Inequality Overview Slides Spring 2009 David Autor Lecture 1

Similar documents
College/high school median annual earnings gap,

Figure 1a. Top 1% income share: China vs USA vs France

Rising Income Inequality

Top incomes in historical and international perspective: Recent developments

Figure 1: Gini coefficient

44 Economic Perspectives

An Overview of the Canadian Labour Market

Top 1% Income Share and Top MTR

The Virginia Economy: Labor Markets and Workforce

Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States

Wealth Inequality in the United States since 1913

GENDER INEQUALITY IN THE LABOR MARKET

It s the economy stupid!

Comment on: Productivity Growth, Wage Growth and Unions by Kügler, Schönberg and Schreiner

Inequality in America : The 1% in International and Historical Perspective

Figure 1.1. Percentage SCE of All Immigrants. Percentage. Period. Source: Carter et al. (1997).

Macroeconomics Measurements

Is this time really dierent? Long term macroeconomic paerns in the US economy

Applying Generalized Pareto Curves to Inequality Analysis

Top Incomes and the Great Recession: Recent Evolutions and Policy Implications

Economy On The Rebound

More of the Same; Or now for Something Completely Different?

B. Single Taxpayers (122,401 obs.) A. Married Taxpayers Filing jointly (266,272 obs.) Density Distribution. Density Distribution

2016 LERA Winter Meetings Inequality in Japan Session. Top Income Shares and Income Mobility in Japan. Chiaki Moriguchi*

Polanyi s Paradox and the Shape of Employment Growth

US imports from emerging economies have grown rapidly

State of American Trucking

Larry Kessler, Ph.D. Boyd Center for Business & Economic Research University of Tennessee

U.S. Economic Activity. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

U.S. Economic Activity. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

U.S. Economic Activity. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

Economic Overview. Melissa K. Peralta Senior Economist April 27, 2017

Economic Update and Outlook

Oakmont: Who are we?

Business Cycles. Chris Edmond NYU Stern. Spring 2007

Journal of Sports Economics 2000; 1; 299

Puget Sound Regional Forecast Chris Mefford Community Attributes

The Economic Status of Women in the U.S. What Has Changed in the Last Years

U.S. Overview. Gathering Steam? Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations in Allegheny County

Stocks and Bonds Track Aging Population:

MIT Spring 2018: Lecture 1 An Overview of Topics and Questions

Figure 1: Canadian Real Exports and Imports 1981Q1 2009Q2, Quarterly

Very Persistent Current Accounts July Horag Choi, University of Auckland Nelson C. Mark, University of Notre Dame and NBER

Understanding the Stagnation of Modern Economies

Economic Growth in the Trump Economy

From Recession to Recovery

Briefing on the State of the State. presented to the. SCAA Schuyler Center for Analysis and Advocacy

Tarleton State University Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data EADA Report

Department of Economics Working Paper

A New Gilded Age? Recent Trends in Top Income Shares in Canada

Lessons from NAFTA for Latin American and Caribbean Countries. World Bank January

Big Changes, Unknown Impacts

THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS

Deficit Reduction and Economic Growth: Are They Mutually Exclusive Goals? Tuesday, May 1, 2012; 2:30 PM - 3:45 PM

First Lecture Capitalism: A Brief History

Current Hawaii Economic Conditions. Eugene Tian

Beyond market forces: a story of changing economic inequalities in rich countries

Canada s Standard of Living in 2042: Will Policy Keep Pace with Technology?

2018 Annual Economic Forecast Dragas Center for Economic Analysis and Policy

Quantifying the Lasting Harm to the U.S. Economy from the Financial Crisis

The Global Economy: Sustaining Momentum

Rethinking Growth The Schumpeterian Perspective

The Fed and the Economic Outlook

Architect: Dekleva Gregoric Architects Project: Compact Karst House Photo: James Maroti Place: Vrhovlje, Slovenia

Smoothing the histogram: The Normal Curve (Chapter 8)

BC Pension Forum. Economic Outlook. Presented by: Ben Homsy, CFA Portfolio Manager

Economic & Market Outlook

University Of Maryland

President and Chief Executive Officer Federal Reserve Bank of New York Washington and Lee University H. Parker Willis Lecture in Political Economics

OPENING KEYNOTE SPEAKER

Firm Dynamics, Job Creation and Entrepreneurship in the U.S.

