Stabling Point Risk Assessments Wakefield Kirkgate sidings

Similar documents
Module T7. Safe systems of work when walking or working on or near the line. Withdrawn Document Uncontrolled When Printed. GE/RT T7 Rule Book

A GUIDE TO WRITING A RISK ASSESSMENT FOR A BMAA EVENT

Archery Risk Management Plan Lutanda Yarramundi

Aquatic Guidelines Safe Water Entry Information and Risk Assessments

Pre-control risk estimate. Likelihood Risk

ABBEYFIELD STAIR AND CHAIR LIFT RISK ASSESSMENT

New Airfield Risk Assessment / Categorisation

Infrastructure Requirements for Personal Safety in Respect of Clearances and Access

Identification and Screening of Scenarios for LOPA. Ken First Dow Chemical Company Midland, MI

Rock Climbing Risk Management Plan Lutanda Yarramundi

Recommendations for the Risk Assessment of Buffer Stops and End Impact Walls

Mountain Bike Risk Management Plan

DETERMINATION OF SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY- RELATED PROTECTION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS - IEC 61508

Abseiling Risk Management Plan Lutanda Yarramundi

1.0 PURPOSE 2.0 REFERENCES

Safety assessments for Aerodromes (Chapter 3 of the PANS-Aerodromes, 1 st ed)

Faculty/School: Faculty of Pharmacy Initial Issue Date: Oct 2016

Prevention of Falls and Working at Heights

Risk Analysis & Management Plan

Safe Work Method Statement

University risk assessment form and guidance notes. Oct 06

HAZARD MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE

High Ropes Management Plan

Sharing practice: OEM prescribed maintenance. Peter Kohler / Andy Webb

Hazard Assessment & Control. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine

General Risk Assessment Form

Instructions for the Use of the Excel Spreadsheet. There are Three tabs at the bottom of this worksheet. Instructions tab is the one you are reading

Method Statement Author

PLANT RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT

City University of Hong Kong. Health and Safety Risk Assessment for Workstations, Experiments and Research Projects

Safe Work Method Statements (SWMS)

MEMORANDUM. Background

SPAD and TPWS activity report Quarter /14

Executive Group Sponsor name: Jane Doe Delegated Nominee name: Position: Director of Development Position:

Safe High Pressure Water Washing (HPWW) Requirement

TLILIC2001 Licence to Operate a Forklift Truck

Abseiling Risk Management Plan

Risk Assessment Form

Safety Guidelines for Live Entertainment and Events I Part 2. Hazard Identification and Risk Management 1

Development, implementation and use of the All Level Crossing Risk Model (ALCRM) Alan Symons Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd Great Britain

Basketball Risk Assessment for AoC Sport National Championships 2018 Nottingham University

Telco Antennas SWMS Working At Height Above 2m

Minimum Safety Requirements for Contractors Working on Railway Property

Review of Guidelines for Cycleway Safety Fencing

Step 3 Existing Control Measures. Step 4 Risk Score & Rating (Table 1) Risk

Hazard Recognition. Leader s Guide and Quiz

Safety in Precast Erection

Closing statement. I have chosen not to object in principle to the proposal to close S08.

Safe Use of Access Equipment

THE PONY CLUB RISK ASSESSMENT CHECK LIST SUMMER CAMP

RISK ASSESSMENT. White Paper.

Our Approach to Managing Level Crossing Safety Our Policy

ALIGNING MOD POSMS SAFETY AND POEMS ENVIRONMENTAL RISK APPROACHES EXPERIENCE AND GUIDANCE

Jillys Early Childhood Development and Educational Centre

HS329 Risk Management Procedure

Learning event following Ironmen runaway

CYCLING TIME TRIALS The national governing body for CYCLING time trials

RISK ASSESSMENT. Catapults

SH&E Work Method Statement Concrete Cutting & Drilling Fast Cut Qld Pty Ltd, 91 Basalt, GEEBUNG PH M ABN

FIRE HYDRANT TESTING METHOD STATEMENT.

APPENDIX F: TECHNICAL NOTE 22 (VICARAGE ROAD JUNCTION)

T-PROP RISK ASSESSMENT

Room B15 Architecture Building Bridgeford Street

Specific Safety Legislation/Codes of Practice/Australian Standards applicable to this JSA (Tick those applicable).

Aeronautical studies and Safety Assessment

Faculty/School: Pharmacy Initial Issue Date: Oct 2016

RISK ASSESSMENT HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

Accident, Incident and Ill-health Reporting Procedure. This is a sub-policy of UEL s main Health and Safety Policy Statement

APPENDIX 1: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION and RISK ASSESSMENT PRO-FORMAS

PLANNED LIGHTING MAINTENANCE LTD METHOD STATEMENT & RISK ASSESSMENT REPLACEMENT OF LAMPS OR REPAIRS TO LOW LEVEL LIGHT UNITS

Low Level Cycle Signals used as repeaters of the main traffic signals Appendices

This guidance explains what hazards and risks are and provides an overview of requirements under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA).

