Autonomous Vehicles & V2X

Similar documents
Estimating Potential Safety Benefits for Advanced Vehicle Technologies

New Safety Features for Crash Avoidance. Dr. Kay Stepper Robert Bosch LLC

Advanced driver assistance systems status and future potential

ITS Solutions for Pedestrian Safety in Detroit

M. DAVID WILDE Coordinateur National du département investigation et analyse des accidents Trafikverket PALAIS DES CONGRÈS NAMUR 15/06/2012

BHATNAGAR. Reducing Delay in V2V-AEB System by Optimizing Messages in the System

Outline. TAMU Campus Projects TxDOT Innovative Research Project Mobileye Shield+ Pilot

Active and Passive Safety Passenger Car Technologies: Potentials to Save Lives in India. Pradeep Puthan, Prateek Thalya, Nils Lubbe

For Immediate Release September 14, 2015 Contact: Sue Chrzan Tampa Hillsborough Expressway Authority ext.

Traffic safety manual for the citizens of the Sultanate of Oman.

CONNECTED VEHICLE PILOT DEPLOYMENT PROGRAM

Speed Limits in the Hoddle Grid

EuroRAP s priorities. Road Safety: no Safe System without forgiving roads

Crash Patterns in Western Australia. Kidd B., Main Roads Western Australia Willett P., Traffic Research Services

A Novel Approach to Evaluate Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings using Trajectory Data

How Might Connected Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles Influence Geometric Design? October 10, 2017

MOBILEYE SHIELD+ COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM

CATS Deliverable 4.2: CATS propulsion system requirements

Insert the title of your. presentation. Potential Benefit of Lane. Departure Warning Systems and. Keep Assistance. Richard Cuerden 9 th March 2015

Way. Roundabout (FUNCTIONING AS A ROUNDABOUT) Driving the

ROAD SAFETY IN RUSSIA

Human Factors for Limited-Ability Autonomous Driving Systems

INTERSECTIONS AT GRADE INTERSECTIONS

Mobileye Shield+ Collision Avoidance System Pilot Program

MOBILEYE SHIELD + COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM OUR VISION. YOUR SAFETY.

California DMV Test. Mark the correct answers. 1. The intersection has a stop sign. Where should you first stop?

Roundabout Design: Safety and Capacity Background Paper July 25, 2004

An intelligent approach that works for all Brake Fleet Safety Conference 2016 Nick O Donnell, Assistant Director Strategic Transport, Ealing Council

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH REGARDING NIGHT VISIBILITY IN ROAD TRAFFIC

Designing for Pedestrians: An Engineering Symposium. Rutgers University March 21, 2013

ESTIMATION OF THE EFFECT OF AUTONOMOUS EMERGENCY BRAKING SYSTEMS FOR PEDESTRIANS ON REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF PEDESTRIAN VICTIMS


Intersection Safety 6/7/2015 INTERSECTIONS. Five basic elements should be considered in intersection design. Intersection Safety (continued)

Texas Driver Education Classroom and In-car Instruction Model Curriculum

CLARIFICATION OF PRIORITY FACTORS FOR REDUCING TRAFFIC ACCIDENT FATALITIES IN THE U.S. AND BENEFIT ESTIMATION OF AEB SYSTEM FOR ONCOMING VEHICLES

Prepared By: Town of Waxhaw Traffic Calming Policy

Can ITS Improve PTW Safety? Findings Based on German Insurers Accident Analyses

Pinellas County Safety Initiatives

ITE Northeastern District Meeting

Roundabouts. By: Nezamuddin, Valparaiso University. February 19, 2015

US Hwy. 64/264 Pedestrian Crossing at the Little Bridge Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

Designing a Traffic Circle By David Bosworth For MATH 714

Preventing Rear End Collisions. OSACH Safety Group Meeting April 16, 2009

BEST PRACTICE FLEET MANAGEMENT AND PRIORITY ACTIONS

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

IVHS Countermeasures for Rear-End Collisions, Task 1 Volume I: Summary

Grover 1 EMERGENCY LANE KEEPING (ELK) SYSTEM TEST DEVELOPMENT. Colin, Grover Matthew, Avery Thatcham Research UK. Paper Number ABSTRACT

DRIVING ON EXPRESSWAYS/ INTERSTATE CHAPTER 11

Ch Driving on Expressways. Characteristics of Expressway Driving. Expressway. Types of Expressways. Why do they have fewer collisions?

USDOT Transit Connected Vehicle Research Program

Children s expectations and beliefs toward the relative safety of riding bicycles at night

MCIWEST-MCB CAMP PENDLETON Critical Days of Summer Newsletter. Week 11: 31 Jul - 04 Aug Bicycle Safety

Use of Throw Distances of Pedestrians and Bicyclists as Part of a Scientific Accident Reconstruction Method 1

Department of Transportation

c. continue onto the expressway and use the next exit ramp.

