Council on Accreditation Complaint Policy and Procedures

Similar documents
NONCOMPLIANCE. 1. Overview

Lapse in IRB Approval

USA Swimming National Team Steering Committee Policy Manual

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Banbury Lawn Tennis Club. Membership Rules

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Policy on IRB Review of Protocol Deviations and Noncompliance for Non-exempt Research

Inter-Club Council Constitution Student Life Office, Mt. San Antonio College

Wayne State University Institutional Review Board

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

NUTMEG WOMEN'S SOCCER LEAGUE LEAGUE RULES

USA TABLE TENNIS GAMES STAFF SELECTION PROCEDURES 2020 OLYMPIC GAMES December 4, 2018

Men s Artistic Gymnastics 2019 Junior World Championships Selection Process

IRB MEMBERSHIP COMPOSITION, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILIES

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

2016 Tennis Regulations League Section

EEA AGREEMENT - PROTOCOL 24 p. 1 PROTOCOL 24 { 1 } ON COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF CONTROL OF CONCENTRATIONS GENERAL PRINCIPLES.

CONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS

STATE CUP COMPETITIONS US YOUTH SOCCER NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES

University of Cincinnati. Radiation Safety Committee Operations Guidelines Statement of Policy (RSC Guidelines) RSC Guidelines (revision 5)

CUNY HRPP Policy: Suspension or Termination of Human Subject Research

League Section 2018 Intermountain Regulations

MARIST COLLEGE INFRACTIONS REPORT. By the NCAA Committee on Infractions. MISSION, KANSAS--This report is organized as follows: I. Introduction.

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval

North Shore Women s Platform Tennis League By-Laws

Southwest Power Pool REGIONAL STATE COMMITTEE BYLAWS

SOP Institutional Review Board (IRB) Appointments and Membership

GENERAL EVENT RULES (UPDATED 7 MARCH 2015)

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

Disciplinary Commission. Case No Final Decision in the matter of. against. and

VOLLEYBALL ALBERTA - WEB PRIVACY POLICY

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

6. Officials should maintain a high level of personal hygiene and should maintain a professional appearance at all times.

OVA Privacy Policy. a) Arranges and encourages volleyball matches and competitions within Ontario;

Financial Dispute Resolution Guide

Australian Canoeing. Canoeing Competitions Bylaw. Adopted by the Board 31 October Bylaw #19

Men s Artistic Gymnastics 2018 Jr Pan American Championships Selection Process

IRB COMPOSITION AND IRB MEMBER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

Senior World Championships RHYTHMIC GYMNASTICS SELECTION PROCESS JANUARY 2019

CLEBURNE SOCCER ASSOCIATION POST OFFICE BOX 255 CLEBURNE, TEXAS 76033

NORTHEASTERN OHIO TENNIS ASSOCIATION USTA LEAGUE REGULATIONS (2018)

Junior State Titles Competition Rules

STATE CUP COMPETITIONS US YOUTH SOCCER NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES Section Cup Committee Each seasonal year the CJSA President shall

STATE LEAGUE RULES & REGULATIONS

CONTEST OFFICIATING 8

SOP 903: HRPP AND NON-COMPLIANCE

SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

Arizona Premier League

Human Research Protection Program Policy

2.0 Institutional Review Board

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD MANUAL: PURPOSE and POLICIES.

New Brunswick Rugby Union, Inc. By-laws 1. Membership Policy 2. Game Regulations

USTA LEAGUE NEBRASKA DISTRICT RULES 2017 FOR ADULT AND MIXED DIVISIONS

EAST VALLEY SENIORS TENNIS LEAGUE BY-LAWS. Revised March 25, 2014 BY-LAWS

The Somerset R.F.U Knock-Out Vase Competition Regulations

INTER CORPS MERIT TABLE CHAMPIONSHIP REGULATIONS REVISED SEPTEMBER 10

GEVA Region Recruiting and Binding Commitment Policy

EMERGENCY USE 03/02/2016

PREMIER LEAGUE Elite League Section Board of Governors Premier League Structure. Fall Premier. League Season. Fines.

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

INDEX SECTION I. INTRODUCTION

3.01B(2) Section and District/Area. Each Sectional Association shall appoint a Sectional Association League

Illinois Institute of Technology Institutional Review Board Handbook of Procedures for the Protection of Human Research Subjects

Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:

TRAINING and POLICIES FOR USE of AEROSOL DEFENSIVE DEVICES

LYBS Volunteer Sign-Up Sheet

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Non-affiliated Member Nomination

University of Wisconsin Colleges Administrative Policy #56 NON-COMPLIANCE IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

MICHIGAN STATE YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION 2012 US YOUTH SOCCER MICHIGAN STATE CUP, SPONSORED BY PEMMICAN COMPETITION RULES

VIENNA YOUTH SOCCER POLICIES Revised March, Policy: The respective Division Commissioner appoints House coaches.

