Return to Session Menu DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE QUALITY ASSURANCE SESSION. The Meaning of LIFE. Richard Purser GL Noble Denton

Similar documents
Application Research for DP Enhanced Notation

REDUNDANT PROPULSION SHIPS RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF NEWBUILDINGS DET NORSKE VERITAS SPECIAL EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS ADDITIONAL CLASS PART 6 CHAPTER 2

OIL & GAS. MTS DP Committee. Workshop in Singapore Session 4 Day 2. Unwanted Thrust

ANNUAL DYNAMIC POSITIONING TRIALS FOR DYNAMICALLY POSITIONED VESSELS

DYNAMIC POSITIONING SYSTEMS

TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL GUIDANCE (TECHOP) TECHOP_ODP_13_(D) (CONTROL POWER SUPPLIES AND AUTO CHANGEOVERS) NOVEMBER 2017

Managing Dynamic Positioning (DP) Operations

Guidelines for The Design and Operation of Dynamically Positioned Vessels

Guidance on Operational Activity Planning

IMCA DP Station Keeping Bulletin 04/18 November 2018

Dynamic Positioning Systems

Rules for Classification and Construction Ship Technology

OSVDPA CT-1-001, the OSVDPA Competency Standard

DNVGL-RP-E306 Edition July 2015

IMCA DP Station Keeping Bulletin 03/18 August 2018

Dynamic Positioning Vessel Design Philosophy Guidelines

Marine Technology Society

DP Station Keeping Event Bulletin

Nautical Institute Standard for DP Knowledge for Technical Staff

MARINE TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY DP VESSEL DESIGN PHILOSOPHY GUIDELINES - PART 2

TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL GUIDANCE (TECHOP) TECHOP_ODP_05_(O) (DP OPERATIONS MANUAL) FEBRUARY 2014

Guidelines on Surveys for Dynamic Positioning System

OFFICIAL MESSAGE CIRCULAR

Record of Assessment OFFICER IN CHARGE OF AN ENGINEERING WATCH

GUIDELINES FOR VESSELS WITH DYNAMIC POSITIONING SYSTEMS ***

Dynamic Positioning: Method for Disaster Prevention and Risk Management

Subj: USE OF DYNAMIC POSITIONING (DP) BY OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSELS (OSVs) FOR OIL AND HAZMAT TRANSFERS

Advanced Training for DP Operators

EVALUATING CRITERIA FOR DP VESSELS

ATL R/V Atlantis AUXILIARY PLANT OPERATION APPENDIX OPERATING PROCEDURES

Record of Assessment OFFICER IN CHARGE OF AN ENGINEERING WATCH

Risk Management. Risk Analysis of a Dynamic Positioning Diving Vessel Up Weather of a Platform and Jack Up

AMENDMENTS TO THE GUIDELINES FOR VESSELS WITH DYNAMIC POSITIONING (DP) SYSTEMS (MSC/CIRC.645) Proposed amendments to the Guidelines

ShipRight Design and Construction. Procedure for Assigning SRtP Descriptive Note

BIBBY POLARIS MULTI PURPOSE DIVE SUPPORT & OFFSHORE CONSTRUCTION VESSEL

ANNEX AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL CODE FOR FIRE SAFETY SYSTEMS (FSS CODE) CHAPTER 15 INERT GAS SYSTEMS

Electrical, electronic and control engineering at the operational level

FUNDAMENTAL SAFETY OVERVIEW VOLUME 2: DESIGN AND SAFETY CHAPTER I: AUXILIARY SYSTEMS. A high-capacity EBA system [CSVS] [main purge]

FMEA Proving Trials and Offloading Simulations

Challenges in estimating the vessel station-keeping performance

Reliability Analysis Including External Failures for Low Demand Marine Systems

Dynamic positioning systems - operation guidance

DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE October 13-14, 2015 RISK. Risk Analysis of DP Operations for CAT-D Drilling Unit in the Troll Field

TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL GUIDANCE (TECHOP)

BIBBY POLARIS MULTI PURPOSE DIVE SUPPORT & OFFSHORE CONSTRUCTION VESSEL

BMA INFORMATION BULLETIN No. 96

DYNAMIC POSITIONING SYSTEMS

NEW IGC CODE AND IGF CODE

Rules for Classification and Construction Additional Rules and Guidelines

STATIONKEEPING DYNAMIC POSITIONING FOR YACHTS. Hans Cozijn

RESOLUTION MSC.235(82) (adopted on 1 December 2006) ADOPTION OF THE GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSELS, 2006

Operations and Requirements A Practical Approach to Managing DP Operations

Marine Technology Society

Workshop Information IAEA Workshop

DP OPERATIONS GUIDANCE

Periodic Survey of Fuel Installations on Ships other than Liquefied Gas Carriers utilizing gas or other low flash point fuels

Implementing Emergency Stop Systems - Safety Considerations & Regulations A PRACTICAL GUIDE V1.0.0

Marine Technology Society

Minimum standard of competence for electro-technical officers (STCW Reg III/6) Electrical, electronic and control engineering at the operational level

10 December 2010 GUIDANCE FOR WATERTIGHT DOORS ON PASSENGER SHIPS WHICH MAY BE OPENED DURING NAVIGATION

THE APPLICATION OF SPECIAL PURPOSE SHIP (SPS) REQUIREMENTS TO OFFSHORE SUPPORT VESSELS

Summary Report for Individual Task 551-8ST-1027 Operate Emergency Steering Status: Approved

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES. Interpretations of the. IGF Code

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 119/P

FPSO and Shuttle Tanker Positioning

ENS-200 Energy saving trainer

SPR - Pneumatic Spool Valve

Safety and Risk Engineering. HSE Case Implementation Clive Rawson

RESOLUTION MSC.137(76) (adopted on 4 December 2002) STANDARDS FOR SHIP MANOEUVRABILITY

Guidelines for Clean Agent Fire Suppression Systems

RESOLUTION MSC.397(95) (adopted on 11 June 2015) AMENDMENTS TO PART A OF THE SEAFARERS' TRAINING, CERTIFICATION AND WATCHKEEPING (STCW) CODE

Ingersoll Rand. X-Series System Automation

Commonwealth of Dominica. Office of the Maritime Administrator

Hydro Plant Risk Assessment Guide

Fault Diagnosis based on Particle Filter - with applications to marine crafts

GAS FUELLED ENGINE INSTALLATIONS

RESOLUTION A.567(14) adopted on 20 November 1985 REGULATION FOR INERT GAS SYSTEMS ON CHEMICAL TANKERS

Rules for Classification and Construction Additional Rules and Guidelines

Release: 1. UEPOPL002A Licence to operate a reciprocating steam engine

DP Ice Model Test of Arctic Drillship

FP15 Interface Valve. SIL Safety Manual. SIL SM.018 Rev 1. Compiled By : G. Elliott, Date: 30/10/2017. Innovative and Reliable Valve & Pump Solutions

Solenoid Valves For Gas Service FP02G & FP05G

System Operating Limit Definition and Exceedance Clarification

Fail Operational Controls for an Independent Metering Valve

ATLANTIC EXPLORER with Dynamic Positioning System FULL SPECIFICATIONS

Challenges in Ship Design to Maintain Thrusters inside Ship

Operations. On The Use of Safety Moorings in DP Operations

Puyuan. QUY 160 Crawler Crane Technical Manual

CONTROL SOLUTIONS DESIGNED TO FIT RIGHT IN. Energy Control Technologies

MDEP Common Position No AP

QUANTIFYING THE TOLERABILITY OF POTENTIAL IGNITION SOURCES FROM UNCERTIFIED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT INSTALLED IN HAZARDOUS AREAS

Risk Analysis of DP Operations for CAT-D Drilling Unit in the Troll Field

International Association of Drilling Contractors North Sea Chapter HPHT Guidance on MODU Safety Case Content

INNOVATIVE MOORING SYSTEMS

Hydraulic (Subsea) Shuttle Valves

Significant Change to Dairy Heat Treatment Equipment and Systems

Using what we have. Sherman Eagles SoftwareCPR.

FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) FOR CLASSIFICATION

Calibration Requirements for Direct Reading Confined Space Gas Detectors

(Dynamic Positioning System (DPS) Risk Analysis Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA))

Transcription:

Return to Session Menu DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE October 15-16, 2013 QUALITY ASSURANCE SESSION The Meaning of LIFE Richard Purser GL Noble Denton

The Meaning of Life 15 th October 2013

What is the meaning of LIFE? Low Impact Failure Effect

Where Has LIFE Come From? Low Impact Failure Effect (LIFE) is not a new concept, it is simply the application of good practice and lessons learned. It is a design concept with which most practitioners in the DP community will be familiar. The LIFE concept simply gives a name to this practice and formalises its application in a simple methodology.

Why Do We Need LIFE? Essentially to improve the post failure capability of the vessel after a single failure. Maximise the vessel s availability for work and to provide a very high degree of reliability and fault tolerance.

Good Design How do we use the LIFE Concept to achieve a robust Design? Designing a vessel to meet Class Rules does not necessarily produce a vessel that is fault tolerant enough to address the ability of the vessel to continue its Industrial Mission following a single failure.

Industrial Mission Defined as Primarily the operational role of the vessel, typically applicable to MODUs and Project Construction Vessels.

Key Elements of a Fault Tolerant Design Performance Protection Detection Performance: For a DP system to be fault, tolerant each redundant equipment group and all of the DP related machinery and systems within it must be capable of their defined performance Performance means more than steady state capacity, it also includes dynamic performance, response time and accuracy. Protection: Even the best separated DP systems inevitably have some common points between redundant equipment groups and these represent potential fault propagation paths. There must be effective protective functions or features to prevent faults in one system adversely affecting the operation of others. Detection: It is important to know when full fault tolerance has been lost. Potential hidden failures can be detected by suitable alarms and periodic testing.

MTS DP Vessel Design Philosophy The 7 Pillars of Wisdom for a Robust DP System: 1. Independence 2. Segregation 3. Autonomy 4. Fault tolerance 5. Fault resistance 6. Fault ride through capability 7. Differentiation

Independence Main machinery should be made as independent as possible.

Segregation Systems intended to provide redundancy should have as few common points connecting them as possible.

Autonomy Control and automation functions should be decentralized to the point that each item of main machinery (generators and thrusters) is capable of making itself ready for DP operations independently of any centralised or hierarchical control system. Emergency Generator CUMMINS QSK60-D(M) MG0 3.3m 3 Cartridge Filters Hand Activated Hatlapa 38m3/hr 30 bar Air Compressor Air Start Motor Reducing valve 30>8 bar Emergency Air Receiver 30 bar 1050ltr Supply from Start Air ER 2

Fault Tolerance DP systems of equipment classes 2 & 3 are required to be fault tolerant in respect of defined single failure criteria appropriate to each DP class notation. Remain in position until Time to Terminate (TTT).

Fault Resistance DP related equipment should be selected on the basis of high reliability and resistance to internal and external influences which may reduce reliability. INSTRUMENT ROOM DPC CABINET IJS CONTROL UPS

Fault Ride Through Capability The ability of redundant systems to continue operating without malfunction when subjected to the effects of failures in other systems to which the surviving systems are connected. G1 G2

Differentiation The principles of differentiation, diversity and orthogonality in the design of redundant systems should be used to best advantages.

