Artificial Lift Basics Pre Reading

Similar documents
Gas Well Deliquification Workshop. Sheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado February 29 March 2, 2016

International Journal of Petroleum and Geoscience Engineering Volume 03, Issue 02, Pages , 2015

Packer-Type Gas Separator with Seating Nipple

The Inflow Performance Relationship, or IPR, defines a well s flowing production potential:

A LIFE OF THE WELL ARTIFICIAL LIFT STRATEGY FOR UNCONVENTIONAL WELLS

Optimizing Production Throughout the Well s Lifespan. Gas Lift

Pump Fillage Problem Overview. Jim McCoy. 9 th Annual Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop. Renaissance Hotel Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 17-20, 2013

Advanced Intermittent Gas Lift Utilizing a Pilot Valve

PRODUCTION I (PP 414) ANALYSIS OF MAXIMUM STABLE RATE AND CHOKES RESOLVE OF OIL WELLS JOSE RODRIGUEZ CRUZADO JOHAN CHAVEZ BERNAL

Appalachian Basin Gas Well. Marietta College, Marietta, Ohio June 7-8, Development. Robert McKee, P.E. Design Engineer Multi Products Company

Sucker Rod Lift Downhole Gas Separators Proposed Industry Testing

Beam Pumping to Dewater Horizontal Gas Wells

bakerhughes.com CENesis PHASE multiphase encapsulated production solution Keep gas out. Keep production flowing.

Intermittent Gas Lift Utilizing a Pilot Valve

Introduction to Artificial Lift Methods COPYRIGHT. Gas Lift and ESP Pump Core. This section will cover the following learning objectives:

Jim McCoy. Tubing Anchor Effect on Pump Fillage. Lynn Rowlan Tony Podio Ken Skinner. Gas Well Deliquification Workshop.

Downhole Diverter Gas Separator

Intermittent Gas Lift and Gas Assist Plunger Lift

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop. Gas Assisted Rod Pump

Contact Information. Progressive Optimization Service. We Provide: Street Bay #2. Grande Prairie, AB T8V - 4Z2

Sizing, Selection, and Installation of Pressure-relieving Devices in Refineries

Fundamentals Of Petroleum Engineering PRODUCTION

Gas Locked Pumps are NOT Gas Locked!

Don-Nan Pump & Supply. Don-Nan Pump & Supply 1

2010 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop Optimizing Production and Reducing Costs by Solving Rod Pumping Problems With The Beam Gas Compressor

Innovating Gas-Lift for Life of Well Artificial Lift Solution. The Unconventional Solution!

Venting Atmospheric and Low-pressure Storage Tanks API STANDARD 2000 SEVENTH EDITION, MARCH 2014

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ARTIFICIAL LIFT METHODS ON A NIGER DELTA FIELD

Downhole Gas Separation Performance

Using Gas Lift to Unload Horizontal Gas Wells

Artificial Lift: Making Your Electrical Submersible Pumps Talk To You

Restoring Fluid Flow in Tubing Strings

Downhole Pressure Boosting: A production enhancement tool for both dry and liquid loaded Gas wells

De-Liquification and Revival of Oil & Gas Wells using Surface Jet Pump (SJP) Technology

An approach to account ESP head degradation in gassy well for ESP frequency optimization

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L PRESSURE BASICS AND CONCEPTS

Perforated Stator for Gas Control in PC Pumps Hollow Rotor for Controlling Solids Problems in PC Pumps

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Sheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado February 20 22, 2017

Electrical Submersible Pump Analysis and Design

Downhole Gas Separator Selection

SPE Copyright 2012, Society of Petroleum Engineers

Drilling Efficiency Utilizing Coriolis Flow Technology

Two Short Topics 1) Using Compressors More Effectively 2) Improving Upon Poor-Boy Gas-Lift

Demystifying ESPs: A technique to make your ESP talk to you.

