Orange County MPA Watch A n n u a l R e p o r t

Similar documents
Orange County MPA Watch A n n u a l R e p o r t

Orange County MPA Watch 2016 A n n u a l R e p o r t

Orange County MPA Watch M o n i t o r i n g H u m a n U s a g e

Orange County MARINE PROTECTED AREAS 3 rd Quarter 2015 Report

Orange County MARINE PROTECTED AREAS 2 nd Quarter 2016 Report

Orange County MARINE PROTECTED AREAS

Orange County MARINE PROTECTED AREAS

Orange County MPA Watch Program Quarterly Report (Jan 1 March 31, 2012)

4 th Quarter 2014 Report OC MPA Watch Program Orange County Coastkeeper

Enforcement and Compliance within South Coast Marine Protected Areas

CA Department of Fish and Wildlife

Point Conception State Marine Reserve

The Otter Project & MPA Watch

Commercial Fisheries in the South Coast s Marine Protected Areas

Coastal and marine recreation in New England is ingrained in the region s economic and

To Fish or Not to Fish? A role-playing activity based on the Marine Reserves process at the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary

Essential Fish Habitat

Marine Management Strategy Frequently Asked Questions

Case Study 3. Case Study 3: Cebu Island, Philippines MPA Network 10

Concept for a Whale Protection Zone for the Endangered Southern Resident Killer Whale

Final Report, October 19, Socioeconomic characteristics of reef users

no-take zone 1 of 5 Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary, California

Fisheries in the. US Virgin Islands. Jed Brown Acting Director & Chief of Fisheries USVI Division of Fish and Wildlife St. Croix, US Virgin Islands

ARRIVE. Experience the elements of exceptionality

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Safe Harbor for Sea Turtles

Management under the Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan

CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF COASTAL WETLANDS IN CALIFORNIA

Eastern Shore Islands Area of Interest Community Newsletter

Commercial Anchovy Fishery Public Meeting

North Carolina. Striped Mullet FMP. Update

Wave Prediction in the Santa Barbara Channel

Survey of New Jersey s Recreational Blue Crab Fishery in Delaware Bay

This report will help to direct the next steps necessary to open all remaining vertical accessways that have yet to be opened.

West Coast Rock Lobster. Description of sector. History of the fishery: Catch history

San Diego-Scripps Coastal SMCA and Matlahuayl SMR Survey Sites -La Jolla-

Marine Debris from Land to Sea: Holistic Characterization, Reduction and Education Efforts in New Hampshire

NOAA Fisheries Update:

2016 West Coast Entanglement Summary

Essential Fish Habitat OCNMS Advisory Council July 13, 2013

AN OVERVIEW OF RECENT PROJECTS RELATED TO SAND BUDGETS, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BEACHES

Office of Science & Technology

Managing the coral reef - The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Great Barrier Reef Coral Sea World Heritage Site Zoning

Warm-up # 7 A day 5/17 - B day 5/18 UPDATE YOUR TABLE OF CONTENTS

Trawl fishery management of Eastern Arabian Sea

LIONFISH CONTROL PLAN

Redondo Beach Boat Launch Ramp Facility

To Fish or Not to Fish?

OR DUNGENESS CRAB FISHERY:

ESTIMATED RETURNS AND HARVEST OF COLUMBIA RIVER FALL CHINOOK 2000 TO BY JOHN McKERN FISH PASSAGE SOLUTIONS

County of Orange Resources and Development Management Department Harbors, Beaches and Parks. Strategic Plan. HBP Strategic Plan Workshop 1.

Re: Algae/Cyanobacteria Bloom in St. Lucie, Martin, Palm Beach and Lee Counties.

In each summer issue of Lake

STAFF REPORT C36 A 22 08/23/18 W S 13 A. Franzoia GENERAL LEASE OTHER

TREASURE ISLAND PUBLIC USE MONITORING FINAL REPORT MONITORING SURVEYS

ADDENDUM I TO AMENDMENT 3 OF THE INTERSTATE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WEAKFISH

SUMMARY Pacific Fishery Management Council Preferred Alternative Groundfish Essential Fish Habitat Final Environmental Impact Statement

Fisheries Historic Status U.S. fishermen are granted the right to fish in public waters under the Public Trust Doctrine. Through the years, this right

Drownings in Hawaii, A review of death certificates by the Injury Prevention and Control Program, Hawaii DOH

