INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD MANUAL: PURPOSE and POLICIES.

Similar documents
NONCOMPLIANCE. 1. Overview

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

CONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS

Wayne State University Institutional Review Board

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program

Chapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board

The Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. Cooperative Agreements

Issue in IRB Approvals:

The IRB reviews and monitors human subjects research conducted by Columbia College Chicago faculty, staff, and students.

Independent Ethics Committees

Human Subjects in Research Review and Monitoring Form. Not applicable

Lapse in IRB Approval

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

What s New in GCP? FDA, OHRP Issue Harmonized Guidance on Transferring IRB Oversight of Clinical Studies

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Policy on IRB Review of Protocol Deviations and Noncompliance for Non-exempt Research

Harford Community College. Institutional Review Board Charter and Standard Operating Procedures

IRB Chair Responsibilities

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

POLICY NO EXEMPT RESEARCH... 4 POLICY NO DISCLOSURE OF RESEARCH LAB TEST RESULTS... 5

IV. Basic Procedures for Human Research Protections

Supersedes Document Dated: 7/7/11. SOP: RR 401 Version No.: 07 Version Date: 9/8/15 EXPEDITED REVIEW 1. POLICY

The Top 10 Human Research Protection Compliance Risks

Research Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7

2.0 Institutional Review Board

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW

Arkansas Tech University Institutional Review Board

SOP Institutional Review Board (IRB) Appointments and Membership

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

Tarleton State University

Institutional Responsibilities Under A Federalwide Assurance

AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Penn as Central IRB FAQ

IRB MEMBERSHIP COMPOSITION, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILIES

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date: 07/18/2011

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

COMPLIANCE MONITORING

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 02 06/30/10 08/01/07 1 OF 6

IRB COMPOSITION AND IRB MEMBER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval

Institutional Review Board - Restriction s Impo sed

SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

USC Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

2 Institutional Review Board

Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

Office of the Vice President for Research

SOP 903: HRPP AND NON-COMPLIANCE

Minot State University Institutional Review Board ANNUAL UPDATE/REVISION/PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

University of Cincinnati. Radiation Safety Committee Operations Guidelines Statement of Policy (RSC Guidelines) RSC Guidelines (revision 5)

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. IRB Review Processes

Date Effective 4/21/2008 Identification

Collaborative Research

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.

IRB HANDBOOK April 2010

Ceded IRB Review. The project involves prisoners or other vulnerable populations that require special considerations.

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD POLICY & PROCEDURES 1 OF 40

Effective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

HSPP Standard Operating Procedures

21 CFR Part 56 - Institutional Review Boards

IRB Member Handbook. Introduction

Version 1. Submission Guide and Policies

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Continuing Review of Approved Research

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

Illinois Institute of Technology Institutional Review Board Handbook of Procedures for the Protection of Human Research Subjects

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Post-Approval Submissions

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

EXPEDITED REVIEW. Terms used in this policy, but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Glossary.

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Non-affiliated Member Nomination

HUMAN SUBJECTS INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES

Ceded IRB Review. The University of Arizona has standing agreements in place for the following entities regarding ceded IRB review:

Title: EXPEDITED IRB REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

University of Wisconsin Colleges Administrative Policy #56 NON-COMPLIANCE IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

DOCUMENTATION OF IRB DISCUSSIONS AND DECISIONS ( IRB MINUTES)

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Policies and Procedures Manual

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES

Tuesday, May 15, Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout.

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval

CUNY HRPP Policy: Suspension or Termination of Human Subject Research

Oklahoma State University Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures

Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures

University of Chicago Social & Behavioral Sciences IRB Manual

Centralized IRB Models

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: Appendix II. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

SOP #2-2 Version #1 Date First Effective: December 14, Page 1 of 6

SOP 5.06 Full Committee Review: Initial IRB Review

Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Serving as a Reviewing IRB

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

Yale University Institutional Review Boards

IRB Minutes Quality Improvement Assessment

Transcription:

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD MANUAL: PURPOSE and POLICIES. This manual complies with the Office of Human Resource Protection s (OHRP s) regulatory guidance on written procedures in Guidance on Written IRB Procedures at http://www/hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/irbgd107.pdf. NWIC IRB Manual - Approved by Board of Trustees Dec. 2, 2013 Page 1