STIPumpCard. User Manual

Down-Hole Gas Separator Performance Simulation

Moyno ERT Power Sections. Operational Guidelines

32 nd Gas-Lift Workshop. Optimizing Subsea Well Kick-off Operations Case Study Using FlowLift2

Downhole Gas Separator Selection

Simplicity in VRU by using a Beam Gas Compressor

Acoustic Techniques to Monitor and Troubleshoot Gas-lift Wells

TROUBLESHOOT ROD PUMPED WELLS USING TUBING FLUID LEVEL SHOTS

VARIABLE SLIPPAGE PUMP

Chapter 8: Reservoir Mechanics

Is The Selection Of Artificial Lift

COILED ROD. Optimize Your Rod Lift Systems With Pro-Rod

Pacemaker Plunger Operations in Greater Natural Buttes

APPENDIX A1 - Drilling and completion work programme

Tradition & Technology

New Single Well Gas Lift Process Facilitates Fracture Treatment Flowback

Success Paths: A Risk Informed Approach to Oil & Gas Well Control

High Pressure Continuous Gas Circulation: A solution for the

New power in production logging

Acoustic Troubleshooting of Coal Bed Methane Wells

Downhole Gas Separators

PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONAL ISSUES

A Combined Experimental & Numerical Research Program to Develop a Computer Simulator for Intermittent Gas-lift

VortexFlow DX (Downhole) Tool Installation Instructions

Inflatable Packers for Grouting 11/10/00

On-Off Connector Skirt

Gas-Well De-Watering Method Field Study

Pressure Activated Chamber Technology (PACT)

Selection of gas compressors: part 2

TURBO GAS LIFT Innovative Hybrid Artificial Lift Method GÁS-LIFT COM TURBINA O MODO INOVANTE HÍBRIDO DE ELEVAÇÃO DE PETRÓLEO

Exercise 4-2. Centrifugal Pumps EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE DISCUSSION. Pumps

Applied Fluid Mechanics

GEOTHERMAL WELL COMPLETION TESTS

Compressors. Basic Classification and design overview

PC-PUMP Points to Consider

Plunger Lift Algorithms A Review

I have to say that I had no idea about compressors. That means it s easy for everybody.

TECHNICAL BENEFITS OF CJS / RAISE HSP. Technical Advantages

The Time Has Come For Coiled Rod. Reprinted from Well Servicing magazine

Troubleshooting Gas-lift Wells Using Dual Shot Acoustic Technique

Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop Technology in a Mature Industry. September 2017 John C. Patterson Consultant Retired from ConocoPhillips (2015)

Coiled Tubing string Fatigue Management in High Pressure Milling Operation- Case Study

Modelling Gas Well Liquid (Un)Loading

FLOWING GRADIENTS IN LIQUID LOADED GAS WELLS

A Longer Lasting Flowing Gas Well

Gas Lift Workshop Doha Qatar 4-88 February Gas Lift Optimisation of Long Horizontal Wells. by Juan Carlos Mantecon

Design Tapered Electric Submersible Pumps For Gassy Wells Desheng Zhou, SPE, Rajesh Sachdeva, SPE, IHS INC.

Section 2 Multiphase Flow, Flowing Well Performance

Hard or Soft Shut-in : Which is the Best Approach?

What Geologists Need to Know about Drilling

Introduction to Pumps

Intrinsically Safe Acoustic Instrument Used in Troubleshooting Gas Lift Wells

Challenging Subsea Gas Lift Application, Offshore Norway.

