TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHEET 17. Revision 1 : 2016 MODEL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE MANUAL HANDLING OF GAS CYLINDERS

Similar documents
MANUAL HANDLING CODE OF PRACTICE

GUIDANCE NOTE 3 SAFE CYLINDER HANDLING AND THE APPLICATION OF THE MANUAL HANDLING OPERATIONS REGULATIONS TO GAS CYLINDERS REVISION 3: 2016

2.18 Manual Handling Policy and Procedure Table of Contents

Health and Safety Manual Handling Risk Assessment

Manual Handling Risk Assessment Procedure (HS.1.09)

Age Concern Hounslow Manual Handling Risk Assessment PART ONE PRELIMINARY RISK ASSESSMENT

HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDANCE NOTE MANUAL HANDLING

Health and Safety Services. Safety Guide 37. Manual Handling. Facilities Management Directorate

The Management of Hazardous Manual Handling Operations. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations

Risk factors associated with pushing and pulling loads

Manual Handling Procedure

1 P a g e. Moving & Handling Procedure. Title: Reference No: Procedure 01. Assistant Chief Officer. Ian Plummer, Health & Safety Manager

SAFE MANUAL HANDLING OPERATIONS

Manual Handling Risk Assessment In accordance with the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992

Manual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool) Introduction DRAFT

One Direct Manual Handling Guidance

Risk Assessment. A guide to the safe storage and use of oxygen and dissolved acetylene equipment

Getting to grips with manual handling

Safety Toolkit and Short Guide to General Application Regulations 2007 Manual Handling Section. Manual Handling

Horizon Care and Education Group Limited MANUAL HANDLING POLICY

SAFE HANDLING OF CYLINDERS Information for Customers Handling Gas Cylinders

LEAFLET 4 MANUAL HANDLING

This guidance note gives simple, practical advice on what can be done to eliminate or reduce the risks.

Getting to grips with manual handling A short guide

ASSESSING AND CONTROLLING MANUAL HANDLING RISK

Manual handling at work

Health & Safety and Employment Law

List 4 Example Of How Manual Handling Risks Can Be Reduced

Manual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)

Manual Handling Policy

BASICS OF MANUAL HANDLING SAMPLE COURSE HANDBOOK. HSM Safety Management

Low Medium High Critical Business Impact: X Changes are important, but urgent implementation is not required, incorporate into your existing workflow.

Injury Prevention and Ergonomics Manual Health & Safety

Safety Services. Local Rules for Safety in Manual Handling Operations

Manual Handling - Theory

Hazard Identification and Risk Management

HEALTH AND SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT POLICY Harmer Street Gravesend Kent DA12 2AX

HAZARD RECOGNITION EVALUATION and CONTROL

BCGA GUIDANCE NOTE GN 23

Constructive Ideas. Assessing the risk of sprains and strains CI Introduction. Step 1: Identify hazards. What is musculoskeletal injury (MSI)?

a) Accident/Incident investigation. REACTIVE MEASURE

EHS Workplace Inspection Checklist (Ref. SOP QMS-080; EHS-010)

Examples of pressure systems and equipment are:

Corporate Standard Manual Handling HB#

PLANT RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT

Faculty/School: Pharmacy Initial Issue Date: Oct Dr. Alpesh Patel and Padmaja Dhanvate

Recognition, Evaluation, and Control of Hazards

University College Dublin Machinery/Equipment Risk Assessment Template

A Checklist for a Health and Safety Risk Assessment

Risk Guide: Manual Handling

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard. October, 2014

Workplace Safety Inspection Sheet

PLANT RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT

BCGA GUIDANCE NOTE 17

SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

CONTROL OF SUBSTANCES HAZARDOUS TO HEALTH PROCEDURE

Example of an Occupational Health Risk Assessment

PLANT RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT

Working at Height. Policy and Procedures. Author: Beth Webster Assistant Safety Advisor. On behalf of School Safety Committee.

