COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission

Similar documents

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE. Panet Road / Molson Street Reconstruction. April 24, 2013

Lamb Boulevard Safety Management Plan Between E. Desert Inn Rd. to Lake Mead Blvd. Clark County, NV

Presented by: Presented to:

CHAPTER 4 VISION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Completed Project Justification Package Example

CARLSON BOULEVARD CARLSON BOULEVARD CORRIDOR OVERVIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS. Maine Avenue to El Cerrito Plaza BART Station

Comments Heard PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #1: SUMMARY

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE. Preliminary Engineering Study to Upgrade the Pembina Highway Underpass MAY 9, 2012

DRAFT - TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC HEALTH

2017 Active Allegheny Grant Program Program Guidelines

Phase 1: Station Area Planning. Golden Valley Road Parking Management Strategies Assessment. Purpose. Context. Parking Management Options

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

Federal Way City Center Access Study Comment Log Summary

EXECUTIVB SUMMARY Regular Board Action Item 98 Approval of Revised Regional Roadway Network M"p, Revised Criteria and Joint Resolution

FY 2018 Transportation Alternatives Instructions

Parking Committee Report to Commissioners AUGUST 17, 2018

CITYCOUNCIL. CITY OF KENMORE Public Works Department PO Box Kenmore, WA David Baker, Mayor Allan VanNess, Deputy Mayor

Working Group Meeting #2. One Financial Plaza 1350 Main Street 3rd Floor, Community Room A Springfield, Massachusetts

Stakeholder Working Group (SWG) Meeting #2 Summary

North Avenue Reconstruction Project Context Sensitive Solutions Advisory Group Meeting #4

The timelines for the proposed short-term, medium-term, and long-term improvements to the corridor be accelerated.

Subject: Recommended Updates to Transportation Development Parameters

Project Advisory Team Existing Conditions Meeting Agenda

Construction Design and Management

A template mass rescue operations plan

CITY OF STEVENS POINT AGENDA

PILKINGTON RESPONSE o Rich Martinko returned call on 8/10/2014 at 2:50pm and spoke with Ms. Pilkington o The information below was given to her.

Technical Briefing Rapid Transit

DISCLAIMER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDELINES. Omnitrans 16 member agencies:

DRAFT Active Transportation Work Plan

Appendix A. Bicycle Design Guidelines

Traffic & Safety Update

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Executive Summary

Deer harvest objective for the Deer Plan

Advisory Group Meeting #7. March 9, Transcribed Breakout Group Discussion Notes.

CITY of LOMPOC 2030 General Plan

Minutes of the KENOSHA COUNTY JURISDICTIONAL HIGHWAY PLANNING COMMITTEE. Members Present Gary Sipsma... Director of Highways/Highway Commissioner,

Student Name: Application for Employment-Based Field Practicum. DEPARTMENT of SOCIAL WORK

Bikeway Classification

TRANSPORTATION DISCUSSION GROUP Laptop notes (as projected on screen during the meeting) Monday, June 10, 2013

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Inter-Department Communication

Alpine Guide TAP APPLICATION PACKAGE. Hello and thank you for your interest in applying to the ACMG Training and Assessment Program (TAP).

City of Ottawa. Transit Solutions. O c t o b e r

Topic Sheet No. 5 Safe rigging of rope access equipment

Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers

LAND 2 Aesthetic Resources Technical Study Plan Kaweah Project (FERC Project No. 298)

PSOMAS MEMORANDUM. North Santa Monica Boulevard Resonsturction PROJECT: 1BEVO PSOMAS Project No.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

SANDYFORD BUSINESS DISTRICT SUMMARY OF AREA WIDE MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO. Regulatory Compliance Program

Espa Pumps (UK) Ltd Riverside Avenue West Lawford, Manningtree Essex CO11 1UN

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

OFFICE OF THE WATERFRONT July 6, 2015 KING COUNTY METRO

Prepared by: TH STREET SUITE 2301 DENVER, CO CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER. n W

