Regents Biology LAB. NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS

Similar documents
Biology B / Sanderson!

Graphing population size daily Review Deer: Predation or Starvation

NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS: 3 CASE STUDIES

The Lesson of the Kaibab

Predator Prey Lab Exercise L2

Predator Prey Lab Exercise L3

STUDENT PACKET # 6 Student Exploration: Rabbit Population by Season

Prior Knowledge: Students should have an understanding that plants and animals compete for resources such as food, space, water, air and shelter.

Science Skills Station

Lab: Predator-Prey Simulation

"Oh! Deer! & Limiting Factors" adapted from Project Wild Mr. Mark Musselman Audubon at the Francis Beidler Forest

Ecology Part 2 ~ NJBCT ~ End of Year Populations, Biodiversity, and Conservation

Ecology Quiz Which example shows a relationship between a living thing and a nonliving thing?

SCIENCE EXTENDED LEARNING MODULES STUDENT PACKET GRADE 8 6: INTERDEPENDENCE

c. Escape from Unsuitable Conditions i. A long term escape of a period of reduced activity 1. Ex. ii. Moving to a more favorable habitat 1. Ex.

Deer Population Student Guide

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Wolves in Yellowstone Park. A Story about Ecosystem Balance

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

Invasive Species. Grade Levels. Introduction. This activity is intended for grades 9 12.

Invasive Versus Endemic Species

Carrying Capacity Activity. 5 th Grade PSI. Teacher s Notes Procedure: Simulation 1 Regular herds

Invasive Versus Endemic Species

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

An Alternative Explanation for Leopold s Kaibab Deer Herd Irruption of the 1920 s

Ecological Pyramids Adapted from The Nevada Outdoor School, The Playa Ecological Pyramids Lesson Plan

Comment Letter 1 for Item 5

Stakeholder Activity

Living World Review #2

Background Summary Kaibab Plateau: Source: Kormondy, E. J. (1996). Concepts of Ecology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. p.96.

The Ups and Downs of Populations Based on Oh Deer by Project WILD By Heather Miller

This game has been adapted from SECONDARY PROJECT WILD 1983, 1985

Population Ecology Yellowstone Elk by C. John Graves

Livestock Losses. From Department of Agriculture report 2010 (report also available on this website)

Native Species Restoration and its Impact on Local Populations

Managing Wildlife Populations

Chapter 20: Page 250

The New Coyote and Deer Predation

Lab Activity: Evolution by Natural Selection

The history of the bison: A symbol of the American story

Oh Deer! Objectives. Background. Method. Materials

Deer Management Unit 127

Jeffrey Cole, Wildlife Manager Fish and Wildlife Dispatch

Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Management

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Wildlife CSI - Panhandle elk mortality study

Predation: Lies, Myths, and Scientific Fraud

New Mexico Supercomputing Challenge

Early History, Prehistory

BIGHORN SHEEP IN IDAHO

project 1 [ti] Name Address Club .'_ D.St.SS" A?G.I R.3? '!UJ.SS at: B 1MILDLIFE

Managing Wildlife Populations

Chapter 20. Case #7 (Review Copy) Cycles in Predator and Prey Populations

Name(s) School. a. A farmer in New Zealand uses a sheepdog to herd his sheep, and in exchange the animal receives shelter and food.

Predator-Prey Interactions: Bean Simulation. Materials

Describe what is happening in figures 1-3. Is the population of mice different in figure 3 than in figure 1? Explain why.

This project is about reintroducing animals that became extinct in Britain many years ago. I will be looking at the pros and the cons of the

Objectives. Summary. Background

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

ACTIVITY FIVE SPECIES AT RISK LEARNING OBJECTIVES: MATERIALS: Subjects: Science, math, art, history

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book

2011 Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University. All rights reserved.

5 th Grade Science Pre-assessment Organisms & Environments Unit 5 KEY

April Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department

Environmental Change and its Effects

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

Wild Wapiti Wild Wapiti activities are directly tied to the third spread - pages 5 and 6 of Our Wetland Project.