Ergonomics: Assessments and Evaluations for Job Improvements. Travis Ellis, CSP, CHMM

SAMPLE MANUAL HANDLING CODE OF PRACTICE

THERMAL COMFORT GUIDELINES

Manual Handling October 2014

ESSENTIAL SAFETY RESOURCES

Accident Investigation and Hazard Analysis

BHC-P-07.2 Health Hazards in Construction

Prevention of Falls and Working at Heights

Material Lift Risk and Hazard Management

Leader s Guide ERI Safety Videos

WorkWell Consulting Ergonomic Risk Identification & Assessment. Job Title: Equipment Operator III (Sweeper) Elgin Ford #2108 Date: September 17, 2003

Manual handling. Manual Handling Operations Regulations Guidance on Regulations. HSE Books

Office of Human Resources. Traffic Signal Technician I CJ2608

BRITISH COMPRESSED GASES ASSOCIATION Registered office: 4a Mallard Way, Pride Park, Derby, UK. DE24 8GX Company Number: 71798, England

The Work at Height Regulations 2005 A brief guide

The Work at Height Regulations 2005 A brief guide

Safe Work Method Statements (SWMS)

Safety Services Guidance. Hand Arm Vibration

HEALTH & SAFETY ARRANGEMENTS FOR MANAGEMENT OF WORK AT HEIGHT

Telco Antennas SWMS Working At Height Above 2m

Manual Handling Safety Procedure

COSHH Hazardous Substances Health & Safety Management Standard Issue 2 (September, 2010)

MODULE 2 BRAZING CYLINDER TRANSPORT, STORAGE AND EQUIPMENT

Chapter 13: Manual Handling

Deans, Directors, Heads of Schools and Departments and Research Institute Directors and Managers

Risk Assessment and Manual handling

SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

WORK HEALTH AND SAFETY

Hazard Management Making your workplace safer

NIOSH Equation Outputs: Recommended Weight Limit (RWL): Lifting Index (LI):

Safety is a priority at Vault Pipelines.

Safety Guidelines for Live Entertainment and Events I Part 2. Hazard Identification and Risk Management 1

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Ergonomics Manual handling Part 1: Lifting and carrying

APPENDIX 1: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION and RISK ASSESSMENT PRO-FORMAS

The modern, fast and easy to use risk analysis tool. Advanced Features. Using HAZID in BowTie Pro

Guidance: HSW Risk Assessment Methodology HSW-PR09-WI01. Objective. Implementation

GUIDELINE for MSD Hazard Control Measures

Section 5: Hazard Identification ( version)

SAFETY HARNESSES IN MOBILE ELEVATING WORK PLATFORMS

SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Safe Use of Access Equipment

Transcription:

TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHEET 17 Revision 1 : 2016 MODEL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE MANUAL HANDLING OF GAS CYLINDERS Copyright 2016 by British Compressed Gases Association. First printed 2009. All rights reserved. This publication may be freely produced, except for advertising, endorsement or commercial purposes. Please acknowledge the source as British Compressed Gases Association. BRITISH COMPRESSED GASES ASSOCIATION 4A Mallard Way Pride Park Derby DE24 8GX Website: www.bcga.co.uk ISSN 0260-4809

BRITISH COMPRESSED GASES ASSOCIATION MODEL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE MANUAL HANDLING OF GAS CYLINDERS Manual handling is one of the most common causes of injury at work and causes over a third of all workplace injuries, which include work related Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) such as upper and lower limb pain / disorders, joint and repetitive strain injuries. Gas cylinders are generally heavy and are relatively unstable due to the base diameter to height ratio. Always apply the safe manual handling principles when handling gas cylinders. Employees performing tasks that include any of the following risk factors are at most risk of developing some type of MSD: ~ Repetitive and heavy lifting ~ Bending and twisting ~ Repeating an action too frequently ~ Uncomfortable working position ~ Exerting too much force ~ Working too long without breaks ~ Adverse working environment e.g. hot, cold If more than one of these risk factors are present, the risk is usually higher. The Manual Handling Operations Regulations state that employers must avoid hazardous manual handling operations so far as is reasonably practicable. If they cannot be avoided they must carry out a Manual Handling Risk Assessment. Gas cylinders can be difficult objects to move safely. Large cylinders may weigh upwards of 100 kg, they are tall and thin and can therefore topple easily. This model document provides assistance with the production of a risk assessment for cylinder handling operations. In some instances a full risk assessment may not be required, to assist with this decision please refer to the "Filter" page. The following operations are considered: INTRODUCTION 1) Moving cylinders by hand (lifting and carrying) 2) Moving cylinders by hand (churning*) 3) Moving cylinders by trolley For instructions on how to use the model risk assessment refer to " What to Do" page. NOTES: 1. *Churning is when the cylinder base remains in contact with the ground and the cylinder is rotated by hand whilst tilted at a slight angle in order to move it. 2. This model risk assessment only considers risks associated with manual handling of cylinders; it does not take into account other hazards associated with cylinders such as contents, i.e. pressure and chemical hazards (asphyxiant, toxic, corrosive, flammable). These must be considered separately. 3. BCGA Guidance Note 3 contains worked examples with photographs to assist with the completion of the risk assessment. Reference to Figures in this document refers to the Figures displayed in BCGA GN3. This document has been prepared by BCGA Technical Sub-Committee 6. It was approved for publication at BCGA Technical Committee 154. This document replaces BCGA TIS 17: 2009. This document was first published on 11/05/2016. For comments on this document contact the Association via the website. BCGA TIS 17 - Revision 1