A Conceptual Approach for Using the UCF Driving Simulator as a Test Bed for High Risk Locations

Vision Zero & ITE. April 11, Toole Design Group. Jason DeGray, P.E., PTOE. Vision Zero & ITE

RAISED MEDIAN EFFECTIVENESS

Development and Evaluations of Advanced Emergency Braking System Algorithm for the Commercial Vehicle

Collision Avoidance based on Camera and Radar Fusion. Jitendra Shah interactive Summer School 4-6 July, 2012

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT ROUNDABOUTS

Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Evaluation of Pedestrian and Cyclist Warning Systems for Trucks

Frequently Asked Questions

Memorandum 1. INTRODUCTION. To: Cc: From: Denise Marshall Northumberland County

This subscription presentation was developed by SafetyFirst for the benefit of its clients who are currently enrolled and using a SafetyFirst product

Development and Assessment of CACC for Cars and Trucks

Evaluation of the ACC Vehicles in Mixed Traffic: Lane Change Effects and Sensitivity Analysis

REDUCING COLLISIONS AT HIGH CRASH LOCATIONS

Advanced Driver Assist Systems

VT15 / Allen Martin Drive Intersection Scoping Study

SUPERSTREETS IN TEXAS. ITS Texas Annual Meeting San Marcos, Texas Session 6A - Operations November 11, 2011

Prof. Dr. Karl Viktor Schaller Director of Engineering and Purchasing MAN Nutzfahrzeuge AG

$ 12" $#&%$ 86.) *1! *1 /3 )00, , (1* Neighborhood Traffic Calming Part 3 Solutions Bradley William Yarger, P.E.

OBJECTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY OF PERCEIVED SAFETY & COMFORT DURING ASSISTED DRIVING

Reducing Speeding-Related Crashes Involving Passenger Vehicles

Arlington County Police Department Law Enforcement Guide. Enforcing Bicycle Traffic Laws

Vision Zero: No more traffic deaths on Berkeley streets

TRAFFIC CALMING PLANNER S PORTFOLIO

REDUCING ACCIDENTS MEANS SAVING LIVES.

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

Strategic Research PROGRAM FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT OF THE MOBILEYE SHIELD+ COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

Appendix A Type of Traffic Calming Measures Engineering Solutions

Systemic Safety. Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation March 2016

Highway Safety Improvement

Vermont Permit Test Flash Cards

Study on fatal accidents in Toyota city aimed at zero traffic fatality

BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS CRASH DATA AND SAFETY ANALYSIS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DRAFT MAY 2016

Crash Facts Scenario 1 Pedestrian Accident - Solution - May 2006

Why do you think the chances of a collision are greater at an intersection than at any other point on the roadway?

Driver Education Ch. 4: Safe Driving Rules & Regulations. Ms. Marx

Texas Intersection Safety Implementation Plan Workshop JUNE 2, 2016

Driver Training School Instructor Curriculum Requirements for Student Learning & Performance Goals

Mark Malone, P.E. SD DOT

Reducing Fatalities and Serious Injuries on County Roads

The I-85 Express Lanes Project NASCIO Recognition Award Nomination

Pedestrian Safety - Developments in Crash Worthiness and Crash Avoidance

TRAFFIC ACCIDENT RESEARCH IN GERMANY THE GERMAN IN-DEPTH ACCIDENT STUDY (GIDAS)

1. Places where one road meets or crosses another are called intersections. F

Transcription:

Semi Autonomous Vehicles & V2X James Kuhr, Esq. Acknowledgements: TxDOT, D-STOP, NCTCOG, McCombs School of Business, Dr. Chandra Bhat, Dr. Kara Kockelman

Increase in Roadway Safety Increase in Network Effects Increase in Safety Effects Levels of Autonomy Level 1 Adaptive Cruise Control Level 2 Adaptive Cruise Control + Lane Assist Level 3 Open Road Automated Vehicle Level 4 Generally Hands Off Driving Level 5

Market Shares US Market Share Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 20% 2016 2021 16% 2016 2021 13% 2016 2020 12% 2016 2021 9% 2016 2020 7% 2016 2018 2020 7% 2016 2020 2022 3% 2016 2020 2% 2016 2017 2021 2018 (ride sourcing) Others: Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 2016 2025 2016 2021 2016 2017 2020 2016 2017 2018 2016 2018 2019 2020 https://ctr.utexas.edu/wp-content/uploads/122.pdf

Disruptor: X - sharing Van Sharing Car Sharing Vehicle Miles Traveled should go up with new Carpooling modes of transportation

V2V Communications (DSRC)

