Amendments to Essex Highway Maintenance Strategy Maintenance Policy and Standards April 2008

Similar documents
Speed Limit Policy Isle of Wight Council

Appendix 12 Parking on footways and verges

The Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Aurang Zeb - Head of Highways & Transport

March Maidstone Integrated Transport Strategy Boxley Parish Council Briefing Note. Context. Author: Parish Clerk 2 March 2016

Chelmsford City Growth Package

Mapping Cycle-friendliness towards a national standard

1.5 On this basis it is fundamental that the Transport Strategy for the site focuses on the following key criteria,

Wicklow County Council Chomairle Chontae Chill Mhantáin. Traffic Calming Policy

Classification Criteria

1 This technical note considers the issues associated with the use of tidal flow bus lanes on key public transport corridors in Cambridge.

Local Highway Panels Members Guide 11 Quiet Lanes

4.1 Introduction. 4.2 Aspects of walkable communities

A5.1 Permitted activities

Comments on the Hailsham to Eastbourne Sustainable Transport Corridor

Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility Study Update

Draft letter to Designers and Managing Agents INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 43/02: CANTILEVER AND PORTAL GANTRY VMS

LEA BRIDGE ROAD - A STREET FOR EVERYONE Public consultation document

AT403.1 Ancient monument Note 3 amended P500 Basic triangle New size 1800mm added

TRANSPORT AND MOVEMENT

9. Parking Supporting Statement

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02

Chapter 7 - Rural Roads

DRAFT INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 150/17

Cycle traffic and the Strategic Road Network. Sandra Brown, Team Leader, Safer Roads- Design

Nottingham Cycle City Frequently Asked Questions

Road Condition Statistics: Notes and definitions

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 2 Speed and Traffic Management

Progress update on the Sustainable Movement Corridor scheme Guildford Borough Council, June 2016

Response to further information request Ministry of Education Notice of Requirement (200 & 252 Park Estate Road)

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION NEEDS STUDY

Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Highway Infrastructure Manager

APPENDIX F: TECHNICAL NOTE 22 (VICARAGE ROAD JUNCTION)

Principles. 4biii. Good Urban Design

Phone: Ref No: 06/2018/0884

Living Streets response to the Draft London Plan

GD 0043/18 ACTIVE TRAVEL STRATEGY

Urban Street Design and Development

Road Safety Audits of Traffic Signal Schemes

MILTON ROAD LLF PROJECT UPDATE

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

Cycle Traffic and The Strategic Road Network. John Parkin and Phil Jones Presenting on behalf of Highways England

Report from Embassy Visit to Copenhagen May David Arditti

Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 4 Signs & Road Markings

Chapter 4 Route Window C3 Hyde Park and Park Lane shafts. Transport for London

DARLAND FARM, MEDWAY. Transport Statement

Streets for All : 9 Use of white lines

TRAFFIC ADVISORY LEAFLET

Regional Bus Priority

Developing a Birmingham Transport Space Allocation policy. David Harris Transport Policy Manager Economy Directorate Birmingham City Council

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

5 Highways and Transport Assessment

Strategy for Walking & Cycling Action Plan

The Rower Traffic Management Scheme

Manual for Streets 2: Digested Read

21.07 TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

BLYTHEWOOD PARK, BROMLEY

Sustainable Mobility in Greater Sudbury NeORA Conference September 25, 2012

High frequency bus services operating to Little Island; Creation of a new Park and Ride site and train station at North Esk;

Design Workshops Summary of all Feedback January 2017

SCHEME DESIGN AND ENGINEERING

ONE SIZE DOESN T FIT ALL RECONCILING OVERLAPPING TRANSPORT NETWORKS IN A CONSTRAINED URBAN ENVIRONMENT

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

Intersection Safety 6/7/2015 INTERSECTIONS. Five basic elements should be considered in intersection design. Intersection Safety (continued)

Cycle Routes. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 3/95 March Introduction. Implementation. Project aims. Design

Skid Resistance Policy. July 2008

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

IAN WHITE ASSOCIATES. Crawley Station Gateway Public Realm

Integrated Regional Traffic Management. Michael Aherne Technical Director POLIS Conference 2009

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

SLOUGH Stage 3 Road Safety Audit of A4 London Road, M4 J5 to Sutton Lane

Traffic Sensitive Streets. Guidance Notes. GeoPlace Streets Team. Traffic Sensitive Streets. Guidance Note Page 1 of 7.

LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

Guildwood Village Traffic Response Prepared by City of Toronto Transportation Department

IMPACT OF THE BERMUDA CONNECTIVITY PROJECT ON CYCLING

ROSEE RSA/RSI Introduction courses ROSEE Speed Management courses

Transport Workshop Dearbhla Lawson Head of Transport & Infrastructure Policy & Funding University of the Third Age.

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

Proposed Strategic Housing Development at the Former Doyle s Nursery and Garden Centre and Benoni, Brennanstown Road, Cabinteely, Dublin 18

Transit boulevard: A new road type for Sydney s Growth Centres

Green Streets and Urban Greenways

Launceston's Transport Futures. Greater travel options for the people of Launceston

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

Cycle Lanes Dixon Street (Worksop Road to Crayne Street)

The key to achievement of a sustainable, safe traffic system lies in the systematic and consistent application of safety principles.

Traffic signs policy and speed limit signage. A think piece by CPRE. Introduction

Overview. Existing Conditions. Corridor Description. Assessment

Harriet Fraser Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning

THE PLANNING AND. Transport and the law Integrated transport planning Strategies Responsibilities of local government and road controlling authorities

Pedestrians safety. ROAD SAFETY SEMINAR PIARC/AGEPAR/GRSP Lome, Togo October 2006 Lise Fournier, Canada-Qu

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Services Department A September 18, 2006 Region of Durham Recommended Arterial Corridor All Wards Guidelines Study

Have your say on the transformation of Oxford Street West

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Appendix A Type of Traffic Calming Measures Engineering Solutions

Maynooth Cycling Submission on North South Corridor

Dún Laoghaire Rathdown County Council. Luas to Dart via UCD Cycle and Pedestrian Route

Dakota County Transportation Department Roadway Guidance Signing

Transcription:

Amendments to Essex Highway Maintenance Strategy Maintenance Policy and Standards April 2008 The following amendments to the wording of the maintenance strategy apply following the revised maintenance priorities decision implemented August 2013; 1.1. To rescind the first bullet point for Item 1 of the Winter Service Policy, which refers to carriageways of secondary distributor status and above, detailed on Page 116, Chapter 13 of the Essex Highway Maintenance Strategy Maintenance Policy and Standards April 2008 (which hereafter shall be referred to as the Maintenance Strategy ) and replace with; Carriageways of County Road status 1.1. The current description of the Carriageway Hierarchies only, detailed in the Maintenance Strategy page 55 Chapter 8, item 8, Table 8 (and detailed in Well- Maintained Highways the code of practice for Highway Maintenance Management July 2005 ), will remain in place for non-carriageway defects. The following table applies to identify the new Carriageway Hierarchies: County Route PR1, County Route PR2, and Local Roads. Maintenance Strategy April 2008 Following August 2013 revised Maintenance Priorities Hierarchy Inspection Frequency Hierarchy Inspection Frequency Strategic route 1 Month County Route PR1 Monthly Main 1 Month Secondary 3 Months County Route PR2 Every three months Link road Local Access Road and 6 Months 12 Months Local Roads Annually Minor Access Road 1.1.1. Revise the current priority response times detailed on page 43 Chapter 8, Item 3 of the Maintenance Strategy for those defects which have been identified on the road surface only as per the following table; (defects included within Carriageway Surface and Carriageway Structural defects in Confirm). Existing priorities will remain for all other defects. A list of defects not affected by these changes can be found at the bottom of this document in Appendix 1.0.

