HUD and HDE Topics. Humanitarian Use Device and. Humanitarian Use Device. Humanitarian Device Exemption

Similar documents
IRB Training October 22, 2015

SOP Title Review of Research: Devices for Humanitarian Uses

Institutional Review Board Responsibilities in making the Significant Risk and Non-significant Risk Device Determination

Humanitarian Use Devices Made Simple

Date Effective 4/21/2008 Identification

Policy Number: 42 Title: Investigational Devices Date of Last Revision: 06/12/2008; 07/22/2010; 05/29/2013; 05/01/2016; 10/16/2018

Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: MHC_RP0107. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Origination: 04/2018 Effective: 04/2018 Approved: 04/2018 Last Revised: 04/2018 Expiration: 04/2021

NONCOMPLIANCE. 1. Overview

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

Research Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7

Via Federal Express Rockville, MD 20850

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

Institutional Review Board - Restriction s Impo sed

Human Research Protection Program Policy

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Post-Approval Submissions

EMERGENCY USE 03/02/2016

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN S E RVICES, 'mgr,':~~ MAY WARNING LETTE R

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

AMENDMENTS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESEARCH 3/01/2016

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

Information Sheet Guidance For IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors

Issue in IRB Approvals:

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. IRB Review Processes

Human Subjects in Research Review and Monitoring Form. Not applicable

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

CONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS

JUN L WARNING LETTER VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

What s New in GCP? FDA, OHRP Issue Harmonized Guidance on Transferring IRB Oversight of Clinical Studies

Independent Ethics Committees

DOCUMENTATION OF IRB DISCUSSIONS AND DECISIONS ( IRB MINUTES)

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Submitting Continuing Reviews and/or Amendments to the IRB

Human Research Protections Program Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:

Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

Title: EXPEDITED IRB REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Interactions with the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Ceded IRB Review. The project involves prisoners or other vulnerable populations that require special considerations.

SOP 5.06 Full Committee Review: Initial IRB Review

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the continuing review procedure of approved projects for the IRB.

IRB COMPOSITION AND IRB MEMBER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW

Chapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities

Ceded IRB Review. The University of Arizona has standing agreements in place for the following entities regarding ceded IRB review:

Review of Research by the Convened IRB

Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices an d * 1Ya I a Radiological Health WARNING LETTE R

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

Cayuse IRB Policy and Procedure Manual

The Top 10 Human Research Protection Compliance Risks

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

the HRPP Director will prepare a draft report within three (3) workdays after the IRB meeting at which the determination occurred.

SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

Wayne State University Institutional Review Board

THE DUHS IRB REVIEW PROCESS 8/13/2014

Version 1. Submission Guide and Policies

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Policy on IRB Review of Protocol Deviations and Noncompliance for Non-exempt Research

1. Review and approval of the consent document is a responsibility that FDA assigns to the IRB with jurisdiction

POLICY NO EXEMPT RESEARCH... 4 POLICY NO DISCLOSURE OF RESEARCH LAB TEST RESULTS... 5

IV. Basic Procedures for Human Research Protections

Centralized IRB Models

IRB Chair Responsibilities

21 CFR Part 56 - Institutional Review Boards

HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS RESEARCH NETWORK

510(k) SUMMARY K EIDOSMVED LLC OEC EDG Depth Gauge Page 1 of 2, 510(k) Summary

University of Cincinnati. Radiation Safety Committee Operations Guidelines Statement of Policy (RSC Guidelines) RSC Guidelines (revision 5)

IRB Minutes Quality Improvement Assessment

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Policies and Procedures Manual

IRB APPLICATION CHECKLIST

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD MANUAL: PURPOSE and POLICIES.

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

Supersedes Document Dated: 7/7/11. SOP: RR 401 Version No.: 07 Version Date: 9/8/15 EXPEDITED REVIEW 1. POLICY

Investigator Manual Version date: April 1, 2010

SOP #2-2 Version #1 Date First Effective: December 14, Page 1 of 6

7.0 DEVIATION and EXCEPTION of a PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROTOCOL

Minot State University Institutional Review Board ANNUAL UPDATE/REVISION/PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 02 06/30/10 08/01/07 1 OF 6

Florida State University IRB Standard Operational Procedures

Yale University Institutional Review Boards

HSPP Standard Operating Procedures

IRB-REQUIRED INVESTIGATOR ACTIONS

Effective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

WORKING WITH THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD &

FDA > CDRH > CFR Title 21 Database Search. Registration Listing Adverse Events Advisory Committees. 21 CFR Part 56

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date: 07/18/2011

EXPEDITED REVIEW. Terms used in this policy, but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Glossary.