Project No.: Notes taken by:

MISSOURI STATE 4-H COUNCIL REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATION

Exercise 2: Reviewing the Workplace Inspection Checklist (30 min) p

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Public School Choice EBR Guidance. North Banks Middle School

Training Teams and Selection Criteria:

Owner: USA Division Safety Revision No: 00 Date last revised: 01/14/2013

City of London Transport Strategy

System Development Principles

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

Technical Memorandum. Introduction. Projected Traffic Volumes

ATHLETICS AUSTRALIA SELECTION POLICY WORLD CROSS COUNTRY CHAMPIONSHIPS AARHUS, DENMARK 30 MARCH 2019

Assessing how using a microsimulator in an integrated land use / transportation model affects urban growth simulations

First Aid Policy Version 2.0

Oregon s Transportation System Planning Integration and Consistency

Long-Term Transportation Plan

Nine Elms Lane and Battersea Park Road

Binghamton Metropolitan Transportation Study Pedestrian & Bicycle Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 14, 2008

2.0 VISIONING DIRECTION

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Bus Driver Job Description

Livermore Harley Owners Group RIDING WITH LIVERMORE HOG

THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION DISCIPLINE PROCESS FOR SMALL-SIDED FOOTBALL

Cycling Strategy Group. Terms of Reference

Visit Leader Emergency Action Card

November 11, Worldwide ERC would like to thank today s sponsor: 2014 Worldwide ERC

DRAFT Goals, Principles and Objectives

APPENDIX A BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND TRANSIT ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET. B. Subdivision/Site Development Plan/Grading Permit Name and Number:

Guidance on Exception Reporting for Educational and Clinical Supervisors and Leads

Users Requirements Statement

Neighborhood Bikeway Concept Plan

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (Transportation Advisory Board / Technical Advisory Committee) Minutes April 11, 2012

Field Instruction. 5.2 Poles Inspection and Support Prior to Commencement of Work

Demonstrate the capability to carry out emergency response functions in an unannounced exercise or drill.

SELECTION POLICY (PARA) WORLD RANKING EVENTS EURO GP, ITALY (2-10 JUN) EURO GP, CZECH (30 JUN 8 JUL)

SCENTRE GROUP JULY 2018 REF: 10869/1

First Aid Policy. North Halifax Grammar School. Approved by: Principal. Date approved: November Next review: Autumn Term 2020.

American Water Works Association. Organizational & Technical Strategic Data Management Assessment Request for Proposal

MEASURE K BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL AND SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Columbia Pike Implementation Team (CPIT) Meeting

Department of Transportation Project No Rehabilitation of Bridge No Towns of East Haddam and Haddam, Connecticut

Badminton New Zealand Sanctioned Events Information and Time-lines

Advisory Group Meeting Notes

E25 FATIGUE MANAGEMENT

If you have any questions please contact us at the (preferred) or numbers below.

Transcription:

Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin INSTRUCTIONS This Checklist is an implementatin tl f the Philadelphia Cmplete Streets Handbk (the Handbk ) and enables City engineers and planners t review prjects fr their cmpliance with the Handbk s plicies. The handbk prvides design guidance and des nt supersede r replace language, standards r plicies established in the City Cde, City Plan, r Manual n Unifrm Traffic Cntrl Devices (MUTCD). The Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin receives this Checklist as a functin f its Civic Design Review (CDR) prcess. This checklist is used t dcument hw prject applicants cnsidered and accmmdated the needs f all users f city streets and sidewalks during the planning andr design f prjects affecting public rights-f-way. Departmental reviewers will use this checklist t cnfirm that submitted designs incrprate cmplete streets cnsideratins (see 11-901 f The Philadelphia Cde). Applicants fr prjects that require Civic Design Review shall cmplete this checklist and attach it t plans submitted t the Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin fr review, alng with an electrnic versin. The Handbk and the checklist can be accessed at http:www.phila.gvcityplanningprjectreviewspagescivicdesignreview.aspx PRELIMINARY PCPC REVIEW AND COMMENT: DATE FINAL STREETS DEPT REVIEW AND COMMENT: DATE 1

Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin INSTRUCTIONS (cntinued) APPLICANTS SHOULD MAKE SURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: This checklist is designed t be filled ut electrnically in Micrsft Wrd frmat. Please submit the Wrd versin f the checklist. Text fields will expand autmatically as yu type. All plans submitted fr review must clearly dimensin the widths f the Furnishing, Walking, and Building Znes (as defined in Sectin 1 f the Handbk). High Pririty Cmplete Streets treatments (identified in Table 1 and subsequent sectins f the Handbk) shuld be identified and dimensined n plans. All plans submitted fr review must clearly identify and site all street furniture, including but nt limited t bus shelters, street signs and hydrants. Any prject that calls fr the develpment and installatin f medians, bi-swales and ther such features in the right-f-way may require a maintenance agreement with the Streets Department. ADA curb-ramp designs must be submitted t Streets Department fr review Any prject that significantly changes the curb line may require a City Plan Actin. The City Plan Actin Applicatin is available at http:www.philadelphiastreets.cmsurvey-and-design-bureaucity-plans-unit. An applicatin t the Streets Department fr a City Plan Actin is required when a prject plan prpses the: Placing f a new street; Remval f an existing street; Changes t radway grades, curb lines, r widths; r Placing r striking a city utility right-f-way. Cmplete Streets Review Submissin Requirement*: EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN, shuld be at an identified standard engineering scale FULLY DIMENSIONED CURB CUTSDRIVEWAYSLAYBY LANES TREE PITSLANDSCAPING BICYCLE RACKSSTATIONSSTORAGE AREAS TRANSIT SHELTERSSTAIRWAYS PROPOSED CONDITIONS SITE PLAN, shuld be at an identified standard engineering scale FULLY DIMENSIONED, INCLUDING DELINEATION OF WALKING, FURNISHING, AND BUILDING ZONES AND PINCH POINTS PROPOSED CURB CUTSDRIVEWAYSLAYBY LANES PROPOSED TREE PITSLANDSCAPING BICYCLE RACKSSTATIONSSTORAGE AREAS TRANSIT SHELTERSSTAIRWAYS *APPLICANTS PLEASE NOTE: ONLY FULL-SIZE, READABLE SITE PLANS WILL BE ACCEPTED. ADDITIONAL PLANS MAY BE REQUIRED AND WILL BE REQUESTED IF NECESSARY 2

Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION 1. PROJECT NAME 2. DATE 3. APPLICANT NAME 5. PROJECT AREA: list precise street limits and scpe 4. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION 6. OWNER NAME 7. OWNER CONTACT INFORMATION 8. ENGINEER ARCHITECT NAME 9. ENGINEER ARCHITECT CONTACT INFORMATION 10. STREETS: List the streets assciated with the prject. Cmplete Streets Types can be fund at www.phila.gvmap under the Cmplete Street Types field. Cmplete Streets Types are als identified in Sectin 3 f the Handbk. STREET FROM TO COMPLETE STREET TYPE 11. Des the Existing Cnditins site survey clearly identify the fllwing existing cnditins with dimensins? a. Parking and lading regulatins in curb lanes adjacent t the site YES NO b. Street Furniture such as bus shelters, hnr bxes, etc. YES NO NA c. Street Directin YES NO d. Curb Cuts YES NO NA e. Utilities, including tree grates, vault cvers, manhles, junctin bxes, signs, lights, ples, etc. YES NO NA f. Building Extensins int the sidewalk, such as stairs and stps YES NO NA APPLICANT: General Prject Infrmatin Additinal Explanatin Cmments: REVIEW: General Prject Infrmatin Reviewer Cmments: 3

Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (Handbk Sectin 4.3) 12. SIDEWALK: list Sidewalk widths fr each street frntage. Required Sidewalk widths are listed in Sectin 4.3 f the Handbk. STREET FRONTAGE TYPICAL SIDEWALK WIDTH (BUILDING LINE TO CURB) Required Existing Prpsed CITY PLAN SIDEWALK WIDTH Existing Prpsed 13. WALKING ZONE: list Walking Zne widths fr each street frntage. The Walking Zne is defined in Sectin 4.3 f the Handbk, including required widths. STREET FRONTAGE WALKING ZONE Required Existing Prpsed 14. VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS: list Vehicular Intrusins int the sidewalk. Examples include but are nt limited t; driveways, lay-by lanes, etc. Driveways and lay-by lanes are addressed in sectins 4.8.1 and 4.6.3, respectively, f the Handbk. EXISTING VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS INTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT PROPOSED VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS INTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT 4

Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (cntinued) 15. When cnsidering the verall design, des it create r enhance a pedestrian envirnment that prvides safe and cmfrtable access fr all pedestrians at all times f the day? YES NO YES NO APPLICANT: Pedestrian Cmpnent Additinal Explanatin Cmments: REVIEW: Pedestrian Cmpnent Reviewer Cmments: 5

Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (Handbk Sectin 4.4) 16. BUILDING ZONE: list the MAXIMUM, existing and prpsed Building Zne width n each street frntage. The Building Zne is defined as the area f the sidewalk immediately adjacent t the building face, wall, r fence marking the prperty line, r a lawn in lwer density residential neighbrhds. The Building Zne is further defined in sectin 4.4.1 f the Handbk. STREET FRONTAGE MAXIMUM BUILDING ZONE WIDTH Existing Prpsed 17. FURNISHING ZONE: list the MINIMUM, recmmended, existing, and prpsed Furnishing Zne widths n each street frntage. The Furnishing Zne is further defined in sectin 4.4.2 f the Handbk. STREET FRONTAGE MINIMUM FURNISHING ZONE WIDTH Recmmended Existing Prpsed 18. Identify prpsed high pririty building and furnishing zne design treatments that are incrprated int the design plan, where width permits (see Handbk Table 1). Are the fllwing treatments identified and dimensined n the plan? Bicycle Parking Lighting Benches Street Trees Street Furniture 19. Des the design avid tripping hazards? 20. Des the design avid pinch pints? Pinch pints are lcatins where the Walking Zne width is less than the required width identified in item 13, r requires an exceptin 6

Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (cntinued) 21. D street trees andr plants cmply with street installatin requirements (see sectins 4.4.7 & 4.4.8) 22. Des the design maintain adequate visibility fr all radway users at intersectins? APPLICANT: Building & Furnishing Cmpnent Additinal Explanatin Cmments: REVIEW: Building & Furnishing Cmpnent Reviewer Cmments: 7

Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin BICYCLE COMPONENT (Handbk Sectin 4.5) 23. List elements f the prject that incrprate recmmendatins f the Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan, lcated nline at http:phila2035.rgwp-cntentuplads201206bikepedfinal2.pdf 24. List the existing and prpsed number f bicycle parking spaces, n- and ff-street. Bicycle parking requirements are prvided in The Philadelphia Cde, Sectin 14-804. BUILDING ADDRESS REQUIRED SPACES ON-STREET Existing Prpsed ON SIDEWALK Existing Prpsed OFF-STREET Existing Prpsed 25. Identify prpsed high pririty bicycle design treatments (see Handbk Table 1) that are incrprated int the design plan, where width permits. Are the fllwing High Pririty elements identified and dimensined n the plan? Cnventinal Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane Bicycle-Friendly Street 26. Des the design prvide bicycle cnnectins t lcal bicycle, trail, and transit netwrks? 27. Des the design prvide cnvenient bicycle cnnectins t residences, wrk places, and ther destinatins? APPLICANT: Bicycle Cmpnent Additinal Explanatin Cmments: REVIEW: Bicycle Cmpnent Reviewer Cmments: 8

Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT (Handbk Sectin 4.6) 28. Des the design limit cnflict amng transprtatin mdes alng the curb? 29. Des the design cnnect transit stps t the surrunding pedestrian netwrk and destinatins? 30. Des the design prvide a buffer between the radway and pedestrian traffic? YES NO YES NO 31. Hw des the prpsed plan affect the accessibility, visibility, cnnectivity, andr attractiveness f public transit? YES NO APPLICANT: Curbside Management Cmpnent Additinal Explanatin Cmments: REVIEW: Curbside Management Cmpnent Reviewer Cmments: 9

Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin VEHICLE CARTWAY COMPONENT (Handbk Sectin 4.7) 32. If lane changes are prpsed,, identify existing and prpsed lane widths and the design speed fr each street frntage; If nt, g t questin N. 35 STREET FROM TO LANE WIDTHS Existing Prpsed DESIGN SPEED 33. What is the maximum AASHTO design vehicle being accmmdated by the design? 34. Will the prject affect a histrically certified street? An inventry f histric streets (1) is maintained by the Philadelphia Histrical Cmmissin. 35. Will the public right-f-way be used fr lading and unlading activities? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO 36. Des the design maintain emergency vehicle access? YES NO YES NO 37. Where new streets are being develped, des the design cnnect and extend the street grid? 38. Des the design supprt multiple alternative rutes t and frm destinatins as well as within the site? 39. Overall, des the design balance vehicle mbility with the mbility and access f all ther radway users? YES NO YES NO APPLICANT: Vehicle Cartway Cmpnent Additinal Explanatin Cmments: REVIEW: Vehicle Cartway Cmpnent Reviewer Cmments: (1) http:www.philadelphiastreets.cmimagesupladsdcumentshistrical_street_paving.pdf 10

Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin URBAN DESIGN COMPONENT (Handbk Sectin 4.8) 40. Des the design incrprate windws, strefrnts, and ther active uses facing the street? 41. Des the design prvide driveway access that safely manages pedestrian bicycle cnflicts with vehicles (see Sectin 4.8.1)? 42. Des the design prvide direct, safe, and accessible cnnectins between transit stpsstatins and building access pints and destinatins within the site? APPLICANT: Urban Design Cmpnent Additinal Explanatin Cmments: REVIEW: Urban Design Cmpnent Reviewer Cmments: 11

Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin INTERSECTIONS & CROSSINGS COMPONENT (Handbk Sectin 4.9) 43. If signal cycle changes are prpsed, please identify Existing and Prpsed Signal Cycle lengths; if nt, g t questin N. 48. SIGNAL LOCATION EXISTING CYCLE LENGTH PROPOSED CYCLE LENGTH 44. Des the design minimize the signal cycle length t reduce pedestrian wait time? 45. Des the design prvide adequate clearance time fr pedestrians t crss streets? 46. Des the design minimize pedestrian crssing distances by narrwing streets r travel lanes, extending curbs, reducing curb radii, r using medians r refuge islands t break up lng crssings? If yes, City Plan Actin may be required. 47. Identify High Pririty intersectin and crssing design treatments (see Handbk Table 1) that will be incrprated int the design, where width permits. Are the fllwing High Pririty design treatments identified and dimensined n the plan? YES NO Marked Crsswalks Pedestrian Refuge Islands Signal Timing and Operatin Bike Bxes 48. Des the design reduce vehicle speeds and increase visibility fr all mdes at intersectins? 49. Overall, d intersectin designs limit cnflicts between all mdes and prmte pedestrian and bicycle safety? APPLICANT: Intersectins & Crssings Cmpnent Additinal Explanatin Cmments: REVIEW: Intersectins & Crssings Cmpnent Reviewer Cmments: 12

Philadelphia City Planning Cmmissin ADDITIONAL COMMENTS APPLICANT Additinal Explanatin Cmments: REVIEW Additinal Reviewer Cmments: 13