Exam 2. Two-Lane Highway Capacity and LOS Analysis. Two-lane Highway Characteristics. LOS Considerations 10/24/2009

Similar documents
Basic Freeways and Multilane Highways (LOS) CIVL 4162/6162

BASIC FREEWAY CAPACITY STUDIES Definitions

Highway Capacity and LOS. Reading Assignment: pgs

HIGHWAY CONCEPTS. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 CHAPTER 12 CONTENTS

Multilane Highways 54

Highway Capacity. 1. A traffic stream is carrying 4500 veh/hr in three lanes in one direction. What is the average headway per lane?

Highway Capacity and LOS. Reading Assignment: pgs

Transportation Knowledge

Analysis of Weaving, Merging, and Diverging Movements CIVL 4162/6162

Highway Capacity Manual 2010

2009 PE Review Course Traffic! Part 1: HCM. Shawn Leight, P.E., PTOE, PTP Crawford Bunte Brammeier Washington University

T R A N S P O R T A T I O N M E M O R A N D U M

Sensitivity Analysis of Factors Affecting Road Widening Thresholds

Tonight we will be discussing accidents

Updated Roundabout Analysis Methodology

Guidelines for Integrating Safety and Cost-Effectiveness into Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

MEMORANDUM. Date: September 22, Don Skillingstad, Spokane Transit Authority. Yongliang Zhu, Lochner

HCM 2010: ROUNDABOUTS. PRAVEEN EDARA, PH.D., P.E., PTOE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA

CE576: Highway Design and Traffic Safety

Chapter Capacity and LOS Analysis of a Signalized I/S Overview Methodology Scope Limitation

Springer Tracts on Transportation and Traffic

Shawn Leight, P.E., PTOE, PTP CBB Transportation Engineers + Planners ITE International President Washington University

DESIGN BULLETIN #66/2010

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS

l- Peak hour factor (PHR) l- The capacity of the highway 2' The average speed of traffic when the flow rate is 1300 veh/hr.

appendix b BLOS: Bicycle Level of Service B.1 Background B.2 Bicycle Level of Service Model Winston-Salem Urban Area

HCM Sixth Edition. Plus More. Rahim (Ray) Benekohal University of Illinois at Urban Champaign,

CAPACITY, LEVEL OF SERVICE, FUNDAMENTALS OF HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS

Methodology Update for Estimating Volume to Service Flow Ratio

TWO-LANE ROAD ANALYSIS METHODOL.OGY IN THE HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL

TWO-LANE HIGHWAY SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS

METHODOLOGY FOR THE OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF TWO-LANE HIGHWAY FACILITIES

URBAN STREET CONCEPTS

This Technical Memorandum extends the expiration date of Technical Memorandum TS-07 to August 1, 2021 unless superseded prior to that date.

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

APPENDIXB. Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum

Defining Purpose and Need

Performance Measures on Two-Lane Highways: Survey of Practice

Management of Multi-Lane Highways in Jordan (Case Study)

EXAMINING THE EFFECT OF HEAVY VEHICLES DURING CONGESTION USING PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

Classification Criteria

Traffic Management Guidelines for Structure Rehabilitation Projects

US 81 CORRIDOR STUDY FROM NORTH OF UNION CITY SOUTH TO SH 19 SOUTH OF CHICKASHA CANADIAN AND GRADY COUNTIES, OKLAHOMA JULY 2007

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

Analysis of Signalized Intersections

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

Multimodal Analysis in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual

Methodology for analysing capacity and level of service for signalized intersections (HCM 2000)

Transferability of HCM to Asian Countries: An Exploratory Evidence From Bangkok s Multilane Highways

Table of Contents FIGURES TABLES APPENDICES. Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

1.3.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASSIFICATIONS

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

3 Department of Development Services Tim Snellings, Director Pete Calarco, Assistant Director

Signal Timing Design CIVL 4162/6162

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

6. signalized Intersections

6.4.2 Capacity of Two-Way Intersections-HCM Method

A Study on Adjustment Factors for U-Turns in Left-Turn Lanes at Signalized intersections

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Practical Application of Turn Lane Design Criteria in Developing Suburban & Urban Corridors

Estimation of Operational Benefits of Slow Vehicle Turnouts on Rural Highways in Alaska

Geometric design deals with the dimensioning of the elements of highways, such

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES. Figure Title

Bicycling and Walking

Design of Turn Lane Guidelines

Roadway Geometric Design I: Functions, Controls and Alignments

3 ROADWAYS 3.1 CMS ROADWAY NETWORK 3.2 TRAVEL-TIME-BASED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Roadway Travel Time Measures

Section 1 Project Description

APPENDIX A TWO-LANE RURAL ROADS ELEMENTS OF DESIGN CREST VERTICAL CURVES

Geometric Design Tables

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS...

