Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Innovations & Applications

Regional trends in walking and biking Transport Chicago conference. June 9, 2017

CITY OF CAMBRIDGE 2015 BICYCLE PLAN TOWARDS A BIKABLE FUTURE

Safety Impacts: Presentation Overview

Engineering Countermeasures for Transportation Safety. Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

New York City School Safety Engineering Program. Jackson Wandres The RBA Group June 09, 2005

Smart Trips Austin: Team Training. Friday, April 1, 2016 City Hall

Evolving Roadway Design Policies for Walking and Bicycling

APPENDIX A: RESOURCES & ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

DART Bus Crash Analysis. typical scenarios associated with selected crash types

Vision. Goals and Objectives. Walking

OCALA/MARION TPO CITY OF BELLEVIEW CORRIDOR PLAN STUDY PRESENTATION TO THE BELLEVIEW CITY COMMISSION JANUARY 25, :00 PM

2017 Annual Traffic Safety Report

Bicycle Crashes. Number of Bike Crashes. Total Bike Crashes. are down 21% and severe bike crashes down 8% since 2013 (5 years).

By: Bill Baranowski, PE TRAFFIC CALMING EXAMPLES IN SUGARHOUSE, DAYBREAK, AND WEST JORDAN CITY

Transcription:

Caltrans Transportation Planning Speaker Series September 28, 2015 Bike and Pedestrian Issues in Transportation Planning: Road Safety Management for Pedestrians and Bicyclists Offer Grembek Co-Director, UC Berkeley, SafeTREC

The Traffic Safety Problem in CA Facts and Figures Over 34,000 traffic fatali8es in the past 10 years. 2013 Figures 3,000 fatali8es 33% * Source: Fatality Analysis Repor8ng System (FARS), NHTSA * Source: Fatality Analysis Repor8ng System (FARS), NHTSA

The Traffic Safety Problem in CA Facts and Figures Over 34,000 traffic fatali8es in the past 10 years. Since 2010 (end of recession) there is a 10% increase in fatali8es 2013 Figures 3,000 fatali8es 33% 10% * Source: Fatality Analysis Repor8ng System (FARS), NHTSA * Source: Fatality Analysis Repor8ng System (FARS), NHTSA

Passenger Vehicle Fatali8es Facts and Figures Over 21,000 passenger vehicle fatali8es in the past 10 years. 2013 Figures 1,611 fatali8es 10% * Source: Fatality Analysis Repor8ng System (FARS), NHTSA

Passenger Vehicle Fatali8es Facts and Figures Over 21,000 passenger vehicle fatali8es in the past 10 years. Since 2010 (end of recession) there is a 1% increase in passenger vehicle fatali8es 2013 Figures 1,611 fatali8es 10% 1% * Source: Fatality Analysis Repor8ng System (FARS), NHTSA

Pedestrian Fatali8es Increased Facts and Figures Over 6,500 pedestrian fatali8es in the past 10 years. 2013 Figures 701 fatali8es 10% 1% * Source: Fatality Analysis Repor8ng System (FARS), NHTSA

Pedestrian Fatali8es Increased Facts and Figures Over 6,500 pedestrian fatali8es in the past 10 years. Since 2010 (end of recession) there is a 17% increase in pedestrian fatali8es 2013 Figures 701 fatali8es 10% 1% 17% * Source: Fatality Analysis Repor8ng System (FARS), NHTSA

Bicycle Fatali8es Increased Facts and Figures Over 1,100 pedestrian fatali8es in the past 10 years. 2013 Figures 141 fatali8es 10% 1% 17% * Source: Fatality Analysis Repor8ng System (FARS), NHTSA

Bicycle Fatali8es Increased Facts and Figures Over 1,100 pedestrian fatali8es in the past 10 years. Since 2010 (end of recession) there is a 41% increase in bicycle fatali8es 2013 Figures 141 fatali8es 10% 1% 17% 41% * Source: Fatality Analysis Repor8ng System (FARS), NHTSA

P/B Fatali8es are Increasing While passenger vehicles fatali8es remained the same, pedestrian and bicycle fatali8es have increased significantly over the past four years. 10% 1% 17% 41% * Source: Fatality Analysis Repor8ng System (FARS), NHTSA

Rela8ve Vulnerability in Traffic

The Vulnerability Matrix Table from Grembek (2010) * SWITRS 2005-2009, Injury crashes of two par8es or less.