WELL SCAVENGER. Versatile wellbore clean-up tool for the most demanding operations

Installation Instructions JATCO Environmental Protection Tank Model J-7000

MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTS: COMPRESSORS, PUMPS, SEALS, SPEED DRIVES, CONTROL VALVES & ACTUATORS & SAFETY RELIEF VALVES

Transcription:

Artificial Lift Basics Pre Reading (Last Updated 7 January 2016)

NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information contained herein and/or these workshop/seminar proceedings (WORK) was prepared by or contributed to by various parties in support of professional continuing education. For purposes of this Disclaimer, Company Group is defined as PetroSkills, LLC.; OGCI Training, Inc.; John M. Campbell and Company; its and their parent, subsidiaries and affiliated companies; and, its and their co-lessees, partners, joint ventures, co-owners, shareholders, agents, officers, directors, employees, representatives, instructors, and contractors. Company Group takes no position as to whether any method, apparatus or product mentioned herein is or will be covered by a patent or other intellectual property. Furthermore, the information contained herein does not grant the right, by implication or otherwise, to manufacture, sell, offer for sale or use any method, apparatus or product covered by a patent or other intellectual property right; nor does it insure anyone against liability for infringement of same. Except as stated herein, COMPANY GROUP MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY, WITH RESPECT TO THE WORK, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Company Group does not guarantee results. All interpretations using the WORK, and all recommendations based upon such interpretations, are opinion based on inferences from measurements and empirical relationships, and on assumptions, which inferences and assumptions are not infallible, and with respect to which competent specialists may differ. In addition, such interpretations, recommendations and descriptions may involve the opinion and judgment of the USER. USER has full responsibility for all interpretations, recommendations and descriptions utilizing the WORK. Company Group cannot and does not warrant the accuracy, correctness or completeness of any interpretation, recommendation or description. Under no circumstances should any interpretation, recommendation or description be relied upon as the basis for any drilling, completion, well treatment, production or other financial decision, or any procedure involving any risk to the safety of any drilling venture, drilling rig or its crew or any other individual. USER has full responsibility for all such decisions concerning other procedures relating to the drilling or production operations. Except as expressly otherwise stated herein, USER agrees that COMPANY GROUP SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY TO USER OR TO ANY THIRD PARTY FOR ANY ORDINARY, SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR LOSSES WHICH MIGHT ARISE DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY BY REASON OF USER S USE OF WORK. USER shall protect, indemnify, hold harmless and defend Company Group of and from any loss, cost, damage, or expense, including attorneys fees, arising from any claim asserted against Company Group that is in any way associated with the matters set forth in this Disclaimer. The Content may not be reproduced, distributed, sold, licensed, used to create derivative works, performed, displayed, transmitted, broadcast or otherwise exploited without the prior written content of the Company Group. Use of the WORK as a reference or manual for adult training programs is specifically reserved for PetroSkills, LLC. All rights to the WORK, including translation rights, are reserved. COPYRIGHT PETROSKILLS, LLC., 2015 THIS WORK IS COPYRIGHTED BY PETROSKILLS, LLC. AND DISTRIBUTED UNDER EXCLUSIVE LICENSE BY PETROSKILLS, LLC.

Blended Learning Participant Guide Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Straight Line Inflow Performance Relationship... 1 Curved Line Inflow Performance Relationship... 1 Gas Wells... 2 Establishing a Well's IPR... 2 Use of the IPR... 3 Tubing Selection... 3 Artificial Lift... 4 Gas Lift... 4 Beam Pumping... 7 Electric Submersible Pumping... 9 PCP Pumps... 10 Plunger Lift... 11 Hydraulic Pumping... 12 Artificial Lift Selection... 13 Summary... 14 Page i

Introduction New oil wells which naturally flow are produced by managing the drawdown in the well by means of a surface choke. New wells often produce above the bubble point pressure at the reservoir depth. As the reservoir ages and reservoir pressure drops, flow drops until the well must employ an artificial lift system to provide assistance. Straight Line Inflow Performance Relationship Single phase flow with the well bottomhole pressure above the bubble point pressure generates a straight line result for flow as a function of Pwf. This behavior is referred to as a well s productivity index, a constant referred to as the well PI. The well productivity is illustrated below in Figure 1 for flow above the bubble point pressure at Pwf. Figure 1 Curved Line Inflow Performance Relationship When the flowing bottomhole pressure Pwf is below the bubble point pressure, two phase liquid and gas flow occurs in the reservoir. The well productivity is illustrated below in Figure 2 for flow below the bubble point pressure at Pwf. This type of performance is typical of a solution gas drive reservoirs. A plot of flowing bottomhole pressure Pwf vs. liquid production rate generates a curved line with a reduction in the inflow performance relationships as the reservoir pressure (Pres) depletes. Page 1