Existing as Per Maintenance Strategy April 2008 Following August 2013 Revised Maintenance Priorities - County routes Following August 2013 Revised Maintenance Priorities local roads Priority response Response Time Priority response Response Time Priority response Response Time P1 2 hours P1 2 hours* P1 2 hours* P2 End of next working day P2 2 working days* P2 5 working days* P3 Up to 28 calendar days P3 Up to 28 calendar days P3 Presumption not to undertake repair within a stated time period P4 More than 28 days P4 Defect to be considered for repair as part of the planned maintenance programme P4 Defect to be considered for repair as part of the planned maintenance programme 1.1.2. The current Priority 1: 2 hour make safe or repair from the time the defects is assessed on site by an inspector will remain and will apply to all roads. 1.1.3. The current Priority 2 make safe or repair by the end of the next working day from the time the defect is assessed on site by an inspector, will change to a make safe or repair within two working days from the time the defect is assessed on site by an inspector where this is practicable (where the site can be accessed safely within this time period) if on the County Routes hierarchy. If the defect is on the Local Roads hierarchy the response will be a make safe or repair within 5 working days from the time the defect is assessed on site by an inspector. 1.1.4. Where a Priority 1 or Priority 2, as referenced above, requires a follow up treatment to undertake a permanent repair, this will be undertaken within five working days of the completion of the make safe irrespective of whether it is on a County Routes hierarchy or Local Roads hierarchy. The exception to this will be where the permanent repair can be accommodated via planned works. 1.1.5. The current Priority 3 up to 28 calendar days repair will remain for the County Routes hierarchy, and the timescale will be amended for local roads. There will be a presumption NOT to undertake a repair within a stated time period. In the case of Local Roads where a Priority 3 has been identified in response to a customer enquiry, this issue of NOT to undertake a repair within a stated time period will be

addressed through appropriate wording in the reply. For example, wording such as (but not specifically): There are currently no plans to undertake repairs to this road. However, the defect you have reported will be monitored for purpose of safety, and where deemed necessary dealt with as part of a planned maintenance scheme in due course. The exception to this will be roads providing direct access to emergency services, where a repair can be undertaken at the discretion of the Business Unit Leader for Maintenance and Operations. 1.1.6. The current Priority 4 more than 28 calendar days repair, within the next available programme will be amended with a presumption not to undertake a repair within a stated time period. Defects categorised as P4 are considered to be low priority, meaning that either or both the likelihood of interaction and resulting risk is low. Therefore defects categorised as P4 will be either considered for repair when planned resurfacing works take place. 1.1.7. The statement referring to the departure from the Code of Practice, at the bottom page 55 of the Maintenance Strategy, will be revised to: Note: neither the carriageway hierarchy description, nor the corresponding frequency of inspection, conform to the recommendations within Well Maintained Highways; Code of Practice for Highway Maintenance Management July 2005. The reason for the departure is to implement a revised carriageway hierarchy and corresponding inspection frequency, to facilitate the setting of levels of service and the corresponding prioritisation of funding in a manner deemed more appropriate for the authority within an environment of reduced government funding.

Appendix 1.0 Revised hierarchy details New County/Local Hierarchy Category Hierarchy Description Type of Road General description Description PR1 These routes will carry large volumes of high speed traffic through and around Essex. It is essential that traffic on these routes remains free flowing, that they are maintained to the highest standards, and that unnecessary obstructions are removed promptly. 1 Motorway Limited access motorway regulations apply Radial Feeders Final journey route into or out of town centres Routes for fast moving long distance traffic. Fully grade separated and restrictions on use. These are not maintained by Essex County Council. These routes feed traffic to and from the inter-urban routes (to their final destination) and carry large volumes of traffic during the peak hours when people are trying to access/leave town centres. They will normally be developed areas in towns and village centres. It is essential that traffic on these routes remains free flowing, that they are maintained to the highest standards, and that unnecessary obstructions are removed promptly. They will normally have car park guidance systems and traffic signals to aid the flow of traffic and manage areas of conflict between the different modes and hierarchies. Therefore it will be necessary to check and, if required, adjust the systems regularly. 2 Strategic Route Trunk and some Principal A roads between primary destinations Routes for fast moving long distance traffic with little frontage access or pedestrian traffic. Speed limits are usually in excess of 40 mph and there are few junctions. Pedestrian crossings are either segregated or controlled and parked vehicles are generally prohibited.

