Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015

Similar documents
Northbound San Jose Avenue & I-280 Off-Ramp Road Diet Pilot Project

VISIONZEROPHL.COM #VISIONZEROPHL

VISION ZERO UPDATE JUNE 2, 2016

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

ABOUT THIS OPEN HOUSE

Central Freeway and Octavia Circulation Study

Richmond-Adelaide Cycle Tracks

25th Avenue Road Diet Project A One Year Evaluation. Transportation Fund for Clean Air Project #05R07

FOLSOM-HOWARD STREETSCAPE OVERVIEW

Lincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Vision Zero San Jose. Moving toward zero traffic deaths and providing safe streets for all

SPEED MANAGEMENT FOR VISION ZERO

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

San Jose Transportation Policy

PEDALING FORWARD. A Glance at the SFMTA s Bike Program for SFMTA.COM

Data Analysis February to March Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns.

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Data Analysis February to March Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns.

Monterey Road Complete Streets

COMMUNITY MEETING AGENDA

DOWNTOWN TUPELO MAIN STREET: ROAD DIET STUDY

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY

Project Goal and Description. Why Broadway? Broadway SFMTA.COM/BROADWAY. The goal of the Broadway Safety Improvement

Upper Market Street Bike Lane Project

PROJECT OVERVIEW. 20th Avenue Project Limits (Lincoln Way to Wawona St)

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

Bellevue Downtown Association Downtown Bike Series

Bicycle Network. Vision Zero San Francisco The City and County of San

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

CITY OF LOMITA CITY COUNCIL REPORT

CITY OF SLO SEEKS INPUT ON PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FOR BROAD STREET BICYCLE BOULEVARD PROJECT

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner

AUTOMATED SPEED ENFORCEMENT: REDUCING SPEED TO SAVE LIVES

WELCOME Mission-Geneva Transportation Study

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

BD RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE VISION ZERO RAMP INTERSECTION STUDY PHASE 1

MARKET/JFK VISION ZERO PILOT PROJECT FEBRUARY 2019 EVALUATION REPORT

Polk Streetscape Project

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard City Council Study Session Summary

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

Draft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan

Freeway ramp intersection study

Pedestrian injuries in San Francisco: distribution, causes, and solutions

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

Bicycle RSAs: How to Conduct Road Safety Audits and How to Use Them to Promote Bicyclist Safety. Dan Nabors, PE, VHB Bill DeSantis, PE, VHB

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. General Manager, Transportation Services

Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements in Balboa Park Station Area

Route 29 Solutions Projects

Film Guide for Educators. Designing for Safety

Living Streets Policy

Central Avenue Bikeway Traffic and Safety Impact Assessment

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

Why Zone In on Speed Reduction?

TASK FORCE UPDATE MARCH 29, 2016

Vision Zero Priority Projects (March 2017)

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

VISION ZERO: ELIMINATING TRAFFIC DEATHS BY 2024 MARCH 2015

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

Queensboro Bridge Bus Priority Study: Summary of Recommendations. Presentation to Manhattan Community Board 8 May 4, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Boston Post Road Design Feasibility Study

2. Vision & Goals. Vision. Santa Rosa is a community where walking and bicycling are comfortable and convenient for people of all ages and abilities.

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

Vision Zero & ITE. April 11, Toole Design Group. Jason DeGray, P.E., PTOE. Vision Zero & ITE

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Protected Bike Lanes in San Francisco Mike Sallaberry SFMTA NACTO Workshop - Chicago IL

Station 1: Street & Sidewalk Upgrades

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Memo. Ocean Avenue Corridor Design Project Public Workshop #2 Summary

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Mission Bay Loop (MBL) Public Meeting

Safer Cycling: How the City of Vancouver is Proactively Improving Cycling Safety

Scarlett Road Bridge & Road Improvements Lambton Park Community School - Gymnasium Tuesday November 28 th, 2017

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

San Francisco 2009 Collisions Report April 21, 2011

Replace century-old sewer & water pipes Pedestrian-scale sidewalk lighting

Oakland Pedestrian Master Plan Oakland Pedestrian Plan Draft Recommendations Chapter Outline

MEMORANDUM. City Constituents. Leilani Schwarcz, Vision Zero Surveillance Epidemiologist, SFDPH

NACTO Designing Cities 2014 Dongho Chang, City Traffic Engineer October 23, 2014

Dowling/Beaty Cycling Route

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Pearl Street / Prospect Street / Colchester Avenue Intersection Scoping Study. April 11, 2013 Steering Committee Meeting #3