WELLINGTON GOLF INCORPORATED (WGI)

XXI Commonwealth Games. Gold Coast, Australia April Selection Policy and Standards December 2016

USA Rugby Disciplinary Regulations and Procedures. General Information and Requirements

BEST EVER GOLF ASSOCIATION (BEGA) BY-LAWS

US Youth Soccer National League Charter as of October 25, 2017

BETWEEN THE TOWN OF CLIFTON, NEW YORK, AND THE TOWN OF FINE, NEW YORK,

Part E Discipline/Fair Play

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the continuing review procedure of approved projects for the IRB.

COMPLIANCE MONITORING

Florida State University IRB Standard Operational Procedures

MKS/Inter-league Play U10-U14 Program Rules and Regulations

Vermin, Insects and Scavenging Birds Management Plan

SIR HARRY GIBBS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW MOOT

PENALTY CODE The penalty code outlined throughout the handbook and in this section has been adopted by the Association s member schools.

USC Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

USTA NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP JUNIOR TEAM TENNIS 2018 REGULATIONS

DISCIPLINE, DISPUTE AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION POLICY

1 The BGDA Inc

CODE OF CONDUCT AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

OSSL RULES (Revised 2/6/13)

U.S. ANTI-DOPING AGENCY WHEREABOUTS POLICY

OFFICE OF THE INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER REPORT REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF A MEMBER OF AN ARENA BOARD OF MANAGEMENT

Rhythmic Gymnastics 2018 Junior Pan American Championships Selection Process

ITF WORLD TENNIS TOUR JUNIORS 2019 RULE CHANGES

Chapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities

Transcription:

Council on Accreditation Complaint Policy and Procedures Introduction The NRPA Council on Accreditation (COA), in fulfillment of its public responsibility assuring the quality and integrity of academic preparation in recreation, park resources, and leisure services has established the following process for reviewing complaints against the COA, accredited programs, and/or visitors. Any individual, (e.g. student, faculty member, park and recreation practitioner, and/or responsible public citizen) may submit a written complaint concerning the COA, an accredited program, and/or a visitation team member. The COA will act only upon a signed allegation that a Program, visitor representing the COA, or the COA and/or its members appears to be out of compliance or adherence with the accreditation standards or policies. The COA will not intervene on behalf of individuals, nor will it act as a court of appeal for individuals in matters of admissions, appointment, promotion, or dismissal of faculty or students. This policy addresses three distinct procedures: 1) complaints against an accredited program; 2) complaints against the COA/COA members, and; 3) complaints against an approved visitor representing the COA. Procedures for Complaints against an Accredited Program The following procedures will be used in the investigation of a complaint against an accredited program. 1. A written, signed complaint is received by the NRPA Accreditation Staff Liaison to the COA. complainant in writing that no further action will be taken. acknowledged in writing within two weeks of receipt by the COA Chair and Executive Committee and the complainant will be provided a copy of the process for handling the complaint. 5. At the same time as the complainant is notified, the complaint will be forwarded by certified mail to the program head as identified in the most recent self-study response to COA Accreditation Standard 3.02. The administrative officer of the institution (as currently on file with the COA), will receive a copy of the correspondence by first class mail. At the request of the complainant, the name of the complainant will be redacted within the body of the written complaint sent to the program head and administrator. 6. The COA Chair will request that the Program conduct a preliminary investigation and submit an initial report addressing the complaint as related to accreditation standards or

policies. The initial report shall be postmarked no more than 30 calendar days following receipt of the notification, as documented by return receipt of certified mail. 7. The COA Chair may request further information or materials relating to the complaint from the complainant, the institution, or other sources. 8. The COA Chair will appoint a review committee comprised of three COA members to consider the complaint, along with all relevant information. The review committee will recommend appropriate action to the COA at its next scheduled meeting. Complaints 9. Determination of an appropriate action will be based on COA consideration of the complaint, materials relating to the complaint, and the review committee s findings and 10. The COA or the COA Executive Committee may determine that consultation with legal counsel is appropriate. As Staff Liaison to the COA, the NRPA Accreditation Manager will work with the COA and legal counsel to develop a plan to address the complaint. 11. If the complaint is determined to be unsubstantiated or unrelated to the accreditation standards or policies, no action will be taken and the complainant will be so notified. 12. If the complaint is substantiated and the COA determines that the Program appears to be out of compliance with the accreditation standards or policies, action will be taken. This action may include, but is not limited to, scheduling a prompt on-site visit of the program, establishing time-delimited conditions, assigning warnings, or withdrawing accreditation. 13. The Program head and administrative officer of the institution will be notified of the COA s decision and action in writing within two weeks of the decision. The complainant will be notified of the final decision and actions following expiration of the reconsideration and appeals process. 14. The Program will have the right to request reconsideration of the COA actions by the COA when the Program provides evidence that the COA did not adhere to its complaint policy and procedures. Any such request must be made in writing and submitted to the NRPA Staff Liaison to the COA within 30 days of receipt of final action 15. The complainant will have the right to request reconsideration of the COA actions by the COA when the complainant provides evidence that the COA did not adhere to its

