SAWS QA/QC CHECKLIST WATER ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION PROJECTS

Similar documents
PROPOSAL. PROPOSAL OF, a corporation a

CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN STANDARDS

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN

DESIGN CRITERIA DIVISION 4900 TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Inspector MUST Sign and Date Each Inspection

2014 Street and Utility Improvement Project. Feasibility Report January 28, 2014

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

22. Specialty Valves.

ROAD OCCUPANCY PERMIT APPLICATION # Damascus Township, 60 Conklin Hill Road, Damascus, PA Tel Fax

Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design

Consult with manufacturers concerning permeation of the pipe walls, jointing materials, valve seats, etc.

CITY OF EPHRATA NAT WASHINGTON WAY OVERLAY TIB NO.: 3-E-164(003)-1 CITY OFFICIALS. Bruce Reim. Mayor. Tony Mora, Jr. City Council

Planning & Zoning Commission

Lake Waterford Community Association Meeting. November 15, 2016

FEASIBILITY REPORT STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TERRACE AND METCALF CITY OF OVERLAND PARK JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS

GENERAL LEGEND 12"CMP

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

APPENDIX L. Design Criteria

PROJECT NO. 093 MA 199 H C. FEDERAL NO. xxxx WIKIEUP-WICKENBURG-PHOENIX HIGHWAY TEGNER STREET, ALTERNATIVE 10 PROJECT IMPROVEMENT

IH 20 RANGER HILL PUBLIC MEETING

CONSTRUCTION ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION AND PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS

Table 1.0 Grade Crossing Enhancements PVL San Jacinto Branch Line

Section 7 Complete Green Street Guidelines DRAFT

Replace sanitary manhole casting (CITY to furnish casting); complete as specified Each $ $23,600.00

East Downtown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) No. 15 Infrastructure Assessment Study

City of Madison, East Johnson Street North Baldwin Street to First Street Local Street Dane County

CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

Designing with the Railroad

Route 47 (North Main Street) Reconstruction

LARIMER COUNTY: ENGINEERING DOUGLAS ROAD (CR 54)

2010 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DRAWINGS

Atwood Avenue Fair Oaks Avenue Cottage Grove Road

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR A FENCE PERMIT

CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DRAWINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 8 STAKING SIGNALS AND LIGHTING FIELD GUIDE. 8.1 Staking Traffic Control Signal Systems

TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS

l Civil Engineering Group of PSRA Techn ical Plan Review Team. '\J \

STAKING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEMS

American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association Letter Ballot. Draft

0 CITY OF SANTA ANA 0

City of Madison, East Johnson Street North Baldwin Street to First Street Local Street Dane County

Department of Public Works Office of Disability Affairs February 23, 2017 Presented by Mark Zwoyer, PE

20 minute presentation on proposed project. Comments and Questions following presentation. City of Madison

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

Union Pacific Railroad

Address: City: State: Zip:

CITY OF SOUTH DAYTONA

City of West Des Moines PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

CITY OF ROCK ISLAND. 46th Street Reconstruction North of 28th Avenue to 29th Avenue. 29th Avenue Reconstruction 46th Street to 47th Avenue Court

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

La Crescent Township Zoning Ordinance

SECTION TRAFFIC REGULATIONS

San Antonio Creek Spreading Grounds Rehabilitation Project Ojai Valley, CA

4.7 Landscape Provisions.

SECTION 14: LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION

Roadway Design Manual

MEMORANDUM Ashford Dunwoody Road: Request to waive right of way dedication requirements of Sec

TRANSPORTATION & INDUSTRIAL ACCESS STUDY PHASE II GENESEE TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL

SECTION PRESSURE TESTING OF PIPING

Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department)

TANGIBLE CAPITAL ASSET (TCA) Reporting Guidelines for Land Development Projects

Engineering Design Criteria & Standard Drawings

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

B741 TEMPORARY CONCRETE BARRIERS - OPSS 741

Paul Vraney Bureau of Project Development 02/11/2016

STATEMENT of POLICY and PROCEDURE

ADA Operations Contact Info

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Preparing a Curb Ramp Project. December 15, 2010