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Transcription:

Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015

Vision Zero The City and County of San Francisco adopted Vision Zero San Francisco Vision Zero High Injury Network as a policy in 2014, committing an effort to prioritize street safety and eliminate traffic deaths in San Francisco by 2024. The San Jose Road Diet Pilot Project is working towards this overarching citywide initiative. More than 70 percent of severe and fatal traffic injuries occur on just 12 percent of San Francisco streets. The Vision Zero High Injury Network is comprised of 125 miles of roadway. Core Principles Achieving zero fatalities is a shared responsibility among everyone. Below are the five core principles that will guide us as we work together: 1. Traffic deaths are preventable and unacceptable. 2. Safety is our highest priority. 3. Human error is inevitable and unpredictable. We should design the transportation system to anticipate error so the consequence is not severe injury or death. 4. Safe human behaviors, education about enforcement of safety rules, and vehicle technologies are essential contributors to a safe system. 5. People are inherently vulnerable and speed is a fundamental predictor of crash survival. The transportation system should be designed for speeds that protect life. Two-Year Action Strategy The Vision Zero Two-Year Action Strategy outlines specific projects and Project Area policy changes the City plans to pursue in the next two years, which fall in the following categories: Engineering Enforcement Education Evaluation Policy For more information, please visit: www.visionzerosf.com

History & Context The Bernal Cut segment of San Jose Avenue between the I-280 off-ramp and Randall Street hosts freeway-like conditions on a city street. This problem is partially fed by a two-lane off-ramp from northbound I-280, which was widened from a single lane to accommodate detoured traffic after the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, which necessitated the closure of the Central Freeway. Residents have long expressed concerns about high vehicular speeds, and a portion of the corridor is part of the Vision Zero High-Injury Network for vehicular collisions. In addition, the Glen Park Community Plan recommended further steps toward reconfiguring San Jose Avenue into an avenue, rather than an urban freeway. Loma Prieta Earthquake Bernal Cut Glen Park Community Plan Image: Michael Macor / AP Image: SF Planning Image: SF Planning

Goals & Scope Pilot Project Scope Through the Pilot Project, SFMTA is working with Caltrans towards a communitydriven vision for a safer corridor. A reconfiguration was proposed to: 1. Eliminate one travel lane from Northbound San Jose Avenue; and then 2. Convert the two-lane I-280 off-ramp into a single lane The Pilot Project tests whether this new configuration can slow free-flow speeds to a target of 35 MPH on Northbound San Jose Avenue. This pilot is limited to temporary changes namely paint in the existing road space. The following data and observations will be evaluated to determine the pilot s success: Pilot Project Goals The San Jose Road Diet Pilot Project was scoped with the goals of increasing safety for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians along the corridor by: Reducing traffic speeds on northbound San Jose Avenue by reducing the number of traffic lanes on the I-280 offramp and on San Jose Avenue Reducing cut-through traffic from northbound I-280 Facilitating safer turning movements to & from northbound San Jose Avenue and adjacent residential streets Leveraging excess road space by upgrading the existing northbound bicycle lane with a wider, more separated bikeway Pre-pilot: SFMTA and Caltrans used travel models to project that a single-lane off-ramp and two-lane Northbound San Jose Avenue would not significantly delay operations on the I-280 freeway mainline. Pilot Phase 1: SFMTA reduced Northbound San Jose Avenue between the I-280 off-ramp and Randall Street to two lanes, adding a buffer to the existing bicycle lane with the newly added space. Evaluation: Traffic volume and speed data collected showed that speeds did not decrease to the desired 35 MPH goal. Pilot Phase 2: SFMTA worked with Caltrans to adjust the freeway off-ramp from two lanes into a two- to one-lane merge in order to further slow upstream traffic. Ongoing Evaluation: SFMTA and Caltrans are collecting traffic speed and volume data to assess whether the off-ramp changes have succeeded in slowing speeds on Northbound San Jose Avenue. Congestion is also being closely monitored through travel time surveys.