INCORPORATING CYCLING IN OTTAWA-GATINEAU TRAVEL MODEL. Surabhi Gupta & Peter Vovsha, Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc. Ahmad Subhani, City of Ottawa

Training Strategies and Materials

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

Geometric and Trafc Conditions Summary

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

Effects of Traffic Condition (v/c) on Safety at Freeway Facility Sections

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

Traffic Signal Redesign 50% Design Report

Impact of Signalized Intersection on Vehicle Queue Length At Uthm Main Entrance Mohd Zulhilmi Abdul Halim 1,b, Joewono Prasetijo 2,b

Improvement of pedestrian safety and traffic flow regulation at the railway junction, Kandy

Roadway Design Manual

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

NOVEMBER, 2012 MnDOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL 2-0(1)

4.11 TRANSPORTATION 4.11 TRANSPORTATION Environmental Setting Intersection, Roadway, and Freeway Evaluation Methodology

CORE MPO Non-motorized Transportation Plan. Appendix D

LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

Traffic Analysis and Design Report. NW Bethany Boulevard. NW Bronson Road to NW West Union Road. Washington County, Oregon

Bicycle and Pedestrian Level of Service Evaluation

Alberta Highway 881. Corridor Management Plan. Session Forum 1 - Highways. Tri-Party Transportation Conference Moving Alberta Into the Future

Transcription:

Two-Lane Highway Capacity and LOS Analysis CE322 Transportation Engineering Ahmed Abdel-Rahim, Ph.D., P.E. Exam 2 Wednesday 10/28/2009 No class Monday 10/24/2009 Open-Book Open notes Exam 6 Problems Traffic Stream Models Queuing theory LOS (Freeway, Multi-Lane Highway, and Two-Lane Highways) Class website (Class notes, HWs, Suggested Problems) Two-lane Highway Characteristics One travel lane in each direction, and typically undivided Used for lower traffic volume situations Generally have free-flow speeds ranging between 45 and 65 mi/hr Have wide-ranging design standards May have occasional traffic signals or even stop-control In order to pass a vehicle, the opposing lane must be used (except for where passing lanes are provided) LOS Considerations Unlike the procedures for freeways and multilane highways, both directions must be considered in the level of service analysis, even if only interested in one direction Traffic in the opposing direction influences the passing opportunities for vehicles in the direction of interest Terrain can have a more significant effect due to restrictions on passing-sight distance 1

Service Measure(s) The service measure or measures is dictated by the functional classification of the two-lane highway segment. There are two classes defined for two-lane highways by the HCM. Classifications Class I: two-lane highways on which motorists expect to travel at high speeds (e.g., inter-city routes, primary arterials connecting major traffic generators, daily commuter routes, and primary links in state or national highway networks) and, Class II: two-lane highways on which motorists do not necessarily expect to travel at high speeds (e.g., scenic or recreational routes or pass through rugged terrain). These routes also generally serve shorter trip lengths than Class I routes. Level of Service Class I LOS Criteria LOS Percent Time-Spent- Average Travel Speed (ATS) Following (PTSF) mi/h km/h A 35 > 55 > 90 B 50 > 50 > 80 C 65 > 45 > 70 D 80 > 40 > 60 E > 80 40 60 Class II LOS Criteria Table 6.21 Table 6.22 Percent Time-Spent-Following LOS (PTSF) A 40 B 55 C 70 D 85 E > 85 LOS Determination Procedure 1. Establish Base Conditions and Capacity 2. Estimate or Measure Free-Flow Speed 3. Calculate Analysis Flow Rate 4. Calculate Service Measure(s) and Determine LOS 2