Lewelling Boulevard Improvements Response to Questions/Comments From October 9, 2001 Community Meeting

ACHD Board of Commissioners Stacey Yarrington, Planner III Tandem Ridge/ EPP / PP-07-16/ RZ-12-16/ CPA-01-16/ A-07-16

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

The Woods at Rush Creek - PUD Concept & Dvlpt Stage Plan Review

GENERAL CODE PROVISIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

Railroad Inspection Procedure Manual

Committed to Service. Development Services. February 21, ACHD Commission. Mindy Wallace, AICP

Replacement of N. Carlin Springs Road Bridge over George Mason Dr.

I-290 Phase I Study Area OAK PARK AVE AUSTIN BLVD. Reconstruction Area (9 miles) Oak Park RIDGELAND AVE CENTRAL AVE HARLEM AVE. Cicero.

SAFE WALKS PROGRAM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

$ Plan Review Fee when Permit Application is submitted HOT TUBS AND SPAS BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. COST: $80.

Final Sidewalk Feasibility Study

*A Certificate of Survey for the property may be on file at City Hall if the house was built after 1984.

TABLE OF WHITE PAVEMENT LETTERS ITEM ALIGN CL STATION SIDE DESCRIPTION C RT BIKE THROUGH ARROW 1

DIVISION 2200 STREETS

Midway City Council 15 January 2019 Regular Meeting. Homestead Villas / Preliminary Approval


The District Municipality of Muskoka 70 Pine Street Bracebridge ON P1L 1N3

Hospital Link Project Project Update September 2017

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

BPP / SUB

Derby Street. Project Updates. Salem, Massachusetts

SECTION 5: PEER CITY REVIEW

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Projects

Appendix G. Alternative Solutions Details. Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Project PROJECT FILE REPORT CITY OF PICKERING

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Central Subway UMS Utility Relocation

Transcription:

SAWS QA/QC CHECKLIST WATER ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION PROJECTS Project Name: SAWS Water Job No.: CSJ No. (if applicable): Date: AWS Consultant: PROJECT INFORMATION N/A Yes No Joint Bid (COSA/TxDOT) N/A Yes No Reimbursable Adjustments N/A Yes No Geotechnical Report N/A Yes No Environmental Report N/A Yes No Potholes Required N/A Yes No Pothole Data Provided N/A Yes No Adjustment of Mains/Services N/A Yes No Replacement of Mains/Services N/A Yes No Pre-bid Consultant/SAWS Project walk-thru N/A Yes No Cost Estimates Provided COORDINATION Confirm/verify internal SAWS Coordination (Initial) N/A Yes No Acquire Maps/As Builts of the project area N/A Yes No Production, Recycle, Treatment N/A Yes No Master Planning N/A Yes No Replacements & Improvements N/A Yes No Inspections N/A Yes No COSA External Agency Coordination N/A Yes No CPS Energy N/A Yes No AT&T N/A Yes No Time Warner Cable N/A Yes No Bexar Met N/A Yes No TxDOT N/A Yes No Bexar County N/A Yes No Union Pacific Railroad N/A Yes No Local Small City Municipality Page 1 of 6

