Rock Climbing Risk Management Plan Lutanda Yarramundi

Similar documents
Abseiling Risk Management Plan Lutanda Yarramundi

Archery Risk Management Plan Lutanda Yarramundi

Abseiling Risk Management Plan

High Ropes Management Plan

Mountain Bike Risk Management Plan

POSITION OF PERSON COMPLETING REPORT: IN CONSULTATION WITH: David Radolovic POSITION: HSR/ Program Coordinator

RSP1.1 Single pitch rock climbing and abseiling on outcrops and crags using. RSP2.1 The learning outcome will vary depending on Particiapnt needs and

Risk Assessment Form

Risk Assessment for Rock Climbing

Risk Assessment for Low Ropes

General Risk Assessment for Climbing, Bouldering and Abseiling

Risk Assessment for Night Olympics

Risk Assessment for Team Builders

Climbing & Abseiling Activity Plan

Climbing Area. Review Completed by: Jamie Brunt Approved By: Steve Allard Date: June 2012

Activities Risk Management Guide 2018

RISK ASSESSMENT Indoor Abseiling

Risk Assessment for Radio Rogaine

Risk Assessment Form

Event / Process / Activity / Task Risk Assessment Template

Team Building /Leadership Challenge Risk Assessment - Management Plan

Control Control Owner Residual Risk I L Score I L Score

Top-Rope Climbing - conducted by Tinaroo EEC Staff

RISK ASSESSMENT Outdoor Abseiling

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN MOUNT VICTORIA

University of Lincoln Students Union Annual Risk Assessment for Activities

RISK ASSESSMENT Outdoor Climbing Wall

Swimming Pool Risk Assessment - Management Plan

Curriculum Activity Risk Planner for Mid Ropes & Flying Fox

Curriculum Activity Risk Planner for Movie Night and Popcorn

ACTIVITY RISK ASSESSMENT

PS 2.1 The learning outcome will vary depending on the needs of the. PS3.1 Must have understanding of the process of group dynamics and reviewing

Risk Assessment Form

RISK Assessment & Management Plan

CHRISTIAN YOUTH CAMPS BURLEIGH HEADS MOUNTAIN BIKING

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Outdoor Education

Curriculum Activity Risk Planner for Rock Climbing & Abseiling

CHRISTIAN YOUTH CAMPS BURLEIGH HEADS STAND UP PADDLE BOARDING

RISK ASSESSMENT Indoor Climbing Wall

RISK ASSESSMENT. Catapults

Activity Risk Assessments. Level of risk assessment. Contents

Camp Barrabadeen Risk Assessment

Archery. Reviews Complete By Revision Date Approved By Approval Date Kai Timm 16/6/2016 Libby Mensa 4/4/2017 Robbie Shanks 6/04/2017

Activity Risk Assessments. Level of risk assessment. Contents

Risk Assessment Mobile Climbing Wall

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN ABSEILING

University of Lincoln Students Union Annual Risk Assessment for Activities

Exercise IARD. Risk Assessment & Management Plan

Important Information for Activity Supervisors RAMS (Risk Assessment & Method Statement)

All Wedderburn Christian Campsite s Safe Operating Procedures and activity curricula have been developed with reference to these documents.

Risk Assessment Ground Belay

JOB SAFETY ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS (JSEA) Working With In Situ Testing Rigs

SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT (SWMS) All Trades Abseiling ABN: Ph:

METHODOLOGY RISK TABLES TABLE 1 - QUALITATIVE MEASURES OF CONSEQUENCE OR IMPACT TABLE 2 - QUALITATIVE MEASURES OF LIKELIHOOD

RISK ASSESSMENT RADIO ROGAINE

Climbing - Outdoor Rock Climbing

CHRISTIAN YOUTH CAMPS BURLEIGH HEADS INDOOR ROCK CLIMBING

Risk Assessment Ground Belay

SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT Part 1

Risk Control Measures in Place Remaining Risk Falling from a height Participants 5 The instructor is trained and assessed by a competent person.