California Health & Safety Code Requirement for Reporting of Sewage Spills

Tracking Juvenile Summer Flounder

History and Status of the Oregon Dungeness Crab Fishery

2001 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WEAKFISH (Cynoscion regalis)

MANAGEMENT ESTABLISHING JURISDICTION LEGAL BASIS DEFINING LOGICAL APPROACHES

Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Metrolink Ridership and Revenue Quarterly Report. Staff Report

Surfrider s Recreational Use Survey and Marine Spatial Planning in Washington State. Gus Gates- WA Policy Manager

Charter Boat Fishing in Lake Michigan: 2015 Illinois Reported Harvest

Project Limulus on Napatree Point: Horseshoe Crab Surveys in 2017

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE RECOMMENDATIONS ON ADDITIONAL WINTER-RUN PROTECTIONS IN 2016 OCEAN FISHERIES

ARRIVE. Experience the elements of exceptionality

Consultation Document

SUCCESSFUL GEAR RECOVERY Lessons from Puget Sound

Año Nuevo State Marine Conservation Area and Greyhound Rock State Marine Conservation Area

UBCM Community Excellence Awards 2007 Submission

Goliath grouper management stakeholder project. Kai Lorenzen, Jessica Sutt, Joy Hazell, Bryan Fluech, Martha Monroe University of Florida

California Management of Forage Fish Species. Deb Wilson- Vandenberg Senior Environmental Scientist California Department of Fish and Game

HOW CAN WE HELP TO SUSTAIN AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY?

October Net Loss: Overfishing Off the Pacific Coast

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE NINTH REGULAR SESSION August 2013 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

Collect marine debris around the coral reef areas surrounding Ao Nang and Phi Phi National Park.

Management advisory for the Bay of Bengal Indian mackerel fishery

Chesapeake Bay Jurisdictions White Paper on Draft Addendum IV for the Striped Bass Fishery Management Plan

OUR COAST TO KEEP. Coastal Public Access. Linda Locklin, Coastal Access Program Manager California Coastal Commission

Map Showing NAFO Management Units

SOCIETAL GOALS TO DETERMINE ECOSYSTEM HEALTH: A FISHERIES CASE STUDY IN GALVESTON BAY SYSTEM, TEXAS

Charter Boat Fishing in Lake Michigan: 2017 Illinois Reported Harvest

West Hawaii Regional Fishery Management Area

BICYCLE SAFETY OBSERVATION STUDY 2014

Agenda Item G.1.a Supplemental CDFW Report 2 September 2015

I. What is a Fishery? II. What is Fisheries Management? III. What is Fisheries Science? I. Brief history of the evolution of fisheries science.

Balance in the Bay. An introduction to ecosystem-based management and the Monterey Bay market squid fishery.

Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND. Attachment 1

Comparison of EU and US Fishery management Systems Ernesto Penas Principal Adviser DG Mare

WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENTS 5 TH MEETING DOCUMENT SAR-5-05 BET A

Summary of NWA Trail Usage Report November 2, 2015

We have the tools to start. saving our oceans... now all we need is. action

Cook Inlet Habitat Conservation Strategy

Boating Safety Account Continuation Review

Unless otherwise noted, images throughout the presentation are by FWC.

Transcription:

Orange County MPA Watch 2 0 1 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t

WHAT IS AN MPA? Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are discrete geographic marine or estuarine areas designed to protect or conserve marine life and habitat. The MLPA (Marine Life Protection Act) was passed in 1999, and the statewide network of MPAs created under it was completed in 2012. The MLPA is different from traditional fishery regulations in that it seeks to protect entire marine ecosystems rather than individual species. All MPAs have measurable goals and objectives, and function as a network. Also, scientific data on the MPAs must be collected to evaluate their performance and facilitate adaptive management. This data is reviewed and adaptive management decisions are made every five years by the California Fish and Wildlife Commission. WHY DO WE HAVE MPA S? MPA s preserve California s stunning marine ecosystems so that future generations can observe and enjoy. Direct benefits include: Increased spawning stock Improved habitats Spillover effect enhances catch close to protected areas Enhanced biodiversity and species protection WHAT IS THE OC MPA WATCH PROGRAM? The Orange County Marine Protected Area (OC MPA) Watch Program enlists volunteers, community groups, and local government to monitor human activity in and around the seven Orange County MPAs. The program is organized and run by Orange County Coastkeeper (OCCK). OCMPA Watch is part of a larger state wide program with surveys sites from Klamath to San Diego being done by a variety of groups. All of the groups use the same monitoring procedures and data collection sheet and enter data into a central database. The program has a Technical Advisory Committee made up of well-known scientists as well as a statewide coordinator that assists local programs and committees that develop training materials and manage Quality Control issues. The website for the statewide program is www.mpawatch.org. The goal for the statewide program is to develop information on human activities that will be used by the Department of Fish and Wildlife, other state and local agencies, and the public in managing our MPAs to insure their success. Orange County Marine Protected Areas: 1. Bolsa Bay State Marine Conservation Area (SMCA) 2. Bolsa Chica Basin SMCA 3. Crystal Cove SMCA 4. Laguna Beach State Marine Reserve (SMR) 5. Laguna Beach SMCA 6. Dana Point SMCA 7. Upper Newport Bay SMCA