National and Virginia Economic Outlook Professor Robert M. McNab Dragas Center for Economic Analysis and Policy Strome College of Business

The ABA Advantage: Economic Issues Update & ABA Resources

Economic Outlook. Peter Rupert Professor and Chair Department of Economics, UCSB Director, UCSB Economic Forecast Project

The 2015 Mid-Year Economic Update

Accounting for the Evolution of U.S. Wage Inequality

RTC TRANSIT OPERATING STATISTICS RTC RIDE RTC RAPID RTC INTERCITY SIERRA SPIRIT

Enrollment and Educator Data ( School Year) About the Data

2014 Economic Indicators, Trends & Observations. 51 South Main Street Janesville, WI P F RockCountyAlliance.

Trade Union Membership and Influence

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Economics 134 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Spring 2018 Professor David Romer

Michigan Population Trends: The School Age Population

nipigon.net Township of Nipigon 2018 Community Profile

Rossana Merola ILO, Research Department

Muhlenkamp & Company. Webinar December 1, Ron Muhlenkamp, Portfolio Manager Jeff Muhlenkamp, Portfolio Manager Tony Muhlenkamp, President

Social Convergence, Development Failures and Industrial Relations: The Case of Portugal

Labour Market Segmentation in Poland. Artur Gajdos Department of Spatial Econometrics University of Lodz

WORKFORCE LOCAL AREA EMPLOYMENT STATISTICS (LAUS)

BBL Seminar. Handout. September 12, CAI Fang. China s Demographic Change and Implications for Rest of the World"

Colorado Economic Update

Great Depressions of the Twentieth Century Project

U.S. and Colorado Economic Outlook National Association of Industrial and Office Parks. Business Research Division Leeds School of Business

THE MOST INFORMATIVE EVENT COVERING REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

Southwest Ohio Regional Economy in Context. Richard Stock, PhD. Business Research Group

2019 ECONOMIC FORECAST AND FINANCIAL MARKET UPDATE

What variables explain differences in coaching salaries for Division I women's sports?

Reading the Tea Leaves: Investing for 2010 and Beyond

Keynesian Macroeconomics for the 21 st Century Part 3: Demand Dynamics, Inequality and Secular Stagnation

Outlook for Livestock and Poultry. Michael Jewison World Agricultural Outlook Board, USDA

Transcription:

Inequality Overview Slides 14.662 Spring 2009 David Autor Lecture 1

Returns to Education

Goldin and Katz, 2007

Autor, Katz, Kearney (out-takes)

Overview Slides Productivity and Wage Growth Katz and Autor, 1999

Dustmann, Ludsteck and Schonberg, 2008

Real Wage Levels

Source: Robert Gordon, 2000, NBER WP 7833

Source: Robert Gordon, 2006

Source: Robert Gordon, 2006

Source: Robert Gordon, 2000, NBER WP 7752

Autor, Katz, Kearney 2008

Changes in Composition-Adjusted Male Full Time Log Weekly Wages 1963-2005 Changes in Log Real Wage Levels (1963 = 0) -.1 0.1.2.3.4.5.6 A. Males 1963 1969 1975 1981 1987 1993 1999 2005 HS Dropout Some College Post-College HS Grads Exactly College Autor 2008

Changes in Log Real Wage Levels (1963 = 0) Changes in Composition-Adjusted Female Full Time Log Weekly Wages 1963-2005 -.1 0.1.2.3.4.5.6 B. Females 1963 1969 1975 1981 1987 1993 1999 2005 HS Dropout Some College Post-College HS Grads Exactly College Autor 2008

Wage Distribution and Top Incomes

Autor, Katz, Kearney 2008

Log 90/10 wage ratio.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Overall Male 90/10 Wage Inequality 1964 1970 1976 1982 1988 1994 2000 2006 CPS March Full-Time CPS May/ORG Hourly Autor, Katz, Kearney 2008

37.5% 35.0% 32.5% 30.0% 27.5% 25.0% 22.5% 20.0% FIGURE 8 The Top Decile Wage Income Share, 1927-2006 Share (in %) 1927 1932 1937 1942 1947 1952 1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 Piketty and Saez 2003

