CHAPTER 5 CULVERT DESIGN

Similar documents
Indiana LTAP Road Scholar Core Course #10 Culvert Drainage. Presented by Thomas T. Burke, Jr., PhD, PE Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd.

CHAPTER 4 SPALDING COUNTY, GEORGIA 4.0 CULVERT DESIGN

APPENDIX B HYDRAULIC DESIGN DATA FOR CULVERTS

The Basics of Culvert and Inlet Design

General Information for Culvert Design

Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis

HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date January 17, Federal Highway Administration.

APPENDIX A STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS AND RATING CURVES

Culvert Design An Overview of the NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 8

19.1 Problem: Maximum Discharge

Culvert Design Basics

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design

Sediment Basin 7E-12. Design Manual Chapter 7 - Erosion and Sediment Control 7E - Design Information for ESC Measures BENEFITS.

Appendix G. Alternative Solutions Details. Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Project PROJECT FILE REPORT CITY OF PICKERING

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

BC Ministry of Forests. March Fish Stream Crossing Guidebook. Forest Practices Code of British Columbia.

STRUCTURE 65-B PURPOSE SPILLWAY OPERATION

Plan B Dam Breach Assessment

WMS 8.4 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling HY-8 Modeling Wizard Learn how to model a culvert using HY-8 and WMS

MEMO. Schedule 'B' Class Environmental Assessment and Preliminary Design Lakeview Boulevard Improvements Culvert Assessment.

Culvert Hydraulics: Comparison of Current Computer Models

STRUCTURE S-65 PURPOSE SPILLWAY OPERATION

UNDERWATER INSPECTION REPORT DOUBLE CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CULVERT HAWTHORN ROAD OVER RICE CREEK (PELKEY LAKE) MORRISON COUNTY

Broadly speaking, there are four different types of structures, each with its own particular function:

Section 5: Pond Outlets

D emonstration of Possible F low Conditions in a Culvert

HEC 26 Aquatic Organism Passage Design Manual Evolution & Application

Fish Passage Assessment Report Mare Brook Culverts

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

1. In most economical rectangular section of a channel, depth is kept equal to

Stream Crossings I: Engineering and Design Approaches to Provide Fish Passage at Culvert Slipline Projects in Connecticut

Storm Damage Floating Culverts & Other Inlet Issues

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 133 OVER A DITCH ST. LOUIS COUNTY

SELBY CREEK SILVERADO TRAIL CULVERT FISH PASSAGE ASSESSMENT

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 13 CULVERTS APRIL 2011

Hours / 100 Marks Seat No.

Exercise (4): Open Channel Flow - Gradually Varied Flow

STORM DRAIN STUDY WRIGHT PROPERTY 203 CENTRAL AVENUE GAITHERSBURG, MD

Slip Lined Culvert Retrofit and Fish Passage

Physical Model Study of the San Antonio River Lock System

2O-2 Open Channel Flow

Follow this and additional works at:

APPENDIX A STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS AND RATING CURVES. Lake Okeechobee & EAA Vol 3 A-i December 2005 Version 1 Draft 4

Stormwater Management Pond Design Brief. Greely Village Centre - Commercial Phase - Ultimate Conditions - - City of Ottawa -

Experiment (13): Flow channel

TM /AFM 88-5, Chap Underground hydraulic design Inlets UFC - Drainage In Areas Other Than Airfields

Great Lakes Stream Crossing Inventory Instructions

Modeling of Long Culverts and Stormdrains A Comparison of Different Methods

CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM PERTINENT DATA

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

Fish Passage Assessment of Private Stream Crossings on Lower Stonybrook Creek

APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

Lecture 10 : Sewer Appurtenances

OPEN CHANNEL FLOW WORKSHEET 3 WATER SURFACE PROFILES

Driveway Design Criteria

Evaluating Surge Potential in CSO Tunnels

CLEANING, INSPECTION, AND TESTING OF SEWERS

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 4 OVER THE BEAVER RIVER ST. LOUIS COUNTY

Evaluating the Spillway Capacity of the Morning Glory Spillway at Harriman Dam

Exercise (3): Open Channel Flow Rapidly Varied Flow

Swimming Pools, Hot Tubs and Spas

Chutes Part 2: Synthetic linings

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT METRO DISTRICT - ANOKA COUNTY

APPENDIX C ESTIMATING SCOUR IN BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERTS

Section 10 - Hydraulic Analysis

Whitewater Valley Station Surface Impoundment Coal Combustion Residual Annual Report

Chapter 9 System Design Procedures

Transition Submergence and Hysteresis Effects in Three-Foot Cutthroat Flumes

Photo 1: Typical 4 Weephole

Packwood Hydroelectric Project Barrier Analysis December 12, 2006

Fish Passage Culvert Assessment for Cahilty Creek Watershed FIA Project #

Homework of Chapter (4.2,4.3)

6.6 Gradually Varied Flow

DESIGN OF BELL-MOUTH SPILLWAY AT BARVI DAM

STREAM SURVEY File form No..

CSO/STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. HYDROVEX FluidMoon Self-Adjusting Knife-Gate Regulator

A river runs through it

January 25, Franklin Pasture Sanitary Sewer Cure-In-Place Pipe Lining Bid No Bid Date: 2/7/17 ADDENDUM NO 1

Highway geometric design QUESTION PAPER

Gales Creek Fish Passage Assessment and Prioritization

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 11 APPENDIX B TIDEROUT 2 USERS MANUAL

Greenup Lock Filling and Emptying System Study

Figure 1: Graphical definitions of superelevation in terms for a two lane roadway.

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

Fish Passage at Road Crossings Assessment Boise National Forest FY 2004

Rock Ramp Design Guidelines. David Mooney MS Chris Holmquist-Johnson MS Drew Baird Ph.D. P.E. Kent Collins P.E.