Orange County MPA Regulations: All activities that do not harm marine life including swimming, boating, diving, surfing, tidepooling, walking and other beach recreational activities are allowed with no restrictions. The only activities restricted in MPAs are those that may potentially inpact marine resources. The regulations for each MPA are as follows: 1. The Bolsa Bay SMCA allows fishing from shore by hook and line only. Due to additional restrictions from the ecological reserve overlay, fishing is only allowed at one site in the very north end of the SMCA near the Bolsa Chica Interpretative Center. 2. The Bolsa Basin SMCA allows no take of any kind. 3. The Crystal Cove SMCA allows the recreational take of lobster, sea urchin, and finfish by hook-and-line or spearfishing, and the commercial take of lobster, urchins, and coastal pelagic species such as sardine, anchovy and squid by round haul net. The take of all living marine resources from tidepools is prohibited. The SMCA is bounded by the southern Newport Harbor jetty in the north to Abalone Point in the south. 4. The Laguna Beach Marine Reserve does not allow take of any marine resources in the 4.7 mile stretch from Abalone Point in the north to Goff Island in the south. 5. The Laguna Beach SMCA does not allow take of any marine resources in the 1.2 mile stretch from in Geoff Island the north to Table Rock Point in the south. 6. The Dana Point SMCA allows the recreational take of lobster, sea urchin, and finfish by hook-and-line or spearfishing, and the commercial take of lobster, urchins, and coastal pelagic species such as sardine, anchovy, and squid by round haul net. The take of all living marine resources from inside tidepools is prohibited. The SCMA is bounded by Table Rock Point in the north and the bend in the Dana Point Harbor jetty in the south. 7. The Upper Newport Bay SMCA allows fishing from shore using hook and line only. Due to the ecological reserve overlay, fishing is only allowed at four designated sites: Castaways Beach, North Star Beach, Rocky Point, and the Jamboree Bridge. This SMCA includes all of Newport Bay north of the Pacific Coast Highway Bridge. HOW & WHY MONITOR HUMAN ACTIVITIES IN AN MPA? To assure the effectiveness of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and to determine the impacts on marine resources, we need to identify the types of human activities that occur in or near MPAs. Because gathering this data is time-consuming, partnerships with key community groups and engaged citizens are a cost-effective and resource-efficient means to evaluate human uses. Trained volunteers can produce accurate and reliable information that can be used to better understand how individuals use MPAs. MPA Watch data provides the human use context needed to assist with the interpretation of biological data in the Orange County region through monitoring of human uses inside MPAs.

Observed: What human activities occur in and around MPAs? What resources are needed to support the MPAs? Are regulations being followed? Have consumptive and non-consumptive uses changed since the MPAs were implemented? Partners: City of Newport Beach City of Laguna Beach City of Dana Point Eco Adventure Center, Ritz Carlton Laguna Niguel Members of the public DATA: With sound practices, data from effective volunteer monitoring programs can be used to inform resource managers and provide information to enhance the management and performance of Marine Protected Areas. The data collected by MPA Watch volunteers is analyzed to identify human use patterns in MPAs. OCCK then uses the collected information to prepare four quarterly reports and one annual report that summarize the survey data for use by resource managers, partner groups, and the public. This data will allow resource managers and community groups working in the MPAs to make decisions on where to invest their resources to maximize benefits to the MPAs and the community. The MPA Watch program has been designed as a standardized survey, not necessarily a scientific study. The MPA Watch Program is one part of the umbrella of the larger Orange County and statewide MPA program. OCCK is also involved in other parts of the MPA process. Whales Program Kids Ocean Day Boater & Diver Outreach Native Abalone Newport Bay Eelgrass MARINE PROTECTED AREAS Newport Copper Reduction Newport Bay Dredging Project