Example Vessel STARBOARD T5 COMBI AZI/TUNNEL T1 T2 T3 T4 RETRACTABLE T6 PORT MCC DG 6 DG 5 MCC MCC DG 4 DG 3 MCC MCC DG 2 DG 1 MCC OPTION 6.6kV OPTION 6.6kV OPTION 6.6kV MCC T1 T6 MCC MCC T3 T4 MCC MCC T2 T5 MCC FWD BOW TUNNEL THRUSTER AFT PORT AZIMUTH THRUSTER FWD CENTRELINE AZIMUTH THRUSTER RETRACTABLE AFT CENTRELINE AZIMUTH THRUSTER FWD COMBI AZI/TUNNEL THRUSTER AFT STBD AZIMUTH THRUSTER 480V 480V 480V DIVING GENERATOR 220V G 220V 220V ACCOMODATION & NAV BRIDGE SUPPLIES 440V DIVING SWITCHBOARD ACCOMODATION & NAV BRIDGE SUPPLIES ACCOMODATION & NAV BRIDGE SUPPLIES 110V PORT 440V DIVING SWITCHBOARD STBD 440V DIVING SWITCHBOARD 110V 110V DIVE POWER SYSTEM EG 1 OUT OF 4 M M CRANE MOTORS A60 WATERTIGHT A60 WATERTIGHT

Vessel WCFDIclass PART I - WCFDI CLASS - No single failure as defined for class notation DP3 will have a greater effect on the vessel s ability to maintain position and heading than the loss of one of the three independent power and propulsion systems consisting of two generators and two thrusters (one fwd & one aft). This statement is considered to be valid when the power plant is operated with all the bustie circuit breakers between the three power systems open and at least one generator connected to each of the three main switchboards. LIFE WCFDILIFE PART II - WCFDI LIFE - No single failure with the exception of the effects of fire, flooding, Main bus bar fault and passive components (as defined in IMO MSC 645) will have a greater effect on the vessel s ability to maintain position than the loss of one thruster and/or one generator in the same independent power and propulsion group. This statement is considered to be valid when the power plant is operated with all the bustie circuit breakers between the three power systems open and two generators connected to each of the three Main switchboards (it is accepted that the whole independent power system may be temporarily lost if only one generator is connected). Note this requirement is not to be misunderstood as indicting any requirement for compliance with failure criteria other than that situated in this definition, for example Class DP3 or IMCA guidance. This definition simply guides the development of non-critical redundancy intended to improve reliability and vessel availability.

Summary of LIFE Redundancy Design Objectives on a System by System Basis System Fire & Flooding Technical Faults (Excluding Bus Fault) Generators Two out of three groups survive any single failure Independent (6 way split) Thrusters Two out of three groups survive any single failure Independent (6 way split) Marine Auxiliary Two out of three groups survive any single failure Single generator and/or single thruster affected DP Control Dual redundant (main & backup) Triple redundant Control Networks Dual redundant Dual redundant VMS/PMS Two out of three groups survive any single failure Loss of associated machinery WCFDI Part II Safety / ESD Fail safe WCFDI Part I Fail safe WCFDI Part I

Fuel System for 3 Way Split - 6 Generators FO STORAGE TANK FO STORAGE TANK FO STORAGE TANK FO STORAGE TANK FO STORAGE TANK FO STORAGE TANK BUNKER STATION PORT BUNKER STATION STARBOARD TRANSFER PUMP TRANSFER PUMP TRANSFER PUMP CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED SETTLING TANK SETTLING TANK SETTLING TANK PURIFIER 6 PURIFIER 5 PURIFIER 4 PURIFIER 3 PURIFIER 2 PURIFIER 1 SERVICE TANK SERVICE TANK SERVICE TANK SERVICE TANK SERVICE TANK SERVICE TANK FUEL COOLER AIR DRIVEN FO PUMP FILTERS PUMP FLOWMETERS ETC. FILTERS PUMP FLOWMETERS ETC. FUEL COOLER FUEL COOLER AIR DRIVEN FO PUMP FILTERS PUMP FLOWMETERS ETC. FILTERS PUMP FLOWMETERS ETC. FUEL COOLER FUEL COOLER AIR DRIVEN FO PUMP FILTERS PUMP FLOWMETERS ETC. FILTERS PUMP FLOWMETERS ETC. FUEL COOLER DG 6 DG 5 DG 4 DG 3 DG 2 DG 1 A60 WATERTIGHT A60 WATERTIGHT