Minnesota TREK MINNESOTA TRAIL SELF-GUIDED TOUR 6TH - 8TH GRADE. Minnesota Trek 6 8th grades 1

Search for the missing sea otters

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

2012 Wildlife Studies

Describe what is happening in figures 1-3. Is the population of mice different in figure 3 than in figure 1? Explain why.

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

a) Case Study: North American Bison/Wood Buffalo b) Species Diversity/Richness

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Hells Canyon Preservation Council and The Wilderness Society UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

The wolf hunt is on in Wyoming after endangered protections are lifted

Endangered Species. The rare scare

PREDATION MANAGEMENT FOR LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE ENTERPRISES

1748 The Ohio. a trading post near Piqua to trade items made in England for. in big demand.

RANCH & FARM SALES PRESENTS

RANCH & FARM SALES PRESENTS

Saiga: Spirit of the Steppe. You can do things every day to be a hero for saiga! by San Diego Zoo Global. Created for the Saiga Conservation Alliance

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

Modeling Population Decline

Beaver Fever. Adapted From: Oh Deer, Project Wild K-12 Activity Guide, Project WILD, p

RANCH & FARM SALES PRESENTS

Describe what is happening in figures 1-3. Is the population of mice different in figure 3 than in figure 1? Explain why.

Students use wildlife survey study techniques to discover the cause of the drop in a wood duck population.

Wildlife Management. Wildlife Management. Geography 657

QUAIL CSI USING A SCENT STATION

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

Classroom Activity: Population Study Game (Oh, Deer!)

Colorado West Slope Mule Deer Strategy Public Engagement Report

Street Edmonton, AB T6K 1T8. Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA) Position On Game Farming In Alberta February 2004

TERRESTRIAL SOUND Hunter Hike

Transcription:

Period Date LAB. NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS The size of populations in a community are regulated in many ways. Some of the controls acting on populations are: the amount of food and water available to feed the population the amount of nesting sites available to support raising young the size of the predator population the amount of disease and parasites infecting the population Because of these limitations a certain area can only support a certain size population of each type of organism. The population size of each creature that the environment can support is called the carrying capacity of that community. This limit represents how many of a certain species that can survive in that area. In this lab we will study two real life examples of populations, their natural controls, and the carrying capacity of their community. THE KAIBAB DEER In the early 1900s, the Kaibab plateau, north of the Grand Canyon in Arizona, supported a population of about 4000 deer on over 700,000 acres. Predators, such as coyotes, wolves, and pumas, helped to keep the deer population in check. It was estimated at the time that the plateau had a carrying capacity of about 30,000 deer, so that there seemed to be plenty of food for the population that existed. Ranchers who moved into the area lost many sheep and cattle to the predators. Then on November 28th, 1906, President Theodore Roosevelt created the Grand Canyon National Game Preserve to protect the "finest deer herd in America." In an effort to save livestock and increase the deer population for tourists, the Forest Service tried to exterminate the predators of the deer. Between 1907 and 1939, 816 mountain lions, 20 wolves, 7388 coyotes and more than 500 bobcats were killed. With the successful removal of many of the predators, the deer herd increased dramatically. But signs that the deer population was out of control began to appear as early as 1920 and the range (the deer habitat) was beginning to deteriorate rapidly. The food supply was being overgrazed by the high population of deer. Trees and grass were being damaged to the point they couldn t recover for next year s growing season. Soon there wasn t enough food to feed the growing population. By 1923, the deer were reported to be on the verge of starvation and the range conditions were described as "deplorable." The Kaibab Deer Investigating Committee recommended that the number of deer be cut in half as quickly as possible. Hunting was allowed, and during the fall of 1924, 675 deer were killed by hunters. However, these deer represented only one-tenth the number of deer that had been born that spring. Over the next two winters, it is estimated that 60,000 deer starved to death. Today, the Arizona Game Commission carefully manages the Kaibab area. Hunting permits are issued to keep the deer in balance with their range. Predators were re-introduced and are now protected to help keep herds in balance with food supplies. Tragic winter losses are now reduced by keeping the number of deer near the carrying capacity of the range. 1 of 7