I. PURPOSE of the NWIC IRB Researchers seeking to conduct research in American Indian/Alaska Native communities must respect and understand the unique concerns and approval procedures specific to each individual Tribe or Nation where the proposed research is to be conducted, in order to proceed in an ethical and culturally sensitive manner. They must recognize that they are working on sovereign lands and that cultural and legal issues differ from those in their own community or academic setting. They must become informed about the requirements in place at the specific Tribe or Nation of interest. They must also insure that the appropriate Tribal representative or group has issued approval, in writing, before proceeding with any research activities. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) review research protocols to assess the harms (risks) and benefits for the people to be studied. Each proposal is reviewed using criteria listed in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 45 Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects (1991, with minor updates since). Research proposals are reviewed for safety, subject confidentiality, degree of benefit, and the need for and quality of informed consent. Title 45 CFR Part 46 considers primarily the effects of research on individuals, including the three basic principles of: respect for individual persons; potential harms and benefits to individuals; and justice for individuals. The Northwest Indian College (NWIC) IRB, similar to most American Indian/Alaska Native-based IRBs, goes further and considers the effects of research on Tribes / communities as well, including respect for communities, potential harms and benefits to communities, and justice in and for communities. The NWIC IRB recognizes and respects the sovereignty of the American Indian and Alaska Native people to make decisions about research on their lands. The IRB expects the research to maximize the benefits to the community as a whole and to individual volunteers, to contribute to community s own powers and abilities, to support community goals of health and wellness, to promote healthy lifestyles and improve self-esteem, and to fulfill traditional responsibility of caring for future generations. The NWIC IRB thus encourages research that honors, respects, and incorporates what several tribal Elders have expressed to the NWIC IRB, that the research: 1. Protects and benefits their Tribe; 2. Respects elders and their Tribe s traditional knowledge; 3. Respects and promotes their Tribe s sovereignty, power, strengths and survival; 4. Promotes resiliency and assists their Tribe to identify, address and solve problems; 5. Incorporates traditional spiritual beliefs and practices; 6. Promotes Tribal/community pride and ownership of the project and its results; 7. Expresses pride in their Tribe s role in the project; and 8. Expresses hope for their Tribe s future. NWIC IRB Manual - Approved by Board of Trustees Dec. 2, 2013 Page 2

II. POLICIES OF THE NWIC IRB Structure of the IRB A. IRB Membership The NWIC President will appoint all members and officers of the IRB. The IRB will have nine (9) Members, and include at least one member whose primary expertise is in a non-scientific area and also is enrolled in a federally-recognized tribe. Highest recruitment priority will be interested Elders from the Lummi Nation and other Tribes with whom the IRB has formal agreements to review research. B. Meetings The IRB will review proposed research at convened meetings in which: a quorum of at least five (5) members is present; and at least one (1) member is present whose primary background, interest, and expertise is in a non-scientific area and also is enrolled in a federallyrecognized tribe. C. IRB Agreements with Other IRBs and Outside Researchers The IRB may sign formal agreements: with tribal and other IRBs by an IRB Authorization Agreement, and with outside researchers to review their research by an Individual Investigator Agreement. Research proposed by outside researchers to study NWIC staff, students, or faculty must first be approved by the NWIC President and IRB. IRB Review of Research Plans or Protocols D. Criteria for Human Subject Research The IRB will review research that meets regulations by NWIC, federal government, and funding agency, or is covered by NWIC s Federal Wide Assurance (FWA). The IRB will include as human subjects people both who are now living and also who were once living in the past, whether or not they are or were identified to or by a researcher at any time. E. Criteria for IRB Approval of Research The IRB will consider each of the following factors of the proposed research when reviewing research protocols: 1. Study design; 2. Potential Harms (or risks) and Benefits both to individuals and also to tribes and communities (hereafter communities ); 3. Equitable Selection of individual and community participants/subjects; 4. Identification, Confidentiality, and Privacy of individuals and communities; NWIC IRB Manual - Approved by Board of Trustees Dec. 2, 2013 Page 3