Safe Work Method Statement LRB TREE SERVICES 6 Behland St, Kearneys Spring QLD, 4350 ABN

GENERIC AALA ACTIVITIES RISK ASSESSMENT

Low Ropes and Adventure Course Risk Assessment

MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC RISK ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES

SAREA TOP ROPE INSTRUCTOR PERSONAL CLIMBING ASSESSMENT

Raft Building Activity Plan

Safety Management Plan

Dorset Waterpark Activity Risk Assessment

Very unlikely (VU) Unlikely (U) Likely (L) Very likely (VL) Typically experienced once during the working lifetime of an individual

Grizedale Zip Trekking Adventure Risk Assessment

Accident /Incident/Injury Report & Investigation Form

Grizedale Zip Trekking Adventure Risk Assessment

Responsibility. Qualitative measures of Likelihood. A Almost certain Daily Occurrence: Common or frequent. Qualitative Measures of Consequence

SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT Part 1 CONCRETE SAWING

SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT (SWMS)

Activity/Venue Identified Hazards Risk Factor Parties at Risk Current Safety Precautions Further Action

RAMS information for HangDog Indoor Climbing Centre

Risk Assessment & Safe Work Method Statement (SWMS)

The method of Risk Assessment and Mitigation is based on the following Risk Rating Matrix and its general response guidelines.

SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT Part 1. Company Details. Company Name: Contact Name, Position and Phone number: Address: Project details.

Safety Guidelines for Live Entertainment and Events I Part 2. Hazard Identification and Risk Management 1

GENERIC AALA ACTIVITIES RISK ASSESSMENT

Hazard Management Making your workplace safer

Safe Work Method Statements (SWMS)

Dorset Waterpark Activity Risk Assessment

Session plan and risk assessment. Climbing

Procedure: Work health and safety hazard management

Climbing Merit Badge Workbook

SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT SWMS No Version

Example Outdoor Education Risk Assessment

Basketball Risk Assessment for AoC Sport National Championships 2018 Nottingham University

Grizedale Zip Trekking Adventure Risk Assessment

Rock Climbing Review date December 2013

Work Health and Safety Risk Management Procedures

SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT

Hazard & Risk Management

WORK METHOD STATEMENT STRUCTURAL STEEL

Abseiling (Natural Surfaces) REGISTRATION LEVELS AND ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS

Climbing - Zipline/Tyrolean Traverse/Equivalent

Use of the Climbing wall at Pendle Vale College. Method statement and risk assessment

Transcription:

Rock Climbing Risk Management Plan Lutanda Yarramundi School: Year: Dates: Program: Supervising Staff: Activity Context The rock climbing wall at Lutanda Yarramundi is located next on the side of the Activity tower facing the road. Rock climbing is a fun way to challenge participants in their confidence, teamwork and trust. Participants belay each other as they attempt to climb as high up the wall as possible. Leader to Participant Ratios Participation Requirements Equipment For groups 13yo and above: Participants are required to wear/have the following: 1 Activity Facilitator to 17 participants Sun protection (sunscreen, shirt etc.) Minimum Age: 8yo Closed toe footwear For groups 8-13yo: Adequate water 1 Activity Facilitator to 17 participants. An extra supervising Restrictions may apply under differing circumstances Any medication required adult is recommended The following personal protective equipment is provided and For all groups with participants under 18yo: must be worn by participants using the course: Group is required to have a supervising adult present Harness (worn by all participants when climbing) Helmets (worn by anyone in the area between the Higher ratios may be required depending on differing group tower and the belay posts) requirements or circumstances Activity Facilitators Activity Facilitators are trained and signed off as competent to run activity by Activities Manager Activity Facilitators hold current first aid and CPR certificates Emergency - is conducted on site and first aid is located nearby Ambulance time is 15 minutes Activity Facilitators carry the following equipment: First Aid Kit Created by: Jemima Robinson Page 1 of 6 V1, 27/1/16

Risk Management Plan Hazard / Risk Description Existing Control Measures Activity Specific Risk factors specifically associated with activity at Lutanda Yarramundi Fall from height Participants attached to a belay line whenever they are climbing By participant Participants wear safety harnesses while climbing Equipment protected from sharp edges with protective equipment Equipment rated and maintained for loads well above actual load placed upon it Belayers are closely monitored by Activities Facilitator at all times when a climber is off the ground Misbehaviour when belaying is never tolerated and participants may be asked to cease the activity Slipping/Tripping Area cleared by facilitator prior to activity Around the activity area Ropes a hung up on belay posts when not in use during the session Cutting/Scratching Equipment setup to best avoid unnecessary contact with participants On equipment, trees etc. Regular inspections of tower for hazards Impact Injury caused by hitting wall, caused by slipping Landing on ground too hard Entanglement Jewellery Hair Loose Clothing Scarves etc. Fingers Falling Objects Causing injury; eg; equipment, objects carried by participant etc. Rope Burn For climber or belayer Chafing Caused by harness rubbing on skin Participants briefed on and demonstrated proper way to climb Participants briefed on and demonstrated proper way to belay Activity Facilitator provides instruction during climbing to help placement of feet Activity Facilitator monitors belayers at all times throughout the activity All loose clothing, jewellery and other objects that may become entangled are to be removed for the activity Long hair is to be tied back for the activity in low pony tail or braids Participants briefed on where to place hands on rope / away from equipment Belayers briefed to keep fingers away from belay post to prevent getting stuck Loose equipment kept away secured at top of tower Participants briefed on safety near bottom of tower Participants required to wear helmets for activity Helmets required to be worn by anyone between the tower and the belay posts Participants briefed and instructed on proper technique for climbing Belayers help control decent after participant has finished climbing Belayers are instructed to belay hand over hand and not let the rope slide through their hands List of appropriate clothing provided to group prior to camp Participants asked to change into appropriate clothing prior to activity to prevent harness resting on skin Explanation on how to fit harness is given and checked by Activity Facilitator People Risk factors associated with the people using the activity Participant Behaviour Clear behaviour expectations set at start of activity sessions Inability or decision to not follow Encouraging supportive environment directions or cooperate Maintaining supervision Risk Rating Likelihood Consequence Risk Rating Rare Catastrophic Satisfactory Unlikely Moderate Satisfactory Unlikely Moderate Satisfactory Unlikely Minor Satisfactory Created by: Jemima Robinson Page 2 of 6 V1, 27/1/16