Sea Water System for 3 Way Split

Sea Water System for Industrial Equipment CRANE DIVING/ DRILLING 1 DIVING/ DRILLING 2 OTHER / CLOSED / CLOSED H H H A60 WATERTIGHT A60 WATERTIGHT

Networks Vessel automation system networks are generally only available in a dual redundant configuration. The expected level of vessel availability can be achieved by carrying sufficient on-board spare parts (and expertise to change them). The design should ensure there are adequate spare fibres within the main data backbones. All automation system failures should leave the DP system operating in a stable pre failure condition and available for manual control.

General The sections outlined above give an example of how to apply the LIFE concept to a few of the vessel s marine auxiliary systems. This philosophy is followed through to the other systems, including but not limited to: Fresh water cooling Compressed air start, control & service Engine room ventilation Combustion air Remote control valves Quick closing valves

Why Is LIFE Not More Widespread? Elements of the LIFE concept will be familiar to many in the DP community and already exist, in part, in many designs, sometimes by intent, occasionally by accident. COST IN HOUSE DESIGNS (Template) PERSONAL CAPITAL CONVINCING OTHERS 10% EXTRA ON TOP OF POWER PLANT ASOGs, CAMSs & TAMs EVER TIGHTENING RULES & GUIDELINES FOR INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICE.

Implementing the LIFE concept at the design stage would have a cost implication, but a forward thinking owner would have a highly marketable vessel for a wide range of industrial missions once they have demonstrated the robustness of the redundancy and the reliability of each of the redundancy groups.

Benefits of Adopting the LIFE Concept Over and Above The Basic Three Way Split Reduces the probability of experiencing the WCFDI. Reduces the risk of cascade failure when crane and thruster load is reallocated. This could be an issue with IMO Tier-3 engines which have poor load acceptance characteristics. Provides a safety margin that reduces the risk that a hidden loss of capacity in engines or thrusters (not capable of rated output power or thrust output) will lead to a loss of position. The efficiency of power to thrust conversion increases with the number of thrusters online (particular for FPP thrusters). Therefore LIFE concept designs makes even more thrust available after a failure.

Benefits of Adopting the LIFE Concept Over and Above The Basic Three Way Split Because the system has been designed to satisfy the single generator, single thruster failure criteria (LIFE concept) most of the more likely faults that occur will not completely disable the entire power train and therefore the surviving machinery should be able to contribute to the new post failure DP capability after the first fault. The vessel s post failure DP capability becomes greater as only 50% of a single redundancy group is lost. That extra thrust and generating capability might be the difference between being able to finish the work ON HIRE or not?

What Can LIFE Do For Us? The LIFE concept adds common sense redundancy over and above that required by Class. The LIFE concept is essentially the embodiment of the MTS DP Vessel Design Philosophy Guidelines tailored to take advantage of the trends in DP operations driven by the MTS DP Operations Guidance. It is not intended to be a matter of compliance but rather the application of good practice and common sense should allow a vessel owner to identify where design improvements could be made that would bring commercial benefits in the vessel's operational life cycle.

So lets all look on the Bright Side of LIFE References: MTS DP Vessel Design Philosophy Guidelines. MTS DP Operations Guidelines. DNV-RP-E307 Dynamic Positioning Vessel Design Philosophy Guidelines Sept. 2012. DNV-RP-D102 FMEA of Redundant Systems. IMCA M219 Example Specification for a DP FMEA for a new DP vessel. IMCA M220 Guidance on Operational Activity Planning. IMCA MSC645 Guidelines for Vessels with Dynamic Positioning Systems. Richard.Purser@nobledenton.com