Financial Dispute Resolution Guide

Similar documents
FIVB TRIBUNAL REGULATIONS

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Chamber in Resolving Disputes between Players and Clubs

Decision of the Single Judge of the Players Status Committee

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Single Judge of the Players Status Committee

Decision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Panel: Mr Rui Botica Santos (Portugal), President; Mr Jehangir Baglari (Islamic Republic of Iran); Mr Raymond Hack (South Africa)

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

ELECTRONIC INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER PROCEDURE MANUAL

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

1.1 The Applicant is Ms. Karen Pavicic ( the Athlete ), an equestrian rider from Canada.

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

III. Player Eligibility Code

ELECTRONIC INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER PROCEDURE MANUAL

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber. passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 22 July 2004, in the following composition: on the claim presented by

THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CHAMBER OF THE PLAYERS STATUS COMMITTEE

ELECTRONIC INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER PROCEDURE MANUAL

Arbitration CAS 2014/A/3785 Federación Peruana de Fútbol (FPF) v. Club Budapest Honvéd FC KFT, award of 5 June 2015

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Panel: Mr Mark Hovell (United Kingdom), President; Prof. Petros Mavroidis (Greece); Mr Markus Bösiger (Switzerland)

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC) judge

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1530 FSV Kroppach v. European Table Tennis Union (ETTU), award of 19 November 2008

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the sub-committee of the Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC)

Panel: Mr Mark Hovell (United Kingdom), Sole Arbitrator

Arbitration CAS 2015/A/4246 S.C. FC Steaua Bucuresti & Mirel Radoi v. Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA), award of 30 March 2016

Arbitration CAS 2009/A/2011 Stephan Schumacher v. International Olympic Committee (IOC), award on costs of 6 May 2010

Arbitration CAS 2011/A/2628 Foolad Mobarakeh Sepahan FC v. Asian Football Confederation (AFC), award of 14 March 2012

Arbitration CAS 2006/A/1008 Rayo Vallecano de Madrid SAD v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), award of 21 August

Panel: Prof. Massimo Coccia (Italy), President; Mr Jahangir Baglari (Islamic Republic of Iran); Mrs Margarita Echeverria (Costa Rica)

Panel: The Hon. Annabelle Bennett (Australia), Sole Arbitrator

Arbitration CAS anti-doping Division (OG Rio) AD 16/004 International Olympic Committee (IOC) v. Silvia Danekova, award of 12 August 2016

Disciplinary Commission. Case No April 28, Decision of the ISU Disciplinary Commission. against. and

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Arbitration CAS 2012/A/2986 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v. Riley Salmon & Fédération Internationale de Volleyball (FIVB), award of 30 May 2013

IRISH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION AMATEUR GAME PLAYER REGISTRATION REGULATIONS SEASON 2018/19

The Dispute Resolution System within the framework of FIFA

Arbitration CAS 2014/A/3864 AFC Astra v. Laionel da Silva Ramalho & Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), award of 31 July 2015

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1571 Nusaybindemir SC v. Turkish Football Federation (TFF) & Sirnak SC, award of 15 December 2008

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

composed by 25-16; 25-21; 25-22) took place on 11 January 2017, at 19:00, in Novi Sad, Serbia

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1453 Elkin Soto Jaramillo & FSV Mainz 05 v/ CD Once Caldas & FIFA, preliminary decision of 8 February 2008

6. Officials should maintain a high level of personal hygiene and should maintain a professional appearance at all times.

Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

18 October 2013 Marquette University Law School

HOCKEY CANADA BY-LAWS DISPUTE RESOLUTION. 56. Appeals to Hockey Canada

IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT UNDER THE ANTI-DOPING RULES OF THE RUGBY FOOTBALL LEAGUE DECISION

FINANCIAL REGULATIONS

A2:1 The Facility Standards are focused on ensuring appropriate standards for the benefit of the Game including:

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

AFL Coaches Code of Conduct

INTERNATIONAL VOLLEYBALL FEDERATION (FIVB) Volleyball

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber. taken in Zurich, Switzerland, on Friday, 11 th March by the following composition:

Christilot Hanson Boylen v. Equine Canada. Christilot Hanson Boylen Equine Canada. Selection to Olympic Games Richard W. Pound, Q.C.

Arbitration CAS 2015/A/4210 Karam Gaber v. United World Wrestling (FILA), award of 28 December 2015

Arbitration CAS 2001/A/324 Addo & van Nistelrooij / Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA), order of 15 March 2001

ISU Disciplinary Commission. Case No Decision of the ISU Disciplinary Commission. In the matter of. against.

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Arbitration CAS anti-doping Division (OG Rio) AD 16/006 International Olympic Committee (IOC) v. Kleber Da Silva Ramos, award of 20 August 2016

Arbitration CAS 98/218 H. / Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA), award of 27 May 1999

Decision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber

Council on Accreditation Complaint Policy and Procedures

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT (CAS) Ad hoc Division Games of the XXXI Olympiad in Rio de Janeiro AWARD. Ihab Abdelrahman...

Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1448 S. & Zamalek SC v. PAOK FC & FIFA, award of 25 June 2008

INTERNATIONAL RULES FOR THE CHANGE OF NATIONALITY

ISU Disciplinary Commission. Case No Decision of the ISU Disciplinary Commission. In the matter of. against.

Arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (OG Rio) 16/023 Ihab Abdelrahman v. Egyptian NADO, award of 16 August 2016 (operative part of 11 August 2016)

SPECIAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE NEW SOUTH WALES ICE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION Inc. to be held at on Sunday 22 nd February 2004 at Blacktown Ice Arena

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

World Boxing Council Consejo Mundial de Boxeo

IRISH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION AMATEUR GAME PLAYER REGISTRATION REGULATIONS SEASON 2017/18

INTERNATIONAL RULES FOR THE CHANGE OF NATIONALITY

DECISION ITU ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL

Arbitration CAS 2016/A/4547 Nikola Mikic v. Manisaspor KD, award of 22 December 2016

CODE OF CONDUCT AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

Arbitration CAS 2014/A/3544 AS Monaco Football Club v. Football Club Dynamo Kiev, award of 28 November 2014

1.1.1 Appeal Panel means the appeal panel appointed by the Union under the Disciplinary Rules;

Decision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber

Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program

Disciplinary Commission. Case No Decision of the ISU Disciplinary Commission. In the matter of. against. and

ICC REGULATIONS ON SANCTIONING OF EVENTS

NEVZA BEACH REGULATIONS 2015

Transcription:

Financial Dispute Resolution Guide Step-by-Step Procedural Guide for the Resolution of Financial Disputes between Clubs, Players and Coaches in International Volleyball 1

Step 1: Gather information on www.fivb.org To initiate a Complaint procedure: Review FIVB Sports Regulations, Art. 45.11 Download the Complaint Template The dispute shall be: Of financial nature Of international dimension Involving a player/coach v club (or vice versa) Also: coach v NF (or vice versa) 2

Step 2: Complete the Complaint Template The Complaint shall contain: Names, full contact details of the Claimant and the Respondent and of their respective counsel (if any); Summary of facts; Legal arguments (if any); Request for Relief (with a specific amount); Claimant s bank details; Copy of signed Contract(s); and All written evidence (including correspondence, bank slips etc.) Claimant has the burden of proving his/her allegations! 3

Step 3: File the Complaint (I) Determine if the FIVB or a Confederation is competent to decide on the Complaint If both Parties come from Europe, CEV will administer and decide on the Complaint. Competence If both Parties come from North - Central Americas and Caribbean, NORCECA will administer and decide on the Complaint. In all other cases, FIVB will administer and decide on the Complaint. 4

Step 3: File the Complaint (II) Fax or email the completed and signed Complaint together with accompanying documentation to: Email: transfer@fivb.org Fax: +41 21 345 35 45 or Email: transfers@cev.lu Fax: +352 25 46 46 10 or Email: Fax: +1 809 227 32 42 5

Step 4: Procedure initiated Once the Complaint is received, the FIVB/Confederation Confirms with the Claimant that the Complaint was received and whether any documentation is missing Opens a case file* *For Financial Disputes falling under the competence of the FIVB/CEV, the Claimant will be requested to pay the amount of CHF 500/EUR 400 as non-reimbursable handling fee for the procedure. Note: at any stage of the process the FIVB/Confederation may decide to refer the case directly to the FIVB Tribunal 6

Step 5: Respondent is informed FIVB/Confederation informs the Respondent of the Complaint A time limit to file the Reply is established and communicated to Respondent Note: at any stage of the process the FIVB/Confederation may assist the parties in reaching a settlement 7

Step 6: Respondent files Reply The Reply shall contain: Name and full contact details of the Respondent and its counsel (unless this information has already been set out in the Complaint); A statement of defence, including a statement of facts; Legal arguments (if any); Requests for relief; Any counterclaim; and All written evidence on which the Respondent intends to rely. 8

Step 7: Decision by FIVB/Confederation FIVB/Confederation evaluates the submissions and takes a decision based on a balance of probabilities; and applying general principles of justice and fairness The decision may set a final time limit for the parties compliance; determine which party (if any) will bear the costs of the handling fee; and determine that non-compliance will result into sanctions (see list of sanctions in Step 10) 9

Step 8: Request for Review by the FIVB Tribunal Once a Decision is issued by the FIVB/Confederation: Any affected Party may request that the case be reviewed by the FIVB Tribunal The Party must file the Request for Review with the FIVB Tribunal Secretariat within 14 days from notification of the decision See the FIVB Tribunal Regulations for the Request for Review procedure. 10

Step 9: Appeal before CAS Decisions of the FIVB Tribunal can only be appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in Lausanne, Switzerland. Only decisions from the FIVB Tribunal can be appealed to the CAS (no direct appeal against decision of FIVB/Confederation) Appeals must be lodged within 21 days from receipt of FIVB Tribunal s decision. 11

Step 10: Disciplinary Sanctions Failure by a NF, club, coach or player to comply with a decision of FIVB/Confederation/FIVB Tribunal/CAS may be sanctioned as follows: Warning; Fine up to CHF 50,000; Prohibition of receiving an ITC (for clubs) or prohibition to transfer internationally (for players); Prohibition of registering and lining-up foreign players in any competition (for clubs); Prohibition of participating in international competitions. The above sanctions can be applied more than once. 12