Base Conditions Minimum lane widths of 12 ft Minimum shoulder widths of 6 ft 0% no-passing zones Traffic stream consisting of passenger cars only No direct access points along the roadway No impediments to through traffic due to traffic control or turning vehicles Level terrain, with grades no greater than 2% A 50/50 directional split of traffic Capacity Capacity for both directions combined is 3200 pc/h Capacity for a single direction is 1700 pc/h Measuring Free-Flow Speed Estimating Free-Flow Speed Free-flow speed is the mean speed of all vehicles measured under flow rates up to 200 pc/h (2-way). If speeds are measured under a flow rate > 200, use following adjustment equation: FFS = BFFS fls fa Eq. 6.10 V f FFS SFM 0. 00776 f FFS = estimated free-flow speed in mi/h, S FM = mean speed of traffic measured in the field in mi/h, V f = observed flow rate, in veh/h, for the period when field data were obtained, and f HV = heavy-vehicle adjustment factor as determined by Eq. 6.5. HV Eq. 6.9 FFS = free-flow speed (mi/h), BFFS = estimated free-flow speed for base conditions, fls = adjustment for lane and shoulder width from Table 6.16 (mi/h), and fa = adjustment for access-point frequency from Table 6.15 (mi/h). 3

Lane Width and Shoulder Width Access Frequency Table 6.16 Table 6.15 Same as for multilane highways Calculate Analysis Flow Rate Grade Adjustment 1. Adjust for PHF 2. Adjust for grade 3. Adjust for vehicle mix V v p PHF f f v p = 15-min passenger-car equivalent flow rate (pc/h), V = hourly volume (veh/h), PHF = peak-hour factor, f G = grade adjustment factor, and f HV = heavy-vehicle adjustment factor. G HV Eq. 6.11 The grade adjustment factor accounts for the effect of terrain on the traffic flow. Table 6.17 Range of Two-Way Flow Average travel speed (ATS) Percent time-spentfollowing (PTSF) Rates (pc/h) Terrain Type Terrain Type Level Rolling Level Rolling 0-600 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.77 > 600-1200 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.94 > 1200 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 4

PCEs for Extended General Terrain Segments PCE values can be used for general terrain segments, just as for freeways and multilane highways. However, PCE values are different, and only given for level and rolling terrain classifications. Specific grade PCE values must be used for mountainous terrain. PCEs for Extended General Terrain Segments Table 6.18 Vehicle Range of Two-Way Average travel speed (ATS) Percent time-spentfollowing (PTSF) Type Flow Rates Terrain Type Terrain Type (pc/h) Level Rolling Level Rolling Trucks and 0-600 1.7 2.5 1.1 1.8 Buses, ET > 600-1200 1.2 1.9 1.1 1.5 > 1200 1.1 1.5 1.0 1.0 0-600 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 RVs, ER > 600-1200 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 > 1200 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 Notes PCE values for specific grades not covered in this book. Refer to the HCM. Tables 6.17 and 6.18 are in terms of pc/h. However, until Eq. 6.11 is applied, flow rate is in units of veh/h. This can result in the need to use an iterative approach to arrive at the correct adjustment factors and final analysis flow rate. See Example 6.6. fhv and PHF calculated with same equations as for freeways and multilane highways. Calculate Service Measure(s) If the highway is Class I, both ATS and PTSF must be calculated. If the highway is Class II, only PTSF needs to be calculated. 5

Average Travel Speed Adjustment for effect of no-passing zones ATS FFS 0. 00776 v p f np Eq. 6.12 ATS = estimated average travel speed in mi/h, for both directions of travel combined, FFS = free-flow speed in mi/h, as measured in the field and possibly adjusted by Eq. 6.9 or estimated from Eq. 6.10, v p = analysis flow rate in pc/h, as calculated from Eq. 6.11, and f np = adjustment factor for the percentage of no-passing zones, which is determined from Table 6.19. Table 6.19 Percent Time-Spent-Following Combined Adjustment for effect of Directional Distribution and no-passing zones PTSF BPTSF / f d np Eq. 6.13 PTSF = percent time-spent-following for both directions of travel combined, BPTSF = base percent time-spent-following for both directions of travel combined, and f d/np = adjustment factor for the combined effect of the directional distribution of traffic and the percentage of no-passing zones (from Table 6.20). 0.000879v p BPTSF 100 1 e Eq. 6.14 Table 6.20 6

Determine LOS Use Table 6.21 for Class I Use Table 6.22 for Class II Practice Problems 6.13 6.21 7