Hazard / Risk Description Participant Ability Unable to complete activity due to: Fear / Anxiety Complacency / Overconfidence Physical Ability Existing Control Measures Outline consequences of inappropriate behaviour Removal of individual from activity or cancellation of activity Supportive environment encouraged Participants briefed according to age, ability, experience Participation is based on meeting requirements Demonstration of understanding and/or skills must be shown prior to undertaking activity Participants are guided through activity supportively by Activity Facilitator Activities are challenge by choice - participants are positively challenged but not forced to participate in activity Risk Rating Likelihood Consequence Risk Rating Possible Moderate Satisfactory Activity Facilitator Unsafe practices leading to an injury to a participant caused by: Poor supervision by Activity Facilitator Group Leader Unsafe practices including: Poor supervision by group leaders Observers Injury to... Guests or others observing activity while it is running Unsupervised Users Injury to...guests on site when activity is not running; Members of public accessing camp land (unauthorised) Activity Facilitators must follow Standard Operating Procedures at all times Activity Facilitators are trained and signed as competent, by a qualified Activities Instructor. Vigilant supervision required by Activity Facilitators at all times Communication equipment available readily at activity sessions Groups briefed on requirement to provide supervising adult for participants under 18 years old prior to camp and activities Activity Facilitators will stop or cancel activity without adequate supervision from Group Leader Observers not allowed to participate in activity without activity briefing Created by: Jemima Robinson Page 3 of 6 V1, 27/1/16 Groups briefed on not using facilitated activities without Activity Facilitators Activity equipment locked away when not in use Equipment not left out after of before activity Equipment Risk factors associated with the equipment used for the activity Structure Failure Activities tower built by advanced rigger Safety of the Activity tower, end pole and Regular inspections of structure and anchors performed by activity staff anchors Yearly inspections by external assessor performed Equipment Failure Due to improper use, faulty / damaged equipment Activity Facilitators trained in selection, use, inspection, care & maintenance of activity equipment Activity Facilitators perform check of equipment prior to each activity Participants briefed on proper use of equipment All equipment clearly stored and labelled for activity intended for Equipment regularly inspected and maintained Equipment stored, maintained and retired according to manufacturer instructions Equipment used certified by manufacturer as suitable for use Environment Risk factors associated with the environment including weather Exposure to UV rays Sun smart strategies are encouraged Causing sunburn Exposure to Heat Sun smart strategies are encouraged Causing dehydration, heat stroke etc. Participants are encouraged to drink water, carry water bottles Rare Catastrophic Satisfactory Rare Major Satisfactory Unlikely Moderate Satisfactory

Hazard / Risk Description Existing Control Measures Guests are briefed on location of water filling locations on arrival Activities modified / cancelled if necessary or alternative activities arranged Cold / Wet Weather Weather conditions regularly monitored for adverse conditions Causing hypothermia etc. Participants briefed on wearing suitable protective clothing Activities modified / cancelled if necessary or alternative activities arranged Lightning Strike Weather conditions regularly monitored for adverse conditions Activities delayed / cancelled during lightning storm, participants moved to safe area Activities modified / cancelled if necessary or alternative activities arranged Injury or Allergic Reaction caused by organism Injury caused by contact with natural features Groups briefed on arrival on appropriate actions for sighting/be bitten by snakes Activity area regularly monitored for organisms commonly causing allergic reaction and treated accordingly Suitable medication and first aid to be readily available (user group must provide first aid) Communication equipment readily available Medical assistance within 15 minutes Regular checks of activity area carried out and appropriate maintenance performed (sticks removed etc.) Participants briefed on safe areas Risk Rating Likelihood Consequence Risk Rating Rare Moderate Satisfactory Rare Catastrophic Satisfactory Unlikely Minor Satisfactory Created by: Jemima Robinson Page 4 of 6 V1, 27/1/16