Procedures for Complaints against COA and/or COA Member(s) The following procedures will be used in the investigation of a complaint against the COA/COA members. 1. A written, signed complaint is received by the NRPA Accreditation Staff Liaison to the COA. complainant in writing that no further action will be taken. acknowledged in writing within two weeks of receipt by the COA Chair and Executive Committee and the complainant will be provided a copy of the process for handling the complaint. 5. At the same time as the complainant is notified, the complaint will be forwarded to the COA Executive Committee who will receive all correspondence. At the request of the complainant, the name of the complainant will be redacted within the body of the written complaint sent to the COA. 6. If the complaint involves the COA members, at the request of the COA Executive Committee and with the acceptance of all parties, a past COA member (hereafter termed COA Designee ) will conduct the investigation. If a complaint involves the COA Chair, or a conflict of interest arises, the Vice-Chair will fulfill the Chair duties addressed previously. 7. The COA Designee may request further information or materials relating to the complaint from the complainant, the COA, or other sources. 8. The COA Designee will appoint a review committee comprised of three past COA members to consider all relevant information. The Designee will request that the review committee submit a report addressing the complaint as related to accreditation standards or policies. The report shall be postmarked no more than 30 calendar days following receipt of the notification, as documented by return receipt of certified mail. The review committee will recommend appropriate action to the COA Designee. Complaints 9. Determination of an appropriate action will be based on the consideration of the complaint, materials relating to the complaint, and the review committee s findings and

10. The Designee, COA, or the COA Executive Committee may determine that consultation with legal counsel is appropriate. As Staff Liaison to the COA, the NRPA Accreditation Manager will work with the COA Designee and legal counsel to develop a plan to address the complaint. 11. If the complaint is determined to be unsubstantiated or not related to the accreditation standards or policies, no action will be taken, and the complainant will be so notified. 12. If the complaint is substantiated and indicates that the COA member(s) appears to be out of compliance with the accreditation standards or policies, action will be taken. This action may include, but is not limited to, retraining or dismissal from the COA and/or review of any resultant COA actions or decisions influenced by noncompliance with standards or policies. 13. The COA member will be notified of the COA Designee s decision and action in writing within two weeks of the decision. The complainant will be notified of the final decision and actions following expiration of the reconsideration and appeals process. 14. The COA member will have the right to request reconsideration of the COA Designee actions when the COA member(s) provides evidence that the COA did not adhere to its 15. The complainant will have the right to request reconsideration of the COA Designee actions when the complainant provides evidence that the COA did not adhere to its Procedures for Complaints against a Visitor Representing the COA The following procedures will be used in the investigation of a complaint against an approved visitor representing the COA. 1. A written, signed complaint is received by the NRPA Accreditation Liaison to the COA. complainant in writing by that no further action will be taken. acknowledged in writing within two weeks of the receipt by the COA Chair and Executive Committee and the complainant will be provided a copy of the process for handling the complaint.

5. At the same time as the complainant is notified, the complaint will be forwarded by certified mail to the named Visitor. At the request of the complainant, the name of the complainant will be redacted within the body of the written complaint sent to the Visitor. 6. The COA will conduct a preliminary investigation and submit an initial report to the Visitor addressing the complaint as related to accreditation standards or policies. The initial report shall be postmarked no more than 30 calendar days following receipt of the notification, as documented by return receipt of certified mail. 7. The COA Chair may request further information or materials relating to the complaint from the complainant, the institution, the Visitor, or other sources. 8. The COA Chair will appoint a review committee comprised of three COA members to consider the complaint, along with all relevant information. The review committee will recommend appropriate action to the COA at its next scheduled meeting. Complaints 9. Determination of an appropriate action will be based on COA consideration of the complaint, materials relating to the complaint, the review committee s findings and 10. The COA or the COA Executive Committee may determine that consultation with legal counsel is appropriate. As Staff Liaison to the COA, the NRPA Accreditation Manager will work with the COA and legal counsel to develop a plan to address the complaint. 11. If the complaint is determined to be unsubstantiated or unrelated to the accreditation standards or policies, no action will be taken, and the complainant and Visitor will be so notified. 12. If the complaint is substantiated and the COA determines that the Visitor appears to be out of compliance with the accreditation standards or policies, action will be taken. This action may include, but is not limited to, retraining, removal from the COA list of approved Visitors, and/or review of any resultant COA actions or decisions influenced by the Visitor s noncompliance with standards or policies. 13. The Visitor will be notified of the COA s decision and action in writing within two weeks of the decision. The complainant will be notified of the final decision and actions following expiration of the reconsideration and appeals process. 14. The Visitor will have the right to request reconsideration of the COA actions by the COA when the Visitor provides evidence that the COA did not adhere to its complaint policy and procedures. Any such request must be made in writing and submitted to the NRPA Staff Liaison to the COA within 30 days of receipt of final action 15. The complainant will have the right to request reconsideration of the COA actions by the COA when the complainant provides evidence that the COA did not adhere to its