HOW DO YOU RATE RISK? Risk is a combination of the likelihood of an incident occurring and the severity of the injury or loss due to the incident. The Likelihood versus Severity Matrix below is a means for rating risk. Likelihood / Severity Matrix Risk Rating LIKELIHOOD High Medium Low Medium High High Low Medium High Low Low Medium Low Medium High Likelihood: Based on the precautions / controls in place to prevent an incident occurring. High: Medium: SEVERITY Where no precautions are put in place and the employee can only avoid an incident by following verbally communicated procedures - which typically are only short term. No physical barriers or controls in place. Limited physical barriers or controls in place. The employee can only avoid an incident by working carefully, following training, work instructions and safety procedures. Low: Physical barriers or engineering controls such as use of handling aids to minimise the likelihood. Severity: The degree of injury to the employee or third party, or the cost of loss due to property damage. Personal Injury High: Death or disabling injury. Medium: Serious injuries requiring medical treatment and time off from work. Low: Minor injuries. Loss Business Size Large Small High: Where the cost of the incident would exceed: 100,000 20,000 Medium: Where the cost of the incident is between: 10,000 & 100,000 2000 & 20,000 Low: Where the cost of the incident could reasonably be expected to be less 10,000 2,000 BCGA TIS 17 - Revision 1

1 Establish whether a full risk assessment is required by completing the "Filter" form. 2 If a full assessment is not required, record the details on the "Filter" form 3 If a full assessment is required, select the Risk Assessment form for the activity to be risk assessed. 4 Enter details in required fields at the top of the Risk Assessment form. 5 Record the existing control measures beside the recommended control measures. 6 7 HOW TO CARRY OUT THE ASSESSMENT The risk assessment should be carried out by persons who have been trained in manual handling, are familiar with the tasks being assessed and understand the concept of risk assessment. Work through the questions to consider, and if the answer is yes decide, if the associated risk is low, medium or high. Add further details in the 'problems occurring from the task ' and 'possible remedial action ' columns. Once you have answered all the questions, use the answers to make an overall assessment of the risk of injury as low, medium or high and record this on the form. 8 9 10 Risk = Low - activity is adequately controlled Risk = Medium - activity carries a minor residual risk or is not adequately controlled Risk = High - activity is not adequately controlled If the result is medium or high, decide what action is required to reduce the risk to 'as low as reasonably practicable' (ALARP) and record this in the Action Plan. Do not continue with the activity until risk is reduced to as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP). BCGA TIS 17 - Revision 1

Use this filter if you think that the activity to be assessed is low risk - it will quickly and easily confirm this. Go straight to a full risk assessment if you think the activity being assessed involves a significant risk from manual handling. Activity name: Activity description: Observe the activity being assessed and answer the questions below. If you answer yes to any of the questions, a full risk assessment is required. If you answer no to all the questions and you believe the activity to be low risk use this form to record this. General RISK ASSESSMENT FILTER 1) Is the activity carried out once per minute or more frequently? Yes / No 2) Does the activity involve handling whilst seated? Yes / No 3) Does the activity involve twisting whilst handling (the upper body is moved whilst keeping the feet static)? Yes / No 4) Does the load have to be carried more than 10 m without the opportunity to rest? Yes / No 5) Are any personnel involved in the activity at high risk e.g. pregnant, young, suffering from an MSD? Yes / No Lifting, Lowering and Carrying Cylinders 1) Considering the specific manual handling activity and refering to the diagram above, is the maximum weight being handled more than the weight in any of the boxes through which the hands of the individual handler pass? 2) Do the hands of the individual handler pass outside the box zones in the diagram at any time e.g. above head height? 3) Does the task involve raising cylinders from the horizontal? Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Pushing and Pulling a Cylinder Trolley 1) Is the surface which the load is being moved over uneven or soft? Yes / No 2) Are there slopes, ramps or steps present? Yes / No 3) Are there trapping hazards or confined spaces present? Yes / No Churning Cylinders 1) Does the activity involve churning cylinders? Yes / No BCGA TIS 17 - Revision 1