1. In Table 1 is the historical data for the Kaibab deer population. Graph the data and then answer the summary questions. Table 1. Kaibab Deer Population 1900 1940 Year Population Size Comments 1900 4,000 predators maintain control of deer population 1905 5,000 predator removal program begins 1910 9,000 1915 25,000 1920 65,000 1924 100,000 1925 60,000 40,000 deer die of starvation and disease 1926 40,000 1927 37,000 1928 35,000 1929 30,000 1930 25,000 1931 20,000 1935 18,000 1940 10,000 Title: 2 of 7

THE MOOSE OF ISLE ROYALE Isle Royale is a forested island in the middle of Lake Superior in Michigan. The island is about 50 miles long and about 8 miles wide and is a protected forest reserve. A herd of moose lives on the island, but there were no moose-predators, like wolves, living on the island with them. In 1970 the moose population of the island was about 2000 animals. Although the island had excellent vegetation for feeding, the food supply obviously had limits. Thus the forest management personnel feared that overgrazing might lead to mass starvation. Since the area was too remote for hunters, the wildlife service decided to bring in natural predators to control the moose population. It was hoped that natural predation would keep the moose population from becoming too large and also increase the moose quality (or health), as predators often eliminate the weaker members of the herd. In 1971, ten wolves were flown into the island. The results of this program are shown in the following table. The Population Change is the number of moose born minus the number of moose that died during that year. Fill out the last column for each year (the first has been calculated for you). Table 2. Changes in population of moose and wolves on Isle Royale, Michigan 1971-1980 Moose Wolf Moose Moose Year Predation Starvation Population Population Population Offspring Change 1971 10 2,000 800 400 100 +300 1972 12 2,300 920 480 240 1973 16 2,500 1,000 640 500 1974 22 2,360 944 880 180 1975 28 2,244 996 1,120 26 1976 24 2,094 836 960 2 1977 21 1,968 788 840 0 1978 18 1,916 766 720 0 1979 19 1,952 780 760 0 1980 19 1,972 790 760 0 1. Calculate the population change for each year and enter it into the last column in Table 2. The population change is equal to the number of moose that were born minus the number of moose that dies during the year. 2. Graph the moose and wolf populations on the graph below. Use the left axis for the moose population and the right axis for the wolf population. Plot each line using a different color. 3 of 7

Title Number of Moose Number of Wolves SUMMARY QUESTIONS THE KAIBAB DEER 1. During 1906 and 1907, what methods did the Forest Service use to protect the Kaibab deer? 2. Were these methods successful? Use the data from your graph to support your answer. 4 of 7

3. Why did the population of deer start to increase in 1905? 4. Why did the population of deer decline drastically in 1925, even though their predators were eliminated? 5. Why do you think the deer population size in 1900 was 4,000 when it is estimated that the plateau has a carrying capacity of 30,000? 6. Based on these lessons, suggest what YOU would have done in the following years to manage deer herds. a. 1915: b. 1923: 7. What happens to populations as they reach or exceed the carrying capacity of their ecosystem? 5 of 7

8. It is a criticism of many population ecologists that the pattern of population increase and subsequent crash of the deer population would have occurred even if the bounty had not been placed on the predators. Do you agree or disagree with this statement. Explain your reasoning. THE MOOSE OF ISLE ROYALE 9. Describe what happened to the moose and wolf populations between 1971 and 1980. 10. What do you think would have happened to the moose on the island had wolves NOT been introduced? 11. Most biology textbooks describe that predators and prey exist in a balance. This "balance of nature" hypothesis has been criticized by some scientists because it suggests a relationship between predators and prey that is good and necessary. Opponents of this hypothesis propose the following questions: a. Why is death by predators more natural or "right" than death by starvation? 6 of 7

b. How does one determine when an ecosystem is in "balance"? c. Do predators really kill only the old and sick prey? What evidence is there for this statement? d. What is your opinion of the balance of nature hypothesis? Would the deer on the island be better off, worse off, or about the same without the wolves. Defend your position. 7 of 7