Share of total income accruing to each group 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Top 1% (incomes above $382,600 in 2006) Top 5-1% (incomes between $148,400 and $382,600) Top 10-5% (incomes between $104,700 and $148,400) 1913 1918 1923 1928 1933 1938 1943 1948 1953 1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 FIGURE 2 Decomposing the Top Decile US Income Share into 3 Groups, 1913-2006 Piketty and Saez 2003

50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% FIGURE 1 The Top Decile Income Share, 1917-2006 Top 10% Income Share 1917 1922 1927 1932 1937 1942 1947 1952 1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1997 2002 1992 Excluding capital gains Including capital gains Piketty and Saez 2003

5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% FIGURE 3 The Top 0.01% Income Share, 1913-2006 Top 0.01% Income Share 1913 1918 1923 1928 1933 1938 1943 1948 1953 1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 Including capital gains Excluding capital gains Piketty and Saez 2003

10% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% Salaries Capital Income Business Income Capital Gains 1916 1921 1926 1931 1936 1941 1946 1951 1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 FIGURE 4B The Top 0.1% Income Share and Composition, 1916-2005 Piketty and Saez 2003

$100,000,000 $10,000,000 $1,000,000 FIGURE 11 CEO Pay versus Average Wage Income, 1970-2006 $1,000,000 $100,000 $10,000 Piketty and Saez 2003 CEO pay (2005 dollars) 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 Average Wage Income (2005 dollars) Rank 10 CEO pay Rank 50 CEO pay Rank 100 CEO pay Top 100 CEOs average pay Salary+Bonus rank 10 Average Salary (right scale)

25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 FIGURE 7A The Top 0.1% Wealth Share in the United States, 1916-2000 Kopczuk and Saez 2004 Wealth Share

12% 11% 10% United States France United Kingdom 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 1913 1918 1923 1928 1933 1938 1943 1948 1953 1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 share (in %) FIGURE 12 Top 0.1% Income Shares in the U.S., France, and the U.K.,1913-2006 Piketty and Saez 2006 NBER WP 11955

Saez and Veall 2005

Saez and Veall 2005

Saez and Veall 2005

Saez and Veall 2005

Piketty and Saez 2006 NBER WP 11955

Dustmann, Ludsteck and Schonberg, 2008

Dustmann, Ludsteck and Schonberg, 2008

Polarization

Autor and Dorn 2008a

Lemieux, 2007

Hourly wage ratio 1.8 1.9 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 Ratios of 90th, 50th and 10th Percentile Real Hourly Earnings, 1974-2004 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 90/50 (3 Year Moving Avg.) 50/10 (3 Year Moving Avg.) Autor, Katz, Kearney 2006

Autor, Katz, Kearney 2008

Autor, Katz, Kearney 2008

Real Log Wage Changes by Wage Percentile 1980-1990 and 1990-2000 Log real earnings change -.05 0.05.1.15 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 pctile Wage Percentile 1980-1990 1990-2000 Autor and Dorn 2008a

Smoothed Changes in Employment by Occupational Skill Percentile 1980-2005 100 x Change in Employment Share -.1 -.05 0.05.1.15 0 20 40 60 80 100 Skill Percentile (Ranked by Occupational Mean Wage) 1980-1990 1990-2005 Autor and Dorn 2008a

Real Log Wage Changes by Wage Percentile 1980-1990 and 1990-2000 Smoothed Changes in Employment by Occupational Skill Percentile 1980-2005 Log real earnings change -.05 0.05.1.15 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 pctile Wage Percentile 100 x Change in Employment Share -.1 -.05 0.05.1.15 0 20 40 60 80 100 Skill Percentile (Ranked by Occupational Mean Wage) 1980-1990 1990-2000 1980-1990 1990-2005 Autor and Dorn 2008a

Goos and Manning, 2007

Dustmann, Ludsteck and Schonberg, 2008

Goos, Manning and Salomons 2009

Goos, Manning and Salomons 2009

Residual Inequality

Residual Male 90/10 Hourly Wage Inequality Log 90/10 wage ratio.85.95 1.05 1.15 1.25 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 CPS March CPS May/ORG Autor, Katz, Kearney 2005 NBER WP #11628