REFERENCES 1) SI 1992 No. 2793 The Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (as amended). 2) HSE L23 Manual Handling. Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (as amended). Guidance on Regulations. 3) HSE INDG 163 Risk assessment. A brief guide to controlling risks in the workplace. 4) HSE INDG 383 Manual Handling Assessment Charts (the MAC tool). 5) BCGA Guidance Note 3 6) BCGA Technical Information Sheet 12 Safe cylinder handling and the application of the manual handling operations regulations to gas cylinders. Handle gas cylinders safely. Information for customers handling gas cylinders. BCGA TIS 17 - Revision 1

Model Risk Assessment for moving cylinders by hand (lifting and carrying) Activity name Moving gas cylinders by hand (lifting & carrying) Activity description Load weight Frequency of activity Carrying distance Location Personnel involved Do they undertake other handling tasks? Assessment date Review date Assessed by Reviewed by Discussed with employee safety representatives? Overall assessment of the risk of injury (Complete tables below prior to making overall assessment) Recommended control measures High / Medium / Low Existing control measures Questions to consider: If yes, tick the appropriate level of risk Low Medium High Problems occurring from the task (make notes in this column in preparation for the remedial action to be taken) Possible remedial action (e.g. changes that need to be made to the task, load, working environment etc. and who needs to be involved in implementation) 1. Does the task involve: ~ Holding cylinders away from the body? ~ Twisting? ~ Stooping? ~ Reaching upwards? ~ Large vertical movements? ~ Long carrying distances? ~ Unpredictable movement of cylinders? ~ Repetitive cylinder handling? ~ Insufficient rest or recovery? ~ A work rate imposed by a process? 2. Are the cylinders: ~ Heavy? ~ Bulky / unwieldy? ~ Difficult to grasp? ~ Unstable / unpredictable e.g. wet cylinders? ~ Intrinsically harmful e.g. toxic at high pressure? Print date: 09/05/2016 Page 1 of 2

3. In the working environment are there: ~ Constraints on posture? ~ Poor, slippery or uneven floors? ~ Variations in levels e.g. steps, slopes? ~ Hot / cold / humid conditions? ~ Strong air movements? ~ Inadequate lighting conditions? ~ Obstacles on the travel route e.g. doors? 4. Consider individual capability - does the job: ~ Require particular strength, height or other capability? ~ Pose an increased risk to those with a health problem or a physical or learning difficulty? ~ Pose an increased risk to those who are preganant? ~ Call for special information / training? 5. Other factors to consider: ~ Is movement or posture hindered e.g. by clothing, personal protective equipment (PPE) or the cylinder? ~ Is PPE required? If so, is the correct / suitable PPE being worn? ~ Are there sudden changes in workload or seasonal changes? ~ Are cylinder accessories e.g. Valve guard, cap etc. suitable to be used for lifting? ~ Is the end point prepared to receive the cylinder? ACTION PLAN Remedial steps that should be taken (in priority order) Person responsible for implementing controls Target implementation date Completed? Additional references: BCGA GN3, Safe cylinder handling and the application of the manual handling operations regulations to gas cylinders; BCGA TIS12, Handle Gas cylinders safely; HSE L23, Manual handling operations regulations. Guidance on regulations; HSE INDG383, Manual Handling Assessment Charts (MAC); HSE INDG163, Risk assessment. Print date: 09/05/2016 Page 2 of 2

Model Risk Assessment for moving cylinders by hand (churning) Activity name Moving gas cylinders by churning Activity description Load weight Frequency of activity Carrying distance Location Personnel involved Do they undertake other handling tasks? Assessment date Review date Assessed by Reviewed by Discussed with employee safety representatives? Overall assessment of the risk of injury (Complete tables below prior to making overall assessment) Recommended control measures High / Medium / Low Existing control measures Questions to consider: 1. Does the task involve: ~ Holding cylinders away from the body? ~ Twisting? ~ Stooping? ~ Reaching upwards? ~ Large vertical movements? ~ Long churning distances e.g. > 5m? ~ Unpredictable movement of cylinders? ~ Repetitive cylinder handling? ~ Insufficient rest or recovery? ~ A work rate imposed by a process? ~ A change in direction of travel? If yes, tick the appropriate level of risk Low Medium High Problems occurring from the task (make notes in this column in preparation for the remedial action to be taken) Possible remedial action (e.g. changes that need to be made to the task, load, working environment etc. and who needs to be involved in implementation) 2. Are the cylinders: ~ Heavy? ~ Bulky / unwieldy? Print date: 09/05/2016 Page 1 of 2