The Vulnerability Matrix Table from Grembek (2010) * SWITRS 2005-2009, Injury crashes of two par8es or less.

The Vulnerability Matrix Table from Grembek (2010) * SWITRS 2005-2009, Injury crashes of two par8es or less.

The Vulnerability Matrix Table from Grembek (2010) * SWITRS 2005-2009, Injury crashes of two par8es or less.

The Vulnerability Matrix Table from Grembek (2010) * SWITRS 2005-2009, Injury crashes of two par8es or less.

The Vulnerability Matrix Table from Grembek (2010) * SWITRS 2005-2009, Injury crashes of two par8es or less.

The Vulnerability of Pedestrians Table from Grembek (2010) * SWITRS 2005-2009, Injury crashes of two par8es or less. 40,202 1,088 = 36.95 Rela8ve vulnerability of pedestrians in the CA network In other words: pedestrians suffer 36.95 8mes more injuries than they inflict.

The Vulnerability of Bicyclists Table from Grembek (2010) * SWITRS 2005-2009, Injury crashes of two par8es or less. 37,821 2,542 = 14.88 Rela8ve vulnerability of bicyclists in the CA network In other words: pedestrians suffer 14.88 8mes more injuries than they inflict.

P/B are the Most Vulnerable Tables from Grembek (2010)

Safety is Obtained by Buffers Passenger Vehicles Environment Industry Road User

Safety is Obtained by Buffers Passenger Vehicles Environment Industry Road User Pedestrians and Bikes Environment Industry Road User

Limited P/B Industry Safety Buffer Passenger Vehicles Environment Industry Road User Pedestrians and Bikes Environment Industry Road User

Principles of Road Safety Management A set of goals and ac.vi.es to improve P/B safety 1 2 Infrastructure data Volume data 3 4 5 Data EvaluaBon Hazard Assessment Countermeasure SelecBon 6 7 8 Economic Appraisal Funding Sources InsBtuBonalizaBon

Principles of Road Safety Management A set of goals and ac.vi.es to improve P/B safety 1 2 Infrastructure data Volume data 3 4 5 Data EvaluaBon Hazard Assessment Countermeasure SelecBon 6 7 8 Economic Appraisal Funding Sources InsBtuBonalizaBon

Principles of Road Safety Management A set of goals and ac.vi.es to improve P/B safety 1 2 Infrastructure data Volume data 3 4 5 Data EvaluaBon Hazard Assessment Countermeasure SelecBon 6 7 8 Economic Appraisal Funding Sources InsBtuBonalizaBon

Principles of Road Safety Management A set of goals and ac.vi.es to improve P/B safety 1 2 Infrastructure data Volume data 3 4 5 Data EvaluaBon Hazard Assessment Countermeasure SelecBon 6 7 8 Economic Appraisal Funding Sources InsBtuBonalizaBon

Principles of Road Safety Management A set of goals and ac.vi.es to improve P/B safety 1 2 Infrastructure data Volume data 3 4 5 Data EvaluaBon Hazard Assessment Countermeasure SelecBon 6 7 8 Economic Appraisal Funding Sources InsBtuBonalizaBon

Principles of Road Safety Management A set of goals and ac.vi.es to improve P/B safety 1 2 Infrastructure data Volume data 3 4 5 Data EvaluaBon Hazard Assessment Countermeasure SelecBon 6 7 8 Economic Appraisal Funding Sources InsBtuBonalizaBon

Principles of Road Safety Management A set of goals and ac.vi.es to improve P/B safety 1 2 Infrastructure data Volume data 3 4 5 Data EvaluaBon Hazard Assessment Countermeasure SelecBon 6 7 8 Economic Appraisal Funding Sources InsBtuBonalizaBon

Principles of Road Safety Management A set of goals and ac.vi.es to improve P/B safety 1 2 Infrastructure data Volume data 3 4 5 Data EvaluaBon Hazard Assessment Countermeasure SelecBon 3 7 8 Economic Appraisal Funding Sources InsBtuBonalizaBon

Principles of Road Safety Management A set of goals and ac.vi.es to improve P/B safety 1 2 Infrastructure data Volume data 3 4 5 Data EvaluaBon Hazard Assessment Countermeasure SelecBon 3 7 8 Economic Appraisal Funding Sources InsBtuBonalizaBon