COORDINATION, continued Confirm/Verify Internal SAWS Coordination (Final) N/A Yes No Acquire Maps/As Builts @ 90% Design N/A Yes No Master Planning/System Coordination N/A Yes No Inspector s Review N/A Yes No Final SAWS Internal Coordination N/A Yes No System/Valve Test shutdown performed PERMITS/APPROVALS N/A Yes No TxDOT Permit(s) N/A Yes No COSA Permit(s) (Streets, Traffic, Stormwater, Flood Plain Development, etc.) N/A Yes No COSA Tree Permit N/A Yes No COSA ROW Manage Permit(s) PCI requested N/A Yes No TCEQ Requirements for water line / sanitary sewer line clearances N/A Yes No TCEQ - Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone - WPAP for construction sites N/A Yes No TCEQ - Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone - Sanitary Sewer System Permit N/A Yes No TCEQ - TPDES Permit (SW3P) for construction sites over one acre N/A Yes No COE - 404 Permit N/A Yes No RR Permit(s) N/A Yes No Property Owner Permissions N/A Yes No Bexar County Permits (Streets, Flood Plain Development, etc.) DESIGN/PLAN REVIEW Records Research, Existing System Plan Review, Project Evaluation N/A Yes No Request from SAWS and review SAWS As-built information for the project area N/A Yes No Review aerial mapping to identify unique surface features (bridges, creeks, drainage structures, buildings, driveways, narrow right-ofways, trees/landscaping, etc.) N/A Yes No Verify with SAWS which facilities are to be replaced (Currently all AC water mains are to be replaced. If street reconstruction, then all services are to be replaced). N/A Yes No Confirm with SAWS which facilities are to be adjusted. N/A Yes No Verify with SAWS replacement sizes of new water mains N/A Yes No Verify with SAWS the need for additional mains to achieve system loops versus dead end mains Page 2 of 6

Records Research, Existing System Plan Review, Project Evaluation N/A Yes No For street cuts, confirm with COSA ROW Management on existing street PCI and pavement restoration program (limits and pavement section) N/A Yes No Prior to design initiation, Walk / Drive the route to identify special design considerations and potential constructability issues N/A Yes No Field verify water main depths from field ties of water valves and valve stem measure downs N/A Yes No Review system and assist SAWS in conducting a main shutdown procedure to isolate mains affected by the project N/A Yes No Identify and confirm with SAWS all water utility conflicts and replacements N/A Yes No Prior to project bid, Walk / Drive the route to evaluate constructability and potential coordination issues General Requirements N/A Yes No Show SAWS work project limits N/A Yes No Verify SAWS drafting standards from Website N/A Yes No Include north arrow, scale, legend (plan legend, profile legend) N/A Yes No Include plan sheet notes (trench protection, utility locator, CPS gas notes, general, etc.) N/A Yes No Cover sheet with vicinity / location map, SAWS project name and number, consultant firm name / logo, engineers seal, submittal phase status, date N/A Yes No Sheet index (graphical sheet index, as applicable) N/A Yes No Quantity summary (verify overall summary totals to sheet summary) N/A Yes No Notes (SAWS notes, SAWS Traffic Notes, COSA Notes, TxDOT notes, etc., as applicable) N/A Yes No Phasing plan / traffic control plans (as applicable) N/A Yes No Tree preservation / mitigation plans (as applicable) N/A Yes No Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan - SW3P (as applicable) N/A Yes No Pavement replacement / restoration plans (as applicable) Base Map/Plan Background N/A Yes No Verify and show property lines, right-of-way limit lines, lot lines, and easements with typical ROW/easement widths N/A Yes No Identify type of easements (water, sanitary sewer, utility, electric, etc) N/A Yes No Show subdivision names, NCB, block numbers, lot numbers N/A Yes No If unplatted, show Bexar Appraisal District Tract Identification N/A Yes No Show addresses N/A Yes No Show existing surface features N/A Yes No Identify and show trees Page 3 of 6