~ Difficult to grasp? ~ Unstable / unpredictable e.g. wet cylinders? ~ Intrinsically harmful e.g. toxic at high pressure? 3. In the working environment are there: ~ Constraints on posture? ~ Poor, slippery or uneven floors? ~ Variations in levels e.g. steps, slopes? ~ Hot / cold / humid conditions? ~ Strong air movements? ~ Inadequate lighting conditions? ~ Obstacles on the travel route e.g. doors, 4. Consider individual capability - does the job: ~ Require particular strength, height or other capability? ~ Pose an increased risk to those with a health problem or a physical or learning difficulty? ~ Pose an increased risk to those who are preganant? ~ Call for special information / training? 5. Other factors to consider: ~ Is movement or posture hindered e.g. by clothing, personal protective equipment (PPE) or the cylinder? ~ ~ Is PPE required? If so, is the correct / suitable PPE being worn? ~ Are there sudden changes in workload or seasonal changes? ~ Are cylinder accessories e.g. valve guard, cap etc. suitable to be used for churning? ~ Is the end point prepared to receive the cylinder? ACTION PLAN Remedial steps that should be taken (in priority order) Person responsible for implementing controls Target implementation date Completed? Additional references: BCGA GN3, Safe cylinder handling and the application of the manual handling operations regulations to gas cylinders; BCGA TIS12, Handle Gas cylinders safely; HSE L23, Manual handling operations regulations. Guidance on regulations; HSE INDG383, Manual Handling Assessment Charts (MAC); HSE INDG163, Risk assessment. Print date: 09/05/2016 Page 2 of 2

Model Risk Assessment for moving cylinders by trolley Activity name Moving gas cylinders by trolley Activity description Load weight Frequency of activity Carrying distance Location Personnel involved Do they undertake other handling tasks? Assessment date Review date Assessed by Reviewed by Discussed with employee safety representatives? Overall assessment of the risk of injury (Complete tables below prior to making overall assessment) Recommended control measures High / Medium / Low Existing control measures Questions to consider: If yes, tick the appropriate level of risk Low Medium High Problems occurring from the task (make notes in this column in preparation for the remedial action to be taken) Possible remedial action (e.g. changes that need to be made to the task, load, working environment etc. and who needs to be involved in implementation) 1. Does the task involve: ~ Transporting cylinder on trolley away from the body? ~ Twisting? ~ Stooping? ~ Reaching upwards? ~ Large vertical movements? ~ Travel over long distances? ~ Unpredictable movement of cylinders? ~ Repetitive cylinder handling? ~ Insufficient rest or recovery? ~ A work rate imposed by a process? 2. Are the cylinders: ~ Heavy? ~ Bulky / unwieldy? Print date: 09/05/2016 Page 1 of 2

~ Difficult to grasp? ~ Unstable / unpredictable e.g. wet cylinders? ~ Intrinsically harmful e.g. toxic at high pressure? 3. In the working environment are there: ~ Constraints on posture? ~ Poor, slippery or uneven floors? ~ Variations in levels e.g. steps, slopes? ~ Hot / cold / humid conditions? ~ Strong air movements? ~ Inadequate lighting conditions? ~ Obstacles on the travel route e.g. doors? 4. Consider individual capability - does the job: ~ Require particular strength, height or other capability? ~ Pose an increased risk to those with a health problem or a physical or learning difficulty? ~ Pose an increased risk to those who are preganant? ~ Call for special information / training? 5. Other factors to consider: ~ Is movement or posture hindered e.g. by clothing, personal protective equipment (PPE) or the cylinder? ~ Is PPE required? If so, is the correct / suitable PPE being worn? ~ Are there sudden changes in workload or seasonal changes? ~ Pre-use inspection and routine maintenance carried out on the trolley? ~ Is the trollley being used to move more than one cylinder at a time? ~ Is the end point prepared to receive the cylinder? ACTION PLAN Remedial steps that should be taken (in priority order) Person responsible for implementing controls Target implementation date Completed? Additional references: BCGA GN3, Safe cylinder handling and the application of the manual handling operations regulations to gas cylinders; BCGA TIS12, Handle Gas cylinders safely; HSE L23, Manual handling operations regulations. Guidance on regulations; HSE INDG383, Manual Handling Assessment Charts (MAC); HSE INDG163, Risk assessment. Print date: 09/05/2016 Page 2 of 2