Gas Wells Figure 2 For gas wells, viscosity and compressibility are a function of pressure with inflow characteristics similar to the Vogel IPR above. High gas flow velocities around the wellbore often result in turbulent flow. The resulting non linear IPR of gas wells is often expressed as: Pres 2 Pwf 2 = aq + bq 2 Where: aq is referred to as laminar flow and bq 2 is referred to a turbulent flow The constants a and b are derived from multi rate well tests or alternatively estimated from known reservoir and gas properties. Establishing a Well's IPR The inflow performance relationship for a given well has to be established by a well test. In theory, one production rate with corresponding bottomhole pressure and the shut in pressure will define the inflow performance relationship. In practice a number of flow rates may be taken to confirm the well performance. If a sample of formation fluid is taken and analyzed to establish the bubble point pressure, it will be possible to decide whether to use the straight line, the Vogel or the Vogel/Glass inflow performance relationship. Page 2

Use of the IPR The inflow performance relationship is useful as a tool to monitor well performance and predict the stimulation and artificial lift requirements of a number of wells. The IPR for a well must be known in order to size the well tubulars correctly. Based on interpolation between wells, if the initial IPR for a well is lower than expected in a particular part of the reservoir, it may then be suspected that the formation has been badly damaged during the drilling and completion phase. Mapping the IPRs across the field may highlight this situation. When wellbore damage is confirmed by a build up survey the well may require stimulation. Even with stimulation, the inflow performance of a well will decline with falling reservoir pressure. Plotting this decline will indicate approximately when the well will have to be artificially lifted in order to maintain the required offtake rate from the field. Tubing Selection The method by which the optimum tubing string is selected for a well involves the calculation of the I PR and the IPC for several different sets of conditions. These are usually as follows: IPRs for the expected life of the field, incorporating reservoir pressure decline and changes in the PI. IPCs for different tubing sizes, at different GORs, water cuts and/or tubing head pressures, depending on the expected performance of the reservoir. Production requirements such as maximizing initial offtake, optimizing production late in field life, etc. A complete representation of the flowing well is then constructed for each possible set of conditions, and from this the optimum tubing size can be selected, depending on production requirements. An example of a series of IPRs and IPCs for a well is shown in Figure 3. Page 3

Figure 3 Artificial Lift Having selected the optimum tubing size for the well completion, it may be apparent from the IPR and IPC constructions that at some point in the life of the well the reservoir will no longer be able to flow naturally to surface at the required rate. At this point in time, artificial lift will be required in order to maintain production at the required level. There are four main types of artificial lift mechanism used in the industry, namely: Gas Lift Beam Pumps Electric Submersible Pumps Progressing Cavity Pumps Plunger Lift Hydraulic Pump Each of these types of artificial lift is discussed briefly in the following sections. Gas Lift The technique of increasing the flowing lifetime of the well, or of increasing the production rate above the naturally flowing rate, by injecting gas into the tubing string is known as gas lift. Page 4