Principles of Road Safety Management A set of goals and ac.vi.es to improve P/B safety 1 2 Infrastructure data Volume data 3 4 5 Data EvaluaBon Hazard Assessment Countermeasure SelecBon 6 7 8 Economic Appraisal Funding Sources InsBtuBonalizaBon

Principles of Road Safety Management A set of goals and ac.vi.es to improve P/B safety 1 2 Infrastructure data Volume data 3 4 5 Data EvaluaBon Hazard Assessment Countermeasure SelecBon 6 7 8 Economic Appraisal Funding Sources InsBtuBonalizaBon

Facility decomposi8on

Elements and core facili8es Buffer Sidewalk Approach Median Intersection Crosswalk Approach Buffer Sidewalk

Define an approach N1 A1 A2 N2

Formal Infrastructure Database

Labeling nodes and approaches

Computer data collec8on

Principles of Road Safety Management A set of goals and ac.vi.es to improve P/B safety 1 2 Infrastructure data Volume data 3 4 5 Data EvaluaBon Hazard Assessment Countermeasure SelecBon 6 7 8 Economic Appraisal Funding Sources InsBtuBonalizaBon

Pedestrian Crashes Absolute Number of Crashes 42

Pedestrian Crashes Absolute Number of Crashes 43

Pedestrian Crash Risk Crash Risk: (Crashes / Exposure) 44

Pedestrian Crash Risk Crash Risk: (Crashes / Counts) 45

NCHRP 7-19 Equipment Evalua8on Project Purpose Address lack of pedestrian and bicycle volume data Assess data collec8on technologies and methods Develop guidance for prac88oners NCHRP Report 797 Guidebook on Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data Collec8on 46

Pedestrian Crash Risk Es8mate exposure at loca8ons without counts Es8mate Risk 47

Principles of Road Safety Management A set of goals and ac.vi.es to improve P/B safety 1 2 Infrastructure data Volume data 3 4 5 Data EvaluaBon Hazard Assessment Countermeasure SelecBon 6 7 8 Economic Appraisal Funding Sources InsBtuBonalizaBon

Hazard Assessment Hotspot Approach Hotspots or High Collision Concentra8on Loca8ons (HCCL) are road segments with a higher than expected number of crashes, compared to prior experience or a user- defined threshold. Systemic Approach Systemic approach iden8fies a set of loca8ons where countermeasures may be installed systemically where roadway facili8es share the same unsafe features that are associated with par8cular crash types.

Systemic Approach vs. Spot Approach Benefits Complement the hotspot approach Reduced data needs Widespread effect Crash type preven8on Cost- effec8veness Drawbacks Jus8fying blanket improvements can be difficult

The Hotspot Approach Individual Crash Locations Road network 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Postmile

The Hotspot Approach Fixed window length (w): 0.2 miles Minimum number of crashes (n cric ): 2 Number of hotspots identified: 3 Total number of crashes covered: 8 # crashes > n cric 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 First candidate hotspot Move location to the next candidate hotspot location (using the first crash (use as a the start next point) available crash as a start point) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Postmile

The Systemic Approach FHWA s Systemic Approach Program.

The Systemic Approach FHWA s Systemic Approach Program.

Modified Systemic Approach Location type is based on features of the site e.g., Intersection; ADT<10,000; Speed<= 45 mph;traffic Signal Not present Crash type is based on features of the crash e.g., Turning vehicle

Incorpora8ng Crash data

Incorpora8ng Crash data Number of sites Systemic hotspot

Iden8fying the Countermeasures

Iden8fying the Countermeasures

Co- benefits for Countermeasures 5 5 5

Co- benefits for Countermeasures

Principles of Road Safety Management A set of goals and ac.vi.es to improve P/B safety 1 2 Infrastructure data Volume data 3 4 5 Data EvaluaBon Hazard Assessment Countermeasure SelecBon 6 7 8 Economic Appraisal Funding Sources InsBtuBonalizaBon

Road Safety Management System FUNDING VOLUME AND INFRASTRUCTURE DATA ECONOMIC APPRAISAL COUNTERMEASURES systemic hotspot HAZARD ASSESSMENT CRASH DATA INSTITUTIONALIZATION Legend Program core Inputs Outputs Evaluation Support

Summary Why Pedestrians and Bicyclists? Principles of Road Safety Management Hazard Assessment Strategies Hotspot Systemic Successful Road Safety Management System