Base Map/Plan Background N/A Yes No Show existing utilities with appropriate symbols, pipe type, size, and material if known N/A Yes No Show existing contours, if applicable N/A Yes No Show existing bore locations and casing limits Water Plan N/A Yes No Show existing conditions background information N/A Yes No Show proposed street / roadway improvements N/A Yes No Show pipe sizes, material types, and main lengths ( call out whether dead end or tied main) N/A Yes No Show location of all services with size & tap numbers N/A Yes No Ensure Services to each lot including vacant lots (Coordinate with SAWS) N/A Yes No Provide dimension information to layout water pipeline system (coordinates, dimensions from curb and/or ROW, dims from street centerline, etc.) N/A Yes No Include fitting, valve, fire hydrant, etc. call-outs N/A Yes No Verify need to double valve on large water services (hospitals, schools, etc.) N/A Yes No Verify that correct application is shown for water services (i.e. relay, relocate, etc.) N/A Yes No Identify tie-ins to existing mains and call out N/A Yes No Identify water line / sanitary sewer line separation - insure design meets TCEQ rules or incorporate special construction requirements (water line casing pipe, sewer line casing pipe, sewer line encasement, etc.) N/A Yes No Provide top of pipe elevations at utility crossings. N/A Yes No Confirm existing water mains will have adequate cover when constructing proposed street/roadway improvements N/A Yes No Provide plan and profiles for all mains greater than 16 inches N/A Yes No Provide plan and profiles for all boring installations N/A Yes No Verify and show adequate space for bore pit and receiving pit excavations (distance from pavement, pit size, utility interference, depth, sloping/shoring, etc.) N/A Yes No Identify and call out locations and extents of flowable fill N/A Yes No Is yard piping required as a result of meter box relocation? N/A Yes No Verify adequate quantities for yard piping (piping extends from new meter location to tie-in at old meter location) N/A Yes No Call out material for yard piping (Copper, HDPE, PVC, PVC Certalok, etc.) N/A Yes No Tabulate and show a quantity summary on each sheet N/A Yes No During final design phase, prepare Change of Service forms for all affected water services N/A Yes No At the conclusion of each design phase, prepare and submit a response to SAWS addressing each SAWS review comment Page 4 of 6

Water Details N/A Yes No Verify that SAWS typical details apply to project or develop new details as necessary (Call out / list applicable SAWS standard details) N/A Yes No Develop special grade and/ or alignment change details (as applicable) N/A Yes No Develop details associated with water main - sewer main crossings (as applicable) N/A Yes No Develop cross sections at critical locations along the project to show separations between utilities / structures Potential Constructability/Maintainability Issues N/A Yes No Adequate area/space for staging, material storage, equipment storage, haul route (as applicable) (No staging areas within 100 Yr Flood Plain) N/A Yes No Adequate ROW width for construction equipment, maneuverability, and installation operation N/A Yes No Adequate distance from ROW's, fences, structures (3 feet minimum clearance for small mains) N/A Yes No Adequate distance from other utilities (typically 3 feet minimum clearance) N/A Yes No Confirm with SAWS permanent and temporary easement widths for future maintenance operations and replacement construction N/A Yes No Adequate clearance / cover from proposed improvements (excavation limits, pavement depths, driveways, sidewalks, retaining walls, landscaping, islands, etc.) (> 30 inches to street subgrade, proposed driveway, or parkway elevation) N/A Yes No Verify that there are no conflicts associated with service laterals or include special design instructions to accommodate specific field situations Contract Documents N/A Yes No Hard copy of Plans and Specifications (correct size and number of sets) N/A Yes No Specification Book N/A Yes No Invitation to Bidders N/A Yes No SAWS front end documents N/A Yes No Bid Proposal (prepared by consultant) N/A Yes No Special Conditions N/A Yes No Special Provisions N/A Yes No Supplemental conditions for COSA and Bexar County Joint Bid Projects N/A Yes No List of governing specifications N/A Yes No Special specifications N/A Yes No Electronic version of Plans and Specifications N/A Yes No PDF format on CD or DVD (correct number of discs) Page 5 of 6

Cost Estimating N/A Yes No Review most current SAWS unit price list for like pay items N/A Yes No Obtain from SAWS, bid tabulations of recent similar projects and utilize unit price in estimate pricing N/A Yes No Contact and discuss market conditions with Contractors to confirm unit pricing accuracy Project Manager DATE QA;/QC Reviewer DATE Page 6 of 6