5. Process and content of Informed Consent by potential individual and community participants/subjects; 6. Plans for dissemination of reports, presentations, and publications; and 7. Additional IRB-specific decisions. F. General Requirements of Voluntary Informed Consent The IRB will ensure that the research: presents information on research goals and activities clearly and understandably to potential individual and community participants/subjects or to their legal parent or guardian; and asks potential participants/subjects to voluntarily consent, or (if a legal parent or guardian) to voluntarily give permission and (if the legal minor participant/subject) to voluntarily assent, whether to take part. The IRB may decide to waive these requirement under limited circumstances, and only when permitted by the federal regulations. G. Documentation of Voluntary Informed Consent Voluntary informed consent/permission/assent will be documented by: the researcher using written consent/permission/assent documents that had been approved by the NWIC IRB; and the participants/subjects, or minor participants/subjects and their legal parent or guardian, signing the appropriate consent/permission/assent documents. The IRB may decide to waive this requirement under limited circumstances, and only when permitted by the federal regulations. H. The Application to the IRB for Approval of a Protocol The IRB will have a formal process for researchers to use when applying to the NWIC IRB for approval of their protocol. The process will include one or more Application Form(s) developed by the IRB. The IRB will provide technical assistance to researchers about the Application process and Form[s]. I. Phases and Types of IRB Review The IRB will have explicit criteria and procedures that meet regulatory and NWIC IRB requirements for: Pre-review and technical assistance; Not human subject research ; Exempt status; Eligible for Expedited Review; Full Review of protocols; and Review of phase 1 of protocols planning to develop their human participant/subject involvement in phase 2. J. IRB Review of Changes in Approved Research Activities The IRB will have procedures to review the potential harms and benefits of researcher-proposed changes to the protocol after the IRB approved the original NWIC IRB Manual - Approved by Board of Trustees Dec. 2, 2013 Page 4

protocol, and to review and approve minor modifications separately from major modifications. K. Confidentiality of IRB Meetings The content of the IRB discussions and of the applications being reviewed will remain confidential. IRB decisions will be available to the public, as will the minutes of the IRB meetings (except otherwise confidential or private information will be redacted from the minutes). L. IRB Review of Reports, Presentations, and Publications To minimize harms to communities and individuals, the IRB will review and approve proposed reports, presentations, and publications derived from the research projects. M. Research Close-Out and Transfer The IRB will have formal procedures to close-out the IRB s oversight of the research. The IRB may decide to transfer oversight to another IRB before closeout, if the other IRB will observe both the federal and NWIC IRB regulations, and if the other IRB will ensure continued minimization of harms and maximization of benefits to individuals and communities. IRB Reporting N. IRB Reports The IRB will periodically report information about NWIC IRB activities to the NWIC President, to interested tribal governments, and to organizations for which it reviews research. The IRB will report changes of IRB membership to Office for Human Research Protection. O. IRB correspondence The IRB will maintain up-to-date written and e-mail correspondence to and from researchers, and as needed to and from other IRBs, tribes, and institutions. P. Retention and Storage of IRB records The IRB will retain in a secure area: records of research by NWIC student researchers, for three (3) years; records of research by other researchers, for seven (7) years; and records of research involved in litigation and that had a serious violation or problem, for an indefinite period without transfer to another storage facility. NWIC IRB Manual - Approved by Board of Trustees Dec. 2, 2013 Page 5

IRB Management of Special Problems Q. Complaints or Grievances, and Allegations of Non-Compliance The IRB will respond within five (5) working days to complaints or grievances by participant[s] or others about the research, and to allegations of researcher noncompliance. The IRB will observe legal due process, and will comply with federal and NWIC requirements. R. Problems, Deviations, Violations and Adverse Events The IRB will respond within five (5) working days to problems, deviations, or violations of the approved protocol, and to serious adverse events. The IRB will observe legal due process, and will comply with federal and NWIC requirements. S. Suspension or Termination of Prior IRB Approval The NWIC IRB has the authority to suspend or terminate for cause a prior IRB approval of an active research project. The IRB will: first, investigate the alleged cause; then, determine if there was/is a problem, and (if any problem) its severity; and finally, decide IRB action, if any. The IRB will observe legal due process, and will comply with federal and NWIC requirements. The decision to permanently suspend or terminate prior approval of research activities will be made by only a convened IRB meeting with quorum. T. Report Suspension or Termination of Prior IRB Approval The IRB will report within five (5) working days to the researcher, and to specific applicable federal, funding, tribal, and NWIC officials if the IRB suspends or terminates prior IRB approval of an active research project. U. Lapse of IRB approval of research due to Failure to Renew The IRB s approval of a research project ends on the date of the next periodic review deadline, and no more than 365 days since last approval, whichever comes first. The IRB will quickly provide technical assistance to the PI to minimize both potential harms and disruption of the research and to maximize potential benefits of the research. The IRB will observe legal due process, and will comply with federal and NWIC requirements V. Appeal of IRB decisions A researcher may appeal a NWIC IRB s decision to the NWIC IRB. The NWIC IRB will consult with a Resource Person (see section C of Appendix 4) before and while responding the appeal. NWIC IRB Manual - Approved by Board of Trustees Dec. 2, 2013 Page 6