Residual Male 90/50 Hourly Wage Inequality Log 90/50 wage ratio.4.45.5.55.6.65 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 CPS March CPS May/ORG Autor, Katz, Kearney 2005 NBER WP #11628

Residual Male 50/10 Hourly Wage Inequality Log 50/10 wage ratio.35.4.45.5.55.6.65.7 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 CPS March CPS May/ORG Autor, Katz, Kearney 2005 NBER WP #11628

Log 90/10 wage ratio.85.95 1.05 1.15 1.25 Residual Female 90/10 Hourly Wage Inequality 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 CPS March CPS May/ORG Autor, Katz, Kearney 2005 NBER WP #11628

Residual Female 90/50 Hourly Wage Inequality Log 90/50 wage ratio.4.45.5.55.6.65 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 CPS March CPS May/ORG Autor, Katz, Kearney 2005 NBER WP #11628

Residual Female 50/10 Hourly Wage Inequality Log 50/10 wage ratio.35.4.45.5.55.6.65.7 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 CPS March CPS May/ORG Autor, Katz, Kearney 2005 NBER WP #11628

Earnings Instability

Gottschalk and Moffit 1994

Gottschalk and Moffit 1994

Gottschalk and Moffit 1994

Gender and Race Gaps

Goldin, 2006 Goldin, 2006

Goldin, 2006

Mulligan and Rubinstein 2006 Mimeo

Goldin, 2006

Goldin, 2006

Goldin, 2006

Mulligan and Rubinstein, forthcoming

O Neill and O Neill 2005 NBER WP 11240

Western and Petit, 2004

Western and Petit, 2004

Models of Wage Differentials

TABLE I Levels and Changes in the Educational Composition of Employment and the College+/High School Wage Premium, 1940-2000 A. Full-Time Equivalent Employment Shares by Education Level (in percent) and Log College+/High School Wage Premium High School High School Some College College Log College+/ Dropouts Graduates College Graduates Equivalents HS Wage 1940 Census 67.9 19.2 6.5 6.4 9.6.498 1950 Census 58.6 24.4 9.2 7.8 12.4.313 1960 Census 49.5 27.7 12.2 10.6 16.7.396 1970 Census 35.9 34.7 15.6 13.8 21.6.465 1980 Census 20.7 36.1 22.8 20.4 31.8.391 1980 CPS 19.1 38.0 22.0 20.9 31.9.356 1990 CPS 12.7 36.2 25.1 26.1 38.6.508 1990 Census 11.4 33.0 30.2 25.4 40.6.549 Feb. 90 CPS 11.5 36.8 25.2 26.5 39.1.533 2000 CPS 9.2 32.4 28.7 29.7 44.1.568 Source: Autor, Katz, Krueger 1998 (updated to 2000)

Source: Katz and Murphy 1992

Log Relative Supply of College/Non-College Labor, 1963-2003 Log Relative Supply Index -.9 -.6 -.3 0.3 1982 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 Autor, Katz, Kearney 2005

A. Detrended College-High School Wage Differential and Relative Supply, 1963-2005 Log Points -.15 -.1 -.05 0.05.1.15 1963 1969 1975 1981 1987 1993 1999 2005 Detrended Wage Differential Detrended Relative Supply Source: Autor, Katz, Kearney, 2008

B. Katz-Murphy Prediction Model for the College-High School Wage Gap Log Wage Gap.35.45.55.65.75 1963 1969 1975 1981 1987 1993 1999 2005 Observed CLG/HS Gap Katz-Murphy Predicted Wage Gap: 1963-1987 Trend Source: Autor, Katz, Kearney 2008

Goldin and Katz 2007

Goldin and Katz 2007

Goldin and Katz 2007

International Comparisons of Wage Inequality

Source: Blau and Kahn, ReStat 2005

Source: Blau and Kahn, ReStat 2005

Source: Leuven, Oosterbeek and van Ophem 2004

Source: Leuven, Oosterbeek and van Ophem 2004

Source: Leuven, Oosterbeek and van Ophem 2004

Source: Leuven, Oosterbeek and van Ophem 2004