MEMORANDUM. TNC Fisher Slough Final Design and Permitting Subject: DRAFT Technical Memorandum: Levee Emergency Spillway Design

Culvert Inlet Failures-A Case History

Components of a Barrage

Measuring Water with Parshall Flumes

The Discussion of this exercise covers the following points:

KlassikDrain Section. Technical Handbook and Product Catalog. General purpose trench drainage

PX800 M E T A L PX800 PERFORMANCE WIL T-08

SIZING AND CAPACITIES OF GAS PIPING

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 1 PINE COUNTY

If you have comments on this or suggestions for other terms that should be added to this glossary, please send an to

PENNDRAIN.rep. HEC-RAS Version May 2005 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street Davis, California

Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Culvert Repair Fish Passage Pilot Programmatic Agreement Final ODFW Report

Casing Spacer Technology Leaders

Pumping Systems for Landscaping Pumps, Controls and Accessories. Mark Snyder, PE

Transcription:

CHAPTER 5 CULVERT DESIGN HYDRAULICS OF CULVERTS There are two major types of culvert flow: 1) flow with inlet control, and 2) flow with outlet control. For each type, different factors and formulas are used to compute the hydraulic capacity of the culvert. Under inlet control, the slope, roughness, diameter of the culvert barrel, inlet shape, and the amount of headwater or ponding at the entrance must be considered. Outlet control involves the additional consideration of the elevation of the tailwater in the outlet channel and the length of the culvert. Flow with outlet control will not be discussed within the scope of this manual. The need for making involved computations to determine the probable type of flow under which a culvert will operate may be avoided by computing headwater depths from Exhibits 5-1 and 5-2 for inlet control. Culverts Flowing With Inlet Control Inlet control means that the discharge capacity of a culvert is controlled at the culvert entrance by the depth of headwater (HW) and the shape of the entrance. The following figure shows inlet control flow for three types of culvert entrances. In inlet control the length of the culvert barrel and outlet conditions are not factors in determining culvert capacity. In all culvert design, headwater or depth of ponding at the entrance to a culvert is an important factor in culvert capacity. The headwater depth is the vertical distance from the culvert invert at the entrance to the energy line of the headwater pool (depth + velocity head). Because of the low velocities in most entrance pools, the water surface and the energy line at the entrance are assumed to coincide. Headwater-discharge relationships for various types of circular culverts flowing with inlet control are based on laboratory research with models and verified in some instances by full-scale tests. Exhibits 5-1 and 5-2 give headwater-discharge relationships for round concrete and corrugated metal pipe culverts flowing with inlet control. Example 5-1 It is desired to determine the maximum discharge of an existing 42-inch concrete culvert. The allowable headwater depth (HW) upstream is 8.0 feet and the slope of the culvert is 0.02 ft/ft. The culvert has a projecting entrance condition and there will be no backwater from downstream flow. Assume inlet control. 8-02 5-1

HEADWALL PROJECTING MITERED TO CONFORM TO SLOPE s o > s n Culverts with Inlet Control 8-02 5-2

using Exhibit 5-1, compute HW D HW = 8(12) = 2.29 D 42 At 2.29 on scale 3, projecting entrance, draw a horizontal line to scale 1. From this point on scale 1 draw a connecting line between it and 42-inch diameter on scale 4. On scale 5 read 128 cfs. Check for inlet control s o > s n where s o = installed slope of culvert s n = neutral slope - that slope of which the loss n of head due to friction is equal to the gain in head due to elevation. From Table 5-1, n(design) for concrete pipe = 0.012 from Exhibit 5-3, sheet 3 of 6 for Q = 128 cfs and D = 42 inches s n = 0.013 therefore, the culvert is in inlet control, 0.02 >0.013 Example 5-2 Determine the required diameter of a corrugated metal culvert pipe to be installed in an existing channel. Q = 100 cfs, HW max. = 7.0 feet and s o = 0.03. There will be no backwater from downstream flow. Entrance to be mitered to conform to the slope of the embankment. The solution of this problem must be made by trial pipe diameters and solution of HW by use of Exhibit 5-2. Try D = 36" draw a line through 36 inch on scale 4 and 100 cfs on scale 5 to an intersection with scale 1, then a horizontal line from scale 1 to scale 2, mitered inlet. On scale 2 read HW = 3.8, D then HW = 3.8(3) = 11.4 feet (too high) 8-02 5-3

Try D = 48 read from scale 2, HW = 1.45 D HW = 1.45(4) = 5.80 feet ( low ) Try D = 42 read from scale 2, HW = 2.23, D HW = 2.23(3.5) = 7.8 feet (high) From the foregoing trials, it will be necessary to install the 48-inch pipe diameter pipe if the HW is to be 7.0 feet maximum. Check for inlet control s o > s n from Exhibit 5-3, sheet 6 of 6 s n = 0.017 0.03 > 0.017 therefore, inlet control Table 5-1 Values of Manning's, n Description of pipe Values of n Min. Design Max. Steel, riveted and spiral 0.013 0.015-0.017 0.017 Annular corrugated metal 0.021 0.021-0.025 0.0255 Helical corrugated metal 0.013 0.015-0.020 0.021 Neat cement surface 0.010 0.013 Concrete 0.010 0.012-0.017 0.017 Vitrified sewer pipe 0.010 0.013-0.015 0.017 Clay, common drainage tile 0.011 0.012-0.014 0.017 Corrugated plastic 0.014 0.015-0.016 0.017 8-02 5-4

8-02 5-5

8-02 5-6

8-02 5-7

8-02 5-8

8-02 5-9

8-02 5-10

8-02 5-11

8-02 5-12