Continuous Gas Lift - Relatively high pressure gas is continuously injected into the casing from where it enters the tubing string through valves located at intervals along the length of the tubing. By virtue of the increased gas content of the fluid column in the tubing, the density of the fluid is reduced and hence the drawdown on the reservoir increased. Intermittent Gas Lift - Gas is injected in a short burst into the casing-tubing annulus, causing a ball valve at the bottom of the tubing to close and pushing a slug of liquid from the bottom of the tubing to surface. The gas supply is then shut off, allowing the well fluids to enter the tubing from the reservoir ready for the next slug. Schematic diagrams of both types of gas lift are shown in Figure 4. Figure 4 Continuous gas lift is by far the most common form of gas lift used in the industry. Continuous gas lift is essentially an extension of natural flow, whereby the producing GOR is artificially increased by the injection of gas. This results in the flowing bottomhole pressure being reduced for a particular rate. For maximum benefit, the gas should be injected as deep as possible, reducing the density of as much of the fluid column as possible. Gas is injected through gas lift valves, a series of which are run in side pocket mandrels together with the tubing string, and so designed that only one valve is open and passing gas at any one time. It is common practice to utilize the annular space between the casing and the tubing as the conduit for the gas lift gas down to the point of injection. The gas lift valves are such that they allow passage of gas from casing to tubing, but prevent the passage of fluid from tubing to casing. Continuous gas lift is basically a high rate production method. For a given tubing size, there is a gas/liquid ratio which will result in the lowest intake pressure. This is called the optimum GLR, and it decreases as the production rate increases. Consequently, for low rate production, large quantities of Page 5

gas are required to obtain the low intake pressures. Hence, continuous gas lift becomes inefficient at low rates and alternative artificial lift techniques are used. Continuous gas lift takes full advantage of the well's natural energy and can handle significant amounts of solid material. The major disadvantage is the inability to reduce the intake pressure to near zero levels, and the need for a high pressure gas supply. A typical gas lift system comprises of the following components and is illustrated in Figure 5: Source of high pressure gas (compressor, gas well etc.) Gas distribution lines Surface controls Subsurface controls (gas lift valves) Flow lines Separation equipment Storage facilities Figure 5 Page 6

Beam Pumping Another type of artificial lift technique is beam pumping, also called rod pumping or sucker rod pumping. It is used extensively throughout the industry A typical beam pumping system is shown in Figure 6 and consists of the following: Power unit Pumping unit Sucker rod string Subsurface pump The pumping unit is that part of the installation which converts the rotary motion of the power unit to the reciprocal motion required to operate the pump. This motion is transferred to the subsurface pump via sucker rods, which are small diameter steel or fiberglass rods that run inside the tubing string. The subsurface pump is a configuration consisting of a standing valve and a travelling valve, which open and close in sequence with the upstroke and downstroke of the sucker rods. A schematic is shown in Figure #7. During the upstroke, the travelling valve is closed and the standing valve opens, allowing wellbore fluids to enter the tubing string. During the downstroke, the standing valve closes and the travelling valve opens and fluid is forced up the tubing. The cycle is then repeated, bringing the fluid to surface. The main advantage of the beam pump is that the bottom hole flowing pressure Pwf can be drawn down very low, permitting low pressure reservoirs to be produced. The system is also very reliable and economical to operate, once it is set up properly. Beam pumps do exhibit a large pumping unit at surface and the units are not designed for high production rates, gas or significant solids. Consequently, beam pumps are used mainly in depleted reservoirs, where low rate, low GOR production is required. Page 7

Figure 6 Page 8

Electric Submersible Pumping Electric submersible pumps (ESPs) are rotating impeller pumps submerged in the well fluid and driven by an electric motor installed immediately below the pump: A schematic of an ESP system is shown in Figure 7. Figure 7 Electric power is transmitted to the motor via an electric cable. The pump may be installed on the bottom of the tubing or run inside the tubing into a locking device in the tubing string. The pump itself consists of any number of stages (up to a hundred or so), each stage consisting of an impeller and diffuser with axial discharge. The number of stages depends on the ratio between discharge and intake pressure, and is the main design consideration.. The main advantages of the ESP are that it can produce low bottomhole pressures at almost any production rate, and without obtrusive surface units. However, it has the same disadvantages as the beam pump with regard to gas and solids, plus the added (major) disadvantage that the electric cable is highly prone to failure. Average pump run life is approximately 2.5 years across the industry. Page 9