IRFU Age Grade Mini Rugby

Emergency Response Plans

HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY APPENDIX B WORKING AT HEIGHT GUIDE AND RISK ASSESMENT

Report to Cabinet. 18 May 2016

Risk Assessment Form

Risk Assessment Form

Use of MEWPs in Arboriculture

Guidance on Provision, Risk. Assessment and Review of Level. Crossings. Withdrawn Document Uncontrolled When Printed

Improving Cyclist Safety at the Dundas Street West and Sterling Road Intersection

Health and Safety Program Inspections

SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT WORKING IN CONFINED SPACE HSE NET NAT SWMS APAND00030

PLANNED LIGHTING MAINTENANCE LTD METHOD STATEMENT & RISK ASSESSMENT REPLACEMENT OF LAMPS OR REPAIRS TO HIGH LEVEL LIGHT UNITS

WheelPower British Wheelchair Sport

POSITION OF PERSON COMPLETING REPORT: IN CONSULTATION WITH: David Radolovic POSITION: HSR/ Program Coordinator

innova-ve entrepreneurial global 1

RISK ASSESSMENT/SAFE WORKING PRACTICE SD008 Speed Sessions and Competitions Including resurfacing

Welcome to the Ballarat Swap Meet SITE HOLDER INFORMATION GUIDE. Pack up day Sunday 26 th by 1.00pm

Purpose. Scope. Process flow OPERATING PROCEDURE 07: HAZARD LOG MANAGEMENT

Faculty/School: Pharmacy Initial Issue Date: Oct Dr. Alpesh Patel and Padmaja Dhanvate

Work Health & Safety Event Safety Checklist Small Event

Risk Assessment Guidance

Pewsey Carnival Event

Age Concern Hounslow Manual Handling Risk Assessment PART ONE PRELIMINARY RISK ASSESSMENT

Working Alone. Latest revised date: October 26, 2011 Page 1 of 7 Prepared by: Department of Health & Safety S-014

Risk Assessment Generic

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION & RISK ASSESSMENT

ACTIVITY RISK ASSESSMENT

Supervisors guide for managing reported hazards and incident (HS714)

Transcription:

Stabling Point Risk Assessments Wakefield Kirkgate sidings This document is the property of Harsco Track Technologies Ltd. It shall only be used for the purpose for which it is supplied and shall not be copied, reproduced, stored on a retrieval system, disseminated, adapted or disclosed to a third party without the express written permission of Harsco Track Technologies Ltd. Harsco Track Technologies Ltd. 2006 Document Reference: Revision : Date: STAB/WAKE 01 20/04/06 Prepared by: A.Simpson

Introduction and purpose There are approximately 90 stabling points used by the Harsco Track Technologies Ltd. throughout the UK and each of these is unique in terms of its location, layout, hazards and operating requirements and instructions. Information regarding stabling points is difficult to come by across the railway. With this in mind Harsco Track Technologies Ltd. have decided to research and build a directory of stabling points. The purpose of this document is to provide you (the researcher) with the tools and guidance to find and document the information. This information will then be sifted and collated to produce a directory. How to conduct the research It is vital to gain as much information from the site visit as possible. To do this you will need to speak to people at the site and to those who use it regularly. You will also need to answer all the questions provided and make comments as appropriate. Hazard hunt and risk assessment Commencing at the stabling point entrance look for and list all hazards. Look for the things that could cause harm or damage - such as underfoot conditions, overhead obstructions and distances to running lines. Use the 10 points of the COSSs briefing as this will be relevant. Use the Risk assessment table (attached as appendix A) to identify the hazards and calculate the risk. There is an example included Other information (maps and rail layouts) On the spare page provide a rough sketch of the stabling point layout including track layouts, walking routes etc. You will need to include all accessible telephones and structure numbers such as: Bridges Signals Hand operated points Use of derailers

Location Overview Location: Wakefield Kirkgate sidings. Questions Question Answer and comments 1. How is the siding accessed Via Wakefield Kirkgate car park 2. Whose is responsible for the siding (Railtrack, Depot, or other) 3. Who is the point of contact inc telephone numbers 4. How are the emergency services contacted inc names and numbers Network Rail Paul Calton 01924 331301 07753 976522 Mobile phone 999 5. Location of emergency access if different from 1 above 6. Where is the location of the nearest first aid point and name any first aiders 7. Name, location & phone number of nearest Accident and Emergency dept Pinderfields hospital 01924 201688 8. Location of nearest personal amenities 9. Is there a display of local information No 10. What is the most effective means of communication Mobile phone 11. Are there any walking routes No 12. What is the length of the siding Aprox. 300metres 13. How are the sidings protected Fixed signals 14. What needs to happen to protect the machine Red flags/light, not to be moved board 15. What type of lighting is available None 16. Full postal address of location. Wakefield Kirkgate station Monk street Wakefield WF1 4EL 17. Is parking available at machine side. Yes 18. Is stable point a secure stable point? Yes