Observed: We defined a large number of activities that our volunteers would most likely to observe during their surveys, such as beach recreation, wildlife viewing, snorkeling, paddle boarding, and of course, fishing. Each activity falls under one of four categories: On-shore vs. Off-shore Distinction: On-shore includes any activities that are within the MPA boundaries of the mean high tide line, which, for the purposes of this project, includes sandy beaches and rock areas up to the nearest bluff or man-made structure. Off-shore includes the area within the offshore MPA boundaries as defined in the Fish and Game code and all activities that occur in this area. Consumptive vs. Non-consumptive: Consumptive activities include recreational and commercial take of marine species both on and offshore. Non-consumptive activities include kayaking, surfing, scuba-diving, wildlife viewing, and beach-visiting. Survey Results: January 1 st, 2012 was the implementation date for the South Coast MPAs from Point Conception to the Mexican border. From January 1 December 31, 2015, we completed 483 surveys and observed 26,588 activities, consumptive and non-consumptive, onshore and offshore. Compared to 2014, the number of surveys increased by 43 surveys and the number of activities increased by 836 observations. We found that the frequency of non-consumptive activities greatly outnumbered consumptive activities, with 99% of the 26,588 activities observed being non-consumptive. Of these activities, beach recreation was the most popular non-consumptive activity. Of the consumptive activities, fishing from private vessels was the most popular recreational activity. Survey Sites and : 1. The Upper Newport Bay SMCA allows fishing from shore using hook and line only. Due to the ecological reserve overlay, fishing is only allowed at four designated sites: Castaways Beach, North Star Beach, Rocky Point, and the Jamboree Bridge. Each of these is also a survey site. The most popular activities observed were beach recreation and kayaking. 2. The Crystal Cove SMCA consists of two jurisdictions: The City of Newport Beach survey sites are Corona Del Mar Beach, Little Corona Del Mar Beach, and Morning Canyon Beach. The Crystal Cove State Park surveys are Pelican Point, Los Trancos, and Reef Point. 3. The Laguna Beach Marine Reserve and SMCA does not allow take of any marine resources in the 4.7 mile stretch from Abalone Point in the north to Goff Point in the south. The Reserve contains twelve survey sites covering almost every accessible beach. Beach recreation, walking, running, and wildlife viewing (including tidepooling) were the most popular onshore activities, while board sports, diving, snorkeling, and boating were the most popular offshore activities.

4. The Laguna Beach SMCA does not allow take of any marine resources in the 1.2 mile stretch from Goff Island to Table Rock Point (except for public works maintenance activities). The SMCA contains three survey sites covering almost every accessible beach. Beach recreation, walking, running, and wildlife viewing (including tidepooling) were the most popular onshore activities, while surfing, diving, snorkeling, and boating were the most popular offshore activities. 5. The Dana Point SMCA allows the recreational take of lobster and sea urchin, and of finfish by hook-and-line or spearfishing, and the commercial take of lobster, urchins, and coastal pelagic species such as sardine, anchovy, and squid by round haul net. The take of all living marine resources from inside the tidepools in these MPAs is prohibited. The Survey sites are Totuava Beach, Thousand Steps Beach, Three Arch Bay, Salt Creek, Dana Strands, and Dana Point. The most popular activities observed were beach recreation, walking, and tidepooling. The most common non-consumptive offshore activity was surfing, primarily at Salt Creek Beach. This area was also the most popular MPA for fishing from private boats and lobster pots. Please note the following: OC Coastkeeper discontinued monitoring of the Bolsa Chica MPA during the 2 nd Quarter of 2013. Therefore, the data from 2012 and 2013 presented in this report do not include the data from the Bolsa Chica monitoring. Frequency of MPA Watch Visits per Quarter No. of Visits per Quarter MPA Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 TOTAL Upper Newport 18 17 19 50 104 Crystal Cove 6 20 20 48 94 Laguna 48 67 38 76 229 Dana Point 16 16 10 14 56 TOTAL 88 120 87 188 483 The frequency of MPA Watch Visits in the Orange County Marine Protected Areas January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015