PCP Pumps Progressing cavity pump (PCP) systems are the favored artificial lift method for wells with high solids, heavy API oil, and relatively moderate to high fluid volumes. They are also commonly used for heavy oil applications and thermal projects. See Figure 8. Figure 8 PCP systems consist of a (steel rod) rotor and an (elastomer) stator that, when rotated by a surface drive system, causes reservoir fluids in the pump cavities to progress upward and move fluid from the intake to the discharge end of the pump. The resulting continuous positive displacement flow provides the highest volumetric efficiency of any conventional artificial lift system. These systems are ideal for many environments such as heavy crude oil production, medium to light oil production, coalbed methane, and sand laden, horizontal, slanted, and directional wellbores. Page 10

Plunger Lift Plunger lift systems are selected most commonly to efficiently and cost effectively de liquefy gas wells and also to produce oil wells with a high gas to liquid ratio. A plunger lift completion uses well reservoir pressure to periodically lift a plunger installed in a tubing string to the surface to lift fluids on top of the plunger. See Figure 9. Figure 9 The plunger lift system consists of components such as plungers, upper and lower bumper springs, lubricators, downhole accessories, surface controls, and analysis software. The plunger cycles between the upper bumper spring at the surface lubricator and the lower bumper spring in the bottom section of the production tubing string. This creates a solid interface between the lift gas below and the produced fluid above. Page 11

Hydraulic Pumping Hydraulic pumps are reciprocating plunger type pumps located at the bottom of the tubing string, as schematically represented in Figure 10. Figure 10 Power is transmitted by means of a hydraulic fluid to an engine attached to the pump, which in turn drives the pump. A hydraulic control valve directs the flow of power fluid alternately to each side of the engine, which is connected with a rod to the pump, and hence the produced fluid is pumped to surface. The power fluid returns to surface either mixed with the produced fluid or in a separate conduit. The pump may either be installed at the bottom end of the tubing, or may be pumped down into a locking device located in the tubing string. The latter type is particularly attractive in that the pump can be retrieved without the use of a workover hoist to pull the tubing. A variation on the hydraulic pump is called the jet pump. This type has no moving parts and operates by converting pressure into kinetic energy through a small nozzle (Bernoulli Principle). The advantages of the hydraulic pump are that it can produce at high rates and at low bottom hole pressures, and that it is simple and cheap to operate. The main disadvantages are that it requires large volumes of a very clean power fluid, and that it cannot handle solids. Page 12

Artificial Lift Selection The criteria for selection of a particular type of artificial lift mechanism are numerous and often complicated. Some of the main considerations are listed below: Reservoir parameters e.g., pressure, P.I., water cut, sand production, GOR Well parameters e.g., deviation, completion design Location e.g., land or offshore Cost Local experience Availability of resources Workover possibilities Standardization Reliability Figure 11 Page 13

Summary Advantages and disadvantages of these types of artificial lift mechanism are summarized below. Advantages Disadvantages GAS LIFT No volume constraints Requires high pressure gas No solids problem Inefficient at low rates Low cost Limited drawdown capability No deviation constraints Requires integral casing No GOR limits Safety aspects of high pressure gas BEAM PUMPING Simple system Deviation limited Reliable Cannot handle high amounts of solids Very low pressures achievable Cannot handle high GORs Flexible Depth limit (+ 2000 m.) Cheap Cannot be used offshore Easy pump replacement Obtrusive Cannot handle high rates ELECTRIC SUBMERSIBLE PUMPING Can handle high volumes Requires source of electricity Unobtrusive Impractical in shallow, low rate wells Simple to operate Electric cable unreliable No deviation problem Cannot handle high GORs Cheap Cannot handle solids Rapid hook up Inflexible Minimum rate + 25 m 3 /d PCP PUMPS To be provided PLUNGER LIFT To be provided No depth limit No deviation problem Unobtrusive Flexible Low pressures achievable HYDRAULIC PUMPING Requires power fluid Cannot handle solids Cannot handle high GORs Easy pump change out Page 14