MELCOR code application to VVER440/V213 analyses

Similar documents
Ing. JOZEF BALÁŽ Ph.D. and Ing MILAN CVAN CSc

Classical Event Tree Analysis and Dynamic Event Tree Analysis for High Pressure Core Melt Accidents in a German PWR

IEM on Severe Accident Management in the light of the accident at the Fukushima Daïchi NPP

The «practical elimination» approach for pressurized water reactors

Verification and validation of computer codes Exercise

S.A. Klein and G.F. Nellis Cambridge University Press, 2011

Loss of Normal Feedwater Analysis by RELAP5/MOD3.3 in Support to Human Reliability Analysis

Accident Management Strategies for Mark I and Mark III BWRs

SAFETY APPROACHES. The practical elimination approach of accident situations for water-cooled nuclear power reactors

ENVIRONMENTAL AND POLLUTANTS GAS ANALYZERS

Comparison of the partner s approaches for physical phenomena assessment in level 2 PSA

Review and Assessment of Engineering Factors

Safety and efficiency go hand in hand at MVM Paks NPP

Safety Analysis of the European Test Blanket Systems in ITER using MELCOR. Andrew Grief and Simon Owen EMUG 2016

Safety Analysis: Event Classification

[PDF] DOWNLOAD PRESSURE VESSEL DESIGN FREE UNQUOTE BOOKS

Severe Accident Management Programmes for Nuclear Power Plants

Nuclear safety Lecture 4. The accident of the TMI-2 (1979)

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment

V.H. Sanchez Espinoza and I. Gómez-García-Toraño

DETAILS OF THE ACCIDENT PROGRESSION IN 1F1

Technical Standards and Legislation: Risk Based Inspection. Presenter: Pierre Swart

American Chemical Society (ACS) 246th ACS National Meeting Indianapolis, Indiana September 9, 2013

THE NITROGEN INJECTION THREAT IN PWR REACTORS

EXPERIMENTAL SUPPORT OF THE BLEED AND FEED ACCIDENT MANAGEMENT MEASURES FOR VVER-440/213 TYPE REACTORS

Effects of Delayed RCP Trip during SBLOCA in PWR

Swedge 6.0. Now with a Basal Failure Plane and Bench Design. Basal plane, improved water pressure distribution, and more

Considerations for the Practical Application of the Safety Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Design

Level 2 PSA for the VVER 440/213 Dukovany Nuclear Power Plant

Supplementary Operator s Manual 42/24-14 EN Rev. 3

DISTRIBUTION LIST. Preliminary Safety Report Chapter 19 Internal Hazards UK HPR1000 GDA. GNS Executive. GNS all staff. GNS and BRB all staff CGN EDF

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment

Safety Manual. Process pressure transmitter IPT-1* 4 20 ma/hart. Process pressure transmitter IPT-1*

CONTENTS OF THE PCSR CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION

Metering Code Gas TSO, measurement by connected party Effective from to the present

APPLICATION NOTE. Fast Analysis of Coal Mine Gas Using the INFICON 3000 Micro GC ABSTRACT

IAEA Training in Level 2 PSA MODULE 8: Coupling Source Terms to Probabilistic Event Analysis (CET end-state binning)

Basic STPA Exercises. Dr. John Thomas

Critical Systems Validation

RISKAUDIT GRS - IRSN Safety assessment of the BELENE NPP

REACTOR DESIGN AND SAFETY

USE OF THE EXCEEDANCE CURVE APPROACH IN OCCUPIED BUILDING RISK ASSESSMENT

USER GUIDE. Fog Generator. ATMOSPHERE APS Series Haze Generator. MAX APS Series. No: , Revision A/d

7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017

DESIGN OF REACTOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE AND SYSTEMS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

XA TEPSS RELATED PANDA TESTS (ESBWR)

MAHB. INSPECTION Process Hazard Analysis

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )

GAS FUEL VALVE FORM AGV5 OM 8-03

Workshop Information IAEA Workshop

Implementing IEC Standards for Safety Instrumented Systems

Safety Engineering - Hazard Identification Techniques - M. Jahoda

The M-Series Eletta Flow Meter High accuracy DP Flow Meter with multiple functions

Integrated Coping Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events

COMPUTING SOURCE TERMS WITH DYNAMIC CONTAINMENT EVENT TREES

Determination of flammability limits of diluted H 2 /CO/CH 4 /air mixtures in spherical bomb

HUPF Series DESCRIPTION APPLICATION INSTRUCTION SHEET GAS PRESSURE REGULATOR WITH INCORPORATED FILTER EN1C-0003NL05 R1205.

USER GUIDE. Fog Generator. ATMOSPHERE APS TM Series Haze Generator. MAX APS TM Series. No: , Revision A/a

Purpose. Scope. Process flow OPERATING PROCEDURE 07: HAZARD LOG MANAGEMENT

Calibration Requirements for Direct Reading Confined Space Gas Detectors

HTR Systems and Components

SL G3. Warning

DESIGN OF REACTOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE AND SYSTEMS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

Assessing Combinations of Hazards in a Probabilistic Safety Analysis

Safety Manual VEGAVIB series 60

PROCEDURES FOR REPAIRS TO ASME NV STAMPED PRESSURE RELIEF DEVICES OF NUCLEAR SAFETY RELATED PRESSURE RELIEF VALVES

A study on the relation between safety analysis process and system engineering process of train control system

Lab 4: Root Locus Based Control Design

SHUTDOWN SYSTEMS: SDS1 AND SDS2

Tokyo: Simulating Hyperpath-Based Vehicle Navigations and its Impact on Travel Time Reliability

Tools and Methods for Assessing the Risk Associated with Consequential Steam Generator Tube Rupture

Safety Standards. of the Nuclear Safety Standards Commission (KTA)

GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING HYDROGENATION REACTIONS

SL G3 - Fuel Conversion to Propane (NG to LP) P-Kit 302

Diagnosis of Fuel Evaporative System

REGULATORY OBSERVATION

An Overview of Recent Auction Formats

Manned Underwater Operations (MUO) in a holistic safety perspective. Olav Hauso. Special Adviser. Petroleum Safety Authority, Norway (PSA)

VBGx-xx-xx Externally Threaded Control Ball Valves PN25 (DN15 TO DN32)

Learning from Dangerous Occurrences in the Chemical Industries

Air Displacement Pipetting Modules. Total Integrated Liquid Handling

Workshop Information IAEA Workshop

OIL & GAS. MTS DP Committee. Workshop in Singapore Session 4 Day 2. Unwanted Thrust

Understanding safety life cycles

Systems Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA)

HYDROGEN RISK ANALYSIS FOR A GENERIC NUCLEAR CONTAINMENT VENTILATION SYSTEM

SIMULATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL FLIGHT CONDITIONS

ASX 176 Axial Pressure regulator

THE CANDU 9 DISTRffiUTED CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN PROCESS

Safety Manual VEGAVIB series 60

PRESSURE REGULATORS AND FLOWMETERS, ALL MEDICAL GASES

ALARA in Practice Reactor internal parts repair at the Temelín NPP

Maintainability and Availability Analyses

IWR PLANNING SUITE II PCOP WEBINAR SERIES. Laura Witherow (IWR) and Monique Savage (MVP) 26 July

Lecture 04 ( ) Hazard Analysis. Systeme hoher Qualität und Sicherheit Universität Bremen WS 2015/2016

OMS Technical Information. Versions OMS. Versions

Hiden QIC Series Gas Analysers Real-time gas analysis systems

Electronic Turbine Meter TERZ 94

A Revised Framework for the Transformer DGA Guide

High Pressure Chem-SCAN Operating Manual

Transcription:

1 st Meeting of European MELCOR Users Group, MELCOR code application to VVER440/V213 analyses Villigen, Switzerland 15-16 December 2008 Juraj Jančovič jancovic@vuje.sk 1

CONTENT - overview of MELCOR models - core model of VVER440/V213 - AICC pressure calculation - conclusions 2

MELCOR code usage in VUJE MELCOR - versions 1.8.3 and 1.8.5 have been used in VUJE, - model development focused exclusively onto VVER440/V213 design, - the most widely used severe accident code in VUJE. Models of VVER440/V213 for MELCOR 2-loop model for MELCOR 1.8.3 - used for research and development projects, 2-loop model for MELCOR 1.8.5 - used for safety reports, PSA L2 scenario analyses, hydrogen risk assessment, 6-loop model of shut-down reactor - used for research projects, Detailed containment model - used for safety reports, containment phenomena. 3

Model of the core Model of the core (the largest challenge fuel present in the lower plenum) reactor vessel during operation after reactor trip 4

Model of the core Modelling possibilities already used 5

Model of the core Relocation; steam flow through channels hydrogen production 6

Model of the core Modelling possibility planned 7

AICC pressure calculation AICC pressure calculation used for estimation of hydrogen risk - Evaluation of DDT risk planned for further models VVER440/V213 containment features - semidetached rooms in the containment large differences in AICC pressures - airtraps influence amount of noncondensable gases present in the containment - low containment design pressure 250 kpa abs - structural analyses show failure pressure cca. 350 kpa abs - AICC pressure below 350 kpa abs and low probability of DDT in the rooms of the containment is the goal of a successful hydrogen risk mitigation strategy. Assessment of pressure in the containment after hydrogen combustion is of predominant interest. 8

AICC pressure calculation External code calculation An external code is used for evaluation of AICC pressure peaks in containment volumes. Disadvantage is that the code calculates AICC pressure only from plot file data. 500 STC2-LLOCA-INVES-BS-SEALED AICC pressure VUJE, a.s. MELCOR 1.8.5 450 400 Pressure [kpa] 350 300 250 200 150 100 0 20 000 40 000 60 000 80 000 100 000 120 000 140 000 160 000 Čas [s] - 203-boxPG - 206-boxPG - 220-koridor - 243-BV - 223-box žľabov - 253-plynojem - 237-miest.HA - 214-miest.KO 9

AICC pressure calculation Internal calculation AICC module An algorithm of AICC calculation was prepared and incorporated into the MELCOR model (input deck). The model tracks AICC pressure in every time step. Hydrogen and carbon monoxide combustion is considered. Disadvantage is that for now only 3 control volumes are calculated simultaneously. Out of memory/variables error encountered. Comprises 6 general TFs, 11 general CFs and 219 CFs per calculated volume. Output for every calculated control volume: - AICC pressure written to plot file, - max. AICC pressure during scenario, - AICC temperature written to plot file. 10

AICC pressure calculation Model verification against MELCOR Model was verified against MELCOR calculations using BUR package. Closed (isochoric) control volumes without heat structures (adiabatic) with combustion completeness set to 1.0 (complete) were used. Various initial conditions and hydrogen (and CO) concentrations were used. 11

AICC pressure calculation Model verification against MELCOR 12

AICC pressure calculation Model validation against charts based on experimental data Model was validated against charts provided along experimental data in Reactor Safety Course (R-800), USNRC Technical Training Center, Rev 1193 13

Conclusions Conclusions core modelling - fuel/debris support is the main uncertainty in the modelling, - planned core modelling (core rings without fuel) is being applied for a new model, - support structures situated below the core support plate can influence core degradation timing and consequently also corium interaction with the reactor pressure vessel Conclusions AICC pressure calculation Relatively simple model developed. Ready to be used for hydrogen risk related calculations. Incorporation of such a calculation into the CVH or BUR module would be helpful. CVH-PAICC.n or BUR-PAICC.n... maybe? 14