Observed during MPA Watch Visits MPA Upper Newport Bay Onshore, Non- Consumptive Onshore, Consumptive Offshore, Nonconsumptive Offshore, Consumptive TOTALS 142 74 157 0 373 Crystal Cove 6,500 40 386 29 6,955 Laguna 11,845 3 2,763 3 14,614 Dana Point 1,875 36 1,587 12 3,510 TOTALS 20,362 153 4,893 44 25,452 The frequency of consumptive versus non-consumptive activities in the Orange County Marine Protected Areas January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 By the Numbers: 2012 vs 2013 vs 2014 vs 2015 Upper Newport Bay 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 2012 2013 2014 2015 400 200 0 Visits

Crystal Cove 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2000 0 Visits Laguna 25000 20000 15000 10000 2012 2013 2014 2015 5000 0 Visits

Dana Point 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2000 1000 0 Visits Total 50000 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 2012 2013 2014 2015 10000 5000 0 Visits Based on the charts above, the following observations can be made: While there was some slight variation in the number of MPA visits, the amount of activities observed experienced a noticeable decline between the years 2013 2014.

There did not seem to be any noticeable pattern in comparing the number of visits to the number of activities. For example, in Upper Newport, while the number of MPA watch visits from 2014 and 2015 increased significantly from 77 to 104, the number of activities observed declined sharply from 1030 to 501. Also, the number of MPA visits in Crystal Cove declined by almost half between 2012 and 2013, yet the number of activities observed declined only slightly. And during the same period in Laguna, the number of visits declined slightly, but the number of activities observed actually increased. What can be deduced from these observations is the extreme variation in MPA activities depending upon the time and day the observations were made, which can greatly impact the results. For example, frequent visits in early morning or late afternoon on weekdays may potentially yield fewer activities observed than a few visits during peak hours or on weekends. Overall Comparison of 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015 Total Number of Sites Monitored Total Number of Surveys Conducted Total Number of Observed Total Onshore, Consumptive Total Number of Onshore, Non-Consumptive Total Number of Offshore, Consumptive 2012 2013 2014 2015 35 35 25 25 671 527 440 483 43,033 45,189 25,752 26,588 619 611 596 153 32,298 33,587 20,313 21,362 1,413 1,620 208 44 Total Number of Offshore, 8,703 9,371 4,635 5,029 Non-Consumptive Total Number of Violations 69 139 7 0 By comparing the past three years statistically, we can see that each year, the percentage breakdown of uses is almost identical regardless of the number of surveys and sites monitored. In all of the years surveyed, the bulk of observed activities were onshore, non-consumptive. In 2012, 2013, and 2014, onshore, non-consumptive activities comprised 75%, 74%, and 79% of the total observed activities, respectively. In 2015, the percentage of onshore, non-consumptive activities only increased marginally (80% of the total observed activities). The percentage of total activities

that were observed as offshore, non-consumptive also remained fairly constant: 20% in 2012, 21% in 2013, 18% in 2014, and %19% in 2015. The only noticeable trend, as far as breakdown of activities, was that the total percentage of consumptive activities continued to decline further throughout 2015. The percentages of activities observed as being onshore, consumptive activities for 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 were 1.5%, 1.4%, 2.2% and 0.7%, respectively. And offshore, consumptive activities comprised 3.5%, 3.6%, 0.8%, and 0.3% of the total observed activities for 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015, respectively. Thus while the total percentage of consumptive activities (offshore and onshore) comprised only a slim minority for the years 2012 and 2013 (5% for both years), the total percentage of consumptive activities declined to only 3% of the total activities for 2014 and dropped to a mere 1% of the total activities for 2015. The most significant variation observed was in the number of potential MPA regulation violations observed. While the total number of potential violations was 0.15% and 0.29% for 2012 and 2013, the percentage of violations was a mere 0.03% of the total for 2014 and 0% for 2015 as there were no potential violations reported for that year. While this may seem like a large variation, the percentages are so small that the observed variation is not statistically significant. The biggest change in potential violations was the decrease from 2013 to 2014, which could have been the result of increased public awareness about MPAs, improved quality of enforcement, and/or increased warning signs around selected beaches.

Orange County Survey Sites