V2X Safety Benefits Through use of just V2V BSM to warn drivers, with a mature system, NHTSA studies indicate that up to 79% of unimpaired crashes could be avoided. Using just a V2I communication system, NHTSA estimates that 26% of unimpaired crashes could be avoided. Together, NHTSA studies indicate that 81% of all unimpaired crashes could be avoided with a fully mature V2V and V2I system. FHWA ITS JPO Prediction By 2029, seven years after the projected phase-in of the light vehicle V2V rule, 60% of all vehicles, or a cumulative 146 million cars, will have DSRC/V2X equipment. Adoption of aftermarket/consumer electronics DSRC devices will outpace factory installed DSRC within five to six years after a NHTSA Light Vehicle V2V rule requiring 100% of all new vehicles to be equipped with V2V. https://ntl.bts.gov/lib/60000/60500/60535/fhwa-jpo-17-487_final_.pdf

Where Are We Now? http://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/api/public/viewp ublication/812318

Electronic Stability Control Mandatory in 2012 Designed to prevent roll-over accidents (2% of total accidents) In 2010, ESC saved 682 lives (27% penetration) In 2014, ESC saved 1580 lives (48% penetration) Technologies work, they just take a long time to diffuse through markets Sources: NHTSA, IIHS

Accidents Types & ADAS/V2X Pre-Crash Scenario % of Total % of Total Cost ADAS Solution CV Solution Lead Vehicle Accelerating 4.24% 19.17% X X Control Loss With Prior Vehicle Action 1.03% 8.53% X Road Edge Departure With Prior Vehicle Maneuver 1.34% 7.94% X X LTAP/OD at Non-Signalized Junctions 1.98% 6.55% X Straight Crossing Paths at Non-Signalized Junctions 1.23% 5.41% X Lead Vehicle Stopped 2.15% 4.84% X X Control Loss Without Prior Vehicle Action 6.22% 4.48% X Lead Vehicle Decelerating 0.74% 4.24% X X Vehicle(s) Changing Lanes - Same Direction 3.91% 4.11% X X Lead Vehicle Moving at Lower Constant Speed 3.19% 3.74% X X Vehicle(s) Making a Maneuver - Opposite Direction 1.44% 3.60% X Other 1.34% 3.21% Once cars are connected and automated, Estimates of Economic Cost Savings, conservatively: 75% of costs could be addressed through ADAS and vehicle to vehicle communication https://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/kockelman/public_html/trb16cavsafety.pdf

Studies on ADAS Effects http://www.iihs.org/iihs/news/desktopnews/crashes-avoided-frontcrash-prevention-slashes-police-reported-rear-end-crashes https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/inv/2016/incla-pe16007-7876.pdf

Insurance Claim Frequency ADAS http://www.iihs.org/iihs/news/desktopnews/crash-avoidance-features-reduce-crashesinsurance-claims-study-shows-autonomous-braking-and-adaptive-headlights-yield-biggestbenefits

AEB Availability (majority of models) US Market Share Optional Standard 20% 2017 2022 16% 2018 2022 13% 2016 2017 12% 2017 2022 9% 2017 2020 7% 2016 2017 7% 2018 2022 3% 2017 2022 2% 2016 2017 Optional Standard 2017 2022 2016 2022 2016 2019 2014 2017 2016 2017 2020 https://www.consumerreports.org/car-safety/whereautomakers-stand-on-automatic-emergency-braking-pledge/

Toyota Toyota Safety Sense, standard on all new models Pre-Collision system Lane Departure Alert Automatic High Beams Pre-Collision system with Pedestrian Detection Dynamic Radar Cruise Control 90% Reduction in Rear-End Collissions http://www.nasdaq.com/article/toyota-announces-toyota-safety-sense-and-icssafety-support-technologies-that-together-reduce-20170827-00118

Adoption Takes 10-15 years to renew the on-road fleet Semi autonomous is less about behavior, and more about government mandates and OEM offerings Look at the case of Electronic Stability Control

Electronic Stability Control

IIHS Projection

Connected Vehicle Adoption Curve 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2021 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 % Veh w/ DSRC % w/ Safety Apps it is worth noting that in case of no regulations, even at 10% annual drop in technology prices and no-zero, but constant [Willingness To Pay] 83.5% [of vehicles] would have connectivity in 2045 Bansal & Kockleman

A Few Closing Thoughts Insurance is not going away Commercial Vehicles will convert first Yes, AVs are more expensive to build in some cases - but these are the cars that will be in fewer crashes There will be an extended period of mixed traffic There are 315,000 claims adjusters, appraisers examiner and investigators in the United States 40,000 collision body shops 20% of Organ Donations are from car accidents Many markets are going to be affected https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/api/public/viewpublication/812013

Thanks My Email: jkuhr@utexas.edu Center for Transportation Research We Partner to do Research on Private Sector Business Issues Related to New Transportation