3a Main Major Urban Network and Inter-Primary Links. Routes between Strategic Routes and linking urban centres to the strategic network with limited frontage access. In urban areas speed limits are usually 40 mph or less, parking is restricted at peak times and there are positive measures for pedestrian safety. Short medium distance traffic. 3b Secondary Classified Road (B and C class) and unclassified urban bus routes carrying local traffic with frontage access and frequent junctions. In rural areas these roads link the larger villages and HGV generators to the Strategic and Main Network. In built up areas these roads have 30 mph speed limits and very high levels of pedestrian activity with some crossing facilities including zebra crossings. On-street parking is generally unrestricted except for safety reasons. PR2 - The remaining County Routes as defined in the LSA. Although not as important as the Priority 1 routes, the Priority 2 routes still perform an essential traffic 2 Strategic Route Trunk and some Principal A roads between primary destinations Routes for fast moving long distance traffic with little frontage access or pedestrian traffic. Speed limits are usually in excess of 40 mph and there are few junctions. Pedestrian crossings are either segregated or controlled and parked vehicles are generally prohibited.

management distributary function between the local network and Priority One County Routes. They will be accessed by a number of different types of user including local buses. Therefore, motorised vehicular traffic will generally take precedence over the other modes on these routes. 3a 3b Main Secondary Major Urban Network and Inter-Primary Links. Short medium distance traffic. Classified Road (B and C class) and unclassified urban bus routes carrying local traffic with frontage access and frequent junctions. Routes between Strategic Routes and linking urban centres to the strategic network with limited frontage access. In urban areas speed limits are usually 40 mph or less, parking is restricted at peak times and there are positive measures for pedestrian safety. In rural areas these roads link the larger villages and HGV generators to the Strategic and Main Network. In built up areas these roads have 30 mph speed limits and very high levels of pedestrian activity with some crossing facilities including zebra crossings. On-street parking is generally unrestricted except for safety reasons. 4a Link Road Roads linking between the Main and Secondary Network with frontage access In rural areas these roads link the smaller villages to the distributor roads. They are of varying width and not always capable of carrying two way traffic. In urban areas they are residential or industrial inter-connecting roads with 30mph speed limits, random pedestrian movements and uncontrolled parking.

Local Roads - Local roads will comprise all roads not defined as County Routes. These roads will be diverse in nature and use but will fall into one of the following descriptions: and frequent junctions. 4a Link Road Roads linking between the Main and Secondary Network with frontage access and frequent junctions. In rural areas these roads link the smaller villages to the distributor roads. They are of varying width and not always capable of carrying two way traffic. In urban areas they are residential or industrial inter-connecting roads with 30mph speed limits, random pedestrian movements and uncontrolled parking. Developed normally residential roads. These roads will be in towns and some residentially developed parts of villages. Their functional use is similar. i.e. mixed priority use, carrying local traffic only, routes leading to amenities and through residential areas. 4b Local Access Road Roads serving limited numbers of properties carrying only access traffic. In rural areas these roads serve small settlements and provide access to individual properties and land. They are often only single lane width and unsuitable for HGVs. In urban areas they are often residential loop roads or cul-de-sacs. Rural - all other roads will be in this category. They will generally be unclassified

roads linking small areas of development such as hamlets, farms and tourist attractions to each other and the strategic vehicle routes. Their use will be local in a transportation function but these roads are likely to form parts of important cycling, horse riding or walking leisure routes.