19. What security measures are in place? Locked gates and security fencing Note. Under no circumstance should gates or fences be climbed to gain access to yard. 20. Are there any overhead height restrictions? No Map: Directions to Accident & Emergency Dept Start out at WAKEFIELD KIRKGATE STATION,Wakefield Unclassified 0.00 0.06 Turn right onto Tavern Street Tavern Street 0.06 0.09 Turn right onto Brunswick Street Brunswick Street 0.14 0.09 Turn left onto Berners Street Berners Street 0.23 0.10 Turn right onto Peterson Road Peterson Road 0.33 0.09 Continue forward onto Stanley Road Stanley Road 0.42 0.27 Turn right onto Stanley Road - A642 A642 0.69 0.59 Turn left Unclassified 1.28 0.20 Arrive at Pinderfields General Hospital (A and E),Wakefield

Site Summary Location: Wakefield Kirkgate sidings. The sidings are situated at the East end of Wakefield Kirkgate station. Access is via the down loop. Entry into the siding is then through a locked gate. All other lines in the siding are clamped out of use leaving one line available. Departure is via position light into the up loop. Motor access is via Wakefield Kirkgate station car park through a locked gate at the end of the car park. The yard is also used for storing rail, sleepers, & ballast etc.

HARSCO TRACK TECHNOLOGIES LTD. STABLING POINT HAZARD HUNT AND RISK ASSESSMENT Location: Wakefield Kirkgate sidings. Task, activity or item Hazard Consequences Initial Risk Rating Score Control Measures Residual Risk Rating Score Further Action & Comments L S R L S R Ballast / chippings piled at side of track Slip or trip on ballast 2 2 4 Move machine to safer area in sidings 1 1 2 Ballast needs moving Rubbish & broken troughing laying around site Slip or trip 2 2 4 Care to be taken when walking round site 1 1 2 Site needs clean up. No lighting Slip or trip 2 2 4 Care to be taken when walking round site 1 1 2 Lighting required

HARSCO TRACK TECHNOLOGIES LTD. STABLING POINT HAZARD HUNT AND RISK ASSESSMENT Photographs Location: Wakefield Kirkgate sidings. View to exit signal View from yard towards exit View into yard

HARSCO TRACK TECHNOLOGIES LTD. STABLING POINT HAZARD HUNT AND RISK ASSESSMENT Sketch of Stabling Point And Hazards:

HARSCO TRACK TECHNOLOGIES LTD. STABLING POINT HAZARD HUNT AND RISK ASSESSMENT SIMPLE RISK RANKING METHOD OVERVIEW First match your views to the nearest statements in chart one under both likelihood and severity. This generates two numbers. You then multiply those numbers to identify a risk rating. This is then applied to chart two to establish the level of risk. When reporting you will need to make a short statement to justify your decision, this demonstrates you have considered all factors and not relied on gut reaction. LIKELIHOOD It s important to consider that any event is less likely to occur the more factors are involved. Ask what if questions to provide a wider view, but in doing so, you must consider the likelihood of that event occurring and if unlikely, not consider it. SEVERITY It s easy to go for worse case scenario when, in reality, this rarely occurs. Ask what if questions against the actions and reactions of the person but remember these are real and will not change dramatically. We must also consider all the mitigating measures that are in place to prevent an incident or accident occurring. Previous incidents and trends can be used as supporting evidence rather than gut reaction. CHART ONE LIKELIHOOD & SEVERITY RATING CHART TWO FINAL RISK RATING Likelihood Rating Severity Rating 5 5 10 15 20 25 No likely to occur within the next year Likely to occur once within the next year Likely to occur at least three times in the next year Likely to occur at a monthly frequency Likely to occur at a weekly frequency or less 1 No exposure to safety risk. Minimal loss to business process, some extra work created 2 Minimum exposure to a safety risk (minor injury) Minor loss to business process, partial loss of shift, extensive delay / work curtailed (loss of performance pay) 3 High risk of injury (Major injury), Loss to business process, cancellation of a single shift, (Significant loss of performance pay) 4 Single fatality, significant loss to business process, possession overrun - delay to train service, cancellation of multiple shifts, likely to last for a period of days. 5 Multiple fatalities, catastrophic loss to business process, disruption likely to last for more than seven days resulting in significant penalty payments. 1 4 4 8 12 16 20 2 3 3 6 9 12 15 3 2 2 4 3 8 10 4 1 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 5 Risk Level: 1 to 3 = Tolerable Risk Level: 4 to 6 = Broadly acceptable Risk Level: 7 to 25 = Intolerable