Risk Ratings This risk assessment is measured according to the following risk ratings: Likelihood Ratings Likelihood is the description of the probability and frequency. The likelihood of the risks occurring as outlined in Lutanda Mt Yarramundi risk management plans is determined after the control measures have been implemented. Score Description Broad description of frequency Time framed description of frequency 1 Rare The event may occur, but only in highly exceptional circumstances Not expected to occur for years 2 Unlikely Could occur at some time Expected to occur at least annually 3 Possible Might occur at some time Expected to occur at least monthly 4 Likely Will probably occur in most circumstances Expected to occur at least weekly 5 Almost certain Is expected to occur in most circumstances Expected to occur at least daily Consequence Ratings The outcome of an event or situation expressed qualitatively or quantitatively, being the human impact, damage to infrastructure, disruption to public or financial loss. Score Description Injury or impact details 1 Insignificant Little or no injury requiring no medical attention; Minimal impact on environment; Insignificant adjustments to program; Insignificant damage to property, normal wear; Some difficulty in retaining competent staff; Expected running costs incurred 2 Minor Minor injuries requiring first aid / some medical attention; Minor impact to plants / animals, no disruption to ecosystems; Rescheduling / replacement of program activities to client satisfaction; Damage requiring small repairs, low cost; Some difficulty in attracting, developing, resourcing and retaining competent staff; Minor costs incurred (<$250) 3 Moderate Serious injuries requiring hospitalisation / ongoing medical attention; Ecosystem / landscape self repairs within 12mo; Significant disruption / cancellation of program events; Damage requiring moderate repairs or replacement, moderate cost; Significant difficulty in attracting, developing, resourcing and retaining competent staff; Moderate costs incurred (<$1,000) 4 Major Injuries that are life threatening or causing long term disability; Ecosystem / landscape self repairs within 36mo; Program disruption causing loss of program; Damage requiring high cost/projects for repair/replacement; Guest experience and program is majorly affected by lack of competent staff; Major costs incurred (<$15,000) 5 Catastrophic Fatality; Irrecoverable loss of ecosystem / landscape; Program disruption causing broad loss of reputation; Massive damage, significant replacement of infrastructure required; Programs unable to be fulfilled due to lack of competent staff; Massive costs incurred (>$15,000) The consequence of an incident occurring may vary greatly depending on the individual circumstances of each incident. Example A student trips and falls a detailed analysis of falls might show that although falls occur weekly, more serious injuries from falls only occur once or twice a year. In the main most of the other falls have relatively minor outcomes. Therefore the incident could be scored either according to the severity of the actual outcome, or according to the most likely or typical outcome for that type of incident. Both approaches are valid, however to ensure consistency Lutanda Yarramundi has adopted an approach to record the most likely or typical outcome for all incidents. Created by: Jemima Robinson Page 5 of 6 V1, 27/1/16

Risk Rating Matrix All identified risks are recorded in the following risk matrix according to likelihood and consequence. The purpose of this matrix is to provide a snapshot of all identified risks and establish the level of risk to determine if further treatment is required. Likelihood Consequences 1 - Insignificant 2 - Minor 3 - Moderate 4 - Major 5 - Catastrophic 1 - Rare 1 2 3 4 5 2 - Unlikely 2 4 6 8 10 3 - Possible 3 6 9 12 15 4 - Likely 4 8 12 16 20 5 - Almost certain 5 10 15 20 25 Risk Treatment 1-4 Low Risk Risk does not generally need to be managed any further (current controls are adequate), however the risk needs to be monitored for changes in circumstances and current control effectiveness. Risk generally may be accepted. 5-9 Medium Risk Risk needs to be regularly monitored for any changes and control/treatment effectiveness. Risk may be accepted after consideration. 10-14 High Risk Risk is unacceptable, risks must be further treated or removed to bring rating to medium Risks are to be re-assessed by Activities Manager 15+ Extreme Risk Unacceptable risk, urgent attention is required to treat or remove risks Management to consider elimination of activity Risk Assessment Conducted by: Jemima Robinson Position: Activities and Hosting Manager, Lutanda Mt Victoria Date of Risk Assessment: 27 th January 2016 Date of Review: January 2017 Document Revision: Version 1 Created by: Jemima Robinson Page 6 of 6 V1, 27/1/16