Transcription:

Humanitarian Use Device Humanitarian Device Exemption Marian Serge, RN Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Center for Devices and Radiological Health Marian.Serge@fda.hhs.gov 1 HUD and HDE Topics Regulations//Guidance Distinguish between HUD and HDE IRB responsibilities Physician and HDE-holder responsibilities FDA concerns Revised HDE guidance 2 Humanitarian Use Device and Regulation 21 CFR 814 Subpart H 21 CFR 56 Institutional Review Boards 21 CFR 803 Medical Device Reporting Guidance document List of all HUDs Click on HUD number to access labeling Frequently asked questions and answers 3 1

Humanitarian Use Device Humanitarian Use Device (HUD) Office of Orphan Products Development designates a device as an HUD Serious disease or condition affecting fewer than 4,000 individuals in the US per year No other comparable device available 4 The HDE application is reviewed by CDRH (75 days) Bench and animal testing Summary of clinical experience: could be data, literature, investigation(s), marketing experience (but not valid scientific evidence as in the case of a PMA) Approval based on probable benefit outweighs risk of injury from its use (but not reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness as in PMA approval) HDE label states the effectiveness of this device for this use has not been demonstrated The HDE allows marketing distribution for the HUD 5 Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) The HDE-holder must Have both HUD and HDE before device is shipped to institutions with an Institutional Review Board Report clinical experience (safety info) to FDA, annual reports Maintain IRB correspondence Ensure IRB initial and continuing review 6 2

The HDE holder is responsible for ensuring that the HUD is not administered to or implanted in a patient prior to obtaining IRB approval at the health care facility. An HDE holder may wish to enforce this requirement by not shipping the HUD to the facility until it has received confirmation of IRB approval. 7 IRB initial review of an HUD FDA believes that the approval criteria set forth in the IRB regulations at 21 CFR 56.111, can and should be interpreted to include consideration of the patient s need for the HUD and the likelihood that the device is appropriate for the patient s condition or disease state. 8 IRB initial review of an HUD An IRB may approve the use of the HUD in general, for HUD patients that qualify for groups of HUD patients that meet certain criteria under a HUD treatment protocol on a case by case HUD basis 9 3

IRB initial review of an HUD An IRB may specify limitations on the use of the device based upon one or more measures of disease progression prior use and failure of any alternative treatment modalities reporting requirements to IRB appropriate follow up precautions and evaluations any other criteria it determines appropriate 10 IRB Continuing Review Follow written procedures for continuing review of devices Convened meeting Expedited review Ask HDE-specific questions Are patients receiving information packets? Has the HDE been used outside of approved labeling and were reports made? 11 IRB withdrawal of HDE approval IRB requirement to withdraw approval for Failure to follow IRB or FDA requirements Unexpected serious harm to patients An IRB will have to ask specific questions at continuing review to elicit the above information. 12 4

Human subject protections Physician responsibilities Patient consent per IRB policy the effectiveness of this device for this use has not been demonstrated Give patients HDE patientinformation packet Medical Device Reporting (MDR) to FDA (see next slide) and IRB 13 Adverse events reported via MDR Physicians and Institutions must submit MDRs to FDA and IRB Reports of death within 10 working days Reports of serious injury within 10 working days MDR Report: approximately 38 fields to complete 14 Areas of concern and acceptable actions Off label use (guidance) Physician should check with IRB to ensure facility has no restrictions Summary report to IRB and HDEholder following the use Research of off label use Requires an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) 15 5

Recent HUD Compliance Concerns HUD used in research for new use without IDE CDRH required the investigator to obtain IDE HUD used without HDE CDRH/FDA met with the Firm. Recalled the HUDs Flagrant off-label use of HUDs CDRH informed IRBs, physicians, and firms that this is not the intent of an HUD 16 HDE Guidance Pediatric Medical Device Safety and Improvement Act of 2007 Device firms can make a profit on HUDs, if........ It is intended for the treatment or diagnosis of a disease that occurs in pediatric patients (may also include adult use) The distribution of the HDE does not exceed the annual distribution number, (ADN) which is specified by FDA The firm notifies FDA if the ADN is exceeded 17 Section on Role of IRBs New section with 29 Questions and Answers Examples: Differences between HDE, IDE, 510(k), and PMA? How to distinguish between HUD use and HUD research? How to evaluate request for HUD approval? IRB s oversight of physician s use of an HUD? What to consider when physicians request to use a HUD? IRB s concerns with HDE holder charging for HUD? What information do patients receive? HIPAA questions 18 6

Summary Description of HUD and HDE Regulations//Guidance IRB responsibilities Physician & HDE-holder responsibilities FDA concerns Revised HDE Guidance 19 Reference http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/hdeinfo.html 20 Questions 21 7