Implemented Changes Phase I (Northbound San Jose Avenue) SFMTA reduced Northbound Before San Jose Avenue between the I-280 off-ramp and Randall Street to two lanes, adding a buffer to the existing bicycle lane with the newly added space. After Phase II (Northbound I-280 Off-Ramp) SFMTA worked with Caltrans to adjust the freeway off-ramp from two lanes into a two- to one-lane merge in order to further slow upstream traffic. Before After Image: Caltrans District 4

Collision History 14 collisions were reported on northbound San Jose Avenue between the I-280 Off-Ramp and Randall Street from 2010 to 2014, resulting in 22 injured persons. 57% Collisions by Primary Collision Factor Collisions by Time of Day 7% Percent of collisions of the collisions reported were due to unsafe speeding, making it the primary collision factor for 29% 57% 15% this area of San Jose Avenue. 10% 12am - 2am 2am - 4am 4am - 6am 6am - 8am 8am - 10am 10am - 12pm 12pm - 2pm 2pm - 4pm 4pm - 6pm 6pm - 8pm 8pm - 10pm 10pm - 12am Unsafe speed Unsafe lane change 5% 43% Driving under the influence 7% Other hazardous movement of all collisions were rear-end collisions. Collisions by Location 8 6 36% 4 of all collisions involved only one 2 vehicle, all of which were with a fixed object. Monterey St midblock Rousseau St midblock Milton St midblock St Marys Ave midblock Randall St off-ramp intersection intersection intersection intersection

Vehicular Volumes & Speeds Drive Time Analysis Vehicular Speeds (AM Peak Period) A drive time analysis was performed by collecting second-bysecond vehicle location data on San Jose Avenue between the northbound I-280 Ocean Avenue on-ramp and the Randall Street intersection (shown below). The survey took place over multiple AM and PM peak periods in July and August. Street Pre-Pilot Post-Pilot Change North I-280 off-ramp (before NB San Jose Avenue) 52 mph 47 mph -5 mph (-10%*) San Jose Avenue (Northbound) 49 mph 46 mph -3 mph (-6%) Rousseau Street (Southbound) 13 mph 15 mph +2 mph (+18%*) Milton Street (Northbound) 23 mph 22 mph -1 mph (-4%) During free-flow traffic, the average drive time is 4 minutes. Results of the drive time analysis show approximately 2 minutes of delay in the AM and PM peak periods, with most of the delay occuring near the approach at Randall Street, primarily due to the left turn lane of San Jose Avenue onto St. Marys Avenue (Southbound) 23 mph 27 mph +4 mph (+19%) St. Marys Avenue (Northbound) 16 mph 26 mph +10 mph (+63%) Vehicular Volumes *Percentage change based on unrounded speeds Dolores Street. At this location, drivers sometimes have to wait more than one traffic signal cycle to make the left turn onto Dolores Street during peak traffic. San Jose Ave. Northbound AM Peak Pre: 2,068 Post: 1,628 Change: -440 (-21%) St Marys Ave. NB AM Peak SB AM Peak Pre: 28 Pre: 331 Post: 27 Post: 374 Change: -1 (-5%) Change: 44 (+13%) Rousseau St. Southbound AM Peak Pre: 354 Post: 634 Change: 280 (+79%) Milton St. Northbound AM Peak Pre: 42 Post: 32 Change: -10 (-22%) Image: Google Maps

Bicycle Volumes Summary Number of Bicycles on San Jose Avenue When Phase I of the pilot project was implemented in June 2014, a lane previously devoted to motor vehicle travel was repurposed to create space for a separated bicycle facility. With the new wider bike lane and buffer zone, evening peak bike traffic increased by 62 percent on northbound San Jose Avenue and the average daily bike traffic increased by 15 percent. Period Pre-Pilot Post-Pilot Change AM Peak 24 27 +14% PM Peak 19 31 +62% Average Daily Volume 174 200 +15% Though the widening and buffering of the existing bike lane was not the primary goal of the project, the number of bicyclists on San Jose has risen. This surge may be indicative of an increased feeling of comfort on San Jose Avenue. Before After Image: Google Maps

Next Steps Today You are here! SFMTA is at Glen Park School to guide the community through the project. Fall 2015 SFMTA and Caltrans will continue to collect data to monitor traffic, speeds and congestion once school is in session. Data collected will include traffic counts, speeds, travel time surveys, and community feedback. Winter 2015 If the pilot project successfully slows speeds, SFMTA staff will recommend it as a permanent roadway configuration to the City Traffic Engineer. Early 2016 SF Public Works will repave Northbound San Jose Avenue with the configuration ordered by the City Traffic Engineer. Longer Term Elected officials and community stakeholders will work together to identify longer-term enhancements to the corridor to help take additional steps towards a more livable city street.